ML20199K681: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COND11SSION before the                                 ti"4P ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD N JL ~7 p3:n4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COND11SSION before the ti"4P ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD N JL ~7 p3:n4
[7h*.l d T*R r In the Matter of                                                                                                                           BRANCf PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF                                                                                             Docket Nos. 50-443-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL                                                                                                                 50-444-OL 0
[7h*.l d T*R r In the Matter of BRANCf PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF Docket Nos. 50-443-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL 50-444-OL On-Site Emergency Planning 0
On-Site Emergency Planning (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) and Safety Issues S' MOTION TO N NH-10 SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE'S OB to the Applicants have sought
Units 1 and 2) and Safety Issues (Seabrook Station, S' MOTION TO SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE'S OB N NH-10 to the Applicants have sought By pleading dated June 27, 1.
: 1.        By pleading dated June 27, to the Withdrawal of NH-Board dismiss SAPL's Objection have this
to the Withdrawal of NH-Board dismiss SAPL's Objection have this The Applicants assert:
: 10. The Applicants assert:
10.
its right  to pursue the Contention.
to pursue the Contention.
: 1. SAPL has waived 2.
its right SAPL has waived The Motion is."self-executing," and late-filed 1.
The Motion is."self-executing,"                                                   and be treated as a    late-filed Objection                                               should treated, dismissed for failure to
3.
: 3. SAPL's Contention and, as so late-f'iled Contentions.
SAPL's Objection should be treated as a
meet the criteria for the Applicants' Motion should be denied,
2.
: 2. SAPL states that for the following reasons.
treated, dismissed for failure to Contention and, as so late-f'iled Contentions.
SAPL affirmatively joined in A. NH-10 is not moot because                                                                         that it still basis,   i.e.,
the criteria for meet the Applicants' Motion should be denied, SAPL states that 2.
supporting NH-10, and on that in litigation, the Appeal Board had a viable Contention entitled to appeal denial specifically held SAPL was not Contention,     SAPL   Supplemental of    its          own                                    sponsored comply with the National Contention                                             III     (Failure     to g7090216860703                 ADOCK 05000443 G
for the following reasons.
{D
SAPL affirmatively joined in A.
NH-10 is not moot because
: basis, i.e.,
that it still supporting NH-10, and on that in litigation, the Appeal Board had a viable Contention entitled to appeal denial specifically held SAPL was not of its own sponsored Contention, SAPL Supplemental Contention III (Failure to comply with the National g7090216860703 ADOCK 05000443
{D G


d Environmental Policy Act         in regard to severe accident consequences.) Thus, it is the law of this case that SAPL has standing to pursue this Contention, with or without the State of New Hampshire.         ALAB 731, decided June 20, 1983, 17 NRC 731.1 B. The decision that SAPL remain a party because of its joinder in NH-10 came six months af ter the staf f let ter of January 6,1983, which Applicants would rely on to establish SAPL's lack of standing to pursue Contention NH-10.
d Environmental Policy Act in regard to severe accident consequences.) Thus, it is the law of this case that SAPL has standing to pursue this Contention, with or without the State of New Hampshire.
C. As   made   clear by   SAPL's   answer     to   Interrogatories concerning NH-10,     it was SAPL's       intent   to leave the presentation of a direct case in support of NH-10 to the State   of New Hampshire.         However,     in answering the Interrogatories, SAPL specifically stated as follows:
ALAB 731, decided June 20, 1983, 17 NRC 731.1 B.
                    "In answering 'no' to any of the Applicants' specific Interrogatories, the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League does
The decision that SAPL remain a party because of its joinder in NH-10 came six months af ter the staf f let ter of January 6,1983, which Applicants would rely on to establish SAPL's lack of standing to pursue Contention NH-10.
  ,                not waive its right to cross-examine witnesses or urge the denial (or allowance subject to conditions) of the pending Application on the basis of the topic or Contention.           In other words, the Seacoast Ant i-F011 ut ion League retains
C.
                                                          ~
As made clear by SAPL's answer to Interrogatories concerning NH-10, it was SAPL's intent to leave the presentation of a direct case in support of NH-10 to the State of New Hampshire.
its right under the Prairie I;ia'd Rule, found in 2 NRC 392, Footnote 6.     (In the rul $ $r < f Nor thern States Power Company) SAPL further asie y             nat it has discernable interest i n the resolution of ali Content ions admit ted in the above-named proceedings."
: However, in answering the Interrogatories, SAPL specifically stated as follows:
l       1. In urging the Appeal Board to rej ect SAPL's appeal of the ASLB's summary disposition of SAPL Supplemental III, the Applicants' themselves stated: " SAPL acknowledges that the grant of summary disposition did not result in SAPL's dismissal f rom the proceeding as a par ty. SAPL nevertheless urges that it 'is ent itled to an appeal as of right because SAPL Supp. 3 was "the only content ion in which SAPL is the sponsoring party." SAPL Appeal at 2. However , SAPL "j oined" and adopted another contention (of New Hampshire) and thus is still a party; SAPL has evidenced no interest in dismissing that other contention. This being the case, no direct appeal is a va i l a bl e ."
"In answering 'no' to any of the Applicants' specific Interrogatories, the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League does not waive its right to cross-examine witnesses or urge the denial (or allowance subject to conditions) of the pending Application on the basis of the topic or Contention.
Cited from Applicants' Response to Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Appeal of Dismissal of Class 9 Accident Contention or, in the Alternative, Request for Cert ification Pursuant to 10 CFR 92.718(i).
In other words, the Seacoast Ant i-F011 ut ion League retains its right under the Prairie I;ia'd Rule, found in 2 NRC
i w -
~
392, Footnote 6.
(In the rul $ $r < f Nor thern States Power Company) SAPL further asie y nat it has discernable interest i n the resolution of ali Content ions admit ted in the above-named proceedings."
l 1.
In urging the Appeal Board to rej ect SAPL's appeal of the ASLB's summary disposition of SAPL Supplemental
: III, the Applicants' themselves stated: " SAPL acknowledges that the grant of summary disposition did not result in SAPL's dismissal f rom the proceeding as a par ty.
SAPL nevertheless urges that it 'is ent itled to an appeal as of right because SAPL Supp. 3 was "the only content ion in which SAPL is the sponsoring party." SAPL Appeal at 2.
However, SAPL "j oined" and adopted another contention (of New Hampshire) and thus is still a party; SAPL has evidenced no interest in dismissing that other contention.
This being the case, no direct appeal is a va i l a bl e."
Cited from Applicants' Response to Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Appeal of Dismissal of Class 9 Accident Contention or, in the Alternative, Request for Cert ification Pursuant to 10 CFR 92.718(i). i w


  ,,A D. Now that the State of New Hampshire has attempted to wi thdraw NH-10, over SAPL obj ect ion, SAPL will proceed to litigate NH-10 both by exercising its right of cross-examination,   as   reserved       in   its   response   to Interrogatories, and to the extent of its ability to do so, by the furnishing of a direct case.
,,A D.
E. The Applicants'     claim that     the Motion to Withdraw is "immediately self-executing" is without merit.           If the matter   is immediately     self-executing,     it   would be superfluous and redundant for the State to have filed a Motion to Withdraw the Contention.                               -
Now that the State of New Hampshire has attempted to wi thdraw NH-10, over SAPL obj ect ion, SAPL will proceed to litigate NH-10 both by exercising its right of cross-examination, as reserved in its response to Interrogatories, and to the extent of its ability to do so, by the furnishing of a direct case.
F. The Applicants'     claim that SAPL must meet         late-filed Contention criteria is without merit.           The issue before the Board is whether a Contention, timely admitted, and
E.
          .        which SAPL joined in spons.oring, can now be dismissed over SAPL's Obj ect ion, merely because the original sponsor of the Contentlon, the State of New Hampshire, has moved to withdraw the Contention.
The Applicants' claim that the Motion to Withdraw is "immediately self-executing" is without merit.
If the matter is immediately self-executing, it would be superfluous and redundant for the State to have filed a Motion to Withdraw the Contention.
F.
The Applicants' claim that SAPL must meet late-filed Contention criteria is without merit.
The issue before the Board is whether a Contention, timely admitted, and which SAPL joined in spons.oring, can now be dismissed over SAPL's Obj ect ion, merely because the original sponsor of the Contentlon, the State of New Hampshire, has moved to withdraw the Contention.
Respectfully submitted, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE By its attorney, BACKUS, MEYER & SOLOMON
Respectfully submitted, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE By its attorney, BACKUS, MEYER & SOLOMON
                                              '}           /
'}
                                              / fro 6e r t A. Backus P. O. Box 516 116 Lowell Street Manchester, N.H. 03105 Tel: (603) 668-7272 DATE:   July 3, 1986 t
/
/ fro 6e r t A.
Backus P. O. Box 516 116 Lowell Street Manchester, N.H.
03105 Tel: (603) 668-7272 DATE:
July 3, 1986.-
t


g,,                     CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND SERVICE LIST e
g,,
Jose             Asst.Gn.Cnsl. Sheldon J. Wolfe, Chrm.       Thomas Dignan, Esq.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND SERVICE LIST e
Fed. ph   Flynndgmt.
Jose Asst.Gn.Cnsl.
Emerg.         Agcy.     Admn. Judge                     Ropes & Gray 500 C.St. So. West               Atomic Safety & Lic Brd.       225 Franklin St.
Sheldon J. Wolfe, Chrm.
Washington, DC 20472               USNRC                           Boston, MA 02110 Washington, DC       20555 Office of Selectmen                 Dr. Jerry Harbour               Docketing & Serv. Sec.
Thomas Dignan, Esq.
Town of Hampton Falls               Admin. Judge                   Office of the Secretary Hampton Falls, NH 03844             Atomic Safety & Lic Brd.       USNRC USNRC                           Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555
Fed. ph Flynndgmt.
  ** U
Emerg.
* 9*
Agcy.
Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke           Jane Doughty Office of Exec. Legl. Dr.           Admin Judge                     SAPL USNRC                               Atomic Safety & Lic. Brd.       5 Market Street Wahsington, DC 205__               USNRC                           Portsmouth, NH 03801 Washington, DC 20555 Phillip Ahrens, Esq.                 Paul McEachern, Esq.         George Dana Bisbee, Esq.
Admn. Judge Ropes & Gray 500 C.St. So. West Atomic Safety & Lic Brd.
Asst. Atty. General                 Matthew Brock, Esq.           Attorney General's OFF.
225 Franklin St.
State House, Sta. #6                 25 Maplewood Ave.             State of New Hampshire Augusta, ME 04333                   P.O. Box 360                   Concord, NH     03301 Portsnouth, NH 03801 Carol Sneider, Esq. , Asst. AG     Diane Curran, Esq.             William S. Iord One Ashburton Place,               Harmon, Weiss                 Board of Selectmen 19th Floor                         20001 S Street NW Suite 430   Town Hall-Friend St.
Washington, DC 20472 USNRC Boston, MA 02110 Washington, DC 20555 Office of Selectmen Dr. Jerry Harbour Docketing & Serv. Sec.
Boston,,MA     02108               Washington, DC       20009     Amesbury, MA 01913 Richard A. Hampe, Esq.             Maynard Young, Chainmn         Sandra Gauvutis New' Hampshire Civil Defense       Board of Selectmen             Town of Kingston Agency                             10 Central Road               Box 1154 Hanpe & McNicholas                 Rye, NH 03870                 East Kensington, NH 03827 35 Pleasant St.                                .
Town of Hampton Falls Admin. Judge Office of the Secretary Hampton Falls, NH 03844 Atomic Safety & Lic Brd.
Concord, NI 03301 Edward Thomas                 Mr. Robert Harrison FEMA               -
USNRC USNRC Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555
Pres, & Chief Exec. Officer 442 J.W. McConmck (p0CH)       PSCO Boston, MA 02109               P.O. Box 330 Manchester, NH 03105 Roberta Pevear State Rep.-Town of Hanpt Falls Drinkwater Road Hanpton Falls, NH 03844
** U 9*
    .}}
Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Jane Doughty Office of Exec. Legl. Dr.
Admin Judge SAPL USNRC Atomic Safety & Lic. Brd.
5 Market Street Wahsington, DC 205__
USNRC Portsmouth, NH 03801 Washington, DC 20555 Phillip Ahrens, Esq.
Paul McEachern, Esq.
George Dana Bisbee, Esq.
Asst. Atty. General Matthew Brock, Esq.
Attorney General's OFF.
State House, Sta. #6 25 Maplewood Ave.
State of New Hampshire Augusta, ME 04333 P.O. Box 360 Concord, NH 03301 Portsnouth, NH 03801 Carol Sneider, Esq., Asst. AG Diane Curran, Esq.
William S. Iord One Ashburton Place, Harmon, Weiss Board of Selectmen 19th Floor 20001 S Street NW Suite 430 Town Hall-Friend St.
Boston,,MA 02108 Washington, DC 20009 Amesbury, MA 01913 Richard A. Hampe, Esq.
Maynard Young, Chainmn Sandra Gauvutis New' Hampshire Civil Defense Board of Selectmen Town of Kingston Agency 10 Central Road Box 1154 Hanpe & McNicholas Rye, NH 03870 East Kensington, NH 03827 35 Pleasant St.
Concord, NI 03301 Edward Thomas Mr. Robert Harrison FEMA Pres, & Chief Exec. Officer 442 J.W. McConmck (p0CH)
PSCO Boston, MA 02109 P.O. Box 330 Manchester, NH 03105 Roberta Pevear State Rep.-Town of Hanpt Falls Drinkwater Road Hanpton Falls, NH 03844
.}}

Latest revision as of 04:10, 8 December 2024

Objection to Applicant 860627 Motion to Strike Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Objection to Motion to Withdraw Contention NH-10.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20199K681
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/03/1986
From: Backus R
BACKUS, MEYER & SOLOMON, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#386-856 OL, NUDOCS 8607090216
Download: ML20199K681 (4)


Text

- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COND11SSION before the ti"4P ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD N JL ~7 p3:n4

[7h*.l d T*R r In the Matter of BRANCf PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF Docket Nos. 50-443-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL 50-444-OL On-Site Emergency Planning 0

Units 1 and 2) and Safety Issues (Seabrook Station, S' MOTION TO SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE'S OB N NH-10 to the Applicants have sought By pleading dated June 27, 1.

to the Withdrawal of NH-Board dismiss SAPL's Objection have this The Applicants assert:

10.

to pursue the Contention.

its right SAPL has waived The Motion is."self-executing," and late-filed 1.

3.

SAPL's Objection should be treated as a

2.

treated, dismissed for failure to Contention and, as so late-f'iled Contentions.

the criteria for meet the Applicants' Motion should be denied, SAPL states that 2.

for the following reasons.

SAPL affirmatively joined in A.

NH-10 is not moot because

basis, i.e.,

that it still supporting NH-10, and on that in litigation, the Appeal Board had a viable Contention entitled to appeal denial specifically held SAPL was not of its own sponsored Contention, SAPL Supplemental Contention III (Failure to comply with the National g7090216860703 ADOCK 05000443

{D G

d Environmental Policy Act in regard to severe accident consequences.) Thus, it is the law of this case that SAPL has standing to pursue this Contention, with or without the State of New Hampshire.

ALAB 731, decided June 20, 1983, 17 NRC 731.1 B.

The decision that SAPL remain a party because of its joinder in NH-10 came six months af ter the staf f let ter of January 6,1983, which Applicants would rely on to establish SAPL's lack of standing to pursue Contention NH-10.

C.

As made clear by SAPL's answer to Interrogatories concerning NH-10, it was SAPL's intent to leave the presentation of a direct case in support of NH-10 to the State of New Hampshire.

However, in answering the Interrogatories, SAPL specifically stated as follows:

"In answering 'no' to any of the Applicants' specific Interrogatories, the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League does not waive its right to cross-examine witnesses or urge the denial (or allowance subject to conditions) of the pending Application on the basis of the topic or Contention.

In other words, the Seacoast Ant i-F011 ut ion League retains its right under the Prairie I;ia'd Rule, found in 2 NRC

~

392, Footnote 6.

(In the rul $ $r < f Nor thern States Power Company) SAPL further asie y nat it has discernable interest i n the resolution of ali Content ions admit ted in the above-named proceedings."

l 1.

In urging the Appeal Board to rej ect SAPL's appeal of the ASLB's summary disposition of SAPL Supplemental

III, the Applicants' themselves stated: " SAPL acknowledges that the grant of summary disposition did not result in SAPL's dismissal f rom the proceeding as a par ty.

SAPL nevertheless urges that it 'is ent itled to an appeal as of right because SAPL Supp. 3 was "the only content ion in which SAPL is the sponsoring party." SAPL Appeal at 2.

However, SAPL "j oined" and adopted another contention (of New Hampshire) and thus is still a party; SAPL has evidenced no interest in dismissing that other contention.

This being the case, no direct appeal is a va i l a bl e."

Cited from Applicants' Response to Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Appeal of Dismissal of Class 9 Accident Contention or, in the Alternative, Request for Cert ification Pursuant to 10 CFR 92.718(i). i w

,,A D.

Now that the State of New Hampshire has attempted to wi thdraw NH-10, over SAPL obj ect ion, SAPL will proceed to litigate NH-10 both by exercising its right of cross-examination, as reserved in its response to Interrogatories, and to the extent of its ability to do so, by the furnishing of a direct case.

E.

The Applicants' claim that the Motion to Withdraw is "immediately self-executing" is without merit.

If the matter is immediately self-executing, it would be superfluous and redundant for the State to have filed a Motion to Withdraw the Contention.

F.

The Applicants' claim that SAPL must meet late-filed Contention criteria is without merit.

The issue before the Board is whether a Contention, timely admitted, and which SAPL joined in spons.oring, can now be dismissed over SAPL's Obj ect ion, merely because the original sponsor of the Contentlon, the State of New Hampshire, has moved to withdraw the Contention.

Respectfully submitted, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE By its attorney, BACKUS, MEYER & SOLOMON

'}

/

/ fro 6e r t A.

Backus P. O. Box 516 116 Lowell Street Manchester, N.H.

03105 Tel: (603) 668-7272 DATE:

July 3, 1986.-

t

g,,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND SERVICE LIST e

Jose Asst.Gn.Cnsl.

Sheldon J. Wolfe, Chrm.

Thomas Dignan, Esq.

Fed. ph Flynndgmt.

Emerg.

Agcy.

Admn. Judge Ropes & Gray 500 C.St. So. West Atomic Safety & Lic Brd.

225 Franklin St.

Washington, DC 20472 USNRC Boston, MA 02110 Washington, DC 20555 Office of Selectmen Dr. Jerry Harbour Docketing & Serv. Sec.

Town of Hampton Falls Admin. Judge Office of the Secretary Hampton Falls, NH 03844 Atomic Safety & Lic Brd.

USNRC USNRC Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555

    • U 9*

Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Jane Doughty Office of Exec. Legl. Dr.

Admin Judge SAPL USNRC Atomic Safety & Lic. Brd.

5 Market Street Wahsington, DC 205__

USNRC Portsmouth, NH 03801 Washington, DC 20555 Phillip Ahrens, Esq.

Paul McEachern, Esq.

George Dana Bisbee, Esq.

Asst. Atty. General Matthew Brock, Esq.

Attorney General's OFF.

State House, Sta. #6 25 Maplewood Ave.

State of New Hampshire Augusta, ME 04333 P.O. Box 360 Concord, NH 03301 Portsnouth, NH 03801 Carol Sneider, Esq., Asst. AG Diane Curran, Esq.

William S. Iord One Ashburton Place, Harmon, Weiss Board of Selectmen 19th Floor 20001 S Street NW Suite 430 Town Hall-Friend St.

Boston,,MA 02108 Washington, DC 20009 Amesbury, MA 01913 Richard A. Hampe, Esq.

Maynard Young, Chainmn Sandra Gauvutis New' Hampshire Civil Defense Board of Selectmen Town of Kingston Agency 10 Central Road Box 1154 Hanpe & McNicholas Rye, NH 03870 East Kensington, NH 03827 35 Pleasant St.

Concord, NI 03301 Edward Thomas Mr. Robert Harrison FEMA Pres, & Chief Exec. Officer 442 J.W. McConmck (p0CH)

PSCO Boston, MA 02109 P.O. Box 330 Manchester, NH 03105 Roberta Pevear State Rep.-Town of Hanpt Falls Drinkwater Road Hanpton Falls, NH 03844

.