ML22342B260: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER
{{#Wiki_filter:EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief:
Clyde Osterholtz Facility:
GG 10/17/2022 U/I:
Start of Op Test:
10/10/2022 10/15/2022 Due Date Date Complete Initials 2/7/2022 12/8/2021 cco 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 cco 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 cco 3/14/2022 N/A 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 cco 3/28/2022 12/8/2022 cco 5/9/2022 5/6/2022 cco 5/23/2022 5/19/2022 cco 7/25/2022 7/7/2022 cco 8/1/2022 N/A cco 8/22/2022 8/19/2022 cco 9/5/2022 9/5/2022 cco 9/5/2022 9/5/2022 cco 9/12/2022 9/12/2022 cco 9/12/2022 9/12/2022 cco 9/19/2022 9/12/2022 cco 9/26/2022 9/26/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/29/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/29/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 cco 10/10/2022 10/10/2022 cco 10/22/2022 11/7/2022 cco 11/6/2022 11/7/2022 cco 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 cco 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 cco 11/21/2022 11/8/2022 cco 11/28/2022 12/6/2022 cco 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 cco 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 cco 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 cco 12/26/2022 N/A 1/2/2023 by 1/5/2023 cco 1/9/2023 N/A 2/6/2023 N/A Rev. 9 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.
Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed Request facility licensee management feedback on the exam Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC Peer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9 Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and reference materials due.
Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by BC and forwarded for facility licensee review Written exam and operating test reviews completed Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief Administer Operating Test NRC examiners and facility contact assigned Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-201 Att-3 Corporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3 Date of Written Exam:
Description Notes Examination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials End of Op Test:
Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Document review on ES-401-9 Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396 Feedback approved by Branch Chief Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due ES-201-4 prepared by LA Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee RPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam grading completed Branch Chief review of exam results completed Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and waiver/excusal letters sent LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-5)
Post exam comments and graded exams received ES-403-1 to BC Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)
Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated Signed ES 303's to BC produced by CE License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results SUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS SUNSI checklist to LA Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals Examination Report Issued


Chief: Clyde Osterholtz Facility: GG 10/17/2022Date of Written Exam:
password es1021
U/I: Start of Op Test: 10/10/2022 10/15/2022End of Op Test:


Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Due Date Description Date Complete Initials Notes
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Clyde C. Osterholtz/
5/18/2022 Clyde C. Osterholtz/
5/18/2022 Heather J. Gepford 5/19/22


2/7/2022 12/8/2021 ccoExamination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials
Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Date of Exam: October 17, 2022 Exam Level:
 
RO SRO Item Description (Y)es / (N)o a
3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoNRC examiners and facility contact assigned
b*
 
c#
3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoFacility contact briefed on security and other requirements
1.
 
Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each question y i includes a technical reference.
3/14/2022 N/AReference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-201 Att-3 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoCorporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE
2.
 
: a. All questions reference NRG knowledge and abilities (KIAs) requirements.
3/28/2022 12/8/2022 ccoNRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3
y
 
: b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
5/9/2022 5/6/2022 ccoOperating test outline(s) and other checklists due ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 5/23/2022 5/19/2022 ccoOperating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC provided to facility licensee 7/25/2022 7/7/2022 ccoProposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by reference materials due. BC and forwarded for facility licensee review 8/1/2022 N/A ccoPeer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9
y
 
: c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor analvsis.
8/22/2022 8/19/2022 ccoWritten exam and operating test reviews completedDocument review on ES-401-9
3.
 
Senior reactor operator (SRO) questions test at the SRO license level.
9/5/2022 9/5/2022 ccoFeedback approved by Branch Chief 9/5/2022 9/5/2022 ccoExamination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee 9/12/2022 9/12/2022 ccoPreliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396
4.
 
The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator (RO) or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRG licensing exams, including full  
9/12/2022 9/12/2022 ccoOn-site validation & 10% audit of license applications
'I 1 (100-question) retake examinations, consult the NRG Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation operator licensinq program office.)
 
