ML18338A068: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Progress Report on Spent Fuel Cladding Integrity Tests Meraj Rahimi Chief of Renewals and Materials Branch Division of Spent Fuel Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
{{#Wiki_filter:Progress Report on Spent Fuel Cladding Integrity Tests Meraj Rahimi Chief of Renewals and Materials Branch Division of Spent Fuel Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  


Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Safety Functions Subcriticality Unsustainable fission reaction Radiation Shielding                          Confinement / Containment On-site worker and public dose limits               No release of radioactive material Structural Performance Maintain analyzed configuration (no operational problems with respect to spent fuel removal)
Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Safety Functions 2
Heat Removal Fuel temperature  Cladding stresses December 11, 2018                  DSFM REG CON 2018                            2
Subcriticality Unsustainable fission reaction Confinement / Containment No release of radioactive material Radiation Shielding On-site worker and public dose limits Heat Removal Fuel temperature Cladding stresses December 11, 2018 DSFM REG CON 2018 Structural Performance Maintain analyzed configuration (no operational problems with respect to spent fuel removal)


Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Review Guidance Framework Fuel temperature  Cladding stresses ISG-11, Revision 3 Cladding Considerations (Peak Cladding Temperature / Thermal Cycling)
ISG-11, Revision 3 Cladding Considerations (Peak Cladding Temperature / Thermal Cycling)
Dry Storage / Transport NUREG-2215                                                  NUREG-2216 Standard Review Plan                                         Standard Review Plan Dry Storage                                               Transportation NUREG-2214                     NUREG-2224 Managing Aging Processes     Dry Storage / Transportation in Storage                  High Burnup Fuel December 11, 2018                     DSFM REG CON 2018                             3
Dry Storage / Transport Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Review Guidance Framework 3
NUREG-2216 Standard Review Plan Transportation NUREG-2224 Dry Storage / Transportation High Burnup Fuel NUREG-2214 Managing Aging Processes in Storage NUREG-2215 Standard Review Plan Dry Storage December 11, 2018 DSFM REG CON 2018 Fuel temperature Cladding stresses


Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Technical Bases / Position Considerations                  Performance-Related Phenomena ISG-11, Rev. 3, MAPS Report ISG-11, Rev. 3
Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Technical Bases / Position 4
* Hydride reorientation
Hydride reorientation Delayed hydride cracking Thermal creep Low-temperature creep Mechanical overload Oxidation Pitting corrosion Galvanic corrosion SCC Radiation embrittlement Fatigue None of these mechanisms are expected to compromise cladding integrity during transportation and dry storage up to 60 years.
: 1. Peak cladding temperature /
Data expected to confirm conclusions for dry storage beyond 20 years.
* Delayed hydride cracking Controlled hoop stresses
December 11, 2018 DSFM REG CON 2018 ISG-11, Rev. 3 1.
* Thermal creep 400 °C (758 °F) / 90 MPa
Peak cladding temperature /
* Low-temperature creep
Controlled hoop stresses 400 °C (758 °F) / 90 MPa 2.
* Mechanical overload
Limited thermal cycling SRPs / MAPS Report 3.
: 2. Limited thermal cycling
Inert environment 4.
* Oxidation SRPs / MAPS Report
Limited residual water Considerations Performance-Related Phenomena ISG-11, Rev. 3, MAPS Report
* Pitting corrosion
* Galvanic corrosion
: 3. Inert environment
* SCC
: 4. Limited residual water
* Radiation embrittlement
* Fatigue
* None of these mechanisms are expected to compromise cladding integrity during transportation and dry storage up to 60 years.
* Data expected to confirm conclusions for dry storage beyond 20 years.
December 11, 2018                       DSFM REG CON 2018                         4


Where to next?
Where to next?
* What have we learned?
5 What have we learned?
      - Better understanding of hydride reorientation
- Better understanding of hydride reorientation Additional confirmatory testing under DOEs Sister Rod Program
* Additional confirmatory testing under DOEs Sister Rod Program
- Better understanding of rod internal pressures / gas communication
      - Better understanding of rod internal pressures / gas communication
- Improved benchmarking of thermal models Revisit peak cladding temperatures
      - Improved benchmarking of thermal models
- Identifying new metrics for cladding performance (e.g., cladding stresses)
* Revisit peak cladding temperatures
- Risk informing cladding performance (e.g., tolerance of peak cladding temperature, consequences to other safety disciplines)
      - Identifying new metrics for cladding performance (e.g., cladding stresses)
- Defining staffs expectations for technical bases in support of a higher peak cladding temperature December 11, 2018 DSFM REG CON 2018}}
      - Risk informing cladding performance (e.g., tolerance of peak cladding temperature, consequences to other safety disciplines)
      - Defining staffs expectations for technical bases in support of a higher peak cladding temperature December 11, 2018                           DSFM REG CON 2018                 5}}

Latest revision as of 08:54, 5 January 2025

Presentation Slides: Status of Spent Fuel Cladding Tests
ML18338A068
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/04/2018
From: Meraj Rahimi
Renewals and Materials Branch
To:
Lindsay H
Shared Package
ML18338A059 List:
References
Download: ML18338A068 (5)


Text

Progress Report on Spent Fuel Cladding Integrity Tests Meraj Rahimi Chief of Renewals and Materials Branch Division of Spent Fuel Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Safety Functions 2

Subcriticality Unsustainable fission reaction Confinement / Containment No release of radioactive material Radiation Shielding On-site worker and public dose limits Heat Removal Fuel temperature Cladding stresses December 11, 2018 DSFM REG CON 2018 Structural Performance Maintain analyzed configuration (no operational problems with respect to spent fuel removal)

ISG-11, Revision 3 Cladding Considerations (Peak Cladding Temperature / Thermal Cycling)

Dry Storage / Transport Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Review Guidance Framework 3

NUREG-2216 Standard Review Plan Transportation NUREG-2224 Dry Storage / Transportation High Burnup Fuel NUREG-2214 Managing Aging Processes in Storage NUREG-2215 Standard Review Plan Dry Storage December 11, 2018 DSFM REG CON 2018 Fuel temperature Cladding stresses

Spent Fuel Cladding Performance Technical Bases / Position 4

Hydride reorientation Delayed hydride cracking Thermal creep Low-temperature creep Mechanical overload Oxidation Pitting corrosion Galvanic corrosion SCC Radiation embrittlement Fatigue None of these mechanisms are expected to compromise cladding integrity during transportation and dry storage up to 60 years.

Data expected to confirm conclusions for dry storage beyond 20 years.

December 11, 2018 DSFM REG CON 2018 ISG-11, Rev. 3 1.

Peak cladding temperature /

Controlled hoop stresses 400 °C (758 °F) / 90 MPa 2.

Limited thermal cycling SRPs / MAPS Report 3.

Inert environment 4.

Limited residual water Considerations Performance-Related Phenomena ISG-11, Rev. 3, MAPS Report

Where to next?

5 What have we learned?

- Better understanding of hydride reorientation Additional confirmatory testing under DOEs Sister Rod Program

- Better understanding of rod internal pressures / gas communication

- Improved benchmarking of thermal models Revisit peak cladding temperatures

- Identifying new metrics for cladding performance (e.g., cladding stresses)

- Risk informing cladding performance (e.g., tolerance of peak cladding temperature, consequences to other safety disciplines)

- Defining staffs expectations for technical bases in support of a higher peak cladding temperature December 11, 2018 DSFM REG CON 2018