NRC 2012-0042, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ENERG r I            '-
{{#Wiki_filter:June 8,2012 ENERG r '-
                                                                      /-POIN?             BEACH June 8,2012                                                                        NRC 2012-0042 10 CFR 50.54(f)
I
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Dockets 50-266 and 50-301 Renewed License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 Response to NRC Request for lnformation Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Renardinq Recommendation 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident
/-
POIN?
BEACH NRC 201 2-0042 10 CFR 50.54(f)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 1 1555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Dockets 50-266 and 50-301 Renewed License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 Response to NRC Request for lnformation Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Renardinq Recommendation 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident  


==References:==
==References:==
(1)     U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Request for lnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f)
(1)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Request for lnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f)
Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident,"
Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident,"
March 12,2012 (MLI 2053A340)
March 12,201 2 (MLI 2053A340)
(2)     NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC letter to NRC, dated May 10,2012, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC1s60-day Response to NRC Letter, Request for lnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident; dated March 12, 2012 Via Reference (I), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Enclosure 5 of Reference (1) contains specific Requested Actions and Requested lnformation associated with Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP) programs. NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) submitted an alternative course of action and basis for acceptability of that course of action in response to the information request (Reference 2). provides the NextEra response to Communications Request #2 and Staffing Requests #3, #4 and #5 of the proposed alternative course of actions provided in Reference (2).
(2)
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC letter to NRC, dated May 10,2012, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC1s 60-day Response to NRC Letter, Request for lnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident; dated March 12, 201 2 Via Reference (I), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Enclosure 5 of Reference (1) contains specific Requested Actions and Requested lnformation associated with Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP) programs. NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) submitted an alternative course of action and basis for acceptability of that course of action in response to the information request (Reference 2). provides the NextEra response to Communications Request #2 and Staffing Requests #3, #4 and #5 of the proposed alternative course of actions provided in Reference (2).
This letter contains no new Regulatory Commitments and no revisions to existing Regulatory Commitments.
This letter contains no new Regulatory Commitments and no revisions to existing Regulatory Commitments.
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC,6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241  


Document Control Desk Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. James Costedio, Licensing Manager, at 9201755-7427.
Document Control Desk Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. James Costedio, Licensing Manager, at 9201755-7427.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on June 8,2012.
Executed on June 8,2012.
Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Larry Meyer Site Vice President Enclosure cc:     Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Director of Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC
Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Larry Meyer Site Vice President Enclosure cc:
Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Director of Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC  


ENCLOSURE I NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS IAND 2 RESPONSE TO COMMUNICATIONS REQUEST #2 AND STAFFING REQUESTS #3, #4 AND #5 OF THE NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTIONS Via Reference (I), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) submitted an alternative course of action to respond to the requested information associated with Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP) programs of the near-term task force review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident (Reference 2). The following information is provided by NextEra in response to Communications Request #2 and Staffing Requests #3, #4 and #5 of the proposed alternative course of actions provided in Reference (1).
ENCLOSURE I NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS I AND 2 RESPONSE TO COMMUNICATIONS REQUEST #2 AND STAFFING REQUESTS #3, #4 AND #5 OF THE NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTIONS Via Reference (I), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) submitted an alternative course of action to respond to the requested information associated with Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP) programs of the near-term task force review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident (Reference 2). The following information is provided by NextEra in response to Communications Request #2 and Staffing Requests #3, #4 and #5 of the proposed alternative course of actions provided in Reference (1).
COMMUNICATIONS Request #2 Describe any interim actions that have been taken or are planned to be taken to enhance existing communications systems power supplies until the communications assessment and the resulting actions are complete.
COMMUNICATIONS Request #2 Describe any interim actions that have been taken or are planned to be taken to enhance existing communications systems power supplies until the communications assessment and the resulting actions are complete.
NextEra Response The current Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) internal plant phone system has an eight-hour battery back-up. Six satellite phones are also available on-site which are connected to the internal plant phone system, and are also connected to a battery back-up. In the event that all communication infrastructure is lost within 25 miles of the plant, in accordance with Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-01 guidance, it is assumed that the current PBNP internal plant phone system would not be functional.
NextEra Response The current Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) internal plant phone system has an eight-hour battery back-up. Six satellite phones are also available on-site which are connected to the internal plant phone system, and are also connected to a battery back-up. In the event that all communication infrastructure is lost within 25 miles of the plant, in accordance with Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-01 guidance, it is assumed that the current PBNP internal plant phone system would not be functional.
Line 41: Line 47:
Currently, there are more than 100 radios available for use and over 40 additional batteries.
Currently, there are more than 100 radios available for use and over 40 additional batteries.
The battery chargers on site have the ability to be connected to a portable generator to ensure the availability of the site's radio communication system.
The battery chargers on site have the ability to be connected to a portable generator to ensure the availability of the site's radio communication system.
In the event that the present PBNP offsite communication systems are not functional, NextEra has ordered 15 satellite phones. Unlike the satellite phone system connected to the internal plant phone system, these 15 satellite phones will be powered from internal and rechargeable portable batteries. Satellite phones will be made available at each key emergency response facility, as well as the Control Room. These new satellite phones will be deployed to their respective locations by September, 2012.
In the event that the present PBNP offsite communication systems are not functional, NextEra has ordered 15 satellite phones. Unlike the satellite phone system connected to the internal plant phone system, these 15 satellite phones will be powered from internal and rechargeable portable batteries. Satellite phones will be made available at each key emergency response facility, as well as the Control Room. These new satellite phones will be deployed to their respective locations by September, 201 2.
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3  


