ML20080P960: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:~
{{#Wiki_filter:~
FILED:     Oc$p3pfgt,7,1983 USNRC UNITED STATES OF A\1 ERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COi1\1ISSION 13 OCT 11 #0:22 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD OFFitE OF SELF,t i A.
FILED:
Oc$p3pfgt,7,1983 USNRC UNITED STATES OF A\\1 ERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COi1\\1ISSION 13 OCT 11 #0:22 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD OFFitE OF SELF,t i A.
00CnEilNG & SERvu.-
00CnEilNG & SERvu.-
In the matter of:                                                 BRANCH               ,
In the matter of:
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF             Docket Nos.                     50-443 OL NEW llAMPSHIRE, et al                                                 50-444 OL (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)
BRANCH PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF Docket Nos.
50-443 OL NEW llAMPSHIRE, et al 50-444 OL (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)
SAPL'S ANSWER IN SUPPORT OF NECNP'S REPLY TO RESPONSES BY APPLICANTS AND STAFF TO NECNP CONI'ENTIONS ON TiiE NHRERP SAPL answers in support of the position taken by NECNP wi th respect to litigation of implementation procedures.
SAPL'S ANSWER IN SUPPORT OF NECNP'S REPLY TO RESPONSES BY APPLICANTS AND STAFF TO NECNP CONI'ENTIONS ON TiiE NHRERP SAPL answers in support of the position taken by NECNP wi th respect to litigation of implementation procedures.
For the reasons s t ated by NECNP in i ts Reply of September 23rd, SAPL urges the Board to allow litigation of             the     implementation procedures with respect to both the State and local RERP's.                     The bottom line " adequacy" of the plans as defined by 10 C.F.R. 650.47 can only be determined after a full hearing on the capability of sponsoring governments to carry them out.
For the reasons s t ated by NECNP in i ts Reply of September 23rd, SAPL urges the Board to allow litigation of the implementation procedures with respect to both the State and local RERP's.
Respectfully submitted, Seacoast Anti-Pollution League By its attorneys, BACKUS, SHEA & MEYER By:         '
The bottom line " adequacy" of the plans as defined by 10 C.F.R.
d-Robert A. Backus 116 Lowell St., Box 516 Manchester, N . ll .       03105 Tel:   (603) 668-7272 October 7,   1983 G310120122 831007 PDR ADDCK 05000443 G               PDR
650.47 can only be determined after a full hearing on the capability of sponsoring governments to carry them out.
Respectfully submitted, Seacoast Anti-Pollution League By its attorneys, BACKUS, SHEA & MEYER By:
d-Robert A.
Backus 116 Lowell St.,
Box 516 Manchester, N. ll.
03105 Tel:
(603) 668-7272 October 7, 1983 G310120122 831007 PDR ADDCK 05000443 G
PDR
_-}}
_-}}

Latest revision as of 08:48, 14 December 2024

Answer Supporting New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution (Necnp) Reply to Applicant & NRC Responses to Necnp Contentions on State of Nh Radiological Emergency Response Plan
ML20080P960
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/07/1983
From: Backus R
BACKUS, MEYER & SOLOMON, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20080P929 List:
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8310120122
Download: ML20080P960 (1)


Text

~

FILED:

Oc$p3pfgt,7,1983 USNRC UNITED STATES OF A\\1 ERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COi1\\1ISSION 13 OCT 11 #0:22 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD OFFitE OF SELF,t i A.

00CnEilNG & SERvu.-

In the matter of:

BRANCH PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF Docket Nos.

50-443 OL NEW llAMPSHIRE, et al 50-444 OL (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)

SAPL'S ANSWER IN SUPPORT OF NECNP'S REPLY TO RESPONSES BY APPLICANTS AND STAFF TO NECNP CONI'ENTIONS ON TiiE NHRERP SAPL answers in support of the position taken by NECNP wi th respect to litigation of implementation procedures.

For the reasons s t ated by NECNP in i ts Reply of September 23rd, SAPL urges the Board to allow litigation of the implementation procedures with respect to both the State and local RERP's.

The bottom line " adequacy" of the plans as defined by 10 C.F.R. 650.47 can only be determined after a full hearing on the capability of sponsoring governments to carry them out.

Respectfully submitted, Seacoast Anti-Pollution League By its attorneys, BACKUS, SHEA & MEYER By:

d-Robert A.

Backus 116 Lowell St.,

Box 516 Manchester, N. ll.

03105 Tel:

(603) 668-7272 October 7, 1983 G310120122 831007 PDR ADDCK 05000443 G

PDR

_-