ML20234A844: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ | {{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ | ||
l | l i | ||
i | j | ||
j | %HWjfh,;j),_ '$ w %,,,,,. | ||
'gupp/d 5/7/N | |||
~ | |||
g | |||
[g UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINGTON 25.D.C. | |||
ENGINEERING b M OF THE PROPOSED NUCIEAR POWER PIART | ENGINEERING b M OF THE PROPOSED NUCIEAR POWER PIART | ||
~ | |||
ON BOIEGA BEAD, 80 NOMA COUNTY, ChLIFORNIA i | ON BOIEGA BEAD, 80 NOMA COUNTY, ChLIFORNIA i | ||
[ | bY Julius Schlocker and M. G. hnilla | ||
[ | |||
[ | |||
Abstract c | |||
C_' | '_t w | ||
,l This report summarizes and interprets the geologie data presented i. | |||
\\ | |||
C_' | |||
in previous reports by the Geological Surrey. These data bear on the F.. | in previous reports by the Geological Surrey. These data bear on the F.. | ||
5i] | 5i] | ||
nuclear power plant on Bodega Head, California. | effect of large magnitude earthquakes on the foundation of the, proposed L.1 nuclear power plant on Bodega Head, California. | ||
Q | Q The crucial geologic problem at the site involves an estimate of the probability of a suddan permanent displacement, by rupturing, of the foun-dation rock of the reactor during an earthquake. Any such prediction | ||
(( | (( | ||
must be based to a great extent on experience in earthquake-affected B?r | must be based to a great extent on experience in earthquake-affected B?r regions; it can be made only with a relatively low degree of confidence LZ because geologic knowledge of the phannmana being evaluated is incomplete, e | ||
because geologic knowledge of the phannmana being evaluated is incomplete, | { | ||
{ | and in some instances rudimentary. | ||
I' An upper limit on the probability of faulting is set by the probabil-P f-b ity of occurrence of severe earthquakes (Richter magnitude 8.0 and above) | |||
An upper limit on the probability of faulting is set by the probabil-f- | ~ | ||
b | ~ | ||
on the San Andreas fault. This has been ertimated by several highly g | |||
r j | |||
qualified seismologists to be on the order of one or two per century. | |||
The Bodega Head site is almost certain to experience one severe earthquake in the next W years, the assumed lifetime ofet.be plant. | The Bodega Head site is almost certain to experience one severe earthquake in the next W years, the assumed lifetime ofet.be plant. | ||
6 k[lfg2852227 FIRESTO85-665 | 6 k[lfg2852227 FIRESTO85-665 PDR. | ||
l i | |||
\\ | |||
= | |||
.[ | |||
-. -..,~, | |||
4i | 4i | ||
.j | |||
~.. _ _. | |||
r | r 6 | ||
4 | |||
The principal hazards to the plant from such a seismic event' are twofolds | ) | ||
The principal hazards to the plant from such a seismic event' are twofolds (1)shakingofthegroundduetosciamicwavepropagation, and (2) possible displacement of the foundation rocks due to faulting. - | |||
l The hazard due to ahairing is being investigated by others, including the Seismology Division, U. 8. Coast and Geodetic Survey. prediction | |||
-l l' b ; | |||
M | of possible displacement must be based largely on the distribution and asI characteristics of the surface faulting produced by the 1906 earthquake | ||
and to a lesser extent on the distribution of faults in the excavation | * +) | ||
M and to a lesser extent on the distribution of faults in the excavation I | |||
E 3/ | |||
for the reactor and on Bodega Head as a whole. The evidence is not | |||
: Efh, p | |||
h | adequate to suggest more than a general statement of probabilities. | ||
4 | s4 The site is approximately 1,000 feet west of tbs vest edgs of the r-g SanAndreasfaultzone,whichisapproximatelyl}milesvidehere. The b | ||
95 | main surface ruptum during the 1906 earthquake 7,ock place on the east j | ||
g- | p.3 side of the scoe and had a horizontal displacement of 10-20 feet. | ||
erposures in the shaft excavated for the reactor. This fault, one of r' | Throughout Bodega Head, faults and joints are cosmon in the granitic pr;< | ||
many tectonic faults in the granitic rock, is the only one that has e | h rocks with the largest ones trending northwest, northeast, and east. | ||
4 I | |||
e | 95 l At the site, a principal structure is the Shaft fault, named from its W | ||
2 | g-erposures in the shaft excavated for the reactor. This fault, one of | ||
,r' many tectonic faults in the granitic rock, is the only one that has e | |||
i | |||
, e D | |||
been traced downward from the surface through Pleistocene sediments | |||
~. | |||
into the underlying granitic rocks. It strikes N. 400 E. and has been f | |||
e j | |||
t aced on the surface a. total of about 230 feet. ma mart== measured i | |||
displacement in the sediments is 14 inches vertica5.ly and in the granitic rocks is at least 24 feet horizontally. | |||
2 4 | |||
e 2' | |||
~ | |||
--..-.-.--a._ | |||
l' 3 | |||
n | l n | ||
V, u | |||
u | d. | ||
j a | |||
q | q t | ||
l' 1 | |||
l' | i' i | ||
~ The Shaft fault in the bedrock is m' sons that ranges from 2 to lo | |||
.j | |||
~ | |||
i | i | ||
[ | [ | ||
feet in width and consists of several intersecting faults.. This-4 | |||
feet in width and consists of several intersecting faults.. This-l suggests that movement on the fault occurred several times, .though the | -l l | ||
suggests that movement on the fault occurred several times,.though the amount of vertical or horisontal movement during' any one period 'of l | |||
apresent cannot be detenmined. It is not unra-ale, however, to - | j apresent cannot be detenmined. It is not unra-ale, however, to - | ||
I expect that displacements to+= | |||
M several feet have occurred at one j | |||
f | |||
,1 f::- [i tias. The fault displaces Pleistocene sediments dated from geologic | |||
) | |||
L:l | L:l | ||
~.. | |||
F4 | F4 evidence as younger than W,000 years and from radioactive carbon as | ||
l | ] | ||
l | |||
E | $r older-than M!,000 years. Faulting is, therefore, younger than the-i r =: | ||
1 g | |||
[5 | dated sediments, and any be younger than sediments that are not displaced, I | ||
EV i:i_ | |||
p;;, | for in the soft sediments displacement-may be taken up by plastic K+ | ||
clues for predicting future earthquake phencuena on Bodega Head. The G | 1 5 | ||
C'r | deformation rather than rupture. | ||
Le e | E i | ||
y | Surface ruptures created during the 1906 earthquake have been - | ||
f | l c.-- | ||
[5 described at many localities outside of the San Andreas fault zone i | |||
er k( | |||
'(Lawsonetal,1908). The record of these events provides important p;;, | |||
clues for predicting future earthquake phencuena on Bodega Head. The G | |||
C'r character of the measured ruptures at the'se localities indicates that Le e | |||
y sans of the faults parallal the San Andreas, others intersect it at w | |||
f acute angles, and still others are nearly normal to it. | |||
l The principal observations of ruptures outside the main fault zone yi i | |||
after the 1906 earthquake were made at the Point Reyes Peninsula,.the San Francisco Paninsula, and the Santa Crus Mountains; undoubtedly l. | |||
faulting occurred in large areas alsewhere which were not studied. | |||
3 c. | |||
l j | |||
l' g | |||
.-.a | |||
-.--,.--,,g-+,_,.. | |||
_. _.._.~ | |||
e o | I | ||
r | [..t a _.- | ||
y,, | |||
No' investigation was made at Bodega Head. Nevertheless, the. data, | e o | ||
particularly that from the Point Reyes Peninsula, can be used as a very general guide to the expectancy of fault displacements' at | r 1 | ||
various distances 1 rom the main fault zone during some future earthquake. | l No' investigation was made at Bodega Head. Nevertheless, the. data, particularly that from the Point Reyes Peninsula, can be used as a very general guide to the expectancy of fault displacements' at j | ||
I various distances 1 rom the main fault zone during some future earthquake. | |||
) | |||
In general, the 1906 bedrock ruptures were reported by G. K. Gilbert | In general, the 1906 bedrock ruptures were reported by G. K. Gilbert | ||
' | ' rb to increase in abundance and amount of displacement towards the San - | ||
t They occurred in the Point Reyes area as far as q | |||
I Andreas fault zone. | |||
.' f p, | |||
10 miles west of the San Andreas sone, but the ones farthest out were 2 | |||
{ | ~_ i barely discernible. At distances of a mile, horizontal displacement j | ||
m l | |||
{ | |||
sone a horizontal displacement of 2d feet was measuzwd. | of 2 to 6 inches was observed. At Inverness, about 2,000 feet from the j | ||
b.f.' | Ed. i sone a horizontal displacement of 2d feet was measuzwd. | ||
{%~ | l p' | ||
fractured and faulted. Topographic differences between the two areas | b The geologic setting of Bodega Head is similar to that of Point I | ||
are pronounced. Point Reyes is higher, thereby intercepting more rainfall; it is larger and contains a better-defined system of stream | W l | ||
Reyes Peninsula. The granitic rocks of both areas bound the western m | |||
hc | a b.f.' | ||
[.. | edge of the San Andreas sone and both bedrock masses are pervasively | ||
1 in w or earth unkes. | {%~ | ||
fractured and faulted. Topographic differences between the two areas | |||
- j | |||
'* :h are pronounced. Point Reyes is higher, thereby intercepting more R@{ | |||
rainfall; it is larger and contains a better-defined system of stream hc drainage. The topographic differences are considered to be of secondary g- | |||
[.. | |||
importance insofar as predicting future faults is concerned. The two I. | |||
areas would be expected to react similarly to.the stresses culminating. | |||
1 | |||
.c. l in w or earth unkes. | |||
\\ | |||
f i | f i | ||
l 5 | l 5 | ||
6 6 | 6 6 | ||
o | o e | ||
e | |||
,( | |||
,a m... | |||
i | |||
...p | |||
..w | |||
,4.. | |||
-.~,,s. | |||
-..,.. +.. | |||
s, | |||
.,s me e%. | |||
.-,r | |||
.w. p. | |||
c~i,e.-i.,,. | |||
.. v. ; r +p w | |||
g., | |||
r- | r-a j | ||
: t. - | 1 | ||
: t. - | |||
!r4 | |||
,i ' | |||
i- ) | |||
~ 4 | |||
.j N.4 - | |||
The probabilities of' displacements on Bodega Bead are. estimated j | |||
say of Richter magnitude. 8 5, has 'its epicenter in the San Andreas | i in the fol. lawing tabulation. ' It is assumed that a severe earthquake, | ||
') | |||
3 I | |||
~ | |||
say of Richter magnitude. 8 5, has 'its epicenter in the San Andreas k | |||
5 4 | |||
P fault zone in Bodega Barbor. The conclusions are only qualitative j | |||
l s | |||
and perhaps somewhat subjective but cannot be refined from available 1 | |||
knowledge. | |||
O | O | ||
;.gj. | |||
LZ | Displacement on a fault Probability L | ||
in granitic rock of shaft U.,,I i | |||
pf | LZ 2 inches or less Moderate to high i | ||
N Approximately 1 foot Lov i | |||
k | |||
s K | \\ | ||
pf l Approximately 2 feet Lov, lower than above, e | |||
but still a possibility E | |||
[". . - | 'f, 1 | ||
scoe. From observations of sympathetic faulting in bedrock which s | Approximately 5 feet Remote I | ||
h | s K li From general observations, it is clear that the 14k=14haad of g-M occurrence and the magnitude of sympathetic faulting outside of a E | ||
accompanied the 1906 earthquake, the probability of displacements F- | [".. - | ||
major earthquake fault none decreases with distance from the fault | |||
'4 M | |||
scoe. From observations of sympathetic faulting in bedrock which s | |||
h accompanied the 1906 earthquake, the probability of displacements f: | |||
F-of as much as one foot appear to be remote at distances of more than a. | |||
f~ | f~ | ||
3 or so miles from the aan Andreas fault zone. | 3 or so miles from the aan Andreas fault zone. | ||
] | |||
W I | w.W I | ||
f i | \\f i | ||
lo I | |||
t P | |||
l 5 | |||
5 | i g, | ||
i | ( | ||
~ ' | |||
( | |||
o | o | ||
?.__?_ | |||
??l?. | |||
-- ?_ ' ~ ~~ | |||
~ " " * | |||
~' '~ '~"~~~ | |||
~ ~~^ | |||
~ | |||
^^ | |||
~ | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:06, 3 December 2024
Text
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _
l i
j
%HWjfh,;j),_ '$ w %,,,,,.
'gupp/d 5/7/N
~
g
[g UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINGTON 25.D.C.
ENGINEERING b M OF THE PROPOSED NUCIEAR POWER PIART
~
ON BOIEGA BEAD, 80 NOMA COUNTY, ChLIFORNIA i
bY Julius Schlocker and M. G. hnilla
[
[
Abstract c
'_t w
,l This report summarizes and interprets the geologie data presented i.
\\
C_'
in previous reports by the Geological Surrey. These data bear on the F..
5i]
effect of large magnitude earthquakes on the foundation of the, proposed L.1 nuclear power plant on Bodega Head, California.
Q The crucial geologic problem at the site involves an estimate of the probability of a suddan permanent displacement, by rupturing, of the foun-dation rock of the reactor during an earthquake. Any such prediction
((
must be based to a great extent on experience in earthquake-affected B?r regions; it can be made only with a relatively low degree of confidence LZ because geologic knowledge of the phannmana being evaluated is incomplete, e
{
and in some instances rudimentary.
I' An upper limit on the probability of faulting is set by the probabil-P f-b ity of occurrence of severe earthquakes (Richter magnitude 8.0 and above)
~
~
on the San Andreas fault. This has been ertimated by several highly g
r j
qualified seismologists to be on the order of one or two per century.
The Bodega Head site is almost certain to experience one severe earthquake in the next W years, the assumed lifetime ofet.be plant.
6 k[lfg2852227 FIRESTO85-665 PDR.
l i
\\
=
.[
-. -..,~,
4i
.j
~.. _ _.
r 6
4
)
The principal hazards to the plant from such a seismic event' are twofolds (1)shakingofthegroundduetosciamicwavepropagation, and (2) possible displacement of the foundation rocks due to faulting. -
l The hazard due to ahairing is being investigated by others, including the Seismology Division, U. 8. Coast and Geodetic Survey. prediction
-l l' b ;
of possible displacement must be based largely on the distribution and asI characteristics of the surface faulting produced by the 1906 earthquake
- +)
M and to a lesser extent on the distribution of faults in the excavation I
E 3/
for the reactor and on Bodega Head as a whole. The evidence is not
- Efh, p
adequate to suggest more than a general statement of probabilities.
s4 The site is approximately 1,000 feet west of tbs vest edgs of the r-g SanAndreasfaultzone,whichisapproximatelyl}milesvidehere. The b
main surface ruptum during the 1906 earthquake 7,ock place on the east j
p.3 side of the scoe and had a horizontal displacement of 10-20 feet.
Throughout Bodega Head, faults and joints are cosmon in the granitic pr;<
h rocks with the largest ones trending northwest, northeast, and east.
4 I
95 l At the site, a principal structure is the Shaft fault, named from its W
g-erposures in the shaft excavated for the reactor. This fault, one of
,r' many tectonic faults in the granitic rock, is the only one that has e
i
, e D
been traced downward from the surface through Pleistocene sediments
~.
into the underlying granitic rocks. It strikes N. 400 E. and has been f
e j
t aced on the surface a. total of about 230 feet. ma mart== measured i
displacement in the sediments is 14 inches vertica5.ly and in the granitic rocks is at least 24 feet horizontally.
2 4
e 2'
~
--..-.-.--a._
l' 3
l n
V, u
d.
j a
q t
l' 1
i' i
~ The Shaft fault in the bedrock is m' sons that ranges from 2 to lo
.j
~
i
[
feet in width and consists of several intersecting faults.. This-4
-l l
suggests that movement on the fault occurred several times,.though the amount of vertical or horisontal movement during' any one period 'of l
j apresent cannot be detenmined. It is not unra-ale, however, to -
I expect that displacements to+=
M several feet have occurred at one j
f
,1 f::- [i tias. The fault displaces Pleistocene sediments dated from geologic
)
L:l
~..
F4 evidence as younger than W,000 years and from radioactive carbon as
]
l
$r older-than M!,000 years. Faulting is, therefore, younger than the-i r =:
1 g
dated sediments, and any be younger than sediments that are not displaced, I
EV i:i_
for in the soft sediments displacement-may be taken up by plastic K+
1 5
deformation rather than rupture.
E i
Surface ruptures created during the 1906 earthquake have been -
l c.--
[5 described at many localities outside of the San Andreas fault zone i
er k(
'(Lawsonetal,1908). The record of these events provides important p;;,
clues for predicting future earthquake phencuena on Bodega Head. The G
C'r character of the measured ruptures at the'se localities indicates that Le e
y sans of the faults parallal the San Andreas, others intersect it at w
f acute angles, and still others are nearly normal to it.
l The principal observations of ruptures outside the main fault zone yi i
after the 1906 earthquake were made at the Point Reyes Peninsula,.the San Francisco Paninsula, and the Santa Crus Mountains; undoubtedly l.
faulting occurred in large areas alsewhere which were not studied.
3 c.
l j
l' g
.-.a
-.--,.--,,g-+,_,..
_. _.._.~
I
[..t a _.-
y,,
e o
r 1
l No' investigation was made at Bodega Head. Nevertheless, the. data, particularly that from the Point Reyes Peninsula, can be used as a very general guide to the expectancy of fault displacements' at j
I various distances 1 rom the main fault zone during some future earthquake.
)
In general, the 1906 bedrock ruptures were reported by G. K. Gilbert
' rb to increase in abundance and amount of displacement towards the San -
t They occurred in the Point Reyes area as far as q
I Andreas fault zone.
.' f p,
10 miles west of the San Andreas sone, but the ones farthest out were 2
~_ i barely discernible. At distances of a mile, horizontal displacement j
m l
{
of 2 to 6 inches was observed. At Inverness, about 2,000 feet from the j
Ed. i sone a horizontal displacement of 2d feet was measuzwd.
l p'
b The geologic setting of Bodega Head is similar to that of Point I
W l
Reyes Peninsula. The granitic rocks of both areas bound the western m
a b.f.'
edge of the San Andreas sone and both bedrock masses are pervasively
{%~
fractured and faulted. Topographic differences between the two areas
- j
'* :h are pronounced. Point Reyes is higher, thereby intercepting more R@{
rainfall; it is larger and contains a better-defined system of stream hc drainage. The topographic differences are considered to be of secondary g-
[..
importance insofar as predicting future faults is concerned. The two I.
areas would be expected to react similarly to.the stresses culminating.
1
.c. l in w or earth unkes.
\\
f i
l 5
6 6
o e
e
,(
,a m...
i
...p
..w
,4..
-.~,,s.
-..,.. +..
s,
.,s me e%.
.-,r
.w. p.
c~i,e.-i.,,.
.. v. ; r +p w
g.,
r-a j
1
- t. -
!r4
,i '
i- )
~ 4
.j N.4 -
The probabilities of' displacements on Bodega Bead are. estimated j
i in the fol. lawing tabulation. ' It is assumed that a severe earthquake,
')
3 I
~
say of Richter magnitude. 8 5, has 'its epicenter in the San Andreas k
5 4
P fault zone in Bodega Barbor. The conclusions are only qualitative j
l s
and perhaps somewhat subjective but cannot be refined from available 1
knowledge.
O
- .gj.
Displacement on a fault Probability L
in granitic rock of shaft U.,,I i
LZ 2 inches or less Moderate to high i
N Approximately 1 foot Lov i
k
\\
pf l Approximately 2 feet Lov, lower than above, e
but still a possibility E
'f, 1
Approximately 5 feet Remote I
s K li From general observations, it is clear that the 14k=14haad of g-M occurrence and the magnitude of sympathetic faulting outside of a E
[".. -
major earthquake fault none decreases with distance from the fault
'4 M
scoe. From observations of sympathetic faulting in bedrock which s
h accompanied the 1906 earthquake, the probability of displacements f:
F-of as much as one foot appear to be remote at distances of more than a.
f~
3 or so miles from the aan Andreas fault zone.
]
w.W I
\\f i
lo I
t P
l 5
i g,
(
~ '
o
?.__?_
??l?.
-- ?_ ' ~ ~~
~ " " *
~' '~ '~"~~~
~ ~~^
~
^^
~
-