ML20236S713: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000348/1998009]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20236S713
| issue date = 06/29/1998
| title = Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-348/98-09. Statement Made in Ltr Interpreted to Be Assurance to NRC to Have Confidence That NRC Requirements Will Be Adhered to
| author name = Fredrickson P
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee name = Chesser L
| addressee affiliation = AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
| docket = 05000348
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-348-98-09, 50-348-98-9, IA-98-030, IA-98-30, NUDOCS 9807270184
| title reference date = 06-03-1998
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000348/1998009]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
- _ - _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ . _
/pn rf49'o,'
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
8
REGION 11
n
$f
y
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
"'
e
61 FORSYTH STREET. SW, SUITE 23T85
. h,
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30303-3415
.....
.
'
June 29, 1998
,
IA 98-030
I
'Mr. Lloyd W. Chesser
'
>
,,
.[HOME ADDRESS DELETED
PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 2.206]
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-348/98-09 AND
OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS REPORT N0. 2-97-011)
Dear Mr. Chesser:
Thank you for your response which we received on June 3. 1998, to our Notice
of Violation issued on May 15, 1998. We have evaluated your response and
t
found that it meets the intent of 10 CFR 2.201.
' Although your letter did not explicitly state the specific actions you have
taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence, the tone of
1
your. letter indicates that the type of activities which caused this violation
i
will not be repeated. .Specifically, you stated in your letter that "I will
not be worried about deadlines in the future.
I will be more concerned about.
the quality of work I do from now on."
The NRC has interpreted this statement
..
to be your assurance to the NRC. that we can have confidence that you will
l
adhere to NRC requirements should you be employed in the nuclear industry in
;
_the future.
Our review regarding this matter has been completed. This letter closes our
'
j
-actions associated with this violation.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of
the NRC's " Rules of Practice." Part 2. Title 10. Code of Federal Regulations,
a copy of this letter, with your address removed, will be placed in the NRC
Public Document Room.
Si cerely.
$
i
i
l
Pa
E. Fredrickson, Chief
Maintenance Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
. h0
J
h
(fY
9807270184 980629
f
,
PDR
ADOCK 05000348 m
'
G
PDR
h
(
- - - - - - _ - - _ _ -
-
}}

Latest revision as of 22:12, 22 May 2025

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-348/98-09. Statement Made in Ltr Interpreted to Be Assurance to NRC to Have Confidence That NRC Requirements Will Be Adhered to
ML20236S713
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/29/1998
From: Fredrickson P
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Chesser L
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
50-348-98-09, 50-348-98-9, IA-98-030, IA-98-30, NUDOCS 9807270184
Download: ML20236S713 (1)


See also: IR 05000348/1998009

Text

-

- _ - _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ . _

/pn rf49'o,'

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

8

REGION 11

n

$f

y

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER

"'

e

61 FORSYTH STREET. SW, SUITE 23T85

. h,

ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30303-3415

.....

.

'

June 29, 1998

,

IA 98-030

I

'Mr. Lloyd W. Chesser

'

>

,,

.[HOME ADDRESS DELETED

PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 2.206]

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-348/98-09 AND

OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS REPORT N0. 2-97-011)

Dear Mr. Chesser:

Thank you for your response which we received on June 3. 1998, to our Notice

of Violation issued on May 15, 1998. We have evaluated your response and

t

found that it meets the intent of 10 CFR 2.201.

' Although your letter did not explicitly state the specific actions you have

taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence, the tone of

1

your. letter indicates that the type of activities which caused this violation

i

will not be repeated. .Specifically, you stated in your letter that "I will

not be worried about deadlines in the future.

I will be more concerned about.

the quality of work I do from now on."

The NRC has interpreted this statement

..

to be your assurance to the NRC. that we can have confidence that you will

l

adhere to NRC requirements should you be employed in the nuclear industry in

_the future.

Our review regarding this matter has been completed. This letter closes our

'

j

-actions associated with this violation.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of

the NRC's " Rules of Practice." Part 2. Title 10. Code of Federal Regulations,

a copy of this letter, with your address removed, will be placed in the NRC

Public Document Room.

Si cerely.

$

i

i

l

Pa

E. Fredrickson, Chief

Maintenance Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

. h0

J

h

(fY

9807270184 980629

f

,

PDR

ADOCK 05000348 m

'

G

PDR

h

(

- - - - - - _ - - _ _ -

-