ML13003A138

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:36, 21 April 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Development of Evacuation Time Estimates, Appendix J, Representative Inputs to and Outputs from the Dynev II System Through Appendix K, Evacuation Roadway Network, Page K-49
ML13003A138
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2012
From:
KLD Engineering, PC
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Susquehanna
References
Download: ML13003A138 (64)
v • d • e


Text

APPENDIX J Representative Inputs to and Outputs from the DYNEV II System J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM This appendix presents data input to and output from the DYNEV II System. Table J-1 provides the volume and queues for the ten highest volume signalized intersections in the study area.Refer to Table K-2 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each intersection.

Table J-2 provides source (vehicle loading) and destination information for several roadway segments (links) in the analysis network. Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Table J-3 provides network-wide statistics (average travel time, average speed and number of vehicles) for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) for each scenario.Table J-4 provides statistics (average speed and travel time) for the major evacuation routes -Interstate-80, Interstate-81 and US-11 -for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions.

As discussed in Section 7.3 and shown in Figures 7-3 through 7-7, US-11 is congested for most of the evacuation.

As such, the average speeds are comparably slower (and travel times longer) than other evacuation routes for the first two hours of the evacuation.

Table J-5 provides the number of vehicles discharged and the cumulative percent of total vehicles discharged for each link exiting the analysis network, for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions.

Refer-to Table K-i and the figures-in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Figure J-1 through Figure J-14 plot the trip generation time versus the ETE for each of the 14 Scenarios considered.

The distance between the trip generation and ETE curves is the travel time. Plots of trip generation versus ETE are indicative of the level of traffic congestion during evacuation.

For low population density sites, the curves are close together, indicating short travel times and minimal traffic congestion.

For higher population density sites, the curves are farther apart indicating longer travel times and the presence of traffic congestion.

As seen in Figure J-1 through Figure J-14, the curves are spatially separated as a result of the traffic congestion in the EPZ, which was discussed in detail in Section 7.3.Susquehanna Steam Electric Station J-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0 Table J-1. Characteristics of the Ten Highest Volume Signalized Intersections Ineseto Appoc Voum Quu Nod Loato Coto (U Noe (Vh (Veh 361 744 0 198 US-Il & Market St Actuated 364 4,281 3 359 0 0 TOTAL 5,025 656 3,834 21 307 SR 93 & Church St Actuated 425 40 0 437 873 12 TOTAL 4,747 -406 2,364 571 501 2,266 97 181 US-11 & Broadway Actuated 1 0 0 156 0 0 TOTAL 4,630 -234 299 3 455 SR 93 & SR 487 Actuated 235 4,072 10 TOTAL 4,371 -504 2,242 443 503 697 15 501 Main St & Broadway Actuated 181 1,115 76 508 299 0 TOTAL 4,353 -501 3,341 184 506 707 28 508 Kosciuszko St & Main St Actuated 107 0 0 1072 0 0 TOTAL 4,048 -96 1,628 0 89 222 0 91 SR 931 & 1-81 Actuated 9 2,6 6 92 2,164 6 TOTAL 4,014 -832 1,582 10 772 SR 93 & SR 339 Actuated 771 2,399 11 TOTAL 3,981 -307 62 0 440 3,425 58 656 SR 93 & Vine St Actuated 657 471 6 426 0 0 TOTAL 3,958 -888 3,252 238 369 US-11 & Lasalle St Actuated 963 616 114 TOTAL 3,868 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Table J-2. Sample Simulation Model Input g ~I1~~Ia~AVehicles .sI~]. .bI1~ I: 7 t 8633 1,698 1079 346 S 8395 1 _4,500 8400 1,698 8091 1,698 416 155 SW.8642 4,500 8041 1,698 8091 1,698 1145 218 W 8642 4,500 8041 1,698 8395 4,500 1480 171 S 8400 1,698 8436 1,572 8755 4,500 1515 522 NE 8268 1,698 8710 1,698 8940 1,698 1341 190 W 8135 1,698 8091 1,698 8682 4,500 587 120 SE 8395 4,500 8400 1,698 8642 4,500 806 12 W 8041 1,698 8780 1,698 8633 1,698 947 43 8395 4,500 8400 1,698 8395 4,500 1266 6 SE 8682 4,500 8400 1,698 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Table J-3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03)Scnai 1. 2-I3I4I I 5I 6I 7 Network-Wide Average Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi) 1.8 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.2 Network-Wide Average 33.3 28.3 32.4 28.2 28.9 30.6 26.7 Speed (mph)Total Vehicles 62,775 63,185 60,969 61,384 53,256 66,205 66,608 Exiting Network Network-Wide Average 2.2 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi)

