ML16076A061: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA  30303-1257 March 15, 2016   
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA  30303-1257
  March 15, 2016  
   
Mr. Joseph W. Shea  
Mr. Joseph W. Shea  
Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C  
Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority  
1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C  
 
Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801  
Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801  
   
   
  SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007, 05000328/2016007
  SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007,  
05000328/2016007
 
Dear Mr. Shea:  
Dear Mr. Shea:  
  The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah  
  The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah  
Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016.   
Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016.   
Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection team.  This  
Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection team.  This  
inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP) 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection," issued November 29, 2013.   
inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP) 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection," issued November 29, 2013.  
   
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function  
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function  
as designed and to support proper system operation.  The inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.   
as designed and to support proper system operation.  The inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.   
  During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with  Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the  3-week onsite inspection.  The schedule is as follows:  
  During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with  Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the  3-week onsite inspection.  The schedule is as follows:  
  * Information-gathering visit:  Week of April 25 - 29, 2016 * Onsite inspection:  Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016  The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify  
 
  * Information-gathering visit:  Week of April 25 - 29, 2016  
* Onsite inspection:  Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016  
  The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify  
risk-significant components and operator actions.  Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified.  Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic  
risk-significant components and operator actions.  Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified.  Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic  
risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the inspection.  
risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the inspection.  
  The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit.  Please provide the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016.   
 
J. Shea 2  Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit.  The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents  
  The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit.  Please provide  
the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016.   
J. Shea 2  
  Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit.  The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents  
required for inspection preparation.  The additional information should be available to the team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection team's preparation week of May 2, 2016. Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details:  
required for inspection preparation.  The additional information should be available to the team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection team's preparation week of May 2, 2016. Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details:  
(1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection,  
(1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection,  
(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6)  
(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6)  
other applicable information.  In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its  
 
other applicable information.  
  In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its  
enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the  
enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the  
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS).  ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).   
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Managem
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.  If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or contact me at 404-997-4607.   
ent System (ADAMS).  ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
   
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.  If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or  
contact me at 404-997-4607.   
 
   
   
       Sincerely,  
       Sincerely,  
       /RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/        Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief        Engineering Branch 1  
 
       /RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/  
       Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief        Engineering Branch 1  
       Division of Reactor Safety  
       Division of Reactor Safety  
  Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328 License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79  
  Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328 License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79  
   
   
Enclosure:   
Enclosure:   
Information Request for Sequoyah   
Information Request for Sequoyah   
   Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases  Inspection  
   Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases  Inspection
cc:  Distribution via Listserv  
cc:  Distribution via Listserv  
   
   
    
    


_________________________  SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE  FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS      SIGNATURE RNP1 GKO FOR JHB1    NAME RPATTERSON JBARTLEY      DATE 3/ 15 /2016 3/  15/2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 E-MAIL COPY?    YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO       
_________________________  SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE  FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS      SIGNATURE RNP1 GKO FOR JHB1    NAME RPATTERSON JBARTLEY      DATE 3/ 15 /2016 3/  15/2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 E-MAIL COPY?    YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO       
   Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION  COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION  Please provide the information electronically in ".pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable format on CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.).  The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and  
   Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION  COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION  
  Please provide the information electronically in ".pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable format on CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.).  The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and  
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.   
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.   
   
   
1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and fires:  a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA:  one sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance  
1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA)  
  b. A list of the top 500 cutsets  2. From your most recent PSA including external events and fires:  a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA:  one sorted by RAW, and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance  
excluding external events and  
  b.  A list of the top 500 cutsets  3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including human reliability worksheets for these items  4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action  
fires:  a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA:  one sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance  
 
  b. A list of the top 500 cutsets  
  2. From your most recent PSA  
including external events and fires:  
  a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA:  one sorted by RAW, and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance  
 
  b.  A list of the top 500 cutsets  
  3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including human reliability worksheets for these items  
  4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action  
 
  5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since  April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision  
  5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since  April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision  
   
   
6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to  
6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to  
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and associated evaluations or calculations   
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and associated evaluations or calculations  
   
7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the station's corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment  
7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the station's corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment  
failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry  
failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry  
Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013  8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs) design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013   
Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013  
  8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs) design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013  
   
9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred   
9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred   
  since April 1, 2013  10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013
  since April 1, 2013  
  10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013
 
    
    
  2  11. List of equipment on the site's Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if  
  2  11. List of equipment on the site's Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if  
available) of your plans to address the issue(s)  12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020   
available) of your plans to address the issue(s)  
  12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020  
   
13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from   
13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from   
  April 1, 2013, to present  14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems  
  April 1, 2013, to present  
  14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems  
 
   
   
15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report  
15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report  
   
   
16. Copy of Technical Specification(s)  17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases  
16. Copy of Technical Specification(s)  
  17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases  
 
   
   
18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s)  
18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s)  
   
   
19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013  20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s)  
19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013  
  20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s)  
 
   
   
21.  Corrective Action Program Procedure(s)  
21.  Corrective Action Program Procedure(s)  
22. One-line diagram of electrical plant (electronic and full size - hard copy week of  March 28, 2016)
   
   
22. One-line diagram of electrical plant (electronic and full size - hard copy week of  March 28, 2016) 
23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams  
23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams  
   
   
24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses  
24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses  
  25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses   
 
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2 size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)   
  25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses  
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs  28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s)  
   
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2 size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)  
   
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs  
  28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s)  
 
29. Copies of corrective action documents (i.e. condition reports (CRs)) associated with findings from previous CDBI, if applicable
30. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures
31. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection
 
3  32. List of any PIPs generated in preparation for this inspection
   
   
29. Copies of corrective action documents (i.e. condition reports (CRs)) associated with findings from previous CDBI, if applicable  30. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures 
33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013)  
31. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection 
  34. Contact information for a person to discu
3  32. List of any PIPs generated in preparation for this inspection
ss PSA information prior to the information-gathering trip (name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)
33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013)  34. Contact information for a person to discuss PSA information prior to the information-gathering trip (name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)
}}
}}

Revision as of 10:54, 30 June 2018

Notification of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases Inspection - NRC Inspection Report 05000327/2016007, 05000328/2016007
ML16076A061
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 03/15/2016
From: Bartley J H
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1
To: Shea J W
Tennessee Valley Authority
References
IR 2016007
Download: ML16076A061 (6)


See also: IR 05000327/2016007

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257

March 15, 2016

Mr. Joseph W. Shea

Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority

1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C

Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007,

05000328/2016007

Dear Mr. Shea:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah

Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016.

Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection team. This

inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP) 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection," issued November 29, 2013.

The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function

as designed and to support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.

During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the 3-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:

  • Information-gathering visit: Week of April 25 - 29, 2016
  • Onsite inspection: Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016

The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify

risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic

risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the inspection.

The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit. Please provide

the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016.

J. Shea 2

Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents

required for inspection preparation. The additional information should be available to the team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection team's preparation week of May 2, 2016. Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details:

(1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection,

(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6)

other applicable information.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its

enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Managem

ent System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or

contact me at 404-997-4607.

Sincerely,

/RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/

Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief Engineering Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328 License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79

Enclosure:

Information Request for Sequoyah

Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases Inspection

cc: Distribution via Listserv

_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS SIGNATURE RNP1 GKO FOR JHB1 NAME RPATTERSON JBARTLEY DATE 3/ 15 /2016 3/ 15/2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

Please provide the information electronically in ".pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable format on CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.). The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and

hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.

1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA)

excluding external events and

fires: a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance

b. A list of the top 500 cutsets

2. From your most recent PSA

including external events and fires:

a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW, and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance

b. A list of the top 500 cutsets

3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including human reliability worksheets for these items

4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action

5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision

6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to

rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and associated evaluations or calculations

7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the station's corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment

failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry

Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013

8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs) design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013

9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred

since April 1, 2013

10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013

2 11. List of equipment on the site's Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if

available) of your plans to address the issue(s)

12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020

13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from

April 1, 2013, to present

14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems

15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report

16. Copy of Technical Specification(s)

17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases

18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s)

19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013

20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s)

21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s)

22. One-line diagram of electrical plant (electronic and full size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)

23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams

24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses

25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses

26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2 size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)

27. Index and Legend for P&IDs

28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s)

29. Copies of corrective action documents (i.e. condition reports (CRs)) associated with findings from previous CDBI, if applicable

30. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures

31. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection

3 32. List of any PIPs generated in preparation for this inspection

33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013)

34. Contact information for a person to discu

ss PSA information prior to the information-gathering trip (name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)