ML15313A064
| ML15313A064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 11/06/2015 |
| From: | Division of Reactor Safety III |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15124A054 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML15313A064 (2) | |
Text
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 3/26/15 Exam Level: SRO Item Description 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations) 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,+/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature a. Author Ton D. Jennin s I b. Facility Reviewer(') Jim Lucas I c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) d. NRG Supervisor(*) Initials a b Date 3130/15 3130/15 (') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Page 5 of 5 c ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facilit : CLINTON Date of Exam: 3/26/2015 Exam Level: RO 5{) SRO C8J Initials Item Descri tion a b c 1. Clean answer sheets co ied before 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified rJ /J. and documented ?: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors Jt-(reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, (3f licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail as a 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 8f JZ-If are *ustified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training Bf oz-ff deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a Ii cants Printed Name/Signature Date a. Grader J)RC b. ,J:.aemty Reviewer(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor(*) 4m,/t5 4' Lffaz/;s . ' (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not app icable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. $-4/'lJI 15 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 3/26/15 Exam Level: SRO Item Description 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations) 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,+/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature a. Author Ton D. Jennin s I b. Facility Reviewer(') Jim Lucas I c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) d. NRG Supervisor(*) Initials a b Date 3130/15 3130/15 (') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Page 5 of 5 c ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facilit : CLINTON Date of Exam: 3/26/2015 Exam Level: RO 5{) SRO C8J Initials Item Descri tion a b c 1. Clean answer sheets co ied before 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified rJ /J. and documented ?: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors Jt-(reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, (3f licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail as a 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 8f JZ-If are *ustified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training Bf oz-ff deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a Ii cants Printed Name/Signature Date a. Grader J)RC b. ,J:.aemty Reviewer(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor(*) 4m,/t5 4' Lffaz/;s . ' (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not app icable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. $-4/'lJI 15