ML020250090

Final - Operating Section a (RO & SRO)

ML020250090
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	01/04/2002
From:	Wilson M Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
050-423/2001-302 IR-01-302
Download: ML020250090 (122)

Text

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

Millstone 3 Date of Examination: January 7-10, 2002 Examination Level (circle one):

SRO Operating Test Number: A-1 Administrative Describe method of evaluation:

Topic/Subject

1. ONE Administrative JPM, OR Description

2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1.1 Execute JPM Determine the effect and response to degrading Intake conditions Procedure using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

Steps (GEN 2.1.20) (41.10/43.5/45.12)

A.1.2 Review an JPM Review an Estimated Critical Position.

Estimated Critical Position (Sys:001, SRO: 3.9 A4.10)

A.2 Tagging and JPM Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, Clearance review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

Procedures (GEN 2.2.13)

(41.10/45.13)

A.3 Review and JPM Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste discharge Approve permit.

Release Permits (GEN 2.3.6)

(43.4/45.10)

A.4 E-Plan JPM Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager.

Actions (GEN 2.4.44)

(43.5/45.11)

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

JPM ID Number:

Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

SRO-A1.1 Revision:

1 II. Initiated:

10/31/01 Date I1l.

Reviewed:

Ray Martin Technical Reviewer I771ZOJ+/-VL IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nucl dar Training Supervisor 11/15/01 Date Date

/oý //(6 Pa 1 of 12 f

ADMIN JPM SRO-AI.1

SUMMARY

OF CHANGES RE: NRC VALIDATION Removed steps 2-10 as they related to a YELLOW/YELLOW condition.

Moved step 11 to the step 2 position.

Deleted cue at old step 10 as the Circ Water pump trip follows immediately.

Deleted the "Initial" initiating cue Changed validated time to 5 minutes.

Made OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions, a required material Added OP 3325A, Circulating Water, as a General Reference

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility:

Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number:

SRO-AI.1 Revision:

Task

Title:

System:

Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

Intake Structure Time Critical Task:

) YES (X)

NO Validated Time (minutes):

5 min Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

341-01-107, Response to degrading intake conditions.

SRO X

RO PEO K/A Number:

GEN.2.1.20, Ability to execute procedure steps K/A Rating:

Method of Testing:

Location:

Simulated Performance:

Classroom:

X Actual Performance:

Simulator:

In-Plant::

Task Standards:

Required Materials:

General

References:

Response to degrading intake conditions SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination, Rev. 7 OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions, Rev.

7 OP 3325A, Circulating Water 2 of 8 4.3/4.2 X

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

SRO-AI.1 Revision:

1 Simulator Requirements:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

You are the Shift Manager and the unit is experiencing degrading conditions at the intake structure. The Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is keeping SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination current. The last surveillance was done at 0800 and indicated a plant factor condition of YELLOW, an environmental factor condition of YELLOW.

The "B" Screen Wash pump has just tripped due to an electrical fault. Maintenance estimates 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> to restore the pump to operability.

Wind speed, from Met. Tower data, has increased to a steady 27 mph.

The re-calculated surveillance indicated a plant factor condition of RED, an environmental factor condition of RED.

• • • • NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 8 NONE I-I

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

SRO-AI.1 Task

Title:

Revision:

1 Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

Start Time:

EXAMINER: Give candidate the completed copy of SP 3665.2 & the MB6 sheet.

1 2

X X

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Review SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination (0800).

Review SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination relative to the description of plant and environmental conditions and understand the current condition.

SAT UNSAT REVIEW OP 3215 procedure steps and determine which are applicable with the plant factor condition "RED",

OR the environmental factor condition "RED". (step 4.5)

Evaluate factor conditions and returns to procedure section 4.5 Discuss the following:

"* NOTIFY Intake Structure Coordinator and Operations management of the conditions affecting the Intake Structure

"* RESTORE maximum steam dumps and atmospheric dumps to service

"* COMMENCE continuous trash rack cleaning

"* OPEN trash trough trap door if necessary

"* OPEN Plexiglas inspection doors at backside debris trough to monitor debris spray and carryover

"* EVALUATE the condition of the following systems

- Steam Dump System 4 of 8 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

SRO-A1.1 Revision:

1 Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

- Condenser Vacuum Systems

- Screenwash Systems

- Service Water Systems

- Circulating Water Systems Grade:

SAT UNSAT 3

x Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

4 Standards:

Grade:

Monitor conditions in the following systems (step 4.6)

• Steam Dump System

• Condenser Vacuum Systems

• Screenwash Systems Service Water Systems Circulating Water Systems Discusses the need to monitor systems affected by intake challenges SAT UNSAT IF circ pump amps, discharge pressure, and condenser delta T indicate the waterbox is fouling, Refer To OP 3325A, "Circulating Water," and PERFORM backwashes (setp 4.7)

Discusses the need to perform backwashes during intake challenges SAT UNSAT 5

x Performance Step:

IF the circulating pumps in the same condenser bay are lost, TRIP the reactor and Go To EOP 35 E-0, "Reactor Trip or Safety Injection" (step 4.9) 5 of 8 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

SRO-AI.1 Task

Title:

Revision:

1 Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

Standards:

Grade:

Candidate determines that A & B Circ Pumps ARE in the same condenser bay and decides to trip the reactor.

SAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

6 of 8 GRADE x

UNSAT

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

SRO-A1.1 Revision:

1 For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

Validated Time (minutes):

YES NO X

5 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

7 of 8

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

SRO-AI.1 You are the Shift Manager and the unit is experiencing degrading conditions at the intake structure. The Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is keeping SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination current. The last surveillance was done at 0800 and indicated a plant factor condition of YELLOW, an environmental factor condition of YELLOW.

The "B" Screen Wash pump has just tripped due to an electrical fault. Maintenance estimates 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> to restore the pump to operability.

Wind speed, from Met. Tower data, has increased to a steady 27 mph.

The re-calculated surveillance indicated a plant factor condition of RED, an environmental factor condition of RED.

8 of 8

SSurveillanee For.m Generic Inf

=ormation Rev.-No.

Form Title IPr o

Intake Structure Condition DeterminationI 008 Reference Procedure Applicable Tech. Spec.

Applicability (Tech. Spec.)

Frequency SP 3665.2 N/A N/AI s

This form is being used for the following:

o Tech Spec Surveillance C) System Alignment O Other:

o Maintenance Restoration Non-Tech S(pc L (Retest) v iln e( M Stpecific' Information" Awe Number Late Date i Schedule Start Date Performance Modes Prerequisites Completed (Initials)

Precautions Noted (Initials) 1, 2", 3", and 4*

Test Authorized By Date Partial Surveillance Perlormed By Date / Time Yes No Accepted By Date I Time Acceptance Criteria Satisfied Approved By (Department Head or Designee)

Date

[

Yes

]

No Shift Manager Notified of Failed Test Date CR#:

Surveillance Information Test Equipment Type OA Number Cal Due Date N/A N/A N/A Comments

• With vacuum in condenser SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 Page l of 5

Intake Structure Condition Determination Each shift: CIRCLE the applicable box In each 08 08* 20 20*

section, then TOTAL.

Plant Factors

1. Circulating Water Pumps and Screens All bays, circulating pumps, and screens operating properly or are 0

0 available for operation 1 bay out of service (C, D, E, or F) 3 3

3 3

1 bay out of service (A or B) 6 6

6 6

2 bays out of service 9

9 9

9 3 bays out of service 25 25 25 25

2. Screen Wash Pumps Two pumps available 0

0

.0 0

1 pump out of service 8

8 2 pumps out of service 25 25 25 25

3. Trash Racks

< 6 inches dp on all racks 0

0 0

0

> 6 inches dp on one rack 1

1 1

1

> 6 inches dp on two racks 3

3 3

3

> 6 inches dp on three racks (D

6 6

> 6 inches dp on four or more racks 12 12 12 12

> 10 inches on two or more racks 20 20 20 20

4. Trash Rakes Two rakes available (0O 0

0 One rake out of service 8

8 8

8 Two rakes out of service 25 25 25 25

5. Traveling Screens

< 6 inches dp, in either automatic or manual Slow 1 no 0

0

>6 inches dp with screens in Slow 1 6

6 6

6 Screens frequently shifting to Fast 1 (once/hour over 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />) 12 12 12 12 Plant Factors Section Total (1. + 2. + 3. + 4. + 5.)

1 At

• 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> look ahead I

SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 P 2 nff S Paore of 5

Intake Structure Condition Determination I

• 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> look ahead SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 Page 3 of 5 I

I Each shift: CIRCLE the applicable box in 08 08*

20 20*

each section, then TOTAL.

Environmental Factors

1. Predicted Height of Next Tide (local tide chart)

Next high tide is < 3.0 feet 0

0 0

0 Next high tide is > 3.0 feet but < 3.5 feet c*

(

2 2

Next high tide is > 3.5 feet 4

4 4

4

2. Height of Tide in Last 48 Hours (local tide chart)

All high tides < 3.5 feet 0

0 0

0 Any high tide > 3.5 feet 2

2

3. Wind Direction (actual from MET tower or other source as noted below)

From 271 to 119 (_ 2 7 1 or < 119) 1 From 120 to 270 02 02 2

4. Wind Speed (actual from MET tower or other source as noted below)

Sustained speed < 10 mph 1

1 1

Sustained speed > 10 mph but < 20 mph 2

2 2

2 Sustained speed.> 20 mph but < 25 mph 3

3 3

3 Sustained speed >! 25 mph but < 30 mph 5*

(,1j 5

5 Sustained speed _> 30 mph or gusts > 45 mph 7

7 7

7

5.

Historical Wind Speed (PPC (BOP-F11-F1 1), (OFIS, computer priority alarms, or EDAN)

Sustained wind < 20 mph in last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or Sustained wind > 20 mph for less than any 4-hour period in last 24 0

0 0

0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> Sustained wind > 20 mph for any 4-hour period in last 24

(*

2 2

hours

6. Wind Correction: (3.) x (4.+ 5.)

1 0

Intake Structure Condition Determination Each shift: CIRCLE the applicable box in 08 08*

20 20*

each section, then TOTAL.

7. Predicted Wave Height/Seas (from internet)

Wave height < 1 foot 1

1 1

1 Wave height > 1 foot but < 3 feet 2

2 2

2 Wave height > 3 feet but < 5 feet 4

4 Wave height > 5 feet 6

6 6

6

8. Historical Wave Height/Seas (as seen at Intake Structure)

Wave height < 3.5 feet in last 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> 1

1,1 1

Wave height > 3.5 feet in last 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> 1

2 1 2

9. Wave Correction Subtotal: (7.) x (8.)

1

10. Barometric Pressure ( internet or local on site if available)

Pressure > 29.5" (> 750 mm), steady/rising 1

1 1

1 Pressure > 29.5" (> 750 mm), falling 2

2 2

2 Pressure < 29.5" (< 750 mm), steady/rising 2

2 2

2 Pressure < 29.5" (

750 mm), falling 4_

4 4

11. Season January or July n

0 0

February or December 2

2 2

2 March, June, August, November or May1 6-31 4

4 4

4 April, May 1-15, September or October 6

6 6

6

12. Historical Environmental Factor Last environmental factor < 25 0

0 Last environmental factor > 25 4

4 4

4 Environmental Factors Section Total (1. + 2. + 6. + 9. + 10. + 11. + 12.)

• 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> look ahead I

SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 Paee 4 of 5 I

Intake Structure Condition Determination

• 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> look ahead Note 1 If predicted wind speed is expected to be greater than 20 MPH make notifications per 3215, "Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions," step 4.1 Note 2 If any Action Level is exceeded, Refer To OP 3215, "Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions," and PERFORM applicable actions.

SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 Page 5 of 5 I

Determination of Factors Parameter Action Level 08 08*

20 20*

Plant Factors Section Total

> 3 points I 1ý I %"

Environmental Factors Section Total

> 17 points 2t6o 2ý Intake Condition Total 0

u*O (Plant + Environmental)

Predicted le Sustained wind speed from 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> sustained weather forcast ( note I speed >20 mph SM Review (Note 2)

I I

I

INTAKE STRUCTURE STATUS PLANT FACTORS ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS RED RED

)

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

JPM ID Number:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions SRO-A1.2 Revision:

0 II. Initiated:

10/31/01 Date Ill.

Reviewed:

/1

/i19 /o1 Date Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nuclef Training Supervisor 1 of 7 Date

/De Steve Jac w-*

Developer

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions JPM ID Number:

SRO-A1.2 Revision:

0 I1. Initiated:

Steve Jackson Developer Ill.

Reviewed:

Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) 10/31/01 Date Date Nuclear Training Supervisor Date Date 1 of 7

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility:

Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number:

SRO-A1.2 Revision:

0 Task

Title:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions System:

Reactor Core Time Critical Task:

(

) YES

( X ) NO Validated Time (minutes):

20 min Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

K/A Number:

Method of Testin Location:

Task Standards:

Required Materid General Referen C

341-01-175, Perform a reactivity balance to determine estimated critical sondition.

SRO X

RO PEO Sys: 001.A4.10, Determination of an ECP K/A Rating:

g:

Simulated Performance:

Actual Performance:

Classroom:

X Simulator:

In-Plant::

Perform a reactivity balance to determine estimated critical condition.

als:

OP 3209A, Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions ces:

MP3 Reactor Engineering Curve and Data Book 2 of 7 3.5/3.9 X

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

SRO-A1.2 Revision:

0 Simulator Requirements:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

You are an on-shift Senior Licensed Operator. Your shift is preparing to perform a reactor startup. Reactor Engineering has presented you with two independently performed Estimated Critical Condition (ECC) reactivity calculations for your review.

Using the two independently performed Estimated Critical Condition (ECC) reactivity calculations review the ECC in accordance with OP 3209A, Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Condition, Section 4.20. Inform the examiner of the results of your comparison and when you are complete.

3 of 7 NONE

'"NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

SRO-A1.2 Revision:

0 Task

Title:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions Start Time:

Note to Examiner:

approximate values are acceptable, since visual interpolation between curves on a graph may be employed 1

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

2 X

Performance Step:

X Standards:

Grade:

Reviews procedure sections.

Determines if second, independent ECC has been performed (step 4.20.1)

Locate and review procedure section.

Obtains both ECC reactivity calculations.

SAT UNSAT COMPARE the two independent ECC calculations and RESOLVE the differences (step 4.20.2)

Compares the two ECCs and discovers the following differences:

"* differences in ECC 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> Administrative Time Period

"* differences in boron worth SAT UNSAT Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Resolve differences in Estimated Conditions at Criticality between the two ECCs. (steps 4.4.2, 4.4.3)

ECC B is incorrect. Administrative time period must start when T/S time period starts.

Resolve by confirming ECC A Estimated Conditions at Criticality are correct.

SAT UNSAT 4 of 7 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP 3

X X

GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

SRO-A1.2 Task

Title:

Revision:

0 Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions X

Performance Step:

X Standards:

Comment:

Resolve differences in boron worth between the two ECCs. (steps 4.12.1, 4.12.2)

ECC B is incorrect. Incorrect boron worth chosen from curve RE-F-02.

Resolve by confirming ECC A Boron Defect parameters are correct.

There are no other errors in the ECC.

It is not required for the candidate to recalculate values that are in close agreement.

Grade:

SAT UNSAT 5

x x

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Determine or Prepare the final OPS form 3209A-1. (step 4.20.3)

ECC A is correct and should be used as the final OPS form 3209A-1.

SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

5 of 7 STEP 4

GRADE STEP GRADE

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

SRO-A1.2 Revision:

0 For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

YES Validated Time (minutes):

NO X

20 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

6 of 7

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

SRO-A1.2 You are an on-shift Senior Licensed Operator. Your shift is preparing to perform a reactor startup. Reactor Engineering has presented you with two independently performed Estimated Critical Condition (ECC) reactivity calculations for your review.

Using the two independently performed Estimated Critical Condition (ECC) reactivity calculations review the ECC in accordance with OP 3209A, Reactivity Calculations Estimated Critical Condition, Section 4.20. Inform the examiner of the results of your comparison and when you are complete.

7 of 7

I Form Approval I rApproval Date JUL 0 1 1999 A

• 1Effective Date JUL 0 6 1999

~JU 06eciv 1999

"[urnI ColverShedt JGeneric Information Form Title Estimated Critical Conditions Reference Procedure OP 3209A Applicable Tech. Spec.

AR*

This form is being used for the following:

3 Tech Spec Surveillance C) System Alignment 0

Other:

0 Maintenance Restoration Non-Tech Spec (Retest)

Surveillance (PM)

Specific InformationI Schedule Date N/A Applicable Mode Partial D

2 Surveillance Test Authorized By Date Baseline Test Prerequisites Completed (Initials)

Precautions Noted (Initials)

Performed By Date Time Accepted By Date Time Acceptance Criteria Satisfied Approved By (Department Head or Designee)

Date Shift Manager Notified of Failed Test Date D Yes D No Surveillance Information Test Equipment Type QA Number Cal Due Date N/A

• This calculation may be performed at any time but must be verified within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> prior to achieving reactor criticality.

Send completed Form to Reactor Engineering.

OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 1 of 9 4.1.1.1.1.c C/ý,,)

I

k Estimated Critical Conditions, Step No.

Name Date Time 4.2 Performed By:

I Reference Critical Data Step No.

Parameter Value Date o 0 Time 06

_5" Power Level 1O0 Burnup

-74o3-5 MWD/MTU RCS Pressure 2 ;

4,

psia Tavg

_578hL LF Tref

5.

OF Boron Concentration

[lq(

ppm Xenon

(-)

- 7 L.t pcm Samarium

(-)

5 pcm Control Bank C

3.

steps Control Bank D

-7 steps Estimated Conditions At Criticality Step No.

Parameter Value 4.4.1 Date 4.4.2 Administrative Time Period (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) From:

UO00 To:

/ I C 0 4.4.3 T/S Time Period (4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />)

From:

50 300 To:

/ 2. o0 4.4.4 Present Burnup 8 00 MWD/MTU 4.4.5 Tavg 557 OF 4.4.6 RCS Pressure 2,15 psia 4.4.7.b.

Xenon

(-)

0 pcm 4.4.8.b.

Samarium

(-)

1300 pcm 4.4.9.b.

Control Bank C @

2 15 Steps or Desired Critical Rod Height 4.4.10 Control Bank D @

/

-0 Steps Boron Concentration Step No.

Parameter Value 4.5 Present Boron Concentration

/

0 6 0 ppm OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 2 of 9 I

D Defects Estimated Critical Conditions POWER DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.6.1 Power Defect @ Reference Power =

(-)Ji._(,_ pcm Defect @ Ref Power 4.6.2

[(-)

5

.5.

pcm] x (1 U.5."pcm Defect @ Ref Pwr F

Power Defect REFERENCE MODERATOR DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value pcmn/

F(no sign) 4.7.2 Magnitude of MTC @ Tref =

Magnitude of MTC @ Tref 4.7.3 Difference Between Tref and Tavg =

Tref/Tg A OF (no sign) 4.7.4

( _F) x ( _

pcm/°F) =

pcm (no sign)

Trcf/Tavg A MTC @ Tref Ref Mod Defect 4.7.5 Sign of Reference Moderator Defect =

(+ or-)

Sign 4.7.1 or Value and Sign of Reference Moderator Defect Ref C) pcm 4.7.6 Ref Mod Defect ESTIMATED MODERATOR DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value pcm/0 F(no sign) 4.8.2 Magnitude of ITC @ 5570F =

Magnitude of ITC @ 557 0F 4.8.3 Difference Between Estimated Tavg and 557°F =

°F (no sign)

Tavg/ 557'* F A 4.8.4

(

OF) x ( _pcm/*F)

=

pcm (no sign)

Tavg/557*F A ITC @ 557" F Est ModDefect 4.8.5 Sign of Estimated Moderator Defect =

(+ or-)

Sign 4.8.1 or Value and Sign of Estimated Moderator Defect =

(

Mod De pcm 4.8.6 Est Mod Defect OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 I

Estimated Critical Conditions Defects (Continued)

XENON DEFECT Parameter and/or Calculation pcm] -

[(-

7 7. '

7 pcm]

Reference Xe

) 16771 q pcm Xenon Defect SAMARIUM DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.10

[

1-13o 0 pcm] - [(-)0.+/-L,.-

S pcm] =

(-)

33,S pcm Estimated Sm Reference Sm Samarium Defect ROD WORTH DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.11.2.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Reference Conditions =

(-)

.7 pcm 4.11.3.a.

Reference RW 4.11.2.b.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Estimated Conditions =

(-) E "ie pcm 4.11.3.b.

Estimated RW 4.11.1 or

[(-)I5"/3 pcm] - [(-L 7

pcm] =

(_) 5o2,3 pcm 4.11.4 Estimated RW Reference RW RW Defect BORON DEFECT Step Parameter and/or Calculation Value No.

4.12.1 Differential Boron Worth @ Reference Burnup =

(-)63 c/ppm Reference BW 4.12.2 Differential Boron Worth @ Present Burnup =

6,80 pcm/ppm I

Present BW 4.12.3

"[(-

76.7/.

pcm/ppm)+(-

+

.0 pcm/ppm)] -- 2=

(-)279 pcm/ppm Reference BW Present BW Avg DiffBW 4.12.4

[(

o,00 ppm) -

( I I '

ppm)] x [(-) 6.1 pcm/ppm] =

(-) 27-73 pcm Present CB (4.5)

Reference C3 (4.3)

Avg Diff BW Boron Defect OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 4 of 9 Value I

I I (

I

SEstimated Critical Conditions I

Defects (Continued)

VOID DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.13.2 Value of Void Correction Factor (Void Defect) =

(+)...O

.. pcm Void Defect TOTAL REACTIVITY DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value Power Defect

= (+)

5 Spcm (step 4.6.2)

Ref Mod Defect

= (

0) 0 pcm (step 4.7.6)

Est Mod Defect

= ( )

2 pcm (step 4.8.6)

Xe Defect

= (4) 2 6-7? Yf pcm (step 4.9) 4.14.1 c

and Sm Defect

= (-)_331.

pcm

(

ota plDefe pcm 4.14.2 (step 4.10)

Total p Defect RW Defect

= (- 5-4.3 pcm (step 4.11.4)

Boron Defect

= (- 73 pcm (step 4.12.4)

Void Defect

= (+)

Q pcm (step 4.13.2)

+

Combined Total = (-)

. I pcm =

Burnup Correction Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.15.2.a.

Critical Boron Concentration @ Reference Burnup =

Re C71 ppmG Ref Critical CB 4.15.2.b.

Critical Boron Concentration @ Present Burnup =

PrsetCrtia ppm Present Critical CB 4.15.1 1771 ppm)-( 17L'2-ppm) =

(-I)_2_

ppm or Ref77/

Ciia 17 Lk Preset C 4.15.3 Ref Critical CB

-Present Critical CB Burnup Correction OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 5 of 9

Estimated Critical Conditions it Critical Boron Concentration Calculation OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 6 of 9 Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value

[(-H) 101_1.1 pcm]--[(-) (y,80 pcm/ppm] =

()

-)50 ppm 4.16.2 Total p Defect Present BW Boron Equivalent 4.14.2 4.12.2 of p Defect

[(

L 9 ppm] + [(-)

1SO ppm] =

(-)

I ppm 4.16.3 Burnup Correction Boron Equivalent of p Defect Corrected Boron 4.15.3 4.16.2 Equivalent 4.16.4

(-)

12 -1 ppm] x (-1)=

(4) 1.-- I ppm Corrected Boron Equivalent Required Boron A

( l 0oo ppm)+[(4)

I 2.1 ppm] =

-72) ppm 4.16.5 Present CB Required Boron A Calculated CB 4.5 4.16.4 pcm_ 0 F(no sign) 4.16.7.a.

Magnitude of ITC @ 557°F =

Magnitude of ITC@ 557"F 4.16.7.b.

Difference Between Estimated Tavg and 5570F =

7F (no sign)

I Tavg/ 557'F A

(

OF) X (

pcm/°F) =

pcm (no sign) 4.16.7.c.

