ML19329F191: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter | {{#Wiki_filter:n. | ||
: n. | q 1 | ||
1 CODSum8IS i | |||
1 00W8f THIS DOCUMENT CONTAlNS Cam?3D'l POOR QUAllTY PAGES o.e..., c, mc..: m w.. o,c e... | |||
4..,,. | |||
o.e..., c, mc..: m w.. o,c e... 4..,,. | ..n,.. | ||
. 20,.,.. co...,7 7..... | |||
November 9, 1976 i | November 9, 1976 i | ||
/Q Director of Huclear Reactor Regulation rQ ' | |||
N/ | |||
Attention: Mr Roger Boyd, Director h, | |||
o | N Division of Project Management gy | ||
.6.g. g) | |||
QA REGULATORY JUIDE hESPONSES | US Nuclear Regulatory Con: mission | ||
FILE: 0505.2 SERIAL: 2936 | 'f g;g @ y() (g~ | ||
eg y.. | |||
Washington, DC 20555 9; | |||
o k4 MIDLAND PROJECT | |||
/ | |||
g DOCKET NUMBERS 50-329, 50-330 QA REGULATORY JUIDE hESPONSES | |||
'4 te FILE: 0505.2 SERIAL: 2936 W | |||
' -5 ''' On November 3,1976 ve sent a proposed " Quality Assurance Program" description to the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation with a request that it be re-viewed. Subsequent to Nove=ber 3,1976, questions were raised by staff person-nel relating to "exceptiens" which were di:scussed in Sections II and III of the | |||
" Quality Assurance Program" description. In order to clarify the Project posi-tion, Section II and the title of Section III of the attached '! Quality Assurance Program" description have been revised in order to resolve staff questions. | |||
Please review the attached proposed " Quality Assurance Program" description and provide an evaluation as to the acceptability of that description with the under-standing that the effectivity date for implementation of the Babcock & Wilcox co=mitments will be provided when it has been determined. | Please review the attached proposed " Quality Assurance Program" description and provide an evaluation as to the acceptability of that description with the under-standing that the effectivity date for implementation of the Babcock & Wilcox co=mitments will be provided when it has been determined. | ||
.p~. | |||
A.C | A.C s ;, um -- - | ||
,$ ' ~ ' | |||
k s | |||
icjg',e . | R C Bauman | ||
Project Engineer | / | ||
icjg',e. | |||
\\ | |||
D Project Engineer | |||
Qi \ \ | /N 1 | ||
[:.Y b',Oy ; O!),- | |||
@ U.s. [ | |||
RCB/ EMS /fu M | |||
g; ' | |||
4.x s | |||
O l | |||
-'/ | |||
O, | |||
) | |||
Qi \\ \\ | |||
I a | I a | ||
8006200 | 8006200 y- | ||
y- -i- | -i-w- | ||
-s v | |||
.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 05:50, 31 December 2024
| ML19329F191 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1976 |
| From: | Bauman R CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Boyd R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329F192 | List: |
| References | |
| 2936, NUDOCS 8006200875 | |
| Download: ML19329F191 (1) | |
Text
n.
q 1
1 CODSum8IS i
1 00W8f THIS DOCUMENT CONTAlNS Cam?3D'l POOR QUAllTY PAGES o.e..., c, mc..: m w.. o,c e...
4..,,.
..n,..
. 20,.,.. co...,7 7.....
November 9, 1976 i
/Q Director of Huclear Reactor Regulation rQ '
N/
Attention: Mr Roger Boyd, Director h,
N Division of Project Management gy
.6.g. g)
US Nuclear Regulatory Con: mission
'f g;g @ y() (g~
eg y..
Washington, DC 20555 9;
o k4 MIDLAND PROJECT
/
g DOCKET NUMBERS 50-329, 50-330 QA REGULATORY JUIDE hESPONSES
'4 te FILE: 0505.2 SERIAL: 2936 W
' -5 On November 3,1976 ve sent a proposed " Quality Assurance Program" description to the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation with a request that it be re-viewed. Subsequent to Nove=ber 3,1976, questions were raised by staff person-nel relating to "exceptiens" which were di:scussed in Sections II and III of the
" Quality Assurance Program" description. In order to clarify the Project posi-tion,Section II and the title of Section III of the attached '! Quality Assurance Program" description have been revised in order to resolve staff questions.
Please review the attached proposed " Quality Assurance Program" description and provide an evaluation as to the acceptability of that description with the under-standing that the effectivity date for implementation of the Babcock & Wilcox co=mitments will be provided when it has been determined.
.p~.
A.C s ;, um -- -
,$ ' ~ '
k s
R C Bauman
/
icjg',e.
\\
D Project Engineer
/N 1
[:.Y b',Oy ; O!),-
@ U.s. [
RCB/ EMS /fu M
g; '
4.x s
O l
-'/
O,
)
Qi \\ \\
I a
8006200 y-
-i-w-
-s v
.