ML13255A045: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:Craver, PattiFrom: Logan, DennisSent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:21 AMTo: Subin, Lloyd; Cooper, Paula; Susco, Jeremy | |||
==Subject:== | |||
RE: Columbia--Section 7 consultation with NMFS updateWill do. I have not received electronic copies of the letters Mr. Domingue said that NMFS was sending or hadsent (he wasn't sure) to the EPA and Washington State, and they may come by mail.DennisFrom: Subin, LloydSent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:16 AMTo: Logan, Dennis; Cooper, Paula; Susco, Jeremy | |||
==Subject:== | |||
RE: Columbia--Section 7 consultation with NMFS updatePlease send me all correspondence from NMFS and the BA packet including the letter from Fish and WildlifeLloyd B. SubinAttorneyOffice of the General CounselU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 015 D21Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 301-415-1988 301-415-3725 (fax)Lloyd.Subin@nrc.gov SU.S.NRCNOTE: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE/ | |||
ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCTLIMITED TO NRC UNLESS COMMISSION DETERMINES OTHERWISE. | |||
From: Logan, DennisSent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:31 AMTo: Cooper, Paula; Subin, Lloyd; Susco, Jeremy | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Columbia--Section 7 consultation with NMFS updatePaula, Lloyd, and Jeremy,Yesterday I sent Rich Domingue of NMFS an email with the information that we had in house to address hisrequest for additional information for Columbia Generating Station and told him that we would send the rest ofthe information when we receive it from the licensee. | |||
Yesterday after I had gone for the day, he called and left a message. | |||
The NMFS is sending, or probably sentyesterday, letters to the Washington State Energy Facilities Evaluation Council and the USEPA indicating thatNMFS would like to consult with them or be given consideration regarding endangered species in the NPDESpermitting process for the Columbia Generating Station. | |||
He said NMFS sent copies of those letters to us. He116 | |||
.said th&st NMFS would like to consult with them as they are the agencies that have authority overcharacteristics of the intake structure. | |||
He did not indicate what he expected of us, but now seems tounderstand that we do not have authority over design and operation of intake structures and cooling watersystems.He said that, for an unknown period that he believes will be short, NMFS will wait until it hears from thembefore continuing with the section 7 consultation. | |||
Dennis2}} | |||
Revision as of 06:06, 4 July 2018
| ML13255A045 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 05/10/2012 |
| From: | Logan D T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Cooper P E, Subin L B, Susco J J NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB3 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2013-0265 | |
| Download: ML13255A045 (2) | |
Text
Craver, PattiFrom: Logan, DennisSent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:21 AMTo: Subin, Lloyd; Cooper, Paula; Susco, Jeremy
Subject:
RE: Columbia--Section 7 consultation with NMFS updateWill do. I have not received electronic copies of the letters Mr. Domingue said that NMFS was sending or hadsent (he wasn't sure) to the EPA and Washington State, and they may come by mail.DennisFrom: Subin, LloydSent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:16 AMTo: Logan, Dennis; Cooper, Paula; Susco, Jeremy
Subject:
RE: Columbia--Section 7 consultation with NMFS updatePlease send me all correspondence from NMFS and the BA packet including the letter from Fish and WildlifeLloyd B. SubinAttorneyOffice of the General CounselU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 015 D21Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 301-415-1988 301-415-3725 (fax)Lloyd.Subin@nrc.gov SU.S.NRCNOTE: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE/
ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCTLIMITED TO NRC UNLESS COMMISSION DETERMINES OTHERWISE.
From: Logan, DennisSent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:31 AMTo: Cooper, Paula; Subin, Lloyd; Susco, Jeremy
Subject:
Columbia--Section 7 consultation with NMFS updatePaula, Lloyd, and Jeremy,Yesterday I sent Rich Domingue of NMFS an email with the information that we had in house to address hisrequest for additional information for Columbia Generating Station and told him that we would send the rest ofthe information when we receive it from the licensee.
Yesterday after I had gone for the day, he called and left a message.
The NMFS is sending, or probably sentyesterday, letters to the Washington State Energy Facilities Evaluation Council and the USEPA indicating thatNMFS would like to consult with them or be given consideration regarding endangered species in the NPDESpermitting process for the Columbia Generating Station.
He said NMFS sent copies of those letters to us. He116
.said th&st NMFS would like to consult with them as they are the agencies that have authority overcharacteristics of the intake structure.
He did not indicate what he expected of us, but now seems tounderstand that we do not have authority over design and operation of intake structures and cooling watersystems.He said that, for an unknown period that he believes will be short, NMFS will wait until it hears from thembefore continuing with the section 7 consultation.
Dennis2