ML12164A832: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | {{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | ||
Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI. When separated from enclosure, this | |||
transmittal document is decontrolled. | |||
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | |||
June 11, 2012 | |||
EA-12-083 | |||
EA-11-067 | EA-12-083 | ||
Mr. Peter Dietrich | EA-11-067 | ||
Senior Vice President and | |||
Chief Nuclear Officer | Mr. Peter Dietrich | ||
Southern California Edison Company | Senior Vice President and | ||
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station | Chief Nuclear Officer | ||
P. O. Box 128 | Southern California Edison Company | ||
San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 | San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station | ||
SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - | P. O. Box 128 | ||
San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 | |||
Dear Mr. Dietrich: | SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - | ||
On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security | |||
baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The | NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2012403; 05000362/2012403; | ||
enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on | |||
May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members | PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING | ||
of your staff. | |||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and | Dear Mr. Dietrich: | ||
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | |||
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed | On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security | ||
personnel. | baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The | ||
The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater | enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on | ||
than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the | May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members | ||
need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional | of your staff. | ||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and | |||
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | |||
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed | |||
personnel. | |||
The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater | |||
than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the | |||
need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional | |||
UNITED STATES | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
RE GIO N I V | |||
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD | |||
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511 | |||
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | |||
NRC action. The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report. The finding was | |||
assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance | |||
Determination Process (PPSDP). The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated | |||
for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security | |||
requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site. The | OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | ||
finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated | |||
enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the | NRC action. The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report. The finding was | ||
NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement. | assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance | ||
In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our | Determination Process (PPSDP). The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated | ||
evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security | for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security | ||
significance within 90 days of the date of this letter. The significance determination process | requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site. The | ||
encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue | finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated | ||
should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final determination. | enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the | ||
Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to | NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement. | ||
(1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the | |||
facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or | In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our | ||
(2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing. If you request a Regulatory | evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security | ||
Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you | significance within 90 days of the date of this letter. The significance determination process | ||
to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to | encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue | ||
make the conference more efficient and effective. If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not | should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final determination. | ||
be open for public observation. If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal | |||
should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. If you decline to request | Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to | ||
a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the | (1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the | ||
final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements | facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or | ||
stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609. | (2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing. If you request a Regulatory | ||
Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety, | Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you | ||
at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the | to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to | ||
NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue | make the conference more efficient and effective. If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not | ||
with our significance determination and enforcement decision. The final resolution of this matter | be open for public observation. If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal | ||
will be conveyed in separate correspondence. | should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. If you decline to request | ||
Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is | a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the | ||
being issued for this inspection finding at this time. In addition, please be advised that the | final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements | ||
number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection | stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609. | ||
report may change as a result of further NRC review. | |||
Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as | Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety, | ||
determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection. The deficiency was promptly | at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the | ||
corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical | NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue | ||
with our significance determination and enforcement decision. The final resolution of this matter | |||
will be conveyed in separate correspondence. | |||
Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is | |||
being issued for this inspection finding at this time. In addition, please be advised that the | |||
number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection | |||
report may change as a result of further NRC review. | |||
Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as | |||
determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection. The deficiency was promptly | |||
corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical | |||
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | |||
protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors | |||
arrived on site. | |||
This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements. | |||
You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis | |||
for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, | OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | ||
Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear | protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors | ||
Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the | arrived on site. | ||
This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements. | |||
You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis | |||
for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, | |||
Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear | |||
Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the | |||
Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555- | Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555- | ||
0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. | 0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. | ||
One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding. The cross-cutting aspects were both | |||
related to human performance. The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which | One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding. The cross-cutting aspects were both | ||
addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for | related to human performance. The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which | ||
Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow | addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for | ||
procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively. If you disagree with a cross-cutting | Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow | ||
aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of | procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively. If you disagree with a cross-cutting | ||
this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, | aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of | ||
Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. | this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, | ||
Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the | Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. | ||
failure to maintain complete and accurate information. Specifically, a licensee employee failed | |||
to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information | Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the | ||
required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007). This violation would normally be | failure to maintain complete and accurate information. Specifically, a licensee employee failed | ||
categorized at Severity Level IV. However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement | to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information | ||
Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation. | required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007). This violation would normally be | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the | categorized at Severity Level IV. However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement | ||
enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the | Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation. | ||
NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access Management | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the | |||
enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the | |||
NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access Management | |||
System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- | System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- | ||
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with | |||
10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security | However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with | ||
vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically | 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security | ||
for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible | vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically | ||
from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Because this issue | for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible | ||
involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made | from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Because this issue | ||
available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS. If | involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made | ||
Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the | available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS. If | ||
Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the | |||
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | |||
level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security- | |||
Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for | |||
withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is | |||
waiving the affidavit requirements for your response. | |||
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | |||
level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security- | |||
Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for | |||
withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is | |||
Docket: 50-361, 50-362 | waiving the affidavit requirements for your response. | ||
License: NPF-10, NPF-15 | |||
Nonpublic Enclosure: | Sincerely, | ||
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403; | |||
Distribution made electronically | |||
/RA/ | |||
Thomas Blount, Acting Director | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket: 50-361, 50-362 | |||
License: NPF-10, NPF-15 | |||
Nonpublic Enclosure: | |||
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403; | |||
05000362/2012403 w/attachments | |||
Distribution made electronically | |||
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | |||
Distribution w/enclosure: | |||
Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch | |||
Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M | |||
Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43 | |||
Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6 | OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | ||
Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov) | Distribution w/enclosure: | ||
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov | Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch | ||
Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov) | Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M | ||
Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov) | Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43 | ||
Electronic distribution by RIV: | Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6 | ||
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) | Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov) | ||
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov) | Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov | ||
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) | Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov) | ||
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) | Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov) | ||
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov) | |||
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov) | Electronic distribution by RIV: | ||
Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov) | Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) | ||
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov) | Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov) | ||
SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov) | DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) | ||
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov) | DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) | ||
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov) | Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov) | ||
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov) | Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov) | ||
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) | Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov) | ||
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) | Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov) | ||
Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov) | SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov) | ||
Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov) | Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov) | ||
Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov) | Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov) | ||
Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov) | Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov) | ||
Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov) | Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) | ||
RidsOeMailCenter | Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) | ||
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov) | Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov) | ||
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) | Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov) | ||
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) | Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov) | ||
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov) | Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov) | ||
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) | Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov) | ||
OEMail Resource | RidsOeMailCenter | ||
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov) | Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov) | ||
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) | |||
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) | |||
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov) | |||
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) | |||
OEMail Resource | |||
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov) | |||
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | |||
Security Related Complete Report - OUO: | |||
SUNSI Review Completed: MKB | |||
: Non-Publicly Available : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required | |||
Letter Only: | |||
SUNSI Review Completed: MKB ADAMS: : Yes | OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | ||
: Publicly Available | |||
ADAMS No. ML12164A832 | Security Related Complete Report - OUO: | ||
SUNSI Review Completed: MKB | |||
ADAMS: : Yes | |||
Initials: MKB | |||
: Non-Publicly Available : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required | |||
Letter Only: | |||
SUNSI Review Completed: MKB ADAMS: : Yes | |||
Initials: MKB | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | : Publicly Available | ||
: Non-Sensitive | |||
ADAMS No. ML12164A832 | |||
PSI:PSB1 | |||
PSI:PSB1 | |||
C:PSB1 | |||
C:PBB | |||
MBrooks | |||
JCherubini | |||
MHay | |||
RLantz | |||
/RA/ | |||
/RA/ E | |||
/RA/ | |||
/RA | |||
05/31/12 | |||
5 /29/12 | |||
06/11/12 | |||
06/04/12 | |||
ACES | |||
C: ACES | |||
C: PSB1 | |||
AD: DRS | |||
CMaier | |||
HGepford | |||
MHay | |||
TBlount | |||
/RA/ | |||
/RA/ | |||
/RA/ | |||
/RA/ | |||
06/11/2012 | |||
06/11/2012 | |||
06/11/2012 | |||
06/11/2012 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:38, 12 January 2025
| ML12164A832 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre |
| Issue date: | 06/11/2012 |
| From: | Blount T Division of Reactor Safety IV |
| To: | Peter Dietrich Southern California Edison Co |
| dah/vlmBrooks M | |
| References | |
| EA-11-067, EA-12-083 IR-12-403 | |
| Download: ML12164A832 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000361/2012403
Text
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI. When separated from enclosure, this
transmittal document is decontrolled.
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
June 11, 2012
Mr. Peter Dietrich
Senior Vice President and
Chief Nuclear Officer
Southern California Edison Company
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
P. O. Box 128
San Clemente, CA 92674-0128
SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -
NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000361/2012403; 05000362/2012403;
PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN FINDING
Dear Mr. Dietrich:
On May 16, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security
baseline inspection at your San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The
enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on
May 16, 2012, with Mr. Doug Bauder, Vice President and Station Manager, and other members
of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed
personnel.
The attached report documents one finding that has preliminarily been determined to be Greater
than Green (i.e., finding of greater than very low security significance) that may result in the
need for further evaluation to determine the significance and, therefore, the need for additional
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
RE GIO N I V
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
NRC action. The finding is described in the enclosed inspection report. The finding was
assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical Protection Significance
Determination Process (PPSDP). The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated
for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security
requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors arrived on site. The
finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for escalated
enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy, which can be found on the
NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement.
In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, we intend to complete our
evaluation using the best available information and issue our final determination of security
significance within 90 days of the date of this letter. The significance determination process
encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and the licensee; however, the dialogue
should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final determination.
Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to
(1) attend a Regulatory Conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the
facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or
(2) submit your position of the finding to the NRC in writing. If you request a Regulatory
Conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter and we encourage you
to submit supporting documentation at least one week prior to the conference in an effort to
make the conference more efficient and effective. If a Regulatory Conference is held, it will not
be open for public observation. If you decide to submit only a written response, such submittal
should be sent to the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. If you decline to request
a Regulatory Conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the
final SDP determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements
stated in the Prerequisite and Limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609.
Please contact Mr. Michael C. Hay, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1, Division of Reactor Safety,
at (817) 200-1527 and in writing within 10 days from the issue date of this letter to notify the
NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you within 10 business days, we will continue
with our significance determination and enforcement decision. The final resolution of this matter
will be conveyed in separate correspondence.
Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no Notice of Violation is
being issued for this inspection finding at this time. In addition, please be advised that the
number and characterization of the apparent violation described in the enclosed inspection
report may change as a result of further NRC review.
Additionally, one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as
determined by the PPSDP) was identified during this inspection. The deficiency was promptly
corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors
arrived on site.
This finding was determined to involve a violation of NRC requirements.
You should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis
for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk,
Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to (1) the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas 76011-4511; (2) the
Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-
0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to each finding. The cross-cutting aspects were both
related to human performance. The first involved the failure to develop a site procedure which
addressed the need to conduct a cyber security analysis of electronic devices designated for
Safeguards Information (SGI) use and the second involved the failure of personnel to follow
procedural guidance, [H.2.(c)] and [H.4.(b)], respectively. If you disagree with a cross-cutting
aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of
this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator,
Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Further, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requirements occurred involving the
failure to maintain complete and accurate information. Specifically, a licensee employee failed
to promptly report an August 27, 2007, arrest for public intoxication, which was information
required to be maintained by 10 CFR 73.56(h) (2007). This violation would normally be
categorized at Severity Level IV. However, in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Enforcement
Policy, the NRC will exercise discretion and not issue a violation.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," once separated from the
enclosure, a copy of this letter will be made available electronically for public inspection in the
NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access Management
System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
However, the material enclosed within contains Security-Related Information in accordance with
10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security
vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically
for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible
from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Because this issue
involves Security-Related Information, if you choose to respond, your response will not be made
available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS. If
Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-
Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for
withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is
waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Thomas Blount, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket: 50-361, 50-362
Nonpublic Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report 05000361/2012403;
05000362/2012403 w/attachments
Distribution made electronically
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
Distribution w/enclosure:
Ronald Albert, (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch
Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN/T-3A5M
Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN/3D43
Douglas Garner, (Douglas.Garner@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSP/MWSB, TWFN/4 F6
Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Binoy.Desai@nrc.gov
Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)
Electronic distribution by RIV:
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)
SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)
Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov)
Chief, ACES (Heather.Gepford@nrc.gov)
Senior Enforcement Specialist (Ray.Kellar@nrc.gov)
Enforcement Specialist (Christi.Maier@nrc.gov)
Allegations Coordinator (Judith.Weaver@nrc.gov)
RidsOeMailCenter
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
OEMail Resource
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
Security Related Complete Report - OUO:
SUNSI Review Completed: MKB
ADAMS: : Yes
Initials: MKB
- Non-Publicly Available : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required
Letter Only:
SUNSI Review Completed: MKB ADAMS: : Yes
Initials: MKB
- Publicly Available
- Non-Sensitive
ADAMS No. ML12164A832
PSI:PSB1
PSI:PSB1
C:PSB1
C:PBB
MBrooks
JCherubini
MHay
RLantz
/RA/
/RA/ E
/RA/
/RA
05/31/12
5 /29/12
06/11/12
06/04/12
ACES
C: ACES
C: PSB1
AD: DRS
CMaier
HGepford
MHay
TBlount
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax