ML20137T287

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850916-1031

ML20137T287
Person / Time
Site:	River Bend, 05000916
Issue date:	11/19/1985
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137T286	List: IR 05000916/2010031 ML20137T281 ML20137T295
References
50-458-85-69, NUDOCS 8512060425
Download: ML20137T287 (2)

See also: IR 05000916/2010031

Text

,

c ,

- . - -

>

f '-'  ?

2

,,

-

- ,.

.

k

. .

,

'

APPENDIX A

- NOTICE OF VIOLATION

-

t

Gulf States Utilities Docket: 50-458/85-69

River Bend Station License: NPF-40

During an NRC uspection conducted during the period of September 16 through

,

October 31, 1985, two violations of NRC requirements were identifled. The

violations involved the failure to follow an administrative procedure for

control and use of procedures. In accordance with the " General Statement of

Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C

j (1985),theviolationsarelistedbelow:

1

A. Failure'of Document Control Program

i.

4

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, and the licensee's approved

j quality assurance program, require that activities affecting the quality

of safety-related systems and components be conducted in ~accordance with

approved instructions, procedures, and drawings.

Prccedure NPE-3-006, " River Bend Station Design and Modification Request

> Control Plan," Revision 1, states that "the design documents affected by a

j modification will normally be updated by the holder of the design data

-

,

base as managed by NUPE."-

.

Procedure NUPE-AA-59, " Updating and Distributing Design Documents,"

Revision 0, states that " updating and distributing of the~ Design Documents.

shall.be handled by the Holder of the Design Data Base in accordance with

GSU approved procedures."

Contrary to the above, on October 18,1985, it was discovered that

approved modification request (MR) design packages and approved field

change ~ notices ~(FCN) had not been posted against affected design documents

and they had'not been distributed to document control stations. For

example, FCN 85-0397-19 was not posted against drawing 12210-FSK-5 ENS 06

and it was.not available at the document control stations. Several other

>

' examples of the failure to post and distribute ItRs and FCNs were noted.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I.D.)(458/8569-01).

'

B. Improper Use of a Field Change Notice-(FCN)'

b S

10 CFR Part 50, Appendi_x B; Criterion V, and the. licensees' approved . ,

quality assurance program require that activities affecting -the quality of

safety-related systems -and components be'condu_cted in accordance with -

; approved instructions, procedures, and drawings.

n - ,

~

8512060425 851119 ,

,

", PDR ADOCK 05000458 '

-

+

G P,DRm - ,

-

<

,

h

. - _ _ _ , -- 4 , -_ , . . -- -v'- , , , ,[ _ - - , . , - .,y,

. - _ . . __ . . _ ._ _ _._ .

~

.

. - , ,

.s

- -

_

._

a

Procedure NPE-3-006, " River Bend Station Design and Modification Request

Control Plan,".. Revision 1, states that a FCN is "a written instrument used

i to effect a change to design that does not' alter the concept, function or

scope of the original modification, but is needed to document errors, i

material availability, installation problems, etc."

v

' Contrary to the above, on October 18, 1985, it was discovered that

,

FCN 85-0397-19,was approve'd and implemented to modify the function / control

~

< ~ . logic of the ' diesel generator output breaker to allow remote shutdown -

^.cperation from the diesel; generator panel'in either the normal or.

. ; emergency mode. ,

"This is a Sevefity Level .IV violation-(Supplement I.D.)(458/8569-02).

Pursuant to th'e provi$ ions of 10 CFR 2.201, Gulf States Utilities is hereby

required to submit tothe Office witnin 30. days of the date of the letter

• *

transmitting this- Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply,

including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violations if admitted,

2) the corrective steps which have been taken and .the results achieved,

~

' 3)"the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and

, 4) the date when full compliance will:be achieved.- Where good cause is shown,

.c nc sideration will.be given to extending the response time.

'

<

7 Dated at Arlington,' Texas,

, 1985.

this'/%dayof g ,

.

,

4 >

'

1:

e

i

! I

i

3

e

1

Y

]

'

. _..

. . -