ML20049J511: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:P 9 | ||
DuxE Powen ConvAwy | |||
.jl a.; | |||
.l y POWEM UUILDING t; i O, If d | |||
422 SouTu Cnuacia SrazzT, CiunwrTE, N. C. 20242 | |||
( | |||
wl L LI AM O. PA R M E R, J R. | |||
f, Vec t ParsiDENT TELtemout:AatA 704 Strau PnoDuCTION Pebruary 23, 1982 37s-4083 | |||
* Ico Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f,, | |||
s Region 1I G*C7? I 6 | |||
101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 7 | |||
gf 1,I ggg'g7;r 'p g,.t 1 | |||
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 g-g# h..u+.. J ' | |||
' #" O Re: Catawba Nuclear Station V | |||
Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-413 and -414 g g (' | |||
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:== | |||
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55e, please find attached Significant Deficiency Report SD 413-414/82-02. | |||
4 Very truly yours, William O. Parker, Jr. | |||
RWO/php Attachment cc: | |||
Director Mr. Robert Guild, Esq. | |||
Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attorney-at-Law U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 314 Pall Mall Washington, D. C. 20555 Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Mr. P. K. Van Doorn Palmetto Alliance NRC Resident inspector 2135h Devine Street Catawba Nuclear Station Columbia, South Carolina 29205 9203180292 spopp3 DUTXCCOPY DR ADOCK 05000423 | |||
~ ' ~ | |||
-.L L, 7 | |||
"on | |||
~~--~ | |||
/ | |||
., r CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION Report No: | |||
SD 413-414/82-02 i | |||
/ | |||
Report Date: | |||
Februa ry 23, 1982 | |||
.,4 Faci li ty: | |||
Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 identification df Deficiency: Some welds previously completed on miscellaneous | |||
~ | |||
steel structures were found not to meet the requirements of the design drawing or the inspection procedure, QAP M-21. | |||
Initial Report: | |||
On' Janua ry 25, 1982, J Bryant of Region ll, Atlanta, Georgia was notified of the deficiency by W 0 Henry and J H Lanier of Duke Power Company, 422 South Church Street, Charlotte, NC 28242. (CA-82-09) | |||
Description of Deficiency: | |||
During the ba'ck-fi t structural inspection of Mechanical Equipment Supports as committed to per NRC follow-up Item 413/79-03-02 under QA Procedure M-18, | |||
" Inspection of Structural Steel Erection", all accessible welds are re-Inspected during the M-18 process to the requirements of QA Procedure N-21. | |||
Recently some welds were identified that did not meet the requirements of QA Procedure M-21 and the design drawing. | |||
An investigation of the condition revealed that the welds which were identified were made prior to Rev 4 of M-18, which added a signature on the M-18A for verification that all welds ^ were in-spected to M-21. | |||
Prior to Rev 4 of M-18 there was not a required signature that all the welds were inspected. | |||
s Analysis o Safety implication: | |||
Welds on nuclear safety related structures that do not meet design requirements' could impair the safety function of the structure. To date no such impairment has been identified. | |||
i Corrective Action: | |||
Structures were identified for examination of welds as typical of welding j per SAP M-21 prior to implementation of Rev 4 of the QAP M-18. | |||
The welds were inspected to M-21 requirements and indications noted were evaluated by Duke Power Design Engineering-Civil. Design-Civil concluded that welding Indications typical of ones identified would not impair the safety function of structures shown on Civil Design Drawings. | |||
Reactor building frames erected prior to implementatior of Rev 4 of QAP M-18 are under the Design' repsonsibility of the Support / Restraint Section of Mechanical Design Engineering Division. | |||
Further evaluation is being made in V | |||
e-Report No: | |||
I 2/23/82 Page 2 this area of concern. | |||
For work completed after revision 4 to QAP M-18 a verification signature is required on Form M-18A to assure that all welds have been inspected per QAP M-21. | |||
A final report will be provided by September 1,1982. | |||
l 4 | |||
a l | |||
I i | |||
i e | |||
4 e | |||
1 I | |||
= | |||
_.. _. _ -., -... _ -. _. _.. ~ _ _ _. -. ~ _. _,,, - _..... _.,. | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 05:27, 19 December 2024
| ML20049J511 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba |
| Issue date: | 02/23/1982 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8203180292 | |
| Download: ML20049J511 (3) | |
Text
P 9
DuxE Powen ConvAwy
.jl a.;
.l y POWEM UUILDING t; i O, If d
422 SouTu Cnuacia SrazzT, CiunwrTE, N. C. 20242
(
wl L LI AM O. PA R M E R, J R.
f, Vec t ParsiDENT TELtemout:AatA 704 Strau PnoDuCTION Pebruary 23, 1982 37s-4083
- Ico Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f,,
s Region 1I G*C7? I 6
101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 7
gf 1,I ggg'g7;r 'p g,.t 1
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 g-g# h..u+.. J '
' #" O Re: Catawba Nuclear Station V
Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-413 and -414 g g ('
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55e, please find attached Significant Deficiency Report SD 413-414/82-02.
4 Very truly yours, William O. Parker, Jr.
RWO/php Attachment cc:
Director Mr. Robert Guild, Esq.
Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attorney-at-Law U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 314 Pall Mall Washington, D. C. 20555 Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Mr. P. K. Van Doorn Palmetto Alliance NRC Resident inspector 2135h Devine Street Catawba Nuclear Station Columbia, South Carolina 29205 9203180292 spopp3 DUTXCCOPY DR ADOCK 05000423
~ ' ~
-.L L, 7
"on
~~--~
/
., r CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION Report No:
SD 413-414/82-02 i
/
Report Date:
Februa ry 23, 1982
.,4 Faci li ty:
Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 identification df Deficiency: Some welds previously completed on miscellaneous
~
steel structures were found not to meet the requirements of the design drawing or the inspection procedure, QAP M-21.
Initial Report:
On' Janua ry 25, 1982, J Bryant of Region ll, Atlanta, Georgia was notified of the deficiency by W 0 Henry and J H Lanier of Duke Power Company, 422 South Church Street, Charlotte, NC 28242. (CA-82-09)
Description of Deficiency:
During the ba'ck-fi t structural inspection of Mechanical Equipment Supports as committed to per NRC follow-up Item 413/79-03-02 under QA Procedure M-18,
" Inspection of Structural Steel Erection", all accessible welds are re-Inspected during the M-18 process to the requirements of QA Procedure N-21.
Recently some welds were identified that did not meet the requirements of QA Procedure M-21 and the design drawing.
An investigation of the condition revealed that the welds which were identified were made prior to Rev 4 of M-18, which added a signature on the M-18A for verification that all welds ^ were in-spected to M-21.
Prior to Rev 4 of M-18 there was not a required signature that all the welds were inspected.
s Analysis o Safety implication:
Welds on nuclear safety related structures that do not meet design requirements' could impair the safety function of the structure. To date no such impairment has been identified.
i Corrective Action:
Structures were identified for examination of welds as typical of welding j per SAP M-21 prior to implementation of Rev 4 of the QAP M-18.
The welds were inspected to M-21 requirements and indications noted were evaluated by Duke Power Design Engineering-Civil. Design-Civil concluded that welding Indications typical of ones identified would not impair the safety function of structures shown on Civil Design Drawings.
Reactor building frames erected prior to implementatior of Rev 4 of QAP M-18 are under the Design' repsonsibility of the Support / Restraint Section of Mechanical Design Engineering Division.
Further evaluation is being made in V
e-Report No:
I 2/23/82 Page 2 this area of concern.
For work completed after revision 4 to QAP M-18 a verification signature is required on Form M-18A to assure that all welds have been inspected per QAP M-21.
A final report will be provided by September 1,1982.
l 4
a l
I i
i e
4 e
1 I
=
_.. _. _ -., -... _ -. _. _.. ~ _ _ _. -. ~ _. _,,, - _..... _.,.
-