ML22342B260: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER | {{#Wiki_filter:EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER | ||
Chief: Clyde Osterholtz Facility: GG 10/17/2022Date of Written Exam: | |||
U/I: Start of Op Test: 10/10/2022 10/15/2022End of Op Test: | |||
Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station | Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Due Date Description Date Complete Initials Notes | ||
: 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each | |||
: 2. a. All questions reference NRG knowledge and abilities(KIAs) requirements. | 2/7/2022 12/8/2021 ccoExamination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials | ||
3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoNRC examiners and facility contact assigned | |||
: 3. Senior reactor operator(SRO) questions test at the SRO license level. | 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoFacility contact briefed on security and other requirements | ||
3/14/2022 N/AReference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-201 Att-3 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoCorporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE | |||
_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed. | 3/28/2022 12/8/2022 ccoNRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3 | ||
_ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started. | |||
_ The examinations were developed independently. | 5/9/2022 5/6/2022 ccoOperating test outline(s) and other checklists due ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 5/23/2022 5/19/2022 ccoOperating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC provided to facility licensee 7/25/2022 7/7/2022 ccoProposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by reference materials due. BC and forwarded for facility licensee review 8/1/2022 N/A ccoPeer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9 | ||
8/22/2022 8/19/2022 ccoWritten exam and operating test reviews completedDocument review on ES-401-9 | |||
9/5/2022 9/5/2022 ccoFeedback approved by Branch Chief 9/5/2022 9/5/2022 ccoExamination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee 9/12/2022 9/12/2022 ccoPreliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396 | |||
9/12/2022 9/12/2022 ccoOn-site validation & 10% audit of license applications | |||
9/19/2022 9/12/2022 ccoPreliminary license applications and waivers reviewed | |||
9/26/2022 9/26/2022 ccoFinal license applications & waiver/excusal requests due ES-201-4 prepared by LA 10/3/2022 9/29/2022 ccoWritten exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief | |||
10/3/2022 9/29/2022 ccoRequest facility licensee management feedback on the exam 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoFinal applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter waiver/excusal letters sent (ES-201 Att-5) 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoProctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoApproved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners 10/10/2022 10/10/2022 ccoAdminister Operating Test | |||
10/22/2022 11/7/2022 ccoExaminer's document op test results on ES 303's | |||
11/6/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam comments and graded exams received ES-403-1 to BC 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated 11/21/2022 11/8/2022 ccoChief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam Signed ES 303's to BC grading completed 11/28/2022 12/6/2022 ccoBranch Chief review of exam results completed | |||
12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoWaivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision | |||
12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoLicense/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoRPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21 | |||
12/26/2022 N/AFinal Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)21 days after proposed denial letters mailed. | |||
1/2/2023 by 1/5/2023 ccoExamination Report Issuedproduced by CE | |||
1/9/2023 N/ARef Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals | |||
2/6/2023 N/ASUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS SUNSI checklist to LA | |||
Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 | |||
Rev. 9 password es1021 | |||
Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Date of Exam: October 17, 2022 Exam Level: RO SRO Item Description (Y)es / (N)o a b* c# | |||
: 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each questiony i includes a technical reference. | |||
: 2. a. All questions reference NRG knowledge and abilities (KIAs) requirements.y b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. y c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor analvsis. | |||
: 3. Senior reactor operator (SRO) questions test at the SRO license level. | |||
4.The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator (RO) or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRG licensing exams, including full 'I 1 (100-question) retake examinations, consult the NRG Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation operator licensinq program office.) | |||
5.Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: | |||
_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed. y _ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started.y _ The examinations were developed independently. | |||
{._ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication. | {._ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication. | ||
Other (explain): | Other (explain): | ||
: 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, at least Bank Modified New 10% new (at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new 51v or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >23/30. 6% y1 / 1.3% 68% | |||
: 7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO examMemory C/A and at least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the33/ 44% 42/ 56%y y actual RO/SRO-only question distribution > | |||
10% new(at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new | 8.References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.'{ 'I | ||
or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution > | : 9. Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examinationV y outline and is appropriate for the KIA statements' assiqned tier; deviations are justified. | ||
: 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2. '/ 'I 11.The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correcty 'I and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. | |||
R..j Printed Name/t:;;;,,ure Date c,/p- / | |||
z,2-a.Author le_ P..P,,o S /.LIL I) b.Facility Reviewer (*) *-1:*,.,,", W 1ta!,*AI lv '1/1.1/l 1., | |||
c.NRG Reviewer(#) | |||
NRG Chief Examiner NRG Regional Supervisor | |||
* The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests. | |||
: 9. Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved | |||
: 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2. | |||
Printed Name/ | |||
* The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests. | |||
