ML102980265: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML102980265 | | number = ML102980265 | ||
| issue date = 04/22/2010 | | issue date = 04/22/2010 | ||
| title = Email from Ohara, Timothy to Sanders, Carleen, FW: Scan from Salem/Hope Creek HP5035 | | title = Email from Ohara, Timothy to Sanders, Carleen, FW: Scan from Salem/Hope Creek HP5035 | ||
| author name = O'Hara T | | author name = O'Hara T | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/EB1 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/EB1 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:OHara, Timothy From: | {{#Wiki_filter:OHara, Timothy From: | ||
OHara, Timothy fl*J Sent: | |||
Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:40 PM To: | |||
Sanders, Carleen | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: Scan from Salem/Hope Creek HP5035 Attachments: | FW: Scan from Salem/Hope Creek HP5035 Attachments: | ||
Tim OHara | Scan File.pdf; S-TODI-2010-0004 AFW Buried Pipe Evaluation.pdf Hello Carleen, Since Rick is out, I'm sending this to you. We expect the completed analysis tomorrow PM. This FEA is for past operability on the old Salem Unit 1 piping. I think John Tsao knows what we're looking for on this. Please email me with any questions. | ||
Tim OHara Original Message ----- | |||
From: OHara, Timothy Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:00 PM To: Tsao, John Cc: Lupold, Timothy; Conte, Richard; Gray, Harold; Ennis, Rick; Burritt, Arthur; Schroeder, Daniel; Cline, Leonard | From: OHara, Timothy Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:00 PM To: Tsao, John Cc: Lupold, Timothy; Conte, Richard; Gray, Harold; Ennis, Rick; Burritt, Arthur; Schroeder, Daniel; Cline, Leonard | ||
| Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
We don't expect to receive the final copy of the analysis until tomorrow PM so I wanted to, at least, provide this information today. | We don't expect to receive the final copy of the analysis until tomorrow PM so I wanted to, at least, provide this information today. | ||
The first attachment (the letter) describes how they feel they've met the Code requirements. I'm hoping this will give you some advanced information before we get the actual FEA. Let me now if you have any questions. | The first attachment (the letter) describes how they feel they've met the Code requirements. I'm hoping this will give you some advanced information before we get the actual FEA. Let me now if you have any questions. | ||
Tim OHara | Tim OHara Original Message---- | ||
From: R1Scan [mailto:R1Scan@nrc.gov] | From: R1Scan [mailto:R1Scan@nrc.gov] | ||
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:25 PM To: OHara, Timothy | Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:25 PM To: OHara, Timothy | ||
Latest revision as of 02:19, 14 January 2025
| ML102980265 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 04/22/2010 |
| From: | O'Hara T Engineering Region 1 Branch 1 |
| To: | Sanders C Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2010-0334 | |
| Download: ML102980265 (1) | |
Text
OHara, Timothy From:
OHara, Timothy fl*J Sent:
Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:40 PM To:
Sanders, Carleen
Subject:
FW: Scan from Salem/Hope Creek HP5035 Attachments:
Scan File.pdf; S-TODI-2010-0004 AFW Buried Pipe Evaluation.pdf Hello Carleen, Since Rick is out, I'm sending this to you. We expect the completed analysis tomorrow PM. This FEA is for past operability on the old Salem Unit 1 piping. I think John Tsao knows what we're looking for on this. Please email me with any questions.
Tim OHara Original Message -----
From: OHara, Timothy Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:00 PM To: Tsao, John Cc: Lupold, Timothy; Conte, Richard; Gray, Harold; Ennis, Rick; Burritt, Arthur; Schroeder, Daniel; Cline, Leonard
Subject:
FW: Scan from Salem/Hope Creek HP5035 Hello John, PSEG has provided us with a preliminary letter (attached) from SAI describing the results of the finite element analysis performed on the old Salem Unit 1 AFW buried headers #12 and #14. I'm also attaching a copy of the information which PSEG gave SAI as input to the analysis.
We don't expect to receive the final copy of the analysis until tomorrow PM so I wanted to, at least, provide this information today.
The first attachment (the letter) describes how they feel they've met the Code requirements. I'm hoping this will give you some advanced information before we get the actual FEA. Let me now if you have any questions.
Tim OHara Original Message----
From: R1Scan [1]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:25 PM To: OHara, Timothy
Subject:
Scan from Salem/Hope Creek HP5035 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device.