ML18092B462: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18092B462
| number = ML18092B462
| issue date = 12/31/1986
| issue date = 12/31/1986
| title = Delmarva Power,1986 Annual Rept.
| title = Delmarva Power,1986 Annual Rept
| author name = Curtis N
| author name = Curtis N
| author affiliation = DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NOTICE THE ATTACHED FILES ARE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE DIVISION OF DOCUMENT CONTROL . THEY HAVE BEEN CHARGED TO YOU FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIOD AND MUST BE RETURNED TO TH E RECORDS FACILITY BRANCH 016 . PLEASE DO NOT SEND DOCUMENTS CHARGED OUT THROUGH THE MAIL. REMOVAL OF ANY PAGE(S) FROM DOCUMENT FOR REPRODUCTION MUST BE REFERRED TO FILE PERSONNEL .       ;z/_,Z Declurt#~~3 reatrol #tf3 ~/-.
{{#Wiki_filter:NOTICE THE ATTACHED FILES ARE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE DIVISION OF DOCUMENT CONTROL. THEY HAVE BEEN CHARGED TO YOU FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIOD AND MUST BE RETURNED TO TH E RECORDS FACILITY BRANCH 016.
DEADLINE RETURN DATE . . . . "3/<=zo/   _of~~**
PLEASE DO NOT SEND DOCUMENTS CHARGED OUT THROUGH THE MAIL. REMOVAL OF ANY PAGE(S) FROM DOCUMENT FOR REPRODUCTION MUST BE REFERRED TO FILE PERSONNEL.  
                      .......                l RECORDS FACILITY BRANCH
;z/_,Z Declurt#~~
3 reatrol #tf3 ~/-.
DEADLINE RETURN DATE.... "3/<=zo/_of~~**
l RECORDS FACILITY BRANCH  


Employees continue to demonstrate creativity as well as technical skill in accomplishing their jobs.
Stockholders and customers have enjoyed an outstanding year in a prosperous period at Delmarva Power.
Stockholders and customers have enjoyed an outstanding year in a prosperous period at Delmarva Power.
Employees continue to demonstrate creativity as well as technical skill in accomplishing their jobs.
Geor9e lt'il/iams, 1-.dEJc,\\Joor Po11cr Plane Moderate increases in sales and investment earnings will help the company meet the challenges ahead.
Geor9e lt'il/iams, 1-.dEJc ,\Joor Po11cr Plane Moderate increases in sales and investment earnings will help the company meet the challenges ahead.
co1*cr photo: I-arm,.tit. Cuba, Dclau*are  
co1*cr photo: I-arm, .tit. Cuba, Dclau*are


the Earnin9s increased to
Earnin9s increased to  
                                      $2.91 per share and reached a record hi9h.
$2.91 per share and reached a record hi9h.
Delmarva fuwers prices for electricity and                                       0 natural 9as are amon9 the lowest in the re9ion.
Delmarva fuwers prices for electricity and natural 9as are amon9 the lowest in the re9ion.
The company works in several ways to help       the          tive improve the quality of life on the Delmarva Peninsula.
The company works in several ways to help improve the quality of life on the Delmarva Peninsula.
the the
the 0
the tive the the  


Percent Increase FINA CIAL HIGHLIGHTS                               1986                       1985         (Decrease)
Percent Increase FINA CIAL HIGHLIGHTS 1986 1985 (Decrease)
Revenues                               $    714.9   million       $    722.8   million         (I. I)
Revenues 714.9 million 722.8 million (I. I)
Net Income                             $    96.1   million       $    96.6   million         (0.5)
Net Income 96.1 million 96.6 million (0.5)
Earnings Per Share                     $      2.91                 $      2.76                   5.4 Dividends Declared                     $      2.045               $      1.945                   5.1 Common Stock Outstanding Average Shares                       30,481,925                   30,481,925 Common Stock Book Value                 $      19.27                 $    18.43                   4.6 Construction Expenditures               $    102.6 million           $    94.9   million         8.1 Internally Generated Funds':'           $    157.2 million           $    148.9   million         5.6 Electric Sales                                 9.21 billion kwh           8.53 billion kwh       8.0 Electric Customers (average)                 325,832                     314,013                   3.8 Average Residential Usage                       8,605 kwh                   8,059 kwh               6.8 Gas Sales                                     15.95 million mcf           15.71 million mcf         1.5 Gas Customers (average)                       76,614                       75, 103                 2.0 Average Residential Usage                     86.3 mcf                     79.7   mcf             8.3
Earnings Per Share 2.91 2.76 5.4 Dividends Declared 2.045 1.945 5.1 Common Stock Outstanding Average Shares 30,481,925 30,481,925 Common Stock Book Value 19.27 18.43 4.6 Construction Expenditures 102.6 million 94.9 million 8.1 Internally Generated Funds':'
':'Net cash flow from operating activities less preferred and common dividends.
157.2 million 148.9 million 5.6 Electric Sales 9.21 billion kwh 8.53 billion kwh 8.0 Electric Customers (average) 325,832 314,013 3.8 Average Residential Usage 8,605 kwh 8,059 kwh 6.8 Gas Sales 15.95 million mcf 15.71 million mcf 1.5 Gas Customers (average) 76,614 75, 103 2.0 Average Residential Usage 86.3 mcf 79.7 mcf 8.3  
':'Net cash flow from operating activities less preferred and common dividends.  


the l: HAI RMA Nc 1' Curtis Stockholders and customers have enjoyed an outstandin9 year in a prosperous period at Delmarva Power.
the l: H A I R M A Nc1' Curtis Stockholders and customers have enjoyed an outstandin9 year in a prosperous period at Delmarva Power.
* Earnings increased for the sixth consecutive year and reached a record high.
* Earnings increased for the sixth consecutive year and reached a record high.
* Dividends increased for the tenth consecutive \'Car.
* Dividends increased for the tenth consecutive \\'Car.
* The price of electricity and natural gas decreased throughout the service tenitory.
* The price of electricity and natural gas decreased throughout the service tenitory.
* Generating plants performed above national averages.
* Generating plants performed above national averages.
* Customer approval ratings increased for the fourth consecutive year.
* Customer approval ratings increased for the fourth consecutive year.  
                    *Outside investments continued to increase earnings.
*Outside investments continued to increase earnings.
Our report this year is dedicated to Delmarva Power people who not only contributed to this period of prosperity, but who have also prepared themselves through their training, enterprise, and enthusiasm to address a new set of challenges before us. The remainder of my letter addresses those challenges.
Our report this year is dedicated to Delmarva Power people who not only contributed to this period of prosperity, but who have also prepared themselves through their training, enterprise, and enthusiasm to address a new set of challenges before us. The remainder of my letter addresses those challenges.
3
3  


EARN! GS                                                       In last year's repo1t, this letter told of a The current level of financial performance new goal adopted by the company to develop a cannot be sustained during the next year or         plan which would delay, by at least five years, two. Regulators, responding to decreased interest   the in-service date of the next generating unit.
4 EARN! GS The current level of financial performance cannot be sustained during the next year or two. Regulators, responding to decreased interest rates nationally, have reduced significantly the allowable rates of return for most of our business.
rates nationally, have reduced significantly the     Such a delay could be accomplished, without allowable rates of return for most of our business. sacrificing service, through load management tech-The consequences of these rate reductions will       niques and cogeneration. That plan has been be compounded by the new federal tax act which       developed and implementation has begun. The will cut further into the company's strong cash     work so far shows a delay is achievable until about flow and subsequently, into the ability to earn     the tum of the century.
The consequences of these rate reductions will be compounded by the new federal tax act which will cut further into the company's strong cash flow and subsequently, into the ability to earn returns on that cash.
returns on that cash.
As discussed on pages 15 and 16, these decreases in authorized returns and cash flow can be countered somewhat by anticipated increases in sales on the economically-strong Delmarva Peninsula, modest growth in subsidiaries, and con-tinued tight cost control. Nevertheless, while the company is still financially healthy and we expect to continue our policy of modest dividend increases annually, we also expect earnings to be down in 1987.
GROWTH As discussed on pages 15 and 16, these               However, significant new events have decreases in authorized returns and cash flow can   occurred . There have been two years of substantial be countered somewhat by anticipated increases       growth in the demand for electricity during in sales on the economically-strong Delmarva         peak load periods. This has been out of character Peninsula, modest growth in subsidiaries, and con-   with the growth patterns of the previous decade.
Historically, Delmarva Power's earnings growth has tended to be cyclical with periods of prosperity followed by dips and then rebounds.
tinued tight cost control. Nevertheless, while       Since the Arab oil embargo of 1973, peak load the company is still financially healthy and we     growth has occurred at an average rate of about expect to continue our policy of modest dividend     13 a year. In the summer of 1985, it grew 10.5%
Such a rebound from a low in 1987 should occur because, by most standards, the company is financially healthy. The construction budget is relatively modest. Cash flow, although reduced, is still good. Growth prospects are strong. The talent of employees is excellent.
increases annually, we also expect earnings to       and in the summer of 1986, it grew an additional be down in 1987.                                     2.53. Delmarva Power planners have concluded that the summer peaks of 1985 and 1986 were Historically, Delmarva Power's earnings   not aberrations. Peak demand, fueled by a strong growth has tended to be cyclical with periods of     economy in the service territory and lower prosperity followed by dips and then rebounds.       rates, is greater than previously anticipated and is Such a rebound from a low in 1987 should occur       expected to continue to grow.
FUTURE OPTIONS Another challenge ahead will be to make the best decisions about supplying electricity in the next decade. Recent forecasts showed the next generating plant would be needed in 1994.
because, by most standards, the company is financially healthy. The construction budget is               Thus, in addition to beginning the load relatively modest. Cash flow, although reduced,     management program, we also responded by is still good. Growth prospects are strong. The     accelerating the study of various options to supply talent of employees is excellent.                   more power under the general strategy of mini-mizing capital expenses and matching capacity FUTURE OPTIONS                                       expansion to load growth as much as possible.
Another challenge ahead will be to make the best decisions about supplying electricity in the next decade. Recent forecasts showed the next generating plant would be needed in 1994.
Such a new plant would be expensive-about three quarters of a billion dollars. Around the country, large building programs have burdened utilities.
Such a new plant would be expensive-about three quarters of a billion dollars. Around the country, large building programs have burdened utilities.
1listory teaches that large capital investments, such as those in the railroad industry, can be devalued quickly by technological breakthroughs and structural changes within an industry.
1 listory teaches that large capital investments, such as those in the railroad industry, can be devalued quickly by technological breakthroughs and structural changes within an industry.
4
In last year's repo1t, this letter told of a new goal adopted by the company to develop a plan which would delay, by at least five years, the in-service date of the next generating unit.
Such a delay could be accomplished, without sacrificing service, through load management tech-niques and cogeneration. That plan has been developed and implementation has begun. The work so far shows a delay is achievable until about the tum of the century.
GROWTH However, significant new events have occurred. There have been two years of substantial growth in the demand for electricity during peak load periods. This has been out of character with the growth patterns of the previous decade.
Since the Arab oil embargo of 1973, peak load growth has occurred at an average rate of about 13 a year. In the summer of 1985, it grew 10.5%
and in the summer of 1986, it grew an additional 2.53. Delmarva Power planners have concluded that the summer peaks of 1985 and 1986 were not aberrations. Peak demand, fueled by a strong economy in the service territory and lower rates, is greater than previously anticipated and is expected to continue to grow.
Thus, in addition to beginning the load management program, we also responded by accelerating the study of various options to supply more power under the general strategy of mini-mizing capital expenses and matching capacity expansion to load growth as much as possible.


FLEXIBILITY Whi le the plans to delay and the plans to build may appear to be contradictory, they are not. Both load management and capacity additions will be needed . Such diverse efforts are part of Delmarva Power's plans to be flexible as the true future demand for electricity becomes clearer and the possible contribution of load control                   Charlotte Lee Cannon            Oscar L. Carey becomes more known. As competition continues to develop in the utility industry, this flexible approach will help Delmarva Power offer the best prices for its products.
FLEXIBILITY While the plans to delay and the plans to build may appear to be contradictory, they are not. Both load management and capacity additions will be needed. Such diverse efforts are part of Delmarva Power's plans to be flexible as the true future demand for electricity becomes clearer and the possible contribution of load control becomes more known. As competition continues to develop in the utility industry, this flexible approach will help Delmarva Power offer the best prices for its products.
With a sufficient amount of owned reserves plus the availability of capacity for purchase from other companies in the region, final decisions in these areas are not needed for a year or two.
With a sufficient amount of owned reserves plus the availability of capacity for purchase from other companies in the region, final decisions in these areas are not needed for a year or two.
John R. Cooper        Howard E. CosB'ove While this letter has discussed some of the key challenges that face the company, we should not forget that 1986 was an outstanding year.
While this letter has discussed some of the key challenges that face the company, we should not forget that 1986 was an outstanding year.
The company is doing well and is positioned well financially to meet challenges ahead. It also has the people with the technical skills and creati\'e spirit who can continue to make progress for you.
The company is doing well and is positioned well financially to meet challenges ahead. It also has the people with the technical skills and creati\\'e spirit who can continue to make progress for you.
I appreciate their efforts and hope you do also as you look at pictures of many of them at \\'Ork.                 Sal~v  V. Hawkins          Donald W falabe Sincerely, EV CURTIS lchruan I0. 198 7 James 0. Pippin, Jr.      William G. Simeral Delman-a Poll'er's direcwrs represent a broad range of business and communi~r e.\pcrtisc. Their titles and affiliations arc listed on page 48.
I appreciate their efforts and hope you do also as you look at pictures of many of them at \\\\'Ork.
David D. Wakefield   Harland M. Wakefield, Jr.
Sincerely, EV CURTIS lchruan I 0. 198 7 Delman-a Poll'er's direcwrs represent a broad range of business and communi~r e.\\pcrtisc. Their titles and affiliations arc listed on page 48.
Charlotte Lee Cannon Oscar L. Carey John R. Cooper Howard E. CosB'ove Sa l~v V. Hawkins Donald W falabe James 0. Pippin, Jr.
William G. Simeral David D. Wakefield Harland M. Wakefield, Jr.  


the
the  


FINANCIAL STRENGTH                           The fuel mix is balanced:        reduction was $4 million. Virginia Earnings increased 5.43 to   613 coal, 223 oil, and 173                will address rates in 1987.
FINANCIAL STRENGTH Earnings increased 5.43 to  
$2.91 per share. Quarterly divi-     nucl ear through nucl ear plants                Pursuant to a Delaware dends increased by 5.1 3 to 53       partially owned by Delmarva              Public Service Commission order, cents for an indicated annual rate   Power but run by other companies.        the company made the final of $2. 12. The price of common               In 1986, the company              distribution to customers of stock increased from $27Y8 to $33 . completed the acquisition of the          $28. 1 million remaining from the The company paid for all of   Lincoln-Ellendale e lectric              funds negotiated by the company its construction expenses with      system with its 1,420 customers.          in 1975 to allow a contractor its mm cash. The AFUDC ratio,               In the gas business, the          to cancel the proposed Summit a kev indicator for financial       company signed a contract to              Nuclear Power Plant.
$2.91 per share. Quarterly divi-dends increased by 5.1 3 to 53 cents for an indicated annual rate of $2. 12. The price of common stock increased from $27Y8 to $33.
analysis, remained low at 3. 7%     connect to the Columbia Gas of net income. The company's         System, Inc. in late 1987. The use              Earnin9s increased to bond rating, in differing terms     of two suppliers, Columbia and from the different agencies,         Transco, Inc., will give the                                $2.91 per share and is AA.                               company flexibility in meeting Electric sales increased     future demands of its natural                        reached a record hi9h.
The company paid for all of its construction expenses with its mm cash. The AFUDC ratio, a kev indicator for financial analysis, remained low at 3. 7%
8% O\'er 1985 le\'els because       gas customers and an additional of the strong economy on the         source of electrical generating                Also in Delaware, standards Delmarva Peninsula. Industrial       fuel at the Edge Moor Power Plant.        for power plant performance sales increased 5. 73 with sit,mifl-                                           were established . These standards cant gains in the chemical and       RA TE MA TIERS                            provide rewards and penalties refining industries in northern             As a result of declining          for good and poor performance.
of net income. The company's bond rating, in differing terms from the different agencies, is AA.
Dela\\'are and the poultry business capita l costs and exceeding                    The rate-reduction con-in southern Delaware and             al"lo\\'ed rates of return, regulators    sequences of the new federal tax Man*land. Commercial sales in-       cut Delman*a Power's electric            act have been detern1ined in creased 9.53 and residential sales   rates. In Dela\\'are, the reduction      Maryland but are sti ll pending in increased I0.63. The prospects       was $22 .8 million on an interim          the other jurisdict ions.
Electric sales increased 8% O\\'er 1985 le\\'els because of the strong economy on the Delmarva Peninsula. Industrial sales increased 5. 73 with sit,mifl-cant gains in the chemical and refining industries in northern Dela\\\\'are and the poultry business in southern Delaware and Man*land. Commercial sales in-creased 9.53 and residential sales increased I 0.63. The prospects for continued sales growth in the diverse service territory arc discussed on page 15.
for continued sales growth in the   basis with a final decision due diverse service territory arc       near the end of the first quarter, discussed on page 15.               1987. In Maryland, the final reduction was $8.8 million, and FACILITI ES                         for wholesale customers regu-Generating resen'es are       lated by the Federal Energy 243. The company's 1987 capital     Regulatory Commission, the total budget of $137.8 million is relatively modest, indicating adequate capacity. The company sells po\\'er to the PJ M inter-connection and to other companies. This reduced costs                                                                             Anne Wri9ht Chn"stiana to customers by more than
FACILITI ES Generating resen'es are 243. The company's 1987 capital budget of $137.8 million is relatively modest, indicating adequate capacity. The company sells po\\\\'er to the PJ M inter-connection and to other companies. This reduced costs to customers by more than  
$7.5 million in 1986.
$7.5 million in 1986.
Charles Turner Ocean City Tim Smith Westover                                        7
The fuel mix is balanced:
613 coal, 223 oil, and 173 nuclear through nuclear plants partially owned by Delmarva Power but run by other companies.
In 1986, the company completed the acquisition of the Lincoln-Ellendale electric system with its 1,420 customers.
In the gas business, the company signed a contract to connect to the Columbia Gas System, Inc. in late 1987. The use of two suppliers, Columbia and Transco, Inc., will give the company flexibility in meeting future demands of its natural gas customers and an additional source of electrical generating fuel at the Edge Moor Power Plant.
RA TE MA TIERS As a result of declining capital costs and exceeding al"lo\\\\'ed rates of return, regulators cut Delman*a Power's electric rates. In Dela\\\\'are, the reduction was $22.8 million on an interim basis with a final decision due near the end of the first quarter, 1987. In Maryland, the final reduction was $8.8 million, and for wholesale customers regu-lated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the total Tim Smith Westover reduction was $4 million. Virginia will address rates in 1987.
Pursuant to a Delaware Public Service Commission order, the company made the final distribution to customers of
$28. 1 million remaining from the funds negotiated by the company in 197 5 to allow a contractor to cancel the proposed Summit Nuclear Power Plant.
Earnin9s increased to
$2.91 per share and reached a record hi9h.
Also in Delaware, standards for power plant performance were established. These standards provide rewards and penalties for good and poor performance.
The rate-reduction con-sequences of the new federal tax act have been detern1ined in Maryland but are still pending in the other jurisdictions.
Charles Turner Ocean City Anne Wri9ht Chn"stiana 7  


T EAMWO RK                                                                      SAFEll' Recognizing the inevitability           Employees continue to                  As part of its Right-To-of increased competition, four                                                 Know program, the company years ago the company developed         demonstrate creativity as              identified, published, and placed a participative skills program                                                 in accessible areas a list of all designed to encourage innova-                   well as technical skill in      chemicals used in the workplace tion from the employees working                                                 including those which may be the closest to a situation and             accomplishin9 their jobs.            hazardous. Training was given in to take increased advantage of                                                 the safe handling and disposal teamwork. That program is                       Another example of              of these chemicals.
8 T EAMWORK Recognizing the inevitability of increased competition, four years ago the company developed a participative skills program designed to encourage innova-tion from the employees working the closest to a situation and to take increased advantage of teamwork. That program is maturing. By the end of 1986, all employees had been placed on teams and all team leaders had been trained in techniques to encourage participation.
maturing. By the end of 1986, all       employee creativity and skill                Also, employees from employees had been placed on             is the effort to retain a large indus- across the company came teams and all team leaders had           trial customer which had decided      together to develop standards been trained in techniques to           to expand and move outside the        and procedures for handling encourage participation.                 service territory. When employees      asbestos found in the workplace An example of the results of     in the marketing, regulatory          and at customer locations.
An example of the results of this program is the success of the company's profitable Gas Mainte-nance Plan. For the last three years, the employees who repair gas heaters have taken the initiative to increase the sales of this pro-gram. Through their efforts to organize other employees in marketing, corporate communi-cations, and gas service, sales of this program increased 1% in 1984, 6.2% in 1985, and 12.9%
this program is the success of the     practice, and economic develop-              On the overall safety pro-company's profitable Gas Mainte-        ment departments heard of              gram, the company led its cate-nance Plan. For the last three         the proposed relocation, they          gory in the Southeastern Electric years, the employees who repair         put together an innovative rate      Exchange in fewest fleet acci-gas heaters have taken the initiative   package that would be fair to          dents. It finished second in to increase the sales of this pro-     current customers and favorable        the occupational injury category.
in 1986.
gram. Through their efforts to         to the industrial customer as          However, lost-time accidents organize other employees in             an alternative to moving. They        increased to 13 and lost-work days marketing, corporate communi-           worked with the Delaware state        increased to 157. The company cations, and gas service, sales         government which was also              is concerned about these acci-of this program increased 1% in         interested in keeping 35 current      dents and will put increased 1984, 6.2% in 1985, and 12.9%           operating jobs and 75 to 80 new       emphasis on reducing them in 1986.                                jobs in the state plus the con-       in 1987.
Walt Robbins Wilmin9ton Boulevard Tommy Stephens
struction jobs for a $50 million project. The rate proposal is now pending before the Delaware Public Service Commission.
&#xa3;\\:more Employees continue to demonstrate creativity as well as technical skill in accomplishin9 their jobs.
Another example of employee creativity and skill is the effort to retain a large indus-trial customer which had decided to expand and move outside the service territory. When employees in the marketing, regulatory practice, and economic develop-ment departments heard of the proposed relocation, they put together an innovative rate package that would be fair to current customers and favorable to the industrial customer as an alternative to moving. They worked with the Delaware state government which was also interested in keeping 35 current operating jobs and 75 to 80 new jobs in the state plus the con-struction jobs for a $50 million project. The rate proposal is now pending before the Delaware Public Service Commission.
These kinds of efforts will be important to the company in the future as competition in the utility business continues to develop.
These kinds of efforts will be important to the company in the future as competition in the utility business continues to develop.
Walt Robbins                                                                                        James Dennis Wilmin9ton Boulevard                                                                                          Harrin9ton Tom my Stephens                                              Mary Ella Sutton 8                                  &#xa3;\:more                                                    Christiana
SAFEll' As part of its Right-To-Know program, the company identified, published, and placed in accessible areas a list of all chemicals used in the workplace including those which may be hazardous. Training was given in the safe handling and disposal of these chemicals.
Also, employees from across the company came together to develop standards and procedures for handling asbestos found in the workplace and at customer locations.
On the overall safety pro-gram, the company led its cate-gory in the Southeastern Electric Exchange in fewest fleet acci-dents. It finished second in the occupational injury category.
However, lost-time accidents increased to 13 and lost-work days increased to 157. The company is concerned about these acci-dents and will put increased emphasis on reducing them in 1987.
Mary Ella Sutton Christiana James Dennis Harrin9ton


[d Murra). Gar) Ca/d,.*c/J, \'a119hn llomer, John bcre/l, &b &ckell. frank f'cathen, fd Simmon" Sa/i,bury f\more                                                 Cmtr<'villc
[d Murra). Gar) Ca/d,.*c/J, \\'a119hn llomer, John bcre/l, &b &ckell. frank f'cathen, fd Simmon" Sa/i,bury f\\more Cmtr<'villc  


Delmarva Power's prices for electricity and regulators to reduce rates, natural g as are among the lowest in the region.               Delmarva Po\\'er has also worked to reduce prices by refinancing Electric comparisons (in           Throughout the service      debt, consolidating offices, con-cents per k\\'h) are: Ne\\' York territory, the price of electricity trolling expenses, converting 12.28; Newark, NJ 9.40; Philadel- is dee! ining. In Delaware, for    about two thirds of its generating phia 9.14; Boston 8.73; Baltimore example, the price of electricity  capacity from oil to coal, and con-6.51; Delmarva Peninsula 6.46. for a residential customer using    tinuing to keep the number or For natural gas (in cents ccf):   750 kilowatt hours of electricity  employees belo"* the 1982 level.
10 Delmarva Power's prices for electricity and natural gas are among the lowest in the region.
New York 75.89; Philadelphia     per month has decreased 11. 7%            Together, all of these efforts 62 .77; Newark, NJ 62.72;         since 1983.                        help customers and put the Boston 62.04; Baltimore 60.76;           While the decline in inter- company in a better position to Wi lmington 56.62.                est rates nationally has enabled    face developing competition.
Electric comparisons (in cents per k\\\\'h) are: Ne\\\\' York 12.28; Newark, NJ 9.40; Philadel-phia 9.14; Boston 8.73; Baltimore 6.51; Delmarva Peninsula 6.46.
10
For natural gas (in cents ccf):
New York 75.89; Philadelphia 62.77; Newark, NJ 62.72; Boston 62.04; Baltimore 60.76; Wilmington 56.62.
Throughout the service territory, the price of electricity is dee! ining. In Delaware, for example, the price of electricity for a residential customer using 750 kilowatt hours of electricity per month has decreased 11. 7%
since 1983.
While the decline in inter-est rates nationally has enabled regulators to reduce rates, Delmarva Po\\\\'er has also worked to reduce prices by refinancing debt, consolidating offices, con-trolling expenses, converting about two thirds of its generating capacity from oil to coal, and con-tinuing to keep the number or employees belo"* the 1982 level.
Together, all of these efforts help customers and put the company in a better position to face developing competition.  


S ERVICE IM PR OVEM ENTS          difficulty, for any rea~on, in In 1986, customer service        paying their bills. Customer ser-representatives began programs    vice representatives inform the to allow customers to phone in    customer of programs available meter readings and to enable      such as credit extensions, bud-meter readers to read (electroni- get billing, or hmds available cally) inside meters from the    throughout the service territory outside. Planning was begun for  to help. As a result of this a computerized, automated dis-    approach, both writeofls and patch system to improve re-      cutoffs are down - a win-win sponses in the fie ld.            situation for both the customer For several years, the com- and the company.                               Par Ramsey pany has taken an individualized                                                  Christiana approach to customers having Eric Whalen Christiana II
SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS In 1986, customer service representatives began programs to allow customers to phone in meter readings and to enable meter readers to read ( electroni-cally) inside meters from the outside. Planning was begun for a computerized, automated dis-patch system to improve re-sponses in the field.
For several years, the com-pany has taken an individualized approach to customers having difficulty, for any rea~on, in paying their bills. Customer ser-vice representatives inform the customer of programs available such as credit extensions, bud-get billing, or hmds available throughout the service territory to help. As a result of this approach, both writeofls and cutoffs are down - a win-win situation for both the customer and the company.
Eric Whalen Christiana Par Ramsey Christiana II  


E   VlRO MENT                                   The company worked with              The new "Be A Star, In   ovember, 1986,               the University of Delaware to        Volunteer" program provides 50 Delmarva Power crews removed             build an artificial reef demonstra-  employees, chosen through a the last distribution capacitor           tion project in the Atlantic          lottery, a $100 grant for a non-containing the toxic chemical PCB         Ocean off Rehoboth Beach with        profit community organization in the insulating fluid. As part         fly ash - a waste product from        where they have given at least of the company's commitment to           the Indian River Power Plant. The    50 hours of volunteer time.
12 E VlRO MENT In ovember, 1986, Delmarva Power crews removed the last distribution capacitor containing the toxic chemical PCB in the insulating fluid. As part of the company's commitment to operate with as I ittle intrusion into the environment as possible, the company began removing such capacitors before federal laws required utilities to do so and completed the task well ahead of the federal deadline of 1988.
operate with as Iittle intrusion         company is also working with                In other activities, the into the environment as possible,         the Electric Power Research          Good      eighbor Energy Fund the company began removing               Institute to use more of this ash    raised more than $170,000 in such capacitors before federal           as a base for an interstate highway  customer and stockholder con-laws required utilities to do so         entrance being built near the        tributions to help people having and completed the task well               Edge Moor plant.                      trouble paying their energy bills.
The company also em-barked on a study-supported by citizens groups, regulators, and environmental officials - of emerging technologies to correct an infrequent air pollution problem at the Indian River Power Plant. The study was developed with the community as an alternative to an expensive ($40 million), tall smokestack which also would have solved the problem. Initial analyses show that alternatives may not be cheaper but may result in a more effective environmental solution.
ahead of the federal deadline                                                   Employees again exceeded their of 1988.                                         The company works in          goal in contributions to the The company also em-                                                     United Way.
BobSporay Wilmin9ton Boulevard Kate DiPietro Christiana The company worked with the University of Delaware to build an artificial reef demonstra-tion project in the Atlantic Ocean off Rehoboth Beach with fly ash -
barked on a study- supported             several ways to help by citizens groups, regulators, and                                               FO R MATI ON ACTIVITI ES environmental officials - of                   improve the quality of                In an effort to provide emerging technologies to correct                                               customers with info1mation on an infrequent air pollution                           life on the Delmarva      how to use energy wisely, the problem at the Indian River Power                                               company offers a variety of pro-Plant. The study was developed                   Peninsula.                    grams including the monthly with the community as an                                                       customer newsletter, "Energy alternative to an expensive ($40               Employees at the Vienna        News You Can Use", the quarterly million), tall smokestack which           Power Plant, working on their         newsletter for senior citizens, also would have solved the                own time with facilities built by     "Silver Bulletin", and the home problem. Initial analyses show            the company, released striped         building efficiency standards, that alternatives may not be              bass flngerlings they reared into     "Super E+." Face-to-face help cheaper but may result in a more          the Nanticoke River for the           comes from customer service effective environmental solution.        second consecutive year.             representatives, marketing depart-ment employees, and volunteer CoMMUNIIT ACTIVITI ES                 speakers.
a waste product from the Indian River Power Plant. The company is also working with the Electric Power Research Institute to use more of this ash as a base for an interstate highway entrance being built near the Edge Moor plant.
For the second straight year, Delmarva Power employees were honored by President Ronald Reagan at the White House for Radio Watch, a program to summon aid through radios in company vehicles.
The company works in several ways to help improve the quality of life on the Delmarva Peninsula.
Kate DiPietro                                            Larry Maclaren Christiana                                                   Christiana BobSporay                                                                                      Newman Sonnier 12  Wilmin9ton Boulevard                                                                                          Salisbury
Employees at the Vienna Power Plant, working on their own time with facilities built by the company, released striped bass flngerlings they reared into the Nanticoke River for the second consecutive year.
CoMMUNIIT ACTIVITI ES For the second straight year, Delmarva Power employees were honored by President Ronald Reagan at the White House for Radio Watch, a program to summon aid through radios in company vehicles.
The new "Be A Star, Volunteer" program provides 50 employees, chosen through a lottery, a $100 grant for a non-profit community organization where they have given at least 50 hours of volunteer time.
In other activities, the Good eighbor Energy Fund raised more than $170,000 in customer and stockholder con-tributions to help people having trouble paying their energy bills.
Employees again exceeded their goal in contributions to the United Way.
FORMATION ACTIVITIES In an effort to provide customers with info1mation on how to use energy wisely, the company offers a variety of pro-grams including the monthly customer newsletter, "Energy News You Can Use", the quarterly newsletter for senior citizens, "Silver Bulletin", and the home building efficiency standards, "Super E+." Face-to-face help comes from customer service representatives, marketing depart-ment employees, and volunteer speakers.
Larry Maclaren Christiana Newman Sonnier Salisbury  


GROWTH                               as stores and restaurants. Single        provide challenging job oppor-Electric sales increased 83   family housing starts in Delaware        tunities to its employees, and in 1986 - the highest increase       have more than doubled from              ultimately, expects to develop experienced by any of the com-       1982 to 1986. In the service            operating businesses.
GROWTH Electric sales increased 83 in 1986 - the highest increase experienced by any of the com-panies in the PJM regional interconnection. 1 lealthy growth is expected to continue for the immediate future because it is coming from diverse sources in the strong economy of the service area.
panies in the PJM regional           te1Titory, more than 903 of new interconnection. 1lealthy growth     homes are heated with either            Moderate increases in sales is expected to continue for         electricity or natural gas.
Unemployment is near an all-time lo"* in Delaware of about 43, substantially below the national average of about 73.
the immediate future because               People are also using more                and investmen t earnings will it is coming from diverse sources   electricity in their homes. In in the strong economy of the         1986, the average monthly use per      help the company meet service area.                       residential customer increased Unemployment is near an       approximately 73 from 672                              the challenges ahead.
The Financial Center Develop-ment Act of 1981 continues to bring new jobs and oflke-building construction to Dela"*are as banks and insurance companies locate credit card and financial administration operations in Delaware to take advantage of fayorable legislation and tax treatment. These laws have bolstered gro\\\\*th in the com-mercial sector which has seen a 223 increase in jobs in Dela"*are over the past five years com-pared to a national average rate of 133. Tourism and recreation continues to prosper along the Maryland and Virginia coasts.
all-time lo"* in Delaware of         kilowatt-hours per month to 717 about 43 , substantially below       kilowatt-hours per month.                      Broadly, the company in-the national average of about 73 .                                           vests in five areas: gas and oil The Financial Center Develop-        SuBSJDIARI ES                            exploration, liquid cash invest-ment Act of 1981 continues                 Investments by both the          ments, equipment leasing, tech-to bring new jobs and oflke-         parent and subsidiaries contributed      nology and energy projects, building construction to Dela"*are   27 cents to earnings of $2. 91          and real estate. The company as banks and insurance companies     in 1986 compared to 20 cents            has invested in two communica-locate credit card and financial     per share on earnings of $2.76 per      tions satellites, all or part of administration operations in        share in 1985 and 12 cents per          five airplanes, a solar project in Delaware to take advantage of       share on earnings of $2.63 in            California, a hydroelectric project fayorable legislation and tax         1984. Earnings from these busi-        in Maine, and a wastewater treatment. These laws have           nesses are expected to grow              treatment project in Florida.
Population is growing.
bolstered gro\\*th in the com-       modesth- over the next few years.        It is investigating opportunities mercial sector which has seen             The philosophy of the sub-        outside the service territorv a 223 increase in jobs in Dela"*a re sidiary efforts is to seek returns      to generate steam from trash.
From 1978 until 1981, Dela,,*are  
over the past five years com-       which exceed those of the pared to a national average rate     regulated business but do not of 133. Tourism and recreation       detract from the core operation of continues to prosper along the       the energy company. The company Maryland and Virginia coasts.       confines its investments to Population is growing.       areas of its expertise, looks to From 1978 until 1981, Dela,,*are
" *as losing around 5,000 people a year. Now, Delaware is gaining up to 4,000 new people a year moving into the area. Also, the Eastern Shore of Marvland i~ growing faster than the rest or Maryland. This has helped growth in small retail businesses such as stores and restaurants. Single family housing starts in Delaware have more than doubled from 1982 to 1986. In the service te1Titory, more than 903 of new homes are heated with either electricity or natural gas.
" *as losing around 5,000 people a year. Now, Delaware is gaining up to 4,000 new people a year moving into the area. Also, the Eastern Shore of Marvland i~ growing faster than the rest or                                                                         Linda Stevens Christiana Maryland. This has helped growth in small retail businesses such Walter Evans Horrin9 ton Mary Sanford Ocean City 15
People are also using more electricity in their homes. In 1986, the average monthly use per residential customer increased approximately 73 from 672 kilowatt-hours per month to 717 kilowatt-hours per month.
SuBSJDIARI ES Investments by both the parent and subsidiaries contributed 27 cents to earnings of $2. 91 in 1986 compared to 20 cents per share on earnings of $2.76 per share in 1985 and 12 cents per share on earnings of $2.63 in 1984. Earnings from these busi-nesses are expected to grow modesth-over the next few years.
The philosophy of the sub-sidiary efforts is to seek returns which exceed those of the regulated business but do not detract from the core operation of the energy company. The company confines its investments to areas of its expertise, looks to Mary Sanford Ocean City provide challenging job oppor-tunities to its employees, and ultimately, expects to develop operating businesses.
Moderate increases in sales and investment earnings will help the company meet the challenges ahead.
Broadly, the company in-vests in five areas: gas and oil exploration, liquid cash invest-ments, equipment leasing, tech-nology and energy projects, and real estate. The company has invested in two communica-tions satellites, all or part of five airplanes, a solar project in California, a hydroelectric project in Maine, and a wastewater treatment project in Florida.
It is investigating opportunities outside the service territorv to generate steam from trash.
Walter Evans Horrin9 ton Linda Stevens Christiana 15  


The company is also work-       Equipment purchases for the              D IVERSE S ERVICE T ER RITO RY ing to increase returns on its         project are underway.                          Centrally located within the real estate holdings, especially the         However, peak load growth       major East Coast markets, the land around its computer center        continues to exceed projections.         Delmarva Peninsula has a unique under construction at Christiana,      It has increased 13% over the           blend of industrial, agricultural, Delaware.                              past two years.                         commercial, and recreational Thus, the study of options       activities.
16 The company is also work-ing to increase returns on its real estate holdings, especially the land around its computer center under construction at Christiana, Delaware.
G EN ERATING OPTIONS                  for supplying electricity in                   This mixture makes the One of the biggest challenges  the future has been accelerated         demands for electricity and natural over the next few years will          in the event peak load growth           gas less affected by extreme be to make the best decisions          continues to exceed expectations         fluctuations in the national about supplying electricity during    or some of the load control             economy than in many other areas the next decade. Nevv power            and cogeneration programs do             of the nation.
G ENERATING OPTIONS One of the biggest challenges over the next few years will be to make the best decisions about supplying electricity during the next decade. Nevv power plants are eno1mously expensive and can be devalued quickly by technological advances.
plants are eno1mously expensive        not progress as anticipated.                     Delmarva Power serves and can be devalued quickly            Options include purchases from           325,832 electric customers by technological advances.            other utilities, restarting, in         throughout most of the 5,700-In 1986, the company          environmentally acceptable ways,         square-mile Delmarva Peninsula developed and began to imple-          retired units at Edge Moor, or           which includes Delaware, portions ment a project to delay 225            building a new, smaller-than-           of nine Eastern Shore counties megawatts of peak growth by            previously-planned plant using           in Maryland, and two Eastern 1996. Th is would be enough to        advanced technology.                     Shore counties in Virginia. The postpone the next major plant                There is enough generating        company also distributes natural until near the tum of the century. capacity available in Delmarva          gas to 76,614 customers in a Key ingredients of this project      Power's svstem and on the East          275-square-mile area in northern are residential load control          Coast so that no major decision has      Delaware. To serve this area, and cogeneration. During 1987,        to be made for the next year or          Delmarva Power maintains an members of the task force will        two. The strategy is to study all        electric system with 2,277 mega-be conducting market research to      options, keeping the company            watts of generation capacity, determine incentives necessary        as flexible as it can be until            1,306 miles of transmission lines, for customers to participate.        future demand and the potential          and 9,285 miles of distribution Initial projects involving cus-      of load control become clearer.          lines, and a natural gas system tomers are scheduled to begin                                                  with 1,061 miles of gas main.
In 1986, the company developed and began to imple-ment a project to delay 225 megawatts of peak growth by 1996. Th is would be enough to postpone the next major plant until near the tum of the century.
during the first quarter of 1988.                                              The company employs 2,586 people.
Key ingredients of this project are residential load control and cogeneration. During 1987, members of the task force will be conducting market research to determine incentives necessary for customers to participate.
Charlie Johnson Salisbury 16                                      Tom Ashby                            Lori Meredith Exmore                                Westover
Initial projects involving cus-tomers are scheduled to begin during the first quarter of 1988.
Equipment purchases for the project are underway.
However, peak load growth continues to exceed projections.
It has increased 13% over the past two years.
Thus, the study of options for supplying electricity in the future has been accelerated in the event peak load growth continues to exceed expectations or some of the load control and cogeneration programs do not progress as anticipated.
Options include purchases from other utilities, restarting, in environmentally acceptable ways, retired units at Edge Moor, or building a new, smaller-than-previously-planned plant using advanced technology.
There is enough generating capacity available in Delmarva Power's svstem and on the East Coast so that no major decision has to be made for the next year or two. The strategy is to study all options, keeping the company as flexible as it can be until future demand and the potential of load control become clearer.
Tom Ashby Exmore Charlie Johnson Salisbury D IVERSE SERVICE T ERRITORY Centrally located within the major East Coast markets, the Delmarva Peninsula has a unique blend of industrial, agricultural, commercial, and recreational activities.
This mixture makes the demands for electricity and natural gas less affected by extreme fluctuations in the national economy than in many other areas of the nation.
Delmarva Power serves 325,832 electric customers throughout most of the 5,700-square-mile Delmarva Peninsula which includes Delaware, portions of nine Eastern Shore counties in Maryland, and two Eastern Shore counties in Virginia. The company also distributes natural gas to 76,614 customers in a 275-square-mile area in northern Delaware. To serve this area, Delmarva Power maintains an electric system with 2,277 mega-watts of generation capacity, 1,306 miles of transmission lines, and 9,285 miles of distribution lines, and a natural gas system with 1,061 miles of gas main.
The company employs 2,586 people.
Lori Meredith Westover  


PENNSYLVANIA NEW jEH SEY MARYLAND Indian R11'er
PENNSYLVANIA MARYLAND VIRGINIA Indian R11'er
* Laurel Salisburl' LEGEND             ,
* Laurel Salisburl' NEW jEHSEY LEGEND  
                                          / .0 orate Headquarters
/. 0orate Headquarters Nonhem Division Gen~~ol Office J Southern ryn General
                                          "  Nonhem Division Gen~~ol Office VIRGINIA J Southern r yn General
* Cuswmpl Sen* ice Loca1i s  
* Cuswmpl Sen*ice Loca1i s


f IN AN c IAl Rf vIf w and AN Alys Is Rf P0RT 0f MANAGf Mf NT Rf P0RT 0f IN0f Pf N0f NT ACC0UNTA NTS CONSOllOATfO flNANCIAl STAHMfNTS N0H S   to C0NS0l I0AH 0 f INANCIAl STA Tf Mf NTS CONSOllOAHO STATISTICS SHARfHOlOfR INfORMATION 0HI Cf RS     and 0IRf CT 0RS
f IN AN c I Al Rf v If w and AN Alys Is R f P 0 R T 0f M A N A G f M f N T R f P 0 R T 0f I N 0 f P f N 0 f N T A C C 0 U N TA N T S CONSOllOATfO flNANCIAl STAHMfNTS N 0 H S to C 0 N S 0 l I 0 A H 0 f I N A N C I A l S TA T f M f N T S CONSOllOAHO STATISTICS SHARfHOlOfR INfORMATION 0 HI Cf RS and 0 I Rf CT 0 RS


Delmarva Power &. Li9ht Campany SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in Thousands)
Delmarva Power &. Li9ht Campany SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in Thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31             1986             1985         1984     1983     1982 OPERATING                       Operating Revenues                 $ 714,863 $ 722,834 $ 702,593 $ 649,799 $ 636,666 Operating Income                         134,738           135,515     133,209   129,138   116,573 Net Income                               96,123           96,638       92,110     85,063   73,571 EARNINGS AND DIVIDENDS           Earnings Per Share                           2.91         2.76         2.63     2.45     2. 13 Dividends Declared on Common Stock                           2.045           1.945       1.83     1.68     1.595 Average Shares Outstanding (000)                     30,482           30,482       30,248   29,541   28,489 Total Assets                           1,742,552       1,672,527     1,591,630 1,533,263 1,509,771 Construction Expenditures 11 1                 102,597           94,923       79,488     76,056   110,646 Internal Generation121 of Funds                           157,176           148,880     100,493     99,730   54,553 CAPITALIZATION                   Long Term Debt131                       666,979         638,090       567,761   567,935   592,615 Preferred Stock without mandatory redemption               103,306           105,000     105,000   105,000   105,000 Preferred Stock with mandatory redemption 141                4,077           5,992       47,836     49,383   50,000 Common Equity                           587,449         561,811       539,650   503,513   468,073 Total                               $1,361,811 $1,310,893 $1,260,247 $1,225,831 $1,215,688 CAPITALIZATION RATIOS           Long Term Debt                                 493             493         45 3      463       493 Preferred Stock without mandatory redemption                       83             83           83       93       93 Preferred Stock with mandatory redemption                       03             03           43         43       43 Common Equity                                 433             433         433       41 3     383 Total                                       1003           1003         1003     1003     1003 ELECTRIC/ GAS SALES             Electric Sales (kwh 000)             9,205,795         8,530,520   8,308,233   7,878,476 7,249,442 Gas Sal es (mcfOOO)                       15,952           15,708       17,239   16,449   15,604 II !Excludes Allowance for Funds Used During Construction.
For the Years Ended December 31 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 OPERATING Operating Revenues  
$ 714,863 $ 722,834 $ 702,593 $ 649,799 $ 636,666 Operating Income 134,738 135,515 133,209 129,138 116,573 Net Income 96,123 96,638 92,110 85,063 73,571 EARNINGS AND DIVIDENDS Earnings Per Share 2.91 2.76 2.63 2.45
: 2. 13 Dividends Declared on Common Stock 2.045 1.945 1.83 1.68 1.595 Average Shares Outstanding (000) 30,482 30,482 30,248 29,541 28,489 Total Assets 1,742,552 1,672,527 1,591,630 1,533,263 1,509,771 Construction Expenditures11 1 102,597 94,923 79,488 76,056 110,646 Internal Generation121 of Funds 157,176 148,880 100,493 99,730 54,553 CAPITALIZATION Long Term Debt131 666,979 638,090 567,761 567,935 592,615 Preferred Stock without mandatory redemption 103,306 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 Preferred Stock with mandatory redemption141 4,077 5,992 47,836 49,383 50,000 Common Equity 587,449 561,811 539,650 503,513 468,073 Total  
$1,361,811 $1,310,893 $1,260,247 $1,225,831 $1,215,688 CAPITALIZATION RATIOS Long Term Debt 493 493 453 463 493 Preferred Stock without mandatory redemption 83 83 83 93 93 Preferred Stock with mandatory redemption 03 03 43 43 43 Common Equity 433 433 433 41 3 383 Total 1003 1003 1003 1003 1003 ELECTRIC/ GAS SALES Electric Sales (kwh 000) 9,205,795 8,530,520 8,308,233 7,878,476 7,249,442 Gas Sales (mcfOOO) 15,952 15,708 17,239 16,449 15,604 I I !Excludes Allowance for Funds Used During Construction.
iliNet cash now Ii-om operating activities less preferred and common dividends.
iliNet cash now Ii-om operating activities less preferred and common dividends.
iliJncludes long-term debt due within one year.
iliJncludes long-term debt due within one year.
t 41Jncludes mandatory redemption due within one year.
t41Jncludes mandatory redemption due within one year.
19
19  


Delmarva Power &_Light Compan_v FINA CIAL REVIEW A D ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS           EARNINGS Earnings per share of common stock increased to $2.91 in 1986 from $2.76 in 1985 and
Delmarva Power &_Light Compan_v FINA CIAL REVIEW A D ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 300 20 Earnings and Dividends Declared (cents) 82 83 84 85 86 Earnings Dividends EARNINGS Earnings per share of common stock increased to $2.91 in 1986 from $2.76 in 1985 and  
                                $2.63 in 1984. The 1986 increase was principally attributable to higher electric sales, increased investment income and lower financing costs partially offset by rate decreases and higher other operation and maintenance expenses. The 1985 increase of 13<!: per share compared to 1984 resulted from higher electric sales, additional amortization of the credit arising from the sale of contracts (Summit), and increased investment income partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.
$2.63 in 1984. The 1986 increase was principally attributable to higher electric sales, increased investment income and lower financing costs partially offset by rate decreases and higher other operation and maintenance expenses. The 1985 increase of 13<!: per share compared to 1984 resulted from higher electric sales, additional amortization of the credit arising from the sale of contracts (Summit), and increased investment income partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.
DIVIDE OS In December 1986, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend 5% to 53<;: per share, the tenth consecutive annual increase. The current indicated annual dividend rate has increased to $2.12 per share from $2.02 per share. This increase reflects a dividend policy which is to gradually increase dividends on an annual basis and thus provide stockholders with a fair and competitive return on their investment. Although earnings may decline in 1987 due to lower returns authorized by regulatory commissions, the company's favorable Earnings and              cash position should allow for continued increases.
DIVIDE OS In December 1986, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend 5% to 53<;: per share, the tenth consecutive annual increase. The current indicated annual dividend rate has increased to $2.12 per share from $2.02 per share. This increase reflects a dividend policy which is to gradually increase dividends on an annual basis and thus provide stockholders with a fair and competitive return on their investment. Although earnings may decline in 1987 due to lower returns authorized by regulatory commissions, the company's favorable cash position should allow for continued increases.
Dividends Declared (cents)
ELECTRIC REVENUES AND SALES Electric revenues, net of fuel, decreased $9.8 million or 2.33 in 1986. The 1986 decrease was primarily due to a $28.1 million Delaware Summit credit payment and a $13.5 million decrease from lower rates offset by a $31.5 million sales increase. (See Note 10 on page 40 for a discussion of rate matters.) The sales increase resulted from a continued strong economy in the service territory, colder winter weather, and new residential construction. A new system peak of 1,840 megawatts was reached in July 1986, a 2.5% increase over the previous peak in August 1985. The $28.1 million Delaware Summit credit payment consisted of the unamortized Summit credit and related tax benefits. The settlement payment did not reduce earnings since there was a corresponding credit to operating expenses.
ELECTRIC REVENUES AND SALES Electric revenues, net of fuel, decreased $9.8 million or 2.33 in 1986. The 1986 decrease 300 was primarily due to a $28.1 million Delaware Summit credit payment and a $13.5 million decrease from lower rates offset by a $31.5 million sales increase. (See Note 10 on page 40 for a discussion of rate matters.) The sales increase resulted from a continued strong economy in the service territory, colder winter weather, and new residential construction. A new system peak of 1,840 megawatts was reached in July 1986, a 2.5% increase over the previous peak in August 1985. The $28.1 million Delaware Summit credit payment consisted of the unamortized Summit credit and related tax benefits. The settlement payment did not reduce earnings since there was a corresponding credit to operating expenses.
1985 net electric revenues increased $12.3 million or 3%. The increase was mainly attributable to higher sales resulting from an expansion of the banking and financial services sector in Delaware and growth in the residential market.
1985 net electric revenues increased $12.3 million or 3%. The increase was mainly attributable to higher sales resulting from an expansion of the banking and financial services sector in Delaware and growth in the residential market.
GAS REVENUES AND SALES 1986 gas revenues, net of fuel costs, increased $2.7 million or 9.4% in 1986. The net revenue increase reflects a full year of revenues at higher rates, effective March 5, 1985, compared to 1985 which includes only ten months at the higher rates. Also contributing to the increase were higher residential space heating sales which were due to colder winter weather and residential and commercial customer growth. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in industrial sales, largely attributable to lower oil prices, which caused some customers 82  83  84    85  86  to switch from gas.
GAS REVENUES AND SALES 1986 gas revenues, net of fuel costs, increased $2.7 million or 9.4% in 1986. The net revenue increase reflects a full year of revenues at higher rates, effective March 5, 1985, compared to 1985 which includes only ten months at the higher rates. Also contributing to the increase were higher residential space heating sales which were due to colder winter weather and residential and commercial customer growth. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in industrial sales, largely attributable to lower oil prices, which caused some customers to switch from gas.  
* Earnings
* Dividends 20


Delmarva Power     &._ Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS 1985 net gas revenues increased 2.63 due to increased rates partially offset by a 8.93 decrease in sales principally attributable to fuel switching, decreased industrial production levels and mild weather in the first quarter of 1985.
Delmarva Power &._ Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS 100 80 60 40 20 0
Generation Fuel Mix (percent)
I -
~
83 84 85 86 87 Oil Nuclear Coal 1985 net gas revenues increased 2.63 due to increased rates partially offset by a 8.93 decrease in sales principally attributable to fuel switching, decreased industrial production levels and mild weather in the first quarter of 1985.
GAS SUPPLY The company minimized the impact of competition from oil through the purchase of significantly lower priced gas, when available, earmarked specifically for alternate fuel customers. The company has taken two additional actions to secure low priced natural gas for its customers. First, regulations issued in 1985 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission have enabled the company to make spot purchases. The company makes spot purchases when they are advantageous and available. Second, the company will have another primary supplier, Columbia Gas System, Inc., in late 1987 when it is anticipated that construction of a pipeline by Columbia will be completed.
GAS SUPPLY The company minimized the impact of competition from oil through the purchase of significantly lower priced gas, when available, earmarked specifically for alternate fuel customers. The company has taken two additional actions to secure low priced natural gas for its customers. First, regulations issued in 1985 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission have enabled the company to make spot purchases. The company makes spot purchases when they are advantageous and available. Second, the company will have another primary supplier, Columbia Gas System, Inc., in late 1987 when it is anticipated that construction of a pipeline by Columbia will be completed.
Generation Fuel Mix                        FUEL   Mix (percent)
FUEL Mix In 1986, generation from coal, nuclear and oil sources was 613, 173, and 223, respectively.
In 1986, generation from coal, nuclear and oil sources was 613, 173, and 223, respectively.
Nuclear generation increased 233 due to increased production by the Peach Bottom units which experienced extended outages during 1985. Oil generation increased 93 primarily due to a 393 decline in the company's average cost of oil. These factors lowered the effective customer fuel cost, which includes fuel, interchange and purchased power costs, to l.84ct/ kwh in 1986 from 1.94ct/ kwh in 1985 and 1.9M/ kwh in 1984.
Nuclear generation increased 233 due to increased production by the Peach Bottom units which experienced extended outages during 1985. Oil generation increased 93 primarily due to a 393 decline in the company's average cost of oil. These factors lowered the effective 100 customer fuel cost, which includes fuel, interchange and purchased power costs, to l .84ct/ kwh in 1986 from 1.94ct/ kwh in 1985 and 1.9M/ kwh in 1984.
OPERATING EXPENSES Operating expenses, net of fuel costs, decreased 2.23 in 1986 due to $13.5 million accelerated amortization of the Summit credit in the Delaware jurisdiction and the $14.3 million tax effect of the Delaware Summit credit payment. Excluding the impact of the Delaware Summit credit payment, operating expenses, net of fuel costs, increased 5.93. This increase was due to higher payroll, increased insurance costs and higher annual overhaul expenses for the company's generating units.
I 80 -    ....__
1985 operating expenses, net of fuel costs, increased 4.93 principally due to higher payroll and associated benefits, the higher cost of jointly-owned nuclear facilities, costs related to Hurricane Gloria, and increased steam service expenses, which are billed and reflected in steam revenues.
                              -  ~
21  
OPERATING EXPENSES Operating expenses, net of fuel costs, decreased 2.23 in 1986 due to $13.5 million accelerated amortization of the Summit credit in the Delaware jurisdiction and the $14.3 million tax 60                                  effect of the Delaware Summit credit payment. Excluding the impact of the Delaware Summit credit payment, operating expenses, net of fuel costs, increased 5.93. This increase was due to higher payroll, increased insurance costs and higher annual overhaul expenses for the company's generating units.
40 1985 operating expenses, net of fuel costs, increased 4.93 principally due to higher payroll and associated benefits, the higher cost of jointly-owned nuclear facilities, costs related to Hurricane Gloria, and increased steam service expenses, which are billed and reflected in steam revenues.
20 0
83        84    85    86  87
* Oil
* Nuclear
* Coal 21


Delmarva Power &. Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS 1986 TAX   REFORM ACT The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (Tax Act) is the most significant and comprehensive tax legislation passed since 1954. The changes provided by the Tax Act having a significant impact on the company include lower corporate tax rates, less favorable depreciation rules and elimination of the investment tax credit (ITC). The lower corporate tax rate will reduce tax expense and the company expects a corresponding reduction in revenues due to lower customer rates. The company's tax payments are expected to increase due to elimination ofITC and less favorable depreciation rules. This may require the company to rely more heavily on external capital markets for new financing in future years. Additionally, the alternative minimum tax, which is significantly more stringent under the Tax Act, may affect future years.
Delmarva Power &. Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS IMPACT OF INFLATION 22 1986 TAX REFORM ACT The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (Tax Act) is the most significant and comprehensive tax legislation passed since 1954. The changes provided by the Tax Act having a significant impact on the company include lower corporate tax rates, less favorable depreciation rules and elimination of the investment tax credit (ITC). The lower corporate tax rate will reduce tax expense and the company expects a corresponding reduction in revenues due to lower customer rates. The company's tax payments are expected to increase due to elimination ofITC and less favorable depreciation rules. This may require the company to rely more heavily on external capital markets for new financing in future years. Additionally, the alternative minimum tax, which is significantly more stringent under the Tax Act, may affect future years.
OTHER INCOME Other income, excluding allowance for other funds used during construction, increased $6.9 million in 1986 and $3.l million in 1985. The increases in both years reflect increased leveraged leasing income and higher interest and dividend income. Interest and dividend income in 1986 benefited from increased investment funds available, although lower prevailing rates slowed the growth of income. Interest income also increased in 1986 due to interest received on income tax refunds. The 1985 increase consisted principally of leveraged leasing income, as this was the first year the company invested in leveraged leases.
OTHER INCOME Other income, excluding allowance for other funds used during construction, increased $6.9 million in 1986 and $3.l million in 1985. The increases in both years reflect increased leveraged leasing income and higher interest and dividend income. Interest and dividend income in 1986 benefited from increased investment funds available, although lower prevailing rates slowed the growth of income. Interest income also increased in 1986 due to interest received on income tax refunds. The 1985 increase consisted principally of leveraged leasing income, as this was the first year the company invested in leveraged leases.
FINA CING COSTS Interest on long-term debt increased $7.2 million in 1986 primarily due to a December 1985 refinancing of $41.9 million of preferred stock with long-term debt. An increase in loans used to finance leveraged lease investments also contributed to the interest expense increase. During 1986, $87.l million of bonds and preferred stock were refinanced with lower cost securities. The 1985 and 1986 refinancings resulted in a net of tax savings of $2 .3 million in 1986, which reflects a $5.2 million decrease in preferred dividends. In 1985, interest on long-term debt increased $1.4 million mainly due to borrowings related to leveraged leases.
FINA CING COSTS Interest on long-term debt increased $7.2 million in 1986 primarily due to a December 1985 refinancing of $41.9 million of preferred stock with long-term debt. An increase in loans used to finance leveraged lease investments also contributed to the interest expense increase. During 1986, $87.l million of bonds and preferred stock were refinanced with lower cost securities. The 1985 and 1986 refinancings resulted in a net of tax savings of $2.3 million in 1986, which reflects a $5.2 million decrease in preferred dividends. In 1985, interest on long-term debt increased $1.4 million mainly due to borrowings related to leveraged leases.
IMPACT OF INFLATION            In recent years the impact of inflation on the company has decreased due to declining inflation rates. However, the cost of replacing utility plant would be significantly higher than the historical cost reflected in the financial statements. Based on past practices of regulatory commissions, the company anticipates it will recover the increased cost of facilities when replacement actually occurs.
In recent years the impact of inflation on the company has decreased due to declining inflation rates. However, the cost of replacing utility plant would be significantly higher than the historical cost reflected in the financial statements. Based on past practices of regulatory commissions, the company anticipates it will recover the increased cost of facilities when replacement actually occurs.  
22


