|
|
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:B/B-UFSAR | | {{#Wiki_filter:}} |
| | |
| CHAPTER 6.0 - ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 6.0 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES 6.1-1 6.1 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES MATERIALS 6.1-1 6.1.1 Metallic Materials 6.1-1 6.1.1.1 Materials Selection and Fabrication 6.1-1 6.1.1.2 Composition, Compatibility, and Stability of Containment and Core Spray Coolants 6.1-3 6.1.2 Organic Materials 6.1-4 6.1.2.1 Formation of Combustible Gas Mixtures from Organic Materials and Protective Coating 6.1-8 6.1.3 Postaccident Chemistry 6.1-9 6.1.3.1 Steamline Break Inside Containment 6.1-9 6.1.3.2 Main Feedwater Line Break Inside Containment 6.1-10 6.1.3.3 Loss-of-Coolant Accident 6.1-11 6.1.4 References 6.1-11 6.2 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-1 6.2.1 Containment Functional Design 6.2-1 6.2.1.1 Containment Structure 6.2-1 6.2.1.1.1 Design Bases 6.2-1 6.2.1.1.2 Design Features 6.2-2 6.2.1.1.3 Design Evaluation 6.2-3 6.2.1.2 Containment Subcompartments 6.2-14 6.2.1.2.1 Design Basis 6.2-14 6.2.1.2.2 Deleted 6.2-15 6.2.1.2.3 Design Evaluation 6.2-15 6.2.1.2.3.1 Analytical Models 6.2-15 6.2.1.2.3.2 Break Type and Size 6.2-16 6.2.1.2.3.3 Model Description 6.2-17 6.2.1.2.3.4 Pressure Responses 6.2-19 6.2.1.3 Mass and Energy Release Analyses For Postulated Loss-of-Coolant Accidents 6.2-22 6.2.1.3.1 Long Term LOCA Mass and Energy Releases 6.2-22 6.2.1.3.2 LOCA M&E Release Phases 6.2-25 6.2.1.3.3 Computer Codes 6.2-26 6.2.1.3.4 Break Size and Location 6.2-26 6.2.1.3.5 Application of Single-Failure Criterion 6.2-27a 6.2.1.3.6 Acceptance Criteria for Analyses 6.2-27a 6.2.1.3.7 Mass and Energy Release Data 6.2-27a 6.2.1.3.7.1 Blowdown Mass and Energy Release Data 6.2-27a 6.2.1.3.7.2 Reflood Mass and Energy Data 6.2-27b 6.2.1.3.7.3 Post-Reflood Mass and Energy Release Data 6.2-27d 6.2.1.3.7.4 Decay Heat Model 6.2-27e 6.2.1.3.7.5 Steam Generator Equilibration and Depressurization 6.2-27e 6.2.1.3.7.6 Sources of Mass and Energy 6.2-27f 6.2.1.3.8 Conclusions 6.2-27h
| |
| | |
| 6.0-i REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
| |
| PAGE
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.4 Mass and Energy Release for Postulated Secondary System Pipe Breaks Inside 6.2.1.4.1 Containment (PWPipe Break Blowdowns R) - Spectra and 6.2-27h Assumptions 6.2-28 6.2.1.4.2 Description of Blowdown Modeling 6.2-29 6.2.1.4.3 Single Failure Analysis 6.2-30 6.2.1.5 Minimum Containment Pressure Analysis for Performance Capability Studies of 6.2.1.5.1 EmeDELETEDrgency Core Cooling System (PWR) 6.2-31a 6.2.1.5.2 DELETED 6.2.1.5.3 DELETED 6.2.1.5.4 DELETED 6.2.1.5.5 DELETED 6.2.1.5.6 DELETED 6.2.1.5.7 DELETED 6.2.1.5.8 DELETED 6.2.1.6 Testing and Inspection 6.2-35 6.2.1.6.1 Structural Acceptance Test 6.2-35 6.2.1.6.2 Preoperational Leakage Rate Test 6.2-35 6.2.1.6.3 Inservice Leakage Rate Testing 6.2-36 6.2.1.6.4 Tendon Surveillance Program 6.2-36 6.2.1.7 Instrumentation Requirements 6.2-36 6.2.2 Containment Heat Removal System 6.2-38 6.2.2.1 Design Bases 6.2-39 6.2.2.1.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC)
| |
| System 6.2-39 6.2.2.1.2 Containment Spray System 6.2-40 6.2.2.2 System Design 6.2-40 6.2.2.2.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC)
| |
| System 6.2-40 6.2.2.2.2 Containment Spray System 6.2-44 6.2.2.3 Design Evaluation 6.2-44 6.2.2.3.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC)
| |
| System 6.2-44 6.2.2.3.2 Containment Spray System 6.2-46 6.2.2.4 Tests and Inspections 6.2-46 6.2.2.4.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC)
| |
| System 6.2-46 6.2.2.4.2 Containment Spray System 6.2-48 6.2.2.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.2-48 6.2.2.5.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC)
| |
| System 6.2-48 6.2.2.5.2 Containment Spray System 6.2-49 6.2.3 Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2-49 6.2.4 Containment Isolation System 6.2-49a
| |
| | |
| 6.0-ii REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
| |
| PAGE 6.2.4.1 Design Bases 6.2-49a 6.2.4.1.1 Criteria for Pipeline Design 6.2-52 6.2.4.1.2 Criteria for Valving Design 6.2-53 6.2.4.1.3 Criteria and Definitions for Piping Systems 6.2-53 6.2.4.1.3.1 Closed Systems 6.2-54 6.2.4.1.3.2 Open Systems 6.2-54 6.2.4.1.3.3 Functional Types of Penetrating Piping Systems 6.2-54 6.2.4.1.3.4 Isolation Valving 6.2-55 6.2.4.2 System Design 6.2-55 6.2.4.2.1 Modes of Valve Actuation 6.2-56 6.2.4.2.2 Mechanical and Electrical Redundancy 6.2-57 6.2.4.2.3 Qualification of Closed Systems as Isolation Barriers 6.2-57 6.2.4.2.4 Qualification of Valves as Isolation Barriers 6.2-57 6.2.4.2.5 Valve Closure Times 6.2-57 6.2.4.2.6 Environmental Design 6.2-58 6.2.4.2.7 Isolation Valve Testing 6.2-58 6.2.4.2.8 Exceptions to General Design Criteria 55, 56, and 57 Requirements 6.2-58 6.2.4.3 Design Evaluation 6.2-59 6.2.4.4 Tests and Inspections 6.2-60 6.2.5 Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2-60 6.2.5.1 Design Bases 6.2-60 6.2.5.2 System Design (Braidwood) 6.2-62 6.2.5.2 System Design (Byron) 6.2-62a 6.2.5.2.1 Hydrogen Recombiner System Design (Byron only) 6.2-62a 6.2.5.2.1.1 Recombiner Package Component Description 6.2-64 6.2.5.2.1.1.1 (Byron only)Blower Assembly (Byron only) 6.2-64 6.2.5.2.1.1.2 Gas Heater (Byron only) 6.2-64 6.2.5.2.1.1.3 Reaction Chamber (Byron only) 6.2-65 6.2.5.2.1.1.4 Gas Cooler (Byron only) 6.2-65 6.2.5.2.1.2 Electrical (Byron only) 6.2-66 6.2.5.2.1.3 Flowmeter (Byron only) 6.2-66 6.2.5.2.1.4 Alarms and Indications (Byron only) 6.2-66 6.2.5.2.2 Hydrogen Monitoring System Design (Braidwood) 6.2-67 6.2.5.2.2 Hydrogen Monitoring System Design (Byron) 6.2-67a 6.2.5.2.3 Containment Atmosphere Mixing System Design 6.2-68a 6.2.5.2.4 Post-LOCA Purge System Design 6.2-69 6.2.5.3 Design Evaluation 6.2-69 6.2.5.4 Testing and Inspection 6.2-74 6.2.5.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.2-75 6.2.5.6 Materials 6.2-75 6.2.6 Containment Leakage Testing 6.2-75 6.2.6.1 Containment Integrated Leakage Rate Test 6.2-76
| |
| | |
| 6.0-iii REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
| |
| PAGE 6.2.6.1.1 Containment Inspection and Repair 6.2-76 6.2.6.1.2 Preoperational Tests 6.2-76 6.2.6.1.3 Containment Isolation Valve Closure 6.2-77 6.2.6.1.4 System Venting and Draining 6.2-77 6.2.6.1.5 Pressure Stabilization Period 6.2-77 6.2.6.1.6 Containment Atmosphere Stabilization 6.2-78 6.2.6.1.7 Type A Test Frequency 6.2-78 6.2.6.1.8 Test Duration 6.2-78 6.2.6.1.9 Calibration 6.2-78 6.2.6.1.10 Acceptance Criteria 6.2-78 6.2.6.1.11 Verification Tests 6.2-79 6.2.6.2 Containment Penetration Leakage Rate Test 6.2-79 6.2.6.3 Containment Isolation Valve Leakage Rate Test 6.2-82a 6.2.6.4 Scheduling and Reporting of Periodic Tests 6.2-83 6.2.6.5 Special Testing Requirements 6.2-83 6.2.7 References 6.2-83
| |
| | |
| 6.3 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM 6.3-1 6.3.1 Design Bases 6.3-1 6.3.2 System Design 6.3-2 6.3.2.1 Schematic Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams 6.3-2 6.3.2.2 Equipment and Component Descriptions 6.3-3 6.3.2.3 Applicable Codes and Classifications 6.3-14 6.3.2.4 Material Specifications and Compatibility 6.3-14 6.3.2.5 System Reliability 6.3-14 6.3.2.6 Protection Provisions 6.3-21 6.3.2.7 Provisions for Performance Testing 6.3-21 6.3.2.8 Manual Actions 6.3-22 6.3.3 Performance Evaluation 6.3-34 6.3.4 Tests and Inspections 6.3-45 6.3.4.1 ECCS Performance Tests 6.3-45 6.3.4.2 Reliability Tests and Inspections 6.3-47 6.3.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.3-49 6.3.5.1 Temperature Indication 6.3-50 6.3.5.2 Pressure Indication 6.3-50 6.3.5.3 Flow Indication 6.3-51 6.3.5.4 Level Indication 6.3-52 6.3.5.5 Valve Position Indication 6.3-53 6.3.6 References 6.3-53
| |
| | |
| APPENDIX 6.3A PROPER POSITIONING OF VALVES 6.3A-1 6.4 HABITABILITY SYSTEMS (Byron) 6.4-1 6.4.1 Design Basis (Byron) 6.4-1 6.4.2 System Design (Byron) 6.4-2 6.4.2.1.1 Definition of Control Room 6.4-2 6.4.2.1.2 Definition of Control Room Envelope (Byron) 6.4-2 6.4.2.2 Ventilation System Design (Byron) 6.4-2 6.4.2.3 Leaktightness (Byron) 6.4-3
| |
| | |
| 6.0-iv REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
| |
| PAGE 6.4.2.4 Interaction With Other Zones and Pressure-Containing Equipment (Byron) 6.4-3 6.4 HABITABILITY SYSTEMS (Braidwood) 6.4-5 6.4.1 Design Basis (Braidwood) 6.4-5 6.4.2 System Design (Braidwood) 6.4-6 6.4.2.1.1 Definition of Control Room 6.4-6 6.4.2.1.2 Definition of Control Room Envelope (Braidwood) 6.4-6 6.4.2.2 Ventilation System Design (Braidwood) 6.4-6 6.4.2.3 Leaktightness 6.4-7 6.4.2.4 InteractionContaining Equipment (Braidwood) With Other Zones and Pressure - 6.4-7 6.4.2.5 Shielding Design 6.4-9 6.4.3 System Operational Procedures 6.4-9 6.4.4 Design Evaluation 6.4-11 6.4.4.1 Radiological Protection 6.4-11 6.4.4.2 Toxic Gas Protection (Braidwood only) 6.4-15 6.4.5 Testing and Inspection (Byron) 6.4-13 6.4.6 Instrumentation Requirements (Byron) 6.4-13 6.4.5 Testing and Inspection (Braidwood) 6.4-15 6.4.6 Instrumentation Requirements (Braidwood) 6.4-15 6.4.7 References 6.4-16a 6 .5 FISSION PRODUCT REMOVAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 6.5-1 6.5.1 Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) Filter Systems 6.5-1 6.5.1.1 Design Bases 6.5-1 6.5.1.1.1 Control Room Makeup Air Filter Units 6.5-1 6.5.1.1.2 Auxiliary Building Exhaust Systems 6.5-2 6.5.1.1.3 Fuel Handling Building Exhaust System 6.5-4 6.5.1.2 System Design 6.5-5 6.5.1.2.1 Emergency Makeup Air Filter Units 6.5-5 6.5.1.2.2 Auxiliary Building Exhaust System 6.5-7 6.5.1.2.3 Fuel Handling Building Exhaust System 6.5-11 6.5.1.3 Design Evaluation 6.5-16 6.5.1.3.1 Emergency Makeup Air Filter Units 6.5-16 6.5.1.3.2 Auxiliary Building Exhaust System 6.5-16 6.5.1.3.3 Fuel Handling Building Exhaust System 6.5-16 6.5.1.3.3.1 Fuel Handling Accident Inside Spent Fuel Storage Building 6.5-17 6.5.1.4 Tests and Inspections 6.5-18 6.5.1.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.5-19 6.5.1.6 Materials 6.5-20 6.5.2 Containment Spray Systems 6.5-21 6.5.2.1 Design Bases 6.5-21 6.5.2.2 System Design (for Fission Product Removal) 6.5-22 6.5.2.3 Design Evaluation 6.5-27 6.5.2.4 Tests and Inspections 6.5-31 6.5.2.4.1 Preoperational Test Program 6.5-31 6.5.2.4.2 Reliability Tests and Inspections 6.5-31
| |
| | |
| 6.0-v REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
| |
| PAGE 6.5.2.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.5-32 6.5.2.6 Materials 6.5-33 6.5.3 Fission Product Control Systems 6.5-33 ATTACHMENT A6.5 IODINE REMOVAL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM A6.5-1 6.6 INSERVICE INSPECTION OF CLASS 2 AND 3 COMPONENTS 6.6-1 6.6.1 Components Subject to Examination 6.6-1 6.6.2 Accessibility 6.6-1 6.6.3 Examination Techniques and Procedures 6.6-1 6.6.4 Inspection Intervals and Scheduling 6.6-1 6.6.5 Examination and Testing Requirements 6.6-2 6.6.6 Evaluation of Examination Results/Repair Procedures 6.6-2 6.6.7 System Pressure Testing 6.6-2
| |
| | |
| 6.0-vi REVISION 6 - DECEMBER 1996 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| CHAPTER 6.0 - ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES LIST OF TABLES NUMBER TITLE PAGE 6.1 -1 Engineered Safety Features Material 6.1-12 6.1-2 Protective Coatings on Westinghouse-Supplied Equipment Inside Containment 6.1-14 6.1-3 NSSS Containment Paint Summary 6.1-15 6.1-4 Gas Evolution From Protective Coatings 6.1-16 6.1-5 Cables In Containment 6.1-17 6.2-1 Unit 1 Containment Peak Pressure and Temperature 6.2-86 6.2-1a Unit 2 Containment Peak Pressure and Temperature 6.2-86d 6.2-2 Assumptions for Unit 1 Containment Analysis 6.2-87 6.2-3 Assumptions for Unit 2 Containment Analysis 6.2-88 6.2-4 Containment Heat Sinks - Analysis Values 6.2-89 6.2-4a Containment Heat Sinks - Nominal Values 6.2-89b 6.2-5 Thermophysical Properties of Containment Heat Sinks 6.2-91 6.2-6 LOCA Sequence of Events for Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Min SI, Unit 1 6.2-92 6.2-6a LOCA Sequence of Events for Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Min SI, Unit 2 6.2-92a 6.2-7 LOCA Sequence for Double-Ended Hot Leg Break, Unit 1 6.2-93 6.2-7a Deleted 6.2-8 LOCA Sequence for Double-Ended Hot Leg Break Unit 2 2 6.2-94 6.2-9 MSLB Accident Sequence of Events for 0.90 ft Split Break at 30% Power with MS Isolation Valve Failure For Unit 1 - Peak Pressure 6.2-95 6.2-9a MSLB Accident Sequence of Events for 1.0 ft2 Split Break at 100% Power with Loss of Offsite Power and MS Isolation Valve Failure For Unit 1 - Peak Temperature 2 6.2-95 6.2-9b MSLB Accident Sequence of Events for 0.83ft Double-Ended Rupture at 30% Power with MSIV Failure For Unit 2 - Peak Pressure 6.2-95a 6.2-9c MSLB Accident Sequence of Events for 1.0 ft2 Double-Ended Rupture at 100% Power with LOOP and Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure For Unit 2 - Peak Temperature 6.2-95a 6.2-10 Subcompartment Nodal Description 6.2-96 6.2-11 Subcompartment Flow Path Description 6.2-97
| |
| | |
| 6.0-vii REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| NUMBER TITLE PAGE 6.2-11a Deleted 6.2-100 6.2-11b Subcompartment Nodal Description 6.2-102 6.2-11c Subcompartment Vent Path Description 6.2-104 6.2-12 Summary of Subcompartment Pressure Differentials 6.2-108 6.2-13 Subcompartment Mass and Energy Release Rates (DEHL) 6.2-109 6.2-14 Subcompartment Mass and Energy Release Rates (DECL) 6.2-115 6.2-15 Subcompartment Mass and Energy Release Rates (Pressurizer Spray Line) 6.2-121 6.2-16 Subcompartment Steamline Mass and Energy Release Rates 6.2-127 6.2-17 LOCA Mass and Energy Calculation System Parameters and Initial Conditions 6.2-128 6.2-17a Deleted 6.2-18 Safety Injection Flow Minimum Safeguards 6.2-129 6.2-18a Safety Injection Flow Maximum Safeguards 6.2-130 6.2-19 Double-Ended Hot Leg Break Blowdown Mass and Energy Releases - Unit 1 6.2-131 6.2-20 Double-Ended Hot Leg Break Mass Balance -
| |
| Unit 1 6.2-132 6.2-21 Double-Ended Hot Leg Break Energy Balance -
| |
| Unit 1 6.2-133 6.2-21a Deleted 6.2-22 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum Safeguards Blowdown Mass and Energy Releases -
| |
| Unit 1 6.2-134 6.2-22a Deleted 6.2-23 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum Safeguards Reflood Mass and Energy Releases Unit 1 6.2-135 6.2-23a Deleted 6.2-24 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break -Minimum Safeguards Principle Parameters During Reflood Unit 1 6.2-136 6.2-25 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum Safeguards Post-Reflood Mass and En ergy Releases - Unit 1 6.2-137 6.2-26 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Mass Balance Minimum Safeguards - Unit 1 6.2-138 6.2-27 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Energy Balance Minimum Safeguards - Unit 1 6.2-139 6.2-27a Deleted 6.2-28 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum Safeguards Blowdown Mass and Energy Releases -
| |
| Unit 1 6.2-140 6.2-29 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum Safeguards Reflood Mass and Energy Releases -
| |
| Unit 1 6.2-141 6.2-30 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break -Maximum Safeguards Principle Parameters During Reflood
| |
| - Unit 1 6.2-142
| |
| | |
| 6.0-viii REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd)
| |
| NUMBER TITLE PAGE 6.2-31 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum Safeguards Post-Reflood Mass and Energy Releases
| |
| - Unit 1 6.2-143 6.2-32 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Mass Balance Maximum Safeguards - Unit 1 6.2-144 6.2-33 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Energy Balance Maximum Safeguards - Unit 1 6.2-145 6.2-34 Double-Ended Hot Leg Break Blowdown Mass and Energy Releases - Unit 2 6.2-146 6.2-34a Deleted 6.2-35 Double-Ended Hot Leg Break Mass Balance - Unit 2 6.2-147 6.2-35a Deleted 6.2-36 Double-Ended Hot Leg Break Energy Balance -
| |
| Unit 2 6.2-148 6.2-37 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum Safeguards Blowdown Mass and Energy Releases -
| |
| Unit 2 6.2-149 6.2-38 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum Safeguards Reflood Mass and Energy Releases -
| |
| Unit 2 6.2-150 6.2-39 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break -Minimum Safeguards Principle Parameters During Reflood -
| |
| Unit 2 6.2-151 6.2-40 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum Safeguards Post-Reflood Mass and Energy Releases
| |
| - Unit 2 6.2-152 6.2-41 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Mass Balance Minimum Safeguards - Unit 2 6.2-153 6.2-42 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Energy Balance Minimum Safeguards - Unit 2 6.2-154 6.2-43 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum Safeguards Blowdown Mass and Energy Releases
| |
| - Unit 2 6.2-155 6.2-44 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum Safeguards Reflood Mass and Energy Releases -
| |
| Unit 2 6.2-156 6.2-45 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break -Maximum Safeguards Principle Parameters During Reflood
| |
| - Unit 2 6.2-157 6.2-46 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum Safeguards Post-Reflood Mass and Energy Releases
| |
| - Unit 2 6.2-158 6.2-47 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Mass Balance Maximum Safeguards - Unit 2 6.2-159 6.2-48 Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Energy Balance Maximum Safeguards - Unit 2 6.2-160 6.2-49 LOCA Mass and Energy Release Analysis Core Decay Heat Fraction 6.2-161
| |
| | |
| 6.0-viii(a) REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LIST OF TABLES (Contd)
| |
| | |
| NUMBER TITLE PAGE 6.2 -50 MSLB Mass and Energy Releases for Unit 1, 0.90 ft2 Split Break at 30% Power with Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure - Offsite Power Available 6.2-179 6.2-50a MSLB Mass and Energy2 Releases for Unit 1, 1.0 ft Split Break at 100% Power with Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure - Loss of Offsite Power 6.2-179b 6.2-50b MSLB Mass and Energy Releases for Unit 2, 0.83 ft2 Split Break at 30% Power with Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure - Offsite Power Available 6.2-179d 6.2-50c MSLB Mass and Energy Releases f2or Unit 2, 1.0 ft Small Double-Ended Rupture at 100% Power with Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure - Loss of Offsite Power 6.2-179f 6.2-51 DELETED 6.2-52 DELETED 6.2-53 DELETED 6.2-54 DELETED 6.2-55 DELETED 6.2-56 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler Design Characteristics 6.2-186 6.2-57 Single Active Failure Analysis, Reactor Containment Fan Coolers 6.2-190 6.2-58 Containment Isolation Provisions 6.2-191 6.2-59 Thermal Hydrogen Recombiner Parameters 6.2-210 6.2-60 Hydrogen Recombiner System Codes, Standards, and Regulations 6.2-211 6.2-61 Post-LOCA Purge System Components and Parameters 6.2-212 6.2-62 DELETED 6.2-214 6.2-63 DELETED 6.2-216 6.2-64 Core Fission Product Energy After 650 Full-Power Days 6.2-217
| |
| | |
| 6.0-ix REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LIST OF TABLES (Contd)
| |
| | |
| NUMBER TITLE PAGE
| |
| | |
| 6.2-65 Fission Product Decay Deposition in Sump Solution 6.2-218 6.2-66 Liner and Concrete Design Temperatures 6.2-219 6.2-67 Subcompartment Volume Description 6.2-220 6.3-1 Emergency Core Cooling System Component Parameters 6.3-54 6.3-2 ECCS Relief Valves Data 6.3-57 6.3-3 Motor-Operated Isolation Valves in ECCS 6.3-58 6.3-4 Materials Employed for Emergency Core Cooling System Components 6.3-60 6.3-5 Single Active Failure Analysis for Emergency Core Cooling System Components 6.3-62
| |
| | |
| 6.0-ix(a) REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd)
| |
| NUMBER TITLE PAGE 6.3 -6 Emergency Core Cooling System Recirculation Piping Passive Failure Analysis 6.3-65 6.3-7 Sequence of Switchover Operations (Based On No Single Failures) 6.3-66 6.3-8 Emergency Core Cooling System Shared Functions Evaluation 6.3-69 6.3-9 Normal Operating Status of Emergency Core Cooling System Components for Core Cooling 6.3-70 6.3-10 Failure Mode and Effects Analysis -
| |
| Emergency Core Cooling System Active Components 6.3-71 6.3-11 ECCS Active Components 6.3-85 6.3-12 Deleted 6.3-89 6.3-13 Deleted 6.3-91 6.3-14 ECCS Air Operated Valves 6.3-93 6.3-15 Deleted 6.3-94 6.3-16 ECCS Vent Valves Located Inside Containment 6.3-96 6.3-17 Permanent Design ECCS and CS System Void Locations 6.3-97 6.4-1 Expected Dose to Control Room Personnel at Byron Station Following a Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) 6.4-17 6.4-1a Principal Assumptions Used In Control Room Habitability Calculations (Byron) 6.4-18 6.4-1 Expected Dose to Control Room Personnel at Braidwood Station Following a Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) 6.4-19 6.4-1a Principal Assumptions Used In Control Room Habitability Calculations (Braidwood) 6.4-20 6.5-1 Single Active Failure Analysis -
| |
| Containment Spray System 6.5-34 6.5-2 Fuel Handling Accident Inside Spent Fuel Storage Building 6.5-35 6.5-3 Deleted 6.5-36 6.5-4 Deleted 6.5-37 6.5-5 Nonaccessible Areas of the Auxiliary Building 6.5-38
| |
| | |
| 6.0-x REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| CHAPTER 6.0 - ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES LIST OF FIGURES NUM BER TITLE
| |
| | |
| 6.2-1 LOCA Containment Pressure Response for Double Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum SI Unit 1 6.2-1a Deleted 6.2-2 LOCA Containment Temperature Response for Double Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum SI Unit 1 6.2-2a Deleted 6.2-3 LOCA Containment Pressure Response for Double Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum SI Unit 1 6.2-4 LOCA Containment Temperature Response for Double Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum SI Unit 1 6.2-5 LOCA Containment Pressure Response for Double Ended Hot Leg Break Unit 1 6.2-6 LOCA Containment Temperature Response for Double Ended Hot Leg Break Unit 1 6.2-6a Deleted 6.2-7 LOCA Containment Pressure Response for Double Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum SI Unit 2 6.2-7a Deleted 6.2-8 LOCA Containment Temperature Response for Double Ended Pump Suction Break Minimum SI Unit 2 6.2-8a Deleted 6.2-9 LOCA Containment Pressure Response for Double Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum SI Unit 2 6.2-10 LOCA Containment Temperature Response for Double Ended Pump Suction Break Maximum SI Unit 2 6.2-11 LOCA Containment Pressure Response for Double Ended Hot Leg Break Unit 2 6.2-12 LOCA Containment Temperature Response for Double Ended Hot Leg Break Unit 2 6.2-12a Deleted
| |
| | |
| 6.0-xi REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LIST OF FIGURES (Cont'd)
| |
| NUMBER TITLE 6.2 -13 MSLB Containment Pressure Response, Composite Curve, Unit 1 6.2-13a MSLB Containment Pressure Response for 0.83 ft² Split Break at 30% Power and Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure, Unit 1 6.2-13b MSLB Containment Pressure Response for 1.0-ft2 DER at 102% Power with LOOP and Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure, Unit 1 6.2-13c MSLB Containment Pressure Response, Composite Curve, Unit 2 6.2-13d MSLB Containment Pressure Response for 0.83 ft2 Split Break at 30% Power and Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure Unit 2 6.2-13e Deleted 6.2-14 MSLB Containment Temperature Response Composite Curve Unit 1 6.2-14a MSLB Containment Temperature Response for 0.81 ft2 Split Break at 100% Power with LOOP and Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure Unit 1 6.2-14b Deleted 6.2-14c MSLB Containment Temperature Response Composite Curve Unit 2 6.2-14d Deleted 6.2-14e Deleted 6.2-15 MSLB Containment Temperature Response for 1.00 ft2 DER at 100% Power with LOOP and Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure Unit 2 6.2-16 Deleted 6.2-16a Deleted 6.2-16b Deleted 6.2-16c Deleted 6.2-17 Deleted 6.2-18 Containment Subcompartment Nodalization Diagram 6.2-18a Nodalization Schematic 6.2-19 Loop Compartment and Upper Compartment Pressure Transient for Worst Case Break Compartment (Element 3) Having a DEHL Break 6.2-20 Loop Compartment and Upper Compartment Pressure Transient for Worst Case Break Compartment (Element 3) Having a DECL Break
| |
| | |
| 6.0-xi(a) REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LIST OF FIGURES (Cont'd)
| |
| NUMBER TITLE 6.2 -21 Upper Pressurizer Cubicle and Upper Compartment Pressure Transient For Spray Line Break (Element 28) 6.2-22 Steamline Compartment and Upper Compartment Pressure Transient for Steamline Break (Element 25) 6.2-23 Steamline Compartment and Upper Compartment Pressure Transient for Steamline Break (Element 26)
| |
| | |
| 6.0-xii REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LIST OF FIGURES (Cont'd)
| |
| NUMBER TITLE 6.2 -24 DELETED 6.2-24a DELETED 6.2-24b DELETED 6.2-25 One Fan Cooler Estimated Heat Removal Capacity for Containment Response Analysis (Byron) 6.2-25 One Fan Cooler Estimated Heat Removal Capacity for Containment Response Analysis (Braidwood) 6.2-25a DELETED 6.2-26 DELETED 6.2-27 DELETED 6.2-28 Containment Penetration Isolation Valve Test Connections 6.2-29 Isolation Valve Schemes 6.2-30 Instrumentation Penetration Scheme 6.2-31 DELETED 6.2-32 DELETED 6.2-33 Total Residual Decay Power as a Fraction of Operating Power vs. Time 6.2-34 Beta, Gamma, and Beta Plus Gamma Energy Release Rates vs.
| |
| Time (TID-14844 Based) 6.2-34a Integrated Energy Release of Beta, Gamma, and Beta Plus Gamma vs. Time 6.2-35 DELETED 6.2-36 DELETED 6.2-37 Fuel Transfer Penetration 6.2-38 Piping Volumes in the Main Steam System 6.2-39 Piping Volumes in the Main Feedwater System (Between Control Valves and Steam Generators)- Unit 1 6.2-40 Piping Volumes in the Main Feedwater System (Between Control Valves and Steam Generators) - Unit 2 6.3-1 Deleted 6.3-2 Deleted 6.3-2a Emergency Core Cooling System 6.3-3 Residual Heat Removal Pump Performance Curve (without uncertainty)
| |
| | |
| 6.0-xiii REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LIST OF FIGURES (Cont'd)
| |
| NUMBER TITLE 6.3 -4 Centrifugal Charging Pump Performance Curve (without uncertainty) 6.3-5 Safety Injection Pump Performance Curve (without uncertainty) 6.3-6 Deleted 6.3-7 Deleted 6.3-8A Recirculation Sump Details 6.3-8B Sump outline / Trash Rack Details 6.4-1 Deleted 6.4-2 Isometric View of Control Room 6.4-3 Diagrammatic Representation of Radioactive Sources for Protected Area of Control Room During a LOCA 6.4-4 Diagrammatic Representation of Total Control Room LOCA Dose 6.4-5 Simplified Control Room HVAC System Diagram - Normal Operation 6.4-6 Simplified Control Room HVAC System Diagram - Emergency Operation 6.4-7 Simplified Control Room HVAC System Diagram - Emergency Operation (Alternate) 6.4-8 Simplified Control Room HVAC System Diagram - Makeup HEPA Filter Testing Operation (Byron) 6.5-1 Deleted 6.5-2 Deleted 6.5-3 Deleted 6.5-4 Deleted 6.5-5 Nozzle Spraying Downward 6.5-6 Nozzle Spraying Horizontally 6.5-7 Nozzle Spraying Downward at 45 6.5-8 Pressure Drop vs. Flow, 1713A Nozzle 6.5-9 Spray Envelope Reduction Factor
| |
| | |
| 6.0-xiv REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| CHAPTER 6.0 - ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES DRAWINGS CITED IN THIS CHAPTER*
| |
| | |
| *The listed drawings are included as General References only; i.e., refer to the drawings to obtain additional detail or to obtain background information. These drawings are not part of the UFSAR. They are controlled by the Controlled Documents Program.
| |
| | |
| DRAWING* SUBJECT M-5 General Arrangement Roof Plan Units 1 & 2 M-6 General Arrangement Main Floor At El. 451-0 Units 1 &
| |
| 2 M-7 General Arrangement Mezzanine Floor At El. 426-0 Units 1 & 2 M-8 General Arrangement Grade Floor At El. 401-0 Units 1
| |
| & 2 M-9 General Arrangement Floor Plan At El. 383-0 Units 1 &
| |
| 2 M-10 General Arrangement Basement Floor At El. 364-0 Units 1 & 2 M-11 General Arrangement Floor Plan At El. 346-0 Units 1 &
| |
| 2 M-12 General Arrangement Radwaste/Service Building Units 1 &
| |
| 2 M-13 General Arrangement Fuel Handling Building Units 1 & 2 M-14 General Arrangement Section A-A Units 1 & 2 M-15 General Arrangement Section B-B Units 1 & 2 M-16 General Arrangement Section C-C and D-D Units 1 & 2 M-17 General Arrangement Section E-E Units 1 & 2 M-18 General Arrangement Section F-F Units 1 & 2 M-46 Diagram of Containment Spray System Unit 1 M-61 Diagram of Safety Injection System Unit 1 M-62 Diagram of Residual Heat Removal System Unit 1 M-95 Diagram of Auxiliary Building HVAC (VA) Systems Units 1
| |
| & 2 M-103 Diagram of Primary Containment Ventilation (VP) System Unit 1 M-104 Diagram of Primary Containment Ventilation (VP) System Unit 2 M-105 Diagram of Primary Containment Purge, Pressurization, and Vacuum Relief (VQ, VP) System Unit 1 M-106 Diagram of Primary Containment Purge, Pressurization, and Vacuum Relief (VQ, VP) System Unit 2 M-197 Reactor Containment Penetrations Sleeves Schedule M-535 Containment Spray System Plans and Sections M-1033-13 Control Room Envelope (CRE)
| |
| M-1323-1 Auxiliary Building Ventilation Plan Floor Plan Elevation 4510 M-1323-8 Auxiliary Building Ventilation System Floor Plan Elevation 4510
| |
| | |
| 6.0-xv REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| CHAPTER 6.0 - ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES 6.0 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES The engineered safety features of the By ron and Braidwood Stations are those systems whose actions are essential to a safety action required to mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents. The features can be divided into five general groups as follows: containment systems, emergency core cooling systems (ECCS), habitability systems, fission product removal, and control systems and other systems. The engineered safety features, listed above, are discussed in detail throughout this chapter.
| |
| 6.1 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES MATERIALS 6.1.1 Metallic Materials 6.1.1.1 Materials Selection and Fabrication Material specifications used for the principal pressure retaining applications in the components of the engineered safety features (ESF) are listed in Table 6.1-1. In some cases, Table 6.1-1 may not be totally inclusive of the material specifications used in the listed applications; however, the listed spe cifications are representative of those materials utilized. All of the materials used conform to the requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, plus applicable and appropriate addenda and code cases.
| |
| The welding materials used for joining t he ferritic base materials of the ESF conform to or are equivalent to ASME Material Specifications SFA 5.1, 5.5, 5.13, 5.17, 5.18, 5.20, 5.23, and 5.28. The welding materials used for joining nickel-chromium-iron alloy in similar base material combination and in dissimilar ferritic or austenitic base material combination conform to ASME Material Specifications SFA 5.11 and 5.14. The welding materials used for joining the austenitic stainless steel base materials conform to ASME Material Specifications SFA 5.4, 5.9, and 5.30. These materials are tested and qualified to the requirements of the ASME Code, Section III and Section IX rules, and are used in procedures which have been qualified to these same rules.
| |
| Parts of components in contact with borated water are fabricated of, or clad with austenitic stainless steel or equivalent corrosion resistant material. The integrity of the safety-related components of the ESF is maintained during all stages of component manufacture. Austenitic stainless steel is used in the final heat treated condition as required by the respective ASME Code Section II material specification for the particular type or grade of alloy. Furthermore, austenitic stainless steel materials used in the ESF components are handled, protected, stored, and cleaned according to recognized
| |
| | |
| 6.1-1 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| and accepted methods which are designed to minimize contamination which could lead to stress corrosion cracking; these controls are stipulated in Westinghouse process specifications, which are discussed in Subsection 5.2.3. Additional information concerning austenitic stainless steel, including the avoidance of sensitization and the prevention of intergranular attack, can be found in Subsection 5.2.3. No cold worked austenitic stainless steels having yield strengths greater than 90,000 psi are used for components of the ESF supplied by Westinghouse.
| |
| Components within the containment that would be exposed to core cooling water and containment sprays in the event of a loss-of-coolant accident utilize materials listed in Table 6.1-1. These components are manufactured primarily of stainless steel or other corrosion resistant material. The integrity of the materials of construction for ESF equipment when exposed to post design-basis accident (DBA) conditions has been evaluated.
| |
| Post DBA conditions were conservatively represented by test conditions. The test program (Reference 1) performed by Westinghouse considered spray and core cooling solutions of the design chemical compositions, as well as the design chemical compositions contaminated with corrosion and deterioration products which may be transferred to the solution during recirculation. The effects of sodium (free caustic), chlorine (chloride), and fluorine (fluoride) on austenitic stainless steels were considered. Based on this investigation, as well as testing by ORNL and others, the behavior of austenitic stainless steels in the post DBA environment will be acceptable. No cracking is anticipated on any equipment even in the presence of postulated levels of contaminants, provided the core cooling and spray solution pH is maintained at an adequate level. The inhibitive properties of alkalinity (hydroxyl ion) against chloride cracking and the inhibitive characteristic of boric acid on fluoride cracking have been demonstrated. Coatings on exposed surfaces within the containment are not subject to breakdown under exposure to the spray solution and can withstand the temperature and pressure expected in the event of a loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| The majority of the coating work inside contai nment complies with the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.54, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants." The majority of the material manufactured and applied conforms to requirements of ANSI N101.2, "Protective Coatings (Paints) for Light Water Nuclear Reactor Containment Facilities," ANSI N5.12, "Protective Coatings (Paints) for the Nuclear Industry," and ANSI N101.4, "Qua lity Assurance for Protective Coatings Applied to Nuclear Facilities" (see Subsection 6.1.2).
| |
| | |
| Information concerning the degree to which the materials used comply with requirements for control of ferrite content in stainless steel weld metal, cleaning of fluid systems and
| |
| | |
| 6.1-2 REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| associated components, and control of the use of sensitized stainless steels can be found in Appendix A.
| |
| 6.1.1.2 Composition, Compatibility, and Stability of Containment and Core Spray Coolants The containment spray system is designed to provide a sufficient quantity of 30% to 36% sodium hydroxide to the containment to form a minimum of 8.0 pH solution when combined with the spilled reactor coolant water, the safety injection accumulator inventory, and the refueling water storage tank inventory. Refer to Subsection 6.5.2 for information on pH changes during system operation. The probability of stress-corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steel components is therefore minimized by maintaining the long-term sump pH between 8.0 and 10.5.
| |
| Most components in the containment are fabricated of austenitic stainless steel. These materials are compatible with the NaOH solution, with the exception of galvanized steel and aluminum.
| |
| To prevent degradation of the sodium hydroxide, an inert gas is maintained within the spray additive tank. A relief valve is provided to prevent overpressurization of the tank.
| |
| The vessels used for storing ESF coolants include the accumulators, the containment spray additive (sodium hydroxide) tank, and the refueling water storage tank.
| |
| The ESF coolant is stored in a stainless-steel-lined concrete refueling water storage tank. The chloride ion concentration of borated water coolant stored in this tank normally is less than 0.15 ppm, therefore stress corrosion cracking of the lined stainless steel or ESF components through which the coolant circulates is very unlikely.
| |
| The accumulators are carbon steel clad with austenitic stainless steel. Because of the corrosion resistance of these materials, significant corrosive attack on the storage vessels is not expected.
| |
| The accumulators are vessels filled with borated water and pressurized with nitrogen gas. The nominal boron concentration is 2200 to 2400 ppm. Samples of the solution in the accumulators are taken periodically for checks of boron concentration.
| |
| Principal design parameters of the accumulators are listed in Table 6.3-1.
| |
| | |
| 6.1-3 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The refueling water storage tank is a source of borated cooling water for injection. The nominal boron concentration is 2300-2500 ppm, which is below the solubility limit at freezing.
| |
| The temperature of the refueling water is maintained above freezing. Further information on the refueling water
| |
| | |
| 6.1-3a REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| storage tanks is given in Subsection 3.8.4.1.3, Sections 6.3 and 6.5, and the Technical Specifications.
| |
| 6.1.2 Organic Materials
| |
| | |
| Criteria have been developed for selection and application of protective coatings for structures and components inside containment. The coatings on most of the structure and components conform to this criteria and, as a result, will remain intact and protect exposed surfaces during and after any postulated event. The limited amount of undocumented/
| |
| unqualified coatings have been identified and an evaluation of the potential effect of coatings failure on containment ECCS sump functionality has been completed. This evaluation demonstrates that coating failure will not result in unacceptable sump performance.
| |
| The following coating systems, which apply to the containment building, have been used, and each of these systems provides corrosion protection for the exposed metal and concrete surfaces and facilitates the decontamination process:
| |
| : a. Steel Containment
| |
| : 1. System Description - A prime coat of inorganic zinc-rich coating and a finish coat of phenolic organic coating with the exception that the finish coat at Braidwood is limited to a height of 8 feet 0 inch above the operating floor (elevation 426
| |
| : 2. System Thickness - Minfeet 0 inch).
| |
| imum dry film thicknesses a) Prime Coat - 3 mils minimum, 6 mils maximum; are as follows:
| |
| | |
| b) Finish Coat - 4 mils minimum, 6 mils maximum; and c) Total System Thickness - 7 mils minimum, 12 mils maximum.
| |
| : 3. Manufacturers and coatings a) Inorganic zinc - rich primer carbo zinc 11SG equivalent. inorganic zinc - Carboline Company or
| |
| | |
| b) Phenolic organic finish coat - Phenoline 305 finish - Carboline Company or equivalent.
| |
| | |
| 6.1-4 REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 1. System b. Concrete walls and steel embedded in walls applied over formed concrete wall and ceiling description - one epoxy surface coat surfaces and over concrete masonry wall surfaces, and one phenolic finish coat applied over the surfacer coat.
| |
| : 2. Uses - indoor surfaces of concrete walls and ceilings, concrete masonry walls and metalwork that require protection from a corrosive atmosphere, chemical attack and wear, irradiation, radioactive materials and the decontamination processes involved, and which provides for general maintenance service and moderate impact and abrasion service.
| |
| : 3. System thickness - minimum dry film thicknesses a) Surfacer coat - applied to a reasonably are as follows:
| |
| | |
| mils. smooth, sealed surface - about 20 to 30
| |
| | |
| b) Finish coat - 4 to 6 mils.
| |
| c) Total system thickness - 24 to 36 mils.
| |
| : 4. Manufacturers and coatings a) Typical Carboline Company or equivalent. surfacer coat - Surfacer 195 -
| |
| | |
| b) Typical finish coat - Phenoline 305 finish -
| |
| : c. Concrete floors and steel embedded in floorsCarboline Company or equivalent.
| |
| : 1. System description - o one phenolic finish coat applied over finished ne epoxy prime coat and concrete floors and the miscellaneous steel
| |
| : 2. Uses embedded in the floor.
| |
| require protection from a corros- indoor surfaces or concrete floors that ive atmosphere, chemical attack and wear, irradiation, radioactive materials and the decontamination processes involved, and which provides for general maintenance service and heavy impact and abrasion service.
| |
| : 3. System thickness - minimum dry film thicknesses shall be as follows:
| |
| | |
| 6.1-5 REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| a) Prime Coat - 20 to 30 mils.
| |
| b) Finish Coat - 6 to 8 mils.
| |
| c) Total system thickness - 26 to 38 mils.
| |
| : 4. Manufacturers and coatings - same as specified for
| |
| : d. Curing prime coats and finish coats for concrete walls.
| |
| Ambient, but not less than 60oF. Properties of the Procedures for All Coating Systems
| |
| : 1. Dry coating systems are as follows:
| |
| a) Coating Density:
| |
| psf. system for steel containment - 0.148 b) Coating system for concrete walls - 0.265 psf.
| |
| c) Coating system for concrete floors - 0.265
| |
| : 2. Heat transfer through the various materials psf.
| |
| | |
| comprising the primary containment structure will be essentially in direct proportion to the resistance indicated in the following tabulation:
| |
| | |
| Part of Thickness Resistance Percentage of Structure (in) (R) Total R Value (%)
| |
| Coating System 0.007 0.00280 0.44 Steel Liner Plate 0.250 0.00074 0.06 Concrete Walls 42.000 5.60000 88.00 Air (Both Sides) 0.78000 11.50 Totals 42.257 6.38354 100.00
| |
| : 3. Approximate surface area covered by each coating system:
| |
| a) Steel Containment - 104,000 ft2,
| |
| | |
| b) Concrete Walls and Embedded Steel - 86,200 ft2, and c) Concrete Floors and Embedded Steel - 31,100 ft2.
| |
| The coating systems that are used on components in the NSSS vendor's scope of supply are given in Table 6.1-3.
| |
| | |
| 6.1-6 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Quantification of significant amounts of protective coatings on Westinghouse supplied components located inside the containment building is given in Table 6.1-2; the painted surfaces of Westinghouse supplied equipment comprise a small percentage of the total painted surfaces inside containment.
| |
| For large equipment requiring protective coatings (specifically itemized in Table 6.1-2), Westinghouse specifies or approves the type of coating systems utilized; requirements with which the coating system must comply are stipulated in Westinghouse process specifications, which supplement the equipment specifications.
| |
| For these components, the generic types of coatings used are zinc, rich silicate, or epoxy based primer with or without chemically-cured epoxy or epoxy modified phenolic top coat.
| |
| The remaining equipment requires protective coatings on much smaller surface areas and is procured from numerous vendors; for this equipment Westinghouse specifications require that high quality coatings be applied using good commercial practices and in accordance with conventional industry standards. Table 6.1-2 includes identification of this equipment and total quantities of protective coatings on such equipment.
| |
| Protective coatings for use in the reactor containment have been evaluated as to their suitability in post-DBA conditions.
| |
| Tests have shown that certain epoxy and modified phenolic systems are satisfactory for in-containment use. This evaluation (Reference 2) considered resistance to high temperature and chemical conditions anticipated during a LOCA, as well as high radiation resistance.
| |
| Information regarding quality assurance requirements for protective coatings is discussed in Appendix A. Further compliance information has been submitted to the NRC for review (via letter NS-CE-1352 dated February 1, 1977, to C. J.
| |
| Heltemes, Jr., Quality Assurance Branch, NRC, from C.
| |
| Eicheldinger, Westinghouse PWRSD, Nuclear Safety Dept.) and accepted (via {{letter dated|date=April 27, 1977|text=letter dated April 27, 1977}}, to C. Eicheldinger from C. J. Heltemes, Jr.).
| |
| The majority of coatings inside containment comply with the guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.54, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants." The coating material conforms to requirements of ANSI N101.2, "Protective Coatings (Paints) for Light Water Nuclear Reactor Containment Facilities," ANSI N5.12, "Protective Coatings (Paints) for the Nuclear Industry,"
| |
| and ANSI N101.4, "Quality Assurance for Protective Coatings Applied to Nuclear Facilities."
| |
| | |
| A review has been completed of the coatings qualification in each containment. Braidwood 1 was found to have the largest
| |
| | |
| 6.1-7 REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| amount of undocumented or unqualified coatings and was used for all subsequent evaluation. The quantity of unqualified coatings was then assumed to fail and become detached. Conservative assumptions were utilized for the fragment size and specific gravity in calculating the transport of fragments to the sump.
| |
| The results demonstrated that a relatively small portion of the failed coatings would reach the sump screens. The resulting blockage was evaluated with respect to pump NPSH requirements and found to cause only an insignificant change in the NPSH margin.
| |
| The Category 1 equipment coating, as described in letter NS-CE-1352 dated February 1, 1977, meets ANSI N101.2, and meets the alternate QA program on control of paint as described in WCAP-8370. The range of coating thicknesses for this equipment is 5.5 mils to 8.0 mils.
| |
| 6.1.2.1 Formation of Combustible Gas Mixtures from Organic Materials and Protective Coating The protective coating systems inside the containment are described in detail in Subsection 6.1.2. Based on the information given in that subsection, the resultant amounts of gas evolved are listed in Table 6.1-4. Temperature and chemical effects on the generation of hydrogen and methane gas from these coatings are expected to be minimal. With a containment volume of 2.81 x 106 ft3, the concentration of generated gas is less than 0.024% of the containment volume. Therefore, the coating systems used inside containment, which are qualified to ANSI N101.2, will not create solid debris or significant amounts of hydrogen or methane gas due to radiolytic and chemical decomposition at DBA conditions. Hydrogen generation from zinc based coatings is discussed in Subsection 6.2.5.
| |
| Charcoal and oil present inside the containment are located within filter housings and mechanical components, respectively.
| |
| Thus, charcoal and oil are not exposed to the containment spray and will not create debris nor generate hydrogen and methane gas.
| |
| Other organic materials within the primary containment are the insulation and jacket materials of power, control and instrumentation cables. Ethylene propylene rubber (EPR)/hypalon (chlorosulfonated polyethylene) are used for the construction of insulation/jackets for the Okonite power and control cables.
| |
| Ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM)/hypalon are used for the construction of the insulation/jacket for the Samuel Moore instrumentation cables. Power, control, and instrumentation cables purchased under Nuclear Electrical Material Standard N-EM-0035 (representing cables procured and installed after the initial fuel load) may be constructed of other approved insulation and jacket materials. The quantity of hydrogen and methane from this source is a small fraction of that from other sources.
| |
| | |
| 6.1-8 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The quantity (weight and volume) of uncovered cable and cable in conduit or closed cable trays are as follows:
| |
| : a. Uncovered
| |
| | |
| Weight (W) = 11,359.31 pounds
| |
| : b. Covered Volume (V) = 81.96 cubic feet
| |
| | |
| W = 75,061.53 pounds V = 586.49 cubic feet.
| |
| A breakdown of cable diameters and associated conductor cross sections is shown on Table 6.1-5.
| |
| The insulation and jacket materials are also indicated on Table 6.1-5.
| |
| | |
| There is no wood or asphalt inside the containment.
| |
| 6.1.3 Postaccident Chemistry In the event of an accident, sodium hydroxide and boric acid solutions will be present in the containment sump; the presence of sodium hydroxide in the sump solution will reduce the probability of stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels by maintaining the long-term sump solution pH at 8.0 or greater.
| |
| | |
| There are two independent safety grade sumps in the containment which are used to recycle ESF fluids. The only significant source of low pH fluids is a possible leak of borated reactor coolant. The boric acid content of this water is very low, and as a result, the pH of the coolant will be only slightly less than 7.0. In the event of a LOCA, the reactor coolant pH will be increased by the addition of NaOH in the containment spray. A sufficient quantity of NaOH is added to maintain the pH of liquids in the containment at 8.0 or greater. This pH level can be maintained even in the event of a maximum break size LOCA, and the concurrent failure of one of the two saf ety grade containment spray systems. The containment spray systems are designed so that each division fully covers the containment, thereby ensuring that all reactor coolant spillage, when combined with the spray, has a minimum pH of 8.0.
| |
| 6.1.3.1 Steamline Break Inside Containment
| |
| | |
| In the event of a main steamline break i nside the containment concurrent with failure of the isolation valve to close in the
| |
| | |
| 6.1-9 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| faulted steamline, there would be backflow from piping which is external to the containment. Low steamline pressure setpoints would be reached within approximately 5 seconds after the break occurs, and the three remaining main steamline isolation valves and the main feedwater isolation valves would require an additional 5 seconds for closure. In addition, steam would be released from the steam generator via a 1.1-ft2 flow restrictor for Unit 1 and a 1.4-ft2 flow restrictor for Unit 2 located within the vessel discharge nozzle. Peak containment pressure resulting from this break is high enough to cause actuation of containment spray and caustic eduction. After the type of break has been ascertained, the caustic addition can be secured by operator action. Once the containment pressure has decreased below 15 psig, the CS pumps may also be secured.
| |
| | |
| 6.1-9a REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Although there may be up to 1.50 ppm of ammonia in the steam resulting from decomposition of morpholine or from direct feed of ammonia, this has no significant effect upon pH of condensed steam containment spray mixture as it accumulates in the containment sump.
| |
| 6.1.3.2 Main Feedwater Line Break Inside Containment In the event of a main feedwater line failure inside the containment concurrent with failure of the isolation valve to close in the faulted line, but with the feedwater regulator valve located in the turbine building assumed to close within 10 seconds after the break occurs, the resulting peak containment pressure will differ between Unit 1 and Unit 2 due to feedwater design differences. Unit 1 has a larger break size due to the feedring/J-tube arrangement in the feedwater system. Unit 2 has a preheater design with a flow restricting orifice. For Unit 1, the containment spray system may actuate on high containment pressure; however, the integrated energy into containment for a Unit 1 main feedline break is less than the energy associated with a main steamline break. Accordingly, the containment spray would run for less time following a main feedline break, and the quantity of liquid and the impact on the maximum value of pH is bounded by the main steamline break evaluation for Unit 1. For Unit 2, the peak containment pressure response will be less than the pressure at which containment spray is actuated. Therefore, for Unit 2 the accumulation of liquid in the containment basement will be the amount of liquid discharged from the feedwater line, plus water and steam released from the feedwater nozzle via a restricting orifice located in the nozzle. It is assumed that all four reactor containment fan coolers will condense flashed steam at their total design rate of 6,840 lb/min. The following chemical composition of the liquid is expected:
| |
| Free hydroxide, ppm as CaCO3 less than 0.15 Ammonia, ppm less than 0.25 In addition, there will be trace quantities of other substances such as silica, sodium and chlorides.
| |
| | |
| 6.1-10 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.1.3.3 Loss-of-Coolant Accident In the event of a pipe break of a reactor coolant loop, both safety injection and containment spray will be initiated. The pH of the final sump solution is independent of the number of trains of ECCS and CS pumps in operation. The final sump pH is determined by the quantity of water and concentration of boron in the RWST, the RCS, and the SI accumulators and the quantity of water and concentration of NaOH educted from the containment spray additive tank. The pH of the spray solution is determined by the CS pump suction source and the quantity of NaOH educted from the spray additive tank. The systems function in the same manner regardless of whether one or two ECCS/containment spray trains are in operation. The residual heat removal pumps will be semiautomatically transferred to the recirculation mode when the refueling water storage tank reaches the Lo-2 level setpoint.
| |
| The charging and safety injection pumps are then manually aligned for the recirculation mode. The containment spray pumps will continue to operate with suction from the RWST until the RWST reaches the Lo-3 level setpoint. The operator will then manually align the containment spray pump suction from the RWST to the recirculation sump. Caustic addition will continue until the spray additive tank reaches the Lo-2 level regardless of CS pump suction source. This ensures that the final sump solution pH will always be between 8.0 and 10.5. The spray pH may exceed the upper EQ limit of 10.5 depending on the spray additive tank NaOH concentration. Refer to Subsection 6.5.2 for further information on spray pH.
| |
| 6.1.4 References
| |
| : 1. WCAP-7803, "Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel in Post Hypothetical Loss of Coolant Environment."
| |
| : 2. Picone, L. F., "Evaluation of Protective Coatings for Use in Reactor Containment," WCAP 7825, December 1971.
| |
| : 3. Bolt, R., and Carroll, J., "Radiation Effects on Organic Materials," Academic Press, 1963.
| |
| : 4. Zhiklarer, V., et al., "Study of Radiolysis of Epichloryhydrin by an Electrical Conducting Method," (Institute of Physical Chemistry, Kier, 1973), abstract only in Nuclear Science Abstracts, 28, No. 12, Item 29672, 1973.
| |
| | |
| 6.1-11 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.1-1
| |
| | |
| ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES MATERIALS
| |
| | |
| Valves
| |
| | |
| Bodies SA182 Type F316 or SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M
| |
| | |
| Bonnets SA182 Type F316 or SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M
| |
| | |
| Discs SA182 Type F316 or SA564 Gr 630 or SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M
| |
| | |
| Pressure retaining bolting SA453 Gr 660
| |
| | |
| Pressure retaining nuts SA453 Gr 660 or SA194 Gr 6
| |
| | |
| Ball Valves ( 1" Nominal Pipe Size and Approved for Specific Application
| |
| | |
| Bodies A-479 Type 316
| |
| | |
| Flanges A-479 Type 316
| |
| | |
| Ball A-276 Type 316
| |
| | |
| Pressure retaining bolting SA-453 Gr 660
| |
| | |
| Pressure retaining nuts SA-194 Gr 6
| |
| | |
| Auxiliary Heat Exchangers
| |
| | |
| Heads SA240 Type 304
| |
| | |
| Nozzle necks SA240 Type 304
| |
| | |
| Tubes SA249 Type 304
| |
| | |
| Tube sheets SA515 Gr 70 with Stainless Steel Cladding A-8 Analysis
| |
| | |
| Shells SA240 Type 304
| |
| | |
| Flange SA182 Gr F304
| |
| | |
| 6.1-12 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.1-1 Cont'd
| |
| | |
| Auxiliary Pressure Vessels, Tanks, Filters, etc.
| |
| | |
| Shells and heads SA351 Gr CF8A, SA240 Type 304, SA264 Clad Plate of SA537 Gr B with SA240 Type 304 Clad and Stainless Steel Weld Overlay A-8 Analysis
| |
| | |
| Flanges and nozzles SA182 Gr F304, SA350 Gr LF2 with SA240 Type 304 and Stainless Steel Weld Overlay A-8 Analysis
| |
| | |
| Piping SA 312 Type 304, Type 316 or SA 376 Type 304, Type 316
| |
| | |
| Containment Recirculation Sump SA-240 TP 304 Screen
| |
| | |
| 6.1-12a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.1-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| Pipe fittings SA403 WP304 Seamless
| |
| | |
| Closure bolting and nuts SA193 Gr B7 and SA194 Gr 2H
| |
| | |
| Auxiliary Pumps
| |
| | |
| Pump casing and heads SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M, SA182 Gr F304 or F316
| |
| | |
| Flanges and nozzles SA182 Gr F304 or F316k SA403 Gr WP316L Seamless
| |
| | |
| Stuffing or packing box cover SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M, SA240 Gr 304 or 316
| |
| | |
| Closure bolting SA193 Gr B7, Br B8 or SA453 Gr 660
| |
| | |
| Closure nuts SA194 Gr 8
| |
| | |
| Tubing SA213 Type 304, 304L, 316 or 316L
| |
| | |
| Pipe SA312 Type 304, 304L, 316 or 316L
| |
| | |
| Piping
| |
| | |
| Pipe SA312, Type 304 SA358, Type 304 SA376, Type 304
| |
| | |
| Fittings SA182, GR F304 SA403, GR WP304
| |
| | |
| Flanges SA182, GR F304 SA182, GR F304
| |
| | |
| Bolting SA193, GR B7
| |
| | |
| 6.1-13 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.1-2
| |
| | |
| PROTECTIVE COATINGS ON WESTINGHOUSE-SUPPLIED EQUIPMENT
| |
| | |
| INSIDE CONTAINMENT
| |
| | |
| PAINTED SURFACE AREA COMPONENT (ft2)
| |
| | |
| Reactor coolant pump motors 1600
| |
| | |
| Accumulator tanks 5400
| |
| | |
| Manipulator crane 3100
| |
| | |
| Other refueling equipment 1100
| |
| | |
| Remaining equipment <1300
| |
| | |
| (such as valves, auxiliary tanks and heat exchanger supports, transmitters, alarm horns, and small instruments)
| |
| | |
| 6.1-14
| |
| | |
| B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| The containment systems include the containment heat removal systems, the containment isolation system, and the containment combustible gas control system. The containment and the containment systems function to prevent or control the release of radioactive fission products that might be released into the containment atmosphere following a postulated LOCA, secondary system pipe break, or fuel-handling accident.
| |
| 6.2.1 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.1 Containment Structure
| |
| | |
| The containment is a prestressed-concrete shell structure made up of a cylinder with a shallow dome roof and a flat foundation slab. The entire containment structure is lined on the inside with steel plate, which acts as a leak tight membrane. The containment completely encloses the entire pressurized water reactor, steam generators, reactor coolant loops, and portions of the auxiliary and engineered safeguard features (ESF) systems.
| |
| : 6. 2.1.1.1 Design Bases
| |
| | |
| The containment systems are designed such that for all break sizes, up to and including the double-ended severance of a reactor coolant pipe or secondary system pipe, the containment peak pressure remains below the design pressure, with adequate margins, as presented in Tables 6.2-1 and 6.2-1a, for Unit 1 and 2, respectively. These margins are maintained by the containment system even assuming the worst single active failure affecting the operation of the emergency core cooling system, containment spray system, and the reactor containment fan coolers during the injection phase, and the worst active or passive single failure during the recirculation phase. For primary system breaks, loss of offsite power is assumed. For secondary system breaks, cases with and without the loss of offsite power have been evaluated.
| |
| The offsite power available case is conservative for maximizing the releases to containment through forced convection of the reactor primary coolant due to reactor coolant pump operation.
| |
| Assuming loss of offsite power is conservative for delaying safeguards actuation due to startup and loading of the emergency diesel generators. The Unit 1 and Unit 2 analyses considered cases with and without loss of offsite power separately in order to determine the limiting set of conditions.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-1 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The analyses presented in this section are based on assumptions which are conservative with respect to the design of the containment systems (i.e., minimum heat removal, maximum containment pressure). Subsection 6.2.1.2 presents the mass and energy releases and design evaluation of containment subcompartments. Subsections 6.2.1.3 and 6.2.1.4 present the mass and energy releases used in the design evaluation.
| |
| Subsection 6.2.1.5 presents a discussion of the minimum containment pressure analysis used in the Large Break LOCA ECCS Analysis.
| |
| | |
| The results of analyses for the pressurizer spray line in the upper pressurizer cubicles and
| |
| | |
| 6.2-1a REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| the main steamline in the steam line pipe chases are included in Subsection 6.2.1.2.
| |
| 6.2.1.1.2 Design Features
| |
| | |
| Containment design features include:
| |
| : a. A secondary shield wall constructed of 4-foot, 6-inch-thick reinforced concrete, extending from the base mat (elevation 377 feet 0 inch) to the operating floor (elevation 426 feet 0 inch). The shield wall encloses the reactor coolant pumps, reactor vessel and its primary shield wall, steam generators, the pressurizer up to elevation 426 feet 0 inch, and the refueling cavity. The secondary shield wall supports the operating floor, which together with the shield wall prevents the containment liner from being impacted by potential internal missiles and from the effects of pipe whip. Refer to Chapter 3.0 for a more detailed discussion.
| |
| : b. The Byron/Braidwood design does not use a pressure-suppression-type containment.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-2 REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. Since the reactor containment fan coolers are utilized during normal operation with chilled water supplied to a non-safety-related cooling coil in each fan cooler, inadvertent changes to the accident mode will produce no significant effect upon containment internal pressure. The chilled water coils of the reactor containment fan coolers (RCFC) are designed to remove the containment heat in conjunction with essential service water coils during normal plant operation only and hence are non-safety-related.
| |
| However, the essential service water coils and other components of the RCFC are safety-related as they would be required to operate following a LOCA for heat removal in the containment. For further description of the RCFC System operation and design requirements under post-LOCA conditions, refer to Subsections 6.2.2.2 and 6.2.2.3. For a description of RCFC system operation and design requirements under normal operation, refer to Subsection 9.4.8.1.
| |
| : d. Water may fill the refueling cavity until it empties into the reactor vessel cavity and floods the cavity up to base mat (elevation of 377 feet 0 inch). Other than this, there are no locations within the containment where water may be trapped and prevented from returning to the containment sump. Water that condenses within the reactor
| |
| | |
| 6.2-2a REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| containment base mat.containment fan cooler housing is drained to the
| |
| : e. The containment and subcompartment atmospheres are maintained during normal operation within prescribed pressure, temperature, and humidity limits by means of the containment chilled water systems which deliver 40F water to the dehumidifying coils within each reactor containment fan cooler. Containment penetrations cooling is accomplished by means of supplying component cooling water to the penetrations that have cooling coils. Containment ventilation systems such as the CRDM booster fans and the CRDM cooling fans are used during normal operation and require no periodic testing to ensure functional capability.
| |
| 6.2.1.1.3 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| The short -term pressure subcompartment analysis considers a loss of offsite power. Consideration of single active failures is of no consequence, since none of the safety equipment functions during the initial seconds of the postaccident transient. The maximum calculated differential pressure in the loop compartment is 20.27 psi resulting from a double-ended hot leg (DEHL) break in volume 3 (see Table 6.2-10 for listing of volumes). The maximum calculated differential pressure in the upper pressurizer cubicle is 10.24 psi resulting from a spray line double-ended break. The maximum calculated differential pressure in the steamline pipe chase is 13.43 psi resulting from a main steamline break in volume 26.
| |
| The containment subcompartment differential pressure analysis is described in detail in Subsection 6.2.1.2. The results of the pressure and temperature transient analysis of the containment for the loss-of-coolant accidents are shown in Figures 6.2-1 through 6.2-6 for Unit 1. Containment pressure and temperature curves are presented in Figures 6.2-7 through 6.2-12 for Unit 2.
| |
| The cases examined in this analysis determine the effects of the full range of large reactor coolant break sizes up to and including a double-ended break. Cases illustrating the sensitivity to break location are also shown. All of these cases show that the containment pressure will remain below design pressure with margin. After the peak pressure is attained, the performance of the safeguards system reduces the containment pressure. At the end of the first day following the accident, the containment pressure has been reduced to a low value. The peak pressures and margins are shown in Tables 6.2-1 and 6.2-1a.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-3 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Additional containment analyses were performed for the purpose of evaluating ultimate heat sink capability (see Subsection 9.2.5).
| |
| The containment analyses performed for the ultimate heat sink reconstitution differ from the containment integrity analyses described here in that the heat removal rates from the reactor containment fan coolers and the residual heat removal system were maximized to determine the limiting heat load on the ultimate heat sink.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-3a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The results of the pressure transient analysis of the containment for the secondary side breaks are presented in Tables 6.2-1 and 6.2-1a. The pressure and temperature curves for the most limiting steam breaks are presented in Figures 6.2-13 through 6.2-14e.
| |
| | |
| Calculation of containment pressure and temperature transients is accomplished by use of the digital computer code, COCO (Reference 1). The COCO code has been used and found acceptable to calculate containment pressure transients for the H.B.
| |
| Robinson and Zion plants.
| |
| The analyses performed to evaluate the containment temperature and pressure response to a postulated main steamline break (MSLB) inside containment utilized the Westinghouse containment model developed for the IEEE-323-1971 Westinghouse Supplemental Equipment Qualification Program. These models and their justification (experimental and analytical) are detailed in Reference 2 and References 18 through 21.
| |
| The analysis of these containment models has been compared to the analyses for other Westinghouse plants where models were used which conform to those presented in CSB "Interim Evaluation Model for the Main Steam Line Break Inside Containment."
| |
| | |
| These comparisons indicate:
| |
| : a. The conservatism of the Westinghouse large steamline break containment model when used with dry steam blowdowns.
| |
| : b. The Westinghouse small steamline break containment model, using the convective heat flux heat transfer model, results in peak temperatures comparable to those calculated using the NRC Interim Proposed Model with 8% revaporization.
| |
| | |
| Details of the analytical model used to conservatively determine the maximum containment temperature and pressure for a spectrum of postulated main steam line breaks for various reactor power levels are provided below:
| |
| : a. Single failure in the safety grade systems required to mitigate the consequences of a spectrum of main steamline breaks inside containment were evaluated to determine the limiting set of conditions for Byron/Braidwood. One such failure is the failure of a main steam isolation valve to close. This
| |
| | |
| 6.2-4 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| increases the steam pipe volume available for blowdown through the break. When all valves operate, only the volume between the steam generator and the first isolation valve adds to the blowdown. When the isolation valve fails to close, the volume between the break and the isolation valves in the other steamline becomes available as well as the volume of the safety and relief valve headers and other connecting lines.
| |
| Failure of the feedwater isolation valve to close was evaluated. This failure increases the volume of feedwater not isolated from the steam generator which would be available for blowdown. The volume increase is due to water between the feedwater isolation valve and the feedwater regulating valve including all headers and connecting lines.
| |
| While the steamline and feed water isolation valves are closing, the flow is considered as unrestricted until the time of complete closure.
| |
| Auxiliary feedwater flow that continues after isolation of the steam and feedlines was included in the analysis. Excessive blowdown of auxiliary feedwater through the depressurized steam generator is prohibited by the flow limiting orifices installed in each auxiliary feedwater supply line. Within 30 minutes, auxiliary feedwater flow to the depressurized steam generator is isolated manually by the operator from the control room. Auxiliary feedwater flow to the intact steam generators is assumed to continue.
| |
| A blowdown increase due to a failure of the main feedwater pump trip was included in the analysis.
| |
| Single failure of the containment cooling systems with reduction of heat removal capability was included. These were by a train failure or by a diesel failure after a loss of offsite power.
| |
| All NSSS equipment to be relied on for the transients are safety grade.
| |
| : b. The design temperature for the liner is 280F. The design temperature of the internal containment structure is 280F.
| |
| The peak containment temperature for a primary side
| |
| | |
| break is 264.24F for Unit 1 and 257.40F for Unit 2.
| |
| The peak containment temperature for secondary side breaks is 329F for Unit 1 and 323F for Unit 2.
| |
| Refer to Tables 6.2-1 and 6.2-1a.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-5 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The justification for the design temperatures, provided in Table 6.2-66, selected for the liner and internal containment structures is that they are conservative when the duration of the peak temperature for the secondary side break, the temperature lag between the containment atmosphere and the passive heat sinks such as the containment liner and
| |
| | |
| 6.2-5a REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| internal structures, and the resistance to heat transfer provided by the materials used, are considered.
| |
| The design temperatures defined for the qualification of Westinghouse PWR-SD supplied safety-related instrumentation inside containment are provided in Supplement 1 (Rev. 1, November, 1978) to WCAP-8587 "Methodology for Qualifying Westinghouse PWR-SD Supplied NSSS Safety Related Electrical Equipment."
| |
| : c. The piping volumes from the plant layout between the affected steam generator and the various steamline isolation valves and feedwater isolation valves and control valves are the following. The maximum volume between the affected steam generator and: (1) the main steam isolation valve is 766 ft3 for Unit 1 and 749 ft3 for Unit 2, (2) the main steam isolation valves for the intact steam generators is 11,575 ft3 for Unit 1 and 11,358 ft3 for Unit 2, (3) the main feedwater isolation valve is 222 ft3 for Unit 1 and 175 ft3 for Unit 2, and (4) the main feedwater control valve is 702 ft3 for Unit 1 and 655 ft3 for Unit 2. The assumed analysis values for the Unit 1 volumes conservatively bound the as-built values shown in Figures 6.2-38 and 6.2-39. The volumes for Unit 2 are shown in Figures 6.2-38 and 6.2-40.
| |
| The main feedwater isolation valves have a 5-second maximum closure time. The main steam and feedwater preheater bypass valves have a 6-second maximum closure time. The main feedwater control valves are discussed in Subsection 6.2.1.4.3. Automatic closure of auxiliary feedwater isolation valves is not a requirement.
| |
| | |
| Blowdown from the broken steamline is assumed to be saturated steam.
| |
| Transient phenomena within the reactor coolant system affect containment conditions by means of convective mass and energy transport through the pipe break.
| |
| For analytical rigor and convenience, the containment air-steam-water mixture is separated into two systems. The first system consists of the air-steam phase; the second is the water phase. Sufficient relationships to describe the transient are provided by the equations of conservation of mass and energy as applied to each system, together with appropriate boundary conditions. As thermodynamic equations of state and conditions may vary during the transient, the equations have been derived for all possible cases of superheated or saturated steam and
| |
| | |
| 6.2-6 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| subcooled or saturated water. Switching between states is handled automatically by the code. The following are the major assumptions made in the analysis:
| |
| : a. Discharge mass and energy flow rates through the reactor coolant system break are established from the analysis in Subsection 6.2.1.3.
| |
| : b. For the steam break analysis and the blowdown portion of the LOCA analysis, the discharge flow separates into steam and water phases at the break point. The saturated water phase is at the total containment pressure, while the steam phase is at the partial pressure of the steam in the containment. For the post-blowdown portion of the LOCA analysis, steam and water releases are input separately.
| |
| : c. Homogeneous mixing is assumed. The steam-air mixture and the water phase each have uniform properties.
| |
| More specifically, thermal equilibrium between the air and steam is assumed. This does not imply thermal equilibrium between the steam-air mixture and water phase.
| |
| : d. Air is taken as an ideal gas, while compressed water and steam tables are employed for water and steam thermodynamic properties.
| |
| : e. For large steamline breaks the saturation temperature at the partial pressure of the steam is used for heat transfer.
| |
| : f. For small steamline breaks the model described in Section 2 of Reference 2 was utilized with plant-specific data and stagnant Tagami heat transfer.
| |
| | |
| Subsections 6.2.1.3 and 6.2.1.4 present the mass and energy releases used for the analysis.
| |
| | |
| Initial Conditions An analysis of containment response to the break of the reactor coolant system must start with knowledge of the initial conditions in the containment. The pressure, temperature, and relative humidity of the containment atmosphere prior to the postulated accident are specified in the analysis.
| |
| | |
| Also, values for the temperature of the service water and refueling water storage tank solution are assumed, along with the initial water inventory of the refueling water storage tank. All of these values are chosen conservatively, as shown in Tables 6.2-2 and 6.2-3.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-7 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| In each of the transients, the safeguards systems shown in Tables 6.2-2 and 6.2-3 are assumed to operate at the times indicated in Tables 6.2-6 through 6.2-9c.
| |
| | |
| Heat Removal The significant heat removal source during the early portion of the transient is structural heat removal. Provision is made in the containment pressure transient analysis for heat transfer through, and heat storage in, both interior and exterior walls.
| |
| Every wall is divided into a large number of nodes. For each node, a conservation of energy equation expressed in finite-difference form accounts for transient conduction into and out of the node and temperature rise of the node. Tables 6.2-4 and 6.2-5 are summaries of the containment structural heat sinks used in the analysis. To generate the values in Table 6.2-4, a complete and detailed list of surface areas and thicknesses of structures and equipment in the containment was compiled. An uncertainty from 0 to -50% was assigned to each of the nominal surface areas in Table 6.2-4a. When the surface areas of several items were combined into one table entry, the appropriate uncertainty for each individual area was applied before the combined area was calculated. All areas were reduced to the minimum value in the uncertainty range specified. Thicknesses were reduced to give conservatively small total volume when several items of varying thickness were combined into one table entry. This procedure resulted in a conservatively small estimate of the available heat sinks.
| |
| The heat transfer coefficient to the containment structure is calculated by the code based primarily on the work of Tagami (Reference 3). From this work, it was determined that the value of the heat transfer coefficient increases parabolically to peak value at the end of blowdown for LOCA and increases parabolically to peak at the time of steamline isolation. The value then decreases exponentially to a stagnant heat transfer coefficient which is a function of steam to air weight ratio.
| |
| Tagami presents a plot of the maximum value of h as a function of "coolant energy transfer speed," defined as follows:
| |
| | |
| From this the maximum h of steel is calculated:
| |
| | |
| (6.2-1)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-8 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| where:
| |
| hmax = maximum value of h (Btu/hr ft2F),
| |
| t = time from start of accident to end of blowdown p
| |
| for LOCA and steamline isolation for secondary breaks (sec),
| |
| V = containment volume (ft3), and
| |
| | |
| E = coolant energy discharge (Btu).
| |
| | |
| The parabolic increase to the peak value is given by:
| |
| | |
| (6.2-2)
| |
| | |
| where:
| |
| hs = heat transfer coefficient for steel (Btu/hr ft2F), and t = time from start of accident (sec).
| |
| p
| |
| | |
| For concrete, the heat transfer coefficient is taken as 40% of the value calculated for steel.
| |
| The exponential decrease of the heat transfer coefficient is given by:
| |
| h = h + (h - h ) e-0.05 (t-t), for t < tp s stag max stag p
| |
| | |
| where:
| |
| h =
| |
| stag 2 + 50X, for 0 X 1.4,
| |
| | |
| hstag = h for stagnant conditions (Btu/hr ft2F), and
| |
| | |
| X = steam-to-air weight ratio in containment.
| |
| | |
| The heat transfer coefficients for the most limiting steamline breaks are presented in Figures 6.2-16 through 6.2-16c.
| |
| | |
| For a large break the safety features are quickly brought into operation. Because of the brief period of time required to depressurize the reactor coolant system, the safeguards are not a major influence on the blowdown peak pressure; however, they reduce the containment pressure after the blowdown and maintain a low long-term pressure. Also, although the containment
| |
| | |
| 6.2-9 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| structure is not as effective a heat sink as during the reactor coolant system blowdown, it still contributes significantly as a form of heat removal during the long-term cooling period.
| |
| | |
| During the injection phase of postaccident operation, the emergency core cooling system pumps water from the refueling water storage tank into the reactor vessel. Since this water enters the vessel at refueling water storage tank temperature, which is less than the temperature of the water in the vessel, it can absorb heat from the core until saturation temperature is reached. During the recirculation phase of operation, water is taken from the containment sump and cooled in the residual heat removal heat exchanger. The cooled water is then pumped back to the reactor vessel to absorb more decay heat. The heat is removed from the residual heat removal heat exchanger by component cooling water.
| |
| Another contai nment heat removal system is the containment spray. During the injection phase of operation, the containment spray pumps draw water from the refueling water storage tank and sprays it into the containment through nozzles mounted high above the operating deck. As the spray droplets fall, they absorb heat from the containment atmosphere. Since the water comes from the refueling water storage tank, the entire heat capacity of the spray from the refueling water storage tank temperature to the temperature of the containment atmosphere is available for energy absorption. During the recirculation phase of postaccident operation, water is drawn from the sump and sprayed into the containment atmosphere.
| |
| When a spray drop enters the hot, saturated, steam-air containment environment following a loss-of-coolant accident, the vapor pressure of the water at its surface is much less than the partial pressure of the steam in the atmosphere. Hence, there will be diffusion of steam to the drop surface and condensation on the drop. This mass flow will carry energy to the drop.
| |
| Simultaneously, the temperature difference between the atmosphere and the drop will cause the drop temperature and vapor pressure to rise. The vapor pressure of the drop will eventually become equal to the partial pressure of the steam and the condensation will cease. The temperature of the drop will essentially equal the temperature of the steam-air mixture.
| |
| | |
| The equations describing the temperature rise of a falling drop are as follows:
| |
| | |
| = mhg + q (6.2-3)
| |
| | |
| = m (6.2-4)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-10 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| where: q = h A (T - T), and c s m = k A (P - P ).
| |
| g s v
| |
| | |
| The coefficients of heat transfer (hc) and mass transfer (kg) are calculated from the Nusselt number for heat transfer, u, and the Nusselt number for mass transfer, u'.
| |
| Both u and u' may be calculated from the equations of Ranz and Marshall (Reference 4).
| |
| u = 2 + 0.6 (Re)1/2 (Pr)1/3 (6.2-5)
| |
| | |
| u' = 2 + 0.6 (Re)1/2 (Sc)1/3
| |
| | |
| Thus, Equations 6.2-3 and 6.2-4 can be integrated numerically to find the internal energy and mass of the drop as a function of time as it falls through the atmosphere. Analysis shows that the temperature of the (mass) mean drop produced by the spray nozzles rises to a value within 99% of the bulk containment temperature in less than 2 seconds.
| |
| | |
| Drops of this size will reach temperature equilibrium with the steam-air containment atmosphere after falling through less than half the available spray fall height.
| |
| Detailed calculations of the heatup of spray drops in postaccident containment atmospheres by Parsly (Reference 5) show that drops of all sizes encountered in the containment spray reach equilibrium in a fraction of their residence time in a typical pressurized water reactor containment.
| |
| These results confirm the assumption that the containment spray will be 100% effective in removing heat from the atmosphere.
| |
| | |
| Nomenclature A = area,
| |
| | |
| hc = coefficient of heat transfer, kg = coefficient of mass transfer, hg = steam enthalpy, M = droplet mass, m = diffusion rate, u = Nusselt number for heat transfer, u' = Nusselt number for mass transfer,
| |
| | |
| 6.2-11 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| P = steam partial pressure, s
| |
| | |
| Pv = droplet vapor pressure, Pr = Prandtl number, q = heat flow rate, Re = Reynolds number, Sc = Schmidt number, T = droplet temperature, s
| |
| | |
| T = steam temperature, t = time, and u = internal energy.
| |
| | |
| The reactor containment fan coolers are a final means of heat removal. The main aspect of a fan cooler from the heat removal standpoint are the fan and the banks of cooling coils. The fans draw the dense atmosphere through banks of finned cooling coils and mix the cooled steam/air mixture with the rest of the containment atmosphere. The coils are kept at a low temperature by a constant flow of cooling water. Since this system does not use water from the refueling water storage tank, the mode of operation remains the same both before and after the spray system and emergency core cooling system change to the recirculation mode. The fan cooler performance as a function of saturation temperature is given in Figure 6.2-25. The data in Figure 6.2-25 conservatively minimize the fan cooler heat removal rate for use in MSLB and LOCA containment response analyses. In addition to the fan cooler design data in Table 6.2-56, conservative assumptions used to develop the fan cooler performance curve in Figure 6.2-25 include:
| |
| Operation in accident mode
| |
| | |
| Service water inlet temperature 100F Byron (Note 1) 104F (Note 2),
| |
| Braidwood
| |
| | |
| Inlet air flow rate 65,000 ACFM Tube fouling factor 0.0015 hr -ft2-F/Btu
| |
| | |
| Service water flow rate 2660 gpm Tube plugging 10%
| |
| | |
| Note 1 - The Braidwood RCFC performance curve (104F service water inlet temperature) was conservatively used in the Byron containment response analyses.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-12 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Note 2 - The maximum initial UHS temperature is 102F. The RCFC performance curve reflects the UHS temperature post LOCA (See Figure 9.2-9).
| |
| | |
| Inadvertent Spray Actuation In the event of inadvertent spray, the containment would depressurize until the temperature of the air was approximately the temperature of the spray. A calculation was performed to calculate the maximum outside to inside pressure differential.
| |
| The following initial conditions were assumed:
| |
| : a. The containment is initially at 120F, which maximizes the temperature differential between the containment atmosphere and the spray, which is at a temperature of 35F.
| |
| : b. The containment is at 14.7 psia.
| |
| : c. The relative humidity is at a maximum value of 100%.
| |
| | |
| As the air temperature is reduced, the partial pressure of the air decreases from 13.007 to 11.1 psia. The steam partial pressure decreases from 1.6927 to 0.09991 psia as the spray cools the atmosphere. Thus a containment pressure of 11.2 psia is
| |
| | |
| 6.2-12a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| produced, causing a differential pressure of 3.5 psi across the containment shell.