Tavg/557°F A ITC @ 557"F Magnitude of 4.16.7.b.

4.16.7.a.

Mod CF 4.16.7.d.

Sign of Moderator Correction Factor

(+ or-)

4.16.7.e.S Sign of Moderator Correction Factor

=

Sign 4.16.7.e.

Value and Sign of Moderator Correction Factor =

( )______pcm Moderator CF 4.16.7.f.

Differential Boron Worth @ for Present Burnup =

cm/ppm 4.12.2 Diff BW R( )_

pcm] - [(-)_

pcm/ppm] =

( )

ppm 4.16.7.g.

Mod CF Diff BW Boron Equivalent 4.16.7.e.

4.16.7.f.

of Moderator CF 4.16.6.a.

Calculated Boron Concentration = Critical Boron Concentration =

4.16.5 4.16.1

(

4.16.5 pcm) + (

1____

pcm) =

r a

ppm or Boron Equivalent of Mod CF Calculated CB 4.16.7.h.

4.16.7.g.

4.16.5

I Critical Rod Height Calculation mated Critical ConditionsJ Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value

[(+)_____

ppm] x [(-)

pcmwppm] =

4.17.1 Burnup Correction Present BW pcm 4.15.3 4.12.2 p Equivalent of BC

[(-)_pcm]+[(

) _

pcm] =

( )__

pcm 4.17.2 p Equivalent of BC Total p Defect Corrected Total 4.17.1 4.14.2 p Defect 4.17.3.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Reference Conditions N

cm 4.17.4 RW @ Ref

[( )____

pcm] + [(+)

pcm]

4.17.5 Corrected p Defect RW @ Reference N

pcm 4.17.2 4.17.4 Net p Defect 4.17.6.a.

_Bank or Critical Rod Position Corresponding to Net p Defect =@

I Steps 4.17.6.b.

Critical Rod Position Rod Withdrawal Limits Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.18.1.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Estimated Critical Position

(+) 5 i 3 pcm 4.18.2 RW @ ECP 4.18.3

[(+)

5 "3 pcm] - (500 pcm)

=f(-4) o r pcm RW @ ECP RW for D @ 57 Steps W/D Limit 4.18.4 Bank D

or Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the D @ 57 Steps

@ 2 ) I Steps 4.18.5 Withdrawal Limit or the Control Bank D Full Out Position D @ 57 Steps Withdrawal Limit 4(pcm]-(750pcm)=

(-)

23-7 pcm 4.18.6 RW @ ECP RW for C @ 57 Steps W/D Limit 4.18.5 or Bank 4.18.7 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the C @ 57 Steps Steps r.

Withdrawal Limit or the Control Bank D Full Out Position C @ 57 Steps 4.18.8 Withdrawal Limit OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 7 of 9

Estimated Critical Condition4 OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 8 of 9 Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.19.1

[(+)

_ pcm] + (500 pcm) =

(+ fo 1@3 pcm RW ECPRW for D @ 57 Steps RW @ECP Insertion Limit Bank P

4.19.2.a.

Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the D @ 57 Step Insertion Limit

@ 4j Steps or 4.19.3 Rod Position for D @ 57 Steps Limit Bank C 4.19.4 Zero Power Rod Insertion Limit (RIL) =

@ 5"1 Steps 0% RIL 4.19.5 Bank 49 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the q3 Steps or 4.19.6 D @ 57 Step Insertion Limit or the 0% RIL D @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit 4.19.7

[(+)S

' 3 pcm] + (750 pcm) =

(+)

oC2 63 pcm RW @ ECP RW for C @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit 4.19.8.a.

Bank 1?*

or Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the C @ 57 Step Insertion Limit Ba Steps or

@..J~.

tp 4.19.9 Rod Position for C @ 57 Steps iUmit 4.19.6.a.

or Bank__f2_

4.19.10 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the 1 ;L Steps C @ 57 Step Insertion Limit or the 0% RIL C @ 57 Steps or 4.19.11 Insertion Limit I

( Estimated Critical Conditions(

Estimated Critical Conditions" lAeview Step No.

Name Date Time 4.20.4 Independent Calculation By:

4.20.6 Licensed Operator Review By:

T/S Acceptance Criteria Step No.

Acceptance Criteria Yes No OP 3202 Predicted Critical Rod Position Greater Than the RIL Step 4.8.1 OP 3202 SteP 4.2 Criticality Predicted Within the T/S 4 Hour Time Period (4.4.3)

Step 4.8.2 OP 3202 SP 3202.

Plant is in MODE 2 @ the RIL AND Reactor NOT Critical Step 4.19.7.b OP 3202 Step 4.22 Criticality Achieved Within the T/S 4 Hour Time Period (4.4.3)

Actual Critical Data Parameter Source Value Date X

Time Intermediate Range Current NMI-NI35B amps Intermediate Range Current NMI-NI36B amps NR Pressure 3RCS-PI455A psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI456A psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI457 psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI458 psia Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI412 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI422 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI432 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI442 OF Boron Concentration Chemistry ppm Control Bank C Rod Step Counters steps Control Bank D Rod Step Counters steps OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 9 of 9

Form Approval !

j.pproval Date

(

JUL 0 11999 Effective Date JUL 0 6 1999 Form Cover Sheet Generic Information 7 Form Title Rev. No.

Estimated Critical Conditions 6

Reference Procedure Applicable Tech. Spec.

Frequency OP 3209A 4.1.1.1.1.c AR*

This form is being used for the following:

STech Spec Surveillance 0

System Alignment

0) Other:

0 Maintenance Restoration Non-Tech Spec (Retest)

Surveillance (PM)

Specific InfBy mDteonim Schedule Date Applicable Mode Partial fed S l Nce n2 Surveillance n

fTest Authorized By Date Baseline r

Test D D

Prerequisites Completed (Initials)

Precautions Noted (Initials)

Performed By' Date Time

- Acepte By ateTime Accepac Criteria Acceptd BySDteisfied Approved By (Department Head or Designee)

Date Shift Manager Notified of Failed Test Date 11Ys F1N Surveillance Information Test Equipment Type CA Number Cal Due Date N/A

• This calculation may be performed at any time but must be verified within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> prior to achieving reactor criticality.

Send completed Form to Reactor Engineering.

OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 1 of 9 I

Estimated Critical Conditions,

(

OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 2 of 9 Step No.

Name Date Time 4.2 Performed By:

I 106001 Reference Critical Data Step No.

Parameter Value Date

/0 [,

I 0 1 Time Q 6

5.

Power Level 00 Burnup

- 6 3,

S MWD/MTU RCS Pressure Z2--*

. 6 psia Tavg 6

0F 6, 6 OF Tref 5

136. 9 OF Boron Concentration 1 1 9 1

ppm Xenon

(-)

2679.

+

pcm Samarium

(-)

6 1, S pcm Control Bank C Z2 -.

steps Control Bank D ea 1 -

steps Estimated Conditions At Criticality Step No.

Parameter Value 4.4.1 Date 4.4.2 Administrative Time Period (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />)

From "

0

/0 To:

Z 4.4.3 T/S Time Period (4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />)

From: 0 O0 To:

Zo CoC 4.4.4 Present Burnup

` 30 00D MWD/MTU 4.4.5 Tavg OF 4.4.6 RCS Pressure 2-25O psia 4.4.7.b.

Xenon

(-)

O pcm 4.4.8.b.

Samarium

(-)

1300 pcm 4.4.9.b.

Control Bank C @

2 I 5 Steps or Desired Critical Rod Height 4.4.10 Control Bank D @

00 Steps Boron Concentration Step No.

Parameter Value 4.5 Present Boron Concentration

/:1 00 ppm

Estimated Critical Conditionst POWER DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.6.1 Power Defect @ Reference Power H

(-)__q I

pcm Defect @ Ref Power 4.6.2

[(-)_pcm]

x (-1) =

(+)

(9* 60 pcm Defect @ Ref Pwr Power Defect REFERENCE MODERATOR DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value

__._pcm/1 F(no sign) 4.7.2 Magnitude of MTC @ T"e Magnitude of MTC @ Tref 4.7.3 Difference Between Tref and Tavg =F (no sign) 4.7.4 (F)

(Pcm/°F)___

pcm (no sign)

-Trefffavg A MTC @ T,,"

Ref Mod Defect 4.7.5 Sign of Reference Moderator Defect Sign-(+ or 4.7.1 or Value and Sign of Reference Moderator Defect =

( )_

pcm 4.7.6 Ref Mod Defect ESTIMATED MODERATOR DEFECT Ntep INO.

4.8.2 4.8.3 4.8.4 4.8.5 I

I Parameter and/or Calculation Value 1

4 Magnitude of ITC @ 5570F =

ITC@ 5570F 1

4.

Difference Between Estimated Tavg and 557°F =

(

°OF) x ( _pcm/!F)

=

Tavg/557°F A ITC@ 557"F Sign of Estimated Moderator Defect =

4.8.1 or Value and 4.8.6 Sign of Estimated Moderator Defect =

Tavg/557 0FA 4.

._p cml° F(no sign)

Magnitude of ITC @ 557°F OF (no sign)

Tag/ 557-°F A pcm (no sign)

Est ModDefect Est ModDefect

(+ or -)

Sign

( ) C pcm Est Mod Defect Est Mod Defect I. _______________________________________

OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 of 9 I

Defects I

C"*_

'L Value Sign

Estimated Critical Conditionsk Defects (Continued)

XENON DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.9 pcm] - [(-)_pcm]

(-)267*4 pcm Estimated Xe Reference Xe Xenon Defect SAMARIUM DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.10

[(-)--

_pcm]

[(-)

pcm]

p

=

(-)3 7, 5 pcm Estimated Sm Reference Sm Samarium Defect ROD WORTH DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.11.2.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Reference Conditions =

(-)R ifc pcm 4.11.3.a.

Reference RW 4.11.2.b.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Estimated Conditions =

()

5* 0 pcm 4.11.3.b.

Estimated RW 4.11.1 or

[(-)

ppc[m

=

( ) 500 pcm 4.11.4 Estimated RW Reference RW RW Defect BORON DEFECT Step Parameter and/or Calculation Value No.

4.12.1 Differential Boron Worth @ Reference Burnup

(-) 6. Z pcm/ppm Reference BW 4.12.2 Differential Boron Worth @ Present Burnup =

Pn Z B cm/ppm Present BW 4.12.3 pcm/ppm) + (-_pcm/ppm)]

-- 2 =

(-)L. IJ pc m/ppm Reference BW Present BW Avg Diff BW 4.12.4

[(

ppm) -

(

ppm)] X [(-)

pcm/ppm] =

(-) a

-"t'*'

pcm Present CB (4.5)

Reference CB (4.3)

Avg Diff BW Boron Defect OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 4 of 9

Defects (Continued)

Estimated Critical Conditions*

VOID DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.13.2 Value of Void Correction Factor (Void Defect) =

(+)

pcm Void Defect TOTAL REACTIVITY DEFECT Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value Power Defect

= (+) I 960 pcm (step 4.6.2)

Ref Mod Defect

= ()

0 pcm (step 4.7.6)

Est Mod Defect

= ( )

0 pcm (step 4.8.6)

Xe Defect

= (+)_2

'Jpcm (step 4.9) 4.14.1 5

(.

'1 pcm and Sm Defect

= (-). 3 36,Q Spcm

(

o-) p Defect 4.14.2 (step 4.10)

Total P Defect RWDefect

= H 0

pcm (step 4.11.4)

Boron Defect

= H z 5 il pcm (step 4.12.4)

Void Defect

= (H)

G pcm (step 4.13.2)

+

Combined Total = (0.) I 5 21 2

pcm =

Burnup Correction Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.15.2.a.

Critical Boron Concentration @ Reference Burnup =

0 ppm Ref Critical CB 4.15.2.b.

Critical Boron Concentration @ Present Burnup =

to

'tO ppm Present Critical CB 4.15.1 or

(

ppm) - (

ppm) =

(-)

SO ppm 4.15.3 Ref Critical CB.

Present Critical CB Burnup Correction OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page5 of 9

Estimated Critical Conditions Cn Critical Boron Concentration Calculation OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 6 of 9 Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value

[(I) Z 52. -

pcm]

[(-) 6.2 5 pcm/ppmJ =

(-)__00 ppm 4.16.2 Total p Defect Present BW Boron Equivalent 4.14.2 4.12.2 of p Defect

[().
20 ppm] + [(--

0(,0 ppm] =

(-)

1 04

(

ppm 4.16.3 Burnup Correction Boron Equivalent of p Defect Corrected Boron 4.15.3 4.16.2 Equivalent 4.16.4

(-)

ppm] x (-1) =

(+)

X ppm Corrected Boron Equivalent Required Boron A

(

I 0O(G ppm)+[(4) 1-+0 ppm]

=

V4 O ppm 4.16.5 Present CB Required Boron Aac e

4.5 4.16.4 Calculated CB pcn/ 0 F(no sign) 4.16.7.a.

Magnitude of ITC @557°F =

Magnitude of ITC@ 557 0F 4.16.7.b.

Difference Between Estimated Tavg and 557 0F a

°F (no sign)

Tavg/ 557"*F A

( __

_OF) x (

pcm/°F) =

pcm (no sign) 4.16.7.c.

Tavg/557°F A ITC @ 557°F Magnitude of 4.16.7.b.

4.16.7.a.

Mod CF 4.16.7.d.

Sign of Moderator Correction Factor =

Si

(+ or-)

Sign 4.16.7.e.

Value and Sign of Moderator Correction Factor =

( )_pcm Moderator CF 4.16.7.f.

Differential Boron Worth @ for Present Burnup =

(-)p cm/ppm 4.12.2 Diff BW

[R )_pcm]

+ [(-)

pcm/ppm] =

( )__ppm 4.16.7.g.

Mod CF Diff BW Boron Equivalent 4.16.7.e.

4.16.7.f.

of Moderator CF 4.16.6.a.

Calculated Boron Concentration = Critical Boron Concentration =

4.16.5 4.16.1

(

__pcm)

+ (

(

=

0 ppm or Boron Equivalent of Mod CF Calculated CB Critical CB 4.16.7.h.

4.16.7.g.

4.16.5

Estimated Critical Conditions.

C Critical Rod Height Calculation '

OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Paozet 7 of 9 Pare ofI Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value ppm] x [(-)_pcm/ppm]

=

4.17.1 Burnup Correction Present BW pcm 4.15.3 4.12.2 p Equivalent of BC

[(-)_pcm]

+ R( )

pcmJ

=

( )_

pcm 4.17.2 p Equivalent of BC Total p Defect Corrected Total 4.17.1 4.14.2 p Defect 4.17.3.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Reference Conditions =

(+)L

_pcm 4.17.4 RW @ Ref

[( )____

pcm] + [(+)

pcm] =

4.17.5 Corrected p Defect RW @ Reference pcm 4.17.2 4.17.4 Net P Defect 4.17.6.a.

Bank or Critical Rod Position Corresponding to Net p Defect Steps 4.17.6.b.

Critical Rod Position Rod Withdrawal Limits Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.18.1.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Estimated Critical Position =

(+) 5 10 pcm 4.18.2 RW @ ECP 4.18.3

[

I pcm]-

(500 pcm)

=()

OD 7 pcm RW @ ECP RW for D @ 57 Steps W/D Limit 4.18.4 Bank i0 48 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the D @ 57 Steps

@ 2 2.0 Steps 4.18.5 Withdrawal Limit or the Control Bank D Full Out Position D @ 57 Steps Withdrawal Limit 4.18.6

[(+)

pcm] -

(750 pcm)

=

(

-)

or @-

pcm RW @ ECP RW for C @ 57 Steps W/D Limit 4.18.5 or Bank 0 4.18.7 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the C @ 57 Steps

@ Z I i-Steps or Withdrawal Limit or the Control Bank D Full Out Position C @ 57 Steps 4.18.8 Withdrawal Limit

- I

( Estimated Critical Conditionj OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 8 of 9 Step No.

Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.19.1

[(+)

510 pcmj + (500 pcm) =

(+)

1010 pcm RW @ ECP RW for D @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit 4.19.2.a Bank 0 0or

• Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the D @ 57 Step Insertion Limit L-q-Steps 4.19.3

=Rod Position for D @ 57 Steps Limit Bank C

4.19.4 Zero Power Rod Insertion Limit (RIL) =

@ __5 1 Steps 0% RIL 4.19.5 Bank 0 or Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the

+4 Steps 4.19.6 D @ 57 Step Insertion Limit or the 0% RIL D @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit 4.19__________.pcm] + (750 pcm) =

(+) JZ.O pcm 4.19.7 RW @ ECP RW for C @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit 4.19.8.a.

Bank 6

or Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the C @ 57 Step Insertion Limit 13 Steps 4.19.9

=

Rod Position for C @ 57 Steps Limit 4.19.6.a.

Bank D

or Bn 4.19.10 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the 13 Steps or C @ 57 Step Insertion Limit or the 0% RIL C @ 57 Steps 4.19.11 Insertion Limit SEstimated Critical Condition*

Estimated Critical ConditionT Igeview T/S Acceptance Criteria Actual Critical Data Parameter Source Value Date Time Intermediate Range Current NMI-NI35B amps Intermediate Range Current NMI-NI36B amps NR Pressure 3RCS-PI455A psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI456A psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI457 psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI458 psia Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI412 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI422 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI432 oF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI442 OF Boron Concentration Chemistry ppm Control Bank C Rod Step Counters steps Control Bank D Rod Step Counters steps OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Step No.

Name Date Time 4.20.4 Independent Calculation By:

4.20.6 Licensed Operator Review By:

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

JPM ID Number:

Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

SRO-A2 Revision:

0 II. Initiated:

Steve Ja¢ 10/31/01 Date Ill.

Reviewed:

Technical Reviewer IV.

Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) uK r Training Supervisor

,,/1/0 j Date Date Da 1 of 8

Tagging and Clearance 341-01-079, Develop and/or modify, review, authorize, install, verify, and clear a tag clearance in accordance with plant and/or site procedural and safety requirements GEN.2.2.13, Knowledge of Tagging and Clearance Procedures

'*READ TO THE STUDENT'*

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Millstone Unit 3 Facility:

JPM ID Number:

SRO-A2 Revision:

- 0 Task

Title:

System:

Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

Time Critical Task:

(

) YES

( X ) NO Validated Time (minutes):

10 min Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

SRO X

RO PEO K/A Rating:

3.6/3.8 K/A Number:

--- Method of Testing:

Simulated Performance:

Actual Performance:

X Simulator:

In-Plant::

Location:

Task Standards:

Required Materials:

General

References:

Classroom:

X Review and approve a tag clearance boundary Completed work package boundary sheet P&IDs EE One-Line Electrical Drawings OP 3300 series procedures WC 2, Tagging OP 3250, Removing Equipment from Service for Maintenance 2 of 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

SRO-A2 Simulator Reauirements:

Revision:

0 NONE Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

You are a licensed SRO. A tagout clearance boundary for the shaft mechanical seal replacement for the "B" Reactor Plant Component Cooling Water (CCP) pump has been developed.

Your task is to review the recommended tagout clearance boundary using available references so that the work package boundary sheet is ready for approval.

3 of 8 NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

SRO-A2 Task

Title:

Revision:

0 Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

Start Time:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

STEP GRADE STEP GRADE Reviews the Work Package Boundary Sheet and selects appropriate reference materials Selects:

P&ID EM-121A, (CCP), EE Drawing.

1M, OP 3330A, Rev. 15-02 SAT UNSAT Reviews 3CCP-P1 B-CS, "B" RPCCW Pump Control Switch Uses selected references and determines the Pump Control Switch tagging is correct.

SAT UNSAT 3

x x

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Reviews power supply 34D9-2, 3CCP*P1 B breaker racked down and red tagged.

Uses selected references and determines power supply 34D9-2 is INCORRECT.

34D8-2 is the correct breaker (EE Drawing. 1M,).

Tag and tagged position are correct.

SAT UNSAT 4 of 8 1

Standards:

Grade:

2 STEP GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

SRO-A2 Revision:

0 Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

4 x

Performance Step:

X Standards:

Grade:

5 x

x Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Reviews 3CCP*V91, RPCCW Pump P1 B Suction Isolation, red tagged closed.

Uses selected references and determines that 3CCP*V91 selection, position and tagging is correct.

SAT UNSAT Reviews 3CCP*V8, RPCCW Pump P1 B Discharge Isolation, red tagged closed.

Uses selected references and determines that 3CCP*V8 selection is INCORRECT.

3CCP*V6 is the correct boundary (P&ID EM-121A)

CLOSED position and RED tagging is correct.

SAT UNSAT X

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Reviews 3CCP*V649, RPCCW Pump P1 B Vent valve, red tagged open.

Uses selected references and determines that 3CCP V649 selection, position and tagging is correct.

SAT UNSAT 5 of 8 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE 6

STEP GRADE x

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

SRO-A2 Revision:

0 Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Reviews 3CCP*V314, RPCCW Pump P1B Drain Valve, red tagged open.

Uses selected references and determines that 3CCP*V314 selection, position and tagging is correct.

SAT UNSAT Amend and approve the clearance boundary Makes indicated changes to the clearance boundary, and recommends approval as amended.

SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

6 of 8 STEP 7

x GRADE x

STEP 8

GRADE

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

SRO-A2 Revision:

0 For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

Validated Time (minutes):

YES NO X

10 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Imorovement:

7 of 8

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

SRO-A2 You are a licensed SRO. A tagout clearance boundary for the shaft mechanical seal replacement for the "B" Reactor Plant Component Cooling Water (CCP) pump has been developed.

Your task is to review the recommended tagout clearance boundary using available references so that the work package boundary sheet is ready for approval.

8 of 8

WORK PACKAGE BOUNDARY SHEET Clearance Number:

AWO Number:

Clearance Adequate for Personnel Safety:

Date:

M30110525 Contact Person / Designee Sign Step Tag Tagged Tag Equipment ID Equipment Equipment Notes Tag Tag Worker Number Type Position Serial Description Location Placed Verified Verified Number 1

YEL 3CCP-P1 B-CS B RPCCW PUMP POWER IS RED CONTROL SWITCH TAGGED OFF 2

RED RACKED 34D9-2 3CCP*P1B DOWN 3

RED CLOSED 3CCP*V91 RPCCW PUMP P1 B SUCTION ISOLATION 4

RED CLOSED 3CCP*V8 RPCCW PUMP P1B DISCHARGE ISOLATION 5

RED OPEN 3CCP*V649 RPCCW PUMP P1 B VENT VALVE 6

RED OPEN 3CCP*V314 RPCCW PUMP P1B DRAIN VALVE

(

KEY---WORK PACKAGE BOUNDARY SHEET---KEY Clearance Number:

AWO Number:

Clearance Adequate for Personnel Safety:

Date:

M30110525 Contact Person ! Designee Sign Step Tag Tagged Tag Equipment ID Equipment Equipment Notes Tag Tag Worker Number Type Position Serial Description Location Placed Verified Verified Number 1

YEL 3CCP-PI B-CS B RPCCW PUMP POWER IS RED CONTROL SWITCH TAGGED OFF 2

RED RACKED 34D8-2 3CCP*P1B DOWN 3

RED CLOSED 3CCP*V91 RPCCW PUMP P1B SUCTION ISOLATION 4

RED CLOSED 3CCP*V6 RPCCW PUMP P1B DISCHARGE ISOLATION 5

RED OPEN 3CCP*V649 RPCCW PUMP P1 B VENT VALVE 6

RED OPEN 3CCP*V314 RPCCW PUMP P1B DRAIN VALVE

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit JPM ID Number:

SRO-A3 Revision:

0 II. Initiated:

Steve Jackso(=

-z-n Developer Reviewed:

Ray Martin C

o* t Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nu'cfrTraining Supervisor Date Dat 1 of 7 11/01/01 Date 11/15/01 Date

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number:

SRO-A3 Revision:

Task

Title:

System:

Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Radioactive Liquid Waste System Time Critical Task:

) YES (X)

NO Validated Time (minutes):

Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

068-01-064, Discharge the contents of a Low Level Waste Drain Tank 068-03-001, Adhere to the requirements of the Radwaste Management Program SRO X

RO PEO K/A Number:

GEN-2.3.6 K/A Rating:

Method of Testing:

Simulated Performance:

X Actual Performance:

Location:

Classroom:

Task Standards:

Required Materials:

General

References:

In-Plant::

X Simulator:

X Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit OP 3335D, Radioactive Liquid Waste System Liquid Discharge Permit Screen Print of Rad Monitor LWS70-1 None 2 of 7 Facility:

0 2.1/3.1 X

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

SRO-A3 Simulator Reauirements:

Revision:

0 None Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

The unit is at 100% power with all systems in normal line-ups.

The "A" and "B" Service Water pumps and all Circulating Water pumps are running.

The Radwaste PEO has presented OP 3335D sign off copy and a Liquid Discharge Permit for discharging the "A" Waste Test Tank to the Circulating Water discharge tunnel for your approval.

Review and approve the permit and report to the examiner when complete.

3 of 7

"*NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

1 Task

Title:

SRO-A3 Revision:

Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Start Time:

1 X

X 2

X X

X Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Standards:

Comments:

Go to the correct procedure step, OP3335D, Section 4.25.4.j Locates the correct procedure step.

Candidate may review previous steps.

SAT UNSAT PERFORM Independent Verification of liquid effluent monitor alarm and alert settings. [step 4.25.4.j.1)]

Locates liquid effluent monitor alarm and alert settings on Liquid Discharge Permit.

Locates liquid effluent monitor alarm and alert current settings on RMS Console.

Since this JPM is done in a classroom setting the RMS Console is not available. When candidate requests information and specifies that he would access the RMS screen for LWS70-1, Liquid Waste discharge process radiation monitor, exercise the cue.

X Standards:

Compares permit settings and RMS information and identifies that RMS is incorrect. Recommends changing RMS to match the permit.

4 of 7 0

STEP GRADE STEP GRADE GRADE GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

1 Task

Title:

SRO-A3 Revision:

Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Initials permit after receiving the cue.

Grade:

SAT UNSAT Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Refer to CHEM Form 3800P-001 and CHECK "EST Activity this Discharge (Ci) on Liquid Discharge Permit is less than action level specified. [step 4.25.4.j.2)]

COMPARE CHEM Form 3800P-001 and CHECK "EST Activity this Discharge (Ci) to Discharge permit "Estimated activity this discharge (Ci)".

Determines that values are below the limits. Initials permit.

SAT UNSAT CHECK required dilution flowrate is met. [step 4.25.4.j.4)]

COMPARES permit requirement of 2 SWP and 3 CWP to actual plant condition of 2 SWP and 6 CWP.

Determines that dilution flow is met.

Initials permit.

SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation of this JPM is Complete Stop Time:

5 of 7 0

3 STEP GRADE x

x STEP 4

GRADE x

x

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

SRO-A3 Revision:

0 For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

YES Validated Time (minutes):

NO X

10 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

6 of 7

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

SRO-A3 The unit is at 100% power with all systems in normal line ups. The "A" and "B" Service Water pumps and all Circulating Water pumps are running.

The Radwaste PEO has presented OP 3335D sign off copy and a Liquid Discharge Permit for discharging the "A" Waste Test Tank to the Circulating Water discharge tunnel for your approval. Review and approve the permit and report to the examiner when complete.

7 of 7

FORM APPROVED.:

C.

J.

Schwar2 MILLSTONE UNIT #3 DATE.: 5/16/97 PORC MTG NO.: 3-97-105 LIQUID DISCHARGE PERMIT NO.

4463 (2001-69338) ank.............

WTT-A Date/time sampled...:

9-NOV-2001 17:35 Sampled by.....

Date/time on recirc.:

9-NOV-2001 14:00 TSS (ppm).:

(tank limit

= 45 ppm) pH.:

4.7 Boric acid conc (ppm).:

4330.0

<<< 2 circulators must be in operation during a discharge >>>

Independent samples taken >>> yes no (circle one)

Activity (uCi/ml) 3.522E-07

4. 720E-07

4. 779E-06 4 240E-07

1. 920E-07

1. 268E-07

1. 720E-01

6. 346E-06

(@)

MPC (uCi/ml)

1. OOOE-04

5. 000E-05 1.000E-04

2. 000E-05

3. 000E-03 Activity/MPC 3.522E-03 9.441E-03 4.779E-02 6.342E-03 5.733E+01

5. 740E+01 Dissolved gas conc (uCi/ml) =

6.161E-07 (limit = 4.0E-l)

Minimum recirc time using 1 pump is 175.

(min)

Sample saved for composite....................

Date Release limit (Ci)...............................

6.700E-03

)tal activity released to date (Ci)...........

1.613E-03

-stimated volume this discharge (gal).........

21000.

Estimated activity this discharge (Ci).........

5.044E-04

(@)

Estimated total activity released (Ci).........

2.117E-03

(@)

(W) these values do not include activity due to tritium (1) Reduction factor.............................

1.742E-02 (2) Required dilution flow rate..............

3 circ water, 2 service water pump(s)

(3) Normal rate limit (flow rate=#l*#2*0.1)..:

(4) Liquid effluent monitor alert setting....

(5) Liquid effluent monitor alarm setting....

(6) Rad monitor source check completed at....

Maximum approved rate........................

(Authorization required to exceed normal rate limit.)

SM/US init 480000.

(gpm) 150.

1.500E-04

2. OOOE-04 (gpm)

(uCi/ml)

(uCi/ml)

Oper (gpm)

Dual verification of release rate calculation

>>> yes no (circle one)

-** DISCHARGE DILUTION FLOW RATE (gpm)

TANK LEVEL (gallons)

DISCHARGE RATE (gpm)

OPERATOR Isotope CO-58 CO-60 SB-125 XE-133 XE-135 CS-137 H-3 Totals Tech Tech DATE TIME

(UJ/

' Aplroval Approval Date

(

POC Mtg. No.

Unit 3 Liquid Radwaste Discharge Goals Year:

Normal at Power Operations Refueling and Cold Shutdown Outages Annual Action Level Monthly Goal Action Level Monthly Goal Goal

Z a V, 00 gal/month

,.7r*-p3 Ci/month 12.c,,v9 a gal/month I /."7 if-A 'j2 r;/mr~ntb'

,q r.-03 Cl/discharge gal/month I.2--)

t000

_n galm--o n S/7r-o3 Ci/month

3.

,6 -03*

Ci/discharge gal/month 1 -

.30. (ioo gal

/

if -A -Z Ci/month Ci Radwaste Coordinator / Date Motcl t-3 W TT-

 1k

Mtode q-4 Lw-Pl' I,A'I-oi' 3.*-Q3 2, q, A,

//,.

t7T gJJhsI

Pe:

Chem Form 3800P -1 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 1 a2 tffect(ve Date (D

0' (Ji l

(O©ppV m_-

i

~I

"-T,,

n Lf,-,, I ýs, 2-L z *,

4Z.: 7-0 SWAVIV-0NI 313t;ýHOtý3ý4

3N 1 - A 0

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager JPM ID Number:

SRO-A4 Revision:

0 I1. Initiated:

9/28/01 Date III.

Reviewed:

Technical Reviewer Date IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nucr r Training Supervisor Date

/D~te 1 of 12

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Millstone Unit 3 Revision:

JPM ID Number:

SRO-A4 Task

Title:

System:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager Admin, SERO Time Critical Task:

(X

)YES

(

Validated Time (minutes):

10 Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

301-05-578, Assume command of the SERO SRO X

RO K/A Number:

GEN.2.4.44 K/A Rating:

Method of Testing:

Simulated Performance:

Location:

Task Standards:

Required Materials:

General

References:

Classroom:

X Simulator:

Actual Performance:

X X

In-Plant::

X Assume command of the SERO MP-26-EPI-FAP01-001, Control Room DSEO, Rev. 000 MP-26-EPI-FAP06, Classification and PARs, Rev. 000 MP-26-EPI-FAP06-005, Control Room PARs, Rev. 000 MP-26-EPI-FAP08, Evacuation and Assembly, Rev. 000 EPUG-08B, Millstone Emergency Preparedness Resource Book MP-26-EPI-FAP06-001, EAL Tables, Rev. 000 2 of 12 Facility:

0

) NO PEO 4.0

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

SRO-A4 Simulator Requirements:

Initial Conditions:

Revision:

0 none The Initial Conditions are covered in the Event Description.

Initiating Cues:

You are the Shift Manager. You have assumed responsibility in the Control Room DSEO (CR-DSEO) role during an Inter-System LOCA event. You are implementing EPI-FAP01-001, Control Room DSEO, and have completed all actions in Section A and are ready to Go To Section E.

You have classified the event as a General Emergency Alpha (GE-A) based on events in progress and the Incident Report Form (IRF) has been reviewed, approved and transmitted. Your task is to complete all actions in Section E, General Emergency Immediate Actions. Discuss with the examiner any actions that cannot be performed or simulated.

The examiner will act as all persons or agencies with whom you must communicate. Inform the examiner when you have completed the task.

3 of 12

• • • • NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

SRO-A4 Revision:

0 Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager Record Start Time:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Comments:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Comments:

Grade:

Locate Section E of FAP01-001, and review notes.

Reviews notes:

"* Consideration of shelter versus evacuation during hazardous events

"* Advisability of not making PA announcements during security events SAT UNSAT Notify the unaffected unit control rooms of the event Discusses with examiner contacting MP1 and MP2 control rooms. Includes methods of communicating in discussion.

Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

SAT UNSAT Request Security to restrict site access Discusses with examiner the following items:

all personnel called on site must process through EOF Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

SAT UNSAT 4 of 12 STEP 1

GRADE 2

STEP "G RADE STEP 3

GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

SRO-A4 Task

Title:

Revision:

0 Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager STEP 4

Performance Step:

Standards:

Comments:

Grade:

Performance Step:

UNSAT Review and approve IRF Comments:

6 X

Performance Step:

Standards:

For this JPM IRF has already been approved and transmitted.

Refer to EPI-FAP06-005, Section B:

Control Room PAR Process Flowchart and determine the appropriate PAR Reviews flowchart and diagnoses that 5 mile doses exceed Table 2 values of TEDE> 1 Rem and transitions down to "EVACUATE 5 MILE RADIUS and 10 MILE DOWNWIND, SHELTER REMAINING EPZ." Protective action 5 of 12 Make station page.

Discusses with examiner the following items:

how to active the outside speakers

• the need to expedite evacuation after site page

• the PA message where to log time of announcement Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

"* Outside speakers activated at US desk.

"* Expedited evacuation precludes spontaneous evacuation.

• Message should be clear and brief

• Autolog or SERO logsheet FAP1 5 012 acceptable SAT GRADE STEP 5

STEP GRADE X

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

SRO-A4 Revision:

0 Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager recommendation SAT 7

X X

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

If PARs are warranted out to 10 miles:

1. Record the current wind direction in degrees (from):

2. Check the appropriate row on the PAR table Records 2700 Identifies correct zones to evacuate as A and B and F and Groton City &

town in E, and shelter ALL other zones SAT UNSAT Comments:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Evacuate and Shelter recommendations must both be identified Contact the DEP Dispatcher in Hartford Obtains telephone number from EPUG-08B and attempts to call SAT UNSAT Cue:Examiner acts as DEP Dispatcher~

9 X

Performance Step:

Identify self and read Evacuate and Shelter recommendations Standards:

Identifies self and state recommended zones to evacuate as A and B and F and Groton City & town in E, and shelter ALL other zones Grade:

SAT UNSAT Cue:,

• Acknowe*ege receipt of PARs....

6 of 12 Grade:

STEP GRADE UNSAT STEP 8

GRADE X

X STEP GRADE X

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

SRO-A4

--v Task

Title:

Revision:

0 Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager 10 X

x Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Request the dispatcher inform the DEP Duty Officer that a PAR has been issued Requests the dispatcher inform the DEP Duty Officer that a PAR has been issued SAT UNSAT Cue:

Acknowledge receipt f equest 11 X

x 12 13 Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Comments:

Log date and time of notification Uses either Auto-Log, SERO Log Sheet from EPI-FAP15-012 or other means to log date and time of DEP notification SAT UNSAT If necessary, refer to and review EPI FAP06, Att. 4, PAR Zone Descriptions Refers to EPI-FAP06 for PAR Zone Descriptions SAT UNSAT Refer to EPI-FAP08, "Evacuation and Assembly", and conduct evacuation.

Refers to EPI-FAP08, Section 2.2 Discusses SSS/MOS interaction Inform Waterford PD of evacuation Establish traffic control with Waterford PD and CT State Police Ask candidate how this is 7 of 12 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

SRO-A4 Revision:

0 Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

SAT UNSAT Performance Step:

Standards:

Comments:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Comments:

Grade:

Perform announcement over Site PA Discuss site notification Activate outside speakers Sound Evacuation alarm for 30 seconds

• Select station public address system Make announcement log time of the announcement and contingencies:

Security sweeps using bullhorns HP personnel O&M radios Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

SAT UNSAT Discuss SSS/MOS responsibilities to Shift Manager

"* Security sweeps to cover areas PA does not cover

"* Verify personnel responding to evacuation order

"* Provide accountability to SM with 30 minutes Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

SAT UNSAT 8 of 12 STEP Grade:

14 GRADE STEP 15 GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

SRO-A4 "1-' Task

Title:

Revision:

0 Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager 15 Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Refer to EPI-FAP1 5-001, "DSEO/ADTS Briefing Sheet" and complete.

Obtain sheet Using Unit Status handout, complete to substantially match the DSEO/ADTS Briefing Sheet - Master SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The evaluation for this JPM is complete Record Stop Time:

9 of 12 STEP GRADE

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

SRO-A4 Revision:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

YES Validated Time (minutes):

NO 15 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

10 of 12 0

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

SRO-A4 The Initial Conditions are covered in the Event Description.

You are the Shift Manager. You have assumed responsibility in the Control Room DSEO (CR-DSEO) role during an Inter-System LOCA event. You are implementing EPI-FAP01-001, Control Room DSEO, and have completed all actions in Section A and are ready to Go To Section E You have classified the event as a General Emergency - Alpha (GE-A) based on events in progress and the Incident Report Form (IRF) has been reviewed, approved and transmitted. Your task is to complete all actions in Section E, General Emergency Immediate Actions. Discuss with the examiner any actions that cannot be performed or simulated. The examiner will act as all persons or agencies with whom you must communicate. Inform the examiner when you have completed the task.

11 of 12

STUDENT HANDOUT INITIATING CUE:

The plant was at 100% power. At 0530 the reactor was tripped and Safety Injection was actuated due to an Inter-System LOCA. The following conditions exist.

CRITICAL PARAMETERS TIME INFORMATION SOURCE The following parameters exist:

MB indications RCS pressure 1900 psia and rising PZR level 20% and rising CTMT Pressure Normal CETCs Subcooling 40°F CTMT temperature 1 100 F and stable CTMT radiation histogram Increasing levels Rx Tripped/SI Actuated Operating normally Chemistry Tech reports that the Initial Dose Assessment (IDA) calculated offsite dose is 1.1 Rem Chemistry report TEDE.

Met Tower-All levels of the Met Tower indicate the PPC indication wind is from the North West (2700) at 4 mph Classification:

NRC: GENERAL EMERGENCY State Posture Code:

EAL Table Designation: OG1.6, Integrated Offsite Dose > 1 Rem TEDE 12 of 12 ALPHA

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Millstone 3 Date of Examination:

January 7-10, 2002 Examination Level (circle one):

RO Operating Test Number: A-I Administrative Describe method of evaluation:

Topic/Subject

1. ONE Administrative JPM, OR Description

2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1.1 Execute JPM Complete a Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist (OP 3260A, Procedure Conduct of Outages, Section 1.2)

Steps (GEN 2.1.20) (41.10/43.5/45.12)

A.1.2 Use the Plant JPM Use the plant process computer to determine current Quadrant Process Power Tilt Ratio,analyze results, and recommend actions to Unit Computer Supervisor. (bundled with SIM JPM #130)

(GEN 2.1.19)

(45.12)

A.2 Tagging and JPM Given a maintenance repair recommendation and reference Clearance material, recommend a clearance boundary.

Procedures (GEN 2.2.13) (41.10/45.13)

A.3 Review RWP JPM Review RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a and Survey contaminated area (RHR Cubicles).

Maps (GEN 2.3.10)

(43.4/45.10)

A.4 RO Respon-Question #1: Reporting location during an evacuation alarm?

sibility in E Plan (GEN 2.4.39)

Question #2: Where to report in when called in during an emergency event?

(45.11)

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST JPM ID Number:

RO-AI.1 Revision:

0 II. Initiated:

10/25/01 Date Ill.

Reviewed:

Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Supervisor 1 of 10

,/ //itio I Date Date

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility:

Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number:

RO-AI.1 Revision:

0 Task

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST System:

Conduct of Outages Time Critical Task:

(

) YES

( X ) NO Validated Time (minutes):

10 min Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

341-01-162, Perform a Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist SRO RO X

PEO K/A Number:

GEN.2.1.20, Ability to execute procedure steps K/A Rating:

4.3/4.2 Method of Testing:

Simulated Performance:

Location:

Classroom:

Required Materials:

General

References:

X Actual Performance:

Simulator:

OP 3260A, Conduct of Outages Current Equipment Status Worksheet None 2 of 10 Task Standards:

X X

In-Plant::

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

RO-A1.1 Revision:

0 Simulator Requirements:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

The unit is shutdown in Mode 5 after a refueling outage.

Plant conditions have just changed. An electrical fault has rendered the "A" SIH pump inoperable. The Shift Manager has directed you to complete a Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist. Current equipment and unit are listed on the handout.

Report to the examiner, as Shift Manager, any conditions that would require compensatory actions.

3 of 10 None

"**** NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-A1.1 Task

Title:

Revision:

0 COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Start Time:

1 2

X X

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Obtain materials, locate correct procedure step Candidate obtains handout from examiner, copy of OP 3260A, Conduct of Outages, and form 004 the Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist. Locates section 1.2 of OP 3260A.

SAT UNSAT CIRCLE appropriate Train Designator Candidate circles "A" on Form 004 SAT UNSAT 3

X X

Performance Step:

Standards:

Comment:

Grade:

CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

RCS Decay Heat Removal Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

RHRTrainA All conditions to support natural circulation Natural Circulation: Candidate should refer to section 1.3.3 to make this determination.

SAT UNSAT 4 of 10 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

RO-Al.1 Revision:

0 COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 4

X X

Performance Step:

Standards:

Comment:

Grade:

CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

SFC Decay Heat Removal Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

SFCTrainA

>23' pool level Fuel Offload Required Equipment should not be checked. Only for Mode 6.

SAT UNSAT 5

X X

X 6

X Performance Step:

Standards:

Comment:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

Inventory Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

Train A CHS PP & flow path Candidate should also check RWST level >250,000 gallons and V43 tagged. However failure to do so will not effect the Safety Status.

SAT UNSAT CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

Power Availability Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

SA EDG RSST NSST/Main 5 of 10 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

RO-AI.1 Revision:

0 COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 0 Station Blackout EDG Grade:

SAT UNSAT 7

X X

X 8

9 Performance Step:

Standards:

Comment:

Grade:

Performance Step:

X Standards:

Grade:

X Performance Step:

X Standards:

CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

Reactivity Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

RCS Boron > required SDM Inventory Flow Paths (1)

One SDM Train Operable Dilution paths tagged Inventory flow paths: Connected to the RWST and capable of injecting into the RCS. In the current plant status only the "A" CHS pump and line-up meets this criteria.

SAT UNSAT CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

0 Containment Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

0 Containment Closure set SAT UNSAT INITIAL appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

0 PZR Surge Line Flooding Using handout, candidate initials appropriate boxes.

6 of 10 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP

'l-.GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-A1.1 Task

Title:

Revision:

0 COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Reactor Core refueled PZR vent path < 6 sq. in.

Grade:

SAT 10 X

X 11 X

X Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

To obtain each Key Safety Function Total, SUM the points allotted for each credited component or condition supporting the Key Safety Function and ENTER in the box Candidate sums the points for each credited component or condition supporting the Key Safety Function RCS Decay Heat Removal 2

SFC Decay Heat Removal 2

Inventory I

Power Availability 4

Reactivity 4

Containment I

SAT UNSAT Using the Key Safety Function total, CIRCLE the associated color condition.

see examiner's copy)

Candidate circles the associated color condition for each Key Safety Function

"* RCS Decay Heat Removal Yellow

"* SFC Decay Heat Removal Yellow

"* Inventory Orange

"* Power Availability Green

"* Reactivity Yellow

"* Containment Green 7 of 10 UNSAT STEP GRADE STEP GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-AI.1 Task

Title:

Revision:

0 COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Grade:

SAT UNSAT Comment:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Comment:

Grade:

If the candidate attempts to continue on in the procedure beyond step 1.2.1.j, prompt him to evaluate the checklist and make recommendations to Shift Manager Report to the Unit Supervisor any conditions requiring compensatory actions Reports that all Key Safety Functions are yellow or green except INVENTORY which is orange and requires compensatory actions.

No further recommendations are required beyond that some compensatory actions are required.

SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

8 of 10 STEP 12 GRADE

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

RO-AI.1 Revision:

0 For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

YES Validated Time (minutes):

NO X

5 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for ImDrovement:

9 of 10

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

RO-A1.1 The unit is shutdown in Mode 5 after a refueling outage.

Plant conditions have just changed. An electrical fault has rendered the "A" SIH pump inoperable. The Shift Manager has directed you to complete a Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist. Current equipment and unit are listed on the handout. Report to the examiner, as Shift Manager, any conditions that would require compensatory actions.

10 of 10

RO-AI.1 PLANT CONDITION HANDOUT INITIAL CONDITIONS

"* MODE 5

"* RCS 200 psia

"* PZR LEVEL 60% LEVEL COLD CAL

"* "A" TRAIN PROTECTED

"* "B" TRAIN ELECTRICAL OUTAGE; 34D DE-ENERGIZED

"* "A" + "D" STEAM GENERATOR 50% WITH STEAM RELEASE AND FEEDING CAPABILITY

"* "A" TRAIN RHR IN THE COOLDOWN MODE

"* "A" TRAIN SFC RUNNING

"* SFP NORMAL LEVEL

"* "A" CHS IN PTL

"* BOTH OFFSITE SOURCES ARE AVAILABLE

"* SBO DIESEL IS AVAILABLE

"* SDM MONITOR OPERABLE

"* CTMT CLOSURE IS SET

"* RCS BORON CONCENTRATION IS > SHUTDOWN MARGIN

"* DILUTION PATHS TAGGED PER SP3604C.6

"* THE RWST LEVEL IS > 1,000,000 GALLONS

"* 3RHS*V43 IS TAGGED AND LOCKED CLOSED AN ELECTRICAL FAULT HAS RENDERED THE "A" SIH PUMP INOPERABLE

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAKE JPM ID Number:

RO-A1.2 Revision:

0 II. Initiated:

Steve J, Developer II1. Reviewed:

Ray Martin Cr rrf f Technical Reviewer 11/15/01 Date IV.

Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Date Nuc, Pr Training Supervisor

'D1 1 of 9 10/25/01 Date

ADMIN JPM RO-A1.2 NOTE ON SCHEDULING OF JPM This JPM is planned to be performed "within" SIM JPM-1 30, Control Rod Out of Alignment, since it flows naturally from the planned procedure path and JPM-1 30 establishes all of the conditions for ADMIN JPM RO-A1.2, Determine QPTR.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility:

Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number:

RO-A1.2 Revision:

0 Task

Title:

System:

DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS Admin, Rod Control Time Critical Task:

(

) YES

( X ) NO Validated Time (minutes):

5 min Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

341-01-788, Perform a QPTR SRO RO K/A Number:

GEN.2.1.19, Ability to use plant computer to obtain and evaluate parametric information on system or component status K/A Rating:

Method of Testing:

Simulated Performance:

Actual Performance:

Location:

Classroom:

Simulator:

Task Standards:

Required Materials:

General

References:

Plant Process Computer SP 31012, Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio, Rev. 4 Reactor Engineering Curve and Data Book MP3 Tech Specs AOP 3552, Malfunction of the Rod Drive System, Rev. 3 2 of 9 X

PEO 3.0/3.0 X

X In-Plant::

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

RO-AI.1 Revision:

0 Simulator Requirements:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

Set-Up for JPM-1 30, Control Rod Out of Alignment; at step 3.b of Attachment A.