Delmarva Power &.. Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND             A ALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND                           LIQUIDITY CAPITAL RESOURCES The company's liquidity is affected principally by its construction program and, to a lesser degree, by other capital requirements such as maturing debt and sinking fund requirements.
Delmarva Power &.. Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND A ALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Interest Charges (SEC method) 82 83 84 85 86 LIQUIDITY The company's liquidity is affected principally by its construction program and, to a lesser degree, by other capital requirements such as maturing debt and sinking fund requirements.
The company's cash flow was decreased by 1986 rate reductions and will decrease to a greater degree in 1987, when the rate reductions will be in effect for a full year. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 will also reduce the company's internal generation of cash due to loss of the investment tax credit and less favorable depreciation rules.
The company's cash flow was decreased by 1986 rate reductions and will decrease to a greater degree in 1987, when the rate reductions will be in effect for a full year. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 will also reduce the company's internal generation of cash due to loss of the investment tax credit and less favorable depreciation rules.
The company has the ability to issue commercial paper supported by adequate lines of credit to meet fluctuations in working capital requirements as well as the interim financing necessary for construction projects. The company has lines of credit with banks in the amount of
The company has the ability to issue commercial paper supported by adequate lines of credit to meet fluctuations in working capital requirements as well as the interim financing necessary for construction projects. The company has lines of credit with banks in the amount of  
                                      $44.5 million. These lines are available for bank loans and to secure commercial paper borrowings as the need arises. At December 31, 1986, the company had no commercial paper outstanding.
$44.5 million. These lines are available for bank loans and to secure commercial paper borrowings as the need arises. At December 31, 1986, the company had no commercial paper outstanding.
During 1986, the company continued to lower its cost of capital through refinancings. In June 1986, the company issued $66 million of 9.25% first mortgage bonds pursuant to a $102 million shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
During 1986, the company continued to lower its cost of capital through refinancings. In June 1986, the company issued $66 million of 9.25% first mortgage bonds pursuant to a $102 million shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The proceeds were primarily used to redeem $30 million and $29.1 million of first mortgage Ratio of Earnings                bonds, bearing interest rates of 11.75% and 11%, respectively. In June 1986, the company to Fixed Interest Charges                          also issued $28 million of adjustable rate preferred stock to refund $15 million and $13 million (SEC method)                      of preferred stock, bearing dividend rates of 8% and 8.96%, respectively. The dividend rate on the adjustable rate preferred stock averaged 5.58% in 1986. In another 1986 financing,
The proceeds were primarily used to redeem $30 million and $29.1 million of first mortgage bonds, bearing interest rates of 11.75% and 11%, respectively. In June 1986, the company also issued $28 million of adjustable rate preferred stock to refund $15 million and $13 million of preferred stock, bearing dividend rates of 8% and 8.96%, respectively. The dividend rate on the adjustable rate preferred stock averaged 5.58% in 1986. In another 1986 financing,  
                                      $18 million of bank loans were secured to finance investments in leveraged leases.
$18 million of bank loans were secured to finance investments in leveraged leases.
The company's ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 3.67, as of December 31, 1986, decreased 4.0
The company's ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 3.67, as of December 31, 1986, decreased  
                                      &om 1985 primarily due to increased interest on long-term debt and a lower effective income tax rate. This ratio may decrease in future years due to the effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and lower returns authorized by regulatory commissions. The company's preferred stock and first mortgage bonds maintained a AA quality credit rating in 1986.
&om 1985 primarily due to increased interest on long-term debt and a lower effective income tax rate. This ratio may decrease in future years due to the effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and lower returns authorized by regulatory commissions. The company's preferred stock and first mortgage bonds maintained a AA quality credit rating in 1986.
3.0 2.0 1.0 0
23  
82  83    84    85  86 23


Delmana Pou er &. Li9ht Company FINA CIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS CAPITAL AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS For the period 1984-1986, the company had total capital requirements of $424 million, including $277 million for construction (excluding AFUDC). During the same period, $407 million was generated internally (cash from operations less common and preferred dividend requirements) which represents 963 of the capital requirements and 1473 of the construction requirements. Capital requirements for the period 1987-1989 are estimated to be $478 million, including $396 million for construction (excluding AFUDC). The company presently anticipates that, for the period 1987-1989, internally generated funds will be $311 million which equals 653 of the total capital requirements and 793 of its construction requirements.
Delmana Pou er &. Li9ht Company FINA CIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS 150 120 90 60 30 0
Actual construction expenditures may vary from the above estimates due to, among other factors, the rate of inflation, regulation and legislation, rates of load growth, licensing and construction delays, results of rate proceedings, and the cost and availabi lity of capital.
24 Construction Expenditures and Internally Generated Funds (millions of dollars) 85 86 87 88 89 Internally Generated Funds Construction Expenditures (excluding AFU DC)
The company estimates that its annual energy and peak load growth for the next 10 years wi ll be at a rate of 2.13 and 1.33, respectively. The company's present generating capacity of 2,277 megawatts provides a reserve of 243 against its company peak of 1,840 megawatts experienced in the summer of 1986. In 1985, the company peak was 1,795 megawatts.
CAPITAL AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS For the period 1984-1986, the company had total capital requirements of $424 million, including $277 million for construction (excluding AFUDC). During the same period, $407 million was generated internally (cash from operations less common and preferred dividend requirements) which represents 963 of the capital requirements and 1473 of the construction requirements. Capital requirements for the period 1987-1989 are estimated to be $478 million, including $396 million for construction (excluding AFUDC). The company presently anticipates that, for the period 1987-1989, internally generated funds will be $311 million which equals 653 of the total capital requirements and 793 of its construction requirements.
Construction Expenditures and Internally                  The company developed a plan to delay the in-service date of its next generation unit Generated Funds                  until the late 1990's because of the high cost of adding new capacity and possible future (millions of dollars)            technological developments. In order to respond to the unexpectedly high peak growth experienced over the past two years by the company, the development of the plan's supply side and demand side options has been intensified. The company's strategy is to match capacity expansion and load growth as closely as possible. This strategy will enable the company 150 to maintain its relatively low pricing within the Northeast and meet developing competition in the utility industry.
Actual construction expenditures may vary from the above estimates due to, among other factors, the rate of inflation, regulation and legislation, rates of load growth, licensing and construction delays, results of rate proceedings, and the cost and availability of capital.
120 90 60 30 0
The company estimates that its annual energy and peak load growth for the next 10 years will be at a rate of 2.13 and 1.33, respectively. The company's present generating capacity of 2,277 megawatts provides a reserve of 243 against its company peak of 1,840 megawatts experienced in the summer of 1986. In 1985, the company peak was 1,795 megawatts.
85    86  87    88  89
The company developed a plan to delay the in-service date of its next generation unit until the late 1990's because of the high cost of adding new capacity and possible future technological developments. In order to respond to the unexpectedly high peak growth experienced over the past two years by the company, the development of the plan's supply side and demand side options has been intensified. The company's strategy is to match capacity expansion and load growth as closely as possible. This strategy will enable the company to maintain its relatively low pricing within the Northeast and meet developing competition in the utility industry.  
* Internally Generated Funds
* Construction Expenditures (excluding AFU DC) 24


Delmarva Power &. Light Company REPORT OF MANAGEMENT           Management is responsible for the information and representations contained in the company's financial statements. Our financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, based upon cunently available facts and circumstances and management's best estimates and judgments of the expected effects of events and transactions.
Delmarva Power &. Light Company REPORT OF MANAGEMENT REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Management is responsible for the information and representations contained in the company's financial statements. Our financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, based upon cunently available facts and circumstances and management's best estimates and judgments of the expected effects of events and transactions.
Delmarva Power & Light Company maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance of the reliability of the financial records and the protection of assets. The internal control system is supported by written administrative policies, a program of internal audits, and procedures to assure the selection and training of qualified personnel.
Delmarva Power & Light Company maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance of the reliability of the financial records and the protection of assets. The internal control system is supported by written administrative policies, a program of internal audits, and procedures to assure the selection and training of qualified personnel.
Coopers & Lybrand, independent certified public accountants, are engaged to examine the financial statements and express their opinion thereon. Their examination was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which include a review of internal controls.
Coopers & Lybrand, independent certified public accountants, are engaged to examine the financial statements and express their opinion thereon. Their examination was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which include a review of internal controls.
The audit committee of the Board of Directors, composed of outside Directors only, meets with management, internal auditors and the independent accountants to review accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters. The independent accountants are appointed by the Board on recommendation of the audit committee, subject to shareholder approval.
The audit committee of the Board of Directors, composed of outside Directors only, meets with management, internal auditors and the independent accountants to review accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters. The independent accountants are appointed by the Board on recommendation of the audit committee, subject to shareholder approval.
                                                                              ~fl~
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Roger D. Campbell Chairman, President and                        Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer                        Chief Financial Officer REPORT OF INDEPENDENT          To THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS CERTIFIED PUBLIC                DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ACCOUNTANTS                    WILMINGTON, DELAWARE We have examined the consolidated balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Delmarva Power & Light Company as of December 31, 1986 and 1985, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in common stockholders' equity and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1986. Our examinations were made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
~fl~
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly the consolidated financial position of Delmarva Power & Light Company at December 31, 1986 and 1985 and the consolidated results of its operations and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1986 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.
Roger D. Campbell Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer To THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WILMINGTON, DELAWARE We have examined the consolidated balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Delmarva Power & Light Company as of December 31, 1986 and 1985, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in common stockholders' equity and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1986. Our examinations were made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
                                ~~
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly the consolidated financial position of Delmarva Power & Light Company at December 31, 1986 and 1985 and the consolidated results of its operations and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1986 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.  
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania February 6, 1987 25
~~
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania February 6, 1987 25  


Delmarva Power &._Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Dollars in Thousands)
Delmarva Power &._Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Dollars in Thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31                             1986       1985       1984 OPERATING REVENUES             Electric                                             $ 602,240   $ 605,581 $ 584,163 Gas                                                     91,802       95,256     101,578 Steam                                                   20,821       21,997     16,852 714,863     722,834     702,593 OPERATING EXPENSES             Operation:
For the Years Ended December 31 1986 1985 1984 OPERATING REVENUES Electric  
Fuel for electric generation                         207,862     240,901     278,474 Net interchange and purchased power                 (28,098)     (63,962)   (108,011)
$ 602,240  
Purchased gas                                         57,012       69,847     74,082 Deferred energy costs                                   7,767     (2,549)     (2,345)
$ 605,581  
Other operation                                     128,116     121, 105   108,001 Maintenance                                             62,621       59,406     56,752 Depreciation                                             64,657       61,183     58,464 Amortization of Summit credit                           (15,707)     (7,202)     (4,762)
$ 584,163 Gas 91,802 95,256 101,578 Steam 20,821 21,997 16,852 714,863 722,834 702,593 OPERATING EXPENSES Operation:
Taxes on income                                         65,208       77,836     77,577 Taxes other than income                                 30,687       30,754     31,152 580,125     587,319     569,384 OPERATING INCOME                                                                       134,738     135,515     133,209 OTHER INCOME                   Allowance for other funds used during construction                               2,750       2,428       2,780 Other, net                                               13,267       6,382       3,243 16,017       8,810       6,023 INCOME BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES                                                                                 150,755     144,325     139,232 INTEREST CHARGES               Long-term debt                                           54,478       47,236     45,815 Short-term debt and other                                     922     1,059       2,090 Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction                                 (768)     (608)       (783) 54,632       47,687     47,122 EARNINGS                       Net Income                                               96,123       96,638     92, 110 Dividends on preferred stock                               7,405     12,599     12,662 Earnings applicable to common stock                   $ 88,718   $ 84,039   $ 79,448 COMMON STOCK                   Average shares outstanding (thousands)                   30,482       30,482     30,248 Earnings per average share                           $      2.91 $    2.76 $    2.63 Dividends declared Eer share                         $    2.045   $  1.945 $      1.83 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fuel for electric generation 207,862 240,901 278,474 Net interchange and purchased power (28,098)
26
(63,962)
(108,011)
Purchased gas 57,012 69,847 74,082 Deferred energy costs 7,767 (2,549)
(2,345)
Other operation 128,116 121, 105 108,001 Maintenance 62,621 59,406 56,752 Depreciation 64,657 61,183 58,464 Amortization of Summit credit (15,707)
(7,202)
(4,762)
Taxes on income 65,208 77,836 77,577 Taxes other than income 30,687 30,754 31,152 580,125 587,319 569,384 OPERATING INCOME 134,738 135,515 133,209 OTHER INCOME Allowance for other funds used during construction 2,750 2,428 2,780 Other, net 13,267 6,382 3,243 16,017 8,810 6,023 INCOME BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES 150,755 144,325 139,232 INTEREST CHARGES Long-term debt 54,478 47,236 45,815 Short-term debt and other 922 1,059 2,090 Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (768)
(608)
(783) 54,632 47,687 47,122 EARNINGS Net Income 96,123 96,638 92, 110 Dividends on preferred stock 7,405 12,599 12,662 Earnings applicable to common stock  
$ 88,718  
$ 84,039  
$ 79,448 COMMON STOCK Average shares outstanding (thousands) 30,482 30,482 30,248 Earnings per average share 2.91 2.76 2.63 Dividends declared Eer share 2.045 1.945 1.83 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
26  


Delman-a Power &._Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION (Dollars in Thousands)
Delman-a Power &._Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION (Dollars in Thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31                                 1986                 1985                 1984 CASH FROM OPERATIONS           Net Income                                               $   96,123         $   96,638           $ 92,110 Items not requiring (providing) cash:
For the Years Ended December 31 1986 1985 1984 CASH FROM OPERATIONS Net Income  
Depreciation                                             64,657               61, 183             58,464 Amortization of Summit credit                           (15,707)             (7,202)               (4,762)
$ 96,123  
Amortization of nuclear fuel                               5,405               6,594                 2,071 Allowance for funds used during construction                                           (3,518)             (3,036)               (3,563)
$ 96,638  
Investment tax credit adjustments, net                                         (956)             21,878                 2,253 Deferred income taxes, net                               54,535               47,462               31,935 Dther                                                     (1,569)             (2,307)
$ 92,110 Items not requiring (providing) cash:
Refundable taxes and interest                                 31,111               (2,981)               (2,188)
Depreciation 64,657 61, 183 58,464 Amortization of Summit credit (15,707)
Net change in receivables, inventory & payables                                     17,228               20,915             (24,029)
(7,202)
Changes in other current assets
(4,762)
                                    & liabilities':'                                         (21,154)             (19,140)             15,003 Net cash flow from operating activities                     226,155             220,004               167,294 INVESTING AcnvITIES             Construction expenditures (excluding AFUDC)                                       (102,597)             (94,923)             (79,488)
Amortization of nuclear fuel 5,405 6,594 2,071 Allowance for funds used during construction (3,518)
Investment in leveraged leases                               (28,682)           (45,006)
(3,036)
Investment in marketable securities                         (51,249)           (32,308)             (19,754)
(3,563)
Construction funds held by trustee                             9,186               6,392               (4,933)
Investment tax credit adjustments, net (956) 21,878 2,253 Deferred income taxes, net 54,535 47,462 31,935 Dther (1,569)
Other non-current changes, net                               (6,911)             (8,313)               (4, 722)
(2,307)
Net cash used by investing activities                       (180,253)           (174,158)             (108,897)
Refundable taxes and interest 31,111 (2,981)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES           Dividends: Common                                           (61,574)             (58,525)             (54, 139)
(2,188)
Preferred                                     (7,405)             (12,599)             (12,662)
Net change in receivables, inventory & payables 17,228 20,915 (24,029)
Redemptions: Term loan                                                           (33,000)               (5,500)
Changes in other current assets  
Long-term debt                           (114,250)             (10, 100)           (10, 100)
& liabilities':'
Preferred stock                           (31,635)             (41,573)               (1,418)
(21,154)
Premium on redemption of securities                         (6,218)             (2,814)
(19,140) 15,003 Net cash flow from operating activities 226,155 220,004 167,294 INVESTING AcnvITIES Construction expenditures (excluding AFUDC)
Issuances: First mortgage bonds                             126,000 Variable rate demand series bonds                                                     33,500               15,500 Other long-term debt                           18,000               80,000 Preferred stock                                 28,000 Common stock                                                                             11,921 Net cash used by financing activities                       (49,082)             (45,111)             (56,398)
(102,597)
Net increase     ~decrease)   in cash                     $  (3,180)         $        735         $    1,999
(94,923)
                                *:'Other than long-term debt due and preferred stock redeemable within one year and current deferred income taxes.
(79,488)
Investment in leveraged leases (28,682)
(45,006)
Investment in marketable securities (51,249)
(32,308)
(19,754)
Construction funds held by trustee 9,186 6,392 (4,933)
Other non-current changes, net (6,911)
(8,313)
( 4, 722)
Net cash used by investing activities (180,253)
(174,158)
(108,897)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES Dividends: Common (61,574)
(58,525)
(54, 139)
Preferred (7,405)
(12,599)
(12,662)
Redemptions: Term loan (33,000)
(5,500)
Long-term debt (114,250)
(10, 100)
(10, 100)
Preferred stock (31,635)
(41,573)
(1,418)
Premium on redemption of securities (6,218)
(2,814)
Issuances: First mortgage bonds 126,000 Variable rate demand series bonds 33,500 15,500 Other long-term debt 18,000 80,000 Preferred stock 28,000 Common stock 11,921 Net cash used by financing activities (49,082)
(45,111)
(56,398)
Net increase ~decrease) in cash (3,180) 735 1,999  
*:'Other than long-term debt due and preferred stock redeemable within one year and current deferred income taxes.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
27
27  


Delmarva Power &__Light Company CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in Thousands)
Delmarva Power &__Light Company CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in Thousands)
ASSETS                         As of December 3 I                                                 1986       1985 UTILI1Y PLANT-                 Electric                                                     $1,685,954 $1,624,881 AT ORIGINAL COST               Gas                                                               96,782     90,956 Steam                                                             24,746     24,389 Common                                                           85,261     80,541 1,892,743 1,820,767 Less: Accumulated depreciation                                   587,075   535,873 Net utility plant in service                                   1,305,668 1,284,894 Plant held for future use                                         6,830     15,297 Construction work in progress                                     45,467     33,184 Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost                                   19,461     19,796 1,377,426 1,353,171 0rHER INVESTMENTS               Investment in leveraged leases                                   60,716     30,465 Construction funds held by trustee                                           9,186 Other                                                             11,178     4,340 71,894     43,991 CURRENT ASSETS                 Cash                                                             14,228     17,408 Marketable securities, at cost                                   111,205     59,956 Accounts receivable:
ASSETS As of December 3 I 1986 1985 UTILI1Y PLANT-Electric  
Customers                                                     46,844     49,037 Other                                                         19,433     24,337 Inventories, at average cost:
$1,685,954  
Fuel (coal, oil and gas)                                     43,745     55,694 Materials and supplies                                       21,284     20,648 Prepayments                                                       4,999     4,236 Deferred income taxes, net                                         1,326       (755)
$1,624,881 AT ORIGINAL COST Gas 96,782 90,956 Steam 24,746 24,389 Common 85,261 80,541 1,892,743 1,820,767 Less: Accumulated depreciation 587,075 535,873 Net utility plant in service 1,305,668 1,284,894 Plant held for future use 6,830 15,297 Construction work in progress 45,467 33,184 Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost 19,461 19,796 1,377,426 1,353,171 0rHER INVESTMENTS Investment in leveraged leases 60,716 30,465 Construction funds held by trustee 9,186 Other 11,178 4,340 71,894 43,991 CURRENT ASSETS Cash 14,228 17,408 Marketable securities, at cost 111,205 59,956 Accounts receivable:
Refundable taxes and interest                                               31,111 263,064   261,672 DEFERRED CHARGES AND             Unamortized debt expense                                         6,233     5,368 0rHER ASSETS                     Deferred recoverable plant costs                                 8,145 Other                                                             15,790     8,325 30,168     13,693 Total                                                         $1,742,552 $1,672,527 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Customers 46,844 49,037 Other 19,433 24,337 Inventories, at average cost:
28
Fuel (coal, oil and gas) 43,745 55,694 Materials and supplies 21,284 20,648 Prepayments 4,999 4,236 Deferred income taxes, net 1,326 (755)
Refundable taxes and interest 31,111 263,064 261,672 DEFERRED CHARGES AND Unamortized debt expense 6,233 5,368 0rHER ASSETS Deferred recoverable plant costs 8,145 Other 15,790 8,325 30,168 13,693 Total  
$1,742,552  
$1,672,527 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
28  


Delmarva Power &_Light Company CONSOLIDATED BAIANCE SHEETS (Dollars in Thousands)
Delmarva Power &_Light Company CONSOLIDATED BAIANCE SHEETS (Dollars in Thousands)
CAPITALIZATION                 As of December 31                                                   1986       1985 AND LIABILITIES CAPITALIZATION                 Common stock                                                 $   102,876 $ 102,876 (see Statements               Additional paid-in capital                                       235,187   235,798 of Capitalization)             Retained earnings                                               249,386   223,137 Total common stockholders' equity                             587,449   561,811 Preferred stock:
CAPITALIZATION As of December 31 1986 1985 AND LIABILITIES CAPITALIZATION Common stock  
Without mandatory redemption                                 103,306   105,000 With mandatory redemption                                       3,277     5,192 Long-term debt                                                   666,829   637,940 1,360,861 1,309,943 CURRENT LIABILITIES           Long-term debt due and preferred stock redeemable within one year                                       950       950 Accounts payable                                                 31,947     33,129 Taxes accrued                                                     1,961     16, 181 Interest accrued                                                 10,937     22,729 Dividends declared                                               16,155     15,393 Deferred energy costs, net                                         6,229     (1,488)
$ 102,876  
Other                                                             8,344     10,440 76,523     97,334 DEFERRED CREDITS AND           Credit arising from sale of contracts                             1,261     16,057 OTHER LIABILITIES             Deferred income taxes, net                                       231,360   174,746 Deferred investment tax credits                                   69,460     70,416 Other                                                             3,087     4,031 305,168   265,250 OTHER                         Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 6 and 11)
$ 102,876 (see Statements Additional paid-in capital 235,187 235,798 of Capitalization)
Total                                                       $1,742,552 $1,672,527 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Retained earnings 249,386 223,137 Total common stockholders' equity 587,449 561,811 Preferred stock:
29
Without mandatory redemption 103,306 105,000 With mandatory redemption 3,277 5,192 Long-term debt 666,829 637,940 1,360,861 1,309,943 CURRENT LIABILITIES Long-term debt due and preferred stock redeemable within one year 950 950 Accounts payable 31,947 33,129 Taxes accrued 1,961 16, 181 Interest accrued 10,937 22,729 Dividends declared 16,155 15,393 Deferred energy costs, net 6,229 (1,488)
Other 8,344 10,440 76,523 97,334 DEFERRED CREDITS AND Credit arising from sale of contracts 1,261 16,057 OTHER LIABILITIES Deferred income taxes, net 231,360 174,746 Deferred investment tax credits 69,460 70,416 Other 3,087 4,031 305,168 265,250 OTHER Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 6 and 11)
Total  
$1,742,552  
$1,672,527 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
29  


Dclmal1'a Power &_Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION (Dollars in Thousands)
Dclmal1'a Power &_Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK LONG-TERM DEBT 30 (Dollars in Thousands)
As of December 31                                                         1986            1985 COMMON STOCKHOLDERS'            Common stock, par value $3.375 per share EQUITY                                authorized 35 ,000,000 shares, outstanding 30,481,925 shares                                             $ 102,876      $ 102,876 Additional paid-in capital                                             235,187        235,798 Retained earnings                                                     249,386        223,137 Total Common Stockholders' Equity                                     587,449 433     561,811  43%
As of December 31 Common stock, par value $3.375 per share authorized 35,000,000 shares, outstanding 30,481,925 shares Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Total Common Stockholders' Equity 1986
CUMULATIVE PREFERRED            Par value $25 per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding STOCK                          Par value $100 per share, 1,800,000 shares authorized Without Mandatory Redemption:
$ 102,876 235,187 249,386 587,449 433 Par value $25 per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding Par value $100 per share, 1,800,000 shares authorized Without Mandatory Redemption:
Series           Shares Issued (1986 and 1985) 3.70%-4.56%               240,000 and 240,000                    24,000          24,000 5.00%-7.84%               330,000 and 330,000                    33,000          33,000 7.88%-8.96%               200,000 and 480,000                    20,000          48,000 Adjustable-5.58%Pl               280,000 and             0            28,000 105,000        105,000 Less: Reacquired preferred shares held in treasury (at cost)                                         1,694 Preferred Stock without Mandatory Redemption                           103,306  83    105,000    8%
Series Shares Issued (1986 and 1985) 3.70%-4.56%
With Mandatory Redemption:
240,000 and 240,000 5.00%-7.84%
9.00% Series! 2 l      40,766 and 59,916 shares                 4,077  03      5,992    0%
330,000 and 330,000 7.88%-8.96%
Less: Amount to be redeemed within one year                               800            800 Preferred Stock with Mandatory Redemption                               3,277          5,192 LONG-TERM DEBT                  First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds:
200,000 and 480,000 Adjustable-5.58%Pl 280,000 and 0
Maturity           Interest Rates Jun. 1, 1988               3Ys%                               25,000          25,000 1994-1997             4%%-6%%                               50,000          50,000 1998-2002             7%-11-M%                             158,100        158,100 2003-2005             6.6%-10\4%                             92,150        121,250 2008-2016             9\4%-12%                             207,900        111,900 533,150        466,250 Pollution Control Notes:
Less: Reacquired preferred shares held in treasury (at cost)
Series, 1973 5.7% effective rate, due 1987-1998                         7,550          7,700 Series, 1976 7.3% effective rate, due 1992-2006                         34,500          34,500 42,050          42,200 Variable Rate Demand Series, due 2014-2015-4.51%!               1
Preferred Stock without Mandatory Redemption With Mandatory Redemption:
                                                                                                  )    49,000          49,000 Other Long-Term Debt- 7.76%(1 1                                         43,000          80,000 Unamortized premium and discount, net                                   (221)            640 666,979 493    638,090 49%
9.00% Series!2l 40,766 and 59,916 shares Less: Amount to be redeemed within one year Preferred Stock with Mandatory Redemption First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds:
Long-term debt due within one year                                       (150)          ( 150)
Maturity Interest Rates Jun. 1, 1988 3Ys%
Total Long-Term Debt                                                   666,829        637,940 Total Capitalization                                               $1,360,861 1003 $1,309,943 100%
1994-1997 4%%-6%%
illAverage rate during 1986.
1998-2002 7%-11-M%
                                  ! 2 1Redemption price at December 31, 1986 is$ 107.
2003-2005 6.6%-10\\4%
2008-2016 9\\4%-12%
Pollution Control Notes:
Series, 1973 5.7% effective rate, due 1987-1998 Series, 1976 7.3% effective rate, due 1992-2006 Variable Rate Demand Series, due 2014-2015-4.51%! 1)
Other Long-Term Debt-7.76%(1 1 Unamortized premium and discount, net Long-term debt due within one year Total Long-Term Debt Total Capitalization illAverage rate during 1986.  
!21Redemption price at December 31, 1986 is$ 107.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
30
24,000 33,000 20,000 28,000 105,000 1,694 103,306 83 4,077 03 800 3,277 25,000 50,000 158,100 92,150 207,900 533,150 7,550 34,500 42,050 49,000 43,000 (221) 666,979 493 (150) 666,829
$1,360,861 1003 1985
$ 102,876 235,798 223,137 561,811 43%
24,000 33,000 48,000 105,000 105,000 8%
5,992 0%
800 5,192 25,000 50,000 158,100 121,250 111,900 466,250 7,700 34,500 42,200 49,000 80,000 640 638,090
( 150) 637,940 49%
$1,309,943 100%


DelmatYO Power ~Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Dollars in Thousands)
DelmatYO Power ~Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Dollars in Thousands)
Additional For the Three Years Ended             Common               Par   Paid-in   Retained December 31, 1986                         Shares         Value   Capital   Earnings       Total BALANCE AS OF                                                     29,841,182       $100,714   $225,585   $177,214   $503,513 jANUARY     1, 1984           Net income                                                                     92,110   92, 110 Cash dividends declared:
Additional For the Three Years Ended Common Par Paid-in Retained December 31, 1986 Shares Value Capital Earnings Total BALANCE AS OF 29,841,182  
Common stock ($1.83)                                                       (55,361) (55,361)
$100,714  
Preferred stock                                                             (12,662) ( 12,662)
$225,585  
$177,214  
$503,513 jANUARY 1, 1984 Net income 92,110 92, 110 Cash dividends declared:
Common stock ($1.83)
(55,361)
(55,361)
Preferred stock (12,662)
( 12,662)
Issuance of common stock:
Issuance of common stock:
Dividend Reinvestment and Common Share Purchase Plan                   640,743           2,162     9,888                 12,050 Gain on retirement of preferred stock                                                     125                   125 Common stock expense                                                 ( 125)                 (125)
Dividend Reinvestment and Common Share Purchase Plan 640,743 2,162 9,888 12,050 Gain on retirement of preferred stock 125 125 Common stock expense
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER       31, 1984                                           30,481,925       102,876     235,473   201,301   539,650 Net income                                                                     96,638   96,638 Cash dividends declared:
( 125)
Common stock ($1.945)                                                       (59,287) (59,287)
(125)
Preferred stock                                                             (12,599) (12,599)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1984 30,481,925 102,876 235,473 201,301 539,650 Net income 96,638 96,638 Cash dividends declared:
Net loss on retirement of preferred stock                                                     325     (2,916)   (2,591)
Common stock ($1.945)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER       31, 1985                                           30,481,925       102,876     235,798   223,137   561,811 Net income                                                                     96, 123   96, 123 Cash dividends declared:
( 59,287)
Common stock ($2.045)                                                       (62,336) (62,336)
(59,287)
Preferred stock                                                             (7,405)   (7,405)
Pref erred stock (12,599)
Issuance of preferred stock                                           (650)                 (650)
(12,599)
Redemption of preferred stock                                           39       (133)       (94)
Net loss on retirement of preferred stock 325 (2,916)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER       31, 1986                                           30,481,925       $102,876   $235,187   $249,386   $587,449 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2,591)
31
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1985 30,481,925 102,876 235,798 223,137 561,811 Net income 96, 123 96, 123 Cash dividends declared:
Common stock ($2.045)
( 62,336)
(62,336)
Preferred stock (7,405)
(7,405)
Issuance of preferred stock (650)
(650)
Redemption of preferred stock 39 (133)
(94)
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986 30,481,925  
$102,876  
$235,187  
$249,386  
$587,449 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
31  


