Information Notice 1986-46, Improper Cleaning and Decontamination of Respiratory Protection Equipment: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-46 | {{#Wiki_filter:SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-46 | ||
===UNITED STATES=== | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT | ===OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT=== | ||
WASHINGTON, D.C. | |||
20555 | |||
===June 12, 1986=== | |||
IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-46: | |||
===IMPROPER CLEANING AND DECONTAMINATION OF=== | |||
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION EQUIPMENT | RESPIRATORY PROTECTION EQUIPMENT | ||
| Line 36: | Line 42: | ||
performance or safety function of respiratory protection devices from improper | performance or safety function of respiratory protection devices from improper | ||
cleaning and decontamination techniques. | cleaning and decontamination techniques. | ||
===It is expected that recipients will=== | |||
review the information for applicability to their respiratory protection | review the information for applicability to their respiratory protection | ||
program and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude similar problems at | program and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude similar problems at | ||
their facility. However, suggestions contained in this notice do not consti- tute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is | their facility. | ||
However, suggestions contained in this notice do not consti- tute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is | |||
required. | required. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 61: | ||
Nuclear Power Operations' (INPO's) "Note Pad" a cracking problem they noted | Nuclear Power Operations' (INPO's) "Note Pad" a cracking problem they noted | ||
with the plastic coupling nut on Mine Safety Appliance (MSA) Ultra-twin Respi- rators. | with the plastic coupling nut on Mine Safety Appliance (MSA) Ultra-twin Respi- rators. | ||
This coupling nut fits over the speaking diaphragm and can be removed | |||
to connect an air hose if needed. | |||
===Cracks in these coupling nuts lead to=== | |||
excessive respirator leakage and reduction of protection. | |||
===In response to the=== | |||
Point Beach report, MSA initiated an investigation that included a survey of | Point Beach report, MSA initiated an investigation that included a survey of | ||
other Ultra-twin users. | other Ultra-twin users. | ||
indicate a problem with their product. | ===MSA concluded that the reported cracking did not=== | ||
indicate a problem with their product. | |||
===With the exception of the Susquehanna=== | |||
station, the investigation found less than a 1% incidence of cracked coupling | station, the investigation found less than a 1% incidence of cracked coupling | ||
nuts. MSA considers this normal for a plastic replacement part. The rela- tively high incidence of cracking found at Susquehanna (17%) was attributed to | nuts. | ||
MSA considers this normal for a plastic replacement part. | |||
The rela- tively high incidence of cracking found at Susquehanna (17%) was attributed to | |||
the improper use of organic solvents to clean or decontaminate the units. | |||
The | |||
cracks noted at Susquehanna were noticeably different from those noted at the | cracks noted at Susquehanna were noticeably different from those noted at the | ||
other facilities surveyed. | other facilities surveyed. | ||
===MSA was able to reproduce this type of cracking by=== | |||
exposing coupling nuts to Freon. | exposing coupling nuts to Freon. | ||
Discussion: | Discussion: | ||
The results of the MSA survey point out the importance of following manufactur- ers recommended cleaning practices. Use of improper or harsh cleaning tech- niques can lead to a degradation of integrity or loss of a safety function. | The results of the MSA survey point out the importance of following manufactur- ers recommended cleaning practices. | ||
Use of improper or harsh cleaning tech- niques can lead to a degradation of integrity or loss of a safety function. | |||
8606090354 | 8606090354 | ||
| Line 85: | Line 109: | ||
breathing apparatus (SCBA) air cylinders to remove fixed contamination, have | breathing apparatus (SCBA) air cylinders to remove fixed contamination, have | ||
been noted. An important safety function can be lost if the cylinders are not | been noted. | ||
An important safety function can be lost if the cylinders are not | |||
repainted with the proper paint because the manufacturer-applied coating is | repainted with the proper paint because the manufacturer-applied coating is | ||
| Line 91: | Line 117: | ||
designed to indicate excessive heating of the air cylinder by discoloring at | designed to indicate excessive heating of the air cylinder by discoloring at | ||
350'F. | 350'F. | ||
