ML20137L081: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:___m... | {{#Wiki_filter:___m... | ||
DEC-@7-95 THU 11343 I P1 A ORP 4074669991 P.14 4 | |||
[7) | C | ||
- 4 ^~ | |||
Page 1 of 6 0 | [7) | ||
.-m ' | |||
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO | Page 1 of 6 4 | ||
0 C.A | |||
&R | |||
l f | / | ||
'f& | |||
i | .g'qcy | ||
/ | |||
//O FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO s | |||
l f | |||
/ | |||
\\ | |||
/ | |||
i RNGINEERING EVALUATION i | |||
PLANT OPERATION AT 2225 PSIA NOMINAL OPERATING PRES 8URE l | |||
j 4 | |||
ST LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 JPN-PSL-5ENP-95-025 i | |||
/ | |||
SAFETY RELATED | .i REVISION 1 | ||
.- ) | |||
/, | |||
}\\ | |||
m | |||
/ | |||
n a | |||
V' | ./ l u | ||
M 'q | ,,i | ||
\\ | |||
l v | |||
SAFETY RELATED s. | |||
*l 0" | |||
o | .M, L | ||
i | |||
, in V' 1 4,l' | |||
t- | / | ||
M 'q d | |||
e., | |||
/ | |||
n f | |||
f | |||
40 | /* | ||
>t. o'\\ | |||
l i | |||
/ | |||
c | |||
~ | |||
o - | |||
/ | |||
n | |||
\\ | |||
t- | |||
' #'~ 1 i ~, d | |||
\\,~' | |||
i | |||
\\ | |||
/ | |||
40 1 970402 BINDER 96-485 PDR | |||
.._m DEC-07-95 THU 11349 IMAGE MGMT CORP 4074669991 P.15 g | |||
JPN-PSL-SENP-95-025 REVISION 1 PAGE 2 OF 6 arvirv Aan APPeovAL acceso | |||
} | |||
} | PLANT | ||
TITLE N ANY #f aATI(W if 7924 ptf a MrMif mal @ttATIMC Per**'*8 | : 57. LutfF tAtlT5 1 | ||
LEAD DISCIPLINE | J l | ||
REVIEW / APPROVAL: | TITLE N ANY #f aATI(W if 7924 ptf a MrMif mal @ttATIMC Per**'*8 LEAD DISCIPLINE Licfutfac ENGINEERlWO ORGANIZATION permut?teu f acturretuG ceduP REVIEW / APPROVAL: | ||
i l | |||
INTERFACE TYPE | INTERFACE TYPE et0VP PAEPAAED VERIFIE0 APPROVED FPL APPROYED* | ||
INPUT | INPUT REVIEW N/A mmMM-- | ||
REVIEW | m IE CN X | ||
IE CN | ELECT X | ||
2&<Jak. | |||
C51 | fdtes AMA%4 1u x | ||
4 | CIVIL 4 | ||
* For Contractor Evels As Deter 1bined By Projects | c4 V J | ||
FPL PtoJECTS APPtWAL: b W NMdw_ | #2VAh // #Cd/$?:' | ||
t | u e" X | ||
4 f | |||
C51 X | |||
IAJC FLEL X | |||
l 4 | |||
* For Contractor Evels As Deter 1bined By Projects | |||
** Review Interface As A Min On All 10CFR50.59 Evats and PLAs a | |||
FPL PtoJECTS APPtWAL: b W NMdw_ | |||
DATE: _10 j 10) { | |||
t OTNER INTERFACES 1 | |||
JPW Form 24, Rev. 9/92 t | JPW Form 24, Rev. 9/92 t | ||
a d | a d | ||
. _ ~. - _ | |||
mec-ov-9s Tsu a2249 rnacs ncnv comp | mec-ov-9s Tsu a2249 rnacs ncnv comp 4e7466999 P.se i | ||
[I | JPN-PSL-SENP-95-025 | ||
[I REVISION 1 pAGE 3 0F 6 f | |||
1.0 PURPOFE AND DESCRIPTION i | |||
' This evaluation documents an assessment of. the effects of plant operation at 2225 psia nominal RCS pressure. | |||
l | Plant operation isl typically at a nominal 2250 psia. | ||
Revision 0 documented the acceptability of plant operation at 2235 psia nominal | This evaluation concludes that plant operation at 2225 psia is within the limits and analyses of the l | ||
2.0 | ''echnical specifications, FSAR and plant procedures, and therefore, is l | ||
acceptable for normal operation and accident conditions. | |||
l In addition, plant operation at 2225 psia does not require changes tol the technical specifications, is not a change to the plant as described in the FSAR, and does not require changes to plant procedures as described in the FSAR, and therefore, does not require a 50.59 safety evaluation nor NRC approval. | |||
Revision 0 documented the acceptability of plant operation at 2235 psia nominal RCS pressui*e. | |||
Revision 1 | |||
is issued to document the acceptability of plant operation down to the technical specification minimum value of 2225 paia. | |||
2.0 TECEMICAL SPECIFICATIONS I | |||
The technical specifications have been reviewed and operation at 2225 psia nominal RCS pressure is allowed. | The technical specifications have been reviewed and operation at 2225 psia nominal RCS pressure is allowed. | ||
Igehnical Snecificat_ ion, f2.1.1) | Igehnical Snecificat_ ion, f2.1.1) | ||
The reactor core safety limit technical specification describes that for | The reactor core safety limit technical specification describes that for combinations of THERMAL POWER, pressurizar pressure and maximum cold leg coolant temperature shall not exceed the limits shown on Figure 2.1-1 of the specification. | ||
combinations of THERMAL POWER, pressurizar pressure and maximum cold leg | The limits of the curve prevent overheating and the onset of DNB. | ||
The RPS in, combination with the Limiting Conditions of operation (LCO) is designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for reactor coolant system temperature, pressure, and thermal power level that would result in a DNBR of less than the DNBR limit and preclude the existence of flow instabilities. | |||
Therefore, operating within the LCO limits for DNB parameters assures power operation within the safety limits. Plant operation at a pressure of 2225 psia does not adversely affect safe plant operation or safety l and is within the DNB parameters LCo. | Therefore, operating within the LCO limits for DNB parameters assures power operation within the safety limits. | ||
Plant operation at a pressure of 2225 psia does not adversely affect safe plant operation or safety l and is within the DNB parameters LCo. | |||
Technical _somelfication. (3/4.2.5) | Technical _somelfication. (3/4.2.5) | ||
The DNB parameters technical s | The DNB parameters technical s requires that cold leg temperature, pressurizer pressure,pecification RCS total flow rate, and axial shape index be maintained within limits.. | ||
Therefore, plant operation at a pressure of 2225 psia does not adversely affect | plant operation at a pressure of 2225 psia is within the pressurizer pressure limit of 2 2225 psia. | ||
safe plant operation or safety and is within the DNB parameters | Therefore, plant operation at a pressure of 2225 psia does not adversely affect safe plant operation or safety and is within the DNB parameters LCo. | ||
4 DEC-e7-95 THU 11 50 IMAGE MGMT CORP | 4 DEC-e7-95 THU 11 50 IMAGE MGMT CORP 4074669991 P.17 lf JPN-PSL-SENP-95-o25 i | ||
] | REVISION 1 | ||
I The limits on the DNB related parameters assure that each of the l | ] | ||
l | PAGE 4 OF 6 i | ||
4 The design features specification for RCS design pressure and | I The limits on the DNB related parameters assure that each of the l | ||
parametere are maintained within the normal steady state envelope of j; | |||
operation assumed in the transient and accident analyses. | |||
:~ | l Taehnical specification. (5.4.11 i | ||
l | 4 The design features specification for RCS design pressure and temperature is not affected by plant operation at a pressure of 2225 l psia. All assumptions for design cyclic or transient limits remain valid. | ||
