ML24087A071: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:[7590- | {{#Wiki_filter:[7590- 01-P] | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
[Docket Nos. 72-0028 | [Docket Nos. 72-0028, 50- 387, and 50 -388; NRC-2024- 0068] | ||
Susquehanna Nuclear, LLC; | Susquehanna Nuclear, LLC; | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
environmental assessment (EA) and a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for an | environmental assessment (EA) and a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for an | ||
exemption request submitted by Susquehanna Nuclear, LLC (Susquehanna) | exemption request submitted by Susquehanna Nuclear, LLC (Susquehanna) that would | ||
permit Susquehanna Steam Electric Station | permit Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) to load six new 89 multi-purpose | ||
canisters (MPC) with continuous basket shims | canisters (MPC) with continuous basket shims (CBS) in the HI-STORM Flood/Wind (FW) | ||
MPC Storage System | MPC Storage System at its SSES Units 1 and 2 independent spent fuel storage | ||
installation (ISFSI) in | installation (ISFSI) in a storage condition where the terms, conditions, and specifications | ||
in the Certificate of Compliance (CoC) | in the Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1032, Amendment No. 5, are not met. | ||
DATES: The EA | DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in this document are available on | ||
April 22, 2024. | April 22, 2024. | ||
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC- | ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2024- 0068 when contacting the NRC | ||
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly | about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly | ||
available information related to this document using any of the following methods: | available information related to this document using any of the following methods: | ||
* Federal Rulemaking Webs | * Federal Rulemaking Webs ite: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and | ||
search for Docket ID NRC-2024- | search for Docket ID NRC-2024- 0068. Address questions about D ocket IDs in | ||
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; telephone: 301-415- | Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; telephone: 301-415- 0624; email: | ||
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov | Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the | ||
For Further Information Contact section of this document. | For Further Information Contact section of this document. | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public | (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public | ||
Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading- | Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the | ||
search, select | search, select Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For problems with ADAMS, please | ||
contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1- | contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at | ||
301- | 301-415-4737, or by email to PDR. Resource@nrc.gov. For the convenience of the | ||
reader, instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are provided | reader, instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are provided | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
available documents, is open by appointment. To make an appointment to visit the PDR, | available documents, is open by appointment. To make an appointment to visit the PDR, | ||
please send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call 1- | please send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415- | ||
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except | 4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC | Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC | ||
20555; | 20555; telephone: 301-415-6825; email: Christian.Jacobs @nrc.gov. | ||
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: | SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
I. Introduction | I. Introduction | ||
The NRC is reviewing an exemption | The NRC is reviewing an exemption request from Susquehanna, dated | ||
March 19, 2024 | March 19, 2024, and supplemented on March 21, 2024. Susquehanna is requesting an | ||
exemption, pursuant to section | exemption, pursuant to section 72.7 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations | ||
(10 | (10 CFR), in paragraphs 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and | ||
72.214 | 72.214 that require Susquehanna to comply with the terms, conditions, and | ||
2 specifications of the CoC No. 1032 | 2 specifications of the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5. If approved, the exemption | ||
would allow | would allow Susquehanna to load six new MPC-89-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC | ||
Storage System at the SSES | Storage System at the SSES ISFSI in a storage condition where the terms, conditions, | ||
and specifications in the | and specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5, are not met. | ||
II. | II. Environmental Assessment | ||
=== | === | ||
Background=== | Background=== | ||
SSES is located in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, just west of | |||
SSES is located in | |||
the Susquehanna River. The largest community within 10 miles (16 km) of the site is the | the Susquehanna River. The largest community within 10 miles (16 km) of the site is the | ||
| Line 141: | Line 140: | ||
Pennsylvania, approximately 50 mi (80 km) to the southeast. Unit 1 began operating in | Pennsylvania, approximately 50 mi (80 km) to the southeast. Unit 1 began operating in | ||
1981 | 1981 and Unit 2 began operating in 1982. Susquehanna has been storing spent fuel in | ||
an ISFSI at SSES | an ISFSI at SSES under a general license as authorized by 10 CFR p art 72, subpart K, | ||
General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites. Susquehanna | General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites. Susquehanna | ||
| Line 149: | Line 148: | ||
currently uses the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System under CoC No. 1032, | currently uses the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System under CoC No. 1032, | ||
Amendment No. 5 | Amendment No. 5, for dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at the SSES ISFSI. | ||
Description of the Proposed Action | Description of the Proposed Action | ||
The CoC is the NRC approved design for each dry cask storage system | The CoC is the NRC approved design for each dry cask storage system. The | ||
proposed action would exempt the applicant from the requirements of | proposed action would exempt the applicant from the requirements of | ||
10 | 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 only as | ||
these requirements pertain to the use of the MPC | these requirements pertain to the use of the MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC | ||
Storage System for the near-term planned loading of the canisters | Storage System for the near-term planned loading of the canisters. The exemption | ||
would allow SSES | would allow SSES to load six new MPC-89-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage | ||
System at the SSES | System at the SSES ISFSI, despite the MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC | ||
3 Storage System not being in | 3 Storage System not being in compliance with the terms, conditions, and specifications in | ||
CoC No. 1032 | CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5. | ||
The HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System CoC provides the requirements, | The HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System CoC provides the requirements, | ||
| Line 179: | Line 178: | ||
Storage System, developed a variant of the design with CBS for the MPC-89, known as | Storage System, developed a variant of the design with CBS for the MPC-89, known as | ||
MPC | MPC CBS. Holtec originally implemented the CBS variant design under the | ||
provisions of 10 CFR 72.48, which allows licensees to make changes to cask designs | provisions of 10 CFR 72.48, which allows licensees to make changes to cask designs | ||
without a CoC | without a CoC amendment under certain conditions (listed in 10 CFR 72.48(c)). After | ||
evaluating the specific changes to the cask designs, the NRC determined that Holtec | evaluating the specific changes to the cask designs, the NRC determined that Holtec | ||
| Line 189: | Line 188: | ||
erred when it implemented the CBS variant design under 10 CFR 72.48, as this was not | erred when it implemented the CBS variant design under 10 CFR 72.48, as this was not | ||
the type of change allowed without a CoC | the type of change allowed without a CoC amendment. For this reason, the NRC issued | ||
three Severity Level IV violations to Holtec. Susquehanna | three Severity Level IV violations to Holtec. Susquehanna plans to load six new MPC- | ||
89- | 89-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System beginning in August 2024. This | ||
exemption considers the near-term planned loading of the six | exemption considers the near-term planned loading of the six canisters with the CBS | ||
variant basket design. | variant basket design. | ||
| Line 201: | Line 200: | ||
Need For The Proposed Action | Need For The Proposed Action | ||
Susquehanna | Susquehanna requested this exemption to allow SSES to load six new MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System at the SSES ISFSI for the future | ||
loading campaign scheduled | loading campaign scheduled to begin in August 2024. | ||
Approval of the exemption request would | Approval of the exemption request would allow Susquehanna to effectively | ||
manage the margin for full core reserve in the SSES | manage the margin for full core reserve in the SSES spent fuel pool to enable refueling | ||
and offloading fuel from the reactor. It would also allow Susquehanna | and offloading fuel from the reactor. It would also allow Susquehanna to manage | ||
logistical considerations, such as personnel and specific equipment resources, needed | logistical considerations, such as personnel and specific equipment resources, needed | ||
to support refueling outages | to support refueling outages at SSES and across the industry. | ||
4 Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action | 4 Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action | ||
| Line 219: | Line 218: | ||
This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of granting an exemption | This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of granting an exemption | ||
from the | from the terms, conditions, and specifications in CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5. The | ||
exemption would allow six | exemption would allow six new MPC CBS to be loaded in the HI-STORM FW MPC | ||
Storage System in a near-term loading | Storage System in a near-term loading campaign beginning in August 2024 and | ||
maintained in storage at the SSES | maintained in storage at the SSES ISFSI. | ||
The potential environmental impacts of storing spent nuclear fuel in NRC- | The potential environmental impacts of storing spent nuclear fuel in NRC- | ||
| Line 235: | Line 234: | ||
storage of spent fuel under a general license in cask designs approved by the NRC. The | storage of spent fuel under a general license in cask designs approved by the NRC. The | ||
EA for the 1990 final rule analyzed the potential environmental impacts | EA for the 1990 final rule analyzed the potential environmental impacts of using NRC- | ||
approved storage casks. The EA for the HI | approved storage casks. The EA for the HI -STORM FW MPC Storage System, CoC No. | ||
1032, Amendment No. 5 | 1032, Amendment No. 5, (85 FR 28479), published in 2015, tiers off of the EA issued for | ||
the July 18, 1990, | the July 18, 1990, final rule. Tiering off earlier EAs is a standard process encouraged | ||
by the regulations implementing | by the regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) | ||
that entails the use of impact analyses of previous EAs to bound the impacts of a | that entails the use of impact analyses of previous EAs to bound the impacts of a | ||
proposed action | proposed action where appropriate. The Holtec HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System is | ||
designed to mitigate the effects of design basis accidents that could occur during | designed to mitigate the effects of design basis accidents that could occur during | ||
| Line 259: | Line 258: | ||
would not be significant. | would not be significant. | ||
The exemptions | The exemptions requested by Susquehanna at the SSES site as they relate to | ||
CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5 | CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5, for the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System are | ||
limited to the use of the CBS variant basket design | limited to the use of the CBS variant basket design only for the near-term planned | ||
5 loading | 5 loading of six new canisters utilizing the CBS variant basket design. The staff has | ||
determined that this change in the basket would | determined that this change in the basket would not result in either radiological or non- | ||
radiological environmental impacts that significantly differ from the environmental | radiological environmental impacts that significantly differ from the environmental | ||
impacts evaluated in the environmental assessment supporting the issuance of CoC | impacts evaluated in the environmental assessment supporting the issuance of CoC No. | ||
1032, Amendment No. 5 | 1032, Amendment No. 5. If the exemption is granted, there would be no significant | ||
change in the types or amounts of any effluents released, no significant increase in | change in the types or amounts of any effluents released, no significant increase in | ||
individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure | individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure, and no significant | ||
increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological accidents. Accordingly, | increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological accidents. Accordingly, | ||
the Commission concludes that there would be | the Commission concludes that there would be no significant environmental impacts | ||
associated with the proposed action. | associated with the proposed action. | ||
| Line 287: | Line 286: | ||
Alternative to the Proposed Action | Alternative to the Proposed Action | ||
The staff considered the no- | The staff considered the no-action alternative. The no -action alternative (denial of | ||
the exemption request) would require Susquehanna | the exemption request) would require Susquehanna to keep the spent fuel in the spent | ||
fuel pool until older design canisters can be fabricated and delivered to site. | fuel pool until older design canisters can be fabricated and delivered to site. Not allowing | ||
the planned future loading campaign could affect Susquehannas | the planned future loading campaign could affect Susquehannas ability to manage pool | ||
capacity, reactor fuel offloading, and refueling. It | capacity, reactor fuel offloading, and refueling. It could also impact Susquehannas | ||
availability to manage personnel resources and coordinate refueling outages | availability to manage personnel resources and coordinate refueling outages at SSES | ||
and across the industry. The NRC has determined that these potential impacts of the | and across the industry. The NRC has determined that these potential impacts of the no- | ||
action alternative could be avoided by proceeding with the proposed exemption, | action alternative could be avoided by proceeding with the proposed exemption, | ||
especially given that the staff has concluded in | especially given that the staff has concluded in NRCs Safety Determination | ||
Memorandum, issued with respect to the enforcement action against Holtec regarding | Memorandum, issued with respect to the enforcement action against Holtec regarding | ||
these | these violations, that fuel can be stored safety in the MPC CBS. | ||
Agencies Consulted | Agencies Consulted | ||
The NRC provided the Pennsylvania | The NRC provided the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection | ||
(PDEP) a copy of this draft EA for review by an email dated April | (PDEP) a copy of this draft EA for review by an email dated April 10, 2024. On April 12, | ||
6 2024, the PDEP provided its concurrence by email. | 6 2024, the PDEP provided its concurrence by email. | ||
| Line 323: | Line 322: | ||
accordance with the requirements in 10 CFR part 51, which implement NEPA. Based | accordance with the requirements in 10 CFR part 51, which implement NEPA. Based | ||
upon the foregoing e | upon the foregoing e nvironmental assessment, the NRC finds that the proposed action | ||
