ML993500387
| ML993500387 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/14/1999 |
| From: | Beckner W Technical Specifications Branch |
| To: | Brooks A Nuclear Energy Institute |
| Gilles N, NRR/DRIP, 415-1180 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML993500387 (3) | |
Text
December
==
14,
==
1999
==
Mr.
==
Anthony
==
Brooks
==
Nuclear
==
Energy
==
Institute
==
Suite
==
400
==
1776
==
I
==
Street,
==
NW
==
==
==
20006-3708
==
Mr.
==
Brooks:
==
The
==
purpose
==
of
==
this
==
letter
==
is
==
to
==
transmit
==
the
==
summary
==
of
==
two
==
meetings
==
with
==
the
==
Risk-Informed
==
Technical
==
Specifications
==
Task
==
Force.
==
The
==
first
==
meeting
==
was
==
held
==
at
==
the
==
San
==
Onofre
==
Nuclear
==
Generating
==
Station
==
on
==
October
==
6-7,
==
1999.
==
The
==
second
==
meeting
==
was
==
held
==
at
==
the
==
U.S.
==
Nuclear
==
Regulatory
==
Commission
==
(NRC)
==
Headquarters
==
offices
==
in
==
Rockville,
==
==
on
==
November
==
10,
==
1999.
==
Sincerely,
==
Original
==
signed
==
by:
==
William
==
D.
==
Beckner,
==
Chief
==
Technical
==
Specifications
==
Branch
==
Division
==
of
==
Regulatory
==
Improvement
==
Programs
==
Office
==
of
==
Nuclear
==
Reactor
==
Regulation
==
Enclosures:
==
1.
==
Meeting
==
Summary
==
2.
==
Attendance
==
List
==
3.
==
October
==
Meeting
==
Presentations
==
4.
==
November
==
Meeting
==
Presentations
==
cc:
==
See
==
attached
==
list
==
December
==
14,
==
1999
==
Mr.
==
Anthony
==
Brooks
==
Nuclear
==
Energy
==
Institute
==
Suite
==
400
==
1776
==
I
==
Street,
==
NW
==
==
==
20006-3708
==
Mr.
==
Brooks:
==
The
==
purpose
==
of
==
this
==
letter
==
is
==
to
==
transmit
==
the
==
summary
==
of
==
two
==
meetings
==
with
==
the
==
Risk-Informed
==
Technical
==
Specifications
==
Task
==
Force.
==
The
==
first
==
meeting
==
was
==
held
==
at
==
the
==
San
==
Onofre
==
Nuclear
==
Generating
==
Station
==
on
==
October
==
6-7,
==
1999.
==
The
==
second
==
meeting
==
was
==
held
==
at
==
the
==
U.S.
==
Nuclear
==
Regulatory
==
Commission
==
(NRC)
==
Headquarters
==
offices
==
in
==
Rockville,
==
==
on
==
November
==
10,
==
1999.
==
Sincerely,
==
Original
==
signed
==
by:
==
William
==
D.
==
Beckner,
==
Chief
==
Technical
==
Specifications
==
Branch
==
Division
==
of
==
Regulatory
==
Improvement
==
Programs
==
Office
==
of
==
Nuclear
==
Reactor
==
Regulation
==
Enclosures:
==
1.
==
Meeting
==
Summary
==
2.
==
Attendance
==
List
==
3.
==
October
==
Meeting
==
Presentations
==
4.
==
November
==
Meeting
==
Presentations
==
cc:
==
See
==
attached
==
list
==
DISTRIBUTION:
==
See
==
attached.
==
DOCUMENT
==
NAME:
==
G:\RTSB\GILLES\MTGSUMRITSTF111099.WPD
==
OFFICE
==
NRR/DRIP/RTSB
==
NRR/DRIP/RTSB
==
NRR/DRIP/RTSB
==
NAME
==
NVGilles
==
RLDennig
==
WDBeckner
==
DATE
==
12/14/99
==
12/14/99
==
12/14/99
==
OFFICIAL
==
RECORD
==
COPY
==
Multiple
==
Addressees
==
December
==
14,
==
1999
==
cc:
==
Mr.
==
Alan
==
Hackerott
==
Mr.
==
Dennis
==
Henneke
==
Omaha
==
Public
==
Power
==
District
==
San
==
Onofre
==
Nuclear
==
Generating
==
Station
==
Ft.
==
Calhoun
==
Nuclear
==
Station
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
P.O.
==
Box
==
399
==
5000
==
Pacific
==
Coast
==
Highway
==
Ft.
==
Calhoun,
==
NE
==
68023-0399
==
San
==
Clemente,
==
==
92674-0128
==
Mr.
==
Noel
==
Clarkson
==
Ms.
==
Sharon
==
Mahler
==
Duke
==
Energy/Oconee
==
Cooper
==
Nuclear
==
Station
==
==
Code:
==
0N03RC
==
==
Pulic
==
Power
==
District
==
Highways
==
130
==
&
==
183
==
(29678)
==
P.O.
==
Box
==
98
==
P.O.
==
Box
==
14393652
==
Brownville,
==
NE
==
68321-0098
==
Seneca,
==
SC
==
29679-1439
==
Mr.
==
Frank
==
Rahn
==
Mr.
==
Greg
==
Krueger
==
Electric
==
Power
==
Research
==
Institute
==
==
Energy
==
Company
==
P.
==
O.
==
Box
==
10412
==
==
Code
==
==
Palo
==
Alto,
==
CA
==
94303
==
965
==
Chesterbrook
==
Boulevard
==
Wayne,
==
==
19087
==
Mr.
==
Donald
==
Hoffman
==
EXCEL
==
Services
==
Corporation
==
Mr.
==
Wayne
==
Harrison
==
11921
==
Rockville
==
Pike,
==
Suite
==
100
==
South
==
==
Project
==
Electric
==
Generating
==
Rockville,
==
==
20852
==
Station
==
==
Nuclear
==
Operating
==
Company
==
Mr.
==
Jack
==
Stringfellow
==
P.
==
O.
==
Box
==
289
==
Southern
==
Nuclear
==
Operating
==
Company
==
Wadsworth,
==
TX
==
77483
==
P.O.
==
Box
==
1295
==
Birmingham,
==
==
35201-1295
==
Multiple
==
Addressees
==
December
==
14,
==
1999
==
DISTRIBUTION:
==
==
w/o
==
Enclosures
==
3
==
&
==
4
==
SCollins/RPZimmerman
==
JJohnson
==
BWSheron
==
DBMatthews
==
SFNewberry
==
GMHolahan
==
WDBeckner
==
RJBarrett
==
RLDennig
==
FMReinhart
==
MLWohl
==
NTSaltos
==
==
Staff
==
JAZwolinski
==
JFWilliams
==
AWMarkley
==
MACunningham,
==
==
MMarkley,
==
==
Staff
==
HARD
==
COPY
==
FILE
==
CENTER
==
PUBLIC
==
==
R/F
==
NVGilles
==
NRC/INDUSTRY
==
MEETING
==
OF
==
THE
==
RISK-INFORMED
==
TECHNICAL
==
SPECIFICATION
==
TASK
==
FORCE
==
Meeting
==
Summaries
==
October
==
6-7
==
and
==
November
==
10,
==
1999
==
Two
==
meetings
==
between
==
the
==
NRC
==
staff
==
and
==
industry
==
representatives
==
comprising
==
the
==
Risk-
==
Informed
==
Technical
==
Specifications
==
Task
==
Force
==
(RITSTF)
==
were
==
held
==
on
==
October
==
6-7
==
and
==
November
==
10,
==
1999.
==
The
==
attendees
==
are
==
listed
==
in
==
Enclosure
==
2.
==
The
==
meetings
==
were
==
a
==
continuation
==
of
==
earlier
==
meetings
==
where
==
the
==
NRC
==
staff
==
and
==
the
==
industry
==
discussed
==
ongoing
==
risk-
==
informed
==
technical
==
specification
==
initiatives
==
and
==
the
==
creation
==
of
==
a
==
fully
==
risk-informed
==
set
==
of
==
standard
==
technical
==
specifications
==
(STS).
