ML083080089

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:24, 12 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
License Amendment Request for Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09, Supplement 9
ML083080089
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/28/2008
From: Baxter D
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Corp
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TSC-2007-09, Suppl 9
Download: ML083080089 (51)
v • d • e


Text

Duke DAVE BAXTER Vice President k_`Energy.

Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy Corporation ONO1 VP17800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672 864-885-4460 864-885-4208 fax dabaxter@dukeenergy.

corn October 28, 2008 U. S.-Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention:

Document Control Desk

Subject:

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 License Amendment Request for Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change (TSC) Number 2007-09, Supplement 9 On January 31, 2008, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke) submitted a License Amendment Request (LAR) to address replacement of the existing Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS)analog based Reactor Protective System (RPS) and Engineered Safeguards Protective System (ESPS) with a digital computer based RPS/ESPS.

Duke docketed most of the technical documents listed in Table 1-2 of the LAR in Supplement 1 dated April 3, 2008.In some cases where the document's date of availability was not known, Duke indicated the date would be determined.

During subsequent discussions with NRC Staff, Duke agreed to provide factory acceptance test (FAT), procedures (Table 1-2, Item 16.a) by electronic mail as they become available and then docket within two weeks. The FAT procedures Duke provided by electronic.mail on October 19, 20, 21, and 23, 2008, are provided in Enclosure 3.Enclosure 2 identifies test cases that address software integration testing requirements for the ESFAS Functional FAT. These test cases address testing requirements that could be performed using AREVA NP's simulation validation tool.The documents included in Enclosure 3 are classified by AREVA NP as proprietary.

The appropriate affidavits by AREVA NP are provided in Enclosure 1 in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.390.If there are any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Boyd Shingleton at (864) 885-4716.Enclosure 3 to this letter contains proprietary information.

Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390.Upon removal of Enclosure 3, this letter is uncontrolled.

, www. duke-energy.

corn U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 28, 2008 Page 2 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 28, 2008.Very truly yours, Dave Baxter, Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station

Enclosures:

1.2.3.AREVA NP Affidavits Test Case Identification AREVA NP Documents

-Proprietary Enclosure 3 to this letter contains proprietary information.

Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390.Upon removal of Enclosure 3, this letter is uncontrolled.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 28, 2008 Page 3 cc: wlo enclosures Mr. L. N. Olshan, Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 0-14 H25 Washington, D. C. 20555 L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

-Region II Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. G. A. Hutto Senior Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station S. E. Jenkins, Manager Infectious and Radioactive Waste Management Section 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 Enclosure 3 to this letter contains proprietary information.

Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390.Upon removal of Enclosure 3, this letter is uncontrolled.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 28, 2008 Page 4 bcc: w/o enclosures R. W. Cornett B. R. Loftis B. M. Thomas J. L. Abbott B. G. Davenport J. E. Burchfield C. E. Curry L. F. Vaughn D. B. Coyle E. L. Anderson R. L. Gill -NRI&A R. D. Hart -CNS K. L. Ashe- MNS R. V. Gambrell D. C. Richardson M. E. Bailey NSRB, EC05N File -T.S. Working BWOG Tech Spec Committee (5)w/ enclosures ONS Document Management ELL, ECO50 Enclosure 3 to this letter contains proprietary information.

Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390.Upon removal of Enclosure 3, this letter is uncontrolled.

License Amendment Request No. 2007-09, Supplement 9 October 28, 2008 Enclosure 1 AREVA NP Affidavit for Enclosure 3 Documents AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NPinformation is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 63-9014398-000, Small Break LOCA Factory Acceptance Test Procedure Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.

.5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP.s research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology' or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP onlyas required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this ___day of YkIF/(X-L 2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Notary Public commonwealth of Vlrglnia 7079129 my commission Expires Oct 31, 2010 AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA S) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG

)1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP, Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with~the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiarwith the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 62-9078736-000, Small Break LOCA Factory Acceptance Test Specification Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Cormmission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from.public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary': (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar.product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical~techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this _-______day of ...J. .2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SHERRY L. MCFADEN J Notary Public I Commonwealth of Virginia 7079129 My Commission Expires Oct 31, 2010 AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application ofthese criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade; Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 63-9070638-000, Gateway to OAC Factory Acceptance Test Procedure Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. ThisDocument contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience; I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this.Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory

(.Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advaniage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this____day of ' ./1 4& ,2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SHERRY L* MVCFADEN Notary Public COmmonwealth of Virgoni 7079129 My commission Expires oct-jj 2010 AFF IDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment, Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 62-9065544-000, Gateway to OAC Factory Acceptance Test Specification Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVANP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.

.5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information'!.

.6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive

  • advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b),.6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. SUBSCRIBED before me on this day of , 2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SHERRY L. MCFADEN Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginla [S7079129 My Commission Expires Oct 31, 2010 w -

AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG, 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request'for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 63-9014397-000, One Pump Coast Down Factory Acceptance Test Procedure Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding.

from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this day of , 2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginla 7079129 My Commission Expires Oct 31, 2010 AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with-the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective (System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is, provided and referred to herein as the "Document.".,* AREVA NP document 62-9078508-000, One Pump Coast Down Factory Acceptance Test Specification Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, orcomponent, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a.limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief./V SUBSCRIBED before me on this ____day of___________

2008;GL$\k~NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG

)1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a.DukePower Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."'

  • AREVA NP document 63-9067378-000, GSM Functional Test Procedure Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.
4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on thiis day of -2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SHERR"Y L. MCFADEN Notary Public I Commonwealth of Virginla 7079129 " My Commission Explres Oct 31, 20101 A F F IDAV IT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

Iam familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 62-9066853-000, GSM Factory Acceptance Test Specification Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information .of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) , The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP,-would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this ____day of & 'f'V.A'-, 2008.NOTARY-PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SHERRY L. MCFADEN Notary Public commonwealth of Virginia 7079129 M Commission Explrs Oct 31. 2010n AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary., I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 63-9013619-000, RPS/ESFAS Hardware Failure Factory Acceptance Test Procedure Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.
4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals de tails of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure'and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this _-__-_day of .2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SHERRY L. MCFADEN Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia'" 7079129 3 2 MyCommission Expires Oct 31, 2010 a RP W qP .

AFFIDAVI T COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, ProductLicensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 63-9013611-000, ESFAS Functional Test Procedure Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to.the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, orý component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this _____day of -2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA= SERY L MFADEN Notarwy Public 7079129 commission Expires Oct 31, 2010 AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective

/System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document." , AREVA NP document 62-9070978-000, ESFAS Functional Test Specification Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in tim eor resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file orarea and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this 2/b day of 2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SHERRY L. MCFADEH"Notary PubliC j commonwealth Of Virglnlaa My 7079129[NVComnmission ExPires Oct 31, ]2010 A FFI DAV IT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing,'

for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective

'System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document."* AREVA NP document 63-9014387-000, Supplemental ESFAS Hardware Failure Factory Acceptance Test Procedure Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information, contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. ( The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusiveuse of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.N
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this____day of _2008, NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA AFFIDAVI T COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing; for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document." 0 AREVA NP document 63-9013943-000, FAT Procedure for RPS Response Time Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available tothe public.Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made'available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or, market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and underksuitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributedon a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this ____day of .. ., 2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA AFF IDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA) ss.CITY OF LYNCHBURG 1. My name is Mark J. Burzynski.

I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA NP Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA NP to determine whether certain AREVA NP information is proprietary.

I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA NP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA NP information provided to the NRC in support of a Duke Power Company LLC License Amendment Request for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287) entitled Reactor Protective System/Engineered Safeguards Protective System Digital Upgrade, Technical Specification Change Number 2007-09. The following AREVA NP document is provided and referred to herein as the "Document.".AREVA NP document 63-9013944-000, FAT Procedure for ESFAS Response Time Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA NP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA NP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.

4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA NP and not made available to the public..Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure.

The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure'is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information".

6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA NP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA NP's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA NP.(d) "The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA NP in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA NP, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA NP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA NP.The information in this Document is considered proprietary.for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(c) and 6(d) above.6
7. In accordance with AREVA NP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA NP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA NP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me on this ____day of .

2008.NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA I, SHERRY L. MCFADEN Notary Public Commonwealth of Vlrginla 7079129 My Commission Expires Oct 31. 2010 License Amendment Request No. 2007-09, Supplement 9 October 28, 2008 Enclosure 2 The following test cases address Oconee application software integration testing requirements that could be performed during the implementation phase using SIVAT. The specific test cases are described in AREVA NP document 62-9070978-000, Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 RPS/ESFAS Controls Upgrade ESFAS Factory Acceptance Test Functional Test Specification.

ESFAS-T~rip Function, Test Cases System Test -Acquisition Set 1 Cases 1 through 13 (Test Specification Sections 2.1.3 -2.1.15)System Test -Acquisition Set 2 Cases 1 through 13 (Test Specification Sections 2.2.3 -2.2.15)Voter Test -Voter ODD1 Test Cases 1 through 6 (Test Specification Sections 3.1.2 -3.1.7)Voter Test -Voter ODD1 Channel 1 Output Test Case 1 (Test Specification Section 3.2.3)Voter Test -Voter ODD2 Test Cases 1 through 6 ESFAS Trip #1 (Attachment

1) (Test Specification Sections 3.3.3 -3.3.8)Voter Test -Voter ODD2 Channel 1 Output Test Case 1 (Test Specification Section 3.4.3)Voter Test- Voter EVEN 1 Test Cases 1 through 6 (Test Specification Sections 3.5.2 -3.5.7)Voter Test -Voter EVEN 1 Channel 2 Output Test Case 1 (Test Specification Section 3.6.2)Voter Test -Voter EVEN2 Test Cases 1 through 6 (Test Specification Sections 3.7.3 -3.7.8)Voter Test -Voter EVEN2 Channel 2 Output Test Case 7 (Test Specification Section 3.8.2)

