ML20209E279: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:., | {{#Wiki_filter:., | ||
o Distribution: *w/ encl. | |||
**M s/f 1 | |||
* WMLU r/f | * WMLU r/f | ||
@s %39/^;^.;;.^/GG/66/06/GF NMSS r/f | |||
* RE Browning | * RE Browning | ||
* MJ Bell | * MJ Bell J0 Bunting | ||
* MR Knapp | * MR Knapp DE Martin | ||
* E Hawkins, URF0 *H. Pettengill g | * E Hawkins, URF0 *H. Pettengill g | ||
8W P Justus J Greeves M Nataraja M Fliegel G Gnugnoli D Gillen Pon-Note to: | |||
R. Dale Smith, Director URF0 From: | |||
Giorgio Gnugnoli, WMLU | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
JULY 31, 1986 UMTRAP STATUS BRIEFING FOR NRC STAFF Enclosed is a copy of the subject briefing handout. At present, such briefings are expected to occur on a bimonthly schedule. We still intend to prepare a monthly UMTRAP status report. Your staff's cooperation in providing updates on the status of URF0 UMTRAP related activities was extremely helpful. | JULY 31, 1986 UMTRAP STATUS BRIEFING FOR NRC STAFF Enclosed is a copy of the subject briefing handout. | ||
In order to maintain this monthly distribution of UMTRAP information to interested individuals in NRC, it would be helpful if you could direct your staff to communicate status revisions for URF0 designated UMTRAP activities directly to Daniel M. Gillen (FTS 427-4160) by the beginning of the fourth week of each month. The use of the IMB 5520 electronic information transfer feature would be ideal in accomplishing this communcation. | At present, such briefings are expected to occur on a bimonthly schedule. | ||
We still intend to prepare a monthly UMTRAP status report. Your staff's cooperation in providing updates on the status of URF0 UMTRAP related activities was extremely helpful. | |||
In order to maintain this monthly distribution of UMTRAP information to interested individuals in NRC, it would be helpful if you could direct your staff to communicate status revisions for URF0 designated UMTRAP activities directly to Daniel M. Gillen (FTS 427-4160) by the beginning of the fourth week of each month. | |||
The use of the IMB 5520 electronic information transfer feature would be ideal in accomplishing this communcation. | |||
Should you have any questions regarding this transmittal or contents of the. | Should you have any questions regarding this transmittal or contents of the. | ||
enclosure, please contact me or Daniel Gillen. | enclosure, please contact me or Daniel Gillen. | ||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
7/31/86 UMTRAP Status Handout WM Record File | 7/31/86 UMTRAP Status Handout WM Record File VlM Project _ | ||
DocketNo. | DocketNo. | ||
PDR V LPDR 8609100194 | PDR V LPDR 8609100194 Distribution: | ||
PDR | PDR WASTE WM-39 PDR (Return to WM,623;SS) l | ||
(Return to WM,623;SS) l | } | ||
0FC :WM t., | |||
0FC :WM | NAME$G ko 'i DATE :86/08/ M | ||
( | |||
NAME$G | oi L | ||
DATE :86/08/ M | |||
( | |||
e, AGENDA FOR UMTRAP STATUS BRIEFING July 31, 1986 (Thursday) | e, AGENDA FOR UMTRAP STATUS BRIEFING July 31, 1986 4 | ||
Conference Room 106 & 110 Willste Building | (Thursday) 10:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. | ||
Conference Room 106 & 110 Willste Building | |||
~ o Introduction o | |||
Generic Activities MOU Revision (GNG) | |||
Status of HQ/URF0 Involvement (GNG SRP/ TAD Revision Status (DMG Commingling Title I/ Title II Waste (GNG Short Term Schedule (DMG o | |||
Hand-out - Status of UMTRAP Activities (DMG) o Open Discussion l | |||
l l | l l | ||
b | b | ||
O 2 | |||
UMTRAP Casework Breakdown | UMTRAP Casework Breakdown gi t | ||
gi t | ~URF0 TBD f | ||
Monument Valley | Shiprock Lakeview Gunnison Salt Lake City Durango Spook Canonsburg Tuba City Belfield Riverton Monument Valley Bowman Green Riv,er Ambrosia Lake Lowman GrandJunction(RAP) | ||
Ambrosia Lake | Mexican Hat Rifle Naturita Falls City Grand Junction (EIS) | ||
GrandJunction(RAP) | |||
Slick Rock Maybell Vicin'ty property reviews (except CAN), construction inspections and iicensing (except CAN) will be performed by UP,FO. | Slick Rock Maybell Vicin'ty property reviews (except CAN), construction inspections and iicensing (except CAN) will be performed by UP,FO. | ||
O e | O e | ||
| Line 69: | Line 72: | ||
DOE GM04-85AL26037 DOE-NRC MOU UMTRA Project l | DOE GM04-85AL26037 DOE-NRC MOU UMTRA Project l | ||
APPENDIX A REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE PROCEDURES 1.0 | APPENDIX A REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE PROCEDURES 1.0 REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE DOCUMENTS | ||
s These Procedures set forth coordination responsibilities, including the preparation and transmittal of documents, the review of such documents, the preparation of comments, and in some cases an indication of concurrence or non-concurrence with such documents. The Document Coordination Table, below, is intended to be a graphic identification of the document, the version of the document (e.g., draft, final), the number of copies to be transmitted, the purpose of the transmittal (i.e. , for information, review and comment, concurrence), the response time, and the pertinent Section of the Procedures which provides for NRC-DOE coordination of the document. The response times shown are calendar days from receipt of the document. | .s These Procedures set forth coordination responsibilities, including the preparation and transmittal of documents, the review of such documents, the preparation of comments, and in some cases an indication of concurrence or non-concurrence with such documents. The Document Coordination Table, below, is intended to be a graphic identification of the document, the version of the document (e.g., draft, final), the number of copies to be transmitted, the purpose of the transmittal (i.e., for information, review and comment, concurrence), the response time, and the pertinent Section of the Procedures which provides for NRC-DOE coordination of the document. The response times shown are calendar days from receipt of the document. | ||
DOCUMENT COORDINATION TABLE PROCEDURES | DOCUMENT COORDINATION TABLE PROCEDURES UMTRAP PURPOSE OF | ||
===RESPONSE=== | |||
# OF SECTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL TIME COPIES 3.1.1 Draft Comparative Analysis Review / Comment 20-30 days | |||
,1 of Disposal Site Alte'na- | |||
~ | |||
tives Report (CADSAR) | tives Report (CADSAR) | ||
Final CADSAR | Final CADSAR Review / Comment 20-30 days j[ | ||
Draft EA Review / Comment 45 days | |||
Draft EA | [15] 10 3.1.2 Information N/A | ||
