ML20065U024: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:y | {{#Wiki_filter:y 10/29/82 g gTAR g mppBBDESTATES OF AMERICA 00LMETED NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION "dRC 22 DCT 29 P2:4g BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD QC 3 | ||
10/29/82 g gTAR g mppBBDESTATES OF AMERICA | In the Matter of | ||
) | |||
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY | ) | ||
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY | |||
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | ) | ||
) | |||
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY | PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | ||
) | |||
Docket No. 50-537 | |||
) | |||
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY | |||
) | |||
) | |||
(Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant)) | (Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant)) | ||
) | |||
APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO | APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO INTERVENORS' MOTION CONCERNING ORDER OF CROSS-EXAMINATION The United States Department of Energy and Project Management Corporation, for themselves and on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority, (the Applicants) hereby respond to Intervenors' Motion Concerning Order of Cross-Examination, dated October 20, 1982, as follows: | ||
INTERVENORS' MOTION CONCERNING ORDER OF CROSS-EXAMINATION | ~.. | ||
The United States Department of Energy and Project Management Corporation, for themselves and on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority, (the Applicants) hereby respond to Intervenors' Motion Concerning Order of Cross-Examination, dated October 20, 1982, as follows: | |||
Applicants have no objection to grant of the-Moti'on | Applicants have no objection to grant of the-Moti'on | ||
- ~. | |||
' ~ " | |||
for the reason that it will make no difference in regard to_ | for the reason that it will make no difference in regard to_ | ||
efficiency and fairness of the hearings.'.For that reason, | |||
efficiency and fairness of the hearings.'.For that reason, Applicants do not feel compelled to respond in detail'to | ~ | ||
Applicants do not feel compelled to respond in detail'to | |||
NRDC's mischaracterizations of the record in_the prior-phase of hearings. Applicants will, of course, reserve the right to conduct such cross-examination of any party and redirect w | ~~ | ||
B211030348 B21029 | NRDC's mischaracterizations of the record in_the prior-phase | ||
PDR ADOCK 05000537 0 | ^ | ||
of hearings. | |||
Applicants will, of course, reserve the right to conduct such cross-examination of any party and redirect w | |||
B211030348 B21029 PDR ADOCK 05000537 0 | |||
PDR | |||
4. | |||
s examination as is necessary to protect their rights and is consistent with true and full disclosure of the facts. | |||
Respectfully submitted, | Respectfully submitted, | ||
/ | |||
(Teorgp4.. Edga,P/ | (Teorgp4.. Edga,P/ | ||
Attorney for Pr6 ject Management Corporation Warren E. Bergholz, J . | Attorney for Pr6 ject Management Corporation Warren E. Bergholz, J. | ||
Attorney for the Department of Ener y DATED: | / | ||
Attorney for the Department of Ener y DATED: | |||
October 29, 1982 | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:50, 16 December 2024
| ML20065U024 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 10/29/1982 |
| From: | Bergholz W, Edgar G ENERGY, DEPT. OF, PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORP. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20065U023 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8211030348 | |
| Download: ML20065U024 (2) | |
Text
y 10/29/82 g gTAR g mppBBDESTATES OF AMERICA 00LMETED NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION "dRC 22 DCT 29 P2:4g BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD QC 3
In the Matter of
)
)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
)
)
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
)
Docket No. 50-537
)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
)
)
(Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant))
)
APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO INTERVENORS' MOTION CONCERNING ORDER OF CROSS-EXAMINATION The United States Department of Energy and Project Management Corporation, for themselves and on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority, (the Applicants) hereby respond to Intervenors' Motion Concerning Order of Cross-Examination, dated October 20, 1982, as follows:
~..
Applicants have no objection to grant of the-Moti'on
- ~.
' ~ "
for the reason that it will make no difference in regard to_
efficiency and fairness of the hearings.'.For that reason,
~
Applicants do not feel compelled to respond in detail'to
~~
NRDC's mischaracterizations of the record in_the prior-phase
^
of hearings.
Applicants will, of course, reserve the right to conduct such cross-examination of any party and redirect w
B211030348 B21029 PDR ADOCK 05000537 0
4.
s examination as is necessary to protect their rights and is consistent with true and full disclosure of the facts.
Respectfully submitted,
/
(Teorgp4.. Edga,P/
Attorney for Pr6 ject Management Corporation Warren E. Bergholz, J.
/
Attorney for the Department of Ener y DATED:
October 29, 1982
-