ML19345F053: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:TOPICAL REPORT PWROG-17090, REVISION 0 COMMENT RESOLUTION TABLE Comment Text Location         PWROG Comment         NRC Response Number  Page       Line 1       1 of 24     27       Revise the text       The staff finds the proposed SA508, Class 2 to    change acceptable because 6 of 24    38        ASME SA508,          ASME SA508, Class 2 and Class 2 (or the        ASTM A508, Class 2 are 23 of 24    37        corresponding          equivalent material ASTM A508,            specifications, and the change Class 2).            does not affect the staffs findings or conclusions.
{{#Wiki_filter:TOPICAL REPORT PWROG-17090, REVISION 0 COMMENT RESOLUTION TABLE Attachment Comment Number Text Location PWROG Comment NRC Response Page Line 1
2       8 of 24     33       Add or equal to     The staff finds the proposed after greater than. change acceptable because it ensures technical consistency The text or equal to and does not affect the staff's will also be added to findings or conclusions.
1 of 24 27 Revise the text SA508, Class 2 to ASME SA508, Class 2 (or the corresponding ASTM A508, Class 2).
the corresponding location in the first sentence in PWROG-17090-NP Section 3.1, Bullet 1 in the NRC-approved version of the topical report that will be issued after the Final Safety Evaluation is issued. This is consistent with the discussions in footnote (g) of PWROG-17090-NP Table 5 and footnote (e) of PWROG-17090-NP Table 7.
The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because ASME SA508, Class 2 and ASTM A508, Class 2 are equivalent material specifications, and the change does not affect the staffs findings or conclusions.
3       8 of 24     34 and 37 Revise > to to   The staff finds the proposed be consistent with     change acceptable because it PWROG-17090-NP         ensures technical consistency Section 3.1, Bullet 1. and does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.
6 of 24 38 23 of 24 37 2
4       12 of 24   7 and 16 Add or equal to     The staff finds the proposed after greater than. change acceptable because it ensures technical consistency and does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.
8 of 24 33 Add or equal to after greater than.
Attachment
The text or equal to will also be added to the corresponding location in the first sentence in PWROG-17090-NP Section 3.1, Bullet 1 in the NRC-approved version of the topical report that will be issued after the Final Safety Evaluation is issued. This is consistent with the discussions in footnote (g) of PWROG-17090-NP Table 5 and footnote (e) of PWROG-17090-NP Table 7.
The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because it ensures technical consistency and does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.
3 8 of 24 34 and 37 Revise > to to be consistent with PWROG-17090-NP Section 3.1, Bullet 1.
The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because it ensures technical consistency and does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.
4 12 of 24 7 and 16 Add or equal to after greater than.
The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because it ensures technical consistency and does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.  


TOPICAL REPORT PWROG-17090, REVISION 0 COMMENT RESOLUTION TABLE Comment Text Location         PWROG Comment       NRC Response Number  Page       Line 5       22 of 24   47       Add of unirradiated The staff finds the proposed Charpy USE, Cu       change acceptable because it content, and/or Ni   provides additional clarification content after      for this issue, and it does not measured values. affect the staff's findings or conclusions.
TOPICAL REPORT PWROG-17090, REVISION 0 COMMENT RESOLUTION TABLE Comment Number Text Location PWROG Comment NRC Response Page Line 5
6       23 of 24   3 and 8   Add or A508,       The staff finds the proposed Class 2 after      change acceptable because SA508, Class 2. these are equivalent material specifications, and the change does not affect the staffs findings or conclusions.}}
22 of 24 47 Add of unirradiated Charpy USE, Cu content, and/or Ni content after measured values.
The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because it provides additional clarification for this issue, and it does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.
6 23 of 24 3 and 8 Add or A508, Class 2 after SA508, Class 2.
The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because these are equivalent material specifications, and the change does not affect the staffs findings or conclusions.}}

Latest revision as of 09:10, 24 December 2024

Comment Resolution, Final SE by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation for the Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Topical Report PWROG-17090-NP, Revision 0, Generic Rotterdam Forging and Weld Initial Upper-Shelf Energy Determination
ML19345F053
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/07/2019
From:
NRC/NRR/DMLR/MVIB
To:
Licensing Processes Branch
Fields L
References
Download: ML19345F053 (2)
v • d • e


Text

TOPICAL REPORT PWROG-17090, REVISION 0 COMMENT RESOLUTION TABLE Attachment Comment Number Text Location PWROG Comment NRC Response Page Line 1

1 of 24 27 Revise the text SA508, Class 2 to ASME SA508, Class 2 (or the corresponding ASTM A508, Class 2).

The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because ASME SA508, Class 2 and ASTM A508, Class 2 are equivalent material specifications, and the change does not affect the staffs findings or conclusions.

6 of 24 38 23 of 24 37 2

8 of 24 33 Add or equal to after greater than.

The text or equal to will also be added to the corresponding location in the first sentence in PWROG-17090-NP Section 3.1, Bullet 1 in the NRC-approved version of the topical report that will be issued after the Final Safety Evaluation is issued. This is consistent with the discussions in footnote (g) of PWROG-17090-NP Table 5 and footnote (e) of PWROG-17090-NP Table 7.

The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because it ensures technical consistency and does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.

3 8 of 24 34 and 37 Revise > to to be consistent with PWROG-17090-NP Section 3.1, Bullet 1.

The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because it ensures technical consistency and does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.

4 12 of 24 7 and 16 Add or equal to after greater than.

The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because it ensures technical consistency and does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.

TOPICAL REPORT PWROG-17090, REVISION 0 COMMENT RESOLUTION TABLE Comment Number Text Location PWROG Comment NRC Response Page Line 5

22 of 24 47 Add of unirradiated Charpy USE, Cu content, and/or Ni content after measured values.

The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because it provides additional clarification for this issue, and it does not affect the staff's findings or conclusions.

6 23 of 24 3 and 8 Add or A508, Class 2 after SA508, Class 2.

The staff finds the proposed change acceptable because these are equivalent material specifications, and the change does not affect the staffs findings or conclusions.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19345F053&oldid=4707737"