ML19155A041: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML19155A041 | | number = ML19155A041 | ||
| issue date = 06/03/2019 | | issue date = 06/03/2019 | ||
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Fifth Ten-Year Interval Relief Request | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Fifth Ten-Year Interval Relief Request 1 | ||
| author name = Wentzel M | | author name = Wentzel M | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-DRMAPEm Resource From: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-DRMAPEm Resource From: | ||
Wentzel, Michael Sent: | |||
Monday, June 3, 2019 3:36 PM To: | |||
Mike.Snyder@fpl.com Cc: | |||
Frehafer, Ken; Mack, Jarrett; Shoop, Undine | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Fifth Ten-Year Interval Relief Request #1 (EPID L-2019-LLR-0044) | St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Fifth Ten-Year Interval Relief Request #1 (EPID L-2019-LLR-0044) | ||
Mr. Snyder, By letter dated May 8, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML19129A115), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request for an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section XI Class 1 and 2 piping examination requirements for Categories B-F, B-J, C-F-1 and C-F-2 of Tables IWB-2500-1 and IWC-2500-1 for Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-67 for St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff performs acceptance reviews of applications to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the staff to complete its technical reviews. The acceptance reviews also intend to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | Mr. Snyder, By {{letter dated|date=May 8, 2019|text=letter dated May 8, 2019}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML19129A115), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request for an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section XI Class 1 and 2 piping examination requirements for Categories B-F, B-J, C-F-1 and C-F-2 of Tables IWB-2500-1 and IWC-2500-1 for Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-67 for St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff performs acceptance reviews of applications to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the staff to complete its technical reviews. The acceptance reviews also intend to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), | Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), | ||
the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety. | the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety. | ||
The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence. | ||
The staff has estimated that it will take approximately | The staff has estimated that it will take approximately 250 hours to complete its review of this proposed alternative and that it will complete its review within one year of acceptance of the application (i.e., by June 2020). These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and could change because of several factors, such as requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of application scope, review by NRC advisory committees, or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance of or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. If complexities or challenges during the review cause significant changes to the estimated hours or completion date, the assigned project manager will communicate the new estimates and reasons for the changes to the licensee during routine interactions. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6459 or michael.wentzel@nrc.gov. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6459 or michael.wentzel@nrc.gov. | ||
Sincerely, Michael Wentzel, Project Manager | Sincerely, Michael Wentzel, Project Manager | ||
Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | 2 Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: | ||
NRR_DRMA Email Number: | |||
27 Mail Envelope Properties (BL0PR0901MB3250096B234281FF2F25D838E7140) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Fifth Ten-Year Interval Relief Request | St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Fifth Ten-Year Interval Relief Request | ||
#1 (EPID L-2019-LLR-0044) | #1 (EPID L-2019-LLR-0044) | ||
Sent Date: | Sent Date: | ||
6/3/2019 3:36:25 PM Received Date: | |||
6/3/2019 3:36:25 PM From: | |||
Wentzel, Michael Created By: | |||
Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
"Frehafer, Ken" <Ken.Frehafer@fpl.com> | "Frehafer, Ken" <Ken.Frehafer@fpl.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Mack, Jarrett" <Jarrett.Mack@fpl.com> | Tracking Status: None "Mack, Jarrett" <Jarrett.Mack@fpl.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Shoop, Undine" <Undine.Shoop@nrc.gov> | Tracking Status: None "Shoop, Undine" <Undine.Shoop@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Mike.Snyder@fpl.com" <Mike.Snyder@fpl.com> | Tracking Status: None "Mike.Snyder@fpl.com" <Mike.Snyder@fpl.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
BL0PR0901MB3250.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3281 6/3/2019 3:36:25 PM Options Priority: | |||
Standard Return Notification: | |||
No Reply Requested: | |||
No Sensitivity: | |||
Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | Recipients Received:}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:08, 5 January 2025
| ML19155A041 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 06/03/2019 |
| From: | Michael Wentzel Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Snyder M Florida Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| L-2019-LLR-0044 | |
| Download: ML19155A041 (3) | |
Text
1 NRR-DRMAPEm Resource From:
Wentzel, Michael Sent:
Monday, June 3, 2019 3:36 PM To:
Mike.Snyder@fpl.com Cc:
Frehafer, Ken; Mack, Jarrett; Shoop, Undine
Subject:
St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Fifth Ten-Year Interval Relief Request #1 (EPID L-2019-LLR-0044)
Mr. Snyder, By letter dated May 8, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML19129A115), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) submitted a request for an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical EngineersSection XI Class 1 and 2 piping examination requirements for Categories B-F, B-J, C-F-1 and C-F-2 of Tables IWB-2500-1 and IWC-2500-1 for Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-67 for St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff performs acceptance reviews of applications to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the staff to complete its technical reviews. The acceptance reviews also intend to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.
The staff has estimated that it will take approximately 250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br /> to complete its review of this proposed alternative and that it will complete its review within one year of acceptance of the application (i.e., by June 2020). These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and could change because of several factors, such as requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of application scope, review by NRC advisory committees, or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance of or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. If complexities or challenges during the review cause significant changes to the estimated hours or completion date, the assigned project manager will communicate the new estimates and reasons for the changes to the licensee during routine interactions.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6459 or michael.wentzel@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, Michael Wentzel, Project Manager
2 Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_DRMA Email Number:
27 Mail Envelope Properties (BL0PR0901MB3250096B234281FF2F25D838E7140)
Subject:
St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Fifth Ten-Year Interval Relief Request
Sent Date:
6/3/2019 3:36:25 PM Received Date:
6/3/2019 3:36:25 PM From:
Wentzel, Michael Created By:
Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Frehafer, Ken" <Ken.Frehafer@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None "Mack, Jarrett" <Jarrett.Mack@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None "Shoop, Undine" <Undine.Shoop@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Mike.Snyder@fpl.com" <Mike.Snyder@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
BL0PR0901MB3250.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3281 6/3/2019 3:36:25 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: