Information Notice 1993-11, Single Failure Vulnerability of Engineered Safety Features Actuation Systems

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:23, 14 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Single Failure Vulnerability of Engineered Safety Features Actuation Systems
ML031080164
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Crane  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/04/1993
From: Grimes B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
IN-93-011, NUDOCS 9301290025
Download: ML031080164 (12)


UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 February 4, 1993 NRC INFORMATION

NOTICE 93-11: SINGLE FAILURE VULNERABILITY

OF ENGINEERED

SAFETY FEATURES ACTUATION

SYSTEMS

Addressees

All holders of operating

licenses or construction

permits for nuclear power reactors.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) is issuing this notice to alert addressees

to potential

single failure vulnerabilities

in engineered

safety features actuation

systems. It is expected that recipients

will review the information

for applicability

to their facilities

and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.

However, suggestions

contained

in this information

notice are not NRC requirements;

therefore, no specific action or written response is required.DescriDtion

of Circumstances

On July 6, 1992, during a planned outage at the Millstone

Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, with the core off loaded to the spent fuel pool, the licensee, the Northeast

Nuclear Utilities

Company, was preparing

to replace two vital inverters.

Millstone

Unit 2 uses four inverters, two on each vital dc bus, to power two trains of engineered

safety feature actuation

comprised of four sensor cabinets and two actuation

cabinets.

Operators

removed power from one actuation

train, which caused a false loss of normal power signal and a false start signal for the emergency

core cooling system. The effect of this action was similar in consequence

to the complete loss of one of the two vital dc buses.One emergency

diesel generator (EDG) started and tied onto the bus. The second EDG did not start because it was out of service for maintenance.

After the one EDG started, the safety loads failed to sequence onto the bus because of a continuous

false load shed signal. Operators

recovered

from the event by stopping the EDG and restoring

power to one of the sensor cabinets.This action removed the false loss of power signal and thus the load shed signal.The licensee reviewed the event and concluded

that an unblocking

feature of the automatic

test insertion (ATI) system had caused the continuous

load shedding signal. The ATI system, a continuous, on-line, logic tester that is common for both trains, was still energized

and permitted

the spurious loss of power signal to continue to shed the loads. The ATI system applies 2-millisecond

unblocking

pulses to the input of the actuation

logic modules 9301290025

7 '.

IN 93-11 February 4, 1993 and checks the module outputs for proper operation.

The 2-millisecond

pulses are too brief to actuate relays and start equipment.

In 1978, the licensee added a feature to permit ATI testing of the loss of normal power logic.To test the logic, the licensee determined

that the ATI system needed to provide an unblocking

of the loss of power signal for 500 milliseconds.

In the actual event, the false signal generated

by the lack of control power was continuously

present during the 500 ms ATI unblocking

signal. This caused a recurring

load shed signal to be generated

even though the EDG was ready to accept loads; therefore, the EDG load breakers never closed.In reviewing

the event, the licensee determined

that the engineered

safety feature actuation

system could also cause other unintended

actions under certain power supply failure conditions.

These automatic

actions are not related to the ATI modification.

(1) If power is lost to either one of the two dc vital buses, both the safety injection

actuation

signal and sump recirculation

actuation signal'would

be simultaneously

initiated.

The recirculation

actuation signal would result in tripping all low pressure injection

pumps. Also, the spurious sump recirculation

actuation

signal would cause one of the containment

sump outlet valves to open.(2) If power was lost only to the sensor cabinets in one actuation

train, both containment

sump outlet valves would open. If this occurred during a-loss-of-coolant--accident, high-pressure

in containment-could

shut both refueling

water storage tank check valves, inhibiting

flow to all emergency

coolant injection

pumps.(3) The loss of all dc power to one actuation

train would cause a power operated relief valve in the other train to open. In addition, when control power alone is lost to only the sensor cabinets in a single actuation

train, spurious high pressurizer

pressure signals would cause the relief valves in both trains to open. Both cases would result in a loss of primary coolant.Discussion

The design deficiency

in the on-line testing feature could have prevented

both emergency

diesels from accepting

emergency

loads under certain single failure conditions.

The licensee investigated

this event at Millstone

Unit 2 and found several single failure vulnerabilities

related to loss of a vital dc bus which may apply to engineered

safety features actuation

systems at other plants. Although the described

event resulted from an ATI modification, the other vulnerabilities

are inherent in the actuation

system design and its power supplies.Millstone

Unit 2 uses two-out-of-four

logic supplied by Consolidated

Controls Incorporated

to actuate automatically

a number of safety features.

In the actuation

system, a sensor, and subsequent

interposing

electronic

logic, condition

the signal for use by the actuation

logic. Upon loss of power, the interposing

logic generates

a signal to perform the safety function.

The problems discussed

above result from having a two-out-of-four

logic powered by

I -.IN 93-11 February 4, 1993 only two safety-related

power sources coupled with a lack of coherence

in specifying

the preferred

failure mode for automated

safety-related

actions, given a loss of power.The licensee is preparing

modifications

to correct these problems and is reviewing

the design of Unit 2 for other similar problems.In NRC Bulletin 79-27, "Loss of Non-Class

lE Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation," the NRC requested

licensees

to evaluate the effects of a loss of power to IE and Non-lE instrument

and control systems.In addition, in NRC Generic Letter 89-18, "Systems Interactions

in Nuclear Power Plants," the NRC highlighted

concerns regarding

actuation

system designs which may have automated

safety-related

actions with no preferred

failure modes.This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please contact one of the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.an K rimes, Director--Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts:

Ram S. Bhatia, Region I (215) 337-5262 Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices Ste- (--

Attachment

IN 93-11 February 4, 1993 Page 1 of I LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NRC INFORMATION

NOTICES)Information

Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 93-10 Dose Calibrator

Quality 02/02/93 All Nuclear Regulatory

Cor-Control mission medical licensees.

93-09 Failure of Undervoltage

02/02/93 All holders of OLs or CPs Trip Attachment

on for nuclear power reactors.Westinghouse

Model DB-SO Reactor Trip Breaker 93-08 Failure of Residual 02/01/93 All holders of OLs or CPs Heat Removal Pump for nuclear power reactors.Bearings due to High Thrust Loading 93-07 Classification

of Trans- 02/01/93 All Licensees

required to portation

Emergencies

have an emergency

plan.93-06 Potential

Bypass Leak- 01/22/93 All holders of OLs or CPs age Paths Around Filters for nuclear power reactors.Installed

in Ventilation

Systems 93-05 Locking of Radiography

01/14/93 All Nuclear Regulatory

Exposure Devices Commission

industrial

radiography

licensees.

93-04 Investigation

and Re- 01/07/93 All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

porting of Misadministra- Commission

medical tions by the Radiation

licensees.

Safety Officer 93-03 Recent Revision to 01/05/93 All byproduct, source, and 10 CFR Part 20 and special nuclear material Change of Implementa- licensees.

tion Date to January 1, 1994 93-02 Malfunction

of A Pres- 01/04/93 All holders of OLs or CPs surizer Code Safety for nuclear power reactors.Valve 01 -Operating

License CP -Construction

Permit a oU0 0 0 O 0 C 0 O 0 0 Lb Loo (00L (00 wCC W' I<0 0 co'II zn Ul o .W U 0 a0.I*1 Q IZ

IN 93-11 February 4, 1993 only two safety-related

power sources coupled with a lack of coherence

in specifying

the preferred

failure mode for automated

safety-related

actions, given a loss of power.The licensee is preparing

modifications

to correct these problems and is reviewing

the design of Unit 2 for other similar problems.In NRC Bulletin 79-27, "Loss of Non-Class

1E Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation,N

the NRC requested

licensees

to evaluate the effects of a loss of power to IE and Non-1E instrument

and control systems.In addition, in NRC Generic Letter 89-18, "Systems Interactions

in Nuclear Power Plants," the NRC highlighted

concerns regarding

actuation

system designs which may have automated

safety-related

actions with no preferred

failure modes.This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please contact one of the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Brian K. Crimog Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts: Ram S. Bhatia, Region I (215) 337-5262 Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

  • OGCB:DORS
NRR *OGCB:DORS:NRR

RMoore JBirmingham

10/22/92 11/18/92*TECH ED JMain 10/19/92*C/OGCB:DORS:NRR

GMarcus 01/22/93*HICB:DRCH:NRR

IAhmed 11/15/92*SC/OEAB:DORS

EGoodwin 01/15/93 Document Name:*C/HICB:DRCH:NRR

SNewberry 11/24/92 NRC:DRS:RI

WRuland 01/ /93 S:\DORS SEC\93-11.If

  • C/EELB:DE:NRR
  • CBerlinger

12/17/92*C/OEAB:DORS-:NRR

AChaffee 01/19/93 OEAB:DORS:NRR

TKoshy 01/2X 3/ 12.r 9 3 IN 93-January , 1993 only two safety-related

power sources coupled with a lack of coherence

in specifying

the preferred

failure mode for automated

safety-related

actions, given a loss of power.The licensee is preparing

modifications

to correct these problems and is reviewing

the design of Unit 2 for other similar problems.In NRC Bulletin 79-27, "Loss of Non-Class

1E Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation," the NRC requested

licensees

to evaluate the effects of a loss of power to IE and Non-lE instrument

and control systems.In addition, in NRC Generic Letter 89-18, "Systems Interactions

in Nuclear Power Plants," the NRC highlighted

concerns regarding

actuation

system designs which may have "Automated

Safety-Related

Actions with No Preferred

Failure Modes." This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please contact one of the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts: Ram S. Bhatia, Region I (215) 337-5262 Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

  • OGCB:DORS:NRR
  • OGCB:DORS:NRR

RMoore JBirmingham

10/22/92 11/18/92*TECH ED JMain 10/19/92*HICB:DRCH:NRR

IAhmed 11/15/92*SC/OEAB:DORS

EGoodwin 01/15/93*C/HICB:DRCH:NRR

SNewberry 11/24/92 NRC:DRS:R1 WRuland 01/ /93*C/EELB:DE:NRR

CBerlinger

12/17/92*C/OEAB:DORS:NRR

AChaffee 01/19/93*C/OGCB:DORS:NRR

GMarcus 01/22/93 OEAB:DORS:NRB

TKoshy/ LX793 D/DORS:NRR

BKGrimesp/ /93 Document Name: S:\DORSSEC\ESASIN.TK

IN 93-January , 1993 only two safety-related

power sources coupled with a lack of coherence

in specifying

the preferred

failure mode for automated

safety-related

actions, given a loss of power.The licensee is preparing

modifications

to correct these problems and is reviewing

the design of Unit 2 for other similar problems.In NRC Bulletin 79-27, "Loss of Non-Class

IE Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation," the NRC required licensees

to evaluate the effects of a loss of power to lE and Non-lE instrument

and control systems.In addition, in NRC Generic Letter 89-18, "Systems Interactions

in Nuclear Power Plants," the NRC highlighted

concerns regarding

actuation

system designs which may have "Automated

Safety-Related

Actions with No Preferred

Failure Modes." This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please call the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts: Ram S. Bhatia, Region I (215) 337-5262 Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

  • OGCB:DORS:NRR
  • OGCB:DORS:NRR

RMoore JBirmingham

10/22/92 11/18/92*TECH ED JMain 10/19/92 C/OGCB:DORS:NRR

GMarcus glfDg, I /2,/93*HICB:DRCH:NRR

IAhmed 11/15/92*C/HICB:DRCH:NRR

SNewberry 11/24/92 C/EELB:DE:NRR

CBerlinger*

12/17/92 OEAB:DORS:NRR.TKoshy*01/15/93 SC/OEAB:DORS

EGoodwin*01/15/93 Document Name: NRC:DRS:R1 C/OEAB:DORS:NRR

WRuland* AChaffee*01/ /93 01/19/93 S:\DORSSEC\ESASIN.TK

D/DORS:NRR

BKGrimes/ /93 IN 93-January , 1992 specifying

the preferred

failure mode for automated

safety-related

actions, given a loss of power.The licensee is preparing

modifications

to correct these problems and is reviewing

the design of Unit 2 for other similar problems.In NRC Bulletin 79-27, "Loss of Non-Class

lE Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation," the NRC required licensees

to evaluate the effects of a loss of power to lE and Non-lE instrument

and control systems.In addition, in NRC Generic Letter 89-18, NSystems Interactions

in Nuclear Power Plants," the NRC highlighted

concerns regarding

actuation

system designs which may have "Automated

Safety-Related

Actions with No Preferred

Failure Modes." This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please call the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts: Ram S. Bhatia, Region I (215) 337-5262 Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

  • OGCB:DORS:NRR
  • OGCB:DORS:NRR

RMoore JBirmingham

10/22/92 11/18/92*TECH ED JMain 10/19/92 C/OGCB:DORS:NRR

GMarcus 't lt_ h & H K to /32493*HICB:DRCH:NRR

IAhmed 11/15/92 SC/OEAB:DO0)

EGoodwin/ /g-/93 Document Name:*C/HICB:DRCH:NRR

SNewberry 11/24/92 NRC:DRS:Rl

WRuland e/ /93 C/EELB:DE:NRR

CBerlinger*

12/17/92 C/ ff .DORS:NRR A affee I /17/93 OEAB:DORS:NRR

9 TKoshy E/ //r793 D/DORS:NRR

BKGrimes/ /93 S:\DORS SEC\ESASIN.TK

IN 93-January , 1992 specifying

the preferred

failure mode for automated

safety-related

actions, given a loss of power.The licensee is preparing

modifications

to correct these problems and is reviewing

the design of Unit 2 for other similar problems.In NRC Bulletin 79-27, "Loss of Non-Class

lE Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation,*

the NRC required licensees

to evaluate the effects of a loss of power to IE and Non-lE instrument

and control systems.In addition, in NRC Generic Letter 89-18, "Systems Interactions

in Nuclear Power Plants," the NRC highlighted

concerns regarding

actuation

system designs which may have 'Automated

Safety-Related

Actions with No Preferred

Failure Modes.'This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please call the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts: Ram S. Bhatia, Region I (215) 337-0%W.5s,.2Cp1

-Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

  • OGCB:DORS:NRR
  • OGCB:DO RS:NRR RMoore JBirmingham

10/22/92 11/18/92*TECH ED JMain 10/19/92 C:OGCB:DORS:NRR

GMarcus/ /93*HICB:DRCH:NRR

IAhmed 11/15/92 SC/OEAB:DORS

EGoodwin/ /93*C:HICB:DRCH:NRR

SNewberry 11/24/92 NRC:DRS:R1A

".P.WRuland

WU*4 l /93 C:EELB:DE:NRR

CBerlinger*

12/17/92 C:OEAB:DORS:NRR

AChaffee/ /93 OEAB:DORSA

RR TKoshy I #4/9 D:DORS:NRR

BKGrimes/ /93 Document Name: S:\DORSSEC\ESASIN.TK

'J/IN 92-December , 1992 The licensee is preparing

modifications

to resolve these vulnerabilities

and is reviewing

the design of Unit 2 for other similar problems.It should be noted that in NRC Bulletin 79-27, "Loss of Non-Class

lE Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation," the NRC required licensees

to evaluate the effects of a loss of power to 1E and Non-lE instrument

and control systems. In addition, in NRC Generic Letter 89-18,"Systems Interactions

in Nuclear Power Plants," the NRC highlighted

concerns regarding

actuation

system designs which may have "Automated

Safety-Related

Actions with No Preferred

Failure Modes." This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please call the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts: Ram S. Bhatia, Region I (215) 337-9465 Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

  • OGCB:DORS:NRR
  • OGCB:DORS:NRR

RMoore JBirmingham

10/22/92 11/18/92*TECH ED JMain 10/19/92 C:E R CBerl ingr 12/1 7/92 C:OGCB:DORS:NRR

GMarcus 12/ E OEAgW1~S:NRR

TKoshy 12//17/92*HICB:DRCH:NRR

IAhmed 11/15/92*C:HICB:DRCH:NRR

SNewberry 11/24/92 NRC:DRS:RI

C:OEAB:DORS:NRR

WRuland AChaffee 12/ /92 12/ /92 Document Name: A:\ESASIN.TK

D:DORS:NRR

BKGrimes 12/ /92 IN 92-November , 1992 _..........In NRC Bulletin 79-27, uLoss of Non-Class

IE Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation,'

the NRC addressed

the review of this type of design vulnerability.

The NRC required licensees

to evaluate the effects of a loss of power to IE and Non-lE instrument

and control systems and to describe any proposed modifications

resulting

from the evaluation.

This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please call the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts: Ram S. Bhatia, Region I (215) 337-9465 Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 Attachment:

List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices ,- I ;,. .i .0..*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES

  • OGCB:DORS:NRR

OGCB:DORS:NRR

RMoore JBirmingham

10/22/92 11/1926vf

6 HICB:DRCH:NRR

IAhmed S24., 11 /792 C:H .DRCH:NRR SN erry 11/92*TECH ED JMain 10/19/92 1 C:EEL :-E:NRR CBerlinger

11/ /92;C:OGCB:DORS:NRR

GMarcus 11/ /92 OEAB:DORS:NRR

TKoshy 11/ /92 NRC:DRS:R1 C:OEAB:DORS:NRR

WRuland AChaffee 11/ /92 11/ /92 Document Name: A:\ESASIN.TK

D:DORS:NRR

BKGrimes 11/, /92 IN 92-XX October XX, 1992 Page 3 power. The design problems resulted from having two-out-of-four

logic combined with a single safety-related

power source for two sensor cabinets.The licensee is preparing

modifications

to resolve these vulnerabilities

and is reviewing

the design of Unit 2 for similar problems.In NRC Bulletin 79-27, "Loss of Non-Class

1E Instrumentation

and Control Power System Bus During Operation," the NRC addressed

the review of this type of design vulnerability.

The NRC required the licensees

to determine

which instrument

and control system loads connected

to 1E and non-lE power sources and evaluate the effects of a loss of power to those loads.This information

notice requires no specific action or written response.

If you have any questions

about the information

in this notice, please call the technical

contacts listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating

Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical

contacts:

Ram S. Bhatia', Region I (215) 337-9465 Thomas Koshy, NRR (301) 504-1176 DISTRIBUTION:

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
  • OGCB:DORS:NRR

OGCB:DORS:NRR

  • TECH ED C:OGCB:DORS:NRR

Moore Ago- JBirmingham

JMain GMarcus 10/22/92 10/ /92 10/19/92 10/ /92 HICB:DRCH:NRR

C:HICB:DRCH:NRR

C:EELB:DE:NRR

OEAB:DORS:NRR

IAhmed SNewberry

CBerlinger

TKoshy 10/ /92 10/ /92 10/ /92 10/ /92 C:OEAB:DORS:NRR

DD:DRCH:NRR

D:DORS:NRR

AChaffee CThomas BKGrimes 10/ /92 10/ /92 10/ /92