ML090080084: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML090080084
| number = ML090080084
| issue date = 12/15/2008
| issue date = 12/15/2008
| title = 2008/12/15 Indian Point Lr Hearing - Groundwater Contamination at Indian Point and License Renewal
| title = Lr Hearing - Groundwater Contamination at Indian Point and License Renewal
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:IPRenewal NPEmails From:                       John Boska Sent:                       Monday, December 15, 2008 3:20 PM To:                         Lisa Regner Cc:                         Bo Pham; Andrew Stuyvenberg; Mark Kowal; Kimberly Green
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:
John Boska Sent:
Monday, December 15, 2008 3:20 PM To:
Lisa Regner Cc:
Bo Pham; Andrew Stuyvenberg; Mark Kowal; Kimberly Green


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Groundwater contamination at Indian Point and license renewal We had a call with the licensee today to discuss the trends on the samples from the monitoring wells near IP2 for groundwater at the site. They are not seeing much of a decrease of tritium in the wells (in some cases they saw an increase). The readings can be affected by the amount of rain. About the end of the 1st quarter 2009, the licensee plans to inform us of their observations. They wanted to let us know that their conclusion might be that a very small leak continues from the Indian Point 2 spent fuel pool. There is nothing firm yet. If the leak continues, there is nothing they can do to stop it, so it would continue for the life of the plant. They do have the ability to switch to active pumping, where they pump out groundwater, but they don't intend to do that (the tritium still goes into the Hudson River that way, just through the normal release path) because it doesn't make sense (you lose the radioactive decay inherent in slow underground travel). I just wanted to let you know the situation in case you think it has any bearing on license renewal.
Groundwater contamination at Indian Point and license renewal We had a call with the licensee today to discuss the trends on the samples from the monitoring wells near IP2 for groundwater at the site. They are not seeing much of a decrease of tritium in the wells (in some cases they saw an increase). The readings can be affected by the amount of rain. About the end of the 1st quarter 2009, the licensee plans to inform us of their observations. They wanted to let us know that their conclusion might be that a very small leak continues from the Indian Point 2 spent fuel pool. There is nothing firm yet. If the leak continues, there is nothing they can do to stop it, so it would continue for the life of the plant. They do have the ability to switch to active pumping, where they pump out groundwater, but they don't intend to do that (the tritium still goes into the Hudson River that way, just through the normal release path) because it doesn't make sense (you lose the radioactive decay inherent in slow underground travel). I just wanted to let you know the situation in case you think it has any bearing on license renewal.
John Boska Indian Point Project Manager, DORL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-2901 email: john.boska@nrc.gov 1
John Boska Indian Point Project Manager, DORL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-2901 email: john.boska@nrc.gov  


Hearing Identifier:   IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:         988 Mail Envelope Properties (John.Boska@nrc.gov20081215152000)
Hearing Identifier:
IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:
988 Mail Envelope Properties (John.Boska@nrc.gov20081215152000)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Groundwater contamination at Indian Point and license renewal Sent Date:             12/15/2008 3:20:28 PM Received Date:         12/15/2008 3:20:00 PM From:                 John Boska Created By:           John.Boska@nrc.gov Recipients:
Groundwater contamination at Indian Point and license renewal Sent Date:
12/15/2008 3:20:28 PM Received Date:
12/15/2008 3:20:00 PM From:
John Boska Created By:
John.Boska@nrc.gov Recipients:  
"Bo Pham" <Bo.Pham@nrc.gov>
"Bo Pham" <Bo.Pham@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Andrew Stuyvenberg" <Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Andrew Stuyvenberg" <Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov>
Line 33: Line 43:
Tracking Status: None "Lisa Regner" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Lisa Regner" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                         Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                       1204                     12/15/2008 3:20:00 PM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:         No Reply Requested:             No Sensitivity:                 Normal Expiration Date:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1204 12/15/2008 3:20:00 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 13:46, 14 January 2025

Lr Hearing - Groundwater Contamination at Indian Point and License Renewal
ML090080084
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2008
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML090080084 (2)


Text

1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:

John Boska Sent:

Monday, December 15, 2008 3:20 PM To:

Lisa Regner Cc:

Bo Pham; Andrew Stuyvenberg; Mark Kowal; Kimberly Green

Subject:

Groundwater contamination at Indian Point and license renewal We had a call with the licensee today to discuss the trends on the samples from the monitoring wells near IP2 for groundwater at the site. They are not seeing much of a decrease of tritium in the wells (in some cases they saw an increase). The readings can be affected by the amount of rain. About the end of the 1st quarter 2009, the licensee plans to inform us of their observations. They wanted to let us know that their conclusion might be that a very small leak continues from the Indian Point 2 spent fuel pool. There is nothing firm yet. If the leak continues, there is nothing they can do to stop it, so it would continue for the life of the plant. They do have the ability to switch to active pumping, where they pump out groundwater, but they don't intend to do that (the tritium still goes into the Hudson River that way, just through the normal release path) because it doesn't make sense (you lose the radioactive decay inherent in slow underground travel). I just wanted to let you know the situation in case you think it has any bearing on license renewal.

John Boska Indian Point Project Manager, DORL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-2901 email: john.boska@nrc.gov

Hearing Identifier:

IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:

988 Mail Envelope Properties (John.Boska@nrc.gov20081215152000)

Subject:

Groundwater contamination at Indian Point and license renewal Sent Date:

12/15/2008 3:20:28 PM Received Date:

12/15/2008 3:20:00 PM From:

John Boska Created By:

John.Boska@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Bo Pham" <Bo.Pham@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Andrew Stuyvenberg" <Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Mark Kowal" <Mark.Kowal@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Kimberly Green" <Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Lisa Regner" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1204 12/15/2008 3:20:00 PM Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: