ML20196D082: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:DOCKET NUMBER D1 PROPOSED RUI.E rn | {{#Wiki_filter:DOCKET NUMBER D1 PROPOSED RUI.E rn 5D (53 FR IM 35) 00C Ki'iD g | ||
Secretary of the Commission | USNLC kheg,%es P | ||
Samuel J. Chilk QFFtc(.,em,,.,g., | |||
A N5[1 %rv:} ice Branch Secretary of the Commission i b6keting D | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Se 1717 H Street, N.W. | |||
Washington, D.C. | |||
20555 Dear Sirs On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants. | |||
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel. | The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel. | ||
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements. | As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements. | ||
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt. | The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. | ||
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. | The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt. | ||
Sincerely, e- | In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. | ||
All offsite emergency respor.se planning requiremente must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation. | |||
jr fYrrA $ Yo n 'Il 35' N | Sincerely, 2A e-Name and Address: | ||
b x n W r- | jr fYrrA $ Yo n 'Il 35' N Sc.Itodl 17 b x n W r-J41 14- / / ') S I 4 8007010302 GG0606 PDR PR 50 53FR1643b VDU hS-/O | ||
50 53FR1643b | .}} | ||
hS-/O}} | |||
Latest revision as of 17:05, 10 December 2024
| ML20196D082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1988 |
| From: | Oconnell S AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00816, 53FR16435-816, NUDOCS 8807010302 | |
| Download: ML20196D082 (1) | |
Text
DOCKET NUMBER D1 PROPOSED RUI.E rn 5D (53 FR IM 35) 00C Ki'iD g
USNLC kheg,%es P
Samuel J. Chilk QFFtc(.,em,,.,g.,
A N5[1 %rv:} ice Branch Secretary of the Commission i b6keting D
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Se 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Dear Sirs On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind.
The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change.
All offsite emergency respor.se planning requiremente must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.
Sincerely, 2A e-Name and Address:
jr fYrrA $ Yo n 'Il 35' N Sc.Itodl 17 b x n W r-J41 14- / / ') S I 4 8007010302 GG0606 PDR PR 50 53FR1643b VDU hS-/O
.