ML20338A260: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:©2020 Nuclear Energy Institute 1 Treatment of FLEX in licensee PRAs is a common subject for RAIs in risk-informed LARs RAIs often large scope Unclear what information is needed to support development of SE Scope of review not always commensurate with impact on decision NRC and industry met to discuss possible improvements July public meeting November workshop Ongoing discussions highlighted potential for additional guidance Industry-developed Voluntary, best practices Continued dialogue necessary to reach mutual understanding of role of RG 1.200 R3 Regular technical exchanges on state-of-practice and consensus methods vital to efficient implementation FLEX in Risk-Informed Licensing}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:13, 29 November 2024
| ML20338A260 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
| Issue date: | 12/14/2020 |
| From: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
| To: | NRC/NRR/DRA |
| Alexander Schwab | |
| References | |
| Download: ML20338A260 (1) | |
Text
©2020 Nuclear Energy Institute 1 Treatment of FLEX in licensee PRAs is a common subject for RAIs in risk-informed LARs RAIs often large scope Unclear what information is needed to support development of SE Scope of review not always commensurate with impact on decision NRC and industry met to discuss possible improvements July public meeting November workshop Ongoing discussions highlighted potential for additional guidance Industry-developed Voluntary, best practices Continued dialogue necessary to reach mutual understanding of role of RG 1.200 R3 Regular technical exchanges on state-of-practice and consensus methods vital to efficient implementation FLEX in Risk-Informed Licensing