# An independent NRG reviewer performs steps in column c. This may be the NRG Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the written examination under review. | # An independent NRG reviewer performs steps in column c. This may be the NRG Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the written examination under review. | ||
y y | y y | ||
y y | y y | ||
| Line 75: | Line 91: | ||
y y | y y | ||
y y | y y | ||
Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/28/2022 9/28/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22 | |||
Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist | Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist | ||
: a. Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable: | : a. Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable: | ||
* task standard | * task standard* initial conditions* initiating cues* references and tools, including associated procedures* reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if the facility licensee deems it to be time criticali 1* alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path"* operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following: | ||
* initial conditions | - detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature-system response and other examiner cues-statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant-criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard - identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards - restrictions on the sequence of steps, if aoolicable | ||
* initiating cues | : b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2)y have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., itemy distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms. | ||
* references and tools, including associated procedures | Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES | ||
* alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path" | : 1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be y 1out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. | ||
* operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following: | : 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. '( '/ | ||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., | |||
: 1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be | |||
: 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. | |||
: 3. Each event description consists of the following: | : 3. Each event description consists of the following: | ||
* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiatedf 1* the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew* the expected operator actions (by shift position)* the event termination point (if applicable) | |||
* the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event | QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) a (Y)es / (N)o b* c# | ||
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew | : 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. y '/ | ||
* the expected operator actions (by shift position) | : 5. The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team toy y observe and evaluate applicant performance. | ||
* the event termination point (if applicable) | |||
(Y)es / (N)o | |||
: 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. | |||
: 5. The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team | |||
: 6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. | : 6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. | ||
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue | f Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue timey constraints. Cues are given. | ||
: 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. '-I y | |||
: 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. | : 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d}, any open simulatoryperformance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. | ||
: 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d}, any open | : 9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4. '( y y | ||
: 9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4. | y y | ||
y y | y y | ||
y y | y y | ||
y y | y y | ||
y y | y y | ||
Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR | Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist | ||
A | |||
N | Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 E Scenarios A V M P E I P N 1 2 3 4 T N L T O I I T M C T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U A Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L M* | ||
N P R T O R T O R T O R T O T E O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 | |||
NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2 | |||
SRO-U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 | |||
Man. C trl 2 1 3 1 1 0 | |||
TS 0 2 2 | |||
RX 1 1 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 | |||
SRO -I I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2 | |||
MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 SRO -U Man. C trl 1 2 3 1 1 0 | |||
TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 2 1 1 0 | |||
NOR 2 1 3 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 3 9 4 4 2 | |||
SRO -U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. C trl 3 1 4 1 1 0 | |||
TS 2 2 0 2 2 | |||
RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 | |||
NOR 2 1 3 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 3 9 4 4 2 | |||
SRO -U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. C trl 3 2 5 1 1 0 | |||
TS 2 2 0 2 2 | |||
RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 | |||
NOR 2 2 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 6 4 4 2 | |||
SRO -U MAJ 2 2 2 2 1 | |||
Man. C trl 3 3 1 1 0 | |||
TS 2 2 0 2 2 | |||
Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist | |||
Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 E Scenarios A V M P E I P N 1 2 3 4 T N L T O I I T M C T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U A Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L M* | |||
N P R T O R T O R T O R T O T E O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U RO RX 1 1 1 1 0 | |||
NOR 1 2 3 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3 6 9 4 4 2 | |||
SRO-U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2 3 5 1 1 0 | |||
TS 2 2 0 2 2 | |||
RX 1 1 2 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 2 3 1 1 1 | |||
SRO -I I/C 3 6 9 4 4 2 | |||
MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 SRO -U Man. Ctrl 1 3 4 1 1 0 TS 2 2 0 2 2 | |||
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule | |||
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 | |||
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational | |||
Region: 4 | |||
# Candidates Exam Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned Week 09/11/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 FB-OR-Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick CAC #: 000956 ONSITE Kirkland,John VALIDATI Murphy,Kevin ON OF Osterholtz,Clyde INITIAL You,David LICENSE EXAMIN ATION (OV) 10/09/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 4 0 7 1 FB-OR-NFF Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick CAC #: 000500 INITIAL Kirkland,John LICENSE Murphy,Kevin EXAM Osterholtz,Clyde ADMINIS You,David TRATION (EXAD) | |||
Sites: GG | |||
Orgs: ALL | |||
