ML040050235: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:January 16, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: | {{#Wiki_filter:January 16, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: | ||
Deirdre W. Spaulding, Project Manager, Section 1 | |||
/RA/ | |||
Project Directorate III Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | Project Directorate III Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
| Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
Discussion Points | Discussion Points | ||
ML040050235 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Submittal Dated November 3, 2003 TAC MB8183 and MB8184 Discussion Points Response Number 5: | ML040050235 | ||
The response mentions the application of a V(z) term to the measured FQ(z). The staff is not clear on what the V(z) term is, or how it is determined and applied. Is this term the same as the W(z) term used in the RAOC methodology? The response also mentions possible application of an additional burnup correction term. Please discuss the V(z) term and the additional burnup correction term, including descriptions of how these terms are determined and applied, and providing references to appropriate methodologies. | |||
ATTACHMENT Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Submittal Dated November 3, 2003 TAC MB8183 and MB8184 Discussion Points Response Number 5: | |||
The response mentions the application of a V(z) term to the measured FQ(z). The staff is not clear on what the V(z) term is, or how it is determined and applied. Is this term the same as the W(z) term used in the RAOC methodology? The response also mentions possible application of an additional burnup correction term. Please discuss the V(z) term and the additional burnup correction term, including descriptions of how these terms are determined and applied, and providing references to appropriate methodologies.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 05:52, 16 January 2025
| ML040050235 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 01/16/2004 |
| From: | Spaulding D NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD3 |
| To: | NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD3 |
| References | |
| TAC MB8183, TAC MB8184 | |
| Download: ML040050235 (3) | |
Text
January 16, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM:
Deirdre W. Spaulding, Project Manager, Section 1
/RA/
Project Directorate III Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION FOR ISSUES DISCUSSED IN TELEPHONE CONFERENCE (TAC NOS. MB8183 AND MB8184)
The attachment was transmitted by fax to Mr. Jack Gadzala, the Nuclear Management Company, LLC, in preparation for a telephone conference. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey a formal request for information or represent an Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff position.
Docket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301
Attachment:
Discussion Points
ATTACHMENT Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Submittal Dated November 3, 2003 TAC MB8183 and MB8184 Discussion Points Response Number 5:
The response mentions the application of a V(z) term to the measured FQ(z). The staff is not clear on what the V(z) term is, or how it is determined and applied. Is this term the same as the W(z) term used in the RAOC methodology? The response also mentions possible application of an additional burnup correction term. Please discuss the V(z) term and the additional burnup correction term, including descriptions of how these terms are determined and applied, and providing references to appropriate methodologies.