Delmarva Power &_ Li9ht Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power &_ Li9ht Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 1. SIGNIFICANT                 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ACCOUNTING POLICIES The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its totally-held subsidialies, Delmarva Energy Company, Delmarva Industries Inc., Delmarva Services Company, and Delmarva Capital Investments, Inc. and its subsidialies. In conformity with generally accepted accounting plinciples, the accounting policies reflect the financial effects of rate decisions issued by regulatory commissions having juiisdiction over the company.
: 1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 32 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its totally-held subsidialies, Delmarva Energy Company, Delmarva Industries Inc., Delmarva Services Company, and Delmarva Capital Investments, Inc. and its subsidialies. In conformity with generally accepted accounting plinciples, the accounting policies reflect the financial effects of rate decisions issued by regulatory commissions having juiisdiction over the company.
Certain reclassifications, not affecting income, have been made to amounts reported in plior years to confo1m to the presentations used in 1986.
Certain reclassifications, not affecting income, have been made to amounts reported in plior years to confo1m to the presentations used in 1986.
REVENUES Revenues are recorded at the time billings are rendered to customers on a monthly cycle basis. At the end of each month, there is an amount of unbilled electric and gas service which has been rendered from the last meter reading to the month-end.
REVENUES Revenues are recorded at the time billings are rendered to customers on a monthly cycle basis. At the end of each month, there is an amount of unbilled electric and gas service which has been rendered from the last meter reading to the month-end.
FUEL COSTS Fuel costs (electlic and gas) are deferred and charged to operations on the basis of fuel costs included in customer billings under the company's taliffs, which are subject to peiiodic regulatory review and approval.
FUEL COSTS Fuel costs ( electlic and gas) are deferred and charged to operations on the basis of fuel costs included in customer billings under the company's taliffs, which are subject to peiiodic regulatory review and approval.
DEPRECIATION AND MAINTENANCE The annual provision for depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis using composite rates by classes of depreciable property. Provision for the costs of decommissioning of nuclear plant is made to the extent of the net cost of removal allowed for rate purposes (approximately 203 of 01iginal plant cost). The relationship of the annual provision for depreciation for financial accounting purposes to average depreciable property was 3.53 for 1986, 3.63 for 1985 and 3.43 for 1984.
DEPRECIATION AND MAINTENANCE The annual provision for depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis using composite rates by classes of depreciable property. Provision for the costs of decommissioning of nuclear plant is made to the extent of the net cost of removal allowed for rate purposes (approximately 203 of 01iginal plant cost). The relationship of the annual provision for depreciation for financial accounting purposes to average depreciable property was 3.53 for 1986, 3.63 for 1985 and 3.43 for 1984.
The cost of maintenance and repairs, including renewals of minor items of property, is charged to operating expenses. A replacement of a unit of property is accounted for as an addition to and a retirement from utility plant. The original cost of the property retired is charged to accu-mulated depreciation together with the net cost of removal. For income tax purposes, the cost of removing retired property is deducted as an expense.
The cost of maintenance and repairs, including renewals of minor items of property, is charged to operating expenses. A replacement of a unit of property is accounted for as an addition to and a retirement from utility plant. The original cost of the property retired is charged to accu-mulated depreciation together with the net cost of removal. For income tax purposes, the cost of removing retired property is deducted as an expense.
NUCLEAR FUEL The company's share of nuclear fuel costs relating to jointly-owned nuclear generating stations is charged to fuel expense on a unit of production basis, which includes a factor for spent nuclear fuel disposal costs pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. The company is collecting future storage and disposal costs for spent fuel as authoiized by the regulatory commissions in each juiisdiction and is paying such amounts quarterly to the Department of Energy.
NUCLEAR FUEL The company's share of nuclear fuel costs relating to jointly-owned nuclear generating stations is charged to fuel expense on a unit of production basis, which includes a factor for spent nuclear fuel disposal costs pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. The company is collecting future storage and disposal costs for spent fuel as authoiized by the regulatory commissions in each juiisdiction and is paying such amounts quarterly to the Department of Energy.  
32


Delmarva Power &.. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LEVERAGED LEASES The company's net investment in leveraged leases includes the aggregate of rentals receivable (net of principal and interest on nonrecourse indebtedness) and estimated residual values of the leased equipment less unearned and deferred income (including investment tax credits).
Delmarva Power &.. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LEVERAGED LEASES The company's net investment in leveraged leases includes the aggregate of rentals receivable (net of principal and interest on nonrecourse indebtedness) and estimated residual values of the leased equipment less unearned and deferred income (including investment tax credits).
Line 291: Line 429:
ALLOWANCE FOR FUNDS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) is a non-cash item and is defined in the regulatory system of accounts as the "net cost for the period of construction of borrowed funds used for construction purposes and a reasonable rate on other funds so used." AFUDC is segregated into two components: (1) the interest on debt component ("allowance for borrowed funds used during construction"), which is net of taxes and classified as a credit to interest charges, and (2) the common stock equity and preferred dividend component
ALLOWANCE FOR FUNDS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) is a non-cash item and is defined in the regulatory system of accounts as the "net cost for the period of construction of borrowed funds used for construction purposes and a reasonable rate on other funds so used." AFUDC is segregated into two components: (1) the interest on debt component ("allowance for borrowed funds used during construction"), which is net of taxes and classified as a credit to interest charges, and (2) the common stock equity and preferred dividend component
("allowance for other funds used during construction"), which is classified as an item of other income. AFUDC is considered a cost of utility plant with a concurrent credit to income. It is excluded from taxable income for tax purposes. The rates used in determining AFUDC, which includes semi-annual compounding, were 9.2% in 1986 and 1985 and 9.0% in 1984.
("allowance for other funds used during construction"), which is classified as an item of other income. AFUDC is considered a cost of utility plant with a concurrent credit to income. It is excluded from taxable income for tax purposes. The rates used in determining AFUDC, which includes semi-annual compounding, were 9.2% in 1986 and 1985 and 9.0% in 1984.
33
33  


Delmarva Power &.. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power &.. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 2. INCOME TAXES                 (Dollars in Thousands) 1986           1985              1984 Operations:
: 2. INCOME TAXES 34 (Dollars in Thousands) 1986 Operations:
Federal: Current                               $29,278         $32,557            $36,131 Deferred                             26,779         28,638              27,380 State: Current                                     5,051           6,320              6,560 Deferred                                   4,596           4,978              4,555 Investment tax credit adjustments, net             (496)         5,343              2,951 Other income: Current                               (27,223)       (29,788)              1,528 Deferred                         23,160           13,846 Investment tax credit adjustments, net           (1,720)         12,608 Total                                             $59,425         $74,502           $79,105 Investment tax credits utilized to reduce federal income taxes payable amounted to $5,450,000 in 1986, $24,992,000 in 1985 and $6,890,000 in 1984. The amounts for 1986, 1985 and 1984 include Employee Stock Ownership Plan credits of $464,000, $535,000 and $707,000, respectively.
Federal: Current  
$29,278 Deferred 26,779 State: Current 5,051 Deferred 4,596 Investment tax credit adjustments, net (496)
Other income: Current (27,223)
Deferred 23,160 Investment tax credit adjustments, net (1,720)
Total  
$59,425 1985
$32,557 28,638 6,320 4,978 5,343 (29,788) 13,846 12,608
$74,502 1984
$36,131 27,380 6,560 4,555 2,951 1,528
$79,105 Investment tax credits utilized to reduce federal income taxes payable amounted to $5,450,000 in 1986, $24,992,000 in 1985 and $6,890,000 in 1984. The amounts for 1986, 1985 and 1984 include Employee Stock Ownership Plan credits of $464,000, $535,000 and $707,000, respectively.
The following is a reconciliation of the difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by multiplying income before tax by the federal statutory rate:
The following is a reconciliation of the difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by multiplying income before tax by the federal statutory rate:
(Dollars in Thousands) 1986             1985               1984 Amount       Rate Amount     Rate Amount       Rate Statutory income tax expense                $71,553     46% $78,725     46% $78,758       46%
(Dollars in Thousands)
Increase (Decrease) in taxes                                                    '
Statutory income tax expense Increase (Decrease) in taxes resulting from:
resulting from:
Exclusion of AFUDC for income tax purposes Depreciation not normalized ITC amortization/flow-through State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit Amortization of credit arising from sale of contracts Other, net Income tax expense 1986 1985 1984 Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate  
Exclusion of AFUDC for income tax purposes                    (1,619)     (1) (1,397)    (1)  (1,639)      (1)
$71,553 46% $78,725 46% $78,758 46%
Depreciation not normalized                2,852       2   2,196      1    1, 163      1 ITC amortization/flow-through            (7,667)     (5) (7,144)     (4) (4,018)     (2)
(1,619)
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit                  5,333        3  6,160      4    6,067      3 Amortization of credit arising from sale of contracts                (7,225)     (5) (3,313)     (2) (2,190)     (1)
(1) 2,852 2
Other, net                                (3,802)      (2)   (725)               964 Income tax expense                          $59,425       38% $74,502     44% $79,105       46%
(7,667)
(5) 5,333 3
(7,225)
(5)
(3,802)
(2)
(1,397)
(1) 2,196 1
(7,144)
(4) 6,160 4
(3,313)
(2)
(725)
(1,639)
(1) 1, 163 1
(4,018)
(2) 6,067 3
(2,190)
(1) 964  
$59,425 38% $74,502 44% $79,105 46%
The components of deferred income taxes relate to the following tax effects of timing differences between book and tax income:
The components of deferred income taxes relate to the following tax effects of timing differences between book and tax income:
(Dollars in Thousands) 1986           1985              1984 Depreciation                                      $43,443         $33,394            $18,887 Deferred energy costs                                (2,082)         1, 163              954 Capitalized overhead costs                            1,143           1,432              1,508 Deferred recoverable plant costs                      3,488 Pollution control amortization                        3,076           3,629              3,687 ADR repair allowance                                  2,337          4,295              4,863 Other, net                                            3,130          3,549             2,036 Total                                              $54,535          $47,462            $31,935 34
(Dollars in Thousands)
Depreciation Deferred energy costs Capitalized overhead costs Deferred recoverable plant costs Pollution control amortization ADR repair allowance Other, net Total 1986  
$43,443 (2,082) 1,143 3,488 3,076 2,337 3,130
$54,535 1985
$33,394 1, 163 1,432 3,629 4,295 3,549  
$47,462 1984
$18,887 954 1,508 3,687 4,863 2,036
$31,935  


Delmarva Power 8(_ Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power 8(_ Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 2. INCOME TAXES                 The company has not provided deferred income taxes of approximately $83 million, based (continued)                  on anticipated future income tax rates, related to cumulative timing differences of $208 million arising before the adoption of full tax normalization for ratemaking purposes by regulatory authorities. The company is collecting the unnormalized taxes in its rate jurisdictions either on a levelized basis, over the life of the related plant facilities, or when actually paid to taxing authorities.
: 2. INCOME TAXES (continued)
: 3. TAXES OTHER THAN INCOME
: 4. PENSION PLAN AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS The company has not provided deferred income taxes of approximately $83 million, based on anticipated future income tax rates, related to cumulative timing differences of $208 million arising before the adoption of full tax normalization for ratemaking purposes by regulatory authorities. The company is collecting the unnormalized taxes in its rate jurisdictions either on a levelized basis, over the life of the related plant facilities, or when actually paid to taxing authorities.
During 1986, the company received the refund of approximately $11.5 million of net federal and state taxes and interest related to taxation of the proceeds from the sale of contracts for a nuclear steam supply system (Summit). (See Note 7.) Accordingly, all tax years through 1981 were closed as of December 31, 1986.
During 1986, the company received the refund of approximately $11.5 million of net federal and state taxes and interest related to taxation of the proceeds from the sale of contracts for a nuclear steam supply system (Summit). (See Note 7.) Accordingly, all tax years through 1981 were closed as of December 31, 1986.
: 3. TAXES OTHER THAN            (Dollars in Thousands)
(Dollars in Thousands) 1986 1985 1984 Delaware utility  
INCOME                                                                              1986               1985               1984 Delaware utility                                     $11,869           $12,168           $13,732 Property                                               6,787             6,784             6,652 Other gross receipts                                   5,881             5,799             4,995 Payroll, franchise and other                           6,150             6,003             5,773 Total                                               $30,687           $30,754           $31,152
$11,869  
: 4. PENSION PLAN AND              The company has a trusteed noncontributory pension plan covering all regular employees.
$12,168  
POST-RETIREMENT              There were no pension contributions in 1986. Pension contributions for 1985 and 1984 BENEFITS                    were $3,284,000 and $2,354,000, respectively. The contributions provide for normal cost and amortization of prior service costs over periods of five to twenty-five years.              .
$13,732 Property 6,787 6,784 6,652 Other gross receipts 5,881 5,799 4,995 Payroll, franchise and other 6,150 6,003 5,773 Total  
The actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits, determined as of January 1, 1986, was
$30,687  
                                $102,756,000 for vested benefits and $15,936,000 for accrued nonvested benefits. The market value of net assets, at that date, available for plan benefits was $253,468,000. The actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits, determined as of January 1, 1985 was $94,410,000 for vested benefits and $15,638,000 for accrued nonvested benefits. The market value of net assets, at that date, available for plan benefits was $201,398,000. The assumed rate of return used in determining the actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits was 8% for 1986 and 1985.
$30,754  
$31,152 The company has a trusteed noncontributory pension plan covering all regular employees.
There were no pension contributions in 1986. Pension contributions for 1985 and 1984 were $3,284,000 and $2,354,000, respectively. The contributions provide for normal cost and amortization of prior service costs over periods of five to twenty-five years.
The actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits, determined as of January 1, 1986, was  
$102,756,000 for vested benefits and $15,936,000 for accrued nonvested benefits. The market value of net assets, at that date, available for plan benefits was $253,468,000. The actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits, determined as of January 1, 1985 was $94,410,000 for vested benefits and $15,638,000 for accrued nonvested benefits. The market value of net assets, at that date, available for plan benefits was $201,398,000. The assumed rate of return used in determining the actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits was 8% for 1986 and 1985.
In 1987, the company will adopt Statement of Financial Accounting' Standards No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions." Implementation of this accounting standard will not have a material ~ffect on the company's financial position or results of operations.
In 1987, the company will adopt Statement of Financial Accounting' Standards No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions." Implementation of this accounting standard will not have a material ~ffect on the company's financial position or results of operations.
The company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees.
The company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees.
Substantially all of the company's employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach normal retirement age while still working for the company. The company recognizes the cost of providing those benefits by expensing the insurance claims as they are paid. These costs totalled $2,009,000, $2,094,000 and $1,640,000 for 1986, 1985 and 1984, respectively.
Substantially all of the company's employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach normal retirement age while still working for the company. The company recognizes the cost of providing those benefits by expensing the insurance claims as they are paid. These costs totalled $2,009,000, $2,094,000 and $1,640,000 for 1986, 1985 and 1984, respectively.
35
35  


Delmarva Power &._Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power &._Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 5. CAPITALIZATION                 RETAINED EARNINGS The current first mortgage bond indenture restricts the amount of consolidated retained earnings available for cash dividend payments on common stock to $35,000,000 plus accumulations after June 30, 1978, which available amount at December 31, 1986 was approximately $170,059,000.
: 5. CAPITALIZATION 36 RETAINED EARNINGS The current first mortgage bond indenture restricts the amount of consolidated retained earnings available for cash dividend payments on common stock to $35,000,000 plus accumulations after June 30, 1978, which available amount at December 31, 1986 was approximately $170,059,000.
PREFERRED STOCK The annual preferred dividend requirements on all outstanding preferred stock at December 31, 1986 are $6,656,000. If preferred dividends are in arrears the company may not declare common stock dividends or acquire its common stock.
PREFERRED STOCK The annual preferred dividend requirements on all outstanding preferred stock at December 31, 1986 are $6,656,000. If preferred dividends are in arrears the company may not declare common stock dividends or acquire its common stock.
WITHOUT MANDATORY REDEMPTION These series may be redeemed at the option of the company at any time, in whole or in part at the various redemption prices fixed for each series (ranging from $103 to $106 at December 31, 1986).
WITHOUT MANDATORY REDEMPTION These series may be redeemed at the option of the company at any time, in whole or in part at the various redemption prices fixed for each series (ranging from $103 to $106 at December 31, 1986).
Line 331: Line 510:
preferred stock. As of December 31, 1986, these shares were held in treasury.
preferred stock. As of December 31, 1986, these shares were held in treasury.
WITH MANDATORY REDEMPTION The company redeemed 16,000 shares of the 9% series in December 1986 at $100 per share.
WITH MANDATORY REDEMPTION The company redeemed 16,000 shares of the 9% series in December 1986 at $100 per share.
Eight thousand of the 16,000 shares were required to be redeemed by the sinking fund and the remaining 8,000 shares were redeemed under an option of the sinking fund. Through a 1985 tender offer for the 9% series the company purchased at $103 per share 3,150 shares in January 1986. Under certain conditions the 9% series may also be redeemed at the option of the company. Mandatory sinking fund redemptions are $800,000 per year during the next five years.
Eight thousand of the 16,000 shares were required to be redeemed by the sinking fund and the remaining 8,000 shares were redeemed under an option of the sinking fund. Through a 1985 tender offer for the 9% series the company purchased at $103 per share 3,150 shares in January 1986. Under certain conditions the 9% series may also be redeemed at the option of the company. Mandatory sinking fund redemptions are $800,000 per year during the next five years.  
36


Delman'a Power &._Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delman'a Power &._Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 5. CAPITALIZATION               LONG-TERM DEBT (continued)
: 5. CAPITALIZATION (continued)
: 1) Sinking fund requirements for the First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds may be reduced by an amount not exceeding sixty percent (603) of the bondable value of property additions. For the years 1984-1986, property additions satisfied the sinking fund requirements.
LONG-TERM DEBT
: 1) Sinking fund requirements for the First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds may be reduced by an amount not exceeding sixty percent ( 603) of the bondable value of property additions. For the years 1984-1986, property additions satisfied the sinking fund requirements.
: 2) Substantially all utility plant of the company now or hereafter owned is subject to the lien of the related Mortgage and Deed of Trust.
: 2) Substantially all utility plant of the company now or hereafter owned is subject to the lien of the related Mortgage and Deed of Trust.
: 3) Pursuant to a bank loan agreement, the company has a $33,000,000 revolving credit commitment through November 1, 1989, convertible into a term loan due November 1, 1992. The loan agreement requires a commitment fee of 1/53 on any unused portion of the revolving credit commitment. Loans under the agreement may be prepaid at any time without penalty and would bear interest at 1003 of the prime rate.
: 3) Pursuant to a bank loan agreement, the company has a $33,000,000 revolving credit commitment through November 1, 1989, convertible into a term loan due November 1, 1992. The loan agreement requires a commitment fee of 1/53 on any unused portion of the revolving credit commitment. Loans under the agreement may be prepaid at any time without penalty and would bear interest at 1003 of the prime rate.
Line 342: Line 521:
In recognition of the long-term financing capability, these bonds have been classified as long-term debt.
In recognition of the long-term financing capability, these bonds have been classified as long-term debt.
: 5) On January 15, 1986, the company issued $60 million of the 10Ys3 Series First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds, due January 1, 2016. The proceeds from the bond issuance were used to repay a $55 million bank loan with the balance being applied to general corporate cash requirements.
: 5) On January 15, 1986, the company issued $60 million of the 10Ys3 Series First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds, due January 1, 2016. The proceeds from the bond issuance were used to repay a $55 million bank loan with the balance being applied to general corporate cash requirements.
: 6) On June 4, 1986, the company issued $66 million of 9~3 Series First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds, due June 1, 2015. The proceeds were primarily used to redeem
: 6) On June 4, 1986, the company issued $66 million of 9~3 Series First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds, due June 1, 2015. The proceeds were primarily used to redeem  
                                $59.1 million of First Mortgage Bonds (11.753 Series, due July 1, 2010-$30 million and 113 Series, due July 1, 2005-$29.l million) called on July 1, 1986. The call premium plus related unamortized discount and expenses totaling $5 .5 million have been deferred in anticipation of recovery in rates. Recovery in the Maryland jurisdiction has been approved.
$59.1 million of First Mortgage Bonds (11.753 Series, due July 1, 2010-$30 million and 113 Series, due July 1, 2005-$29.l million) called on July 1, 1986. The call premium plus related unamortized discount and expenses totaling $5.5 million have been deferred in anticipation of recovery in rates. Recovery in the Maryland jurisdiction has been approved.
: 7) During 1986, a subsidiary extended its borrowings under an existing loan agreement from
: 7) During 1986, a subsidiary extended its borrowings under an existing loan agreement from  
                                $25 million to $43 million. $3 million was borrowed at a rate of 8.733, maturing on February 19, 1989. $15 million was borrowed at a rate which is adjusted periodically based on prevailing rates. The $15 million loan matures on February 19, 1989 and may be prepaid at anytime, in some instances subject to a penalty.
$25 million to $43 million. $3 million was borrowed at a rate of 8.733, maturing on February 19, 1989. $15 million was borrowed at a rate which is adjusted periodically based on prevailing rates. The $15 million loan matures on February 19, 1989 and may be prepaid at anytime, in some instances subject to a penalty.
: 8) Maturities of long-term debt during the next five years are 1987-$150,000; 1988-
: 8) Maturities of long-term debt during the next five years are 1987-$150,000; 1988-
                                $25,150,000; 1989-$43,150,000; 1990-$150,000; 1991-$15Q,OOO.
$25,150,000; 1989-$43,150,000; 1990-$150,000; 1991-$15Q,OOO.
: 9) The annual interest requirements on all borrowings classified as long-term debt at December 31, 1986 are $54,315,000.
: 9) The annual interest requirements on all borrowings classified as long-term debt at December 31, 1986 are $54,315,000.
UNAMORTIZED DEBT DISCOUNT, PREMIUM AND EXPENSE These amounts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the long-term debt issues to which they pertain.
UNAMORTIZED DEBT DISCOUNT, PREMIUM AND EXPENSE These amounts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the long-term debt issues to which they pertain.
37
37  


Delmarva Power &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 6. COMMITMENTS               The company estimates that approximately $137,779,000 excluding AFUDC, will be expended for construction purposes in 1987. The company also has commitments under long-term fuel supply contracts.
: 6. COMMITMENTS 38 The company estimates that approximately $137,779,000 excluding AFUDC, will be expended for construction purposes in 1987. The company also has commitments under long-term fuel supply contracts.
Under SFAS No. 71, regulated industries were required to adopt the lease accounting requirements of SFAS No. 13 for all capital leases commencing on or after January 1, 1983.
Under SFAS No. 71, regulated industries were required to adopt the lease accounting requirements of SFAS No. 13 for all capital leases commencing on or after January 1, 1983.
The company's capital leases commencing after January 1, 1983, were not material and therefore, were not recorded. All capital leases, including leases commencing prior to January 1983, were treated as operating leases. However, if capital leases had been recorded on the balance sheet, related assets and liabilities would have increased by $6,504,000 and
The company's capital leases commencing after January 1, 1983, were not material and therefore, were not recorded. All capital leases, including leases commencing prior to January 1983, were treated as operating leases. However, if capital leases had been recorded on the balance sheet, related assets and liabilities would have increased by $6,504,000 and  
                                $8,609,000 at December 31, 1986 and 1985, respectively. The company will record its capital le~ses in 1987, as required by SFAS No. 71.
$8,609,000 at December 31, 1986 and 1985, respectively. The company will record its capital le~ses in 1987, as required by SFAS No. 71.
Minimum commitments as of December 31, 1986 under all non-cancellable lease agreements are as follows:
Minimum commitments as of December 31, 1986 under all non-cancellable lease agreements are as follows:
1987                               $ 3,059,000 1988                                  2,310,000 1989                                  2,080,000 1990                                    537,000 1991                                    260,000 Remainder                            3,857,000 Total                              $12,103,000 The total minimum rental commitments are applicable to the following types of property:
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 Remainder Total
$ 3,059,000 2,310,000 2,080,000 537,000 260,000 3,857,000  
$12,103,000 The total minimum rental commitments are applicable to the following types of property:
railroad coal cars, $1,110,000; distribution facilities, $5,157,000; transportation vehicles, $5,152,000; computer equipment, $684,000. Rentals charged to operating expenses aggregated $7,439,000 in 1986, $6,634,000 in 1985 and $6,213,000 in 1984.
railroad coal cars, $1,110,000; distribution facilities, $5,157,000; transportation vehicles, $5,152,000; computer equipment, $684,000. Rentals charged to operating expenses aggregated $7,439,000 in 1986, $6,634,000 in 1985 and $6,213,000 in 1984.
Nuclear fuel requirements for Peach Bottom Generating Station are being provided by the operating company through a fuel purchase contract. The company is responsible for payment of its share of fuel consumed and interest expense. Nuclear fuel expense for Peach Bottom totalled $8,372,000 in 1986, $4,520,000 in 1985 and $6,072,000 in 1984.
Nuclear fuel requirements for Peach Bottom Generating Station are being provided by the operating company through a fuel purchase contract. The company is responsible for payment of its share of fuel consumed and interest expense. Nuclear fuel expense for Peach Bottom totalled $8,372,000 in 1986, $4,520,000 in 1985 and $6,072,000 in 1984.
The company has an agreement providing for the availability of fuel storage and pipeline facilities through 1999. Under the agreement, the company must make specified minimum payments monthly, which totalled $2,766,000 in 1986, $1,682,000 in 1985 and
The company has an agreement providing for the availability of fuel storage and pipeline facilities through 1999. Under the agreement, the company must make specified minimum payments monthly, which totalled $2,766,000 in 1986, $1,682,000 in 1985 and  
                                $1,912,000 in 1984. The amount of required payments is $2,151,000 in 1987, $1,484,000 in 1988, $1,299,000 in 1989, $999,000 in 1990, $1,672,000 in 1991 and $12,398,000 between 1992 and 1999.
$1,912,000 in 1984. The amount of required payments is $2,151,000 in 1987, $1,484,000 in 1988, $1,299,000 in 1989, $999,000 in 1990, $1,672,000 in 1991 and $12,398,000 between 1992 and 1999.  
38


Delmarva PolVer &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva PolVer &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 7. SALE OF CONTRACTS             The proceeds received by the company for the sale in 1975 of the contracts for a nuclear FOR NUCLEAR PLANT            steam supply system (Summit) and related fuel, net of related plant expenditures, are classified as a deferred credit in the balance sheet. The credit has been reduced by applicable income taxes and related interest. The company has amortized the credit since 1982 in the retail jurisdictions. Amounts amortized in 1986, 1985 and 1984 were $15,707,000, $7,202,000, and $4,762,000, respectively. Amortization in 1986 included $13,455,000 of accelerated amortization due to the Delaware Summit credit payment as discussed in Note 10. Amortization in 1985 included $2,500,000 for the resale jmisdiction. As of December 31, 1986, the Summit credit was fully amortized in the Maryland and resale jurisdiction. The December 31, 1986 balance of $1,261,000 includes $674,000 for Delaware and $587,000 for Virginia.
: 7. SALE OF CONTRACTS FOR NUCLEAR PLANT
: 8. SHORT-TERM DEBT              As of December 31, 1986, the company had unused bank lines of credit of $44,500,000 and AND LINES OF CREDIT          is generally required to pay commitment fees for these lines. Such lines of credit are periodically reviewed by the company, at which time they may be renewed or cancelled.
: 8. SHORT-TERM DEBT AND LINES OF CREDIT
: 9. JOINTLY-OWNED PLANT            Information with respect to the company's share of jointly-owned plant, including nuclear fuel for the Salem plant, as of December 31, 1986 is as follows:
: 9. JOINTLY-OWNED PLANT The proceeds received by the company for the sale in 1975 of the contracts for a nuclear steam supply system (Summit) and related fuel, net of related plant expenditures, are classified as a deferred credit in the balance sheet. The credit has been reduced by applicable income taxes and related interest. The company has amortized the credit since 1982 in the retail jurisdictions. Amounts amortized in 1986, 1985 and 1984 were $15,707,000, $7,202,000, and $4,762,000, respectively. Amortization in 1986 included $13,455,000 of accelerated amortization due to the Delaware Summit credit payment as discussed in Note 10. Amortization in 1985 included $2,500,000 for the resale jmisdiction. As of December 31, 1986, the Summit credit was fully amortized in the Maryland and resale jurisdiction. The December 31, 1986 balance of $1,261,000 includes $674,000 for Delaware and $587,000 for Virginia.
As of December 31, 1986, the company had unused bank lines of credit of $44,500,000 and is generally required to pay commitment fees for these lines. Such lines of credit are periodically reviewed by the company, at which time they may be renewed or cancelled.
Information with respect to the company's share of jointly-owned plant, including nuclear fuel for the Salem plant, as of December 31, 1986 is as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Dollars in Thousands)
Construction Ownership           Plant in   Accumulated           Work in Share         Service   Depreciation         Progress
Construction Ownership Plant in Accumulated Work in Share Service Depreciation Progress
* Nuclear:
* Nuclear:
Peach Bottom                       7.51%       $ 91,307         $ 29,818           $ 3,602 Salem                               7.41%         198,839         63,716             9,074 Coal-Fired:
Peach Bottom 7.51%  
Keystone                           3.70%           11,880         4,491               299 Conemaugh                           3.72%           11,692         4,982               758 Men-ill Creek Reservoir               11.91%                                           10,534 Transmission Facilities               Various           4,462           1,252 Total                                             $318,180         $104,259           $24,267 The company provides its own financing for its share of improvements to jointly-owned plant. In addition, the company is a joint guarantor of loans ($662,000 proportionate share) advanced for operation of the coal mines that supply the Keystone plant. The company's share of operating and maintenance expenses of the jointly-owned plant is included in the corresponding expenses in the statements of income.
$ 91,307  
39
$ 29,818  
$ 3,602 Salem 7.41%
198,839 63,716 9,074 Coal-Fired:
Keystone 3.70%
11,880 4,491 299 Conemaugh 3.72%
11,692 4,982 758 Men-ill Creek Reservoir 11.91%
10,534 Transmission Facilities Various 4,462 1,252 Total  
$318,180  
$104,259  
$24,267 The company provides its own financing for its share of improvements to jointly-owned plant. In addition, the company is a joint guarantor of loans ($662,000 proportionate share) advanced for operation of the coal mines that supply the Keystone plant. The company's share of operating and maintenance expenses of the jointly-owned plant is included in the corresponding expenses in the statements of income.
39  