==
The
==
main
==
purpose
==
of
==
the
==
October
==
6-7
==
meeting
==
was
==
to
==
have
==
a
==
more
==
detailed
==
discussion
==
of
==
the
==
probabilistic
==
risk
==
analysis
==
(PRA)
==
work
==
done
==
to
==
support
==
the
==
current
==
technical
==
specification
==
(TS)
==
initiatives
==
being
==
prepared
==
for
==
submittal
==
to
==
the
==
staff.
==
There
==
was
==
limited
==
==
representation
==
at
==
this
==
meeting.
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
has
==
volunteered
==
San
==
Onofre
==
Nuclear
==
Generating
==
Station
==
(SONGS)
==
to
==
be
==
the
==
industrys
==
==
plant
==
for
==
the
==
majority
==
of
==
the
==
seven
==
initiatives
==
currently
==
being
==
pursued
==
by
==
the
==
==
These
==
include:
==
1.
==
Define
==
preferred
==
end
==
states
==
for
==
TS
==
actions
==
(e.g.,
==
hot
==
shutdown
==
vs.
==
cold
==
shutdown)
==
2.
==
Increase
==
the
==
time
==
allowed
==
to
==
delay
==
entering
==
required
==
actions
==
when
==
a
==
surveillance
==
is
==
missed
==
3.
==
Modify
==
existing
==
mode
==
restraint
==
logic
==
to
==
allow
==
use
==
risk
==
assessments
==
for
==
entry
==
into
==
limiting
==
conditions
==
for
==
operation
==
(LCOs)
==
with
==
==
equipment
==
based
==
on
==
low
==
risk
==
4.
==
Develop
==
a
==
risk-informed
==
extension
==
of
==
current
==
allowed
==
outage
==
times
==
based
==
on
==
a
==
configuration
==
risk
==
management
==
program
==
(CRMP)
==
5.
==
Optimize
==
surveillance
==
requirements
==
(SRs)
==
6.
==
Modify
==
LCO
==
3.0.3
==
actions
==
and
==
timing
==
by
==
extending
==
minimum
==
time
==
to
==
begin
==
LCO
==
3.0.3
==
shutdown
==
from
==
1
==
hour
==
to
==
24
==
hours
==
and
==
allowing
==
for
==
a
==
risk-informed
==
evaluation
==
to
==
determine
==
whether
==
it
==
is
==
better
==
to
==
shut
==
down
==
or
==
continue
==
to
==
operate
==
7.
==
Define
==
actions
==
to
==
be
==
taken
==
when
==
equipment
==
is
==
not
==
==
but
==
is
==
still
==
functional
==
The
==
staff
==
and
==
the
==
industry
==
discussed
==
the
==
meaning
==
of
==
the
==
term
==
risk-informed
==
as
==
it
==
relates
==
to
==
regulatory
==
applications.
==
The
==
industry
==
stated
==
that
==
it
==
was
==
their
==
general
==
philosophy
==
to
==
use
==
qualitative
==
risk
==
assessments
==
where
==
they
==
believed
==
the
==
benefits
==
of
==
a
==
proposed
==
change
==
were
==
obvious,
==
and
==
to
==
use
==
quantitative
==
assessments
==
where
==
the
==
outcome
==
was
==
not
==
as
==
obvious.
==
The
==
industry
==
also
==
stated
==
that
==
they
==
take
==
into
==
account
==
other
==
aspects
==
such
==
as
==
defense
==
in
==
depth
==
and
==
safety
==
margins
==
when
==
considering
==
a
==
proposed
==
change.
==
The
==
industry
==
believed
==
such
==
an
==
approach
==
was
==
consistent
==
with
==
the
==
guidance
==
in
==
Regulatory
==
Guide
==
1.174,
==
An
==
Approach
==
for
==
Using
==
Probabilistic
==
Risk
==
Assessment
==
in
==
Risk-Informed
==
Decisions
==
on
==
Plant-Specific
==
Changes
==
to
==
the
==
Licensing
==
Basis,
==
to
==
use
==
==
to
==
improve
==
decision
==
making
==
and
==
regulatory
==
effectiveness.
==
The
==
staff
==
reserved
==
judgement
==
of
==
such
==
an
==
approach
==
noting
==
that
==
benefits
==
that
==
are
==
obvious
==
to
==
one
==
person
==
or
==
group
==
might
==
not
==
be
==
obvious
==
to
==
another.
