ML13228A059: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Setzer, Thomas From: | {{#Wiki_filter:Setzer, Thomas From: | ||
Rutenkroger, Scott Sent: | |||
Thursday, October 04, 2012 3:49 PM To: | |||
Gray, Harold Cc: | |||
Bums, Thomas; Bellamy, Ronald; Setzer, Thomas; Keighley, Elizabeth; DeBoer, Joseph: | |||
Sheehan, Neil | Sheehan, Neil | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks AUachments: | RE: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks AUachments: | ||
Letter to the Edltor.pdf Sounds good; and this information clearly establishes that the letter to the editor is not an allegation. | |||
I do not have Nell Sheehan's recent letter to the editor on this subject. Actually, I am not aware of such. | I do not have Nell Sheehan's recent letter to the editor on this subject. Actually, I am not aware of such. | ||
For other's benefit, I have re-attached the letter to the editor from a member of the public that I saw that prompted me to ask the question in the first place. | For other's benefit, I have re-attached the letter to the editor from a member of the public that I saw that prompted me to ask the question in the first place. | ||
: Thanks, Scott | : Thanks, Scott Original Message-- | ||
From: Gray, Harold Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:56 PM To: Rutenkroger, Scott Cc: Bums, Thomas | From: Gray, Harold Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:56 PM To: Rutenkroger, Scott Cc: Bums, Thomas | ||
| Line 39: | Line 43: | ||
-An information notice will come out after that. We have been hampered by the Belgian government not authorizing us to release Information to our public. | -An information notice will come out after that. We have been hampered by the Belgian government not authorizing us to release Information to our public. | ||
Robert Hardies Senior Level Advisor for Materials Engineering Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission offi(mbnn | Robert Hardies Senior Level Advisor for Materials Engineering Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission offi(mbnn la 5-5502 Cel (b)(6) | ||
Original Message-From: Gray, Harold Sent: Thursday. October 04, 2012 7:49 AM To: Hardies, Robert Cc: Screnci, Diane; Sheehan, Nell; Trapp, James; Bums, Thomas; Wilson, Peter, Miller, Chris | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks Bob, In case you do not already have it, the attached. | FW: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks | ||
: Bob, In case you do not already have it, the attached. | |||
Is NRC going to issue a summary on the significance to US plants of these UT indications, which have been characterized as hydrogen flaking, small Indications in the plane of the shell surface, similar to laminations? | Is NRC going to issue a summary on the significance to US plants of these UT indications, which have been characterized as hydrogen flaking, small Indications in the plane of the shell surface, similar to laminations? | ||
As I read the related info, It looks like the vacuum degassing or post forming heat treatment of the shell ring forging by the steel producer were factors in the indication development. | As I read the related info, It looks like the vacuum degassing or post forming heat treatment of the shell ring forging by the steel producer were factors in the indication development. | ||
Harold Gray | Harold Gray Original Message-- | ||
From: Rutenkroger, Scott Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:25 AM To: Gray, Harold; Burns, Thomas | From: Rutenkroger, Scott Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:25 AM To: Gray, Harold; Burns, Thomas | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks Either of you know anything? Or, are the current ISI and NDE Inspections such that we already know it isn't possible? | FW: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks Either of you know anything? Or, are the current ISI and NDE Inspections such that we already know it isn't possible? | ||
Thanks, Scott | : Thanks, Scott | ||
-Original Message--- | |||
From: Rutenkroger, Scott Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:20 AM To: Bellamy, Ronald; Selzer, Thomas; Keighley, Elizabeth; DeBoer, Joseph; Guzman, Richard | From: Rutenkroger, Scott Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:20 AM To: Bellamy, Ronald; Selzer, Thomas; Keighley, Elizabeth; DeBoer, Joseph; Guzman, Richard | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks I read this article in a local newspaper last night. I'm evaluating it for potential to be an allegation. I would think this would be an issue for which the validity is known, making it NOT an allegation, However, I don't recall any such discussion or Information. Anyone know anything? | Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks I read this article in a local newspaper last night. I'm evaluating it for potential to be an allegation. I would think this would be an issue for which the validity is known, making it NOT an allegation, However, I don't recall any such discussion or Information. Anyone know anything? | ||
Thanks, Scott 2}} | : Thanks, Scott 2}} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:00, 11 January 2025
| ML13228A059 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/04/2012 |
| From: | Scott Rutenkroger Division Reactor Projects I |
| To: | Gray E Division of Reactor Safety I |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2013-0139 | |
| Download: ML13228A059 (2) | |
Text
Setzer, Thomas From:
Rutenkroger, Scott Sent:
Thursday, October 04, 2012 3:49 PM To:
Gray, Harold Cc:
Bums, Thomas; Bellamy, Ronald; Setzer, Thomas; Keighley, Elizabeth; DeBoer, Joseph:
Sheehan, Neil
Subject:
RE: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks AUachments:
Letter to the Edltor.pdf Sounds good; and this information clearly establishes that the letter to the editor is not an allegation.
I do not have Nell Sheehan's recent letter to the editor on this subject. Actually, I am not aware of such.
For other's benefit, I have re-attached the letter to the editor from a member of the public that I saw that prompted me to ask the question in the first place.
- Thanks, Scott Original Message--
From: Gray, Harold Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:56 PM To: Rutenkroger, Scott Cc: Bums, Thomas
Subject:
FW: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks
- Scott, FYI. If you have questions, please call one of us or Email.
Do you have Nell Sheehan's recent letter to the editor on this subject?
Harold Gray, 610-337-5325
Original Message-From: Hardles, Robert Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 8:34 AM To: Gray, Harold Cc: Screnci, Diane; Sheehan, Nell; Trapp, James; Bums, Thomas; Wilson, Peter; Miller, Chris
Subject:
RE: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks Thanks for this Harold. We are going to have a public meeting after we all get back from another round of meetings with the Belgian regulator during the week of October 15. The public meeting is not set up yet, so I don't have a date.
Vermont Yankee doesn't have any Rotterdam forgings, and no forgings at all for the shell courses. They were all welded plate construction. The flanges are forgings, but the flanges have bolt holes and sealing surfaces and weld preps that were examined with surface techniques that would have picked up large numbers (or even small numbers) of linear indications. So it is safe to say that the indications found at Doel 3 cannot exist at Vermont Yankee.
-An information notice will come out after that. We have been hampered by the Belgian government not authorizing us to release Information to our public.
Robert Hardies Senior Level Advisor for Materials Engineering Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission offi(mbnn la 5-5502 Cel (b)(6)
Original Message-From: Gray, Harold Sent: Thursday. October 04, 2012 7:49 AM To: Hardies, Robert Cc: Screnci, Diane; Sheehan, Nell; Trapp, James; Bums, Thomas; Wilson, Peter, Miller, Chris
Subject:
FW: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks
- Bob, In case you do not already have it, the attached.
Is NRC going to issue a summary on the significance to US plants of these UT indications, which have been characterized as hydrogen flaking, small Indications in the plane of the shell surface, similar to laminations?
As I read the related info, It looks like the vacuum degassing or post forming heat treatment of the shell ring forging by the steel producer were factors in the indication development.
Harold Gray Original Message--
From: Rutenkroger, Scott Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:25 AM To: Gray, Harold; Burns, Thomas
Subject:
FW: Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks Either of you know anything? Or, are the current ISI and NDE Inspections such that we already know it isn't possible?
- Thanks, Scott
-Original Message---
From: Rutenkroger, Scott Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:20 AM To: Bellamy, Ronald; Selzer, Thomas; Keighley, Elizabeth; DeBoer, Joseph; Guzman, Richard
Subject:
Newspaper opinion article RE reactor vessel cracks I read this article in a local newspaper last night. I'm evaluating it for potential to be an allegation. I would think this would be an issue for which the validity is known, making it NOT an allegation, However, I don't recall any such discussion or Information. Anyone know anything?
- Thanks, Scott 2