ML18164A085: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Enclosure 3 Reactor Oversight Process Meeting Briefing Material May 24, 2018 ML18164A085
{{#Wiki_filter:Enclosure 3 Reactor Oversight Process Meeting Briefing Material May 24, 2018 ML18164A085  


Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment Mary Anderson, Self Assessment Lead Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1
1 1
Key Messages
Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment Mary Anderson, Self Assessment Lead Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Key Messages
* Fully implemented the ROP self-assessment process:
* Fully implemented the ROP self-assessment process:
  - Completed ROP metrics assessment
- Completed ROP metrics assessment
  - Performed program evaluations
- Performed program evaluations
  - Conducted focused assessment on the engineering inspection program
- Conducted focused assessment on the engineering inspection program
* ROP provided objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable oversight
* ROP provided objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable oversight
* Identified improvements to the ROP 2
* Identified improvements to the ROP 2
1


Revised ROP Self-Assessment Process
2 Revised ROP Self-Assessment Process
* Three elements defined in IMC 0307:
* Three elements defined in IMC 0307:
: 1. Measure effectiveness of and adherence to ROP governance documents
: 1. Measure effectiveness of and adherence to ROP governance documents
: 2. Monitor ROP revisions and to assess effectiveness of recent changes
: 2. Monitor ROP revisions and to assess effectiveness of recent changes
: 3. Conduct focused assessments and regional peer reviews 3
: 3. Conduct focused assessments and regional peer reviews 3
CY 2017 ROP Self-Assessment Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 4
4 Element 1 CY 2017 ROP Self-Assessment Element 2 Element 3
2


CY 2017 Results Element 1: Measure effectiveness of and adherence to the current program
3 CY 2017 Results Element 1: Measure effectiveness of and adherence to the current program
* Metrics assessment:
* Metrics assessment:
    - 22 of 26 metrics were determined to be Green
- 22 of 26 metrics were determined to be Green
    - Three metrics were Red; one metric was Yellow
- Three metrics were Red; one metric was Yellow
* Responsiveness to ROP feedback forms (Red)
* Responsiveness to ROP feedback forms (Red)
* Timely completion of performance deficiency determinations (Red)
* Timely completion of performance deficiency determinations (Red)
* Performance of lessons learned evaluations (Red)
* Performance of lessons learned evaluations (Red)
* Completion of final significance determinations (Yellow)
* Completion of final significance determinations (Yellow)
    - Actions underway to address Red metrics
- Actions underway to address Red metrics
* Program evaluations:
* Program evaluations:
    - PI, inspection, SDP, and assessment programs 5
- PI, inspection, SDP, and assessment programs 5
CY 2017 Results Element 2: Monitor ROP revisions and assess effectiveness of recent program changes
Element 2: Monitor ROP revisions and assess effectiveness of recent program changes
* ROP revisions that were monitored:
* ROP revisions that were monitored:
  - OIG audit of IMC 2515, Appendix C inspections
- OIG audit of IMC 2515, Appendix C inspections
* No effectiveness reviews were conducted in CY 2017:
* No effectiveness reviews were conducted in CY 2017:
  - Several recent ROP changes; allowing for operating time before assessing
- Several recent ROP changes; allowing for operating time before assessing
  - Three reviews planned/underway in CY 2018 6
- Three reviews planned/underway in CY 2018 6
3
CY 2017 Results


CY 2017 Results Element 3: Conduct focused assessment and regional peer review
4 Element 3: Conduct focused assessment and regional peer review
* Regional peer review:
* Regional peer review:
  - Biennial. Not required in 2017.
- Biennial. Not required in 2017.
* ROP focused reviews:
* ROP focused reviews:
  - Enhancements to the engineering inspection program.
- Enhancements to the engineering inspection program.
* ROP Baseline IP review:
* ROP Baseline IP review:
  - Biennial. Not required in 2017.
- Biennial. Not required in 2017.
7 CY 2017 Conclusions
7 CY 2017 Results CY 2017 Conclusions
* ROP provided effective oversight by meeting program goals and achieving intended outcomes
* ROP provided effective oversight by meeting program goals and achieving intended outcomes
* Ensured openness and effectiveness in supporting NRC mission and strategic goals of safety and security
* Ensured openness and effectiveness in supporting NRC mission and strategic goals of safety and security
* Program was successful in being objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable
* Program was successful in being objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable
* Program improvements implemented and underway based on lessons learned and feedback from stakeholders 8
* Program improvements implemented and underway based on lessons learned and feedback from stakeholders 8
4


Plans for CY 2018 ROP Self-Assessment Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 9
5 9
2018 Planned Effectiveness Reviews
Plans for CY 2018 ROP Self-Assessment Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 2018 Planned Effectiveness Reviews
: 1. Inspection Finding Resolution Management (IFRM) pilot (underway)
: 1. Inspection Finding Resolution Management (IFRM) pilot (underway)
: 2. Closure of IP 95001 inspections (underway)
: 2. Closure of IP 95001 inspections (underway)
: 3. Safety Culture Common Language 10 5}}
: 3. Safety Culture Common Language 10}}

Latest revision as of 18:24, 5 January 2025

Enclosure Briefing Material
ML18164A085
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/13/2018
From: Jo Bridge
NRC/NRR/DIRS/IRAB
To:
Bridge J, NRR/DIRS, 415-4052
References
Download: ML18164A085 (6)


Text

Enclosure 3 Reactor Oversight Process Meeting Briefing Material May 24, 2018 ML18164A085

1 1

Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment Mary Anderson, Self Assessment Lead Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Key Messages

  • Fully implemented the ROP self-assessment process:

- Completed ROP metrics assessment

- Performed program evaluations

- Conducted focused assessment on the engineering inspection program

  • ROP provided objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable oversight
  • Identified improvements to the ROP 2

2 Revised ROP Self-Assessment Process

  • Three elements defined in IMC 0307:
1. Measure effectiveness of and adherence to ROP governance documents
2. Monitor ROP revisions and to assess effectiveness of recent changes
3. Conduct focused assessments and regional peer reviews 3

4 Element 1 CY 2017 ROP Self-Assessment Element 2 Element 3

3 CY 2017 Results Element 1: Measure effectiveness of and adherence to the current program

  • Metrics assessment:

- 22 of 26 metrics were determined to be Green

- Three metrics were Red; one metric was Yellow

  • Responsiveness to ROP feedback forms (Red)
  • Timely completion of performance deficiency determinations (Red)
  • Performance of lessons learned evaluations (Red)
  • Completion of final significance determinations (Yellow)

- Actions underway to address Red metrics

  • Program evaluations:

- PI, inspection, SDP, and assessment programs 5

Element 2: Monitor ROP revisions and assess effectiveness of recent program changes

  • ROP revisions that were monitored:

- OIG audit of IMC 2515, Appendix C inspections

  • No effectiveness reviews were conducted in CY 2017:

- Several recent ROP changes; allowing for operating time before assessing

- Three reviews planned/underway in CY 2018 6

CY 2017 Results

4 Element 3: Conduct focused assessment and regional peer review

  • Regional peer review:

- Biennial. Not required in 2017.

  • ROP focused reviews:

- Enhancements to the engineering inspection program.

  • ROP Baseline IP review:

- Biennial. Not required in 2017.

7 CY 2017 Results CY 2017 Conclusions

  • ROP provided effective oversight by meeting program goals and achieving intended outcomes
  • Ensured openness and effectiveness in supporting NRC mission and strategic goals of safety and security
  • Program was successful in being objective, risk-informed, understandable, and predictable
  • Program improvements implemented and underway based on lessons learned and feedback from stakeholders 8

5 9

Plans for CY 2018 ROP Self-Assessment Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 2018 Planned Effectiveness Reviews

1. Inspection Finding Resolution Management (IFRM) pilot (underway)
2. Closure of IP 95001 inspections (underway)
3. Safety Culture Common Language 10