ML20245J668

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Deviations Noted in Insp Repts 50-313/89-26 & 50-368/89-26

ML20245J668
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	08/14/1989
From:	Milhoan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Campbell G ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8908180119
Download: ML20245J668 (2)

See also: IR 05000313/1989026

Text

,

.

,.

,.

. _..

.-_

--

,

,9 y

af-

[ Ip ,"g 3.[ '

,

,

,

'

'

4

7y

.

~

-

+

.

.w

,,

..

Y

,

'

>

.g.

m

. ,

,

g

In Reply; Refer To: .

%y

LDockets:?50-313/89-26-

,,

,

'

~50-368/89-26

s

,n'

>

-x

+

.;.

~

(Arkansas' Power & Light Company

i

"

.ATTNi Mr. Gene Campbell

'

.

X

Vice' President.. Nuclear

,

ug

7 ..

0perations

%,

P.O. Box 551

l.

.

,

Little Rock, Arkansas 72203

'- i

y

..

.

.

' Gentlemen:'

.

lThank you.'for your letteridated -July 21,1989, _in - response to our. letter-

.

'and Notice of; Deviation dated June 22, 1989. We have reviewed your reply and

,

.. find it responsive to the' concerns raised'in our Notice of Deviation. We will

review theLimplementat. ion of your cor/ective actions duping a future inspection

,,

(

t.,

'to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintained.

'

,

T ',.

,_

N

-Sincerely,

Driginal Signed By

'

J. L. Milhoan

6-

'

Ja'mes L. Milhoan, Director

7

4

'

< Division-of Reactor Projects

s

,

CC:

,

Arkansas: Nuclear One '

'

ATTN:_'N. S.1Carns, Director.

Nuclear Operations

^

-P.O.. Box 608

Russellville,' Arkansas '72801

Arkansas' Radiation Control' Program Director

i

IRIV:RI':PSS*'

C:PSS*

AD:DRS*

D

ASingh/cjg

TStetka

JJaudon

JLMi]hoan

'

'

{(/ /89

-/L/89

/ /89

/ /89

ft

'

j. ,

' *previously concurred

o

.

MRS2nais SMS$p

Q

-

.Si

..,

..,

. ._. - - - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ - _ _ - _ -

.

. . -

.

1

Arkansas Power & Light Company

-2-

'

L

bec to DMB (IE01).

bec distrib..by RIV:

RRI.

R. D.' Martin, RA

RPB-DRSS

Section Chief (DRP/A)

Lisa Shea. RM/Al.F

RIV File

,

DRP

~ MIS System

.

.

RSTS Operator

ProjectEngineer(DRP/A)

DRS

C. Harbuck, NRR Project Manager-(MS:: 13-D-18)

C. Poslusny, NRR Project Manager- (MS:

13-D-18)-

.

A. Singh

"

.

T. Stetka

.

(

h

-

T

_ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ - _

_

_

__

_

._

.g

-

gn. w e _. : J d' FG,

~ ~ nl/

-

e

. . . -

r

,

Y(g)j{

Jlb 24 BW h;

t!q

e-

-

t

4

Q

M

.

.

' g. u '"'_

ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

. -_

r

July 21, 1989

' " ~~~

'

OCAN078918

J. L. Milhoan, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region IV.

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000

Arlington, Texas 76011

SUBJECT:

Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2

Docket Nos. 50-313/50-368

License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6

Response to Inspection Report

50-313/89-26 and 50-368/89-26

Dear Mr. Milhoan:

Pursuant to the provisions of 10CFR2.201, a response to the

deviation identified in the subject. inspection report is submitted.

Very truly yours,

-

-

,.

i. ; /

,

A

,

_,

'E. C. Ewing

General Manager,

Technical Support

and Assessment

ECE:PLC:sgw

enclosure

cc w/ enc 1:

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Document Control Desk

Mail Station P1-137

Washington, D. C.

20555

i

f & ( j> {^ $ M

9

9

i a

e

o

4c,'

MEMBEA MfDOLE SOUTH UTILITIES SYSTEM

=

_-_. __ __ --

. _ _

]

-

'

OCANB78918

..

..

July 21, 1989

Page 2 of 4

Notice of Deviation

Based on the results of an WRC inspection conducted on June 5-9,

1989, a deviation from a commitment to the NRC was identified.

The

deviation consisted of failure to complete and implement the

Preventive Maintenance Program (PMP).

In accordance with the

" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement

Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the deviation is listed

below:

In a letter dated November 30, 1987, in response to Violation

313/8730-01; 368/8730-01, concerning an inadequate PMP for

safety-related components, the licensee committed to complete

and implement a new PMP by October 1988.

Contrary to the above, as of June 9,1989, the new PMP has not

been completed and implemented.

Deviation 313-368/8926-01

Response to Deviation 313-368/8926-01

(1) The reason for the deviation if admitted:

AP&L does admit that the Preventive Maintenance Program (PMP)

was not completed and implemented by October 1988.

The program

status for October 1988 was as follows:

Procedures for Preventive Maintenance:

Mech

Elect

I&C

Total

Required

207

193

450

850

Draft / Planned

185

163

285

635

Approved

146

107

108

361

% Complete (Draft)

89

84

63

74

% Complete (Approved)

70

55

22

42

Preventive Maintenance Engineering Evaluations:

Required

174

Draft / Planned

151

Approved

149

% Complete (Oraft)

86

% Complete (Approved)

85

Repetitive Tasks:

Mech

Elect

I&C

Total

Required

2039

2995

2216

7250

Draft / Planned

1435

2690

500

4615

Approved

898

1034

97

2035

,

% Completed (Draft)

70

89

22

63

l

% Complete (Approved)

44

34

4

28

l

i

l

!

l

c _ ___ _ _

_

i

- - - - - _ -

SCAN 878918

..

.

' '

.'#- - * ,e

i

July 21,1989

Pag 2 3 of 4-

The status through July 16, 1989, is as follows:

Procedures for Preventive Maintenance:

Mech

Elect

I&C

Total

Required

207

193

450

850

Draft / Planned

198

193

412

803

Approved

187

162

252

601

% Complete (Draft)

95

100

91

94

% Complete (Approved)

90

83

56

70

Preventive Maintenance Engineering Evaluations:

Required

174

Draft / Planned

164

Approved

162

% Complete (Draft)

93

% Complete (Approved)

92

Repetitive Tasks:

Mech

Elect

I&C

Total

Required

1700

3450

.2100

7250

Draft / Planned

1696

3450

1891

7037

Approved

1470

2653

979

5102

% Complete (Draft)

99

100

90

97

% Complete (Approved)

86

76

46

70

The completion of the project was delayed due to the following:

1.

Scope addition

- Vibration analysis

- Oil analysis

- Setpoint development

- Equipment configuration verifications

2.

Revisions to procedures after issuance required additional

resources.

The responsibility for execution of the program was transferred

from one group to another, and due to an oversight, AP&L failed

to notify NRC of our projected schedule overrun.

It is expected

l

that procedures will be revised or added based on addition of

equipment, maintenance history, and industry experience.

This

^should be part of normal naaintenance of the program and not part

of the development.

.

(

- - - . _ . - _ - - - _ - _ . - - - - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ - _ - . - . - -

w

- _ _ - _ - .

. . . _ .

.-c %.

9CAN878918

'

,. 9 :::, r.

-

July.21, 1989

.

Page 4 of 4;

,

,

. (2) The corrective steps that have been taken and~the results-

achieved:

1The program status was reviewed-and the scope defined.

A

completion .cate for safety-related. and other selected components

c

.

procedures wasLestablished. . A review of AP&L's outstanding NRC

commitments was performed.

The results identified three additional

commitments related to NRC inspection. reports which were not-

completed by.the expected'due date. These were' discussed

between Mrc Dwight Chamberlain of NRC Region IV' and Mr. Charles

Turk,: Acting Licensing Manager on July 17, 1989, and in followup

correspondence (SCAN 078917).

(3) The corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further

deviations:

The current method of tracking NRC commitments is being evaluated.

LIf an improved method is deemed necessary, actions will be

directed.toward implementing the changes.

The Preventive ~

Maintenance Program progress will be closely tracked and if

delays result, notification to the NRC will be provided.

~

(4) The date when- full compliance will be achieved:

By.0ctober 31, 1990, the preventive maintenance procedure for

the current scope of safety-related and other selected components.

will.he completed. . Implementation.of specific-preventive

maintenance procedures will be governed by the schedule

established as part of the. program. ..This date is based on

continuing with the current level of progress.

The evaluation

of the method for tracking NRC commitments will be completed by

October 15, 1989. This date will allow for identification of

the various management reports to be issued from the tracking-

system data.

,

m.___._

___mm.

~-

-..m_.

. _ _ _.

.s

..m_ _ - - . ._

_ _ - . . _ _ _ __ . _ _ _ _ _ _

-__-_..s_.____--___.__._m.._-___..__..-

________-__.__m______m_-._._____.__.___.__._____._._-__

-

-

-