Exam Author: ALL | |||
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV | |||
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 1 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule | |||
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 | |||
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational | |||
Region: 4 | |||
Summary by Date RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 10/2022 4 7 1 0 12 | |||
Sites: GG | |||
Orgs: ALL | |||
Exam Author: ALL | |||
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV | |||
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 2 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule | |||
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 | |||
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational | |||
Region: 4 | |||
Summary by Site RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Grand Gulf 4 7 1 0 12 | |||
Sites: GG | |||
Orgs: ALL | |||
Exam Author: ALL | |||
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV | |||
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 3 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule | |||
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022 | |||
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational | |||
Region: 4 | |||
Summary by Region RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Region 4 4 7 1 0 12 | |||
Sites: GG | |||
Orgs: ALL | |||
Exam Author: ALL | |||
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV | |||
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 4 of 4}} | |||
Revision as of 15:33, 15 November 2024
| ML22342B260 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf |
| Issue date: | 10/14/2022 |
| From: | Heather Gepford Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Entergy Operations |
| References | |
| Download: ML22342B260 (1) | |
Text
EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER
Chief: Clyde Osterholtz Facility: GG 10/17/2022Date of Written Exam:
U/I: Start of Op Test: 10/10/2022 10/15/2022End of Op Test:
Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Due Date Description Date Complete Initials Notes
2/7/2022 12/8/2021 ccoExamination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials
3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoNRC examiners and facility contact assigned
3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoFacility contact briefed on security and other requirements
3/14/2022 N/AReference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-201 Att-3 3/14/2022 12/8/2022 ccoCorporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE
3/28/2022 12/8/2022 ccoNRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3
5/9/2022 5/6/2022 ccoOperating test outline(s) and other checklists due ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 5/23/2022 5/19/2022 ccoOperating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC provided to facility licensee 7/25/2022 7/7/2022 ccoProposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by reference materials due. BC and forwarded for facility licensee review 8/1/2022 N/A ccoPeer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9
8/22/2022 8/19/2022 ccoWritten exam and operating test reviews completedDocument review on ES-401-9
9/5/2022 9/5/2022 ccoFeedback approved by Branch Chief 9/5/2022 9/5/2022 ccoExamination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee 9/12/2022 9/12/2022 ccoPreliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396
9/12/2022 9/12/2022 ccoOn-site validation & 10% audit of license applications
9/19/2022 9/12/2022 ccoPreliminary license applications and waivers reviewed
9/26/2022 9/26/2022 ccoFinal license applications & waiver/excusal requests due ES-201-4 prepared by LA 10/3/2022 9/29/2022 ccoWritten exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief
10/3/2022 9/29/2022 ccoRequest facility licensee management feedback on the exam 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoFinal applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter waiver/excusal letters sent (ES-201 Att-5) 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoProctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 10/3/2022 9/30/2022 ccoApproved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners 10/10/2022 10/10/2022 ccoAdminister Operating Test
10/22/2022 11/7/2022 ccoExaminer's document op test results on ES 303's
11/6/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam comments and graded exams received ES-403-1 to BC 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed 11/14/2022 11/7/2022 ccoPost exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated 11/21/2022 11/8/2022 ccoChief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam Signed ES 303's to BC grading completed 11/28/2022 12/6/2022 ccoBranch Chief review of exam results completed
12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoWaivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision
12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoLicense/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results 12/5/2022 12/6/2022 ccoRPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21
12/26/2022 N/AFinal Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.
1/2/2023 by 1/5/2023 ccoExamination Report Issuedproduced by CE
1/9/2023 N/ARef Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals
2/6/2023 N/ASUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS SUNSI checklist to LA
Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1
Rev. 9 password es1021
Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Date of Exam: October 17, 2022 Exam Level: RO SRO Item Description (Y)es / (N)o a b* c#
- 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each questiony i includes a technical reference.
- 2. a. All questions reference NRG knowledge and abilities (KIAs) requirements.y b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. y c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor analvsis.
4.The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator (RO) or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRG licensing exams, including full 'I 1 (100-question) retake examinations, consult the NRG Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation operator licensinq program office.)
5.Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed. y _ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started.y _ The examinations were developed independently.
{._ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication.
Other (explain):
- 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, at least Bank Modified New 10% new (at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new 51v or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >23/30. 6% y1 / 1.3% 68%
- 7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO examMemory C/A and at least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the33/ 44% 42/ 56%y y actual RO/SRO-only question distribution >
8.References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.'{ 'I
- 9. Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examinationV y outline and is appropriate for the KIA statements' assiqned tier; deviations are justified.