On Plant Process Computer substitute values for the following instruments:

NMP-NM43C and NMP-NM43D substitute "0" You are realigning a misaligned rod lAW AOP 3552, Malfunction of the Rod Drive System, Attachment A; Misaligned Rod. You are at step 3.b having just determined that reactor power is greater than 50%.

Complete AOP 3552, step 3.b through step 3.d and Determine QPTR.

3 of 9

• • • • NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

RO-A1.2 Revision:

0 DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS Start Time:

X Performance Step:

X Standards:

Grade:

2 X

Performance Step:

x Standards:

Grade:

Candidate uses Plant Process Computer, Tilting Factors, determine QPTR At PPC monitor or Real Time MMI, locates and calls up Tilting Factors SAT UNSAT Determine Tilting Factors using Plant Process Computer.

Candidate determines that 3 of the NI channels are valid information and records that information, but should determine that one channel is NOT providing good QPTR information via the Plant Process Computer.

NI41:

-1.03 NI42:

-1.03 SNI 43:

FAILED NI44:

-1.03 SAT UNSAT Comments:

Candidate should record "good" data and proceed to SP 31012 4 of 9 1

STEP GRADE STEP GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-A1.2 "Task

Title:

Revision:

0 DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS 3

4 x

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

X Standards:

Grade:

5 X

Performance Step:

x Standards:

Grade:

Go To SP31012, QPTR, Step 4.2:

QPTR by measurement Locates copy of SP31012 and correct section SAT UNSAT RECORD average percent reactor power from NI cabinet meters NMP NM43F on Attachment 1 (step 4.2.1)

Locates NMP-NM43F and records average percent reactor using SAT UNSAT RECORD upper and lower detector digital meter reading for NMP-NM43C and NMP-NM43D on Attachment 1.

(step 4.2.3.a.1)

Locates NMP-NM43C and NMP NM43D and upper and lower detector digital meter reading using Attachment 1

SAT UNSAT Performance Step:

Standards:

RECORD data source in "Remarks" section on Attachment 1 (step 4.2.3.b)

Locates Remarks" section on and records at least that Channel 43 data came from NMP NM43C and NMP-NM43D, upper and lower detector digital meter.

5 of 9 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP 6

GRADE x

x

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-A1.2 "Task

Title:

Revision:

0 DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS Grade:

SAT UNSAT 7

x x

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

On Attachment 1, RECORD 100% NI upper and lower currents from. (step 4.2.4.a)

Locates current Attachment 2 in Reactor Engineering Curve Book and records 100% NI upper and lower currents on Attachment 1.

SAT UNSAT 8

X 9

x Performance Step:

X Standards:

Grade:

X Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

RECORD data source and date of entry in "Remarks" section on Attachment 1 (step 4.2.4.b)

Locates Remarks" section on and records data source and date of Attachment 2 entry.

SAT UNSAT CALCULATE the detector ratio for each detector by dividing each detectors reading by that detectors 100% current and RECORD on. (step 4.2.4.c)

Uses step instructions and calculates detector ratio for AT LEAST channel 43.

SAT UNSAT 6 of 9 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE STEP GRADE

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

RO-A1.2 Revision:

0 DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS 10 X

X 11 X

X Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

CALCULATE the average upper and lower ratio and RECORD on. (step 4.2.4.d)

Uses step instructions and calculates average upper and lower detector ratio.

SAT UNSAT STEP GRADE STEP SAT UNSAT 12 X

X 13 X

Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

RECORD maximum upper and lower QPTR and associated channel on. (step 4.2.4.f)

DETERMINES maximum upper and lower QPTR and associated channel and records on Attachment 1 SAT UNSAT VERIFY maximum QPTR does not exceed 1.02 (step 4.2.6.a)

Standards:

Grade:

Determines QPTR is >1.02 SAT 7 of 9 CALCULATE power tilt for each detector and RECORD in QPTR section of Attachment 1. (step 4.2.4.e)

Uses formulae in step 4.2.4.e and calculates power tilt for AT LEAST channel 43.

GRADE STEP GRADE STEP GRADE X

UNSAT

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

RO-A1.2 Revision:

0 DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS 14 X

X Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

IF QPTR is greater than 1.02 and power is above 50% RTP, NOTIFY Shift Manager that Technical Specification 3/4.2.4, "Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio," action statement applies (step 4.2.6.b)

Determines QPTR is >1.02 and notifies the examiner acting as Shift Manager that Technical Specification 3/4.2.4, "Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio,"

action statement applies.

SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete. Return to AOP 3552, Attachment A, Step 3.e, and continue your actions with the Misaligned Rod.

Stop Time:

8 of 9 STEP GRADE

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

RO-A1.2 Revision:

0 For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

YES Validated Time (minutes):

NO X

-5 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

9 of 9

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

RO-AI.2 You are realigning a misaligned rod lAW AOP 3552, Malfunction of the Rod Drive System, Attachment A; Misaligned Rod. You are at step 3.b having just determined that reactor power is greater than 50%.

Complete AOP 3552, step 3.b through step 3.d and Determine QPTR.

10 of 9

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

JPM ID Number:

Given a maintenance repair recommendation and reference material, recommend a clearance boundary.

RO-A2 Revision:

0 II. Initiated:

Steve Jacksc 10/31/01 Date III.

Reviewed:

Ray Martin a*

Technical Reviewer 11/15/01 Date IV.

Approved:

Date Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nucle Training Supervisor

&11'Z16 1 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Millstone Unit 3 Revision:

0 JPM ID Number:

RO-A2 Task

Title:

Given a maintenance repair recommendation and reference material, recommend a clearance boundary.

Tagging and Clearance Time Critical Task:

(

) YES (X)

NO Validated Time (minutes):

10 min Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

341-01-079, Develop and/or modify, review, authorize, install, verify, and clear a tag clearance in accordance with plant and/or site procedural and safety requirements SRO RO X

PEO K/A Number:

GEN.2.2.13, Knowledge of Tagging and Clearance Procedures K/A Rating:

Method of Testing:

Simulated Performance:

Actual Performance:

Location:

Task Standards:

Required Materials:

General

References:

Classroom:

X Simulator:

In-Plant::

Develop and review a tag clearance Team Lead recommendation P&IDs, EM-109A EE One-Line diagrams OP 3337, Radioactive Gaseous Waste System WC 2, Tagging OP 3250, Removing Equipment from Service for Maintenance 2 of 6 Facility:

System:

3.6/3.8 X

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

RO-A2 Revision:

0 Simulator Requirements:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

The pump impeller on the "B" Degasifier Recirculation Pump, 3GWS-PI B, has seized. Repair efforts are planned and the maintenance Team Lead has made work package recommendations for the clearance boundary.

Your task is to develop a clearance boundary for this repair activity based on the maintenance Team Lead recommendations..

3 of 6 NONE

""NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

Task

Title:

RO-A2 Revision:

0 Given a maintenance repair recommendation and reference material, recommend a clearance boundary.

Start Time:

1_

X Comments:

Performance Step:

X Standards:

Grade:

X Performance Step:

2 X

Standards:

Grade:

Electrical and mechanical isolation of the pump can be done in any order Identifies correct piping isolation boundary for the "B" Degasifier Recirculation Pump, 3GWS-P1B Uses P&ID EM-1 09A or OP3337-001 and other appropriate references and identifies the correct boundary:

Pump Discharge (VO10) CLOSED Pump Suction (V006) CLOSED Casing Drain (V107) OPEN Discharge Vent (V972) OPEN SAT UNSAT Identifies correct electrical isolation boundary for the "B" Degasifier Recirculation Pump, 3GWS-PIB Uses OP3337-004, electrical line-up, or EE-1AC and other appropriate references and identifies the correct boundary:

• At MCC 32-3H(2M)

OFF Pump Control Switch OFF SAT UNSAT Comments:

Submits completed tagout to examiner as the Shift Manager. Tagout should substantially match the JPM attachment.

Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

4 of 6 STEP GRADE STEP GRADE

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

RO-A2 Revision:

0 For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

Validated Time (minutes):

YES NO X

10 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

5 of 6

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

RO-A2 The pump impeller on the "B" Degasifier Recirculation Pump, 3GWS-PIB, has seized. Repair efforts are planned and the maintenance Team Lead has made work package recommendations for the clearance boundary.

Your task is to develop a clearance boundary for this repair activity based on the maintenance Team Lead recommendations.

6 of 6 Tagout Request (Sheet 1 of 1)

NOTE: When this request is used, all sections should be filled out in detail.

Brief Job

Description:

Rep/,cce

,m,://4r ort 3

5-P14 work Package Number:

/t3 3 0

0 5

Component to be Isolated( 1 ):

3

- P3 Multiple isolation points or non-component (i.e.: pipe/tube section): Yes Q

No [

(If yes, walkdown required by Tagging Authority)

Recommended Tags Color Isolation Point PositionM 1 )

(1) For Blue Tags indicate initial position or if initial position is not required enter N/A.

Amplifying Instructions:

Contact Person (for multiple shifts, Contact Person is required for each shift) phone:

Approved By:

Dat:phone:

D Team e-ader / Planner / Engineering Level of Use Information STOP THINK ACT REVIEW WC 2 Rev. 006-02 68 of 81

(

WORK PA CKA GE'L,OUNDARY SHEET

(

Clearance Number:

AWO Number:

Clearance Adequate for Personnel Safety:

Date:

IContact Person / Designee SignI Step Tag Tagged Tag Equipment ID Equipment Equipment Notes Tag Tag Worker Number Type Position Serial Description Location Placed Verified Verified Number

WORK PACKAGE BO(

")ARY SHEET 1Y

/2001 20:11

.,heet 1 Of 1 Clearance 3C08 - GWS06-0006 Num ber:

11111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 111 AWO Number:

Clearance Adequate for Personnel Safety:

Date:

M30110525 Contact Person/Designee Sign Step Tag Tagged Tag Equipment ID Equipment Description Equipment Location Notes Tag Placed:

Tag Verified:

Worker Number Type Position Serial Verified Number 1

IYEL 2461 3GWS-P1B-CS B DEGASIFIER

_AB 04306 POWER IS RED 06/18/2001 06/18/2001 RECIRCULATION PUMP; GWS PANEL TAGGED OFF 07:27 07:27

,NTRL SWITCH 2

RED OFF 2462 32-3H(2M)

]GWS-P1B DEGASIFIER 3_AB 02406 06/18/2001 06/18/2001

ECIRCULATION PUMP

-NORTHWEST 07:27 07:27 3

RED CLOSED 6901 3GWS-V010

)EGASIFIER RECIRC PUMP 3_AB

_00406_DEGAS 11/06/2001 11/06/2001 1,

B) DISCHARGE 16:17 16:51 4

RED CLOSED 6902 3GWS-V006 DEGASIFIER RECIRC PUMP 3_AB

_00406-DEGAS 11/06/2001 11/06/2001

'B" SUCTION 16:17 16:51 5

RED OPEN 6903 3GWS-V107 DEGASIFIER RECIRC PUMP 3_AB

_00406-DEGAS 11/06/2001 11/06/2001 (B) CASING DRAIN 16:17 16:51 6

RED OPEN 6904 3GWS-V972 DEGASIFIER RECIRC PUMP 3_AB

_00406_DEGAS 11/06/2001 11/06/2001 I

(B) DISCHARGE VENT 16:17 16:51

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET 1ý.

I. JPM

Title:

Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

JPM ID Number:

RO-A3 Revision:

1 I1. Initiated:

Develk Ill. Reviewed:

Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nuc &r Training Supervisor Date 1, A Z 1 of 8 11/28/01 Date i x ///./0 /

Date

ADMIN JPM RO-A3

SUMMARY

OF CHANGES RE: NRC VALIDATION Added, "ALARA considerations for this task" to the initiating cue.

Added, "and ALARA considerations" to step 4, performance step area and standards

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility:

Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number:

RO-A3 Revision:

1 Task

Title:

System:

Time Critical Task:

Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

Rad worker

(

) YES (X)

NO Validated Time (minutes):

5 min Task Number(s):

Applicable To:

119-03-070, Approve entry and/or enter/exit the various radiation areas located within Millstone Station SRO X

RO X

PEO X

K/A Number:

GEN.2.3.10, Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure K/A Rating:

Method of Testing:

Simulated Performance:

Actual Performance:

Location:

Classroom:

Task Standards:

Required Materials:

General

References:

X Simulator:

In-Plant::

X Reviews RWP per RPM 5.2.2 to support the ALARA Program RWP for A RHR Cubicle (040) and Rad Survey Figure #30 Radiation Work Permits and Radiation Survey Maps RPM 5.2.2, Basic Radiation Worker Responsibilities 2 of 8 2.9/3.3 X

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number:

RO-A3 Revision:

1 Simulator Requirements:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

You have been directed to vent piping in the A RHR pump cubicle. HP has directed you to use the maintenance RWP 0040, Task 2 for this job. (Give candidate RWP 0040 and survey map #30)

Review and discuss your preparations for entering this area and what special precautions you would have to observe. Include in your discussion:

"* ALARA considerations for this task

"* Highest contamination level in the cubicle

"* Highest radiation level in the cubicle

"* Special radiological hazards

"* Longest possible stay time assuming highest general area rad level Personnel protective equipment required in the cubicle The examiner will act as Health Physics for any related questions.

3 of 8 NONE

• • • • NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1.

Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2.

When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3.

If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-A3 Task

Title:

Revision:

I Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

Start Time:

Ensure candidate has RWP 0040 and survey map #30 Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

Performance Step:

Standards:

Refers to RWP #40 (A RHR Cubicle)

Locates Task 2, RHR Cubicle walkdowns and inspections, covered under RWP #40 SAT UNSAT Locates specific requirements on RWP for at least:

Protective clothing Dosimetry Dose Limit Alarms Dose Rate Alarms Reviews RWP for specific requirements including:

"* Protective clothing

-for this task fulI-PCs

"* Dosimetry

-TLD & electronic dosimeter Dose Limit & Dose Rate Alarms

-75 mrem & 200 mr/hr 4 of 8 STEP 1

GRADE 2

STEP GRADE x

x Cue:

If candidate does not discuss an individual item:

"What are the protective clothing requirements for this area?

"What are the dosimetry requirements for this area?

"What are the Dose Limit & Dose Rate Alarms requirements for this area?

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-A3 Task

Title:

STEP GRADE Revision:

1 Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles) 3 X

X Cue:

If candidate asks HP for area protective clothing requirements for this area respond:

"What would you expect them to be?

And then "Full PCs are required in this area for the task you are performing."

Grade:

SAT UNSAT Performance Step:

Reviews the survey map for ESF Building 4'- 6" Elev. proposed to be entered Standards:

Reviews survey map for specific radiation and contamination hazards in the A RHR Cubicle including:

"* Smear results

-Smear results #18, #19, #20

"* Gamma Surveys

-280 mrem/hr gamma on contact at RHR pump and HX

-40 mrem/hr highest general area gamma

"* Contaminated areas

-No. 18 highest, 15K

"* Hot Spots

-locates on RHR piping (280 mrem/hour)

Grade:

SAT UNSAT Cue:

If candidate does not discuss an individual item:

"What are the smear results requirements for this area?

"What are the results of the gamma surveys of this area?

"Where are the contaminated areas?"

"Where are the hot spots?

5 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-A3 Task

Title:

Revision:

1 Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles) 4 x

x Performance Step:

Standards:

Grade:

STEP GRADE SAT UNSAT 6 of 8 Analyze survey map and RWP to determine preparations for entering this area and what special precautions and ALARA considerations they would have to observe.

Analyze survey map and RWP to determine the following:

"* Highest contamination level in the cubicle

-Pt. 19: 15K

"* Highest radiation level in the cubicle

-80mrem/hr on contact (A RHR Pump)

"* Special radiological hazards

-Wet/Boron near pump

-Hot Spot

"* Longest possible stay time assuming highest rad level

-Dose Limit Alarm (Stay Time) is 125 mrem

-Highest general area rad level is 40mrem/hr

= about 3.125 hours0.00145 days <br />0.0347 hours <br />2.066799e-4 weeks <br />4.75625e-5 months <br /> (figuring in approaching Hot Spots may reduce this time).

"* Personnel protective equipment required in the cubicle

-Full PC's

"* ALARA considerations

-Avoidance of Hot Spot*

-Minimize wait/rest time in higher radiation areas

-Prepare for task (pre stage tools)

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number:

RO-A3 Task

Title:

Revision:

1 Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

Comment::

• Definition of Hot Spot: >100 mr AND 5 times highest background/general area Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

7 of 8

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number:

Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

RO-A3 Revision:

1 For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task?

YES Validated Time (minutes):

NO X

-5 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM:

("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for ImDrovement:

8 of 8

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number:

Initial Conditions:

Initiating Cues:

RO-A3 You have been directed to vent piping in the A RHR pump cubicle. HP has directed you to use the maintenance RWP 0040, Task 2 for this job.

Review and discuss your preparations for entering this area and what special precautions you would have to observe.

Include in your discussion:

• ALARA considerations for this task

• Highest contamination level in the cubicle

• Highest radiation level in the cubicle

• Special radiological hazards

• Longest possible stay time assuming highest general area rad level Personnel protective equipment required in the cubicle The examiner will act as Health Physics for any related questions.

9 of 8

- RADIATION SURVEY FIGURE NO. 30 ESF Building 4' 6" Elev.

SIH*MV8806

• M ie iz A SIH"V11 M

e Z

z.

100 - gamma(r) at waist level in mrem/hr

- contamination survey point NorthI CTMT RECIRC COOLERS 40 RHR PUMP SMEAR RESULTS No. dpm/100cm 2

/- /i

',<"/*

~2 RHR PUMP

• Mezzani 100* - gamma(0 contact in mrem/hr 50 mrad - beta(,/) reading in mrad/hr 25T - neutron(o711) in mrem/hr C(OPY I

UNIT 3

RADIATION WORK PERMIT - 40 Plant Ce Year RWP Number Rev.

IRWP Start IRWP pe RWP Category IsP Eiraon 3

1 0040 03 i 01-jan-2001 S

-POWER 02-jan-2002 RWP DESCRIPTION ESF Building Component & System Modification, Repair TASK

SUMMARY

Job Description 1

3DAS-Pl1 Replace discharge piping.

2 RHR Cubicle-ESF north pipechase preventive and correc 3

RHR Heat Exchanger bolting inspection; remove, instal 4

RHR valve work; 3RHS*HCV607, 3RHS*FCV619 preventive a ALARA INFORMATION I'-RA Review Hours-Estimated Authorized Internal(DAC]- Estimated Authorized External(mRem)-Estimated Authorized 01900 00000 0000 000 001900 001900 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS General access to RCAs to perform repairs and Entry on this RWP requires the worker to understand modificiation to ESF Building components, including and comply with the following:

walkdowns, inspections, and necessary support Be knowledgeable of radiological conditions of activities, the work area

• • Adhere to the requirements of the RWP

• • Notify HP before entering overhead areas

• • Monitor electronic dosimeter frequently, especially in high noise areas

• • Unless specifically briefed otherwise, if DOSE RATE alarm sounds, move to a lower dose area and notify HP If DOSE alarm sounds, leave the area and notify HP If electronic dosimeter malfunctions, notify HP BEFORE logging out Modesty garments will be worn whenever PCs are worn L

Hea.th Physics Representative Date RWP Term/Rev Date/Time Terminated/Rev by XCOOP

RADIATION WORK PERMIT - (40) JOB STEP - 2 OF 4 I[Pant Code Year IRWP Number IRev.

IRWP Start IRWP Type IRWP Category iRWP Expiration 3

1 I 0040 03 01-jan-2001 I

S

~

POWER I02-ian-2002 "fResponsible Individual/Extension Department/Company Job Supervisor/Extension Department/Company THOMAS BtW.NS/4326 AD/DNC THOMAS BURNS/4326 AD/DNC Buidin l'orZone ILocation Plant Equipment IRad. Area Type 3ESF 4'"ESF 416' GEN/ONIDENTIFIED AREA MISCELLANEOUSI WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF JOB (MATERIALS

& METHODS)

RHR Cubicle-ESF north pipechase preventive and corrective maintenance to components, walkdowns, inspections, necessary support activities.

I I

ALARA INFORMATION oALRA Review Hours-Estimated Authorized Internal(DAC)-

Estimated Authorized External(mRem)-Estimated Authorized NA 00900 00000 00000 00000 000900 000900 System Code Component Code Task

!NRC Task,Alara Zone Location Plant Equipment 3305 MISC REPLACE SP 3CMAI 3720 3000 SURVEY MEASUREMENTS RADIATION (MR/HR)

CONTAMINATION(DPM/100CM2)

AIRBORN'.E (DAC) iRRCubicle 140 -200 5KS -

20K<.

14" Pipe Chase Platform Area 5 -

50

<1K

<.3 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS entry to Tech Spec Locked High Radiation Areas

"}'rmitted using this Job Step.

PCs required in contaminated areas.

HP supervision may adjust protective clothing requirements based on any of the followig:

"* TEDE ALARA reviews

"* Heat stress evaluations

"* FME controls Requirements for entry to High Radiation Areas:

• Dose rate meter or alarming dosimeter AND knowledge of area dose rates, OR continuous HP coverage

- Health Physics briefing for High Radiation Areas IDose Limit Alarm(Stay Time)= 0125 mrem Dose Rate Alarm= 0200 mr/hr Elapsed Time Alarm= 0000 min.

REQUIREMENTS Protective clothing:

Lab coat "Cotton liners Surgeon's gloves Health Physics Coverage

• Booties Periodic Coveralls Electronic dosimeter Shoe covers TLD Minimum Margin:

Rubber gloves 0175 mrem Modesty garments alth Physics Representative Date RWP Term/Rev Date/Time Terminated/Rev by

/

/

Reactor Operator E-Plan Responsibilities JPM ID Number:

RO-A.4 Revision:

0 I1. Initiated:

10/05/01 Date I1I.

Reviewed:

Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nucld-Training Supervisor Date Date ln1i6 D5e

1. JPM

Title:

Questions for Admin RO A.4 Topic: RO responsibilities during an E-Plan GEN. 2.4. 39 K/A: 3.3/3.1 Question 1:

You are a qualified Control Operator currently working with the Outage Planning Group. You are eating lunch in the building 475 cafeteria when you hear the evacuation alarm sound. The message following the siren states that an ALERT C-1 has been declared and all non essential personnel evacuate the site via the North Access Point. Where do you go?

Question 2:

You are a qualified Control Operator currently working with the Outage Planning Group. You receive a call at home from the Manager of Resources. He states that a SERO activation has occurred, site access has been restricted and you are requested to report to provide shift relief coverage. Where do you report and to whom do you report?

ANSWER KEY Questions for Admin RO A.4 Topic: RO responsibilities during an E-Plan GEN. 2.4. 39 K/A: 3.3/3.1 Question 1:

You are a qualified Control Operator currently working with the Outage Planning Group. You are eating lunch in the building 475 cafeteria when you hear the evacuation alarm sound. The message following the siren states that an ALERT C-1 has been declared and all non essential personnel evacuate the site via the North Access Point. Where do you go?

Answer: In accordance with EPI-FAP08, Evacuation and Assembly, non on-duty/on-call SERO personnel within the protected are will report to the OSC Assembly Area in the Bldg. 475 Cafeteria.

Question 2:

You are a qualified Control Operator currently working with the Outage Planning Group. You receive a call at home from the Manager of Resources. He states that a SERO activation has occurred, site access has been restricted and you are requested to report to provide shift relief coverage. Where do you report and to whom do you report?

Answer: Since site access has been restricted, the qualified Control Operator should report to the EOF and the Manager of Resources. The Manager of Resources then will contact the requesting party and arrange access to the site for the individual.