ML18164A085: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Enclosure 3 Reactor Oversight Process Meeting Briefing Material May 24, 2018 ML18164A085 | {{#Wiki_filter:Enclosure 3 Reactor Oversight Process Meeting Briefing Material May 24, 2018 ML18164A085 | ||
Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment Mary Anderson, Self Assessment Lead Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | 1 1 | ||
Key Messages | Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment Mary Anderson, Self Assessment Lead Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Key Messages | ||
* Fully implemented the ROP self-assessment process: | * Fully implemented the ROP self-assessment process: | ||
- Completed ROP metrics assessment | |||
- Performed program evaluations | |||
- Conducted focused assessment on the engineering inspection program | |||
* ROP provided objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable oversight | * ROP provided objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable oversight | ||
* Identified improvements to the ROP 2 | * Identified improvements to the ROP 2 | ||
Revised ROP Self-Assessment Process | 2 Revised ROP Self-Assessment Process | ||
* Three elements defined in IMC 0307: | * Three elements defined in IMC 0307: | ||
: 1. Measure effectiveness of and adherence to ROP governance documents | : 1. Measure effectiveness of and adherence to ROP governance documents | ||
: 2. Monitor ROP revisions and to assess effectiveness of recent changes | : 2. Monitor ROP revisions and to assess effectiveness of recent changes | ||
: 3. Conduct focused assessments and regional peer reviews 3 | : 3. Conduct focused assessments and regional peer reviews 3 | ||
CY 2017 ROP Self-Assessment | 4 Element 1 CY 2017 ROP Self-Assessment Element 2 Element 3 | ||
CY 2017 Results Element 1: Measure effectiveness of and adherence to the current program | 3 CY 2017 Results Element 1: Measure effectiveness of and adherence to the current program | ||
* Metrics assessment: | * Metrics assessment: | ||
- 22 of 26 metrics were determined to be Green | |||
- Three metrics were Red; one metric was Yellow | |||
* Responsiveness to ROP feedback forms (Red) | * Responsiveness to ROP feedback forms (Red) | ||
* Timely completion of performance deficiency determinations (Red) | * Timely completion of performance deficiency determinations (Red) | ||
* Performance of lessons learned evaluations (Red) | * Performance of lessons learned evaluations (Red) | ||
* Completion of final significance determinations (Yellow) | * Completion of final significance determinations (Yellow) | ||
- Actions underway to address Red metrics | |||
* Program evaluations: | * Program evaluations: | ||
- PI, inspection, SDP, and assessment programs 5 | |||
Element 2: Monitor ROP revisions and assess effectiveness of recent program changes | |||
* ROP revisions that were monitored: | * ROP revisions that were monitored: | ||
- OIG audit of IMC 2515, Appendix C inspections | |||
* No effectiveness reviews were conducted in CY 2017: | * No effectiveness reviews were conducted in CY 2017: | ||
- Several recent ROP changes; allowing for operating time before assessing | |||
- Three reviews planned/underway in CY 2018 6 | |||
CY 2017 Results | |||
4 Element 3: Conduct focused assessment and regional peer review | |||
* Regional peer review: | * Regional peer review: | ||
- Biennial. Not required in 2017. | |||
* ROP focused reviews: | * ROP focused reviews: | ||
- Enhancements to the engineering inspection program. | |||
* ROP Baseline IP review: | * ROP Baseline IP review: | ||
- Biennial. Not required in 2017. | |||
7 CY 2017 Conclusions | 7 CY 2017 Results CY 2017 Conclusions | ||
* ROP provided effective oversight by meeting program goals and achieving intended outcomes | * ROP provided effective oversight by meeting program goals and achieving intended outcomes | ||
* Ensured openness and effectiveness in supporting NRC mission and strategic goals of safety and security | * Ensured openness and effectiveness in supporting NRC mission and strategic goals of safety and security | ||
* Program was successful in being objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable | * Program was successful in being objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable | ||
* Program improvements implemented and underway based on lessons learned and feedback from stakeholders 8 | * Program improvements implemented and underway based on lessons learned and feedback from stakeholders 8 | ||
Plans for CY 2018 ROP Self-Assessment Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 | 5 9 | ||
2018 Planned Effectiveness Reviews | Plans for CY 2018 ROP Self-Assessment Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 2018 Planned Effectiveness Reviews | ||
: 1. Inspection Finding Resolution Management (IFRM) pilot (underway) | : 1. Inspection Finding Resolution Management (IFRM) pilot (underway) | ||
: 2. Closure of IP 95001 inspections (underway) | : 2. Closure of IP 95001 inspections (underway) | ||
: 3. Safety Culture Common Language 10 | : 3. Safety Culture Common Language 10}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:24, 5 January 2025
| ML18164A085 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/13/2018 |
| From: | Jo Bridge NRC/NRR/DIRS/IRAB |
| To: | |
| Bridge J, NRR/DIRS, 415-4052 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML18164A085 (6) | |
Text
Enclosure 3 Reactor Oversight Process Meeting Briefing Material May 24, 2018 ML18164A085
1 1
Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment Mary Anderson, Self Assessment Lead Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Key Messages
- Fully implemented the ROP self-assessment process:
- Completed ROP metrics assessment
- Performed program evaluations
- Conducted focused assessment on the engineering inspection program
- ROP provided objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable oversight
- Identified improvements to the ROP 2
2 Revised ROP Self-Assessment Process
- Three elements defined in IMC 0307:
- 1. Measure effectiveness of and adherence to ROP governance documents
- 2. Monitor ROP revisions and to assess effectiveness of recent changes
- 3. Conduct focused assessments and regional peer reviews 3
4 Element 1 CY 2017 ROP Self-Assessment Element 2 Element 3
3 CY 2017 Results Element 1: Measure effectiveness of and adherence to the current program
- Metrics assessment:
- 22 of 26 metrics were determined to be Green
- Three metrics were Red; one metric was Yellow
- Responsiveness to ROP feedback forms (Red)
- Timely completion of performance deficiency determinations (Red)
- Performance of lessons learned evaluations (Red)
- Completion of final significance determinations (Yellow)
- Actions underway to address Red metrics
- Program evaluations:
- PI, inspection, SDP, and assessment programs 5
Element 2: Monitor ROP revisions and assess effectiveness of recent program changes
- ROP revisions that were monitored:
- OIG audit of IMC 2515, Appendix C inspections
- No effectiveness reviews were conducted in CY 2017:
- Several recent ROP changes; allowing for operating time before assessing
- Three reviews planned/underway in CY 2018 6
CY 2017 Results
4 Element 3: Conduct focused assessment and regional peer review
- Regional peer review:
- Biennial. Not required in 2017.
- ROP focused reviews:
- Enhancements to the engineering inspection program.
- ROP Baseline IP review:
- Biennial. Not required in 2017.
7 CY 2017 Results CY 2017 Conclusions
- ROP provided effective oversight by meeting program goals and achieving intended outcomes
- Ensured openness and effectiveness in supporting NRC mission and strategic goals of safety and security
- Program was successful in being objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable
- Program improvements implemented and underway based on lessons learned and feedback from stakeholders 8
5 9
Plans for CY 2018 ROP Self-Assessment Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 2018 Planned Effectiveness Reviews
- 1. Inspection Finding Resolution Management (IFRM) pilot (underway)
- 2. Closure of IP 95001 inspections (underway)
- 3. Safety Culture Common Language 10