ML20070L771: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _....
5 i                 .      .
5 i
d.
d.
A e
A e
GPU Nuclear Corporation
GPU Nuclear Corporation
                      . ()
. ()
                                      ' MamM s Wwwaw 55n aer                                                       one upper eoac noao Parsippany, New Jett.ey 07054 201 316-7000 TELEX 136 482 Writer's Direct Dia! Number:
' MamM aer one upper eoac noao s Wwwaw 55n Parsippany, New Jett.ey 07054 201 316-7000 TELEX 136 482 Writer's Direct Dia! Number:
Nrch 12,1991 C321-91-2058 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20355 centlemen
Nrch 12,1991 C321-91-2058 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20355 centlemen


Line 32: Line 32:
Docket No. 50-219 Correction to Technical Specification Change Request No. 194 4-The purpose of this letter is to correct a neutron fluence value given on page 3.3.-5 of the proposed Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) No. 194 which was submitted on January 11, 1991. The TSCR No. 194 proposed new pressure-temperature limits up to 17 EFPY and a new minimum bolt-up temperature for the vessel closure head stud tensioning.
Docket No. 50-219 Correction to Technical Specification Change Request No. 194 4-The purpose of this letter is to correct a neutron fluence value given on page 3.3.-5 of the proposed Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) No. 194 which was submitted on January 11, 1991. The TSCR No. 194 proposed new pressure-temperature limits up to 17 EFPY and a new minimum bolt-up temperature for the vessel closure head stud tensioning.
An incorrect value was provided inadvertently in the second paragraph of the page 3.3-5 of the proposed technical specification. The second sentence of the second paragraph should read:
An incorrect value was provided inadvertently in the second paragraph of the page 3.3-5 of the proposed technical specification. The second sentence of the second paragraph should read:
                                                "The results of dosimeter wire cnalyses (Reference 14) indicated that the neutron fluence (E>1.0MeV) at the end of 17 effective full power years of operation is 1.25x10 10 n/cm at the 1/47 (T= vessel wall thickness) 2 location".
"The results of dosimeter wire cnalyses (Reference 14) indicated that the neutron fluence (E>1.0MeV) at the end of 17 effective full power years of 10 2
10 A fluence value given in our January 11, 1991 submittal was 2.44 x 10 n/cm2 . The correct value was provided in the attachment (page 3-5, GE Nuclear Energy Report, SASR 90-89) to the January 11, 1991 submittal.
operation is 1.25x10 n/cm at the 1/47 (T= vessel wall thickness) location".
10 A fluence value given in our January 11, 1991 submittal was 2.44 x 10 2
n/cm. The correct value was provided in the attachment (page 3-5, GE Nuclear Energy Report, SASR 90-89) to the January 11, 1991 submittal.
The revised page 3.3-5 of the Oyster Creek Tec:nical Specifications with a correct neutron fluence valum is attached to this letter.
The revised page 3.3-5 of the Oyster Creek Tec:nical Specifications with a correct neutron fluence valum is attached to this letter.
Vyryr truly yours,         j h                             '
Vyryr truly yours, j
d                                                                                                {                 g J. J   3arton 9103200234 910312                                                     Di e or, oyster Creek PDR         ADOCK05000,g9                                        I                                                                  q P
h d
JJB/YN/cb cc Adminletrator, Region I Senior NRC Resident Innspector Oyster Creek Proioct Manager GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsd;ary of General Pubic UtAt es Corporation
{
                                                                                                                                                              $8/  ,
g J.
                          -j h O n ,         ^
J 3arton 9103200234 910312 ADOCK05000,g9 I
                                                                                                                                                              /[j}}
Di e or, oyster Creek q
PDR P
JJB/YN/cb cc Adminletrator, Region I Senior NRC Resident Innspector Oyster Creek Proioct Manager
$8/
GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsd;ary of General Pubic UtAt es Corporation
-j h O n,
/[j
^}}

Latest revision as of 09:25, 16 December 2024

Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-16,correcting Tech Spec Change Request 194 Re Fluence Value of New Pressure/Temp Limits Up to 17 EFPYs & New Min bolt-up Temp for Vessel Closure Head Stud Tensioning
ML20070L771
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 03/12/1991
From: J. J. Barton
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20070L773 List:
References
C321-91-2058, NUDOCS 9103200234
Download: ML20070L771 (1)


Text

_ _....

5 i

d.

A e

GPU Nuclear Corporation

. ()

' MamM aer one upper eoac noao s Wwwaw 55n Parsippany, New Jett.ey 07054 201 316-7000 TELEX 136 482 Writer's Direct Dia! Number:

Nrch 12,1991 C321-91-2058 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20355 centlemen

Subject:

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS)

Docket No. 50-219 Correction to Technical Specification Change Request No. 194 4-The purpose of this letter is to correct a neutron fluence value given on page 3.3.-5 of the proposed Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) No. 194 which was submitted on January 11, 1991. The TSCR No. 194 proposed new pressure-temperature limits up to 17 EFPY and a new minimum bolt-up temperature for the vessel closure head stud tensioning.

An incorrect value was provided inadvertently in the second paragraph of the page 3.3-5 of the proposed technical specification. The second sentence of the second paragraph should read:

"The results of dosimeter wire cnalyses (Reference 14) indicated that the neutron fluence (E>1.0MeV) at the end of 17 effective full power years of 10 2

operation is 1.25x10 n/cm at the 1/47 (T= vessel wall thickness) location".

10 A fluence value given in our January 11, 1991 submittal was 2.44 x 10 2

n/cm. The correct value was provided in the attachment (page 3-5, GE Nuclear Energy Report, SASR 90-89) to the January 11, 1991 submittal.

The revised page 3.3-5 of the Oyster Creek Tec:nical Specifications with a correct neutron fluence valum is attached to this letter.

Vyryr truly yours, j

h d

{

g J.

J 3arton 9103200234 910312 ADOCK05000,g9 I

Di e or, oyster Creek q

PDR P

JJB/YN/cb cc Adminletrator, Region I Senior NRC Resident Innspector Oyster Creek Proioct Manager

$8/

GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsd;ary of General Pubic UtAt es Corporation

-j h O n,

/[j

^