Delmarva Power &. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power &. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 10. RATE MATTERS             The company is subject to regulation with respect to its retail sales of electricity by the Delaware and Maryland Public Service Commissions and the Virginia State Corporation Commission, which have broad powers over rate matters, accounting and terms of service.
: 10. RATE MATTERS
: 11. CONTINGENCIES 40 The company is subject to regulation with respect to its retail sales of electricity by the Delaware and Maryland Public Service Commissions and the Virginia State Corporation Commission, which have broad powers over rate matters, accounting and terms of service.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) exercises jurisdiction with respect to the company's accounting systems and policies and the transmission and sale at wholesale (resale) of electric energy.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) exercises jurisdiction with respect to the company's accounting systems and policies and the transmission and sale at wholesale (resale) of electric energy.
: 1) DELAWARE ELECTRIC RETAIL Effective August 20, 1986, the Delaware Public Service Commission (DPSC) issued an interim rate order decreasing electric rates by $22.8 million annually. The interim rate reduction was based on a 133 return on equity, which was previously 15.13. In December 1986, the company made a $28.1 million payment to electric retail customers, as ordered by the DPSC. The payment consisted of the December 15, 1986 Delaware Summit credit balance and related tax benefits. Rate hearings are currently in progress to determine permanent rate levels, which will become effective in early 1987.
: 1) DELAWARE ELECTRIC RETAIL Effective August 20, 1986, the Delaware Public Service Commission (DPSC) issued an interim rate order decreasing electric rates by $22.8 million annually. The interim rate reduction was based on a 133 return on equity, which was previously 15.13. In December 1986, the company made a $28.1 million payment to electric retail customers, as ordered by the DPSC. The payment consisted of the December 15, 1986 Delaware Summit credit balance and related tax benefits. Rate hearings are currently in progress to determine permanent rate levels, which will become effective in early 1987.
Line 383: Line 576:
: 2) MARYLAND RETAIL The Maryland Public Service Commission approved a settlement agreement between the company, the Commission Staff and People's Counsel, under which the company's rates were reduced by $5.55 million, effective October 1, 1986. The rate decrease was based on an overall rate of return of 10.083. Maryland retail rates were reduced an additional $3.3 million due to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, effective January 1, 1987.
: 2) MARYLAND RETAIL The Maryland Public Service Commission approved a settlement agreement between the company, the Commission Staff and People's Counsel, under which the company's rates were reduced by $5.55 million, effective October 1, 1986. The rate decrease was based on an overall rate of return of 10.083. Maryland retail rates were reduced an additional $3.3 million due to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, effective January 1, 1987.
: 3) RESALE In December 1986, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved a settlement agreement which provided for a $1.4 million refund for the period July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986 and an annual rate reduction of $1 million effective July 1, 1986 with an additional $3 million reduction effective August 20, 1986. The settlement agreement also provides for an additional rate reduction in early 1987, primarily to reflect the effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, based on the final outcome of the current Delaware retail electric rate proceedings.
: 3) RESALE In December 1986, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved a settlement agreement which provided for a $1.4 million refund for the period July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986 and an annual rate reduction of $1 million effective July 1, 1986 with an additional $3 million reduction effective August 20, 1986. The settlement agreement also provides for an additional rate reduction in early 1987, primarily to reflect the effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, based on the final outcome of the current Delaware retail electric rate proceedings.
: 11. CONTINGENCIES              1) PLANT HELD FOR FUTURE USE In 1982, the company delayed the construction schedule for the coal-fired Nanticoke #1 generating unit. The plant is now scheduled to begin commercial operation in the late 1990's, based on the company's current load forecast. During 1986, $8.1 million of preliminary engineering and design costs were reclassified from plant held for future use to deferred charges as a result of downsizing the planned unit and the advent of new technologies after development of the preliminary conceptual* design. The remaining $6.2 million classified as plant held for future use and the $8.1 million deferred charge are both anticipated to be recoverable through the ratemaking process.
: 1) PLANT HELD FOR FUTURE USE In 1982, the company delayed the construction schedule for the coal-fired Nanticoke #1 generating unit. The plant is now scheduled to begin commercial operation in the late 1990's, based on the company's current load forecast. During 1986, $8.1 million of preliminary engineering and design costs were reclassified from plant held for future use to deferred charges as a result of downsizing the planned unit and the advent of new technologies after development of the preliminary conceptual* design. The remaining $6.2 million classified as plant held for future use and the $8.1 million deferred charge are both anticipated to be recoverable through the ratemaking process.  
40


Delmarva Power &_ Li9ht Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power &_ Li9ht Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 11. CONTINGENCIES (continued)               2) NUCLEAR INSURANCE The company's insurance coverages applicable to its nuclear power units are as follows:
: 11. CONTINGENCIES (continued)
: 2) NUCLEAR INSURANCE The company's insurance coverages applicable to its nuclear power units are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars)
(Millions of Dollars)
Maximum                      Maximum Retrospective Type and Source of Coverage                             Coverage               Assessment for a Single Incident Public Liability:Pl Private                                             $160                                  None Price Anderson Assessment( 2 l                        535                                  $1.5(3)
Type and Source of Coverage Maximum Coverage Maximum Retrospective Assessment for a Single Incident Public Liability:Pl Private Price Anderson Assessment(2l Property Damage:(5l Peach Bottom(6l Salem(7l All units(Bl Replacement Power:
                                                                                          $695( 4 )
Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL)l9'  
5 Property Damage:( l Peach Bottom( 6 l                                    $585 Salem(7l                                             $585                                  $3.0 All units(Bl                                         $575                                  $1.6 Replacement Power:
$160 535
Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL)l9'                                         $3.0-$3.3                               $1.6 (llThe Price-Anderson Act is scheduled to expire in August 1987 and Congress is currently considering several proposals. The company is unable to predict Congress' ultimate action and what effect such action may have on the company's liability.
$695(4)
$585
$585
$575
$3.0-$3.3 None
$1.5(3)
$3.0
$1.6
$1.6 (llThe Price-Anderson Act is scheduled to expire in August 1987 and Congress is currently considering several proposals. The company is unable to predict Congress' ultimate action and what effect such action may have on the company's liability.
(ZlRetrospective premium program under the Price-Anderson liability provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 as amended. Subject to retrospective assessment with respect to loss from an incident at any licensed nuclear reactor in the United States.
(ZlRetrospective premium program under the Price-Anderson liability provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 as amended. Subject to retrospective assessment with respect to loss from an incident at any licensed nuclear reactor in the United States.
(llMaximum assessment would be $3,000,000 in the event of more than one incident in any year.
(llMaximum assessment would be $3,000,000 in the event of more than one incident in any year.
(4 lLimit of liability under the Price-Anderson Act for each nuclear incident.
(4lLimit of liability under the Price-Anderson Act for each nuclear incident.
(SlThe company is a self insurer, to the extent of its ownership interest, for any property loss in excess of the stated amounts.
(SlThe company is a self insurer, to the extent of its ownership interest, for any property loss in excess of the stated amounts.
(6lfor property damage to the Peach Bottom nuclear plant facilities, the company and its co-owners have private insurance up to $5 85 million.
(6lfor property damage to the Peach Bottom nuclear plant facilities, the company and its co-owners have private insurance up to $5 85 million.
Line 402: Line 603:
Maximum retrospective assessment is seven and a half times the annual premiums.
Maximum retrospective assessment is seven and a half times the annual premiums.
(9lUtility owned mutual insurance company provides coverage against extra expense incurred in obtaining replacement power during prolonged accidental outages of nuclear power units. Maximum weekly indemnity for 52 weeks which commences after the first 26 weeks of an outage. Also provides for an additional 52 weeks indemnity at one-half maximum level. Maximum retrospective assessment is five times annual premiums.
(9lUtility owned mutual insurance company provides coverage against extra expense incurred in obtaining replacement power during prolonged accidental outages of nuclear power units. Maximum weekly indemnity for 52 weeks which commences after the first 26 weeks of an outage. Also provides for an additional 52 weeks indemnity at one-half maximum level. Maximum retrospective assessment is five times annual premiums.
: 3)   OTHER The company is involved in certain other legal and administrative proceedings before various courts and governmental agencies concerning rates, environmental issues, fuel contracts and other matters. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on the company's financial position or results of operations.
: 3) OTHER The company is involved in certain other legal and administrative proceedings before various courts and governmental agencies concerning rates, environmental issues, fuel contracts and other matters. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on the company's financial position or results of operations.
41
41  


Delmarva Power &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 12. SEGMENT INFORMATION     Segment information with respect to electric, gas and steam operations was as follows:
: 12. SEGMENT INFORMATION 42 Segment information with respect to electric, gas and steam operations was as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands) 1986                 1985               1984 Operating Revenues:
(Dollars in Thousands) 1986 1985 1984 Operating Revenues:
Electric                                               $ 602,240             $ 605,581         $ 584,163 Gas                                                         91,802                 95,256           101,578 Steam                                                       20,821                 21,997             16,852 Total                                                   $ 714,863             $ 722,834         $ 702,593 Operating Income:
Electric  
Electric                                               $   126,007           $ 127,148         $ 125,200 Gas                                                           6,985                 6,604               6,616 Steam                                                         1,746                 1,763               1,393 Total                                                   $   134,738           $ 135,515         $ 133,209 Net Utility Plant:l'l12 l Electric                                               $1,306,215           $1,284,062         $1,257,728 Gas                                                         67,267                 64,967             59,097 Steam                                                         3,944                 4,142               4,349 1,377,426             1,353,171           1,321,174 Other Identifiable Assets:
$ 602,240  
Electric                                                   112,423               144,544           157,437 Gas                                                           17,722               32,890             42,685 Steam                                                           409                   418               440 130,554               177,852           200,562 Assets Not Allocated                                       234,572               141,504             69,894 Total Assets                                           $1,742,552           $1,672,527         $1,591,630 Depreciation Expense:
$ 605,581  
Electric                                               $    59,725         $    56,577       $      54,255 Gas                                                           4,016                 3,699               3,310 Steam                                                           916                   907               899 Total                                                   $    64,657         $    61,183       $      58,464 Construction Expenditures:l 3 l Electric                                               $    94,337         $    86,073       $      69,233 Gas                                                           7,751                 '8,382             10,109 Steam                                                           509                   468                 146 Total                                                   $   102,597           $    94,923       $      79,488 ll l!ncludes plant held for future use, construction work in progress and allocation of common utility property.
$ 584,163 Gas 91,802 95,256 101,578 Steam 20,821 21,997 16,852 Total  
$ 714,863  
$ 722,834  
$ 702,593 Operating Income:
Electric  
$ 126,007  
$ 127,148  
$ 125,200 Gas 6,985 6,604 6,616 Steam 1,746 1,763 1,393 Total  
$ 134,738  
$ 135,515  
$ 133,209 Net Utility Plant:l'l12l Electric  
$1,306,215  
$1,284,062  
$1,257,728 Gas 67,267 64,967 59,097 Steam 3,944 4,142 4,349 1,377,426 1,353,171 1,321,174 Other Identifiable Assets:
Electric 112,423 144,544 157,437 Gas 17,722 32,890 42,685 Steam 409 418 440 130,554 177,852 200,562 Assets Not Allocated 234,572 141,504 69,894 Total Assets  
$1,742,552  
$1,672,527  
$1,591,630 Depreciation Expense:
Electric 59,725 56,577 54,255 Gas 4,016 3,699 3,310 Steam 916 907 899 Total 64,657 61,183 58,464 Construction Expenditures:l3l Electric 94,337 86,073 69,233 Gas 7,751  
'8,382 10,109 Steam 509 468 146 Total  
$ 102,597 94,923 79,488 ll l!ncludes plant held for future use, construction work in progress and allocation of common utility property.
12lStated net of the respective accumulated provisions for depreciation.
12lStated net of the respective accumulated provisions for depreciation.
13>Excludes allowance for funds used during construction.
13>Excludes allowance for funds used during construction.
Operating income by segments is reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting and ratemaking principles within the utility industry and, accordingly, includes each segment's proportionate share of taxes on income and general corporate expenses.
Operating income by segments is reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting and ratemaking principles within the utility industry and, accordingly, includes each segment's proportionate share of taxes on income and general corporate expenses.  
42


Delmarva Power &. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Delmarva Power &. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 13. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL         The quarterly data presented below reflect all adjustments necessary in the opinion of the INFORMATION              company for a fair presentation of the interim results. Quarterly data normally vary seasonably (UNAUDITED)                with temperature variations, differences between summer and winter rates, the timing of rate orders and the scheduled downtime and maintenance of electric generating units.
: 13. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Earnings                   Earnings Applicable       Average           per Quarter           Operating Operating             Net   to Common           Shares     Average Ended             Revenue     Income       Income         Stock   Outstanding         Share (Dollars in Thousands)               (In Thousands) 1986 March 31         $208,703 $ 38,235         $27,345       $25,405         30,482       $0.83 June 30           171,341       29,966       19, 183       17,125         30,482         0.57 September 30       201,082       45,766       35,212       33,505         30,482         1.09 December 31       133,737       20,771       14,383       12,683         30,482         0.42
The quarterly data presented below reflect all adjustments necessary in the opinion of the company for a fair presentation of the interim results. Quarterly data normally vary seasonably with temperature variations, differences between summer and winter rates, the timing of rate orders and the scheduled downtime and maintenance of electric generating units.
                                                  $714,863 $134,738         $96,123       $88,718         30,482       $2.91 1985 March 31         $198,788 $ 36,946         $27,114       $23,964         30,482       $0.79 June 30           161,093       29,416       20,582       17,433         30,482         0.57 September 30       196,352     43,496         34,235       31,085         30,482         1.02 December 31       166,601       25,657       14,707       11,557         30,482         0.38
Earnings Earnings Applicable Average per Quarter Operating Operating Net to Common Shares Average Ended Revenue Income Income Stock Outstanding Share (Dollars in Thousands)
                                                  $722,834 $135,515         $96,638       $84,039         30,482       $2.76 In the second quarter of 1985, adjustments were recorded for the additional Delaware electric retail revenue refund for 1984 and additional amortization of the credit arising from the sale of contracts, which resulted from an out-of-court tax settlement. The effect of these adjustments reduced second quarter net income by approximately $1,100,000 (4&#xa2; per share).
(In Thousands) 1986 March 31  
In the fourth quarter of 1985, the company wrote-off its share of advances under uranium supply contracts that were terminated and also accrued for a resale revenue refund. The effect of these adjustments reduced fourth quarter net income by approximately $2,063,000 (7<r- per share).
$208,703 $ 38,235  
$27,345  
$25,405 30,482  
$0.83 June 30 171,341 29,966 19, 183 17,125 30,482 0.57 September 30 201,082 45,766 35,212 33,505 30,482 1.09 December 31 133,737 20,771 14,383 12,683 30,482 0.42  
$714,863 $134,738  
$96,123  
$88,718 30,482  
$2.91 1985 March 31  
$198,788 $ 36,946  
$27,114  
$23,964 30,482  
$0.79 June 30 161,093 29,416 20,582 17,433 30,482 0.57 September 30 196,352 43,496 34,235 31,085 30,482 1.02 December 31 166,601 25,657 14,707 11,557 30,482 0.38  
$722,834 $135,515  
$96,638  
$84,039 30,482  
$2.76 In the second quarter of 1985, adjustments were recorded for the additional Delaware electric retail revenue refund for 1984 and additional amortization of the credit arising from the sale of contracts, which resulted from an out-of-court tax settlement. The effect of these adjustments reduced second quarter net income by approximately $1,100,000 (4&#xa2; per share).
In the fourth quarter of 1985, the company wrote-off its share of advances under uranium supply contracts that were terminated and also accrued for a resale revenue refund. The effect of these adjustments reduced fourth quarter net income by approximately $2,063,000 (7<r-per share).
Rate decreases in the company's jurisdictions decreased net income during 1986 as follows:
Rate decreases in the company's jurisdictions decreased net income during 1986 as follows:
first quarter-$528,000 (1.7<r- per share); second quarter-$468,000 (1.5<r- per share); third quarter-$1,578,000 (5.2<r- per share); fourth quarter-$4,179,000 (13.7<r- per share).
first quarter-$528,000 (1.7<r-per share); second quarter-$468,000 (1.5<r-per share); third quarter-$1,578,000 (5.2<r-per share); fourth quarter-$4,179,000 (13.7<r-per share).
In the fourth quarter of 1986, the company recorded the Delaware Summit credit payment, interest on tax refunds, tax accrual adjustments, and the impact of the Tax Refmm Act of 1986 on its leveraged lease investments. The effect of these adjustments increased net income $1,119,000 (3.7<r- per share).
In the fourth quarter of 1986, the company recorded the Delaware Summit credit payment, interest on tax refunds, tax accrual adjustments, and the impact of the Tax Refmm Act of 1986 on its leveraged lease investments. The effect of these adjustments increased net income $1,119,000 (3.7<r-per share).
43
43  


Delmarva Po1Ver &._Light Campany CONSOLIDATED STATISTICS 10 Years of Review                                               1986         1985         1984         1983 ELECTRIC REVENUES (thousands):                     Residential               $ 217,393   $ 212,254   $ 205,910   $ 193,021 Commercial                   169,157     168,957     156,507     140,809 Industrial                   127,900     135,141     128,833     126,703 Other utilities, etc.         80,291       79,399       79,235       68,991 Miscellaneous revenues         7,499       9,830       13,678       12,728 Total electric revenues   $ 602,240   $ 605,581   $ 584,163   $ 542,252 ELECTRIC SALES
Delmarva Po1Ver &._Light Campany CONSOLIDATED STATISTICS 10 Years of Review 1986 1985 1984 1983 ELECTRIC REVENUES (thousands):
( 1,000 kilowatt-hours):         Residential                 2,496,099   2,256,922   2,249,270   2,136,265 Commercial                 2,370,775   2,165,685   2,073,457   1,844,324 Industrial                 2,753,902   2,606,466   2,569,572   2,600,492 Other utilities, etc.       1,585,019   1,501,447   1,415,934   1,297,395 Total electric sales       9,205,795   8,530,520   8,308,233   7,878,476 ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS (end of period):                 Residential                   293,452     283,911     275,175     267,357 Commercial                     35,089       33,189       31,548       30,525 Industrial                       853         893         929         949 Other utilities, etc.             517         492         502         434 Total electric customers     329,911     318,485     308,154     299,265 GAS REVENUES (thousands):                     Residential               $    43,145 $    39,224 $    40,933 $    36,694 Commercial                     18,523       17,901       18,663       16,527 Industrial                     16,995       19,762       22,940       23,232 Interruptible                 11,464       17,419       18,098       17,026 Other utilities, etc.             142         130         160         115 Miscellaneous revenues         1,533         820         784         764 Total gas revenues       $    91,802 $    95,256 $ 101,578   $    94,358 GAS SALES (million cubic feet):           Residential                     6,201       5,622       6,213       5,640 Commercial                     2,906       2,742       2,971       2,677 Industrial                     3,338       3,579       4,245       4,378 Interruptible                   3,471       3,734       3,769       3,723 Other utilities, etc.             36           31           41           31 Total gas sales               15,952       15,708       17,239       16,449 GAS CUSTOMERS (end of period):               Residential                   72,685       70,804       70,183       69,608 Commercial                     4,693       4,417       4,233       4,075 Industrial                       158         160         165         160 Interruptible                       14           15           19           19 Other utilities, etc.               1           1                         1 Total gas customers           77,551       75,397       74,601       73,863 STEAM SERVICE Electricity delivered         370,802     335,308     298,203     309,043
Residential  
$ 217,393  
$ 212,254  
$ 205,910  
$ 193,021 Commercial 169,157 168,957 156,507 140,809 Industrial 127,900 135,141 128,833 126,703 Other utilities, etc.
80,291 79,399 79,235 68,991 Miscellaneous revenues 7,499 9,830 13,678 12,728 Total electric revenues  
$ 602,240  
$ 605,581  
$ 584,163  
$ 542,252 ELECTRIC SALES
( 1,000 kilowatt-hours):
Residential 2,496,099 2,256,922 2,249,270 2,136,265 Commercial 2,370,775 2,165,685 2,073,457 1,844,324 Industrial 2,753,902 2,606,466 2,569,572 2,600,492 Other utilities, etc.
1,585,019 1,501,447 1,415,934 1,297,395 Total electric sales 9,205,795 8,530,520 8,308,233 7,878,476 ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS (end of period):
Residential 293,452 283,911 275,175 267,357 Commercial 35,089 33,189 31,548 30,525 Industrial 853 893 929 949 Other utilities, etc.
517 492 502 434 Total electric customers 329,911 318,485 308,154 299,265 GAS REVENUES (thousands):
Residential 43,145 39,224 40,933 36,694 Commercial 18,523 17,901 18,663 16,527 Industrial 16,995 19,762 22,940 23,232 Interruptible 11,464 17,419 18,098 17,026 Other utilities, etc.
142 130 160 115 Miscellaneous revenues 1,533 820 784 764 Total gas revenues 91,802 95,256  
$ 101,578 94,358 GAS SALES (million cubic feet):
Residential 6,201 5,622 6,213 5,640 Commercial 2,906 2,742 2,971 2,677 Industrial 3,338 3,579 4,245 4,378 Interruptible 3,471 3,734 3,769 3,723 Other utilities, etc.
36 31 41 31 Total gas sales 15,952 15,708 17,239 16,449 GAS CUSTOMERS (end of period):
Residential 72,685 70,804 70,183 69,608 Commercial 4,693 4,417 4,233 4,075 Industrial 158 160 165 160 Interruptible 14 15 19 19 Other utilities, etc.
1 1
1 Total gas customers 77,551 75,397 74,601 73,863 STEAM SERVICE Electricity delivered 370,802 335,308 298,203 309,043
( 1,000 kilowatt-hours)
( 1,000 kilowatt-hours)
Steam delivered             6,627,130   6,794,105   6,922,416   6,965,904
Steam delivered 6,627,130 6,794,105 6,922,416 6,965,904
( 1,000 pounds) 44
( 1,000 pounds) 44  


Average Annual Compound%
Average Annual Compound%
1982       1981       1980     1979     1978       1977     1976 Rate of Growth
1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 Rate of Growth  
$183,258   $164,919   $144,637 $115,381 $105,237   $ 97,691 $ 80,416     10.46 137,434   123,099     112,166   91,798   82,196     74,641   60, 111     10.90 127,441   129,601     116,401   98,023   83,972     76,801   64,458       7.09 73,469     73,602     63,698   53,782   40,840     38,974   34,896       8.69 13,168     12,898       7,025     4,682     5,261     3,461     2,398     12.08
$183,258  
$534,770   $504,119   $443,927 $363,666 $318,106   $291,568 $242,279       9.53 2,026,398 1,996,647   2,046,546 1,968,452 1,979,624 1,924,723 1,787,663       3.39 1,729,863' 1,660,147 . 1,648,776 1,598,299 1,568,600 1,495,796 1,412,259       5.32 2,255,673 2,454,685   2,429,842 2,624,438 2,418,527 2,277,630 2,260,661       1.99 1,237,508 1,283,845   1,335,216 1,300,611 1,281,498 1,207,941 1,199,155       2.83 7,249,442 7,395,324   7,460,380 7,491,800 7,248,249 6,906,090 6,659,738       3.29 260,371   255,646     246,887   242,745   237,925   233,106   230,579       2.44 29,966     29,450     28,162   27,998   28,421     29,648   28,345       2.16 741       788         821       874       858       921     1,002     ( 1.60) 434       434         440       478       480       561       550     (0.62) 291,512   286,318     276,310   272,095   267,684   264,236   260,476       2.39
$164,919  
$ 36,505   $ 34,123   $ 26,525 $ 25,719 $ 28,370   $ 21,829 $ 18,826       8.65 15,792     14,344     10,342     8,954   10, 154     7,133     6,062     11.82 20, 112   22,259     12,404     9,884   10,191     6,950     5,984     11.00 11,733     11,711       9,293     4,440       716       169     1,301     24.31 53       61         46       55         93       49         44     12.43 552       572         430       270       116       103         31     47.71
$144,637  
$ 84,747   $ 83,070   $ 59,040 $ 49,322 $ 49,640   $ 36,233 $ 32,248     11.03 6,062     6,193       6,321     6,423     6,941     6,751     6,956     (1.14) 2,768     2,704       2,683     2,415     2,593     2,439     2,586       1.17 4,108     4,809       3,937     3,388     3,290     2,811     3,264       0.22 2,656     2,802       2,738     1,720       319         81       953     13.80 10       12         14       16         29       17         20     5.76 15,604     16,520     15,693   13,962   13,172     12,099   13,779       1.48 69,092     68,608     67,784   66,631   66,364     66,231   67,754       0.71 4,057     3,967       3,846     3,712     3,773     3,738     4,154       1.23 166       167         155       131       163       163       198     (2.23) 18       16         16       16         21       21         21     (3.97) 1         1           1         1         1         1         1 73,334     72,759     71,802   70,491   70,322     70,154   72,128       0.73 322,804   343,063     328,420   262,159   270,006   289,049   318,389       1.54 7,778,929 7,673,420   7,570,944 6,378,705 6,016,095 4,888,366 5,301,421       2.26 45
$115,381  
$105,237  
$ 97,691  
$ 80,416 10.46 137,434 123,099 112,166 91,798 82,196 74,641 60, 111 10.90 127,441 129,601 116,401 98,023 83,972 76,801 64,458 7.09 73,469 73,602 63,698 53,782 40,840 38,974 34,896 8.69 13,168 12,898 7,025 4,682 5,261 3,461 2,398 12.08  
$534,770  
$504,119  
$443,927  
$363,666  
$318,106  
$291,568  
$242,279 9.53 2,026,398 1,996,647 2,046,546 1,968,452 1,979,624 1,924,723 1,787,663 3.39 1,729,863' 1,660,147  
. 1,648,776 1,598,299 1,568,600 1,495,796 1,412,259 5.32 2,255,673 2,454,685 2,429,842 2,624,438 2,418,527 2,277,630 2,260,661 1.99 1,237,508 1,283,845 1,335,216 1,300,611 1,281,498 1,207,941 1,199,155 2.83 7,249,442 7,395,324 7,460,380 7,491,800 7,248,249 6,906,090 6,659,738 3.29 260,371 255,646 246,887 242,745 237,925 233,106 230,579 2.44 29,966 29,450 28,162 27,998 28,421 29,648 28,345 2.16 741 788 821 874 858 921 1,002
( 1.60) 434 434 440 478 480 561 550 (0.62) 291,512 286,318 276,310 272,095 267,684 264,236 260,476 2.39  
$ 36,505  
$ 34,123  
$ 26,525  
$ 25,719  
$ 28,370  
$ 21,829  
$ 18,826 8.65 15,792 14,344 10,342 8,954 10, 154 7,133 6,062 11.82 20, 112 22,259 12,404 9,884 10,191 6,950 5,984 11.00 11,733 11,711 9,293 4,440 716 169 1,301 24.31 53 61 46 55 93 49 44 12.43 552 572 430 270 116 103 31 47.71  
$ 84,747  
$ 83,070  
$ 59,040  
$ 49,322  
$ 49,640  
$ 36,233  
$ 32,248 11.03 6,062 6,193 6,321 6,423 6,941 6,751 6,956 (1.14) 2,768 2,704 2,683 2,415 2,593 2,439 2,586 1.17 4,108 4,809 3,937 3,388 3,290 2,811 3,264 0.22 2,656 2,802 2,738 1,720 319 81 953 13.80 10 12 14 16 29 17 20 5.76 15,604 16,520 15,693 13,962 13,172 12,099 13,779 1.48 69,092 68,608 67,784 66,631 66,364 66,231 67,754 0.71 4,057 3,967 3,846 3,712 3,773 3,738 4,154 1.23 166 167 155 131 163 163 198 (2.23) 18 16 16 16 21 21 21 (3.97) 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 73,334 72,759 71,802 70,491 70,322 70,154 72,128 0.73 322,804 343,063 328,420 262,159 270,006 289,049 318,389 1.54 7,778,929 7,673,420 7,570,944 6,378,705 6,016,095 4,888,366 5,301,421 2.26 45  


Delmarva Power &._Light Company STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION SHAREHOLDER SERVICES                 COMMON STOCK -
Delmarva Power &._Light Company STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION 46 SHAREHOLDER SERVICES Carol C. Conrad, Assistant Secretary Delmarva Power & Light Company 800 King Street* P.O. Box 231 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 Telephone (302) 429-3355.
Carol C. Conrad, Assistant Secretary Wilmington Trust Company, Delmarva Power & Light Company       Corporate Trust Division 800 King Street* P.O. Box 231       Rodney Square North Wilmington, Delaware 19899           Wilmington, Delaware 19890.
STOCK SYMBOL Common Stock, DEW - listed on the New York and Philadelphia Stock Exchanges.
Telephone (302) 429-3355.           Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company STOCK SYMBOL                         Stock Transfer Department Common Stock, DEW - listed on       P.O. Box 24935 the New York and Philadelphia       Church Street Station Stock Exchanges.                    New York, New York 10249.
ANNUAL MEETING The Annual Meeting will be held on April 28 at 11:00 a.m., in the Clayton Hall, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
ANNUAL MEETING                       REGULATORY COMMISSIONS The Annual Meeting will be held     Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, on April 28 at 11:00 a.m., in       825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,
ADDITIONAL REPORTS To supplement information in this Annual Report, a Financial and Statistical Review (1975-1985) and the Form 10-K are available upon request. Please write to Shareholder Services, Delmarva Power, 800 King Street, P.O. Box 231, Wilmington, Delaware 19899.
the Clayton Hall, University of     Washington, D.C. 20426.
Delaware, Newark, Delaware.         Delaware Public Service Commission, ADDITIONAL REPORTS                   1560 S. du Pont Highway, To supplement information in this   Dover, Delaware 19901.
Annual Report, a Financial and       Maryland Public Service Commission, Statistical Review (1975-1985) and   American Building, the Form 10-K are available upon     231 East Baltimore Street, request. Please write to Shareholder Baltimore, Maryland 21202.
Services, Delmarva Power,            Virginia State Corporate Commission, 800 King Street, P.O. Box 231,      P.O. Box 1197, Wilmington, Delaware 19899.          Richmond, Virginia 23209.
TRUSTEES First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds - Chemical Bank, New York, New York Pollution Control Revenue Bonds -
TRUSTEES First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds - Chemical Bank, New York, New York Pollution Control Revenue Bonds -
Mellon Bank (DE) N.A.
Mellon Bank (DE) N.A.
Wilmington, Delaware Bank of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware Wilmington Trust Company, Wilmington, Delaware Irving Trust Company New York, New York.
Wilmington, Delaware Bank of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware Wilmington Trust Company, Wilmington, Delaware Irving Trust Company New York, New York.
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS Preferred Stock-Wilmington Trust Company, Corporate Trust Division Rodney Square North Wilmington, Delaware 19890.
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS Preferred Stock-Wilmington Trust Company, Corporate Trust Division Rodney Square North Wilmington, Delaware 19890.
46
COMMON STOCK -
Wilmington Trust Company, Corporate Trust Division Rodney Square North Wilmington, Delaware 19890.
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company Stock Transfer Department P.O. Box 24935 Church Street Station New York, New York 10249.
REGULATORY COMMISSIONS Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Delaware Public Service Commission, 1560 S. du Pont Highway, Dover, Delaware 19901.
Maryland Public Service Commission, American Building, 231 East Baltimore Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.
Virginia State Corporate Commission, P.O. Box 1197, Richmond, Virginia 23209.


