ML20083R084: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ | {{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ | ||
p | p q | ||
l i | O V | ||
July 11, 1972 | ,q h | ||
>5 Jersey Central I awer & Light Company u | |||
l i | |||
United States Atomic Energy Commission | M ADISoN AVENUE AT PUNCH BOWL RO AD e MORRISTOWN. N.J. 07960 e 539-6111 l | ||
July 11, 1972 l | |||
r1SN 1 | |||
.g> '~ | |||
1/ | |||
Oy Mr. A. Giambusso h~O'' | |||
<. ~ | |||
Deputy Director for Reactor Projects f (,. | |||
CJ | |||
. ', ' ' Il[ld3 g L. | |||
Directorate of Licensing United States Atomic Energy Commission d | |||
: 53. me: g,g g l | |||
Washington, D. C. 20545 p | |||
ru m | |||
==Dear Mr. Giambusso:== | ==Dear Mr. Giambusso:== | ||
rhj$ | rhj$ | ||
,// | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
N l | Docket No. 5 -219 N | ||
( | l Oyster Creek Station | ||
l | ( | ||
exceeded the total activity limit of 10 curies as set forth in l | Outside Radwaste Tank Activity j | ||
The purpose of this letter is to report an incident that-, | |||
l occurredatOysterCreekinwhichtheoutsideradwastetankactivity) | |||
~ | |||
exceeded the total activity limit of 10 curies as set forth in l | |||
Technical Specification 3.6.C. | |||
Routine analysis of the radwaste outside tank activity, as required by Paragraph 4.6.D of the Technical Specifications, was made during the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. As confirmed by final analysis', | Routine analysis of the radwaste outside tank activity, as required by Paragraph 4.6.D of the Technical Specifications, was made during the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. As confirmed by final analysis', | ||
which was completed at 9:30 p.m., | |||
a total of 12.78 curies were present l | |||
at the time of sampling. | |||
10.48 curies were contributed by the contents of floor drain sample tank A. | |||
The source of this high activity water was traced to the / | The source of this high activity water was traced to the / | ||
_ overflow of waste neutralizer tanks A and B during regeneration of | |||
( | |||
s l | |||
l-7 condensate demineralizer. Tank space in the waste neutralizer | |||
~ | |||
tanks had been minimal when completion of _l-7 co"densate demineralizer resin regeneration became necessary due to high differential pressure developing across the condensate demineralizers./ In attempting to continue the regeneration, both waste neutralizing tanks overflowed to 1-9 floor drain sump in radwaste. The concentration of activity in this water was quite high as a result of it being regenerate j-pater from the 1-7 condensate demineralizer. Floor drain sump 1-9 pumps directly to the floor drain collector tank from where the water was processed through the floor drain filter and into floor drain saaple tank A. | |||
al'), | al'), | ||
b Y 8303310373 720711 | |||
~ | |||
'M"' /' | |||
PDR ADOCK 05000219 8 | PDR ADOCK 05000219 8 | ||
PDR | |||
e | ~ | ||
e | |||
9 | 9 | ||
^ | |||
p | |||
in the outside tanks was less than 10 curies by 3:00 p.m. and in fact, was 1.54 curies by 3:30 p.m. ,f When calculations of the outside tank activity were completed late in the evening, the water remaining in floor drain sample tank A was transferred to the waste neutralizer tanks inside the radwaste facility. | .Q y | ||
Mr. A. Giambusso Page II July 11, 1972 Floor drain sample tank A was routinely cycled into the waste neutralizer tanks as space became available during'the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. | |||
Back calculations indicate that the activity - | |||
in the outside tanks was less than 10 curies by 3:00 p.m. and in fact, was 1.54 curies by 3:30 p.m.,f When calculations of the outside tank activity were completed late in the evening, the water remaining in floor drain sample tank A was transferred to the waste neutralizer tanks inside the radwaste facility. | |||
In order to prevent a recurrence of this event, the condensate demineralizer regeneration procedure is being modified to require a positive verification that adequate radwaste tank capacity exists.- | In order to prevent a recurrence of this event, the condensate demineralizer regeneration procedure is being modified to require a positive verification that adequate radwaste tank capacity exists.- | ||