Network-Wide Average 27.7 32.3 28.1 28.2 28.8 29.0 31.9 Speed (mph)Total Vehicles 66,206 60,922 61,344 60,671 53,282 67,133 62,838 Exiting Network I Table J-4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Scenario 1)1-80 EB 25.2 69.3 1 21.8 62.6 24.1 1 69.6 21.7 1 69.6 21.7 1 1-80 WB 25.2 69.6 21.7 62.9 24.0 68.7 22.0 69.6 21.7 1-81 NB 13.4 66.8 12.0 65.6 12.3 65.8 12.2 66.8 12.0 1-81 SB 13.4 67.5 11.9 64.6 12.4 67.5 11.9 67.5 11.9 US-li EB 11.7 33.0 121.2 32.8 21.3 52.7 113.3 53.9 F13.0 US-11 WB 12.6 13.2 57.5 5.8 130.9 39.6 119.1 40.9 118.5 I J-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Table J-5. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario 1 S Cumultive Ehilapes Discared by(heo Idiatdsim Cumlaiv Pecn of Veice DicagdDrn4h niaeieItra 136 714 1,059 1,167 70 1%2%2%2%2,036 4,696 5,039 5,074 12% 10% 8% 8%734 2,107 2,740 2,793 4% 5% 5% 4%2,732 6,930 8,332 8,474 16% 15% 14% 14%504 1,462 1,998 2,016 3% 3% 3% 3%383 1,139 1,609 1,627 2% 2% 3% 3%108 882 1,135 1,151 1% 2% 2% 2%784 2,000 2,819 2,847 928 5%. 4% 5% 5%80 308 379 384 1031 0% 1% 1% 1%320 1,254 2,027 2,371 1046 2% 3% 3% 4%386 1,453 1,784 1,828 1093 2% 3% 3% 3%405 1,466 1,915 1,938 1149 2% 3% 3% 3%3,198 7,660 9,522 9,706 19% 16% 16% 15%2,781 7,182 9,093 9,494 1179 16% 15% 15% .15%114 533 680 698 1184 1% 1% 1% 1%848 2,379 3,924 4,420 1210 5% 5% 6% 7%280 1,087 1,444 1,527 2% 2% 2% 2%i-s KLD Engineering, P.C.Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Cumuatie Veicls Dischre by thniatdTm~~~Cumulative Preto Vehicles Discharged byin the Indicated Time Itra 469 1,556 2,577 2,681 1423 3%3%4%4%187 423 525 534 1527 1% 1% 1% 1%237 833 1,061 1,083 1% 2% 2% 2%200 673 895 962 1% 1% 1% 2%Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate i-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.J-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1)-Trip Generation , ETE 100%80%60%*6 40%4-C 0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed lime (min)Figure J-1. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)-Trip Generation -ETE VI 0 U 0 4-0 I-'I-0 4-C 0 U I-0 a.100%80%60%40%20%0%-Ooeo00000000-00

ý10--ZZO-000, 0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-2. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3)-Trip Generation -mETE 100%CD S80%40%4-C 20%CL 0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-3. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%" 80%M 60%0 40%4-C 20%CD a-0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-4. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5)Trip Generation mETE 4-0 4-1 a, 100%80%60%40%20%0%zoo""*ý0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-5. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6)-Trip Generation -mETE 100%"n 0J 4,-a, a, 80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 Elapsed Time (min)180 210 240 270 Figure J-6. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6)Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)-Trip Generation m ETE 100%80%0*0 60%"6 40%2o 9L, l.6 0%,0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-7. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)-Trip Generation m ETE 100%0 40%20%I,-0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed rime (min)Figure J-8. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 9)i-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%80%60% /40%S20%a-0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed lime (min)Figure J-9. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 9)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)-Trip Generation m ETE 100%80%*i60%06 I.-4 40%4.C wu 20%a.0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-10. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)iTrip Generation m ETE 100%80%J 60%0 40%-I.-C k! 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-11. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 12)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%80%'I-60%4 40%*I-C 20%a.0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-12. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 12)Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 0 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 13)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%" 80%60%4 0%0%p 20%0% , , 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-13. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Special Event (Scenario 13)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%80%o 60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed lime (min)Figure J-14. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 APPENDIX K Evacuation Roadway Network K. EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK As discussed in Section 1.3, a link-node analysis network was constructed to model the roadway network within the study area. Figure K-1 provides an overview of the link-node analysis network. The figure has been divided up into 47 more detailed figures (Figure K-2 through Figure K-48) which show each of the links and nodes in the network.The analysis network was calibrated using the observations made during the field survey conducted in August and September 2011. Table K-1 lists the characteristics of each roadway section modeled in the ETE analysis.

Each link is identified by its road name and the upstream and downstream node numbers. The geographic location of each link can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided in Table K-1. The roadway type identified in Table K-1 is generally based on the following criteria: " Freeway: limited access highway, 2 or more lanes in each direction, high free flow speeds* Freeway ramp: ramp on to or off of a limited access highway* Major arterial:

3 or more lanes in each direction* Minor arterial:

2 or more lanes in each direction" Collector:

single lane in each direction* Local roadways:

single lane in each direction, local roads with low free flow speeds The term, "No. of Lanes" in Table K-1 identifies the number of lanes that extend throughout the length of the link. Many links have additional lanes on the immediate approach to an intersection (turn pockets);

these have been recorded and entered into the input stream for the DYNEV II System.As discussed in Section 1.3, lane width and shoulder width were not physically measured during the road survey. Rather, estimates of these measures were based on visual observations and recorded images.Table K-2 identifies each node in the network that is controlled and the type of control (stop sign, yield sign, pre-timed signal, actuated signal, traffic control point) at that node.Uncontrolled nodes are not included in Table K-2. The location of each node can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided.Susquehanna Steam Electric Station K-1 KILD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0 Appendix K Ov-r-iew ------" We.i oing Ix -,,. __1.2.--8 1 9 On~Yge 112 /'3' 5- .r:-~~Eae Me5 FN6 5 4 ERPun-1 indx Gr1d 71 Nesquho1ni Susauehanna Steam Electric Station K-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.EvacuationYa TieEtmaeRv5 Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0 Figure K-2. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 1 0 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-3. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 2 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 0 Figure K-4. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 3 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-5. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 4 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-6. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 5 K-7 KID Engineering, P.C.Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 .N\ 4q)IX-i/E F Il#_R /'/ 14\ ,~ I~44.N N'239 1* ___/ 2i I W//'1121 SP*~~.:ii.h/

/ I& I/ 225k.--& -27A9~ / /-w B 613 N.6 6/SSES Evacuation Time Estimate-Analysis Network Figures* 2, W_ S,1s, lsM i Grid 6-RFA =i Win M &Figure K-7. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 6 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-8. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 7 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-9. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 8 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-10. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 9 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0

  • \ I 19.3 405$41 C7>7Y* //t~\ ,-RA I~ '- h~$e-47I -SSES Evacuation Time Estimate*SES --1 Link-Node Analysis Network Figures MaNde 2, S,10, 1S M~hik t Un jw__ _ Grid 10 IVs Figure K-11. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 10 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station K-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0 Figure K-12. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 11 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-13. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 12 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-14. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 13 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-15. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 14 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-16. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 15 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-17. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 16 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-18. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 17 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 11 i/ o , ji< .'V 7/ $ SI-* : I(17) , o 2100-3 ...- 37A-.- ----<. : ,---- -- B .yle .., lSSEauto ime Estimates~s Analysis Network Figures--,uk w. Grd1 Figure K-19. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 18 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station K-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0 Figure K-20. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 19 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0

~Td57 ~N~nd~ ~L~NKmi4 Rd~p kN En/IX ý_7"Z.Laer ý/ *8~Rd az )'/*j Iý j1 i I ,'.4f It /"? 20/ /192 Rdd~I1Al 4,A Lak S2 Aý~ i(Y'C'-ii;AM %7Rd ~j* SSES S9Wdow n Link-Node Analysis Network Figures No"a _ 2, 5, 10, 15 MU. Rinp-m. Link Wor Grid 20 42ElMA ___GMT1 Figure K-21. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 20 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station K-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0 0 Figure K-22. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 21 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-23. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 22 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-24. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 23 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-25. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 24 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-26 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-26. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 25 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-27 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-27. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 26 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-28 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 ERPA: 1 MOO 712" *T398 2,,71-14, MWA 1 IV ig i iI 3 1 ~ ~ 31 ASTm ltm Link-NEvU*ode Tkne NEt',k Figues* Grid 27 0 /ýI _____II /I e Analysis Network -Grid 27 K-29 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-28. Unk-Node Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate Figure K-29. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 28 K-30 KID Engineering, P.C.Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-30 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 274/ 1 6 3 44/ --E2!,-- _______Figure K-30. LinNNode Analysis etworkk-FGrid 2~ rn d ae Susquehanna Steam Electric Station K-31 KID Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0 Figure K-31. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 30 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-32 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-32. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 31 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-33 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-33. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 32 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-34 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-34. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 33 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-35 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-35. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 34 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-36 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-36. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 35 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-37 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-37. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 36 K-38 KLD Engineering, P.C.Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-38 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-38. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 37 0 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-39 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-39. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 38 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-40 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-40. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 39 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-41 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 I Figure K-41. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 40 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-42 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-42. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 41 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-43 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-43. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 42 K-44 KLD Engineering, P.C.Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-44 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-44. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 43 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-45 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-45. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 44 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-46 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-46. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 45 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-47 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-47. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 46 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-48 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0 Figure K-48. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 47 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-49 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 0

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A138&oldid=1492963"