- 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2. '/ 'I 11.The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correcty 'I and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
R..j Printed Name/t:;;;,,ure Date c,/p- /
z,2-a.Author le_ P..P,,o S /.LIL I) b.Facility Reviewer (*) *-1:*,.,,", W 1ta!,*AI lv '1/1.1/l 1.,
c.NRG Reviewer(#)
NRG Chief Examiner NRG Regional Supervisor
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- An independent NRG reviewer performs steps in column c. This may be the NRG Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the written examination under review.
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
Clyde Osterholtz Clyde Osterholtz 9/28/2022 9/28/2022 Heather Gepford 9/30/22
Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist
- a. Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable:
- task standard* initial conditions* initiating cues* references and tools, including associated procedures* reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if the facility licensee deems it to be time criticali 1* alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path"* operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature-system response and other examiner cues-statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant-criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard - identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards - restrictions on the sequence of steps, if aoolicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2)y have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., itemy distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms.
Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES
- 1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be y 1out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. '( '/
- 3. Each event description consists of the following:
- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiatedf 1* the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew* the expected operator actions (by shift position)* the event termination point (if applicable)
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) a (Y)es / (N)o b* c#
- 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. y '/
- 5. The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team toy y observe and evaluate applicant performance.
- 6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
f Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue timey constraints. Cues are given.
- 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. '-I y
- 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d}, any open simulatoryperformance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4. '( y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist
Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 E Scenarios A V M P E I P N 1 2 3 4 T N L T O I I T M C T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U A Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L M*
N P R T O R T O R T O R T O T E O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U RO RX 1 1 1 1 0
NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2
SRO-U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1
Man. C trl 2 1 3 1 1 0
TS 0 2 2
RX 1 1 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1
SRO -I I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2
MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 SRO -U Man. C trl 1 2 3 1 1 0
TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 2 1 1 0
NOR 2 1 3 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 3 9 4 4 2
SRO -U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. C trl 3 1 4 1 1 0
TS 2 2 0 2 2
RO RX 1 1 1 1 0
NOR 2 1 3 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 3 9 4 4 2
SRO -U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. C trl 3 2 5 1 1 0
TS 2 2 0 2 2
RO RX 1 1 1 1 0
NOR 2 2 1 1 1 SRO -I I/C 6 6 4 4 2
SRO -U MAJ 2 2 2 2 1
Man. C trl 3 3 1 1 0
TS 2 2 0 2 2
Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist
Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR Date of Exam: 10/10/2022 Operating Test No.:GGNS-2022 E Scenarios A V M P E I P N 1 2 3 4 T N L T O I I T M C T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A U A Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L M*
N P R T O R T O R T O R T O T E O C P O C P O C P O C P RO I U RO RX 1 1 1 1 0
NOR 1 2 3 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3 6 9 4 4 2
SRO-U MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2 3 5 1 1 0
TS 2 2 0 2 2
RX 1 1 2 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 2 3 1 1 1
SRO -I I/C 3 6 9 4 4 2
MAJ 2 1 3 2 2 1 SRO -U Man. Ctrl 1 3 4 1 1 0 TS 2 2 0 2 2
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational
Region: 4
- Candidates Exam Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned Week 09/11/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 FB-OR-Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick CAC #: 000956 ONSITE Kirkland,John VALIDATI Murphy,Kevin ON OF Osterholtz,Clyde INITIAL You,David LICENSE EXAMIN ATION (OV) 10/09/2022 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2022301 4 0 7 1 FB-OR-NFF Osterholtz, Clyde Hernandez,Nick CAC #: 000500 INITIAL Kirkland,John LICENSE Murphy,Kevin EXAM Osterholtz,Clyde ADMINIS You,David TRATION (EXAD)
Sites: GG
Orgs: ALL
Exam Author: ALL
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 1 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational
Region: 4
Summary by Date RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 10/2022 4 7 1 0 12
Sites: GG
Orgs: ALL
Exam Author: ALL
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 2 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational
Region: 4
Summary by Site RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Grand Gulf 4 7 1 0 12
Sites: GG
Orgs: ALL
Exam Author: ALL
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 3 of 4 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule
From 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022
Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational
Region: 4
Summary by Region RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Region 4 4 7 1 0 12
Sites: GG
Orgs: ALL
Exam Author: ALL
Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV
11/16/2022 1:14:50 PM Page 4 of 4