ML18064A192: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
0F | 0F | ||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CNL-18-016 Page 3 March 5, 2018 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CNL-18-016 Page 3 March 5, 2018 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 5th day of March 2018. J. ea Vi e President, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Support Services | ||
Executed on this 5th day of March 2018. J. ea Vi e President, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Support Services | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Revision as of 01:19, 6 July 2018
| ML18064A192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar |
| Issue date: | 03/05/2018 |
| From: | Shea J W Tennessee Valley Authority |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 391-WBN-TS-18-03, CNL-18-016 | |
| Download: ML18064A192 (16) | |
Text
Code of Federal Regulations
0F
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CNL-18-016 Page 3 March 5, 2018 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 5th day of March 2018. J. ea Vi e President, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Support Services
Enclosure:
Evaluation of Proposed Change cc (Enclosure):
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Administrator NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Project Manager, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Director, Division of Radiological Health -Tennessee State Department of Environment and Conservation
Code of Federal Regulations
1F
- 1. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in the probability or consequence of an accident previously evaluated?
Code of Federal Regulations
- 2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
- 3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?