: ~ | |||
l 3.0 EA&R The FSAR has been reviewed The FSAR analyses support a nominal RCS pressure l and operation at 2225 psia nominal RCS i | |||
i | l pressure is allowed. | ||
{ | 1 of 2225 psia for both normal operation and accident conditions. | ||
l 1 | |||
i Nominal Reactor Coolant System (RCS) pressure during steady state | |||
{ | |||
the, secondary conditions would remain unchanged. | conditions as described in various FSAR sections (Sections 1.3, 4.2, j' | ||
4.4, S.1, 5.5, and 9.3) is 2250 psia. | |||
FSAR Table 4.4-1 (pg. 4.4-40) provides RCS plant thermal 1 hydraulic design parameters for nominal l | |||
(steady state)and design conditions: | |||
Nominal (Steady State) | |||
Design Conditions l | |||
Pressure, psia 2250 2250 i 50 4.0 RCS TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE The reduction in RCS pressure from 2250 psia to 2225 psia would havel minimal effect on the RCS temperature. | |||
For the range of current temperaturesfTSoe, T,.w) the effect on RCS oT has been estimated to be less than 0.1 F. | |||
With the minimal effect on the primary temperatures, the, secondary conditions would remain unchanged. | |||
'7 b'!q | |||
,Q c'Z)f4GL D j A-Mh% | |||
2 5.0 ACCIDENT ANALYSES MM# | |||
J | |||
,( | |||
~. _ _ | |||
~ | |||
reduction of~the norma. | reduction of~the norma. | ||
per& ting pressurizer pressure from 2250 psia 4 | |||
a to 2225 psia does not Affae* | |||
+ha.rsan t'h=ntar is analyses.x Tn | |||
==rety KM1yses supports nt operation in the pressurizer preiisure range of l 2225 psia to 22 psia. | |||
i DEC-97-95 THU 11:51 IMAGE MGMT CORP | The value of 2225 psia corresponds to the Specification limitjar_the___ reactor _ coolant system current Technic pressuia./ Plant operation at 2225 psia, therefore, does not exceed anyl safety _ limits. | ||
Revision 1 to this evaluation addresses operation at the technical specification limit of 2225 psia. | |||
The uncertainties used in the UFSAR accident analyses were reviewed and compared with the uncertainties of the instruments used for technical specification compliance. | |||
The accident analyses assumes an instrument uncertainty of 122 psi (Ref 10). | |||
The four instruments averaged (PI-1102 A,B,C & D) have an uncertainty of 14.2 psi (i.e., 24.55//3) assuming a minimum of three operable channels (Ref 6 & 11). | |||
Therefore, the uncertainty of the instruments used for | |||
- ~ ~ | |||
. ~.. _ _. - -. _ | |||
- ~. - ~.. | |||
._-- - -.--.. ~ | |||
i DEC-97-95 THU 11:51 IMAGE MGMT CORP 4074669991 P.18 | |||
} | } | ||
]j | ]j JPN-PSL-SENP-95-025 REVISION 1 | ||
] | |||
] | PAGE 5 0F 6 i | ||
l | l monitoring primary pressure is within the uncertainty assumed in the accident analyses. | ||
accident analyses. | The technical specification surveillance of i | ||
l pressurizer pressure is normally via Sigma indicators on the RTGB. | |||
However, to ensure plant operation in compliance with the technical 4 | |||
C.0 | i specification limit, the ERDADS display of pressurizer pressure from the P-1102 A, B, | ||
C & D instrument loops (average of 2 3 loops) may be used to verify pressure. | |||
This digital computer based system provides j | |||
increased resolution over the analog Sigma meters. | |||