of granting the exemption from the regulations in | of granting the exemption from the regulations in 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), | ||
72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11) and 72.214, | 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11) and 72.214, which require the licensee to comply with the | ||
terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC, would | terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC, would not significantly impact the | ||
quality of the human environment. The exemption | quality of the human environment. The exemption in this case would be limited to | ||
specific future loading of six canisters with the CBS variant design | specific future loading of six canisters with the CBS variant design beginning in August | ||
2024. | 2024. Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a FONSI is appropriate, and an | ||
environmental impact statement is not warranted. | environmental impact statement is not warranted. | ||
| Line 345: | Line 344: | ||
persons through ADAMS, as indicated. | persons through ADAMS, as indicated. | ||
Document Description | Document Description ADAMS Accession No. or Federal Register notice Susquehannas request for exemption, dated ML24079A070 March 19, 2024. | ||
Supplement to request for exemption, | Supplement to request for exemption, dated ML24081A335 March 21, 2024. | ||
Certificate of Compliance No. 1032, Amendment 5, | Certificate of Compliance No. 1032, Amendment 5, ML20163A701 (Package) dated June 25, 2020. | ||
Holtec International, Inc. - | Holtec International, Inc. - Notice of Violation; The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection ML24016A190 Report No. 07201014/2022-201, EA-23- 044, dated January 30, 2024. | ||
10 CFR part 72 amendment to allow spent fuel storage in NRC-approved casks, dated | 10 CFR part 72 amendment to allow spent fuel storage in NRC-approved casks, dated 55 FR 29181 July 18, 1990. | ||
EA for part 72 amendment to allow spent fuel storage in NRC-approved casks, dated | EA for part 72 amendment to allow spent fuel storage in NRC-approved casks, dated ML051230231 March 8, 1989. | ||
Final rule for List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage | Final rule for List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage 85 FR 28479 | ||
7 Casks: Holtec International HI-STORM Flood/Wind Multipurpose Canister Storage System CoC No. | 7 Casks: Holtec International HI-STORM Flood/Wind Multipurpose Canister Storage System CoC No. | ||
1032, Amendment 5, dated May 13, 2020. | 1032, Amendment 5, dated May 13, 2020. | ||
Safety Determination of a Potential Structural Failure of the Fuel Basket During Accident Conditions for the HI-STORM 100 and HI-STORM | Safety Determination of a Potential Structural Failure of the Fuel Basket During Accident Conditions for the HI-STORM 100 and HI-STORM ML24018A085 Flood/Wind Dry Cask Storage Systems, dated January 31, 2024. | ||
NRC email to PDEP requesting review of EA/FONSI for SSES | NRC email to PDEP requesting review of EA/FONSI for SSES Exemption, dated ML24106A066 April 10, 2024. | ||
Email from PDEP regarding review of EA/FONSI | Email from PDEP regarding review of EA/FONSI ML24106A067 for SSES Exemption, dated April 12, 2024. | ||
Dated: April 16, 2024. | Dated: April 16, 2024. | ||
| Line 363: | Line 362: | ||
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. | For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. | ||
/RA/ | |||
Bernard H. White, | Bernard H. White, Acting Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch, | ||
Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. | ||
8}} | 8}} | ||
Revision as of 08:32, 5 October 2024
| ML24087A071 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna |
| Issue date: | 04/16/2024 |
| From: | Bernie White Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch |
| To: | Susquehanna |
| Shared Package | |
| ML24087A066 | List: |
| References | |
| NRC-2024-0068, 89 FR 29369 | |
| Download: ML24087A071 (1) | |
Text
[7590- 01-P]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 72-0028, 50- 387, and 50 -388; NRC-2024- 0068]
Susquehanna Nuclear, LLC;
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2;
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation;
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice; issuance.
SUMMARY
- The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
environmental assessment (EA) and a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for an
exemption request submitted by Susquehanna Nuclear, LLC (Susquehanna) that would
permit Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) to load six new 89 multi-purpose
canisters (MPC) with continuous basket shims (CBS) in the HI-STORM Flood/Wind (FW)
MPC Storage System at its SSES Units 1 and 2 independent spent fuel storage
installation (ISFSI) in a storage condition where the terms, conditions, and specifications
in the Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1032, Amendment No. 5, are not met.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in this document are available on
April 22, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2024- 0068 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this document using any of the following methods:
- Federal Rulemaking Webs ite: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and
search for Docket ID NRC-2024- 0068. Address questions about D ocket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; telephone: 301-415- 0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the
For Further Information Contact section of this document.
- NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public
Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For problems with ADAMS, please
contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at
301-415-4737, or by email to PDR. Resource@nrc.gov. For the convenience of the
reader, instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are provided
in the Availability of Documents section.
- NRCs PDR: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies of publicly
available documents, is open by appointment. To make an appointment to visit the PDR,
please send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christian Jacobs, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555; telephone: 301-415-6825; email: Christian.Jacobs @nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is reviewing an exemption request from Susquehanna, dated
March 19, 2024, and supplemented on March 21, 2024. Susquehanna is requesting an
exemption, pursuant to section 72.7 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR), in paragraphs 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and
72.214 that require Susquehanna to comply with the terms, conditions, and
2 specifications of the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5. If approved, the exemption
would allow Susquehanna to load six new MPC-89-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC
Storage System at the SSES ISFSI in a storage condition where the terms, conditions,
and specifications in the CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5, are not met.
II. Environmental Assessment
=
Background===
SSES is located in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, just west of
the Susquehanna River. The largest community within 10 miles (16 km) of the site is the
borough of Berwick, which is approximately 5 miles (8 km) southwest of SSES, in
Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The nearest major metropolitan areas are Wilkes-Barre,
Pennsylvania, approximately 20 mi (32 km) to the northeast, and Allentown,
Pennsylvania, approximately 50 mi (80 km) to the southeast. Unit 1 began operating in
1981 and Unit 2 began operating in 1982. Susquehanna has been storing spent fuel in
an ISFSI at SSES under a general license as authorized by 10 CFR p art 72, subpart K,
General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites. Susquehanna
currently uses the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System under CoC No. 1032,
Amendment No. 5, for dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at the SSES ISFSI.
Description of the Proposed Action
The CoC is the NRC approved design for each dry cask storage system. The
proposed action would exempt the applicant from the requirements of
10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 only as
these requirements pertain to the use of the MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC
Storage System for the near-term planned loading of the canisters. The exemption
would allow SSES to load six new MPC-89-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage
System at the SSES ISFSI, despite the MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC
3 Storage System not being in compliance with the terms, conditions, and specifications in
CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5.
The HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System CoC provides the requirements,
conditions, and operating limits necessary for use of the system to store spent fuel.
Holtec International (Holtec), the designer and manufacturer of the HI-STORM FW MPC
Storage System, developed a variant of the design with CBS for the MPC-89, known as
MPC CBS. Holtec originally implemented the CBS variant design under the
provisions of 10 CFR 72.48, which allows licensees to make changes to cask designs
without a CoC amendment under certain conditions (listed in 10 CFR 72.48(c)). After
evaluating the specific changes to the cask designs, the NRC determined that Holtec
erred when it implemented the CBS variant design under 10 CFR 72.48, as this was not
the type of change allowed without a CoC amendment. For this reason, the NRC issued
three Severity Level IV violations to Holtec. Susquehanna plans to load six new MPC-
89-CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System beginning in August 2024. This
exemption considers the near-term planned loading of the six canisters with the CBS
variant basket design.
Need For The Proposed Action
Susquehanna requested this exemption to allow SSES to load six new MPC CBS in the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System at the SSES ISFSI for the future
loading campaign scheduled to begin in August 2024.
Approval of the exemption request would allow Susquehanna to effectively
manage the margin for full core reserve in the SSES spent fuel pool to enable refueling
and offloading fuel from the reactor. It would also allow Susquehanna to manage
logistical considerations, such as personnel and specific equipment resources, needed
to support refueling outages at SSES and across the industry.
4 Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of granting an exemption
from the terms, conditions, and specifications in CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5. The
exemption would allow six new MPC CBS to be loaded in the HI-STORM FW MPC
Storage System in a near-term loading campaign beginning in August 2024 and
maintained in storage at the SSES ISFSI.
The potential environmental impacts of storing spent nuclear fuel in NRC-
approved storage systems have been documented in previous assessments. On
July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the NRC amended 10 CFR part 72 to provide for the
storage of spent fuel under a general license in cask designs approved by the NRC. The
EA for the 1990 final rule analyzed the potential environmental impacts of using NRC-
approved storage casks. The EA for the HI -STORM FW MPC Storage System, CoC No.
1032, Amendment No. 5, (85 FR 28479), published in 2015, tiers off of the EA issued for
the July 18, 1990, final rule. Tiering off earlier EAs is a standard process encouraged
by the regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
that entails the use of impact analyses of previous EAs to bound the impacts of a
proposed action where appropriate. The Holtec HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System is
designed to mitigate the effects of design basis accidents that could occur during
storage. Considering the specific design requirements for the accident conditions, the
design of the cask would prevent loss of containment, shielding, and criticality control. If
there is no loss of containment, shielding, or criticality control, the environmental impacts
would not be significant.
The exemptions requested by Susquehanna at the SSES site as they relate to
CoC No. 1032, Amendment No. 5, for the HI-STORM FW MPC Storage System are
limited to the use of the CBS variant basket design only for the near-term planned
5 loading of six new canisters utilizing the CBS variant basket design. The staff has
determined that this change in the basket would not result in either radiological or non-
radiological environmental impacts that significantly differ from the environmental
impacts evaluated in the environmental assessment supporting the issuance of CoC No.
1032, Amendment No. 5. If the exemption is granted, there would be no significant
change in the types or amounts of any effluents released, no significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure, and no significant
increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological accidents. Accordingly,
the Commission concludes that there would be no significant environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
Alternative to the Proposed Action
The staff considered the no-action alternative. The no -action alternative (denial of
the exemption request) would require Susquehanna to keep the spent fuel in the spent
fuel pool until older design canisters can be fabricated and delivered to site. Not allowing
the planned future loading campaign could affect Susquehannas ability to manage pool
capacity, reactor fuel offloading, and refueling. It could also impact Susquehannas
availability to manage personnel resources and coordinate refueling outages at SSES
and across the industry. The NRC has determined that these potential impacts of the no-
action alternative could be avoided by proceeding with the proposed exemption,
especially given that the staff has concluded in NRCs Safety Determination
Memorandum, issued with respect to the enforcement action against Holtec regarding
these violations, that fuel can be stored safety in the MPC CBS.
Agencies Consulted
The NRC provided the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
(PDEP) a copy of this draft EA for review by an email dated April 10, 2024. On April 12,
6 2024, the PDEP provided its concurrence by email.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The environmental impacts of the proposed action have been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements in 10 CFR part 51, which implement NEPA. Based
upon the foregoing e nvironmental assessment, the NRC finds that the proposed action
of granting the exemption from the regulations in 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3),
72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11) and 72.214, which require the licensee to comply with the
terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC, would not significantly impact the
quality of the human environment. The exemption in this case would be limited to
specific future loading of six canisters with the CBS variant design beginning in August
2024. Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a FONSI is appropriate, and an
environmental impact statement is not warranted.
IV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to interested
persons through ADAMS, as indicated.
Document Description ADAMS Accession No. or Federal Register notice Susquehannas request for exemption, dated ML24079A070 March 19, 2024.
Supplement to request for exemption, dated ML24081A335 March 21, 2024.
Certificate of Compliance No. 1032, Amendment 5, ML20163A701 (Package) dated June 25, 2020.
Holtec International, Inc. - Notice of Violation; The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection ML24016A190 Report No. 07201014/2022-201, EA-23- 044, dated January 30, 2024.
10 CFR part 72 amendment to allow spent fuel storage in NRC-approved casks, dated 55 FR 29181 July 18, 1990.
EA for part 72 amendment to allow spent fuel storage in NRC-approved casks, dated ML051230231 March 8, 1989.
Final rule for List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage 85 FR 28479
7 Casks: Holtec International HI-STORM Flood/Wind Multipurpose Canister Storage System CoC No.
1032, Amendment 5, dated May 13, 2020.
Safety Determination of a Potential Structural Failure of the Fuel Basket During Accident Conditions for the HI-STORM 100 and HI-STORM ML24018A085 Flood/Wind Dry Cask Storage Systems, dated January 31, 2024.
NRC email to PDEP requesting review of EA/FONSI for SSES Exemption, dated ML24106A066 April 10, 2024.
Email from PDEP regarding review of EA/FONSI ML24106A067 for SSES Exemption, dated April 12, 2024.
Dated: April 16, 2024.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Bernard H. White, Acting Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch,
Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
8