ML062210024: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML062210024 | | number = ML062210024 | ||
| issue date = 08/08/2006 | | issue date = 08/08/2006 | ||
| title = Response to Mr. Glenn O. | | title = Response to Mr. Glenn O. Steigers Letter Concerning Electrical Load Contingency Protocol and Its Impact on Seabrook Station | ||
| author name = Collins S | | author name = Collins S | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/ORA | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/ORA | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Dear Mr. Steiger:== | ==Dear Mr. Steiger:== | ||
I am responding to your {{letter dated|date=May 24, 2006|text=letter dated May 24, 2006}}, concerning the repeated downpowering of Seabrook Station. In your letter, you expressed concerns about the design and operational impacts of these downpowers, and how the Town of Hudson, Light and Power Department (HL&PD), along with the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company (MMWEC), | |||
I am responding to your letter dated May 24, 2006, concerning the repeated downpowering of Seabrook Station. In your letter, you expressed concerns about the design and operational impacts of these downpowers, and how the Town of Hudson, Light and Power Department (HL&PD), along with the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company (MMWEC), | |||
have a significant financial interest in the safe and reliable operation of Seabrook Station. You noted that between October 19, 2005, and April 20, 2006, the Independent System Operator, New England (ISO-NE) mandated downpowers of Seabrook Station from full power to levels at or below 1,200 Megawatts-Electric (MWe) on 27 separate occasions. The ISO-NE mandated these downpowers at the request of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) in response to reliability concerns in the New York Central East region. | have a significant financial interest in the safe and reliable operation of Seabrook Station. You noted that between October 19, 2005, and April 20, 2006, the Independent System Operator, New England (ISO-NE) mandated downpowers of Seabrook Station from full power to levels at or below 1,200 Megawatts-Electric (MWe) on 27 separate occasions. The ISO-NE mandated these downpowers at the request of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) in response to reliability concerns in the New York Central East region. | ||
The NRCs primary mission is to regulate the safe use of radioactive material for civilian purposes to ensure the protection of public health and safety and the environment. The NRC achieves its safety mission, in part, by licensing individuals and organizations to use radioactive materials for beneficial civilian purposes, and ensuring that the safety performance of these "licensees" meets acceptable levels. | The NRCs primary mission is to regulate the safe use of radioactive material for civilian purposes to ensure the protection of public health and safety and the environment. The NRC achieves its safety mission, in part, by licensing individuals and organizations to use radioactive materials for beneficial civilian purposes, and ensuring that the safety performance of these "licensees" meets acceptable levels. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
With respect to ensuring a reliable offsite power source, we must rely on other agencies and entities to govern and oversee safe grid operations due to our lack of regulatory authority in this area. In this respect, we would encourage Seabrook Station to continue to work with ISO-NE, | With respect to ensuring a reliable offsite power source, we must rely on other agencies and entities to govern and oversee safe grid operations due to our lack of regulatory authority in this area. In this respect, we would encourage Seabrook Station to continue to work with ISO-NE, | ||
G. Steiger | 2 G. Steiger NYISO, and the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) through established processes to try to eliminate the need for such frequent downpowers in the future. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ Marc Dapas signed for Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator | |||
G. Steiger | 3 G. Steiger Mr. Glenn O. Steiger, General Manager Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company Moody Street, Post Office Box 426 Ludlow, MA 01056 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 38: | Line 37: | ||
==Dear Mr. Steiger:== | ==Dear Mr. Steiger:== | ||
I am responding to your {{letter dated|date=May 24, 2006|text=letter dated May 24, 2006}}, concerning the repeated downpowering of Seabrook Station. In your letter, you expressed concerns about the design and operational impacts of these downpowers, and how the Town of Hudson, Light and Power Department (HL&PD), along with the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company (MMWEC), have a significant financial interest in the safe and reliable operation of Seabrook Station. You noted that between October 19, 2005, and April 20, 2006, the Independent System Operator, New England (ISO-NE) mandated downpowers of Seabrook Station from full power to levels at or below 1,200 Megawatts-Electric (MWe) on 27 separate occasions. The ISO-NE mandated these downpowers at the request of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) in response to reliability concerns in the New York Central East region. | |||
I am responding to your letter dated May 24, 2006, concerning the repeated downpowering of Seabrook Station. In your letter, you expressed concerns about the design and operational impacts of these downpowers, and how the Town of Hudson, Light and Power Department (HL&PD), along with the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company (MMWEC), have a significant financial interest in the safe and reliable operation of Seabrook Station. You noted that between October 19, 2005, and April 20, 2006, the Independent System Operator, New England (ISO-NE) mandated downpowers of Seabrook Station from full power to levels at or below 1,200 Megawatts-Electric (MWe) on 27 separate occasions. The ISO-NE mandated these downpowers at the request of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) in response to reliability concerns in the New York Central East region. | |||