[15] I6 | |||
Information | [3.1.1] | ||
Notice of Intent | Final EA Preliminary Draft EIS Review / Comment 45 days | ||
[3.1.2] | [15] IO Draft EIS Review / Comment 45 days | ||
Final RAP (including final design) | [15] 10 Preliminary Final EIS Review / Comment 30 days | ||
[3.1.3] | [15] 10 Final EIS Information N/A (15] 10 | ||
site) | ~~ | ||
Modification to VPMIM | Notice of Intent Information N/A 2 | ||
[3.2.1] | VP Environmental Report Information N/A 2 | ||
3.1.3 Draft RAP Review / Comment [45-60] 30-45 days | |||
[15]j[ | |||
[3.1.2] | |||
Preliminary Design Review / Comment 30 days j[ | |||
Final RAP (including final design) | |||
Concurrence (45] | |||
20-30 days | |||
[15] 9, RAP Modification Concurrence 20-30 days 4 | |||
3.1.4 REA (Normal Cases) | |||
Information N/A 2 | |||
[3.1.3] | |||
REA (Supp. Stds., | |||
Concurrence 30 days 2 | |||
separate disposal site) | |||
Modification to VPMIM Concurrence 30 days 4 | |||
[3.2.1] | |||
[ Detailed Designs] | |||
[Information] | |||
[N/A] | |||
[2] | |||
A-1 | A-1 | ||
e., | e., | ||
DOE GM04-85AL26037 DOE-NRC MOU UMTRA Project | DOE GM04-85AL26037 DOE-NRC MOU UMTRA Project l | ||
PROCEDURES | PROCEDURES UMTRAP PURPOSE OF | ||
[3.2.2] | ===RESPONSE=== | ||
Remedial Action Inspec- | # OF -~ | ||
tion Plan NRC In-Process /On-Site | SECTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL TIME COPIES 2 | ||
3.2.2 | 3.2.1 Mo81fications to UMTRAP Information N/A 2. | ||
[3.2.3] | [3.2.2] | ||
QA Plan Remedial Action Inspec-Concurrence 21 days 2 | |||
tion Plan NRC In-Process /On-Site Resolution of 2 | |||
Report Review Issues 3.2.2 Modifications to UMTRA Information N/A 2 | |||
( | [3.2.3] | ||
VP 4.4 | Project EH&S Plan Site-Specific EH&S Plan Information 21 days 2 | ||
3.4 Certification Report- | |||
Concurrence | -Processing Site, Concurrence 45 days 2 | ||
[5.1) | Disposal Site, | ||
Plan for UMTRA Sites (Draft License Application] | -Separate VPs Concurrence 30 days 2 | ||
Draft Licensing Support Documentation (including | Certification Report-Information N/A 2 | ||
Site Surveillance and Maintenance) | Normal VPs 3.5 Remilling Contract Review / Comment Reasonable 2 | ||
Time 4.2 Prior Written Notice of Concurrence 20 days 1 | |||
Pre-RAP Processing Site Acquisition or Acquisition of VP 4.3 Prior Written Notice of Concurrence 20 days 1 | |||
State Sale / Retention | |||
( | |||
of Processing Site / | |||
VP 4.4 Indian Permits / Easements Inforsation N/A 2 | |||
/ Rights of Way l | |||
4.5 Prior Written Notice Concurrence Reasonable 1 | |||
i of State Transfer Time l | |||
of Title to Disposal Site 5.2 | |||
[UMTRA Project) | |||
Review / Comment 30 days 4 | |||
[5.1) | |||
Licensing [ Guidance) | |||
Plan for UMTRA Sites (Draft License Application] | |||
Draft Licensing Support Documentation (including Site Surveillance and Maintenance) | |||
Review / Comment 30 days 4 | |||
A-2 | |||
t, DOE GM04-85AL26037 DOE-NRC MOU UMTRA Project PROCEDURES UMTRAP PURPOSE OF | |||
===RESPONSE=== | |||
# OF -- | |||
SECTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL TIME COPIES 5.3 | |||
[UMTRA Project Main-Review / Comment 60 days 4 | |||
[5.2] | |||
.tenance and | |||
_o Surveillance Plan] | |||
N Guidance for UMTRA Project Surveillance and Main-tenance 6.1 Draft Cooperative Agree-Review / Comment 30 days 2 | |||
ment or Modification Executed Cooperative Concurrence 21 days 4 | |||
Agreement or Modification 6.2 Annual Report to Consultation / | |||
Timely 2 | |||
Congress Separate | |||
===Response=== | |||
Comments 2.0 DESIGNATION 2.1 Processing Sites - DOE, in consultation with NRC, has designated the processing sites included within the UMTRA Project. | |||
In connection with,such designation, DOE assigned to each site a relative priority for carrying out remedial action at such site. The priorities are indicated in 44 FR 74892 (December 18, 1979). | |||
2.2 Vicinity Properties - | |||
DOE, with the concurrence of NRC, developed a Summary Protocol for tne Survey and Inclusion of Vicinity Properties (Summary Protocol) as guidance for designation and inclusion of vicinity properties. DOE will include designated properties within the scope of the UMTRA Project cleanup effort in accordance with the Summary Protocol. | |||
3.0 REMEDIAL ACTIONS 3.1 Selection of Remedial Action - DOE has the primary responsibility for selecting remedial action under Title I of the UMTRCA. Selection of remedial action shall be with the concurrence of participating agencies. NRC concurrence shall be effected as provided herein. | |||
3.1.1 Comparative Analysis of Disposal Site Alternatives Report (CADSAR) - During the early site characterization and analyses activities for each mill site and alternate disposal site (s), DOE shall prepare and submit to NRC a A-3 | |||
Comments 2.0 DESIGNATION 2.1 Processing Sites - DOE, in consultation with NRC, has designated the processing sites included within the UMTRA Project. In connection with,such designation, DOE assigned to each site a relative priority for carrying out remedial action at such site. The priorities are indicated in 44 FR 74892 (December 18, 1979). | |||
2.2 Vicinity Properties - | |||
3.0 REMEDIAL ACTIONS 3.1 | |||
3.1.1 | |||
i WM UMTRAP CASEWORK FORECAST THROUGH 1987 MONTH | i WM UMTRAP CASEWORK FORECAST THROUGH 1987 MONTH REVIEW ITEMS M | ||
June | June CAN DFT CERT RPT; SHP DFT SMP; GRN DFT CADSAR July SRK DFT CADSAR; FCT PRE FNL CADSAR August GRJ DRAP/SCD; MAY DFT CADSAR September RFL DEIS; GRN FNL CADSAR; FCT FNL CADSAR; FCT DEA; FCT DRAP; SPK DFT CADSAR October CAN FNL CERT RPT; GRJ PRE DSG (Phase I); [ LOW DFT CADSAR] | ||
November | November GRJ PRE DSG (Phase II); RFL DRAP/SCD; SRK FNL CADSAR; MAY FNL CADSAR December SHP DFT CERT RPT; GRN DEA; GRN DRAP; [B0W DFT CADSAR]; | ||
[BELDFTCADSAR) 1987 January CAN FNL SMP February SLC, DFT SMP; GRJ FEIS; MAY DEA; MAY DRAP March SHP FNL CERT RPT; FCT FEA April SRKDEA;SRKDRAP;[GUNDEA];[GUNDRAP];[SPKFNLCADSAR] | |||
[BELDFTCADSAR) 1987 January | May GRNFEA;[LOWFNLCADSAR] | ||
June SHP FNL SMP; GRJ FRAP; RFL FEIS; MAY FEA July SLC DFT CERT RPT August RFLPREDSG;[GUNFEA];[GUNFRAP] | |||
May | September SRKFEA;[LOWDEA];[SPKDEA];[SPXDRAP] | ||
June | October | ||
September | ;LOWDRAP];MAYPREDSG;[B0WFNLCADSAR]; | ||
October | .BELFNLCADSAR] | ||
November SLC FNL CERT RPT December GRN PRE DSG o | |||
November | Sites not listed include: RVT on hold and URF0 sites - DUR, LXV, NAT, HAT, MON, TUB, and AMB Bracketed casework is yet to be assigned to either URF0 or WM. | ||
o | |||
UMTRAP DOCUMENT RESPONSE LOG Responsibility | UMTRAP DOCUMENT RESPONSE LOG Document Responsibility Dated Rec'd Responded to 1. | ||
and response to comments SHP; Mod. 2 signature pages | SHP; Mod. I signature pages DMG 6/25/86 7/1/86 7/30/86 and response to comments 2. | ||
SHP; Mod. 2 signature pages DMG 6/26/86 7/1/86 7/10/86 3. | |||
5/29/86 | SHP; Mod. 3 for review DMG 5/29/86 6/2/86 4. | ||
SHP; Draft S&M Plan DMG 6/13/86 6/16/86 5. | |||
rock gradations | SHP; Additional info on DMG 6/4/86 6/9/86 7/7/86 rock gradations 6. | ||
CAN; Certification Plan GNG 6/11/86 6/18/86 7. | |||
GRN; Draft CADSAR GNG 5/20/86 5/23/86 URF0 7/1/86 6/9/86 WMLU 8. | |||
Draft, UMTRAP Site Management DMG/MH 6/4/86 6/9/86 7/22/86 Manual 9. | |||
Hydro Calcs in RAPS 5/27/86 | Ltr. re: Elimination of Eng & | ||
URF0 6/20/86 6/27/86 7/15/86 Hydro Calcs in RAPS | |||
: 11. NAT; Draft CADSAR | : 10. VP Certification Plan and DS 5/27/86 6/4/86 7/18/86 7/10/86 VPMIM Update | ||
: 12. DUR; Final RAP / design | : 11. NAT; Draft CADSAR URF0 6/2/86 6/6/86 7/24/86 | ||
: 13. LKV; Rad. Monitoring Plan | : 12. DUR; Final RAP / design URF0 6/13/86 6/2D/86 | ||
: 13. LKV; Rad. Monitoring Plan URF0 5/12/86 5/16/86 86/07/29 DMG/86/07/29 1 | |||
I | |||
7 i | 7 i | ||
i | i | ||
: 14. LKV; Health Physics Monitoring URF0 5/7/86 5/16/86 7/14/86 Plan j | |||
: 15. LKV; RAP Mod - Uncontaminated URF0 | |||
: 15. LKV; RAP Mod - Uncontaminated | '5/12/86 5/16/86 7/24/86 woodchips contract | ||
: 16. LKV; RAP Mod - Mill Area URF0 5/12/86 5/16/86 7/24/86 Windblown Tailings Subcont. | |||
: 16. LKV; RAP Mod - Mill Area | |||
1 | 1 | ||
: 17. Field Study of Indoor Average DS 7/2/86 7/7/86 Rn Daughter Estimation i | |||
: 18. SRK; Draft CADSAR | Methods | ||
: 19. SHP; Revised RAIP | : 18. SRK; Draft CADSAR MH 7/7/86 7/10/86 | ||
: 20. Revised M00 | : 19. SHP; Revised RAIP DMG 6/24/86 6/25/86 7/17/86 | ||
: 22. DUR; HP Monitoring Plan | : 20. Revised M00 GNG 7/8/86 7/14/86 i | ||
: 21. GRJ, Draft EIS URF0 3/21/86 3/86 l | |||
: 24. Draft GW Protection Plan | : 22. DUR; HP Monitoring Plan URF0 7/8/86 7/16/86 | ||
l | : 23. CAN; Burrell cales and GNG 7/3/86 7/21/86 drawings (DCC copy delay) | ||
: 24. Draft GW Protection Plan DMG 7/17/86 7/21/86 I | |||
l DMG/86/07/29 2 | |||
86/07/29 e | |||
- -}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:12, 6 December 2024
| ML20209E279 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/08/1986 |
| From: | Gnugnoli G NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Rich Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20209E284 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-WM-39 NUDOCS 8609100194 | |
| Download: ML20209E279 (9) | |
Text
.,
o Distribution: *w/ encl.
- M s/f 1
- WMLU r/f
@s %39/^;^.;;.^/GG/66/06/GF NMSS r/f
- RE Browning
- MJ Bell J0 Bunting
- E Hawkins, URF0 *H. Pettengill g
8W P Justus J Greeves M Nataraja M Fliegel G Gnugnoli D Gillen Pon-Note to:
R. Dale Smith, Director URF0 From:
Giorgio Gnugnoli, WMLU
Subject:
JULY 31, 1986 UMTRAP STATUS BRIEFING FOR NRC STAFF Enclosed is a copy of the subject briefing handout.
At present, such briefings are expected to occur on a bimonthly schedule.
We still intend to prepare a monthly UMTRAP status report. Your staff's cooperation in providing updates on the status of URF0 UMTRAP related activities was extremely helpful.
In order to maintain this monthly distribution of UMTRAP information to interested individuals in NRC, it would be helpful if you could direct your staff to communicate status revisions for URF0 designated UMTRAP activities directly to Daniel M. Gillen (FTS 427-4160) by the beginning of the fourth week of each month.
The use of the IMB 5520 electronic information transfer feature would be ideal in accomplishing this communcation.
Should you have any questions regarding this transmittal or contents of the.
enclosure, please contact me or Daniel Gillen.
Enclosure:
7/31/86 UMTRAP Status Handout WM Record File VlM Project _
DocketNo.
PDR V LPDR 8609100194 Distribution:
PDR WASTE WM-39 PDR (Return to WM,623;SS) l
}
0FC :WM t.,
NAME$G ko 'i DATE :86/08/ M
(
oi L
e, AGENDA FOR UMTRAP STATUS BRIEFING July 31, 1986 4
(Thursday) 10:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
Conference Room 106 & 110 Willste Building
~ o Introduction o
Generic Activities MOU Revision (GNG)
Status of HQ/URF0 Involvement (GNG SRP/ TAD Revision Status (DMG Commingling Title I/ Title II Waste (GNG Short Term Schedule (DMG o
Hand-out - Status of UMTRAP Activities (DMG) o Open Discussion l
l l
b
O 2
UMTRAP Casework Breakdown gi t
~URF0 TBD f
Shiprock Lakeview Gunnison Salt Lake City Durango Spook Canonsburg Tuba City Belfield Riverton Monument Valley Bowman Green Riv,er Ambrosia Lake Lowman GrandJunction(RAP)
Mexican Hat Rifle Naturita Falls City Grand Junction (EIS)
Slick Rock Maybell Vicin'ty property reviews (except CAN), construction inspections and iicensing (except CAN) will be performed by UP,FO.
O e
9 0
O e
DOE GM04-85AL26037 DOE-NRC MOU UMTRA Project l
APPENDIX A REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE PROCEDURES 1.0 REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE DOCUMENTS
.s These Procedures set forth coordination responsibilities, including the preparation and transmittal of documents, the review of such documents, the preparation of comments, and in some cases an indication of concurrence or non-concurrence with such documents. The Document Coordination Table, below, is intended to be a graphic identification of the document, the version of the document (e.g., draft, final), the number of copies to be transmitted, the purpose of the transmittal (i.e., for information, review and comment, concurrence), the response time, and the pertinent Section of the Procedures which provides for NRC-DOE coordination of the document. The response times shown are calendar days from receipt of the document.
DOCUMENT COORDINATION TABLE PROCEDURES UMTRAP PURPOSE OF
RESPONSE
- OF SECTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL TIME COPIES 3.1.1 Draft Comparative Analysis Review / Comment 20-30 days
,1 of Disposal Site Alte'na-
~
tives Report (CADSAR)
Final CADSAR Review / Comment 20-30 days j[
Draft EA Review / Comment 45 days
[15] 10 3.1.2 Information N/A
[15] I6
[3.1.1]
Final EA Preliminary Draft EIS Review / Comment 45 days
[15] IO Draft EIS Review / Comment 45 days
[15] 10 Preliminary Final EIS Review / Comment 30 days
[15] 10 Final EIS Information N/A (15] 10
~~
Notice of Intent Information N/A 2
VP Environmental Report Information N/A 2
3.1.3 Draft RAP Review / Comment [45-60] 30-45 days
[15]j[
[3.1.2]
Preliminary Design Review / Comment 30 days j[
Final RAP (including final design)
Concurrence (45]
20-30 days
[15] 9, RAP Modification Concurrence 20-30 days 4
3.1.4 REA (Normal Cases)
Information N/A 2
[3.1.3]
REA (Supp. Stds.,
Concurrence 30 days 2
separate disposal site)
Modification to VPMIM Concurrence 30 days 4
[3.2.1]
[ Detailed Designs]
[Information]
[N/A]
[2]
A-1
e.,
DOE GM04-85AL26037 DOE-NRC MOU UMTRA Project l
PROCEDURES UMTRAP PURPOSE OF
RESPONSE
- OF -~
SECTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL TIME COPIES 2
3.2.1 Mo81fications to UMTRAP Information N/A 2.
[3.2.2]
QA Plan Remedial Action Inspec-Concurrence 21 days 2
tion Plan NRC In-Process /On-Site Resolution of 2
Report Review Issues 3.2.2 Modifications to UMTRA Information N/A 2
[3.2.3]
Project EH&S Plan Site-Specific EH&S Plan Information 21 days 2
3.4 Certification Report-
-Processing Site, Concurrence 45 days 2
Disposal Site,
-Separate VPs Concurrence 30 days 2
Certification Report-Information N/A 2
Normal VPs 3.5 Remilling Contract Review / Comment Reasonable 2
Time 4.2 Prior Written Notice of Concurrence 20 days 1
Pre-RAP Processing Site Acquisition or Acquisition of VP 4.3 Prior Written Notice of Concurrence 20 days 1
State Sale / Retention
(
of Processing Site /
VP 4.4 Indian Permits / Easements Inforsation N/A 2
/ Rights of Way l
4.5 Prior Written Notice Concurrence Reasonable 1
i of State Transfer Time l
of Title to Disposal Site 5.2
[UMTRA Project)
Review / Comment 30 days 4
[5.1)
Licensing [ Guidance)
Plan for UMTRA Sites (Draft License Application]
Draft Licensing Support Documentation (including Site Surveillance and Maintenance)
Review / Comment 30 days 4
A-2
t, DOE GM04-85AL26037 DOE-NRC MOU UMTRA Project PROCEDURES UMTRAP PURPOSE OF
RESPONSE
- OF --
SECTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL TIME COPIES 5.3
[UMTRA Project Main-Review / Comment 60 days 4
[5.2]
.tenance and
_o Surveillance Plan]
N Guidance for UMTRA Project Surveillance and Main-tenance 6.1 Draft Cooperative Agree-Review / Comment 30 days 2
ment or Modification Executed Cooperative Concurrence 21 days 4
Agreement or Modification 6.2 Annual Report to Consultation /
Timely 2
Congress Separate
Response
Comments 2.0 DESIGNATION 2.1 Processing Sites - DOE, in consultation with NRC, has designated the processing sites included within the UMTRA Project.
In connection with,such designation, DOE assigned to each site a relative priority for carrying out remedial action at such site. The priorities are indicated in 44 FR 74892 (December 18, 1979).
2.2 Vicinity Properties -
DOE, with the concurrence of NRC, developed a Summary Protocol for tne Survey and Inclusion of Vicinity Properties (Summary Protocol) as guidance for designation and inclusion of vicinity properties. DOE will include designated properties within the scope of the UMTRA Project cleanup effort in accordance with the Summary Protocol.
3.0 REMEDIAL ACTIONS 3.1 Selection of Remedial Action - DOE has the primary responsibility for selecting remedial action under Title I of the UMTRCA. Selection of remedial action shall be with the concurrence of participating agencies. NRC concurrence shall be effected as provided herein.
3.1.1 Comparative Analysis of Disposal Site Alternatives Report (CADSAR) - During the early site characterization and analyses activities for each mill site and alternate disposal site (s), DOE shall prepare and submit to NRC a A-3
i WM UMTRAP CASEWORK FORECAST THROUGH 1987 MONTH REVIEW ITEMS M
June CAN DFT CERT RPT; SHP DFT SMP; GRN DFT CADSAR July SRK DFT CADSAR; FCT PRE FNL CADSAR August GRJ DRAP/SCD; MAY DFT CADSAR September RFL DEIS; GRN FNL CADSAR; FCT FNL CADSAR; FCT DEA; FCT DRAP; SPK DFT CADSAR October CAN FNL CERT RPT; GRJ PRE DSG (Phase I); [ LOW DFT CADSAR]
November GRJ PRE DSG (Phase II); RFL DRAP/SCD; SRK FNL CADSAR; MAY FNL CADSAR December SHP DFT CERT RPT; GRN DEA; GRN DRAP; [B0W DFT CADSAR];
[BELDFTCADSAR) 1987 January CAN FNL SMP February SLC, DFT SMP; GRJ FEIS; MAY DEA; MAY DRAP March SHP FNL CERT RPT; FCT FEA April SRKDEA;SRKDRAP;[GUNDEA];[GUNDRAP];[SPKFNLCADSAR]
May GRNFEA;[LOWFNLCADSAR]
June SHP FNL SMP; GRJ FRAP; RFL FEIS; MAY FEA July SLC DFT CERT RPT August RFLPREDSG;[GUNFEA];[GUNFRAP]
September SRKFEA;[LOWDEA];[SPKDEA];[SPXDRAP]
October
- LOWDRAP];MAYPREDSG;[B0WFNLCADSAR];
.BELFNLCADSAR]
November SLC FNL CERT RPT December GRN PRE DSG o
Sites not listed include: RVT on hold and URF0 sites - DUR, LXV, NAT, HAT, MON, TUB, and AMB Bracketed casework is yet to be assigned to either URF0 or WM.
o
UMTRAP DOCUMENT RESPONSE LOG Document Responsibility Dated Rec'd Responded to 1.
SHP; Mod. I signature pages DMG 6/25/86 7/1/86 7/30/86 and response to comments 2.
SHP; Mod. 2 signature pages DMG 6/26/86 7/1/86 7/10/86 3.
SHP; Mod. 3 for review DMG 5/29/86 6/2/86 4.
SHP; Draft S&M Plan DMG 6/13/86 6/16/86 5.
SHP; Additional info on DMG 6/4/86 6/9/86 7/7/86 rock gradations 6.
CAN; Certification Plan GNG 6/11/86 6/18/86 7.
GRN; Draft CADSAR GNG 5/20/86 5/23/86 URF0 7/1/86 6/9/86 WMLU 8.
Draft, UMTRAP Site Management DMG/MH 6/4/86 6/9/86 7/22/86 Manual 9.
Ltr. re: Elimination of Eng &
URF0 6/20/86 6/27/86 7/15/86 Hydro Calcs in RAPS
- 10. VP Certification Plan and DS 5/27/86 6/4/86 7/18/86 7/10/86 VPMIM Update
- 11. NAT; Draft CADSAR URF0 6/2/86 6/6/86 7/24/86
- 12. DUR; Final RAP / design URF0 6/13/86 6/2D/86
- 13. LKV; Rad. Monitoring Plan URF0 5/12/86 5/16/86 86/07/29 DMG/86/07/29 1
I
7 i
i
- 14. LKV; Health Physics Monitoring URF0 5/7/86 5/16/86 7/14/86 Plan j
- 15. LKV; RAP Mod - Uncontaminated URF0
'5/12/86 5/16/86 7/24/86 woodchips contract
- 16. LKV; RAP Mod - Mill Area URF0 5/12/86 5/16/86 7/24/86 Windblown Tailings Subcont.
1
- 17. Field Study of Indoor Average DS 7/2/86 7/7/86 Rn Daughter Estimation i
Methods
- 18. SRK; Draft CADSAR MH 7/7/86 7/10/86
- 19. SHP; Revised RAIP DMG 6/24/86 6/25/86 7/17/86
- 20. Revised M00 GNG 7/8/86 7/14/86 i
- 21. GRJ, Draft EIS URF0 3/21/86 3/86 l
- 22. DUR; HP Monitoring Plan URF0 7/8/86 7/16/86
- 23. CAN; Burrell cales and GNG 7/3/86 7/21/86 drawings (DCC copy delay)
- 24. Draft GW Protection Plan DMG 7/17/86 7/21/86 I
l DMG/86/07/29 2
86/07/29 e
- -