ML20083R084: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _
p                               q                                   l O               ,q               V                                  l h >5 Jersey Central I awer & Light Company                                                 u l
p q
l i                   M ADISoN AVENUE AT PUNCH BOWL RO AD e MORRISTOWN. N.J. 07960 e 539-6111 l
O V
July 11, 1972 r1SN1/
,q h
l 1                                                                           .g> '~           Oy Mr. A. Giambusso                                     h~O''   <.~
>5 Jersey Central I awer & Light Company u
!                    Deputy Director for Reactor Projects                 f ( ,.               CJ Directorate of Licensing                                           L.
l i
United States Atomic Energy Commission             . ' , ' ' Il[ld3 g g         l Washington, D. C. 20545                           dp 53.rume:    m g,g    -
M ADISoN AVENUE AT PUNCH BOWL RO AD e MORRISTOWN. N.J. 07960 e 539-6111 l
July 11, 1972 l
r1SN 1
.g> '~
1/
Oy Mr. A. Giambusso h~O''
<. ~
Deputy Director for Reactor Projects f (,.
CJ
. ', ' ' Il[ld3 g L.
Directorate of Licensing United States Atomic Energy Commission d
: 53. me: g,g g l
Washington, D. C. 20545 p
ru m


==Dear Mr. Giambusso:==
==Dear Mr. Giambusso:==
rhj$       ,//
rhj$
Docket No. 5 -219                            @
,//


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
N l                                           Oyster Creek Station
Docket No. 5 -219 N
(                                           Outside Radwaste Tank Activity j                               The purpose of this letter is to report an incident that- ,
l Oyster Creek Station
l                   occurredatOysterCreekinwhichtheoutsideradwastetankactivity)       ~
(
exceeded the total activity limit of 10 curies as set forth in l                   Technical Specification 3.6.C.
Outside Radwaste Tank Activity j
The purpose of this letter is to report an incident that-,
l occurredatOysterCreekinwhichtheoutsideradwastetankactivity)
~
exceeded the total activity limit of 10 curies as set forth in l
Technical Specification 3.6.C.
Routine analysis of the radwaste outside tank activity, as required by Paragraph 4.6.D of the Technical Specifications, was made during the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. As confirmed by final analysis',
Routine analysis of the radwaste outside tank activity, as required by Paragraph 4.6.D of the Technical Specifications, was made during the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. As confirmed by final analysis',
,                    which was completed at 9:30 p.m., a total of 12.78 curies were present l                   at the time of sampling. 10.48 curies were contributed by the contents of floor drain sample tank A.
which was completed at 9:30 p.m.,
a total of 12.78 curies were present l
at the time of sampling.
10.48 curies were contributed by the contents of floor drain sample tank A.
The source of this high activity water was traced to the /
The source of this high activity water was traced to the /
,                  _ overflow s      of waste neutralizer tanks A and B during regeneration of               (
_ overflow of waste neutralizer tanks A and B during regeneration of
                                                                                                      ~
(
l                    l-7 condensate demineralizer. Tank space in the waste neutralizer
s l
!                    tanks had been minimal when completion of _l-7 co"densate demineralizer resin regeneration became necessary due to high differential pressure developing across the condensate demineralizers./ In attempting to continue the regeneration, both waste neutralizing tanks overflowed to 1-9 floor drain sump in radwaste. The concentration of activity
l-7 condensate demineralizer. Tank space in the waste neutralizer
;                    in this water was quite high as a result of it being regenerate pater from the 1-7 condensate demineralizer. Floor drain sump 1-9 j-pumps directly to the floor drain collector tank from where the water was processed through the floor drain filter and into floor drain saaple tank A.
~
tanks had been minimal when completion of _l-7 co"densate demineralizer resin regeneration became necessary due to high differential pressure developing across the condensate demineralizers./ In attempting to continue the regeneration, both waste neutralizing tanks overflowed to 1-9 floor drain sump in radwaste. The concentration of activity in this water was quite high as a result of it being regenerate j-pater from the 1-7 condensate demineralizer. Floor drain sump 1-9 pumps directly to the floor drain collector tank from where the water was processed through the floor drain filter and into floor drain saaple tank A.
al'),
al'),
bY 8303310373 720711
b Y 8303310373 720711
                                        ~
~
                                                                                      'M"' /'
'M"' /'
PDR ADOCK 05000219 8                 PDR       _
PDR ADOCK 05000219 8
                                                                                                  ~
PDR
e                                                                     .
~
e