operation and for many, but not all (e.g. Loss of Flow and CEA Drop | C.0 SETPOIMT AM1 LYSES Operation at 2225 psia remains within the current Technical l Specification requirements. | ||
Protection against exceeding the Linear i | |||
Heat Rate limit (21 kw/ft) is provided by the local power density (LPD) i LSSS and LPD LCO, which are dependent on the nuclear power peaking and j | |||
4 | core power level, but independent of the operating system pressure, and i | ||
will therefore be unaffected. | |||
The thermal margin low pressure trip (TM/LP) protects against the occurrence of DNB during steady state i | |||
operation and for many, but not all (e.g. Loss of Flow and CEA Drop Events) Anticipated operational occurrences (A00s). | |||
The reduction in RCs operating pressure (25 psi) will provide a reduced operating margin l to the TM/LP setpoint. | |||
The present instrument loops for cor. trol of pressurizer pressure have been reviewed with respect to operating at 2225 psia. Generally, thel | However, the TM/LP will continue to perform as i | ||
required to provide DNB protection. | |||
4 Similarly, the DNR LCO provides protection against DNB for transients i | |||
The | involving changes in reactor coolant flow or changes in power peaking i | ||
which do not significantly change ASI. | |||
The~ available margin to the current LCO is dependent on the range of core operating parameters evaluated. | |||
The lower nominal pressure affects the allowed core power as a function of ASI which is used to verify the adequacy of the current LCO for the Cycle 13 setpoint evaluation. | |||
However, the available DNB l | |||
LCO margin of 12.9% is more than sufficient to accommodate the lower i | |||
nominal pressure because of the small sensitivity of DNE to RCS pressure changes. | |||
7.0 PRESSURYSER CONTROL j | |||
1 The present instrument loops for cor. trol of pressurizer pressure have been reviewed with respect to operating at 2225 psia. Generally, thel system design is flexible enough that control will be the same as 2250 i | |||
psia. | |||
The proportional heaters and spray control will be modulated to maintain the operator selected setting. | |||
The backup heaters are energized at 2200 psia (decreasing) which is sufficiently below the 2225 psia operating setting to preclude spurious actuation and unnecessary l q | |||
cycling. | |||
The Techaical Specification limit for minimum pressurizer pressure is 2225 psia. | |||
The operator is required to verify that they are at or abovel j | |||
this setting at least once per 12 hours. | |||
Since the operating setting is reduced, care must be taken in verifying that pressurizer pressure channels (PT-1102A, B, | |||
C, and D) | |||
Specification limit. | |||
are in compliance with the Technical l | |||
_ . . . . ~ | _.... ~ | ||
DEC-97-95 7HU 11:52 IMAGE MGMT CORP | . ~ - -.. ~. - | ||
j | ~ - - - -.. - -. | ||
insignificant und thus will have minimal impact on the results of the calculations. | ~ ~. -. | ||
j | - ~... -. - - | ||
DEC-97-95 7HU 11:52 IMAGE MGMT CORP 4074669991 P.19 i i i / | |||
l | JPN-PEL-SENP-95-025 REVISION 1 I | ||
PAGE 6 OF 6 i | |||
j The-effect of operating at the lower pressure on the scaling calculations for pressurizer pressure and pressurizer level has been l. | |||
reviewed. | |||
The effect of the lower pressure on the specific volumes is insignificant und thus will have minimal impact on the results of the calculations. | |||
j s.o prauer mustnicTroms i | |||
None l-J 90 mRFERENCES l | |||
l 1. | |||
St. Lucie Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Amendnient No. 138 i | |||
2. | |||
St. Lucie Unit l'FSAR, through Amendment No. 14 l | |||
3. | |||
St. Lucie Unit 1 Safety Evaluation Report (SER) and supplements 1 | |||
& 2. | |||
l I | l I | ||
4. | |||
System Description SD9-Rev.1 - Pressurizer Pressure and Level control. | |||
i | i 5. | ||
PSL 1 Control Wiring Diagrams t | |||
8770-B-327 | 8770-B-327 Sh. 97 Rev. 14 8770-B-327 Sh. 98 Rov. 11 i | ||
8770-B-327 | 8770-B-327 sh. 124 Rev. 8 8770-B-327 Sh. 125 Rev. 7 8770-B-327 Sh. 126 Rev. 7 8770-B-327 Sh. 127 Rev. 7 l. | ||
8770-B-327 Sh. 128 Rev. 7 8770-B-327 Sh. 129 Rev. 7 i | |||
8770-B-327 Sh. 130 Rev. 15 8770-B-327 Sh. 372 Rev. 15 i | |||
1 Pressuriser Pressure and Hot and Cold Leg Temperature | 8770-B-327 Sh. 381 Rev. 16 8770-B-327 Sh. 382 Rev. 16 j | ||
8770-B-327 Sh. 383 Rev. 12 8770-B-327 sh. 384 Rev. 12 l | |||
6. | |||
Calculation PSL-1FJI-92-013 Rev. 1 dated 8/7/92 - St. Lucie Unit t | |||
1 Pressuriser Pressure and Hot and Cold Leg Temperature Instrument Uncertainties During Normal Operation. | |||
7. | |||
Calculation PSL-1FJI-93-008 Rev.1 dated 7/23/93 - St. Lucie Unit i | |||
1 RPS/SIAS Pressurizer Pressure Uncertainty Determination (P- | 1 RPS/SIAS Pressurizer Pressure Uncertainty Determination (P- | ||
{ | { | ||
1102A, B, C, D). | |||
i 8. | i 8. | ||
Calculation 19367-ICE-0612-00 Rev. O dated 1/7/79 - Pressurizer i | |||
19367-ICE-0612-00 Rev. O dated 1/7/79 - Pressurizer | Level Measurement. | ||
9. | |||
PSL 1 Setpoint List 8770-B-470 Rev. 13. | |||
10. | |||
PC/M 054-194, Cycle 13 Fuel Reload. | |||
11. | |||
St. Lucie Operating Procedure 1-0110057, Rev. 17, Periodic j | |||
Surveillance of DNB Margin. | |||
i | i | ||
.l | .l | ||
,}} | |||
Latest revision as of 22:56, 11 December 2024
| ML20137L081 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie |
| Issue date: | 10/10/1995 |
| From: | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137K821 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-96-485 JPN-PSL-SENP-95, JPN-PSL-SENP-95-025, JPN-PSL-SENP-95-25, NUDOCS 9704070151 | |
| Download: ML20137L081 (6) | |
Text
___m...
DEC-@7-95 THU 11343 I P1 A ORP 4074669991 P.14 4
C
- 4 ^~
[7)
.-m '
Page 1 of 6 4
0 C.A
&R
/
'f&
.g'qcy
/
//O FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO s
l f
/
\\
/
i RNGINEERING EVALUATION i
PLANT OPERATION AT 2225 PSIA NOMINAL OPERATING PRES 8URE l
j 4
ST LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 JPN-PSL-5ENP-95-025 i
/
.i REVISION 1
.- )
/,
}\\
m
/
n a
./ l u
,,i
\\
l v
SAFETY RELATED s.
- l 0"
.M, L
i
, in V' 1 4,l'
/
M 'q d
e.,
/
n f
f
/*
>t. o'\\
l i
/
c
~
o -
/
n
\\
t-
' #'~ 1 i ~, d
\\,~'
i
\\
/
40 1 970402 BINDER 96-485 PDR
.._m DEC-07-95 THU 11349 IMAGE MGMT CORP 4074669991 P.15 g
JPN-PSL-SENP-95-025 REVISION 1 PAGE 2 OF 6 arvirv Aan APPeovAL acceso
}
PLANT
- 57. LutfF tAtlT5 1
J l
TITLE N ANY #f aATI(W if 7924 ptf a MrMif mal @ttATIMC Per**'*8 LEAD DISCIPLINE Licfutfac ENGINEERlWO ORGANIZATION permut?teu f acturretuG ceduP REVIEW / APPROVAL:
i l
INTERFACE TYPE et0VP PAEPAAED VERIFIE0 APPROVED FPL APPROYED*
INPUT REVIEW N/A mmMM--
ELECT X
2&<Jak.