prior to starting a regeneration. | prior to starting a regeneration. | ||
We are enclosing twenty-five copies of this report. | We are enclosing twenty-five copies of this report. | ||
Very truly yours, Ivan R._Finfr k, | Very truly yours, Ivan R._Finfr k, | ||
. Manager, Nuclear Generating Stations IRF/pk Enclosures cc: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Regulatory Operations, Region I | |||
~ | |||
e s}} | e s}} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:08, 14 December 2024
| ML20083R084 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 07/11/1972 |
| From: | Finfrock I JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Anthony Giambusso US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083R087 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8303310373 | |
| Download: ML20083R084 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _
p q
O V
,q h
>5 Jersey Central I awer & Light Company u
l i
M ADISoN AVENUE AT PUNCH BOWL RO AD e MORRISTOWN. N.J. 07960 e 539-6111 l
July 11, 1972 l
r1SN 1
.g> '~
1/
Oy Mr. A. Giambusso h~O
<. ~
Deputy Director for Reactor Projects f (,.
CJ
. ', ' ' Il[ld3 g L.
Directorate of Licensing United States Atomic Energy Commission d
- 53. me: g,g g l
Washington, D. C. 20545 p
ru m
Dear Mr. Giambusso:
rhj$
,//
Subject:
Docket No. 5 -219 N
l Oyster Creek Station
(
Outside Radwaste Tank Activity j
The purpose of this letter is to report an incident that-,
l occurredatOysterCreekinwhichtheoutsideradwastetankactivity)
~
exceeded the total activity limit of 10 curies as set forth in l
Technical Specification 3.6.C.
Routine analysis of the radwaste outside tank activity, as required by Paragraph 4.6.D of the Technical Specifications, was made during the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. As confirmed by final analysis',
which was completed at 9:30 p.m.,
a total of 12.78 curies were present l
at the time of sampling.
10.48 curies were contributed by the contents of floor drain sample tank A.
The source of this high activity water was traced to the /
_ overflow of waste neutralizer tanks A and B during regeneration of
(
s l
l-7 condensate demineralizer. Tank space in the waste neutralizer
~
tanks had been minimal when completion of _l-7 co"densate demineralizer resin regeneration became necessary due to high differential pressure developing across the condensate demineralizers./ In attempting to continue the regeneration, both waste neutralizing tanks overflowed to 1-9 floor drain sump in radwaste. The concentration of activity in this water was quite high as a result of it being regenerate j-pater from the 1-7 condensate demineralizer. Floor drain sump 1-9 pumps directly to the floor drain collector tank from where the water was processed through the floor drain filter and into floor drain saaple tank A.
al'),
b Y 8303310373 720711
~
'M"' /'
PDR ADOCK 05000219 8
~
e
9
^
p
.Q y
Mr. A. Giambusso Page II July 11, 1972 Floor drain sample tank A was routinely cycled into the waste neutralizer tanks as space became available during'the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972.
Back calculations indicate that the activity -
in the outside tanks was less than 10 curies by 3:00 p.m. and in fact, was 1.54 curies by 3:30 p.m.,f When calculations of the outside tank activity were completed late in the evening, the water remaining in floor drain sample tank A was transferred to the waste neutralizer tanks inside the radwaste facility.
In order to prevent a recurrence of this event, the condensate demineralizer regeneration procedure is being modified to require a positive verification that adequate radwaste tank capacity exists.-
prior to starting a regeneration.
We are enclosing twenty-five copies of this report.
Very truly yours, Ivan R._Finfr k,
. Manager, Nuclear Generating Stations IRF/pk Enclosures cc: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Regulatory Operations, Region I
~
e s