The NRCs primary mission is to regulate the safe use of radioactive material for civilian purposes to ensure the protection of public health and safety and the environment. The NRC achieves its safety mission, in part, by licensing individuals and organizations to use radioactive materials for beneficial civilian purposes, and ensuring that the safety performance of these "licensees" meets acceptable levels. | The NRCs primary mission is to regulate the safe use of radioactive material for civilian purposes to ensure the protection of public health and safety and the environment. The NRC achieves its safety mission, in part, by licensing individuals and organizations to use radioactive materials for beneficial civilian purposes, and ensuring that the safety performance of these "licensees" meets acceptable levels. | ||
To ensure that Seabrook operates safely, the licensee must comply with all conditions of its operating license, which includes the plants Technical Specifications and design bases. The Technical Specifications include requirements relative to plant thermal transients and the offsite power source. The Seabrook Station Technical Specifications reference the number of times selected safety-related structures, systems, and components can be subject to thermal transients. The downpowers that you described in your letter were from a full output of about 1,250 MWe to about 1,200 MWe, a change of 4% rated thermal power. These changes in power are relatively minor and do not challenge the transient limits described in the Seabrook Technical Specifications or design bases. While undesirable from an economic standpoint for Seabrook, these small transients are fully within Seabrooks design bases, and therefore, the NRC does not impose any restrictions or limits on such small power changes. | To ensure that Seabrook operates safely, the licensee must comply with all conditions of its operating license, which includes the plants Technical Specifications and design bases. The Technical Specifications include requirements relative to plant thermal transients and the offsite power source. The Seabrook Station Technical Specifications reference the number of times selected safety-related structures, systems, and components can be subject to thermal transients. The downpowers that you described in your letter were from a full output of about 1,250 MWe to about 1,200 MWe, a change of 4% rated thermal power. These changes in power are relatively minor and do not challenge the transient limits described in the Seabrook Technical Specifications or design bases. While undesirable from an economic standpoint for Seabrook, these small transients are fully within Seabrooks design bases, and therefore, the NRC does not impose any restrictions or limits on such small power changes. | ||
With respect to ensuring a reliable offsite power source, we must rely on other agencies and entities to govern and oversee safe grid operations due to our lack of regulatory authority in this area. In this respect, we would encourage Seabrook Station to continue to work with ISO-NE, P. Krohn, DRP | With respect to ensuring a reliable offsite power source, we must rely on other agencies and entities to govern and oversee safe grid operations due to our lack of regulatory authority in this area. In this respect, we would encourage Seabrook Station to continue to work with ISO-NE, Distribution: | ||
DOCUMENT NAME: E:\Filenet\ML062210024.wpd After declaring this document An Official Agency Record it will be released to the Public. | S. Collins, RA M. Dapas, DRA, B. Holian, DRP A. Blough, DRS D. Lew, DRP M. Gamberoni, DRS P. Krohn, DRP J. Rogge, DRS B. Norris, DRP G. Dentel, DRP, SRI - Seabrook D. Screnci, PAO G. Wilson, OI R. Barkley, ORA K. Farrar, ORA SUNSI Review Complete: | ||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE | BSN (Reviewers Initials) | ||
DOCUMENT NAME: E:\\Filenet\\ML062210024.wpd After declaring this document An Official Agency Record it will be released to the Public. | |||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE RI/DRP RI/DRS RI/DRP NRR *per telecon NAME PKrohn/BSN JRogge/BSN DLew GWilson / BSN for DATE 8/3/06 08/02/06 8/3/06 08/02/06 OFFICE RI/ORA RI/PAO RI/RA NAME RBarkley / RSB DScrenci / DPS SCollins/MLD DATE 08/03/06 08/03/06 8/8/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:31, 15 January 2025
| ML062210024 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 08/08/2006 |
| From: | Collins S Region 1 Administrator |
| To: | Steiger G Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML062210024 (3) | |
Text
August 8, 2006 Mr. Glenn O. Steiger, General Manager Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company Moody Street, Post Office Box 426 Ludlow, MA 01056
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER CONCERNING ELECTRICAL LOAD CONTINGENCY PROTOCOL AND ITS IMPACT ON SEABROOK STATION
Dear Mr. Steiger:
I am responding to your letter dated May 24, 2006, concerning the repeated downpowering of Seabrook Station. In your letter, you expressed concerns about the design and operational impacts of these downpowers, and how the Town of Hudson, Light and Power Department (HL&PD), along with the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company (MMWEC),
have a significant financial interest in the safe and reliable operation of Seabrook Station. You noted that between October 19, 2005, and April 20, 2006, the Independent System Operator, New England (ISO-NE) mandated downpowers of Seabrook Station from full power to levels at or below 1,200 Megawatts-Electric (MWe) on 27 separate occasions. The ISO-NE mandated these downpowers at the request of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) in response to reliability concerns in the New York Central East region.
The NRCs primary mission is to regulate the safe use of radioactive material for civilian purposes to ensure the protection of public health and safety and the environment. The NRC achieves its safety mission, in part, by licensing individuals and organizations to use radioactive materials for beneficial civilian purposes, and ensuring that the safety performance of these "licensees" meets acceptable levels.
To ensure that Seabrook operates safely, the licensee must comply with all conditions of its operating license, which includes the plants Technical Specifications and design bases. The Technical Specifications include requirements relative to plant thermal transients and the offsite power source. The Seabrook Station Technical Specifications reference the number of times selected safety-related structures, systems, and components can be subject to thermal transients. The downpowers that you described in your letter were from a full output of about 1,250 MWe to about 1,200 MWe, a change of 4% rated thermal power. These changes in power are relatively minor and do not challenge the transient limits described in the Seabrook Technical Specifications or design bases. While undesirable from an economic standpoint for Seabrook, these small transients are fully within Seabrooks design bases, therefore, the NRC does not impose any restrictions or limits on such small power changes.
With respect to ensuring a reliable offsite power source, we must rely on other agencies and entities to govern and oversee safe grid operations due to our lack of regulatory authority in this area. In this respect, we would encourage Seabrook Station to continue to work with ISO-NE,
2 G. Steiger NYISO, and the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) through established processes to try to eliminate the need for such frequent downpowers in the future.
Sincerely,
/RA/ Marc Dapas signed for Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator
3 G. Steiger Mr. Glenn O. Steiger, General Manager Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company Moody Street, Post Office Box 426 Ludlow, MA 01056
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER CONCERNING ELECTRICAL LOAD CONTINGENCY PROTOCOL AND ITS IMPACT ON SEABROOK STATION
Dear Mr. Steiger:
I am responding to your letter dated May 24, 2006, concerning the repeated downpowering of Seabrook Station. In your letter, you expressed concerns about the design and operational impacts of these downpowers, and how the Town of Hudson, Light and Power Department (HL&PD), along with the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company (MMWEC), have a significant financial interest in the safe and reliable operation of Seabrook Station. You noted that between October 19, 2005, and April 20, 2006, the Independent System Operator, New England (ISO-NE) mandated downpowers of Seabrook Station from full power to levels at or below 1,200 Megawatts-Electric (MWe) on 27 separate occasions. The ISO-NE mandated these downpowers at the request of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) in response to reliability concerns in the New York Central East region.
The NRCs primary mission is to regulate the safe use of radioactive material for civilian purposes to ensure the protection of public health and safety and the environment. The NRC achieves its safety mission, in part, by licensing individuals and organizations to use radioactive materials for beneficial civilian purposes, and ensuring that the safety performance of these "licensees" meets acceptable levels.
To ensure that Seabrook operates safely, the licensee must comply with all conditions of its operating license, which includes the plants Technical Specifications and design bases. The Technical Specifications include requirements relative to plant thermal transients and the offsite power source. The Seabrook Station Technical Specifications reference the number of times selected safety-related structures, systems, and components can be subject to thermal transients. The downpowers that you described in your letter were from a full output of about 1,250 MWe to about 1,200 MWe, a change of 4% rated thermal power. These changes in power are relatively minor and do not challenge the transient limits described in the Seabrook Technical Specifications or design bases. While undesirable from an economic standpoint for Seabrook, these small transients are fully within Seabrooks design bases, and therefore, the NRC does not impose any restrictions or limits on such small power changes.
With respect to ensuring a reliable offsite power source, we must rely on other agencies and entities to govern and oversee safe grid operations due to our lack of regulatory authority in this area. In this respect, we would encourage Seabrook Station to continue to work with ISO-NE, Distribution:
S. Collins, RA M. Dapas, DRA, B. Holian, DRP A. Blough, DRS D. Lew, DRP M. Gamberoni, DRS P. Krohn, DRP J. Rogge, DRS B. Norris, DRP G. Dentel, DRP, SRI - Seabrook D. Screnci, PAO G. Wilson, OI R. Barkley, ORA K. Farrar, ORA SUNSI Review Complete:
BSN (Reviewers Initials)
DOCUMENT NAME: E:\\Filenet\\ML062210024.wpd After declaring this document An Official Agency Record it will be released to the Public.
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE RI/DRP RI/DRS RI/DRP NRR *per telecon NAME PKrohn/BSN JRogge/BSN DLew GWilson / BSN for DATE 8/3/06 08/02/06 8/3/06 08/02/06 OFFICE RI/ORA RI/PAO RI/RA NAME RBarkley / RSB DScrenci / DPS SCollins/MLD DATE 08/03/06 08/03/06 8/8/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY