ML19246A142

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:50, 4 September 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New Presentation Slides for September 6, 2019, Meeting on RIS 2016-11
ML19246A142
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/06/2019
From: Stephen Dembek
Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs
To:
Dembek, Steve
References
RIS 2016-11
Download: ML19246A142 (9)


See also: RIS 2016-11

Text

Path Forward in Response to Comments on the NRC's Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2016

-11 Presentation by NRC StaffSeptember 6, 2019

PurposeTo discuss the NRC's proposed path forward to address concerns regarding RIS 2016

-11 and to receive feedback from stakeholders.

2

Recent History of Relevant10 CFR 20.2002Guidance*Agreement State (AS) Letter FSME

-12-025 (ML12065A038)

  • Regulatory Issue Summary 2016

-11, "Requests to Dispose of Very Low

-level Radioactive Waste Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2002 (ML16007A488)

3

Stakeholders' Letters

4

Two-Step Process for Offsite Disposals

-Generator of waste requests approval of proposed disposal procedures

-Recipient of Waste receives approval to receive and dispose of VLLW

  • Agreement State, if applicable, approves disposal in non-licensed facility and grants exemption to non

-licensed facility

5

NRC's PathForward*For any 10 CFR Part 50 or 52 licensees that have used Agreement State approvals

-case-by-case Enforcement Discretion, as appropriate

  • Review of 20.2002 Requests

-NRC, if applicable, will consider any Agreement State review and decision *Update RIS 2016

-11 (issue draft for comment) to describe how NRC will consider Agreement State review, if applicable, to facilitate NRC review of 20.2002 requests

  • 10 CFR 20.2001 Approval

-Potential change in scope of acceptable disposal of VLLW

-Very Low-Level Waste Scoping Study

6

Open Discussion

  • Comments from NEI, EnergySolutions, Waste Control Specialists, STP, and Agreement States on NRC's Presentation

7

Public Comments

  • Comments from the public should be addressed to the NRC staff.

8

Conclusion

  • NRC's discussionof results of today's meeting
  • NRC's plan for formal responses to incoming letters*Please contact Stephen Dembek if you have additional comments at: Stephen.Dembek@nrc.govor 301-415-2342 9