ML14280A074: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 24: Line 24:
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)  
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified  
+/-4% on the reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified  
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed b half or more of the a licants a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed b half or more of the a licants a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)
n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
D. McNeil/ NRC Supervisor(*)
D. McNeil/ NRC Supervisor(*)
H. Peterson a n/a n/a Initials b c n/a n/a n/a n/a rJ/tt Date 08/12/14
H. Peterson a n/a n/a Initials b c n/a n/a n/a n/a rJ/tt Date 08/12/14 __ .n@_ 08/12/14 The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}
__ .n@_ 08/12/14 The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}

Revision as of 11:09, 9 July 2018

2014 DC Cook Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
ML14280A074
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/2014
From: McNeil D R
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
American Electric Power, Indiana Michigan Power Co
Shared Package
ML13093A427 List:
References
50-315/14-301, 50-316/14-301 50-315/OL-14, 50-316/OL-14
Download: ML14280A074 (1)


Text

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form Quality Checklist 0

Facility:

DC Cook U1/U2 Date of Exam: -e8t(Hfl2tH4-*In...

Exam Level: RO L2J SRO 0 Item Description

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed b half or more of the a licants a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)

n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)

D. McNeil/ NRC Supervisor(*)

H. Peterson a n/a n/a Initials b c n/a n/a n/a n/a rJ/tt Date 08/12/14 __ .n@_ 08/12/14 The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.