ML16076A061: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 | |||
March 15, 2016 | |||
Mr. Joseph W. Shea | Mr. Joseph W. Shea | ||
Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C | Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority | ||
1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C | |||
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | ||
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007, 05000328/2016007 | SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007, | ||
05000328/2016007 | |||
Dear Mr. Shea: | Dear Mr. Shea: | ||
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah | The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah | ||
Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016. | Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016. | ||
Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection team. This | Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection team. This | ||
inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP) 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection," issued November 29, 2013. | inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP) 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection," issued November 29, 2013. | ||
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function | The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function | ||
as designed and to support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications. | as designed and to support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications. | ||
During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the 3-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows: | During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the 3-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows: | ||
* Information-gathering visit: Week of April 25 - 29, 2016 * Onsite inspection: Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016 The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify | |||
* Information-gathering visit: Week of April 25 - 29, 2016 | |||
* Onsite inspection: Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016 | |||
The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify | |||
risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic | risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic | ||
risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the inspection. | risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the inspection. | ||
The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit. Please provide the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016. | |||
J. Shea 2 Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents | The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit. Please provide | ||
the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016. | |||
J. Shea 2 | |||
Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents | |||
required for inspection preparation. The additional information should be available to the team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection team's preparation week of May 2, 2016. Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details: | required for inspection preparation. The additional information should be available to the team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection team's preparation week of May 2, 2016. Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details: | ||
(1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection, | (1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection, | ||
(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6) | (3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6) | ||
other applicable information. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its | |||
other applicable information. | |||
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its | |||
enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the | enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the | ||
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and | NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Managem | ||
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or contact me at 404-997-4607. | ent System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html | ||
(the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or | |||
contact me at 404-997-4607. | |||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/ Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief Engineering Branch 1 | |||
/RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/ | |||
Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief Engineering Branch 1 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | Division of Reactor Safety | ||
Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328 License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79 | Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328 License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79 | ||
Enclosure: | Enclosure: | ||
Information Request for Sequoyah | Information Request for Sequoyah | ||
Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases Inspection | Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases Inspection | ||
cc: Distribution via Listserv | cc: Distribution via Listserv | ||
_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS SIGNATURE RNP1 GKO FOR JHB1 NAME RPATTERSON JBARTLEY DATE 3/ 15 /2016 3/ 15/2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO | _________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS SIGNATURE RNP1 GKO FOR JHB1 NAME RPATTERSON JBARTLEY DATE 3/ 15 /2016 3/ 15/2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO | ||
Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION Please provide the information electronically in ".pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable format on CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.). The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and | Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | ||
Please provide the information electronically in ".pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable format on CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.). The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and | |||
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. | hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. | ||
1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and fires: a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance | 1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) | ||
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets 2. From your most recent PSA including external events and fires: a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW, and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance | excluding external events and | ||
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets 3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including human reliability worksheets for these items 4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action | fires: a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance | ||
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets | |||
2. From your most recent PSA | |||
including external events and fires: | |||
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW, and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance | |||
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets | |||
3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including human reliability worksheets for these items | |||
4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action | |||
5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision | 5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision | ||
6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to | 6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to | ||
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and associated evaluations or calculations | rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and associated evaluations or calculations | ||
7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the station's corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment | 7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the station's corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment | ||
failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry | failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry | ||
Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013 8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs) design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013 | Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013 | ||
8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs) design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013 | |||
9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred | 9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred | ||
since April 1, 2013 10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013 | since April 1, 2013 | ||
10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013 | |||
2 11. List of equipment on the site's Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if | 2 11. List of equipment on the site's Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if | ||
available) of your plans to address the issue(s) 12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020 | available) of your plans to address the issue(s) | ||
12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020 | |||
13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from | 13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from | ||
April 1, 2013, to present 14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems | April 1, 2013, to present | ||
14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems | |||
15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report | 15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report | ||
16. Copy of Technical Specification(s) 17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases | 16. Copy of Technical Specification(s) | ||
17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases | |||
18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s) | 18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s) | ||
19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013 20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s) | 19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013 | ||
20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s) | |||
21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s) | 21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s) | ||
22. One-line diagram of electrical plant (electronic and full size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016) | |||
23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams | 23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams | ||
24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses | 24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses | ||
25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses | |||
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2 size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016) | 25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses | ||
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs 28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s) | |||
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2 size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016) | |||
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs | |||
28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s) | |||
29. Copies of corrective action documents (i.e. condition reports (CRs)) associated with findings from previous CDBI, if applicable | |||
30. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures | |||
31. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection | |||
3 32. List of any PIPs generated in preparation for this inspection | |||
33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013) | |||
34. Contact information for a person to discu | |||
ss PSA information prior to the information-gathering trip (name, title, phone number, and e-mail address) | |||
33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013) 34. Contact information for a person to | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:54, 30 June 2018
| ML16076A061 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah |
| Issue date: | 03/15/2016 |
| From: | Bartley J H NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1 |
| To: | Shea J W Tennessee Valley Authority |
| References | |
| IR 2016007 | |
| Download: ML16076A061 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000327/2016007
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257
March 15, 2016
Mr. Joseph W. Shea
Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007,
Dear Mr. Shea:
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah
Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016.
Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection team. This
inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP) 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection," issued November 29, 2013.
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function
as designed and to support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.
During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the 3-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:
- Information-gathering visit: Week of April 25 - 29, 2016
- Onsite inspection: Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016
The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify
risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic
risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the inspection.
The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit. Please provide
the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016.
J. Shea 2
Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents
required for inspection preparation. The additional information should be available to the team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection team's preparation week of May 2, 2016. Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details:
(1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection,
(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6)
other applicable information.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its
enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Managem
ent System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or
contact me at 404-997-4607.
Sincerely,
/RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/
Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief Engineering Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328 License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79
Enclosure:
Information Request for Sequoyah
Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases Inspection
cc: Distribution via Listserv
_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS SIGNATURE RNP1 GKO FOR JHB1 NAME RPATTERSON JBARTLEY DATE 3/ 15 /2016 3/ 15/2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
Please provide the information electronically in ".pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable format on CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.). The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.
1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA)
excluding external events and
fires: a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets
2. From your most recent PSA
including external events and fires:
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW, and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets
3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including human reliability worksheets for these items
4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action
5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision
6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and associated evaluations or calculations
7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the station's corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment
failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry
Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013
8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs) design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013
9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred
since April 1, 2013
10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013
2 11. List of equipment on the site's Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if
available) of your plans to address the issue(s)
12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020
13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from
April 1, 2013, to present
14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems
15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
16. Copy of Technical Specification(s)
17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases
18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s)
19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013
20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s)
21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s)
22. One-line diagram of electrical plant (electronic and full size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)
23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams
24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses
25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2 size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs
28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s)
29. Copies of corrective action documents (i.e. condition reports (CRs)) associated with findings from previous CDBI, if applicable
30. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures
31. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection
3 32. List of any PIPs generated in preparation for this inspection
33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013)
34. Contact information for a person to discu
ss PSA information prior to the information-gathering trip (name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)