Delmarva Power &._Light Company STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION QUARTERLY COMMON               COMMON STOCK STOCK DIVIDENDS AND PRICE RANGES                   The company's common stock is listed in the New York and Philadelphia Stock Exchanges and has unlisted trading privileges on the Cincinnati, Midwest and Pacific Stock Exchanges.
Delmarva Power &._Light Company STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION QUARTERLY COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS AND PRICE RANGES COMMON STOCK The company's common stock is listed in the New York and Philadelphia Stock Exchanges and has unlisted trading privileges on the Cincinnati, Midwest and Pacific Stock Exchanges.
The company had 53,446 holders of common stock as of December 31, 1986.
The company had 53,446 holders of common stock as of December 31, 1986.
1986                                 1985 Dividend             Price           Dividend             Price Declared       High       Low       Declared       High       Low First Quarter           $.505       30%         25%           $.48         23Ys       21 Second Quarter           .505       34%         291/4           .48       26llz       22Ys Third Quarter             .505       381/s       30%             .48       26%         22}4 Fourth Quarter           .53       341/2       30%             .505       28!4       22%
1986 1985 Dividend Price Dividend Price Declared High Low Declared High Low First Quarter  
$.505 30%
25%  
$.48 23Ys 21 Second Quarter  
.505 34%
291/4  
.48 26llz 22Ys Third Quarter  
.505 381/s 30%  
.48 26%
22}4 Fourth Quarter  
.53 341/2 30%  
.505 28!4 22%
(
(
47
47  


Delman-a Po1Ver &._Light Compan,v OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OFFICERS                           NEVIUS M. CURTIS                   RICHARD H. EVANS Chairman of the Board, President   Vice President, Corporate Communications and Chief Executive Officer PAUL S. GERRITSEN HOWARD     E. COSGROVE             Vice President, Regulatory Practices Executive Vice President BARBARA S. GRAHAM ROGER D. CAMPBELL                   Treasurer Senior Vice President and Chief KENNETH K. JONES Financial Officer Vice President, Planning H. RAY LANDON CHARLES MARCHYSHYN Senior Vice President Comptroller HARLAND M. WAKEFIELD, jR.
Delman-a Po1Ver &._Light Compan,v OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OFFICERS DIRECTORS 48 NEVIUS M. CURTIS Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer HOWARD E. COSGROVE Executive Vice President ROGER D. CAMPBELL Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer H. RAY LANDON Senior Vice President HARLAND M. WAKEFIELD, jR.
FRANK j. PERRY, JR.
Senior Vice President WAYNE A. LYONS Vice President DONALD E. CAIN Division Vice President, Northern Division DONALD P. CONNELLY Secretary CHARLOTTE LEE CANNON Director of H. P. Cannon & Son, Inc.
Senior Vice President Vice President, Gas Division WAYNE A. LYONS Vice President THOMAS    s. SHAW, JR.
(warehousing) Bridgeville, Delaware OSCAR L. CAREY President and Director of Larmar Corporation (general real estate and home builders) Salisbury, Maryland JOHN R. COOPER Director of Environmental Affairs of E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (a diversified chemical, energy and specialty products company)
Vice President, Production DONALD E. CAIN DUANE    C. TAYLOR Division Vice President, Northern Vice President, Information Systems Division D. WAYNE YERKES DONALD P. CONNELLY Division Vice President, Southern Secretary Division DIRECTORS                        CHARLOTTE LEE CANNON                 WILLIAM G. SIMERAL Director of H. P. Cannon & Son, Inc. Director, Executive Vice (warehousing) Bridgeville, Delaware President and member of the OSCAR    L. CAREY                    Executive Committee of E. I.
Wilmington, Delaware HOWARD E. COSGROVE Executive Vice President of the Company NEVIUS M. CURTIS Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company SALLY v. HAWKINS Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Delaware Broadcasting Company and President and General Manager of Station WILM (radio broadcasting)
President and Director of Larmar    du Pont de Nemours & Company (a Corporation (general real estate and diversified chemical, energy and home builders) Salisbury, Maryland  specialty products company)
Wilmington, Delaware DONALD W. MABE President and Vice Chairman of Perdue Farms Incorporated (integrated poultry company)
Wilmington, Delaware JOHN R. COOPER Director of Environmental Affairs of DAVID D. WAKEFIELD E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company   Senior Vice President of Morgan (a diversified chemical, energy and Guaranty Trust Company of New specialty products company)          York, New York, New York; Wilmington, Delaware                Director of Continental American Life Insurance Company, HOWARD E. COSGROVE                  Wilmington, Delaware Executive Vice President of the Company                              HARLAND M. WAKEFIELD, jR.
Salisbury, Maryland jAMES 0. PIPPIN, jR.
Senior Vice President of the NEVIUS M. CURTIS                    Company Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the  EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Company                              Nevius M. Curtis, Chairperson; Oscar L. Carey; William G. Simeral; David D.
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Centreville National Bank of Maryland, Centreville, Maryland RICHARD H. EVANS Vice President, Corporate Communications PAUL S. GERRITSEN Vice President, Regulatory Practices BARBARA S. GRAHAM Treasurer KENNETH K. JONES Vice President, Planning CHARLES MARCHYSHYN Comptroller FRANK j. PERRY, JR.
SALLY  v. HAWKINS                  Wakefield; Harland M. Wakefield, Jr.
Vice President, Gas Division THOMAS s. SHAW, JR.
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Delaware        AUDIT COMMITTEE Broadcasting Company and President  Oscar L. Carey, Chairperson; John R.
Vice President, Production DUANE C. TAYLOR Vice President, Information Systems D. WAYNE YERKES Division Vice President, Southern Division WILLIAM G. SIMERAL Director, Executive Vice President and member of the Executive Committee of E. I.
and General Manager of Station      Cooper; James 0. Pippin, Jr.
du Pont de Nemours & Company (a diversified chemical, energy and specialty products company)
WILM (radio broadcasting)            NOMINATING COMMITTEE Wilmington, Delaware                Sally V. Hawkins, Chairperson; Nevius DONALD W. MABE                      M. Curtis; James 0. Pippin, Jr.
Wilmington, Delaware DAVID D. WAKEFIELD Senior Vice President of Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, New York, New York; Director of Continental American Life Insurance Company, Wilmington, Delaware HARLAND M. WAKEFIELD, jR.
President and Vice Chairman of      COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Perdue Farms Incorporated          William G. Simeral, Chairperson; (integrated poultry company)        Oscar L. Carey; Nevius M. Curtis; Salisbury, Maryland                  David D. Wakefield jAMES  0. PIPPIN, jR.              INVESTMENT COMMITTEE Director, President and              David D. Wakefield, Chairperson; Chief Executive Officer of the      Nevius M. Curtis; James 0. Pippin, Jr.
Senior Vice President of the Company EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Nevius M. Curtis, Chairperson; Oscar L. Carey; William G. Simeral; David D.
Centreville National Bank of Maryland, Centreville, Maryland 48}}
Wakefield; Harland M. Wakefield, Jr.
AUDIT COMMITTEE Oscar L. Carey, Chairperson; John R.
Cooper; James 0. Pippin, Jr.
NOMINATING COMMITTEE Sally V. Hawkins, Chairperson; Nevius M. Curtis; James 0. Pippin, Jr.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE William G. Simeral, Chairperson; Oscar L. Carey; Nevius M. Curtis; David D. Wakefield INVESTMENT COMMITTEE David D. Wakefield, Chairperson; Nevius M. Curtis; James 0. Pippin, Jr.}}

Latest revision as of 04:14, 6 January 2025

Delmarva Power,1986 Annual Rept
ML18092B462
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek, 05000000
Issue date: 12/31/1986
From: Curtis N
DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML18092B463 List:
References
NUDOCS 8703190556
Download: ML18092B462 (51)


Text

NOTICE THE ATTACHED FILES ARE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE DIVISION OF DOCUMENT CONTROL. THEY HAVE BEEN CHARGED TO YOU FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIOD AND MUST BE RETURNED TO TH E RECORDS FACILITY BRANCH 016.

PLEASE DO NOT SEND DOCUMENTS CHARGED OUT THROUGH THE MAIL. REMOVAL OF ANY PAGE(S) FROM DOCUMENT FOR REPRODUCTION MUST BE REFERRED TO FILE PERSONNEL.

z/_,Z Declurt#~~

3 reatrol #tf3 ~/-.

DEADLINE RETURN DATE.... "3/<=zo/_of~~**

l RECORDS FACILITY BRANCH

Employees continue to demonstrate creativity as well as technical skill in accomplishing their jobs.

Stockholders and customers have enjoyed an outstanding year in a prosperous period at Delmarva Power.

Geor9e lt'il/iams, 1-.dEJc,\\Joor Po11cr Plane Moderate increases in sales and investment earnings will help the company meet the challenges ahead.

co1*cr photo: I-arm,.tit. Cuba, Dclau*are

Earnin9s increased to

$2.91 per share and reached a record hi9h.

Delmarva fuwers prices for electricity and natural 9as are amon9 the lowest in the re9ion.

The company works in several ways to help improve the quality of life on the Delmarva Peninsula.

the 0

the tive the the

Percent Increase FINA CIAL HIGHLIGHTS 1986 1985 (Decrease)

Revenues 714.9 million 722.8 million (I. I)

Net Income 96.1 million 96.6 million (0.5)

Earnings Per Share 2.91 2.76 5.4 Dividends Declared 2.045 1.945 5.1 Common Stock Outstanding Average Shares 30,481,925 30,481,925 Common Stock Book Value 19.27 18.43 4.6 Construction Expenditures 102.6 million 94.9 million 8.1 Internally Generated Funds':'

157.2 million 148.9 million 5.6 Electric Sales 9.21 billion kwh 8.53 billion kwh 8.0 Electric Customers (average) 325,832 314,013 3.8 Average Residential Usage 8,605 kwh 8,059 kwh 6.8 Gas Sales 15.95 million mcf 15.71 million mcf 1.5 Gas Customers (average) 76,614 75, 103 2.0 Average Residential Usage 86.3 mcf 79.7 mcf 8.3

':'Net cash flow from operating activities less preferred and common dividends.

the l: H A I R M A Nc1' Curtis Stockholders and customers have enjoyed an outstandin9 year in a prosperous period at Delmarva Power.

  • Earnings increased for the sixth consecutive year and reached a record high.
  • Dividends increased for the tenth consecutive \\'Car.
  • The price of electricity and natural gas decreased throughout the service tenitory.
  • Generating plants performed above national averages.
  • Customer approval ratings increased for the fourth consecutive year.
  • Outside investments continued to increase earnings.

Our report this year is dedicated to Delmarva Power people who not only contributed to this period of prosperity, but who have also prepared themselves through their training, enterprise, and enthusiasm to address a new set of challenges before us. The remainder of my letter addresses those challenges.

3

4 EARN! GS The current level of financial performance cannot be sustained during the next year or two. Regulators, responding to decreased interest rates nationally, have reduced significantly the allowable rates of return for most of our business.

The consequences of these rate reductions will be compounded by the new federal tax act which will cut further into the company's strong cash flow and subsequently, into the ability to earn returns on that cash.

As discussed on pages 15 and 16, these decreases in authorized returns and cash flow can be countered somewhat by anticipated increases in sales on the economically-strong Delmarva Peninsula, modest growth in subsidiaries, and con-tinued tight cost control. Nevertheless, while the company is still financially healthy and we expect to continue our policy of modest dividend increases annually, we also expect earnings to be down in 1987.

Historically, Delmarva Power's earnings growth has tended to be cyclical with periods of prosperity followed by dips and then rebounds.

Such a rebound from a low in 1987 should occur because, by most standards, the company is financially healthy. The construction budget is relatively modest. Cash flow, although reduced, is still good. Growth prospects are strong. The talent of employees is excellent.

FUTURE OPTIONS Another challenge ahead will be to make the best decisions about supplying electricity in the next decade. Recent forecasts showed the next generating plant would be needed in 1994.

Such a new plant would be expensive-about three quarters of a billion dollars. Around the country, large building programs have burdened utilities.

1 listory teaches that large capital investments, such as those in the railroad industry, can be devalued quickly by technological breakthroughs and structural changes within an industry.

In last year's repo1t, this letter told of a new goal adopted by the company to develop a plan which would delay, by at least five years, the in-service date of the next generating unit.

Such a delay could be accomplished, without sacrificing service, through load management tech-niques and cogeneration. That plan has been developed and implementation has begun. The work so far shows a delay is achievable until about the tum of the century.

GROWTH However, significant new events have occurred. There have been two years of substantial growth in the demand for electricity during peak load periods. This has been out of character with the growth patterns of the previous decade.

Since the Arab oil embargo of 1973, peak load growth has occurred at an average rate of about 13 a year. In the summer of 1985, it grew 10.5%

and in the summer of 1986, it grew an additional 2.53. Delmarva Power planners have concluded that the summer peaks of 1985 and 1986 were not aberrations. Peak demand, fueled by a strong economy in the service territory and lower rates, is greater than previously anticipated and is expected to continue to grow.

Thus, in addition to beginning the load management program, we also responded by accelerating the study of various options to supply more power under the general strategy of mini-mizing capital expenses and matching capacity expansion to load growth as much as possible.

FLEXIBILITY While the plans to delay and the plans to build may appear to be contradictory, they are not. Both load management and capacity additions will be needed. Such diverse efforts are part of Delmarva Power's plans to be flexible as the true future demand for electricity becomes clearer and the possible contribution of load control becomes more known. As competition continues to develop in the utility industry, this flexible approach will help Delmarva Power offer the best prices for its products.

With a sufficient amount of owned reserves plus the availability of capacity for purchase from other companies in the region, final decisions in these areas are not needed for a year or two.

While this letter has discussed some of the key challenges that face the company, we should not forget that 1986 was an outstanding year.

The company is doing well and is positioned well financially to meet challenges ahead. It also has the people with the technical skills and creati\\'e spirit who can continue to make progress for you.

I appreciate their efforts and hope you do also as you look at pictures of many of them at \\\\'Ork.

Sincerely, EV CURTIS lchruan I 0. 198 7 Delman-a Poll'er's direcwrs represent a broad range of business and communi~r e.\\pcrtisc. Their titles and affiliations arc listed on page 48.

Charlotte Lee Cannon Oscar L. Carey John R. Cooper Howard E. CosB'ove Sa l~v V. Hawkins Donald W falabe James 0. Pippin, Jr.

William G. Simeral David D. Wakefield Harland M. Wakefield, Jr.

the

FINANCIAL STRENGTH Earnings increased 5.43 to

$2.91 per share. Quarterly divi-dends increased by 5.1 3 to 53 cents for an indicated annual rate of $2. 12. The price of common stock increased from $27Y8 to $33.

The company paid for all of its construction expenses with its mm cash. The AFUDC ratio, a kev indicator for financial analysis, remained low at 3. 7%

of net income. The company's bond rating, in differing terms from the different agencies, is AA.

Electric sales increased 8% O\\'er 1985 le\\'els because of the strong economy on the Delmarva Peninsula. Industrial sales increased 5. 73 with sit,mifl-cant gains in the chemical and refining industries in northern Dela\\\\'are and the poultry business in southern Delaware and Man*land. Commercial sales in-creased 9.53 and residential sales increased I 0.63. The prospects for continued sales growth in the diverse service territory arc discussed on page 15.

FACILITI ES Generating resen'es are 243. The company's 1987 capital budget of $137.8 million is relatively modest, indicating adequate capacity. The company sells po\\\\'er to the PJ M inter-connection and to other companies. This reduced costs to customers by more than

$7.5 million in 1986.

The fuel mix is balanced:

613 coal, 223 oil, and 173 nuclear through nuclear plants partially owned by Delmarva Power but run by other companies.

In 1986, the company completed the acquisition of the Lincoln-Ellendale electric system with its 1,420 customers.

In the gas business, the company signed a contract to connect to the Columbia Gas System, Inc. in late 1987. The use of two suppliers, Columbia and Transco, Inc., will give the company flexibility in meeting future demands of its natural gas customers and an additional source of electrical generating fuel at the Edge Moor Power Plant.

RA TE MA TIERS As a result of declining capital costs and exceeding al"lo\\\\'ed rates of return, regulators cut Delman*a Power's electric rates. In Dela\\\\'are, the reduction was $22.8 million on an interim basis with a final decision due near the end of the first quarter, 1987. In Maryland, the final reduction was $8.8 million, and for wholesale customers regu-lated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the total Tim Smith Westover reduction was $4 million. Virginia will address rates in 1987.

Pursuant to a Delaware Public Service Commission order, the company made the final distribution to customers of

$28. 1 million remaining from the funds negotiated by the company in 197 5 to allow a contractor to cancel the proposed Summit Nuclear Power Plant.

Earnin9s increased to

$2.91 per share and reached a record hi9h.

Also in Delaware, standards for power plant performance were established. These standards provide rewards and penalties for good and poor performance.

The rate-reduction con-sequences of the new federal tax act have been detern1ined in Maryland but are still pending in the other jurisdictions.

Charles Turner Ocean City Anne Wri9ht Chn"stiana 7

8 T EAMWORK Recognizing the inevitability of increased competition, four years ago the company developed a participative skills program designed to encourage innova-tion from the employees working the closest to a situation and to take increased advantage of teamwork. That program is maturing. By the end of 1986, all employees had been placed on teams and all team leaders had been trained in techniques to encourage participation.

An example of the results of this program is the success of the company's profitable Gas Mainte-nance Plan. For the last three years, the employees who repair gas heaters have taken the initiative to increase the sales of this pro-gram. Through their efforts to organize other employees in marketing, corporate communi-cations, and gas service, sales of this program increased 1% in 1984, 6.2% in 1985, and 12.9%

in 1986.

Walt Robbins Wilmin9ton Boulevard Tommy Stephens

£\\:more Employees continue to demonstrate creativity as well as technical skill in accomplishin9 their jobs.

Another example of employee creativity and skill is the effort to retain a large indus-trial customer which had decided to expand and move outside the service territory. When employees in the marketing, regulatory practice, and economic develop-ment departments heard of the proposed relocation, they put together an innovative rate package that would be fair to current customers and favorable to the industrial customer as an alternative to moving. They worked with the Delaware state government which was also interested in keeping 35 current operating jobs and 75 to 80 new jobs in the state plus the con-struction jobs for a $50 million project. The rate proposal is now pending before the Delaware Public Service Commission.

These kinds of efforts will be important to the company in the future as competition in the utility business continues to develop.

SAFEll' As part of its Right-To-Know program, the company identified, published, and placed in accessible areas a list of all chemicals used in the workplace including those which may be hazardous. Training was given in the safe handling and disposal of these chemicals.

Also, employees from across the company came together to develop standards and procedures for handling asbestos found in the workplace and at customer locations.

On the overall safety pro-gram, the company led its cate-gory in the Southeastern Electric Exchange in fewest fleet acci-dents. It finished second in the occupational injury category.

However, lost-time accidents increased to 13 and lost-work days increased to 157. The company is concerned about these acci-dents and will put increased emphasis on reducing them in 1987.

Mary Ella Sutton Christiana James Dennis Harrin9ton

[d Murra). Gar) Ca/d,.*c/J, \\'a119hn llomer, John bcre/l, &b &ckell. frank f'cathen, fd Simmon" Sa/i,bury f\\more Cmtr<'villc

10 Delmarva Power's prices for electricity and natural gas are among the lowest in the region.

Electric comparisons (in cents per k\\\\'h) are: Ne\\\\' York 12.28; Newark, NJ 9.40; Philadel-phia 9.14; Boston 8.73; Baltimore 6.51; Delmarva Peninsula 6.46.

For natural gas (in cents ccf):

New York 75.89; Philadelphia 62.77; Newark, NJ 62.72; Boston 62.04; Baltimore 60.76; Wilmington 56.62.

Throughout the service territory, the price of electricity is dee! ining. In Delaware, for example, the price of electricity for a residential customer using 750 kilowatt hours of electricity per month has decreased 11. 7%

since 1983.

While the decline in inter-est rates nationally has enabled regulators to reduce rates, Delmarva Po\\\\'er has also worked to reduce prices by refinancing debt, consolidating offices, con-trolling expenses, converting about two thirds of its generating capacity from oil to coal, and con-tinuing to keep the number or employees belo"* the 1982 level.

Together, all of these efforts help customers and put the company in a better position to face developing competition.

SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS In 1986, customer service representatives began programs to allow customers to phone in meter readings and to enable meter readers to read ( electroni-cally) inside meters from the outside. Planning was begun for a computerized, automated dis-patch system to improve re-sponses in the field.

For several years, the com-pany has taken an individualized approach to customers having difficulty, for any rea~on, in paying their bills. Customer ser-vice representatives inform the customer of programs available such as credit extensions, bud-get billing, or hmds available throughout the service territory to help. As a result of this approach, both writeofls and cutoffs are down - a win-win situation for both the customer and the company.

Eric Whalen Christiana Par Ramsey Christiana II

12 E VlRO MENT In ovember, 1986, Delmarva Power crews removed the last distribution capacitor containing the toxic chemical PCB in the insulating fluid. As part of the company's commitment to operate with as I ittle intrusion into the environment as possible, the company began removing such capacitors before federal laws required utilities to do so and completed the task well ahead of the federal deadline of 1988.

The company also em-barked on a study-supported by citizens groups, regulators, and environmental officials - of emerging technologies to correct an infrequent air pollution problem at the Indian River Power Plant. The study was developed with the community as an alternative to an expensive ($40 million), tall smokestack which also would have solved the problem. Initial analyses show that alternatives may not be cheaper but may result in a more effective environmental solution.

BobSporay Wilmin9ton Boulevard Kate DiPietro Christiana The company worked with the University of Delaware to build an artificial reef demonstra-tion project in the Atlantic Ocean off Rehoboth Beach with fly ash -

a waste product from the Indian River Power Plant. The company is also working with the Electric Power Research Institute to use more of this ash as a base for an interstate highway entrance being built near the Edge Moor plant.

The company works in several ways to help improve the quality of life on the Delmarva Peninsula.

Employees at the Vienna Power Plant, working on their own time with facilities built by the company, released striped bass flngerlings they reared into the Nanticoke River for the second consecutive year.

CoMMUNIIT ACTIVITI ES For the second straight year, Delmarva Power employees were honored by President Ronald Reagan at the White House for Radio Watch, a program to summon aid through radios in company vehicles.

The new "Be A Star, Volunteer" program provides 50 employees, chosen through a lottery, a $100 grant for a non-profit community organization where they have given at least 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> of volunteer time.

In other activities, the Good eighbor Energy Fund raised more than $170,000 in customer and stockholder con-tributions to help people having trouble paying their energy bills.

Employees again exceeded their goal in contributions to the United Way.

FORMATION ACTIVITIES In an effort to provide customers with info1mation on how to use energy wisely, the company offers a variety of pro-grams including the monthly customer newsletter, "Energy News You Can Use", the quarterly newsletter for senior citizens, "Silver Bulletin", and the home building efficiency standards, "Super E+." Face-to-face help comes from customer service representatives, marketing depart-ment employees, and volunteer speakers.

Larry Maclaren Christiana Newman Sonnier Salisbury

GROWTH Electric sales increased 83 in 1986 - the highest increase experienced by any of the com-panies in the PJM regional interconnection. 1 lealthy growth is expected to continue for the immediate future because it is coming from diverse sources in the strong economy of the service area.

Unemployment is near an all-time lo"* in Delaware of about 43, substantially below the national average of about 73.

The Financial Center Develop-ment Act of 1981 continues to bring new jobs and oflke-building construction to Dela"*are as banks and insurance companies locate credit card and financial administration operations in Delaware to take advantage of fayorable legislation and tax treatment. These laws have bolstered gro\\\\*th in the com-mercial sector which has seen a 223 increase in jobs in Dela"*are over the past five years com-pared to a national average rate of 133. Tourism and recreation continues to prosper along the Maryland and Virginia coasts.

Population is growing.

From 1978 until 1981, Dela,,*are

" *as losing around 5,000 people a year. Now, Delaware is gaining up to 4,000 new people a year moving into the area. Also, the Eastern Shore of Marvland i~ growing faster than the rest or Maryland. This has helped growth in small retail businesses such as stores and restaurants. Single family housing starts in Delaware have more than doubled from 1982 to 1986. In the service te1Titory, more than 903 of new homes are heated with either electricity or natural gas.

People are also using more electricity in their homes. In 1986, the average monthly use per residential customer increased approximately 73 from 672 kilowatt-hours per month to 717 kilowatt-hours per month.

SuBSJDIARI ES Investments by both the parent and subsidiaries contributed 27 cents to earnings of $2. 91 in 1986 compared to 20 cents per share on earnings of $2.76 per share in 1985 and 12 cents per share on earnings of $2.63 in 1984. Earnings from these busi-nesses are expected to grow modesth-over the next few years.

The philosophy of the sub-sidiary efforts is to seek returns which exceed those of the regulated business but do not detract from the core operation of the energy company. The company confines its investments to areas of its expertise, looks to Mary Sanford Ocean City provide challenging job oppor-tunities to its employees, and ultimately, expects to develop operating businesses.

Moderate increases in sales and investment earnings will help the company meet the challenges ahead.

Broadly, the company in-vests in five areas: gas and oil exploration, liquid cash invest-ments, equipment leasing, tech-nology and energy projects, and real estate. The company has invested in two communica-tions satellites, all or part of five airplanes, a solar project in California, a hydroelectric project in Maine, and a wastewater treatment project in Florida.

It is investigating opportunities outside the service territorv to generate steam from trash.

Walter Evans Horrin9 ton Linda Stevens Christiana 15

16 The company is also work-ing to increase returns on its real estate holdings, especially the land around its computer center under construction at Christiana, Delaware.

G ENERATING OPTIONS One of the biggest challenges over the next few years will be to make the best decisions about supplying electricity during the next decade. Nevv power plants are eno1mously expensive and can be devalued quickly by technological advances.

In 1986, the company developed and began to imple-ment a project to delay 225 megawatts of peak growth by 1996. Th is would be enough to postpone the next major plant until near the tum of the century.

Key ingredients of this project are residential load control and cogeneration. During 1987, members of the task force will be conducting market research to determine incentives necessary for customers to participate.

Initial projects involving cus-tomers are scheduled to begin during the first quarter of 1988.

Equipment purchases for the project are underway.

However, peak load growth continues to exceed projections.

It has increased 13% over the past two years.

Thus, the study of options for supplying electricity in the future has been accelerated in the event peak load growth continues to exceed expectations or some of the load control and cogeneration programs do not progress as anticipated.

Options include purchases from other utilities, restarting, in environmentally acceptable ways, retired units at Edge Moor, or building a new, smaller-than-previously-planned plant using advanced technology.

There is enough generating capacity available in Delmarva Power's svstem and on the East Coast so that no major decision has to be made for the next year or two. The strategy is to study all options, keeping the company as flexible as it can be until future demand and the potential of load control become clearer.

Tom Ashby Exmore Charlie Johnson Salisbury D IVERSE SERVICE T ERRITORY Centrally located within the major East Coast markets, the Delmarva Peninsula has a unique blend of industrial, agricultural, commercial, and recreational activities.

This mixture makes the demands for electricity and natural gas less affected by extreme fluctuations in the national economy than in many other areas of the nation.

Delmarva Power serves 325,832 electric customers throughout most of the 5,700-square-mile Delmarva Peninsula which includes Delaware, portions of nine Eastern Shore counties in Maryland, and two Eastern Shore counties in Virginia. The company also distributes natural gas to 76,614 customers in a 275-square-mile area in northern Delaware. To serve this area, Delmarva Power maintains an electric system with 2,277 mega-watts of generation capacity, 1,306 miles of transmission lines, and 9,285 miles of distribution lines, and a natural gas system with 1,061 miles of gas main.

The company employs 2,586 people.

Lori Meredith Westover

PENNSYLVANIA MARYLAND VIRGINIA Indian R11'er

  • Laurel Salisburl' NEW jEHSEY LEGEND

/. 0orate Headquarters Nonhem Division Gen~~ol Office J Southern ryn General

  • Cuswmpl Sen* ice Loca1i s

f IN AN c I Al Rf v If w and AN Alys Is R f P 0 R T 0f M A N A G f M f N T R f P 0 R T 0f I N 0 f P f N 0 f N T A C C 0 U N TA N T S CONSOllOATfO flNANCIAl STAHMfNTS N 0 H S to C 0 N S 0 l I 0 A H 0 f I N A N C I A l S TA T f M f N T S CONSOllOAHO STATISTICS SHARfHOlOfR INfORMATION 0 HI Cf RS and 0 I Rf CT 0 RS

Delmarva Power &. Li9ht Campany SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in Thousands)

For the Years Ended December 31 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 OPERATING Operating Revenues

$ 714,863 $ 722,834 $ 702,593 $ 649,799 $ 636,666 Operating Income 134,738 135,515 133,209 129,138 116,573 Net Income 96,123 96,638 92,110 85,063 73,571 EARNINGS AND DIVIDENDS Earnings Per Share 2.91 2.76 2.63 2.45

2. 13 Dividends Declared on Common Stock 2.045 1.945 1.83 1.68 1.595 Average Shares Outstanding (000) 30,482 30,482 30,248 29,541 28,489 Total Assets 1,742,552 1,672,527 1,591,630 1,533,263 1,509,771 Construction Expenditures11 1 102,597 94,923 79,488 76,056 110,646 Internal Generation121 of Funds 157,176 148,880 100,493 99,730 54,553 CAPITALIZATION Long Term Debt131 666,979 638,090 567,761 567,935 592,615 Preferred Stock without mandatory redemption 103,306 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 Preferred Stock with mandatory redemption141 4,077 5,992 47,836 49,383 50,000 Common Equity 587,449 561,811 539,650 503,513 468,073 Total

$1,361,811 $1,310,893 $1,260,247 $1,225,831 $1,215,688 CAPITALIZATION RATIOS Long Term Debt 493 493 453 463 493 Preferred Stock without mandatory redemption 83 83 83 93 93 Preferred Stock with mandatory redemption 03 03 43 43 43 Common Equity 433 433 433 41 3 383 Total 1003 1003 1003 1003 1003 ELECTRIC/ GAS SALES Electric Sales (kwh 000) 9,205,795 8,530,520 8,308,233 7,878,476 7,249,442 Gas Sales (mcfOOO) 15,952 15,708 17,239 16,449 15,604 I I !Excludes Allowance for Funds Used During Construction.

iliNet cash now Ii-om operating activities less preferred and common dividends.

iliJncludes long-term debt due within one year.

t41Jncludes mandatory redemption due within one year.

19

Delmarva Power &_Light Compan_v FINA CIAL REVIEW A D ANALYSIS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 300 20 Earnings and Dividends Declared (cents) 82 83 84 85 86 Earnings Dividends EARNINGS Earnings per share of common stock increased to $2.91 in 1986 from $2.76 in 1985 and

$2.63 in 1984. The 1986 increase was principally attributable to higher electric sales, increased investment income and lower financing costs partially offset by rate decreases and higher other operation and maintenance expenses. The 1985 increase of 13<!: per share compared to 1984 resulted from higher electric sales, additional amortization of the credit arising from the sale of contracts (Summit), and increased investment income partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.

DIVIDE OS In December 1986, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend 5% to 53<;: per share, the tenth consecutive annual increase. The current indicated annual dividend rate has increased to $2.12 per share from $2.02 per share. This increase reflects a dividend policy which is to gradually increase dividends on an annual basis and thus provide stockholders with a fair and competitive return on their investment. Although earnings may decline in 1987 due to lower returns authorized by regulatory commissions, the company's favorable cash position should allow for continued increases.

ELECTRIC REVENUES AND SALES Electric revenues, net of fuel, decreased $9.8 million or 2.33 in 1986. The 1986 decrease was primarily due to a $28.1 million Delaware Summit credit payment and a $13.5 million decrease from lower rates offset by a $31.5 million sales increase. (See Note 10 on page 40 for a discussion of rate matters.) The sales increase resulted from a continued strong economy in the service territory, colder winter weather, and new residential construction. A new system peak of 1,840 megawatts was reached in July 1986, a 2.5% increase over the previous peak in August 1985. The $28.1 million Delaware Summit credit payment consisted of the unamortized Summit credit and related tax benefits. The settlement payment did not reduce earnings since there was a corresponding credit to operating expenses.

1985 net electric revenues increased $12.3 million or 3%. The increase was mainly attributable to higher sales resulting from an expansion of the banking and financial services sector in Delaware and growth in the residential market.

GAS REVENUES AND SALES 1986 gas revenues, net of fuel costs, increased $2.7 million or 9.4% in 1986. The net revenue increase reflects a full year of revenues at higher rates, effective March 5, 1985, compared to 1985 which includes only ten months at the higher rates. Also contributing to the increase were higher residential space heating sales which were due to colder winter weather and residential and commercial customer growth. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in industrial sales, largely attributable to lower oil prices, which caused some customers to switch from gas.

Delmarva Power &._ Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS 100 80 60 40 20 0

Generation Fuel Mix (percent)

I -

~

83 84 85 86 87 Oil Nuclear Coal 1985 net gas revenues increased 2.63 due to increased rates partially offset by a 8.93 decrease in sales principally attributable to fuel switching, decreased industrial production levels and mild weather in the first quarter of 1985.

GAS SUPPLY The company minimized the impact of competition from oil through the purchase of significantly lower priced gas, when available, earmarked specifically for alternate fuel customers. The company has taken two additional actions to secure low priced natural gas for its customers. First, regulations issued in 1985 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission have enabled the company to make spot purchases. The company makes spot purchases when they are advantageous and available. Second, the company will have another primary supplier, Columbia Gas System, Inc., in late 1987 when it is anticipated that construction of a pipeline by Columbia will be completed.

FUEL Mix In 1986, generation from coal, nuclear and oil sources was 613, 173, and 223, respectively.

Nuclear generation increased 233 due to increased production by the Peach Bottom units which experienced extended outages during 1985. Oil generation increased 93 primarily due to a 393 decline in the company's average cost of oil. These factors lowered the effective customer fuel cost, which includes fuel, interchange and purchased power costs, to l.84ct/ kwh in 1986 from 1.94ct/ kwh in 1985 and 1.9M/ kwh in 1984.

OPERATING EXPENSES Operating expenses, net of fuel costs, decreased 2.23 in 1986 due to $13.5 million accelerated amortization of the Summit credit in the Delaware jurisdiction and the $14.3 million tax effect of the Delaware Summit credit payment. Excluding the impact of the Delaware Summit credit payment, operating expenses, net of fuel costs, increased 5.93. This increase was due to higher payroll, increased insurance costs and higher annual overhaul expenses for the company's generating units.

1985 operating expenses, net of fuel costs, increased 4.93 principally due to higher payroll and associated benefits, the higher cost of jointly-owned nuclear facilities, costs related to Hurricane Gloria, and increased steam service expenses, which are billed and reflected in steam revenues.

21

Delmarva Power &. Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS IMPACT OF INFLATION 22 1986 TAX REFORM ACT The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (Tax Act) is the most significant and comprehensive tax legislation passed since 1954. The changes provided by the Tax Act having a significant impact on the company include lower corporate tax rates, less favorable depreciation rules and elimination of the investment tax credit (ITC). The lower corporate tax rate will reduce tax expense and the company expects a corresponding reduction in revenues due to lower customer rates. The company's tax payments are expected to increase due to elimination ofITC and less favorable depreciation rules. This may require the company to rely more heavily on external capital markets for new financing in future years. Additionally, the alternative minimum tax, which is significantly more stringent under the Tax Act, may affect future years.

OTHER INCOME Other income, excluding allowance for other funds used during construction, increased $6.9 million in 1986 and $3.l million in 1985. The increases in both years reflect increased leveraged leasing income and higher interest and dividend income. Interest and dividend income in 1986 benefited from increased investment funds available, although lower prevailing rates slowed the growth of income. Interest income also increased in 1986 due to interest received on income tax refunds. The 1985 increase consisted principally of leveraged leasing income, as this was the first year the company invested in leveraged leases.

FINA CING COSTS Interest on long-term debt increased $7.2 million in 1986 primarily due to a December 1985 refinancing of $41.9 million of preferred stock with long-term debt. An increase in loans used to finance leveraged lease investments also contributed to the interest expense increase. During 1986, $87.l million of bonds and preferred stock were refinanced with lower cost securities. The 1985 and 1986 refinancings resulted in a net of tax savings of $2.3 million in 1986, which reflects a $5.2 million decrease in preferred dividends. In 1985, interest on long-term debt increased $1.4 million mainly due to borrowings related to leveraged leases.

In recent years the impact of inflation on the company has decreased due to declining inflation rates. However, the cost of replacing utility plant would be significantly higher than the historical cost reflected in the financial statements. Based on past practices of regulatory commissions, the company anticipates it will recover the increased cost of facilities when replacement actually occurs.

Delmarva Power &.. Li9ht Company FINANCIAL REVIEW AND A ALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Interest Charges (SEC method) 82 83 84 85 86 LIQUIDITY The company's liquidity is affected principally by its construction program and, to a lesser degree, by other capital requirements such as maturing debt and sinking fund requirements.

The company's cash flow was decreased by 1986 rate reductions and will decrease to a greater degree in 1987, when the rate reductions will be in effect for a full year. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 will also reduce the company's internal generation of cash due to loss of the investment tax credit and less favorable depreciation rules.

The company has the ability to issue commercial paper supported by adequate lines of credit to meet fluctuations in working capital requirements as well as the interim financing necessary for construction projects. The company has lines of credit with banks in the amount of

$44.5 million. These lines are available for bank loans and to secure commercial paper borrowings as the need arises. At December 31, 1986, the company had no commercial paper outstanding.

During 1986, the company continued to lower its cost of capital through refinancings. In June 1986, the company issued $66 million of 9.25% first mortgage bonds pursuant to a $102 million shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The proceeds were primarily used to redeem $30 million and $29.1 million of first mortgage bonds, bearing interest rates of 11.75% and 11%, respectively. In June 1986, the company also issued $28 million of adjustable rate preferred stock to refund $15 million and $13 million of preferred stock, bearing dividend rates of 8% and 8.96%, respectively. The dividend rate on the adjustable rate preferred stock averaged 5.58% in 1986. In another 1986 financing,

$18 million of bank loans were secured to finance investments in leveraged leases.

The company's ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 3.67, as of December 31, 1986, decreased

&om 1985 primarily due to increased interest on long-term debt and a lower effective income tax rate. This ratio may decrease in future years due to the effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and lower returns authorized by regulatory commissions. The company's preferred stock and first mortgage bonds maintained a AA quality credit rating in 1986.

23

Delmana Pou er &. Li9ht Company FINA CIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS 150 120 90 60 30 0

24 Construction Expenditures and Internally Generated Funds (millions of dollars) 85 86 87 88 89 Internally Generated Funds Construction Expenditures (excluding AFU DC)

CAPITAL AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS For the period 1984-1986, the company had total capital requirements of $424 million, including $277 million for construction (excluding AFUDC). During the same period, $407 million was generated internally (cash from operations less common and preferred dividend requirements) which represents 963 of the capital requirements and 1473 of the construction requirements. Capital requirements for the period 1987-1989 are estimated to be $478 million, including $396 million for construction (excluding AFUDC). The company presently anticipates that, for the period 1987-1989, internally generated funds will be $311 million which equals 653 of the total capital requirements and 793 of its construction requirements.

Actual construction expenditures may vary from the above estimates due to, among other factors, the rate of inflation, regulation and legislation, rates of load growth, licensing and construction delays, results of rate proceedings, and the cost and availability of capital.

The company estimates that its annual energy and peak load growth for the next 10 years will be at a rate of 2.13 and 1.33, respectively. The company's present generating capacity of 2,277 megawatts provides a reserve of 243 against its company peak of 1,840 megawatts experienced in the summer of 1986. In 1985, the company peak was 1,795 megawatts.

The company developed a plan to delay the in-service date of its next generation unit until the late 1990's because of the high cost of adding new capacity and possible future technological developments. In order to respond to the unexpectedly high peak growth experienced over the past two years by the company, the development of the plan's supply side and demand side options has been intensified. The company's strategy is to match capacity expansion and load growth as closely as possible. This strategy will enable the company to maintain its relatively low pricing within the Northeast and meet developing competition in the utility industry.

Delmarva Power &. Light Company REPORT OF MANAGEMENT REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Management is responsible for the information and representations contained in the company's financial statements. Our financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, based upon cunently available facts and circumstances and management's best estimates and judgments of the expected effects of events and transactions.

Delmarva Power & Light Company maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance of the reliability of the financial records and the protection of assets. The internal control system is supported by written administrative policies, a program of internal audits, and procedures to assure the selection and training of qualified personnel.

Coopers & Lybrand, independent certified public accountants, are engaged to examine the financial statements and express their opinion thereon. Their examination was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which include a review of internal controls.

The audit committee of the Board of Directors, composed of outside Directors only, meets with management, internal auditors and the independent accountants to review accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters. The independent accountants are appointed by the Board on recommendation of the audit committee, subject to shareholder approval.

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

~fl~

Roger D. Campbell Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer To THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WILMINGTON, DELAWARE We have examined the consolidated balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Delmarva Power & Light Company as of December 31, 1986 and 1985, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in common stockholders' equity and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1986. Our examinations were made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly the consolidated financial position of Delmarva Power & Light Company at December 31, 1986 and 1985 and the consolidated results of its operations and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1986 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.

~~

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania February 6, 1987 25

Delmarva Power &._Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Dollars in Thousands)

For the Years Ended December 31 1986 1985 1984 OPERATING REVENUES Electric

$ 602,240

$ 605,581

$ 584,163 Gas 91,802 95,256 101,578 Steam 20,821 21,997 16,852 714,863 722,834 702,593 OPERATING EXPENSES Operation:

Fuel for electric generation 207,862 240,901 278,474 Net interchange and purchased power (28,098)

(63,962)

(108,011)

Purchased gas 57,012 69,847 74,082 Deferred energy costs 7,767 (2,549)

(2,345)

Other operation 128,116 121, 105 108,001 Maintenance 62,621 59,406 56,752 Depreciation 64,657 61,183 58,464 Amortization of Summit credit (15,707)

(7,202)

(4,762)

Taxes on income 65,208 77,836 77,577 Taxes other than income 30,687 30,754 31,152 580,125 587,319 569,384 OPERATING INCOME 134,738 135,515 133,209 OTHER INCOME Allowance for other funds used during construction 2,750 2,428 2,780 Other, net 13,267 6,382 3,243 16,017 8,810 6,023 INCOME BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES 150,755 144,325 139,232 INTEREST CHARGES Long-term debt 54,478 47,236 45,815 Short-term debt and other 922 1,059 2,090 Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (768)

(608)

(783) 54,632 47,687 47,122 EARNINGS Net Income 96,123 96,638 92, 110 Dividends on preferred stock 7,405 12,599 12,662 Earnings applicable to common stock

$ 88,718

$ 84,039

$ 79,448 COMMON STOCK Average shares outstanding (thousands) 30,482 30,482 30,248 Earnings per average share 2.91 2.76 2.63 Dividends declared Eer share 2.045 1.945 1.83 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

26

Delman-a Power &._Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION (Dollars in Thousands)

For the Years Ended December 31 1986 1985 1984 CASH FROM OPERATIONS Net Income

$ 96,123

$ 96,638

$ 92,110 Items not requiring (providing) cash:

Depreciation 64,657 61, 183 58,464 Amortization of Summit credit (15,707)

(7,202)

(4,762)

Amortization of nuclear fuel 5,405 6,594 2,071 Allowance for funds used during construction (3,518)

(3,036)

(3,563)

Investment tax credit adjustments, net (956) 21,878 2,253 Deferred income taxes, net 54,535 47,462 31,935 Dther (1,569)

(2,307)

Refundable taxes and interest 31,111 (2,981)

(2,188)

Net change in receivables, inventory & payables 17,228 20,915 (24,029)

Changes in other current assets

& liabilities':'

(21,154)

(19,140) 15,003 Net cash flow from operating activities 226,155 220,004 167,294 INVESTING AcnvITIES Construction expenditures (excluding AFUDC)

(102,597)

(94,923)

(79,488)

Investment in leveraged leases (28,682)

(45,006)

Investment in marketable securities (51,249)

(32,308)

(19,754)

Construction funds held by trustee 9,186 6,392 (4,933)

Other non-current changes, net (6,911)

(8,313)

( 4, 722)

Net cash used by investing activities (180,253)

(174,158)

(108,897)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES Dividends: Common (61,574)

(58,525)

(54, 139)

Preferred (7,405)

(12,599)

(12,662)

Redemptions: Term loan (33,000)

(5,500)

Long-term debt (114,250)

(10, 100)

(10, 100)

Preferred stock (31,635)

(41,573)

(1,418)

Premium on redemption of securities (6,218)

(2,814)

Issuances: First mortgage bonds 126,000 Variable rate demand series bonds 33,500 15,500 Other long-term debt 18,000 80,000 Preferred stock 28,000 Common stock 11,921 Net cash used by financing activities (49,082)

(45,111)

(56,398)

Net increase ~decrease) in cash (3,180) 735 1,999

  • 'Other than long-term debt due and preferred stock redeemable within one year and current deferred income taxes.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

27

Delmarva Power &__Light Company CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in Thousands)

ASSETS As of December 3 I 1986 1985 UTILI1Y PLANT-Electric

$1,685,954

$1,624,881 AT ORIGINAL COST Gas 96,782 90,956 Steam 24,746 24,389 Common 85,261 80,541 1,892,743 1,820,767 Less: Accumulated depreciation 587,075 535,873 Net utility plant in service 1,305,668 1,284,894 Plant held for future use 6,830 15,297 Construction work in progress 45,467 33,184 Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost 19,461 19,796 1,377,426 1,353,171 0rHER INVESTMENTS Investment in leveraged leases 60,716 30,465 Construction funds held by trustee 9,186 Other 11,178 4,340 71,894 43,991 CURRENT ASSETS Cash 14,228 17,408 Marketable securities, at cost 111,205 59,956 Accounts receivable:

Customers 46,844 49,037 Other 19,433 24,337 Inventories, at average cost:

Fuel (coal, oil and gas) 43,745 55,694 Materials and supplies 21,284 20,648 Prepayments 4,999 4,236 Deferred income taxes, net 1,326 (755)

Refundable taxes and interest 31,111 263,064 261,672 DEFERRED CHARGES AND Unamortized debt expense 6,233 5,368 0rHER ASSETS Deferred recoverable plant costs 8,145 Other 15,790 8,325 30,168 13,693 Total

$1,742,552

$1,672,527 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

28

Delmarva Power &_Light Company CONSOLIDATED BAIANCE SHEETS (Dollars in Thousands)

CAPITALIZATION As of December 31 1986 1985 AND LIABILITIES CAPITALIZATION Common stock

$ 102,876

$ 102,876 (see Statements Additional paid-in capital 235,187 235,798 of Capitalization)

Retained earnings 249,386 223,137 Total common stockholders' equity 587,449 561,811 Preferred stock:

Without mandatory redemption 103,306 105,000 With mandatory redemption 3,277 5,192 Long-term debt 666,829 637,940 1,360,861 1,309,943 CURRENT LIABILITIES Long-term debt due and preferred stock redeemable within one year 950 950 Accounts payable 31,947 33,129 Taxes accrued 1,961 16, 181 Interest accrued 10,937 22,729 Dividends declared 16,155 15,393 Deferred energy costs, net 6,229 (1,488)

Other 8,344 10,440 76,523 97,334 DEFERRED CREDITS AND Credit arising from sale of contracts 1,261 16,057 OTHER LIABILITIES Deferred income taxes, net 231,360 174,746 Deferred investment tax credits 69,460 70,416 Other 3,087 4,031 305,168 265,250 OTHER Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 6 and 11)

Total

$1,742,552

$1,672,527 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

29

Dclmal1'a Power &_Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK LONG-TERM DEBT 30 (Dollars in Thousands)

As of December 31 Common stock, par value $3.375 per share authorized 35,000,000 shares, outstanding 30,481,925 shares Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Total Common Stockholders' Equity 1986

$ 102,876 235,187 249,386 587,449 433 Par value $25 per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding Par value $100 per share, 1,800,000 shares authorized Without Mandatory Redemption:

Series Shares Issued (1986 and 1985) 3.70%-4.56%

240,000 and 240,000 5.00%-7.84%

330,000 and 330,000 7.88%-8.96%

200,000 and 480,000 Adjustable-5.58%Pl 280,000 and 0

Less: Reacquired preferred shares held in treasury (at cost)

Preferred Stock without Mandatory Redemption With Mandatory Redemption:

9.00% Series!2l 40,766 and 59,916 shares Less: Amount to be redeemed within one year Preferred Stock with Mandatory Redemption First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds:

Maturity Interest Rates Jun. 1, 1988 3Ys%

1994-1997 4%%-6%%

1998-2002 7%-11-M%

2003-2005 6.6%-10\\4%

2008-2016 9\\4%-12%

Pollution Control Notes:

Series, 1973 5.7% effective rate, due 1987-1998 Series, 1976 7.3% effective rate, due 1992-2006 Variable Rate Demand Series, due 2014-2015-4.51%! 1)

Other Long-Term Debt-7.76%(1 1 Unamortized premium and discount, net Long-term debt due within one year Total Long-Term Debt Total Capitalization illAverage rate during 1986.

!21Redemption price at December 31, 1986 is$ 107.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

24,000 33,000 20,000 28,000 105,000 1,694 103,306 83 4,077 03 800 3,277 25,000 50,000 158,100 92,150 207,900 533,150 7,550 34,500 42,050 49,000 43,000 (221) 666,979 493 (150) 666,829

$1,360,861 1003 1985

$ 102,876 235,798 223,137 561,811 43%

24,000 33,000 48,000 105,000 105,000 8%

5,992 0%

800 5,192 25,000 50,000 158,100 121,250 111,900 466,250 7,700 34,500 42,200 49,000 80,000 640 638,090

( 150) 637,940 49%

$1,309,943 100%

DelmatYO Power ~Light Company CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Dollars in Thousands)

Additional For the Three Years Ended Common Par Paid-in Retained December 31, 1986 Shares Value Capital Earnings Total BALANCE AS OF 29,841,182

$100,714

$225,585

$177,214

$503,513 jANUARY 1, 1984 Net income 92,110 92, 110 Cash dividends declared:

Common stock ($1.83)

(55,361)

(55,361)

Preferred stock (12,662)

( 12,662)

Issuance of common stock:

Dividend Reinvestment and Common Share Purchase Plan 640,743 2,162 9,888 12,050 Gain on retirement of preferred stock 125 125 Common stock expense

( 125)

(125)

BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1984 30,481,925 102,876 235,473 201,301 539,650 Net income 96,638 96,638 Cash dividends declared:

Common stock ($1.945)

( 59,287)

(59,287)

Pref erred stock (12,599)

(12,599)

Net loss on retirement of preferred stock 325 (2,916)

(2,591)

BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1985 30,481,925 102,876 235,798 223,137 561,811 Net income 96, 123 96, 123 Cash dividends declared:

Common stock ($2.045)

( 62,336)

(62,336)

Preferred stock (7,405)

(7,405)

Issuance of preferred stock (650)

(650)

Redemption of preferred stock 39 (133)

(94)

BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986 30,481,925

$102,876

$235,187

$249,386

$587,449 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

31

Delmarva Power &_ Li9ht Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 32 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its totally-held subsidialies, Delmarva Energy Company, Delmarva Industries Inc., Delmarva Services Company, and Delmarva Capital Investments, Inc. and its subsidialies. In conformity with generally accepted accounting plinciples, the accounting policies reflect the financial effects of rate decisions issued by regulatory commissions having juiisdiction over the company.

Certain reclassifications, not affecting income, have been made to amounts reported in plior years to confo1m to the presentations used in 1986.

REVENUES Revenues are recorded at the time billings are rendered to customers on a monthly cycle basis. At the end of each month, there is an amount of unbilled electric and gas service which has been rendered from the last meter reading to the month-end.

FUEL COSTS Fuel costs ( electlic and gas) are deferred and charged to operations on the basis of fuel costs included in customer billings under the company's taliffs, which are subject to peiiodic regulatory review and approval.

DEPRECIATION AND MAINTENANCE The annual provision for depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis using composite rates by classes of depreciable property. Provision for the costs of decommissioning of nuclear plant is made to the extent of the net cost of removal allowed for rate purposes (approximately 203 of 01iginal plant cost). The relationship of the annual provision for depreciation for financial accounting purposes to average depreciable property was 3.53 for 1986, 3.63 for 1985 and 3.43 for 1984.

The cost of maintenance and repairs, including renewals of minor items of property, is charged to operating expenses. A replacement of a unit of property is accounted for as an addition to and a retirement from utility plant. The original cost of the property retired is charged to accu-mulated depreciation together with the net cost of removal. For income tax purposes, the cost of removing retired property is deducted as an expense.

NUCLEAR FUEL The company's share of nuclear fuel costs relating to jointly-owned nuclear generating stations is charged to fuel expense on a unit of production basis, which includes a factor for spent nuclear fuel disposal costs pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. The company is collecting future storage and disposal costs for spent fuel as authoiized by the regulatory commissions in each juiisdiction and is paying such amounts quarterly to the Department of Energy.

Delmarva Power &.. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LEVERAGED LEASES The company's net investment in leveraged leases includes the aggregate of rentals receivable (net of principal and interest on nonrecourse indebtedness) and estimated residual values of the leased equipment less unearned and deferred income (including investment tax credits).

Unearned and deferred income is recognized at a level rate of return during the periods in which the net investment is positive.

INCOME TAXES Deferred income taxes result from timing differences in the recognition of certain income and expenses for tax and financial accounting purposes. The principal items accounting for deferred income taxes are: (1) use of the Accelerated Cost Recovery System and other accelerated depreciation methods for income tax purposes, (2) deferred fuel and gas production costs deducted currently for income tax purposes, and (3) other timing differences involving the capitalization of certain taxes and overhead costs. The company expects that accumulated deferred taxes resulting from accelerated depreciation will be amortized ratably over the remaining regulatory lives of the assets in accordance with the average rate assumption method prescribed by the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Investment tax credits from regulated operations utilized to reduce federal income taxes are deferred and generally amortized over the useful lives of the related utility plant. Investment tax credits of the company's non-regulated operations (excluding leveraged leases) are accounted for by the flow-through method.

Additional tax credits in 1984, 1985 and 1986 related to an Employee Stock Ownership Plan do not affect net income and are recorded as liabilities until the contribution is made to the Plan.

ALLOWANCE FOR FUNDS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) is a non-cash item and is defined in the regulatory system of accounts as the "net cost for the period of construction of borrowed funds used for construction purposes and a reasonable rate on other funds so used." AFUDC is segregated into two components: (1) the interest on debt component ("allowance for borrowed funds used during construction"), which is net of taxes and classified as a credit to interest charges, and (2) the common stock equity and preferred dividend component

("allowance for other funds used during construction"), which is classified as an item of other income. AFUDC is considered a cost of utility plant with a concurrent credit to income. It is excluded from taxable income for tax purposes. The rates used in determining AFUDC, which includes semi-annual compounding, were 9.2% in 1986 and 1985 and 9.0% in 1984.

33

Delmarva Power &.. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. INCOME TAXES 34 (Dollars in Thousands) 1986 Operations:

Federal: Current

$29,278 Deferred 26,779 State: Current 5,051 Deferred 4,596 Investment tax credit adjustments, net (496)

Other income: Current (27,223)

Deferred 23,160 Investment tax credit adjustments, net (1,720)

Total

$59,425 1985

$32,557 28,638 6,320 4,978 5,343 (29,788) 13,846 12,608

$74,502 1984

$36,131 27,380 6,560 4,555 2,951 1,528

$79,105 Investment tax credits utilized to reduce federal income taxes payable amounted to $5,450,000 in 1986, $24,992,000 in 1985 and $6,890,000 in 1984. The amounts for 1986, 1985 and 1984 include Employee Stock Ownership Plan credits of $464,000, $535,000 and $707,000, respectively.

The following is a reconciliation of the difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by multiplying income before tax by the federal statutory rate:

(Dollars in Thousands)

Statutory income tax expense Increase (Decrease) in taxes resulting from:

Exclusion of AFUDC for income tax purposes Depreciation not normalized ITC amortization/flow-through State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit Amortization of credit arising from sale of contracts Other, net Income tax expense 1986 1985 1984 Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate

$71,553 46% $78,725 46% $78,758 46%

(1,619)

(1) 2,852 2

(7,667)

(5) 5,333 3

(7,225)

(5)

(3,802)

(2)

(1,397)

(1) 2,196 1

(7,144)

(4) 6,160 4

(3,313)

(2)

(725)

(1,639)

(1) 1, 163 1

(4,018)

(2) 6,067 3

(2,190)

(1) 964

$59,425 38% $74,502 44% $79,105 46%

The components of deferred income taxes relate to the following tax effects of timing differences between book and tax income:

(Dollars in Thousands)

Depreciation Deferred energy costs Capitalized overhead costs Deferred recoverable plant costs Pollution control amortization ADR repair allowance Other, net Total 1986

$43,443 (2,082) 1,143 3,488 3,076 2,337 3,130

$54,535 1985

$33,394 1, 163 1,432 3,629 4,295 3,549

$47,462 1984

$18,887 954 1,508 3,687 4,863 2,036

$31,935

Delmarva Power 8(_ Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. INCOME TAXES (continued)
3. TAXES OTHER THAN INCOME
4. PENSION PLAN AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS The company has not provided deferred income taxes of approximately $83 million, based on anticipated future income tax rates, related to cumulative timing differences of $208 million arising before the adoption of full tax normalization for ratemaking purposes by regulatory authorities. The company is collecting the unnormalized taxes in its rate jurisdictions either on a levelized basis, over the life of the related plant facilities, or when actually paid to taxing authorities.

During 1986, the company received the refund of approximately $11.5 million of net federal and state taxes and interest related to taxation of the proceeds from the sale of contracts for a nuclear steam supply system (Summit). (See Note 7.) Accordingly, all tax years through 1981 were closed as of December 31, 1986.

(Dollars in Thousands) 1986 1985 1984 Delaware utility

$11,869

$12,168

$13,732 Property 6,787 6,784 6,652 Other gross receipts 5,881 5,799 4,995 Payroll, franchise and other 6,150 6,003 5,773 Total

$30,687

$30,754

$31,152 The company has a trusteed noncontributory pension plan covering all regular employees.

There were no pension contributions in 1986. Pension contributions for 1985 and 1984 were $3,284,000 and $2,354,000, respectively. The contributions provide for normal cost and amortization of prior service costs over periods of five to twenty-five years.

The actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits, determined as of January 1, 1986, was

$102,756,000 for vested benefits and $15,936,000 for accrued nonvested benefits. The market value of net assets, at that date, available for plan benefits was $253,468,000. The actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits, determined as of January 1, 1985 was $94,410,000 for vested benefits and $15,638,000 for accrued nonvested benefits. The market value of net assets, at that date, available for plan benefits was $201,398,000. The assumed rate of return used in determining the actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits was 8% for 1986 and 1985.

In 1987, the company will adopt Statement of Financial Accounting' Standards No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions." Implementation of this accounting standard will not have a material ~ffect on the company's financial position or results of operations.

The company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees.

Substantially all of the company's employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach normal retirement age while still working for the company. The company recognizes the cost of providing those benefits by expensing the insurance claims as they are paid. These costs totalled $2,009,000, $2,094,000 and $1,640,000 for 1986, 1985 and 1984, respectively.

35

Delmarva Power &._Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. CAPITALIZATION 36 RETAINED EARNINGS The current first mortgage bond indenture restricts the amount of consolidated retained earnings available for cash dividend payments on common stock to $35,000,000 plus accumulations after June 30, 1978, which available amount at December 31, 1986 was approximately $170,059,000.

PREFERRED STOCK The annual preferred dividend requirements on all outstanding preferred stock at December 31, 1986 are $6,656,000. If preferred dividends are in arrears the company may not declare common stock dividends or acquire its common stock.

WITHOUT MANDATORY REDEMPTION These series may be redeemed at the option of the company at any time, in whole or in part at the various redemption prices fixed for each series (ranging from $103 to $106 at December 31, 1986).

1) On June 4, 1986, the company issued 280,000 shares of $100 par value Adjustable Rate Preferred Stock, Series A. The dividend is cumulative and adjusted quarterly based on U. S. Treasury securities rates, but in no event will be less than 5.5% or greater than 10%.

As of December 31, 1986, the dividend rate was 5.5%. The proceeds were used to redeem 280,000 shares of $100 par value preferred stock (8% Series-150,000 shares and 8.96%

Series-130,000 shares) called on June 30, 1986. The call premium plus related unamortized premium and expenses totaling $1.3 million have been deferred in anticipation of recovery in rates. Recovery in the Maryland jurisdiction has been approved.

2) On July 2, 1986, the company paid $1.7 million to purchase 17,200 shares of its 7.88%

preferred stock. As of December 31, 1986, these shares were held in treasury.

WITH MANDATORY REDEMPTION The company redeemed 16,000 shares of the 9% series in December 1986 at $100 per share.

Eight thousand of the 16,000 shares were required to be redeemed by the sinking fund and the remaining 8,000 shares were redeemed under an option of the sinking fund. Through a 1985 tender offer for the 9% series the company purchased at $103 per share 3,150 shares in January 1986. Under certain conditions the 9% series may also be redeemed at the option of the company. Mandatory sinking fund redemptions are $800,000 per year during the next five years.

Delman'a Power &._Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. CAPITALIZATION (continued)

LONG-TERM DEBT

1) Sinking fund requirements for the First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds may be reduced by an amount not exceeding sixty percent ( 603) of the bondable value of property additions. For the years 1984-1986, property additions satisfied the sinking fund requirements.
2) Substantially all utility plant of the company now or hereafter owned is subject to the lien of the related Mortgage and Deed of Trust.
3) Pursuant to a bank loan agreement, the company has a $33,000,000 revolving credit commitment through November 1, 1989, convertible into a term loan due November 1, 1992. The loan agreement requires a commitment fee of 1/53 on any unused portion of the revolving credit commitment. Loans under the agreement may be prepaid at any time without penalty and would bear interest at 1003 of the prime rate.
4) As of December 31, 1986, $49,000,000 of Variable Rate Demand Bonds were outstanding which have put options for the bondholders whereby the bonds can be presented for payment at specified times. The bonds can be sold by the remarketing agent. The company has sufficient long-term financing agreements available to redeem any bonds not remarketed.

In recognition of the long-term financing capability, these bonds have been classified as long-term debt.

5) On January 15, 1986, the company issued $60 million of the 10Ys3 Series First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds, due January 1, 2016. The proceeds from the bond issuance were used to repay a $55 million bank loan with the balance being applied to general corporate cash requirements.
6) On June 4, 1986, the company issued $66 million of 9~3 Series First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds, due June 1, 2015. The proceeds were primarily used to redeem

$59.1 million of First Mortgage Bonds (11.753 Series, due July 1, 2010-$30 million and 113 Series, due July 1, 2005-$29.l million) called on July 1, 1986. The call premium plus related unamortized discount and expenses totaling $5.5 million have been deferred in anticipation of recovery in rates. Recovery in the Maryland jurisdiction has been approved.

7) During 1986, a subsidiary extended its borrowings under an existing loan agreement from

$25 million to $43 million. $3 million was borrowed at a rate of 8.733, maturing on February 19, 1989. $15 million was borrowed at a rate which is adjusted periodically based on prevailing rates. The $15 million loan matures on February 19, 1989 and may be prepaid at anytime, in some instances subject to a penalty.

8) Maturities of long-term debt during the next five years are 1987-$150,000; 1988-

$25,150,000; 1989-$43,150,000; 1990-$150,000; 1991-$15Q,OOO.

9) The annual interest requirements on all borrowings classified as long-term debt at December 31, 1986 are $54,315,000.

UNAMORTIZED DEBT DISCOUNT, PREMIUM AND EXPENSE These amounts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the long-term debt issues to which they pertain.

37

Delmarva Power &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. COMMITMENTS 38 The company estimates that approximately $137,779,000 excluding AFUDC, will be expended for construction purposes in 1987. The company also has commitments under long-term fuel supply contracts.

Under SFAS No. 71, regulated industries were required to adopt the lease accounting requirements of SFAS No. 13 for all capital leases commencing on or after January 1, 1983.

The company's capital leases commencing after January 1, 1983, were not material and therefore, were not recorded. All capital leases, including leases commencing prior to January 1983, were treated as operating leases. However, if capital leases had been recorded on the balance sheet, related assets and liabilities would have increased by $6,504,000 and

$8,609,000 at December 31, 1986 and 1985, respectively. The company will record its capital le~ses in 1987, as required by SFAS No. 71.

Minimum commitments as of December 31, 1986 under all non-cancellable lease agreements are as follows:

1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 Remainder Total

$ 3,059,000 2,310,000 2,080,000 537,000 260,000 3,857,000

$12,103,000 The total minimum rental commitments are applicable to the following types of property:

railroad coal cars, $1,110,000; distribution facilities, $5,157,000; transportation vehicles, $5,152,000; computer equipment, $684,000. Rentals charged to operating expenses aggregated $7,439,000 in 1986, $6,634,000 in 1985 and $6,213,000 in 1984.

Nuclear fuel requirements for Peach Bottom Generating Station are being provided by the operating company through a fuel purchase contract. The company is responsible for payment of its share of fuel consumed and interest expense. Nuclear fuel expense for Peach Bottom totalled $8,372,000 in 1986, $4,520,000 in 1985 and $6,072,000 in 1984.

The company has an agreement providing for the availability of fuel storage and pipeline facilities through 1999. Under the agreement, the company must make specified minimum payments monthly, which totalled $2,766,000 in 1986, $1,682,000 in 1985 and

$1,912,000 in 1984. The amount of required payments is $2,151,000 in 1987, $1,484,000 in 1988, $1,299,000 in 1989, $999,000 in 1990, $1,672,000 in 1991 and $12,398,000 between 1992 and 1999.

Delmarva PolVer &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. SALE OF CONTRACTS FOR NUCLEAR PLANT
8. SHORT-TERM DEBT AND LINES OF CREDIT
9. JOINTLY-OWNED PLANT The proceeds received by the company for the sale in 1975 of the contracts for a nuclear steam supply system (Summit) and related fuel, net of related plant expenditures, are classified as a deferred credit in the balance sheet. The credit has been reduced by applicable income taxes and related interest. The company has amortized the credit since 1982 in the retail jurisdictions. Amounts amortized in 1986, 1985 and 1984 were $15,707,000, $7,202,000, and $4,762,000, respectively. Amortization in 1986 included $13,455,000 of accelerated amortization due to the Delaware Summit credit payment as discussed in Note 10. Amortization in 1985 included $2,500,000 for the resale jmisdiction. As of December 31, 1986, the Summit credit was fully amortized in the Maryland and resale jurisdiction. The December 31, 1986 balance of $1,261,000 includes $674,000 for Delaware and $587,000 for Virginia.

As of December 31, 1986, the company had unused bank lines of credit of $44,500,000 and is generally required to pay commitment fees for these lines. Such lines of credit are periodically reviewed by the company, at which time they may be renewed or cancelled.

Information with respect to the company's share of jointly-owned plant, including nuclear fuel for the Salem plant, as of December 31, 1986 is as follows:

(Dollars in Thousands)

Construction Ownership Plant in Accumulated Work in Share Service Depreciation Progress

  • Nuclear:

Peach Bottom 7.51%

$ 91,307

$ 29,818

$ 3,602 Salem 7.41%

198,839 63,716 9,074 Coal-Fired:

Keystone 3.70%

11,880 4,491 299 Conemaugh 3.72%

11,692 4,982 758 Men-ill Creek Reservoir 11.91%

10,534 Transmission Facilities Various 4,462 1,252 Total

$318,180

$104,259

$24,267 The company provides its own financing for its share of improvements to jointly-owned plant. In addition, the company is a joint guarantor of loans ($662,000 proportionate share) advanced for operation of the coal mines that supply the Keystone plant. The company's share of operating and maintenance expenses of the jointly-owned plant is included in the corresponding expenses in the statements of income.

39

Delmarva Power &. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. RATE MATTERS
11. CONTINGENCIES 40 The company is subject to regulation with respect to its retail sales of electricity by the Delaware and Maryland Public Service Commissions and the Virginia State Corporation Commission, which have broad powers over rate matters, accounting and terms of service.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) exercises jurisdiction with respect to the company's accounting systems and policies and the transmission and sale at wholesale (resale) of electric energy.

1) DELAWARE ELECTRIC RETAIL Effective August 20, 1986, the Delaware Public Service Commission (DPSC) issued an interim rate order decreasing electric rates by $22.8 million annually. The interim rate reduction was based on a 133 return on equity, which was previously 15.13. In December 1986, the company made a $28.1 million payment to electric retail customers, as ordered by the DPSC. The payment consisted of the December 15, 1986 Delaware Summit credit balance and related tax benefits. Rate hearings are currently in progress to determine permanent rate levels, which will become effective in early 1987.

In September 1986, the DPSC issued an order regarding the settlement of various fuel-related issues through December 31, 1985. The settlement requires a $3 million reduction in fuel clause collections during 1987. There is no effect on the company's financial position or results of operations due to a prior accrual.

2) MARYLAND RETAIL The Maryland Public Service Commission approved a settlement agreement between the company, the Commission Staff and People's Counsel, under which the company's rates were reduced by $5.55 million, effective October 1, 1986. The rate decrease was based on an overall rate of return of 10.083. Maryland retail rates were reduced an additional $3.3 million due to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, effective January 1, 1987.
3) RESALE In December 1986, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved a settlement agreement which provided for a $1.4 million refund for the period July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986 and an annual rate reduction of $1 million effective July 1, 1986 with an additional $3 million reduction effective August 20, 1986. The settlement agreement also provides for an additional rate reduction in early 1987, primarily to reflect the effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, based on the final outcome of the current Delaware retail electric rate proceedings.
1) PLANT HELD FOR FUTURE USE In 1982, the company delayed the construction schedule for the coal-fired Nanticoke #1 generating unit. The plant is now scheduled to begin commercial operation in the late 1990's, based on the company's current load forecast. During 1986, $8.1 million of preliminary engineering and design costs were reclassified from plant held for future use to deferred charges as a result of downsizing the planned unit and the advent of new technologies after development of the preliminary conceptual* design. The remaining $6.2 million classified as plant held for future use and the $8.1 million deferred charge are both anticipated to be recoverable through the ratemaking process.

Delmarva Power &_ Li9ht Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11. CONTINGENCIES (continued)
2) NUCLEAR INSURANCE The company's insurance coverages applicable to its nuclear power units are as follows:

(Millions of Dollars)

Type and Source of Coverage Maximum Coverage Maximum Retrospective Assessment for a Single Incident Public Liability:Pl Private Price Anderson Assessment(2l Property Damage:(5l Peach Bottom(6l Salem(7l All units(Bl Replacement Power:

Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL)l9'

$160 535

$695(4)

$585

$585

$575

$3.0-$3.3 None

$1.5(3)

$3.0

$1.6

$1.6 (llThe Price-Anderson Act is scheduled to expire in August 1987 and Congress is currently considering several proposals. The company is unable to predict Congress' ultimate action and what effect such action may have on the company's liability.

(ZlRetrospective premium program under the Price-Anderson liability provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 as amended. Subject to retrospective assessment with respect to loss from an incident at any licensed nuclear reactor in the United States.

(llMaximum assessment would be $3,000,000 in the event of more than one incident in any year.

(4lLimit of liability under the Price-Anderson Act for each nuclear incident.

(SlThe company is a self insurer, to the extent of its ownership interest, for any property loss in excess of the stated amounts.

(6lfor property damage to the Peach Bottom nuclear plant facilities, the company and its co-owners have private insurance up to $5 85 million.

(7lNuclear Mutual Limited, a utility-owned mutual insurance company with which the company and the Salem nuclear facility co-owners are members. Maximum retrospective assessment is ten times annual premium with respect to loss at any nuclear generating station insured by the mutual insurance company.

(BlAll units are insured by Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL II) for losses in excess of $500 million.

Maximum retrospective assessment is seven and a half times the annual premiums.

(9lUtility owned mutual insurance company provides coverage against extra expense incurred in obtaining replacement power during prolonged accidental outages of nuclear power units. Maximum weekly indemnity for 52 weeks which commences after the first 26 weeks of an outage. Also provides for an additional 52 weeks indemnity at one-half maximum level. Maximum retrospective assessment is five times annual premiums.

3) OTHER The company is involved in certain other legal and administrative proceedings before various courts and governmental agencies concerning rates, environmental issues, fuel contracts and other matters. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on the company's financial position or results of operations.

41

Delmarva Power &_Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12. SEGMENT INFORMATION 42 Segment information with respect to electric, gas and steam operations was as follows:

(Dollars in Thousands) 1986 1985 1984 Operating Revenues:

Electric

$ 602,240

$ 605,581

$ 584,163 Gas 91,802 95,256 101,578 Steam 20,821 21,997 16,852 Total

$ 714,863

$ 722,834

$ 702,593 Operating Income:

Electric

$ 126,007

$ 127,148

$ 125,200 Gas 6,985 6,604 6,616 Steam 1,746 1,763 1,393 Total

$ 134,738

$ 135,515

$ 133,209 Net Utility Plant:l'l12l Electric

$1,306,215

$1,284,062

$1,257,728 Gas 67,267 64,967 59,097 Steam 3,944 4,142 4,349 1,377,426 1,353,171 1,321,174 Other Identifiable Assets:

Electric 112,423 144,544 157,437 Gas 17,722 32,890 42,685 Steam 409 418 440 130,554 177,852 200,562 Assets Not Allocated 234,572 141,504 69,894 Total Assets

$1,742,552

$1,672,527

$1,591,630 Depreciation Expense:

Electric 59,725 56,577 54,255 Gas 4,016 3,699 3,310 Steam 916 907 899 Total 64,657 61,183 58,464 Construction Expenditures:l3l Electric 94,337 86,073 69,233 Gas 7,751

'8,382 10,109 Steam 509 468 146 Total

$ 102,597 94,923 79,488 ll l!ncludes plant held for future use, construction work in progress and allocation of common utility property.

12lStated net of the respective accumulated provisions for depreciation.

13>Excludes allowance for funds used during construction.

Operating income by segments is reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting and ratemaking principles within the utility industry and, accordingly, includes each segment's proportionate share of taxes on income and general corporate expenses.

Delmarva Power &. Light Company NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The quarterly data presented below reflect all adjustments necessary in the opinion of the company for a fair presentation of the interim results. Quarterly data normally vary seasonably with temperature variations, differences between summer and winter rates, the timing of rate orders and the scheduled downtime and maintenance of electric generating units.

Earnings Earnings Applicable Average per Quarter Operating Operating Net to Common Shares Average Ended Revenue Income Income Stock Outstanding Share (Dollars in Thousands)

(In Thousands) 1986 March 31

$208,703 $ 38,235

$27,345

$25,405 30,482

$0.83 June 30 171,341 29,966 19, 183 17,125 30,482 0.57 September 30 201,082 45,766 35,212 33,505 30,482 1.09 December 31 133,737 20,771 14,383 12,683 30,482 0.42

$714,863 $134,738

$96,123

$88,718 30,482

$2.91 1985 March 31

$198,788 $ 36,946

$27,114

$23,964 30,482

$0.79 June 30 161,093 29,416 20,582 17,433 30,482 0.57 September 30 196,352 43,496 34,235 31,085 30,482 1.02 December 31 166,601 25,657 14,707 11,557 30,482 0.38

$722,834 $135,515

$96,638

$84,039 30,482

$2.76 In the second quarter of 1985, adjustments were recorded for the additional Delaware electric retail revenue refund for 1984 and additional amortization of the credit arising from the sale of contracts, which resulted from an out-of-court tax settlement. The effect of these adjustments reduced second quarter net income by approximately $1,100,000 (4¢ per share).

In the fourth quarter of 1985, the company wrote-off its share of advances under uranium supply contracts that were terminated and also accrued for a resale revenue refund. The effect of these adjustments reduced fourth quarter net income by approximately $2,063,000 (7<r-per share).

Rate decreases in the company's jurisdictions decreased net income during 1986 as follows:

first quarter-$528,000 (1.7<r-per share); second quarter-$468,000 (1.5<r-per share); third quarter-$1,578,000 (5.2<r-per share); fourth quarter-$4,179,000 (13.7<r-per share).

In the fourth quarter of 1986, the company recorded the Delaware Summit credit payment, interest on tax refunds, tax accrual adjustments, and the impact of the Tax Refmm Act of 1986 on its leveraged lease investments. The effect of these adjustments increased net income $1,119,000 (3.7<r-per share).

43

Delmarva Po1Ver &._Light Campany CONSOLIDATED STATISTICS 10 Years of Review 1986 1985 1984 1983 ELECTRIC REVENUES (thousands):

Residential

$ 217,393

$ 212,254

$ 205,910

$ 193,021 Commercial 169,157 168,957 156,507 140,809 Industrial 127,900 135,141 128,833 126,703 Other utilities, etc.

80,291 79,399 79,235 68,991 Miscellaneous revenues 7,499 9,830 13,678 12,728 Total electric revenues

$ 602,240

$ 605,581

$ 584,163

$ 542,252 ELECTRIC SALES

( 1,000 kilowatt-hours):

Residential 2,496,099 2,256,922 2,249,270 2,136,265 Commercial 2,370,775 2,165,685 2,073,457 1,844,324 Industrial 2,753,902 2,606,466 2,569,572 2,600,492 Other utilities, etc.

1,585,019 1,501,447 1,415,934 1,297,395 Total electric sales 9,205,795 8,530,520 8,308,233 7,878,476 ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS (end of period):

Residential 293,452 283,911 275,175 267,357 Commercial 35,089 33,189 31,548 30,525 Industrial 853 893 929 949 Other utilities, etc.

517 492 502 434 Total electric customers 329,911 318,485 308,154 299,265 GAS REVENUES (thousands):

Residential 43,145 39,224 40,933 36,694 Commercial 18,523 17,901 18,663 16,527 Industrial 16,995 19,762 22,940 23,232 Interruptible 11,464 17,419 18,098 17,026 Other utilities, etc.

142 130 160 115 Miscellaneous revenues 1,533 820 784 764 Total gas revenues 91,802 95,256

$ 101,578 94,358 GAS SALES (million cubic feet):

Residential 6,201 5,622 6,213 5,640 Commercial 2,906 2,742 2,971 2,677 Industrial 3,338 3,579 4,245 4,378 Interruptible 3,471 3,734 3,769 3,723 Other utilities, etc.

36 31 41 31 Total gas sales 15,952 15,708 17,239 16,449 GAS CUSTOMERS (end of period):

Residential 72,685 70,804 70,183 69,608 Commercial 4,693 4,417 4,233 4,075 Industrial 158 160 165 160 Interruptible 14 15 19 19 Other utilities, etc.

1 1

1 Total gas customers 77,551 75,397 74,601 73,863 STEAM SERVICE Electricity delivered 370,802 335,308 298,203 309,043

( 1,000 kilowatt-hours)

Steam delivered 6,627,130 6,794,105 6,922,416 6,965,904

( 1,000 pounds) 44

Average Annual Compound%

1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 Rate of Growth

$183,258

$164,919

$144,637

$115,381

$105,237

$ 97,691

$ 80,416 10.46 137,434 123,099 112,166 91,798 82,196 74,641 60, 111 10.90 127,441 129,601 116,401 98,023 83,972 76,801 64,458 7.09 73,469 73,602 63,698 53,782 40,840 38,974 34,896 8.69 13,168 12,898 7,025 4,682 5,261 3,461 2,398 12.08

$534,770

$504,119

$443,927

$363,666

$318,106

$291,568

$242,279 9.53 2,026,398 1,996,647 2,046,546 1,968,452 1,979,624 1,924,723 1,787,663 3.39 1,729,863' 1,660,147

. 1,648,776 1,598,299 1,568,600 1,495,796 1,412,259 5.32 2,255,673 2,454,685 2,429,842 2,624,438 2,418,527 2,277,630 2,260,661 1.99 1,237,508 1,283,845 1,335,216 1,300,611 1,281,498 1,207,941 1,199,155 2.83 7,249,442 7,395,324 7,460,380 7,491,800 7,248,249 6,906,090 6,659,738 3.29 260,371 255,646 246,887 242,745 237,925 233,106 230,579 2.44 29,966 29,450 28,162 27,998 28,421 29,648 28,345 2.16 741 788 821 874 858 921 1,002

( 1.60) 434 434 440 478 480 561 550 (0.62) 291,512 286,318 276,310 272,095 267,684 264,236 260,476 2.39

$ 36,505

$ 34,123

$ 26,525

$ 25,719

$ 28,370

$ 21,829

$ 18,826 8.65 15,792 14,344 10,342 8,954 10, 154 7,133 6,062 11.82 20, 112 22,259 12,404 9,884 10,191 6,950 5,984 11.00 11,733 11,711 9,293 4,440 716 169 1,301 24.31 53 61 46 55 93 49 44 12.43 552 572 430 270 116 103 31 47.71

$ 84,747

$ 83,070

$ 59,040

$ 49,322

$ 49,640

$ 36,233

$ 32,248 11.03 6,062 6,193 6,321 6,423 6,941 6,751 6,956 (1.14) 2,768 2,704 2,683 2,415 2,593 2,439 2,586 1.17 4,108 4,809 3,937 3,388 3,290 2,811 3,264 0.22 2,656 2,802 2,738 1,720 319 81 953 13.80 10 12 14 16 29 17 20 5.76 15,604 16,520 15,693 13,962 13,172 12,099 13,779 1.48 69,092 68,608 67,784 66,631 66,364 66,231 67,754 0.71 4,057 3,967 3,846 3,712 3,773 3,738 4,154 1.23 166 167 155 131 163 163 198 (2.23) 18 16 16 16 21 21 21 (3.97) 1 1

1 1

1 1

1 73,334 72,759 71,802 70,491 70,322 70,154 72,128 0.73 322,804 343,063 328,420 262,159 270,006 289,049 318,389 1.54 7,778,929 7,673,420 7,570,944 6,378,705 6,016,095 4,888,366 5,301,421 2.26 45

Delmarva Power &._Light Company STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION 46 SHAREHOLDER SERVICES Carol C. Conrad, Assistant Secretary Delmarva Power & Light Company 800 King Street* P.O. Box 231 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 Telephone (302) 429-3355.

STOCK SYMBOL Common Stock, DEW - listed on the New York and Philadelphia Stock Exchanges.

ANNUAL MEETING The Annual Meeting will be held on April 28 at 11:00 a.m., in the Clayton Hall, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.

ADDITIONAL REPORTS To supplement information in this Annual Report, a Financial and Statistical Review (1975-1985) and the Form 10-K are available upon request. Please write to Shareholder Services, Delmarva Power, 800 King Street, P.O. Box 231, Wilmington, Delaware 19899.

TRUSTEES First Mortgage and Collateral Trust Bonds - Chemical Bank, New York, New York Pollution Control Revenue Bonds -

Mellon Bank (DE) N.A.

Wilmington, Delaware Bank of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware Wilmington Trust Company, Wilmington, Delaware Irving Trust Company New York, New York.

TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS Preferred Stock-Wilmington Trust Company, Corporate Trust Division Rodney Square North Wilmington, Delaware 19890.

COMMON STOCK -

Wilmington Trust Company, Corporate Trust Division Rodney Square North Wilmington, Delaware 19890.

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company Stock Transfer Department P.O. Box 24935 Church Street Station New York, New York 10249.

REGULATORY COMMISSIONS Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426.

Delaware Public Service Commission, 1560 S. du Pont Highway, Dover, Delaware 19901.

Maryland Public Service Commission, American Building, 231 East Baltimore Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

Virginia State Corporate Commission, P.O. Box 1197, Richmond, Virginia 23209.

Delmarva Power &._Light Company STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION QUARTERLY COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS AND PRICE RANGES COMMON STOCK The company's common stock is listed in the New York and Philadelphia Stock Exchanges and has unlisted trading privileges on the Cincinnati, Midwest and Pacific Stock Exchanges.

The company had 53,446 holders of common stock as of December 31, 1986.

1986 1985 Dividend Price Dividend Price Declared High Low Declared High Low First Quarter

$.505 30%

25%

$.48 23Ys 21 Second Quarter

.505 34%

291/4

.48 26llz 22Ys Third Quarter

.505 381/s 30%

.48 26%

22}4 Fourth Quarter

.53 341/2 30%

.505 28!4 22%

(

47

Delman-a Po1Ver &._Light Compan,v OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OFFICERS DIRECTORS 48 NEVIUS M. CURTIS Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer HOWARD E. COSGROVE Executive Vice President ROGER D. CAMPBELL Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer H. RAY LANDON Senior Vice President HARLAND M. WAKEFIELD, jR.

Senior Vice President WAYNE A. LYONS Vice President DONALD E. CAIN Division Vice President, Northern Division DONALD P. CONNELLY Secretary CHARLOTTE LEE CANNON Director of H. P. Cannon & Son, Inc.

(warehousing) Bridgeville, Delaware OSCAR L. CAREY President and Director of Larmar Corporation (general real estate and home builders) Salisbury, Maryland JOHN R. COOPER Director of Environmental Affairs of E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (a diversified chemical, energy and specialty products company)

Wilmington, Delaware HOWARD E. COSGROVE Executive Vice President of the Company NEVIUS M. CURTIS Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company SALLY v. HAWKINS Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Delaware Broadcasting Company and President and General Manager of Station WILM (radio broadcasting)

Wilmington, Delaware DONALD W. MABE President and Vice Chairman of Perdue Farms Incorporated (integrated poultry company)

Salisbury, Maryland jAMES 0. PIPPIN, jR.

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Centreville National Bank of Maryland, Centreville, Maryland RICHARD H. EVANS Vice President, Corporate Communications PAUL S. GERRITSEN Vice President, Regulatory Practices BARBARA S. GRAHAM Treasurer KENNETH K. JONES Vice President, Planning CHARLES MARCHYSHYN Comptroller FRANK j. PERRY, JR.

Vice President, Gas Division THOMAS s. SHAW, JR.

Vice President, Production DUANE C. TAYLOR Vice President, Information Systems D. WAYNE YERKES Division Vice President, Southern Division WILLIAM G. SIMERAL Director, Executive Vice President and member of the Executive Committee of E. I.

du Pont de Nemours & Company (a diversified chemical, energy and specialty products company)

Wilmington, Delaware DAVID D. WAKEFIELD Senior Vice President of Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, New York, New York; Director of Continental American Life Insurance Company, Wilmington, Delaware HARLAND M. WAKEFIELD, jR.

Senior Vice President of the Company EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Nevius M. Curtis, Chairperson; Oscar L. Carey; William G. Simeral; David D.

Wakefield; Harland M. Wakefield, Jr.

AUDIT COMMITTEE Oscar L. Carey, Chairperson; John R.

Cooper; James 0. Pippin, Jr.

NOMINATING COMMITTEE Sally V. Hawkins, Chairperson; Nevius M. Curtis; James 0. Pippin, Jr.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE William G. Simeral, Chairperson; Oscar L. Carey; Nevius M. Curtis; David D. Wakefield INVESTMENT COMMITTEE David D. Wakefield, Chairperson; Nevius M. Curtis; James 0. Pippin, Jr.