STAFFING Request #3 ldentify how the augmented staff would be notified given degraded communications capabilities.
STAFFING Request #3 ldentify how the augmented staff would be notified given degraded communications capabilities.
NextEra Response Expectations have been communicated to all Emergency Response Organization (ERO) members to respond to their respective assigned emergency response facilities when made aware of an area-wide loss-of-grid or loss-of-communicationcapability event. In the event that their respective facility is inaccessible, ERO members were directed to go to the Joint Public Information Center (JPIC), located approximately 25 miles from PBNP, in Green Bay, Wisconsin. The expectation will be included in EP initial and refresher training for ERO members.
NextEra Response Expectations have been communicated to all Emergency Response Organization (ERO) members to respond to their respective assigned emergency response facilities when made aware of an area-wide loss-of-grid or loss-of-communication capability event. In the event that their respective facility is inaccessible, ERO members were directed to go to the Joint Public Information Center (JPIC), located approximately 25 miles from PBNP, in Green Bay, Wisconsin. The expectation will be included in EP initial and refresher training for ERO members.
Request #4 ldentify the methods of access (e.g., roadways, navigable bodies of water and dockage, airlift, etc.) to the site that are expected to be available after a widespread large scale natural event.
Request #4 ldentify the methods of access (e.g., roadways, navigable bodies of water and dockage, airlift, etc.) to the site that are expected to be available after a widespread large scale natural event.
NextEra Response Primary vehicle access to the PBNP Owner Controlled Area (OCA) is through the south site entrance from Nuclear Road. A secondary access point to the PBNP OCA is through the north site entrance on Lakeshore Road. There are numerous traffic routes north, south and west of the OCA that maximize the potential that site vehicle access would not be hindered. If access to the plant is restricted due to debris covering the roadways, both county and commercially available heavy equipment could be utilized to free a travel path to the site. In addition to being accessible via a vehicle, PBNP can be accessed via other methods including a helicopter, watercraft, or walking.
NextEra Response Primary vehicle access to the PBNP Owner Controlled Area (OCA) is through the south site entrance from Nuclear Road. A secondary access point to the PBNP OCA is through the north site entrance on Lakeshore Road. There are numerous traffic routes north, south and west of the OCA that maximize the potential that site vehicle access would not be hindered. If access to the plant is restricted due to debris covering the roadways, both county and commercially available heavy equipment could be utilized to free a travel path to the site. In addition to being accessible via a vehicle, PBNP can be accessed via other methods including a helicopter, watercraft, or walking.
NextEra has Letters of Agreement (LOA) with the following agencies, which may be utilized in order to assure site accessibility following a large-scale event:
NextEra has Letters of Agreement (LOA) with the following agencies, which may be utilized in order to assure site accessibility following a large-scale event:
State of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Emergency Management Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department Manitowoc County Emergency Management Kewaunee County Emergency Management Kewaunee County Sheriff's Department Town of Two Creeks Brandt Buses, Inc.
State of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Emergency Management Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department Manitowoc County Emergency Management Kewaunee County Emergency Management Kewaunee County Sheriff's Department Town of Two Creeks Brandt Buses, Inc.
Manitowoc County Highway Commission Page 2 of 3
Manitowoc County Highway Commission Page 2 of 3  


Identify any interim actions that have been taken or are planned prior to the completion of the staffing assessment.
Identify any interim actions that have been taken or are planned prior to the completion of the staffing assessment.

Latest revision as of 01:42, 12 January 2025

Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident
ML12163A248
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/2012
From: Meyer L
Point Beach
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NRC 2012-0042
Download: ML12163A248 (5)


Text

June 8,2012 ENERG r '-

I

/-

POIN?

BEACH NRC 201 2-0042 10 CFR 50.54(f)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 1 1555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Dockets 50-266 and 50-301 Renewed License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 Response to NRC Request for lnformation Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Renardinq Recommendation 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident

References:

(1)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Request for lnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f)

Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident,"

March 12,201 2 (MLI 2053A340)

(2)

NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC letter to NRC, dated May 10,2012, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC1s 60-day Response to NRC Letter, Request for lnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident; dated March 12, 201 2 Via Reference (I), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Enclosure 5 of Reference (1) contains specific Requested Actions and Requested lnformation associated with Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP) programs. NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) submitted an alternative course of action and basis for acceptability of that course of action in response to the information request (Reference 2). provides the NextEra response to Communications Request #2 and Staffing Requests #3, #4 and #5 of the proposed alternative course of actions provided in Reference (2).

This letter contains no new Regulatory Commitments and no revisions to existing Regulatory Commitments.

NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241

Document Control Desk Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. James Costedio, Licensing Manager, at 9201755-7427.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on June 8,2012.

Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Larry Meyer Site Vice President Enclosure cc:

Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Director of Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC

ENCLOSURE I NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS I AND 2 RESPONSE TO COMMUNICATIONS REQUEST #2 AND STAFFING REQUESTS #3, #4 AND #5 OF THE NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTIONS Via Reference (I), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) submitted an alternative course of action to respond to the requested information associated with Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP) programs of the near-term task force review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident (Reference 2). The following information is provided by NextEra in response to Communications Request #2 and Staffing Requests #3, #4 and #5 of the proposed alternative course of actions provided in Reference (1).

COMMUNICATIONS Request #2 Describe any interim actions that have been taken or are planned to be taken to enhance existing communications systems power supplies until the communications assessment and the resulting actions are complete.

NextEra Response The current Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) internal plant phone system has an eight-hour battery back-up. Six satellite phones are also available on-site which are connected to the internal plant phone system, and are also connected to a battery back-up. In the event that all communication infrastructure is lost within 25 miles of the plant, in accordance with Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-01 guidance, it is assumed that the current PBNP internal plant phone system would not be functional.

Point-to-point contact would be available on-site via the site's radio communication system.

Currently, there are more than 100 radios available for use and over 40 additional batteries.

The battery chargers on site have the ability to be connected to a portable generator to ensure the availability of the site's radio communication system.

In the event that the present PBNP offsite communication systems are not functional, NextEra has ordered 15 satellite phones. Unlike the satellite phone system connected to the internal plant phone system, these 15 satellite phones will be powered from internal and rechargeable portable batteries. Satellite phones will be made available at each key emergency response facility, as well as the Control Room. These new satellite phones will be deployed to their respective locations by September, 201 2.

Page 1 of 3

STAFFING Request #3 ldentify how the augmented staff would be notified given degraded communications capabilities.

NextEra Response Expectations have been communicated to all Emergency Response Organization (ERO) members to respond to their respective assigned emergency response facilities when made aware of an area-wide loss-of-grid or loss-of-communication capability event. In the event that their respective facility is inaccessible, ERO members were directed to go to the Joint Public Information Center (JPIC), located approximately 25 miles from PBNP, in Green Bay, Wisconsin. The expectation will be included in EP initial and refresher training for ERO members.

Request #4 ldentify the methods of access (e.g., roadways, navigable bodies of water and dockage, airlift, etc.) to the site that are expected to be available after a widespread large scale natural event.

NextEra Response Primary vehicle access to the PBNP Owner Controlled Area (OCA) is through the south site entrance from Nuclear Road. A secondary access point to the PBNP OCA is through the north site entrance on Lakeshore Road. There are numerous traffic routes north, south and west of the OCA that maximize the potential that site vehicle access would not be hindered. If access to the plant is restricted due to debris covering the roadways, both county and commercially available heavy equipment could be utilized to free a travel path to the site. In addition to being accessible via a vehicle, PBNP can be accessed via other methods including a helicopter, watercraft, or walking.

NextEra has Letters of Agreement (LOA) with the following agencies, which may be utilized in order to assure site accessibility following a large-scale event:

State of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Emergency Management Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department Manitowoc County Emergency Management Kewaunee County Emergency Management Kewaunee County Sheriff's Department Town of Two Creeks Brandt Buses, Inc.

Manitowoc County Highway Commission Page 2 of 3

Identify any interim actions that have been taken or are planned prior to the completion of the staffing assessment.

NextEra Response NextEra has not identified any interim actions related to ERO staffing prior to completion of the staffing assessment.

References NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC letter to NRC, dated May 10, 2012, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC's 60-day Response to NRC Letter, Request for lnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident; dated March 12, 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Request for lnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident," March 12,2012 (ML12053A340)

Page 3 of 3