ML24157A056: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:June 13, 2024 Workshop on Vendor Oversight 1
Safety Culture Issues at Lake Charles Module Fabrication Facility - Impact on Vogtle and VC Summer George Khouri Construction Project Manager Division of Construction Oversight Region II, Atlanta
 
Outline
* Structural Module Overview
* Timeline (module fabrication facility, combined license issuance, and setting of the first module)
* Discuss Consequences of Safety Culture Issues 2
 
AP1000 Site Layout 3
 
CA20 - Auxiliary Building Areas 5 & 6 4
 
CA01 Steam Generator & Refueling Canal Module 5
 
Vogtle Unit 3 CA20 6
 
Vogtle Unit 3 CA01 and CA20 7
 
Vogtle Unit 3 8
 
Timeline
* Initial plans were for Lake Charles facility to manufacture structural and mechanical, ASME type, modules.
* Safety related fabrication started in early 2010.
* ASME certification was projected for 2010.
* Vogtle was anticipating the first CA20 sub-module in July 2010 and V.C. Summer (VCS) by November 2010.
* The combined license (COL) for both VCS and Vogtle issued in early 2012.
9
 
Timeline
* Vogtle Unit 3 CA20 was set in March 2014 and May 2014 for VCS Unit 2.
* Quality issues discovered during NRC inspections have been documented in publicly available inspection reports.
* Nonconformances were resolved in accordance with applicable codes and standards, and in compliance with NRC regulations prior to fuel load.
* In 2024, the NRC completed a 10 CFR Part 52 Construction Lessons-Learned Report (ML23325A202).
10
 
Safety Culture Issues Consequences
* Impact of Safety Culture Issues at Lake Charles Module Fabrication Facility on the AP1000 Construction Sites:
- Schedule delays
- Increased NRC oversight (both at Lake Charles and at the sites)
- CB&I Confirmatory Order EA-13-196 required additional training of site personnel
- Observed impact on moral of CB&I personnel at the site (increased allegation intake from the sites) 11
 
Safety Culture Issues Consequences
* Impact of Safety Culture Issues (cont.):
- Licensees created additional quality control inspection teams.
- Licensees needed to adjust their original module fabrication plans:
* New manufacturing facilities were needed to complete the module fabrication (for both ASME mechanical and structural modules).
* Numerous fabrication nonconformances required rework at the sites.
* Some modules were intentionally shipped to the sites partially complete.
- CA20 module was set > 2 years after the COL was issued, some delays could be attributed to safety culture issues.
12
 
Questions ?
13}}

Latest revision as of 18:06, 24 November 2024

Georges 2024 Workshop Presentation
ML24157A056
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/13/2024
From: George Khouri
NRC/RGN-II/DCI
To:
References
Download: ML24157A056 (13)


Text

June 13, 2024 Workshop on Vendor Oversight 1

Safety Culture Issues at Lake Charles Module Fabrication Facility - Impact on Vogtle and VC Summer George Khouri Construction Project Manager Division of Construction Oversight Region II, Atlanta

Outline

  • Structural Module Overview
  • Timeline (module fabrication facility, combined license issuance, and setting of the first module)
  • Discuss Consequences of Safety Culture Issues 2

AP1000 Site Layout 3

CA20 - Auxiliary Building Areas 5 & 6 4

CA01 Steam Generator & Refueling Canal Module 5

Vogtle Unit 3 CA20 6

Vogtle Unit 3 CA01 and CA20 7

Vogtle Unit 3 8

Timeline

  • Initial plans were for Lake Charles facility to manufacture structural and mechanical, ASME type, modules.
  • Safety related fabrication started in early 2010.
  • ASME certification was projected for 2010.
  • Vogtle was anticipating the first CA20 sub-module in July 2010 and V.C. Summer (VCS) by November 2010.
  • The combined license (COL) for both VCS and Vogtle issued in early 2012.

9

Timeline

  • Vogtle Unit 3 CA20 was set in March 2014 and May 2014 for VCS Unit 2.
  • Quality issues discovered during NRC inspections have been documented in publicly available inspection reports.
  • Nonconformances were resolved in accordance with applicable codes and standards, and in compliance with NRC regulations prior to fuel load.

10

Safety Culture Issues Consequences

  • Impact of Safety Culture Issues at Lake Charles Module Fabrication Facility on the AP1000 Construction Sites:

- Schedule delays

- Increased NRC oversight (both at Lake Charles and at the sites)

- CB&I Confirmatory Order EA-13-196 required additional training of site personnel

- Observed impact on moral of CB&I personnel at the site (increased allegation intake from the sites) 11

Safety Culture Issues Consequences

  • Impact of Safety Culture Issues (cont.):

- Licensees created additional quality control inspection teams.

- Licensees needed to adjust their original module fabrication plans:

  • New manufacturing facilities were needed to complete the module fabrication (for both ASME mechanical and structural modules).
  • Numerous fabrication nonconformances required rework at the sites.
  • Some modules were intentionally shipped to the sites partially complete.

- CA20 module was set > 2 years after the COL was issued, some delays could be attributed to safety culture issues.

12

Questions ?

13