License Amendment Request No. 2007-09, Supplement 9 October 28, 2008 ESFAS Trip Function Test Cases'System Test -Acquisition Set 1 Cases 1 through 16 (Test Specification Sections 2.1.3 -2.1.18)System Test -Acquisition Set 2 Cases 1 through 16 (Test Specification Sections 2.2.3 -2.2.18)Voter Test -Voter ODD1 Test Cases 1 through 7 ESFAS Trip #2 (Attachment

2) (Test Specification Sections 3.1.3 -3.1.9)Voter Test -Voter ODD2 Test Cases 1 through 7 (Test Specification Sections 3.2.3 -3.2.9)Voter Test- Voter EVEN 1 Test Cases 1 through 7 (Test Specification Sections 3.3.3 -3.3.9)Voter Test -Voter EVEN2 Test Cases 1 through 7 (Test Specification Sections 3.4.3 -3.4.9)System Test -Acquisition Set 1 ESFAS Trip #3 (Attachment
3) Cases 1 through 13 (Test Specification Sections 2.1.3 -2.1.15)System Test -Acquisition Set 2 Cases 1 through 13 (Test Specification Sections 2.2.3 -2.2.15)Voter Test -Voter ODD1 Test Cases 1 through 6 (Test Specification Sections 3.1.2 -3.1.7)Voter Test -Voter ODDI1 Channel 5 Output Test Case 1 (Test Specification Section 3.2.3)Voter Test -Voter ODD2 Test Cases 1 through 6 (Test Specification Sections 3.3.3 -3.3.8)Voter Test -Voter ODD2 Channel 5 Output Test Case 1 (Test Specification Section 3.4.3)Voter Test -Voter EVEN 1 Test Cases 1 through 6 (Test Specification Sections 3.5.3 -3.5.8)Voter Test -Voter EVEN 1 Channel 6 Output Test Case 1 License Amendment Request No. 2007-09, Supplement 9 October 28, 2008 ESFAS.Trip Function Test Cases, (Test Specification Section 3.6.3)Voter Test -Voter EVEN2 Test Cases 1 through 6 (Test Specification Sections 3.7.3 -3.7.8)Voter Test -Voter EVEN2 Channel 6 Output Test Case 1 (Test Specification Section 3.8.3)System Test -Acquisition Set 1 Cases 1 through 13 (Test Specification Sections 2.1.3 -2.1.15)System Test -Acquisition Set 2 Cases 1 through 13 (Test Specification Sections 2.2.3 -2.2.15)Voter Test -Voter ODD1 Test Cases 1 through 7 ESFAS Trip #4 (Test Specification Sections 3.1.3 -3.1.9)(Attachment
4) Voter Test -Voter ODD2 Test Cases 1 through 7 (Test Specification Sections 3.2.3 -3.2.9)Voter Test -Voter EVEN 1 Test Cases 1 through 7 (Test Specification Sections 3.3.3 -3.3.9)Voter Test -Voter EVEN2 Test Cases 1 through 7 (Test Specification Sections 3.4.3 -3.4.9)ESFAS Trip #19 (Attachment 5)None ESFAS Trip: Signal Failure Section None (Attachment_6)

_______________________

'i°License Amendment Request No. 2007-09, Supplement 9 -Proprietary October 28, 2008 Enclosure 3 AREVA NP Documents Document Name (Item number correlates to Table Document Number 1-2 of RPS/ESPS LAR Enclosure 1)16.a FAT Procedures Small Break LOCA Factory Acceptance Test AREVA NP Document No. 63-9014398-000 Procedure Small Break LOCA Factory Acceptance Test AREVA NP Document No. 62-9078736-000 Specification Gateway to OAC Factory Acceptance Test AREVA NP Document No. 63-9070638-000 Procedure Gateway to OAC Factory Acceptance Test AREVA NP Document No. 62-9065544-000 Specification One Pump Coast Down Test Procedure AREVA NP Document No. 63-9014397-000 One Pump Coast Down Test Specification AREVA NP Document No. 62-9078508-000 GSM SW Functional Test Procedure AREVA NP Document No. 63-9067378-000 GSM SW Functional Test Specification AREVA NP Document No. 62-9066853-000 RPS/ESFAS Hardware Failure Testing Procedure AREVA NP Document No. 63-9013619-000 ESFAS SW Functional Test Procedure AREVA NP Document No. 63- 9013611-000 ESFAS SW Functional Test Specification AREVA NP Document No. 62-9070978-000 Supplemental ESF Hardware Failure Testing AREVA NP Document No. 63-9014387-000 Procedure RPS Response Time Testing Procedure AREVA NP Document No. 63-9013943-000 ESF Response Time Testing Procedure AREVA NP Document No. 63-9013944-000

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML083080089&oldid=1807676"