ML23130A064

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:35, 14 November 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
M230516: Slides/Supporting Presentation Material - N. Mcmurray - Update on 10 C.F.R. Part 53 Licensing and Regulation of Advanced Nuclear Reactors
ML23130A064
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/16/2023
From:
NRC/OCM
To:
Shared Package
ML23067A030 List:
References
M230516, 10 CFR Part 53, NRC-2019-0062, RIN 3150-AK31
Download: ML23130A064 (8)


Text

NRC Commission Hearing:

Update on 10 C.F.R. Part 53 Licensing and Regulation of Advanced Nuclear Reactors

May 16, 2023 ClearPath Mission: Develop and advance policies that accelerate innovations to reduce and remove global energy emissions.

2 Key technologies and policy areas

Power Federal R&D (basic and applied)

Demonstration Nuclear Storage Natural Gas Programs

Deployment Incentives Carbon CaptureHydro Geothermal Ecosystem Industrial e.g. Regulatory Modernization

Technology Export Concrete Metals Hydrogen and Finance 3

Two Questions for the NRC Commissioners

Can reactors licensed under the existing regulatory frameworks transition to Part 53?

Due to recent policies, there will be multiple initial applications using Part 50 or Part 52 Part 53 needs to provide a better, long-term regulatory framework, or developers will continue to use Part 50 or Part 52 Speed should not take priority over a thoughtful rulemaking - Chairman Hanson

Can Part 53 efficiently and effectively handle a large volume of applications?

Expanded interest in clean energy and energy security have increased the demand for new nuclear Multiple new reactor designs with unique safety cases as well as dozens of applications per design are expected Part 53 should not add unnecessary regulatory burden onto industry or onto the NRC staff

4 Flexibility vs Predictability How to Recreate the Rule

Current Draft Rule Licensing Review Process Recreating the Draft Rule

The Licensing Modernization The current approach tries to This different philosophical approach can address Project (LMP) is already approved create predictability in rule text staff, industry, and stakeholder concerns for Part 50 and Part 52, so it does itself this has made the draft not need to form the basis for rule unworkable If the rule is performance-based, then it will be easier Framework A to be risk-informed and technology inclusive A change in approach can allow Framework B seemingly offers the staff to incorporate current Frameworks A and B should be guidance that meet few bene"ts over Part 50/52 and future review experience performance-based requirements and feedback more easily

5 The Commissioners Responsibility

Locking in overly complex language today will be harder to untangle tomorrow By not considering how to fully implement the rule, it will create an additional burden Consequences on the NRC staff when they are making their safety findings of inaction Part 53 will not meet the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (NEIMA)

There is significant, detailed stakeholder feedback on how to craft the rule Existing and future licensing reviews will provide valuable feedback on implementing Part 53 Leverage A performance-based rule, with Frameworks A and B as regulatory guidance, what exists can also address major technical concerns on the draft proposed rule

Clarify and communicate what a successful Part 53 looks like The Consider the implementation of Part 53 holistically Commission Send the rule back to the staff with detailed, clear instructions should: and expectations 6

References

ClearPath, A Simpler, Dedicated Pathway for Advanced Nuclear Reactor Licensing, https://clearpath.org/our-take/a-simpler-dedicated-pathway-for-advanced-nuclear-reactor-licensing/,

October 7, 2020

ClearPath Comments on Proposed Rule, Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors, ML21187A250, July 2, 2021

Joint Comment: The Breakthrough Institute, ClearPath, Good Energy Collective, Nuclear Innovation Alliance, and Third Way, ML21207A223, July 23, 2021

ClearPath Presentation, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting on Part 53, ML22038A179, February 8, 2022

ClearPath, New Nuclear Energy Needs New Licensing Process, https://clearpath.org/our-take/new-nuclear-energy-needs-new-licensing-process/, March 16, 2023

7 Nicholas McMurray Managing Director, Public Policy mcmurray@clearpath.org

8