this decontamination technique is used on composite air cylinders. Commercial | Also, significant degradation of structural integrity can result if | ||
this decontamination technique is used on composite air cylinders. | |||
Commercial | |||
paint stripper will attack the bonding material of the reinforcing fiberglass | paint stripper will attack the bonding material of the reinforcing fiberglass | ||
| Line 101: | Line 131: | ||
Licensees are reminded that proper cleaning and decontamination of respiratory | Licensees are reminded that proper cleaning and decontamination of respiratory | ||
protection devices is essential to their safe use. | protection devices is essential to their safe use. | ||
cleaning techniques can unwittingly cause a loss of safety function. | ===Even apparently mild=== | ||
cleaning techniques can unwittingly cause a loss of safety function. | |||
Submer- sion of the BIOPAK-60 rebreather SCBA respirator in soapy water will cause | |||
serious corrosion of the unit's oxygen reserve alarm. | |||
===Some cases have been=== | |||
reported in which this type of corrosion was sufficient to defeat the alarm | reported in which this type of corrosion was sufficient to defeat the alarm | ||
functions. The manufacturer does not recommend submerging the unit to clean | functions. | ||
The manufacturer does not recommend submerging the unit to clean | |||
it. Manufacturers recommendations for cleaning and decontaminating a respirator | it. Manufacturers recommendations for cleaning and decontaminating a respirator | ||
are found in the technical literature supplied with the respirator. Additional | are found in the technical literature supplied with the respirator. | ||
Additional | |||
information on the appropriateness of a particular cleaning technique can be | information on the appropriateness of a particular cleaning technique can be | ||
| Line 125: | Line 163: | ||
Administrator of the appropriate regional office or this office. | Administrator of the appropriate regional office or this office. | ||
Edward L.J rdan, Director | ===Edward L.J rdan, Director=== | ||
Division of Emergency Preparedness | Division of Emergency Preparedness | ||
and Eng heering Response | and Eng heering Response | ||
Office of Inspection and Enforcement | ===Office of Inspection and Enforcement=== | ||
Technical Contacts: | |||
===Roger L. Pedersen, IE=== | |||
(301) 492-9425 | |||
===James E. Wigginton, IE=== | |||
(301) 492-4967 Attachment: | |||
===List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices=== | |||
Attachment 1 IN 86-46 | ===Attachment 1=== | ||
IN 86-46 | |||
===June 12, 1986=== | |||
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED | |||
Information | ===IE INFORMATION NOTICES=== | ||
Information | |||
Date of | |||
Notice No. | |||
Subject | |||
Issue | |||
Issued to | |||
86-45 | |||
86-44 | |||
86-43 | |||
86-42 | |||
86-41 | |||
86-32 Sup. 1 | |||
86-40 | |||
86-39 | |||
===Potential Falsification Of=== | |||
Test Reports On Flanges | |||
===Manufactured By Golden Gate=== | |||
Forge And Flange, Inc. | |||
6/10/86 Failure To Follow Procedures 6/10/86 | |||
===When Working In High Radiation=== | |||
Areas | |||
===Problems With Silver Zeolite=== | |||
Sampling Of Airborne Radio- iodine | |||
===Improper Maintenance=== | |||
Radiation Monitoring | |||
Of | |||
Systems | |||
===Evaluation Of Questionable=== | |||
Exposure Readings Of Licensee | |||
===Personnel Dosimeters=== | |||
Request For Collection Of | |||
===Licensee Radioactivity=== | |||
Measurements Attributed To | |||
===The Chernobyl Nuclear Plant=== | |||
Accident | |||
===Degraded Ability To Isolate=== | |||
The Reactor Coolant System | |||
From Low-Pressure Coolant | |||
===Systems in BWRS=== | |||
Failures Of RHR Pump Motors | |||
===And Pump Internals=== | |||
6/10/86 | |||
6/9/86 | |||
6/9/86 | |||
6/6/86 | |||
6/5/86 | |||
5/20/86 | |||
===All power reactor=== | |||
facilities holding | |||
an OL or CP and | |||
research and test | |||
facilities | |||
===All power reactor=== | |||
facilities holding | |||
an OL or CP and | |||
research and test | |||
reactors | |||
===All power reactor=== | |||
facilities holding | |||
an OL or CP | |||
===All power rector=== | |||
facilities holding | |||
an OL or CP | |||
===All byproduct=== | |||
material- licensees | |||
===All power reactor=== | |||
facilities holding | |||
an OL or CP | |||
===All power reactor=== | |||
facilities holding | |||
an OL or CP | |||
===All power reactor=== | |||
facilities holding | |||
an OL or CP | an OL or CP | ||
Latest revision as of 10:08, 16 January 2025
SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-46
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555
June 12, 1986
IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-46:
IMPROPER CLEANING AND DECONTAMINATION OF
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION EQUIPMENT
Addressees
All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or a
construction permit (CP) and fuel fabrication facilities.
Purpose
This notice is being issued to alert recipients of the potential loss of
performance or safety function of respiratory protection devices from improper
cleaning and decontamination techniques.
It is expected that recipients will
review the information for applicability to their respiratory protection
program and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude similar problems at
their facility.
However, suggestions contained in this notice do not consti- tute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is
required.
Description of Circumstances
In November 1985, Point Beach Nuclear Station reported on the Institute of
Nuclear Power Operations' (INPO's) "Note Pad" a cracking problem they noted
with the plastic coupling nut on Mine Safety Appliance (MSA) Ultra-twin Respi- rators.
This coupling nut fits over the speaking diaphragm and can be removed
to connect an air hose if needed.
Cracks in these coupling nuts lead to
excessive respirator leakage and reduction of protection.
In response to the
Point Beach report, MSA initiated an investigation that included a survey of
other Ultra-twin users.
MSA concluded that the reported cracking did not
indicate a problem with their product.
With the exception of the Susquehanna
station, the investigation found less than a 1% incidence of cracked coupling
nuts.
MSA considers this normal for a plastic replacement part.
The rela- tively high incidence of cracking found at Susquehanna (17%) was attributed to
the improper use of organic solvents to clean or decontaminate the units.
The
cracks noted at Susquehanna were noticeably different from those noted at the
other facilities surveyed.
MSA was able to reproduce this type of cracking by
exposing coupling nuts to Freon.
Discussion:
The results of the MSA survey point out the importance of following manufactur- ers recommended cleaning practices.
Use of improper or harsh cleaning tech- niques can lead to a degradation of integrity or loss of a safety function.
8606090354
IN 86-46 June 12, 1986 Examples of poor practices, such as stripping the paint from self-contained
breathing apparatus (SCBA) air cylinders to remove fixed contamination, have
been noted.
An important safety function can be lost if the cylinders are not
repainted with the proper paint because the manufacturer-applied coating is
designed to indicate excessive heating of the air cylinder by discoloring at
350'F.
Also, significant degradation of structural integrity can result if
this decontamination technique is used on composite air cylinders.
Commercial
paint stripper will attack the bonding material of the reinforcing fiberglass
wrapping.
Licensees are reminded that proper cleaning and decontamination of respiratory
protection devices is essential to their safe use.
Even apparently mild
cleaning techniques can unwittingly cause a loss of safety function.
Submer- sion of the BIOPAK-60 rebreather SCBA respirator in soapy water will cause
serious corrosion of the unit's oxygen reserve alarm.
Some cases have been
reported in which this type of corrosion was sufficient to defeat the alarm
functions.
The manufacturer does not recommend submerging the unit to clean
it. Manufacturers recommendations for cleaning and decontaminating a respirator
are found in the technical literature supplied with the respirator.
Additional
information on the appropriateness of a particular cleaning technique can be
obtained by contacting the respective manufacturer.
No specific action or written response is required by this information notice.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the Regional
Administrator of the appropriate regional office or this office.
Edward L.J rdan, Director
Division of Emergency Preparedness
and Eng heering Response
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Technical Contacts:
Roger L. Pedersen, IE
(301) 492-9425
James E. Wigginton, IE
(301) 492-4967 Attachment:
List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices
Attachment 1
June 12, 1986
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
IE INFORMATION NOTICES
Information
Date of
Notice No.
Subject
Issue
Issued to
86-45
86-44
86-43
86-42
86-41
86-32 Sup. 1
86-40
86-39
Potential Falsification Of
Test Reports On Flanges
Manufactured By Golden Gate
Forge And Flange, Inc.
6/10/86 Failure To Follow Procedures 6/10/86
When Working In High Radiation
Areas
Problems With Silver Zeolite
Sampling Of Airborne Radio- iodine
Improper Maintenance
Radiation Monitoring
Of
Systems
Evaluation Of Questionable
Exposure Readings Of Licensee
Personnel Dosimeters
Request For Collection Of
Licensee Radioactivity
Measurements Attributed To
The Chernobyl Nuclear Plant
Accident
Degraded Ability To Isolate
From Low-Pressure Coolant
Systems in BWRS
Failures Of RHR Pump Motors
And Pump Internals
6/10/86
6/9/86
6/9/86
6/6/86
6/5/86
5/20/86
All power reactor
facilities holding
research and test
facilities
All power reactor
facilities holding
research and test
reactors
All power reactor
facilities holding
All power rector
facilities holding
All byproduct
material- licensees
All power reactor
facilities holding
All power reactor
facilities holding
All power reactor
facilities holding
OL = Operating License
CP = Construction Permit