5.
9/19/2022 9/12/2022 ccoPreliminary license applications and waivers reviewed
Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
 
_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed.
9/26/2022 9/26/2022 ccoFinal license applications & waiver/excusal requests due ES-201-4 prepared by LA 10/3/2022 9/29/2022 ccoWritten exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief
y
 
_ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started.
10/3/2022 9/29/2022 ccoRequest facility licensee management feedback on the exam 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoFinal applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter waiver/excusal letters sent (ES-201 Att-5) 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoProctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoApproved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners 10/10/2022 10/10/2022 ccoAdminister Operating Test
y
 
_ The examinations were developed independently.
10/22/2022 11/7/2022 ccoExaminer's document op test results on ES 303's
 
11/6/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam comments and graded exams received ES-403-1 to BC 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated 11/21/2022 11/8/2022 ccoChief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam Signed ES 303's to BC grading completed 11/28/2022 12/6/2022 ccoBranch Chief review of exam results completed
 
12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoWaivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision
 
12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoLicense/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoRPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21
 
12/26/2022 N/AFinal Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.
 
1/2/2023 by 1/5/2023 ccoExamination Report Issuedproduced by CE
 
1/9/2023 N/ARef Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals
 
2/6/2023 N/ASUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS SUNSI checklist to LA
 
Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1
 
Rev. 9 password es1021
 
Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Date of Exam: October 17, 2022 Exam Level: RO SRO Item Description (Y)es / (N)o a b* c#
: 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each questiony i includes a technical reference.
: 2. a. All questions reference NRG knowledge and abilities (KIAs) requirements.y b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. y c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor analvsis.
: 3. Senior reactor operator (SRO) questions test at the SRO license level.
4.The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator (RO) or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRG licensing exams, including full 'I 1 (100-question) retake examinations, consult the NRG Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation operator licensinq program office.)
5.Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed. y _ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started.y _ The examinations were developed independently.
{._ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication.
{._ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication.
Other (explain):
Other (explain):
: 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, at least Bank Modified New 10% new (at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new 51v or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >23/30. 6% y1 / 1.3% 68%
6.
: 7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO examMemory C/A and at least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the33/ 44% 42/ 56%y y actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, at least Bank Modified New 10% new (at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new 51 v or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >
8.References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.'{ 'I
23/30.6%
: 9. Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examinationV y outline and is appropriate for the KIA statements' assiqned tier; deviations are justified.
y 1 / 1.3%
: 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2. '/ 'I 11.The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correcty 'I and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
68%
R..j Printed Name/t:;;;,,ure Date c,/p- /
7.
z,2-a.Author le_ P..P,,o S /.LIL I) b.Facility Reviewer (*) *-1:*,.,,", W 1ta!,*AI lv '1/1.1/l 1.,
Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO exam Memory C/A and at least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the 33/ 44%
c.NRG Reviewer(#)
42/ 56%
y y actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >
8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
'{ 'I
: 9.
Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination V y outline and is appropriate for the KIA statements' assiqned tier; deviations are justified.
: 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2.
'/ 'I
: 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correct y 'I and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
R..j Printed Name/t:;;;,,ure  

Date c,/p-/
z,2-a.
Author
 
le_
P..P,,o S  
/  
.LIL I)
b.
Facility Reviewer (*)
*-1:*,.,,", W 1ta!,*AI lv
'1/1.1/l 1.
c.
NRG Reviewer(#)
NRG Chief Examiner NRG Regional Supervisor
NRG Chief Examiner NRG Regional Supervisor
* The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.  
* The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.  
Line 93: Line 110:
Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/28/2022 9/28/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22
Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/28/2022 9/28/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22


Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist
y y
: a. Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable:
y y
* task standard* initial conditions* initiating cues* references and tools, including associated procedures* reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if the facility licensee deems it to be time criticali 1* alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path"* operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following:
y y
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature-system response and other examiner cues-statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant-criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard - identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards - restrictions on the sequence of steps, if aoolicable
y y
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2)y have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., itemy distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms.
y y
y Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/28/2022 9/28/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22
 
Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist a.
Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable:
task standard initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if the facility licensee deems it to be time critical i 1 alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path" operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if aoolicable b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2) y have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item y
distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms.
Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES
Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES
: 1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be y 1out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
: 1.
: 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. '( '/
The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be y 1 out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
: 3. Each event description consists of the following:
2.
* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiatedf 1* the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew* the expected operator actions (by shift position)* the event termination point (if applicable)
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) a (Y)es / (N)o b* c#
'( '/
: 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. y '/
: 3.
: 5. The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team toy y observe and evaluate applicant performance.
Each event description consists of the following:
: 6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated f 1 the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
f Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue timey constraints. Cues are given.
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) a (Y)es / (N)o b*
: 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. '-I y
c#
: 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d}, any open simulatoryperformance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
4.
: 9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4. '( y y
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
y '/
5.
The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to y y observe and evaluate applicant performance.
6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
f Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time y
constraints. Cues are given.
7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
'-I y
: 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d}, any open simulator y
performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9.
Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4.
'( y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
Line 117: Line 158:
y y
y y


Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist
y y
 
y y
Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 E Scenarios A V M P E I P N 1 2 3 4 T N L T O I I T M C T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U A Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L M*
y y
N P R T O R T O R T O R T O T E O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U RO RX 1 1 1 1 0
y y
 
y Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/29/2022 9/29/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22
NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2
 
SRO-U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1
 
Man. C trl 2 1 3 1 1 0
 
TS 0 2 2
 
RX 1 1 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1
 
SRO -I I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2
 
MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 SRO -U Man. C trl 1 2 3 1 1 0
 
TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 2 1 1 0
 
NOR 2 1 3 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 3 9 4 4 2
 
SRO -U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. C trl 3 1 4 1 1 0
 
TS 2 2 0 2 2
 
RO RX 1 1 1 1 0
 
NOR 2 1 3 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 3 9 4 4 2
 
SRO -U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. C trl 3 2 5 1 1 0
 
TS 2 2 0 2 2
 
RO RX 1 1 1 1 0
 
NOR 2 2 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 6 4 4 2
 
SRO -U MAJ 2 2 2 2 1
 
Man. C trl 3 3 1 1 0
 
TS 2 2 0 2 2
 
Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist
 
Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 E Scenarios A V M P E I P N 1 2 3 4 T N L T O I I T M C T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U A Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L M*
N P R T O R T O R T O R T O T E O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U RO RX 1 1 1 1 0
 
NOR 1 2 3 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3 6 9 4 4 2
 
SRO-U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2 3 5 1 1 0
 
TS 2 2 0 2 2
 
RX 1 1 2 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 2 3 1 1 1
 
SRO -I I/C 3 6 9 4 4 2
 
MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 SRO -U Man. Ctrl 1 3 4 1 1 0 TS 2 2 0 2 2
 
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule
 
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
 
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational
 
Region: 4
 
# Candidates Exam Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned Week 09/11/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 FB-OR-Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick CAC #: 000956 ONSITE Kirkland,John VALIDATI Murphy,Kevin ON OF Osterholtz,Clyde INITIAL You,David LICENSE EXAMIN ATION (OV) 10/09/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 4 0 7 1 FB-OR-NFF Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick CAC #: 000500 INITIAL Kirkland,John LICENSE Murphy,Kevin EXAM Osterholtz,Clyde ADMINIS You,David TRATION (EXAD)
 
Sites: GG
 
Orgs: ALL
 
Exam Author: ALL
 
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV
 
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 1 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule
 
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
 
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational
 
Region: 4
 
Summary by Date RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 10/2022 4 7 1 0 12
 
Sites: GG
 
Orgs: ALL
 
Exam Author: ALL
 
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV
 
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 2 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule
 
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
 
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational
 
Region: 4
 
Summary by Site RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Grand Gulf 4 7 1 0 12
 
Sites: GG
 
Orgs: ALL
 
Exam Author: ALL
 
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV
 
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 3 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule
 
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
 
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational
 
Region: 4


Summary by Region RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Region 4 4 7 1 0 12
Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 A
P P
L I
C A
N T
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E Scenarios 1
2 3
4 T
O T
A L
M I
N I
M U
M*
POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P RO I
U RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 1
1 0 NOR 1
1 2
1 1 1 I/C 3
3 6
4 4 2 MAJ 2
1 3
2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2
1 3
1 1 0 TS 0
2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 1
1 0 NOR 1
1 2
1 1 1 I/C 3
3 6
4 4 2 MAJ 2
1 3
2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 1
2 3
1 1 0 TS 0
2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 2
1 1 0 NOR 2
1 3
1 1 1 I/C 6
3 9
4 4 2 MAJ 2
1 3
2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3
1 4
1 1 0 TS 2
2 0
2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 1
1 0 NOR 2
1 3
1 1 1 I/C 6
3 9
4 4 2 MAJ 2
1 3
2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3
2 5
1 1 0 TS 2
2 0
2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 1
1 0 NOR 2
2 1
1 1 I/C 6
6 4
4 2 MAJ 2
2 2
2 1 Man. Ctrl 3
3 1
1 0 TS 2
2 0
2 2


Sites: GG
Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 A
P P
L I
C A
N T
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E Scenarios 1
2 3
4 T
O T
A L
M I
N I
M U
M*
POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P RO I
U RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 1
1 0 NOR 1
2 3
1 1 1 I/C 3
6 9
4 4 2 MAJ 2
1 3
2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2
3 5
1 1 0 TS 2
2 0
2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 2
1 1 0 NOR 1
2 3
1 1 1 I/C 3
6 9
4 4 2 MAJ 2
1 3
2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 1
3 4
1 1 0 TS 2
2 0
2 2


Orgs: ALL
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
# Candidates Exam Week Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt #
RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned 09/11/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 CAC #: 000956 FB-OR-ONSITE VALIDATI ON OF INITIAL LICENSE EXAMIN ATION (OV)
Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick Kirkland,John Murphy,Kevin Osterholtz,Clyde You,David 10/09/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 CAC #: 000500 4
0 7
1 FB-OR-INITIAL LICENSE EXAM ADMINIS TRATION (EXAD)
NFF Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick Kirkland,John Murphy,Kevin Osterholtz,Clyde You,David Page 1 of 4 11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: GG Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV


Exam Author: ALL
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 Summary by Date RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 10/2022 4
7 1
0 12 Page 2 of 4 11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: GG Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV


Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 Summary by Site RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Grand Gulf 4
7 1
0 12 Page 3 of 4 11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: GG Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV


11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 4 of 4}}
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 Summary by Region RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Region 4 4
7 1
0 12 Page 4 of 4 11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: GG Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV}}

Latest revision as of 11:55, 27 November 2024

10 Public Forms
ML22342B260
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/14/2022
From: Heather Gepford
Operations Branch IV
To:
Entergy Operations
References
Download: ML22342B260 (1)


Text

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief:

Clyde Osterholtz Facility:

GG 10/17/2022 U/I:

Start of Op Test:

10/10/2022 10/15/2022 Due Date Date Complete Initials 2/7/2022 12/8/2021 cco 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 cco 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 cco 3/14/2022 N/A 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 cco 3/28/2022 12/8/2022 cco 5/9/2022 5/6/2022 cco 5/23/2022 5/19/2022 cco 7/25/2022 7/7/2022 cco 8/1/2022 N/A cco 8/22/2022 8/19/2022 cco 9/5/2022 9/5/2022 cco 9/5/2022 9/5/2022 cco 9/12/2022 9/12/2022 cco 9/12/2022 9/12/2022 cco 9/19/2022 9/12/2022 cco 9/26/2022 9/26/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/29/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/29/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 cco 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 cco 10/10/2022 10/10/2022 cco 10/22/2022 11/7/2022 cco 11/6/2022 11/7/2022 cco 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 cco 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 cco 11/21/2022 11/8/2022 cco 11/28/2022 12/6/2022 cco 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 cco 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 cco 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 cco 12/26/2022 N/A 1/2/2023 by 1/5/2023 cco 1/9/2023 N/A 2/6/2023 N/A Rev. 9 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.

Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed Request facility licensee management feedback on the exam Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC Peer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9 Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and reference materials due.

Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by BC and forwarded for facility licensee review Written exam and operating test reviews completed Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief Administer Operating Test NRC examiners and facility contact assigned Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-201 Att-3 Corporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3 Date of Written Exam:

Description Notes Examination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials End of Op Test:

Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Document review on ES-401-9 Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396 Feedback approved by Branch Chief Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due ES-201-4 prepared by LA Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee RPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam grading completed Branch Chief review of exam results completed Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and waiver/excusal letters sent LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-5)

Post exam comments and graded exams received ES-403-1 to BC Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)

Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated Signed ES 303's to BC produced by CE License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results SUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS SUNSI checklist to LA Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals Examination Report Issued

password es1021

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Clyde C. Osterholtz/

5/18/2022 Clyde C. Osterholtz/

5/18/2022 Heather J. Gepford 5/19/22

Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Date of Exam: October 17, 2022 Exam Level:

RO SRO Item Description (Y)es / (N)o a

b*

c#

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each question y i includes a technical reference.

2.

a. All questions reference NRG knowledge and abilities (KIAs) requirements.

y

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

y

c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor analvsis.

3.

Senior reactor operator (SRO) questions test at the SRO license level.

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator (RO) or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRG licensing exams, including full

'I 1 (100-question) retake examinations, consult the NRG Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation operator licensinq program office.)

5.

Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed.

y

_ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started.

y

_ The examinations were developed independently.

{._ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication.

Other (explain):

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, at least Bank Modified New 10% new (at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new 51 v or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >

23/30.6%

y 1 / 1.3%

68%

7.

Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO exam Memory C/A and at least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the 33/ 44%

42/ 56%

y y actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

'{ 'I

9.

Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination V y outline and is appropriate for the KIA statements' assiqned tier; deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2.

'/ 'I

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correct y 'I and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

R..j Printed Name/t:;;;,,ure



Date c,/p-/

z,2-a.

Author

le_

P..P,,o S

/

.LIL I)

b.

Facility Reviewer (*)

  • -1:*,.,,", W 1ta!,*AI lv

'1/1.1/l 1.

c.

NRG Reviewer(#)

NRG Chief Examiner NRG Regional Supervisor

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRG reviewer performs steps in column c. This may be the NRG Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the written examination under review.

y y

y y

y y

y y

y y

Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/28/2022 9/28/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22

y y

y y

y y

y y

y y

y Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/28/2022 9/28/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22

Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist a.

Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable:

task standard initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if the facility licensee deems it to be time critical i 1 alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path" operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if aoolicable b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2) y have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item y

distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms.

Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

1.

The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be y 1 out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

'( '/

3.

Each event description consists of the following:

the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated f 1 the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) a (Y)es / (N)o b*

c#

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

y '/

5.

The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to y y observe and evaluate applicant performance.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

f Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time y

constraints. Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

'-I y

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d}, any open simulator y

performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4.

'( y y

y y

y y

y y

y y

y y

y y

y y

y y

y y

y Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/29/2022 9/29/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22

Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

E V

E N

T T

Y P

E Scenarios 1

2 3

4 T

O T

A L

M I

N I

M U

M*

POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P RO I

U RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 1

1 2

1 1 1 I/C 3

3 6

4 4 2 MAJ 2

1 3

2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2

1 3

1 1 0 TS 0

2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 1

1 2

1 1 1 I/C 3

3 6

4 4 2 MAJ 2

1 3

2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 1

2 3

1 1 0 TS 0

2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 2

1 1 0 NOR 2

1 3

1 1 1 I/C 6

3 9

4 4 2 MAJ 2

1 3

2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3

1 4

1 1 0 TS 2

2 0

2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 2

1 3

1 1 1 I/C 6

3 9

4 4 2 MAJ 2

1 3

2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3

2 5

1 1 0 TS 2

2 0

2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 2

2 1

1 1 I/C 6

6 4

4 2 MAJ 2

2 2

2 1 Man. Ctrl 3

3 1

1 0 TS 2

2 0

2 2

Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

E V

E N

T T

Y P

E Scenarios 1

2 3

4 T

O T

A L

M I

N I

M U

M*

POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P RO I

U RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 1

2 3

1 1 1 I/C 3

6 9

4 4 2 MAJ 2

1 3

2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2

3 5

1 1 0 TS 2

2 0

2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 2

1 1 0 NOR 1

2 3

1 1 1 I/C 3

6 9

4 4 2 MAJ 2

1 3

2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 1

3 4

1 1 0 TS 2

2 0

2 2

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022

  1. Candidates Exam Week Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt #

RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned 09/11/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 CAC #: 000956 FB-OR-ONSITE VALIDATI ON OF INITIAL LICENSE EXAMIN ATION (OV)

Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick Kirkland,John Murphy,Kevin Osterholtz,Clyde You,David 10/09/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 CAC #: 000500 4

0 7

1 FB-OR-INITIAL LICENSE EXAM ADMINIS TRATION (EXAD)

NFF Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick Kirkland,John Murphy,Kevin Osterholtz,Clyde You,David Page 1 of 4 11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: GG Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 Summary by Date RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 10/2022 4

7 1

0 12 Page 2 of 4 11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: GG Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 Summary by Site RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Grand Gulf 4

7 1

0 12 Page 3 of 4 11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: GG Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 Summary by Region RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Region 4 4

7 1

0 12 Page 4 of 4 11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Orgs: ALL Sites: GG Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV