Regulatory Guide 3.7: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:3/21/73 U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
{{#Wiki_filter:3/21/73 U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION  
                                REGULATORY
REGULATORY GUIDE
                                DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDS
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDS  
                                                                                                                              GUIDE
REGULATORY GUIDE 3.7 MONITORING OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES AND VAPORS IN  
                                                                REGULATORY GUIDE 3.7 MONITORING OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES AND VAPORS IN
PLUTONIUM PROCESSING AND FUEL FABRICATION PLANTS
                              PLUTONIUM PROCESSING AND FUEL FABRICATION PLANTS


==A. INTRODUCTION==
==A. INTRODUCTION==
Combustible gases and vapors and their limits of flammability in various oxidizing atmospheres have been Each applicant for a license to possess and use                               studied by the Bureau of Mines.' 7 Flammability has special nuclear material in a plutonium processing and                               been found to be a function of the type of combustible fuel fabrication plant as defined in § 70.4(r) of 10 CFR                             gas, oxidant concentration, temperature, humidity, Part 70, "Special Nuclear Material," must fulfill the                                 vessel characteristics, and direction of flame provisions of § 70.23, "Requirements for the Approval                               propagation, among other things. Within the of Applications." Subparagraphs § 70.23(a)(3) and (4)                                 confinement barriers of a plutonium processing and fuel require that the applicant's proposed equipment and                                   fabrication plant, flammable mixtures must be facilities and proposed procedures be adequate to                                     precluded, and therefore the maximum allowable protect health and to minimize danger to life or                                     concentration of any combustible gas or vapor in a property. Where combustible gases and solvents are used                             mixture should always be below the lower limit of within the confinement barriers of a plutonium                                        flammability as given for that particular mixture.
Each applicant for a license to possess and use special nuclear material in a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant as defined in § 70.4(r) of 10 CFR  
Part 70, "Special Nuclear Material," must fulfill the provisions of § 70.23, "Requirements for the Approval of Applications." Subparagraphs § 70.23(a)(3) and (4)  
require that the applicant's proposed equipment and facilities and proposed procedures be adequate to protect health and to minimize danger to life or property. Where combustible gases and solvents are used within the confinement barriers of a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant, measures are needed to protect against the possibility of the formation of flammable mixtures with these gases and vapors. The presence of such a flammable mixture within the multiple confinement barriers of the plant
"could result in a fire or explosion which might breach one or more of the confinement barriers and allow radioactive material to be dispersed within regions of the plant and possibly the environs. This regulatory guide describes an acceptable program for complying with the Commission's regulations with regard to protecting against the possibility of the formation of flammable mixtures with combustible gases and vapors.


processing and fuel fabrication plant, measures are needed to protect against the possibility of the                                           Some common sources of combustible gases and formation of flammable mixtures with these gases and                               vapors that have led to fires and explosions within vapors. The presence of such a flammable mixture                                    confinement barriers have been (1) solvents or coolants within the multiple confinement barriers of the plant                                used in chemical processing, surface finishing, or
==B. DISCUSSION==
"could result in a fire or explosion which might breach                              equipment maintenance, (2) reducing atmospheres used one or more of the confinement barriers and allow                                    in conversion and sintering furnaces, and (3)
Within a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant, a postulated fire or explosion is an accident that can furnish sufficient energy for the release and dispersal of radioactive material from the confinement barriers to the regions occupied by working personnel and, depending upon the severity of the accident, to the environs. Therefore, conditions that can lead to these hazardous events must be precluded. One such event is the uncontrolled or undetected formation of a flammable mixture of a combustible gas or vapor and an oxidant followed by its deflagration or detonation.
radioactive material to be dispersed within regions of the                          decomposition products formed during waste plant and possibly the environs. This regulatory guide                              incineration and chemical processing. Measures have describes an acceptable program for complying with the                              been developed to prevent the recurrence of Commission's regulations with regard to protecting                                    flammability conditions and have been based on one or against the possibility of the formation of flammable                                more of the following concepts: (I) prohibiting or mixtures with combustible gases and vapors.                                          restricting the use of the combustible material, (2) inert gas purging within the confinement barriers where  
 
Combustible gases and vapors and their limits of flammability in various oxidizing atmospheres have been studied by the Bureau of Mines.' 7 Flammability has been found to be a function of the type of combustible gas, oxidant concentration, temperature, humidity, vessel characteristics, and direction of flame propagation, among other things.
 
Within the confinement barriers of a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant, flammable mixtures must be precluded, and therefore the maximum allowable concentration of any combustible gas or vapor in a mixture should always be below the lower limit of flammability as given for that particular mixture.
 
Some common sources of combustible gases and vapors that have led to fires and explosions within confinement barriers have been (1) solvents or coolants used in chemical processing, surface finishing, or equipment maintenance, (2) reducing atmospheres used in conversion and sintering furnaces, and  
(3)  
decomposition products formed during waste incineration and chemical processing. Measures have been developed to prevent the recurrence of flammability conditions and have been based on one or more of the following concepts: (I) prohibiting or restricting the use of the combustible material, (2) inert gas purging within the confinement barriers where combustible gases or vapors are expected, thus reducing or eliminating the oxidant content, or increasing the air flow within these confinement barriers, thus diluting the combustible concentration below the lower limit for flammability, and (3) establishing other procedural changes based upon the results of the accident investigation.
 
'Bureau of Mines Bulletin 503, "Limits of Flammability of Gases and Vapors," H. F. Coward and G. W. Jones.
 
I Bureau of Mines Bulletin
627,
"Flammability Characteristics of Combustible Gases and Vapors,"
M. G.


==B. DISCUSSION==
Zabetakis.
combustible gases or vapors are expected, thus reducing or eliminating the oxidant content, or increasing the air Within a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication                            flow within these confinement barriers, thus diluting the plant, a postulated fire or explosion is an accident that                            combustible concentration below the lower limit for can furnish sufficient energy for the release and dispersal                          flammability, and (3) establishing other procedural of radioactive material from the confinement barriers to                            changes based upon the results of the accident the regions occupied by working personnel and,                                        investigation.


depending upon the severity of the accident, to the environs. Therefore, conditions that can lead to these                                    'Bureau of Mines Bulletin 503, "Limits of Flammability of hazardous events must be precluded. One such event is                              Gases and Vapors," H. F. Coward and G. W. Jones.
USAEC REGULATORY GUIDES
Copie of published guild may be obtained by request indicating the divisions desired to the US. Atomic Energy Commission, Wiahington. D.C. 20645, Regulatory Guides Ie issued to desclrae and make available to the public Attention: Director of Regulatory Standards. Comments and suggestions for met' od- acpteble to the AEC Regulatory staff of Implementing specific parts of Inpo4 enuats in thee guidos we encouraged end should be sent to the Secretary the Commbelonm'
regulations, to delineate schnslque. used by the ptaff In of the Commnilon. US. Atomic Energy Commission. Washington. D.C. 20545.


the uncontrolled or undetected formation of a                                            I Bureau of Mines Bulletin 627, "Flammability flammable mixture of a combustible gas or vapor and an                              Characteristics of Combustible Gases and Vapors," M. G.
eowluating specific problems or postulated aciklents, or to provide giuldnc to Attenition: Chief. Public Proceedings Staff.


oxidant followed by its deflagration or detonation.                                Zabetakis.
spalisents. Regulatory Guides ae not substitutes for regulations and complance with them Is not required. Methods and Solutlons different from those sat out In The guids am issued in the following ten broad divisions:
tie guides will be cceptebhl If they provide a balei for the findings requisite to to isuanrc or coatinuarce of a permit or lioense by the Commisslon.


USAEC REGULATORY GUIDES                                      Copie of published guild      may be obtained by request indicating the divisions desired to the US. Atomic Energy Commission, Wiahington. D.C. 20645, Regulatory Guides      Ie issued to desclrae and make available to the public      Attention: Director of Regulatory Standards. Comments and suggestions for met' od- acpteble to the AEC Regulatory staff of Implementing specific parts of    Inpo4 enuats in thee guidos we encouraged end should be sent to the Secretary the Commbelonm'    regulations, to delineate schnslque. used by the ptaff In      of the Commnilon. US. Atomic Energy Commission. Washington. D.C. 20545.
I. Power eavctors


eowluating specific problems or postulated aciklents, or to provide giuldnc to    Attenition: Chief. Public Proceedings Staff.
===6. Products ===
2. Research end Test Reactort


spalisents. Regulatory Guides ae not substitutes for regulations and complance with them Is not required. Methods and Solutlons different from those sat out In  The guids am issued in the following ten broad divisions:
===7. Transportation ===
tie guides will be cceptebhl If they provide a balei for the findings requisite to to isuanrc or coatinuarce of a permit or lioense by the Commisslon.                  I. Power  eavctors                       
3. Fuels end Materials Facilities
8. Occupational Health Pub#visold guides will be revised periodically, a appropriat


===6. Products===
====e. to accommodate ====
                                                                                    2. Research end Test Reactort               
4. Environmental and Siting
9. Antitrust Review comments and to reflact .sw information or ixperlence.


===7. Transportation===
5. Matarias and Plant Protection  
                                                                                    3. Fuels end Materials Facilities            8. Occupational Health Pub#visold guides will be revised periodically, a appropriate. to accommodate      4. Environmental and Siting                  9. Antitrust Review comments and to reflact .sw information or ixperlence.                              5. Matarias and Plant Protection           1
1


===0. General===
===0. General===


While this arrangement has for the most part been       abnormal conditions, the formation of a flammable or effective in preventing the recurrence of fires and           explosive mixture within the confinement barriers explosions for specific processes within an individual       should be precluded by establishing suitable process facility, such procedures usually have been initiated         parameters and plant operating procedures.
While this arrangement has for the most part been effective in preventing the recurrence of fires and explosions for specific processes within an individual facility, such procedures usually have been initiated and/or emphasized only after an accident and may suffer with time from relaxation of vigilance, process modifications, and the formation of unexpected combustible products. The monitoring and alarm system for combustible gases and vapors discussed in this regulatory guide is expected to contribute to the safe operation of the plant in many ways, especially in the following aspects: (1) an initial fire or explosion accident is unlikely to happen since an alarm will indicate when the flammable limit is being approached,
(2) the need for administrative involvement should be minimal since the system can provide continuous automatic surveillance, and (3) unexpected combustible products will have a high probability of being detected.
 
==C. REGULATORY POSITION==
I.
 
All processes and plant operations carried out in or associated with the confinement barriers of a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant should be evaluated as potential sources of combustible solvents, gases, or vapors.
 
2.
 
Where sources of combustible solvents, gases, or vapors can be identified or postulated under normal or abnormal conditions, the formation of a flammable or explosive mixture within the confinement barriers should be precluded by establishing suitable process parameters and plant operating procedures.
 
3.
 
Assurance that the established processing and operating procedures are maintaining safe conditions should be provided by suitable continuous monitoring systems appropriately placed within those confinement barriers that were identified in C. 1. above. These systems should give an audible and visual local alarm indication to operating personnel when the prescribed safe limits for combustible gas and vapor mixtures have been achieved or exceeded.
 
4.


and/or emphasized only after an accident and may suffer with time from relaxation of vigilance, process                    3. Assurance that the established processing and modifications, and the formation of unexpected                operating procedures are maintaining safe conditions combustible products. The monitoring and alarm system        should be provided by suitable continuous monitoring for combustible gases and vapors discussed in this            systems appropriately placed within those confinement regulatory guide is expected to contribute to the safe        barriers that were identified in C. 1. above. These systems operation of the plant in many ways, especially in the        should give an audible and visual local alarm indication following aspects: (1) an initial fire or explosion          to operating personnel when the prescribed safe limits accident is unlikely to happen since an alarm will            for combustible gas and vapor mixtures have been indicate when the flammable limit is being approached,        achieved or exceeded.
The procedure for remedial action to be taken in the event of an alarm signal should be established.


(2) the need for administrative involvement should be minimal since the system can provide continuous                    4. The procedure for remedial action to be taken automatic surveillance, and (3) unexpected combustible        in the event of an alarm signal should be established.
5.


products will have a high probability of being detected.
The absence of an evident ignition source within those confinement barriers postulated to contain combustible gases, solvents, or vapors does not relieve the requirement for a monitoring and alarm system.


5. The absence of an evident ignition source
6.


==C. REGULATORY POSITION==
The monitoring and alarm system itself should not introduce an ignition source and should not affect the confinement integrity.
within those confinement barriers postulated to contain combustible gases, solvents, or vapors does not relieve I. All processes and plant operations carried out        the requirement for a monitoring and alarm system.


in or associated with the confinement barriers of a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant should              6. The monitoring and alarm system itself should be evaluated as potential sources of combustible              not introduce an ignition source and should not affect solvents, gases, or vapors.                                    the confinement integrity.
7.


2. Where sources of combustible solvents, gases, or          7. The monitoring and alarm system should be vapors can be identified or postulated under normal or        designed for in-place calibration and testing.
The monitoring and alarm system should be designed for in-place calibration and testing.


3.7-2}}
3.7-2}}


{{RG-Nav}}
{{RG-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 02:06, 17 January 2025

Monitoring of Combustible Gases & Vapors in Plutonium Processing & Fuel Fabrication Plants
ML003740201
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/31/1973
From:
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
References
RG-3.7
Download: ML003740201 (2)


3/21/73 U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

REGULATORY GUIDE

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDS

REGULATORY GUIDE 3.7 MONITORING OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES AND VAPORS IN

PLUTONIUM PROCESSING AND FUEL FABRICATION PLANTS

A. INTRODUCTION

Each applicant for a license to possess and use special nuclear material in a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant as defined in § 70.4(r) of 10 CFR

Part 70, "Special Nuclear Material," must fulfill the provisions of § 70.23, "Requirements for the Approval of Applications." Subparagraphs § 70.23(a)(3) and (4)

require that the applicant's proposed equipment and facilities and proposed procedures be adequate to protect health and to minimize danger to life or property. Where combustible gases and solvents are used within the confinement barriers of a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant, measures are needed to protect against the possibility of the formation of flammable mixtures with these gases and vapors. The presence of such a flammable mixture within the multiple confinement barriers of the plant

"could result in a fire or explosion which might breach one or more of the confinement barriers and allow radioactive material to be dispersed within regions of the plant and possibly the environs. This regulatory guide describes an acceptable program for complying with the Commission's regulations with regard to protecting against the possibility of the formation of flammable mixtures with combustible gases and vapors.

B. DISCUSSION

Within a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant, a postulated fire or explosion is an accident that can furnish sufficient energy for the release and dispersal of radioactive material from the confinement barriers to the regions occupied by working personnel and, depending upon the severity of the accident, to the environs. Therefore, conditions that can lead to these hazardous events must be precluded. One such event is the uncontrolled or undetected formation of a flammable mixture of a combustible gas or vapor and an oxidant followed by its deflagration or detonation.

Combustible gases and vapors and their limits of flammability in various oxidizing atmospheres have been studied by the Bureau of Mines.' 7 Flammability has been found to be a function of the type of combustible gas, oxidant concentration, temperature, humidity, vessel characteristics, and direction of flame propagation, among other things.

Within the confinement barriers of a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant, flammable mixtures must be precluded, and therefore the maximum allowable concentration of any combustible gas or vapor in a mixture should always be below the lower limit of flammability as given for that particular mixture.

Some common sources of combustible gases and vapors that have led to fires and explosions within confinement barriers have been (1) solvents or coolants used in chemical processing, surface finishing, or equipment maintenance, (2) reducing atmospheres used in conversion and sintering furnaces, and

(3)

decomposition products formed during waste incineration and chemical processing. Measures have been developed to prevent the recurrence of flammability conditions and have been based on one or more of the following concepts: (I) prohibiting or restricting the use of the combustible material, (2) inert gas purging within the confinement barriers where combustible gases or vapors are expected, thus reducing or eliminating the oxidant content, or increasing the air flow within these confinement barriers, thus diluting the combustible concentration below the lower limit for flammability, and (3) establishing other procedural changes based upon the results of the accident investigation.

'Bureau of Mines Bulletin 503, "Limits of Flammability of Gases and Vapors," H. F. Coward and G. W. Jones.

I Bureau of Mines Bulletin

627,

"Flammability Characteristics of Combustible Gases and Vapors,"

M. G.

Zabetakis.

USAEC REGULATORY GUIDES

Copie of published guild may be obtained by request indicating the divisions desired to the US. Atomic Energy Commission, Wiahington. D.C. 20645, Regulatory Guides Ie issued to desclrae and make available to the public Attention: Director of Regulatory Standards. Comments and suggestions for met' od- acpteble to the AEC Regulatory staff of Implementing specific parts of Inpo4 enuats in thee guidos we encouraged end should be sent to the Secretary the Commbelonm'

regulations, to delineate schnslque. used by the ptaff In of the Commnilon. US. Atomic Energy Commission. Washington. D.C. 20545.

eowluating specific problems or postulated aciklents, or to provide giuldnc to Attenition: Chief. Public Proceedings Staff.

spalisents. Regulatory Guides ae not substitutes for regulations and complance with them Is not required. Methods and Solutlons different from those sat out In The guids am issued in the following ten broad divisions:

tie guides will be cceptebhl If they provide a balei for the findings requisite to to isuanrc or coatinuarce of a permit or lioense by the Commisslon.

I. Power eavctors

6. Products

2. Research end Test Reactort

7. Transportation

3. Fuels end Materials Facilities

8. Occupational Health Pub#visold guides will be revised periodically, a appropriat

e. to accommodate

4. Environmental and Siting

9. Antitrust Review comments and to reflact .sw information or ixperlence.

5. Matarias and Plant Protection

1

0. General

While this arrangement has for the most part been effective in preventing the recurrence of fires and explosions for specific processes within an individual facility, such procedures usually have been initiated and/or emphasized only after an accident and may suffer with time from relaxation of vigilance, process modifications, and the formation of unexpected combustible products. The monitoring and alarm system for combustible gases and vapors discussed in this regulatory guide is expected to contribute to the safe operation of the plant in many ways, especially in the following aspects: (1) an initial fire or explosion accident is unlikely to happen since an alarm will indicate when the flammable limit is being approached,

(2) the need for administrative involvement should be minimal since the system can provide continuous automatic surveillance, and (3) unexpected combustible products will have a high probability of being detected.

C. REGULATORY POSITION

I.

All processes and plant operations carried out in or associated with the confinement barriers of a plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant should be evaluated as potential sources of combustible solvents, gases, or vapors.

2.

Where sources of combustible solvents, gases, or vapors can be identified or postulated under normal or abnormal conditions, the formation of a flammable or explosive mixture within the confinement barriers should be precluded by establishing suitable process parameters and plant operating procedures.

3.

Assurance that the established processing and operating procedures are maintaining safe conditions should be provided by suitable continuous monitoring systems appropriately placed within those confinement barriers that were identified in C. 1. above. These systems should give an audible and visual local alarm indication to operating personnel when the prescribed safe limits for combustible gas and vapor mixtures have been achieved or exceeded.

4.

The procedure for remedial action to be taken in the event of an alarm signal should be established.

5.

The absence of an evident ignition source within those confinement barriers postulated to contain combustible gases, solvents, or vapors does not relieve the requirement for a monitoring and alarm system.

6.

The monitoring and alarm system itself should not introduce an ignition source and should not affect the confinement integrity.

7.

The monitoring and alarm system should be designed for in-place calibration and testing.

3.7-2