fdtes AMA%4 1u x
CIVIL 4
c4 V J
- 2VAh // #Cd/$?:'
u e" X
4 f
C51 X
IAJC FLEL X
l 4
- For Contractor Evels As Deter 1bined By Projects
- Review Interface As A Min On All 10CFR50.59 Evats and PLAs a
FPL PtoJECTS APPtWAL: b W NMdw_
DATE: _10 j 10) {
t OTNER INTERFACES 1
JPW Form 24, Rev. 9/92 t
a d
. _ ~. - _
mec-ov-9s Tsu a2249 rnacs ncnv comp 4e7466999 P.se i
JPN-PSL-SENP-95-025
[I REVISION 1 pAGE 3 0F 6 f
1.0 PURPOFE AND DESCRIPTION i
' This evaluation documents an assessment of. the effects of plant operation at 2225 psia nominal RCS pressure.
Plant operation isl typically at a nominal 2250 psia.
This evaluation concludes that plant operation at 2225 psia is within the limits and analyses of the l
echnical specifications, FSAR and plant procedures, and therefore, is l
acceptable for normal operation and accident conditions.
l In addition, plant operation at 2225 psia does not require changes tol the technical specifications, is not a change to the plant as described in the FSAR, and does not require changes to plant procedures as described in the FSAR, and therefore, does not require a 50.59 safety evaluation nor NRC approval.
Revision 0 documented the acceptability of plant operation at 2235 psia nominal RCS pressui*e.
Revision 1
is issued to document the acceptability of plant operation down to the technical specification minimum value of 2225 paia.
2.0 TECEMICAL SPECIFICATIONS I
The technical specifications have been reviewed and operation at 2225 psia nominal RCS pressure is allowed.
Igehnical Snecificat_ ion, f2.1.1)
The reactor core safety limit technical specification describes that for combinations of THERMAL POWER, pressurizar pressure and maximum cold leg coolant temperature shall not exceed the limits shown on Figure 2.1-1 of the specification.
The limits of the curve prevent overheating and the onset of DNB.
The RPS in, combination with the Limiting Conditions of operation (LCO) is designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for reactor coolant system temperature, pressure, and thermal power level that would result in a DNBR of less than the DNBR limit and preclude the existence of flow instabilities.
Therefore, operating within the LCO limits for DNB parameters assures power operation within the safety limits.
Plant operation at a pressure of 2225 psia does not adversely affect safe plant operation or safety l and is within the DNB parameters LCo.
Technical _somelfication. (3/4.2.5)
The DNB parameters technical s requires that cold leg temperature, pressurizer pressure,pecification RCS total flow rate, and axial shape index be maintained within limits..
plant operation at a pressure of 2225 psia is within the pressurizer pressure limit of 2 2225 psia.
Therefore, plant operation at a pressure of 2225 psia does not adversely affect safe plant operation or safety and is within the DNB parameters LCo.
4 DEC-e7-95 THU 11 50 IMAGE MGMT CORP 4074669991 P.17 lf JPN-PSL-SENP-95-o25 i
REVISION 1
]
PAGE 4 OF 6 i
I The limits on the DNB related parameters assure that each of the l
parametere are maintained within the normal steady state envelope of j;
operation assumed in the transient and accident analyses.
l Taehnical specification. (5.4.11 i
4 The design features specification for RCS design pressure and temperature is not affected by plant operation at a pressure of 2225 l psia. All assumptions for design cyclic or transient limits remain valid.
- ~
l 3.0 EA&R The FSAR has been reviewed The FSAR analyses support a nominal RCS pressure l and operation at 2225 psia nominal RCS i
l pressure is allowed.
1 of 2225 psia for both normal operation and accident conditions.
l 1
i Nominal Reactor Coolant System (RCS) pressure during steady state
{
conditions as described in various FSAR sections (Sections 1.3, 4.2, j'
4.4, S.1, 5.5, and 9.3) is 2250 psia.
FSAR Table 4.4-1 (pg. 4.4-40) provides RCS plant thermal 1 hydraulic design parameters for nominal l
(steady state)and design conditions:
Nominal (Steady State)
Design Conditions l
Pressure, psia 2250 2250 i 50 4.0 RCS TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE The reduction in RCS pressure from 2250 psia to 2225 psia would havel minimal effect on the RCS temperature.
For the range of current temperaturesfTSoe, T,.w) the effect on RCS oT has been estimated to be less than 0.1 F.
With the minimal effect on the primary temperatures, the, secondary conditions would remain unchanged.
'7 b'!q
,Q c'Z)f4GL D j A-Mh%
2 5.0 ACCIDENT ANALYSES MM#
J
,(
~. _ _
~
reduction of~the norma.
per& ting pressurizer pressure from 2250 psia 4
a to 2225 psia does not Affae*
+ha.rsan t'h=ntar is analyses.x Tn
==rety KM1yses supports nt operation in the pressurizer preiisure range of l 2225 psia to 22 psia.
The value of 2225 psia corresponds to the Specification limitjar_the___ reactor _ coolant system current Technic pressuia./ Plant operation at 2225 psia, therefore, does not exceed anyl safety _ limits.
Revision 1 to this evaluation addresses operation at the technical specification limit of 2225 psia.
The uncertainties used in the UFSAR accident analyses were reviewed and compared with the uncertainties of the instruments used for technical specification compliance.
The accident analyses assumes an instrument uncertainty of 122 psi (Ref 10).
The four instruments averaged (PI-1102 A,B,C & D) have an uncertainty of 14.2 psi (i.e., 24.55//3) assuming a minimum of three operable channels (Ref 6 & 11).
Therefore, the uncertainty of the instruments used for
- ~ ~
. ~.. _ _. - -. _
- ~. - ~..
._-- - -.--.. ~
i DEC-97-95 THU 11:51 IMAGE MGMT CORP 4074669991 P.18
}
]j JPN-PSL-SENP-95-025 REVISION 1
]
PAGE 5 0F 6 i
l monitoring primary pressure is within the uncertainty assumed in the accident analyses.
The technical specification surveillance of i
l pressurizer pressure is normally via Sigma indicators on the RTGB.
However, to ensure plant operation in compliance with the technical 4
i specification limit, the ERDADS display of pressurizer pressure from the P-1102 A, B,
C & D instrument loops (average of 2 3 loops) may be used to verify pressure.
This digital computer based system provides j
increased resolution over the analog Sigma meters.
C.0 SETPOIMT AM1 LYSES Operation at 2225 psia remains within the current Technical l Specification requirements.
Protection against exceeding the Linear i
Heat Rate limit (21 kw/ft) is provided by the local power density (LPD) i LSSS and LPD LCO, which are dependent on the nuclear power peaking and j
core power level, but independent of the operating system pressure, and i
will therefore be unaffected.
The thermal margin low pressure trip (TM/LP) protects against the occurrence of DNB during steady state i
operation and for many, but not all (e.g. Loss of Flow and CEA Drop Events) Anticipated operational occurrences (A00s).
The reduction in RCs operating pressure (25 psi) will provide a reduced operating margin l to the TM/LP setpoint.
However, the TM/LP will continue to perform as i
required to provide DNB protection.
4 Similarly, the DNR LCO provides protection against DNB for transients i
involving changes in reactor coolant flow or changes in power peaking i
which do not significantly change ASI.
The~ available margin to the current LCO is dependent on the range of core operating parameters evaluated.
The lower nominal pressure affects the allowed core power as a function of ASI which is used to verify the adequacy of the current LCO for the Cycle 13 setpoint evaluation.
However, the available DNB l
LCO margin of 12.9% is more than sufficient to accommodate the lower i
nominal pressure because of the small sensitivity of DNE to RCS pressure changes.
7.0 PRESSURYSER CONTROL j
1 The present instrument loops for cor. trol of pressurizer pressure have been reviewed with respect to operating at 2225 psia. Generally, thel system design is flexible enough that control will be the same as 2250 i
psia.
The proportional heaters and spray control will be modulated to maintain the operator selected setting.
The backup heaters are energized at 2200 psia (decreasing) which is sufficiently below the 2225 psia operating setting to preclude spurious actuation and unnecessary l q
cycling.
The Techaical Specification limit for minimum pressurizer pressure is 2225 psia.
The operator is required to verify that they are at or abovel j
this setting at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
Since the operating setting is reduced, care must be taken in verifying that pressurizer pressure channels (PT-1102A, B,
C, and D)
Specification limit.
are in compliance with the Technical l
_.... ~
. ~ - -.. ~. -
~ - - - -.. - -.
~ ~. -.
- ~... -. - -
DEC-97-95 7HU 11:52 IMAGE MGMT CORP 4074669991 P.19 i i i /
JPN-PEL-SENP-95-025 REVISION 1 I
PAGE 6 OF 6 i
j The-effect of operating at the lower pressure on the scaling calculations for pressurizer pressure and pressurizer level has been l.
reviewed.
The effect of the lower pressure on the specific volumes is insignificant und thus will have minimal impact on the results of the calculations.
j s.o prauer mustnicTroms i
None l-J 90 mRFERENCES l
l 1.
St. Lucie Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Amendnient No. 138 i
2.
St. Lucie Unit l'FSAR, through Amendment No. 14 l
3.
St. Lucie Unit 1 Safety Evaluation Report (SER) and supplements 1
& 2.
l I
4.
System Description SD9-Rev.1 - Pressurizer Pressure and Level control.
i 5.
PSL 1 Control Wiring Diagrams t
8770-B-327 Sh. 97 Rev. 14 8770-B-327 Sh. 98 Rov. 11 i
8770-B-327 sh. 124 Rev. 8 8770-B-327 Sh. 125 Rev. 7 8770-B-327 Sh. 126 Rev. 7 8770-B-327 Sh. 127 Rev. 7 l.
8770-B-327 Sh. 128 Rev. 7 8770-B-327 Sh. 129 Rev. 7 i
8770-B-327 Sh. 130 Rev. 15 8770-B-327 Sh. 372 Rev. 15 i
8770-B-327 Sh. 381 Rev. 16 8770-B-327 Sh. 382 Rev. 16 j
8770-B-327 Sh. 383 Rev. 12 8770-B-327 sh. 384 Rev. 12 l
6.
Calculation PSL-1FJI-92-013 Rev. 1 dated 8/7/92 - St. Lucie Unit t
1 Pressuriser Pressure and Hot and Cold Leg Temperature Instrument Uncertainties During Normal Operation.
7.
Calculation PSL-1FJI-93-008 Rev.1 dated 7/23/93 - St. Lucie Unit i
1 RPS/SIAS Pressurizer Pressure Uncertainty Determination (P-
{
1102A, B, C, D).
i 8.
Calculation 19367-ICE-0612-00 Rev. O dated 1/7/79 - Pressurizer i
Level Measurement.
9.
PSL 1 Setpoint List 8770-B-470 Rev. 13.
10.
PC/M 054-194, Cycle 13 Fuel Reload.
11.
St. Lucie Operating Procedure 1-0110057, Rev. 17, Periodic j
Surveillance of DNB Margin.
i
.l
,