ML20063F954: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.-
{{#Wiki_filter:.-
Comm::nwacith Edison O     one First National Plaza. Chicago, litenois OO        Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Augus t 2 7, 1982 Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division o f Licensing                                 * \
OO Comm::nwacith Edison O
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555                                         s
one First National Plaza. Chicago, litenois Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Augus t 2 7, 1982 Mr. Darrell G.
                                                                    \
Eisenhut, Director Division o f Licensing
* \\
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
\\
s


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2 Supplemental Response to Generic Le tter No . 82-05 concerning NUREG 0737 Itein II.F.1.3 Implementation Status NRC Docket Nos. 50-254/265 Re ference (a):             E. D. Swartz letter to D. G. Eisenhut dated April 15, 1982
Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2 Supplemental Response to Generic Le tter No. 82-05 concerning NUREG 0737 Itein II.F.1.3 Implementation Status NRC Docket Nos. 50-254/265 Re ference (a):
E.
D. Swartz letter to D. G.
Eisenhut dated April 15, 1982


==Dear Mr. Eis enhu t :==
==Dear Mr. Eis enhu t :==
 
Re ference (a) provided commitments concerning NUREG 0737 Item II.F.1.3 " Containment High-Range Radiation Monitor" in response to Generic Letter No. 82-05 for our Quad Cities Station.
Re ference (a) provided commitments concerning NUREG 0737 Item II.F.1.3 " Containment High-Range Radiation Monitor" in response to Generic Letter No. 82-05 for our Quad Cities Station.                               We indicated that a source calibration would be performed on the monitors contin'                 Jpon the station's receipt o f the Shephard Beam Calibrator whi                     purchased for this purpose. Based upon vendor delivery schecu_ s as promised, we expected to commence the source.
We indicated that a source calibration would be performed on the monitors contin' Jpon the station's receipt o f the Shephard Beam Calibrator whi purchased for this purpose.
Based upon vendor delivery schecu_ s as promised, we expected to commence the source.
calibration by July 1, 1982.
calibration by July 1, 1982.
Due to vendor delivery problems beyond the control o f the Commonwealth Edison Company, our commitment to commence source calibration by July 1,1982 could not be met. The current schedule for vendor delivery of the Shephard Beam Calibrator to our Quad Cities Station is now 4 to 6 weeks. Contingent upon this current delivery schedule, our best estimate for completion of the required calibrations is the end o f October 1982.                           Our implementation status for this item was discussed with Mr. Jos e ph D . He gn e r .
Due to vendor delivery problems beyond the control o f the Commonwealth Edison Company, our commitment to commence source calibration by July 1,1982 could not be met.
The current schedule for vendor delivery of the Shephard Beam Calibrator to our Quad Cities Station is now 4 to 6 weeks.
Contingent upon this current delivery schedule, our best estimate for completion of the required calibrations is the end o f October 1982.
Our implementation status for this item was discussed with Mr. Jos e ph D. He gn e r.
Based upon the above, we hereby request Commission approval to delay the implementation due date for this item until October 30, 1982 in order to accommodate our current schedule requirements.
Based upon the above, we hereby request Commission approval to delay the implementation due date for this item until October 30, 1982 in order to accommodate our current schedule requirements.
Please address any questions that you or your staf f may have             '
Please address any questions that you or your staf f may have concerning this matter to this o f fice.
concerning this matter to this o f fice.
One (1) signed original and thirty-nine (39) copies o f this letter are provided for your use.
One (1) signed original and thirty-nine (39) copies o f this letter are provided for your use.
Very truly   ours r-                    '. / f. - /,
Very truly ours'. / f. - /,
8200310402 820827                                                               -I PDR ADOCK 05000254                                           E. ouglas Swar '
r-
P                   ppg                                       Nuclea r Licensing Adminis trator cc:   J. G. Keppler, Region III RIII Inspector - Quad Cities Roby Bevan ORB -2                                                                   gff[p '
-I 8200310402 820827 PDR ADOCK 05000254 E.
Jo seph D . Hegner ORB-2 4885N
ouglas Swar '
P ppg Nuclea r Licensing Adminis trator cc:
J.
G. Keppler, Region III RIII Inspector - Quad Cities Roby Bevan ORB -2 gff[p Jo seph D. Hegner ORB-2 4885N
)
)
!}}
!}}

Latest revision as of 21:51, 16 December 2024

Submits Supplemental Response to Generic Ltr 82-05 Re NUREG-0737,Item II.F.1.3, Containment High-Range Radiation Monitor. Requests Delay of Implementation Until 821030 Due to Delivery Problems
ML20063F954
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/27/1982
From: Swartz E
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.F.1, TASK-TM 4885N, GL-82-05, GL-82-5, NUDOCS 8208310402
Download: ML20063F954 (1)


Text

.-

OO Comm::nwacith Edison O

one First National Plaza. Chicago, litenois Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Augus t 2 7, 1982 Mr. Darrell G.

Eisenhut, Director Division o f Licensing

  • \\

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

\\

s

Subject:

Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2 Supplemental Response to Generic Le tter No. 82-05 concerning NUREG 0737 Itein II.F.1.3 Implementation Status NRC Docket Nos. 50-254/265 Re ference (a):

E.

D. Swartz letter to D. G.

Eisenhut dated April 15, 1982

Dear Mr. Eis enhu t :

Re ference (a) provided commitments concerning NUREG 0737 Item II.F.1.3 " Containment High-Range Radiation Monitor" in response to Generic Letter No. 82-05 for our Quad Cities Station.

We indicated that a source calibration would be performed on the monitors contin' Jpon the station's receipt o f the Shephard Beam Calibrator whi purchased for this purpose.

Based upon vendor delivery schecu_ s as promised, we expected to commence the source.

calibration by July 1, 1982.

Due to vendor delivery problems beyond the control o f the Commonwealth Edison Company, our commitment to commence source calibration by July 1,1982 could not be met.

The current schedule for vendor delivery of the Shephard Beam Calibrator to our Quad Cities Station is now 4 to 6 weeks.

Contingent upon this current delivery schedule, our best estimate for completion of the required calibrations is the end o f October 1982.

Our implementation status for this item was discussed with Mr. Jos e ph D. He gn e r.

Based upon the above, we hereby request Commission approval to delay the implementation due date for this item until October 30, 1982 in order to accommodate our current schedule requirements.

Please address any questions that you or your staf f may have concerning this matter to this o f fice.

One (1) signed original and thirty-nine (39) copies o f this letter are provided for your use.

Very truly ours'. / f. - /,

r-

-I 8200310402 820827 PDR ADOCK 05000254 E.

ouglas Swar '

P ppg Nuclea r Licensing Adminis trator cc:

J.

G. Keppler, Region III RIII Inspector - Quad Cities Roby Bevan ORB -2 gff[p Jo seph D. Hegner ORB-2 4885N

)

!