==
==
representatives
==
then
==
presented
==
some
==
details
==
regarding
==
their
==
==
work
==
in
==
support
==
of
==
some
==
of
==
the
==
==
initiatives.
==
The
==
San
==
Onofre
==
presentations
==
are
==
contained
==
in
==
Enclosure
==
3.
==
The
==
==
representatives
==
presented
==
information
==
regarding
==
their
==
living
==
==
and
==
Safety
==
Monitor,
==
including
==
the
==
full
==
power,
==
transition,
==
and
==
low
==
power
==
and
==
shutdown
==
risk
==
models.
==
The
==
==
representatives
==
stated
==
that
==
they
==
had
==
their
==
own
==
transition
==
model
==
development
==
document
==
1
==
Enclosure
==
1
==
that
==
would
==
likely
==
be
==
referenced
==
or
==
included
==
in
==
the
==
==
plant-specific
==
submittal
==
for
==
Initiative
==
- 1.
==
The
==
staff
==
and
==
the
==
==
discussed
==
some
==
specific
==
submittal
==
and
==
implementation
==
and
==
technical
==
issues
==
related
==
to
==
a
==
few
==
of
==
the
==
initiatives.
==
With
==
regard
==
to
==
Initiative
==
- 1
==
related
==
to
==
safe
==
end
==
states,
==
the
==
==
indicated
==
that
==
the
==
Combustion
==
Engineering
==
Owners
==
Group
==
(CEOG)
==
was
==
preparing
==
a
==
draft
==
report
==
to
==
support
==
this
==
initiative
==
and
==
that
==
the
==
report
==
would
==
accompany
==
an
==
industry
==
request
==
for
==
a
==
generic
==
change
==
to
==
the
==
STS.
==
The
==
==
indicated
==
that
==
changes
==
to
==
the
==
TS
==
end
==
states
==
would
==
be
==
proposed
==
for
==
the
==
vast
==
majority
==
of
==
LCOs
==
in
==
the
==
STS.
==
The
==
==
indicated
==
that
==
uncertainties
==
and
==
sensitivities
==
of
==
==
results
==
will
==
be
==
investigated.
==
The
==
group
==
discussed
==
that
==
additional
==
known
==
shutdown
==
issues
==
which
==
may
==
impact
==
the
==
results
==
(e.g.,
==
external
==
events
==
and
==
==
dilution)
==
should
==
be
==
addressed.
==
Representatives
==
from
==
the
==
Boiling
==
Water
==
Reactor
==
Owners
==
Group
==
(BWROG)
==
stated
==
that
==
they
==
are
==
still
==
considering
==
this
==
initiative
==
and
==
that
==
the
==
risk
==
of
==
operating
==
in
==
hot
==
shutdown
==
and
==
in
==
cold
==
shutdown
==
is
==
relatively
==
the
==
same,
==
whereas
==
for
==
the
==
pressurized
==
water
==
reactors
==
there
==
appears
==
to
==
be
==
a
==
clear
==
risk
==
benefit
==
to
==
operating
==
in
==
hot
==
shutdown
==
in
==
most
==
cases.
==
They
==
indicated
==
that
==
they
==
would
==
be
==
more
==
interested
==
in
==
changing
==
the
==
current
==
TS
==
to
==
allow
==
them
==
to
==
use
==
==
in
==
deciding
==
whether
==
to
==
stay
==
at
==
power
==
or
==
shut
==
the
==
reactor
==
down.
==
They
==
also
==
indicated
==
that
==
they
==
may
==
be
==
interested
==
in
==
extending
==
the
==
time
==
requirements
==
for
==
going
==
to
==
cold
==
shutdown.
==
This
==
would
==
allow
==
them
==
to
==
operate
==
longer
==
in
==
hot
==
shutdown
==
conditions.
==
The
==
==
is
==
considering
==
a
==
pilot
==
plant
==
for
==
this
==
issue.
==
The
==
==
and
==
the
==
staff
==
discussed
==
how
==
the
==
==
assessment
==
results
==
for
==
Initiative
==
- 1
==
could
==
be
==
applied
==
to
==
other
==
plants.
==
The
==
==
Owners
==
Group
==
(WOG)
==
indicated
==
that
==
they
==
would
==
attempt
==
to
==
show
==
how
==
the
==
==
results
==
apply
==
using
==
qualitative
==
assessments
==
and
==
comparisons,
==
and
==
that
==
they
==
did
==
not
==
plan
==
to
==
perform
==
any
==
further
==
plant-specific
==
analyses.
==
The
==
Babcock
==
and
==
Wilcox
==
Owners
==
Group
==
indicated
==
that
==
they
==
intended
==
to
==
pursue
==
a
==
similar
==
approach.
==
The
==
group
==
indicated
==
that
==
they
==
could
==
use
==
the
==
==
model
==
to
==
help
==
develop
==
sensitivity
==
studies
==
to
==
address
==
some
==
of
==
the
==
design
==
differences
==
between
==
the
==
plants.
==
The
==
staff
==
stated
==
that
==
they
==
could
==
not
==
make
==
any
==
definitive
==
decisions
==
on
==
what
==
type
==
of
==
submittals
==
they
==
would
==
find
==
acceptable
==
and
==
that
==
the
==
burden
==
of
==
proof
==
of
==
similarity
==
to
==
the
==
==
work
==
would
==
rest
==
with
==
the
==
other
==
owners
==
groups.
==
With
==
regard
==
to
==
Initiative
==
- 2
==
related
==
to
==
missed
==
SRs,
==
the
==
group
==
discussed
==
the
==
==
aspects
==
of
==
that
==
initiative.
==
In
==
order
==
to
==
assess
==
the
==
increase
==
in
==
risk
==
it
==
is
==
necessary
==
to
==
make
==
an
==
assumption
==
about
==
the
==
frequency
==
of
==
the
==
various
==
expected
==
missed
==
surveillances.
==
This
==
requires
==
an
==
understanding
==
of
==
the
==
reasons,
==
the
==
nature
==
and
==
circumstances
==
under
==
which
==
surveillances
==
are
==
missed.
==
The
==
==
pointed
==
out
==
that
==
even
==
if
==
the
==
failure
==
rate
==
of
==
a
==
component
==
is
==
doubled,
==
due
==
to
==
the
==
missed
==
surveillance
==
on
==
that
==
component,
==
the
==
plant
==
risk
==
would
==
not
==
be
==
affected
==
significantly.
==
The
==
staff
==
agreed
==
that
==
most
==
likely
==
the
==
risk
==
increase
==
would
==
not
==
be
==
significant
==
unless
==
some
==
licensees
==
abuse
==
the
==
proposed
==
flexibility.
==
The
==
development
==
and
==
implementation
==
of
==
an
==
appropriate
==
regulatory
==
oversight
==
process
==
could
==
address
==
this
==
issue.
==
The
==
industry
==
and
==
the
==
staff
==
agreed
==
that
==
the
==
staffs
==
review
==
of
==
this
==
issue
==
would
==
involve
==
more
==
of
==
a
==
policy
==
decision
==
than
==
a
==
technical
==
decision.
==
With
==
regard
==
to
==
Initiative
==
- 3
==
related
==
to
==
mode
==
restraints,
==
==
has
==
been
==
studying
==
this
==
issue
==
by
==
comparing
==
the
==
relative
==
importance
==
of
==
functions
==
and
==
associated
==
systems
==
at
==
various
==
modes
==
of
==
operation.
==
The
==
proposed
==
change
==
would
==
allow
==
a
==
licensee
==
to
==
use
==
a
==
==
to
==
decide
==
whether
==
to
==
enter
==
into
==
a
==
mode
==
or
==
other
==
specified
==
condition
==
within
==
the
==
applicability
==
with
==
==
equipment.
==
The
==
staff
==
agreed
==
that
==
the
==
study
==
of
==
conditions
==
and
==
risks
==
associated
==
with
==
various
==
likely
==
transitions
==
could
==
help
==
focus
==
the
==
issue
==
and
==
identify
==
an
==
appropriate
==
regulatory
==
oversight
==
mechanism.
==
2
==
Enclosure
==
1
==
With
==
regard
==
to
==
Initiative
==
- 6
==
related
==
to
==
changes
==
to
==
LCO
==
3.0.3,
==
the
==
==
stated
==
that
==
this
==
initiative
==
is
==
very
==
closely
==
tied
==
to
==
the
==
maintenance
==
rule
==
as
==
it
==
addresses
==
what
==
actions
==
to
==
take
==
for
==
a
==
loss
==
of
==
safety
==
function.
==
The
==
industry
==
indicated
==
that
==
the
==
frequency
==
of
==
plant
==
conditions
==
for
==
which
==
this
==
TS
==
change
==
is
==
applicable
==
is
==
low.
==
The
==
staff
==
mentioned
==
that
==
the
==
identification
==
and
==
study
==
of
==
examples
==
of
==
plant
==
specific
==
LCO
==
3.0.3
==
entries
==
and
==
conditions
==
that
==
would
==
drive
==
the
==
plant
==
to
==
shutdown,
==
including
==
associated
==
risks,
==
could
==
help
==
focus
==
the
==
issue.
==
The
==
group
==
discussed
==
the
==
process
==
for
==
plants
==
to
==
adopt
==
approved
==
changes
==
to
==
the
==
STS.
==
The
==
staff
==
briefly
==
discussed
==
processes
==
being
==
considered
==
to
==
make
==
adoption
==
of
==
such
==
approved
==
changes
==
more
==
efficient.
==
Finally,
==
the
==
group
==
discussed
==
submittal
==
schedules
==
for
==
some
==
of
==
the
==
initiatives.
==
The
==
==
stated
==
that
==
they
==
expected
==
to
==
submit
==
Initiatives
==
- 2
==
and
==
- 3
==
to
==
the
==
staff
==
around
==
October
==
30,
==
1999,
==
and
==
that
==
they
==
might
==
be
==
able
==
to
==
submit
==
some
==
of
==
their
==
==
assessment
==
for
==
Initiative
==
- 1
==
by
==
December
==
31,
==
1999.
==
The
==
==
stated
==
that
==
Initiatives
==
- 4
==
and
==
- 6
==
would
==
come
==
sometime
==
in
==
2000.
==
The
==
November
==
10,
==
1999
==
meeting
==
was
==
a
==
meeting
==
of
==
the
==
full
==
==
to
==
discuss
==
high-level
==
objectives
==
and
==
the
==
status
==
of
==
the
==
current
==
initiatives.
==
All
==
presentations
==
for
==
the
==
meeting
==
are
==
contained
==
in
==
Enclosure
==
4.
==
The
==
staff
==
opened
==
the
==
meeting
==
with
==
a
==
general
==
discussion
==
of
==
the
==
status
==
of
==
risk-informed
==
regulatory
==
activities
==
at
==
the
==
NRC.
==
The
==
staff
==
pointed
==
out
==
that
==
there
==
was
==
a
==
high
==
level
==
of
==
interest
==
in
==
the
==
==
activities
==
and
==
that
==
we
==
needed
==
to
==
understand
==
how
==
broad
==
the
==
interest
==
in
==
the
==
industry
==
was.
==
The
==
staff
==
presented
==
several
==
thoughts
==
on
==
a
==
long-term
==
vision
==
for
==
risk-
==
informed
==
TS
==
and
==
acknowledged
==
that
==
structure
==
and
==
resource
==
issues
==
will
==
need
==
to
==
be
==
worked
==
out.
==
The
==
staff
==
also
==
pointed
==
out
==
that
==
it
==
will
==
need
==
to
==
address
==
the
==
four
==
strategic
==
performance
==
goals
==
identified
==
in
==
the
==
Commissions
==
Nuclear
==
Reactor
==
Safety
==
Strategic
==
Plan.
==
Those
==
performance
==
goals
==
are:
==
(1)
==
Maintain
==
safety;
==
(2)
==
Increase
==
public
==
confidence;
==
(3)
==
Reduce
==
unnecessary
==
regulatory
==
burden;
==
and
==
(4)
==
Make
==
NRC
==
activities
==
and
==
decisions
==
more
==
effective,
==
efficient,
==
and
==
realistic.
==
The
==
==
presented
==
some
==
of
==
its
==
thoughts
==
on
==
a
==
long-term
==
vision
==
for
==
risk-informed
==
TS.
==
Much
==
of
==
the
==
discussion
==
focused
==
on
==
a
==
slide
==
which
==
presented
==
the
==
==
Owners
==
Group
==
(WOG)
==
five
==
year
==
risk-informed
==
TS
==
strategy.
==
The
==
group
==
discussed
==
at
==
what
==
point
==
rulemaking
==
might
==
be
==
needed
==
to
==
accommodate
==
all
==
of
==
the
==
envisioned
==
changes
==
to
==
TS.
==
The
==
group
==
also
==
discussed
==
the
==
issue
==
of
==
==
quality
==
and
==
the
==
fact
==
that
==
the
==
==
==
standard
==
currently
==
being
==
developed
==
did
==
not
==
address
==
configuration
==
risk
==
management
==
tools
==
like
==
those
==
envisioned
==
as
==
necessary
==
to
==
implement
==
many
==
of
==
the
==
TS
==
changes
==
under
==
development.
==
Representatives
==
from
==
the
==
South
==
==
Project
==
presented
==
a
==
concept
==
of
==
a
==
fully
==
risk-informed
==
set
==
of
==
TS
==
that
==
essentially
==
relies
==
on
==
a
==
==
as
==
the
==
backbone
==
of
==
the
==
TS.
==
They
==
likened
==
the
==
proposed
==
risk
==
limits
==
in
==
their
==
concept
==
to
==
radiation
==
protection
==
limits
==
(i.e.,
==
==
limits).
==
The
==
NRC
==
regulates
==
==
limits
==
at
==
a
==
high
==
level
==
and
==
licensees
==
control
==
these
==
limits
==
at
==
a
==
lower
==
level
==
administratively.
==
The
==
group
==
also
==
discussed
==
whether
==
there
==
was
==
a
==
need
==
for
==
an
==
instantaneous
==
risk
==
cap
==
for
==
TS.
==
The
==
==
stated
==
that
==
the
==
major
==
question
==
is
==
the
==
cost
==
benefit
==
of
==
going
==
to
==
this
==
extreme.
==
For
==
example,
==
if
==
plant
==
==
essentially
==
become
==
the
==
TS,
==
then
==
licensees
==
would
==
have
==
to
==
control
==
changes
==
to
==
the
==
==
model
==
to
==
the
==
same
==
degree
==
as
==
TS
==
changes
==
are
==
currently
==
controlled.
==
The
==
==
presented
==
a
==
status
==
of
==
the
==
seven
==
initiatives
==
currently
==
under
==
development.
==
The
==
group
==
discussed
==
Initiative
==
- 1
==
related
==
to
==
safe
==
end
==
states.
==
The
==
==
stated
==
that
==
the
==
expected
==
results
==
were
==
confirmed
==
by
==
the
==
==
work
==
done
==
by
==
==
The
==
group
==
again
==
discussed
==
what
==
work
==
the
==
other
==
owners
==
groups
==
planned
==
to
==
do
==
to
==
justify
==
the
==
changes
==
for
==
their
==
plant
==
types
==
by
==
taking
==
3
==
Enclosure
==
1
==
advantage
==
of
==
the
==
==
and
==
==
work.
==
Updated
==
schedules
==
for
==
the
==
various
==
initiatives
==
were
==
discussed.
==
The
==
==
stated
==
that
==
they
==
expected
==
to
==
submit
==
Initiative
==
- 1
==
in
==
February
==
or
==
March
==
2000.
==
Initiatives
==
- 2
==
and
==
- 3
==
were
==
expected
==
to
==
be
==
submitted
==
in
==
the
==
very
==
near
==
future.
==
Initiative
==
- 4
==
was
==
planned
==
for
==
submittal
==
in
==
late
==
2000.
==
Initiatives
==
5,
==
6,
==
and
==
7
==
were
==
also
==
expected
==
in
==
mid
==
to
==
late
==
2000.
==
The
==
group
==
briefly
==
discussed
==
the
==
staffs
==
planned
==
process
==
for
==
reviewing
==
and
==
adopting
==
these
==
initiatives
==
as
==
changes
==
to
==
the
==
STS.
==
The
==
group
==
also
==
discussed
==
support
==
for
==
the
==
December
==
16,
==
1999
==
meeting
==
with
==
the
==
Advisory
==
Committee
==
for
==
Reactor
==
Safeguards
==
Reliability
==
and
==
==
Subcommittee
==
and
==
agreed
==
to
==
a
==
possible
==
future
==
meeting
==
in
==
late
==
February
==
2000.
==
4
==
Enclosure
==
1
==
Meeting
==
Attendees
==
October
==
6-7,
==
1999
==
Name
==
Affiliation
==
Dennis
==
Henneke
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
Sharon
==
Mahler
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
Gary
==
Chung
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
Brian
==
Woods
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
Thomas
==
Hook
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
Ed
==
Scherer
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
Don
==
McCamy
==
==
Valley
==
Authority
==
Kent
==
Sulton
==
==
Public
==
Power
==
District
==
S.
==
Visweswaran
==
General
==
Electric
==
Thomas
==
Sihko
==
==
Yankee
==
Jerry
==
André
==
==
Mike
==
Kitlan
==
Duke
==
Power
==
Rick
==
Wachowiak
==
==
Public
==
Power
==
District
==
Frank
==
Rahn
==
Electric
==
Power
==
Research
==
Institute
==
Nicholas
==
Saltos
==
NRC/NRR/SPSB
==
Millard
==
Wohl
==
NRC/NRR/SPSB
==
Nanette
==
Gilles
==
NRC/NRR/RTSB
==
ÿýüûúø÷
==
Enclosure
==
2
==
Meeting
==
Attendees
==
November
==
10,
==
1999
==
Name
==
Affiliation
==
Ray
==
Schneider
==
ABB-Combustion
==
Engineering
==
Nuclear
==
Fuel
==
Company
==
Alan
==
Hackerott
==
Omaha
==
Public
==
Power
==
District
==
Dennis
==
Henneke
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
Sharon
==
Mahler
==
Southern
==
==
Edison
==
Biff
==
Bradley
==
Nuclear
==
Energy
==
Institute
==
Noel
==
Clarkson
==
Duke
==
Power
==
Wayne
==
Harrison
==
South
==
==
Project
==
Rick
==
Grantom
==
South
==
==
Project
==
Donald
==
Hoffman
==
EXCEL
==
Services
==
Jerry
==
André
==
==
Jim
==
Andrachek
==
==
Jack
==
Stringfellow
==
Southern
==
Nuclear
==
Don
==
McCamy
==
==
Valley
==
Authority
==
E.
==
D.
==
Ingram
==
Southern
==
Nuclear
==
Glenn
==
Warren
==
==
Owners
==
Group
==
David
==
Stellfox
==
McGraw
==
Hill
==
John
==
Fehringer
==
INEEL
==
J.
==
E.
==
Rhoads
==
Energy
==
Northwest
==
Richard
==
Harris
==
Entergy
==
Mike
==
Kitlan
==
Duke
==
Power
==
Rodney
==
Johnson
==
Detroit
==
Edison
==
Bert
==
Morris
==
==
Valley
==
Authority
==
Gregory
==
Norris
==
Entergy
==
Rick
==
Wachowiak
==
==
Public
==
Power
==
District
==
Scott
==
Newberry
==
NRC/NRR/DRIP
==
Rich
==
Barrett
==
NRC/NRR/SPSB
==
Mark
==
Reinhart
==
NRC/NRR/SPSB
==
Mark
==
Rubin
==
NRC/NRR/SPSB
==
Millard
==
Wohl
==
NRC/NRR/SPSB
==
Nick
==
Saltos
==
NRC/NRR/SPSB
==
William
==
Beckner
==
NRC/NRR/RTSB
==
Bob
==
Dennig
==
NRC/NRR/RTSB
==
Jack
==
Foster
==
NRC/NRR/RTSB
==
Nanette
==
Gilles
==
NRC/NRR/RTSB
==
ÿýüûúø÷
==
Enclosure
==
2
==
ENCLOSURE
==
3
==
OCTOBER
==
6-7,
==
1999
==
MEETING
==
PRESENTATIONS
==
ÿýüûúø÷
==
Enclosure
==
2
==
ENCLOSURE
==
4
==
NOVEMBER
==
10,
==
1999
==
MEETING
==
PRESENTATIONS
==
ÿýüûúø÷
==
Enclosure
==
2