9
9
                                ^                                   p
^
                                .Q                                   y Mr. A. Giambusso Page II July 11, 1972 Floor drain sample tank A was routinely cycled into the waste neutralizer tanks as space became available during'the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. Back calculations indicate that the activity -
p
in the outside tanks was less than 10 curies by 3:00 p.m. and in fact, was 1.54 curies by 3:30 p.m. ,f When calculations of the outside tank activity were completed late in the evening, the water remaining in floor drain sample tank A was transferred to the waste neutralizer tanks inside the radwaste facility.
.Q y
Mr. A. Giambusso Page II July 11, 1972 Floor drain sample tank A was routinely cycled into the waste neutralizer tanks as space became available during'the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972.
Back calculations indicate that the activity -
in the outside tanks was less than 10 curies by 3:00 p.m. and in fact, was 1.54 curies by 3:30 p.m.,f When calculations of the outside tank activity were completed late in the evening, the water remaining in floor drain sample tank A was transferred to the waste neutralizer tanks inside the radwaste facility.
In order to prevent a recurrence of this event, the condensate demineralizer regeneration procedure is being modified to require a positive verification that adequate radwaste tank capacity exists.-
In order to prevent a recurrence of this event, the condensate demineralizer regeneration procedure is being modified to require a positive verification that adequate radwaste tank capacity exists.-
prior to starting a regeneration.
prior to starting a regeneration.
We are enclosing twenty-five copies of this report.
We are enclosing twenty-five copies of this report.
Very truly yours, Ivan R._Finfr k,   .
Very truly yours, Ivan R._Finfr k,
                                              . Manager, Nuclear Generating Stations IRF/pk Enclosures cc: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Regulatory Operations, Region I
. Manager, Nuclear Generating Stations IRF/pk Enclosures cc: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Regulatory Operations, Region I
            ~
~
e s}}
e s}}

Latest revision as of 05:08, 14 December 2024

Ro:On 720628,during Routine Analysis of Radwaste Outside Tank,Activity Found Exceeding Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Overflow of Waste Neutralizer Tanks During Regeneration of 1-7 Condensate Demineralizer.Procedure Modified
ML20083R084
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 07/11/1972
From: Finfrock I
JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Anthony Giambusso
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20083R087 List:
References
NUDOCS 8303310373
Download: ML20083R084 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _

p q

O V

,q h

>5 Jersey Central I awer & Light Company u

l i

M ADISoN AVENUE AT PUNCH BOWL RO AD e MORRISTOWN. N.J. 07960 e 539-6111 l

July 11, 1972 l

r1SN 1

.g> '~

1/

Oy Mr. A. Giambusso h~O

<. ~

Deputy Director for Reactor Projects f (,.

CJ

. ', ' ' Il[ld3 g L.

Directorate of Licensing United States Atomic Energy Commission d

53. me: g,g g l

Washington, D. C. 20545 p

ru m

Dear Mr. Giambusso:

rhj$

,//

Subject:

Docket No. 5 -219 N

l Oyster Creek Station

(

Outside Radwaste Tank Activity j

The purpose of this letter is to report an incident that-,

l occurredatOysterCreekinwhichtheoutsideradwastetankactivity)

~

exceeded the total activity limit of 10 curies as set forth in l

Technical Specification 3.6.C.

Routine analysis of the radwaste outside tank activity, as required by Paragraph 4.6.D of the Technical Specifications, was made during the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. As confirmed by final analysis',

which was completed at 9:30 p.m.,

a total of 12.78 curies were present l

at the time of sampling.

10.48 curies were contributed by the contents of floor drain sample tank A.

The source of this high activity water was traced to the /

_ overflow of waste neutralizer tanks A and B during regeneration of

(

s l

l-7 condensate demineralizer. Tank space in the waste neutralizer

~

tanks had been minimal when completion of _l-7 co"densate demineralizer resin regeneration became necessary due to high differential pressure developing across the condensate demineralizers./ In attempting to continue the regeneration, both waste neutralizing tanks overflowed to 1-9 floor drain sump in radwaste. The concentration of activity in this water was quite high as a result of it being regenerate j-pater from the 1-7 condensate demineralizer. Floor drain sump 1-9 pumps directly to the floor drain collector tank from where the water was processed through the floor drain filter and into floor drain saaple tank A.

al'),

b Y 8303310373 720711

~

'M"' /'

PDR ADOCK 05000219 8

PDR

~

e

9

^

p

.Q y

Mr. A. Giambusso Page II July 11, 1972 Floor drain sample tank A was routinely cycled into the waste neutralizer tanks as space became available during'the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972.

Back calculations indicate that the activity -

in the outside tanks was less than 10 curies by 3:00 p.m. and in fact, was 1.54 curies by 3:30 p.m.,f When calculations of the outside tank activity were completed late in the evening, the water remaining in floor drain sample tank A was transferred to the waste neutralizer tanks inside the radwaste facility.

In order to prevent a recurrence of this event, the condensate demineralizer regeneration procedure is being modified to require a positive verification that adequate radwaste tank capacity exists.-

prior to starting a regeneration.

We are enclosing twenty-five copies of this report.

Very truly yours, Ivan R._Finfr k,

. Manager, Nuclear Generating Stations IRF/pk Enclosures cc: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Regulatory Operations, Region I

~

e s