ML20237D141: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - - | {{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - - | ||
December 17, 1987 Project No. 675 Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering 100 Prospect Hill Road Post Office Box 500 Windsor, Connecticut 06095-0500 | December 17, 1987 Project No. 675 Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering 100 Prospect Hill Road Post Office Box 500 Windsor, Connecticut 06095-0500 | ||
==Dear Mr. Scherer:== | ==Dear Mr. Scherer:== | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
COMMENTS AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING CHAPTER 1, SAFEGUARDS, CESSAR-DC Our Reactor Safeguards Branch has reviewed Chapter 1, Amendment 12 of System 80+ CESSAR-DC, transmitted by your {{letter dated|date=September 18, 1987|text=letter dated September 18, 1987}}, and has provided comments and identified the need for additional information in order | COMMENTS AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING CHAPTER 1, SAFEGUARDS, CESSAR-DC Our Reactor Safeguards Branch has reviewed Chapter 1, Amendment 12 of System 80+ CESSAR-DC, transmitted by your {{letter dated|date=September 18, 1987|text=letter dated September 18, 1987}}, and has provided comments and identified the need for additional information in order l | ||
to continue the review. | |||
Sincerely, Guy ." Viss n"g, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate | The enclosed Request For Additional Information provides the comments and describes the needed information. Our schedule calls for the information to be received within 90 days from the date of this letter. | ||
Sincerely, Guy." Viss n"g, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power ffk22h0071071217 Reactor Project Directorate ROJ paa Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, 675 F V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
As stated l | As stated l | ||
cc: See Next page | cc: See Next page | ||
] | |||
. DISTRIBUTION: | |||
(Central File | (Central File LRubenstein NRC PDR EJordan | ||
() | ' () | ||
, M'. h, L | |||
PDSNP Readino JPartlow EHylton | |||
~ | |||
OGC-BETH GVissing ACRS (10) | |||
RErickson | RErickson BMendelsohn D | ||
PDSNPg | |||
/ | |||
PDSNP PDSf GViss3 (g' EHfKon LRubenstein 12/ff/87 12/ :/87 12//,>/87 | |||
\\ | |||
p iso 8,/ | p iso 8,/ | ||
{ | o,, | ||
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y | |||
o r | |||
{ | |||
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20666 | |||
,/ | |||
December 17, 1987 Project No. 675 Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering 100 Prospect Hill Road Post Office Box 500 Windsor, Connecticut 06095-0500 | |||
==Dear Mr. Scherer:== | ==Dear Mr. Scherer:== | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
COMMENTS AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING CHAPTER 1, SAFEGUARDS, CESSAR-DC Our Reactor Safeguards Branch has reviewed Chapter 1, Amendment 12 of System 80+ CESSAR-DC, transmitted by your {{letter dated|date=September 18, 1987|text=letter dated September 18, 1987}}, and has provided comments and identified the need for additional information in order to continue the review. The enclosed Request For Additional Information provides the comments and describes the needed information. Our schedule calls for the information to be received within 90 days from the date of this letter. | |||
Sincerely, g | |||
Sincerely, g | Guy S. Vissing, Pr et Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
Guy S. Vissing, Pr | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
As stated cc: See Next page | As stated cc: See Next page | ||
^ | |||
- Combustion Engineering, Inc. | |||
Project No. 675 Advanced CESSAR cc: Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering, Inc. | |||
1000 Prospect Hill Road Windsor, Connecticut 06095 Mr. C.- B. Brinkman, Manager. | 1000 Prospect Hill Road Windsor, Connecticut 06095 Mr. C.- B. Brinkman, Manager. | ||
Washington Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc. | Washington Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc. | ||
| Line 66: | Line 71: | ||
6 | 6 | ||
} | } | ||
I | I l | ||
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 6-CONCERNING REACTOR SAFEGUARDS BRANCH REVIEW | |||
) | |||
0F CHAPTER 1, AMENDMENT NO. 12 | |||
) | |||
0F-COMBUSTION ENGINEERING SYSTEM 80+ DESIGN, CESSAR-DC PROJECT NO. 675 500.1 | 0F-COMBUSTION ENGINEERING SYSTEM 80+ DESIGN, CESSAR-DC PROJECT NO. 675 500.1 There is no indication in this chapter of wherein the Severe Accident Policy and the unresolved generic issues will be addressed. | ||
500.2 | 500.2 Section 1.2-2. indicates that the descriptions of the Nuclear Power Module (NPM) and the Interfaces are sufficient for evaluation of the essentially complete plant. Neither Table 1.2-1, the CESSAR scope for NPM, nor Table 1.2-2, the matrix of Interface sections, includes the security system. Yet: | ||
(a) Section 13.6 of NUREG-0800 includes review of the layout of the plant and other design features and equipment arrangements intended to provide protection of vital equipment against acts of radiological sabotage. | (a) Section 13.6 of NUREG-0800 includes review of the layout of the plant and other design features and equipment arrangements intended to provide protection of vital equipment against acts of radiological sabotage. | ||
(b) The physical barrier guidance in Regulatory Guide 5.65 should be considered during design of structures that contain equipment designated as vital equipment. | (b) The physical barrier guidance in Regulatory Guide 5.65 should be considered during design of structures that contain equipment designated as vital equipment. | ||
(c) A protected source of power for security lighting and access control systems should be considered during design of on-site electric power systems. (See NUREG/CR-1327 Security Lighting Planning Document for Nuclear Fixed Site Facilities.) | (c) A protected source of power for security lighting and access control systems should be considered during design of on-site electric power systems. | ||
500.3 | (See NUREG/CR-1327 Security Lighting Planning Document for Nuclear Fixed Site Facilities.) | ||
500.3 Table 1.8-8, the list of applicable Regulatory Guides addressed in the System 80+ design, does not include RG 5.65. | |||
1 | 1 | ||
.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 08:03, 2 December 2024
| ML20237D141 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/17/1987 |
| From: | Vissing G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Scherer A ABB COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NUCLEAR FUEL (FORMERLY |
| References | |
| PROJECT-675F NUDOCS 8712230071 | |
| Download: ML20237D141 (4) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - -
December 17, 1987 Project No. 675 Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering 100 Prospect Hill Road Post Office Box 500 Windsor, Connecticut 06095-0500
Dear Mr. Scherer:
SUBJECT:
COMMENTS AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING CHAPTER 1, SAFEGUARDS, CESSAR-DC Our Reactor Safeguards Branch has reviewed Chapter 1, Amendment 12 of System 80+ CESSAR-DC, transmitted by your letter dated September 18, 1987, and has provided comments and identified the need for additional information in order l
to continue the review.
The enclosed Request For Additional Information provides the comments and describes the needed information. Our schedule calls for the information to be received within 90 days from the date of this letter.
Sincerely, Guy." Viss n"g, Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power ffk22h0071071217 Reactor Project Directorate ROJ paa Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, 675 F V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated l
cc: See Next page
]
. DISTRIBUTION:
(Central File LRubenstein NRC PDR EJordan
' ()
, M'. h, L
PDSNP Readino JPartlow EHylton
~
OGC-BETH GVissing ACRS (10)
RErickson BMendelsohn D
PDSNPg
/
PDSNP PDSf GViss3 (g' EHfKon LRubenstein 12/ff/87 12/ :/87 12//,>/87
\\
p iso 8,/
o,,
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y
o r
{
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20666
,/
December 17, 1987 Project No. 675 Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering 100 Prospect Hill Road Post Office Box 500 Windsor, Connecticut 06095-0500
Dear Mr. Scherer:
SUBJECT:
COMMENTS AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING CHAPTER 1, SAFEGUARDS, CESSAR-DC Our Reactor Safeguards Branch has reviewed Chapter 1, Amendment 12 of System 80+ CESSAR-DC, transmitted by your letter dated September 18, 1987, and has provided comments and identified the need for additional information in order to continue the review. The enclosed Request For Additional Information provides the comments and describes the needed information. Our schedule calls for the information to be received within 90 days from the date of this letter.
Sincerely, g
Guy S. Vissing, Pr et Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See Next page
^
- Combustion Engineering, Inc.
Project No. 675 Advanced CESSAR cc: Mr. A. E. Scherer, Director Nuclear Licensing Combustion Engineering, Inc.
1000 Prospect Hill Road Windsor, Connecticut 06095 Mr. C.- B. Brinkman, Manager.
Washington Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.
7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1310 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 9
i l
6
}
I l
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 6-CONCERNING REACTOR SAFEGUARDS BRANCH REVIEW
)
0F CHAPTER 1, AMENDMENT NO. 12
)
0F-COMBUSTION ENGINEERING SYSTEM 80+ DESIGN, CESSAR-DC PROJECT NO. 675 500.1 There is no indication in this chapter of wherein the Severe Accident Policy and the unresolved generic issues will be addressed.
500.2 Section 1.2-2. indicates that the descriptions of the Nuclear Power Module (NPM) and the Interfaces are sufficient for evaluation of the essentially complete plant. Neither Table 1.2-1, the CESSAR scope for NPM, nor Table 1.2-2, the matrix of Interface sections, includes the security system. Yet:
(a) Section 13.6 of NUREG-0800 includes review of the layout of the plant and other design features and equipment arrangements intended to provide protection of vital equipment against acts of radiological sabotage.
(b) The physical barrier guidance in Regulatory Guide 5.65 should be considered during design of structures that contain equipment designated as vital equipment.
(c) A protected source of power for security lighting and access control systems should be considered during design of on-site electric power systems.
(See NUREG/CR-1327 Security Lighting Planning Document for Nuclear Fixed Site Facilities.)
500.3 Table 1.8-8, the list of applicable Regulatory Guides addressed in the System 80+ design, does not include RG 5.65.
1
.