| |
| | |
| Accident Chronology For the double -ended pump suction and double-ended hot leg loss-of-coolant accidents, the major events and their times of occurrence are shown in Tables 6.2-6 through 6.2-8. Tables 6.2-9 through 6.2-9c present the accident chronology for the limiting steamline breaks. In the event of a LOCA or main steamline break in conjunction with loss of offsite power, the diesel generators will receive a start signal and energize the emergency buses within 13 seconds. An additional 2 seconds is required for switching and activation of the sequencer logic before the major loads begin to sequence onto the diesel generators. Therefore, the containment spray pumps are available at 30 seconds or if not required at 30 seconds, the pumps will be available after 55 seconds. As noted in Table 8.3-5, the RCFCs are loaded on the emergency buses 20 seconds following initiation of the safety injection signal.
| |
| The RCFCs will operate at full power 5 seconds after loading onto emergency power. The containment spray (CS) pumps operate at full power 2.1 seconds after startup. The CS containment isolation valves require 10 seconds to open. The valves are immediately loaded onto the ESF buses. The containment spray system is kept full at least to the 407 foot elevation (isolation valve) by the RWST. It will require less than 51.1 seconds to fill the spray system and achieve full flow. This fill time conservatively considers the lowest CS Pump capacity (A Train) and the largest CS header volume (B Train).
| |
| | |
| For LOCA and MSLB containment analysis the assumptions for containment spray (CS) and reactor containment fan cooler (RCFC) delay times bound the times described above.
| |
| | |
| The RCFC delay and startup sequence times assumed for the loss of offsite power cases are given below. This sequence is applicable for cases in which the RCFCs receive a start signal within 38 seconds of the initiation of the event. Receipt of the actuation signal within 38 seconds guarantees that the RCFCs will start and be at full speed by the time that the essential service water (SX) pumps have loaded onto the emergency diesel generators.
| |
| Therefore, 65 seconds is the assumed actuation time (not a delay) for these cases.
| |
| Electronics Delay 2 seconds Emergency Diesel Generator Start 15 seconds SX Pump Loaded on Emergency Diesel 25 seconds Generators SX Pumps at Full Power and Flow 23 seconds TOTAL ACTUATION TIME 65 seconds *
| |
| * For the Unit 2 MSLB analysis, the total actuation time is assumed to be 66.3 seconds, and the above sequence is applicable to cases in which the RCFCs receive a start signal within 38.8 seconds of the initiation of the event.
| |
| 6.2-13 REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The RCFC delay and startup sequence times assumed for the offsite power available cases or for cases in which the RCFC actuation signal is received after 38 seconds are given below. This sequence is a delay time (not an actuation time) after the RCFC actuation signal is received. For the offsite power available cases, the RCFC delay may be considerably shorter than the loss of offsite power cases because the SX pumps will already be running at high speed.
| |
| Electronics Delay 2 seconds RCFC Start Delay (Allows 20 seconds Coastdown to Low Speed)
| |
| RCFCs at Full Power 5 seconds TOTAL DELAY TIME 27 seconds *
| |
| * For the Unit 2 MSLB analysis, the total delay time assumed is 27.5 seconds, and the above sequence is applicable to cases in which the RCFCs receive a start signal after 38.8 seconds of the initiation of the event.
| |
| | |
| The CS delay and startup sequence times assumed for the loss of offsite power cases are given below. This CS actuation sequence allows for CS pump loading onto the emergency diesel generators 40 seconds after sequencing starts (consistent with the later time given in Table 8.3-5). In addition, this sequence allows for a 20-second stroke time for the CS valves and assumes that the CS valves must be fully open in order for the CS pump to load onto the emergency diesel generators. Since the CS valves will not begin to open until the CS actuation setpoint has been reached, the setpoint must be reached 20 seconds before the CS pumps load onto the emergency diesel generator. Therefore, this sequence is applicable for cases in which the CS start signal is received within 35 seconds of the initiation of the event. If the CS actuation setpoint is reached within 35 seconds, 88.1 seconds is the assumed actuation time (not a delay) for these cases.
| |
| | |
| Electronics Delay 2 seconds Emergency Diesel Generator Start 15 seconds CS Pumps Loaded on Emergency 40 seconds Diesel Generators CS Pumps at Full Flow 2.1 seconds Time to Fill Header and 51.1 seconds Attain Full Flow
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACTUATION TIME 110.2 seconds *
| |
| * For the Unit 2 MSLB analysis, the total actuation time is assumed to be 112.0 seconds, and the above sequence is applicable to cases in which the CS actuation setpoint is reached within 35.7 seconds of the initiation of the event.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-13a REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The CS delay and startup sequence assumed for the offsite power available cases in which the CS actuation signal is received after 35 seconds is given below. This sequence is a delay time (not an actuation time) after the CS signal is received. For the offsite power available cases, the CS delay may be shorter than the loss of offsite power cases because the CS pumps will already have a power supply and will not have to wait to load onto the emergency diesel generator. For the cases in which the actuation setpoint is reached after 35 seconds, there will also be no delay since they will load onto the emergency diesel generator as soon as the CS valves are open. In these cases, there will be no emergency diesel generator loading delay.
| |
| Electronics Delay 2 seconds CS Valves Stroke Time 20 seconds CS Pumps at Full Flow 2.1 seconds Time to Fill Header and 51.1 seconds Attain Full Flow TOTAL DELAY TIME 75.2 seconds *
| |
| * For the Unit 2 MSLB analysis, the total delay time assumed is 76.3 seconds, and the above sequence is applicable to cases in which the RCFCs receive a start signal after 35.7 seconds of the initiation of the event.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-13b REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.2 Containment Subcompartments 6.2.1.2.1 Design Basis
| |
| | |
| Based on the regulatory approval of (1) the main coolant loop piping leak-before-break analysis (Reference 41) performed by Westinghouse (Westinghouse Report WCAP-14559), (2) the accumulator line piping and reactor coolant loop bypass piping leak-before-break analysis (Reference 42) performed by Sargent &
| |
| Lundy (SL-4518), and (3) the scope outlined in General Design Criterion 4, the containment subcompartments need not be designed for dynamic pressurization loads due to postulated primary coolant loop piping breaks (Reference 43). The subcompartments are not necessary to containment function, and therefore, dynamic or non-static pressurization need not be considered.
| |
| The reactor cavity and RPV nozzle inspection cavity, therefore, need not consider the pressurization loads due to the primary coolant loop cold leg nozzle breaks. In particular, the inspection cavity shield doors no longer are required to serve as a mechanism to vent the cavity into the main containment.
| |
| | |
| The loop compartment design bases loads may no longer result from the primary coolant loop breaks, although the evaluation for these loads are retained in the UFSAR. These breaks are controlling when compared to other high energy line breaks which occur in these compartments.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-14 REVISION 14 - DECEMBER 2012 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Loop Compartment, Upper Pressurizer Cubicles, and Steamline Pipe Chase
| |
| | |
| Reference 6 provides the basis for break locations, types, and areas. The design-basis break for the subcompartments is a circumferential, double-ended guillotine break of high-pressure system pipe which yields the maximum mass and energy release rates. Since the circumferential double-ended guillotine break of a system pipe is the design basis, no credit is taken for limiting break areas due to pipe restraints.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-14a REVISION 4 - DECEMBER 1992 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The subcompartment nodal volumes are presented in Table 6.2-10 and the vent areas in Table 6.2-11.
| |
| 6.2.1.2.2 Deleted
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.2.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.1.2.3.1 Analytical Models
| |
| | |
| The analytical model used to calculate the mass and energy releases is fully described in Reference 7. The TMD code for subcompartment pressure transients is fully described in Reference 8. The TMD code with unaugmented critical flow and
| |
| | |
| 6.2-15 REVISION 5 - DECEMBER 1994 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| "Y" compressibility factor was used to calculate the subcompartment pressure transients.
| |
| 6.2.1.2.3.2 Break Type and Size
| |
| | |
| The analysis discussed in this section applies to Unit 2. The Unit 1 steam generators are bounded by the analysis for Unit 2 because of the difference in blowdown area of the integral flow restrictors.
| |
| | |
| A double-ended guillotine (DEG) break is more severe for mass and energy release. This break models a complete severance of two ends of a broken pipe with an available break area corresponding to twice the pipe cross-sectional area. Only the main steamline break considers the use of a break limiter. The main steamline DEG break or double-ended rupture (DER) is assumed to occur downstream of the flow limiter (1.1 ft2 for Unit 1 and 1.4 ft2 for Unit 2) in the steamline pipe chase such that flow from the faulted steam generator is limited below the pipe cross-sectional area. The integral flow restrictors of the steam generators of the intact loops will also eventually limit the backflow through the main steam header.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-16 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.2.3.3 Model Description
| |
| | |
| The containment subcompartment nodalization diagram is presented in Figure 6.2-18. Plan and section drawings are included in Drawings M-5 through M-18. A specific nodalization sensitivity study was not performed. Various models (nodalization schemes) were set up to determine the minimum number of volume nodes required to conservatively predict the maximum pressure load.
| |
| The nodalization for this analysis was based on natural geometric boundaries and constraints so that the largest pressure gradients occur across the control volume boundaries.
| |
| To further clarify the subcompartment nodal model of Subsection 6.2.1.2.3.3, Table 6.2-67 lists and briefly describes each nodal volume with respect to its physical location in the containment. Nodal numbers 1 through 6 are the subcompartments located inside the crane wall and below the operating deck and divided at the points of least flow area created by the four steam generators, the refueling canal, and the concrete structures opposite the refueling canal. Nodal number 7 consists of all the volume above the operating deck, plus the net volume of the refueling canal and the upper reactor cavity. Nodal numbers 8 through 15 are the subcompartments located outside the crane wall, below the operating deck, and above the intermediate floor. The areas were divided at the points of maximum flow area obstruction (i.e., maximum flow restriction). Nodal numbers 16 through 23 are the subcompartments located outside the crane wall, and below the intermediate floor. These nodes were divided in a similar manner to those of nodes 8 through 14.
| |
| Nodal number 28 models the pressurizer compartment. The only high energy line in this cavity is the 6-inch spray line.
| |
| Since breaks are normally postulated at points of stress concentration, it is therefore postulated that the only point a break might occur on the spray line would be at the elbow, which is near the top of the pressurizer. If this line were to break at the elbow, above the separative floor in the pressurizer cavity, the flashing fluid and subsequent local pressure transient would be vented out the top of the cavity which is open and only a few feet above the elbow of the line. This venting would relieve the pressure immediately and result in a minimum, if any, load on the pressurizer.
| |
| | |
| In general, the flow constraints occurred at the points of free volume subdivision, between such compartments which resulted in
| |
| | |
| 6.2-17 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| the least flow area due to maximum flow area obstruction.
| |
| Figure 6.2-18 has been updated to show all the nodes and flow paths.
| |
| | |
| The loop compartments, upper pressurizer cubicle, and steamline pipe chase were analyzed using the above mentioned model. The subcompartment volume description and initial conditions are listed in Table 6.2-10. The subcompartment flowpath descriptive information is presented in Table 6.2-11.
| |
| | |
| Junction loss coefficients were calculated using Idel'chik's Handbook, Reference 17. The employed method of determining the loss coefficients is best described by sample calculations.
| |
| : a. Loss coefficients due to turning were calculated based on the data presented in Idel'chik (Section
| |
| : 6) and, in particular, Diagram 6.2. Thus, for example, the loss coefficient for the junction 1 extending from the center of the control volume 1 to the center of control volume 2 is calculated to be 0.35 based on the flow area 0.83 ft2. For this calculation it was conservatively assumed that the mean height of roughness peaks of the junction surfaces was 1.0 mm, and the Reynolds number (Re) exceeded 2 x 105 during the most significant time period of the pressure transients. These two assumptions are made throughout the model.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-18 REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : b. Loss coefficient calculation for junction 31 connecting the control volume 1 with the control volume of the main containment illustrates calculations of friction losses as well as calculations of losses due to a "discharge through thick edged orifice," and the method of combining individual losses along a junction. Using Idel'chik, Diagram 2.4, the friction loss coefficient was 2 calculated at 0.06 based on the flow area 2.82 ft.
| |
| Losses due to the discharge through the 1 3/4 inch gap at the top of the separation wall were calculated using data in the Idel'chik, Diagram 11-28.
| |
| Calculations yielded loss coefficient of 2.04 based 2 on the minimum junction flow area 1.05 ft . The total (combined) junction loss coefficient was then calculated, using relationship:
| |
| | |
| to be 2.05, based on the minimum junction flow area 1.05 ft2.
| |
| : c. Junction 75 connecting control volumes 31 and 7, is an example when (due to a lack of an applicable configuration in Idel'chik) loss coefficient was estimated for two configurations reported and the more conservative valve adopted. First, the configuration was approximated as a "thick walled orifice" (Idel'chik, Diagram 4-18) and loss coefficient of 1.80 calculated based on the junction 2 minimum flow area of 4.0 ft (gap between the penetration wall and the bare pipe after the pipe insulation has been blown off). Second, the junction was approximated with a "free discharge from an annular-radial diffuser" (Idel'chik, Section 11-9) and to the resulting loss coefficient (0.8) an entrance loss of 0.5 was added. Thus, in this case, the total junction loss coefficient was 1.3 based on the junction minimum flow area.
| |
| | |
| Control volume and junction characteristics as well as the initial conditions are given in Tables 6.2-11b and 6.2-11c.
| |
| | |
| Selected model options include such as 100% entrainment and Moody's critical flow model with flow coefficient of 0.6.
| |
| 6.2.1.2.3.4 Pressure Responses The tabulation of maximum pressure differential is presented in Table 6.2-12.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-19 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Loop Compartments Two postulated breaks, a double-ended cold leg (DECL) guillotine break and a double-ended hot leg (DEHL) guillotine break, maximize mass and energy release to the loop compartment. A DEHL in volume 3 yielded the maximum pressure differential (20.27 psi) for the loop compartment. The mass and energy release rates for the DEHL guillotine break are presented in Table 6.2-13. The break compartment (volume 3) and the upper containment (volume 9) pressure transients are graphed in Figure 6.2-19. Results of the maximum pressure differentials for a DEHL break in each loop compartment volume are tabulated in Table 6.2-12. A DECL break yielded a maximum pressure differential when the break occurred in volume 3. The mass and energy release rates for DECL guillotine break are presented in Table 6.2-14. The break compartment (volume 3) and upper containment (volume 7) pressure transients are graphed in Figure 6.2-20. Results of maximum pressure differentials for DECL break in each loop compartment volume are tabulated in Table 6.2-12.
| |
| | |
| Upper Pressurizer Cubicles A double-ended spray line break is most severe for the vapor space in the upper pressurizer cubicle. The mass and energy release rates are presented in Table 6.2-15. The break compartments (volume 28) and upper containment (volume 7) pressure transients are graphed in Figure 6.2-21. The maximum pressure differentials across the cubicle walls are tabulated in Table 6.2-12. The data presented in Tables 6.2-12, 6.2-15, and Figure 6.2-21 for the pressurizer spray line break apply to both Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| | |
| Steamline Pipe Chase The steamline double-ended break with flow limiters (see Subsection 6.2.1.2.3.2) provides maximum blowdown mass and energy releases to the steamline pipe chases. The steamline mass and energy releases are presented in Table 6.2-16. Breaks in volumes 25 and 26 are considered. Break compartments 25 and 26 and upper containment (volume 7) pressure transients are graphed in Figures 6.2-22 and 6.2-23. The maximum pressure differentials are presented in Table 6.2-12.
| |
| | |
| The following assumptions/methodology were used in generating the short-term mass and energy releases found in Table 6.2-16 for the steamline pipe chase analysis:
| |
| : a. Length of pipe was identified by the Architect-Engineer within the steam generator enclosure inside containment.
| |
| : b. A full double-ended break was postulated in the steam piping in this area.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-20 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. Moody critical mass velocities were assumed based on reservoir quality and pressure.
| |
| : 1. Steam generator pressure was assumed to be no-load value.
| |
| : 2. Both dry steam and entrainment are considered consistent with D series steam generator data.
| |
| : 3. Break flows were calculated based on steam piping cross-sectional areas. For example, initial steam flows will be choked by break area (approximately 5.0 ft2) and later by the steam generator-integral flow restrictors . The analysis discussed in this section applies to Unit 2. The Unit 1 steam generators are bounded by the analysis for Unit 2 because of the difference in blowdown area of the integral flow restrictors.
| |
| : d. Both forward and reverse flows were considered based on appropriate piping volumes.
| |
| : e. Time intervals were calculated based on the above information contained in items c and d. Times were minimized and maximized for conservatism by varying the break location inside the enclosure.
| |
| | |
| All of the assumptions listed above yield bounding mass and energy releases for the steamline pipe chase analysis.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-21 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3 Mass and Energy Release Analyses For Postulated Loss-of-Coolant Accidents
| |
| | |
| The uncontrolled release of pressurized high temperature reactor coolant, termed a Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA), will result in release of steam and water into the containment. This, in turn will result in increases in the global containment pressure and temperature. Therefore, a postulated LOCA was considered for Byron Unit 1&2 and Braidwood Unit 1&2.
| |
| | |
| The long-term LOCA mass and energy releases are analyzed to approximately 1E+06 seconds and are utilized as input to the containment integrity analysis, which demonstrates the acceptability of the containment safeguards systems to mitigate the consequences of a hypothetical large break LOCA. The containment safeguards systems must be capable of limiting the peak containment pressure to less than the design pressure and to limit the temperature excursion to less than the Environmental Qualification (EQ) acceptance limits. The mass and energy releases were generated using the March 1979 model, described in Reference 37. The NRC review and approval letter is included with Reference 37.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.1 Long Term LOCA Mass and Energy Releases
| |
| | |
| The mass and energy release rates described in this section form the basis for the containment pressure calculations presented in Section 6.2.1.1.3. Discussed in this section are the long-term LOCA mass and energy releases for the hypothetical double-ended pump suction (DEPS) rupture and double-ended hot leg (DEHL) rupture break cases for Byron/Braidwood Unit 1 with the BWI steam generator and Byron/Braidwood Unit 2 with the Westinghouse model D5 steam generator.
| |
| | |
| Input Parameters and Assumptions
| |
| | |
| The mass and energy release analysis is sensitive to the assumed characteristics of various plant systems, in addition to other key modeling assumptions. Where appropriate, bounding inputs are utilized and instrumentation uncertainties are included. For example, the RCS operating temperatures are chosen to bound the highest average coolant temperature range of all operating cases, and a temperature uncertainty allowance of (9.1oF) is then added.
| |
| Nominal parameters are used in certain instances. For example, the reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure in this analysis is based on a nominal value of 2250 psia plus an uncertainty allowance (+43 psi). All input parameters are chosen consistent with accepted analysis methodology.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-22 REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Some of the most-critical items are the RCS initial conditions, core decay heat, safety injection flow, and primary and secondary metal mass and steam generator heat release modeling. Specific assumptions concerning each of these items are next discussed.
| |
| Table 6.2-17, 6.2-18, and 6.2-18a present key data assumed in the analysis.
| |
| The core rated power of 3658.3 MWt was used in the analysis. As previously noted, the use of RCS operating temperatures to bound the highest average coolant temperature range were used as bounding analysis conditions. The use of higher temperatures is conservative because the initial fluid energy is based on coolant temperatures that are at the maximum levels attained in steady state operation. Additionally, an allowance to account for instrument error and deadband is reflected in the initial RCS temperatures. As previously discussed, the initial reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure in this analysis is based on a nominal value of 2250 psia an allowance which accounts for the measurement uncertainty on pressurizer pressure. The selection of 2250 psia as the limiting pressure is considered to affect the blowdown phase results only, since this represents the initial pressure of the RCS. The RCS rapidly depressurizes from this value until the point at which it equilibrates with containment pressure.
| |
| | |
| The rate at which the RCS blows down is initially more severe at the higher RCS pressure. Additionally, the RCS has a higher fluid density at the higher pressure (assuming a constant temperature) and subsequently has a higher RCS mass available for releases. Thus, 2250 psia plus uncertainty was selected for the initial pressure as the limiting case for the long-term mass and energy release calculations.
| |
| | |
| The selection of the fuel design features for the long-term mass and energy release calculation is based on the need to conservatively maximize the energy stored in the fuel at the beginning of the postulated accident (i.e., to maximize the core stored energy). Core stored energy is based on the time in life for maximum fuel densification. The assumptions used to calculate the fuel temperatures for the core stored energy calculation account for appropriate uncertainties associated with the models in the PAD 4.0 code (e.g., calibration of the thermal model, pellet densification model, cladding creep model, etc.).
| |
| In addition, the fuel temperatures for the core stored energy calculation account for appropriate uncertainties associated with manufacturing tolerances (e.g., pellet as-built density). The total uncertainty for the fuel temperature calculation is a statistical combination of these effects and is dependent upon fuel type, power level, and burnup.
| |
| | |
| Margin in RCS volume of 3% (which is composed of 1.6% allowance for thermal expansion and 1.4% for uncertainty) is modeled.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-23 REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| A uniform steam generator (SG) tube plugging level of 0% is modeled. This assumption maximizes the reactor coolant volume and fluid release by virtue of consideration of the RCS fluid in all SG tubes. During the post-blowdown period the steam generators are active heat sources since significant energy remains in the secondary metal and secondary mass that has the potential to be transferred to the primary side. The 0% tube plugging assumption maximizes heat transfer area and therefore the transfer of secondary heat across the SG tubes.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-23a REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Additionally, this assumption reduces the reactor coolant loop resistance, which reduces the P upstream of the break for the pump suction breaks and increases break flow. Thus, the analysis bounds any level of steam generator tube plugging that may occur in the future.
| |
| Regarding safety injection flow, the mass and energy release calculation considered configurations/failures to conservatively bound respective alignments. The cases include: (a) Minimum Safeguards Case (1 CV, 1 SI, and 1 RH Pumps); and (b) Maximum Safeguards, (2 CV, 2 SI, and 2 RH Pumps).
| |
| | |
| The following assumptions were employed to ensure that the mass and energy releases are conservatively calculated, thereby maximizing energy release to containment.
| |
| : a. Maximum expected operating temperature of the reactor coolant system (100% full power conditions)
| |
| : b. Allowance for RCS temperature uncertainty (+9.1oF)
| |
| : c. Margin in RCS volume of 3% (which is composed of 1.6%
| |
| allowance for thermal expansion, and 1.4% for uncertainty)
| |
| : d. Core rated power of 3658.3 MWt which includes calorimetric error.
| |
| : e. Conservative heat transfer coefficient (i.e., steam generator primary/secondary heat transfer and reactor coolant system metal heat transfer)
| |
| : f. Allowance in core stored energy that is based on a statistical combination of effects including fuel type, power level, manufacturing tolerances, densification and burnup.
| |
| : g. An allowance for RCS initial pressure uncertainty (+43 psi)
| |
| : h. A maximum containment backpressure equal to the Pa Technical Specifications value (42.8 psig for Unit 1 and 38.4 psig for Unit 2).
| |
| : i. Minimum RCS loop flow (92,000 gpm/loop)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-24 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : j. Steam generator tube plugging leveling (0%) uniform)
| |
| | |
| Maximizes reactor coolant volume and fluid release Maximizes heat transfer area across the SG tubes Reduces coolant loop resistance, which reduces the P upstream of the break for the pump suction breaks and increases break flow
| |
| : k. The steam generator metal mass was modeled to include only the portion of the SGs which are in contact with the fluid on the secondary side. Portions of the SGs such as the head, upper shell and miscellaneous upper internals have poor heat transfer due to their location above the operating water level. The heat that is stored in this region is unavailable for release to containment and will not be able to effectively transfer energy to the RCS in the first 3600 seconds. Thus, this energy will be removed at a much slower rate and over a longer time period (>10000 seconds).
| |
| | |
| 6.2-24a REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Additionally, there are some differences between Byron &
| |
| Braidwood Unit 1 and Bryon & Braidwood Unit 2. Units 1 at each site have BWI replacement steam generators, whereas Unit 2 at each site have Westinghouse designed model D5 steam generators.
| |
| Separate analytical models were generated for each steam generator type and were used for the calculations. Mass and Energy releases for both steam generator designs are provided herein.
| |
| | |
| Description of Analyses
| |
| | |
| The evaluation model used for the long-term LOCA mass and energy release calculations is the March 1979 model described in Reference 37. This evaluation model has been reviewed and approved generically by the NRC. The approval letter is included in Reference 37.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.2 LOCA M&E Release Phases The containment system receives mass and energy releases following a postulated rupture in the RCS. These releases continue over a time period, which, for the LOCA mass and energy analysis, is typically divided into four phases.
| |
| : a. Blowdown - the period of time from accident initiation (when the reactor is at steady state operation) to the time that the RCS and containment reach an equilibrium state.
| |
| : b. Refill - the period of time when the lower plenum is being filled by accumulator and ECCS water. At the end of blowdown, a large amount of water remains in the cold legs, downcomer, and lower plenum. To conservatively consider the refill period for the purpose of containment mass and energy releases, it is assumed that this water is instantaneously transferred to the lower plenum along with sufficient accumulator water to completely fill the lower plenum. This allows an uninterrupted release of mass and energy to containment. Thus, the refill period is conservatively neglected in the mass and energy release calculation.
| |
| : c. Reflood - begins when the water from the lower plenum enters the core and ends when the core is completely quenched.
| |
| : d. Post-reflood (Froth) - describes the period following the reflood phase. For the pump suction break, a two-phase mixture exits the core, passes through the hot legs, and is superheated in the steam generators prior to exiting the break as steam. After the broken loop steam generator cools, the break flow becomes two phase.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-25 REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.3 Computer Codes The Reference 37 mass and energy release evaluation model is comprised of mass and energy release versions of the following codes: SATAN VI, WREFLOOD, FROTH, and EPITOME. These codes were used to calculate the long-term LOCA mass and energy releases for Byron Unit 1&2 and Braidwood Unit 1&2.
| |
| | |
| SATAN VI calculates blowdown, the first portion of the thermal-hydraulic transient following break initiation, including pressure, enthalpy, density, mass and energy flow rates, and energy transfer between primary and secondary systems as a function of time.
| |
| The WREFLOOD code addresses the portion of the LOCA transient where the core reflooding phase occurs after the primary coolant system has depressurized (blowdown) due to the loss of water through the break and when water supplied by the Emergency Core Cooling System refills the reactor vessel and provides cooling to the core. The most important feature of WREFLOOD is the steam/water mixing model.
| |
| FROTH models the post-reflood portion of the transient. The FROTH code is used for the steam generator heat addition calculation from the broken and intact loop steam generators.
| |
| EPITOME continues the FROTH post-reflood portion of the transient from the time at which the secondary equilibrates to containment design pressure to the end of the transient. It also compiles a summary of data on the entire transient, including formal instantaneous mass and energy release tables and mass and energy balance tables with data at critical times.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.4 Break Size and Location
| |
| | |
| Generic studies have been performed with respect to the effect of postulated break size on the LOCA mass and energy releases. The double-ended guillotine break has been found to be limiting due to larger mass flow rates during the blowdown phase of the transient. During the reflood and froth phases, the break size has little effect on the releases.
| |
| | |
| Three distinct locations in the reactor coolant system loop can be postulated for pipe rupture for any release purposes:
| |
| : a. Hot leg (between vessel and steam generator)
| |
| : b. Cold leg (between pump and vessel)
| |
| : c. Pump suction (between steam generator and pump)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-26 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The break locations analyzed for this program are the double-ended pump suction (DEPS) rupture (10.48 ft2), and the double-ended hot leg (DEHL) rupture (9.18 ft2). Break mass and energy releases have been calculated for the blowdown, reflood, and post-reflood phases of the LOCA for the DEPS cases. For the DEHL case, the releases were calculated only for the blowdown. The following information provides a discussion on each break location.
| |
| | |
| The DEHL rupture has been shown in previous studies to result in the highest blowdown mass and energy release rates. Although the core flooding rate would be the highest for this break location, the amount of energy released from the steam generator secondary is minimal because the majority of the fluid which exits the core vents directly to containment bypassing the steam generators. As a result, the reflood mass and energy releases are reduced significantly as compared to either the pump suction or cold leg break locations where the core exit mixture must pass through the steam generators before venting through the break. For the hot leg break, generic studies have confirmed that there is no reflood peak (i.e., from the end of the blowdown period the containment pressure would continually decrease). Therefore, only the mass and energy releases for the hot leg break blowdown phase are calculated and presented in this section of the report.
| |
| | |
| The cold leg break location has also been found in previous studies to be much less limiting in terms of the overall containment energy releases. The cold leg blowdown is faster than that of the pump suction break, and more mass is released into the containment. However, the core heat transfer is greatly reduced, and this results in a considerably lower energy release into containment. Studies have determined that the blowdown transient for the cold leg is , in general, less limiting than that for the pump suction break. During reflood, the flooding rate is greatly reduced and the energy release rate into the containment is reduced. Therefore, the cold leg break is bounded by other breaks and no further evaluation is necessary.
| |
| | |
| The pump suction break combines the effects of the relatively high core flooding rate, as in the hot leg break, and the addition of the stored energy in the steam generators. As a result, the pump suction break yields the highest energy flow rates during the post-blowdown period by including all of the available energy of the RCS in calculating the releases to containment.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-27 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.5 Application of Single-Failure Criterion An analysis of the effects of the single-failure criterion has been performed on the mass and energy release rates for each break analyzed. An inherent assumption in the generation of the mass and energy release is that offsite power is lost. This results in the actuation of the emergency diesel generators, required to power the safety injection system. This is not an issue for the blowdown period, which is limited by the DEHL break.
| |
| | |
| Two cases have been analyzed to assess the effects of a single failure. The first case assumes minimum safeguards SI flow based on the postulated single failure of an emergency diesel generator. This results in the loss of one train of safeguards equipment. The other case assumes maximum safeguards SI flow based on no postulated failures that would impact the amount of ECCS flow. The analysis of the cases described provides confidence that the effect of credible failure is bounded.
| |
| | |
| The maximum safeguards case was previously shown to be less limiting than the minimum safeguards cases in the analyses performed for the stretch power uprate to 3586.6 MWt. Therefore, this case was not re-analyzed for the MUR uprate. Thus, the tables and figures for the maximum safeguards case are from the stretch power uprate analysis and do not reflect the MUR licensed thermal power level condition.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.6 Acceptance Criteria for Analyses A large break loss-of-coolant accident is classified as an ANS Condition IV event, an infrequent fault. To satisfy the Nuclear Regulatory Commission acceptance criteria presented in the Standard Review Plan Section 6.2.1.3, the relevant requirements are as follows:
| |
| : a. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A
| |
| : b. 10 CFR 50, Appendix K, paragraph I.A In order to meet these requirements, the following must be addressed.
| |
| : a. Sources of Energy
| |
| : b. Break Size and Location
| |
| : c. Calculation of Each Phase of the Accident 6.2.1.3.7 Mass and Energy Release Data 6.2.1.3.7.1 Blowdown Mass and Energy Release Data
| |
| | |
| The SATAN-VI code is used for computing the blowdown transient.
| |
| The code utilizes the control volume (element) approach with the capability for modeling a large variety of thermal fluid system configurations. The fluid properties are considered uniform and 6.2-27a REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| thermodynamic equilibrium is assumed in each element. A point kinetics model is used with weighted feedback effects. The major feedback effects include moderator density, moderator temperature, and Doppler broadening. A critical flow calculation for subcooled (modified Zaloudek), two-phase (Moody), or superheated break flow is incorporated into the analysis. The methodology for the use of this model is described in Reference 37.
| |
| Tables 6.2-19 (Unit 1) and 6.2-34 (Unit 2) present the calculated mass and energy release for the blowdown phase of the DEHL break.
| |
| For the hot leg break mass and energy release tables, break path 1 refers to the mass and energy exiting from the reactor vessel side of the break; break path 2 refers to the mass and energy exiting from the steam generator side of the break.
| |
| Tables 6.2 -22 (Unit 1) and 6.2-37 present the calculated mass and energy releases for the blowdown phase of the DEPS break with minimum ECCS flows. Tables 6.2-28 (Unit 1) and 6.2-43 (Unit 2) presents the calculated mass and energy releases for the blowdown phase of the DEPS break with maximum ECCS flows. For the pump suction breaks, break path 1 in the mass and energy release tables refers to the mass and energy exiting from the steam generator side of the break; break path 2 refers to the mass and energy exiting from the pump side of the break.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.7.2 Reflood Mass and Energy Release Data The WREFLOOD code is used for computing the reflood transient.
| |
| The WREFLOOD code consists of two basic hydraulic models - one for the contents of the reactor vessel, and one for the coolant loops. The two models are coupled through the interchange of the boundary conditions applied at the vessel outlet nozzles and at the top of the downcomer. Additional transient phenomena such as pumped safety injection and accumulators, reactor coolant pump performance, and steam generator release are included as auxiliary equations which interact with the basic models as required. The WREFLOOD code permits the capability to calculate variations during the core reflooding transient of basic parameters such as core flooding rate, core and downcomer water levels, fluid thermodynamic conditions (pressure, enthalpy, density) throughout the primary system, and mass flow rates through the primary system. The code permits hydraulic modeling of the two flow paths available for discharging steam and entrained water from the core to the break; i.e., the path through the broken loop and the path through the unbroken loops.
| |
| A complete thermal equilibrium mixing condition for the steam and ECCS injection water during the reflood phase has been assumed for each loop receiving ECCS water. This is consistent with the usage and application of the Reference 37 mass and energy release evaluation model in recent analyses, e.g., D. C. Cook Docket (Reference 38). Even though the Reference 37 model credits steam/water mixing only in the intact loop and not in the broken
| |
| | |
| 6.2-27b REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| loop; the justification, applicability, and NRC approval for using the mixing model in the broken loop has been documented (Reference 39). Moreover, this assumption is supported by test data and is further discussed below.
| |
| The model assumes a complete mixing condition (i.e., thermal equilibrium) for the steam/water interaction. The complete mixing process, however, is made up of two distinct physical processes. The first is a two-phase interaction with condensation of steam by cold ECCS water. The second is a single-phase mixing of condensate and ECCS water. Since the steam release is the most important influence to the containment pressure transient, the steam condensation part of the mixing process is the only part that need be considered. (Any spillage directly heats only the sump).
| |
| | |
| The most applicable steam/water mixing test data has been reviewed for validation of the containment integrity reflood steam/water mixing model. This data was generated in 1/3-scale tests (Reference 39), which are the largest scale data available and thus most clearly simulates the flow regimes and gravitational effects that would occur in a PWR. These tests were designed specifically to study the steam/water interaction for PWR reflood conditions.
| |
| A group of 1/3-scale tests corresponds directly to containment integrity reflood conditions. The injection flow rates for this group cover all phases and mixing conditions calculated during the reflood transient. The data from these tests were reviewed and discussed in detail in Reference 37. For all of these tests, the data clearly indicates the occurrence of very effective mixing with rapid steam condensation. The mixing model used in the containment integrity reflood calculation is therefore wholly supported by the 1/3-scale steam/water mixing data.
| |
| Additionally, the following justification is also noted. The post-blowdown limiting break for the containment integrity peak pressure analysis is the pump suction double-ended rupture break.
| |
| For this break, there are two flow paths available in the RCS by which mass and energy may be released to containment. One is through the outlet of the steam generator, the other via reverse flow through the reactor coolant pump. Steam which is not condensed by ECCS injection in the intact RCS loops passes around the downcomer and through the broken loop cold leg and pump in venting to containment. This steam also encounters ECCS injection water as it passes through the broken loop cold leg, complete mixing occurs and a portion of it is condensed. It is this portion of steam, which is condensed, that is taken credit for in this analysis. This assumption is justified based upon the postulated break location, and the actual physical presence of the ECCS injection nozzle. A description of the test and test results are contained in References 37 and 39.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-27c REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Tables 6.2-23 (Unit 1) and 6.2-38 (Unit 2), and Tables 6.2-29 (Unit 1) and 6.2-44 (Unit 2) present the calculated mass and energy releases for the reflood phase of the pump suction double-ended rupture, minimum safeguards, and maximum safeguards cases, respectively.
| |
| The transient response of the principal par ameters during reflood are given in Tables 6.2-24 (Unit 1) and 6.2-39 (Unit 2), and Tables 6.2-30 (Unit 1) and 6.2-45 (Unit 2) for the DEPS minimum and maximum safeguards cases.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.7.3 Post-Reflood Mass and Energy Release Data The FROTH code (Reference 7) is used for computing the post-reflood transient. The FROTH code calculates the heat release rates resulting from a two-phase mixture present in the steam generator tubes. The mass and energy releases that occur during this phase are typically superheated due to the depressurization and equilibration of the broken loop and intact loop steam generators. During this phase of the transient, the RCS has equilibrated with the containment pressure, but the steam generators contain a secondary inventory at an enthalpy that is much higher than the primary side. Therefore, significant reverse heat transfer occurs. Steam is produced in the core due to core decay heat. For a pump suction break, a two-phase fluid exits the core, flows through the hot legs and becomes superheated as it passes through the steam generator. Once the broken loop cools, the break flow becomes two phase. During the FROTH calculation, ECCS injection is addressed for both the injection phase and the recirculation phase. The FROTH code calculation stops when the secondary side equilibrates to the saturation temperature (Tsat) at the containment design pressure, after this point the EPITOME code completes the SG depressurization.
| |
| The methodology for the use of this model is described in Reference 37. The mass and energy release rates are calculated by FROTH and EPITOME until the time of containment depressurization. After containment depressurization (14.7 psia), the mass and energy release available to containment is generated directly from core boiloff/decay heat.
| |
| Tables 6.2-25 (Unit 1) and 6.2-40 (Unit 2), and Tables 6.2-31 (Unit 1) and 6.2-46 (Unit 2) present the two-phase post-reflood mass and energy release data for the double-ended pump suction break, minimum and maximum safeguards cases.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-27d REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B-UFSAR 6.2.1.3.7.4 Decay Heat Model The American Nuclear Society (ANS) Standard 5.1 (Reference 40) was used in the LOCA mass and energy release model for the determination of decay heat energy. This standard was balloted by the Nuclear Power Plant Standards Committee (NUPPSCO) in October 1978 and subsequently approved. The official standard (Reference 40) was issued in August 1979. Table 6.2-49 lists the decay heat curve used in the M&E release analysis, post blowdown, for the Byron Units 1 & 2, and Braidwood Units 1 & 2 for the MUR program.
| |
| | |
| Significant assumptions in the generation of the decay heat curve for use in the LOCA M&E releases analysis include the following:
| |
| : a. Decay heat sources considered are fission product decay and heavy element decay of U-239 and Np-239.
| |
| : b. Decay heat power from fissioning isotopes other than U-235 is assumed to be identical to that of U-235.
| |
| : c. Fission rate is constant over the operating history of maximum power level.
| |
| : d. The factor accounting for neutron capture in fission products has been taken from Equation 11 of Reference 40, up to 10,000 seconds and from Table 10 of Reference 40, beyond 10,000 seconds.
| |
| : e. The fuel has been assumed to be at full power for 108 seconds.
| |
| : f. The number of atoms of U-239 produced per second has been assumed to be equal to 70 percent of the fission rate.
| |
| : g. The total recoverable energy associated with one fission has been assumed to be 200 MeV/fission.
| |
| : h. Two-sigma uncertainty (two times the standard deviation) has been applied to the fission product decay.
| |
| Based upon NRC staff review, Safety Evaluation Report (SER) of the March 1979 evaluation model (Reference 37), use of the ANS Standard-5.1, November 1979 decay heat model was approved for the calculation of M&E releases to the containment following a LOCA.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.7.5 Steam Generator Equilibration and Depressurization Steam generator equilibration and depressurization is the process by which secondary side energy is removed from the steam generators in stages. The FROTH computer code calculates the heat removal from the secondary mass until the secondary temperature reaches saturation (Tsat) at the containment design pressure. After the FROTH calculations, the EPITOME code continues the FROTH calculation for SG cooldown removing steam generator secondary energy at different rates (i.e., first and second stage rates).
| |
| 6.2-27e REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR The first stage rate is applied until the steam generator reaches Tsat at the user specified intermediate equilibration pressure, when the secondary pressure is assumed to reach the actual containment pressure. Then the second stage rate is used until the final depressurization, when the secondary reaches the o reference temperature of Tsat at 14.7 psia, or 212F. The heat removal of the broken loop and intact loop steam generators are calculated separately.
| |
| During the FROTH calculations, steam generator heat removal rates are calculated using the secondary side temperature, primary side temperature and a secondary side heat transfer coefficient determined using a modified McAdams correlation. Steam generator energy is removed during the FROTH transient until the secondary side temperature reaches saturation at the containment design pressure. The constant heat removal rate used during the first heat removal stage is based on the final heat removal rate calculated by FROTH. The SG energy available to be released during the first stage interval is determined by calculating the difference in secondary energy available at the containment design pressure and that at the (lower) user specified intermediate equilibration pressure, assuming saturated conditions. This energy is then divided by the first stage energy removal rate, resulting in an intermediate equilibration time. At this time, the rate of energy release drops substantially to the second stage rate. The second stage rate is determined as the fraction of the difference in secondary energy available between the intermediate equilibration and final depressurization at 212oF, and the time difference from the time of the intermediate equilibration to the user specified time of o the final depressurization at 212F. With current methodology, all of the secondary energy remaining after the intermediate equilibration is conservatively assumed to be released by imposing a mandatory cooldown and subsequent depressurization down to atmospheric pressure at 3600 seconds, i.e., 14.7 psia and 212oF.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.3.7.6 Sources of Mass and Energy The sources of mass considered in the LOCA mass and energy release analysis are given in Tables 6.2-20 (Unit 1) and 6.2-35 (Unit 2) for the hot leg break, Tables 6.2-26 (Unit 1) and 6.2-41 (Unit 2) for the DEPS break minimum safeguards case, and Tables 6.2-32 (Unit 1) and 6.2-47 (Unit 2) for the DEPS break maximum safeguards case. These sources are the reactor coolant system, accumulators, and pumped safety injection.
| |
| The energy inventories considered in the LOCA mass and energy release analysis are given in Tables 6.2-21 (Unit 1) and 6.2-36 (Unit 2) for the hot leg break, Tables 6.2-27 (Unit 1) and 6.2-42 (Unit 2) for the DEPS break minimum safeguards case, and Tables 6.2-33 (Unit 1) and 6.2-48 (Unit 2) for the DEPS break maximum safeguards case. The energy sources include:
| |
| | |
| 6.2-27f REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : a. Reactor Coolant System Water .
| |
| : b. Accumulator Water (all four inject).
| |
| : c. Pumped Safety Injection Water.
| |
| : d. Decay Heat.
| |
| : e. Core Stored Energy.
| |
| : f. Reactor Coolant System Metal (includes SG tubes).
| |
| : g. Steam Generator Metal (includes transition cone, shell, wrapper, and other internals, located below the operating water level).
| |
| : h. Steam Generator Secondary Energy (includes fluid mass and steam mass).
| |
| : i. Secondary Transfer of Energy (feedwater into and steam out of the steam generator secondary).
| |
| | |
| Energy Reference Points:
| |
| : a. Available Energy: 212oF; 14.7 psia (All energies in the system are assumed to be taken out to these conditions in the first hour of the event).
| |
| : b. Total Energy Content: 32oF; 14.7 psia (Reference point for the system energy).
| |
| The mass and energy inventories are presented at the following times, as appropriate:
| |
| : a. Time zero (initial conditions).
| |
| : b. End of blowdown time.
| |
| : c. End of refill time.
| |
| : d. End of reflood time.
| |
| : e. Time of broken loop steam generator equilibration to pressure setpoint.
| |
| : f. Time of intact loop steam generator equilibration to pressure setpoint.
| |
| : g. Time of full depressurization (3600 seconds).
| |
| In the mass and energy release data presented, no Zirc-water reaction heat was considered because the clad temperature is assumed not to rise high enough for the rate of the Zirc-water reaction heat to be of any significance.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-27g REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The sequence of events for the LOCA transients are shown in Table 6.2-6 (Unit 1, DEPS break, minimum SI), Table 6.2-6a (Unit 2, DEPS break, minimum SI), Table 6.2-7 (Unit 1, DEHL break), and Table 6.2-8 (Unit 2 DEHL break).
| |
| 6.2.1.3.8 Conclusions The consideration of the various energy sources in the long-term mass and energy release analysis, including the BWI SG (Unit 1) and the Westinghouse D5 SG (Unit 2), provides assurance that all available sources of energy have been included in this analysis.
| |
| Thus, the review guidelines presented in Standard Review Plan Section 6.2.1.3 have been satisfied.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.4 Mass and Energy Release for Postulated Secondary System Pipe Breaks Inside Containment (PWR)
| |
| | |
| The containment structure receives mass and energy releases following a postulated break of the steam or feedwater line. A spectrum of main steamline break (MSLB) accidents covering different break areas and reactor operating power levels is analyzed. These are discussed in the following subsections.
| |
| The LOFTRAN code is used to model the heat transfer in the MSLB blowdown model for Unit 1 and Unit 2. The heat transfer in the core is calculated based on a nodal analysis employing implicit backward difference methodology. The heat transfer rate is based on two modes of heat transfer.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-27h REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : a. Subcooled forced convection and
| |
| : b. Nucleate boiling (using the Jens-Lottes' correlation).
| |
| | |
| For a more detailed discussion on heat transfer models used in LOFTRAN, refer to WCAP 7907.
| |
| A feedwater pipe break inside containment is not analyzed because it is not as severe as the main steamline break, since the break effluent is at a lower specific enthalpy.
| |
| 6.2.1.4.1 Pipe Break Blowdowns - Spectra and Assumptions
| |
| | |
| A series of steamline breaks were analyzed to determine the most severe break condition for containment temperature and pressure response. The following assumptions were used in the analysis:
| |
| : a. Breaks were assumed to be either double-ended breaks occurring at the nozzle at one steam generator or split breaks.
| |
| : b. Blowdown from the broken steamline is assumed to be saturated steam.
| |
| : c. For Unit 1 and Unit 2, steamline isolation is assumed to be completed 8 seconds after the isolation setpoint is reached, and feedline isolation is assumed to be completed 7 seconds after the isolation setpoint is reached. The assumed closure times allow for signal generation, processing, and delay. The steamline isolation signal is generated by either a low steamline pressure, high-2 containment pressure, or high steamline rate of pressure decrease. The feedwater isolation signal is generated by either a safety injection, P-4 (reactor trip) with coincident LO Tave, or S/G high-2 level. For the steam line break analyses, feedwater isolation results from a safety injection signal.
| |
| : d. Analyses have been done at a range of power levels from hot zero power to full power plus calorimetric uncertainty. Cases were evaluated at initial power levels of 100%, 70%, 30% and 0%. The results presented provide the most limiting cases from the set of power levels described above, and the composite results include the results of all these cases.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-28 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : e. The double-ended breaks were evaluated for a full double-ended guillotine (1.1 ft 2) and a small double-ended guillotine (1.0 ft 2) for Unit 1 and a full double-ended guillotine (1.4 ft 2) and a small double-ended guillotine (1.0 ft2) for Unit 2. The split breaks were evaluated at 1.0 ft2, 0.96 ft2, 0.90 ft2 and 0.64 ft2 for Unit 1 and 0.81 ft2, 0.82 ft2, 0.83 ft2 and 0.62 ft2 for Unit 2. Steamline flow restrictors in the steam generators limit the effective break area of a full double2-ended pipe break to 1.1 ft per steam generator for Unit 1 and 1.4 ft2 per steam generator for Unit 2 after steamline isolation. Initially, the effective flow area for reverse flow is the full pipe flow area.
| |
| After the first few seconds of the transient, the reverse flow is limited by the size of the steam generator flow restrictor. Reverse flow continues until steamline isolation.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-28a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : f. Failures of a main steam isolation valve, a diesel generator, and a feedwater isolation valve were considered.
| |
| : g. The auxiliary feedwater system is manually realigned by the operator within 30 minutes by isolating auxiliary feedwater flow from the depressurized steam generator.
| |
| | |
| Liquid entrainment was not assumed in the MSLB analysis for the Unit 1 and Unit 2 steam generators.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-29 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.4.2 Description of Blowdown Modeling
| |
| | |
| The following is a description of the break flow modeling of the blowdown of the steam generators and plant steam piping:
| |
| | |
| 6.2-29a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : a. Steam Generator Blowdown Break flows and enthalpies from the steam generators are calculated using the Westinghouse LOFTRAN code for Unit 1 and for Unit 2 (Reference 32). Blowdown mass and energy release were determined using the LOFTRAN Code, including effects of core power generation, main and auxiliary feedwater additions, engineered safeguards systems, reactor coolant system thick metal heat storage, and reverse steam generator heat transfer.
| |
| : b. Steam Plant Piping Blowdown The contribution to the mass and energy releases from the secondary plant steam piping is included in the mass and energy release calculations. The flow rate is determined using the Moody correlation, and modeling considerations include the pipe cross-sectional area, the steam generator flow restrictor area, and the area of the break. The steam piping blowdown calculations consider the initial steam in the piping as well as the reverse flow from the intact steam generators until steamline isolation.
| |
| The blowdown model is further discussed in Reference 32.
| |
| 6.2.1.4.3 Single Failure Analysis
| |
| | |
| The following single failures were evaluated to determine the limiting set of conditions for this analysis:
| |
| : a. Failure of a main steam isolation valve (MSIV) increases the volume of steam piping which is not isolated from the break. When all valves operate, the piping volume capable of blowing down is located between the steam generator and the first isolation valve. If this valve fails, the volume between the break and the isolation valves in the other steamlines including safety and relief valve headers and other connecting lines will feed the break.
| |
| : b. Failure of a diesel generator would result in the loss of one containment safeguards train resulting in minimum heat removal capability. However, a diesel generator failure is only considered for cases that assume a loss of offsite power. For cases that assume offsite power is available, the limiting single failure in the containment safeguards system for MSLB was determined to be the failure of one RCFC train that results in the loss of 2 RCFC
| |
| | |
| 6.2-30 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| units. Failure of one CS pump was shown, by plant-specific analyses to be less limiting than the failure of one RCFC train.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-30a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. Failure of the main feedwater pump trips would result in additional inventory supplied to the steam generator before feedwater isolation. In the analysis, feedwater pump trip was ignored, which is conservative as it allows increased blowdown.
| |
| Therefore, the failure of a feedwater pump to trip was not analyzed as a separate failure.
| |
| : d. Failure of a feedwater isolation valve could only result in additional inventory in the feedwater line which would not be isolated from the steam generator.
| |
| The mass in this volume can flash into steam as it enters the steam generator and subsequently exit through the break. Both the feedwater isolation valve and the feedwater regulating valve close in no more than 5 seconds, precluding the pumping of any additional feedwater into the steam generator. The additional line volume available to flash into steam as it enters the steam generator is that between the feedwater isolation valve and the feedwater regulating valve, including all headers and connecting lines.
| |
| | |
| The resultant mass and energy release rates for the limiting steam pipe break are presented in Tables 6.2-50, 6.2-50a, 6.20-50b, and 6.2-50c. The containment peak pressures and temperatures for the secondary side breaks that make-up the composite curves are listed in Tables 6.2-1 and 6.2-1a.
| |
| | |
| For Unit 1 and Unit 2, the worst-case single failure for maximizing the peak pressure response is failure of a main steamline isolation valve to close with offsite power available.
| |
| The worst case single failure for maximizing the containment peak temperature is failure of the main steamline isolation valve to close without offsite power.
| |
| | |
| The mass and energy releases given in Tables 6.2-50, 6.2-50a, 6.2-50b, and 6.2-50c are based on the appropriate worst-case single failure, as discussed above. The feedwater and main steam isolation valve closure times associated with the mass and energy release data in Tables 6.2-50, 6.2-50a, 6.2-50b, and 6.2-50c are given in Tables 6.2-9, 6.2-9a, 6.2-9b, and 6.2-9c.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-31 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.5 Minimum Containment Pressure Analysis for Performance Capability Studies of Emergency Core Cooling System (PWR)
| |
| | |
| A conservatively low containment backpressure is calculated for each LOCA transient in the Large Break LOCA analyses for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, presented in Section 15.6.5.2.2.2. The containment backpressure plots for the transients that produced the analysis PCT results are provided in Figure 15.6-6i for Units 1 and in Figure 15.6-8i for Units 2. The containment backpressure is calculated using the methods and assumptions described in Section 15.6.5.2.2.2.2. Input parameters including the containment initial conditions, net free containment volume, and starting time and number of containment cooling systems used in the analyses are presented in Table 15.6-1b. Fan cooler performance data are shown in Table 15.6-1c. Passive heat sink material thickness and surface areas are shown in Table 15.6-1d.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-31a REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-32 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-33 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-34 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.1.6 Testing and Inspection 6.2.1.6.1 Structural Acceptance Test
| |
| | |
| For a discussion of the structural acceptance test see Subsection 3.8.1.7.
| |
| 6.2.1.6.2 Preoperational Leakage Rate Test
| |
| | |
| The containment leakage testing program will be performed in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. This document establishes frequency, methods, and acceptance criteria. The purpose of the test is to confirm that the actual containment leakage rate is within the design requirement. The reduced pressure leakage rate test is performed to provide baseline information for future tests. Containment leakage testing is further described in Section 6.2.6.
| |
| In addition to the initial containment Type A leakage rate tests at full and reduced pressure the following Type B and Type C tests of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J will be performed on the indicated components:
| |
| Type B Test
| |
| : a. Electrical penetrations Zones 1 through 4
| |
| : b. Fuel transfer tube
| |
| : 1. Containment side blind flange (double O-rings)
| |
| : c. Equipment door/integral personnel airlock
| |
| : 1. Equipment door seals - double O-rings
| |
| : 2. Airlock door seals - double lip gasket
| |
| : 3. Personnel airlock pressurization
| |
| : 4. One inch test penetration flange double O-rings
| |
| | |
| 6.2-35 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : d. Emergency personnel lock
| |
| : 1. Airlock doors seals - double lip gasket
| |
| : 2. Personnel airlock pressurization
| |
| : 3. One inch test penetration flange double O-rings
| |
| : e. Containment pressurization penetration (PC-4)
| |
| : f. Spare containment penetrations (PC-63, PC-64 & PC-74)
| |
| | |
| Type C Test
| |
| | |
| Containment isolation valves as identified in Table 6.2-58.
| |
| 6.2.1.6.3 Inservice Leakage Rate Testing
| |
| | |
| Periodic leakage rate testing of the containment will be performed in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix J, Option B as modified by approved exceptions in Technical Specification 5.5.16.
| |
| 6.2.1.6.4 Tendon Surveillance Program
| |
| | |
| For a discussion of the tendon surveillance program see the Technical Specifications.
| |
| 6.2.1.7 Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| | |
| The containment is provided with instrumentation to monitor the conditions in the containment over the full operating range of the plant. Containment air sampling and radiation monitoring are described in Subsections 11.5.2.2 and 12.2.2.
| |
| | |
| The components and subsystems to the containment system that require actuation to initiate the safety function are described in Subsection 6.2.4 and Section 6.5.
| |
| | |
| Containment pressure and temperature are indicated on the main control board. The following ventilation equipment temperature elements are monitored by the computer;
| |
| : a. control rod drive shroud air inlet,
| |
| : b. control rod drive booster fan air outlet,
| |
| : c. hot leg nozzle air outlet,
| |
| : d. out-of-core neutron monitors air outlet, and
| |
| : e. containment fan cooler return air.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-36 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| For containment pressure, the requirements of NUREG-0737 and Regulatory Guide 1.97 are met by pressure transmitters with diaphragm seals.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-36a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The existing pressure measurement instrumentation consists of four channels, with each channel having a range of 0 to 60 psig.
| |
| The four channels provide inputs to the reactor protection system. Additional containment wide range pressure measurement instruments are provided as follows:
| |
| : 1. Qualified to IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975.
| |
| : 2. Two channels are provided with one transmitter/
| |
| diaphragm seal in each.
| |
| : 3. The range of each channel is 5 psia to 150 psig.
| |
| : 4. Continuous display and recording are provided in the main control room.
| |
| For Byron and Braidwood containment wide range water level (PC006 and PC007), the requirements of NUREG-0737 and Regulatory Guide 1.97 are met by differential pressure transmitters with diaphragm seals. For Byron Unit 1 and Braidwood Unit 1 narrow range containment water level (Containment Floor Drain Sump Level Instruments - PC002 and PC003), the requirements of NUREG-0737 and Regulatory Guide 1.97 are met by differential pressure transmitters with diaphragm seals. For Byron Unit 2 narrow range containment water level, the requirements of NUREG- 0737 and Regulatory Guide 1.97 are met by float-type resistance level transmitters with signal conditioners. For Braidwood Unit 2 narrow range containment water level, the requirements of NUREG-0737 and Regulatory Guide 1.97 are met by a thermal dispersion type level measurement system.
| |
| | |
| Two channels of level measurement are provided for each application of containment level as follows:
| |
| : 1. Qualified to IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975.
| |
| : 2. Containment wide range water level is measured from the bottom of containment to the equivalent level of 600,000 gallons of water. (PC006 and PC007).
| |
| : 3. The low reference point for containment water level and containment floor drain sump level is as near containment bottom and containment floor drain sump bottom; respectively, as physically possible.
| |
| : 4. The main control room display/recording requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.97 are met for containment water level and containment floor drain sump level.
| |
| | |
| Reactor support concrete temperatures are indicated inside containment.
| |
| | |
| Refer to Section 7.3 for design details.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-37 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.2 Containment Heat Removal System
| |
| | |
| The containment heat removal system consists of the reactor containment fan cooler system and the containment spray system.
| |
| The reactor containment fan cooler system has no emergency function other than containment heat removal, while the primary function of the containment spray system is the removal of iodine and other radionuclides from the containment atmosphere.
| |
| | |
| The containment spray system is designed to operate following a LOCA to reduce the iodine concentration of the containment atmosphere and to raise the pH of the containment sump by adding NaOH, to ensure that the iodine removed from containment atmosphere will be retained in the sump solution. When the RWST reaches the Lo-3 level, the system is isolated from the RWST and plant valves are aligned for CS pump operation with suction from the recirculation sump. When the required quantity of NaOH has been added to the recirculation sump, the spray additive tank is isolated. (It should be noted that after 30 minutes most of the heat removal from containment is provided by the reactor containment fan coolers, which are safety grade for Byron/Braidwood.) Sprays are not required for long-term heat removal. Nevertheless, the containment sprays will be operated for at least 8 hours following a LOCA before they are terminated.
| |
| | |
| The RHR, CV, and SI systems are designed to operate following a LOCA to cool the reactor core. These systems are switched from injection to recirculation when the RWST reaches the Lo-2 level and remain in operation for the remainder of the accident.
| |
| Additional fuel clad failure is not postulated while these systems are operating.
| |
| The containment spray system is discussed in Subsection 6.5.2, and the performance of both the reactor containment fan cooler system and the containment spray system under the design-basis loss-of-coolant accident condition is evaluated in Subsection 6.2.1.1.
| |
| | |
| The containment heat removal system rejects heat to the ultimate heat sink. Containment analyses to support the design bases of the ultimate heat sink are described in Subsection 9.2.5.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-38 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.2.1 Design Bases
| |
| | |
| The containment heat removal system is designed in accordance with General Design Criteria 38, 39, 40, and 50 (see Section 3.1).
| |
| 6.2.2.1.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC) System
| |
| | |
| The reactor containment fan cooler system is designed to meet the following requirements:
| |
| : a. During normal conditions, the system cools and dehumidifies the containment to meet the operating environment required by the mechanical, electrical, and structural components within the containment.
| |
| These environments are described in Section 3.11.1 under normal conditions.
| |
| : b. The RCFC system, the emergency core cooling system, and the containment spray system share in removing energy released following a postulated loss-of-coolant accident. Source of energy and energy release rate and the response of the containment atmosphere to the energy released and to the containment heat removal system are addressed in Subsection 6.2.1.
| |
| : c. Blowdown and heat removal analysis is based on the availability of at least one of the two redundant trains provided by the RCFC system, containment spray system, and emergency core cooling system.
| |
| : d. The RCFC system is designed for full operation within 40 seconds following the initiation of safety actuation signal and will continue to operate over an extended period of time under the environmental conditions existing thereafter. Following a design basis accident concurrent with a loss of offsite power, the analysis assumptions regarding RCFC actuation allow for an extended RCFC startup delay in order to account for startup of the essential service water system. See Subsection 6.2.1 for more information.
| |
| : e. The RCFC system components are designed to operate and to meet the design performance under the postulated loss-of-coolant accident conditions.
| |
| : f. As described in Subsection 6.2.2.1.1(c) above, minimum required number of components can be available considering a single failure.
| |
| : g. All components essential to the operation of the RCFC system are designed to withstand the safe shutdown earthquake without loss of function.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-39 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : h. The RCFC system components, including fan, motor, service water cooling coils, housing, and ductwork, are designed to withstand the dynamic effect resulting from a transient pressure difference
| |
| | |
| 6.2-39a REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| between the various subcompartments inside the containment during a loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| : i. During normal operating conditions, only one of the two redundant trains is required to meet normal containment cooling requirements. The equipment manufacturer's recommendations and station practices were considered in determining required maintenance.
| |
| 6.2.2.1.2 Containment Spray System
| |
| | |
| For a discussion of the heat removal capabilities of the containment spray system, see Subsection 6.5.2.1.
| |
| 6.2.2.2 System Design 6.2.2.2.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC) System
| |
| | |
| The RCFC system is shown in Drawings M-103 and M-104.
| |
| Description of system operation and design requirements under normal operating conditions is given in Subsection 9.4.8.
| |
| Description of system operation and design requirements under post-LOCA accident conditions is summarized as follows:
| |
| : a. All system components that are required to support system operation following a loss-of-coolant accident are classified as engineered safety feature system and are designed to Safety Category I requirements.
| |
| : b. Design performance data are given in Table 6.2-56.
| |
| : c. Two redundant trains are provided. Each is powered from a separate redundant essential bus. Each train consists of two 50%-capacity RCFC units.
| |
| Each unit consists of the following components:
| |
| : 1. Fan/Motor Assembly
| |
| | |
| One vane-axial fan is provided and directly driven by a totally enclosed air over (TEAO) 2-speed motor. The motor is cooled by direct containment air atmosphere flowing over the motor.
| |
| At Byron Units 1 and 2, motor space heaters are provided for each fan motor to maintain favorable conditions of temperature and humidity in their environment during shutdown periods.
| |
| During normal operating conditions, the RCFC fan motor operates in the high-speed mode. On initiation of post-LOCA mode of operation, the
| |
| | |
| 6.2-40 REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| motor will shift to low speed, resulting in lower airflow. The lower airflow compensates for the increase in containment air density resulting from the higher pressure and humidity following a loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| : 2. Essential Service Water (ESW) Cooling Coil Assembly Ten finned tube essential service water coil sections are provided for each RCFC unit.
| |
| Drain troughs are provided to collect and remove essential service water coil condensate.
| |
| The ESW cooling coils are designed to meet the entire cooling requirements following a loss-of-coolant accident; however, during normal operation, these coils (with the same essential service water flow rate required for postaccident heat removal) remove containment heat consistent with the essential service water and containment temperatures. The balance of heat removal during normal operation will be transferred in the independent chilled water coils described below.
| |
| : 3. Chilled Water Cooling Coil Assembly Chilled water is used through an independent coil mounted in series with the essential service water cooling coil to supplement essential service water cooling capability under normal operation only. The chilled water system is Safety Category II, Quality Group D, except for containment penetrations and some of the piping within the containment. The chilled water is provided by refrigeration units located outside the containment. The condensers of the refrigeration units are cooled by the essential service water return from the essential service water cooling coil sections during normal operation. Upon receipt of safeguards actuation signals, the Safety Category II chilled water condensers are automatically isolated from the Safety Category I essential service water system.
| |
| : 4. Check Dampers
| |
| | |
| The RCFC discharges directly into the lower containment volume. Due to limited vent areas to the upper containment volume, the lower
| |
| | |
| 6.2-41 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| volumes will pressurize more rapidly than the upper volume following a LOCA.
| |
| To protect the RCFC fans and motors against possible adverse effects of transient induced reversed flow, check dampers are provided in the discharge ductwork. One check damper is provided for each RCFC unit. The dampers are spring operated and will close under any conditions where reverse flow is experienced in the fan discharge duct.
| |
| The RCFC check dampers, have been tested to ensure a closure time of 0.1 second during an accident. Pressure drop and leakage tests were also performed and the results were within acceptable limits. The results of the ESW cooling coil assembly performance test show a good correlation between the test results and the anticipated thermal performance at relatively low temperature and pressure. At higher temperature and pressures, the test results indicate performance which is 10% to 20% higher than anticipated.
| |
| : 5. Housing and Ductwork
| |
| | |
| During all operating conditions air is drawn from the upper volume of the containment approximately 50 feet above the operating floor by a return air riser (one riser for each RCFC unit). The return air is then routed through the ESW cooling coils, the chilled water cooling coils, and the fan and discharge duct (one for each RCFC unit) where the backdraft damper is located. The RCFC housing encloses the cooling coils (both ESW and chilled water) and the fan/motor assembly.
| |
| : d. As discussed in Subsection 6.2.2.1.1, only one of the two redundant trains is required to operate under all operating conditions. Rotating the operating train and periodic starting of the standby train assures the system availability. The RCFC system components are located outside the secondary shield wall where radiation exposure to operators is kept at a minimum.
| |
| Access doors and maintenance platforms and gratings are provided to facilitate operator access to system components.
| |
| : e. Governing codes and standards and quality group classifications utilized in designing the system components are listed in Table 3.2-2 and discussed under Subsection 3.2.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-42 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : f. Plant protection signals and setpoints are discussed in Section 7.3. While the actuation of the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) takes the first priority in initiation and in emergency power supply, the containment spray system takes second priority, and the RCFC system takes third priority following the initiation of the ECCS and the containment spray system. The containment spray system provides short-term cooling, while the RCFC system provides long-term cooling. Sequencing time of the above initiation is selected governed by the maximum rate of loading on the emergency diesel generator.
| |
| : g. The essential cooling water is maintained continuously through the ESW cooling coils of the operating RCFC units and is made available whenever the corresponding RCFC fans are operated. Also, the RCFC fans in the operating train are continuously running at the high-speed mode. Following a loss-of-coolant accident signal, the operating fans will trip and commence operation on the low-speed mode following a 20-second time delay. The RCFC fans which were not operating during normal operation will also commence operation on low speed 20 seconds after receipt of the initiating signal.
| |
| : h. As discussed in Section 7.3, no operator action is required for the post-LOCA accident operation of the RCFC System.
| |
| : i. The following qualification tests have been performed on the RCFC system components:
| |
| : 1. Fan/Motor Assembly Fan/motor assemblies similar to those installed for the Byron/Braidwood Stations have been tested under simulated loss-of-coolant accident environment and in accordance with the requirements of IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 334-1971. The assembly has been also qualified to meet the requirements of IEEE 344-1971.
| |
| Subsections 3.10 and 3.11 address the qualification to IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 334-1971.
| |
| : 2. Essential Service Water Cooling Coil Assembly
| |
| | |
| Performance testing was performed for the ESW cooling coils assembly. A mathematical model was developed to verify the test results. The coils meet the requirements of ASME Code Section III, Class 3, and were
| |
| | |
| 6.2-43 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| hydrostatically tested to the code requirements. The coils will be qualified analytically to withstand the dynamic effect of the loss-of-coolant accident concurrent with the design-basis seismic event.
| |
| Analyses performed in response to NRC Generic Letter 96-06 indicated that, even though there was a potential for limited steam voiding to occur in the RCFC cooling coil piping during loss-of-coolant accident conditions, the calculated stresses in the limiting piping subsystem remained within design allowables.
| |
| These analyses are contained in References 33 and 34.
| |
| : 3. Chilled Water Cooling Coil Assembly The chilled water cooling coil assembly was hydrostatically tested to the requirements of ASME Code Section VIII. The coils and their supports are designed to retain their structural integrity during the design-basis seismic event to assure continuity of function of the adjacent essential service water cooling coils.
| |
| : 4. Check Dampers The check dampers have been tested under conditions similar to the postulated dynamic effect of the loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| : 5. Housing and Ductwork
| |
| | |
| No test was provided for the housing or the ductwork. The RCFC housing is designed for a transient pressure of 5 psid and the RCFC return air riser is designed for a transient pressure of 3 psid.
| |
| 6.2.2.2.2 Containment Spray System
| |
| | |
| Refer to Subsection 6.5.2.2.
| |
| 6.2.2.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.2.3.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC) System
| |
| : a. The evaluation of the reactor containment fan cooler performance under the design-basis loss-of-coolant accident conditions is presented in Subsection 6.2.1.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-44 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : b. The reactor containment fan coolers provide the design heat-removal capacity for the containment following a loss-of-coolant accident, assuming that the core residual heat is released to the containment as steam. The system will accomplish this by continuously recirculating the air-steam mixture through cooling coils to transfer heat from containment to essential service water.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-44a REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. Any two of the four RCFC units will provide sufficient heat-removal capability to maintain the containment pressure below the design value following a loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| : d. The starting sequence and timing for the RCFC units following a loss-of-coolant accident with loss of offsite power are described in Section 8.3.
| |
| : e. A failure analysis has been made on all active components of the system to assure that the failure of any single active component will not prevent fulfilling the design function. The 100% redundancy in the RCFC units fulfills this criterion (see Table 6.2-57).
| |
| : f. The principal systems which are interconnected with the reactor containment fan cooler system are the essential service water system and the ESF electrical buses. The essential service water supply to the fan coolers is a redundant system such that the failure of any one single component or pipe will not reduce the cooling capacity of the RCFC units below that required for either accident or normal operational modes. The essential service water system is described in Subsection 9.2.1. Chilled water is not required after an accident, and the failure of any chilled water system component cannot interact to adversely affect the RCFC operation, since it is isolated from the essential service water system. Electrical power to the RCFC fans will be supplied from the emergency diesel generators upon loss of auxiliary power. The electrical system is described in Section 8.3.
| |
| : g. The basic design of the motor as described herein is such that the incident environment is prevented from entering the motor winding.
| |
| : h. The motor stator winding temperature rise (by
| |
| | |
| embedded detector) is 65 above 50C ambient when operating at full load. Insulation is Class H.
| |
| : i. During the lifetime of the plant, these motors perform the normal heat-removal service and as such are loaded to only approximately 85% of their nominal rating.
| |
| : j. The bearings are designed to perform in the accident ambient temperature conditions.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-45 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : k. The motor insulation has high resistance to moisture. Tests have been performed to indicate that the insulation system will survive the incident ambient moisture condition without failure.
| |
| : l. In addition, it should be noted that at the time of the postulated accident, the load on the fan motor would increase internal motor temperature and would therefore tend to drive any moisture out of the winding. Additionally, the motors are furnished with insulation voltage margin beyond the operating voltage.
| |
| : m. Performance test of the ESW cooling coils is based on testing a representative coil section under simulated containment atmosphere of air and water vapor while it is cooled by water at design temperature. The cooling coil performance under fouling conditions is determined by the same analytical method which is verified by test under the clean conditions. A fair agreement between the calculated and the test performance verifies the soundness of the analytical method and justifies its applicability to the prediction of equipment performance under fouled conditions.
| |
| : n. The RCFC system is designed with adequate monitoring to demonstrate system availability at all modes of operation.
| |
| : o. The system components are designed, fabricated, tested and installed in accordance with codes, standards, and quality groups identified in Subsection 3.2.1.
| |
| | |
| 6.2.2.3.2 Containment Spray System
| |
| | |
| For a discussion of the design evaluation of the containment spray system, refer to Subsection 6.5.2.3.
| |
| 6.2.2.4 Tests and Inspections 6.2.2.4.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC) System
| |
| : a. Testing of the RCFC system is performed prior to plant operation in accordance with the procedures described in Chapter 14.0.
| |
| : b. The RCFC system will operate continuously during normal operation of the plant.
| |
| Malfunction of system components can be detected
| |
| | |
| 6.2-46 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| and corrected as necessary. This design further enhances the reliability of the system to perform its intended function following a postulated loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| : c. Testing provisions are incorporated in the system design to enable periodic evaluation of the operability and performance of system components and to permit periodic flow continuity and hydrostatic tests.
| |
| : d. Visual inspection and maintenance of the RCFC System components will be conducted during each refueling period.
| |
| : e. Components, valves, and piping will be inspected in accordance with ASME Section XI and ASME Section III where applicable.
| |
| : f. Opening of containment isolation valves upon receipt of an actuation signal is checked to demonstrate the proper operation of the remotely operated valves.
| |
| The reactor containment fan coolers and portions of th e associated essential service water supply and return piping between the outermost containment isolation valves were supplied and constructed to Quality Group C requirements (ASME Section III, Class 3).
| |
| In order to provide a level of quality equivalent to Quality Group B standards, additional ASME Section III Class 2 nondestructive examinations were performed on the RCFC essential service water cooling coils (magnetic particle examination on RCFC coil nozzle joint at water box header and radiograph examination of the flange connection to the nozzle). In addition, ASME Section III Class 2 nondestructive examinations were performed on the Quality Group C essential service water piping portions serving the RCFC coils (radiographic examination of the circumferential weld joints).
| |
| | |
| Following is the justification to demonstrate that by performing magnetic particle examination on the fillet welds and radiographic examination on the butt welds, these coils will meet Class 2 NDE requirements:
| |
| : a. The RCFC coils are made of seamless copper tubes, formed and machined in one piece with end tube sheets.
| |
| : b. The return bends are brazed to the tubes on one end. The NDE requirements are the same for brazing processes for Class 2 and Class 3.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-47 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. The water boxes are made in one piece with no joints and bolted to the tube sheet on the other end of the coil.
| |
| Welded baffles in the box are internal to the box and hence are not in containment pressure boundary.
| |
| The pressure boundary welds associated with replacement essential service water RCFC water boxes, piping and components classified as ASME Quality Group C, shall be inspected in accordance with ASME Section III, Class 2 requirements to ensure Quality Group B standards, are maintained. Replacement RCFC essential service water coils, components or associated piping may be supplied, examined and installed in accordance with ASME Section III, Class 2 requirements.
| |
| | |
| For subsequent inservice inspections, these lines shall be treated as all other Class 2 lines. They will be included into the Byron/Braidwood Stations ASME Section XI inservice inspection NDE program and will receive all code required examinations. However, these lines are covered by the following exemptions:
| |
| : a. IWC-1220 (b) exempts components of systems or portions of systems, other than residual heat removal systems and emergency core cooling systems, that are not required to operate above a pressure of 275 psig (1900kPa) or above a temperature of 200F (93C).
| |
| : b. IWC-1220 (c) exempts component connections (including nozzles in vessels and pumps), piping and associated valves and vessels (and their supports) that are 4 inch nominal pipe size and smaller.
| |
| The subject lines operate at 75 psig and a temperature of 189F. Portions of these lines are 4 inch and smaller. Therefore, the aforementioned lines are subject to Section XI VT-2 examinations only.
| |
| 6.2.2.4.2 Containment Spray System For a discussion of testing and inspection of the containment spray system, see Subsection 6.5.2.4.
| |
| 6.2.2.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.2.2.5.1 Reactor Containment Fan Cooler (RCFC) System The instrumentation associated with the RCFC system provides measurements that are used to indicate, alarm, and control process variables. Analog and logic channels employed for actuation of the system are discussed in Section 7.3.
| |
| The instrumentation provided in the RCFC system is summarized as follows:
| |
| : a. The inlet and outlet air temperatures of each RCFC unit are indicated locally and in the control room to provide an indication of cooling coils performance. Extreme temperatures are alarmed in the control room for the operator's evaluation.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-48 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : b. Fan motor trip is alarmed in the control room. Motor operation is indicative of fan operation, as the fan rotor is mounted directly on the motor shaft.
| |
| : c. The degree of vibration of the fan/motor assembly is monitored and excessive vibration is alarmed in the control room.
| |
| All power -operated components including the ESW piping serving the RCFC system are capable of remote manual operation actuation by means of a signal from the control room.
| |
| A status indication of each valve and fan is provided in the control room to indicate valve position and status of fan operation.
| |
| For PWRs, Regulatory Guide 1.97 identifies containment sump water temperature and atmosphere temperature as important parameters for postaccident monitoring. Both are categorized as Type D parameters in accordance with ANS-4.5 because they are parameters that provide information to indicate the operation of individual safety systems and other systems important to safety.
| |
| Containment atmosphere temperature is to be measured in the range of 40F to 400F to indicate the accomplishment of cooling. The RCFC inlet and outlet temperature indicators are utilized for monitoring containment atmosphere temperature. The Design and qualification of these instruments are Category 3 as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.97. The intent of containment sump water temperature instrumentation is to provide operators verification of adequate NPSH for the RH and CS pumps during the recirculation phase of safety injection. Containment sump water temperature instrumentation, however, is not installed in the plant since other methods of ensuring NPSH have been established. These methods include conservatively calculating, with a sufficient safety margin, the available NPSH such that the containment sump water temperature is not required. Also, since the containment sump is directly connected to the RH system during recirculation, monitoring RH temperature provides an adequate alternative indication of containment cooling status. The RHR heat exchanger outlet temperature indicators are utilized as an approved alternate to monitoring containment sump temperature. The design and qualification of these instruments are Category 2 as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.97.
| |
| 6.2.2.5.2 Containment Spray System
| |
| | |
| For a discussion of instrumentation requirements for the containment spray system, see Subsection 6.5.2.5.
| |
| 6.2.3 Secondary Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| The plant design does not employ a secondary containment. This section is not applicable.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-49 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.4 Containment Isolation System 6.2.4.1 Design Bases
| |
| | |
| Design of the containment isolation system follows General Design Criteria 54, 55, 56 and 57 given in 10 CFR 50, Appendix A. This is discussed in Subsections 3.1.2.5.5 through 3.1.2.5.8. In the unlikely event of an accident which releases radioactive material inside the containment, the containment atmosphere is isolated from the environment by the use of isolation valves and other barriers for all pipelines which penetrate the containment unless such lines are required for service during the accident. The function of containment
| |
| | |
| 6.2-49a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| isolation is to provide an essentially leaktight barrier against the uncontrolled release of radioactivity to the environment and to limit the leakage to within the applicable requirements of 10 CFR 20, 10 CFR 50 Appendix I, 10 CFR 100, and 10 CFR 50.67 (for dose analyses performed utilizing alternative source term methods).
| |
| | |
| Adequate protection is provided for containment isolation system equipment, including valves, piping and vessels, against dynamic effects and missiles coincident with a loss-of-coolant accident and against missile damage resulting from other events requiring containment isolation. A detailed description is given in Subsections 3.5.1.2 and 3.6.2.
| |
| All valves and equipment considered to be isolation barriers are designed in accordance with Safety Category 1 criteria and are at least Quality Group B. Classification of systems and components is discussed in Section 3.2.
| |
| | |
| The Byron/Braidwood design ensures containment isolation dependability by satisfying the following requirements of NUREG-0737:
| |
| | |
| Position 1 Containment isolation systems designs shall comply with the recommendations of Standard Review Plan Section 6.2.4 (i.e.,
| |
| that there be diversity in the parameters sensed for the initiation of containment isolation).
| |
| The following parameters are monitored for the initiation of containment isolation:
| |
| : a. Automatic Safety Injection
| |
| : b. Containment Pressure
| |
| : c. Steamline Pressure
| |
| : d. Pressurizer Pressure
| |
| | |
| Position 2 All plant personnel shall give careful consideration to the definition of essential and nonessential systems, identify each system determined to be nonessential, describe the basis for selection of each essential system, modify their containment isolation designs accordingly, and report the results of the reevaluation to the NRC.
| |
| All systems penetrating the containment were designed to the requirements of General Design Criteria 54, 55, 56, and 57.
| |
| Essential systems have been defined in Table 6.2-58.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-50 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Position 3 All nonessential systems shall be automatically isolated by the containment isolation signal.
| |
| All systems not required for hot shutdown are automatically isolated by the containment isolation signal.
| |
| | |
| Position 4 The design of control systems for automatic containment isolation valves shall be such that resetting the isolation signal will not result in the automatic reopening of containment isolation valves. Reopening of containment isolation valves shall require deliberate operation action.
| |
| | |
| The individual control circuits are designed to prevent automatic loss of containment isolation due to the resetting of the isolation signals.
| |
| | |
| Deliberate operator action is required to open the containment isolation valves after resetting the actuating signal. Each containment isolation valve must be opened individually.
| |
| | |
| Position 5 The containment setpoint pressure that initiates containment isolation for nonessential penetrations must be reduced to the minimum compatible with normal operating conditions.
| |
| The containment isolation setpoint pressure is 3.4 psig. This value is used in all analyses of the capability of the containment to withstand and contain the results of postulated line breaks. Operating plant experience indicates that use of this setpoint pressure will not result in unnecessary isolation signals. Analytical results show that the containment pressure and offsite releases will stay well below limits and that safety systems will work properly with this setpoint.
| |
| | |
| Position 6 Containment purge valves that do not satisfy the operability criteria set forth in Branch Technical Position 6-4 or the Staff Interim Position of October 23, 1979 must be sealed closed as defined in SRP 6.2.4, Item II.6.f during operational conditions 1, 2, 3, and 4. Furthermore, these valves must be verified to be closed in accordance with the frequency specified in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.
| |
| | |
| The containment purge valves are closed whenever the reactor is not in the cold shutdown or refueling mode. These valves are put under administrative control per ANSI N271-1976. These valves will be verified to be closed in accordance with the frequency specified in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program by checking position indication in the control room.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-51 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Position 7 Containment purge and vent isolation valves must close on a high radiation signal.
| |
| A high radiation signal, separate from the containment isolation signal, will close the containment purge and vent isolation valves. See Subsection 6.2.4.2.4.
| |
| Area radiation detectors RE -AR011 and RE-AR012 are interlocked with containment purge isolation valves VQ001A and B, and VQ002A and B, and containment mini-purge isolation valves VQ003, VQ004A and B, and VQ005A, B, and C. Upon detection of high radiation levels, a containment ventilation isolation signal will be initiated and the above mentioned valves that are open will be closed. It should be noted that the containment ventilation isolation signal is separate from either the Phase A or Phase B containment isolation signal as shown in Table 6.2-58.
| |
| | |
| The normal containment purge valves are locked closed by the administrative procedure of interrupting power to the valve at the circuit breaker (i.e., the circuit breaker is racked out (open)) and tagging the breaker "out of service". Inadvertent operation of the purge valves requires violation of procedures prohibiting both the operation of tagged-out equipment and the containment purge system. Tagging out at the breaker is considered equivalent to a mechanical lock because in both instances positive action is used to prevent the valve from receiving power and an administrative procedure is required to return the breaker to service. At Braidwood, valves VQ001A/B and VQ002A/B have exterior mechanical stops mounted to the valve.
| |
| These valve stops are used as an additional method of locking the valves closed.
| |
| Valves VQ003, VQ004A/B, and VQ005A/B/C are equipped with an operator capable of closing the valves in 5 seconds for containment isolation (see Table 6.2-58). These 8-inch post-LOCA purge and miniflow purge valves meet the guidance of Branch Technical Position CSB 6-4.
| |
| 6.2.4.1.1 Criteria for Pipeline Design
| |
| | |
| The following criteria apply to piping for which containment isolation provision is required:
| |
| : a. The design pressure of all piping and connected equipment comprising the isolated boundary is greater than the design pressure of the containment.
| |
| : b. Lines which must remain in service subsequent to certain accidents, due to safety considerations, are redundant, and each line is provided with manually actuated containment isolation provisions.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-52 REVISION 14 - DECEMBER 2012 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.4.1.2 Criteria for Valving Design
| |
| | |
| The following criteria apply to containment isolation valving:
| |
| : a. A check valve inside the containment on incoming lines is considered to meet or exceed the criteria for a remote manual valve or an automatic valve.
| |
| : b. A locked closed valve is considered an automatic valve.
| |
| : c. Automatic trip valves are provided in those lines which must be isolated immediately following an accident, and each valve is provided with a manual switch for normal and test operations, with the position of each valve indicated in the control room.
| |
| : d. All lines on open systems for which isolation is required are provided with two barriers so that no single failure will prevent isolation (in lines where two automatic valves are provided, each valve operator is actuated by an independent signal, and each operator is also supplied from a separate emergency power supply).
| |
| : e. Air-operated isolation valves are designed to close on loss of electrical power or air supply to the valve operator.
| |
| : f. Remote manually operated valves are provided in those lines which penetrate the containment but which must remain in service subsequent to certain accidents due to safety considerations. The positions of these valves are indicated in the control room.
| |
| : g. Motor-operated valves are used where "as is" failure is required or where valve position must be changed following an accident.
| |
| : h. Check valves close by gravity or spring closure and open only when fluid pressure in the incoming line exceeds the pressure in the containment side.
| |
| : i. Isolation valves outside the containment are located as close to the containment wall as practical.
| |
| 6.2.4.1.3 Criteria and Definitions for Piping Systems
| |
| | |
| Piping systems are either open or closed depending on whether they communicate with their environment. Systems which penetrate the containment are designed to minimize the possibility of leaking radioactivity to the outside environment during
| |
| | |
| 6.2-53 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| normal and accident conditions. This is accomplished by the use of isolation valves.
| |
| 6.2.4.1.3.1 Closed Systems
| |
| | |
| Closed systems exist either inside or outside the containment.
| |
| If outside the containment, they do not communicate directly with the outside environment. A closed system outside the containment which penetrates the containment has an internal design temperature and pressure at least equal to the containment internal design temperature and pressure. This type of system can be isolated from the containment atmosphere and the reactor coolant pressure boundary. If inside the containment, a closed system does not connect directly with the containment atmosphere or with the reactor coolant pressure boundary. This type of system is isolable from the outside environment if it penetrates the containment and is connected to an open system outside the containment. These systems are designed to:
| |
| : a. withstand postulated missile impact;
| |
| : b. withstand accident temperature, pressure, and fluid velocity transients, and the resulting environment; and
| |
| : c. withstand external temperature and pressure at least equal to the containment design temperature and pressure.
| |
| 6.2.4.1.3.2 Open Systems
| |
| | |
| Open systems exist either inside or outside the containment.
| |
| If outside the containment, they communicate directly with the outside environment. Open systems outside the containment which penetrate the containment are isolable from the containment atmosphere and the reactor coolant pressure boundary. If inside the containment, they communicate directly with the containment atmosphere or the reactor coolant pressure boundary. Open systems inside the containment which penetrate the containment are isolable from the outside environment.
| |
| 6.2.4.1.3.3 Functional Types of Penetrating Piping Systems
| |
| | |
| Based on the definitions of open and closed systems, there are four basic functional types of penetrating piping system configurations, as follows:
| |
| : a. Type 1 - two closed systems, one inside the containment and one outside the containment.
| |
| : b. Type 2 - two open systems, one inside the containment and one outside the containment.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-54 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. Type 3 - a closed system inside the containment and an open system outside the containment.
| |
| : d. Type 4 - an open system inside the containment and a closed system outside the containment.
| |
| | |
| All penetration piping systems fall into one or more of these functional types.
| |
| 6.2.4.1.3.4 Isolation Valving
| |
| | |
| Based on the functional types of penetration piping systems of Subsection 6.2.4.1.3.3, the following valving schemes, as a minimum, are employed:
| |
| : a. System Type 1 - no isolation valves required.
| |
| : b. System Type 2 - an automatic valve inside the containment and an automatic valve outside the containment.
| |
| : c. System Type 3 - an automatic valve outside the containment or a normally closed valve under administrative control.
| |
| : d. System Type 4 - an automatic valve inside the containment.
| |
| 6.2.4.2 System Design
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2 -58 provides design information regarding the containment isolation provisions for fluid system lines and fluid instrument lines penetrating the containment. Column 19, labeled Isolation Signals, lists the plant protection signals which initiate closure of the automatic containment isolation valves. This issue is discussed in detail in the isolation logic section of Chapter 7.0. The extent to which containment isolation provisions of the fluid instrument lines meet the recommendations for containment penetrations for instrument lines is discussed in Chapter 7.0.
| |
| | |
| Byron Only Test, Vent, and Drain (TVD) valves are treated as a type of containment barrier distinct from the main in-line process containment isolation valves. Surveillance requirements encompasses more than just containment isolation valves but also other containment barriers, such as blind flanges. TVD valves on containment penetration piping segments are considered containment barriers and not containment isolation valves, and therefore are still subject to the 31 day Technical Specification position verification surveillance requirement.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-55 REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.4.2.1 Modes of Valve Actuation
| |
| | |
| Valve actuation modes are chosen with regard to how the process line connects to the reactor coolant pressure boundary or to the containment atmosphere. Lines which connect directly to either (considered open systems inside the containment) are provided with automatically actuated valves (air or electrical) for isolation. The positions of these valves are indicated in the main control room. The valves are provided with manual override protection in the case of operator malfunction.
| |
| | |
| The control switches associated with the remote-manual operation of the containment isolation valves for the steam generator blowdown lines in penetrations P-80, 81, 82, 83, 88, 89, 90 and 91 are on the main control panel located in the main control room. Open and closed position indicating lights are also on the panel.
| |
| Lines which do not communicate directly with the reactor coolant pressure boundary or the containment atmosphere (considered closed systems inside the containment) are provided with manual actuation provisions.
| |
| | |
| All normally closed manual valves in test, vent, drain, instrument, and similar types of branch lines which serve as containment isolation barriers are under administrative controls.
| |
| (Reference ANSI N271-1976, p. 2.). Test and vent connections are administratively controlled to ensure valve closure and cap reinstallation within the local leak rate test procedure, and with a checklist providing verification prior to unit restart into modes of operation when containment integrity is required.
| |
| The valves listed below are either manual or air -operated solenoid remote manual but closed during normal, shutdown, and postaccident conditions. These valves are closed and will be tagged closed under administrative controls.
| |
| Penetration Number Valve Number System
| |
| | |
| P-37 CV8346 RCS Fill Line P-57 FC009, FC010 Spent Fuel Pool Cleaning Line P-32 FC011, FC012 Spent Fuel Pool Cleaning Line P-50, 51 SI8890A,B Safety Injection Test Lines P-59 SI8881 Safety Injection Test Line P-73 SI8824 Safety Injection Test Line P-60 SI8823 Safety Injection Test Line P-66 SI8825 Safety Injection Test Line P-26 SI8843 Safety Injection Test Line
| |
| | |
| 6.2-56 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.4.2.2 Mechanical and Electrical Redundancy
| |
| | |
| Mechanical redundancy is provided in design to ensure that an active failure of a single valve does not prevent containment isolation. Electrical redundancy is provided in design to eliminate the dependence on a single power source to attain isolation actuation of automatic valves. Electrical cables on the separate electrical power trains for isolation valves are routed separately.
| |
| 6.2.4.2.3 Qualification of Closed Systems As Isolation Barriers
| |
| | |
| Closed systems are defined and discussed in Subsection 6.2.4.1.3.1. These systems provide an isolation barrier, since their material makeup (piping, valve bodies, and components) provides physical separation between the fluid contained and the reactor coolant pressure boundary, containment atmosphere, and the outside environment. Therefore, even though they present a path for fluid flow through the confines of the containment structure, they do not provide a path for fluid flow between the environment and the reactor coolant pressure boundary, or between the environment and the containment atmosphere. The design of piping for these systems is in accordance with Subsection 6.2.4.1.1.
| |
| 6.2.4.2.4 Qualification of Valves as Isolation Barriers Valves are considered isolation barriers if th ey are the first or second valves on the external side of pipelines which penetrate the containment structure. Also, for certain systems, the first or second valves on the internal side of pipelines which penetrate the containment structure are considered isolation barriers. These valves prevent fluid flow:
| |
| : a. within closed systems through the containment structure,
| |
| : b. between the reactor coolant pressure boundary and the outside environment, and
| |
| : c. between the containment atmosphere and the outside environment.
| |
| | |
| The design of these valves is in accordance with Subsection 6.2.4.1.2. These valves are listed in Table 6.2-58.
| |
| 6.2.4.2.5 Valve Closure Times Valves in systems not required for safe shutdown of the plant following an accident are provided with immediate closure.
| |
| Valves which must remain open during certain phases of shutdown remain open during those phases, but are provided with short closure times. Closure times vary with valve size and system function and are listed in Table 6.2-58. The containment miniflow purge
| |
| | |
| 6.2-57 REVISION 14 - DECEMBER 2012 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| lines, which present a direct path between the containment atmosphere and the environs, are provided with closure times of less than 5 seconds. This is in accordance with the guidelines given in Branch Technical Position CSB 6-4.
| |
| 6.2.4.2.6 Environmental Design
| |
| | |
| Procurement specifications for components comprising the isolation boundaries specify the applicable environmental requirements these components must meet to ensure that they are designed for the conditions (temperature, pressure, humidity and radiation) in which they will serve. The requirements are stated for both normal plant operating conditions and postulated accident conditions. Section 3.11 discusses this issue in greater detail.
| |
| 6.2.4.2.7 Isolation Valve Testing
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-28 depicts several common methods of containment isolation valve testing used to meet the Type C leakage testing requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J. Table 6.2-58 includes all the containment isolation valves tested in a like manner. The method of determining the rate of leakage may be either pressure decay using a known volume, or direct measurement by the use of a flowmeter on a makeup test system. Valves are normally tested in the proper direction; i.e., applying the gas pressure on the containment side of the valve seats. However, this method cannot always be employed because of design or operating considerations.
| |
| In those cases an equivalent and sometimes conservative method of reverse direction testing is necessary. Reference Subsection 6.2.6.3 for more information.
| |
| Piping penetrations which are exempt from Type C local leakage rate testing are identified in Table 6.2-58. The following letters and evaluations provide justification for exempting these penetrations:
| |
| : 1. {{letter dated|date=April 19, 1983|text=April 19, 1983 letter}} from F. G. Lentine to H. R. Denton
| |
| : 2. {{letter dated|date=July 7, 1983|text=July 7, 1983 letter}} from F. G. Lentine to H. R. Denton.
| |
| : 3. Engineering Evaluation EC 404972 (Byron) and EC 406445 (Braidwood) 6.2.4.2.8 Exceptions to General Design Criteria 55, 56, and 57 Requirements
| |
| | |
| Lines SI06AA and SI06AB, from penetration sleeves 92 and 93 respectively (Drawing M-61, Sheet 4), are not provided with isolation valving inside the containment as required by General Design Criteria (GDC) 56. Instead, a single valve outside containment, enclosed in a controlled leakage housing, is provided.
| |
| The controlled leakage housing is provided with a level switch that alarms in the main control room. The RHR system is a closed system outside containment; therefore, any through-valve leakage would be returned to the containment.
| |
| Lines RH01BA and RH01BB from penetrations 68 and 75 respectively (Drawing M-62) are not provided with isolation valving
| |
| | |
| 6.2-58 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| outside the containment as required by GDC 55. No safety implications are involved because these lines tie directly into the branch lines referred to in the preceding paragraph. Figure 6.2-29, Configuration 9, shows the valving scheme used.
| |
| 6.2.4.3 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-29 shows the sixteen different valving configurations used for containment penetration isolation. Each process line penetrating flow path can be shown schematically by one or by a combination of one or more of these configurations.
| |
| Figure 6.2 -29, Configurations 1 through 7 and configurations 1A and 2A, provide isolation valving for open systems within the containment and satisfy the requirements of GDC 55 and GDC 56.
| |
| By design, these schemes remain effective in providing containment isolation in the event of a single postulated pipe break or a single postulated valve failure. Between the environs and both the reactor coolant pressure boundary and the containment atmosphere there is a minimum of either two pipe boundaries, two valve boundaries, or a combination of a pipe boundary and a valve boundary.
| |
| | |
| Configurations 1A and 2A are designed to provide thermal overpressure protection for isolated penetration piping due to containment ambient temperature rise under a LOCA or MSLB condition as described in NRC GL 96-06. For the following penetrations, thermal overpressurization is mitigated by procedural controls to either drain lines or assure that isolation valves have been left open as described in References 9 and 10:
| |
| : a. PC-30: Containment Demineralized Water Supply At Byron Station, the demineralized water system containment penetration is drained after each refueling outage. At Braidwood Station, valve 1(2)WM192A is left open during normal operation. This valve is located inside containment and provides a path from the demineralized water system, which is isolated to the containment during normal operation, to the containment atmosphere. This configuration allows pressure relief through the containment isolation check valve, 1(2)WM191, into containment and still maintains the check valves containment isolation function.
| |
| : b. PC-32 and PC-57: Fuel Pool Cooling Return to/from Refueling Cavity These penetrations are drained after refueling activities are completed and the reactor cavity is drained, prior to returning the plant to power operations.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-59 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-29, Configurations 10 through 14, provide isolation valving for closed systems within the containment and satisfy the requirements of GDC 57. By design, the schemes remain effective in providing containment isolation in the event of a single postulated failure, either valve or pipeline. There are two boundaries, one valve and the closed system piping, between the environs and both the reactor coolant pressure boundary and the containment atmosphere.
| |
| Figure 6.2 -29, Configuration 9, provides isolation valving in the residual heat removal recirculation lines. This is a closed system outside the containment which returns to the containment.
| |
| The double valve provision prevents single valve failure from compromising containment isolation integrity. The valve and closed system pipeline arrangement prevents a single pipeline failure from compromising containment isolation integrity.
| |
| Figure 6.2 -30 shows the instrument line penetrations. These lines are closed systems both inside and outside the containment.
| |
| A single line break will not provide a path between the environs and either the reactor coolant pressure boundary or the containment atmosphere. Also refer to Subsection 7.1.2.5.
| |
| | |
| Instrument penetrations (I-1, I-2, I-3, I-4, I-5, and P-19) and the lines inside and outside containment meet the requirements of closed systems as per the standard review plan.
| |
| | |
| The leak testing test connection penetration (P-4) and the spare penetrations listed in Table 3.8-1 are closed with welded
| |
| | |
| 6.2-59a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| cover plates, except three spare penetrations as discussed below.
| |
| The design criteria for these cover plates are equivalent to the containment liner.
| |
| | |
| Drawing M-197-2 contains the design information for PC-4. This penetration will be used for the integrated leak rate test. The penetration is sealed off between the pipe and sleeve with a steel plate welded to both members. There is a blind flange outside containment which will seal the pipe when it is not being used for leak rate testing. Drawing M-105-3 shows the piping arrangement (PC-4 is the same as P-4).
| |
| | |
| The spare penetrations P-63, P-64, and P-74 have been modified such that a removable blind flange outside the containment serves as the containment boundary. Drawing M-197-3 contains the design information for 1PC-63, 1PC-64, and 1PC-74 in Unit 1; Drawings M-197-7 at Byron and M-197-9 at Braidwood provide the design information for 2PC-63, 2PC-64, and 2PC-74 in Unit 2. These spares are used during outages for temporary cables and hoses.
| |
| (PC-63 designates 1PC-63 or 2PC-63; PC-64 designates 1PC-64 or 2PC-64 and PC-74 designates 1PC-74 or 2PC-74.)
| |
| For Unit 1, penetrations P-99, P-100, P-101, and P-102 have a closed spectacle flange outside of containment to serve as the containment boundary.
| |
| 6.2.4.4 Tests and Inspections
| |
| | |
| Preoperational testing was performed to comply with the intent of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J. Penetrations valved with configurations as shown in Figure 6.2-29 have isolation valves tested for leaktight integrity prior to initial plant startup. Valving arrangements not in accordance with the configurations of Figure 6.2-29 were leaktight integrity tested in conjunction with the containment structure prior to plant startup. Inservice valve leaktight integrity testing will be done in the same manner as the preoperational testing described above. The frequency of tests will be in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, Option B as modified by approved exceptions in Technical Specification 5.5.16. Further discussion of tests and inspections can be found in Section 4.6 and Subsection 6.2.6.
| |
| 6.2.5 Combustible Gas Control in Containment Following a design -basis accident, hydrogen gas may be generated inside the containment by reactions such as Zirconium metal with water, corrosion of materials of construction, and radiolysis of aqueous solution in the core and sump. Studies performed by the Commission in support of the revision to 10 CFR 50.44 that eliminated the design-basis loss-of-coolant accident hydrogen release determined that hydrogen release during design basis accidents is not risk significant because it would not lead to early containment failure. Furthermore, the studies concluded that combustible gas generated from severe accidents was not risk significant for large, dry containments, such as the Byron and Braidwood containments, because of the large volumes, high
| |
| | |
| 6.2-60 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| failure pressures, and likelihood of random ignition to help prevent build-up of detonable hydrogen concentrations. The containment atmosphere mixing function of the combustible gas control system required by 10 CFR 50.44 prevents local accumulation of combustible or detonable gases that could threaten containment integrity or equipment operating in a local compartment.
| |
| Technical Specification Amendment Nos. 143 and 137 for Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, respectively, approved the removal of the hydrogen recombiners and the containment hydrogen monitors from the Technical Specifications. However, the following commitment was made in support of these license amendments.
| |
| | |
| Byron and Braidwood will maintain the capability of monitoring containment hydrogen for beyond design basis accidents.
| |
| The Technical Specification Amendments are based on a revision to 10 CFR 50.44, Combustible gas control for nuclear power reactors, which eliminated the design basis LOCA hydrogen release since it was determined not to be risk significant; eliminated the requirements for hydrogen control systems to mitigate such releases; maintained the requirements for mixing the post accident containment atmosphere; and maintained the requirements for monitoring of containment atmosphere hydrogen concentration for diagnosing beyond design basis accidents.
| |
| Based on the 10 CFR 50.44 rule change, the containment atmosphere mixing and hydrogen monitoring functions are still required.
| |
| However, the hydrogen control systems (i.e., hydrogen recombiners and backup hydrogen vent and purge systems) are no longer required for the Byron and Braidwood combustible gas control systems.
| |
| The containment atmosphere mixing function of the combustible gas control system required by 10 CFR 50.44 prevents local accumulation of combustible or detonable gases that could threaten containment integrity or equipment operating in a local compartment. Therefore, for large, dry PWR containments the 10 CFR 50.44 rule change eliminated the design bases loss-of-coolant accident hydrogen release and the need to calculate the design bases post accident containment hydrogen concentrations.
| |
| Consequently, Regulatory Guide 1.7, Control of Combustible Gas in Containment Following a Loss-of-Coolant Accident, Revision 2 is no longer applicable to Byron and Braidwood Stations. This Regulatory Guide provided a very conservative methodology to calculate the design basis loss-of-coolant accident hydrogen generation. This methodology assumed that during a design basis loss-of-coolant accident, the amount of hydrogen released due to the zirconium water reaction would be five times the maximum amount calculated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.46, Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for light-water nuclear power reactors.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-60a REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The adequacy of the performance of the containment atmosphere mixing function of the combustible gas control system was previously evaluated. The containment atmosphere mixing function as supported by Technical Specification 3.6.6 Containment Spray and Cooling Systems satisfies the combustible gas control requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix A General Design Criterion 41, Containment Atmosphere Cleanup. The Containment Spray and Containment Cooling System (i.e., reactor containment fan coolers) provide the combustible gas control function via mixing the containment atmosphere during post loss-of-coolant accident conditions.
| |
| 10 CFR 50.44 also requires that equipment be provided for monitoring hydrogen in containment. Equipment for monitoring hydrogen must be functional, reliable, and capable of continuously measuring the concentration of hydrogen atmosphere following a significant beyond design basis accident for accident management, including emergency planning. Based on the revision to 10 CFR 50.44 that eliminated the design basis loss-of-coolant accident hydrogen release, the hydrogen monitors are no longer required to support mitigation of design basis accidents.
| |
| Consequently, the hydrogen monitors no longer meet the definition of Regulatory Guide 1.97, Instrumentation for Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants to Assess Plant and Environs Conditions During and Following an Accident, Category 1 instruments.
| |
| Category 1 instruments are defined as applying to instrumentation designed for monitoring key variables that most directly indicate the accomplishment of a safety function for design basis accident events. Based on the revision to 10 CFR 50.44, the hydrogen monitors have been reclassified as Regulatory Guide 1.97, Category 3 instruments. Category 3 is the least stringent in that it provides for high quality commercial grade equipment that requires only offsite power. Category 3 instruments do not require seismic qualification or redundancy. The design of the hydrogen monitoring instrumentation was based on the original Regulatory Guide 1.97 Category 1 classification that exceeds the design requirements for Regulatory Guide 1.97 Category 3 instrumentation. Therefore, no changes are required for the existing instrumentation as a result of the change in Regulatory Guide 1.97 classification.
| |
| This subsection describes the various subsystems of the combustible gas control system. As discussed above, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.44 the containment atmosphere mixing and containment hydrogen monitoring functions are required.
| |
| However, the hydrogen control systems (i.e., hydrogen recombiners and backup hydrogen vent and purge systems) are no longer required for the Byron and Braidwood combustible gas control systems.
| |
| 6.2.5.1 Design Bases As described in subsection 6.2.5, the hydrogen recombiners and backup hydrogen vent and purge systems are no longer required for the Byron and Braidwood combustible gas control systems. Although not required, these systems remain in place (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood).
| |
| | |
| 6.2-60b REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The following design bases were used for the combustible gas control system design:
| |
| : a. DELETED
| |
| : b. The capability to uniformly mix the containment atmosphere and prevent high concentrations of combustible gases from forming locally was considered in the system design. The natural convection processes, the mixing of containment atmosphere by containment spray system, and the
| |
| | |
| 6.2-60c REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| operation of the containment fan coolers assure adequate mixing.
| |
| : c. The capability to monitor combustible gas concentrations within the containment has been provided. Two systems for monitoring hydrogen concentration in the containment atmosphere are available. One is a qualified system capable of measuring the hydrogen concentrations up to 30%.
| |
| The second system is a nonqualified system which is part of the hydrogen recombiners and is capable of measuring hydrogen concentrations up to 5%. This second nonqualified hydrogen monitoring system is not required.
| |
| : d. Two hydrogen recombiners, described in subsection 6.2.5.2.1, are available at Byron Station (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood). Cross connection piping and redundant flow paths are furnished such that either recombiner is available for either nuclear unit. Failure of any one component will not disable the redundant recombiner system. As noted above, based on a revision to 10 CFR 50.44 which eliminated the design basis LOCA hydrogen release since it was determined not to be risk significant, the hydrogen recombiners are no longer required.
| |
| However, the hydrogen recombiners remain in place at this time.
| |
| : e. The location of the thermal recombiner (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood) in the auxiliary building renders it safe from any postulated dynamic effects within the containment.
| |
| : f. The combustible gas control system is designed to operate in the postaccident auxiliary building environment. Components which contact the containment atmosphere are designed to operate any time after 3 hours after a postulated LOCA.
| |
| : g. The combustible gas control system recombiner (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood) and post-LOCA purge system are located in an accessible part of the auxiliary building. These systems can be inspected or tested during normal plant operation or during shutdown conditions.
| |
| : h. During operation of the recombiners (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood), high radiation levels near the recombiners are possible.
| |
| The only local operation required is at the local control panel which is a low radiation area. Access to the recombiner itself is not required during operation.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-61 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : i. Capability is provided to purge the containment as a backup means for combustible gas control. As indicated in Branch Technical Position CSB 6-2, the purge system is not redundant, nor is it designated as Safety Category I. Each unit of both stations has a separate post-LOCA hydrogen purge system.
| |
| As noted above, based on a revision to 10 CFR 50.44 which eliminated the design basis LOCA hydrogen release since it was determined not to be risk significant, the backup hydrogen vent and purge systems are no longer required. However, the backup hydrogen vent and purge systems remain in place.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-61a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.5.2 System Design
| |
| | |
| The combustible gas control system consists of three subsystems: A hydrogen monitoring system; a mixing system; and a post-LOCA purge system. The design features of these three systems are described in the following subsections.
| |
| The combustible gas control system defined by the requirements of 10 CFR 50.44 consists of a hydrogen monitoring system and a mixing system. Based on a revision to 10 CFR 50.44 which eliminated the design basis LOCA hydrogen release, the hydrogen recombiners and backup hydrogen vent and purge systems are no longer required.
| |
| However, the hydrogen recombiners and backup hydrogen vent and purge systems remain in place.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-62 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.5.2 System Design
| |
| | |
| The combustible gas control system consists of four subsystems: A hydrogen recombiner; a hydrogen monitoring system; a mixing system; and a post-LOCA purge system. The design features of these four systems are described in the following subsections.
| |
| The combustible gas control system defined by the requirements of 10 CFR 50.44 consists of a hydrogen monitoring system and a mixing system. Based on a revision to 10 CFR 50.44 which eliminated the design basis LOCA hydrogen release, the hydrogen recombiners and backup hydrogen vent and purge systems are no longer required.
| |
| However, the hydrogen recombiners and backup hydrogen vent and purge systems remain in place.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.1 Hydrogen Recombiner System Design
| |
| | |
| The hydrogen recombiners at the Byron/Braidwood Stations can be used to help remove the hydrogen and oxygen gases that accumulate in the containment atmosphere following a loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| The recombiner system parameters are listed in Tabl e 6.2-59.
| |
| The inlet line pipe routes the process gas from the containment, through the enclosed blower, and to the gas heater pipe which spirals around the reaction chamber. The gases are heated as they flow through the gas heater pipe, receiving its heat by radiation from electric heater elements. As the temperature of the process gas rises, the exothermic recombination of the oxygen and hydrogen gases occurs, first in the heater pipe, then within the reaction chamber.
| |
| The recombined gases flow from the reaction chamber, through the gas cooler pipe and back to the containment.
| |
| | |
| The recombiner system is designed to process a minimum of 70 scfm of gas containing up to 5% hydrogen, with the balance consisting of unlimited amount of oxygen, nitrogen, or water vapor. Therefore, the system will recombine at least 3.50 scfm of hydrogen. The process is accomplished by increasing the temperature of the gas to the point where the hydrogen-oxygen reaction, 2H2 + O2 2H2O, will occur spontaneously to form water vapor, using the exothermic property of the reaction to assure that it goes to completion.
| |
| | |
| After a LOCA, the recombiner could be started shortly after the containment temperature is reduced to below 225F. All piping and wiring required for recombiner operation is permanently installed. To start the recombiner, the appropriate isolation valves are opened and the recombiner start switch is actuated.
| |
| | |
| The gas temperature is raised by the heaters until the hydrogenoxygen reaction starts. As the gas temperature in the reaction chamber approaches the preset point of 1,325F, the gas heater automatically reduces its power demand to maintain that preset temperature. For example, for a 4% hydrogen in air mixture and a preset reaction chamber gas temperature of 1,325F, the heater outlet gas temperature will reduce to approximately 800F once the reaction has begun, with the remainder of the required heat of reaction being input by the exothermic reaction itself. As the percentage of hydrogen in the air mixture is reduced, the total amount of heat given off by the
| |
| | |
| 6.2-62a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| recombination reaction in the chamber reduces. The heater outlet gas temperature will rise to maintain a constant reaction chamber gas temperature of 1,325F.
| |
| | |
| The system will operate satisfactorily with an above normal inlet process gas flow and over 5% hydrogen. The demonstration test system reported in AI-72-61, Zion Station FSAR, Appendix 6B, Amendment 25, January 1973, which has a lower flow capacity than the Byron and Braidwood systems, has operated well with all temperatures below 1,400F and with 75 scfm of air containing 5.5% hydrogen. It also has operated well with liquid water injected into the inlet at a flow rate of >20 weight percent of the total flow. These demonstration tests have shown that the system will operate over a wide range of conditions and that the hydrogen concentration in effluent will be <0.1% over the entire range. Test results for the hydrogen recombiner are proprietary to the vendor. However, the Byron/Braidwood recombiner proposal referenced performance test results in Atomics International Report AI-75-2, "Thermal Hydrogen Recombiner Systems for Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 2, 1975. Atomics International Report AI-72-61, "Thermal Recombiner Demonstration Test," is also applicable to the Byron/Braidwood recombiners.
| |
| | |
| A single blower creates the pressure differential necessary to cause the gas flow from the containment to the recombiner system and back to the containment.
| |
| | |
| The recombination efficiency is essentially 100%. The concentration of the minimum constituent gas in the effluent is less than can be measured with equipment which has a sensitivity of 0.01% (ratio of hydrogen concentration in effluent to that in influent after steady state).
| |
| The pressure boundary and component supports of the hydrogen recombiners were constructed in accordance with the ASME Section III Class 2 requirements. The 1977 Editions plus Addenda through the Summer of 1977 are incorporated in the design.
| |
| | |
| All electrical components are Class 1E except for the hydrogen analyzer cell which is not Class 1E and the space heaters, which are non-safety-related.
| |
| | |
| The station recombiners are powered from electrical divisions Ell and E12. Redundant inlet and outlet lines are provided from each recombiner to each containment. In the event of a LOCA in either unit and a failure of a valve, or electrical division, a redundant recombiner will be available.
| |
| | |
| The hydrogen recombiner containment isolation system has inboard and outboard isolation valves close to the containment on each of the four supply and return lines for each unit.
| |
| These valves have position indication in the control room and can be operated from the control room. The outboard and inboard valve on each line is powered from the same Class 1E bus. The recombiner suction and exhaust valves do not receive
| |
| | |
| 6.2-63 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| containment isolation signals because isolation requirements are satisfied by the valves mentioned above. All valves associated with hydrogen recombiner containment isolation are normally closed.
| |
| The cooling air supply and exhaust points are local and this added heat load has been included in the auxiliary building HVAC system design basis. The hydrogen recombiners are located in the general area at elevation 401 feet 0 inches of the auxiliary building, which is ventilated by auxiliary building
| |
| | |
| 6.2-63a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| HVAC system. The cooling fan which is an integral part of the recombiners, draws relatively cool air inside the room and exhausts the air into the general area. The auxiliary building HVAC system is safety-related and is adequate to dissipate the additional heat load from the hydrogen recombiners. Cooling air inlet and outlet structures are protected against tornados, floods, missiles, etc.
| |
| | |
| Since the hydrogen recombiner package and the separate control panel are located in the auxiliary building, adequate design provisions exist for the periodic inspection and operability testing of the system and system components. An L-shaped radiation shield is included to allow personnel to approach the recombiner and avoid unnecessary radiation exposure. This shield wall is discussed in Subsection 12.3.1.
| |
| | |
| As described earlier, the recombiner system is actuated manually from the remote control panel by energizing the interlock or prestart switches after opening the valves which isolate the recombiner system from the containment. After all interlocks are satisfied, the manual actuation of start switches would energize the blower and heater. After this, the system comes up to temperature and operates automatically.
| |
| | |
| The hydrogen recombiner system is a Quality Group B system designed in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section III, Subsection NC, Class 2 Components, and in conformance to the codes and standards listed in Table 6.2-60.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.1.1 Recombiner Package Component Description 6.2.5.2.1.1.1 Blower Assembly
| |
| | |
| The gases and vapors are circulated by a blower mounted in a pressure vessel designed and fabricated in accordance with ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Class 2 Requirements. All structural mounting and electrical and gas attachments are made to a blind flange which forms a part of the pressure vessel. Removing the flange bolts frees the remaining parts of the pressure vessel to be removed for inspection and maintenance of the blower and motor.
| |
| | |
| Motive power is provided by a 7.5-hp, totally enclosed, fan cooled (TEFC), Class H insulated, 230F ambient rated motor.
| |
| The motor will contain space heaters to keep it warm and dry.
| |
| The blower impeller is mounted directly on the motor shaft.
| |
| This minimum part system is expected to demonstrate very high reliability.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.1.1.2 Gas Heater The gas being heated is contained in coiled, 2 -inch, Type 304 austenitic stainless steel pipe. The array of radiant heaters are individually positioned, 2 inches or more away from the
| |
| | |
| 6.2-64 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| pipes and the insulation. The heaters are not muffled but are free to radiate in all directions, either directly to the pipes or to the insulation with subsequent reradiation to the pipes.
| |
| The spacing of the heaters away from the process gas piping eliminates the danger of an arc damaging the pipe containing the process gas. The heaters are removable for replacement from the cold upper end without disturbing the gas piping.
| |
| | |
| This design approach has been used effectively in a number of air and sodium heating systems designed to both Section VIII and Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
| |
| The system is readily coded, since no thin-wall tubular heater sheaths form a part of the containment boundary. The design is particularly attractive for heating reactive gases, since velocities and residence times are well controlled, with no stagnant or recirculating pockets in which the gases are delayed long enough to react. Furthermore, if, during an instability, a reaction does occur in the heater pipe, the pipe simply heats up and radiates heat during the transient to adjacent pipes and heaters. Sheathed heaters exposed directly to reactive gases have no way to dump heat, and "hot-spot" filament burnouts commonly occur in that type of design.
| |
| | |
| The heater section has 15 heater elements, each with a rating of 3.2 kW. The voltage across each element is 277 volts (480 volts connected in a "Y" arrangement), with maximum sheath temperatures of 1,600F and heat flux of 20 W/in2 . Under this derated condition (from 45 W/in2), very long heater life is predicted.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.1.1.3 Reaction Chamber A uniquely constructed reaction chamber is located downstream from the heater. All materials used in its construction are Type 304 austenitic stainless steel. The gas is delivered through the heater pipe to the reaction chamber. The flow field in the reaction zone is highly turbulent, with sufficient mixing of the inlet gas with the reacting gas to bring the inlet gas temperatures rapidly to a level where virtually complete recombination occurs. The geometric configuration and volume of the reaction chamber are ample to provide gas transport times which assure that, at the process temperatures, the specified hydrogen-oxygen gas will react to virtually 100%
| |
| completion. The reacted gas steam exits through a 2-inch pipe to the gas cooler.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.1.1.4 Gas Cooler
| |
| | |
| The gas cooler is coiled 2 -inch austenitic stainless steel pipe which ducts the reacted gas from the reaction chamber to the return outlet. A centrifugal fan forces ~ 3,000 cfm of air past the coil, cooling the process gas to 150F. The heat exchange rate at design conditions is 100,000 Btu/hr.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-65 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.5.2.1.2 Electrical
| |
| | |
| All wiring and terminal blocks for the heaters, blower and fan motors, and thermocouples will be protected in steel enclosures or conduits. Thermocouples are redundant at critical control points of temperature measurement and are routed separately from power wiring.
| |
| All electrical components in the system meet the requirements of ANSI Cl for NEMA 12 service.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.1.3 Flowmeter
| |
| | |
| A venturi-type flowmeter is located at a flanged joint in the piping. Connections are made to a differential-pressure cell through Type 304 stainless steel tubes. An electric signal is transmitted to a flow indicator located in the control package.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.1.4 Alarms and Indications
| |
| | |
| Local alarms for the hydrogen recombiner and the hydrogen analyzer are provided on the hydrogen recombiner control console annunciator. The points annunciated are as follows:
| |
| : a. return gas temperature high,
| |
| : b. reaction chamber wall temperature high,
| |
| : c. reaction chamber gas temperature low,
| |
| : d. blower off,
| |
| : e. blower temperature high,
| |
| : f. blower discharge flow low,
| |
| : g. heat exchanger off,
| |
| : h. heater outlet wall temperature high, and
| |
| : i. circuit breaker tripped.
| |
| | |
| A common hydrogen recombiner/hydrogen analyzer trouble alarm is located in the main control which also sounds for any of the above conditions.
| |
| Indications for the following hydrogen recombiner and hydrogen analyzer variables are provided locally:
| |
| : a. heater gas temperature,
| |
| : b. reaction chamber gas temperature, c . gas return temperature,
| |
| | |
| 6.2-66 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.5.2.2 Hydrogen Monitoring System Design
| |
| | |
| A hydrogen analyzer is furnished with the hydrogen recombiner to sample either the blower outlet or the recombiner outlet.
| |
| Three sources of calibration gas are provided:
| |
| : a. 4% H in nitrogen, 2
| |
| : b. 0.5% H in nitrogen, and 2
| |
| : c. nitrogen zero gas.
| |
| | |
| A local, manual five-position selector switch energizes solenoids to admit any one of the calibrating gases or sample streams to the analyzer.
| |
| Local indication of H concentration, a local H 2 2 concentration - high alarm light, and a local sample pressure-low alarm light are provided.
| |
| The environmental conditions for the containment atmosphere are listed in Table 3.11-2. Temperatures are given for the containment building for normal, abnormal, and accident conditions. For the accident conditions the temperatures in all areas of the containment are listed as the same. The sample conditions for the Delphi hydrogen monitor are from above saturation temperature to 300F. The maximum sample temperature is the temperature used in the manufacturer's 100-day LOCA test.
| |
| | |
| A containment hydrogen monitoring system, independent of the hydrogen recombiners is also provided. A detailed description of this system is included in Item E.30 of Appendix E.
| |
| | |
| The requirements of NUREG-0737 Item II.F.1 Attachment 6, "Containment Hydrogen Monitor," have been satisfied as described below:
| |
| : a. The monitors are maintained in the standby mode and manually actuated from the main control room when required to operate.
| |
| : b. The monitors have a split range of 0-10% and 0-30%
| |
| hydrogen concentration by volume (dry analysis) over the pressure range from -5 psig to 50 psig.
| |
| : c. The hydrogen monitors are qualified to IEEE 323-1974.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-67 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| : d. inlet gas temperature, and
| |
| : e. H2 concentration (0-5%).
| |
| 6.2.5.2.2 Hydrogen Monitoring System Design
| |
| | |
| A hydrogen analyzer is furnished with the hydrogen recombiner to sample either the blower outlet or the recombiner outlet.
| |
| Three sources of calibration gas are provided:
| |
| : a. 4% H in nitrogen, 2
| |
| : b. 0.5% H2 in nitrogen, and
| |
| : c. nitrogen zero gas.
| |
| | |
| A local, manual five-position selector switch energizes solenoids to admit any one of the calibrating gases or sample streams to the analyzer.
| |
| | |
| Local indication of H2 concentration, a local H2 concentration - high alarm light, and a local sample pressure-low alarm light are provided.
| |
| | |
| The environmental conditions for the containment atmosphere are listed in Table 3.11-2. Temperatures are given for the containment building for normal, abnormal, and accident conditions. For the accident conditions the temperatures in all areas of the containment are listed as the same. The sample conditions for the Delphi hydrogen monitor are from above saturation temperature to 300F. The maximum sample temperature is the temperature used in the manufacturer's 100-day LOCA test.
| |
| A containment hydrogen monitoring system, independent of the hydrogen recombiners is also provided. A detailed description of this system is included in Item E.30 of Appendix E.
| |
| The requirements of NUREG -0737 Item II.F.1 Attachment 6, "Containment Hydrogen Monitor," have been satisfied as described below:
| |
| : a. The monitors are maintained in the standby mode and manually actuated from the main control room when required to operate.
| |
| : b. The monitors have a split range of 0-10% and 0-30%
| |
| hydrogen concentration by volume (dry analysis) over the pressure range from -5 psig to 50 psig.
| |
| : c. The hydrogen monitors are qualified to IEEE 323-1974.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-67a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : d. Indication of hydrogen concentration is available in the main control room when the monitors are operating.
| |
| : e. The hydrogen monitors are located in the auxiliary building elevation 401 feet. Samples are piped from containment penetrations to the monitors. The accuracy of the monitors is +/-2.5% of full scale (dry basis).
| |
| | |
| Operation of the hydrogen monitors is independent of the hydrogen recombiner (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood) and its associated hydrogen analyzer since both systems use separate piping and containment penetrations and are not dependent upon the other to operate in any way. The hydrogen monitoring system consists of two independent, physically separated and redundant subsystems. Separate piping penetrations of the containment are utilized by each train of this system.
| |
| Each train's hydrogen monitor discharge containment isolation valve (PS230A/B) and one of two series inlet containment isolation valves (PS228A/229B) are powered from separate 1E sources. The second inlet containment isolation valve (PS228B/229A) is powered from the alternate power train.
| |
| Isolation valves PS228B and PS229A are designed to fail open on loss of power. Thus, failure of one of the 1E electric power sources will disable only one train of the hydrogen monitoring system.
| |
| The hydrogen monitoring system was originally design ed to meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.97, Instrumentation for Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants to Assess Plant and Environs Conditions During and Following an Accident, Category 1 instruments. Regulatory Guide 1.97 Category 1 is intended for key variables that most directly indicate the accomplishment of a safety function for design basis accident events and provides for full qualification, redundancy, and continuous real-time display and requires onsite (standby) power. Based on a revision to 10 CFR 50.44 that eliminated the design basis LOCA hydrogen release, the hydrogen monitors have been reclassified as Regulatory Guide 1.97 Category 3 instruments. The design of the hydrogen monitoring instrumentation was based on the original Regulatory Guide 1.97 Category 1 classification that exceeds the design requirements for Regulatory Guide 1.97 Category 3 instrumentation. Therefore, no changes are required for the existing instrumentation as a result of the change in Regulatory Guide 1.97 classification.
| |
| | |
| The portions of the hydrogen monitoring piping system which form the containment atmosphere isolation barrier are designated Seismic Category I, Quality Group B. The remainder of the system outside the containment is Seismic Category I, Quality Group B up to the hydrogen monitoring instrumentation. Piping internal to the instrumentation is classified as ANSI B31.1. The piping from the containment to the first isolation valve is designed to the requirements of SRP 3.6.2.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-68 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| A sample of the containment atmosphere is taken at or near one of the containment penetrations and another approximately 180 degrees away on the other side of the containment (approximately 135 degrees away for Byron Unit 2 only). The samples taken are representative of the containment atmosphere due to the mixing system effects.
| |
| | |
| The mechanical piping penetrations used for the hydrogen monitoring system at Byron and Braidwood are as follows:
| |
| Penetrations Byron Braidwood
| |
| | |
| 1PC-12, 2PC-12 Train A discg. spare 1PC-31, 2PC-31 Train B discg. spare 1PC-36. 2PC-36 Train B suction Train B suction/discg.
| |
| 1PC-45, 2PC-45 Train A suction Train A suction/discg.
| |
| Additional information concerning the mechanical penetrations's elevations and azimuths are listed in Table 3.8-1.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.3 Containment Atmosphere Mixing System Design
| |
| | |
| The mixing subsystem satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR 50.44.
| |
| The function of the mixing subsystem is to prevent local accumulation of combustible or detonable gases that could threaten containment integrity or equipment operating in a local compartment. The mixing is achieved by natural convection processes, reactor containment fan cooler operation, and the containment spray system.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-68a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Natural convection occurs as a result of the temperature difference between the bulk gas space in the vessel and the containment wall. The natural convection action is enhanced by the momentum of steam emitted from the point of the break.
| |
| The operation of the containment spray system following the accident will result in the creation of an extremely turbulent atmosphere within the containment, as demonstrated in the Zion Station full-flow containment spray system test. The containment spray system is discussed in Subsection 6.5.2.
| |
| | |
| Mixing of the containment atmosphere to assure that there will be no "pocketing" of large hydrogen concentrations will be accomplished by the reactor containment fan coolers (RCFC), an engineered safety feature described in Subsection 6.2.2.
| |
| | |
| The operation of the recombiner system (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood) is not dependent on the operation of any engineered safety features other than the reactor containment fan coolers. Four coolers (two required for both normal and postaccident conditions) each supplying 94,000 cfm (normal operation) or 59,000 cfm (postaccident operation) are provided for each containment. The RCFC fans discharge this air through concrete ducts to the lower elevation.
| |
| 6.2.5.2.4 Post-LOCA Purge System Design
| |
| | |
| The post-LOCA purge system is described in Subsection 9.4.9.3.
| |
| The schematic diagram of the system is shown in Drawings M-105 and M-106. Equipment parameters are given in Table 6.2-61.
| |
| 6.2.5.3 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| As discussed in section 6.2.5, the combustible gas control system as defined by the requirements of 10 CFR 50.44 consists of a hydrogen monitoring system and a mixing system. Based on the revision to 10 CFR 50.44 which eliminated the design basis LOCA hydrogen release, the hydrogen recombiners and backup hydrogen vent and purge systems are no longer required. Studies performed by the Commission in support of the 10 CFR 50.44 rule change, determined that hydrogen release during design basis accidents is not risk significant and would not lead to early containment failure. The mixing function prevents local accumulation of combustible or detonable gases that could threaten containment integrity or equipment operating in a local compartment. The studies performed by the Commission demonstrate that containment atmosphere mixing function satisfies the 10 CFR 50 Appendix A Criteria 41 requirement to control the concentration of hydrogen in the containment atmosphere following postulated accidents as required to assure that containment integrity is maintained. The hydrogen monitoring system is required to diagnose beyond design basis accidents.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-69 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-70 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-71 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-72 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-72a REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-73 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-74 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.5.4 Testing and Inspection
| |
| | |
| The hydrogen recombiners (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood) have been shop tested to assure proper operation of the heaters, fans, and other components. Because their operation relies on a simple and well-proven principle, testing with hydrogen has not been done. The (hydrogen recombiners) for Byron/Braidwood do not have or require a leakage limit. The recombiners have undergone pneumatic testing at other stations and have exhibited virtually no leakage. Since the recombiners are protected from overpressurization during an accident by the various containment protection and reactor protection systems,
| |
| | |
| 6.2-74a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| no additional protection is deemed necessary. Prior to shipment, the units for Byron/Braidwood were pneumatically tested.
| |
| | |
| Each active component of the combustible gas control system is testable during normal reactor power operation.
| |
| The hydrogen recombiner system (Byron only) and the containment purge system are tested periodically to assure that they will operate correctly. Preoperational tests of the combustible gas control system are conducted during the final stages of plant construction prior to initial startup.
| |
| 6.2.5.5 Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| | |
| A description of the controls provided for the post-LOCA purge system is given in Subsection 9.4.9.3.
| |
| A panel containing all operating controls for each of two redundant hydrogen recombiners will be located outside of the containment. The controls include adequate automatic controls and alarms to allow the unattended operation of the recombiners.
| |
| These controls include an automatic temperature controller for the regulation of the air temperature in the recombiner chamber and interlocks for the recombiner fans which cut off power to the thermal element in the event that power to the fans is interrupted (Hydrogen Recombiners have been abandoned at Braidwood).
| |
| | |
| All controls for the hydrogen recombiners are classified as Safety Category I.
| |
| 6.2.5.6 Materials
| |
| | |
| The material for the high-temperature recombiner components is Type 304 austenitic stainless steel meeting the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code requirements for Section III, Class 2 components. This material provides the requisite structural integrity and corrosion resistance for the service environment and operating conditions.
| |
| The skid and heater enclosure structure are made of ASTM A -36 structural steel. The external surfaces are painted with a rust-inhibiting primer paint. Heat from the "trickle heater" will keep the internal surfaces dry, thereby inhibiting corrosion.
| |
| 6.2. 6 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| The proposed containment leakage testing program is summarized below. The program complies with the requirements of the General Design Criteria and Appendix J of 10 CFR 50. The tests described in the following subsections are for preoperational and periodic testing of the reactor containment isolation barriers.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-75 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Byron and Braidwood have been approved to implement 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-informed categorization and treatment of structures, systems, and components for nuclear power plants." This regulation provides an alternative approach for establishing requirements for treatment of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) using a risk-informed method of categorizing SSCs according to their safety significance. Specifically, for SSCs categorized as low safety significant, alternate treatment requirements may be implemented rather than treatments chosen by the 10 CFR 50 Appendix J program. Refer to Section 3.2.3 for further information.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-75a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.6.1 Containment Integrated Leakage Rate Test
| |
| | |
| The Type A test is performed using the Absolute Method. The preoperational Type A test was performed at two pressures:
| |
| greater than or equal to Pa, 44.4 psig, and Pt, 22.2 psig for the full pressure and reduced pressure test, respectively. Type A tests are performed at a nominal Pa and at a frequency ranging from once every 48 months to once every 15 years based on Type A test performance history or as modified by approved exceptions in Technical Specification 5.5.16. The maximum allowable leakage rate La at pressure Pa is 0.20% per day for the full pressure test.
| |
| The Type A test is performed in accordance with the provisions of ANSI N56.8-1994. The duration of preoperational Type A test was 24 hours, during which data was collected in order to justify a shorter duration test. Paragraph 7.6 states that, "if it can be demonstrated...that the leakage rate can be accurately determined during a shorter test period, the agreed upon shorter period may be used."
| |
| Test, vent, and drain (TVD) connections used to complete Type A, B, and C containment testing are under administrative control as per ANSI N271-1976, Section 2. Connections are closed and signed off and under periodic surveillance with respect to minimizing the exposure of operating personnel to as low as reasonably achievable.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.1 Containment Inspection and Repair
| |
| | |
| A general visual inspection of the accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment structures and components shall be performed prior to any Type A test and during two other refueling outages before the next Type A test (if the interval for the Type A test has been extended to 10 years) or during three other refueling outages before the next Type A test (if the interval has been extended to 15 years) to uncover any evidence of structural deterioration which may affect either the containment structural integrity or leak tightness. If there is evidence of structural deterioration, a Type A test shall not be performed until corrective action is taken in accordance with acceptable procedures, nondestructive tests and inspections.
| |
| | |
| Such structural deterioration and corrective actions taken shall be included as part of the test record.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.2 Preoperational Tests
| |
| | |
| A structural integrity test shall precede the preoperational Type A test. A containment isolation system functional test and Type B and Type C leakage tests may be completed prior to the preoperational Type A test. In the event a Type B or Type C test is not completed prior to the preoperational Type A tests, any Type B and Type C penetration path test leakage not accounted for in the Type A test shall be added to the measured overall integrated leakage rate Lam. The reason for delaying the
| |
| | |
| 6.2-76 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| performance of Type B and C tests shall be documented.
| |
| The venting and draining of systems complies with the "Leakage Testing Requirements" of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. Any exceptions to this are identified in formal written correspondence. The RHR system was not vented or drained during initial Type A tests or periodic Type A tests. Systems that are closed inside containment were not vented or drained. The RCS was vented to the containment.
| |
| The hydrogen recombiner system is designed with containment isolation valves both inside and outside the containment wall for each piping penetration. A Type C local leakage rate test is performed on all containment isolation valves of this system.
| |
| Testing of the hydrogen recombiner system during the integrated leak rate test is done in the same manner as any other "OPEN" system and complies with Appendix J of 10 CFR 50. The Hydrogen Recombiner system, with the exception of the containment penetrations and containment isolation valves, have been abandoned at Braidwood.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.3 Containment Isolation Valve Closure
| |
| | |
| Closure of containment isolation valves for the Type A test shall be accomplished by normal operation and without any preliminary exercising or adjustments (e.g., no tightening of remote operated valves after closure). In the event a valve cannot be closed by normal methods, the method used shall be documented and local leak rate tests performed following installation and/or closure by normal means.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.4 System Venting and Draining
| |
| | |
| Those portions of the fluid systems that are part of the reactor containment boundary that may be open directly to the containment or outside atmosphere under postaccident conditions shall be opened or vented to the appropriate atmosphere during the test.
| |
| This includes portions of systems inside or outside containment that penetrate the containment and may break as a result of a loss of coolant accident. Systems that are required to maintain the plant in a safe condition during the test shall be operable in their normal mode and need not be vented. Systems that are normally filled with water and operating under postaccident conditions, such as the containment heat removal system, need not be vented or drained. Systems used for proper conduct of the test need not be vented or drained, but they must be Type C tested and the leakage for the penetration path added to Lam unless the system is specifically designed to survive the accident. If a system that may not survive an accident condition cannot be vented and/or drained, the Type C test leakage rate for the penetration path shall be added to Lam. For planning and scheduling purposes or ALARA considerations, pathways that are Type B or C tested within the previous 30 calendar months need not be vented or drained during the Type A test. The Type B or C leakage must be added to Lam.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-77 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.2.6.1.5 Pressure Stabilization Period
| |
| | |
| To prevent outgasing from concrete or equipment within containment that may affect the validity of test results, the containment internal environment shall be at a pressure less than 85% Pac for at least 24 hours prior to commencing the Type A test
| |
| | |
| 6.2-77a REVISION 6 - DECEMBER 1996 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| at Pac and shall stabilize for a period of not less than 4 hours after test pressure Pac is reached.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.6 Containment Atmosphere Stabilization
| |
| | |
| Upon completion of primary containment pressurization to the test pressure, the primary containment air mass shall be allowed to stabilize prior to the start of the Type A test. Primary containment atmosphere stabilization shall demonstrate that the containment dry air mass is stable. The criteria for containment atmosphere stabilization are listed in ANSI/ANS 56.8-2002.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.7 Type A Test Frequency
| |
| | |
| Type A tests are performed at a frequency ranging from once every 48 months to once every 15 years based on Type A test performance history (Reference 31) as modified by approved exceptions in Technical Specification 5.5.16.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.8 Test Duration
| |
| | |
| After the containment atmosphere has stabilized, the integrated leakage rate test period begins. The duration of the test period shall be sufficient to enable adequate data to be accumulated and statistically analyzed so that a leakage rate and upper confidence limit can be accurately determined. A Type A test shall last a minimum of 6 hours after stabilization and shall have a total of not less than 30 sets of data points at approximately equal time intervals. A plot of containment air absolute pressure versus time shall also be made.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.9 Calibration
| |
| | |
| Calibration data provided for Type A test instrumentation shall include information concerning the error associated with measurement of change by the individual measurement system.
| |
| Instrumentation used for Type A containment integrated leakage rate tests shall be individually calibrated or checked as applicable no more than 6 months prior to the start of the Type A test. Primary test instrument calibration regarding accuracy shall be traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Instrumentation repeatability shall be certified by the supplier.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.10 Acceptance Criteria
| |
| | |
| The measured as -found leakage rate at the upper 95% confidence limit, which includes appropriate consideration for random measurement errors, shall be below La. Depending on the sensitivity and repeatability of the instrumentation, the duration of a Type A test may have to be extended in order to achieve this degree of statistical confidence. The measured containment leakage rate shall be obtained by a linear regression analysis of the test data using the method of least squares. If the leakage rate exceeds the acceptance criterion, a Type A
| |
| | |
| 6.2-78 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| test need not be repeated provided major leakage paths are isolated and local leakage rate measurements are conducted before and after repair of local penetrations so isolated. If the Type A performance leakage rate is not acceptable, the performance criterion is not met, and a determination should be performed to identify the cause of unacceptable performance and determine appropriate corrective actions. Once completed, acceptable performance should be reestablished by demonstrating an acceptable performance leakage rate during a subsequent Type A test before resuming operation and by performing another successful Type A test within 48 months following the unsuccessful Type A test. Test results shall include both the prerepair and postrepair result values, i.e., two Type A values are reported; as follows:
| |
| : a. Prerepaired local leak rate test results, and
| |
| : b. Postrepaired test results.
| |
| | |
| Records of the corrective action shall be documented.
| |
| | |
| The measured as-left leakage rate at the upper 95% confidence limit plus the as-left minimum pathway leak rate (MNPLR) of all leakage paths isolated during the performance of the Type A test shall be below 75% La.
| |
| 6.2.6.1.11 Verification Tests
| |
| | |
| A verification test shall be performed following each Type A test. The verification test provides a method for assuring that systematic error or bias is given adequate consideration. During the verification test, containment pressure may not decrease to less than 0.96 Pa. The test shall be performed using the calibrated leak method. In this method, a calibrated leak is intentionally superimposed on the existing leaks in the containment system. Acceptability is demonstrated if:
| |
| | |
| (LO + Lam - 0.25 La) Lc (LO + Lam + 0.25 La)
| |
| | |
| The superimposed leakage rate (LO) shall be between 75% and 125%
| |
| of La. Lc is the composite leakage rate measured using the Type A test instrumentation after LO is superimposed.
| |
| 6.2.6.2 Containment Penetration Leakage Rate Test
| |
| | |
| Type B tests are performed at a test pressure of Pa or greater and at a frequency ranging from once every 30 months to once every 120 months, based on Type B test performance history. Type C tests are performed at a test pressure of Pa or greater and at a frequency ranging from once every 30 months to once every 75 months, based on Type C test performance history (Ref. 31). When a higher differential pressure results in increased sealing, such as in the case of a closed check valve, the differential pressure in a Type B or C test shall not exceed 1.1 Pa. Air or nitrogen shall be the test media. When the pressure decay method of local leak rate testing is employed, a minimum of 15 minutes
| |
| | |
| 6.2-79 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| duration is used. The majority of the Type B and C tests will be performed using a direct measurement system, for example, a flow meter. An appropriate method to demonstrate stabilized conditions is used to determine the duration of this type of test.
| |
| Containment penetrations whose design incorporates resilient seals, gaskets, or sealant compounds receive preoperational and periodic tests in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix J.
| |
| The following penetrations will be tested:
| |
| : a. equipment access hatch,
| |
| : b. the two personnel access hatches,
| |
| : c. fuel transfer penetration (Figure 6.2-37),
| |
| : d. electrical penetrations (Figure 3.8-43), and
| |
| : e. spare containment penetrations PC-63, PC-64, and PC-74.
| |
| | |
| Containment penetrations are anchor points in their respective systems and have been designed to 1974 ASME III, Summer 1975 Addenda.
| |
| | |
| The following containment piping penetrations are fitted with expansion bellows:
| |
| : 1. fuel transfer tube penetration sleeve, and
| |
| : 2. recirculation sump effluent pipe i.e., closure joint between the process pipe and guard pipe.
| |
| | |
| There are three expansion bellows in the penetration sleeve of the fuel transfer tube and one bellow attached to the penetration sleeve of each recirculation sump effluent pipe. The bellows on the recirculation sump effluent pipes are flood seals and are not required to maintain containment integrity.
| |
| | |
| Test methods used in determining the leakage through the penetrations are given in the following. The physical descriptions of the penetrations are given in Subsection 3.8.2.1.
| |
| : a. Equipment Access Hatch The equipment access hatch has been furnished with a double-gasketed flange and bolted dish door (Figure 3.8-38). Provisions are made to pressurize the space between the double gaskets of the door flanges and the weld seam channels at the liner joint, hatch flange, and dished door.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-80 REVISION 6 - DECEMBER 1996 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : b. Personnel Access Hatch There are two personnel locks. One penetrates the dished door of the equipment hatch, used for access to the containment building. The second, which penetrates the containment on the side opposite the equipment hatch at grade level (Figure 3.8-39), is used as an emergency escape route, an alternate containment access at power, and as routine access for personnel and equipment into and out of the containment building during cold shutdown, refueling mode, and when the reactor is defueled. An access facility is located next to the containment building emergency hatch entrance to facilitate entry of materials, equipment, and personnel into the containment while maintaining radwaste and contamination control. Both personnel locks are double-door, mechanically latched, welded steel assemblies. The space between the doors can be pressurized to peak containment pressure, Pa, through test connections. The airlocks shall be tested at 30-month intervals at an internal pressure not less than Pa. The Type B test for the airlock door seals shall be performed at a pressure between 3 and 12 psig either as described in Section III.D.2.bii of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J or by installing a continuous pressurization source to the airlock door seals that will be monitored by a flowmeter and alarm.
| |
| Stabilization criteria for testing the airlocks shall be "less than 1 psig change in the test volume pressure in the last 15 minutes and less than 20%
| |
| change in the flowrate reading in the last 5 minutes" or "after monitoring the flow rate at test pressure for a minimum of 4 hours." Provisions made for leak testing of the door seals consist of taps, which are threaded to allow capping during operation and connection for test purposes, and a volume between the gaskets for test pressurization. A flanged pipe is provided through the exterior bulkhead of the lock for leak testing of the entire lock. The flanges of this pipe are detailed to provide for a bolted connection of a cap during operation or another flanged pipe for test purposes. Leakage from each door can be monitored and the total leakage rate can be measured at Pa.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-81 REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The interior lock door is restrained during lock leak testing by means of horizontal beams which span the door frame inside the lock. They are bolted to the door adjacent to the door/bulkhead mating surface.
| |
| There are five of these beams located at equal spacing vertically and symmetrically about the door midheight. The only penetrations through the personnel air lock are two 2-inch diameter pipes through which air sampling is taken from and returned to the containment. At Byron, the air sampling units have been removed and the two 2-inch diameter pipes are capped.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-81a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. Fuel Transfer Penetration The penetration consists of a 20-inch pipe inside a 24-inch sleeve. The inner pipe will be fitted with a double-gasketed blind flange in the refueling canal.
| |
| A seal plate will be welded to the containment liner and also the inside tube. This seal plate and the blind flange act as the containment boundary. In order to leak test the blind flange, provisions will be made to pressurize the space between the double gaskets of the blind flange. The integrity of the seal plate and its welds to the containment liner and fuel transfer tube is verified during the Type A test.
| |
| The fuel transfer tube sleeve bellows are tested in accordance with Type B test methods allowed by 10 CFR 50 Appendix J.
| |
| : d. Electrical Penetrations Electrical penetrations are tested individually or in groups in accordance with Type B test methods allowed by 10 CFR 50 Appendix J.
| |
| A nitrogen supply system is used to provide continuous pressurization between the closure flanges of all containment wall electrical penetrations, with the exception of 1CQ01E, 1CQ02E, 2CQ01E, 2CQ02E and various spare penetrations. This system supplies a clean, dry cover gas for the penetrations and is used for periodic leakage monitoring during periods between Type B tests. Operation of the system is not required to maintain the containment integrity. The electrical penetrations installed on the equipment access hatch (discussed in Subsection 6.2.6.2.a) and on the personnel access hatch (discussed in Subsection 6.2.6.2.b) are not provided with a nitrogen supply system. These electrical penetrations provide Class Non-1E power feeds to the electrical circuits associated with the hatches.
| |
| Electrical penetrations 1CQ01E and 2CQ01E are installed on the equipment/personnel access hatch, and electrical penetrations 1CQ02E and 2CQ02E are installed on the emergency escape hatch. These penetrations feed the Class Non-1E electrical circuits associated with the hatches.
| |
| | |
| The acceptance criteria for preoperational and periodic testing are in compliance with Appendix J of 10 CFR 50.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-82 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : e. Spare Containment Penetrations (PC-63, PC-64, and PC-74)
| |
| These penetrations consist of a 16-inch-diameter sleeve with a welded neck flange and a blind flange on the outside of the containment. The blind flange is fitted with a double gasket with provisions for pressurizing the space between the gaskets. The penetrations are tested individually in accordance with Type B test methods stated in 10 CFR 50 Appendix J.
| |
| 6.2.6.3 Containment Isolation Valve Leakage Rate Test
| |
| | |
| Containment penetrations with isolation valving as shown in Figure 6.2-28 are provided with the leak test provisions shown to satisfy the Type C leak test requirements.
| |
| Isolation valves outside containment are positioned as close as possible to the containment boundary.
| |
| The acceptance criteria for preoperational and periodic testing are in compliance with Appendix J of 10 CFR 50.
| |
| | |
| Some valves are Type C tested in the reverse-direction as per Appendix J to 10 CFR 50. Specifically, the following valves can be tested in the reverse-direction, which is clearly equivalent or more conservative than the forward direction: butterfly, plug, diaphragm, and globe valves.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-82a REVISION 6 - DECEMBER 1996 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Butterfly and diaphragm valves have one sealing surface. Plug valves have a common sealing surface from both directions. In some instances, globe valves may be pressurized on the downstream side of the valve including packing leakage.
| |
| The capability currently exists to leak test the purge/vent containment isolation valves during operational Modes 1 through 4 of plant operation as listed in BTP CSB-6-4. The overall surveillance program conforms to the periodic retest scheduled in accordance with Appendix J to 10 CFR 50. During each periodic retest, attention is given to active and passive purge/vent systems.
| |
| 6.2.6.4 Scheduling and Reporting of Periodic Tests
| |
| | |
| The periodic test schedule is referenced in the Technical Specifications.
| |
| 6.2.6.5 Special Testing Requirements There are no special requirements for maximum allowable leakage rate for inleakage. The design conditions for the containment
| |
| (-0.1 to 1.0 psig) allow for a slight positive internal pressure.
| |
| The design positive internal pressure would eliminate the necessity for establishing a maximum allowable inleakage.
| |
| 6.2.7 References
| |
| : 1. F. M. Burdelon and E. T. Murphy, Containment Pressure Analysis Code (COCO), WCAP-8327 (Proprietary) and WCAP-8326 (Non-Proprietary), 1974.
| |
| : 2. T. Hsieh, R. T. Barlow, and H. V. Julian, "Environmental Qualification - Instrument Transmitter Temperature Transient Analysis", WCAP 8936, February 1977.
| |
| : 3. Takashi Tagami, "Interim Report on Safety Assessments and Facilities, Establishment Project in Japan for Period Ending June, 1965 (No. 1)".
| |
| : 4. E. W. Ranz and W. R. Marshall, Jr., "Evaporation for Drops,"
| |
| Chemical Engineering Progress, 48141-146, March 1952.
| |
| : 5. L. F. Parsly, "Spray Tests at the Nuclear Safety Pilot Plant," in: "Nuclear Safety Program Annual Progress Report for Period Ending December 31, 1970", ORNL 4647, p.82, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1971.
| |
| : 6. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, "Pipe Breaks for the LOCA Analysis of the Westinghouse Primary Coolant Loop," WCAP 8082-P-A, June 1973 (Proprietary) and WCAP 8172-A, January 1975 (Non-Proprietary).
| |
| | |
| 6.2-83 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 7. R. M. Shepard et al., "Westinghouse Mass and Energy Release Data for Containment Design," WCAP-8264-P-A, June 1975 (Proprietary and WCAP-8312-A, Revision June 1975 (Non-Proprietary).
| |
| : 8. R. Salvatori, "Ice -Condenser Containment Pressure Transient Analysis Methods," WCAP-8077, March 1973 (Proprietary), and WCAP-8078, March 1973 (Non-Proprietary).
| |
| : 9. Letter from R.M. Krich (Commonwealth Edison Company) to U.S.
| |
| NRC, "Supplemental Information Regarding a Request for Additional Information Related to NRC Generic Letter 96-06, "Assurance of Equipment Operability and Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Conditions," dated October 27, 1999.
| |
| : 10. Letter from U.S. NRC to C.M. Crane (Exelon Generation Company, LLC), "Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, Generic Letter 96-06, 'Assurance of Equipment Operability and Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Conditions," dated February 24, 2004.
| |
| : 11. (Deleted)
| |
| : 12. (Deleted)
| |
| : 13. J. J. DiNunno et al., "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites," TID-14844, March 1962.
| |
| : 14. W. B. Cottrell, "ORNL Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program Bi-Monthly Report for July - August 1968,"
| |
| ORNL-TM-2368, November 1968.
| |
| : 15. W. B. Cottrell, "ORNL Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program Bi-Monthly Report for September - October 1968," ORNL-TM-2425, p. 53, January 1969.
| |
| : 16. RELAP4/MOD5, A Computer Program for Transient Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of Nuclear Reactors and Related Systems, User's Manual Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, ANCR-NUREG-1335, September 1976.
| |
| : 17. I.E. Idel'chi k, "Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance, Coefficients of Local Resistance and of Friction," AEC-TR-6630, 1960.
| |
| : 18. Letter to Mr. D. B. Vassallo, Chief, Light Water Reactors Project Branch 6, USNRC From Mr. C. Eicheldinger, Manager, Nuclear Safety, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, (NS CE-992)
| |
| Dated March 17, 1976.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-84 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 19. Letter to Mr. D. B. Vassallo, Chief, Light Water Reactors Project Branch 6, USNRC From Mr. C. Eicheldinger, Manager, Nuclear Safety, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, (NS CE-692) Dated July 10, 1975.
| |
| : 20. Letter to Mr. D. B. Vassallo, Chief, Light Water Reactors Project Branch 6, USNRC From Mr. C. Eicheldinger, Manager, Nuclear Safety, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, (NS CE-1021) Dated April 7, 1976.
| |
| : 21. Letter to Mr. J. F. Stolz, Chief, Light Water Reactors Project Branch 6, USNRC From Mr. C. Eicheldinger, Manager, Nuclear Safety, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, (NS CE-1183) Dated August 27, 1976.
| |
| : 22. Commonwealth Edison Letter RS-00-38, Attachment E, Power Uprate Licensing Report for Byron Station and Braidwood Station, July 5, 2000.
| |
| : 23. (Deleted)
| |
| : 24. (Deleted)
| |
| : 25. (Deleted)
| |
| : 26. (Deleted)
| |
| : 27. (Deleted)
| |
| : 28. Shapiro, H. A., "The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow," Volume 1, p. 85.
| |
| : 29. 1967 ASME Steam Tables, p. 301.
| |
| : 30. Letter from John F. Stolz to Thomas M. Anderson, March 27, 1980.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-85 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 31. Nuclear Energy Institute, "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J," NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, July 2012.
| |
| : 32. Burnett, T. W. T., et al, "LOFTRAN Code Description," WCAP-7907-P-A (Proprietary), WCAP-7907-A (Nonproprietary), April 1984.
| |
| : 33. Commonwealth Edison NFS Calculation PSA-B-96-08, "Thermal Hydraulic Behavior of RCFC Coils During LOCA for Byron/Braidwood."
| |
| : 34. Commonwealth Edison Calculation BRW-97-0395-M, "Evaluation of the Effects Related to GL 96-06 for Piping Subsystem 1SX09."
| |
| : 35. DELETED
| |
| : 36. DELETED
| |
| : 37. Westinghouse LOCA Mass and Energy Release Model for Containment Design - March 1979 Version, WCAP-10325-P-A, May 1983 (Proprietary), WCAP-10326-A (Non-Proprietary).
| |
| : 38. Docket No. 50-315, Amendment No. 126, Facility Operating License No. DPR-58 (TAC No. 7106), for D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1, June 9, 1989.
| |
| : 39. EPRI 294-2, Mixing of Emergency Core Cooling Water with Steam; 1/3-Scale Test and Summary, (WCAP-8423), Final Report, June 1975.
| |
| : 40. ANSI/ANS-5.1 1979, American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors, August 1979.
| |
| : 41. Letter from R. Assa (NRC) to I. Johnson (Commonwealth Edison), Safety Evaluation (SE) Regarding Leak-Before-Break Analysis, Byron Stations Units 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2, (TAC Nos, M95342, M95343, M95344, and M95345), October 25, 1996.
| |
| : 42. Letter from A. Hsia (NRC) to T. Kovach (Commonwealth Edison), Safety Evaluation of Leak-Before-Break Methodology Applicable to Accumulator Piping and Reactor Coolant Bypass Piping (TAC Nos, 73306, 73307, 73308, and 73309), April 19, 1991.
| |
| : 43. NRR Division of Component Integrity Response, Leak-Before-Break (LBB) Knowledge Management Document, TAC No. MD3570 (ADAMS: TAC No. ML092430585), May 29, 2007.
| |
| : 44. Design Analysis No. CN-CRA-00-8, Byron/Braidwood 1&2 Uprate Project-Short Term LOCA Mass & Energy Releases and Subcompartment Pressurization.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-85a REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022
| |
| | |
| B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1
| |
| | |
| UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT PEAK PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE
| |
| | |
| AVAIL- PEAK PEAK ABLE TEMPER-BREAK PRESSURE (psig) MARGIN (psi) ATURE (F)
| |
| | |
| Primary Side Ruptures
| |
| | |
| Double -ended pump suction - Max SI 40.85 9.15 261.56 (Note 1)
| |
| | |
| Double-ended pump suction - Min SI 42.08 7.92 262.6 Double-ended hot leg - Min SI 42.10 7.90 263.5
| |
| | |
| Secondary Side Breaks
| |
| | |
| Limiting Pressure Cases for Composite Curve (Note 2)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 95.1%
| |
| power (RCFC train failure) 38.8 11.2 N/A Full double-ended break - 28.0% power (RCFC train failure) 38.8 11.2 N/A Full double -ended break - 95.1% power (feedwater isolation valve failure) 39.3 10.7 N/A
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 0% power (RCFC train failure) 37.7 12.3 N/A
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 95.1% power (loss of offsite power with emergency diesel generator failure) 32.4 17.6 N/A
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 28.0% power (loss of offsite power with emergency diesel generator failure) 33.0 17.0 N/A
| |
| | |
| 0.87-ft2 split break - 28.0% power (loss of offsite power with emergency diesel generator failure) 29.2 20.8 N/A
| |
| | |
| Limiting Pressure Cases (No LOOP) for UHS Temperature Increase Analysis (Note 4)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 0% power 32.23 17.77 N/A (RCFC train failure)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT PEAK PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE AVAIL- PEAK PEAK ABLE TEMPER PRESSURE MARGIN -ATURE BREAK (psig) (psi) (F)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 100% power 32.58 17.42 N/A (MSIV failure)
| |
| Full double -ended break - 30% power 32.75 17.25 N/A (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 100% power 32.12 17.88 N/A (FIV failure)
| |
| | |
| 0.96 ft2 split break - 70% power 33.77 16.23 N/A (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| 0.90 ft2 split break - 30% power 34.48 15.52 N/A (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Secondary Side Breaks
| |
| | |
| Limiting Temperature Cases for Composite Curve (Note 3)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 95.1% power (loss of offsite power with FIV failure) N/A N/A 284 1.0-ft2 double-ended break - 100% power (loss of offsite power with MSIV failure) N/A N/A 334 1 .0-ft2 double-ended break - 100% power (MSIV failure) N/A N/A 327
| |
| | |
| 0.96-ft2 split break - 95.1% power (loss of offsite power with emergency diesel generator failure) N/A N/A 327
| |
| | |
| 1.0-ft2 split break - 100% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 318
| |
| | |
| 0.96-ft2 split break - 95.1% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 316 0.93-ft2 split break - 65.3% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 313
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT PEAK PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE
| |
| | |
| PEAK AVAILABLE -TEMPERPEAK PRESSURE MARGIN -ATURE BREAK (psig) (psi) (F)
| |
| | |
| 1.0-ft2 double-ended break - 95.1% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 307 1.0-ft2 double-ended break - 65.3% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 305 1.0 -ft2 double-ended break - 28.0% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 302
| |
| | |
| 1.0-ft2 double-ended break - 0% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 299
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 28.0% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 278 Full double-ended break - 0% power (RCFC train failure) N/A N/A 255 Full double -ended break - 95.1% power (loss of offsite power with emergency diesel generator failure) N/A N/A 284 Full double -ended break - 28.0% power (loss of offsite power with emergency diesel generator failure) N/A N/A 278 0.87 -ft2 split break - 28.0% power (loss of offsite power with emergency diesel generator failure) N/A N/A 318 Limiting Temperature Cases (LOOP)
| |
| | |
| for UHS Temperature Increase Analysis (Note 5)
| |
| | |
| 1.00 ft2 split break - 100% power N/A N/A 329 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Small double-ended break - 100% power N/A N/A 328.2 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Small double-ended break - 70% power N/A N/A 327 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Small double-ended break - 70% power N/A N/A 310.3 (RCFC failure)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| AVAIL- PEAK PEAK ABLE TEMPER-PRESSURE MARGIN ATURE BREAK (psig) (psi) (F)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 100% power N/A N/A 248 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 100% power N/A N/A 237.2 (RCFC train failure)
| |
| | |
| 0.64 ft2 split break - 0% power N/A N/A 293.6 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Note 1 This case was not re-analyzed for the MUR uprate of the UHS temperature increase analyses.
| |
| | |
| Note 2 For these cases, 130F initial containment temperature and 15.7 psia initial containment pressure were assumed. See Figure 6.2-13 for a composite pressure curve.
| |
| | |
| Note 3 For these cases, 120F initial containment temperature and 14.6 psia initial containment pressure were assumed. See Figure 6.2-14 for a composite temperature curve.
| |
| | |
| Note 4 The composite pressure curve in Figure 6.2-13 envelopes the limiting pressure curve from the Braidwood UHS Temperature increase.
| |
| | |
| Note 5 The composite temperature curve in Figure 6.2-14 is enveloped by the Environmental Qualification Temperature profile.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86c REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1a
| |
| | |
| UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT PEAK PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE
| |
| | |
| PEAK AVAILABLE PEAK PRESSURE MARGIN TEMPERATURE BREAK (psig) PSI (oF)
| |
| Primary Side Ruptures
| |
| | |
| Double -ended pump suction - Max SI 36.77 13.23 254.89
| |
| | |
| (Note 1)
| |
| | |
| Double-ended pump suction - Min SI 38.37 11.63 256.69
| |
| | |
| Double-ended hot leg - Min SI 37.73 12.27 256.53
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86d REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1a (Contd)
| |
| | |
| UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT PEAK PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE
| |
| | |
| PEAK AVAILABLE PEAK PRESSURE MARGIN TEMPERATURE BREAK (psig) PSI (oF)
| |
| Secondary Side Breaks
| |
| | |
| Limiting Pressure Cases for Composite Curve (Note 2)
| |
| Full double-ended break - 95.1% power, 35.6 14.4 N/A (RCFC train failure)
| |
| Full double-ended break - 28.0% power, 37.8 12.2 N/A (RCFC train failure)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 0% power, 38.3 11.7 N/A (RCFC train failure)
| |
| Full double-ended break - 28.0% power, 36.7 13.3 N/A (feedwater isolation valve failure)
| |
| | |
| 1.0 ft2 double ended break - 28.0% 28.4 21.6 N/A
| |
| : power, (LOOP with emergency diesel generator failure) 0.86 ft2 split break - 28.0% power, 28.4 21.6 N/A (LOOP with emergency diesel generator failure)
| |
| Full double -ended break - 28.0% power, 32.5 17.5 N/A (LOOP with emergency diesel generator failure)
| |
| Limiting Pressure Cases (No LOOP) for UHS Temperature Increase Analysis (Note 4)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 0% power, 33.83 16.17 N/A (RCFC train failure)
| |
| Full double-ended break - 0% power 32.53 17.47 N/A (FIV failure)
| |
| Full double-ended break - 30% power 33.62 16.38 N/A (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 0% power 34.32 16.68 N/A (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86e REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1a (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT PEAK PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE
| |
| | |
| PEAK AVAILABLE PEAK PRESSURE MARGIN TEMPERATURE BREAK (psig) PSI (oF)
| |
| | |
| 0.62 ft2 split break - 0% power 33.54 16.46 N/A (RCFC failure) 0.83 ft2 split break - 30% power 34.44 15.56 N/A (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Secondary Side Breaks Limiting Temperature Cases for Composite Curve (Note 3)
| |
| Full doubl e-ended break - 28.0% power, N/A N/A 282.4 (RCFC train failure)
| |
| Full double-ended break - 0% power, N/A N/A 280.9 (RCFC train failure)
| |
| Full double-ended break - 95.1% power, N/A N/A 281.7 (feedwater isolation valve failure)
| |
| | |
| 1.0 ft2 double-ended break - 65.3% power, N/A N/A 305.6 (RCFC train failure) 1.0 ft2 double-ended break - 28.0% power, N/A N/A 304.0 (RCFC train failure) 0.82 ft2 split break - 100% power, N/A N/A 307.0 (RCFC train failure) 1.0 ft2 double-ended break - 0% power, N/A N/A 299.1 (RCFC train failure) 1.0 ft2 double-ended break - 95.1% power, N/A N/A 326.3 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| 0.91 ft2 split break - 95.1% power, N/A N/A 313.1 (RCFC train failure)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 95.1% power, N/A N/A 281.7 (LOOP with emergency diesel generator failure)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86f REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1a (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT PEAK PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE
| |
| | |
| PEAK AVAILABLE PEAK PRESSURE MARGIN TEMPERATURE BREAK (psig) PSI (oF)
| |
| Full double -ended break - 28.0% power, N/A N/A 282.4 (LOOP with emergency diesel generator failure) 1.0 ft2 double-ended break - 28.0% power, N/A N/A 310.6 (LOOP with emergency diesel generator failure)
| |
| | |
| 1.0 ft2 double-ended break - 95.1% power, N/A N/A 330.8 (LOOP with MSIV failure) 0.91 ft2 split break - 95.1% power, N/A N/A 322.6 (LOOP with emergency diesel generator failure) 0.86 ft2 split break - 28.0% power, N/A N/A 317.7 (LOOP with emergency diesel generator failure)
| |
| | |
| Limiting Temperature Cases (LOOP) for UHS Temperature Increase Analysis (Note 5)
| |
| | |
| Small double-ended break - 100% power N/A N/A 323.0 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Small double-ended break - 70% power N/A N/A 323.0 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 70% power N/A N/A 239.8
| |
| ( FIV failure)
| |
| Small double-ended break - 70% power N/A N/A 306.4 (RCFC failure)
| |
| Full double -ended break - 100% power N/A N/A 248.2 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| Full double-ended break - 100% power N/A N/A 234.1 (RCFC train failure) 0.62 ft2 split break - 0% power N/A N/A 293.1 (MSIV failure)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86g REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-1a (Contd)
| |
| | |
| UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT PEAK PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE
| |
| | |
| Note 1 This case was not reanalyzed for the MUR uprate or the UHS
| |
| | |
| temperature increase analyses.
| |
| Note 2 For these cases, 120°F initial containment temperature and 15.7 psia initial containment pressure were assumed.
| |
| See Figure 6.2-13c for a composite pressure curve.
| |
| Note 3 For these cases, 120°F initial containment temperature and 14.6 psia initial containment pressure were assumed.
| |
| See Figure 6.2-14c for a composite temperature curve.
| |
| Note 4 The composite pressure curve in Figure 6.2-13C envelopes the limiting pressure curve from the Braidwood UHS temperature increase.
| |
| Note 5 The composite temperature curve in Figure 6.2-14C is enveloped by the EQ temperature profile.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-86h REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-2 ASSUMPTIONS FOR UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT ANALYSIS Initial Containment Conditions
| |
| | |
| Temperature (F)
| |
| LOCA 120 Cases MSLB Limiting Temperature 120 MSLB Limiting Pressure Cases 130 Pressure (psia)LOCA 15.7 MSLB Limiting Temperature 14.6 Cases MSLB Limiting Pressure Cases 15.7 Relative Humidity (%) 20 Net free volume (ft 3) 2.758 X 106 104 (Note 1)
| |
| Essential service water temperature (F)
| |
| | |
| Refueling water storage tank temperature (F)
| |
| LOCA 105 MSLB Limiting Temperature Cases 120 MSLB Limiting Pressure Cases 130 RWST deliverable water volume (gal)
| |
| ECCS/CS injection (above lo-lo setpoint) 180,888 CS injection (after ECCS switchover to recirculation) 146,084 TOTAL 326,972 Number of fan coolers TOTAL 4 Operating maximum 4 Operating minimum/single failure 2 (RCFC train failure or EDG failure)
| |
| Number of spray pumps2 pump deliverable flow (gpm) 70802 1 pump deliverable flow (gpm) 3113 (CS train failure or EDG failure)
| |
| Condensate Revaporiza tion (%)
| |
| MSLB 1.0-ft2 100 MSLB 1.0-ft2 0
| |
| | |
| Note 1: This value reflects the UHS temperature post-LOCA for Braidwood. The higher Braidwood UHS temperature was also used for Byron.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-87 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-3 ASSUMPTIONS FOR UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT ANALYSIS
| |
| | |
| Initial Containment Conditions
| |
| | |
| Temperature (oF)
| |
| LOCA 120 MSLB Limiting Temperature Cases 120 MSLB Limiting Pressure Cases 130
| |
| | |
| Pressure (psia)
| |
| LOCA 15.7 MSLB Limiting Temperature Cases 14.6 MSLB Limiting Pressure Cases 15.7
| |
| | |
| Relative Humidity (%) 20
| |
| | |
| Net free Volume (ft3) 2.758 x 106
| |
| | |
| Essential service water temperature (oF) 104 (Note 1)
| |
| | |
| Refueling water storage tank temperature (oF)
| |
| LOCA 105 MSLB Limiting Temperature Cases 120 MSLB Limiting Pressure Cases 130
| |
| | |
| RWST deliverable water volume (gal)
| |
| ECCS/CS injection (above lo-lo setpoint) 180,888 CS injection (after ECCS switchover to 146,084 recirculation)
| |
| TOTAL 326,972
| |
| | |
| Number of fan coolers TOTAL 4 Operating maximum 4 Operating minimum/single failure 2 (RCFC train failure or EDG failure
| |
| | |
| Number of spray pumps 2 2 pump deliverable flow (gpm) 7080 2 pump deliverable flow - MSLB, loss of 6938 offsite power (gpm)*
| |
| 1 pump deliverable flow, CS train failure 3113) or LOCA EDG failure (gpm) 1 pump deliverable flow - MSLB EDG 3113) failure (gpm)*
| |
| | |
| Condensate Revaporization (%)
| |
| MSLB > 1.0-ft2 100 MSLB < 1.0-ft2 0
| |
| | |
| *includes 2% reduction for additional margin
| |
| | |
| Note 1: This value reflects the UHS temperature post-LOCA for Braidwood. The higher Braidwood UHS temperature was also used for Byron.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-88 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-4 CONTAINMENT HEAT SINKS - ANALYSIS VALUES
| |
| | |
| HEAT THICK-TRANSFER AREA NESS WALL DESCRIPTION HEAT(ft 2) MATERIAL (ft)
| |
| : 1. Containment cylinder wall 72,741 Paint 8.30E-04 Concrete 0.7500 Carbon steel 0.0208
| |
| : 2. Containment dome 17,550 Paint 8.30E-04 Concrete 0.7500 Carbon steel 0.0208
| |
| : 3. Unlined concrete - 16,037 Concrete* 0.7500 combined from containment floor and the slab at El. 425'-0"
| |
| : 4. Lined concrete - combined 848 Stainless 4.15E-02 from containment floor and steel reactor pool wall Concrete 0.7500
| |
| : 5. Unlined concrete - 4,803 Concrete 1.0000 combined reactor cavity, outside reactor wall, and reactor pool wall
| |
| : 6. Lined concrete - secondary 7,702 Paint 8.30E-04 wall Carbon steel 0.0766 Concrete 0.7500
| |
| : 7. Lined concrete - slab at 422.3 Paint 8.30E-04 El. 425'-0" lining only Carbon steel 0.0625
| |
| : 8. Unlined concrete - 69,541 Concrete 0.7500 combined from slabs on steel beams at El. 412'-0" and 426'-0", instrument access tunnel, and enclosures for steam generator, reactor coolant pumps, etc.
| |
| : 9. Lined concrete - Slabs on 3,852 Paint 8.30E-04 steel beams at El. 412'-0" Carbon steel 0.0040 and 426'-0" Concrete 0.7500
| |
| : 10. Lined concrete - Enclosures 1,570 Paint 8.30E-04 for steam generator, Carbon steel 0.0710 reactor coolant pumps, etc Concrete 0.7500
| |
| | |
| 6.2-89 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-4 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| HEAT THICK-TRANSFER AREA NESS WALL DESCRIPTION HEAT(ft 2) MATERIAL (ft)
| |
| : 11. Lined concrete - refueling 2129 Stainless 0.0690 cavity steel Concrete 0.7500
| |
| : 12. Miscellaneous steel plates, 19,791 Paint 8.30E-04 HVAC hangers, polar crane Carbon steel 0.0416 trolley and bridge plates, and NSSS supports
| |
| : 13. Miscellaneous steel plates, 94,670 Paint 8.30E-04 grating, pressurizer relief Carbon steel 0.0210 tank, polar crane bridge plates,and return air riser
| |
| : 14. Polar crane trolley and 14,089 Paint 8.30E-04 bridge plates and machinery Carbon steel 0.0760
| |
| : 15. Combined from manipulator 21,875 Paint 8.30E-04 crane fan, RCFC fan, and Carbon steel 0.0400 reactor cavity fans
| |
| : 16. Combined from containment 22,528 Paint 8.30E-04 charcoal filter unit housing, Carbon steel 0.0150 HVAC hangers, uninsulated pipe, ductwork, and duct supports
| |
| : 17. Cable/conduit trays 27,095 Paint 8.30E-04 Carbon steel 0.0104
| |
| : 18. Combined from cable/conduit 6,385 Paint 8.30E-04 tray supports, junction boxes, Carbon steel 8.20E-03 and incore flux mapping equipment
| |
| : 19. Combined from charcoal filter unit, and 69,856 Paint 8.30E-04 miscellaneous steel Carbon steel 0.0157 beams and columns
| |
| : 20. Lined concrete - combined from the instrument access 9,291 Stainless 0.0165 tunnel, reactor cavity, and steel inside reactor pool Concrete 0.7500
| |
| | |
| *This material is modeled in contact with water.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-89a REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-4a CONTAINMENT HEAT SINKS - NOMINAL VALUES
| |
| | |
| HEAT THICK-TRANSFER AREA NESS WALL DESCRIPTION HEAT(ft 2) MATERIAL (ft)
| |
| : 1. Containment cylinder 80,823 Concrete 0.7500 Carbon steel 0.0208
| |
| : 2. Containment dome 19,500 Concrete 0.7500 Carbon steel 0.0208
| |
| : 3. Containment floor 17,819 Concrete 0.7500 and operating deck operating deck
| |
| : 4. Reactor cavity and 987 Concrete 0.7500 reactor cavity Stainless support walls steel 0.0415
| |
| : 5. Reactor cavity 5,337 Concrete 1.0000 exterior reactor cavity wall
| |
| : 6. Exterior reactor 10,269 Concrete 0.7500 cavity wall and Carbon steel 0.0766 secondary shield wall
| |
| : 7. Operating deck 563 Carbon steel 0.0625
| |
| : 8. Miscellaneous 77,348 Concrete 0.7500 unlined concrete
| |
| : 9. Miscellaneous steel- 4,360 Concrete 0.7500 lined concrete Carbon steel 0.0040
| |
| : 10. Enclosures for 2,094 Concrete 0.7500 steam generator, Carbon steel 0.0710 pressurizers, and reactor pumps
| |
| : 11. Refueling cavity 2,839 Concrete 0.7500 Stainless steel 0.0690
| |
| : 12. Miscellaneous A 20,914 Carbon steel 0.0416
| |
| : 13. Miscellaneous B 97,182 Carbon steel 0.0210
| |
| | |
| 6.2-89b REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-4a (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| HEAT THICK-
| |
| | |
| TRANSFER AREA NESS WALL DESCRIPTION HEAT(ft 2) MATERIAL (ft)
| |
| : 14. Trolley plate 14,089 Carbon steel 0.0760 and bridge plate
| |
| : 15. Miscellaneous C 22,679 Carbon steel 0.0400
| |
| : 16. Miscellaneous D 23,485 Carbon steel 0.0150
| |
| : 17. Miscellaneous E 30,404 Carbon steel 0.0104
| |
| : 18. Miscellaneous F 6,384 Carbon steel 0.0082
| |
| : 19. Steel beams and 75,094 Carbon steel 0.0157 columns
| |
| : 20. Access tunnels and 10,353 Concrete 0.7500 reactor cavity Stainless steel 0.0165
| |
| | |
| NOTE: All carbon steel is modeled with a layer of paint with a thickness = 0.00083 ft
| |
| | |
| 6.2-90 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-5
| |
| | |
| THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CONTAINMENT HEAT SINKS
| |
| | |
| THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY VOLUMETRIC HEAT CAPACITY MATERIAL (Btu/hr-ft-F) (Btu/ft3-F)
| |
| | |
| Paint 00.30 28.00
| |
| | |
| Carbon steel 27.00 58.80
| |
| | |
| Stainless steel 09.00 53.70
| |
| | |
| Concrete 00.92 22.62
| |
| | |
| 6.2-91 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-6
| |
| | |
| LOCA SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MIN SI, UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Time of Occurrence Event (sec)
| |
| | |
| 14.8 Broken Loop Accumulator Begins Injecting Water
| |
| | |
| 14.9 Intact Loop Accumulators Begins Injecting Water
| |
| | |
| 24.2 End of Blowdown Phase
| |
| | |
| 43.6 Safety Injection Begins
| |
| | |
| 64.75 Broken Loop Accumulator Water Injection Ends
| |
| | |
| 65.0 Start Fan Coolers
| |
| | |
| 65.55 Intact Loop Accumulators Water Injection Ends
| |
| | |
| 110.2 Start Spray
| |
| | |
| 223.65 End of Reflood
| |
| | |
| 716.36 Containment Peak Pressure and Temperature
| |
| | |
| 1110. Recirculation, Injection
| |
| | |
| 3778. Recirculation, Spray
| |
| | |
| 28800. Containment Spray Terminated
| |
| | |
| 6.2-92 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-6a
| |
| | |
| LOCA SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP
| |
| | |
| SUCTION BREAK MIN SI, UNIT 2 Time of
| |
| | |
| Occurrence Event (sec)
| |
| | |
| 12.9 Broken Loop Accumulator Begins Injecting Water 13.1 Intact Loop Accumulators Begins Injecting Water
| |
| | |
| 22.2 End of Blowdown Phase 44.4 Safety Injection Begins
| |
| | |
| 60.05 Broken Loop Accumulator Water Injection Ends 63.8 Intact Loop Accumulators Water Injection Ends
| |
| | |
| 65.0 Start Fan Coolers 110.2 Start Spray
| |
| | |
| 228.55 End of Reflood 592.2 Containment Peak Pressure and Temperature
| |
| | |
| 1110.0 Recirculation, Injection 3778. Recirculation, Spray
| |
| | |
| 28800. Containment Spray Terminated
| |
| | |
| 6.2-92a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-7
| |
| | |
| LOCA SEQUENCE FOR DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK, UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Time of
| |
| | |
| Occurrence Event (sec) 14.2 Accumulator Begins Injecting
| |
| | |
| 21.54 Containment Peak Pressure and Temperature 24.2 End of Blowdown Phase
| |
| | |
| Note: Double-ended hot leg breaks are only analyzed until the end of blowdown since double-ended pump suction breaks are limiting thereafter (see Section 6.2.1.3.4).
| |
| | |
| 6.2-93 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-8
| |
| | |
| LOCA SEQUENCE FOR DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK, UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Time of
| |
| | |
| Occurrence Event (sec) 12.5 Accumulator Begins Injecting
| |
| | |
| 19.73 Containment Peak Pressure and Temperature 22.4 End of Blowdown
| |
| | |
| Note: Double-ended hot leg breaks are only analyzed until the end of blowdown since double-ended pump suction breaks are limiting thereafter (see Section 6.2.1.3.4).
| |
| | |
| 6.2-94 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2 -9 MSLB ACCIDENT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR 0.90 FT2 SPLIT BREAK AT 30% POWER WITH MS ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE FOR UNIT 1 (PEAK PRESSURE)
| |
| | |
| TIME OF OCCURRENCE EVENT (sec)
| |
| | |
| Main feedwater isolation 23
| |
| | |
| Steamline isolation 40
| |
| | |
| Start fan coolers 42.92
| |
| | |
| Containment peak temperature 51.7
| |
| | |
| Start sprays 196.2
| |
| | |
| Containment peak pressure 272.4
| |
| | |
| Steam generator dryout 1817
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-9a
| |
| | |
| MSLB ACCIDENT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR 1.0 FT2 SPLIT BREAK AT 100% POWER WITH LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER AND MS ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE FOR UNIT 1 (PEAK TEMPERATURE)
| |
| TIME OF OCCURRENCE EVENT (sec)
| |
| | |
| Main feedwater isolation 22.0
| |
| | |
| Steamline isolation 37.0
| |
| | |
| Start fan coolers 65
| |
| | |
| Containment peak temperature 65
| |
| | |
| Start sprays 153.1
| |
| | |
| Containment peak pressure 1685
| |
| | |
| Steam generator dryout 1816
| |
| | |
| 6.2-95 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-9b
| |
| | |
| MSLB ACCIDENT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR 0.83 FT2 DOUBLE-ENDED RUPTURE
| |
| | |
| AT 30% POWER WITH MSIV FAILURE FOR UNIT 2 (PEAK PRESSURE)
| |
| | |
| EVENT TIME OF OCCURRENCE (sec)
| |
| | |
| Main feedwater isolation 25.0
| |
| | |
| Start fan coolers 41.85
| |
| | |
| Steamline isolation 43.0
| |
| | |
| Containment peak temperature 55.7
| |
| | |
| Start sprays 195.3
| |
| | |
| Containment peak pressure 297.5
| |
| | |
| Steam generator dryout 1820
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-9c MSLB ACCIDENT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR 1.0 FT 2 DOUBLE-ENDED RUPTURE
| |
| | |
| AT 100% POWER WITH LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER AND MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE FOR UNIT 2 (PEAK TEMPERATURE)
| |
| | |
| EVENT TIME OF OCCURRENCE (sec)
| |
| | |
| Main feedwater isolation 7.7
| |
| | |
| Steamline isolation 8.7
| |
| | |
| Start fan coolers 66.3
| |
| | |
| Containment peak temperature 66.3
| |
| | |
| Start sprays 810.2
| |
| | |
| Containment peak pressure 868.0
| |
| | |
| Steam generator dryout 1818
| |
| | |
| 6.2-95a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-10
| |
| | |
| SUBCOMPARTMENT NODAL DESCRIPTION
| |
| | |
| INITIAL CONDITIONS
| |
| | |
| AIR STEAM ELEMENT VOLUME TEMP. PRESS PRESS.
| |
| NO. (ft3) (F) (psia) (psia)
| |
| | |
| 1 36,152 120.00 14.05 0.85 2 33,294 120.00 14.05 0.85 3 35,011 120.00 14.05 0.85 4 41,024 120.00 14.05 0.85 5 38,625 120.00 14.05 0.85 6 36,251 120.00 14.05 0.85 7 2,254,200 120.00 14.05 0.85 8 9,983 120.00 14.05 0.85 9 3,742 120.00 14.05 0.85 10 4,159 120.00 14.05 0.85 11 15,677 120.00 14.05 0.85 12 20,743 120.00 14.05 0.85 13 9,914 120.00 14.05 0.85 14 3,515 120.00 14.05 0.85 15 5,435 120.00 14.05 0.85 16 25,159 120.00 14.05 0.85 17 6,968 120.00 14.05 0.85 18 10,232 120.00 14.05 0.85 19 39,190 120.00 14.05 0.85 20 51,611 120.00 14.05 0.85 21 24,844 120.00 14.05 0.85 22 6,250 120.00 14.05 0.85 23 12,236 120.00 14.05 0.85 24 3,145 120.00 14.05 0.85 25 11,472 120.00 14.05 0.85 26 11,138 120.00 14.05 0.85 27 2,838 120.00 14.05 0.85 28 4,993 120.00 14.05 0.85
| |
| | |
| 6.2-96 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11 SUBCOMPARTMENT FLOW PATH DESCRIPTION
| |
| | |
| FLOW BETWEEN PATH HYDR.(4) FLOW(5) EQUI.(6)
| |
| COMPTS. NO. K-FAC(1) F-FAC(2) LENGTH(3) D. A A A/A(7) 1-16 1H 3.6530E+00 2.2000E -02 8.0400E+00 4.2000E+00 2.1000E+01 7.3100E+00 1.5900E -92 2-1 2H 5.9000E-01 2.2000E-02 4.0000E+-1 1.1000E+01 5.7200E+02 4.0000E+01 5.4170E-01 3-4 3H 5.0000E+00 2.2000E-02 8.0000E+01 1.0000E+01 2.2000E+02 7.0000E+01 1.2200E-01 4-28 4H 1.7000E+00 2.2000E-02 9.7100E+00 1.0900E+00 1.9400E+01 2.0000E+00 1.3620E-01 5-6 5H 5.9000E-01 2.2000E-02 4.0000E+01 1.1000E+01 5.7200E+02 4.0000E+01 5.4170E-01 6-1 6H 1.0200E+00 2.2000E-02 5.2000E+01 1.5000E+01 5.7800E+02 5.3000E+01 8.2110E-01 7-6 7H 2.5300E+00 2.2000E-02 8.5400E+01 4.7300E+01 2.3200E+01 5.1510E+01 2.1280E-01 8-15 8H 1.7000E+00 2.2000E-02 4.3000E+01 1.0580E+01 1.3300E+02 4.3000E+01 5.5630E-01 9-8 9H 2.5800E-01 2.2000E-02 2.7250E+01 1.0600E+01 1.1900E+02 3.8500E+01 5.0000E-01 11 -10 11H 2.5150E+00 2.2000E -02 3.2530E+01 1.1050E+01 1.8700E+02 2.4940E+01 7.4200E -01 12-20 12H 2.3500E+00 2.2000E-02 1.6600E-01 6.3240E+02 6.3240E+02 6.9500E+00 3.9600E-01 13-12 13H 2.0500E-01 2.2000E-02 3.4110E+01 1.2130E+01 1.8200E+02 3.4070E+01 7.8030E+01 14-15 14H 2.1500E+00 2.2000E-02 3.2450E+01 1.0600E+01 1.1900E+02 2.6310E+01 5.0000E-01 16-17 16H 7.1000E-01 2.2000E-02 4.2630E+01 7.2000E+00 1.4000E+02 3.7940E-01 2.3530E-01 17-18 17H 3.3300E-01 2.2000E-02 1.7380E+01 1.1910E+01 2.6650E+02 1.5430E+01 4.3200E-01 18-19 18H 9.6700E-01 2.2000E-02 3.2420E+01 7.1800E+00 1.4000E+02 2.5900E+01 2.3530E-01 19-20 19H 1.7480E+00 2.2000E-02 7.1800E+01 1.1320E+01 1.3300E+02 5.6370E+01 2.3750E-01 20-21 20H 8.2900E-01 2.2000E-02 4.7420E+01 7.3100E+00 1.4000E+02 3.9700E+01 2.5000E-01 21-22 21H 1.9110E+00 2.2000E-02 9.3800E+00 3.7800E+00 7.0000E+01 3.9700E+00 1.1760E-01 22-23 22H 9.8400E-01 2.2000E-02 4.9180E+01 7.1800E+00 1.4000E+02 4.2230E+01 2.3550E-01 23-16 23H 9.7000E-01 2.2000E-02 3.3930E+01 7.2000E+00 1.4000E+02 2.8170E+01 2.3550E-01 24-18 24H 3.1140E+00 2.2000E-02 3.1500E+00 3.6800E+01 1.7508E+01 2.6300E+00 1.8500E-02 25-17 25H 8.7600E-01 2.2000E-02 8.6900E+00 6.8200E+00 9.4500E+02 6.8200E+00 6.8970E-01 26-22 26H 1.2000E-01 2.2000E-02 9.2000E+00 2.6100E+01 8.4130E+02 8.6000E+00 8.0130E+01 1-7 1R 1.8400E+00 2.2000E-02 4.5000E+01 1.0000E+01 1.9700E+02 4.5000E+01 3.3910E-01 2-7 2R 1.8400E+00 2.2000E-02 6.0000E+01 1.0000E+01 1.8600E+02 6.0000E+01 3.2010E-01 3-7 3R 1.8400E+00 2.2000E-02 4.5000E+01 1.0000E+01 2.1900E+02 4.5000E+01 3.7700E-01 4-7 4R 1.8400E+00 2.2000E-02 4.5000E+01 1.0000E+01 1.7900E+02 4.5000E+01 3.0810E-01
| |
| | |
| 6.2-97 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| FLOW BETWEEN PATH HYDR.(4) FLOW(5) EQUI.(6)
| |
| COMPTS. NO. K-FAC(1) F-FAC(2) LENGTH(3) D. A A A/A(7) 5-7 5R 1.8400E+00 2.2000E -02 6.0000E+01 1.0000E+01 1.9050E+02 6.0000E+01 3.2790E -01 6-7 6R 1.8400E+00 2.2000E-02 4.5000E+01 1.0000E+01 1.9900E+02 4.5000E+01 3.4240E-01 7-15 7R 1.8500E+00 2.2000E-02 1.8000E+00 4.7000E-01 9.6400E+01 4.7000E-02 1.6710E-01 8-7 8R 2.2300E+00 2.2000E-02 1.2200E+00 2.6000E-01 9.0000E+01 2.8000E-02 1.4170E-01 9-10 9R 2.5800E-01 2.2000E-02 2.0000E+01 1.0600E+01 1.1900E+02 1.8000E+01 5.0000E-01 11-7 11R 1.7900E+00 2.2000E-02 2.0900E+00 2.3000E-01 3.3280E+02 1.2000E-01 2.6650E-01 12-7 12R 1.8900E+00 2.2000E-02 2.6600E+00 2.000E-01 5.0400E+02 2.3000E-01 3.7530E-01 13-7 13R 1.6200E+00 2.2000E-02 3.3500E+00 1.5300E-01 1.7600E-02 1.3500E+00 4.8400E-01 14-7 14R 1.1400E+00 2.2000E-02 1.4800E+01 1.3300E-01 4.8000E+01 3.1770E+00 1.0710E-01 16-8 16R 3.7400E-01 2.2000E-02 2.3770E+01 7.9200E+00 2.9700E+02 2.1160E+01 3.8900E-01 17-9 17R 2.1560E+00 2.2000E-02 2.2270E+01 1.1000E-01 1.1480E+02 2.0760E+01 4.3610E-01 18-10 18R 2.2340E+00 2.2000E-02 1.1800E+00 1.3300E-01 4.5000E+01 5.9000E-01 1.5390E-01 19-11 19R 1.8430E+00 2.2000E-02 1.7080E+01 1.7800E-01 4.7300E+02 1.5480E+01 4.8360E-01 21-13 21R 2.0000E+00 2.2000E-02 1.2500E+01 1.3300E-01 2.0400E+02 6.3900E+00 5.0000E-01 25-7 25R 1.0000E+00 2.2000E-02 4.4710E+01 9.2100E+00 1.9800E+02 3.5500E+01 1.0000E+00 26-14 26R 2.7200E=01 2.2000E-02 1.5100E+01 1.9100E+01 4.2090E+02 1.2840E+01 4.7840E-01 27-7 27R 1.6400E+00 2.2000E-02 2.6000E+01 6.1900E+01 8.2870E+00 8.3800E-01 7.8200E-01 28-7 28R 7.0000E-01 2.2000E-02 2.0070E+01 3.0500E+00 5.8200E+01 1.8700E+01 4.0870E-01 1-7 1A 2.5300E+00 2.2000E-02 8.5400E+01 4.7300E+00 2.3200E+01 5.1510E+01 2.1280E-01 2-3 2A 5.9000E-01 2.2000E-02 4.0000E+01 1.1000E+01 5.7200E+02 4.0000E+01 5.4170E-01 3-7 3A 2.5300E+00 2.2000E-02 8.5400E+01 4.7300E+00 2.3200E+01 5.1510E+01 2.1280E-01 4-7 4A 2.5300E+00 2.2000E-02 8.5400E+01 4.7300E+00 2.3200E+01 5.1510E+01 2.1280E-01 5-4 5A 5.9000E-01 2.2000E-02 4.0000E+01 1.1000E+01 5.7200E+02 4.0000E+01 5.4170E-01 11-12 11A 1.2730E+00 2.2000E-02 3.3590E+01 4.8000E+00 3.6000E+01 1.9070E+01 1.6800E-01 13-14 13A 2.5000E-01 2.2000E-02 2.3000E+01 1.0600E+01 1.1900E+02 1.9500E+01 5.0000E-01 14-22 14A 1.0000E+00 2.2000E-02 7.8200E+00 1.3300E-01 7.8800E+00 3.0000E+00 3.0000E-02 15-23 15A 1.2650E+00 2.2000E-02 6.6300E+00 1.3300E-01 1.3980E+02 1.7200E+00 1.8800E-01 25-9 25A 2.4750E+00 2.2000E-02 2.7040E+01 1.2930E+01 2.2950E+02 2.5840E+01 6.0720E-01 26-7 26A 1.0000E+00 2.2000E-02 4.4710E+01 9.2100E+00 1.9800E+02 3.5500E+01 1.0000E+00
| |
| | |
| 6.2-98 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| NOTES:
| |
| : 1. Factor for form loss and area change pressure drop calculation.
| |
| : 2. Friction factor for frictional pressure drop calculation.
| |
| : 3. Length for inertial pressure drop calculation.
| |
| : 4. Hydraulic diameter for frictional pressure drop calculation.
| |
| : 5. Vent flow area.
| |
| : 6. Equivalent length for frictional pressure drop calculation.
| |
| : 7. Minimum area/maximum area for compressibility effects.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-99 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2-11a has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-100 and 6.2-101 REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11b SUBCOMPARTMENT NODAL DESCRIPTION
| |
| | |
| FLOW CALK.
| |
| CROSS- BOTTOM INITIAL CONDITIONS PEAK SECTIONAL ELEVA- TEMP RELATIVE PRESS.
| |
| NODE VOLUME HEIGHT AREA TION PRESS. HUMIDITY DIFF.*
| |
| NO. DESCRIPTION (ft3) (ft) (ft2) (ft) (F) (psia) (%) (psid)
| |
| Case A Case B 1 RPV-Shield Annulus 6.95 2.25 2.80 397.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -30.5 -18.0 2 RPV-Shield Annulus 6.95 2.25 2.80 397.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -21.5 -9.8 3 RPV-Shield Annulus 6.95 2.25 2.80 397.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -7.8 -5.5 4 RPV-Shield Annulus 20.85 2.25 8.40 397.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -3.0 -2.4 5 RPV-Shield Annulus 6.95 2.25 2.80 397.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -9.8 -6.9 6 RPV-Shield Annulus 6.95 2.25 2.80 397.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -22.2 -10.3 7 RPV-Shield Annulus 18.05 4.75 6.05 393.00 122. 15.00 0.1 -30.0 -12.2 8 RPV-Shield Annulus 19.10 4.75 6.05 393.00 122. 15.00 0.1 -19.3 -8.8 9 RPV-Shield Annulus 19.10 4.75 6.05 393.00 122. 15.00 0.1 -6.9 -6.5 10 RPV-Shield Annulus 55.25 4.75 18.15 393.00 122. 15.00 0.1 -2.9 -2.5 11 RPV-Shield Annulus 19.10 4.75 6.05 393.00 122. 15.00 0.1 -9.0 -5.8 12 RPV-Shield Annulus 18.05 4.75 6.05 393.00 122. 15.00 0.1 -23.0 -10.8 13 RPV-Shield Annulus 7.55 5.25 4.00 387.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -29.5 +8.0 14 RPV-Shield Annulus 8.10 5.25 1.50 387.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -17.8 -9.6 15 RPV-Shield Annulus 8.10 5.25 1.50 387.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -7.7 -4.2 16 RPV-Shield Annulus 23.25 5.25 4.50 387.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -4.7 -4.0 17 RPV-Shield Annulus 8.10 5.25 1.50 387.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -9.0 -7.7 18 RPV-Shield Annulus 7.55 5.25 1.50 387.75 122. 15.00 0.1 -21.3 -12.4 19 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 387.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +7.1 +8.4 20 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 387.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +6.8 +9.3 21 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 379.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +7.0 +8.9 22 RPV-Shield Annulus 52.35 8.00 6.45 379.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +8.8 +7.4
| |
| | |
| 6.2-102 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11b (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| FLOW CALK.
| |
| CROSS- BOTTOM INITIAL CONDITIONS PEAK SECTIONAL ELEVA- RELATIVE PRESS.
| |
| NODE VOLUME HEIGHT AREA TION TEMP PRESS. HUMIDITY DIFF.
| |
| NO. DESCRIPTION (ft3) (ft) (ft2) (ft) (F) (psia) (%) (psid)
| |
| Case A Case B 23 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 379.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +7.8 +8.8 24 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 379.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +7.2 +9.3 25 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 371.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +5.3 +4.9 26 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 371.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +4.4 +6.6 27 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 371.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +5.1 +7.0 28 RPV-Shield Annulus 52.35 8.00 6.45 371.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +6.3 +5.1 29 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 371.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +5.8 +7.1 30 RPV-Shield Annulus 17.45 8.00 2.15 371.75 122. 15.00 0.1 +5.2 +6.4 31 Inspection Cavity 226.35 10.50 23.45 389.50 122. 15.00 0.1 +31.2 +24.8 32 Inspection Cavity 201.62 10.50 19.25 389.50 122. 15.00 0.1 +28.3 +24.7 33 Inspection Cavity 210.68 10.50 19.25 389.50 122. 15.00 0.1 +18.9 +18.3 34 Inspection Cavity 341.44 10.50 37.20 389.50 122. 15.00 0.1 +15.2 +15.0 35 Inspection Cavity 303.80 10.50 28.95 389.50 122. 15.00 0.1 +15.7 +15.3 36 Inspection Cavity 210.68 10.50 19.25 389.50 122. 15.00 0.1 +21.9 +20.3 37 Inspection Cavity 217.28 10.50 23.45 389.50 122. 15.00 0.1 +29.2 +24.9 38 Inspection Cavity 3.95E4 21.25 2.225E 350.50 122. 15.00 0.1 +1.2 +1.9 39 Containment 3.15E7 2.5E3 1.55E3 350.50 122. 15.00 0.1
| |
| | |
| Peaks do not occur at the same time.
| |
| 6.2-103 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11c SUBCOMPARTMENT VENT PATH DESCRIPTION
| |
| | |
| HEAD LOSS, K FROM TO DESCRIPTION EXPANSION VENT VOL. VOL. OF AREA** LENGTH HYDRAULIC &
| |
| PATH NODE NODE VENT PATH A2 L DIAMETER FRICTION TURNING CONTRAC NO. NO. NO. FLOW* (ft) (ft) (ft-1) (ft) LOSS,K£ LOSS, Kbl TION, KE TOTAL 1 1 2 unchoked 0.85 7.10 8.35 0.70 0.30 0.05 -- 0.35 2 2 3 choked (b) 0.85 7.10 8.35 0.70 0.30 0.05 -- 0.35 3 3 4 unchoked 0.85 14.20 16.70 0.70 0.60 0.10 -- 0.70 4 5 4 unchoked 0.85 14.20 16.70 0.70 0.60 0.10 -- 0.70 5 6 5 choked (b) 0.85 7.10 8.35 0.70 0.30 0.05 -- 0.35 6 1 6 unchoked 0.85 7.10 8.35 0.70 0.30 0.05 -- 0.35 7 7 8 unchoked 3.43 6.95 2.00 1.50 0.10 0.85 -- 0.95 8 8 9 choked (b) 1.57 6.95 4.50 1.50 0.02 0.18 0.45 0.65 9 9 10 unchoked 1.43 13.90 9.60 1.50 0.04 0.32 1.04 1.40 10 11 10 unchoked 1.57 13.90 9.00 1.50 0.04 0.36 0.90 1.30 11 12 11 choked (b) 1.43 6.95 4.80 1.50 0.02 0.16 0.52 0.70 12 7 12 unchoked 3.43 6.95 2.00 1.50 0.10 0.85 -- 0.95 13 13 14 unchoked 1.19 6.95 5.60 0.35 0.40 0.80 -- 1.20 14 14 15 choked (b) 0.47 6.95 14.15 0.35 0.05 0.10 0.60 0.75 15 15 16 unchoked 0.43 13.30 13.30 31.00 0.35 0.10 1.10 1.50 16 17 16 unchoked 0.47 13.30 28.30 0.35 0.10 0.20 1.20 1.50 17 18 17 choked (b) 0.43 6.65 15.50 0.35 0.05 0.15 0.55 0.75 18 18 18 choked (b) 1.19 6.65 5.60 0.35 0.40 0.35 -- 0.75 19 19 20 unchoked 2.15 6.65 3.10 0.55 0.38 0.07 -- 0.45 20 20 21 unchoked 2.15 6.65 3.10 0.55 0.38 0.07 -- 0.45 21 21 22 unchoked 2.15 13.30 6.20 0.55 0.76 0.14 -- 0.90 22 23 22 unchoked 2.15 13.30 6.20 0.55 0.76 0.14 -- 0.90 23 24 23 unchoked 2.15 6.65 3.10 0.55 0.38 0.07 -- 0.45 24 19 24 unchoked 2.15 6.65 3.10 0.55 0.38 0.07 -- 0.45 25 25 26 unchoked 2.15 6.65 3.10 0.55 0.38 0.07 -- 0.45 26 26 27 unchoked 2.15 6.65 3.10 0.55 0.38 0.07 -- 0.45 27 27 28 unchoked 2.15 13.30 6.20 0.55 0.76 0.14 -- 0.90
| |
| | |
| 6.2-104 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11c (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| HEAD LOSS, K FROM TO DESCRIPTION EXPANSION VENT VOL. VOL. OF AREA** LENGTH HYDRAULIC &
| |
| PATH NODE NODE VENT PATH A2 L DIAMETER FRICTION TURNING CONTRAC-NO. NO. NO. FLOW* (ft) (ft) (ft-1) (ft) LOSS,K£ LOSS, Kbl TION, KE TOTAL 28 29 28 unchoked 2.15 13.30 6.20 0.55 0.76 0.14 -- 0.90 29 30 29 unchoked 2.15 6.65 3.10 0.55 0.38 0.07 -- 0.45 30 25 30 unchoked 2.15 6.65 3.10 0.55 0.38 0.07 -- 0.45 31 1 39 choked (b) 1.05 1.75 1.05 0.75 0.01 -- 2.04 2.05 32 2 39 choked (b) 1.05 1.75 1.05 0.75 0.01 -- 2.04 2.05 33 3 39 choked (b) 1.05 1.75 1.05 0.75 0.01 -- 2.04 2.05 34 4 39 unchoked 3.15 1.75 0.35 0.75 0.01 -- 2.04 2.05 35 5 39 unchoked 1.05 1.75 1.05 0.75 0.01 -- 2.04 2.05 36 6 39 choked (b) 1.05 1.75 1.05 0.75 0.01 -- 2.04 2.05 37 7 1 unchoked 2.80 3.50 0.90 1.75 0.07 -- 0.28 0.35 38 8 2 unchoked 2.80 3.50 0.90 1.75 0.07 -- 0.28 0.35 39 9 3 unchoked 2.80 3.50 0.90 1.75 0.07 -- 0.28 0.35 40 10 4 unchoked 8.40 3.50 0.30 1.75 0.07 -- 0.28 0.35 41 11 5 unchoked 2.80 3.50 0.90 1.75 0.07 -- 0.28 0.35 42 12 6 unchoked 2.80 3.50 0.90 1.75 0.07 -- 0.28 0.35 43 7 13 choked (b) 0.73 5.00 6.85 1.75 0.07 -- 0.21 0.45 44 8 14 unchoked 0.83 5.00 6.05 1.75 0.07 -- 0.21 0.45 45 9 15 choked (b) 0.83 5.00 6.05 1.75 0.24 -- 0.28 0.45 46 10 16 unchoked 2.29 5.00 2.20 1.75 0.24 -- 0.21 0.45 47 11 17 choked (b) 0.83 5.00 6.05 1.75 0.24 -- 0.21 0.45 48 12 18 unchoked 0.73 5.00 6.85 1.75 0.24 -- 0.21 0.45 49 13 19 choked (b) 1.10 6.63 4.80 0.35 0.60 -- 0.15 0.75 50 14 20 choked (b) 1.10 6.63 4.80 0.35 0.60 -- 0.15 0.75 51 15 21 unchoked 1.10 6.63 4.80 0.35 0.60 -- 0.15 0.75 52 16 22 unchoked 3.30 6.63 1.60 0.35 0.60 -- 0.15 0.75 53 17 23 unchoked 1.10 6.63 4.80 0.35 0.60 -- 0.15 0.75 54 18 24 choked (b) 1.10 6.63 4.80 0.35 0.60 -- 0.15 0.75 55 19 25 unchoked 1.80 8.00 4.50 0.55 0.70 -- 0.15 0.70 56 20 26 unchoked 1.80 8.00 4.50 0.55 0.70 -- -- 0.70
| |
| | |
| 6.2-105 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11c (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| HEAD LOSS, K FROM TO DESCRIPTION EXPANSION VENT VOL. VOL. OF AREA** LENGTH HYDRAULIC &
| |
| PATH NODE NODE VENT PATH A2 L DIAMETER FRICTION TURNING CONTRAC-NO.*** NO. NO. FLOW* (ft) (ft) (ft-1) (ft) LOSS,K£ LOSS, Kbl TION, KE TOTAL 57 21 27 unchoked 1.80 8.00 4.50 0.55 0.70 -- -- 0.70 58 22 28 unchoked 5.40 8.00 1.50 0.55 0.70 -- -- 0.70 59 23 29 unchoked 1.80 8.00 4.50 0.55 0.70 -- -- 0.70 60 24 30 unchoked 1.80 8.00 4.50 0.55 0.70 -- -- 0.70 61 25 38 unchoked 1.80 8.00 6.90 0.55 1.05 -- -- 1.90 62 26 38 unchoked 1.80 14.75 6.90 0.55 1.05 -- 0.85 1.90 63 27 38 unchoked 1.80 14.75 6.90 0.55 1.05 -- 0.85 1.90 64 28 38 unchoked 5.40 14.75 2.30 0.55 1.05 -- 0.85 1.90 65 29 38 unchoked 1.80 14.75 6.90 0.55 1.05 -- 0.85 1.90 66 30 38 unchoked 1.80 14.75 6.90 0.55 1.05 -- 0.85 1.90 67 38 39 unchoked 112.75 65.00 0.60 10.50 0.02 0.73 1.00 1.75 68 31 32 choked (a) 18.00 8.65 0.50 3.95 0.05 0.50 -- 0.55 69 43 33 choked 7.60 8.65 1.15 3.95 0.01 0.09 0.50 0.60 70 33 34 choked 6.50 10.80 1.65 3.95 0.01 0.14 0.65 0.80 71 34 35 unchoked 7.10 13.00 1.85 3.95 0.02 0.08 0.55 0.65 72 36 35 choked 6.50 10.80 1.65 3.95 0.01 0.11 0.98 1.10 73 37 36 choked 8.20 8.65 1.05 3.95 0.01 0.12 0.32 0.45 74 31 37 choked 18.00 8.65 0.50 3.95 0.05 0.50 -- 0.55 75 31 7 choked (b) 4.00 3.75 0.95 1.00 -- -- 1.80 1.80 76 32 8 choked 1.50 3.25 2.20 0.35 -- -- 1.70 1.70 77 33 9 choked 1.50 3.25 2.20 0.35 -- -- 1.70 1.70 78 34 10 choked 1.74 3.75 2.20 0.30 -- -- 1.80 1.80 79 35 10 choked (b) 2.08 3.50 1.65 0.30 -- -- 1.75 1.75 80 36 11 choked (a) 1.50 3.25 2.20 0.35 -- -- 1.70 1.70 81 37 12 choked (a) 1.16 3.75 3.25 0.25 -- -- 1.80 1.80 82 31 13 choked (b) 4.00 3.75 0.95 1.00 -- -- 1.80 1.80 83 32 14 choked (a) 1.28 3.25 2.55 0.35 -- -- 1.70 1.70 84 33 15 unchoked 1.50 3.25 2.20 0.35 -- -- 1.70 1.70 85 34 16 choked (b) 1.29 3.75 2.95 0.30 -- -- 1.80 1.80
| |
| | |
| 6.2-106 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-11c (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| HEAD LOSS, K FROM TO DESCRIPTION EXPANSION VENT VOL. VOL. OF AREA** LENGTH HYDRAULIC &
| |
| PATH NODE NODE VENT PATH A2 L DIAMETER FRICTION TURNING CONTRAC NO.*** NO. NO. FLOW* (ft) (ft) (ft-1) (ft) LOSS,K£ LOSS, Kbl TION, KE TOTAL 86 35 16 choked (b) 1.86 3.50 1.85 0.30 -- -- 1.75 1.75 87 36 17 unchoked 1.50 3.25 2.20 0.35 -- -- 1.70 1.70 88 37 18 choked (a) 0.71 3.75 5.30 0.25 -- -- 1.80 1.80 89 31 39 choked 23.45 -- 0.45 -- -- -- -- 3.15 90 32 39 unchoked 19.25 -- 0.70 -- -- -- -- 4.00 91 33 39 unchoked 19.25 -- 0.70 -- -- -- -- 4.00 92 34 39 unchoked 37.20 -- 0.30 -- -- -- -- 4.35 93 35 39 unchoked 28.95 -- 0.40 -- -- -- -- 4.00 94 36 39 unchoked 19.25 -- 0.70 -- -- -- -- 4.00 95 37 39 unchoked 23.45 -- 0.45 -- -- -- -- 4.35 96 0 31 blowdown 1.00 -- 0.00 -- -- -- -- 0.00
| |
| * pertains to both cases, a and b, unless otherwise noted.
| |
| ** minimum cross-sectional area.
| |
| | |
| *** Under sufficient pressure, junctions 89 through 96 become available as a result of hinged shield doors geometry.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-107 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-12
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF SUBCOMPARTMENT PRESSURE DIFFERENTIALS
| |
| | |
| ELEMENT BREAK PEAK PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL NO. DESCRIPTION CONSIDERED (psi) 1 Loop Compartment DECL
| |
| * 14.02 @ .396 sec.
| |
| | |
| 2 Loop Compartment DECL* 15.02 @ .352 sec.
| |
| 3 Loop Compartment DECL
| |
| * 19.39 @ .205 sec.
| |
| | |
| 4 Loop Compartment DECL* 19.24 @ .244 sec.
| |
| 5 Loop Compartment DECL
| |
| * 15.06 @ .383 sec.
| |
| | |
| 6 Loop Compartment DECL* 14.14 @ .408 sec.
| |
| 1 Loop Compartment DEHL
| |
| * 14.69 @ .108 sec.
| |
| | |
| 2 Loop Compartment DEHL* 14.52 @ .133 sec.
| |
| 3 Loop Compartment DEHL
| |
| * 20.27 @ .123 sec.
| |
| | |
| 4 Loop Compartment DEHL* 19.81 @ .137 sec.
| |
| 5 Loop Compartment DEHL
| |
| * 13.98 @ .141 sec.
| |
| | |
| 6 Loop Compartment DEHL* 14.62 @ .107 sec.
| |
| 25 Steamline Steamline 12.16 @ .032 sec.
| |
| Pipe Chase Double-Ended
| |
| | |
| 26 Steamline Steamline 13.43 @ .035 sec.
| |
| Pipe Chase Double-Ended
| |
| | |
| 28 Upper Pressurizer Spray Line 10.24 @ .364 sec.
| |
| Cubicle Double-Ended
| |
| | |
| *See Subsection 6.2.1.2.1. These are loop compartment design controlling loads. Note that the dynamic (non-static) effects associated with a primary coolant loop break need not be considered to the primary coolant leak-before-break analysis.
| |
| 6.2-108 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-13
| |
| | |
| SUBCOMPARTMENT MASS AND ENERGY RELEASE RATES (DEHL)
| |
| | |
| LOOP COMPARTMENT HOT LEG DE (G)*
| |
| INCLUDES 10 PERCENT MARGIN
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| = BREAK MASS FLOW AND ENERGY FLOW TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .00032 1.0450000E+04 6.7906190E+06 649.82
| |
| .00252 9.1702623E+04 5.9379899E+07 647.53
| |
| .00502 8.4987827E+04 5.4873596E+07 645.66
| |
| .00751 7.6133240E+04 4.9139061E+07 645.44
| |
| .01002 7.6118821E+04 4.9171867E+07 645.99
| |
| .01251 7.7281712E+04 4.9915878E+07 645.90
| |
| .01502 7.7537193E+04 5.0095089E+07 646.08
| |
| .01750 7.9167162E+04 5.0521676E+07 646.33
| |
| .02001 7.9926657E+04 5.1022108E+07 646.45
| |
| .02251 7.9562960E+04 5.1441490E+07 646.55
| |
| .02501 8.0132282E+04 5.1816527E+07 646.64
| |
| .02751 8.0649564E+04 5.2157182E+07 646.71
| |
| .03000 8.1102823E+04 5.2456305E+07 646.79
| |
| .03251 8.1512962E+04 5.2727098E+07 646.86
| |
| .03503 8.1868122E+04 5.2961052E+07 646.91
| |
| .03750 8.2148150E+04 5.3145226E+07 646.94
| |
| .04002 8.2347995E+04 5.3277013E+07 646.97
| |
| .04251 8.2467109E+04 5.3356941E+07 647.01
| |
| .04502 8.2535403E+04 5.3406017E+07 647.07
| |
| .04750 8.2600816E+04 5.3456527E+07 647.17
| |
| .05002 8.2700645E+04 5.3533389E+07 647.32
| |
| .05252 8.2873456E+04 5.3663223E+07 647.53
| |
| .05501 8.3177249E+04 5.3883535E+07 647.82
| |
| .05752 8.3677092E+04 5.4233441E+07 648.13
| |
| .06003 8.4280315E+04 5.4645085E+07 648.37
| |
| .06250 8.4884261E+04 5.5851393E+07 648.55
| |
| .06502 8.5491246E+04 5.5454646E+07 648.66
| |
| .06751 8.6096552E+04 5.5851394E+07 648.71
| |
| .07002 8.6667429E+04 5.6222612E+07 648.72
| |
| .07255 8.7248811E+04 5.6597392E+07 648.69
| |
| .07501 8.7791402E+04 5.6944705E+07 648.64
| |
| .07753 8.9334175E+04 5.7289566E+07 648.55
| |
| .08001 8.9843083E+04 5.7611027E+07 648.46
| |
| .08252 8.9338838E+04 5.7921985E+07 648.34
| |
| .08506 8.9807039E+04 5.8213517E+07 648.21
| |
| .08756 9.0232328E+04 5.8476779E+07 648.07
| |
| .09002 9.0626674E+04 5.8718619E+07 647.92
| |
| .09250 9.0979344E+04 5.8932222E+07 647.75
| |
| .09501 9.1288544E+04 5.9116696E+07 647.58
| |
| * See Section 6.2.1.2.1. These are loop compartment controlling loads. Note that the dynamic (non-static) effects associated with a primary coolant loop break need not be considered due to primary coolant loop leak-before-break analysis.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-109 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-13 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .09753 9.1537257E+04 5.9260481E+07 647.39
| |
| .10038 9.1697001E+04 5.9345622E+07 647.19
| |
| .10251 9.1722568E+04 5.9343701E+07 646.99
| |
| .10504 9.1546452E+04 5.9210142E+07 646.78
| |
| .10758 9.1131493E+04 5.8922018E+07 646.56
| |
| .11010 9.1541335E+04 5.8523458E+07 646.37
| |
| .11251 8.9909390E+04 5.8100288E+07 646.21
| |
| .11505 8.9208432E+04 5.7635842E+07 646.08
| |
| .11757 8.8541420E+04 5.7195037E+07 645.97
| |
| .12002 8.7897019E+04 5.6759054E+07 645.86
| |
| .12255 8.7250220E+04 5.6343084E+07 645.76
| |
| .12510 8.6638177E+04 5.5940805E+07 645.68
| |
| .12764 8.6078721E+04 5.5573590E+07 645.61
| |
| .13016 8.5579263E+04 5.5246187E+07 645.56
| |
| .13263 8.5137430E+04 5.4955555E+07 645.49
| |
| .13508 8.4734273E+04 5.4690153E+07 645.43
| |
| .13762 8.4358080E+04 5.4441957E+07 645.37
| |
| .14013 8.4018877E+04 5.4216759E+07 645.29
| |
| .14260 8.3702355E+04 5.4005842E+07 645.21
| |
| .14502 8.3412103E+04 5.3811719E+07 645.13
| |
| .14758 8.3121905E+04 5.3616804E+07 645.04
| |
| .15014 8.2847574E+04 5.3431757E+07 644.94
| |
| .15256 8.2602551E+04 5.3265857E+07 644.85
| |
| .15502 8.2366882E+04 5.3105760E+07 644.75
| |
| .15758 8.2141014E+04 5.2951766E+07 644.64
| |
| .16009 8.1941352E+04 5.2814957E+07 644.55
| |
| .16250 8.1766972E+04 5.2694520E+07 644.45
| |
| .16519 8.1614729E+04 5.2587949E+07 644.34
| |
| .16754 8.1495818E+04 5.2503181E+07 644.24
| |
| .17019 8.1380394E+04 5.2419855E+07 644.13
| |
| .17254 8.1293516E+04 5.2355373E+07 644.03
| |
| .17519 8.1203618E+04 5.2286828E+07 643.90
| |
| .17758 8.1126015E+04 5.2226411E+07 643.77
| |
| .18002 8.1047811E+04 5.2164671E+07 643.63
| |
| .18270 8.0960694E+04 5.2095655E+07 643.47
| |
| .18511 8.0883548E+04 5.2034310E+07 643.32
| |
| .18772 8.0802101E+04 5.1969144E+07 643.17
| |
| .19014 8.0730574E+04 5.1911322E+07 643.02
| |
| .19261 8.0662932E+04 5.1855768E+07 642.87
| |
| .19518 8.0599680E+04 5.1802622E+07 642.71
| |
| .19762 8.0543649E+04 5.1754893E+07 642.57
| |
| .20002 8.0496818E+04 5.1713205E+07 642.43
| |
| .20252 8.0450983E+04 5.1571411E+07 642.27
| |
| .20503 8.0407924E+04 5.1531247E+07 642.12
| |
| .20750 8.0366583E+04 5.1592242E+07 641.96
| |
| .21008 8.0321441E+04 5.1549967E+07 641.80
| |
| .21271 8.0269049E+04 5.1502514E+07 641.62
| |
| | |
| 6.2-110 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-13 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .21504 8.0216713E+04 5.1456680E+07 641.47
| |
| .21762 8.0149604E+04 5.1399883E+07 641.30
| |
| .22021 8.0071203E+04 5.1335773E+07 641.13
| |
| .22253 7.9991201E+04 5.1272140E+07 640.97
| |
| .22502 7.9895429E+04 5.1197642E+07 640.81
| |
| .22772 7.9781335E+04 5.1110519E+07 640.63
| |
| .23020 7.9666671E+04 5.1024250E+07 640.47
| |
| .23265 7.9546714E+04 5.0935061E+07 640.32
| |
| .23510 7.9421278E+04 5.0842576E+07 640.16
| |
| .23754 7.9290871E+04 5.0747077E+07 640.01
| |
| .24018 7.9146210E+04 5.0641788E+07 639.85
| |
| .24255 7.9013973E+04 5.0545907E+07 639.71
| |
| .24520 7.8866810E+04 5.0439354E+07 639.55
| |
| .24769 7.8729297E+04 5.0339808E+07 639.40
| |
| .25022 7.8591574E+04 5.0240058E+07 639.26
| |
| .25255 7.8467771E+04 5.0150211E+07 639.12
| |
| .25518 7.8332634E+04 5.0051810E+07 638.96
| |
| .25761 7.8212276E+04 4.9953817E+07 638.82
| |
| .26008 7.8095021E+04 4.9877644E+07 638.68
| |
| .26261 7.7980718E+04 4.9793094E+07 638.53
| |
| .26519 7.7869684E+04 4.9710360E+07 638.38
| |
| .26755 7.7772777E+04 4.9637586E+07 638.24
| |
| .27009 7.7672410E+04 4.9561795E+07 638.09
| |
| .27256 7.7576236E+04 4.9488687E+07 637.94
| |
| .27520 7.7486381E+04 4.9419682E+07 637.79
| |
| .27758 7.7405520E+04 4.9356976E+07 637.64
| |
| .28017 7.7321833E+04 4.9291403E+07 637.48
| |
| .28254 7.7246455E+04 4.9232037E+07 637.34
| |
| .28513 7.7166761E+04 4.9168993E+07 637.16
| |
| .28770 7.7089602E+04 4.9107700E+07 637.02
| |
| .29012 7.7017314E+04 4.9050307E+07 636.87
| |
| .29270 7.6941775E+04 4.8990192E+07 636.72
| |
| .29504 7.6874009E+04 4.8936219E+07 636.58
| |
| .29750 7.6799861E+04 4.8877173E+07 636.42
| |
| .30018 7.6725683E+04 4.8818143E+07 636.27
| |
| .30255 7.6657763E+04 4.8764156E+07 636.13
| |
| .30520 7.6581960E+04 4.8704001E+07 635.97
| |
| .30766 7.6511537E+04 4.8648223E+07 635.83
| |
| .31020 7.6439107E+04 4.8590967E+07 635.68
| |
| .31256 7.6371632E+04 4.8537718E+07 635.55
| |
| .31502 7.6301264E+04 4.8482265E+07 635.41
| |
| .31776 7.6222240E+04 4.8420259E+07 635.25
| |
| .32026 7.6151152E+04 4.8364573E+07 635.11
| |
| .32278 7.6078762E+04 4.8307987E+07 634.97
| |
| .32500 7.6015001E+04 4.8258290E+07 634.85
| |
| .32751 7.5943429E+04 4.8202571E+07 634.72
| |
| .33003 7.5871648E+04 4.8146770E+07 634.58
| |
| | |
| 6.2-111 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-13 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .33255 7.5800063E+04 4.8091216E+07 634.45
| |
| .33507 7.5728692E+04 4.8035901E+07 634.32
| |
| .33759 7.5657336E+04 4.7980673E+07 634.18
| |
| .34012 7.5586039E+04 4.7925580E+07 634.05
| |
| .34264 7.5514831E+04 4.7870648E+07 633.92
| |
| .34517 7.5443644E+04 4.7815826E+07 633.80
| |
| .34770 7.5372478E+04 4.7761116E+07 633.67
| |
| .35022 7.5301372E+04 4.7706550E+07 633.54
| |
| .35275 7.5230345E+04 4.7652137E+07 633.42
| |
| .35528 7.5159424E+04 4.7597892E+07 633.29
| |
| .35753 7.5096514E+04 4.7549840E+07 633.18
| |
| .36006 7.5025937E+04 4.7495993E+07 633.06
| |
| .36260 7.4955633E+04 4.7442404E+07 632.94
| |
| .36514 7.4885686E+04 4.7389115E+07 632.82
| |
| .36769 7.4816195E+04 4.7336176E+07 632.70
| |
| .37026 7.4747270E+04 4.7283643E+07 632.58
| |
| .37255 7.4686576E+04 4.7237335E+07 632.47
| |
| .37515 7.4619085E+04 4.7185755E+07 632.36
| |
| .37777 7.4552567E+04 4.7134782E+07 632.24
| |
| .38012 7.4494234E+04 4.7089978E+07 632.13
| |
| .38280 7.4429957E+04 4.7040302E+07 632.01
| |
| .38521 7.4373927E+04 4.6996807E+07 631.90
| |
| .38766 7.4319097E+04 4.6953985E+07 631.79
| |
| .39014 7.4265592E+04 4.6911901E+07 631.68
| |
| .39257 7.4213490E+04 4.6870577E+07 631.56
| |
| .39525 7.4162848E+04 4.6830030E+07 631.45
| |
| .39755 7.4119771E+04 4.6795197E+07 631.35
| |
| .40024 7.4071956E+04 4.6756110E+07 631.23
| |
| .40263 7.4031324E+04 4.6722508E+07 631.12
| |
| .40505 7.3992265E+04 4.6689869E+07 631.01
| |
| .40754 7.3953634E+04 4.6657181E+07 630.90
| |
| .41008 7.3915834E+04 4.6624898E+07 630.78
| |
| .41265 7.3878877E+04 4.6593031E+07 630.67
| |
| .41522 7.3842520E+04 4.6561488E+07 630.55
| |
| .41759 7.3809273E+04 4.6532683E+07 630.44
| |
| .42016 7.3773743E+04 4.6501827E+07 630.33
| |
| .42263 7.3739360E+04 4.6472025E+07 630.22
| |
| .42509 7.3705024E+04 4.6442349E+07 630.11
| |
| .42767 7.3668412E+04 4.6410792E+07 630.00
| |
| .43024 7.3630468E+04 4.6378431E+07 629.88
| |
| .43281 7.3591538E+04 4.6345540E+07 629.77
| |
| .43510 7.3555847E+04 4.6315678E+07 629.67
| |
| .43779 7.3512262E+04 4.6279600E+07 629.55
| |
| .44015 7.3471929E+04 4.6246663E+07 629.45
| |
| .44263 7.3427628E+04 4.6211068E+07 629.34
| |
| .44503 7.3383680E+04 4.6176106E+07 629.24
| |
| .44776 7.3331978E+04 4.6135356E+07 629.13
| |
| | |
| 6.2-112 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-13 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .45031 7.3282141E+04 4.6096379E+07 629.03
| |
| .45260 7.3235561E+04 4.6060263E+07 628.93
| |
| .45518 7.3182092E+04 4.6019183E+07 628.83
| |
| .45779 7.3126951E+04 4.5977094E+07 628.73
| |
| .46006 7.3077974E+04 4.5939970E+07 628.64
| |
| .46262 7.3022010E+04 4.5897808E+07 628.55
| |
| .46518 7.2965695E+04 4.5855565E+07 628.45
| |
| .46775 7.2909064E+04 4.5813244E+07 628.36
| |
| .47030 7.2852601E+04 4.5771172E+07 628.27
| |
| .47255 7.2803434E+04 4.5734594E+07 628.19
| |
| .47512 7.2747555E+04 4.5693055E+07 628.10
| |
| .47771 7.2692239E+04 4.5651939E+07 628.02
| |
| .48032 7.2637685E+04 4.5611357E+07 627.93
| |
| .48262 7.2590658E+04 4.5776315E+07 627.85
| |
| .48527 7.2537845E+04 4.5536867E+07 627.77
| |
| .48762 7.2492558E+04 4.5502934E+07 627.69
| |
| .49034 7.2441942E+04 4.5464857E+07 627.60
| |
| .49274 7.2398700E+04 4.5432173E+07 627.53
| |
| .49517 7.2356762E+04 4.5400321E+07 627.45
| |
| .49765 7.2315453E+04 4.5368758E+07 627.37
| |
| .50024 7.2273965E+04 4.5337058E+07 627.29
| |
| .51032 7.2127491E+04 4.5222834E+07 626.98
| |
| .52016 7.2001732E+04 4.5122139E+07 626.68
| |
| .53003 7.1882619E+04 4.5026374E+07 626.39
| |
| .54020 7.1757488E+04 4.4926891E+07 626.09
| |
| .55004 7.1625934E+04 4.4825006E+07 625.82
| |
| .56004 7.1478064E+04 4.4713790E+07 625.56
| |
| .57018 7.1315949E+04 4.4594769E+07 625.31
| |
| .58018 7.1151872E+04 4.4476280E+07 625.09
| |
| .59033 7.0991087E+04 4.4360991E+07 624.88
| |
| .60028 7.0846250E+04 4.4257250E+07 624.69
| |
| .61006 7.0720517E+04 4.4166727E+07 624.52
| |
| .62028 7.0603826E+04 4.4081922E+07 624.36
| |
| .63028 7.0497398E+04 4.4004179E+07 624.20
| |
| .64037 7.0390156E+04 4.3926138E+07 624.04
| |
| .65032 7.0279762E+04 4.3846588E+07 623.89
| |
| .66003 7.0166429E+04 4.3766038E+07 623.75
| |
| .67035 7.0040619E+04 4.3677892E+07 623.61
| |
| .68020 6.9916543E+04 4.3592177E+07 623.49
| |
| .69008 6.9789328E+04 4.5305404E+07 623.38
| |
| .70037 6.9655953E+04 4.3415515E+07 623.29
| |
| .71029 6.9527357E+04 4.3329755E+07 623.20
| |
| .72021 6.9402132E+04 4.3247000E+07 623.14
| |
| .73010 6.9276026E+04 4.3164872E+07 623.09
| |
| .74021 6.9149644E+04 4.3082727E+07 623.04
| |
| .75002 6.9029488E+04 4.3004148E+07 622.98
| |
| .76000 6.8906029E+04 4.2924081E+07 622.94
| |
| | |
| 6.2-113 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-13 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .77025 6.87804105+04 4.2843095E+07 622.90
| |
| .78006 6.8662759E+04 4.2767283E+07 622.86
| |
| .79033 6.8541617E+04 4.2689920E+07 622.83
| |
| .80016 6.8426399E+04 4.2616761E+07 622.81
| |
| .81028 6.8307192E+04 4.2541464E+07 622.80
| |
| .82032 6.8186958E+04 4.2455921E+07 622.79
| |
| .83026 6.8064929E+04 4.2389625E+07 622.78
| |
| .84010 6.7940977E+04 4.2312479E+07 622.78
| |
| .85016 6.7811183E+04 4.2232057E+07 622.79
| |
| .86014 6.7680887E+04 4.2151725E+07 622.80
| |
| .87013 6.7551641E+04 4.2072496E+07 622.82
| |
| .88014 6.7424638E+04 4.1995093E+07 622.84
| |
| .89016 6.7300109E+04 4.1919559E+07 622.88
| |
| .90014 6.7177304E+04 4.1845265E+07 622.91
| |
| .91001 6.7055021E+04 4.1771327E+07 622.94
| |
| .92008 6.6928373E+04 4.1694733E+07 622.98
| |
| .93002 6.6801748E+04 4.1618209E+07 623.01
| |
| .94022 6.6672846E+04 4.1540604E+07 623.05
| |
| .95016 6.6552609E+04 4.1468865E+07 623.10
| |
| .96032 6.6439870E+04 4.1402573E+07 623.16
| |
| .97003 6.6342067E+04 4.1346011E+07 623.22
| |
| .98019 6.6247034E+04 4.1291775E+07 623.30
| |
| .99034 6.6155388E+04 4.1239880E+07 623.38 1.00009 6.6067983E+04 4.1190608E+07 623.46 1.05030 6.5603486E+04 4.0931086E+07 623.92 1.10009 6.5077242E+04 4.0636301E+07 624.43 1.15005 6.4460076E+04 4.0283981E+07 624.94 1.20022 6.3921631E+04 3.9986030E+07 625.55 1.25009 6.3380665E+04 3.9683232E+07 626.11 1.30021 6.2889985E+04 3.9411562E+07 626.67 1.35018 6.2380042E+04 3.9124505E+07 627.20 1.40030 6.1869308E+04 3.8836200E+07 627.71 1.45011 6.1327869E+04 3.8526052E+07 628.20 1.50013 6.0753843E+04 3.8194367E+07 628.67 1.55010 6.0152311E+04 3.7844382E+07 629.14 1.60014 5.9508198E+04 3.7465703E+07 629.59 1.65001 5.8867275E+04 3.7090366E+07 630.07 1.70007 5.8227768E+04 3.6717784E+07 630.59 1.75010 5.7570888E+04 3.6335240E+07 631.14 1.80003 5.6924962E+04 3.5962142E+07 631.75 1.85003 5.6285021E+04 3.5594964E+07 632.41 1.90028 5.5632266E+04 3.5220597E+07 633.10 1.95028 5.4981660E+04 3.4848198E+07 633.81 2.00032 5.4354119E+04 3.4491783E+07 634.58
| |
| | |
| 6.2-114 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-14
| |
| | |
| SUBCOMPARTMENT MASS AND ENERGY RELEASE RATES (DECL)
| |
| | |
| LOOP COMPARTMENT COLD LEG DE (G)*
| |
| INCLUDES 10 PERCENT MARGIN
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| = BREAK MASS FLOW AND ENERGY FLOW TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .00032 1.0450000E+04 5.8364295E+06 558.51
| |
| .00252 6.5293399E+04 3.6149158E+07 553.64
| |
| .00501 6.9050997E+04 3.8213077E+07 553.40
| |
| .00751 6.6248743E+04 3.6637286E+07 553.03
| |
| .01002 6.2701722E+04 3.4658711E+07 552.76
| |
| .01251 6.0415941E+04 3.3398156E+07 552.80
| |
| .01501 6.0048462E+04 3.3209641E+07 553.05
| |
| .01754 6.0804842E+04 3.4637961E+07 553.21
| |
| .02002 6.1534934E+04 3.4045517E+07 553.27
| |
| .02256 6.2099988E+04 3.4360624E+07 553.31
| |
| .02501 6.2519500E+04 3.4596249E+07 553.37
| |
| .02753 6.2922332E+04 3.4823718E+07 553.44
| |
| .03000 6.3303899E+04 3.5039501E+07 553.51
| |
| .03253 6.3681171E+04 3.5252837E+07 553.58
| |
| .03502 6.4052068E+04 3.5461821E+07 553.64
| |
| .03751 6.4405685E+04 3.5661226E+07 553.70
| |
| .04001 6.4757004E+04 3.5862976E+07 553.81
| |
| .04250 6.5173289E+04 3.6102591E+07 553.95
| |
| .04502 6.5637870E+04 3.6368066E+07 554.07
| |
| .04750 6.6338671E+04 3.6789796E+07 554.58
| |
| .05001 6.7982945E+04 3.7710906E+07 554.71
| |
| .05252 6.9398632E+04 4.8500911E+07 554.78
| |
| .05503 8.4757420E+04 5.7836613E+07 554.96
| |
| .05751 9.1285190E+04 5.0710377E+07 555.52
| |
| .06001 9.2962792E+04 5.1639617E+07 555.49
| |
| .06250 9.1170263E+04 5.0616264E+07 555.18
| |
| .06503 9.2737233E+04 5.1491742E+07 555.24
| |
| .06753 9.3489060E+04 5.1913091E+07 555.29
| |
| .07005 9.4737866E+04 5.2608120E+07 555.30
| |
| .07256 9.4936403E+04 5.2716009E+07 555.28
| |
| .07501 9.5012243E+04 5.2752588E+07 555.22
| |
| .07751 9.5219511E+04 5.2873399E+07 555.28
| |
| .08002 9.6097778E+04 5.3368064E+07 555.35
| |
| .08257 9.6796106E+04 5.3759464E+07 555.39
| |
| .08502 9.7062220E+04 5.3907457E+07 555.39
| |
| .08750 9.7452854E+04 5.4127827E+07 555.43
| |
| .09034 9.7929979E+04 5.4396834E+07 555.47
| |
| .09256 9.8302034E+04 5.4604677E+07 555.48
| |
| .09504 9.8468322E+04 5.4697076E+07 555.48
| |
| * See Section 6.2.1.2.1. These are loop compartment design controlling loads. Note that the dynamic (non-static) effects associated with a primary coolant loop break need not be considered due to primary coolant loop leak-before-break analysis.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-115 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-14 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .0975 1 9.8676819E+04 5.4813954E+07 555.49
| |
| .10002 9.8894161E+04 5.4935727E+07 555.50
| |
| .10258 9.9016455E+04 5.5003384E+07 555.50
| |
| .10506 9.9116068E+04 5.5058823E+07 555.50
| |
| .10762 9.9229045E+04 5.5121624E+07 555.50
| |
| .11009 9.9279361E+04 5.5148793E+07 555.49
| |
| .11256 9.9290025E+04 5.5154087E+07 555.48
| |
| .11507 9.9390184E+04 5.5210636E+07 555.49
| |
| .11755 9.9582207E+04 5.5319088E+07 555.51
| |
| .12009 9.9790673E+04 5.5436501E+07 555.53
| |
| .12251 9.9992890E+04 5.5550409E+07 555.54
| |
| .12506 1.0025231E+05 5.5696726E+07 555.57
| |
| .12751 1.0054998E+05 5.5864690E+07 555.59
| |
| .13011 1.0086495E+05 5.6042365E+07 555.62
| |
| .13258 1.0112191E+05 5.6187418E+07 555.64
| |
| .13505 1.0135538E+05 5.6318896E+07 555.66
| |
| .13754 1.0156197E+05 5.6435857E+07 555.68
| |
| .14012 1.0172003E+05 5.6525463E+07 555.70
| |
| .14255 1.0182024E+05 5.6582663E+07 555.71
| |
| .14510 1.0185915E+05 5.6605779E+07 555.73
| |
| .14755 1.0185191E+05 5.6602976E+07 555.74
| |
| .15005 1.0181196E+05 5.6582199E+07 555.75
| |
| .15259 1.0175793E+05 5.6553815E+07 555.77
| |
| .15503 1.0172085E+05 5.6535270E+07 555.79
| |
| .15765 1.0171597E+05 5.6535329E+07 555.82
| |
| .16017 1.0174698E+05 5.6555427E+07 555.84
| |
| .16259 1.0180477E+05 5.6590450E+07 555.87
| |
| .16502 1.0188002E+05 5.6634740E+07 555.90
| |
| .16754 1.0197234E+05 5.6688459E+07 555.92
| |
| .17013 1.0205675E+05 5.6737224E+07 555.94
| |
| .17252 1.0212086E+05 5.6774011E+07 555.95
| |
| .17500 1.0216666E+05 5.6800249E+07 555.96
| |
| .17753 1.0219290E+05 5.6815191E+07 555.96
| |
| .18002 1.0219181E+05 5.6814441E+07 555.96
| |
| .18264 1.0214929E+05 5.6790099E+07 555.95
| |
| .18505 1.0206855E+05 5.6744146E+07 555.94
| |
| .18756 1.0193973E+05 5.6671148E+07 555.93
| |
| .19007 1.0177028E+05 5.6575210E+07 555.91
| |
| .19261 1.0158053E+05 5.6458077E+07 555.89
| |
| .19506 1.0136546E+05 5.6346986E+07 555.88
| |
| .19762 1.0116089E+05 5.6231928E+07 555.87
| |
| .20014 1.0098518E+05 5.6133616E+07 555.86
| |
| .20251 1.0085093E+05 5.6006190E+07 555.86
| |
| .20504 1.0075617E+05 5.6058642E+07 555.86
| |
| .20760 1.0070154E+05 5.5976418E+07 555.86
| |
| .21000 1.0069211E+05 5.5972068E+07 555.87
| |
| .21253 1.0071815E+05 5.5987766E+07 555.89
| |
| | |
| 6.2-116 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-14 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .21508 1.0077350E+05 5.6019827E+07 555.90
| |
| .21766 1.0084813E+05 5.6062595E+07 555.91
| |
| .22002 1.0092308E+05 5.6105147E+07 555.92
| |
| .22256 1.0100710E+05 5.6152669E+07 555.93
| |
| .22517 1.0108645E+05 5.6197399E+07 555.93
| |
| .22766 1.0116008E+05 5.6238720E+07 555.94
| |
| .23007 1.0122343E+05 5.6274239E+07 555.94
| |
| .23268 1.0128341E+05 5.6307706E+07 555.94
| |
| .23503 1.0133802E+05 5.6338198E+07 555.94
| |
| .23766 1.0139493E+05 5.6369993E+07 555.94
| |
| .24004 1.0145018E+05 5.6400808E+07 555.95
| |
| .24263 1.0151245E+05 5.6435680E+07 555.95
| |
| .24520 1.0157079E+05 5.6468279E+07 555.95
| |
| .24762 1.0162722E+05 5.6499819E+07 555.95
| |
| .25008 1.0167322E+05 5.6525539E+07 555.95
| |
| .25257 1.0171015E+05 5.6546041E+07 555.95
| |
| .25506 1.0173048E+05 5.6557262E+07 555.95
| |
| .25768 1.0172963E+05 5.6556483E+07 555.95
| |
| .26005 1.0170843E+05 5.6544253E+07 555.94
| |
| .26258 1.0165900E+05 5.6516060E+07 555.94
| |
| .26513 1.0158144E+05 5.6472132E+07 555.93
| |
| .26767 1.0147922E+05 5.6414442E+07 555.92
| |
| .27002 1.0136204E+05 5.6348377E+07 555.91
| |
| .27251 1.0121949E+05 5.6268134E+07 555.90
| |
| .27512 1.0105313E+05 5.6174591E+07 555.89
| |
| .27754 1.0089788E+05 5.6087280E+07 555.88
| |
| .28009 1.0072300E+05 5.5989406E+07 555.88
| |
| .28252 1.0056402E+05 5.5900296E+07 555.87
| |
| .28517 1.0040775E+05 5.5812918E+07 555.86
| |
| .28751 1.0027094E+05 5.5736496E+07 555.86
| |
| .29012 1.0015486E+05 5.5671910E+07 555.86
| |
| .29265 1.0009684E+05 5.5640472E+07 555.87
| |
| .29513 1.0011182E+05 5.5650319E+07 555.88
| |
| .29768 1.0016733E+05 5.5682826E+07 555.90
| |
| .30012 1.0020994E+05 5.5707478E+07 555.91
| |
| .30250 1.0023137E+05 5.5719871E+07 555.91
| |
| .30505 1.0025572E+05 5.5733973E+07 555.92
| |
| .30773 1.0029144E+05 5.5754487E+07 555.92
| |
| .31015 1.0031138E+05 5.5765822E+07 555.93
| |
| .31253 1.0031119E+05 5.5765662E+07 555.93
| |
| .31512 1.0030749E+05 5.5763671E+07 555.93
| |
| .31759 1.0031822E+05 5.5769997E+07 555.93
| |
| .32008 1.0034212E+05 5.5783805E+07 555.94
| |
| .32264 1.0037469E+05 5.5802485E+07 555.94
| |
| .32507 1.0041691E+05 5.5826655E+07 555.95
| |
| .32763 1.0047305E+05 5.5858690E+07 555.96
| |
| .33003 1.0054114E+05 5.5897475E+07 555.97
| |
| | |
| 6.2-117 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-14 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .33253 1.0061897E+05 5.5941692E+07 555.98
| |
| .33520 1.0070993E+05 5.5993274E+07 555.99
| |
| .33753 1.0079164E+05 5.6039530E+07 555.99
| |
| .34000 1.0086973E+05 5.6083588E+07 556.00
| |
| .34251 1.0093668E+05 5.6121262E+07 556.00
| |
| .34513 1.0098898E+05 5.6150556E+07 556.01
| |
| .34756 1.0102134E+05 5.6158561E+07 556.01
| |
| .35003 1.0103349E+05 5.6175072E+07 556.00
| |
| .35263 1.0102007E+05 5.6167084E+07 556.00
| |
| .35511 1.0098126E+05 5.6144779E+07 555.99
| |
| .35756 1.0092594E+05 5.6113230E+07 555.98
| |
| .36012 1.0085319E+05 5.6071917E+07 555.98
| |
| .36259 1.0077946E+05 5.6030196E+07 555.97
| |
| .36508 1.0069881E+05 5.5984654E+07 555.96
| |
| .36752 1.0062053E+05 5.5940534E+07 555.96
| |
| .37012 1.0053621E+05 5.5893013E+07 555.95
| |
| .37257 1.0045506E+05 5.5847393E+07 555.94
| |
| .37511 1.0036841E+05 5.5798651E+07 555.94
| |
| .37751 1.0027592E+05 5.5746557E+07 555.93
| |
| .38017 1.0016478E+05 5.5683952E+07 555.92
| |
| .38251 1.0005392E+05 5.5621474E+07 555.91
| |
| .38506 9.9925528E+04 5.5549166E+07 555.91
| |
| .38752 9.9790289E+04 5.5473083E+07 555.90
| |
| .39002 9.9648674E+04 5.5393348E+07 555.89
| |
| .39268 9.9499183E+04 5.5309571E+07 555.88
| |
| .39507 9.9360111E+04 5.5231564E+07 555.87
| |
| .39752 9.9234440E+04 5.5161163E+07 555.87
| |
| .40013 9.9105290E+04 5.5089028E+07 555.86
| |
| .40252 9.9002837E+04 5.5031891E+07 555.86
| |
| .40502 9.8927142E+04 5.4989977E+07 555.86
| |
| .40762 9.8867421E+04 5.4957141E+07 555.87
| |
| .41012 9.8835955E+04 5.4940258E+07 555.87
| |
| .41266 9.8826302E+04 5.4935716E+07 555.88
| |
| .41504 9.8834809E+04 5.4941391E+07 555.89
| |
| .41752 9.8856432E+04 5.4954441E+07 555.90
| |
| .42012 9.8885825E+04 5.4971714E+07 555.91
| |
| .42254 9.8913923E+04 5.4988105E+07 555.92
| |
| .42511 9.8940187E+04 5.5003432E+07 555.93
| |
| .42770 9.8959221E+04 5.5014980E+07 555.93
| |
| .43007 9.8974144E+04 5.5023391E+07 555.94
| |
| .43260 9.8984293E+04 5.5029513E+07 555.94
| |
| .43508 9.8993498E+04 5.5035154E+07 555.95
| |
| .43755 9.9002597E+04 5.5040727E+07 555.95
| |
| .44003 9.9013620E+04 5.5047449E+07 555.96
| |
| .44267 9.9026937E+04 5.5055425E+07 555.96
| |
| .44501 9.9041839E+04 5.5064305E+07 555.97
| |
| .44766 9.9058368E+04 5.5074106E+07 555.98
| |
| | |
| 6.2-118 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-14 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .45011 9.9074658E+04 5.5083755E +07 555.98
| |
| .45258 9.9088119E+04 5.5091746E+07 555.99
| |
| .45501 9.9098885E+04 5.5098224E+07 555.99
| |
| .45752 9.9103054E+04 5.5100920E+07 556.00
| |
| .46004 9.9098918E+04 5.5098912E+07 556.00
| |
| .46255 9.9084833E+04 5.5091252E+07 556.00
| |
| .46505 9.9058050E+04 5.5076388E+07 556.00
| |
| .46758 9.9021749E+04 5.5056210E+07 556.00
| |
| .47005 9.8972631E+04 5.5028786E+07 556.00
| |
| .47256 9.8918429E+04 5.4998522E+07 556.00
| |
| .47503 9.8855024E+04 5.4963088E+07 556.00
| |
| .47759 9.8787595E+04 5.4925458E+07 556.00
| |
| .48017 9.8720201E+04 5.4887918E+07 555.99
| |
| .48257 9.8654501E+04 5.4851348E+07 555.99
| |
| .48510 9.8590296E+04 5.4815697E+07 555.99
| |
| .48751 9.8529026E+04 5.4781698E+07 556.00
| |
| .49014 9.8466506E+04 5.4747106E+07 556.00
| |
| .49257 9.8411679E+04 5.4716830E+07 556.00
| |
| .49511 9.8356708E+04 5.4686497E+07 556.00
| |
| .49763 9.8305497E+04 5.4658299E+07 556.00
| |
| .50010 9.8256310E+04 5.4631275E+07 556.01
| |
| .51013 9.8093375E+04 5.4542483E+07 556.03
| |
| .52002 9.8016719E+04 5.4502720E+07 556.06
| |
| .53001 9.8030509E+04 5.4514014E+07 556.09
| |
| .54004 9.8049077E+04 5.4527561E+07 556.13
| |
| .55001 9.7970636E+04 5.4486026E+07 556.15
| |
| .56012 9.7807326E+04 5.4396893E+07 556.16
| |
| .57008 9.7621367E+04 5.4295392E+07 556.18
| |
| .58009 9.7425011E+04 5.4188258E+07 556.20
| |
| .59015 9.7213809E+04 5.4073029E+07 556.23
| |
| .60006 9.7034190E+04 5.3975992E+07 556.26
| |
| .61001 9.6922063E+04 5.3917290E+07 556.30
| |
| .62011 9.6856360E+04 5.3884870E+07 556.34
| |
| .63010 9.6799204E+04 5.3857102E+07 556.38
| |
| .64021 9.6722714E+04 5.3818597E+07 556.42
| |
| .65006 9.6605719E+04 5.3757220E+07 556.46
| |
| .66009 9.6429082E+04 5.3662426E+07 556.50
| |
| .67007 9.6217883E+04 5.3548485E+07 556.53
| |
| .68012 9.6029601E+04 5.3448009E+07 556.58
| |
| .69020 9.5881221E+04 5.3370286E+07 556.63
| |
| .70010 9.5749448E+04 5.3301953E+07 556.68
| |
| .71007 9.5613630E+04 5.3231285E+07 556.73
| |
| .72011 9.5479138E+04 5.3161491E+07 556.79
| |
| .73007 9.5343769E+04 5.3091220E+07 556.84
| |
| .74002 9.5190880E+04 5.3011203E+07 556.89
| |
| .75005 9.5014279E+04 5.2918060E+07 556.95
| |
| .76009 9.4826835E+04 5.2818991E+07 557.00
| |
| | |
| 6.2-119 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-14 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (L3/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .77013 9.4638591E+04 5.2719726E+07 557.06
| |
| .78013 9.4563697E+04 5.2684627E+07 557.13
| |
| .79001 9.4375101E+04 5.2584744E+07 557.19
| |
| .80003 9.4211962E+04 5.2500157E+07 557.26
| |
| .81015 9.4041285E+04 5.2411686E+07 557.33
| |
| .82004 9.38676975+04 5.2321578E+07 557.40
| |
| .83020 9.3684217E+04 5.2225952E+07 557.47
| |
| .84010 9.3488271E+04 5.2123117E+07 557.54
| |
| .85000 9.3277468E+04 5.2011889E+07 557.60
| |
| .86003 9.3057931E+04 5.1896026E+07 557.67
| |
| .87007 9.2847260E+04 5.1785318E+07 557.75
| |
| .88019 9.2644308E+04 5.1679101E+07 557.82
| |
| .89005 9.2443153E+04 5.1574072E+07 557.90
| |
| .90012 9.2237350E+04 5.1467038E+07 557.98
| |
| .91005 9.2035255E+04 5.1362308E+07 558.07
| |
| .92012 9.2005625E+04 5.1355698E+07 558.18
| |
| .93003 9.2063920E+04 5.1396925E+07 558.27
| |
| .94012 9.2101294E+04 5.1426245E+07 558.37
| |
| .95007 9.2101938E+04 5.1435012E+07 558.48
| |
| .96012 9.2093904E+04 5.1438991E+07 558.55
| |
| .97010 9.1974451E+04 5.1379998E+07 558.63
| |
| .98005 9.1799443E+04 5.1290091E+07 558.72
| |
| .99024 9.16610575+04 5.1221516E+07 558.81 1.00003 9.1507811E+04 5.1144439E+07 558.91 1.05006 9.0810290E+04 5.0798705E+07 559.39 1.10003 9.0191154E+04 5.0498277E+07 559.90 1.15007 8.9579390E+04 5.0202720E+07 560.43 1.20007 8.8514882E+04 4.9654038E+07 560.97 1.25021 8.7416588E+04 4.9086975E+07 561.53 1.30017 8.6243958E+04 4.8479041E+07 562.12 1.35011 8.5068988E+04 4.7869143E+07 562.71 1.40001 8.4077437E+04 4.7360420E+07 563.30 1.45012 8.3078233E+04 4.6848713E+07 563.91 1.50011 8.2313650E+04 4.6467814E+07 564.52 1.55011 8.1609508E+04 4.6119548E+07 565.12 1.60004 8.0867656E+04 4.5748266E+07 565.72 1.65019 8.0095162E+04 4.5354842E+07 566.26 1.70007 7.9135253E+04 4.4854435E+07 566.81 1.75007 7.8073107E+04 4.4285394E+07 567.23 1.80000 7.6871315E+04 4.3630008E+07 567.57 1.85008 7.5758761E+04 4.3019588E+07 567.85 1.90011 7.4603834E+04 4.2383078E+07 568.11 1.95006 7.3533736E+04 4.1794583E+07 568.37 2.00012 7.2586063E+04 4.1273341E+07 568.61
| |
| | |
| 6.2-120 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-15
| |
| | |
| SUBCOMPARTMENT MASS AND ENERGY RELEASE RATES (PRESSURIZER SPRAY LINE)
| |
| | |
| PRESSURIZER SPRAY LINE BREAK PRESSURIZER INCLUDES 10 PERCENT MARGIN
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| = BREAK MASS FLOW AND ENERGY FLOW TIME (S) MASS FLOW (LB/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| | |
| .00000 0. 0. 0.00
| |
| .00251 5.5520269E+03 3.4074591E+06 613.73
| |
| .00502 5.7566695E+03 3.5214197E+06 611.71
| |
| .00751 5.6923083E+03 3.4814317E+06 611.60
| |
| .01002 5.6156477E+03 3.4348228E+06 611.65
| |
| .01251 5.5820416E+03 3.4132128E+06 611.46
| |
| .01502 5.6059056E+03 3.4246446E+06 610.90
| |
| .01755 5.9216506E+03 3.6028096E+06 608.41
| |
| .02003 6.0459291E+03 3.6722760E+06 607.30
| |
| .02255 6.0807799E+03 3.6897530E+06 606.79
| |
| .02505 6.0942687E+03 3.6961327E+06 606.49
| |
| .02754 6.2322326E+03 3.7737113E+06 605.52
| |
| .03004 6.3772227E+03 3.8554807E+06 604.57
| |
| .03259 6.4620881E+03 3.9026378E+06 603.93
| |
| .03507 6.4752834E+03 3.9088990E+06 603.66
| |
| .03753 6.5151813E+03 3.9305146E+06 603.29
| |
| .04002 6.5143568E+03 3.9287741E+06 603.09
| |
| .04251 6.4438043E+03 3.8870628E+06 603.22
| |
| .04511 6.3427181E+03 3.8281043E+06 603.54
| |
| .04763 6.2773775E+03 3.7899141E+06 603.74
| |
| .05005 6.2551735E+03 3.7764886E+06 603.74
| |
| .05263 6.2524046E+03 3.7741758E+06 603.64
| |
| .05518 6.2658754E+03 3.7818297E+06 603.46
| |
| .05760 6.2974621E+03 3.7987461E+06 603.22
| |
| .06003 6.3249883E+03 3.8139254E+06 602.99
| |
| .06259 6.3350379E+03 3.8191169E+06 602.86
| |
| .06519 6.3288577E+03 3.8150521E+06 602.80
| |
| .06750 6.3276385E+03 3.8139641E+06 602.75
| |
| .07006 6.3455081E+03 3.8238003E+06 602.60
| |
| .07250 6.3665132E+03 3.8354407E+06 602.44
| |
| .07503 6.3688606E+03 3.8363851E+06 602.37
| |
| .07763 6.3404989E+03 3.8197353E+06 602.43
| |
| .08003 6.2872107E+03 3.7888759E+06 602.63
| |
| .08254 6.2175863E+03 3.7487047E+06 602.92
| |
| .08512 6.1352700E+03 3.7014579E+06 603.31
| |
| .08753 6.0708749E+03 3.6645461E+06 603.63
| |
| .09001 6.0409120E+03 3.6473208E+06 603.77
| |
| .09253 6.0539679E+03 3.6546606E+06 603.68
| |
| .09508 6.1075851E+03 3.6851210E+06 603.37
| |
| | |
| 6.2-121 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-15 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (LB/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .09759 6.1876085E+03 3.7306914E+06 602.93
| |
| .10002 6.2735718E+03 3.7796317E+06 602.47
| |
| .10257 6.3664980E+03 3.8325765E+06 601.99
| |
| .10507 6.4429047E+03 3.8761465E+06 601.61
| |
| .10758 6.4965895E+03 3.9067176E+06 601.35
| |
| .11001 6.5270618E+03 3.9240262E+06 601.19
| |
| .11253 6.5344748E+03 3.9281326E+06 601.14
| |
| .11510 6.5204882E+03 3.9199857E+06 601.18
| |
| .11761 6.4843044E+03 3.8991158E+06 601.32
| |
| .12009 6.4325725E+03 3.8693579E+06 601.53
| |
| .12255 6.3726344E+03 3.8349813E+06 601.79
| |
| .12518 6.3034597E+03 3.7953523E+06 602.11
| |
| .12761 6.2383094E+03 3.7580645E+06 602.42
| |
| .13012 6.1820566E+03 3.7258948E+06 602.70
| |
| .13264 6.1395327E+03 3.7015958E+06 602.91
| |
| .13504 6.1127110E+03 3.6862746E+06 603.05
| |
| .13755 6.0998879E+03 3.6789327E+06 603.11
| |
| .14010 6.0988357E+03 3.6783086E+06 603.12
| |
| .14257 6.1080626E+03 3.6835439E+06 603.06
| |
| .14510 6.1240390E+03 3.6926378E+06 602.97
| |
| .14758 6.1442581E+03 3.7041585E+06 602.87
| |
| .16011 6.1657410E+03 3.7169743E+06 602.75
| |
| .15260 6.1857163E+03 3.7283579E+06 602.64
| |
| .15502 6.1992384E+03 3.7354879E+06 602.57
| |
| .15755 6.2031636E+03 3.7377038E+06 602.55
| |
| .16011 6.1939722E+03 3.7324198E+06 602.59
| |
| .16265 6.1745723E+03 3.7213319E+06 602.69
| |
| .16510 6.1423746E+03 3.7029436E+06 602.85
| |
| .16751 6.1097626E+03 3.6843379E+06 603.02
| |
| .17014 6.0750772E+03 3.6645786E+06 603.22
| |
| .17253 6.0482471E+03 3.6492888E+06 603.36
| |
| .17512 6.0289841E+03 3.6383136E+06 603.47
| |
| .17760 6.0193184E+03 3.6328038E+06 603.52
| |
| .18008 6.0197962E+03 3.6330808E+06 603.52
| |
| .18258 6.0276833E+03 3.6375701E+06 603.48
| |
| .18501 6.0400469E+03 3.6446001E+06 603.41
| |
| .18766 6.0528858E+03 3.6518945E+06 603.33
| |
| .19013 6.0646210E+03 3.6585557E+06 603.26
| |
| .19254 6.0708106E+03 3.6620600E+06 603.22
| |
| .19500 6.0717703E+03 3.6625777E+06 603.21
| |
| .19754 6.0668335E+03 3.6597328E+06 603.24
| |
| .20010 6.0570812E+03 3.6541472E+06 603.29
| |
| .20274 6.0452208E+03 3.6473601E+06 603.35
| |
| .20509 6.0330499E+03 3.6404113E+06 603.41
| |
| .20760 6.0241617E+03 3.6353420E+06 603.46
| |
| .21005 6.0191035E+03 3.6324522E+06 603.49
| |
| .21254 6.0197127E+03 3.6327939E+06 603.48
| |
| | |
| 6.2-122 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-15 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (LB/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .21510 6.0257956E+03 3.6362513E +06 603.45
| |
| .21754 6.0357699E+03 3.6419285E+06 603.39
| |
| .22016 6.0480859E+03 3.6489364E+06 603.32
| |
| .22256 6.0625560E+03 3.6571731E+06 603.24
| |
| .22504 6.0749929E+03 3.6642500E+06 603.17
| |
| .22753 6.0866417E+03 3.6708838E+06 603.10
| |
| .23007 6.0951080E+03 3.6757012E+06 603.06
| |
| .23259 6.1001899E+03 3.6785898E+06 603.03
| |
| .23508 6.1011008E+03 3.6791040E+06 603.02
| |
| .23753 6.0973306E+03 3.6769487E+06 603.04
| |
| .24023 6.0876426E+03 3.6714129E+06 603.09
| |
| .24255 6.0753055E+03 3.6643848E+06 603.16
| |
| .24503 6.0554102E+03 3.6536132E+06 603.26
| |
| .24751 6.0364519E+03 3.6422456E+06 603.38
| |
| .25009 6.0184816E+03 3.6320047E+06 603.48
| |
| .25280 6.0028077E+03 3.6230838E+06 603.56
| |
| .25504 5.9931687E+03 3.6175960E+06 603.62
| |
| .25759 5.9900445E+03 3.6158252E+06 603.64
| |
| .26004 5.9938317E+03 3.6179873E+06 603.62
| |
| .26255 6.0039391E+03 3.6237539E+06 603.56
| |
| .25501 6.0188653E+03 3.6322491E+06 603.48
| |
| .26759 6.0373297E+03 3.6427624E+06 603.37
| |
| .27011 6.0551031E+03 3.6528848E+06 603.27
| |
| .27258 6.0711548E+03 3.6620230E+06 603.18
| |
| .27506 6.0821145E+03 3.6682550E+06 603.12
| |
| .27752 6.0879002E+03 3.6715416E+06 603.09
| |
| .28003 6.0867031E+03 3.6708478E+06 603.09
| |
| .28252 6.0784821E+03 3.6661507E+06 603.14
| |
| .28504 6.0651856E+03 3.6585621E+06 603.21
| |
| .28754 6.0434821E+03 3.6461959E+06 603.33
| |
| .29006 6.0196102E+03 3.6325934E+06 603.46
| |
| .29255 5.9947341E+03 3.6184236E+06 603.60
| |
| .29520 5.9887892E+03 3.6036635E+06 603.75
| |
| .29758 5.9450244E+03 3.5901412E+06 603.89
| |
| .30004 5.9252478E+03 3.5788953E+06 604.01
| |
| .30284 5.9052411E+03 3.5675125E+06 604.13
| |
| .30504 5.8913813E+03 3.5596397E+06 604.21
| |
| .30760 5.8782215E+03 3.5521680E+06 604.29
| |
| .31001 5.8700234E+03 3.5475147E+06 604.34
| |
| .31256 5.8639105E+03 3.5440436E+06 604.33
| |
| .31501 5.8607978E+03 3.5422734E+06 604.40
| |
| .31753 5.8599636E+03 3.5417959E+06 604.41
| |
| .32004 5.8608011E+03 3.5422668E+06 604.40
| |
| .32254 5.8629988E+03 3.5435071E+06 604.38
| |
| .32505 5.8656482E+03 3.5450037E+06 604.37
| |
| .32784 5.8686407E+03 3.5466905E+06 604.35
| |
| .33009 5.8714918E+03 3.5482967E+06 604.33
| |
| | |
| 6.2-123 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-15 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (LB/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .33273 5.8741682E+03 3.5498034E+06 604.31
| |
| .33508 5.8771774E+03 3.5514986E+06 604.29
| |
| .33756 5.8802735E+03 3.5532429E+06 604.26
| |
| .34009 5.8841700E+03 3.5554426E+06 604.24
| |
| .34260 5.8884789E+03 3.5578797E+06 604.21
| |
| .34507 5.8930780E+03 3.5604779E+06 604.18
| |
| .34755 5.8975952E+03 3.5630314E+06 604.15
| |
| .35027 5.9014291E+03 3.5651946E+06 604.12
| |
| .35257 5.9039809E+03 3.5666279E+06 604.11
| |
| .35506 5.9044769E+03 3.5668906E+06 604.10
| |
| .35763 5.9024245E+03 3.5657013E+06 604.11
| |
| .35011 5.8983568E+03 3.5633740E+06 604.13
| |
| .36265 5.8905550E+03 3.5589069E+06 604.17
| |
| .36502 5.8818991E+03 3.5539585E+06 604.22
| |
| .36763 5.8702901E+03 3.5473402E+06 604.29
| |
| .37011 5.8585785E+03 3.5406607E+06 604.35
| |
| .37259 5.8478945E+03 3.5345723E+06 604.42
| |
| .37512 5.8384907E+03 3.5292171E+06 604.47
| |
| .37757 5.8315699E+03 3.5252690E+06 604.51
| |
| .38001 5.8283142E+03 3.5234085E+06 604.53
| |
| .38255 5.8284433E+03 3.5234795E+06 604.53
| |
| .38504 5.8325211E+03 3.5257837E+06 604.50
| |
| .38764 5.8405465E+03 3.5303363E+06 604.45
| |
| .39003 5.8503172E+03 3.5358907E+06 604.39
| |
| .39255 5.8632583E+03 3.5432350E+06 604.31
| |
| .39507 5.8769944E+03 3.5510359E+06 604.23
| |
| .39752 5.8901754E+03 3.5585146E+06 604.14
| |
| .40002 5.9026209E+03 3.5655867E+06 604.07
| |
| .40266 5.9140894E+03 3.5720883E+06 604.00
| |
| .40506 5.9222442E+03 3.5767163E+06 603.95
| |
| .40761 5.9272907E+03 3.5795690E+06 603.91
| |
| .41010 5.9287654E+03 3.5803886E+06 603.90
| |
| .41261 5.9266016E+03 3.5791393E+06 603.91
| |
| .41515 5.9207163E+03 3.5757700E+06 603.94
| |
| .41756 5.9120146E+03 3.5708002E+06 603.99
| |
| .42010 5.9007105E+03 3.5643532E+06 604.05
| |
| .42264 5.8873278E+03 3.5567264E+06 604.13
| |
| .42510 5.8733889E+03 3.5487826E+06 604.21
| |
| .42776 5.8596323E+03 3.5409490E+06 604.30
| |
| .43002 5.8458384E+03 3.5330901E+06 604.38
| |
| .43273 5.8331063E+03 3.5258467E+06 604.45
| |
| .43505 5.8221311E+03 3.5196022E+06 604.52
| |
| .43751 5.8130794E+03 3.5144558E+06 604.58
| |
| .44011 5.8051154E+03 3.5099211E+06 604.63
| |
| .44254 5.7994338E+03 3.5066831E+06 604.65
| |
| .44510 5.7943623E+03 3.5037894E+06 604.69
| |
| .44756 5.7908671E+03 3.5017915E+06 604.71
| |
| | |
| 6.2-124 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-15 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (LB/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .45006 5.7884098E+03 3.5003828E+06 604.72
| |
| .45255 5.7868114E+03 3.4994613E+06 604.73
| |
| .45501 5.7860305E+03 3.4990035E+06 604.73
| |
| .45755 5.7859404E+03 3.4989362E+06 604.73
| |
| .46008 5.7865023E+03 3.4992415E+06 604.72
| |
| .46255 5.7876727E+03 3.4998863E+06 604.71
| |
| .46505 5.7891053E+03 3.5006850E+06 604.70
| |
| .46756 5.7908624E+03 3.5016617E+06 604.69
| |
| .47006 5.7926250E+03 3.5026427E+06 604.67
| |
| .47253 5.7940101E+03 3.5034098E+06 604.66
| |
| .47514 5.7949974E+03 3.5039478E+06 604.65
| |
| .47751 5.7952080E+03 3.5040456E+06 604.65
| |
| .48017 5.7945401E+03 3.5036413E+06 604.65
| |
| .48257 5.7927826E+03 3.5026177E+06 604.65
| |
| .48509 5.7901457E+03 3.5010969E+06 604.66
| |
| .48757 5.7864539E+03 3.4989748E+06 604.68
| |
| .49011 5.7818731E+03 3.4963467E+06 604.71
| |
| .49257 5.7768716E+03 3.4934807E+06 604.74
| |
| .49505 5.7713451E+06 3.4903136E+06 604.77
| |
| .49760 5.7657954E+06 3.4871343E+06 604.80
| |
| .50011 5.7603602E+03 3.4840234E+06 604.83
| |
| .51009 5.7491923E+03 3.4775926E+06 604.88
| |
| .52009 5.7609480E+03 3.4841862E+06 604.79
| |
| .53006 5.7844690E+03 3.4974703E+06 604.63
| |
| .54005 5.7987721E+03 3.5055003E+06 604.52
| |
| .55000 5.7970116E+03 3.5044053E+06 604.52
| |
| .56006 5.7863331E+03 3.4982404E+06 604.57
| |
| .57002 5.7741241E+03 3.4912139E+06 604.63
| |
| .58007 5.7631540E+03 3.4848951E+06 604.69
| |
| .59036 5.7548799E+03 3.4801119E+06 604.72
| |
| .60004 5.7492097E+03 3.4768050E+06 604.75
| |
| .61010 5.7426034E+03 3.4729615E+06 604.77
| |
| .62004 5.7325199E+03 3.4671373E+06 604.82
| |
| .63014 5.7211947E+03 3.4605989E+06 604.87
| |
| .64006 5.7162332E+03 3.4576773E+06 604.89
| |
| .65003 5.7176191E+03 3.4583568E+06 604.86
| |
| .66012 5.7204578E+03 3.4598599E+06 604.82
| |
| .67003 5.7223865E+03 3.4608454E+06 604.79
| |
| .68006 5.7257890E+03 3.4626698E+06 604.75
| |
| .69002 5.7317272E+03 3.4659330E+06 604.69
| |
| .70010 5.7366181E+03 3.4686004E+06 604.64
| |
| .71004 5.7366207E+03 3.4684965E+06 604.62
| |
| .72003 5.7320245E+03 3.4657852E+06 604.64
| |
| .73012 5.7251012E+03 3.4617536E+06 604.66
| |
| .74005 5.7172129E+03 3.4571775E+06 604.70
| |
| .75003 5.7094890E+03 3.4526916E+06 604.73
| |
| .76011 5.7035213E+03 3.4491984E+06 604.75
| |
| | |
| 6.2-125 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-15 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| TIME (S) MASS FLOW (LB/S) ENERGY FLOW (BTU/S) AVG. ENTHALPY (BTU/LB)
| |
| .77015 5.6997968E+03 3.4469781E+06 604.75
| |
| .78006 5.6960407E+03 3.4447350E+06 604.76
| |
| .79006 5.6906934E+03 3.4415867E+06 604.77
| |
| .80005 5.6856760E+03 3.4386253E+06 604.79
| |
| .81021 5.6845992E+03 3.4379041E+06 604.78
| |
| .82006 5.6883128E+03 3.4399046E+06 604.73
| |
| .83010 5.6942403E+03 3.4431581E+06 604.67
| |
| .84013 5.6985107E+03 3.4454743E+06 604.63
| |
| .85000 5.6994327E+03 3.4458899E+06 604.60
| |
| .86014 5.6970829E+03 3.4444488E+06 604.60
| |
| .87001 5.6929918E+03 3.4420216E+06 604.61
| |
| .88010 5.6890670E+03 3.4396914E+06 604.61
| |
| .89006 5.6860123E+03 3.4378527E+06 604.62
| |
| .90008 5.6830007E+03 3.4360407E+06 604.62
| |
| .91009 5.6783432E+03 3.4332928E+06 604.63
| |
| .92011 5.6715216E+03 3.4293170E+06 604.66
| |
| .93018 5.6647085E+03 3.4253454E+06 604.68
| |
| .94003 5.6629152E+03 3.4242285E+06 604.68
| |
| .95003 5.6673076E+03 3.4266195E+06 604.63
| |
| .96010 5.6722227E+03 3.4293052E+06 604.58
| |
| .97011 5.6735480E+03 3.4299524E+06 604.55
| |
| .98001 5.6715705E+03 3.4287262E+06 604.55
| |
| .99004 5.6708125E+03 3.4281936E+06 604.53 1.00005 5.6717795E+03 3.4286424E+06 604.51 1.05002 5.6542380E+03 3.4181930E+06 604.54 1.10009 5.6578617E+03 3.4197733E+06 604.43 1.15011 5.6427925E+03 3.4107498E+06 604.44 1.20005 5.6426635E+03 3.4102125E+06 604.36 1.25004 5.6325971E+03 3.4040406E+06 604.35 1.30006 5.6245751E+03 3.3990528E+06 604.32 1.35009 5.6163063E+03 3.3939444E+06 604.30 1.40023 5.6056208E+03 3.3874824E+06 604.30 1.45004 5.5990362E+03 3.3833512E+06 604.27 1.50006 5.5888967E+03 3.3772132E+06 604.27 1.55004 5.5798754E+03 3.3717233E+06 604.26 1.60010 5.5703163E+03 3.3659471E+06 604.26 1.65004 5.5670531E+03 3.3637635E+06 604.23 1.70008 5.5583218E+03 3.3584925E+06 604.23 1.75012 5.5601180E+03 3.3591994E+06 604.16 1.80010 5.5588433E+03 3.3581573E+06 604.11 1.85006 5.5580249E+03 3.3573797E+06 604.06 1.90001 5.5513019E+03 3.3532637E+06 604.05 1.95012 5.5450010E+03 3.3494269E+06 604.04 2.00000 5.5358334E+03 3.3439853E+06 604.06
| |
| | |
| 6.2-126 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-16
| |
| | |
| SUBCOMPARTMENT STEAMLINE MASS AND ENERGY RELEASE RATES
| |
| | |
| TIME MASS FLOW ENERGY FLOW AVE ENTHALPY (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.0 20140. 24.03 (106) 1193.15
| |
| | |
| 0.187 20140. 24.03 (106) 1193.15 0.1871 14560. 17.31 (10 6) 1188.87
| |
| | |
| 1.03 14560. 17.31 (106) 1188.87 1.031 21980. 19.69 (10 6) 895.81
| |
| | |
| 1.480 21980. 19.69 (106) 895.81 1.481 42560. 24.84 (10 6) 583.65
| |
| | |
| 4.0 42560. 24.84 (106) 583.65
| |
| | |
| 6.2-127 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-17
| |
| | |
| LOCA MASS AND ENERGY CALCULATION SYSTEM PARAMETERS AND INITIAL CONDITONS
| |
| | |
| Unit 1 Unit 2 Core Thermal Power (MWt) 3658.3 3658.3
| |
| | |
| Reactor Coolant System Total Flowrate 37590.0 37590.0 (lbm/sec)
| |
| Vessel Outlet Temperature (oF) 630.0 630.0
| |
| | |
| Core Inlet Temperature (oF) 564.2 564.2
| |
| | |
| Vessel Average Temperature (oF) 597.1 597.1
| |
| | |
| Initial Steam Generator Steam Pressure 1055.0 967.0 (psia)
| |
| | |
| Steam Generator Design BWI D5 Steam G enerator Tube Plugging (%) 0 0
| |
| | |
| Initial Steam Generator Secondary Side 136617.8 106484.0 Mass (lbm)
| |
| Assumed Maximum Containment Backpressure (psia) 57.5 53.1 Accumulator Water Volume (ft3) per accumulator 1005.2 1015.4 N2 Cover Gas Pressure (psia) 661.7 661.7 Temperature (oF) 120. 120.
| |
| | |
| Safety Injection Delay, total (sec) 40.0 40.0 (from beginning of event)
| |
| | |
| Note: Core Thermal Power, RCS Total Flowrate, RCS Coolant Temperatures, and SG Secondary Side Mass include appropriate uncertainty and/or allowance.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-128 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-18
| |
| | |
| SAFETY INJECTION FLOW MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS
| |
| | |
| RCS Pressure (psia) Total Flow (gpm)
| |
| | |
| Injection Mode (Reflood Phase)
| |
| | |
| 15 4637
| |
| | |
| 40.0 4334
| |
| | |
| 60.0 4070
| |
| | |
| 80.0 3776
| |
| | |
| 100.0 3448
| |
| | |
| 120.0 3065
| |
| | |
| 156 2229
| |
| | |
| 157 1847
| |
| | |
| 182 951
| |
| | |
| 300 914
| |
| | |
| Injection Mode (Post-Reflood Phase)
| |
| | |
| 57.5 3121
| |
| | |
| Cold Leg Recirculation Mode
| |
| | |
| 15 3208
| |
| | |
| 6.2-129 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-18a
| |
| | |
| SAFETY INJECTION FLOW MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS
| |
| | |
| RCS Pressure (psia) Total Flow (gpm)
| |
| | |
| Injection Mode (Reflood Phase)
| |
| | |
| 14.7 12305
| |
| | |
| 60.0 12288
| |
| | |
| 135.0 12226
| |
| | |
| 327.0 1582
| |
| | |
| 600.0 1460
| |
| | |
| 1800.0 659.4
| |
| | |
| 1840.0 542.2
| |
| | |
| 2200.0 457.1
| |
| | |
| 3000.0 59.50
| |
| | |
| 3035.0 1.40
| |
| | |
| Injection Mode (Post-Reflood Phase)
| |
| | |
| 64.7 12305
| |
| | |
| Cold Leg Recirculation Mode
| |
| | |
| 64.7 11917.1
| |
| | |
| 6.2-130 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-19 DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1 BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| ENERGY ENERGY TIME FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
| |
| | |
| 1.136569E-03 1.981244E+03 1.305073E+03 1.981195E+03 1.304095E+03 2.225097E-03 4.469539E+03 2.949784E+03 4.802721E+03 3.154095E+03 1.010666E-01 4.364407E+04 2.906676E+04 2.816140E+04 1.845540E+04 2.017220E-01 3.713050E+04 2.486636E+04 2.514056E+04 1.636802E+04 3.014055E-01 3.786656E+04 2.536512E+04 2.269461E+04 1.458722E+04 4.020405E-01 3.680105E+04 2.466135E+04 2.144752E+04 1.357423E+04 5.021913E-01 3.655559E+04 2.451123E+04 2.074680E+04 1.293836E+04 6.015960E-01 3.617254E+04 2.428148E+04 2.023222E+04 1.245708E+04 7.012418E-01 3.564828E+04 2.396763E+04 1.980895E+04 1.206322E+04 8.021292E-01 3.498504E+04 2.357075E+04 1.950969E+04 1.177083E+04 9.018791E-01 3.432423E+04 2.318283E+04 1.925554E+04 1.152796E+04 1.001989E+00 3.376350E+04 2.286955E+04 1.903638E+04 1.132218E+04 1.101259E+00 3.328995E+04 2.261930E+04 1.886712E+04 1.115850E+04 1.201269E+00 3.281336E+04 2.236957E+04 1.874167E+04 1.102907E+04 1.301455E+00 3.230968E+04 2.210597E+04 1.860977E+04 1.090385E+04 1.402018E+00 3.173211E+04 2.177803E+04 1.853968E+04 1.082045E+04 1.501946E+00 3.121072E+04 2.147450E+04 1.848849E+04 1.075342E+04 1.602039E+00 3.077590E+04 2.121976E+04 1.847840E+04 1.071388E+04 1.701849E+00 3.041167E+04 2.101002E+04 1.848448E+04 1.068706E+04 1.801440E+00 3.002069E+04 2.077973E+04 1.850464E+04 1.067135E+04 1.901064E+00 2.952994E+04 2.047459E+04 1.852745E+04 1.065984E+04 2.001933E+00 2.897096E+04 2.011568E+04 1.855001E+04 1.065052E+04 2.101737E+00 2.845629E+04 1.978421E+04 1.857124E+04 1.064314E+04 2.202072E+00 2.803529E+04 1.952019E+04 1.859173E+04 1.063761E+04 2.301777E+00 2.768693E+04 1.930767E+04 1.860849E+04 1.063234E+04 2.401838E+00 2.727659E+04 1.904636E+04 1.861705E+04 1.062456E+04 2.501063E+00 2.681621E+04 1.874109E+04 1.861362E+04 1.061218E+04 2.601881E+00 2.637916E+04 1.844716E+04 1.860175E+04 1.059678E+04 2.702116E+00 2.600690E+04 1.819670E+04 1.858147E+04 1.057845E+04 2.801007E+00 2.567127E+04 1.796940E+04 1.855231E+04 1.055676E+04 2.902041E+00 2.534313E+04 1.774318E+04 1.851038E+04 1.052919E+04 3.001746E+00 2.503697E+04 1.752795E+04 1.845883E+04 1.049750E+04 3.101384E+00 2.472640E+04 1.730371E+04 1.839692E+04 1.046108E+04 3.201848E+00 2.442973E+04 1.708376E+04 1.832397E+04 1.041941E+04 3.301282E+00 2.418448E+04 1.689747E+04 1.824521E+04 1.037529E+04 3.401048E+00 2.396290E+04 1.672475E+04 1.816031E+04 1.032840E+04 3.501050E+00 2.374360E+04 1.654941E+04 1.806804E+04 1.027794E+04
| |
| | |
| 6.2-131 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-19 (Contd)
| |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1 BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| ENERGY ENERGY (SECONDSTIME ) FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) 3.601535E+00 2.355206E+04 1.639011E+04 1.796922E+04 1.022426E+04
| |
| | |
| 3.702248E+00 2.338443E+04 1.624483E+04 1.786700E+04 1.016902E+04 3.801851E+00 2.322238E+04 1.610064E+04 1.776147E+04 1.011215E+04 3.901865E+00 2.308355E+04 1.597001E+04 1.765117E+04 1.005280E+04 4.001381E+00 2.296986E+04 1.585535E+04 1.753888E+04 9.992433E+03 4.200277E+00 2.277596E+04 1.564406E+04 1.731015E+04 9.869732E+03 4.401064E+00 2.264260E+04 1.546889E+04 1.707249E+04 9.742434E+03 4.600691E+00 2.256532E+04 1.532953E+04 1.682265E+04 9.608598E+03 4.800551E+00 2.256713E+04 1.524394E+04 1.655553E+04 9.465695E+03 5.001260E+00 2.258123E+04 1.517013E+04 1.628597E+04 9.322498E+03 5.200625E+00 2.260562E+04 1.511105E+04 1.599639E+04 9.168524E+03 5.401057E+00 2.268539E+04 1.509257E+04 1.569545E+04 9.009836E+03 5.601221E+00 2.277335E+04 1.507864E+04 1.553430E+04 8.934081E+03 5.800035E+00 2.288581E+04 1.508012E+04 1.524976E+04 8.785014E+03 6.000891E+00 2.302976E+04 1.510512E+04 1.495383E+04 8.630464E+03 6.200581E+00 2.322893E+04 1.516187E+04 1.473212E+04 8.519643E+03 6.401200E+00 2.367199E+04 1.533825E+04 1.444347E+04 8.370808E+03 6.600779E+00 1.802055E+04 1.263854E+04 1.416804E+04 8.230153E+03 6.800787E+00 1.812224E+04 1.261167E+04 1.387136E+04 8.078322E+03 7.000594E+00 1.829682E+04 1.263295E+04 1.361608E+04 7.950740E+03 7.200255E+00 1.849791E+04 1.268465E+04 1.335995E+04 7.821767E+03 7.400783E+00 1.868623E+04 1.274535E+04 1.308070E+04 7.678107E+03 7.600621E+00 1.879766E+04 1.273876E+04 1.282418E+04 7.547690E+03 7.801070E+00 1.893151E+04 1.274407E+04 1.256872E+04 7.417325E+03 8.000961E+00 1.908041E+04 1.275297E+04 1.231318E+04 7.286167E+03 8.200760E+00 1.925119E+04 1.278136E+04 1.206748E+04 7.160166E+03 8.400505E+00 1.936248E+04 1.278889E+04 1.182302E+04 7.033966E+03 8.600423E+00 1.946427E+04 1.281815E+04 1.158666E+04 6.911783E+03 8.800213E+00 1.957214E+04 1.282412E+04 1.135532E+04 6.791635E+03 9.000226E+00 1.970159E+04 1.285731E+04 1.112770E+04 6.672921E+03 9.200102E+00 1.958149E+04 1.276860E+04 1.090565E+04 6.556969E+03 9.400482E+00 1.962870E+04 1.277748E+04 1.068559E+04 6.441778E+03 9.600073E+00 1.982161E+04 1.286686E+04 1.046985E+04 6.328808E+03 9.800600E+00 2.077398E+04 1.343048E+04 1.025803E+04 6.217982E+03 1.000115E+01 2.056547E+04 1.329705E+04 1.004317E+04 6.105080E+03 1.020077E+01 2.011602E+04 1.300905E+04 9.828795E+03 5.992326E+03 1.040066E+01 1.945044E+04 1.258888E+04 9.612113E+03 5.878351E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-131a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-19 (Contd)
| |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1 BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| ENERGY ENERGY TIME FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 1.060126E+01 1.772603E+04 1.161076E+04 9.394712E+03 5.764684E+03 1.080010E+01 1.587047E+04 1.061079E+04 9.186068E+03 5.656332E+03 1.100110E+01 1.556561E+04 1.044238E+04 8.979850E+03 5.549806E+03 1.120025E+01 1.545671E+04 1.038639E+04 8.794084E+03 5.455465E+03 1.140013E+01 1.532507E+04 1.032687E+04 8.605661E+03 5.357952E+03 1.160199E+01 1.511327E+04 1.023078E+04 8.424727E+03 5.264464E+03 1.180124E+01 1.486643E+04 1.011892E+04 8.248275E+03 5.172424E+03 1.200229E+01 1.455425E+04 9.972534E+03 8.072688E+03 5.081064E+03 1.220131E+01 1.417368E+04 9.786588E+03 7.895813E+03 4.988209E+03 1.240011E+01 1.372743E+04 9.561555E+03 7.718821E+03 4.895384E+03 1.260156E+01 1.320924E+04 9.294034E+03 7.530892E+03 4.796510E+03 1.280173E+01 1.269197E+04 9.026611E+03 7.342292E+03 4.698154E+03 1.300040E+01 1.221369E+04 8.783600E+03 7.150098E+03 4.599097E+03 1.320225E+01 1.177385E+04 8.565955E+03 6.953402E+03 4.498793E+03 1.340048E+01 1.137079E+04 8.373949E+03 6.762669E+03 4.402552E+03 1.360088E+01 1.097201E+04 8.188629E+03 6.569750E+03 4.305375E+03 1.380249E+01 1.057520E+04 8.008374E+03 6.380345E+03 4.210286E+03 1.400027E+01 1.017803E+04 7.828701E+03 6.197790E+03 4.118726E+03 1.420195E+01 9.780504E+03 7.627593E+03 6.013487E+03 4.026446E+03 1.440130E+01 9.408362E+03 7.417638E+03 5.832524E+03 3.936004E+03 1.460142E+01 8.673632E+03 7.149910E+03 5.649397E+03 3.844226E+03 1.480008E+01 8.001020E+03 6.894744E+03 5.456206E+03 3.747180E+03 1.500168E+01 7.514628E+03 6.644738E+03 5.234247E+03 3.635533E+03 1.520058E+01 7.079692E+03 6.343542E+03 4.983831E+03 3.512673E+03 1.540094E+01 6.680932E+03 6.001052E+03 4.693976E+03 3.373621E+03 1.560161E+01 6.276776E+03 5.664700E+03 4.370144E+03 3.221605E+03 1.580286E+01 5.840198E+03 5.358915E+03 4.024634E+03 3.063606E+03 1.600115E+01 5.398774E+03 5.070309E+03 3.679990E+03 2.910138E+03 1.620167E+01 4.979895E+03 4.809716E+03 3.341510E+03 2.761621E+03 1.640066E+01 4.603250E+03 4.563853E+03 3.030430E+03 2.626155E+03 1.660012E+01 4.286443E+03 4.353305E+03 2.749695E+03 2.503912E+03 1.680001E+01 3.995029E+03 4.151719E+03 2.498696E+03 2.398342E+03 1.700097E+01 3.743585E+03 3.960781E+03 2.279294E+03 2.303316E+03 1.720111E+01 3.531337E+03 3.772739E+03 2.094329E+03 2.221109E+03 1.740031E+01 3.303220E+03 3.596706E+03 1.937519E+03 2.146365E+03 1.760088E+01 3.094949E+03 3.425978E+03 1.805141E+03 2.074332E+03 1.780061E+01 2.889015E+03 3.252369E+03 1.705136E+03 2.001698E+03 1.800081E+01 2.678452E+03 3.082673E+03 1.621000E+03 1.933542E+03 1.820051E+01 2.459352E+03 2.915072E+03 1.535581E+03 1.855843E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-131b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-19 (Contd)
| |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| ENERGY ENERGY TIME FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 1.840050E+01 2.257880E+03 2.756039E+03 1.466876E+03 1.785041E+03 1.860037E+01 2.075561E+03 2.566914E+03 1.396607E+03 1.710795E+03 1.880036E+01 1.932771E+03 2.402269E+03 1.334911E+03 1.641722E+03 1.900072E+01 1.847116E+03 2.298474E+03 1.268106E+03 1.565991E+03 1.920021E+01 1.779350E+03 2.207371E+03 1.211160E+03 1.499180E+03 1.940008E+01 1.702899E+03 2.110505E+03 1.150422E+03 1.427177E+03 1.960060E+01 1.628025E+03 2.017264E+03 1.081777E+03 1.344845E+03 1.980084E+01 1.540895E+03 1.912596E+03 1.071304E+03 1.332630E+03 2.000037E+01 1.490006E+03 1.844864E+03 9.510567E+02 1.187245E+03 2.020025E+01 1.437047E+03 1.778764E+03 9.090874E+02 1.138235E+03 2.040047E+01 1.381979E+03 1.714633E+03 8.847229E+02 1.107523E+03 2.060074E+01 1.333615E+03 1.655293E+03 7.554726E+02 9.452926E+02 2.080056E+01 1.308645E+03 1.619556E+03 6.734434E+02 8.468439E+02 2.100009E+01 1.264137E+03 1.565262E+03 6.886886E+02 8.661698E+02 2.120029E+01 1.169982E+03 1.463886E+03 5.142743E+02 6.455853E+02 2.140031E+01 9.916302E+02 1.255658E+03 4.836827E+02 6.102703E+02 2.160069E+01 8.683320E+02 1.100489E+03 4.104543E+02 5.183179E+02 2.180009E+01 7.477787E+02 9.465984E+02 3.791735E+02 4.793563E+02 2.200005E+01 6.732130E+02 8.510310E+02 3.407533E+02 4.312895E+02 2.220022E+01 5.078378E+02 6.390096E+02 2.963604E+02 3.756072E+02 2.240007E+01 3.637155E+02 4.582568E+02 2.530364E+02 3.212080E+02 2.260025E+01 2.199548E+02 2.772678E+02 2.230309E+02 2.836470E+02 2.280006E+01 6.520866E+01 8.212824E+01 2.012356E+02 2.562874E+02 2.300007E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.870256E+02 2.384584E+02 2.320039E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.781108E+02 2.273034E+02 2.340047E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.653825E+02 2.112354E+02 2.360086E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.515186E+02 1.937304E+02 2.380001E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.220676E+02 1.563600E+02 2.400038E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 7.893525E+01 1.015105E+02 2.420041E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
| |
| * mass and energy exiting from the reactor vessel side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting from the SG side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-131c REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-20
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK MASS BALANCE - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Time (seconds) 0.00 24.20 24.20 Mass (thousand lbm)
| |
| | |
| Initial In RCS and ACC 816.31 816.31 816.31
| |
| | |
| Added Mass Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Added 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 816.31 816.31 816.31 Distribution Reactor Coolant 567.44 81.91 119.32
| |
| | |
| Accumulator 248.87 192.70 155.28 Total Contents 816.31 274.61 274.61
| |
| | |
| Effluent Break Flow 0.00 541.70 541.70 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| Total Effluent 0.00 541.70 541.70 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 816.31 816.31 816.31
| |
| | |
| 6.2-132 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-21
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK ENERGY BALANCE - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Time (Seconds) 0.00 24.20 24.20
| |
| | |
| Energy (Millions BTU)
| |
| | |
| Initial Energy In RCS, ACC, S Gen 968.81 968.81 968.81 Added Energy Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| Decay Heat 0.00 8.44 8.44 Heat From Secondary 0.00 - 1.43 - 1.43
| |
| | |
| Total Added 0.00 7.01 7.01 TOTAL AVAILABLE 968.81 975 .82 975.82
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor Coolant 341.62 21.45 25.17 Accumulator 22.27 17.25 13.52
| |
| | |
| Core Stored 23.64 9.15 9.15 Primary Metal 177.44 166.45 166.45
| |
| | |
| Secondary Metal 91.73 90.30 90.30 Steam Generator 312.11 306.16 306.16
| |
| | |
| Total Contents 968.81 610.75 610.75 Effluent Break Flow 0.00 364.49 364.49
| |
| | |
| ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Effluent 0.00 364.49 364.49
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 968.81 975.25 975.25
| |
| | |
| 6.2-133 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-22
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC) 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+0 0 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.034320E-03 3.974167E+03 2.244921E+03 3.873405E+03 2.186273E+03 2.110625E-03 8.357797E+03 4.722952E+03 6.127431E+03 3.433822E+03 1.010317E-01 3.864359E+04 2.169448E+04 1.953608E+04 1.095706E+04 2.013933E-01 4.259477E+04 2.401627E+04 2.475321E+04 1.386668E+04 3.026177E-01 4.328062E+04 2.454098E+04 2.518198E+04 1.412055E+04 4.013396E-01 4.288059E+04 2.447788E+04 2.460445E+04 1.381289E+04 5.015953E-01 4.280252E+04 2.462482E+04 2.363604E+04 1.328087E+04 6.010946E-01 4.294813E+04 2.492212E+04 2.279934E+04 1.281741E+04 7.020801E-01 4.194388E+04 2.456380E+04 2.205368E+04 1.240151E+04 8.017773E-01 4.229633E+04 2.499043E+04 2.143479E+04 1.205579E+04 9.012152E-01 4.258348E+04 2.537111E+04 2.095673E+04 1.178915E+04 1.001484E+00 4.265618E+04 2.561673E+04 2.063771E+04 1.161082E+04 1.101249E+00 4.245677E+04 2.568351E+04 2.043265E+04 1.149735E+04 1.202050E+00 4.202206E+04 2.559664E+04 2.033318E+04 1.144217E+04 1.301385E+00 4.149956E+04 2.544418E+04 2.025972E+04 1.140144E+04 1.401753E+00 4.094964E+04 2.527057E+04 2.019994E+04 1.136759E+04 1.501988E+00 4.039875E+04 2.509314E+04 2.017202E+04 1.135145E+04 1.601793E+00 3.984687E+04 2.491428E+04 2.018923E+04 1.136090E+04 1.702089E+00 3.929318E+04 2.473864E+04 2.022469E+04 1.138077E+04 1.801475E+00 3.874870E+04 2.457495E+04 2.023936E+04 1.138874E+04 1.901665E+00 3.814051E+04 2.438272E+04 2.020228E+04 1.136716E+04 2.001414E+00 3.704777E+04 2.388868E+04 2.012624E+04 1.132367E+04 2.101062E+00 3.593826E+04 2.338633E+04 2.004712E+04 1.127881E+04 2.201143E+00 3.477670E+04 2.285010E+04 1.995066E+04 1.122454E+04 2.301349E+00 3.370659E+04 2.236756E+04 1.962235E+04 1.103877E+04 2.401063E+00 3.267109E+04 2.189375E+04 1.933433E+04 1.087719E+04 2.501095E+00 3.163547E+04 2.140290E+04 1.913577E+04 1.076615E+04 2.601522E+00 3.061727E+04 2.090373E+04 1.893311E+04 1.065275E+04 2.701316E+00 2.965560E+04 2.042284E+04 1.873613E+04 1.054277E+04 2.801222E+00 2.874144E+04 1.995603E+04 1.852095E+04 1.042277E+04 2.901322E+00 2.785723E+04 1.949122E+04 1.828391E+04 1.029064E+04 3.001562E+00 2.696690E+04 1.900356E+04 1.804577E+04 1.015810E+04 3.101285E+00 2.603043E+04 1.846676E+04 1.783050E+04 1.003875E+04 3.201407E+00 2.513685E+04 1.794931E+04 1.763307E+04 9.929664E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-134 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-22 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC) 3.301214E+00 2.429263E+04 1.745179E+04 1.742301E+04 9.813486E+03 3.401483E+00 2.338694E+04 1.689364E+04 1.722265E+04 9.702922E+03 3.501047E+00 2.260003E+04 1.641218E+04 1.703062E+04 9.597299E+03 3.601067E+00 2.186566E+04 1.595664E+04 1.682601E+04 9.484474E+03 3.701619E+00 2.090998E+04 1.532048E+04 1.657414E+04 9.344862E+03 3.801254E+00 1.998167E+04 1.469415E+04 1.640038E+04 9.250050E+03 3.901557E+00 1.929204E+04 1.423793E+04 1.623882E+04 9.162025E+03 4.001659E+00 1.878249E+04 1.389319E+04 1.606899E+04 9.069196E+03 4.200645E+00 1.801069E+04 1.335108E+04 1.576700E+04 8.905213E+03 4.400101E+00 1.746988E+04 1.294222E+04 1.549478E+04 8.758094E+03 4.600685E+00 1.713915E+04 1.267093E+04 1.524914E+04 8.626354E+03 4.800583E+00 1.687424E+04 1.243341E+04 1.501967E+04 8.503776E+03 5.000416E+00 1.669402E+04 1.224872E+04 1.482058E+04 8.398519E+03 5.200773E+00 1.657638E+04 1.210240E+04 1.463900E+04 8.303189E+03 5.400696E+00 1.652749E+04 1.200056E+04 1.522851E+04 8.654721E+03 5.600454E+00 1.652980E+04 1.193021E+04 1.571859E+04 8.934006E+03 5.800379E+00 1.656265E+04 1.187955E+04 1.569834E+04 8.932161E+03 6.000278E+00 1.663127E+04 1.185366E+04 1.559092E+04 8.879317E+03 6.200446E+00 1.671501E+04 1.184095E+04 1.547559E+04 8.821523E+03 6.400014E+00 1.680410E+04 1.183699E+04 1.531484E+04 8.737298E+03 6.600527E+00 1.688689E+04 1.183608E+04 1.513089E+04 8.639168E+03 6.800535E+00 1.695088E+04 1.183241E+04 1.494991E+04 8.542077E+03 7.000036E+00 1.697129E+04 1.180993E+04 1.476022E+04 8.438813E+03 7.200672E+00 1.696200E+04 1.177574E+04 1.462494E+04 8.365728E+03 7.400690E+00 1.692737E+04 1.172319E+04 1.454800E+04 8.324426E+03 7.600061E+00 1.845504E+04 1.271539E+04 1.441993E+04 8.250279E+03 7.800739E+00 1.652321E+04 1.182507E+04 1.426486E+04 8.158825E+03 8.000743E+00 1.529427E+04 1.131571E+04 1.400858E+04 8.010213E+03 8.200665E+00 1.529547E+04 1.126313E+04 1.391721E+04 7.960426E+03 8.400691E+00 1.548889E+04 1.128664E+04 1.374051E+04 7.861354E+03 8.600151E+00 1.569309E+04 1.131852E+04 1.356666E+04 7.761234E+03 8.800354E+00 1.590652E+04 1.135823E+04 1.339035E+04 7.659523E+03 9.000071E+00 1.609711E+04 1.139263E+04 1.322589E+04 7.566096E+03 9.200517E+00 1.626049E+04 1.141877E+04 1.308048E+04 7.483136E+03 9.400302E+00 1.639402E+04 1.143600E+04 1.289193E+04 7.374451E+03 9.600366E+00 1.649390E+04 1.144280E+04 1.272752E+04 7.280387E+03 9.800135E+00 1.655118E+04 1.143177E+04 1.256927E+04 7.189850E+03 1.000072E+01 1.655784E+04 1.139711E+04 1.237873E+04 7.080205E+03 1.020027E+01 1.648771E+04 1.132628E+04 1.222667E+04 6.992960E+03 1.040075E+01 1.628190E+04 1.118909E+04 1.205019E+04 6.891176E+03 1.060038E+01 1.598904E+04 1.101215E+04 1.189706E+04 6.802760E+03 1.080049E+01 1.570310E+04 1.085268E+04 1.173673E+04 6.709812E+03 1.100017E+01 1.541835E+04 1.069136E+04 1.157299E+04 6.614415E+03 1.120090E+01 1.487864E+04 1.037997E+04 1.142897E+04 6.530449E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-134a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR TABLE 6.2 -22 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC) 1 .140074E+01 1.417795E+04 9.967302E+03 1.128046E+04 6.443310E+03
| |
| | |
| 1.160088E+01 1.341191E+04 9.501623E+03 1.114934E+04 6.365357E+03 1.180119E+01 1.267707E+04 9.056522E+03 1.101848E+04 6.286794E+03 1.200053E+01 1.198618E+04 8.636723E+03 1.089530E+04 6.211907E+03 1.220111E+01 1.115120E+04 8.121812E+03 1.079863E+04 6.151807E+03 1.240012E+01 1.028995E+04 7.616195E+03 1.073840E+04 6.110840E+03 1.260040E+01 9.680642E+03 7.297789E+03 1.062350E+04 6.035519E+03 1.280081E+01 9.187738E+03 7.055400E+03 1.056047E+04 5.991208E+03 1.300106E+01 8.726770E+03 6.835249E+03 1.046410E+04 5.927223E+03 1.320042E+01 8.342593E+03 6.653833E+03 1.037435E+04 5.866645E+03 1.340100E+01 8.014972E+03 6.490729E+03 1.028849E+04 5.808867E+03 1.360055E+01 7.707149E+03 6.334535E+03 1.020165E+04 5.750140E+03 1.380018E+01 7.428822E+03 6.201050E+03 1.010748E+04 5.687100E+03 1.400004E+01 7.153551E+03 6.068634E+03 1.002598E+04 5.631993E+03 1.420084E+01 6.859740E+03 5.923305E+03 9.892374E+03 5.547161E+03 1.440027E+01 6.525035E+03 5.753588E+03 9.718272E+03 5.442902E+03 1.460086E+01 6.193322E+03 5.589479E+03 9.639881E+03 5.395085E+03 1.480083E+01 5.871593E+03 5.431631E+03 9.420238E+03 5.263403E+03 1.500044E+01 5.564993E+03 5.279159E+03 9.336095E+03 5.210306E+03 1.520031E+01 5.296159E+03 5.142295E+03 9.187304E+03 5.104653E+03 1.540108E+01 5.073196E+03 5.035355E+03 9.027698E+03 4.988808E+03 1.560048E+01 4.809501E+03 4.971974E+03 8.978865E+03 4.911408E+03 1.580060E+01 4.377610E+03 4.874280E+03 8.707188E+03 4.679297E+03 1.600040E+01 3.964893E+03 4.734853E+03 8.607071E+03 4.527487E+03 1.620101E+01 3.547918E+03 4.367843E+03 7.683082E+03 3.945081E+03 1.640071E+01 3.180168E+03 3.947061E+03 7.946140E+03 3.964149E+03 1.660131E+01 2.939564E+03 3.662623E+03 7.122121E+03 3.496248E+03 1.680045E+01 2.761559E+03 3.450528E+03 6.390287E+03 3.041750E+03 1.700184E+01 2.580774E+03 3.232314E+03 6.486188E+03 2.994926E+03 1.720089E+01 2.425449E+03 3.045047E+03 5.696108E+03 2.590657E+03 1.740078E+01 2.282862E+03 2.871344E+03 5.518943E+03 2.444032E+03 1.760052E+01 2.145795E+03 2.703918E+03 5.423598E+03 2.346685E+03 1.780111E+01 2.007337E+03 2.533871E+03 5.445796E+03 2.315650E+03 1.800049E+01 1.882893E+03 2.380862E+03 4.357763E+03 1.826337E+03 1.820024E+01 1.766945E+03 2.237474E+03 5.023408E+03 2.065944E+03 1.840066E+01 1.650102E+03 2.092431E+03 5.865724E+03 2.360155E+03 1.860005E+01 1.537008E+03 1.951773E+03 5.827619E+03 2.315844E+03 1.880028E+01 1.434997E+03 1.824747E+03 5.020904E+03 1.984106E+03 1.900023E+01 1.346426E+03 1.714105E+03 4.240250E+03 1.666435E+03 1.920008E+01 1.266591E+03 1.614200E+03 3.730883E+03 1.464361E+03 1.940057E+01 1.192436E+03 1.521168E+03 3.101111E+03 1.212654E+03 1.960011E+01 1.114772E+03 1.423192E+03 2.209232E+03 8.364433E+02 1.980030E+01 1.029472E+03 1.315460E+03 3.994393E+03 1.329354E+03 2.000037E+01 1.004854E+03 1.285779E+03 4.695268E+03 1.514319E+03 2.020053E+01 9.022815E+02 1.156430E+03 4.629151E+03 1.484664E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-134b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-22 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (TBTU/SECHOUSAN)D S (LBM/SEC) (TBTU/SECHOUSAND)S 2 .040040E+01 8.26 0868E+02 1.05 9304E+03 4.52 7376E+03 1.44 8778E+03 2.060047E+01 7.548188E+02 9.684592E+02 4.002044E+03 1.278970E+03 2.080018E+01 6.931217E+02 8.897620E+02 4.259611E+03 1.353917E+03 2.100062E+01 6.460405E+02 8.296601E+02 4.079198E+03 1.285733E+03 2.120015E+01 6.077127E+02 7.808458E+02 3.777844E+03 1.177334E+03 2.140012E+01 5.756026E+02 7.398513E+02 3.467181E+03 1.064525E+03 2.160058E+01 5.391455E+02 6.931864E+02 3.155815E+03 9.507623E+02 2.180007E+01 5.046990E+02 6.491196E+02 2.832556E+03 8.347701E+02 2.200004E+01 4.697669E+02 6.043963E+02 2.465527E+03 7.098810E+02 2.220036E+01 4.363833E+02 5.616268E+02 2.022515E+03 5.695186E+02 2.240029E+01 4.033184E+02 5.192293E+02 1.474985E+03 4.077649E+02 2.260046E+01 3.691338E+02 4.753645E+02 8.080785E+02 2.208681E+02 2.280021E+01 3.344058E+02 4.307745E+02 7.034820E+01 1.925262E+01 2.300030E+01 2.989089E+02 3.851790E+02 -3.359509E+01 -1.037001E+01 2.320017E+01 2.587792E+02 3.335580E+02 4.316361E-01 2.485597E-01 2.340058E+01 2.207146E+02 2.846336E+02 4.866756E+00 4.601038E+00 2.360066E+01 1.851994E+02 2.389603E+02 6.275055E+00 6.440765E+00 2.380059E+01 1.516632E+02 1.957848E+02 4.571865E+00 5.026985E+00 2.400025E+01 1.075738E+02 1.389917E+02 6.879789E+00 7.985954E+00 2.420040E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-134c REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-23
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 2.477540E+01 4.590084E-04 5.401039E-04 1.377000E-04 1.327064E-05 2.487540E+01 4.590088E-04 5.401044E-04 1.377000E-04 1.327030E-05 2.507540E+01 4.590097E-04 5.401055E-04 1.377000E-04 1.326963E-05 2.517540E+01 4.590205E-04 5.401182E-04 1.377000E-04 1.322666E-05 2.527540E+01 4.590212E-04 5.401190E-04 1.377000E-04 1.322634E-05 2.537540E+01 5.834491E+01 6.865998E+01 1.377000E-04 1.537141E-05 2.548790E+01 2.263939E+01 2.664129E+01 1.377000E-04 1.394289E-05 2.561290E+01 1.253303E+01 1.474766E+01 1.377000E-04 1.359489E-05 2.571290E+01 1.539831E+01 1.811916E+01 1.377000E-04 1.373271E-05 2.581290E+01 2.160385E+01 2.542156E+01 1.377000E-04 1.404710E-05 2.591290E+01 2.968970E+01 3.493733E+01 1.377000E-04 1.426379E-05 2.601290E+01 3.573818E+01 4.205640E+01 1.377000E-04 1.444878E-05 2.611290E+01 3.976550E+01 4.679682E+01 1.377000E-04 1.458515E-05 2.621290E+01 4.380663E+01 5.155374E+01 1.377000E-04 1.472251E-05 2.631290E+01 4.760527E+01 5.602551E+01 1.377000E-04 1.485338E-05 2.641290E+01 5.120412E+01 6.026237E+01 1.377000E-04 1.497882E-05 2.651290E+01 5.462790E+01 6.429340E+01 1.377000E-04 1.510043E-05 2.661290E+01 5.791085E+01 6.815889E+01 1.377000E-04 1.521813E-05 2.671290E+01 6.106531E+01 7.187333E+01 1.377000E-04 1.533219E-05 2.678790E+01 6.335540E+01 7.457012E+01 1.377000E-04 1.541558E-05 2.681290E+01 6.410535E+01 7.545329E+01 1.377000E-04 1.544300E-05 2.691290E+01 6.704250E+01 7.891232E+01 1.377000E-04 1.555088E-05 2.701290E+01 6.988636E+01 8.226171E+01 1.377000E-04 1.565611E-05 2.711290E+01 7.264505E+01 8.551102E+01 1.377000E-04 1.575893E-05 2.721290E+01 7.532554E+01 8.866843E+01 1.377000E-04 1.585953E-05 2.821290E+01 9.885996E+01 1.164001E+02 1.377000E-04 1.677424E-05 2.921290E+01 1.183538E+02 1.393856E+02 1.377000E-04 1.757948E-05 3.021290E+01 1.352561E+02 1.593278E+02 1.377000E-04 1.831791E-05 3.121290E+01 1.976645E+02 2.330532E+02 1.577630E+03 2.199529E+02 3.180040E+01 3.586925E+02 4.241604E+02 3.769342E+03 5.497697E+02 3.230040E+01 3.868592E+02 4.578802E+02 4.032325E+03 6.125858E+02 3.330040E+01 3.863633E+02 4.573132E+02 4.023557E+03 6.180427E+02 3.430040E+01 3.803032E+02 4.500831E+02 3.962039E+03 6.117791E+02 3.530040E+01 3.739092E+02 4.424559E+02 3.896211E+03 6.045719E+02 3.630040E+01 3.675143E+02 4.348297E+02 3.829592E+03 5.970714E+02 3.700040E+01 3.631010E+02 4.295678E+02 3.783211E+03 5.917733E+02 3.730040E+01 3.612322E+02 4.273399E+02 3.763475E+03 5.895048E+02 3.830040E+01 3.551171E+02 4.200512E+02 3.698515E+03 5.819911E+02
| |
| | |
| 6.2-135 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR 6.2-23 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1 BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| TIME FLOW (TENERGYHOUSAN DS FLOW (TENERGYHOUSAN DS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) 3.930040E+01 3.491941E+02 4.129933E+02 3.635043E+03 5.745956E+02 4.030040E+01 3.434725E+02 4.061772E+02 3.573224E+03 5.673538E+02 4.130040E+01 3.379506E+02 3.996007E+02 3.513127E+03 5.602815E+02 4.230040E+01 3.326274E+02 3.932623E+02 3.454756E+03 5.533896E+02 4.330040E+01 3.274965E+02 3.871544E+02 3.398087E+03 5.466805E+02 4.385040E+01 3.575570E+02 4.228965E+02 3.761161E+03 5.770536E+02 4.435040E+01 3.544949E+02 4.193087E+02 3.725606E+03 5.730852E+02 4.535040E+01 3.497407E+02 4.136435E+02 3.674728E+03 5.669519E+02 4.635040E+01 3.451427E+02 4.081657E+02 3.625222E+03 5.609754E+02 4.735040E+01 3.406960E+02 4.028692E+02 3.577071E+03 5.551537E+02 4.835040E+01 3.363940E+02 3.977461E+02 3.530226E+03 5.494826E+02 4.935040E+01 3.322297E+02 3.927879E+02 3.484638E+03 5.439569E+02 5.035040E+01 3.281965E+02 3.879866E+02 3.440255E+03 5.385712E+02 5.135040E+01 3.242877E+02 3.833343E+02 3.397025E+03 5.333197E+02 5.235040E+01 3.204972E+02 3.788236E+02 3.354899E+03 5.281968E+02 5.335040E+01 3.168191E+02 3.744474E+02 3.313830E+03 5.231971E+02 5.435040E+01 3.132479E+02 3.701991E+02 3.273771E+03 5.183153E+02 5.535040E+01 3.097782E+02 3.660722E+02 3.234679E+03 5.135462E+02 5.635040E+01 3.064052E+02 3.620609E+02 3.196514E+03 5.088850E+02 5.735040E+01 3.031241E+02 3.581596E+02 3.159234E+03 5.043271E+02 5.835040E+01 2.999307E+02 3.543631E+02 3.122804E+03 4.998680E+02 5.935040E+01 2.968208E+02 3.506663E+02 3.087187E+03 4.955035E+02 5.975040E+01 2.955993E+02 3.492145E+02 3.073161E+03 4.937833E+02 6.035040E+01 2.937900E+02 3.470641E+02 3.052351E+03 4.912294E+02 6.135040E+01 2.908328E+02 3.435499E+02 3.018266E+03 4.870400E+02 6.235040E+01 2.879478E+02 3.401220E+02 2.984900E+03 4.829335E+02 6.335040E+01 2.851318E+02 3.367764E+02 2.952225E+03 4.789066E+02 6.435040E+01 2.823817E+02 3.335096E+02 2.920212E+03 4.749560E+02 6.535040E+01 2.378645E+02 2.806857E+02 2.338118E+03 4.096780E+02 6.635040E+01 4.090093E+02 4.842494E+02 3.129660E+02 2.268175E+02 6.735040E+01 4.235803E+02 5.017634E+02 3.191690E+02 2.359043E+02 6.835040E+01 4.134621E+02 4.896757E+02 3.145733E+02 2.297301E+02 6.935040E+01 4.028887E+02 4.770459E+02 3.097972E+02 2.233014E+02 7.035040E+01 3.923009E+02 4.644050E+02 3.050265E+02 2.168976E+02 7.135040E+01 3.826919E+02 4.529360E+02 3.007010E+02 2.111017E+02 7.235040E+01 3.736563E+02 4.421567E+02 2.966016E+02 2.056805E+02 7.335040E+01 3.650284E+02 4.318676E+02 2.926997E+02 2.005290E+02 7.435040E+01 3.567304E+02 4.219759E+02 2.889551E+02 1.955942E+02 7.535040E+01 3.487325E+02 4.124452E+02 2.853541E+02 1.908565E+02 7.615040E+01 3.425429E+02 4.050718E+02 2.825730E+02 1.872029E+02 7.635040E+01 3.410239E+02 4.032625E+02 2.818913E+02 1.863079E+02 7.735040E+01 3.335951E+02 3.944161E+02 2.785618E+02 1.819413E+02 7.835040E+01 3.264368E+02 3.858947E+02 2.753609E+02 1.777498E+02
| |
| | |
| 6.2-135a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR TABLE 6.2- 23 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1 BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC) 7 .935040E+01 3 .195406E+02 3 .776878E+02 2 .722843E+02 1 .737270E+02 8.035040E+01 3.128970E+02 3.697840E+02 2.693275E+02 1.698664E+02 8.135040E+01 3.064894E+02 3.621633E+02 2.664830E+02 1.661575E+02 8.235040E+01 3.003182E+02 3.548258E+02 2.637500E+02 1.625988E+02 8.335040E+01 2.943771E+02 3.477639E+02 2.611251E+02 1.591853E+02 8.435040E+01 2.886581E+02 3.409678E+02 2.586043E+02 1.559114E+02 8.535040E+01 2.831544E+02 3.344292E+02 2.561843E+02 1.527721E+02 8.735040E+01 2.727682E+02 3.220947E+02 2.516335E+02 1.468792E+02 8.935040E+01 2.631675E+02 3.106982E+02 2.474468E+02 1.414696E+02 9.135040E+01 2.543031E+02 3.001802E+02 2.435992E+02 1.365083E+02 9.335040E+01 2.461286E+02 2.904846E+02 2.400674E+02 1.319629E+02 9.535040E+01 2.386000E+02 2.815584E+02 2.368293E+02 1.278029E+02 9.655040E+01 2.343755E+02 2.765510E+02 2.350188E+02 1.254800E+02 9.735040E+01 2.316758E+02 2.733515E+02 2.338642E+02 1.239998E+02 9.935040E+01 2.253167E+02 2.658166E+02 2.311526E+02 1.205271E+02 1.013504E+02 2.194741E+02 2.588956E+02 2.286722E+02 1.173549E+02 1.033504E+02 2.141122E+02 2.525457E+02 2.264054E+02 1.144595E+02 1.053504E+02 2.092093E+02 2.467406E+02 2.243403E+02 1.118249E+02 1.073504E+02 2.047339E+02 2.414429E+02 2.224617E+02 1.094308E+02 1.093504E+02 2.006564E+02 2.366171E+02 2.207556E+02 1.072585E+02 1.113504E+02 1.969487E+02 2.322297E+02 2.192085E+02 1.052905E+02 1.133504E+02 1.935841E+02 2.282490E+02 2.178080E+02 1.035105E+02 1.153504E+02 1.905377E+02 2.246452E+02 2.165424E+02 1.019031E+02 1.173504E+02 1.877857E+02 2.213901E+02 2.154010E+02 1.004544E+02 1.193504E+02 1.853060E+02 2.184573E+02 2.143736E+02 9.915113E+01 1.213504E+02 1.830775E+02 2.158219E+02 2.134509E+02 9.798122E+01 1.233504E+02 1.810806E+02 2.134606E+02 2.126239E+02 9.693332E+01 1.253504E+02 1.792972E+02 2.113520E+02 2.118849E+02 9.599724E+01 1.273504E+02 1.777101E+02 2.094756E+02 2.112263E+02 9.516330E+01 1.293504E+02 1.763033E+02 2.078125E+02 2.106411E+02 9.442266E+01 1.313504E+02 1.750619E+02 2.063450E+02 2.101231E+02 9.376718E+01 1.333504E+02 1.739722E+02 2.050569E+02 2.096664E+02 9.318941E+01 1.353504E+02 1.730214E+02 2.039330E+02 2.092656E+02 9.268246E+01 1.373504E+02 1.721977E+02 2.029593E+02 2.089157E+02 9.224004E+01 1.393504E+02 1.714900E+02 2.021229E+02 2.086122E+02 9.185636E+01 1.413504E+02 1.708883E+02 2.014117E+02 2.083510E+02 9.152614E+01 1.433504E+02 1.703832E+02 2.008148E+02 2.081282E+02 9.124451E+01 1.453504E+02 1.699663E+02 2.003220E+02 2.079403E+02 9.100704E+01 1.473504E+02 1.696294E+02 1.999239E+02 2.077841E+02 9.080967E+01 1.493504E+02 1.693654E+02 1.996119E+02 2.076568E+02 9.064868E+01 1.513504E+02 1.691564E+02 1.993648E+02 2.075517E+02 9.051598E+01 1.533504E+02 1.689955E+02 1.991747E+02 2.074662E+02 9.040789E+01 1.545504E+02 1.689257E+02 1.990923E+02 2.074254E+02 9.035635E+01 1.553504E+02 1.688896E+02 1.990496E+02 2.074024E+02 9.032720E+01 1.573504E+02 1.688336E+02 1.989834E+02 2.073582E+02 9.027137E+01
| |
| | |
| 6.2-135b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-23 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH N O. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW (TENERGYHOUSAN DS FLOW (TENERGYHOUSAN DS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) 1.593504E+02 1.688228E+02 1.989706E+02 2.073319E+02 9.023807E+01 1.613504E+02 1.688530E+02 1.990062E+02 2.073217E+02 9.022517E+01 1.633504E+02 1.689201E+02 1.990856E+02 2.073262E+02 9.023071E+01 1.653504E+02 1.690207E+02 1.992045E+02 2.073438E+02 9.025292E+01 1.673504E+02 1.691515E+02 1.993590E+02 2.073734E+02 9.029019E+01 1.693504E+02 1.693094E+02 1.995456E+02 2.074137E+02 9.034103E+01 1.713504E+02 1.694917E+02 1.997611E+02 2.074636E+02 9.040411E+01 1.733504E+02 1.696960E+02 2.000025E+02 2.075224E+02 9.047821E+01 1.753504E+02 1.699200E+02 2.002672E+02 2.075889E+02 9.056222E+01 1.773504E+02 1.701617E+02 2.005528E+02 2.076625E+02 9.065517E+01 1.793504E+02 1.704192E+02 2.008572E+02 2.077425E+02 9.075617E+01 1.813504E+02 1.706909E+02 2.011783E+02 2.078283E+02 9.086441E+01 1.833504E+02 1.709752E+02 2.015143E+02 2.079191E+02 9.097915E+01 1.853504E+02 1.712708E+02 2.018637E+02 2.080146E+02 9.109970E+01 1.873504E+02 1.715764E+02 2.022248E+02 2.081141E+02 9.122547E+01 1.881504E+02 1.717011E+02 2.023723E+02 2.081550E+02 9.127712E+01 1.893504E+02 1.718908E+02 2.025965E+02 2.082174E+02 9.135592E+01 1.913504E+02 1.722132E+02 2.029775E+02 2.083240E+02 9.149057E+01 1.933504E+02 1.725425E+02 2.033668E+02 2.084336E+02 9.162899E+01 1.953504E+02 1.728781E+02 2.037635E+02 2.085458E+02 9.177080E+01 1.973504E+02 1.732193E+02 2.041667E+02 2.086605E+02 9.191567E+01 1.993504E+02 1.735653E+02 2.045757E+02 2.087773E+02 9.206330E+01 2.013504E+02 1.739042E+02 2.049762E+02 2.088923E+02 9.220862E+01 2.033504E+02 1.742345E+02 2.053667E+02 2.090047E+02 9.235060E+01 2.053504E+02 1.745696E+02 2.057628E+02 2.091191E+02 9.249528E+01 2.073504E+02 1.749092E+02 2.061642E+02 2.092357E+02 9.264259E+01 2.093504E+02 1.752532E+02 2.065708E+02 2.093542E+02 9.279241E+01 2.113504E+02 1.756013E+02 2.069824E+02 2.094747E+02 9.294465E+01 2.133504E+02 1.759535E+02 2.073987E+02 2.095970E+02 9.309923E+01 2.153504E+02 1.763096E+02 2.078197E+02 2.097210E+02 9.325608E+01 2.173504E+02 1.766696E+02 2.082453E+02 2.098468E+02 9.341514E+01 2.193504E+02 1.770334E+02 2.086753E+02 2.099743E+02 9.357637E+01 2.213504E+02 1.778216E+02 2.096071E+02 2.103377E+02 9.395698E+01 2.233504E+02 1.787574E+02 2.107134E+02 2.111886E+02 9.445247E+01 2.236504E+02 1.788945E+02 2.108755E+02 2.113527E+02 9.452847E+01
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-135c REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-24
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS PRINCIPLE PARAMETERS DURING REFLOOD - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| FLOODING TOTAL INJECTION ACCUM SPILL
| |
| | |
| CARRYOVER CORE DOWNCOMER FLOW TIME TEMP RATE FRACTION HEIGHT HEIGHT FRAC ENTHALPY (SECONDS) (°F) (IN/SEC) (-) (FT) (FT) (-) (POUNDS MASS PER SECOND) (BTU/LBM)
| |
| | |
| 24.2 193.3 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 25.1 189.9 20.855 0.000 0.73 1.24 0.000 6645.8 6645.8 0.0 89.66 25.2 189.2 21.349 0.000 0.91 1.18 0.000 6623.9 6623.9 0.0 89.66 25.3 188.5 20.823 0.000 1.08 1.11 0.000 6602.2 6602.2 0.0 89.66 25.6 188.0 2.323 0.104 1.31 1.64 0.186 6509.5 6509.5 0.0 89.66 25.8 188.0 2.679 0.138 1.35 2.17 0.225 6468.3 6468.3 0.0 89.66 26.8 188.2 2.339 0.307 1.50 4.71 0.326 6267.5 6267.5 0.0 89.66 28.2 188.6 2.280 0.457 1.67 8.40 0.350 6014.1 6014.1 0.0 89.66 31.8 189.8 3.815 0.633 2.00 16.08 0.562 5164.1 5164.1 0.0 89.66 32.3 189.9 3.914 0.649 2.06 16.12 0.562 5007.0 5007.0 0.0 89.66 34.3 190.6 3.643 0.688 2.27 16.12 0.559 4769.7 4769.7 0.0 89.66 37.0 191.8 3.398 0.712 2.50 16.12 0.553 4512.9 4512.9 0.0 89.66 43.3 195.4 3.056 0.734 2.96 16.12 0.538 4028.5 4028.5 0.0 89.66 43.9 195.7 3.225 0.737 3.00 16.12 0.556 4435.6 3907.0 0.0 87.69 51.4 200.7 2.965 0.745 3.50 16.12 0.542 4003.1 3468.1 0.0 87.45
| |
| | |
| 6.2-136 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-24 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS PRINCIPLE PARAMETERS DURING REFLOOD - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| FLOODING TOTAL INJECTION ACCUM SPILL
| |
| | |
| CARRYOVER CORE DOWNCOMER FLOW TIME TEMP RATE FRACTION HEIGHT HEIGHT FRAC ENTHALPY (SECONDS) (°F) (IN/SEC) (-) (FT) (FT) (-) (POUNDS MASS PER SECOND) (BTU/LBM)
| |
| | |
| 59.8 206.5 2.755 0.750 4.00 16.12 0.528 3624.8 3084.0 0.0 87.20 65.4 210.4 2.411 0.750 4.32 16.12 0.486 2795.6 2243.8 0.0 86.40 66.4 211.1 3.389 0.755 4.37 16.00 0.598 515.4 0.0 0.0 73.14 67.4 211.9 3.443 0.755 4.44 15.76 0.601 509.1 0.0 0.0 73.14 68.4 212.8 3.366 0.756 4.51 15.52 0.599 511.7 0.0 0.0 73.14 76.2 219.9 2.844 0.755 5.00 14.01 0.588 528.2 0.0 0.0 73.14 87.4 230.5 2.335 0.755 5.59 12.72 0.571 541.6 0.0 0.0 73.14 96.6 237.7 2.058 0.754 6.00 12.18 0.557 548.0 0.0 0.0 73.14 109.4 245.7 1.815 0.755 6.51 11.93 0.541 553.0 0.0 0.0 73.14 123.4 252.8 1.672 0.756 7.00 12.03 0.529 555.6 0.0 0.0 73.14 139.4 259.5 1.595 0.760 7.53 12.41 0.522 556.9 0.0 0.0 73.14 154.6 264.8 1.567 0.765 8.00 12.88 0.521 557.3 0.0 0.0 73.14 171.4 269.8 1.558 0.771 8.51 13.44 0.521 557.3 0.0 0.0 73.14 175.4 270.9 1.558 0.773 8.63 13.58 0.522 557.2 0.0 0.0 73.14 188.2 274.1 1.559 0.777 9.00 14.02 0.523 557.0 0.0 0.0 73.14 207.4 278.3 1.566 0.785 9.55 14.69 0.526 556.7 0.0 0.0 73.14 223.7 281.3 1.579 0.791 10.00 15.24 0.529 556.3 0.0 0.0 73.14
| |
| | |
| 6.2-136a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-25
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW (TENERGYHOUSAN DS FLOW (TENERGYHOUSAN DS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 2.237000E+02 2.195729E+02 2.749315E+02 3.468448E+02 1.307437E+02 2.287000E+02 2.200155E+02 2.754857E+02 3.464022E+02 1.304477E+02 2.337000E+02 2.190720E+02 2.743043E+02 3.473457E+02 1.305109E+02 2.387000E+02 2.181242E+02 2.731176E+02 3.482935E+02 1.305750E+02 2.437000E+02 2.185176E+02 2.736102E+02 3.479001E+02 1.302909E+02 2.487000E+02 2.175465E+02 2.723942E+02 3.488712E+02 1.303604E+02 2.537000E+02 2.179010E+02 2.728381E+02 3.485167E+02 1.300858E+02 2.587000E+02 2.169056E+02 2.715917E+02 3.495121E+02 1.301609E+02 2.637000E+02 2.172195E+02 2.719848E+02 3.491982E+02 1.298962E+02 2.687000E+02 2.161984E+02 2.707063E+02 3.502192E+02 1.299774E+02 2.737000E+02 2.164706E+02 2.710471E+02 3.499471E+02 1.297229E+02 2.787000E+02 2.167134E+02 2.713510E+02 3.497043E+02 1.294757E+02 2.837000E+02 2.156437E+02 2.700117E+02 3.507740E+02 1.295686E+02 2.887000E+02 2.158415E+02 2.702593E+02 3.505762E+02 1.293324E+02 2.937000E+02 2.147434E+02 2.688843E+02 3.516743E+02 1.294320E+02 2.987000E+02 2.148945E+02 2.690736E+02 3.515231E+02 1.292074E+02 3.037000E+02 2.150131E+02 2.692221E+02 3.514046E+02 1.289908E+02 3.087000E+02 2.138605E+02 2.677789E+02 3.525572E+02 1.291036E+02 3.137000E+02 2.139291E+02 2.678648E+02 3.524886E+02 1.288994E+02 3.187000E+02 2.139630E+02 2.679072E+02 3.524547E+02 1.287039E+02 3.237000E+02 2.127515E+02 2.663903E+02 3.536662E+02 1.288310E+02 3.287000E+02 2.127314E+02 2.663651E+02 3.536863E+02 1.286488E+02 3.337000E+02 2.126762E+02 2.662960E+02 3.537415E+02 1.284755E+02 3.387000E+02 2.125861E+02 2.661832E+02 3.538316E+02 1.283108E+02 3.437000E+02 2.112829E+02 2.645514E+02 3.551348E+02 1.284605E+02 3.487000E+02 2.111277E+02 2.643571E+02 3.552900E+02 1.283120E+02 3.537000E+02 2.109308E+02 2.641105E+02 3.554869E+02 1.281742E+02 3.587000E+02 2.106921E+02 2.638117E+02 3.557256E+02 1.280467E+02 3.637000E+02 2.104087E+02 2.634568E+02 3.560090E+02 1.279306E+02 3.687000E+02 2.100812E+02 2.630467E+02 3.563365E+02 1.278255E+02 3.737000E+02 2.097057E+02 2.625766E+02 3.567119E+02 1.277327E+02
| |
| | |
| 6.2-137 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2 -25 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1 BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW (THENERGYOUSAN DS FLOW (THOUENERGYSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) 3.787000E+02 2.092833E+02 2.620477E+02 3.571344E+02 1.276516E+02 3.837000E+02 2.088097E+02 2.614547E+02 3.576080E+02 1.275835E+02 3.887000E+02 2.082856E+02 2.607985E+02 3.581320E+02 1.275281E+02 3.937000E+02 2.077070E+02 2.600740E+02 3.587106E+02 1.274866E+02 3.987000E+02 2.081180E+02 2.605886E+02 3.582997E+02 1.271881E+02 4.037000E+02 2.075149E+02 2.598334E+02 3.589028E+02 1.271585E+02 4.087000E+02 2.068907E+02 2.590519E+02 3.595269E+02 1.271361E+02 4.137000E+02 2.062044E+02 2.581925E+02 3.602133E+02 1.271296E+02 4.187000E+02 2.064395E+02 2.584869E+02 3.599782E+02 1.268837E+02 4.237000E+02 2.055896E+02 2.574227E+02 3.608281E+02 1.269190E+02 4.287000E+02 2.056250E+02 2.574671E+02 3.607927E+02 1.267242E+02 4.337000E+02 2.055378E+02 2.573579E+02 3.608799E+02 1.265610E+02 4.387000E+02 2.053233E+02 2.570893E+02 3.610944E+02 1.264304E+02 4.437000E+02 2.049690E+02 2.566457E+02 3.614487E+02 1.263357E+02 4.487000E+02 2.044716E+02 2.560228E+02 3.619461E+02 1.262778E+02 4.537000E+02 2.038228E+02 2.552105E+02 3.625948E+02 1.262588E+02 4.587000E+02 2.038625E+02 2.552602E+02 3.625552E+02 1.260609E+02 4.637000E+02 2.028344E+02 2.539729E+02 3.635833E+02 1.261396E+02 4.687000E+02 2.024357E+02 2.534737E+02 3.639820E+02 1.260548E+02 4.737000E+02 2.025578E+02 2.536265E+02 3.638599E+02 1.258344E+02 4.787000E+02 2.023206E+02 2.533296E+02 3.640971E+02 1.257070E+02 4.837000E+02 2.016907E+02 2.525408E+02 3.647270E+02 1.256810E+02 4.887000E+02 2.013421E+02 2.521043E+02 3.650756E+02 1.255818E+02 4.937000E+02 2.011080E+02 2.518112E+02 3.653097E+02 1.254524E+02 4.987000E+02 2.007980E+02 2.514231E+02 3.656197E+02 1.253424E+02 5.037000E+02 2.001640E+02 2.506293E+02 3.662536E+02 1.253161E+02 5.087000E+02 2.000496E+02 2.504860E+02 3.663680E+02 1.251547E+02 5.137000E+02 1.991116E+02 2.493116E+02 3.673060E+02 1.252065E+02 5.187000E+02 1.988844E+02 2.490271E+02 3.675332E+02 1.250736E+02 5.237000E+02 1.985986E+02 2.486691E+02 3.678191E+02 1.249556E+02 5.287000E+02 1.981173E+02 2.480666E+02 3.683003E+02 1.248878E+02 6.992170E+02 1.981173E+02 2.480666E+02 3.683003E+02 1.248878E+02 6.993170E+02 9.616161E+01 1.194631E+02 4.702561E+02 1.519177E+02 7.037000E+02 9.604013E+01 1.193110E+02 4.703776E+02 1.517513E+02 1.108700E+03 8.719153E+01 1.082315E+02 4.792261E+02 1.445971E+02 1.110000E+03 8.717064E+01 1.082053E+02 3.425194E+02 1.675419E+02 1.757368E+03 8.717064E+01 1.082053E+02 3.425194E+02 1.675419E+02 1.757468E+03 7.754533E+01 8.922495E+01 3.521447E+02 7.943032E+01 3.000000E+03 6.844378E+01 7.875255E+01 3.612462E+02 8.107238E+01 3.000100E+03 6.844314E+01 7.875182E+01 3.612469E+02 7.978343E+01 3.600 000E+03 6.465374E+01 7.439167E+01 3.650363E+02 8.046710E+01
| |
| | |
| 6.2-137a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-25 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| ENERGY ENERGY TIME FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 3.600100E+03 5.352215E+01 6.158348E+01 3.761678E+0 5.529667E+01 2
| |
| 1.000000E+04 3.891924E+01 4.478112E+01 3.907708E+0 5.744330E+01 2
| |
| 1.000010E+04 3.801020E+01 4.373517E+01 3.916798E+0 4.817662E+01 2
| |
| 1.000000E+05 2.032142E+01 2.338217E+01 4.093686E+0 5.035233E+01 2
| |
| 1.000001E+05 1.981995E+01 2.280516E+01 4.098701E+0 3.975739E+01 2
| |
| 1.000000E+06 8.492855E+00 9.772021E+00 4.211971E+0 4.085612E+01 2
| |
| 1.000000E+06 8.460734E+00 9.735062E+00 4.212293E+0 3.917432E+01 2
| |
| 1.000000E+07 2.649718E+00 3.048810E+00 4.270403E+0 3.971475E+01 2
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-137b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-26
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MASS BALANCE MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| MASS BALANCE TIME (SECONDS) 0.00 24.20 24.20 223.65 699.32 1757.37 3600.00 MASS (THOUSAND LBM)
| |
| I nitial In RCS a nd ACC 8 16.31 8 16.31 8 16.31 8 16.31 8 16.31 8 16.31 8 16.31
| |
| | |
| Added Mass Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.99 368.39 879.17 1670.93 Total Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.99 368.39 879.17 1670.93
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 816.31 816.31 816.31 915.30 1184.70 1695.48 2487.24
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor Coolant 567.44 56.68 79.68 141.19 141.19 141.19 141.19 Accumulator 248.87 194.11 171.11 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Contents 816.31 250.79 250.79 141.19 141.19 141.19 141.19 Effluent Break Flow 0.00 565.52 565.52 762.50 1031.90 1542.60 2334.36 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Effluent 0.00 565.52 565.52 762.50 1031.90 1542.60 2334.36
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 816.31 816.31 816.31 903.69 1173.09 1683.78 2475.54
| |
| | |
| 6.2-138 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-27
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK ENERGY BALANCE MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| ENERGY BALANCE TIME (SECONDS) 0.00 24.20 24.20 223.65 699.32 1757.37 3600.00 ENERGY (MILLION BTU)
| |
| Initial Energy In RCS, ACC, S GEN 968.81 968.81 968.81 968.81 968.81 968.81 968.81 Added Energy Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.24 26.94 85.68 203.67 Decay Heat 0.00 7.91 7.91 32.31 76.50 154.62 263.36 Heat From Secondary 0.00 16.09 16.09 16.09 16.09 16.09 16.09
| |
| | |
| Total Added 0.00 24.00 24.00 55.64 119.54 256.39 483.12
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 968.81 992.81 992.81 1024.45 1088.35 1222.20 1451.93
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor Coolant 341.62 12.82 14.88 37.20 37.20 37.20 37.20 Accumulator Core 22.27 17.37 15.31 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Stored Primary 23.64 12.20 12.20 4.77 4.71 4.20 3.33 Metal Secondary 177.44 169.29 169.29 132.91 97.27 69.02 51.77 Metal Steam 91.73 91.44 91.44 83.94 67.41 43.62 31.85 Generator 312.11 330.54 330.54 297.20 230.93 146.03 105.95 Total Contents 968.81 633.66 633.66 556.01 437.52 300.07 230.09
| |
| | |
| Effluent Break Flow 0.00 358.58 358.58 446.80 629.19 915.45 1213.56 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Effluent 0.00 358.58 358.58 446.80 629.19 915.45 1213.56
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 968.81 992.24 992.24 1002.81 1066.71 1215.52 1443.65
| |
| | |
| 6.2-139 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-28
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| | |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 0.00000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00111 84856.4 47801.1 43218.0 24297.4 0.101 42559.9 23971.4 22324.8 12538.6 0.201 42838.3 24219.8 24793.7 13937.7 0.302 43224.9 24558.8 24956.9 14042.5 0.402 43629.3 24936.1 24131.6 13591.6 0.502 44059.6 25358.0 23018.1 12973.9 0.601 44503.7 25817.0 22086.5 12453.8 0.701 44766.3 26186.9 21271.1 11996.9 0.801 44702.0 26364.3 20677.2 11664.8 0.902 44293.3 26328.8 20266.8 11437.2 1.00 43606.9 26110.9 20049.6 11317.6 1.10 42759.5 25784.9 19935.4 11255.1 1.20 41898.8 25438.2 19892.2 11231.9 1.30 41061.4 25101.1 19871.4 11220.8 1.40 40249.1 24776.4 19861.7 11215.1 1.50 39450.6 24454.2 19880.1 11225.2 1.60 38642.2 24124.2 19935.6 11256.3 1.70 37855.4 23803.0 20000.0 11292.4 1.80 37099.3 23496.8 20046.8 11318.2 1.90 36353.5 23197.3 20070.2 11330.6 2.00 35584.0 22881.8 20050.4 11318.4 2.10 24788.4 22551.9 20008.5 11293.7 2.20 33983.5 22215.3 19932.5 11249.8 2.30 33099.2 21822.8 19755.4 11148.0 2.40 32225.5 21434.5 19361.7 10924.0 2.50 31325.8 21022.5 19185.7 10824.3 2.60 30441.3 20611.5 19038.8 10740.8 2.70 29572.6 20200.4 18854.7 10635.9 2.80 28678.3 19758.4 18628.6 10507.2 2.90 27509.7 19107.6 18400.1 10377.3 3.00 25599.5 17911.0 18203.1 10265.6 3.10 23103.9 16272.7 18016.5 10160.0 3.20 22045.5 15653.9 17811.6 10043.9 3.30 21224.3 15157.2 17595.1 9921.2 3.40 20058.5 14380.3 17405.2 9814.0 3.50 19288.0 13883.3 17237.8 9719.7
| |
| | |
| 6.2-140 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-28 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| | |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 3.60 18601.3 13430.8 17074.0 9627.5 3.70 17924.0 12974.3 16909.1 9534.8 3.80 17326.2 12570.4 16750.6 9444.7 3.90 16806.1 12218.4 16610.9 9363.1 4.00 16348.7 11908.1 16483.5 9287.8 4.20 15583.5 11384.6 16246.6 9149.5 4.40 15011.5 10988.0 16030.4 9024.5 4.60 14536.4 10650.0 15823.0 8904.5 4.80 14180.7 10389.6 15640.0 8799.1 5.00 13898.4 10171.3 15460.1 8696.8 5.20 13707.0 10009.6 15287.4 8600.1 5.40 13584.4 9887.5 15108.5 8501.5 5.60 13536.4 9810.5 14928.2 8403.1 5.80 13561.8 9777.2 14753.1 8308.4 6.00 13687.6 9806.4 14588.4 8220.1 6.20 14046.6 9992.4 14163.8 7983.7 6.40 13823.6 9748.1 15264.5 8622.7 6.60 13837.2 9861.2 15698.9 8863.1 6.80 12864.8 9629.3 15551.5 8786.2 7.00 11792.7 9136.4 15477.6 8748.4 7.20 11895.0 9150.7 15256.8 8626.0 7.40 12353.9 9364.7 14994.7 8480.4 7.60 12688.5 9505.4 14864.6 8408.9 7.80 13046.4 9674.0 14692.3 8311.1 8.00 13658.2 10006.0 14424.1 8156.9 8.20 14010.7 10113.0 14196.0 8024.4 8.40 13232.0 9447.0 14053.1 7940.2 8.60 11978.7 8556.2 14036.9 7928.0 8.80 11808.4 8473.5 13999.9 7902.8 9.00 11990.9 8569.8 13697.4 7726.3 9.20 11695.6 8326.8 13551.6 7639.5 9.40 11386.8 8127.9 13625.3 7678.3 9.60 11504.0 8226.8 13450.5 7575.6 9.80 11557.4 8236.0 13121.3 7385.6 10.0 11241.7 7986.7 13102.2 7372.7 10.2 11049.1 7859.2 13097.0 7367.7 10.4 11077.6 7874.9 12758.1 7173.1 10.6 10562.4 7501.7 12647.7 7109.1 10.8 10036.8 7179.6 12822.0 7207.0 11.0 9906.9 7144.3 12482.2 7011.9 11.2 9631.2 6995.6 12309.8 6912.8 11.4 9388.7 6877.5 12447.3 6989.5 11.6 9227.6 6800.4 12127.3 6805.9
| |
| | |
| 6.2-140a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-28 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| | |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 11.8 9023.2 6678.0 12015.1 6741.3 12.0 8902.4 6607.4 12028.7 6747.7 12.2 8743.0 6500.3 11752.6 6589.9 12.4 8585.2 6402.5 11733.5 6578.5 12.6 8447.1 6319.1 11611.2 6508.1 12.8 8267.8 6210.9 11460.5 6422.2 13.0 8129.3 6138.5 11409.1 6392.6 13.2 7969.6 6049.7 11252.9 6303.6 13.4 7828.2 5976.2 11176.3 6260.1 13.6 7694.0 5903.4 11048.1 6187.4 13.8 7562.6 5829.5 10950.2 6132.2 14.0 7444.9 5762.2 10834.4 6067.1 14.2 7324.4 5690.5 10725.0 6005.9 14.4 7207.1 5621.6 10605.1 5939.2 14.6 7077.9 5544.8 10470.7 5864.6 14.8 6939.4 5463.2 10342.1 5793.6 15.0 6795.7 5378.3 10205.2 5718.6 15.2 6655.2 5293.0 10082.0 5651.7 15.4 6526.2 5210.3 9955.8 5583.7 15.6 6414.4 5134.6 9840.0 5522.0 15.8 6317.2 5065.3 9724.3 5460.9 16.0 6231.6 5003.2 9612.3 5402.4 16.2 6152.1 4946.7 9504.2 5346.8 16.4 6073.7 4894.6 9395.1 5291.4 16.6 5995.1 4847.6 9290.8 5239.6 16.8 5913.8 4805.4 9184.9 5187.8 17.0 5828.1 4768.1 9079.8 5137.7 17.2 5738.5 4738.3 8977.7 5090.8 17.4 5646.2 4712.3 8856.7 5035.5 17.6 5563.9 4706.1 8745.5 4991.5 17.8 5488.5 4731.4 8449.4 4856.2 18.0 5371.3 4768.5 8188.2 4741.8 18.2 5186.1 4789.8 7999.0 4663.5 18.4 4881.6 4726.5 4720.9 4348.4 18.6 4537.8 4639.1 7143.8 4197.8 18.8 4203.4 4537.1 6821.8 3967.7 19.0 3878.9 4404.3 6529.8 3716.0 19.2 3586.7 4234.7 6310.8 3482.1 19.6 3088.1 3788.5 5781.0 2977.3 19.8 2858.5 3528.6 5479.2 2744.9 20.0 2652.5 3288.7 5191.4 2544.2 20.2 2461.0 3062.0 4909.9 2359.5 20.6 2123.5 2656.6 4401.7 2044.1 20.8 1972.2 2472.9 4194.7 1918.7
| |
| | |
| 6.2-140b REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-28 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| | |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 21.0 1839.8 2311.5 3992.9 1800.1 21.2 1716.5 2160.7 3804.3 1692.1 21.6 1536.2 1940.0 2962.1 1248.6 21.8 1455.5 1840.0 2632.3 1055.6 22.0 1361.9 1723.7 2770.9 1059.7 22.2 1268.5 1607.5 2812.2 1046.2 22.4 1176.9 1493.3 2960.1 1081.2 22.6 1090.6 1385.0 3358.3 1205.5 22.8 1000.0 1272.0 3111.1 1102.2 23.0 914.5 1164.5 2545.1 896.8 23.2 834.9 1064.1 2356.6 827.9 23.4 761.4 971.2 2072.6 725.1 23.6 694.4 886.3 1792.1 625.0 23.8 629.7 804.2 1432.6 499.5 24.0 588.9 752.7 1245.3 433.4 24.2 555.5 710.4 1023.9 350.6 24.4 511.1 653.8 714.4 240.5 24.6 468.8 600.0 445.6 148.2 24.8 433.5 555.1 261.8 85.1 25.0 403.2 516.6 0.0 0.0 25.2 360.3 461.7 0.0 0.0 25.4 328.9 421.7 0.0 0.0 25.6 283.5 363.6 0.0 0.0 25.8 230.0 295.2 0.0 0.0 26.0 205.3 263.6 0.0 0.0 26.2 149.9 192.6 0.0 0.0 26.4 98.1 126.3 0.0 0.0 26.6 49.9 64.4 0.0 0.0 26.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-140c REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-29
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| | |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 26.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.
| |
| 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 7.4 8.8 0.0 0.0 28.1 46.9 55.3 0.0 0.0 28.2 18.7 22.1 0.0 0.0 28.3 12.6 14.8 0.0 0.0 28.4 14.4 16.9 0.0 0.0 28.5 20.0 23.6 0.0 0.0 28.6 26.6 31.4 0.0 0.0 28.7 34.5 40.7 0.0 0.0 28.8 39.5 46.5 0.0 0.0 28.9 44.7 52.7 0.0 0.0 29.0 48.5 57.2 0.0 0.0 29.1 52.1 61.4 0.0 0.0 29.2 55.5 65.5 0.0 0.0 29.3 58.8 69.4 0.0 0.0 29.4 62.0 73.1 0.0 0.0 29.5 63.5 74.9 0.0 0.0 29.5 65.1 76.7 0.0 0.0 29.6 68.0 80.2 0.0 0.0 29.7 70.9 83.6 0.0 0.0 29.8 73.7 86.9 0.0 0.0 30.8 98.0 115.6 0.0 0.0 31.8 118.0 139.2 0.0 0.0 32.8 142.5 168.2 422.7 37.2 33.8 181.8 214.6 1079.2 130.1 34.3 432.6 512.9 4323.7 628.5 34.9 489.2 580.6 4863.7 734.2 35.9 490.5 582.2 4871.6 742.6 36.9 484.9 575.5 4821.3 737.0 37.9 478.6 568.0 4765.0 730.2 38.6 474.2 562.7 4724.2 725.1 38.9 472.3 560.4 4706.6 722.9 39.9 465.9 552.8 4647.8 715.5
| |
| | |
| 6.2-141 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-29 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 40.9 459.7 545.4 4589.5 708.0 41.9 453.6 538.1 4532.2 700.7 42.9 447.7 531.0 4476.1 693.4 43.9 442.0 524.2 4421.3 686.3 44.0 441.4 523.5 4415.8 685.6 44.9 436.5 517.6 4367.8 679.3 45.9 431.1 511.1 4315.7 672.5 46.9 425.9 504.9 4265.1 665.9 47.9 420.9 498.9 4215.7 659.4 48.9 416.0 493.1 4167.7 653.2 49.9 411.3 487.5 4121.0 647.0 50.2 409.9 485.8 4107.2 645.2 50.9 406.7 482.0 4075.4 641.0 51.9 402.3 476.7 4031.1 635.2 52.9 398.0 471.6 3987.8 629.5 53.9 393.8 466.6 3945.7 623.9 54.9 389.7 461.7 3904.6 618.5 55.9 385.8 457.0 3864.4 613.2 56.9 381.9 452.4 3825.3 608.0 57.0 381.6 452.0 3821.4 607.5 57.9 378.2 448.0 3787.0 602.9 58.9 374.6 443.6 3749.6 598.0 59.9 371.0 439.4 3713.1 593.1 60.9 367.5 435.3 3677.3 588.3 61.9 364.1 431.2 3642.3 583.7 62.9 360.8 427.3 3608.1 579.1 63.9 357.6 423.4 3574.6 574.6 64.9 354.4 419.7 3541.8 570.2 65.9 351.3 416.0 3509.6 565.8 66.9 348.3 412.4 3478.1 561.6 67.9 345.3 408.8 3447.1 557.4 68.9 342.4 405.4 3416.8 553.3 69.9 339.6 402.0 3387.0 549.2 70.9 336.8 398.6 3357.8 545.2 71.9 334.0 395.4 3329.1 541.3 72.0 333.8 395.0 3326.3 540.9 72.9 331.3 392.2 3300.9 537.4 73.9 328.7 389.0 3273.2 533.6 74.9 326.1 385.9 3246.0 529.9 75.9 323.5 382.9 3219.2 526.2 76.9 321.0 379.9 3192.9 522.5 77.9 318.5 376.9 3167.0 519.0 78.9 181.5 214.2 1332.4 279.2 79.9 180.8 213.4 1334.0 278.9
| |
| | |
| 6.2-141a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-29 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 80.9 180.5 213.1 1334.6 278.8 81.9 180.2 212.8 1335.2 278.6 82.9 179.9 212.4 1335.8 278.5 83.9 179.7 212.1 1336.5 278.3 84.9 179.4 211.8 1337.1 278.2 85.9 179.2 211.5 1337.8 278.0 86.9 178.9 211.2 1338.5 277.9 87.9 178.6 210.9 1339.1 277.8 89.9 178.1 210.3 1340.5 277.5 91.7 177.7 209.8 1341.7 277.2 91.9 177.6 209.7 1341.8 277.2 93.9 177.1 209.1 1343.2 276.9 95.9 176.6 208.5 1344.6 276.6 97.9 176.1 207.9 1345.9 276.4 99.9 175.6 207.4 1347.3 276.1 101.9 175.2 206.8 1348.7 275.8 103.9 174.7 206.2 1350.1 275.5 105.9 174.2 205.6 1351.5 275.2 107.9 173.7 205.1 1352.9 275.0 109.9 173.2 404.5 1354.3 274.7 111.9 172.8 204.0 1355.7 274.4 113.9 172.3 203.4 1357.0 274.1 114.9 172.1 203.1 1357.7 274.0 115.9 171.8 202.9 1358.4 273.8 117.9 171.4 202.3 1359.8 273.5 119.9 170.9 201.8 1361.1 273.2 121.9 170.5 201.2 1362.5 272.9 123.9 170.0 200.7 1363.8 272.6 125.9 169.5 200.1 1365.1 272.3 127.9 169.1 199.6 1366.5 272.0 129.9 168.6 199.1 1367.8 271.6 131.9 168.2 198.5 1369.1 271.3 133.9 167.8 198.0 1370.4 271.0 135.9 167.3 197.5 1371.6 270.7 137.9 166.9 197.0 1372.9 270.3 139.9 166.4 196.5 1374.2 270.0 140.1 166.4 196.4 1374.3 270.0 141.9 166.0 196.0 1375.4 269.6 143.9 165.6 195.4 1376.7 269.3 145.9 165.1 194.9 1377.9 268.9 147.9 164.7 194.4 1379.2 268.6 149.9 164.3 193.9 1380.4 268.2 151.9 163.9 193.4 1381.6 267.9 153.9 163.4 192.9 1382.8 267.5
| |
| | |
| 6.2-141b REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-29 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 155.9 163.0 192.4 1384.0 267.2 157.9 162.6 191.9 1385.2 266.8 159.9 162.2 191.4 1386.4 266.4 161.9 161.8 190.9 1387.6 266.0 163.9 161.4 190.5 1388.8 265.7 165.9 161.0 190.0 1390.0 265.3 167.5 160.6 189.6 1390.9 265.0 167.9 160.5 189.5 1391.2 264.9 169.9 160.1 189.0 1392.3 264.5 171.9 159.7 188.5 1393.5 264.1 173.9 159.3 188.1 1394.6 263.7 175.9 158.9 187.6 1395.8 263.3 177.9 158.5 187.1 1396.9 262.9 179.9 158.2 186.7 1398.1 262.5 181.9 157.8 186.2 1399.2 262.1 183.9 157.4 185.7 1400.3 261.7 185.9 157.0 185.3 1401.4 261.3 187.9 156.6 184.8 1402.5 260.9 189.9 156.2 184.4 1403.6 260.5 191.9 155.9 183.9 1404.7 260.1 193.9 155.5 183.5 1405.8 259.7 195.9 155.1 183.1 1406.9 259.3 197.7 154.8 182.7 1407.9 258.9
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-141c REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-30
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK - MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS PRINCIPLE PARAMETERS DURING REFLOOD - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Flooding Flow (lbm/sec)
| |
| | |
| Core Downcomer Time Temp Rate Carryover Height Height Flow Injection Enthalpy (sec) (oF) (in/sec) Fractio (ft) (ft) Fracti Total Accum Spill (BTU/lbm) n on
| |
| | |
| 26.8 180.8 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 27.6 179.0 8.407 0.000 0.53 1.18 0.000 6203.3 6203.3 0.0 99.46 27.8 178.0 9.878 0.000 0.85 1.08 0.000 6162.1 6162.1 0.0 99.46 27.9 177.5 9.477 0.000 1.01 1.02 0.000 6141.8 6141.8 0.0 99.46 28.3 177.1 1.765 0.101 1.31 1.58 0.250 6037.9 6037.9 0.0 99.46 28.7 177.2 2.673 0.167 1.38 2.55 0.281 5961.7 5961.7 0.0 99.46 29.5 177.4 2.385 0.300 1.50 4.41 0.328 5811.9 5811.9 0.0 99.46 30.8 177.9 2.318 0.446 1.66 7.63 0.350 5585.8 5585.8 0.0 99.46 34.3 179.4 4.375 0.630 2.00 16.04 0.584 6269.8 4580.1 0.0 96.37 34.9 179.7 4.637 0.650 2.09 16.12 0.599 6042.0 4352.6 0.0 96.26 35.9 180.1 4.473 0.675 2.21 16.12 0.598 5908.4 4219.1 0.0 96.18 38.6 181.7 4.148 0.708 2.51 16.12 0.596 5651.4 3962.0 0.0 96.03 44.0 185.2 3.795 0.731 3.00 16.12 0.587 5238.0 3548.4 0.0 95.76 50.2 189.7 3.538 0.740 3.50 16.12 0.578 4858.9 3169.2 0.0 95.47 57.0 194.9 3.329 0.744 4.00 16.12 0.569 4518.3 2828.4 0.0 95.17 64.9 200.9 3.136 0.747 4.54 16.12 0.559 4189.2 2499.1 0.0 94.84 72.0 206.1 2.989 0.748 5.00 16.12 0.551 3936.9 2246.8 0.0 94.54 78.9 210.9 2.135 0.739 5.42 16.12 0.424 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 80.9 212.1 2.124 0.740 5.51 16.12 0.424 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 91.7 219.4 2.074 0.742 6.00 16.12 0.427 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 103.9 228.6 2.018 0.744 6.54 16.12 0.430 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 114.9 236.9 1.967 0.747 7.00 16.12 0.432 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 127.9 245.5 1.909 0.750 7.53 16.12 0.436 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 140.1 252.4 1.856 0.753 8.00 16.12 0.440 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 153.9 259.1 1.797 0.757 8.52 16.12 0.444 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 167.5 264.8 1.741 0.760 9.00 16.12 0.448 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 183.9 270.6 1.675 0.764 9.56 16.12 0.454 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 197.7 274.8 1.622 0.767 10.00 16.12 0.460 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00
| |
| | |
| 6.2-142 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2 -31 DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec)
| |
| | |
| 197.8 166.5 209.5 1524.4 257.5 202.8 165.9 208.8 1525.0 257.4 207.8 165.4 208.2 1525.5 257.3 212.8 164.9 207.6 1525.9 257.3 217.8 165.9 208.8 1525.0 256.8 222.8 165.4 208.2 1525.5 256.7 227.8 164.9 207.5 1525.9 256.7 232.8 165.8 208.7 1525.0 256.2 237.8 165.3 208.1 1525.5 256.1 242.8 164.8 207.5 1526.0 256.0 247.8 165.8 208.7 1525.1 255.6 252.8 165.3 208.0 1525.6 255.5 257.8 164.8 207.4 1526.1 255.4 262.8 164.2 206.7 1526.6 255.4 267.8 165.2 207.9 1525.7 254.9 272.8 164.6 207.2 1526.2 254.9 277.8 164.1 206.6 1526.7 254.8 282.8 165.0 207.7 1525.8 254.3 287.8 164.5 207.0 1526.4 254.3 292.8 163.9 206.3 1526.9 254.2 297.8 164.8 207.4 1526.0 253.8 302.8 164.3 206.8 1526.6 253.7 307.8 163.7 206.1 1527.1 253.6 312.8 164.6 207.1 1526.3 253.2 317.8 164.0 206.4 1526.8 253.1 322.8 163.5 205.7 1527.4 253.0 327.8 164.3 206.8 1526.6 252.6 332.8 163.7 206.1 1527.1 252.6 337.8 164.5 207.1 1526.3 252.1 342.8 163.9 206.3 1526.9 252.1 347.8 163.4 205.6 1527.5 252.0 352.8 164.1 206.6 1526.7 251.6 357.8 163.5 205.9 1527.3 251.5 362.8 163.0 205.1 1527.9 251.5 367.8 163.7 206.0 1527.1 251.0 372.8 163.1 205.3 1527.7 251.0 377.8 163.8 206.2 1527.0 250.6 382.8 163.2 205.4 1527.6 250.5 387.8 162.6 204.7 1528.2 250.5 392.8 163.3 205.5 1527.5 250.1 397.8 162.7 204.7 1528.2 250.0 402.8 163.4 205.7 1527.4 249.6 407.8 162.9 205.1 1527.9 249.5 412.8 162.5 204.5 1528.4 249.4
| |
| | |
| 6.2-143 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-31 (Contd)
| |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec)
| |
| | |
| 417.8 163.2 205.5 1527.6 249.0 422.8 162.7 204.8 1528.1 248.9 427.8 162.2 204.2 1528.6 248.8 432.8 163.0 205.2 1527.8 248.4 437.8 162.5 204.5 1528.4 248.3 442.8 163.2 205.4 1527.6 247.9 447.8 162.7 204.8 1528.2 247.9 452.8 162.2 204.1 1528.7 247.8 457.8 162.8 205.0 1528.0 247.4 462.8 162.3 204.3 1528.5 247.3 467.8 163.0 205.1 1527.9 253.7 472.8 162.4 204.4 1528.4 253.7 477.8 161.8 203.7 1529.0 253.6 482.8 162.5 204.5 1528.4 253.2 487.8 161.9 203.7 1529.0 253.1 492.8 162.5 204.5 1528.4 252.7 497.8 161.9 203.7 1529.0 252.6 502.8 162.4 204.4 1528.4 252.2 507.8 161.8 203.6 1529.1 252.1 512.8 162.3 204.3 1528.5 251.8 517.8 161.7 203.5 1529.2 251.7 522.8 162.1 204.1 1528.7 251.3 527.8 161.5 203.3 1529.4 251.2 532.8 161.9 203.8 1528.9 250.9 537.8 162.3 204.3 1528.5 250.5 542.8 161.6 203.5 1529.2 250.5 547.8 162.0 203.9 1528.8 250.1 552.8 161.3 203.0 1529.5 250.1 557.8 161.6 203.4 1529.2 249.7 562.8 161.9 203.8 1528.9 249.4 567.8 161.2 202.8 1529.7 249.4 572.8 161.4 203.2 1529.4 249.0 577.8 161.6 203.5 1529.2 248.7 582.8 161.8 203.7 1529.0 248.4 587.8 161.0 202.6 1529.9 248.4 592.8 161.1 202.8 1529.7 248.1 597.8 161.2 202.9 1529.6 247.8 602.8 161.3 203.1 1529.5 247.5 607.8 161.4 203.2 1529.4 247.3 612.8 161.5 203.2 1529.4 247.0 617.8 161.5 203.2 1529.4 246.8 622.8 161.4 203.2 1529.4 246.5 627.8 161.3 203.1 1529.5 246.3 632.8 161.2 202.9 1529.6 246.1
| |
| | |
| 6.2-143a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-31 (Contd)
| |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec)
| |
| | |
| 637.8 161.0 202.7 1529.8 245.9 642.8 160.8 202.4 1530.1 245.7 647.8 160.5 202.0 1530.4 245.5 652.8 161.0 202.7 1529.8 245.1 657.8 160.6 202.1 1530.3 245.0 662.8 160.9 202.6 1529.9 244.6 667.8 160.3 201.8 1530.5 244.5 672.8 160.5 202.0 1530.3 244.2 677.8 160.5 202.0 1530.3 243.9 682.8 160.4 201.9 1530.4 243.7 687.8 160.9 202.6 1529.9 243.3 687.8 160.9 202.6 1529.9 243.3 692.8 160.5 202.0 1530.3 243.2 695.0 156.7 197.2 1451.6 339.7 700.0 156.9 197.5 1451.3 339.4 705.0 156.9 197.5 1451.3 339.1 710.0 156.7 197.2 1451.6 338.9 715.0 87.0 109.5 1521.3 357.3 946.9 87.0 109.5 1521.3 357.3 947.0 91.9 114.5 1516.3 354.5 950.0 91.8 114.5 1516.4 354.3 1512.8 91.8 114.5 1516.4 354.3 1512.9 81.6 93.9 1526.6 251.8 1600.0 80.6 92.8 1527.6 252.0 1600.1 80.6 92.8 1527.6 271.3 3600.0 65.9 75.9 1542.3 273.9 3600.1 54.4 62.6 1553.8 254.8 7000.0 44.0 50.6 1564.2 256.5 7000.1 42.7 49.1 1565.5 209.8 10000.0 38.4 44.2 1569.8 210.4 10000.1 37.8 43.4 1570.5 182.2 100000.0 20.2 23.2 1588.1 184.2 100000.1 20.0 23.0 1588.2 171.5 1000000.0 8.6 9.9 1599.7 172.8 1000000.1 8.6 9.9 1599.7 169.6 10000000. 2.7 3.1 1605.6 170.2 0
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-143b REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-32
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MASS BALANCE MAXIMUM SAFGUARDS - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Time (sec) 0.00 26.80 26.80 197.71 947.04 1512.83 3600.00
| |
| | |
| Mass (1000 lbm)
| |
| | |
| Initial In RCS and 815.56 815.56 815.56 815.56 815.56 815.56 815.56 ACC
| |
| | |
| Added Mass Pumped 0.00 0.00 0.00 280.01 1526.04 2435.96 5792.64 Injection Total Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 280.01 1526.04 2435.96 5792.64
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 815.56 815.56 815.56 1095.56 2341.60 3251.51 6608.20
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor 567.41 56.14 84.14 148.82 148.82 148.82 148.82 Coolant Accumulator 248.14 200.63 172.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 815.56 256.76 256.76 148.82 148.82 148.82 148.82 Contents
| |
| | |
| Effluent Break Flow 0.00 570.25 570.25 946.54 2192.58 3102.40 6459.09 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 570.25 570.25 946.54 2192.58 3102.40 6459.09 Effluent
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 815.56 827.01 827.01 1095.36 2341.39 3251.22 6607.90
| |
| | |
| 6.2-144 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-33 DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK ENERGY BALANCE MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS - UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| Time (sec) 0.00 26.80 26.80 197.71 947.04 1512.83 3600.00
| |
| | |
| Energy (106 BTU)
| |
| | |
| Initial In RCS, ACC 987.47 987.47 987.47 987.47 987.47 987.47 987.47 Energy SG Added Energy Pumped 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.64 160.23 298.54 847.36 Injection Decay Heat 0.00 8.75 8.75 29.96 96.96 138.47 263.69 From 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 10.18 15.94 15.94 Secondary Total Added 0.00 8.78 8.78 54.64 267.38 452.96 1126.99
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 987.47 996.25 996.25 1042.11 1254.85 1440.43 2114.46
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor 341.36 12.17 14.95 38.95 38.95 38.95 38.95 Coolant Accumulator 24.68 19.95 17.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Core Stored 23.82 12.94 12.94 4.91 4.71 4.41 3.33 Primary 169.14 160.64 160.64 132.46 91.34 75.39 57.86 Metal Secondary 119.11 119.14 119.14 109.53 78.90 62.07 47.96 Metal Steam 309.36 309.44 309.44 280.29 203.89 165.86 131.12 Generator Total 987.47 634.28 634.28 566.14 417.79 346.69 279.23 Contents Effluent Break Flow 0.00 362.39 362.39 466.97 828.06 1077.70 1821.64 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 362.39 362.39 466.97 828.06 1077.70 1821.64 Effluent
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 987.47 996.67 996.67 1033.11 1245.85 1424.40 2100.88
| |
| | |
| 6.2-145 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-34
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO.1* BREAK PATH NO.2**
| |
| | |
| ENERGY ENERGY TIME FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.136575E-03 1.981247E+03 1.305075E+03 1.981198E+03 1.304096E+03 2.224618E-03 4.468274E+03 2.948947E+03 4.800761E+03 3.152808E+03 1.014002E-01 4.351383E+04 2.898148E+04 2.800175E+04 1.834941E+04 2.019356E-01 3.686354E+04 2.469200E+04 2.448619E+04 1.594440E+04 3.014987E-01 3.790979E+04 2.539363E+04 2.177780E+04 1.399031E+04 4.017139E-01 3.681159E+04 2.466941E+04 2.038777E+04 1.286381E+04 5.010221E-01 3.655878E+04 2.451512E+04 1.959035E+04 1.214195E+04 6.016651E-01 3.613983E+04 2.426314E+04 1.902986E+04 1.160592E+04 7.016532E-01 3.557857E+04 2.392667E+04 1.860857E+04 1.119457E+04 8.014509E-01 3.491345E+04 2.352989E+04 1.831373E+04 1.089216E+04 9.010227E-01 3.426357E+04 2.315175E+04 1.809461E+04 1.065981E+04 1.001410E+00 3.373148E+04 2.286061E+04 1.796462E+04 1.049839E+04 1.101958E+00 3.324598E+04 2.260572E+04 1.794517E+04 1.041475E+04 1.201662E+00 3.276568E+04 2.235712E+04 1.800208E+04 1.038547E+04 1.301410E+00 3.216462E+04 2.202584E+04 1.808822E+04 1.038114E+04 1.401458E+00 3.158273E+04 2.169162E+04 1.819666E+04 1.039668E+04 1.501222E+00 3.110553E+04 2.141686E+04 1.831118E+04 1.042293E+04 1.602034E+00 3.072685E+04 2.120232E+04 1.842991E+04 1.045794E+04 1.702200E+00 3.031890E+04 2.096365E+04 1.853087E+04 1.048959E+04 1.802145E+00 2.977598E+04 2.062400E+04 1.860378E+04 1.051131E+04 1.901832E+00 2.918045E+04 2.024063E+04 1.865092E+04 1.052365E+04 2.001117E+00 2.866387E+04 1.991077E+04 1.867727E+04 1.052853E+04 2.101911E+00 2.823694E+04 1.964609E+04 1.868578E+04 1.052667E+04 2.201838E+00 2.780038E+04 1.937235E+04 1.867338E+04 1.051589E+04 2.301580E+00 2.731567E+04 1.905819E+04 1.863839E+04 1.049470E+04 2.401670E+00 2.680234E+04 1.871718E+04 1.858593E+04 1.046541E+04 2.501399E+00 2.632296E+04 1.839556E+04 1.851920E+04 1.042941E+04 2.602117E+00 2.591022E+04 1.811956E+04 1.844251E+04 1.038877E+04 2.701565E+00 2.554003E+04 1.787145E+04 1.835987E+04 1.034539E+04
| |
| | |
| 6.2-146 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-34 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO.1* BREAK PATH NO.2**
| |
| | |
| ENERGY ENERGY TIME FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 2.801157E+00 2.514850E+04 1.760197E+04 1.826794E+04 1.029719E+04 2.901735E+00 2.475403E+04 1.732381E+04 1.816465E+04 1.024291E+04 3.001611E+00 2.438893E+04 1.706169E+04 1.805961E+04 1.018771E+04 3.101008E+00 2.404826E+04 1.681228E+04 1.795030E+04 1.013014E+04 3.201399E+00 2.375278E+04 1.659186E+04 1.783722E+04 1.007046E+04 3.302044E+00 2.347910E+04 1.638328E+04 1.772243E+04 1.000975E+04 3.401738E+00 2.320960E+04 1.617336E+04 1.760314E+04 9.946440E+03 3.501784E+00 2.297161E+04 1.598212E+04 1.748086E+04 9.881401E+03 3.601186E+00 2.274843E+04 1.579809E+04 1.735748E+04 9.815707E+03 3.701420E+00 2.254548E+04 1.562537E+04 1.722958E+04 9.747535E+03 3.801232E+00 2.237267E+04 1.547198E+04 1.710096E+04 9.678963E+03 3.901661E+00 2.220995E+04 1.532344E+04 1.696909E+04 9.608648E+03 4.001325E+00 2.207451E+04 1.519266E+04 1.683617E+04 9.537793E+03 4.200749E+00 2.192009E+04 1.500847E+04 1.656453E+04 9.393055E+03 4.400590E+00 2.184796E+04 1.488117E+04 1.628997E+04 9.247035E+03 4.600184E+00 2.177502E+04 1.476067E+04 1.601789E+04 9.102840E+03 4.800370E+00 2.174746E+04 1.467766E+04 1.576120E+04 8.968450E+03 5.001087E+00 2.172616E+04 1.460285E+04 1.554910E+04 8.860455E+03 5.200513E+00 2.170815E+04 1.453503E+04 1.525137E+04 8.702783E+03 5.400299E+00 2.171506E+04 1.448177E+04 1.497944E+04 8.562055E+03 5.601136E+00 2.180654E+04 1.447004E+04 1.469601E+04 8.416535E+03 5.800257E+00 2.192385E+04 1.446628E+04 1.437968E+04 8.252875E+03 6.000427E+00 2.208839E+04 1.448020E+04 1.407681E+04 8.098390E+03 6.200499E+00 2.234135E+04 1.453982E+04 1.379503E+04 7.955535E+03 6.400539E+00 2.280823E+04 1.470578E+04 1.347764E+04 7.790174E+03 6.600151E+00 1.658473E+04 1.169365E+04 1.315470E+04 7.621450E+03 6.800919E+00 1.727581E+04 1.205744E+04 1.289188E+04 7.487277E+03 7.000595E+00 1.736337E+04 1.201666E+04 1.262349E+04 7.348518E+03 7.200045E+00 1.751154E+04 1.202970E+04 1.236000E+04 7.210301E+03 7.400789E+00 1.765663E+04 1.202519E+04 1.209492E+04 7.069858E+03 7.600945E+00 1.763810E+04 1.196470E+04 1.184986E+04 6.940364E+03 7.800557E+00 1.768968E+04 1.191410E+04 1.161113E+04 6.813464E+03 8.000869E+00 1.776058E+04 1.191913E+04 1.137922E+04 6.689443E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-146a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-34 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO.1* BREAK PATH NO.2**
| |
| | |
| ENERGY ENERGY TIME FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 8.200314E+00 1.782812E+04 1.190272E+04 1.115033E+04 6.566145E+03 8.400928E+00 1.781597E+04 1.185614E+04 1.092885E+04 6.446899E+03 8.601108E+00 1.780065E+04 1.179064E+04 1.070857E+04 6.327932E+03 8.800071E+00 1.742931E+04 1.156095E+04 1.049023E+04 6.209876E+03 9.000849E+00 1.741590E+04 1.152856E+04 1.027428E+04 6.093391E+03 9.201312E+00 1.735558E+04 1.146520E+04 1.006040E+04 5.978074E+03 9.400411E+00 1.726416E+04 1.138395E+04 9.847780E+03 5.863331E+03 9.601070E+00 1.709785E+04 1.126341E+04 9.631602E+03 5.746675E+03 9.800646E+00 1.682111E+04 1.108720E+04 9.417702E+03 5.631607E+03 1.000070E+01 1.641476E+04 1.084622E+04 9.202444E+03 5.515885E+03 1.020134E+01 1.589493E+04 1.055002E+04 8.986705E+03 5.400113E+03 1.020282E+01 1.589081E+04 1.054768E+04 8.985114E+03 5.399257E+03 1.040108E+01 1.533982E+04 1.024066E+04 8.773579E+03 5.286009E+03 1.060143E+01 1.481072E+04 9.950614E+03 8.561705E+03 5.172825E+03 1.080092E+01 1.431466E+04 9.681632E+03 8.352983E+03 5.061674E+03 1.100129E+01 1.383743E+04 9.424611E+03 8.143961E+03 4.950276E+03 1.120129E+01 1.336849E+04 9.171663E+03 7.935666E+03 4.839950E+03 1.140167E+01 1.290998E+04 8.922824E+03 7.725793E+03 4.728265E+03 1.160014E+01 1.246641E+04 8.679958E+03 7.508706E+03 4.612651E+03 1.180063E+01 1.203542E+04 8.441986E+03 7.280929E+03 4.491624E+03 1.200165E+01 1.162020E+04 8.212654E+03 7.048429E+03 4.369571E+03 1.220003E+01 1.122287E+04 7.993984E+03 6.814671E+03 4.247363E+03 1.240036E+01 1.083003E+04 7.781464E+03 6.585035E+03 4.128597E+03 1.260159E+01 1.044002E+04 7.575538E+03 6.358148E+03 4.011485E+03 1.280137E+01 1.005314E+04 7.376810E+03 6.138725E+03 3.898297E+03 1.300203E+01 9.634890E+03 7.186344E+03 5.918111E+03 3.784131E+03 1.320017E+01 8.720250E+03 6.918940E+03 5.685709E+03 3.663154E+03 1.340128E+01 7.996609E+03 6.685194E+03 5.421308E+03 3.526374E+03 1.360129E+01 7.340100E+03 6.403749E+03 5.120163E+03 3.370054E+03 1.380051E+01 6.704333E+03 6.076763E+03 4.793216E+03 3.199846E+03 1.400142E+01 6.070176E+03 5.727020E+03 4.451533E+03 3.020683E+03 1.420155E+01 5.528637E+03 5.389884E+03 4.116769E+03 2.846202E+03 1.440064E+01 5.113396E+03 5.072411E+03 3.800365E+03 2.682092E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-146b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-34 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO.1* BREAK PATH NO.2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 1.460076E+01 4.740946E+03 4.788439E+03 3.509097E+03 2.529534E+03 1.480075E+01 4.390978E+03 4.539931E+03 3.242890E+03 2.390239E+03 1.500068E+01 4.081782E+03 4.319358E+03 2.999233E+03 2.265632E+03 1.520079E+01 3.803648E+03 4.112601E+03 2.777892E+03 2.154171E+03 1.540014E+01 3.559418E+03 3.914318E+03 2.576365E+03 2.054332E+03 1.560057E+01 3.334802E+03 3.729398E+03 2.397790E+03 1.964616E+03 1.580080E+01 3.101744E+03 3.528954E+03 2.239556E+03 1.886458E+03 1.600051E+01 2.896200E+03 3.349945E+03 2.101009E+03 1.818266E+03 1.620041E+01 2.691367E+03 3.174662E+03 1.991052E+03 1.761018E+03 1.640065E+01 2.507346E+03 3.028362E+03 1.894811E+03 1.706635E+03 1.660049E+01 2.302950E+03 2.830062E+03 1.801833E+03 1.657401E+03 1.680037E+01 2.144371E+03 2.655460E+03 1.706093E+03 1.614387E+03 1.700015E+01 2.000759E+03 2.487793E+03 1.606673E+03 1.571639E+03 1.720030E+01 1.891219E+03 2.357135E+03 1.504036E+03 1.531573E+03 1.740031E+01 1.826193E+03 2.267233E+03 1.395988E+03 1.488295E+03 1.760015E+01 1.757867E+03 2.178268E+03 1.295741E+03 1.444433E+03 1.780073E+01 1.691471E+03 2.093168E+03 1.209760E+03 1.390784E+03 1.800034E+01 1.621530E+03 2.008154E+03 1.142311E+03 1.344113E+03 1.820099E+01 1.548606E+03 1.920204E+03 1.151291E+03 1.371293E+03 1.840076E+01 1.494461E+03 1.849901E+03 1.086093E+03 1.298692E+03 1.860066E+01 1.443674E+03 1.783094E+03 1.038916E+03 1.252042E+03 1.880073E+01 1.400052E+03 1.729042E+03 9.400072E+02 1.149631E+03 1.900016E+01 1.339175E+03 1.661928E+03 8.058861E+02 9.943219E+02 1.920063E+01 1.137547E+03 1.438864E+03 7.312755E+02 9.053598E+02 1.940052E+01 9.771373E+02 1.239616E+03 6.814092E+02 8.441418E+02 1.960006E+01 8.280051E+02 1.050943E+03 6.367283E+02 7.902548E+02 1.980047E+01 6.826189E+02 8.670762E+02 5.250805E+02 6.516650E+02 2.000001E+01 6.134937E+02 7.779753E+02 4.643149E+02 5.790040E+02 2.020014E+01 5.009611E+02 6.323161E+02 3.751393E+02 4.677005E+02 2.040067E+01 3.503304E+02 4.412629E+02 3.475900E+02 4.348189E+02 2.060099E+01 2.210329E+02 2.784827E+02 3.013509E+02 3.773814E+02 2.080018E+01 1.191013E+02 1.498856E+02 2.494284E+02 3.130316E+02 2.100059E+01 4.133309E+01 5.220214E+01 1.559792E+02 1.964134E+02
| |
| | |
| 6.2-146c REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-34 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO.1* BREAK PATH NO.2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 2.120004E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 8.962929E+01 1.137990E+02 2.140050E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 8.476988E+01 1.081520E+02 2.160085E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 8.794784E+01 1.124021E+02 2.180066E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 8.279589E+01 1.059379E+02 2.200026E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 7.441969E+01 9.535506E+01 2.220116E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.042437E+02 1.339898E+02 2.240110E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
| |
| * mass and energy exiting from the reactor vessel side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting from the SG side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-146d REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-35
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK MASS BALANCE - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| TIME (SECONDS) 0.00 22.40 22.40 MASS (THOUSAND LBM)
| |
| | |
| Initial InRCS and ACC 760.28 760.28 760.28 Added Mass Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| Total Added 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 760.28 760.28 760.28
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor Coolant 511.41 80.02 117.44
| |
| | |
| Accumulator 248.87 193.82 156.40
| |
| | |
| Total Contents 760.28 273.84 273.84 Effluent Break Flow 0.00 486.45 486.45
| |
| | |
| ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| Total Effluent 0.00 486.45 486.45
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 760.28 760.28 760.28
| |
| | |
| 6.2-147 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-36
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED HOT LEG BREAK ENERGY BALANCE - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| TIME (SECONDS) 0.00 22.40 22.40 ENERGY (MILLION BTU)
| |
| | |
| Initial Energy In RCS, ACC, S GEN 835.42 835.42 835.42
| |
| | |
| Added Energy Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| Decay Heat 0.00 8.02 8.02
| |
| | |
| Heat From Secondary 0.00 -0.32 -0.32
| |
| | |
| Total Added 0.00 7.70 7.70
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 835.42 843.12 843.12
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor Coolant 309.15 21.25 24.97
| |
| | |
| Accumulator 22.27 17.35 13.62
| |
| | |
| Core Stored 23.01 9.14 9.14
| |
| | |
| Primary Metal 160.32 150.87 150.87
| |
| | |
| Secondary Metal 73.35 73.03 73.03
| |
| | |
| Steam Generator 247.33 245.96 245.96
| |
| | |
| Total Contents 835.42 517.60 517.60
| |
| | |
| Effluent Break Flow 0.00 324.95 324.95
| |
| | |
| ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| Total Effluent 0.00 324.95 324.95
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 835.42 842.55 842.55
| |
| | |
| 6.2-148 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-37
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW (TENEHOURGYSAN DS FLOW (THOUENERGYSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) 0 .000000E+00 0 .000000E+00 0 .000000E+00 0 .000000E+00 0 .000000E+00 1.016345E-03 3.904093E+03 2.205378E+03 3.806571E+03 2.148614E+03 2.091869E-03 8.289914E+03 4.684635E+03 6.078713E+03 3.406687E+03 1.010008E-01 3.869344E+04 2.174150E+04 1.951426E+04 1.094470E+04 2.014941E-01 4.524526E+04 2.561185E+04 2.471142E+04 1.384306E+04 3.016118E-01 4.686084E+04 2.681227E+04 2.518752E+04 1.412309E+04 4.011108E-01 4.716434E+04 2.735598E+04 2.459138E+04 1.380505E+04 5.019734E-01 4.273358E+04 2.515322E+04 2.363923E+04 1.328248E+04 6.013436E-01 4.284363E+04 2.554843E+04 2.281761E+04 1.282768E+04 7.012544E-01 4.301337E+04 2.594627E+04 2.207817E+04 1.241523E+04 8.016164E-01 4.266267E+04 2.599865E+04 2.145598E+04 1.206782E+04 9.020751E-01 4.199850E+04 2.583049E+04 2.098059E+04 1.180286E+04 1.002137E+00 4.123189E+04 2.557017E+04 2.068215E+04 1.163608E+04 1.101827E+00 4.042820E+04 2.526310E+04 2.046810E+04 1.151757E+04 1.201416E+00 3.963727E+04 2.495107E+04 2.036776E+04 1.146184E+04 1.301123E+00 3.891044E+04 2.467749E+04 2.029158E+04 1.141947E+04 1.401537E+00 3.821451E+04 2.442918E+04 2.022765E+04 1.138323E+04 1.501693E+00 3.710394E+04 2.392045E+04 2.018141E+04 1.135663E+04 1.602096E+00 3.606040E+04 2.345467E+04 2.016490E+04 1.134678E+04 1.702120E+00 3.505929E+04 2.301051E+04 2.015892E+04 1.134298E+04 1.802120E+00 3.401428E+04 2.252441E+04 2.013375E+04 1.132826E+04 1.902161E+00 3.303324E+04 2.205962E+04 2.006809E+04 1.129047E+04 2.001321E+00 3.207823E+04 2.158805E+04 1.997001E+04 1.123460E+04 2.102446E+00 3.116064E+04 2.112400E+04 1.985937E+04 1.117212E+04 2.202084E+00 3.029624E+04 2.067545E+04 1.971557E+04 1.109121E+04 2.301545E+00 2.942584E+04 2.020788E+04 1.936735E+04 1.089413E+04 2.401315E+00 2.854347E+04 1.972281E+04 1.901177E+04 1.069474E+04 2.501179E+00 2.764774E+04 1.921838E+04 1.881051E+04 1.058282E+04 2.601072E+00 2.661978E+04 1.861108E+04 1.860719E+04 1.046966E+04 2.701008E+00 2.565794E+04 1.804807E+04 1.838015E+04 1.034322E+04 2.801017E+00 2.464413E+04 1.744265E+04 1.812284E+04 1.019990E+04 2.901324E+00 2.369644E+04 1.687602E+04 1.781703E+04 1.002946E+04
| |
| | |
| 6.2-149 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-37 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC) 3 .001056E+00 2 .285517E+04 1 .636973E+04 1 .758172E+04 9 .899453E+03 3.101467E+00 2.209172E+04 1.590282E+04 1.736500E+04 9.780110E+03 3.201379E+00 2.140031E+04 1.547085E+04 1.713297E+04 9.652038E+03 3.301171E+00 2.076904E+04 1.506890E+04 1.690592E+04 9.526959E+03 3.401422E+00 2.020028E+04 1.469855E+04 1.669309E+04 9.410137E+03 3.501146E+00 1.969527E+04 1.436130E+04 1.648139E+04 9.294017E+03 3.601178E+00 1.922739E+04 1.404100E+04 1.628422E+04 9.186223E+03 3.701104E+00 1.869944E+04 1.366883E+04 1.609866E+04 9.085106E+03 3.801046E+00 1.819354E+04 1.330888E+04 1.590772E+04 8.980876E+03 3.901126E+00 1.782484E+04 1.304421E+04 1.573589E+04 8.887628E+03 4.001061E+00 1.752839E+04 1.282327E+04 1.556114E+04 8.792991E+03 4.200123E+00 1.703240E+04 1.243812E+04 1.526606E+04 8.633710E+03 4.400151E+00 1.668354E+04 1.214639E+04 1.498048E+04 8.480168E+03 4.600047E+00 1.645115E+04 1.192995E+04 1.472672E+04 8.344734E+03 4.800454E+00 1.634101E+04 1.179331E+04 1.493471E+04 8.479224E+03 5.000218E+00 1.628415E+04 1.169048E+04 1.571297E+04 8.924160E+03 5.200524E+00 1.625502E+04 1.160570E+04 1.562476E+04 8.884426E+03 5.400353E+00 1.625867E+04 1.154480E+04 1.548839E+04 8.816026E+03 5.600320E+00 1.628362E+04 1.150202E+04 1.536552E+04 8.754627E+03 5.800413E+00 1.630190E+04 1.146064E+04 1.518299E+04 8.658689E+03 6.000011E+00 1.631215E+04 1.142216E+04 1.497807E+04 8.549088E+03 6.200363E+00 1.630474E+04 1.138109E+04 1.478789E+04 8.446675E+03 6.400321E+00 1.627741E+04 1.133640E+04 1.464482E+04 8.369773E+03 6.600273E+00 1.623614E+04 1.128130E+04 1.455979E+04 8.324057E+03 6.800162E+00 1.621040E+04 1.123038E+04 1.439407E+04 8.228779E+03 7.000060E+00 1.621814E+04 1.119298E+04 1.421312E+04 8.123886E+03 7.200402E+00 1.628070E+04 1.117692E+04 1.406901E+04 8.041868E+03 7.400020E+00 1.689960E+04 1.168373E+04 1.395797E+04 7.978731E+03 7.600025E+00 1.458654E+04 1.081183E+04 1.382293E+04 7.900451E+03 7.800348E+00 1.458252E+04 1.075087E+04 1.351796E+04 7.723966E+03 8.000025E+00 1.480847E+04 1.077864E+04 1.340663E+04 7.664085E+03 8.200102E+00 1.502981E+04 1.081205E+04 1.325016E+04 7.576909E+03 8.400454E+00 1.520484E+04 1.081892E+04 1.300950E+04 7.436727E+03 8.600049E+00 1.534409E+04 1.081821E+04 1.282980E+04 7.333584E+03 8.800213E+00 1.542426E+04 1.079282E+04 1.268751E+04 7.253339E+03 9.000255E+00 1.548355E+04 1.076451E+04 1.246505E+04 7.124517E+03 9.200570E+00 1.548915E+04 1.071449E+04 1.228490E+04 7.020829E+03 9.400162E+00 1.542960E+04 1.063417E+04 1.211918E+04 6.926094E+03 9.600081E+00 1.533191E+04 1.054220E+04 1.191250E+04 6.806553E+03 9.800532E+00 1.513181E+04 1.040470E+04 1.174446E+04 6.709577E+03 1.000041E+01 1.485799E+04 1.023596E+04 1.154981E+04 6.597141E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-149a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-37(Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 1.020034E+01 1.452033E+04 1.003272E+04 1.136869E+04 6.492174E+03 1.040014E+01 1.411849E+04 9.797121E+03 1.118048E+04 6.382768E+03 1.060057E+01 1.373503E+04 9.601892E+03 1.102083E+04 6.289549E+03 1.080054E+01 1.306522E+04 9.222574E+03 1.081876E+04 6.170727E+03 1.100009E+01 1.231974E+04 8.785554E+03 1.067419E+04 6.085560E+03 1.120025E+01 1.156976E+04 8.326148E+03 1.049594E+04 5.979507E+03 1.140008E+01 1.085369E+04 7.884932E+03 1.035674E+04 5.895143E+03 1.160048E+01 1.015185E+04 7.458110E+03 1.020039E+04 5.799853E+03 1.180015E+01 9.466629E+03 7.049620E+03 1.008473E+04 5.726874E+03 1.200053E+01 8.847533E+03 6.694451E+03 9.945645E+03 5.638694E+03 1.200311E+01 8.840035E+03 6.690219E+03 9.943702E+03 5.637458E+03 1.200441E+01 8.836288E+03 6.688096E+03 9.942744E+03 5.636871E+03 1.200570E+01 8.832543E+03 6.685976E+03 9.941791E+03 5.636250E+03 1.200699E+01 8.828801E+03 6.683859E+03 9.940836E+03 5.635662E+03 1.200828E+01 8.825064E+03 6.681758E+03 9.939879E+03 5.635070E+03 1.200957E+01 8.821336E+03 6.679671E+03 9.938917E+03 5.634471E+03 1.201087E+01 8.817617E+03 6.677585E+03 9.937948E+03 5.633869E+03 1.201216E+01 8.813906E+03 6.675509E+03 9.936982E+03 5.633233E+03 1.201345E+01 8.810202E+03 6.673436E+03 9.936027E+03 5.632633E+03 1.201475E+01 8.806505E+03 6.671370E+03 9.935090E+03 5.632045E+03 1.220030E+01 8.308209E+03 6.396940E+03 9.852425E+03 5.575845E+03 1.240059E+01 7.850190E+03 6.152340E+03 9.714182E+03 5.485754E+03 1.260029E+01 7.462000E+03 5.946670E+03 9.633425E+03 5.428058E+03 1.280060E+01 7.123794E+03 5.766133E+03 9.492501E+03 5.335091E+03 1.300116E+01 6.822408E+03 5.605364E+03 9.419646E+03 5.280932E+03 1.320039E+01 6.533436E+03 5.449108E+03 9.282989E+03 5.186710E+03 1.340085E+01 6.217352E+03 5.274930E+03 9.158267E+03 5.085248E+03 1.360099E+01 5.901628E+03 5.104562E+03 9.108960E+03 5.006424E+03 1.380072E+01 5.558713E+03 4.947121E+03 8.825934E+03 4.796236E+03 1.400059E+01 5.037529E+03 4.780529E+03 8.915465E+03 4.767689E+03 1.420042E+01 4.432622E+03 4.582094E+03 8.438872E+03 4.422881E+03 1.440087E+01 3.953861E+03 4.434255E+03 8.103409E+03 4.136271E+03 1.460019E+01 3.569657E+03 4.268497E+03 1.158231E+04 5.864572E+03 1.480056E+01 3.101041E+03 3.821612E+03 1.115076E+04 5.634225E+03 1.500126E+01 2.752629E+03 3.420480E+03 1.070683E+04 5.364514E+03 1.520016E+01 2.640325E+03 3.291666E+03 4.422998E+03 2.173265E+03 1.540042E+01 2.436692E+03 3.045498E+03 6.975108E+03 3.187862E+03 1.560014E+01 2.285450E+03 2.866422E+03 6.860279E+03 3.163896E+03 1.580018E+01 2.168459E+03 2.723590E+03 4.564157E+03 2.070876E+03 1.600027E+01 2.014340E+03 2.532936E+03 6.495048E+03 2.697934E+03 1.620016E+01 1.837935E+03 2.315829E+03 7.700385E+03 3.199648E+03 1.640033E+01 1.682145E+03 2.123653E+03 6.872908E+03 2.874827E+03
| |
| | |
| 6.2-149b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-37 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC) 1 .660028E+01 1 .543602E+03 1 .952071E+03 7 .452380E+03 3 .098392E+03 1.680028E+01 1.415047E+03 1.792993E+03 6.942152E+03 2.859416E+03 1.700007E+01 1.336320E+03 1.695877E+03 4.499799E+03 1.830826E+03 1.720020E+01 1.274353E+03 1.618731E+03 3.034105E+03 1.239720E+03 1.740054E+01 1.187384E+03 1.508968E+03 2.351121E+03 9.146679E+02 1.760090E+01 1.097241E+03 1.396092E+03 5.107788E+03 1.738119E+03 1.780008E+01 1.019958E+03 1.299048E+03 4.682171E+03 1.581929E+03 1.800068E+01 9.430719E+02 1.202203E+03 4.432051E+03 1.500909E+03 1.820006E+01 9.009129E+02 1.150557E+03 4.678806E+03 1.577117E+03 1.840027E+01 8.201484E+02 1.048509E+03 4.722233E+03 1.569608E+03 1.860020E+01 7.470939E+02 9.556610E+02 3.860038E+03 1.265308E+03 1.880056E+01 6.819645E+02 8.728276E+02 3.579113E+03 1.155314E+03 1.900067E+01 6.275970E+02 8.036810E+02 3.428468E+03 1.087979E+03 1.920055E+01 5.864545E+02 7.512477E+02 3.292579E+03 1.024493E+03 1.940068E+01 5.532716E+02 7.091297E+02 3.103308E+03 9.445544E+02 1.960004E+01 5.251365E+02 6.733052E+02 2.899324E+03 8.605913E+02 1.980043E+01 4.923592E+02 6.314883E+02 2.632363E+03 7.605215E+02 2.000072E+01 4.599742E+02 5.901560E+02 2.271587E+03 6.391389E+02 2.020012E+01 4.296475E+02 5.514384E+02 1.799161E+03 4.945158E+02 2.040054E+01 3.996275E+02 5.130652E+02 1.202182E+03 3.246862E+02 2.060071E+01 3.688615E+02 4.737157E+02 4.905204E+02 1.315089E+02 2.080032E+01 3.383638E+02 4.346942E+02 2.484009E+01 6.874184E+00 2.100029E+01 3.075986E+02 3.953010E+02 4.518594E+00 1.895438E+00 2.120057E+01 2.768292E+02 3.558878E+02 7.510284E+00 7.248856E+00 2.140013E+01 2.466269E+02 3.171787E+02 1.649561E+01 1.787495E+01 2.160003E+01 2.152839E+02 2.769835E+02 4.390336E+00 5.073915E+00 2.180029E+01 1.683923E+02 2.167625E+02 7.183017E+00 8.689577E+00 2.200011E+01 1.086198E+02 1.400050E+02 5.844815E+00 7.221996E+00 2.220001E+01 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-149c REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-38
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| ENERGY ENERGY TIME FLOW (THOUSANDS FLOW (THOUSANDS (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC) (LBM/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 2.277E+01 4.590E-04 5.394E-04 1.377E-04 1.326E-05 2.287E+01 4.590E-04 5.394E-04 1.377E-04 1.326E-05 2.307E+01 4.590E-04 5.394E-04 1.377E-04 1.326E-05 2.317E+01 4.590E-04 5.394E-04 1.377E-04 1.321E-05 2.327E+01 4.591E-04 5.395E-04 1.377E-04 1.321E-05 2.337E+01 6.529E+01 7.675E+01 1.377E-04 1.542E-05 2.348E+01 2.150E+01 2.526E+01 1.377E-04 1.386E-05 2.358E+01 1.325E+01 1.557E+01 1.377E-04 1.360E-05 2.368E+01 1.556E+01 1.829E+01 1.377E-04 1.372E-05 2.378E+01 2.210E+01 2.597E+01 1.377E-04 1.401E-05 2.388E+01 2.968E+01 3.488E+01 1.377E-04 1.419E-05 2.398E+01 3.595E+01 4.226E+01 1.377E-04 1.438E-05 2.408E+01 4.005E+01 4.707E+01 1.377E-04 1.451E-05 2.418E+01 4.416E+01 5.190E+01 1.377E-04 1.465E-05 2.428E+01 4.801E+01 5.643E+01 1.377E-04 1.477E-05 2.438E+01 5.165E+01 6.071E+01 1.377E-04 1.490E-05 2.448E+01 5.512E+01 6.479E+01 1.377E-04 1.501E-05 2.458E+01 5.843E+01 6.869E+01 1.377E-04 1.513E-05 2.468E+01 6.162E+01 7.244E+01 1.377E-04 1.524E-05 2.478E+01 6.469E+01 7.605E+01 1.377E-04 1.535E-05 2.488E+01 6.765E+01 7.953E+01 1.377E-04 1.545E-05 2.498E+01 7.052E+01 8.290E+01 1.377E-04 1.555E-05 2.508E+01 7.330E+01 8.617E+01 1.377E-04 1.565E-05 2.518E+01 7.600E+01 8.935E+01 1.377E-04 1.575E-05 2.528E+01 7.862E+01 9.244E+01 1.377E-04 1.585E-05 2.628E+01 1.017E+02 1.196E+02 1.377E-04 1.672E-05 2.728E+01 1.210E+02 1.423E+02 1.377E-04 1.750E-05 2.828E+01 1.377E+02 1.620E+02 1.377E-04 1.821E-05 2.928E+01 2.793E+02 3.295E+02 2.796E+03 3.972E+02 2.990E+01 3.799E+02 4.491E+02 4.003E+03 5.943E+02 3.030E+01 3.909E+02 4.623E+02 4.102E+03 6.200E+02 3.130E+01 3.887E+02 4.597E+02 4.077E+03 6.218E+02
| |
| | |
| 6.2-150 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-38 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 3.230E+01 3.826E+02 4.524E+02 4.015E+03 6.153E+02 3.330E+01 3.762E+02 4.448E+02 3.949E+03 6.081E+02 3.430E+01 3.699E+02 4.372E+02 3.882E+03 6.005E+02 3.510E+01 3.649E+02 4.313E+02 3.830E+03 5.944E+02 3.530E+01 3.636E+02 4.298E+02 3.816E+03 5.929E+02 3.630E+01 3.576E+02 4.226E+02 3.752E+03 5.853E+02 3.730E+01 3.517E+02 4.156E+02 3.688E+03 5.779E+02 3.830E+01 3.460E+02 4.088E+02 3.627E+03 5.706E+02 3.930E+01 3.405E+02 4.023E+02 3.567E+03 5.636E+02 4.030E+01 3.353E+02 3.960E+02 3.509E+03 5.567E+02 4.130E+01 3.302E+02 3.900E+02 3.452E+03 5.500E+02 4.220E+01 3.258E+02 3.847E+02 3.403E+03 5.441E+02 4.230E+01 3.253E+02 3.841E+02 3.398E+03 5.434E+02 4.330E+01 3.206E+02 3.785E+02 3.344E+03 5.371E+02 4.430E+01 3.160E+02 3.731E+02 3.293E+03 5.309E+02 4.535E+01 3.435E+02 4.058E+02 3.634E+03 5.588E+02 4.635E+01 3.393E+02 4.008E+02 3.587E+03 5.532E+02 4.735E+01 3.352E+02 3.959E+02 3.542E+03 5.477E+02 4.835E+01 3.312E+02 3.912E+02 3.498E+03 5.423E+02 4.935E+01 3.273E+02 3.866E+02 3.456E+03 5.371E+02 5.005E+01 3.247E+02 3.835E+02 3.427E+03 5.336E+02 5.035E+01 3.236E+02 3.821E+02 3.414E+03 5.320E+02 5.135E+01 3.200E+02 3.778E+02 3.374E+03 5.271E+02 5.235E+01 3.165E+02 3.737E+02 3.334E+03 5.222E+02 5.335E+01 3.130E+02 3.696E+02 3.296E+03 5.175E+02 5.435E+01 3.097E+02 3.656E+02 3.258E+03 5.129E+02 5.535E+01 3.065E+02 3.618E+02 3.221E+03 5.084E+02 5.635E+01 3.034E+02 3.581E+02 3.185E+03 5.040E+02 5.735E+01 3.003E+02 3.544E+02 3.150E+03 4.997E+02 5.835E+01 2.973E+02 3.509E+02 3.116E+03 4.955E+02 5.865E+01 2.964E+02 3.499E+02 3.106E+03 4.942E+02 5.935E+01 2.944E+02 3.474E+02 3.083E+03 4.913E+02 6.035E+01 2.916E+02 3.441E+02 3.050E+03 4.873E+02 6.140E+01 2.442E+02 2.879E+02 2.436E+03 4.183E+02 6.240E+01 2.422E+02 2.855E+02 2.410E+03 4.151E+02
| |
| | |
| 6.2-150a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-38 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 6.340E+01 2.402E+02 2.831E+02 2.385E+03 4.120E+02 6.445E+01 4.131E+02 4.887E+02 3.116E+02 2.228E+02 6.545E+01 4.369E+02 5.173E+02 3.217E+02 2.374E+02 6.645E+01 4.267E+02 5.051E+02 3.172E+02 2.313E+02 6.745E+01 4.155E+02 4.917E+02 3.122E+02 2.245E+02 6.845E+01 4.043E+02 4.783E+02 3.072E+02 2.178E+02 6.945E+01 3.942E+02 4.663E+02 3.027E+02 2.118E+02 7.045E+01 3.848E+02 4.550E+02 2.985E+02 2.062E+02 7.145E+01 3.757E+02 4.442E+02 2.945E+02 2.009E+02 7.245E+01 3.670E+02 4.339E+02 2.906E+02 1.958E+02 7.345E+01 3.587E+02 4.239E+02 2.869E+02 1.909E+02 7.445E+01 3.507E+02 4.143E+02 2.834E+02 1.862E+02 7.545E+01 3.429E+02 4.051E+02 2.800E+02 1.818E+02 7.645E+01 3.355E+02 3.963E+02 2.767E+02 1.775E+02 7.745E+01 3.284E+02 3.878E+02 2.736E+02 1.734E+02 7.845E+01 3.215E+02 3.796E+02 2.706E+02 1.694E+02 7.945E+01 3.149E+02 3.718E+02 2.678E+02 1.657E+02 8.045E+01 3.086E+02 3.643E+02 2.650E+02 1.621E+02 8.145E+01 3.025E+02 3.570E+02 2.624E+02 1.587E+02 8.245E+01 2.966E+02 3.501E+02 2.599E+02 1.554E+02 8.345E+01 2.910E+02 3.434E+02 2.574E+02 1.522E+02 8.545E+01 2.804E+02 3.308E+02 2.529E+02 1.463E+02 8.745E+01 2.706E+02 3.192E+02 2.488E+02 1.409E+02 8.945E+01 2.616E+02 3.085E+02 2.450E+02 1.360E+02 9.145E+01 2.533E+02 2.987E+02 2.415E+02 1.315E+02 9.345E+01 2.458E+02 2.897E+02 2.383E+02 1.274E+02 9.545E+01 2.388E+02 2.815E+02 2.354E+02 1.236E+02 9.675E+01 2.346E+02 2.765E+02 2.337E+02 1.214E+02 9.745E+01 2.324E+02 2.739E+02 2.328E+02 1.202E+02 9.945E+01 2.266E+02 2.670E+02 2.304E+02 1.171E+02 1.014E+02 2.212E+02 2.607E+02 2.282E+02 1.143E+02 1.034E+02 2.164E+02 2.549E+02 2.262E+02 1.118E+02 1.054E+02 2.119E+02 2.497E+02 2.243E+02 1.094E+02 1.074E+02 2.079E+02 2.449E+02 2.227E+02 1.073E+02 1.094E+02 2.042E+02 2.405E+02 2.212E+02 1.054E+02
| |
| | |
| 6.2-150b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-38 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 1.114E+02 2.009E+02 2.366E+02 2.199E+02 1.037E+02 1.134E+02 1.979E+02 2.330E+02 2.186E+02 1.022E+02 1.154E+02 1.952E+02 2.299E+02 2.176E+02 1.008E+02 1.174E+02 1.927E+02 2.270E+02 2.166E+02 9.960E+01 1.194E+02 1.906E+02 2.244E+02 2.157E+02 9.848E+01 1.214E+02 1.886E+02 2.221E+02 2.149E+02 9.749E+01 1.234E+02 1.869E+02 2.201E+02 2.142E+02 9.660E+01 1.247E+02 1.858E+02 2.189E+02 2.138E+02 9.608E+01 1.254E+02 1.853E+02 2.182E+02 2.136E+02 9.581E+01 1.274E+02 1.840E+02 2.166E+02 2.130E+02 9.511E+01 1.294E+02 1.828E+02 2.152E+02 2.125E+02 9.449E+01 1.314E+02 1.817E+02 2.140E+02 2.121E+02 9.395E+01 1.334E+02 1.808E+02 2.129E+02 2.117E+02 9.347E+01 1.354E+02 1.800E+02 2.119E+02 2.114E+02 9.306E+01 1.374E+02 1.793E+02 2.111E+02 2.111E+02 9.270E+01 1.394E+02 1.787E+02 2.105E+02 2.109E+02 9.239E+01 1.414E+02 1.783E+02 2.099E+02 2.107E+02 9.213E+01 1.434E+02 1.779E+02 2.094E+02 2.105E+02 9.191E+01 1.454E+02 1.776E+02 2.091E+02 2.103E+02 9.174E+01 1.474E+02 1.773E+02 2.088E+02 2.102E+02 9.159E+01 1.494E+02 1.772E+02 2.086E+02 2.101E+02 9.148E+01 1.514E+02 1.770E+02 2.084E+02 2.101E+02 9.139E+01 1.534E+02 1.769E+02 2.083E+02 2.100E+02 9.132E+01 1.554E+02 1.769E+02 2.083E+02 2.100E+02 9.128E+01 1.570E+02 1.769E+02 2.083E+02 2.100E+02 9.126E+01 1.574E+02 1.769E+02 2.083E+02 2.100E+02 9.126E+01 1.594E+02 1.770E+02 2.084E+02 2.100E+02 9.126E+01 1.614E+02 1.771E+02 2.085E+02 2.100E+02 9.127E+01 1.634E+02 1.772E+02 2.086E+02 2.100E+02 9.130E+01 1.654E+02 1.773E+02 2.088E+02 2.100E+02 9.135E+01 1.674E+02 1.775E+02 2.090E+02 2.101E+02 9.141E+01 1.694E+02 1.777E+02 2.092E+02 2.101E+02 9.148E+01 1.714E+02 1.779E+02 2.095E+02 2.102E+02 9.156E+01 1.734E+02 1.782E+02 2.098E+02 2.103E+02 9.165E+01 1.754E+02 1.784E+02 2.101E+02 2.103E+02 9.175E+01
| |
| | |
| 6.2-150c REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-38 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 1.774E+02 1.787E+02 2.104E+02 2.104E+02 9.186E+01 1.794E+02 1.790E+02 2.107E+02 2.105E+02 9.197E+01 1.814E+02 1.793E+02 2.111E+02 2.106E+02 9.209E+01 1.834E+02 1.796E+02 2.115E+02 2.107E+02 9.222E+01 1.854E+02 1.799E+02 2.118E+02 2.108E+02 9.235E+01 1.874E+02 1.802E+02 2.122E+02 2.109E+02 9.248E+01 1.894E+02 1.806E+02 2.126E+02 2.110E+02 9.262E+01 1.914E+02 1.809E+02 2.130E+02 2.112E+02 9.276E+01 1.918E+02 1.810E+02 2.131E+02 2.112E+02 9.279E+01 1.934E+02 1.813E+02 2.134E+02 2.113E+02 9.291E+01 1.954E+02 1.816E+02 2.139E+02 2.114E+02 9.306E+01 1.974E+02 1.820E+02 2.143E+02 2.115E+02 9.321E+01 1.994E+02 1.823E+02 2.147E+02 2.116E+02 9.336E+01 2.014E+02 1.827E+02 2.151E+02 2.117E+02 9.351E+01 2.034E+02 1.830E+02 2.155E+02 2.119E+02 9.366E+01 2.054E+02 1.834E+02 2.159E+02 2.120E+02 9.381E+01 2.074E+02 1.837E+02 2.164E+02 2.121E+02 9.396E+01 2.094E+02 1.841E+02 2.168E+02 2.122E+02 9.411E+01 2.114E+02 1.845E+02 2.172E+02 2.123E+02 9.426E+01 2.134E+02 1.848E+02 2.176E+02 2.125E+02 9.442E+01 2.154E+02 1.852E+02 2.181E+02 2.126E+02 9.458E+01 2.174E+02 1.855E+02 2.185E+02 2.127E+02 9.474E+01 2.194E+02 1.861E+02 2.191E+02 2.129E+02 9.497E+01 2.214E+02 1.871E+02 2.203E+02 2.136E+02 9.548E+01 2.234E+02 1.880E+02 2.214E+02 2.147E+02 9.597E+01
| |
| | |
| 6.2-150d REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-38 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO. 1* BREAK PATH NO. 2**
| |
| | |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 2.254E+02 1.890E+02 2.226E+02 2.161E+02 9.652E+01 2.274E+02 1.900E+02 2.237E+02 2.178E+02 9.710E+01 2.285E+02 1.905E+02 2.244E+02 2.189E+02 9.743E+01
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-150e REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-39
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS PRINCIPLE PARAMETERS DURING REFLOOD - UNIT 2 INJECTION FLOODING TOTAL ACCUM SPILL CARRY- F OVER CORE DOWNCOMER TIME TEMP RATE FRACTION HEIGHT HEIGHT FLOW ENTHALPY (SECONDS) (ºF) (IN/SEC) (-) (FT) (FT) FRAC (-) (POUNDS MASS PER SECOND) (BTU/LBM)
| |
| | |
| 22.2 191.6 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 23.1 188.3 21.063 0.000 0.74 1.25 0.000 6719.7 6719.7 0.0 89.66 23.2 187.6 21.557 0.000 0.92 1.19 0.000 6697.5 6697.5 0.0 89.66 23.3 186.9 21.001 0.000 1.10 1.13 0.000 6675.5 6675.5 0.0 89.66 23.6 186.4 2.390 0.102 1.31 1.62 0.191 6586.7 6586.7 0.0 89.66 23.8 186.5 2.670 0.137 1.35 2.15 0.230 6544.8 6544.8 0.0 89.66 24.8 186.7 2.319 0.310 1.50 4.80 0.332 6336.4 6336.4 0.0 89.66 26.3 187.1 2.261 0.466 1.67 8.73 0.357 6067.6 6067.6 0.0 89.66 29.9 188.4 3.909 0.640 2.01 16.10 0.565 5141.3 5141.3 0.0 89.66 31.3 188.9 3.756 0.675 2.16 16.12 0.564 4926.7 4926.7 0.0 89.66 35.1 190.6 3.374 0.716 2.50 16.12 0.557 4554.1 4554.1 0.0 89.66 42.2 194.9 3.002 0.740 3.01 16.12 0.541 4020.6 4020.6 0.0 89.66 44.3 196.2 2.924 0.743 3.14 16.12 0.537 3889.3 3889.3 0.0 89.66 45.4 197.0 3.076 0.745 3.21 16.12 0.553 4271.0 3731.6 0.0 87.58 50.1 200.3 2.930 0.750 3.50 16.12 0.545 4025.4 3481.9 0.0 87.44 58.7 206.4 2.722 0.755 4.00 16.12 0.533 3651.0 3101.8 0.0 87.18
| |
| | |
| 6.2-151 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-39 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS PRINCIPLE PARAMETERS DURING REFLOOD - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| INJECTION FLOODING TOTAL ACCUM SPILL CARRY-OVER CORE DOWNCOMER F TIME TEMP RATE FRACTION HEIGHT HEIGHT FLOW ENTHALPY (SECONDS) (ºF) (IN/SEC) (-) (FT) (FT) FRAC (-) (POUNDS MASS PER SECOND) (BTU/LBM)
| |
| | |
| 63.4 209.7 2.387 0.755 4.25 16.12 0.492 2839.5 2279.3 0.0 86.41 64.5 210.5 3.392 0.760 4.31 16.02 0.604 523.8 0.0 0.0 73.20 65.5 211.3 3.496 0.760 4.38 15.77 0.607 514.2 0.0 0.0 73.20 67.5 213.1 3.334 0.760 4.51 15.29 0.604 519.8 0.0 0.0 73.20 75.5 220.7 2.802 0.761 5.00 13.82 0.593 536.4 0.0 0.0 73.20 85.5 230.0 2.348 0.761 5.51 12.71 0.579 548.7 0.0 0.0 73.20 96.8 238.3 2.020 0.761 6.00 12.11 0.563 556.6 0.0 0.0 73.20 111.5 246.6 1.779 0.762 6.55 11.94 0.547 561.7 0.0 0.0 73.20 124.8 252.7 1.668 0.765 7.00 12.11 0.538 563.6 0.0 0.0 73.20 141.5 259.1 1.604 0.770 7.53 12.54 0.533 564.5 0.0 0.0 73.20 157.1 264.1 1.583 0.775 8.00 13.03 0.533 564.7 0.0 0.0 73.20 171.5 268.0 1.579 0.780 8.42 13.52 0.534 564.7 0.0 0.0 73.20 175.5 269.0 1.579 0.782 8.54 13.65 0.534 564.6 0.0 0.0 73.20 191.9 272.8 1.583 0.788 9.00 14.21 0.536 564.4 0.0 0.0 73.20 211.5 276.6 1.590 0.795 9.54 14.87 0.539 564.0 0.0 0.0 73.20 228.6 279.4 1.613 0.802 10.00 15.42 0.544 563.3 0.0 0.0 73.20
| |
| | |
| 6.2-151a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-40
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO.1* BREAK PATH NO.2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 2.286000E+02 2.274218E+02 2.811441E+02 3.469682E+02 1.274728E+02 2.336000E+02 2.276510E+02 2.814274E+02 3.467391E+02 1.272107E+02 2.386000E+02 2.270515E+02 2.806863E+02 3.473386E+02 1.271587E+02 2.436000E+02 2.264192E+02 2.799046E+02 3.479709E+02 1.271146E+02 2.486000E+02 2.265172E+02 2.800258E+02 3.478729E+02 1.268845E+02 2.536000E+02 2.258035E+02 2.791436E+02 3.485865E+02 1.268601E+02 2.586000E+02 2.250552E+02 2.782184E+02 3.493349E+02 1.268441E+02 2.636000E+02 2.250168E+02 2.781710E+02 3.493732E+02 1.266473E+02 2.686000E+02 2.249129E+02 2.780425E+02 3.494772E+02 1.264666E+02 2.736000E+02 2.240187E+02 2.769372E+02 3.503713E+02 1.264864E+02 2.786000E+02 2.238013E+02 2.766684E+02 3.505887E+02 1.263336E+02 2.836000E+02 2.235161E+02 2.763158E+02 3.508739E+02 1.261977E+02 2.886000E+02 2.231622E+02 2.758783E+02 3.512279E+02 1.260788E+02 2.936000E+02 2.227355E+02 2.753508E+02 3.516545E+02 1.259778E+02 2.986000E+02 2.222331E+02 2.747297E+02 3.521570E+02 1.258957E+02 3.036000E+02 2.216537E+02 2.740135E+02 3.527363E+02 1.258327E+02 3.086000E+02 2.216550E+02 2.740151E+02 3.527350E+02 1.256216E+02 3.136000E+02 2.208885E+02 2.730675E+02 3.535015E+02 1.256052E+02 3.186000E+02 2.206754E+02 2.728041E+02 3.537146E+02 1.254476E+02 3.236000E+02 2.203381E+02 2.723870E+02 3.540520E+02 1.253213E+02 3.286000E+02 2.198674E+02 2.718052E+02 3.545226E+02 1.252282E+02 3.336000E+02 2.192580E+02 2.710519E+02 3.551320E+02 1.251700E+02 3.386000E+02 2.191012E+02 2.708580E+02 3.552889E+02 1.249963E+02 3.436000E+02 2.187536E+02 2.704282E+02 3.556365E+02 1.248706E+02 3.486000E+02 2.181974E+02 2.697406E+02 3.561927E+02 1.247974E+02 3.536000E+02 2.174260E+02 2.687870E+02 3.569641E+02 1.247784E+02 3.586000E+02 2.175108E+02 2.688919E+02 3.568792E+02 1.245414E+02 3.636000E+02 2.167234E+02 2.679185E+02 3.576667E+02 1.245255E+02 3.686000E+02 2.161262E+02 2.671802E+02 3.582639E+02 1.244609E+02 3.736000E+02 2.161282E+02 2.671827E+02 3.582619E+02 1.242434E+02 3.786000E+02 2.155824E+02 2.665080E+02 3.588077E+02 1.241647E+02
| |
| | |
| 6.2-152 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-40 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| BREAK PATH NO.1* BREAK PATH NO.2**
| |
| TIME FLOW ENERGY FLOW ENERGY (SECONDS) (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS (LBM/SEC) (THOUSANDS BTU/SEC) BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| 3.836000E+02 2.148698E+02 2.656271E+02 3.595202E+02 1.241278E+02 3.886000E+02 2.147350E+02 2.654604E+02 3.596550E+02 1.239437E+02 3.936000E+02 2.139451E+02 2.644839E+02 3.604450E+02 1.239255E+02 3.986000E+02 2.137580E+02 2.642526E+02 3.606320E+02 1.237537E+02 4.036000E+02 2.130554E+02 2.633841E+02 3.613346E+02 1.237184E+02 4.086000E+02 2.126190E+02 2.628445E+02 3.617711E+02 1.236173E+02 4.136000E+02 2.122196E+02 2.623509E+02 3.621704E+02 1.235062E+02 4.186000E+02 2.118793E+02 2.619301E+02 3.625108E+02 1.233797E+02 5.914250E+02 2.118793E+02 2.619301E+02 3.625108E+02 1.233797E+02 5.915250E+02 9.650713E+01 1.187123E+02 4.778829E+02 1.503192E+02 5.936000E+02 9.642737E+01 1.186137E+02 4.779627E+02 1.502350E+02 1.108600E+03 8.450732E+01 1.038779E+02 4.898827E+02 1.463327E+02 1.110000E+03 8.448491E+01 1.038502E+02 3.452051E+02 1.685844E+02 1.542848E+03 8.448491E+01 1.038502E+02 3.452051E+02 1.685844E+02 1.542948E+03 7.763659E+01 8.932996E+01 3.520534E+02 6.785473E+01 3.000000E+03 6.607184E+01 7.602336E+01 3.636182E+02 6.994120E+01 3.000100E+03 6.607121E+01 7.602263E+01 3.636188E+02 6.994131E+01 3.600000E+03 6.228181E+01 7.166248E+01 3.674082E+02 7.062498E+01 3.600100E+03 5.368262E+01 6.176812E+01 3.760074E+02 5.640111E+01 1.000000E+04 3.903592E+01 4.491538E+01 3.906541E+02 5.859811E+01 1.000010E+04 3.819605E+01 4.394901E+01 3.914940E+02 5.011123E+01 3.000000E+04 2.904561E+01 3.342036E+01 4.006444E+02 5.128248E+01 3.000010E+04 2.848841E+01 3.277924E+01 4.012016E+02 4.332977E+01 1.000000E+05 2.002906E+01 2.304577E+01 4.096609E+02 4.424338E+01 1.000001E+05 1.983878E+01 2.282683E+01 4.098512E+02 4.016542E+01 1.000000E+06 8.500924E+00 9.781305E+00 4.211891E+02 4.127653E+01 1.0000001E+06 8.476764E+00 9.753506E+00 4.212132E+02 4.001526E+01 1.0000000E+07 2.654739E+00 3.054587E+00 4.270353E+02 4.056835E+01 1.00000001E+07 2.637251E+00 3.034464E+00 4.270527E+02 3.758064E+01
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-152a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-41
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MASS BALANCE MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Mass Balance TIME (SECONDS) 0.00 22.20 22.20 228.55 591.53 1542.85 3600.00 MASS (THOUSAND LBM)
| |
| Initial In RCS and ACC 761.83 761.83 761.83 761.83 761.83 761.83 761.83 Added Mass Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 0.00 102.72 311.18 794.98 1678.92 Total Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 102.72 311.18 794.98 1678.92
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 761.83 761.83 761.83 864.55 1073.01 1556.81 2440.75
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor Coolant 511.41 55.96 79.47 141.33 141.33 141.33 141.33 Accumulator 250.42 196.52 173.01 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Contents 761.83 252.48 252.48 141.33 141.33 141.33 141.33
| |
| | |
| Effluent Break Flow 0.00 509.35 509.35 711.62 920.08 1403.78 2287.71 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Effluent 0.00 509.35 509.35 711.62 920.08 1403.78 2287.71
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 761.83 761.83 761.83 852.96 1061.42 1545.11 2429.05
| |
| | |
| 6.2-153 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-42 DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK ENERGY BALANCE MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| ENERGY BALANCE TIME (SECONDS) 0.00 22.20 22.20 228.55 591.53 1542.85 3600.00
| |
| | |
| ENERGY (MILLION BTU)
| |
| | |
| Initial Energy In RCS, 835.56 835.56 835.56 835.56 835.56 835.56 835.56 ACC, S Gen
| |
| | |
| Added Energy Pumped 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.52 22.78 72.48 205.07 Injection
| |
| | |
| Decay Heat 0.00 7.52 7.52 32.77 67.23 140.07 263.13
| |
| | |
| Heat from 0.00 18.34 18.34 18.34 18.34 18.34 18.34 Secondary
| |
| | |
| Total Added 0.00 25.86 25.86 58.63 108.35 230.89 486.54
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 835.56 861.42 861.42 894.19 943.91 1066.45 1322.1
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor 309.15 12.29 14.40 36.51 36.51 36.51 36.51 Coolant
| |
| | |
| Accumulator 22.41 17.59 15.48 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| Core Stored 23.01 11.66 11.66 4.67 4.55 4.16 3.33
| |
| | |
| Primary 160.32 153.36 153.36 115.99 84.34 59.49 46.20 Metal
| |
| | |
| Secondary 73.35 73.82 73.82 66.39 54.72 34.06 25.99 Metal
| |
| | |
| Steam 247.33 270.71 270.71 235.54 186.85 112.41 84.99 Generator
| |
| | |
| Total 835.56 539.43 539.43 459.09 366.96 246.63 197.02 Contents
| |
| | |
| Effluent Break Flow 0.00 321.41 321.41 413.43 555.28 808.07 1115.42
| |
| | |
| ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| Total 0.00 321.41 321.41 413.43 555.28 808.07 1115.42 Effluent
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 835.56 860.85 860.85 872.52 922.25 1054.70 1312.44
| |
| | |
| 6.2-154 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-43
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 0.00000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00110 87607.2 49361.2 43219.8 24298.4 0.101 42805.0 24152.4 22312.0 12531.3 0.201 43760.8 24902.9 24742.7 13908.5 0.302 44964.2 25889.5 24946.0 14035.9 0.401 46001.0 26848.2 24135.6 13593.8 0.502 46551.9 27553.0 23023.5 12977.1 0.602 46199.9 27696.9 22097.2 12460.1 0.701 44824.7 27177.3 21289.6 12007.5 0.802 43056.2 26378.2 20686.6 11670.4 0.902 41384.8 25588.1 20272.2 11440.3 1.00 39914.4 24877.6 20049.0 11317.2 1.10 38662.7 24273.8 19922.5 11247.5 1.20 37624.8 23785.6 19866.0 11216.7 1.30 36787.4 23408.7 19835.2 11199.8 1.40 36074.2 23099.6 19811.0 11186.0 1.50 35427.9 22826.3 19797.9 11178.1 1.60 34810.7 22570.8 19812.9 11186.1 1.70 34211.1 22328.9 19844.3 11203.6 1.80 33541.9 22043.6 19862.7 11213.7 1.90 32892.9 21769.2 19847.5 11204.7 2.00 32174.9 21448.6 19784.1 11168.3 2.10 31436.5 21109.7 19707.2 11124.7 2.20 30679.3 20754.8 19611.5 11070.9 2.30 29882.0 20365.4 19460.5 10985.7 2.40 29029.5 19931.6 19008.3 10729.4 2.50 28149.6 19473.5 18762.7 10592.2 2.60 27069.7 18864.2 18575.6 10487.9 2.70 25656.6 18000.8 18364.7 10370.1 2.80 23583.9 16643.6 18136.3 10242.6 2.90 21815.6 15494.5 17905.4 10114.0 3.00 21223.0 15171.4 17674.8 9985.8 3.10 20717.6 14866.0 17452.5 9862.5 3.20 20012.5 14401.5 17239.4 9744.6 3.30 19464.3 14047.1 17019.9 9623.1 3.40 18821.8 13614.5 16815.6 9510.4 3.50 18171.0 13170.9 16621.3 9403.6 3.60 17514.7 12718.6 16432.8 9300.1
| |
| | |
| 6.2-155 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-43 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 3.70 16893.6 12288.7 16269.1 9210.9 3.80 16314.1 11885.5 16106.6 9122.4 3.90 15793.5 11521.9 15952.5 9038.7 4.00 15345.6 11209.2 15816.0 8965.2 4.20 14628.9 10703.3 15540.7 8816.6 4.40 14090.9 10317.1 15274.6 8673.4 4.60 13670.1 10005.8 15021.6 8536.3 4.80 13376.7 9779.4 14827.7 8426.0 5.00 13229.0 9649.6 14649.6 8325.4 5.20 13113.7 9537.7 15800.5 8988.6 5.40 13015.7 9438.0 15867.1 9021.3 5.60 12953.3 9362.0 15870.0 9025.3 5.80 12915.7 9304.7 15751.2 8958.9 6.00 12842.8 9228.8 15562.9 8852.5 6.20 12729.3 9132.9 15372.3 8744.7 6.40 12589.8 9025.6 15199.1 8646.5 6.60 12421.3 8904.4 15034.5 8552.2 6.80 12271.7 8801.8 14926.5 8489.6 7.00 12138.0 8705.7 14841.7 8438.7 7.20 12018.3 8613.1 14675.8 8340.5 7.40 12225.7 8748.2 14517.0 8246.1 7.60 11917.1 8546.3 14492.1 8229.1 7.80 10995.4 8410.4 14435.4 8192.6 8.00 9788.7 7889.4 14108.0 8001.6 8.20 9673.1 7779.7 13913.2 7887.1 8.40 9717.1 7722.2 13821.4 7832.9 8.60 9725.4 7643.2 13643.0 7728.7 8.80 9775.9 7592.9 13369.9 7570.0 9.00 9862.1 7560.5 13238.9 7493.0 9.20 9925.8 7511.0 13080.5 7399.9 9.40 9967.1 7453.1 12851.1 7266.1 9.60 9986.0 7389.1 12713.7 7184.8 9.80 9958.4 7304.6 12550.6 7088.6 10.0 9878.7 7196.7 12367.4 6980.8 10.2 9775.2 7085.5 12235.8 6902.6 10.4 9623.9 6950.4 12071.1 6805.4 10.6 9440.5 6807.0 11931.7 6722.8 10.8 9263.2 6677.9 11794.1 6641.2 11.0 9058.7 6535.7 11644.6 6552.9 11.2 8862.9 6406.7 11524.3 6481.4 11.4 8667.0 6280.8 11376.9 6394.6 11.6 8471.1 6158.0 11251.5 6320.4 11.8 8283.9 6043.0 11120.4 6243.1 12.0 8096.5 5929.6 10986.0 6164.2
| |
| | |
| 6.2-155a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-43 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 12.2 7917.2 5823.4 10864.0 6092.4 12.4 7740.1 5719.7 10729.0 6013.5 12.6 7572.2 5623.2 10606.8 5941.9 12.8 7404.8 5526.3 10477.4 5866.4 13.0 7238.8 5430.6 10357.7 5796.6 13.2 7085.1 5348.0 10231.5 5723.3 13.4 6930.2 5264.0 10105.3 5650.1 13.6 6784.0 5182.2 9987.2 5581.9 13.8 6642.9 5100.8 9854.4 5505.4 14.0 6500.5 5018.2 9724.8 5431.0 14.2 6343.5 4924.9 9560.7 5337.2 14.4 6181.5 4825.5 9418.0 5255.8 14.6 6020.1 4720.0 9258.2 5165.0 14.8 5874.0 4619.6 9120.6 5087.2 15.0 5740.5 4524.1 8974.0 5004.8 15.2 5619.2 4436.0 8845.1 4932.9 15.4 5516.1 4360.8 8728.6 4868.7 15.6 5430.9 4302.9 8568.2 4788.4 15.8 5363.8 4290.3 8384.1 4711.6 16.0 5234.6 4281.0 8060.5 4546.8 16.2 5065.2 4265.0 7997.0 4526.1 16.4 4883.6 4244.9 7600.1 4307.4 16.6 4699.4 4228.3 7519.9 4256.8 16.8 4485.8 4190.6 7145.4 4014.4 17.0 4217.0 4110.6 6926.2 3834.6 17.2 3927.6 4017.6 6656.1 3599.3 17.4 3615.9 3881.0 6346.6 3332.4 17.6 3319.3 3718.1 5947.4 3024.2 17.8 3050.4 3539.2 5574.5 2750.3 18.0 2808.3 3347.8 5242.3 2515.3 18.2 2595.5 3153.4 4928.0 2302.5 18.4 2389.5 2932.9 4626.6 2108.3 18.6 2205.5 2724.1 4414.4 1964.1 18.8 2050.9 2544.3 4203.8 1829.8 19.0 1913.4 2381.2 4004.9 1707.5 19.2 1800.6 2246.5 3734.5 1562.0 19.4 1695.5 2120.0 3334.6 1365.0 19.6 1598.6 2002.2 2996.7 1193.2 19.8 1494.2 1874.3 3298.0 1268.8 20.0 1381.9 1736.6 3954.8 1486.3 20.2 1275.6 1605.4 4455.1 1658.3 20.4 1180.2 1488.0 4292.7 1586.2 20.6 1109.1 1400.0 3143.1 1156.2 20.8 1022.9 1293.2 2807.7 1032.5
| |
| | |
| 6.2-155b REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-43 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS BLOWDOWN MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 21.0 948.9 1201.1 2453.8 901.5 21.2 880.3 1115.4 2177.7 800.2 21.4 818.6 1038.2 1505.6 552.6 21.6 711.6 902.7 702.6 254.8 21.8 599.3 761.2 1043.2 333.8 22.0 515.7 655.6 4091.7 1150.7 22.2 435.8 554.5 6502.8 1797.9 22.4 378.6 482.0 6906.6 1909.9 22.6 308.9 393.6 7058.2 1954.4 22.8 252.9 322.5 6933.5 1921.3 23.0 188.0 239.9 6311.1 1748.7 23.2 83.9 107.3 4284.0 1185.6 23.4 57.6 73.9 2352.1 648.0 23.6 41.9 53.8 0.0 0.0 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-155c REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-44
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 17.8 20.9 0.0 0.0 25.1 41.0 48.4 0.0 0.0 25.2 20.8 24.6 0.0 0.0 25.3 14.9 17.6 0.0 0.0 25.4 17.3 20.4 0.0 0.0 25.5 23.4 27.6 0.0 0.0 25.6 30.3 35.7 0.0 0.0 25.7 38.0 44.8 0.0 0.0 25.8 43.7 51.6 0.0 0.0 25.9 47.7 56.2 0.0 0.0 26.0 51.7 61.0 0.0 0.0 26.1 55.6 65.5 0.0 0.0 26.2 59.2 69.8 0.0 0.0 26.3 62.7 74.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 66.1 77.9 0.0 0.0 26.5 69.3 81.8 0.0 0.0 26.6 72.5 85.5 0.0 0.0 26.7 75.5 89.0 0.0 0.0 26.8 78.4 92.5 0.0 0.0 26.9 81.3 95.9 0.0 0.0 27.9 106.4 125.5 0.0 0.0 28.9 127.0 149.9 0.0 0.0 29.9 144.9 170.9 0.0 0.0 30.9 218.9 258.5 1669.0 213.9 31.2 421.0 498.9 4083.6 590.4 31.9 508.5 603.6 4935.4 746.9 32.9 509.1 604.3 4936.5 754.4 33.9 503.0 597.0 4882.4 748.2 34.9 496.3 589.0 4822.6 741.0 35.4 492.9 585.0 4791.9 737.1 35.9 489.6 580.9 4761.1 733.3 36.9 482.8 572.8 4699.4 725.4
| |
| | |
| 6.2-156 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-44 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 37.9 476.2 565.0 4638.5 717.6 38.9 469.8 557.3 4578.6 709.9 39.9 463.6 549.8 4520.0 702.3 40.7 458.7 544.0 4474.2 696.4 40.9 457.5 542.6 4462.9 694.9 41.9 451.7 535.6 4407.3 687.6 42.9 446.0 528.8 4353.2 680.6 43.9 440.6 522.3 4300.6 673.7 44.9 435.3 516.0 4249.3 667.0 45.9 430.2 509.9 4199.5 660.5 46.8 425.7 504.5 4155.8 654.7 46.9 425.2 503.9 4151.0 654.1 47.9 420.4 498.2 4103.8 647.9 48.9 415.7 492.6 4057.8 641.8 49.9 411.2 487.2 4013.0 635.9 50.9 406.8 482.0 3969.3 630.2 51.9 402.5 476.9 3926.8 624.5 52.9 398.4 471.9 3885.2 619.0 53.5 395.9 469.0 2860.8 615.8 53.9 394.3 467.1 3844.7 613.6 54.9 390.4 462.4 3805.1 608.4 55.9 386.6 457.8 3766.4 603.2 56.9 382.8 453.4 3728.6 598.2 57.9 379.2 449.0 3691.6 593.3 58.9 375.6 444.8 3655.5 588.4 59.9 372.1 440.6 3620.1 583.7 60.9 368.7 436.6 3585.4 579.0 61.9 365.4 432.6 3551.5 574.4 62.9 362.2 428.7 3518.3 569.9 63.9 359.0 424.9 3485.7 565.5 64.9 355.8 421.2 3453.7 561.2 65.9 352.8 417.6 3422.4 556.9 66.9 349.8 414.0 3391.6 552.7 67.9 346.8 410.5 3361.4 548.6 68.4 345.4 408.7 3346.5 546.5 68.9 343.9 407.0 3331.8 544.5 69.9 341.1 403.7 3302.7 540.5 70.9 338.3 400.3 3274.1 536.6 71.9 335.6 397.1 3245.9 532.7 72.9 332.9 393.9 3218.3 528.9 74.0 223.0 263.4 1880.3 360.4 75.0 222.1 262.3 1872.4 359.0 76.0 221.2 261.3 1864.5 357.6
| |
| | |
| 6.2-156a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-44 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 77.0 186.6 220.3 1328.1 279.5 78.0 186.3 220.0 1328.8 279.3 79.0 186.0 219.6 1329.5 279.2 80.0 185.8 219.3 1330.1 279.1 81.0 185.5 219.0 1330.8 278.9 82.0 185.2 218.7 1331.5 278.8 83.0 184.9 218.3 1332.2 278.6 84.0 184.7 218.0 1332.9 278.5 85.0 184.4 217.7 1333.5 278.4 87.0 183.9 217.1 1334.9 278.1 88.1 183.6 216.7 1335.7 277.9 89.0 183.4 216.4 1336.3 277.8 91.0 182.8 215.8 1337.7 277.5 93.0 182.3 215.2 1339.1 277.3 95.0 181.8 214.6 1340.5 277.0 97.0 181.3 214.0 1342.0 276.7 99.0 180.8 213.4 1343.4 276.4 101.0 180.3 212.8 1344.8 276.2 103.0 179.8 212.2 1346.3 275.9 105.0 179.3 211.7 1347.7 275.6 107.0 178.8 211.1 1349.1 275.4 109.0 178.3 210.5 1350.6 275.1 111.0 177.8 209.9 1352.0 274.8 111.2 177.8 209.9 1352.1 274.8 113.0 177.4 209.4 1353.4 274.5 115.0 176.9 208.8 1354.8 274.2 117.0 176.4 208.2 1356.2 273.9 119.0 175.9 207.7 1357.5 273.6 121.0 175.4 207.1 1358.9 273.3 123.0 175.0 206.5 1360.2 273.0 125.0 174.5 206.0 1361.6 272.7 127.0 174.0 205.4 1362.9 272.3 129.0 173.6 204.9 1364.2 272.0 131.0 173.1 204.3 1365.6 271.7 133.0 172.7 203.8 1366.9 271.4 135.0 172.2 203.3 1368.2 271.0 136.2 171.9 202.9 1368.9 270.8 137.0 171.8 202.7 1369.4 270.7 139.0 171.3 202.2 1370.7 270.3 141.0 170.9 201.7 1372.0 270.0 143.0 170.4 201.1 1373.2 269.7 145.0 170.0 200.6 1374.5 269.3 147.0 169.5 200.1 1375.7 268.9 149.0 169.1 199.6 1377.0 268.6
| |
| | |
| 6.2-156b REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-44 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS REFLOOD MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 151.0 168.7 199.1 1378.2 268.2 153.0 168.2 198.6 1379.4 267.9 155.0 167.8 198.1 1380.7 267.5 157.0 167.4 197.6 1381.9 267.1 159.0 166.9 197.0 1383.1 266.7 161.0 166.5 196.5 1384.3 266.4 163.0 166.1 196.0 1385.5 266.0 163.4 166.0 195.9 1385.7 265.9 165.0 165.7 195.5 1386.7 265.6 167.0 165.3 195.1 1387.9 265.2 169.0 164.9 194.6 1389.0 264.8 171.0 164.4 194.1 1390.2 264.4 173.0 164.0 193.6 1391.4 264.0 175.0 163.6 193.1 1392.5 263.6 177.0 163.2 192.6 1393.7 263.2 179.0 162.8 192.2 1394.8 262.8 181.0 162.4 191.7 1396.0 262.4 183.0 162.0 191.2 1397.1 262.0 185.0 161.6 190.8 1398.2 261.6 187.0 161.2 190.3 1399.4 261.2 189.0 160.9 189.8 1400.5 260.8 191.0 160.5 189.4 1401.6 260.4 193.0 160.1 188.9 1402.7 260.0 193.5 160.0 188.8 1403.0 259.9
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-156c REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-45
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK -MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS PRINCIPLE PARAMETERS DURING REFLOOD - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Flooding Flow (lbm/sec)
| |
| Core Downcomer Time Temp Rate Carryover Height Height Flow Injection Enthalpy (sec) (oF) (in/sec) Fraction (ft) (ft) Fraction Total Accum Spill (BTU/lbm)
| |
| | |
| 23.8 176.9 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 24.6 175.2 8.963 0.000 0.54 1.23 0.000 6431.7 6431.7 0.0 99.46 24.8 174.2 0.665 0.000 0.87 1.13 0.000 6387.5 6387.5 0.0 99.46 24.9 173.8 0.231 0.000 1.04 1.07 0.000 6365.7 6365.7 0.0 99.46 25.3 173.5 1.954 0.108 1.32 1.65 0.254 6259.5 6259.5 0.0 99.46 25.6 173.6 2.760 0.158 1.37 2.41 0.265 6198.0 6198.0 0.0 99.46 26.4 173.8 2.449 0.300 1.50 4.40 0.331 6031.5 6031.5 0.0 99.46 27.9 174.4 2.386 0.462 1.68 8.11 0.357 5763.0 5763.0 0.0 99.46 31.2 176.1 4.329 0.633 2.00 15.99 0.572 6456.1 4766.3 0.0 96.46 31.9 176.5 4.749 0.655 2.10 16.12 0.603 6135.9 4446.7 0.0 96.30 32.9 177.1 4.580 0.679 2.23 16.12 0.602 5996.7 4307.5 0.0 96.23 35.4 178.7 4.268 0.710 2.51 16.12 0.600 5747.1 4057.8 0.0 96.09 40.7 182.6 3.901 0.733 3.00 16.12 0.592 5320.2 3630.7 0.0 95.82 46.8 187.5 3.634 0.743 3.50 16.12 0.582 4928.5 3238.8 0.0 95.53 53.5 192.9 3.416 0.747 4.00 16.12 0.573 4576.3 2886.4 0.0 95.23 60.9 198.9 3.224 0.750 4.52 16.12 0.563 4251.6 2561.6 0.0 94.90 68.4 204.8 3.059 0.751 5.01 16.12 0.555 3971.4 2281.3 0.0 94.58 77.0 210.8 2.168 0.743 5.49 16.12 0.428 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 78.0 211.5 2.163 0.743 5.54 16.12 0.428 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 88.1 218.6 2.115 0.745 6.00 16.12 0.430 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 101.0 228.7 2.054 0.748 6.57 16.12 0.434 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 111.2 236.6 2.006 0.751 7.00 16.12 0.436 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 125.0 245.9 1.942 0.754 7.57 16.12 0.440 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 136.2 252.3 1.892 0.757 8.00 16.12 0.443 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 151.0 259.6 1.828 0.760 8.56 16.12 0.448 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 163.4 264.8 1.776 0.763 9.00 16.12 0.452 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 179.0 270.4 1.712 0.767 9.53 16.12 0.458 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00 193.5 274.9 1.654 0.770 10.00 16.12 0.464 1690.7 0.0 0.0 88.00
| |
| | |
| 6.2-157 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-46
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD
| |
| | |
| MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 193.5 173.0 216.2 1517.9 262.2 198.5 173.1 216.4 1517.8 261.9 203.5 172.4 215.5 1518.4 261.8 208.5 172.8 216.0 1518.1 261.5 213.5 172.2 215.3 1518.6 261.3 218.5 172.6 215.7 1518.3 261.0 223.5 172.0 215.0 1518.8 260.9 228.5 172.3 215.5 1518.5 260.5 233.5 172.7 215.9 1518.2 260.2 238.5 172.1 215.1 1518.8 260.1 243.5 172.4 215.5 1518.4 259.7 248.5 171.8 214.8 1519.0 259.6 253.5 172.1 215.1 1518.7 259.3 258.5 171.5 214.4 1519.4 259.2 263.5 171.8 214.7 1519.1 258.8 268.5 172.0 215.1 1518.8 258.5 273.5 171.4 214.3 1519.4 258.4 278.5 171.6 214.6 1519.2 258.0 283.5 171.9 214.9 1519.0 257.7 288.5 171.2 214.1 1519.6 257.6 293.5 171.4 214.3 1519.4 257.3 298.5 171.7 214.6 1519.2 257.0 303.5 171.0 213.7 1519.9 256.9 308.5 171.2 214.0 1519.7 256.5 313.5 171.3 214.2 1519.5 256.2 318.5 170.6 213.3 1520.2 256.1 323.5 170.8 213.5 1520.1 255.8 328.5 170.9 213.6 1519.9 255.5 333.5 171.0 213.8 1519.8 255.2 338.5 171.1 213.9 1519.7 254.9 343.5 170.3 213.0 1520.5 254.8 348.5 170.4 213.1 1520.4 254.5 353.5 170.5 213.1 1520.4 254.2
| |
| | |
| 6.2-158 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-46 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD
| |
| | |
| MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 358.5 170.5 213.2 1520.3 253.9 363.5 170.5 213.2 1520.3 253.6 368.5 170.5 213.2 1520.3 253.4 373.5 170.5 213.2 1520.3 253.1 378.5 170.5 213.1 1520.4 252.8 383.5 170.4 213.0 1520.4 252.5 388.5 170.3 212.9 1520.5 252.3 393.5 170.2 212.8 1520.6 252.0 398.5 170.1 212.6 1520.8 251.8 403.5 170.0 212.6 1520.8 251.5 408.5 170.0 212.5 1520.8 251.2 413.5 170.0 212.5 1520.9 251.0 418.5 169.9 212.4 1520.9 250.7 423.5 169.8 212.3 1521.0 250.4 428.5 169.7 212.1 1521.2 250.2 433.5 169.6 211.9 1521.3 249.9 438.5 169.3 211.7 1521.5 249.7 443.5 169.1 211.5 1521.7 249.5 448.5 169.6 212.0 1521.2 249.1 453.5 169.3 211.7 1521.5 248.9 458.5 169.0 211.3 1521.8 248.6 463.5 169.3 211.7 1521.5 248.3 468.5 168.9 211.2 1521.9 248.1 473.5 169.2 211.5 1521.7 247.7 478.5 169.3 211.7 1521.5 247.4 483.5 168.8 211.0 1522.1 247.3 488.5 168.8 211.1 1522.0 247.0 493.5 168.8 211.0 1522.1 246.7 498.5 168.7 210.9 1522.2 246.4 503.5 169.1 211.4 1521.7 246.0 508.5 168.8 211.1 1522.0 245.8 513.5 168.4 210.6 1522.4 250.3 518.5 168.5 210.7 1522.3 249.0 523.5 168.5 210.7 1522.3 249.6 528.5 168.3 210.4 1522.5 249.4 533.5 168.5 210.7 1522.3 249.0 538.5 168.5 210.7 1522.3 248.7 543.5 168.3 210.4 1522.5 248.4 548.5 168.3 210.4 1522.5 248.1 553.5 168.5 210.6 1522.4 247.7 558.5 168.2 210.3 1522.6 247.4 563.5 168.4 210.5 1522.4 247.1 568.5 91.4 114.3 1599.4 267.3 693.5 87.6 109.5 1603.3 264.0
| |
| | |
| 6.2-158a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-46 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS POST-REFLOOD
| |
| | |
| MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Break Path No. 1* Break Path No. 2**
| |
| Time Flow Energy Flow Energy (sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) (lbm/sec) (1000 BTU/sec) 695.0 87.5 1 09.4 1520.7 353.2 780.6 87.5 109.4 1520.7 353.2 780.7 94.0 116.6 1514.2 349.5 785.0 93.9 116.5 1514.4 349.2 1254.2 93.9 116.5 1514.4 349.2 1254.3 84.0 96.6 1524.3 239.3 3600.0 64.2 73.9 1544.0 242.8 3600.1 53.6 61.6 1554.7 230.1 10000.0 39.0 44.8 1569.3 232.3 100000.0 20.8 24.0 1587.4 234.9 1000000.0 8.9 10.3 1599.3 236.7 10000000.0 2.8 3.2 1605.4 237.6
| |
| * mass and energy exiting the SG side of the break
| |
| ** mass and energy exiting the pump side of the break
| |
| | |
| 6.2-158b REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-47
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCT ION BREAK MASS BALANCE MAXIMUM SAFEGUARDS - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Time (sec) 0.00 23.80 23.80 193.45 780.67 1254.25 3600.00
| |
| | |
| Mass (1000 lbm)
| |
| | |
| Initial In RCS and 760.82 760.82 760.82 760.82 760.82 760.82 760.82 ACC
| |
| | |
| Added Mass Pumped 0.00 0.00 0.00 276.18 1261.91 2023.55 5796.09 Injection Total Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 276.18 1261.91 2023.55 5796.09
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 760.82 760.82 760.82 1037.00 2022.73 2784.37 6556.91
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor 511.13 42.55 78.23 142.75 142.75 142.75 142.75 Coolant Accumulator 249.69 209.32 173.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 760.82 251.87 251.87 142.75 142.75 142.75 142.75 Contents
| |
| | |
| Effluent Break Flow 0.00 518.20 518.20 891.84 1877.57 2639.15 6411.68 ECCS Spill 0.00 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 518.20 518.20 891.84 1877.57 2639.15 6411.68 Effluent
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 760.82 770.07 770.07 1034.60 2020.33 2781.90 6554.44
| |
| | |
| 6.2-159 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-48
| |
| | |
| DOUBLE-ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK ENERGY BALANCE MAXIMUM SAFEGURARDS - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| Time (sec) 0.00 23.80 23.80 193.45 780.67 1254.25 3600.00
| |
| | |
| Energy (106 BTU)
| |
| | |
| Initial In RCS, ACC, 865.38 865.38 865.38 865.38 865.38 865.38 865.38 Energy SG
| |
| | |
| Added Energy Pumped 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.30 119.31 232.04 790.37 injection Decay Heat 0.00 8.17 8.17 29.41 83.57 120.02 263.31 From 0.00 1.22 1.22 1.22 9.17 14.05 14.05 Secondary Total Added 0.00 9.39 9.39 54.93 212.06 366.11 1067.73
| |
| | |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE 865.38 874.77 874.77 920.31 1077.44 1231.49 1933.11
| |
| | |
| Distribution Reactor 308.94 10.27 13.81 38.06 38.06 38.06 38.06 Coolant Accumulator 24.83 20.82 17.27 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 Core Stored 23.98 12.69 12.69 4.91 4.71 4.48 3.33 Primary Metal 153.18 145.93 145.93 117.29 81.48 67.88 51.65 Secondary 108.26 109.48 109.48 99.03 72.88 57.26 44.03 Metal Steam 246.19 249.88 249.88 220.52 161.58 130.68 102.68 Generator Total 865.38 549.07 549.07 479.80 358.70 298.35 239.75 Contents
| |
| | |
| Effluent Break Flow 0.00 325.93 325.93 431.33 709.56 913.95 1679.40 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 325.93 325.93 431.33 709.56 913.95 1679.40 Effluent
| |
| | |
| TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 865.38 875.00 875.00 911.13 1068.26 1212.30 1919.15
| |
| | |
| 6.2-160 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-49
| |
| | |
| LOCA MASS AND ENERGY RELEASE ANALYSIS CORE DECAY HEAT FRACTION
| |
| | |
| Time (seconds) Decay Heat Generation Rate (BTU/sec) 1.00E+01 0.053876 1.50E+01 0.050401 2.00E+01 0.048018 4.00E+01 0.042401 6.00E+01 0.039244 8.00E+01 0.037065 1.00E+02 0.035466 1.50E+02 0.032724 2.00E+02 0.030936 4.00E+02 0.027078 6.00E+02 0.024931 8.00E+02 0.023389 1.00E+03 0.022156 1.50E+03 0.019921 2.00E+03 0.018315 4.00E+03 0.014781 6.00E+03 0.013040 8.00E+03 0.012000 1.00E+04 0.011262 1.50E+04 0.010097 2.00E+04 0.009350 4.00E+04 0.007778 6.00E+04 0.006958 8.00E+04 0.006424 1.00E+05 0.006021 1.50E+05 0.005323 4.00E+05 0.003770 6.00E+05 0.003201 8.00E+05 0.002834 1.00E+06 0.002580 1.00E+07 0.000808
| |
| | |
| 6.2-161 REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Pages 6.2 -162 through 6.2-177 has been intentionally deleted.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-162 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-178 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-50
| |
| | |
| MSLB MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES FOR UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| 0.90 FT2 SPLIT BREAK AT 30% POWER WITH MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE - OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE
| |
| | |
| Time Mass Rate* Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 2124.67 1186.04 4.60 1992.16 1188.82 9.20 1895.86 1190.81 18.00 1777.25 1193.18 24.80 1811.74 1192.70 40.20 1663.95 1195.78 44.00 1473.60 1198.77 48.00 1331.00 1200.79 55.80 1141.17 1202.95 63.60 1013.13 1203.95 71.40 928.78 1204.32 79.20 878.44 1204.43 97.20 832.82 1204.47 169.00 804.06 1204.47 260.00 799.59 1204.46 262.40 778.19 1204.44 265.00 735.23 1204.33 267.40 666.48 1203.98 270.00 552.76 1202.78 273.80 363.15 1198.00 275.00 317.18 1196.04 276.20 279.18 1193.96 277.40 246.93 1191.79 278.80 215.43 1189.36 281.80 214.46 1189.41 288.80 210.63 1189.09 291.80 208.80 1188.95 295.00 208.64 1188.93 298.00 208.27 1188.91 301.20 207.78 1188.85 304.20 207.12 1188.81 307.40 206.80 1188.77 310.40 205.89 1188.69 313.40 205.19 1188.63 316.40 204.69 1188.58 319.40 204.21 1188.54 322.40 203.61 1188.49
| |
| | |
| 6.2-179 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-50 (Contd)
| |
| | |
| MSLB MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES FOR UNIT 1 0.90 FT2 SPLIT BREAK AT 30% POWER WITH MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE - OFFSITE POWER AVAI LABLE
| |
| | |
| Time Mass Enthalpy (sec) Rate* (Btu/lbm)
| |
| (lbm/sec) 325.40 202.92 1188.42 328.40 202.33 1188.37 331.40 201.53 1188.30 334.40 200.83 1188.23 337.20 199.78 1188.16 340.20 199.10 1188.09 343.20 198.29 1188.02 346.20 197.36 1187.94 349.20 196.39 1187.85 352.20 195.33 1187.75 355.20 194.13 1187.64 358.20 193.10 1187.54 361.00 191.58 1187.42 364.00 190.37 1187.30 367.00 189.07 1187.18 370.00 187.59 1187.03 373.00 186.04 1186.88 375.80 184.21 1186.72 378.80 182.40 1186.53 382.40 179.93 1186.26 404.80 161.77 1184.25 435.40 130.46 1179.99 451.80 118.01 1178.03 472.00 110.25 1176.73 489.00 107.67 1176.29 1800.40 106.48 1176.02 1803.60 85.06 1171.59 1808.60 58.38 1163.94 1813.80 34.58 1154.38 1815.00 27.80 1152.35 1816.00 20.72 1150.96 1816.40 17.50 1150.58 1816.60 15.51 1150.40 1816.80 0.00 0.00 1900.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| *Rate is total for all four loops
| |
| | |
| 6.2-179a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-50a
| |
| | |
| MSLB MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES FOR UNIT 1 1.0 FT2 SPLIT BREAK AT 100% POWER WITH MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE - LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER Time Mass Rate* Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 2261.07 1186.64 2.20 2184.46 1188.04 4.40 2118.88 1189.27 8.60 2020.73 1191.06 12.80 1951.33 1192.30 17.00 1902.20 1193.15 17.20 1985.98 1192.95 19.00 2081.52 1191.34 21.00 2163.00 1189.87 23.00 2214.41 1188.92 25.00 2235.82 1188.54 27.40 2217.85 1188.91 36.80 2035.90 1192.29 37.40 2033.35 1192.76 38.00 1969.07 1193.75 39.20 1868.17 1195.41 41.60 1699.22 1197.94 44.00 1557.81 1199.84 46.40 1437.41 1201.29 48.80 1333.71 1202.37 53.40 1170.23 1203.69 58.20 1034.94 1204.32 63.60 913.88 1204.47 67.60 841.08 1204.39 71.60 780.04 1204.20 75.60 728.30 1203.92 79.80 680.90 1203.55 87.80 604.00 1202.70 96.00 540.86 1201.72 104.00 490.81 1200.67 112.20 448.39 1199.57 120.20 414.08 1198.51 128.40 384.84 1197.48 136.40 360.98 1196.55 144.40 340.88 1195.68 160.60 308.83 1194.06 176.80 284.34 1192.60
| |
| | |
| 6.2-179b REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-50a (Contd)
| |
| | |
| MSLB MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES FOR UNIT 1 1.0 FT2 SPLIT BREAK AT 100% POWER WITH MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE - LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER
| |
| | |
| Time Mass Rate* Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/lbm) 193.00 265.05 1191.35 209.20 249.91 1190.29 225.40 238.46 1189.45 257.60 222.19 1188.17 290.00 209.19 1187.10 322.20 198.09 1186.11 386.80 180.75 1184.36 419.00 174.32 1183.66 451.40 170.22 1183.19 516.00 166.49 1182.76 612.00 164.20 1182.48 794.60 162.88 1182.32 1155.00 153.61 1181.16 1569.80 151.39 1180.87 1656.20 139.34 1179.22 1684.80 132.35 1178.21 1728.00 117.31 1175.91 1742.40 113.58 1175.30 1771.20 109.17 1174.55 1800.00 107.16 1174.19 1801.00 107.86 1174.31 1801.80 107.39 1174.21 1802.80 105.59 1173.86 1804.60 99.92 1172.75 1807.60 87.12 1169.51 1807.80 84.96 1168.87 1808.20 79.42 1167.64 1809.40 66.73 1164.36 1810.20 59.87 1162.33 1811.20 52.00 1159.50 1812.80 40.10 1154.85 1813.40 34.96 1153.29 1813.80 31.19 1152.35 1814.20 27.05 1151.53 1814.60 22.38 1150.84 1814.80 19.64 1150.58 1815.00 16.71 1150.36 1815.20 0.00 0.00 1900.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| *Rate is total for all four loops
| |
| | |
| 6.2-179c REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-50b
| |
| | |
| MSLB MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES FOR UNIT 2 0.83 FT2 SPLIT BREAK AT 30% POWER WITH MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE - OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE
| |
| | |
| Time Mass Rate* Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 1947.05 1186.38 5.20 1820.17 1189.26 10.20 1731.66 1191.23 20.00 1622.76 1193.56 27.00 1661.28 1192.92 43.00 1537.07 1195.48 48.20 1330.48 1199.23 52.40 1207.90 1201.06 56.60 1113.61 1202.28 60.80 1037.88 1203.09 69.20 926.94 1203.99 77.60 858.48 1204.32 86.00 820.37 1204.41 100.80 789.84 1204.46 129.80 771.32 1204.47 284.40 755.47 1204.47 287.20 725.66 1204.45 290.20 666.40 1204.28 293.20 574.59 1203.62 299.00 365.81 1199.24 300.40 323.36 1197.55 302.00 281.91 1195.50 303.40 251.51 1193.60 305.00 222.77 1191.45 309.80 197.70 1189.42 313.40 194.95 1189.18 316.80 194.25 1189.10 320.00 193.58 1189.04 323.20 193.26 1189.01 326.40 192.87 1188.97 329.60 192.36 1188.93 332.80 191.81 1188.87 336.00 191.10 1188.80 339.00 190.54 1188.76 342.00 189.90 1188.70 345.00 189.12 1188.63 348.00 188.51 1188.57
| |
| | |
| 6.2-179d REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-50b (Contd)
| |
| | |
| MSLB MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES FOR UNIT 2 2
| |
| 0.83 FT SPLIT BREAKFAILURE AT -30% OFFSITE POWER POWERWITH MAINAVAI LSTEAMABLE ISOLATION VALVE
| |
| | |
| Time Mass Rate* Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/lbm) 351.00 187.98 1188.52 354.00 187.33 1188.45 357.00 186.63 1188.39 360.00 185.83 1188.31 363.00 185.03 1188.23 366.00 184.33 1188.16 368.80 183.20 1188.06 371.80 182.27 1187.97 374.80 181.33 1187.87 377.60 180.18 1187.76 380.60 179.11 1187.65 383.80 177.76 1187.50 407.80 164.25 1186.08 446.80 131.49 1181.76 466.40 118.06 1179.63 485.80 110.93 1178.41 505.40 107.88 1177.87 737.60 106.08 1177.54 1800.40 106.58 1177.59 1801.20 103.77 1177.01 1803.60 89.30 1174.15 1809.80 58.09 1165.35 1812.40 46.75 1161.23 1816.20 31.86 1154.38 1817.40 25.93 1152.44 1818.00 22.53 1151.61 1819.00 15.89 1150.55 1819.20 13.97 1150.38 1819.40 0.00 0.00 1900.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| *Rate is total for all four loops
| |
| | |
| 6.2-179e REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-50c
| |
| | |
| MSLB MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES FOR UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| 1.0 FT2 SMALL DOUBLE-ENDED RUPTURE AT 100% POWER WITH MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE - LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER Time Mass Rate* Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 4328.49 1189.75 0.40 4248.73 1190.23 1.40 4027.57 1191.89 2.60 3847.53 1193.33 2.80 3947.19 1193.24 6.20 3933.13 1193.11 9.00 3885.43 1194.27 10.80 3628.48 1194.74 19.60 2283.76 1197.90 25.40 1448.41 1200.97 28.40 1035.55 1203.92 28.80 986.37 1204.42 32.00 911.06 1204.47 35.60 838.71 1204.39 39.20 778.05 1204.19 42.80 726.16 1203.90 46.40 680.10 1203.54 53.60 600.41 1202.65 60.80 536.05 1201.63 67.80 484.56 1200.52 75.00 440.42 1199.33 82.20 403.84 1198.16 89.40 373.53 1197.05 96.60 348.46 1196.02 103.80 327.45 1195.03 111.00 309.90 1194.11 118.20 295.09 1193.26 132.40 272.04 1191.81 146.80 254.53 1190.62 161.20 240.82 1189.62 175.40 230.19 1188.81 189.80 221.83 1188.15 204.20 215.36 1187.62 261.80 195.11 1185.82 319.20 177.43 1184.01 348.00 170.39 1183.21 376.60 166.26 1182.73
| |
| | |
| 6.2-179f REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-50c (Contd)
| |
| | |
| MSLB MASS AND ENERGY RELEASES FOR UNIT 2 1.0 FT2 SMALL DOUBLE-ENDED RUPTURE AT 100% POWER WITH MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE - LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER
| |
| | |
| Time Mass Rate* Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/lbm)
| |
| | |
| 434.00 163.05 1182.34 634.00 159.78 1181.94 801.20 154.55 1181.28 867.60 144.22 1179.91 893.60 138.14 1179.05 945.60 118.59 1176.12 958.60 114.60 1175.47 971.60 111.55 1174.96 997.60 107.90 1174.32 1023.60 106.22 1174.03 1086.80 105.57 1173.91 1151.00 106.23 1174.03 1800.00 106.07 1174.00 1801.00 107.06 1174.17 1802.00 106.57 1174.06 1803.00 104.75 1173.71 1804.00 102.01 1173.17 1807.40 89.24 1170.22 1810.20 75.51 1166.80 1811.00 68.06 1164.74 1812.20 58.33 1161.84 1814.40 42.80 1155.83 1815.00 38.27 1154.27 1815.80 31.43 1152.42 1816.40 25.50 1151.28 1816.60 23.27 1150.96 1816.80 20.82 1150.67 1817.00 17.90 1150.43 1817.20 0.00 0.00 1900.00 0.00 0.00
| |
| | |
| *Rate is total for all four loops
| |
| | |
| 6.2-179g REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-51 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-180 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-52 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-181 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-53 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-182 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-54 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-183 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-55 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-184 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| PAGE 6.2-184a HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-184a REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Page 6.2-185 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-185 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-56
| |
| | |
| REACTOR CONTAINMENT FAN COOLER DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
| |
| | |
| (EACH UNIT)
| |
| NORMAL MODE ACCIDENT MODE OPERATION OPERATION
| |
| : 1. Fan Number of fans 1 Fan type Vane-axial Nominal speed (r/min) 1770 1170 Capacity ( ft3/min) 94,000 5 9,000*
| |
| Containment atmosphere pressure (psig) 0 50 Containment atmosphere 120 271 temperature (F)
| |
| Air inlet temperature (F) 48.0 264 Containment atmosphere density (lb/ft3) 0.0667 0.189 Air inlet dens ity (lb/ft3) 0.0754 0.189
| |
| : 2. Motor Number 1 Enclosure TEAO Type 480 V, 3, 60 Hz, two-speed Bearing monitors Vibration and temperature Winding monitors Iron -Constantan Thermocouples Service factor 1.0
| |
| * Coil manufacturer specified value. Actual value required is based on required containment heat removal. For accident mode operation, a flow of 54,000 CFM has been shown by the safety analysis to be adequate to maintain containment integrity.
| |
| 6.2-186 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-56 (Cont'd)
| |
| NORMAL MODE ACCIDENT MODE OPERATION OPERATION Speed (r/min) 1800 1200 Horsepower 150 100
| |
| : 3. Cooling Coil Assembly A. Essential Service Water Section Number of coil sections 10 Net face arsections (ftea of all coil2) 238 Type Helical finne d Tube material Copper Nickel 90/10 Fin material Copper Maximum fins per inch 8 Nominal tube thickness (in.) 0.049 Nominal fin thickness (in.) 0.010 Tube nominal OD (in.) 5/8 Nominal tube length (in.) 120 Coil frame material Galv. steel Drain pan material Stainless steel Heat removal (Btu/hr) 1.97 x 106 132 x 106*
| |
| Steam -air flow entering coil (ft3/min) 106,700 73,700 Steam -air flow leaving coil (ft3/min) 103,200 59,000 Steam -air inlet temperature (F) 120 271
| |
| * Original manufacturer specified value. Actual required value established by the safety analysis is 129 x 106 Btu/hr/RCFC Unit based on the estimated heat released in the containment of 143 x 106 Btu/second.
| |
| 6.2-187 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-56 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| NORMAL MODEOPERATION ACCIDENT MODEOPERATION
| |
| | |
| Steam-air outlet 101 263 temperature (F)
| |
| Total pressure (psig) 0 50
| |
| | |
| Steam-air density entering coil (lb/ft3) 0.0657 0.1795
| |
| | |
| Steam-air density leaving coil (lb/ft3) 0.068 0.1872
| |
| | |
| Relative humidity entering 11% 100%
| |
| coil (%)
| |
| | |
| Relative humidity leaving 20% 100%
| |
| coil (%)
| |
| Coo ling water flow (gal/min) 2660 2660
| |
| | |
| Cooling water inlet 100 100 temperature (F)
| |
| Cooling water outlet 101.0 203 temperature (F)
| |
| Coil tube side fouling factor 0.0015 0.0015
| |
| | |
| B. Chilled Water Section
| |
| | |
| Number of coil sections 10 Net face area for all coilsections (ft2) 238
| |
| | |
| Type Helical finned Copper-Nickel 90/10 Tube material Fin material Copper 8
| |
| Fins per inch Nominal tube thickness (in.) 0.049 Nominal fin thickness (in.) 0.010
| |
| | |
| Tube nominal OD (in.) 5/8 Nominal tube length (in.) Coil 120 frame material Galv. steel
| |
| | |
| 6.2-188 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-56 (Cont'd)
| |
| NORMAL MODE ACCIDENT MODE OPERATION OPERATION Drain pan material Stainless steel
| |
| | |
| Heat removal (Btu/hr) 6.1 x 106 0
| |
| | |
| Steam-air flow leaving coil (ft3/min) 103,900 59,000 Steam -air inlet temperature (F) 101 263
| |
| | |
| Steam-air outlet 49 263 temperature (F)
| |
| Total pressure (psig) 0 50 Steam-air inlet density (lb/ft3) 0.068 0.1872
| |
| | |
| Steam-air outlet density (lb/ft3) 0.0748 0.1872
| |
| | |
| Cooling chilled water flow 1500 0 (gal/min)
| |
| Cooling chilled water inlet temperature (F) 42 --
| |
| | |
| Cooling chilled water outlet 50 --
| |
| temperature (F)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-189 REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-57
| |
| | |
| SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS
| |
| | |
| REACTOR CONTAINMENT FAN COOLERS
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT MALFUNCTION COMMENTS
| |
| | |
| Fan motors Failure to start Redundant system is provided. Separate power supplies for each system.
| |
| | |
| Fan Unsatisfactory Redundant system is performance provided. Separate power supplies for each system.
| |
| | |
| Essential service None Passive component, active water cooling failure not credible.
| |
| coils
| |
| | |
| Essential service Failure of valves Not credible, valves will water cooling to open fail open on loss of coils piping and electric or air supply to valves the valve operator to assure ESW flow. A redundant system is provided.
| |
| | |
| Enclosure and None Passive component, active ductwork failure not credible.
| |
| | |
| Backdraft damper Failure to close If failure of fan results, redundant system is provided with separate power supplies for each system.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-190 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 CONTAINMENT ISOLATION PROVISIONS TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE CVCS 1CV8100 55 28 RC 2 YES M-64-2 Outside NO 2.6 Globe 1CV8112 55 28 RC 2 YES M-64-2 Inside NO N/A Globe
| |
| | |
| 1CV8355C 55 53 RC 2 M-64-2 Outside NO 4.0 Globe 1CV8368C 55 53 RC 2 M-64-2 Inside NO N/A Check 1CV8355D 55 33 RC 2 M-64-2 Outside NO 4.0 Globe 1CV8368D 55 33 RC 2 M-64-2 Inside NO N/A Check 1CV8355A 55 33 RC 2 M-64-1 Outside NO 4.0 Globe 1CV8368A 55 33 RC 2 M-64-1 Inside NO N/A Check 1CV8355B 55 53 RC 2 M-64-1 Outside NO 4.0 Globe 1CV8368B 55 53 RC 2 M-64-1 Inside NO N/A Check 1CV8105 57 71 RC 3 YES M-64-3 Outside NO 2.9 Gate 1CV8106 57 71 RC 3 YES M-64-3 Outside NO 4.75 Gate 1CV8346 55 37 RC 2 M-64-3 Outside NO 3.2 Globe 1CV8348 55 37 RC 2 M-64-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1CV8152 55 41 RC 3 YES M 5 Outside YES (Bwd) 2.9 Globe NO (Byr) 1CV8160 55 41 RC 3 YES M-64-5 Inside YES(Bwd) N/A Globe NO (Byr) 1CV8113 55 28 RC 3/4 M-64-2 Inside NO N/A Check Chilled Water 1WO020A 56 5 Water 10 YES M-118-5 Outside YES 3.0 Gate 1WO006A 56 6 Water 10 YES M-118-5 Outside YES 3.0 Gate 1WO020B 56 8 Water 10 YES M-118-5 Outside YES 3.3 Gate 1WO006B 56 10 Water 10 YES M-118-5 Outside YES 3.3 Gate 1WO007A 56 6 Water 10 YES M-118-5 Inside YES N/A Check 1WO007B 56 10 Water 10 YES M-118-5 Inside YES N/A Check 1WO056A 56 5 Water 10 YES M-118-5 Inside YES N/A Gate 1WO056B 56 8 Water 10 YES M-118-5 Inside YES N/A Gate
| |
| | |
| 6.2-191 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| CONTAINMENT ISOLATION PROVISIONS TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE 1WO079A (Byron) 56 5 Water 3/4 M -118-5 Inside YES N/A Relief 1WO079B (Byron) 56 8 Water 3/4 M-118-5 Inside YES N/A Relief 1WO091A 56 5 Water 3/4 M-118-5 Inside YES N/A Relief (Braidwood) 1WO091B 56 8 Water 3/4 M-118-5 Inside YES N/A Relief (Braidwood)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-191a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION CVCS
| |
| | |
| 1CV8100 55 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 T A RM 1E 1,5 1CV8112 55 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 T A RM 1E 1 1CV8355C 55 MO Open Open Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1CV8368C 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1CV8355D 55 MO Open Open Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1CV8368D 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1CV8355A 55 MO Open Open Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1CV8368A 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1CV8355B 55 MO Open Open Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1CV8368B 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1CV8105 57 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 S A RM 1E 8 1CV8106 57 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 S A RM 1E 8
| |
| | |
| 1CV8346 55 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 7 1CV8348 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 1CV8152 55 AO/S Open Open Open Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1CV8160 55 AO/S Open Open Open Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1CV8113 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 Chilled Water 1WO020A 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 50 T A RM 1E 1 1WO006A 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 50 T A RM 1E 5 1WO020B 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 50 T A RM 1E 1 1WO006B 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 50 T A RM 1E 5 1WO007A 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1WO007B 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1WO056A 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 50 T A RM 1E 1 1WO056B 56 MO Open Open Closed AS Is 50 T A RM 1E 1
| |
| | |
| 6.2-192 REVISION 2 - DECEMBER 1990 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION 1WO 079A 56 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1A
| |
| | |
| (Byron) 1WO079B 56 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1A (Byron) 1WO091A 56 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1A (Braidwood) 1WO091B 56 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1A (Braidwood)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-192a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO VALVE (ft) TYPE Compo nent Cooling
| |
| | |
| 1CC9414 56 21 CCW 6 YES M-66-1A Outside YES 2.9 Gate 1CC9416 56 21 CCW 6 YES M-66-1A Inside YES N/A Gate 1CC9534 56 21 CCW 3/4 M-66-1A Inside YES N/A Check 1CC9437B 57 22 CCW 3 YES M-66-1A Outside NO 3.1 Globe 1CC685 56 24 CCW 4 YES M-66-1A Outside YES 3.1 Gate 1CC9438 56 24 CCW 4 YES M-66-1A Inside YES N/A Gate 1CC9518 56 24 CCW 3/4 YES M-66-1A Inside YES N/A Check 1CC9486 56 25 CCW 6 M-66-1A Inside YES N/A Check 1CC9413A 56 25 CCW 6 YES M-66-1A Outside YES 4.9 Gate 1CC9437A 57 48 CCW 3 YES M-66-1A Outside NO 6.8 Globe Containment Purge 1VQ005A 56 94 Air 8 YES M-105-1 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1VQ005B 56 94 Air 8 YES M-105-1 Outside YES 6.0 But. Fly 1VQ003 56 94 Air 8 YES M-105-1 Outside YES 9.0 But. Fly 1VQ002A 56 95 Air 48 M-105-1 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1VQ002B 56 95 Air 48 M-105-1 Outside YES 2.9 But. Fly 1VQ004A 56 96 Air 8 YES M-105-1 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1VQ004B 56 96 Air 8 YES M-105-1 Outside YES 2.0 But. Fly 1VQ001A 56 97 Air 48 M-105-1 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1VQ001B 56 97 Air 48 M-105-1 Outside YES 2.9 But. Fly 1VQ005C 56 94 Air 8 YES M-105-1 Outside YES 3.5 But. Fly Containment Spray 1CS007A 56 1 NaOH+BW 10 YES M-46-1 Outside YES(Bwd) 3.3 Gate NO (Byr) 1CS008A 56 1 NaOH+BW 10 M-46-1 Inside YES(Bwd) N/A Check NO (Byr) 1CS007B 56 16 NaOH+BW 10 YES M-46-1 Outside YES(Bwd) 3.8 Gate NO (Byr) 1CS008B 56 16 NaOH+BW 10 M-46-1 Inside YES(Bwd) N/A Check NO (Byr)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-193 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Component Cooling
| |
| | |
| 1CC9414 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 P A RM 1E 1,5 1CC9416 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 P A RM 1E 1 1CC9534 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1CC9437B 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 11 1CC685 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 P A RM 1E 1,5 1CC9438 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 P A RM 1E 1 1CC9518 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1CC9486 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1CC9413A 56 MO Open Open Closed As Is 10 P A RM 1E 5 1CC9437A 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 11 Containment Purge 1VQ005A 56 AO/S Closed **** Closed Closed 5 T2 A RM 1E 2 1VQ005B 56 AO/S Closed **** Closed Closed 5 T2 A RM 1E 2 1VQ003 56 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 5 T2 A RM 1E 2 1VQ002A (Byron) 56 HO Closed **** Closed Closed N/A T2 A RM 1E 1 1VQ002B (Byron) 56 HO Closed **** Closed Closed N/A T2 A RM 1E 1 IVQ002A (Braidwood) 56 HO Closed Closed Closed Closed N/A T2 N/A N/A IE 1 IVQ002B (Braidwood) 56 HO Closed Closed Closed Closed N/A T2 N/A N/A 1E 1 1VQ004A 56 AO/S Closed **** Closed Closed 5 T2 A RM 1E 2 1VQ004B 56 AO/S Closed **** Closed Closed 5 T2 A RM 1E 2 1VQ001A (Byron) 56 HO Closed **** Closed Closed N/A T2 A RM 1E 1 1VQ001B (Byron) 56 HO Closed **** Closed Closed N/A T2 A RM 1E 1 IVQ001A (Braidwood) 56 HO Closed Closed Closed Closed N/A T2 N/A N/A 1E 1 IVQ001B (Braidwood) 56 HO Closed Closed Closed Closed N/A T2 N/A N/A 1E 1 1VQ005C 56 AO/S Closed **** Closed Closed 5 T2 A RM 1E 2 Containment Spray 1CS007A 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 30 T1 A RM 1E 5 1CS008A 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1CS007B 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 30 T1 A RM 1E 5 1CS008B 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5
| |
| | |
| 6.2-194 REVISION 14 - DECEMBER 2012 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Essential Service
| |
| | |
| Water 1SX016B 57 7 Water 16 YES M-42-5 Outside NO 3.2 But. Fly 1SX027B 57 9 Water 16 YES M-42-5 Outside NO 3.2 But. Fly 1SX027A 57 14 Water 16 YES M-42-5 Outside NO 2.8 But. Fly 1SX016A 57 15 Water 16 YES M-42-5 Outside NO 2.8 But. Fly
| |
| | |
| Fire Protection 1FP010 56 34 Water 4 YES M-52-1 Outside NO 3.3 Globe 1FP345 56 34 Water 4 YES M-52-1 Inside NO N/A Check Instrument Air 1IA065 56 39 Air 3 YES M-55-2 Outside YES 3.3 Globe 1IA066 56 39 Air 3 YES M-55-2 Inside YES N/A Globe 1IA091 56 39 Air 3/4 YES M-55-2 Inside YES N/A Check Instrument Penetration 1VQ016 56 I3 Air 1/2 M-105-3 Inside YES N/A Globe 1VQ017 56 I3 Air 1/2 M-105-3 Inside YES N/A Globe 1VQ018 56 I3 Air 1/2 M-105-3 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1VQ019 56 I3 Air 1/2 M-105-3 Outside YES MIN. Globe I1 Silicone Oil M-2046-2,4 I2 Silicone Oil M-2046-2,4 I3 Silicone Oil M-2046-2,4 I4 Silicone Oil M-2046-2,4 1RY075 57 I5 Water 1/2 M-2060-6 Outside YES 1.0 Globe 19 Water M-2060-17,18
| |
| | |
| 6.2-195 REVISION 3 - DECEMBER 1991 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Make -up
| |
| | |
| Demineralizer 1WM190 55 30 Water 2 M-49-1 Outside YES 1.6 Globe 1WM191 55 30 Water 2 M-49-1 Inside YES N/A Check Main Steam 1MS001D 57 77 Steam 30.25 YES M-35-1 Outside NO 14.8 Gate 1MS101D 57 77 Steam 4 YES M-35-1 Outside NO 20.0 Globe 1MS021D 57 77 Steam 3 M-35-1 Outside NO 15.4 Globe 1MS018D 57 77 Steam 6 YES M-35-1 Outside NO 32.1 Relief 1MS013D 57 77 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 39.1 Relief
| |
| | |
| 6.2-195a REVISION 4 - DECEMBER 1992 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Essential Service
| |
| | |
| Water 1SX016B 57 MO Open Open Open As Is N/*S (Open) A RM 1E 10 1SX027B 57 MO Open Open Open As Is N/*S (Open) A RM 1E 10 1SX027A 57 MO Open Open Open As Is N/*S (Open) A RM 1E 10 1SX016A 57 MO Open Open Open As Is N/*S (Open) A RM 1E 10
| |
| | |
| Fire Protection 1FP010 56 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 12 T A RM 1E 6 1FP345 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 Instrument Air 1IA065 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 15 T A RM 1E 2,6 1IA066 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 15 T A RM 1E 2 1IA091 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 Instrument Penetration 1VQ016 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 4 1VQ017 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 4 1VQ018 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 4 1VQ019 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 4
| |
| | |
| 1RY075 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A
| |
| | |
| 6.2-196 REVISION 2 - DECEMBER 1990 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Make -up
| |
| | |
| Demineralizer 1WM190 55 M Closed Open Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 7 1WM191 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 Main Steam 1MS001D 57 HO Open Closed Closed As Is 5.0 MS A RM 1E 10 1MS101D 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 6.0 MS A RM 1E 11 1MS021D 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 14 1MS018D 57 HO Closed Closed Closed Closed 20.0 N/A A RM 1E 13 1MS013D 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13
| |
| | |
| 6.2-196a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Main Steam
| |
| | |
| 1MS014D 57 77 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 36.6 Relief 1MS015D 57 77 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 34.1 Relief 1MS016D 57 77 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 31.6 Relief 1MS017D 57 77 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 29.1 Relief 1MS001B 57 85 Steam 32.75 YES M-35-1 Outside NO 10.0 Gate 1MS101B 57 85 Steam 4 YES M-35-1 Outside NO 17.7 Globe 1MS021B 57 85 Steam 3 M-35-1 Outside NO 11.0 Globe 1MS018B 57 85 Steam 6 YES M-35-1 Outside NO 16.5 Relief 1MS013B 57 85 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 38.8 Relief 1MS014B 57 85 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 36.3 Relief 1MS015B 57 85 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 33.8 Relief 1MS016B 57 85 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 31.3 Relief 1MS017B 57 85 Steam 6 M-35-1 Outside NO 28.8 Relief 1MS001A 57 78 Steam 30.25 YES M-35-2 Outside NO 14.8 Gate 1MS101A 57 78 Steam 4 YES M-35-2 Outside NO 20.0 Globe 1MS021A 57 78 Steam 3 M-35-2 Outside NO 15.4 Globe 1MS018A 57 78 Steam 6 YES M-35-2 Outside NO 32.1 Relief 1MS013A 57 78 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 39.1 Relief 1MS014A 57 78 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 36.6 Relief 1MS015A 57 78 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 34.1 Relief 1MS016A 57 78 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 31.6 Relief 1MS017A 57 78 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 29.1 Relief 1MS001C 57 86 Steam 32.75 YES M-35-2 Outside NO 10.0 Gate 1MS101C 57 86 Steam 4 YES M-35-2 Outside NO 17.7 Globe 1MS021C 57 86 Steam 3 M-35-2 Outside NO 11.0 Globe 1MS018C 57 86 Steam 6 YES M-35-2 Outside NO 16.5 Relief 1MS013C 57 86 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 38.8 Relief 1MS014C 57 86 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 36.3 Relief 1MS015C 57 86 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 33.8 Relief 1MS016C 57 86 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 31.3 Relief 1MS017C 57 86 Steam 6 M-35-2 Outside NO 28.8 Relief
| |
| | |
| 6.2-197 REVISION 4 - DECEMBER 1992 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Main Steam
| |
| | |
| 1MS014D 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS015D 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS016D 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS017D 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS001B 57 HO Open Closed Closed As Is 5.0 MS A RM 1E 10 1MS101B 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 6.0 MS A RM 1E 11 1MS021B 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 14 1MS018B 57 HO Closed Closed Closed Closed 20.0 N/A A RM 1E 13 1MS013B 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS014B 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS015B 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS016B 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS017B 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS001A 57 HO Open Closed Closed As Is 5.0 MS A RM 1E 10 1MS101A 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 6.0 MS A RM 1E 11 1MS021A 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 14 1MS018A 57 HO Closed Closed Closed Closed 20.0 N/A A RM 1E 13 1MS013A 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS014A 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS015A 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS016A 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS017A 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS001C 57 HO Open Closed Closed As Is 5.0 MS A RM 1E 10 1MS101C 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 6.0 MS A RM 1E 11 1MS021C 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 14 1MS018C 57 HO Closed Closed Closed Closed 20.0 N/A A RM 1E 13 1MS013C 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS014C 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS015C 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS016C 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 1MS017C 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13
| |
| | |
| 6.2-198 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Off -Gas
| |
| | |
| 1OG079 (Byron) 56 13 Air & H2 3 YES M-47-2 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1OG080 (Byron) 56 13 Air & H2 3 YES M-47-2 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1OG081 (Byron) 56 23 Air & H2 3 YES M-47-2 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1OG057A (Byron) 56 69 Air & H2 3 YES M-47-2 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1OG082 (Byron) 56 13 Air & H2 3 YES M-47-2 Outside YES MIN. But. Fly 1OG083 (Byron) 56 69 Air & H2 3 YES M-47-2 Outside YES MIN. But. Fly 1OG084 (Byron) 56 13 Air & H2 3 YES M-47-2 Outside YES MIN. But. Fly 1OG085 (Byron) 56 23 Air & H2 3 YES M-47-2 Outside YES MIN. But. Fly 1OG079 (Braidwood) 56 13 Air + H2 3 M-47-2 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1OG080 (Braidwood) 56 13 Air + H2 3 M-47-2 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1OG081 (Braidwood) 56 23 Air + H2 3 M-47-2 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1OG057A (Braidwood) 56 69 Air + H2 3 M-47-2 Inside YES N/A But. Fly 1OG082 (Braidwood) 56 13 Air + H2 3 M-47-2 Outside YES MIN. But. Fly 1OG083 (Braidwood) 56 69 Air + H2 3 M-47-2 Outside YES MIN. But. Fly 1OG084 (Braidwood) 56 13 Air + H2 3 M-47-2 Outside YES MIN. But. Fly 1OG085 (Braidwood) 56 23 Air + H2 3 M-47-2 Outside YES MIN. But. Fly Process Radiation 1PR001A 56 52 Air 1 M-78-10 Outside YES 1.4 Globe 1PR001B 56 52 Air 1 M-78-10 Outside YES 3.5 Globe 1PR066 56 52 Air 1 M-78-10 Outside YES 2.3 Globe 1PR032 56 52 Air 1 M-78-10 Inside YES N/A Check 1PR033A(Brwd only) 56 AL Air 2 M-78-6 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PR033B(Brwd only) 56 AL Air 2 M-78-6 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PR002E(Brwd only) 56 AL Air 2 M-78-6 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PR002G(Brwd only) 56 AL Air 2 M-78-6 Inside YES N/A Check 1PR033C(Brwd only) 56 AL Air 2 M-78-6 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PR033D(Brwd only) 56 AL Air 2 M-78-6 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PR002F(Brwd only) 56 AL Air 2 M-78-6 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PR002H(Brwd only) 56 AL Air 2 M-78-6 Inside YES N/A Check Hydrogen Monitor 1PS228A 56 45 H2 + Air 1/2 M-68-7 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS229A 56 45 H2 + Air 1/2 M-68-7 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS230A 56 12(BY) 45(BW) H2 + Air 1/2 M-68-7 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS231A 56 12(BY) 45(BW) H2 + Air 3/4 M-68-7 Inside YES N/A1 Check 1PS228B 56 36 H2 + Air 1/2 M-68-7 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS229B 56 36 H2 + Air 1/2 M-68-7 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS230B 56 31(BY) 36(BW) H2 + Air 1/2 M-68-7 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS231B 56 31(BY) 36(BW) H2 + Air 3/4 M-68-7 Inside YES N/A Check
| |
| | |
| 6.2-199 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Of f-Gas
| |
| | |
| 1OG079 (Byron) 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T A RM 1E 1 1OG080 (Byron) 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T A RM 1E 1 1OG081 (Byron) 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T A RM 1E 1 1OG057A (Byron) 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T A RM 1E 1 1OG082 (Byron) 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T A RM 1E 1 1OG083 (Byron) 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T A RM 1E 1 1OG084 (Byron) 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T A RM 1E 1 1OG085 (Byron) 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T A RM 1E 1 1OG079 (Braidwood)# 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T M M 1E 1 1OG080 (Braidwood)# 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T M M 1E 1 1OG081 (Braidwood)# 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T M M 1E 1 1OG057A (Braidwood)# 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T M M 1E 1 1OG082 (Braidwood)# 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T M M 1E 1 1OG083 (Braidwood)# 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T M M 1E 1 1OG084 (Braidwood)# 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T M M 1E 1 1OG085 (Braidwood)# 56 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is 60 T M M 1E 1 Process Radiation 1PR001A 56 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 4.5 T A RM 1E 8 1PR001B 56 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 4.5 T A RM 1E 8 1PR066 56 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 5.0 T A RM 1E 6 1PR032 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 1PR033A(Brwd only) 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1PR033B(Brwd only) 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1PR002E(Brwd only)56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 1PR002G(Brwd only) 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 1PR033C(Brwd only) 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1PR033D(Brwd only) 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1PR002F(Brwd only) 56 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 1PR002H(Brwd only) 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 Hydrogen Monitor 1PS228A 56 S Open Closed Closed As Is 15 T A RM 1E 1PS229A 56 S Open Closed Closed Open 15 T A RM 1E 1PS230A 56 S Closed Closed Closed Closed 15 T A RM 1E 1PS231A 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1PS228B 56 S Open Closed Closed Open 15 T A RM 1E 1PS229B 56 S Open Closed Closed As Is 15 T A RM 1E 1PS230B 56 S Closed Closed Closed Closed 15 T A RM 1E 1PS231B 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
| |
| | |
| 6.2-200 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Process Sampling
| |
| | |
| 1PS9354A 55 70 RC 3/8 YES M-68-1 Inside YES N/A Globe 1PS9354B 55 70 RC 3/8 YES M-68-1 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS9355A 55 70 RC 3/8 YES M-68-1 Inside YES N/A Globe 1PS9355B 55 70 RC 3/8 YES M-68-1 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS9356A 55 70 RC 3/8 YES M-68-1 Inside YES N/A Globe 1PS9356B 55 70 RC 3/8 YES M-68-1 Outside YES MIN. Globe 1PS9357A 55 70 RC 3/8 YES M-68-1 Inside YES N/A Globe 1PS9357B 55 70 RC 3/8 YES M-68-1 Outside YES MIN. Globe Reactor and Contain-ment Drains to Radwaste 1RE9157 55 65 Gas 1 YES M-70-1 Outside YES 2.5 DIAPH 1RE9159A 55 65 Gas 3/4 YES M-70-1 Inside YES N/A DIAPH 1RE9159B 55 65 Gas 3/4 YES M-70-1 Outside YES 1.0 DIAPH 1RE9160A 55 65 Gas 1 YES M-70-1 Inside YES N/A DIAPH 1RE9160B 55 65 Gas 1 YES M-70-1 Outside YES 1.5 DIAPH 1RE1003 55 11 Water 3 YES M-70-1 Inside YES N/A DIAPH 1RE9170 55 11 Water 3 YES M-70-1 Outside YES 1.0 DIAPH 1RE022 (Byron) 55 11 Water 3/4 M-70-1 Inside YES N/A Relief 1RE040 (Braidwood) 55 11 Water 3/4 M-70-1 Inside YES N/A Relief Reactor Coolant Pressurizer 1RY8025 56 27 Nitrogen 3/8 YES M-60-6 Outside YES 1.3 Globe 1RY8026 56 27 Nitrogen 3/8 YES M-60-6 Inside YES N/A Globe 1RY8033 56 27 Nitrogen 3/4 YES M-60-6 Outside YES 1.3 DIAPH 1RY8047 56 27 Nitrogen 3/4 M-60-6 Inside YES N/A CHECK 1RY8028 56 44 Water 3 YES M-60-6 Outside YES 1.0 DIAPH 1RY8046 56 44 Water 3 M-60-6 Inside YES N/A CHECK
| |
| | |
| 6.2-201 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Residual Heat
| |
| | |
| Removal 1RH8701A 55 68 RC 12 YES M-62 Inside NO N/A Gate 1RH8701B 55 68 RC 12 YES M-62 Inside NO N/A Gate 1RH8702A 55 75 RC 12 YES M-62 Inside NO N/A Gate 1RH8702B 55 75 RC 12 YES M-62 Inside NO N/A Gate
| |
| | |
| 6.2-201a REVISION 2 - DECEMBER 1990 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Process Sampling
| |
| | |
| 1PS9354A 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1PS9354B 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1PS9355A 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1PS9355B 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1PS9356A 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1PS9356B 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1PS9357A 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1PS9357B 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 Reactor and Contain-ment Drains to Radwaste 1RE9157 55 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RE9159A 55 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RE9159B 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RE9160A 55 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RE9160B 55 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RE1003 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RE9170 55 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RE022 (Byron) 55 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2A 1RE040 (Braidwood) 55 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2A Reactor Coolant Pressurizer 1RY8025 56 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RY8026 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1RY8033 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 6 1RY8047 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 1RY8028 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 6 1RY8046 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6
| |
| | |
| 6.2-202 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Residual Heat
| |
| | |
| Removal 1RH8701A 55 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is N/A N/A RM M 1E 9 1RH8701B 55 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is N/A N/A RM M 1E 9 1RH8702A 55 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is N/A N/A RM M 1E 9 1RH8702B 55 MO Closed Closed Closed As Is N/A N/A RM M 1E 9
| |
| | |
| 6.2-202a REVISION 2 - DECEMBER 1990 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INDSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Safety Injec tion
| |
| | |
| 1SI8801A 55 26 BW 4 YES M-61-2 Outside NO 4.8 Gate 1SI8801B 55 26 BW 4 YES M-61-2 Outside NO 8.9 Gate 1SI8815 55 26 BW 3 M-61-2 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8880 55 55 Nitrogen 1 M-61-6 Outside YES 15.5 Globe 1SI8968 55 55 Nitrogen 1 M-61-6 Inside YES N/A Check 1SI8964 55 55 BW 3/4 YES M-61-6 Outside YES 17.8 Globe 1SI8871 55 55 BW 3/4 YES M-61-6 Inside YES N/A Globe 1SI8802A 55 59 Water 4 YES M-61-3 Outside NO 3.7 Gate 1SI8905A 55 59 Water 2 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8905D 55 59 Water 2 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8802B 55 73 Water 4 YES M-61-3 Outside NO 2.7 Gate 1SI8905C 55 73 Water 2 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8905B 55 73 Water 2 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8835 55 60 Water 4 YES M-61-3 Outside NO 3.3 Gate 1SI8819A 55 60 Water 2 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8819B 55 60 Water 2 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8819C 55 60 Water 2 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8819D 55 60 Water 2 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8809A 55 50 Water 8 YES M-61-4 Outside NO 3.7 Gate 1SI8818A 55 50 Water 6 M-61-4 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8818D 55 50 Water 6 M-61-4 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8809B 55 51 Water 8 YES M-61-4 Outside NO 3.3 Gate 1SI8818B 55 51 Water 6 M-61-4 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8818C 55 51 Water 6 M-61-4 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8811A 56 92 NaOH+BW 24 YES M-61-4 Outside NO 1.8 Gate 1SI8811B 56 93 NaOH+BW 24 YES M-61-4 Outside NO 1.8 Gate 1SI8890A 55 50 Water 3/4 M-61-4 Inside NO N/A Globe 1SI8890B 55 51 Water 3/4 M-61-4 Inside NO N/A Globe 1SI8888 55 55 Water 3/4 YES M-61-3 Outside YES 14.7 Globe 1SI8881 55 59 Water 3/4 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Globe
| |
| | |
| 6.2-203 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Safety Injection
| |
| | |
| 1SI8801A 55 MO Closed Closed Open As Is N/* S(Open) A RM 1E 5 1SI8801B 55 MO Closed Closed Open As Is N/* S(Open) A RM 1E 5 1SI8815 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8880 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 6 1SI8968 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 1SI8964 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1SI8871 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1SI8802A 55 MO Closed Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1SI8905A 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8905D 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8802B 55 MO Closed Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1SI8905C 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8905B 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8835 55 MO Open Open Closed As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1SI8819A 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8819B 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8819C 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8819D 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8809A 55 MO Open Open Closed As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1SI8818A 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8818D 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8809B 55 MO Open Open Closed As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 5 1SI8818B 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8818C 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8811A 56 MO Closed Closed Open As Is N/* S(Open) A RM 1E 1SI8811B 56 MO Closed Closed Open As Is N/* S(Open) A RM 1E 1SI8890A 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed N/* N/A RM M Non 1E 1SI8890B 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed N/* N/A RM M Non 1E 1SI8888 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 10 T A RM 1E 2 1SI8881 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed N/* N/A RM M Non 1E
| |
| | |
| 6.2-204 REVISION 2 - DECEMBER 1990 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INDSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Safety I njection
| |
| | |
| 1SI8840 55 66 Water 12 YES M-61-3 Outside NO 3.8 Gate 1SI8824 55 73 Water 3/4 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Globe 1SI8823 55 60 Water 3/4 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Globe 1SI8841A 55 66 Water 8 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8841B 55 66 Water 8 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Check 1SI8825 55 66 Water 3/4 M-61-3 Inside NO N/A Globe 1SI8843 55 26 BW 3/4 M-61-2 Inside NO N/A Globe Service Air 1SA032 56 56 Air 1.50 YES M-54-2 Outside YES 4.4 Globe 1SA033 56 56 Air 1.50 YES M-54-2 Inside YES N/A Globe Spent Fuel Pool Cleaning 1FC009 56 57 Water 4 M-63 Inside YES N/A Plug 1FC010 56 57 Water 4 M-63 Outside YES 3.3 Plug 1FC011 56 32 Water 3 M-63 Outside YES 2.0 Plug 1FC012 56 32 Water 3 M-63 Inside YES N/A Plug
| |
| | |
| Steam Generator Blowdown 1SD002C 57 80 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 53.95 Globe 1SD002D 57 80 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 66.59 Globe 1SD005B 57 80 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 61.50 Globe 1SD002C 57 81 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 70.13 Globe 1SD002D 57 81 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 58.39 Globe 1SD005B 57 81 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 83.24 Globe 1SD002A 57 82 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 12.86 Globe 1SD002B 57 82 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 23.63 Globe 1SD005A 57 82 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 20.50 Globe 1SD002A 57 83 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 23.27 Globe 1SD002B 57 83 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 11.25 Globe 1SD005A 57 83 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 36.75 Globe 1SD002E 57 88 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 62.32 Globe 1SD002F 57 88 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 63.74 Globe 1SD005C 57 88 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 67.29 Globe 1SD002E 57 89 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 64.66 Globe 1SD002F 57 89 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 46.18 Globe 1SD005C 57 89 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 79.20 Globe 1SD002G 57 90 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 6.0 Globe 1SD002H 57 90 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 21.71 Globe 1SD005D 57 90 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 12.0 Globe 1SD002G 57 91 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 40.48 Globe 1SD002H 57 91 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 18.69 Globe 1SD005D 57 91 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 35.98 Globe
| |
| | |
| 6.2-205 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INDSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE
| |
| | |
| 1SD002C 57 99 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 63.1 Globe 1SD002D 57 99 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 45.1 Globe 1SD005B 57 99 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 76.2 Globe 1SD002A 57 100 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 39.4 Globe 1SD002B 57 100 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 24.3 Globe 1SD005A 57 100 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 52.8 Globe 1SD002E 57 101 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 58.3 Globe 1SD002F 57 101 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 45.6 Globe 1SD005C 57 101 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 72.9 Globe 1SD002G 57 102 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 35.8 Globe 1SD002H 57 102 Water 2 YES M-48-5A Outside NO 20.5 Globe 1SD005D 57 102 Water 3/8 YES M-68-8 Outside NO 50.7 Globe
| |
| | |
| 6.2-205a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION Safety Injection
| |
| | |
| 1SI8840 55 MO Closed Closed Open As Is N/A N/A RM M 1E 5 1SI8824 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed N/* N/A RM M Non 1E 1SI8823 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed N/* N/A RM M Non 1E 1SI8841A 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8841B 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1SI8825 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed N/* N/A RM M Non 1E 1SI8843 55 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed N/* N/A RM M Non 1E Service Air 1SA032 (Byron) 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 4.5 T A RM 1E 2 1SA033 (Byron) 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 4.5 T A RM 1E 2 1SA032 (Braidwood) 56 AO/S Closed Open Closed Closed 4.5 T A RM IE 2 1SA033 (Braidwood) 56 AO/S Closed Open Closed Closed 4.5 T A RM IE 2 Spent Fuel Pool Cleaning 1FC009 56 M Closed Open Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 4 1FC010 56 M Closed Open Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 4 1FC011 56 M Closed Open Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 4 1FC012 56 M Closed Open Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 4 Steam Generator Blowdown 1SD002C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T.SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002E 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002F 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002E 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002F 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002G 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002H 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002G 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002H 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11
| |
| | |
| 6.2-206 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION
| |
| | |
| 1SD002C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002E 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002F 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11 1SD002G 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD002H 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 7.5 T,SG A RM 1E 11 1SD005D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 3.0 T A RM 1E 11
| |
| | |
| 6.2-206a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Steam Generator
| |
| | |
| Feedwater 1FW009A 57 79 Water 16 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 13.75 Gate 1AF013A (Braidwood) 57 79 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 73.5 Globe 1AF013A (Byron) 57 79 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 74.4 Globe 2AF013A 57 100 Water 4 YES M-122 Outside NO 66.75 Globe 1AF013E (Braidwood) 57 79 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 69.2 Globe 1AF013E (Byron) 57 79 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 70.1 Globe 2AF013E 57 100 Water 4 YES M-122 Outside NO 62.5 Globe 1FW015A 57 100 Water 3/4 M-48-5A Outside NO 46.75 Globe 2FW015A 57 100 Water 3/4 M-121-1 Outside NO 46.75 Globe 1FW009B 57 84 Water 16 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 13.75 Gate 1AF013B (Braidwood) 57 84 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 64.5 Globe 1AF013B (Byron) 57 84 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 65.7 Globe 2AF013B 57 101 Water 4 YES M-122 Outside NO 57.66 Globe 1AF013F (Braidwood) 57 84 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 59.8 Globe 1AF013F (Byron) 57 84 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 60.9 Globe 2AF013F 57 101 Water 4 YES M-122 Outside NO 53.0 Globe 1FW015B 57 101 Water 3/4 M-48-5A Outside NO 46.75 Globe 2FW015B 57 101 Water 3/4 M-121-1 Outside NO 46.75 Globe 1FW009C 57 87 Water 16 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 13.75 Gate 1AF013C (Braidwood) 57 87 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 62.1 Globe 1AF013C (Byron) 57 87 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 63.9 Globe 2AF013C 57 102 Water 4 YES M-122 Outside NO 55.75 Globe 1AF013G (Braidwood) 57 87 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 58.6 Globe 1AF013G (Byron) 57 87 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 60.4 Globe 2AF013G 57 102 Water 4 YES M-122 Outside NO 52.25 Globe 1FW015C 57 102 Water 3/4 M-121-1 Outside NO 46.75 Globe 2FW015C 57 102 Water 3/4 M-48-5A Outside NO 46.75 Globe 1FW009D 57 76 Water 16 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 13.75 Gate 1AF013D (Braidwood) 57 76 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 65.3 Globe 1AF013D (Byron) 57 76 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 68.5 Globe 2AF013D 57 99 Water 4 YES M-122 Outside NO 57.75 Globe 1AF013H (Braidwood) 57 76 Water 4 YES M-37 Outside NO 61.3 Globe 2AF049A (Byron) 57 100 Water 4 NO M-122 Outside NO 22.5 Check 2AF049B (Byron) 57 101 Water 4 NO M-122 Outside NO 22.5 Check 2AF049C (Byron) 57 102 Water 4 NO M-122 Outside NO 23.7 Check 2AF049D (Byron) 57 99 Water 4 NO M-122 Outside NO 22.6 Check 1AF049A (Braidwood) 57 79 Water 4 NO M-37 Outside NO 23.8 Check 1AF049B (Braidwood) 57 84 Water 4 NO M-37 Outside NO 23.9 Check 1AF049C (Braidwood) 57 87 Water 4 NO M-37 Outside NO 24.1 Check 1AF049D (Braidwood) 57 76 Water 4 NO M-37 Outside NO 22.9 Check 1AF049A (Byron) 57 79 Water 4 NO M-37 Outside NO 22.5 Check 1AF049B (Byron) 57 84 Water 4 NO M-37 Outside NO 22.5 Check 1AF049C (Byron) 57 87 Water 4 NO M-37 Outside NO 23.7 Check 1AF049D (Byron) 57 76 Water 4 NO M-37 Outside NO 22.6 Check 2AF049A (Braidwood) 57 100 Water 4 NO M-122 Outside NO 22.4 Check 2AF049B (Braidwood) 57 101 Water 4 NO M-122 Outside NO 24.1 Check 2AF049C (Braidwood) 57 102 Water 4 NO M-122 Outside NO 23.9 Check 2AF04 9D (Braidwood) 57 99 Water 4 NO M-122 Outside NO 22.9 Check
| |
| | |
| 6.2-207 REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE 1AF013H (Byron) 57 76 Water 4 YES M -37 Outside NO 64.5 Globe
| |
| | |
| 2AF013H 57 99 Water 4 YES M-122 Outside NO 54.25 Globe 1FW015D 57 99 Water 3/4 M-48-5A Outside NO 46.75 Globe 2FW015D 57 99 Water 3/4 M-121-1 Outside NO 46.75 Globe 1FW035A (Braidwood) 57 79 Water 3 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 35.3 Globe 1FW035A (Byron) 57 79 Water 3 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 36.7 Globe 2FW035A 57 100 Water 3 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 29.0 Globe 1FW035B (Braidwood) 57 84 Water 3 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 36.2 Globe 1FW035B (Byron) 57 84 Water 3 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 36.8 Globe 2FW035B 57 101 Water 3 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 29.0 Globe 1FW035C (Braidwood) 57 87 Water 3 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 39.3 Globe 1FW035C (Byron) 57 87 Water 3 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 41.1 Globe 2FW035C 57 102 Water 3 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 32.5 Globe 1FW035D (Braidwood) 57 76 Water 3 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 38.9 Globe 1FW035D (Byron) 57 76 Water 3 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 41.6 Globe 2FW035D 57 99 Water 3 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 32.5 Globe 1FW039A (Braidwood) 57 79 Water 6 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 20.8 Gate 1FW039A (Byron) 57 79 Water 6 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 21.6 Gate 2FW039A 57 100 Water 6 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 14.5 Gate 1FW039B (Braidwood) 57 84 Water 6 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 20.8 Gate 1FW039B (Byron) 57 84 Water 6 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 21.7 Gate 2FW039B 57 101 Water 6 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 14.5 Gate 1FW039C (Braidwood) 57 87 Water 6 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 20.8 Gate 1FW039C (Byron) 57 87 Water 6 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 22.1 Gate 2FW039C 57 102 Water 6 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 14.5 Gate 1FW039D (Braidwood) 57 76 Water 6 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 20.8 Gate 1FW039D (Byron) 57 76 Water 6 YES M-36-1 Outside NO 23.0 Gate 2FW039D 57 99 Water 6 YES M-121 Outside NO 14.5 Gate 2FW043A 57 79 Water 3 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 27.25 Globe 2FW043B 57 84 Water 3 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 27.25 Globe 2FW043C 57 87 Water 3 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 27.25 Globe 2FW043D 57 76 Water 3 YES M-121-1 Outside NO 27.25 Globe
| |
| | |
| 6.2-207a REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| TYPE C VALVE LOCA- LEAK DISTANCE TO ISOLATION GDC PENETRA- LINE TION (INSIDE TEST OUTERMOST VALVE REQUIRE- TION SIZE ESSEN- REFERENCE OR OUTSIDE (YES ISOLATION VALVE NUMBER MENT MET NUMBER FLUID (in.) TIAL* DRAWING CONTAINMENT) OR NO) VALVE (ft) TYPE Waste Disposal
| |
| | |
| 1RF026 56 47 Water 2 YES M-48-6 Inside YES 5.8 Plug 1RF027 56 47 Water 2 YES M-48-6 Outside YES 4.6 Plug 1RF055 (Byron) 56 47 Water 3/4 M-48-6 Inside YES N/A Relief 1RF060 56 47 Water 3/4 M-48-6 Inside YES N/A Relief (Braidwood)
| |
| | |
| 6.2-207b REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION S team Generator
| |
| | |
| Feedwater 1FW009A 57 HO Open Closed Closed Closed 5.0 FW A RM 1E 10 1AF013A 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 2AF013A 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 1AF013E 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 2AF013E 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 1FW015A 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 14 1FW009B 57 HO Open Closed Closed Closed 5.0 FW A RM 1E 10 1AF013B 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 2AF013B 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 1AF013F 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 2AF013F 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 1FW015B 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 14 1FW009C 57 HO Open Closed Closed Closed 5.0 FW A RM 1E 10 1AF013C 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 2AF013C 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 1AF013G 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 2AF013G 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 1FW015C 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 14 1FW009D 57 HO Open Closed Closed Closed 5.0 FW A RM 1E 10 1AF013D 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 2AF013D 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 1AF013H 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 2AF013H 57 MO Open Closed Open As Is N/* N/A RM M 1E 10 1FW015D 57 M Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A M M N/A 14 1FW035A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW035A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 1FW035B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW035B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 1FW035C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW035C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 1FW035D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2AF049A (Byron) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 2AF049B (Byron) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 2AF049C (Byron) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 2AF049D (Byron) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 1AF049A (Braidwood) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 1AF049B (Braidwood) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 1AF049C (Braidwood) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 1AF049D (Braidwood) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 1AF049A (Byron) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 1AF049B (Byron) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 1AF049C (Byron) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 1AF049D (Byron) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 2AF049A (Braidwood) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 2AF049B (Braidwood) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 2AF049C (Braidwood) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 2AF049D (Braidwood) 57 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12
| |
| | |
| 6.2-208 REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| SECOND-ISOLATION PRIMARY ARY ISOLATION VALVE GDC VALVE POST- POWER CLOSURE ISOLA- MODE OF MODE OF VALVE NUMBER REQUIRE- OPER- NORMAL SHUTDOWN ACCIDENT FAILURE TIME** TION ACTUA- ACTUA- POWER CONFIGU-(Cont'd) MENT MET ATOR POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION (sec) SIGNALS TION TION SOURCE RATION 2FW035D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11
| |
| | |
| 1FW039A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW039A 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 1FW039B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW039B 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 1FW039C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW039C 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 1FW039D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW039D 57 AO/S Open Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW043A 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW043B 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW043C 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11 2FW043D 57 AO/S Closed Closed Closed Closed 6.0 FW A RM 1E 11
| |
| | |
| Waste Disposal 1RF026 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 15 T A RM 1E 2 1RF027 56 AO/S Open Open Closed Closed 15 T A RM 1E 2 1RF055 (Byron) 56 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2A 1RF060 (Braidwood) 56 N/A Closed Closed Closed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2A
| |
| | |
| 6.2-208a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| NOTE: Although the data listed are typically only given for Unit 1, the data apply to Unit 2 valves as well, except where Unit 2 data are provided separately.
| |
| * Essential systems are those systems which may be used following a containment isolation signal. Essential systems may be isolated on containment isolation signals as noted in Column Isolation Signals, but their isolation valves are supplied with 1E power to permit remote manual reopening if required.
| |
| ** The valve closure times listed in column Closure Time are estimated maximum closure times. Actual measured times may vary from those listed. N/* indicates that the valve does not receive an automatic isolation signal to close, however, the valve closure time is consistent with isolation valve requirements.
| |
| *** See Figure 6.2-29.
| |
| **** For Byron, if the normal purge subsystem is used, valves 1VQ001A, 1VQ001B, 1VQ002A, and 1VQ002B may be open and valves 1VQ004A, 1VQ004B, 1VQ005A, 1VQ005B, and 1VQ005C are closed.
| |
| For Byron, if the miniflow purge subsystem is used, valves 1VQ004A, 1VQ004B, 1VQ005A, 1VQ005B, 1VQ005C may be open and valves 1VQ001A, 1VQ001B, 1VQ002A, and 1VQ002B are closed.
| |
| For Braidwood, if the miniflow purge subsystem is used, valves 1VQ004A, 1VQ004B, 1VQ005A, 1VQ005B and 1VQ005C may be open. At Braidwood, the supply and exhaust isolation valves for the normal purge system (1VQ001A, 1VQ001B, 1VQ002A, 1VQ002B) are blocked in the closed position in all modes of plant operation.
| |
| Braidwood has gate valves.
| |
| Valve size is 3 inches.
| |
| May be opened during normal operation if service air is required for activities in the containment building.
| |
| Unit 1 only.
| |
| # Valves are motor operated, but are maintained locked closed with power removed.
| |
| KEY: AL = Air Lock RC = Reactor Coolant BW = Borated Water CCW = Component Cooling Water M = Manual S = Solenoid MO = Motor Operated HO = Hydraulic Operated AO = Air Operated AO/S = Air Operated with Solenoid Accessory "As Is" = is the Safe Position
| |
| | |
| 6.2-209 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-58 (Cont'd)
| |
| S = Actuates on Safety Injection T = Actuates on Phase A Containment Isolation P = Actuates on Phase B Containment Isolation MS = Actuates on Main Steam Isolation FW = Actuates on Main Feedwater Isolation T1 = Actuates on Containment Spray Actuation T2 = Actuates on Containment Vent Isolation A = Automatic (Air, Hydraulic, or Electrical)
| |
| Operation M = Manual Operation RM = Remote Manual Operation IA = Instrument Air MIN. = Valves will be placed as close to the containment as practical.
| |
| SG = Actuates on Low-Low Steam Generator Level
| |
| | |
| 6.2-209a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| BRAIDWWOOD TABLE 6.2-59 WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-210 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-59
| |
| | |
| THERMAL HYDROGEN RECOMBINER PARAMETERS
| |
| | |
| Power (maximum) 48 kW Capacity (minimum) 70 scfm*
| |
| | |
| Heater elements Number 15 Surface area element 1.11 ft2 Maximum heat flux 9,800 Btu/hr/ft2 Maximum sheath temperature 1,600 F Rating per element 3.2 kW
| |
| | |
| Fan Rating (minimum) 70 scfm Design pressure 10 psig Design temperature 1,400 F Air blast heat exchange fan Quantity of cooling air required at 120 F 3,000 cfm Temperature of entering process gas 1,300 F Temperature of leaving process gas 150 F
| |
| | |
| Gas TemperatInlet ure 150 F to 225 F In recombiner chamber (max) 1,325 F
| |
| | |
| MaterialsHeater element sheath Incoloy 800 Outer structure Carbon steel Recombiner chamber Austenitic stainless steel Skid structure member Carbon steel Recombiner return air heat exchanger Austenitic stainless steel
| |
| | |
| Dimensions Length 10'-5" Depth 5'-5" Height 8'-0"
| |
| | |
| Weight 8,000 pounds
| |
| * This value, which is based on 70oF and 14.7 psia, was converted to the Standard Conditions of 32oF and 14.7 psia for the original CORHYD analysis, resulting in 65 scfm.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-210a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| BRAIDWOOD TABLE 6.2-60 WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED
| |
| | |
| 6.2-211 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-60
| |
| | |
| HYDROGEN RECOMBINER SYSTEM
| |
| | |
| CODES, STANDARDS, AND REGULATIONS
| |
| : 1. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, "Plant Components," Summer Addendum of 1977
| |
| : 2. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, "Material Specification," Summer Addendum of 1977
| |
| : 3. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division One, Summer Addendum of 1977
| |
| : 4. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX, "Welding Qualifications," Summer Addendum of 1977
| |
| : 5. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components,"
| |
| Summer Addendum of 1977
| |
| : 6. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria 41, 42, 43, and 50
| |
| : 7. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B
| |
| : 8. IEEE 279-1971, "IEEE Criteria for Protection Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations."
| |
| : 9. IEEE 323-1974, "IEEE Qualifying Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations."
| |
| : 10. IEEE 344-1975, "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"
| |
| | |
| 6.2-211a REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-61
| |
| | |
| POST-LOCA PURGE SYSTEM COMPONENTS AND PARAMETERS
| |
| | |
| QUANTITY, TYPE, AND COMPONENT NOMINAL CAPACITY Prefilter 1VQ07F, 2VQ07F Type High efficiency Quantity 2
| |
| | |
| Capacity (cfm) 400
| |
| | |
| Pressure drop:di rty (inches water)clean (inches water) 0.1 1.0 Efficiency (% by ASHRAE 52 Test Std.) 80
| |
| | |
| Media Fiberglass
| |
| | |
| HEPA Filters 1VQ08F, 2VQ08F 1VQ10F, 2VQ10F Type Nuclear grade
| |
| | |
| Quantity 4
| |
| | |
| Capacity (cfm) 400 Pressure drop: clean (inches water) dirty (inches water) 0.52 2.0 Efficiency (% minimum 0.3 micron and larger) 99.97
| |
| | |
| Media Glass fiber -
| |
| waterproof and fire-retardant Charcoal Absorbers IVQ09F, 2VQ09F Type Tray (2 in.)
| |
| Quantity
| |
| | |
| Capacity (cfm) 400 (120 lb.)
| |
| | |
| Pressure drop (inches water) 0.56
| |
| | |
| 6.2-212 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-61 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| QUANTITY, TYPE, AND COMPONENT NOMINAL CAPACITY Media 2 inches of impregnated charcoal
| |
| | |
| Exhaust Fan 1VQ03C, 2VQ03C Type Centrifugal Quantity 2
| |
| | |
| Drive Direct
| |
| | |
| Capacity (cfm) 400 External static pressure (inches water) 14.7
| |
| | |
| 6.2-213 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-62 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-214 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-62 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-215 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-63 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-216 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-63 HAS BEEN DELETED INTENTIONALLY
| |
| | |
| 6.2-216a REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-64
| |
| | |
| CORE FISSION PRODUCT ENERGY
| |
| | |
| AFTER 650 FULL-POWER DAYS
| |
| | |
| Core Fission Product Energy*
| |
| | |
| TIME INTEGRATED REACTOR TRIP ENERGY RELEASE RATE ENERGY RELEASE (days) (watts/MWt x 10-3) (watt days/MWt x 10-4)
| |
| | |
| 1 3.887 0.574
| |
| | |
| 5 2.595 1.777
| |
| | |
| 10 2.211 2.967
| |
| | |
| 20 1.700 4.934
| |
| | |
| 30 1.475 6.541
| |
| | |
| 40 1.291 7.919
| |
| | |
| 50 1.163 9.143
| |
| | |
| 60 1.068 10.259
| |
| | |
| 70 0.992 11.289
| |
| | |
| 80 0.926 12.249
| |
| | |
| 90 0.867 13.139
| |
| | |
| 100 0.814 13.979
| |
| * Assumes release of 50 percent core halogens + 1 percent other fission products, includes 100 percent noble gases. Values are for total ( and ) energy.
| |
| 6.2-217 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-65
| |
| | |
| FISSION PRODUCT DECAY DEPOSITION IN SUMP SOLUTION
| |
| | |
| 50 PERCENT HALOGENS 1 PERCENT OTHER FISSION PRODUCTS TOTAL
| |
| | |
| INTEGRATED INTEGRATED INTEGRATED ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY TIME AFTER RELEASE ENERGY RELEASE RELEASE ENERGY RELEASE RELEASE REACTOR TRIP(days) RENERGY RELEASEATE (watt/MWt) MWt x 1(watt-day/0-2) RATE (watts/MWt x 10-1) MWt x 10watt-day/-2) RATE (watts/MWt x 10-1) MWt x(watt -10day/-3)
| |
| | |
| 1 145 4.27 3.78 0.536 18.28 0.481
| |
| | |
| 3 49.4 5.88 2.90 1.18 7.85 0.707
| |
| | |
| 5 31.0 6.65 2.59 1.73 5.69 0.838
| |
| | |
| 10 18.2 7.82 2.22 2.92 4.03 1.07
| |
| | |
| 20 7.63 9.03 1.77 4.89 2.53 1.39
| |
| | |
| 30 3.22 9.54 1.49 6.51 1.81 1.61
| |
| | |
| 40 1.36 9.76 1.30 7.90 1.44 1.77
| |
| | |
| 60 0.241 9.89 1.08 10.3 1.10 2.02
| |
| | |
| 80 0.043 9.91 0.935 12.3 0.940 2.22
| |
| | |
| 100 0.008 9.92 0.822 14.0 0.823 2.39
| |
| | |
| 6.2-218 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-66
| |
| | |
| LINER AND CONCRETE DESIGN TEMPERATURES
| |
| | |
| I. INSIDE FACE OF CONTAINMENT
| |
| | |
| A. Normal operating
| |
| | |
| Liner and Concrete 120F
| |
| | |
| B. Accident Condition
| |
| | |
| Inside Face of Liner 280F (Short-Term)
| |
| Inside Face of Concrete 208F II. OUTSIDE FACE OF CONTAINMENT
| |
| | |
| A. Normal Operating
| |
| : 1. Below Grade
| |
| : a. Winter 50F
| |
| : b. Summer 80F
| |
| : 2. Above Grade
| |
| : a. Winter 0F
| |
| : b. Summer 100F
| |
| : 3. Wall Area Neighboring
| |
| | |
| Auxiliary Building 70F (Operating Temp. of Auxiliary Building)
| |
| | |
| B. Accident Condition
| |
| | |
| The temperature at below and above grade are the same as those for Normal Operating.
| |
| | |
| 6.2-219 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-67
| |
| | |
| SUBCOMPARTMENT VOLUME DESCRIPTION
| |
| | |
| COMPART-MENT COMPARTMENT COMPARTMENT VENTED AREA NUMBER DESCRIPTION VENTED TO (ft2)
| |
| | |
| 1 Loop Compartment 2,6,7,7,16 572;578;197;232; 21
| |
| | |
| 2 Loop Compartment 3,7 572;186
| |
| | |
| 3 Loop Compartment 4,7,7 220;219;232
| |
| | |
| 4 Loop Compartment 5,7,7,28 572;179;232; 19.4
| |
| | |
| 5 Loop Compartment 6,7 572;190.5
| |
| | |
| 6 Loop Compartment 7,7 199;23.2
| |
| | |
| 7 Dome 8,11,12,13, 80;332.8;504; 14,15,25,26 176;48;96.4; 198;198
| |
| | |
| 8 Upper Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 9,15,16 119;133;297
| |
| | |
| 9 Upper Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 10,17,25 119;114.8;229.5
| |
| | |
| 10 Upper Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 11,18 187;45
| |
| | |
| 11 Upper Outside Crane Wall (A quadrant) 12,19 36;473
| |
| | |
| 12 Upper Outside Crane Wall (A quadrant) 13,20 182;632.4
| |
| | |
| 13 Upper Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 14,21 119;204
| |
| | |
| 14 Upper Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 15,22,26 119;78.8;420.9
| |
| | |
| 15 Upper Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 23 139.8
| |
| | |
| 16 Lower Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 17 140
| |
| | |
| 6.2-220 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.2-67 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPART-MENT COMPARTMENT COMPARTMENT VENTED AREA NUMBER DESCRIPTION VENTED TO (ft2)
| |
| | |
| 17 Lower Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 18 266.5
| |
| | |
| 18 Lower Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 19 140
| |
| | |
| 19 Lower Outside Crane Wall (A quadrant) 20 133
| |
| | |
| 20 Lower Outside Crane Wall (A quadrant) 21 140
| |
| | |
| 21 Lower Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 22 70
| |
| | |
| 22 Lower Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 23 140
| |
| | |
| 23 Lower Outside Crane Wall (subdivision of quadrant) 16 140
| |
| | |
| 24 Seal Table 18 17.5
| |
| | |
| 25 Steamline Pipe Chase 17 945
| |
| | |
| 26 Steamline Pipe Chase 22 841.3
| |
| | |
| 27 Regenerate Heat Exchanger Compartment 7 82.87
| |
| | |
| 28 Upper Pressurizer Cubicle 7 58.2
| |
| | |
| 6.2-221 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.3 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM 6.3.1 Design Bases
| |
| | |
| The emergency core cooling system (ECCS) is designed to cool the reactor core and provide shutdown capability following initiation of the following accident conditions:
| |
| : a. pipe breaks in the reactor coolant system (RCS) which cause a discharge larger than that which can be made up by the normal makeup system, up to and including the instantaneous circumferential break of the largest pipe in the reactor coolant system;
| |
| : b. rupture of a control rod drive mechanism causing a rod cluster control assembly ejection accident;
| |
| : c. pipe breaks in the steam system, up to and including the instantaneous circumferential break of the largest pipe in the steam system; and
| |
| : d. a steam generator tube rupture.
| |
| | |
| The primary function of the ECCS is to remove the stored and fission product decay heat from the reactor core during accident conditions.
| |
| | |
| The ECCS provides shutdown capability for the accidents previously mentioned by means of boron injection. It is designed to tolerate a single active failure (short-term) or a single active or passive failure (long-term). It can meet its minimum required performance level with onsite or offsite electrical power.
| |
| | |
| The ECCS consists of the centrifugal charging, safety injection and residual heat removal pumps, accumulators, RHR heat exchangers and the refueling water storage tank, along with the associated piping, valves, instrumentation and other related equipment.
| |
| The design bases for selecting the functional requirements of the ECCS are derived from following any of the above accidents.
| |
| The subsystem functional parameters are selected so that the requirements are met over the range of anticipated accidents and single failure assumptions.
| |
| | |
| Reliability of the ECCS has been considered in selection of the functional requirements, selections of the particular components and location of components and connected piping. Redundant components are provided where the loss of one component would impair reliability. Valves are provided in series where isolation is desired and in parallel when flow paths are to be
| |
| | |
| 6.3-1 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| established for ECCS performance. Redundant sources of the ECCS actuation signal are available so that the proper and timely operation of the ECCS will not be inhibited. Sufficient instrumentation is available so that a failure of an instrument will not impair readiness of the system. Inside the containment building, Class 1E electrical equipment required to perform a Class 1E function during normal operation and/or after an accident were originally located to safeguard against submergence as a result of a LOCA. Subsequent evaluations of the limiting single failure following a postulated LOCA resulted in increased flood levels (see Attachment D3.6). All Class 1E electrical equipment subject to submergence due to the revised flood levels was evaluated and determined to not be required for LOCA detection, mitigation, or recovery following submergence.
| |
| The active components of the ECCS are powered from separate buses which are energized from offsite power supplies.
| |
| In addition, redundant sources of auxiliary onsite power are available through the use of the emergency diesel-generators to ensure adequate power for all ECCS requirements. Each diesel is capable of driving all pumps, valves, and necessary instruments associated with one train of the ECCS.
| |
| | |
| Spurious movement of a motor-operated valve due to the actuation of its positioning device coincident with a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) has been analyzed and found not to be credible for consideration in design. Consistent with the philosophy of designing against credible single failure, Westinghouse has investigated the mispositioning of an ECCS motor-operated valve coincident with the design-basis events. This analysis is presented in Reference 1. The following valves are blocked from inadvertent operation as described in Subsection 8.1.10:
| |
| SI8802A and B, SI8806, SI8808A, B, C, and D, SI8809A and B, SI8813, SI8835, and SI8840.
| |
| | |
| A more detailed discussion regarding the spurious actuation or mispositioning of motor-operated valves in the ECCS is contained in Appendix 6.3A.
| |
| | |
| The elevated temperature of the sump solution during recirculation is well within the design temperature of all ECCS components. Consideration has been given to the potential for corrosion of various types of metals exposed to the fluid conditions prevalent immediately after the accident or during long-term recirculation operations. Elevated sump temperatures also may result in pressure locking of the containment recirculation sump isolation valves, 1/2SI8811A,B. See "Motor-Operated Valves" in this subsection for further discussion.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-2 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The following instruments provide information for the control and monitoring of the ECCS system and could become flooded during a postulated design-basis LOCA flooding event:
| |
| : a. Pressurizer pressure transmitters PT-0455, 0456, 0457, and 0458 could become submerged, but will have performed their intended safety function prior to submergence.
| |
| : b. Pressurizer level transmitters LT-0459, 0460, and 0461 could become submerged, but are not necessary for control of ECCS flow since three additional diverse and qualified instrument sources (identified in the emergency operating procedures) provide the operators with adequate information to assess ECCS performance.
| |
| : c. Steam generator narrow range level transmitters LT-0527 and 0537 could become submerged, but three other qualified channels per steam generator are available for verification of auxiliary feedwater flow following a postulated LOCA.
| |
| : d. The containment floor level instrumentation (LT-PC006 and LT-PC007) is available to diagnose and monitor a loss-of-coolant accident. Refer to UFSAR section 6.3.5.4 for additional details.
| |
| | |
| The instruments identified above are not relied upon to mitigate the postulated design basis LOCA or mitigate the consequences of the flooding event. Isolation valves RH8701A and RH8702A will be submerged; however, the valve motor-operator is located above the maximum predicted water level. The following air-operated valves will be submerged and inoperable but are not used for safe shutdown:
| |
| RC8037A/B/C/D - Loop drain header valves; fail closed.
| |
| | |
| RE9159A - Isolation valve to gas analyzer from reactor coolant drain tank; fail closed.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-2a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| RE9160A - Isolation valve to waste gas compressor from (Byron only) - reactor coolant drain tank; fail closed.
| |
| | |
| RY469 - Isolation valve to waste gas compressor from (Byron only) - pressurizer relief tank; fail closed.
| |
| Environmental testing of ECCS equipment inside the containment, which is required to operate following a LOCA, is discussed in Section 3.11.
| |
| 6.3.2 System Design The emergency core cooling system (ECCS) components are designed such that a minimum of three accumulators, one charging pump, one safety injection pump, and one residual heat removal pump together with their associated valves and piping will ensure adequate core cooling in the event of a design-basis LOCA. The redundant onsite emergency diesels ensure adequate emergency power to all electrically-operated components in the event that a loss of offsite power occurs simultaneously with a LOCA, even assuming a single failure in the emergency power system such as the failure of one diesel to start.
| |
| 6.3.2.1 Schematic Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams
| |
| | |
| Flow diagrams of the ECCS are shown in Drawings M-61 and M-62.
| |
| Pertinent design and operating parameters for the components of the ECCS are given in Table 6.3-1. The codes and standards to which the individual components of the ECCS are designed are listed in Table 3.2-1.
| |
| | |
| The component interlocks used in different modes of system operation are listed as follows:
| |
| : a. The safety injection signal is interlocked with the following components and initiates the indicated action in the ECCS:
| |
| : 1. Centrifugal charging pumps start on "S" signal.
| |
| : 2. RWST suction valves to the charging pumps open on "S" signal.
| |
| : 3. Safety injection containment isolation valves open on "S" signal.
| |
| : 4. Normal charging path valves close on "S" signal.
| |
| : 5. Charging pump miniflow isolation valves CV8110 and CV8111 close on "S" signal, concurrent with LO-2 RWST level as described in Subsection 7.6.11.
| |
| : 6. Charging pump miniflow isolation valves CV8114 and CV8116 close on low RCS pressure in conjunction with an "S" signal. These valves
| |
| | |
| 6.3-3 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| open to protect the pump should the RCS pressure increase above the open setpoint with an "S" signal present.
| |
| : 7. Safety injection pumps start on "S" signal.
| |
| : 8. The RHR pumps start on "S" signal.
| |
| : 9. VCT outlet isolation valves close on "S" signal.
| |
| : b. Switchover from injection mode to recirculation involves the following interlocks:
| |
| : 1. The suction valves (SI8811A/B) from the containment recirculation sumps open automatically when two of four RWST level instrument channels indicate a LO-2 level in the RWST in conjunction with "S" signal.
| |
| : 2. The safety injection pump and charging pump recirculation suction isolation valves can be opened provided that the safety injection pump miniflow lines have been isolated.
| |
| 6.3.2.2 Equipment and Component Descriptions
| |
| | |
| The component design and operating conditions are specified as the most severe conditions to which each respective component is exposed during either normal plant operation, or during operation of the ECCS. For each component, these conditions are considered in relation to the code to which it is designed. By designing the components in accordance with applicable codes, and with due consideration for the design and operating conditions, the fundamental assurance of structural integrity of the ECCS components is maintained. Components of the ECCS are designed to withstand the appropriate seismic loadings in accordance with their safety class as given in Table 3.2-1.
| |
| The major mechanical components of the ECCS are as follows:
| |
| | |
| Accumulators The accumulators are pressure vessels partially filled with borated water and pressurized with nitrogen gas. During normal operation each accumulator is isolated from the reactor coolant system (RCS) by two check valves in series. Should the RCS pressure fall below the accumulator pressure, the check valves open and borated water is forced into the RCS. One accumulator is attached to each of the cold legs of the RCS. Mechanical operation of the swing-disc check valves is the only action required to open the injection path from the accumulators to the core via the cold leg.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-4 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Connections are provided for remotely adjusting the level and boron concentration of the borated water in each accumulator during normal plant operation as required. Accumulator water level may be adjusted either by draining to the recycle holdup tank or by pumping borated water from the refueling water storage tank to the accumulator. Samples of
| |
| | |
| 6.3-4a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| the solution in the accumulators are taken periodically for checks of boron concentration.
| |
| | |
| Accumulator pressure is provided by a supply of nitrogen gas, and can be adjusted as required during normal plant operation; however, the accumulators are normally isolated from this nitrogen supply. Gas relief valves on the accumulators protect them from pressures in excess of design pressure.
| |
| The accumulators are located within the containment but outside of the secondary shield wall which protects them from missiles.
| |
| | |
| Accumulator gas pressure is monitored by indicators and alarms.
| |
| The operator can take action as required to maintain plant operation within the requirements of the technical specification covering accumulator operability.
| |
| Pumps
| |
| | |
| ECCS pump specifications include a specified maximum required NPSH which the pump is required to meet. Pump vendors have verified that the required NPSH for the Byron/Braidwood pumps was less than the maximum required NPSH through testing in accordance with the criteria established by the Hydraulic Institute Standards.
| |
| Pump characteristic curves are shown in Figures 6.3-3, 6.3-4, and 6.3-5.
| |
| Refer to Subsection 3.9.3.2 and Subsection 6.3.2.5 for discussions of operability and reliability of pumps used for long-term core cooling, respectively.
| |
| Residual Heat Removal Pumps
| |
| | |
| The RHR system is normally used during the latter stages of normal reactor cooldown and when the reactor is held at cold shutdown for core decay heat removal. However, during all other plant operating periods, it is aligned to perform the low head injection function of the ECCS (see Subsection 5.4.7).
| |
| In the event of a loss -of-coolant accident the residual heat removal pumps are automatically started on receipt of an "S" signal. The residual heat removal pumps deliver water to the RCS from the refueling water storage tank during the injection phase and from the containment sump during the recirculation phase. Each residual heat removal pump is a single stage vertical centrifugal pump.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-5 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| A minimum flow bypass line is provided for the pumps to recirculate and return the pump discharge fluid to the pump suction should these pumps be started with their normal flow paths blocked. Once flow is established to the RCS, the bypass line is automatically closed. This line prevents deadheading of the pumps and permits pump testing during normal operation.
| |
| | |
| The motor-operated valve in each mini-flow is interlocked to provide automatic operation. The three position control at the main control board prevents inadvertent operator isolation of the miniflow bypass line. The control switch Open-Auto-Close position control has a spring return to Auto from the Close position to prevent pump deadheading. A control switch maintained open feature is provided for the operator to block miniflow path closure during RHR pump manual starts for testing or for shutdown cooling modes. Gradual warmup of the RHR pump to RCS hot leg temperature requires that the pump recirculation path remain open for a time period longer than the flow interlock would allow. The normal position for the control switch is Auto.
| |
| | |
| The residual heat removal pumps are discussed further in Subsection 5.4.7. A pump performance curve is given in Figure 6.3-3.
| |
| | |
| Centrifugal Charging Pumps In the event of an accident, the charging pumps are started automatically on receipt of an "S" signal and are automatically aligned to take suction from the refueling water storage tank during injection. This signal also closes the valves to isolate the normal charging line and volume control tank and opens the charging pump/refueling water storage tank suction valves to align the high head portion of the ECCS for injection. During recirculation, suction is provided from the residual heat removal pump discharge.
| |
| | |
| These pumps deliver flow to the RCS at the prevailing RCS pressure. Each centrifugal charging pump is a multistage diffuser design, barrel-type casing with vertical suction and discharge nozzles.
| |
| A minimum flow bypass line is provided on each pump discharge to recirculate flow to the pump suction after cooling via the seal water heat exchanger during normal plant operation. Recirculation flow may be temporarily redirected to the top of the VCT as necessary to assist in system fill and vent or as deemed appropriate to support plant operations. The charging pumps may be tested during power operation via the minimum flow bypass line. Solenoid actuated miniflow control valves are provided with actuation logic to isolate the miniflow lines on an "S" signal in conjunction with low-low RCS pressure. These valves open to protect the pumps should the RCS pressure increase above their "open" setpoint with an "S" signal present.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-6 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| In addition to the solenoid actuated charging pump miniflow control valves, two motor-operated charging pump miniflow valves are also provided to isolate the miniflow lines at the time of switchover from safety injection to cold leg recirculation.
| |
| This isolation is automatic when the refueling water storage tank (RWST) water level drops to the LO-2 setpoint in conjunction with an "S" signal.
| |
| A pump performance curve for the centrifugal charging pumps is presented in Figure 6.3-4.
| |
| | |
| Safety Injection Pumps In the event of an accident, the safety injection pumps are started automatically on receipt of an "S" signal.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-6a REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| These pumps deliver water to the RCS from the refueling water storage tank during the injection phase and from the containment sump via the residual heat removal pumps during the recirculation phase.
| |
| A minimum flow bypass line is provided on each pump discharge to recirculate flow to the refueling water storage tank in the event that the pumps are started with the normal flow paths blocked.
| |
| This line also permits pump testing during normal plant operation. Two parallel valves in series with a third, downstream of a common header, are provided in the minimum flow bypass line. These valves are manually closed from the control room as part of the ECCS realignment from the injection to the recirculation mode. A pump performance curve is shown in Figure 6.3-5.
| |
| | |
| Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH) - Low Temperature As part of the chemical effects evaluations related to head loss through the containment recirculation sump strainers (in support of Generic Letter 2004-02), the NPSH analysis for the RHR pumps has been performed at low temperatures.
| |
| | |
| In accordance with the requirements specified in Regulatory Guide 1.1, the NPSH analysis at low temperatures assumes the containment atmospheric pressure is equal to the minimum containment atmospheric pressure that would be present inside containment before the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) event.
| |
| This analysis does not credit calculated increases in containment pressure as a result of the LOCA.
| |
| | |
| Adequate net positive suction head is available to the RHR pumps.
| |
| Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH) - High Temperature
| |
| | |
| Available and required net positive suction head for ECCS pumps are shown in Table 6.3-1. The safety intent of Regulatory Guide 1.1 is met by the design of the ECCS in that adequate net positive suction head is provided to system pumps. In addition to considering the static head and suction line head, the NPSH calculations for the ECCS pumps recirculation mode assume that the vapor pressure of the liquid in the sump is equal to the containment ambient pressure. This ensures that the actual available net positive suction head is always greater than the calculated net positive suction head.
| |
| The ECCS is designed, analyzed, and tested to ensure adequate NPSH is available to system pumps. For the RHR pump NPSH calculation, when taking suction from the containment sump, the vapor pressure of the pumped liquid is assumed to be in equilibrium with containment ambient pressure (i.e., no credit is
| |
| | |
| 6.3-7 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| taken for subcooling of the sump fluid). The equation for this case is:
| |
| NPSH = h - h available static head line losses
| |
| | |
| For other system pumps, or for RHR pump NPSH when operating in other modes, this equation becomes:
| |
| NPSH = h + h available ambient pressurestatic head
| |
| - h - h line losses vapor pressure
| |
| | |
| Adequate net positive suction head is shown to be available for all pumps as follows:
| |
| : 1. Residual Heat Removal Pumps The net positive suction head of the residual heat removal pumps is evaluated for normal plant cooldown operation, and for both the injection and recirculation operation for the
| |
| | |
| 6.3-7a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| design-basis accident. Recirculation modes of operation gives the limiting net positive suction head requirement, and the net positive suction head available is determined from the containment water level relative to the pump elevation and the pressure drop in the suction piping from the sump to the pumps. The calculation takes credit for water level at the 377-foot elevation in the containment.
| |
| The net positive suction head evaluation is based on one residual heat removal pump delivering to two RCS loops and both safety injection and both charging pump suctions. This identifies the limiting single failure as the second RHR pump. The corresponding NPSH requirement is based on the runout flow resulting from this most limiting single failure.
| |
| The suction nozzle of each RHR pump is located sufficiently below the bottom of the containment sump such that the static elevation head is always greater than the head losses plus the pumps required NPSH. The head losses include all losses due to piping, elbows, tees, valves, containment recirculation sump filters, and entrance and exit losses, when assuming that the pumps in each subsystem are operating at the maximum postaccident operating conditions. See subsection 6.5.2.2 for more details.
| |
| During a LOCA, the outleakage from the Reactor Coolant System flows into the containment recirculation sumps. The sumps are filled prior to reaching the RWST LO-2 level. Filling the recirculation sumps ensures the NPSH requirements for the RHR pumps are satisfied prior to reaching the RWST LO-2 level, at which time the RHR pumps are aligned to the recirculation sumps.
| |
| During the LOCA, debris may accumulate on the screens which protect suction pipe in the sumps, resulting in flow restrictions. Calculations (Reference 5a and Reference 5b) have verified that the containment floor water level is sufficiently high above 377 elevation, upon reaching the RWST LO-2 level, to permit adequate inflow to the sumps in support of RHR pumps flow requirements. Therefore, the recirculation sumps fill with water and remain filled so that the RHR pumps NPSH requirements are satisfied prior to and during the recirculation mode of operation after a LOCA.
| |
| : 2. Safety Injection and Centrifugal Charging Pumps The net positive suction head for the safety injection pumps and the centrifugal charging pumps is evaluated for both the injection and recirculation modes of operation for the design-basis accident. The end of the injection mode of operation gives the limiting net positive suction head available (minimum static head). The net positive suction head available is determined from the elevation head and vapor pressure of the water in the refueling water storage tank, the tank air space pressure, and the pressure drop in the suction piping from the tank to the pumps.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-8 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The NPSH evaluation for the centrifugal charging pumps and the safety injection pumps from the refueling water storage tank is based on all safeguard pumps operating at maximum flow. This assumption maximizes the friction losses in the suction piping between the tank and the pumps. For additional conservatism, the corresponding NPSH requirements for all pumps taking suction from the refueling water storage tank are based on maximum flows.
| |
| Preoperational full flow tests are also performed on the systems to verify calculated maximum runout conditions. This serves as a final assurance of acceptable system performance.
| |
| When the refueling water storage tank LO-2 level is reached, the safety injection and charging pumps are
| |
| | |
| 6.3-8a REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| manually aligned to take suction from the residual heat removal pump discharge headers. The net positive suction head requirements of these pumps are therefore satisfied by the discharge head of the residual heat removal pumps during the recirculation mode of system operation. See Subsection 6.5.2.2 for additional information.
| |
| | |
| Residual Heat Exchangers The residual heat exchangers are conventional shell and U-tube type units. During normal cooldown operation, the residual heat removal pumps recirculate reactor coolant through the tube side while component cooling water flows through the shell side.
| |
| During emergency core cooling recirculation operation, water from the containment sump flows through the tube side. The tubes are seal welded to the tube sheet.
| |
| A further discussion of the residual heat exchangers is found in Subsection 5.4.7.
| |
| Valves
| |
| | |
| Design parameters for all types of valves and equipment used in the ECCS are given in Tables 6.3-1, 6.3-2, 6.3-3, 6.3-4 and 6.3-14.
| |
| Design features employed to minimize valve leakage include:
| |
| : a. Where possible, bellows-sealed valves are used.
| |
| : b. Other valves which are normally open, except check valves and those which perform a control function, are provided with backseats to limit stem leakage when fully backseated.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-9 REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. Normally closed globe valves are typically installed with fluid pressure under the seat to minimize steam leakage of radioactive water if packing leaks.
| |
| : d. Relief valves are enclosed, i.e., they are provided with a closed bonnet.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-9a REVISION 4 - DECEMBER 1992 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Motor-Operated Valves The seating design of all motor-operated valves is of the crane flexible wedge design. This design releases the mechanical holding force during the first increment of travel so that the motor operator works only against the frictional component of the hydraulic unbalance on the disc and the packing box friction. The disc is guided throughout the full disc travel to prevent chattering and to provide ease of gate movement. The seating surfaces are hard-faced to prevent galling and to reduce wear.
| |
| | |
| Where a gasket is employed for the body to bonnet joint, it is either a fully trapped, controlled compression, spiral wound gasket with provisions for seal welding, or it is of the pressure seal design with provisions for seal welding. The valve stuffing boxes are designed with a lantern ring leakoff connection with a minimum of a full set of packing below the lantern ring and a minimum of one-half of a set of packing above the lantern ring. A full set of packing is defined as a depth of packing equal to 1-1/2 times the stem diameter. At Braidwood, the leakoff lines are capped for valves 1(2)SI8808A, 1(2)SI8808B, 1(2)SI8808C, and 1(2)SI8808D. This eliminates the potential impact of the leakoff flow on the leakrate calculations for the reactor coolant system.
| |
| The motor operator incorporates a "hammer blow" feature that allows the motor to impact the discs away from the backseat upon opening or closing. This "hammer blow" feature not only impacts the disc but allows the motor to attain its operational speed prior to impact. Valves which must function against system pressure are designed such that they function with a pressure drop equal to full system pressure across the valve disc.
| |
| In response to NRC Generic Letter 95-07, "Pressure Locking and Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves,"
| |
| the following valves were determined to be susceptible to pressure locking: 1(2)SI8802A/B, 1(2)SI8811A/B, 1(2)CV8804A, and 1(2)RH8716A. To address this concern, the following modifications were implemented to ensure the valves continued reliability:
| |
| 1(2)SI8802A/B valve operators were modified to ensure the valves can open under maximum expected pressure locking conditions, 1(2)SI8811A/B valves were equipped with a thermal relief line and relief valves, 1(2)SI8812A/B valves were equipped with an external bypass line, 1(2)CV8804A were equipped with a hole in one side of the disk, and 1(2)RH8716A were equipped with a hole in one side of the disk
| |
| | |
| 6.3-10 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| In addition, the following administrative procedural control was implemented to protect ECCS components from the effects of pressure locking of safety-related power-operated gate valves (Reference 10):
| |
| A precaution was added to not operate the residual heat removal pumps on recirculation flow for longer than 2.4 hours unless component cooling water is aligned to the residual heat exchangers to prevent pressure locking of component cooling water valves from the residual heat exchangers, 1(2)CC9412.
| |
| | |
| Manual Globes, Gates, and Check Valves Gate valves employ a wedge design and are straight through. The wedge is either split or solid. All gate valves have backseat and outside screw and yoke.
| |
| Globe valves, "T" and "Y" style, are either full or reduced port with outside screw and yoke construction. Packless valve designs include both diaphragm and bellows-sealed features.
| |
| Check valves are spring-loaded lift piston types for sizes 2 inches and smaller, swing type for size 2-1/2 inches to 4 inches and tilting disc type for size 4 inches and larger. Stainless steel check valves have no penetration welds other than the inlet, outlet and bonnet. The check hinge is serviced through the bonnet. Where applicable, the stem packing and gasket of the stainless steel manual globe and gate valves are similar to those described previously for motor-operated valves. The valve stuffing boxes are designed either with or without a lantern ring leakoff connection. Carbon steel manual valves are employed to pass nonradioactive fluids only and, therefore, may not contain the double packing and seal weld provisions.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-10a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| For a list of the manually operated valves in the ECCS, see Subsection 6.3.2.5.
| |
| | |
| Accumulator Check Valves (Swing-disc)
| |
| The accumulator check valve is designed with a low -pressure drop configuration with all operating parts contained within the body.
| |
| | |
| Design considerations and analyses which ensure that leakage across the check valves located in each accumulator injection line will not impair accumulator availability are as follows:
| |
| : a. During normal operation the check valves are in the closed position with a nominal differential pressure across the disc of approximately 1650 psi. Since the valves remain in this position except for testing or when called upon to open following an accident and are therefore not subject to the abuse of flowing operation or impact loads caused by sudden flow reversal and seating, they do not experience significant wear of the moving parts and are expected to function with minimal backleakage. This backleakage can be checked via the test connection as described in Subsection 6.3.4.
| |
| : b. When the RCS is being pressurized during the normal plant heatup operation in accordance with the Technical Specifications, the check valves are tested for leakage as soon as there is a stable differential pressure of about 100 psi or more across the valve.
| |
| This test confirms the seating of the disc and whether or not there has been an increase in the leakage since the last test. When this test is completed, the accumulator discharge line motor-operated isolation valves are opened and the RCS pressure increase is continued. There should be no increase in leakage from this point on since increasing reactor coolant pressure increases the seating force and decreases the probability of leakage.
| |
| : c. The experience derived from the check valves employed in the emergency injection systems indicate that the system is reliable and workable; check valve leakage has not been a problem. This is substantiated by the satisfactory experience obtained from operation of the Robert Emmett Ginna Nuclear Power Plant and subsequent plants where the usage of check valves is identifiable to this application.
| |
| : d. The accumulators can accept some inleakage from the RCS without affecting availability. Continuous
| |
| | |
| 6.3-11 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| inleakage would require, however, that the accumulator water volume be adjusted accordingly with technical specification requirements.
| |
| | |
| Relief Valves
| |
| | |
| Relief valves are installed in various sections of the ECCS to protect lines which have a lower design pressure than the RCS.
| |
| The valve stem and spring adjustment assembly are isolated from the system fluids by a bellows seal between the valve disc and spindle. For Braidwood, the Safety Injection pump discharge header relief valves do not have bellows. Their cold differential test pressure (CDTP) is adjusted to account for the effects of back pressure on the discharge piping of the relief valves. The closed bonnet provides an additional barrier for enclosure of the relief valves. Relief valves also are installed off of the containment recirculation sump isolation valve bonnets. These are thermal relief valves designed to protect the motor-operated isolation valves from pressure locking. See "Motor-Operated Valves" in this subsection for further discussion.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.3-2 lists the ECCS relief valves with their capacities and setpoints.
| |
| Butterfly Valves
| |
| | |
| Each main residual heat removal line has an air-operated butterfly valve which is normally open and is designed to fail in the open position. The actuator is arranged such that air pressure on the discharge overcomes the spring force causing the linkage to move the butterfly to the closed position. Upon loss of air pressure, the spring returns the butterfly to the open position. These valves are left in the full open position during normal operation to maximize flow from this system to the RCS during the injection mode of the ECCS operation. These valves are used during normal residual heat removal system (RHRS) operation to control cooldown flow rate.
| |
| | |
| Each residual heat removal heat exchanger bypass line has an air-operated butterfly valve which is normally closed and is designed to fail closed. These valves are used during normal cooldown to avoid thermal shock to the residual heat exchanger and to regulate the cooldown rate.
| |
| Accumulator Motor-Operated Valve Controls
| |
| | |
| As part of the plant shutdown administrative procedures, the operator is required to close these valves. This prevents a loss of accumulator water inventory to the RCS and is done shortly after the RCS has been depressurized below the safety injection unblock setpoint. The redundant pressure and level alarms on each accumulator would remind the operator to close these valves, if any were inadvertently left open.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-12 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Power is disconnected to the valve operators after the valves are closed.
| |
| | |
| During plant startup, the operator is instructed via procedures to energize and open these valves when the RCS pressure reaches the safety injection setpoint. Monitor lights in conjunction with an audible repeating alarm will alert the operator should any of these valves inadvertently be left closed once the RCS pressure increases beyond the safety injection unblock setpoint. Power is disconnected to the valve operators after the valves are opened.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-12a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The accumulator isolation valves are not required to move during power operation or in a postaccident situation. For a discussion of limiting conditions for operation and surveillance requirements of these valves, refer to Technical Specification 3.5.1.
| |
| For further discussions of the instrumentation associated with these valves refer to Subsections 6.3.5, and 7.6.6.
| |
| Motor -Operated Valves and Controls
| |
| | |
| Remotely operated valves for the injection mode which are under manual control (i.e., valves which normally are in their ready position and do not require a safety injection signal) have their positions indicated on a common portion of the control board. If a component is out of its proper position, its monitor light will indicate this on the control panel. At any time during operation when one of these valves is not in the ready position for injection, this condition is shown visually on the control board.
| |
| The ECCS delivery lag times are given in Chapter 15.0. The accumulator injection time varies as the size of the assumed break varies since the RCS pressure drop will vary proportionately to the break size.
| |
| Inadvertent mispositioning of a motor-operated valve due to a malfunction in the control circuitry in conjunction with an accident has been analyzed and found not to be a credible event.
| |
| Table 6.3-3 is a listing of motor-operated isolation valves in the ECCS showing interlocks, automatic features and position indications.
| |
| Periodic visual inspection and operability testing of the motor operated valves in the ECCS ensures that there is no potential for impairment of valve operability due to boric acid crystallization which could result from valve stem leakage.
| |
| | |
| Air-Operated Valves and Controls Table 6.3 -14 lists the ECCS air-operated valves. Valves designated as "Fail Closed" or "Fail Open" will fail to the safe position upon the loss of either electrical power or air supply to the valve operator.
| |
| All valves are provided with the red/green position indication on the main control board (MCB), except HCV 606/607, FCV 618/619, and HCV-943 which have continuous position indication expressed as a percentage of valve opening.
| |
| Some valves are provided with monitor lights on the MCB. (See Subsection 7.5.1 for a discussion of monitor lights.)
| |
| | |
| 6.3-13 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Automatic positioning signal is provided on some valves that are normally open or on valves that could require periodic opening during normal plant operation.
| |
| | |
| The provisions discussed and listed in Table 6.3-14 plus administrative controls ensure proper positioning of air-operated valves during LOCA and RHR cooling.
| |
| 6.3.2.3 Applicable Codes and Classifications
| |
| | |
| Applicable industry codes and classifications for the ECCS are discussed in Subsection 3.9.3.
| |
| 6.3.2.4 Materials Specifications and Compatibility
| |
| | |
| Materials employed for components of the ECCS are given in Table 6.3-4. Materials are selected to meet the applicable material requirements of the codes in Table 3.2-1 and the following additional requirements:
| |
| : a. All parts of components in contact with borated water are fabricated of, or clad with, austenitic stainless steel or equivalent corrosion resistant material.
| |
| : b. All parts of components in contact (internal) with sump solution during recirculation are fabricated of austenitic stainless steel or equivalent corrosion resistant material.
| |
| : c. Valve seating surfaces are hard-faced with Stellite Number 6 or an equivalent to prevent galling and to reduce wear.
| |
| : d. Valve stem materials are selected for their corrosion resistance, high tensile properties, and resistance to surface scoring by the packing.
| |
| 6.3.2.5 System Reliability
| |
| | |
| Reliability of the ECCS is considered in all aspects of the system from initial design to periodic testing of the components during plant operation. The ECCS is a two-train, fully redundant, engineered safety feature. The system has been designed and proven by analysis to withstand any single credible active failure during injection, or active or passive failure during recirculation and maintain the performance objectives desired in Subsection 6.3.1. This capability is demonstrated by the failure mode and effects analysis presented in Table 6.3-10. Two trains of pumps, heat exchangers, and flow paths are provided for redundancy as only one train is required to satisfy the system performance requirements. The initiating signals for the ECCS are derived from independent
| |
| | |
| 6.3-14 REVISION 3 - DECEMBER 1991 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| sources as measured from process (e.g., low pressurizer pressure) or environmental variables (e.g., containment pressure). Redundant, as well as functionally independent variables, are measured to initiate the safeguards signals.
| |
| Each train is physically separated and protected where necessary so that a single event cannot initiate a common failure. Power sources for the ECCS are divided into two independent trains supplied from the emergency buses from offsite power.
| |
| Sufficient diesel-generating capacity is maintained onsite to provide required power to each train. The diesel generators and their auxiliary systems are completely independent and each supplies power to one of the two ECCS trains.
| |
| The reliability program extends to the procurement of the ECCS components in that only designs which have been proven by past use in similar applications are acceptable for use. The quality assurance program (see Chapter 17.0) ensures receipt of components only after manufacture and test to the applicable codes and standards.
| |
| | |
| The preoperational testing program ensures that the systems as designed and constructed will meet the functional requirements as calculated in design.
| |
| | |
| The ECCS is designed with the ability for on-line testing of most components so the availability and operational status can be readily determined.
| |
| | |
| In addition to the above, the integrity of the ECCS is assured through examination of critical components during the routine in-service inspection.
| |
| : a. Active Failure Criteria The ECCS is designed to accept a single failure following its initiation without loss of its protective function. The system design will tolerate the failure of any single active component in the ECCS itself or in the necessary associated service systems at any time during the period required for system operation following the initiating event.
| |
| | |
| A single active failure analysis is presented in Table 6.3-5, and demonstrates that the ECCS can sustain the failure of any single active component in either the short-1 or long-term and still meet the level of performance for core cooling.
| |
| Since the operation of the active components of the ECCS following a steamline break is identical to that following a loss-of-coolant accident, the same analysis is applicable and the ECCS can sustain the
| |
| | |
| 6.3-15 REVISION 3 - DECEMBER 1991 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| failure of any single active component and still meet the level of performance for the addition of shutdown reactivity.
| |
| : b. Passive Failure Criteria
| |
| | |
| A passive failure is the structural failure of a static component which limits the components effectiveness in carrying out its design function.
| |
| Examples include cracks in pipes, valve packing leaks, or pump seal failures.
| |
| A single passive failure analysis is presented in Table 6.3-6. It demonstrates that the ECCS can sustain a single passive failure during the long-term phase and still retain an intact flow path to the core to supply sufficient flow to maintain the core covered and affect the removal of decay heat. The procedure followed to establish the alternate flow path also isolates the component which failed.
| |
| The following philosophy provides for necessary redundancy in component and system arrangement to meet the intent of the General Design Criteria on a single failure as it specifically applies to failure of passive components in the ECCS. Thus, for the long-term, the system design is based on accepting either a passive or an active failure.
| |
| Passive failures are assumed to occur at 24 hours or greater after a Los s of Coolant Accident.
| |
| | |
| Redundancy of Flow Paths and Components for Long-Term Emergency Core Cooling
| |
| | |
| In design of the ECCS, Westinghouse utilizes the following criteria:
| |
| : a. During the long-term cooling period following a loss of coolant, the emergency core cooling flow paths shall be separable into two subsystems, either of which can provide minimum core cooling functions and return spilled water from the floor of the containment back to the RCS.
| |
| : b. Either of the two subsystems can be isolated and removed from service in the event of a leak outside the containment.
| |
| : c. Adequate redundancy of check valves is provided to tolerate failure of a check valve during the long-term period as a passive component.
| |
| : d. Should one of these two subsystems be isolated in this long-term period, the other subsystem remains operable.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-16 REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : e. Provisions are also made in the design to detect leakage from components outside the containment, collect this leakage, and provide for maintenance of the affected equipment.
| |
| : f. There are no motor-operated valves inside the containment that are required to operate submerged under postaccident conditions.
| |
| | |
| Thus, for the long-term emergency core cooling function, adequate core cooling capacity exists with one flow path removed from service.
| |
| | |
| Reliability of Pumps Used for Long-Term Cooling The ECCS active pump applications have gathered extensive operating time. These pumps are seismically qualified by a combination of analyses and tests, which includes structural and operability analysis. Each pump is tested in the vendor's shop to verify hydraulic and mechanical performance. Performance is again checked at the plant site during preoperational system checks periodically per ASME Inservice Testing criteria.
| |
| Pump design is specified, with strong consideration given to shaft critical speed, bearing, and seal design. Thermal transient and 100-hour endurance tests have been completed on the centrifugal charging and the safety injection pumps. Additional rotor dynamics tests have been performed on the centrifugal charging pumps, which are the highest speed applications. A thermal transient analysis has been performed on the RHR pump; this analysis is supported by the vendor's test on a similar design.
| |
| Endurance and leak determination testing has been completed on the mechanical seals by the seal supplier or long-term seal reliability has been demonstrated by previous industry operating experience and by technical evaluation. Seal testing included various temperature, pressure, radiation, and boric acid concentration levels. These test conditions were substantially elevated over those expected during normal or post-accident conditions, or test differences were technically evaluated on a case-by-case basis to justify and document the long-term reliability and operability of the seals.
| |
| | |
| The reliability program extends to the procurement of the ECCS components so that only designs which have been proven by past use in similar applications are acceptable for use. For example, the equipment specification for the ECCS pumps (safety injection, centrifugal charging, and residual heat removal pumps) require them to be capable of performing their long-term cooling function for 1 year. The same type of pumps have been used extensively in other operating plants. Their function during recurrent normal power and cooldown operations in other plants has successfully demonstrated their performance capability.
| |
| Reliability tests and inspections (see Subsection 6.3.4.2) further confirm their long-term operability. Nevertheless, design provisions are included that would allow maintenance of ECCS pumps, if necessary, during long-term operation.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-17 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The operability of two independent ECCS subsystems ensures that sufficient emergency core cooling capability will be available in the event of a LOCA assuming the loss of one subsystem through any single failure consideration. Either subsystem operating in conjunction with the accumulators is capable of supplying sufficient core cooling to ensure that the 10 CFR 50.46 acceptance criteria are met for all postulated break sizes ranging from the double ended break of the largest RCS cold leg pipe downward. In addition, each ECCS subsystem provides long-term core cooling capability in the recirculation mode during the accident recovery period.
| |
| | |
| All ECCS equipment has been designed to perform its system operating function for at least 1 year without any periodic maintenance. The specific accident scenario and the associated emergency operating procedures determine the continuous period of time, from the onset of the accident, that each subsystem of ECCS pumps (CV, SI, RH) is required to operate in support of the long-term core cooling function of the ECCS. The two independent ECCS subsystems or trains allow maintenance to be performed on any pump, if it is necessary, during long-term operation.
| |
| The NRC has revised its guidance for determining susceptibility of PWR recirculation sump screens to the effects of debris blockage during design basis accidents requiring recirculation operation of the ECCS or Containment Spray System (CSS). The revised guidance was developed as part of the efforts to resolve Generic Safety Issue (GSI)-191, Assessment of Debris Accumulation on PWR Sump Performance.
| |
| For the evaluation of PWR recirculation performance in the context of GSI-191, the NRC has specified the extended period of time for long term core cooling is considered to be 30 days.
| |
| Therefore, the CSS and ECCS system components have been evaluated and have been found acceptable for 30 days of operation under debris laden fluid conditions. The resolution to GSI-191 is covered in more details in UFSAR Section A1.82.
| |
| | |
| Managing Gas Accumulation
| |
| | |
| On January 11, 2008, the NRC issued Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems (Reference 7). Generic Letter 2008-01 requested licensees to evaluate the licensing basis, design, testing, and corrective action programs for the Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray systems to ensure that gas accumulation is maintained less than the amount that challenges operability of these systems, and that appropriate action is taken when conditions adverse to quality are identified. As a consequence, evaluations have been performed that resulted, in part, in the development of void acceptance criteria, identification of gas susceptible locations in piping, development of periodic gas monitoring procedures for these locations, and the acceptance of some locations that could potentially accumulate voids that were determined to be benign.
| |
| The piping systems addressed in the response to Generic Letter 2008-01 have the potential to develop voids and pockets of 6.3-18 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| entrained gases. Maintaining the pump suction and discharge piping sufficiently full of water is necessary to ensure that the system will perform properly and will inject the flow assumed in the safety analysis into the Reactor Coolant System or containment upon demand. This will also prevent damage from pump cavitation or water hammer, and pumping of unacceptable quantities of non-condensable gas (e.g., air, nitrogen, or hydrogen) into the reactor vessel following an ECCS start signal or during shutdown cooling. There are some piping locations that cannot be fully vented due to the physical layout and inability to dynamically vent the piping. These locations have been evaluated in accordance with Generic Letter 2008-01 and do not adversely affect the ability of the systems to perform their specified safety functions.
| |
| | |
| The implementation of TSTF-523 (Ref. 9) has formally incorporated the Managing Gas Accumulation program into Technical Specifications. Surveillance Requirements 3.4.6.4, 3.4.7.4, 3.4.8.3, 3.5.2.3, 3.6.6.9, 3.9.5.2, and 3.9.6.3 utilize ultrasonic inspection or manual venting to verify that the CV, SI, RH, and CS systems are sufficiently filled with water. The frequency of these Surveillance Requirements is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.
| |
| Proper initial fill and venting of the ECCS ensures that water hammer will not occur in ECCS lines. In addition, there are several other reasons why gas voids are unlikely to exist when the ECCS systems are initiated for accident mitigation. The pump suction lines and the cold leg RHR and SI discharge lines experience a positive pressure at all times, except for brief intervals during refueling. This pressure is provided by the RWST gravity head or pump head if it is in operation. The positive head ensures that no in leakage of air will result from a pressure boundary leak. Periodic surveillance tests create flow through these lines, which would purge gas voids. Vents are provided at high points in the ECCS piping inside and outside containment. A listing of the vent valves inside containment is provided in Table 6.3-16. The vent valves are used as appropriate when there is a risk of air voids due to maintenance activities.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.3-17 provides a list of potential permanent void locations. These locations cannot be fully vented due to the physical layout and sweeping the voids is not feasible. The void locations have been evaluated in accordance with Generic Letter 2008-01 and do not adversely affect ECCS or CS system functions.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-18a REVISION 16- DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Subsequent Leakage from Components in Safeguards Systems With respect to piping and mechanical equipment outside the containment, considering the provisions for visual inspection and leak detection, leaks will be detected before they propagate to major proportions. A review of the equipment in the system indicates that the largest sudden leak potential would be the sudden failure of a pump shaft seal. Evaluation of leak rate, assuming only the presence of a seal retention ring around the pump shaft, showed flows less than 50 gpm would result. Piping leaks, valve packing leaks, or flange gasket leaks are of a nature to build up slowly with time and are considered less severe than the pump seal failure.
| |
| Larger leaks in the ECCS are prevented by the following:
| |
| : a. The piping is classified in accordance with ANS Safety Class 2 and receives the ASME Class 2 quality assurance program associated with this safety class.
| |
| : b. The piping, equipment, and supports are designed to ANS Safety Class 2 seismic classification permitting no loss of function for the design-basis earthquake.
| |
| : c. The system piping is located within a controlled area on the plant site.
| |
| : d. The piping system receives periodic pressure tests and is accessible for periodic visual inspection.
| |
| : e. The piping is austenitic stainless steel which, due to its ductility, can withstand severe distortion without failure.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-18b REVISION 16 - DECEMBER 2016 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Based on this review, the design of the auxiliary building and related equipment is based upon handling of leaks up to a maximum of 50 gpm. Means are also provided to detect and isolate such leaks in the emergency core cooling flow path within 30 minutes.
| |
| The passive leak is postulated to begin after 24 hours following a LOCA, which is consistent with the NRCs application of the single failure criteria for ECCS systems as discussed in SECY-77-439.
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.3-2a is a simplified illustration of the ECCS. The notes provided with Figure 6.3-2a contain information relative to the operation of the ECCS in its various modes of operation (injection, cold leg recirculation and hot leg recirculation).
| |
| Flow rates to the RCS are provided in Chapter 15.0, where appropriate, for the accident analyses. The accident analysis flow rates are developed from certified pump performance curves and calculated system resistances based on test data and surveillance procedure acceptance criteria consistent with plant piping layouts. Minimum ECCS safeguards flow rates are determined by degrading the weakest certified pump performance curves and assuming that the injection line with the lowest resistance spills to containment (to maximize spill). Maximum ECCS flow rates are determined by enhancing the strongest pump performance curves, minimizing the spill line flow, and including any contribution from the positive displacement pump, if in service. The current accident analysis considers the positive displacement pump administratively isolated and the maximum ECCS flow rate has no input from the positive displacement pump.
| |
| Typically, the accident analysis ECCS flowrates include additional margin below the minimum flowrates and above the maximum flowrates shown in Figures 6.3-3, 6.3-4, and 6.3-5.
| |
| | |
| The analysis for ECCS Recirculation includes the impact of limited blockage for the safety injection throttle valves on the discharge of the charging pumps to the RCS cold legs, and the throttle valves on the discharge of the safety injection pumps to the RCS Cold Legs and Hot Legs. The internal components to these valves including the trim assembly have been replaced in response to GSI-191. The modified valves have been tested at Wyle Laboratories with design basis debris loading condition; the test results indicated a limited amount of blockage. The impact of the limited blockage on the ECCS flow rates to the RCS has been evaluated with acceptable results and long term core cooling (Reference 5c).
| |
| Note that these flows are not used in the small break and large break LOCA analyses present in Section 15.6.5.2.
| |
| Maximum ECCS flow rates to the RCS for the ECCS recirculation analysis have been developed from certified vendor curves by enhancing the strongest pump performance curve. Minimum ECCS flow rates have been determined by degrading the weakest pump, including the RH pump. Pump performance requirements from the ECCS Injection Phase analysis are limiting for the RH pump minimum performance curve.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-19 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Lag Times
| |
| | |
| Lag times for initiation and operation of the ECCS is limited by pump startup time and consequential loading sequence of these motors onto the safeguard buses. Most valves are normally in the position conducive to safety; therefore, valve opening time is not considered for these valves. With offsite power available, all pump and valve motors are started immediately upon receipt of the "S" signal. In the case of a loss of offsite power, a 12-second delay is assumed for diesel startup and actuation of the sequencer logic before the pumps and valves are loaded according to the sequencer. The charging pumps will be applied to the buses in 12 seconds, the safety injection pumps will start in 17 seconds, and the residual heat removal pumps in 22 seconds. These times refer to time after the diesel generators receive their signals to start.
| |
| During plant operations for power generation, startup or hot standby modes, one charging pump is normally operating as part of the chemical and volume control system and continues to operate as long as offsite power is available. During plant operations in the hot shutdown, cold shutdown, and refueling modes, only one charging pump is permitted to operate with either offsite or onsite electrical power available.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-19a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The remaining charging pumps have power locked out to address reactor coolant system cold overpressurization considerations.
| |
| Under accident conditions which result in automatic emergency core cooling system actuation, two centrifugal charging pumps are automatically started on offsite power, if available, or emergency onsite power. Both pumps continue to operate until their operation is terminated via operator action.
| |
| | |
| Potential Boron Precipitation Boron precipitation in the reactor vessel can be prevented by a backflush of cooling water through the core to reduce boil-off and resulting concentration of boric acid in the water remaining in the reactor vessel.
| |
| | |
| Three flow paths are available for hot leg recirculation of sump water. Each SI pump can discharge to two hot legs with suction taken from the RHR pump discharge. Each SI pump flow path provides an individual train of hot leg flow. In addition, either RHR pump can discharge through the common cross connect line and inject water through two hot legs. Normal operator response is to align an RHR pump to the hot legs through the SI8840 valve and both SI pumps to the hot legs. Sufficient flow to prevent boron precipitation only requires one SI pump aligned to the associated hot legs.
| |
| Loss of one pump or one flow path or one complete train will not prevent hot leg recirculation since redundant pumps and flow paths are available for use.
| |
| Boric acid buildup considerations during long-term cooling have been addressed in Reference 2, which presents the method, assumptions, and results of analysis for a typical four-loop plant. During cold leg recirculation for a cold leg pipe break, the analysis shows that boric acid concentrations within the reactor vessel and core regions remain at acceptable levels up to the time of the initiation of hot leg recirculation.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-20 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| An analysis has been performed to determine the maximum boron concentration in the reactor vessel following a hypothetical LOCA. This analysis used the method and assumptions described in Reference 2 with additional assumptions documented in Reference 6.
| |
| The following are the principal input parameters:
| |
| *Reactor core power, 102% of 3586.6 MWt
| |
| | |
| Total inventory of boric acid 4.76 x 106 lbm solution (includes RCS, SI accumulators, RWST)
| |
| | |
| Initial average boric acid 1.444 w/o concentration
| |
| | |
| Effective vessel volume (core 1050 ft3 and upper plenum volume to the bottom of cold leg nozzles)
| |
| | |
| Safety injection subcooling No subcooling assumed Containment pressure 14.7 psia
| |
| | |
| Boron measurement uncertainty 25 ppm The analysis considers the increase in boric acid concentration in the reactor vessel during the long-term cooling phase of a
| |
| | |
| *This power level and measurement uncertainty bounds the MUR power uprate Rated Thermal Power level including measurement uncertainty.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-20a REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| LOCA assuming a conservatively small effective vessel volume, including only the free volumes of the reactor core and the upper plenum below the bottom of the hot leg nozzles. This assumption conservatively neglects the mixing of boric acid solution with directly connected volumes, such as the reactor vessel lower plenum. Additional assumptions are documented in Reference 6. The calculation of boric acid concentration in the reactor vessel considers a cold leg break of the reactor coolant system in which steam is generated in the core from decay heat while the boron associated with the boric acid solution is completely separated from the steam and remains in the effective vessel volume.
| |
| The results of the analysis show t hat the maximum allowable boric acid concentration established by the NRC, which is the boric acid solubility limit minus 4 w/o, will not be exceeded in the vessel if hot leg recirculation is initiated 6.0 hours after the LOCA inception. (See Subsections 6.3.2.8 and 15.6.5.2.)
| |
| | |
| The safety injection flow to the reactor coolant system hot legs (assuming failure of one ECCS train), will exceed the decay heat mass boil-off. The hot leg flow will dilute the reactor vessel boron concentration by passing relatively dilute boron solution from the hot leg through the vessel to the cold leg break location. High head charging flow will continue to be provided to the reactor coolant system cold legs and will preclude any boron concentration buildup in the vessel for breaks in the hot leg.
| |
| Following initial switchover to hot leg recirculation, Byron and Braidwood will remain in this mode of operation. Hot leg recirculation provides simultaneous hot and cold leg recirculation and provides sufficient flow to both hot and cold legs of the loops in order to prevent excessive boron concentration in the reactor vessel during long-term operation following a LOCA. This method complies with the requirements of the NRC staff position concerning boron dilutions.
| |
| 6.3.2.6 Protection Provisions
| |
| | |
| The provisions taken to protect the system from damage that might result from dynamic effects are discussed in Section 3.6.
| |
| The provisions taken to protect the system from missiles are discussed in Section 3.5. The provisions to protect the system from seismic damage are discussed in Sections 3.7, 3.9, and 3.10. Thermal stresses on the RCS are discussed in Section 5.2.
| |
| 6.3.2.7 Provisions for Performance Testing
| |
| | |
| Test lines are provided for performance testing of the ECCS system as well as individual components. These test lines and instrumentation are shown in Drawing M-61. All pumps have
| |
| | |
| 6.3-21 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| miniflow lines for use in testing operability. Additional information on testing can be found in Subsection 6.3.4.2.
| |
| 6.3.2.8 Manual Actions
| |
| | |
| Operator action (both short term and long term) required for the various modes of ECCS operation to mitigate the consequences of a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) or steamline break, as well as other accident conditions, are presented in the Emergency Operating Procedures. These procedures discuss the alarms/indications available to the operator to lead him to take the appropriate actions. The discussion provided below, constitutes an outline of the operator action required following a LOCA or steamline break.
| |
| | |
| The primary function of the safety injection system (SIS) is to provide emergency core cooling (ECC) in the event of a LOCA resulting from a break in the primary reactor coolant system (RCS) or to provide emergency boration in the event of a steamline break accident resulting from a break in the secondary steam system.
| |
| | |
| ECC following a LOCA is divided into three phases:
| |
| : a. Short-Term Core Cooling/Cold Leg Injection Phase
| |
| | |
| The cold leg injection phase is defined as that period during which borated water is delivered from the refueling water storage tank (RWST) and accumulators to the RCS cold legs. During this phase, no operator actions are required to ensure proper ECCS operation.
| |
| : b. Long-Term Core Cooling/Cold Leg Recirculation The cold leg recirculation phase is that period during which borated water is recirculated from the containment sump to the RCS cold legs. Operator actions are required to establish the cold leg recirculation phase. These actions are detailed in Table 6.3-7 and are not required prior to 10 minutes following event initiation.
| |
| : c. Long-Term Core Cooling/Hot Leg Recirculation Phase The hot leg recirculation phase is that period during which borated water is recirculated from the containment sump to both the RCS hot legs and RCS cold legs. Operator actions required to establish hot leg recirculation are detailed in the Table 6.3-7 and are not required until approximately 6.0 hours following event initiation.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-22 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The emergency boration following a steamline break accident would occur only during the injection phase. The function of the SIS during this phase would be to inject borated water into the RCS with sufficient shutdown reactivity to compensate for the change in RCS volume and counteract any reactivity increase caused by the resulting cooldown. The SIS would continue to inject borated water from the RWST until the RCS conditions have stabilized, the accident has been identified as a steamline break, and the criteria for safety injection termination are satisfied. The operator should then take action to terminate ECCS operation.
| |
| | |
| During shutdown, the following operator actions pertain to the isolation of ECCS equipment and would effect a LOCA during the time accumulator isolation valves are closed with power locked out. (Startup is not addressed since shutdown is more limiting due to the higher core decay heat generation.)
| |
| : a. At 1900 psig, the operator is instructed to manually block the automatic safety injection (SI) signal.
| |
| This action disarms the SI signals from the pressurizer pressure transmitters along with the steam pressure transmitters. The other SI signal, containment high pressure, is armed and will actuate safety injection if the setpoint is exceeded. Manual SI actuation is also available.
| |
| : b. At/below 1000 psig, the operator closes and locks out the SI accumulator isolation valves. At RCS temperature below 350F (will be completed prior to reaching 330F), he also locks out and tags the two safety injection pumps and one high head charging pump. At this time, two residual heat removal pumps (LH safety injection) would be available from either automatic or manual SI actuation. An exception is made in the case of power lockout to the safety injection pumps under certain circumstances. Analyses have shown that under certain circumstances at least one high head safety injection pump is required to mitigate the consequences of a loss of decay heat removal event during reduced inventory conditions.
| |
| : c. At less than 360 psig and 350F, the operator aligns the residual heat removal (RHR) system suction to the reactor coolant system. The valves in the line from the refueling water storage tank (RWST) are closed.
| |
| The significance of these actions on the mitigation of a LOCA when power is locked out to the isolation valves is that:
| |
| : a. Between 1000 psig and 360 psig, a portion of the ECCS may be actuated automatically on containment
| |
| | |
| 6.3-23 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| high pressure or high steamline differential pressure signals or manually by the operator. The equipment that can be energized are two RHR pumps and one high head charging pump.
| |
| Subsequently, the operator would reinstitute power at the motor control centers to the other high head charging pump, the two SI pumps, and the accumulator isolation valves.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-23a REVISION 2 - DECEMBER 1990 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : b. Below 360 psig, the system is in the RHR cooling mode.
| |
| The operator would realign the RHR system per plant emergency procedure, as the RHR and the high head charging pumps could still be initiated by an automatic high containment pressure signal, or by manual actuation. Subsequently, the operator would reinstitute power at the motor control centers to the other high head charging pump, the two SI pumps, and the accumulator isolation valves.
| |
| Safety Significance During Shutdown
| |
| | |
| Comparing plant cooldown and heatup, the limiting case for a LOCA would be during a plant cooldown rather than a plant heat-up because the core decay heat generation would be higher.
| |
| The ECCS analysis conforms to the acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46 so that initiation of the LOCA is at 100.35% of full licensed power rating and corresponding RCS conditions. This power level assumption is 102% of the pre-MUR full licensed power rating. This power level bounds the MUR full licensed power rating including measurement uncertainty consistent with 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. Some of the reasons why the analysis would be more limiting than LOCA during shutdown are:
| |
| : a. a LOCA initiated during shutdown would have reduced decay heat generation since the reactor, in general, would have been zero power for an extended period of time;
| |
| : b. the core-stored energy during shutdown would be reduced due to the RCS uniform temperature condition at a reduced temperature; and,
| |
| : c. the energy content of the RCS would be lower.
| |
| | |
| Furthermore, the probability of the occurrence of a LOCA during this period along with the critical flaw size needed to break the RCS piping at reduced pressure clearly indicates that a LOCA is considered to be incredible. These arguments are provided in the following sections.
| |
| : a. Between 1000 psig and 400 psig: For the purpose of calculating the probability of a LOCA, a conservative time of 7 hours is assumed to cool the plant from 500F to 350F. The annual probabilities -3 of small and large LOCA were estimated at 10 and 10-4 per year in WASH-1400. Assuming this same failure rate holds at reduced pressure (this assumption is not realistic since normal operation serves as a proof test for lower pressure operating modes as discussed later), the probability of a LOCA during heatup/cooldown periods (assuming two heatup/cooldown cycles per year) would be:
| |
| | |
| WASH-1400, "Reactor Safety Study," U.S. NRC, October, 1975.
| |
| 6.3-24 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Small LOCA 3.2 x 10-6/yr.
| |
| | |
| Large LOCA 3.2 x 10-7/yr.
| |
| These can be compared to the total meltdown probabilities for small LOCA and large LOCA initiating events analyzed in WASH-1400:
| |
| | |
| Small LOCA 2 x 10-5/yr.
| |
| | |
| Large LOCA 3 x 10-6/yr.
| |
| Therefore, even if there were no pipe break protection for these heatup/cooldown periods, it is concluded that such events add only a small increase to the meltdown risk due to the short time periods involved.
| |
| : b. A break of RCS piping at reduced pressure: Below 1000 psig, an RCS piping break is considered incredible under these low pressure conditions since normal operation serves as a proof test against a break.
| |
| Calculations of critical flaw size for the reactor coolant piping show that at 1000 psi internal pressure:
| |
| : 1. A break cannot occur for a part through-wall flaw regardless of orientation.
| |
| : 2. For a circumferential through-wall flaw, a catastrophic break is not possible.
| |
| : 3. For a through-wall longitudinal flaw, the critical flaw size is in excess of 70 inches.
| |
| | |
| Therefore, postulated RCB piping flaws of critical size for internal pressure below 1000 psig cannot exist since they would have previously failed at the normal operating pressure (2235 psig).
| |
| : c. Below 360 psig: After several hours into the cooldown procedure (a minimum time is approximately 4 hours) when the RCS pressure and temperature have decreased to 360 psig and 350F, the RHR system is placed in operation. This system has a 600 psig design pressure and a break of this system is also considered highly unlikely. However, the proof test argument given above for RCS piping does not apply to the piping in this system.
| |
| The provisions to isolate these lines and the ECCS capability for core cooling should a leak or
| |
| | |
| 6.3-25 REVISION 4 - DECEMBER 1992 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| break develop during this mode of operation are as follows. Any leakage of the RHR system piping would be expected to occur when the system is initially pressurized at 360 psig. The RCS is at this time under manual control by the reactor operator. The reactor operator is monitoring the pressurizer level and the RCS loop pressure so that any significant leakage from the RHR system would be immediately detected. When leakage is detected, then the operator would isolate the RHR system and identify the location and cause. Since the decay heat generation 4 hours after shutdown is about 1.2% of full power, the RCS fluid temperature is at about 350F and the core stored energy is essentially removed, the operator would have ample time to isolate the RHR loop.
| |
| | |
| Therefore, in spite of the low probability of occurrence and the fact that certain failure modes for a pipe break do not exist during cooldown at an RCS pressure of 1000 psig, the plant operation procedures are as follows:
| |
| : 1. At a pressure between 800 and 1000 psig, RCS depressurization is discontinued; the operator will continue to cool down the RCS to 360F.
| |
| : 2. At/below 1000 psig and approximately 360F, the operator will close and lock out the accumulator isolation valves.
| |
| | |
| The above plant operating procedures will ensure that the accumulator isolation valves will not be locked out prior to about 4 hours after reactor shutdown for a cooldown rate of 50F/hr.
| |
| | |
| A conservative analysis has determined that the peak clad temperature resulting from a large break LOCA would be significantly less than 2200F Acceptance Criteria limit using the ECCS equipment available 2-1/2 hours after reactor shutdown.
| |
| The following assumptions were used in the analysis:
| |
| : 1. The RCS fluid is isothermal at a temperature of 425F and a pressure of 1000 psig.
| |
| : 2. The core and metal sensible heat above 425F has been removed.
| |
| : 3. The hot spot occurs at the core midplane.
| |
| : 4. The peak fuel heat generation during full power operation of 12.88 kW/ft (102% of 12.63 kW/ft) will be used to calculate adiabatic heatup.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-26 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 5. At 2-1/2 hours using decay heat in conformance with Appendix K of 10 CFR 50, the peak heat generation rate is 0.174 kW/ft.
| |
| : 6. As previously noted in the original response, two low head SI pumps and one high head charging pump are available from either manual SI actuation or automatic actuation by the containment HI-1 signal. However, for this analysis the loss of one low head safety injection pump was assumed.
| |
| : 7. No liquid waste is present in the reactor vessel at the end of blowdown.
| |
| : 8. A large cold leg break is considered.
| |
| | |
| For a postulated LOCA at the cooldown condition of 1000 psig, previous calculations show that the clad does not heat up above its initial temperature during blowdown. Proceeding from the end of blowdown and assuming adiabatic heatup of the fuel and clad at the hot spot, an increase of 850F was calculated during the lower plenum refill transient of 169.7 seconds.
| |
| During reflood, the core and downcomer water levels rise together until steam generation in the core becomes sufficient to inhibit the reflooding rate. At that time, heat transfer from the clad at the hot spot to the steam boil-off and entrained water will commence. This heat removal process will continue as the water level in the core rises while the downcomer is being filled with safety injection water. The reflood transient was evaluated by considering two bounding cases:
| |
| : 1. Downcomer and core levels rise at the same rate. No cooling due to steam boil-off is considered at the hot spot.
| |
| Quenching of the hot spot occurs when the core water level reaches the core midplane.
| |
| : 2. Core reflooding is delayed until the SI pumps have completely filled the downcomer. No cooling due to steam boil-off is considered at the hot spot until the downcomer is filled. The full downcomer situation may then be compared with the results of the ECCS analysis for Byron/
| |
| Braidwood to obtain a bounding clad temperature rise thereafter.
| |
| | |
| For Case 1 described above, the water level reaches the core midplane 95.3 seconds after bottom of core recovery. The temperature rise during reflood at the hot spot from adiabatic heatup is 478F, which results in a peak clad temperature of approximately 1753F.
| |
| For Case 2, the delay due to downcomer filling is 76.6 seconds. The corresponding temperature rise at the hot spot from adiabatic heatup is 384F, which gives a hot spot clad temperature of 1660F.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-27 REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The clad temperature at the time when the downcomer has filled for the DECLG, CD = 0.6 submitted to satisfy 10 CFR 50.46 requirements are 1994.2F and 2057F at the 6.0 and 7.5 foot elevations, respectively.
| |
| Core reflooding in the shutdown case under consideration will be more rapid from this point on due to less steam generation at the lower core power level in effect; decay heat input at any given elevation is less in the shutdown case. The combination of more rapid reflooding and lower power in the fuel ensures that the clad temperature rise during reflood will be less for the shutdown case than for the design basis case.
| |
| No manual actions are required of the operator for proper operation of the ECCS during the injection mode of operation.
| |
| Only limited manual actions are required by the operator to realign the system for the cold leg recirculation mode of operation. These actions are delineated in Table 6.3-7. After approximately 6.0 hours the system is realigned for hot leg recirculation in order to control the boric acid concentration in the reactor vessel.
| |
| The changeover from the injection mode to recirculation mode is initiated automatically and completed manually by operator action from the main control room. Protection logic is provided to automatically open the two safety injection system recirculation sump isolation valves when two of four refueling water storage tank level channels indicate a refueling water storage tank LO-2 level in conjunction with the initiation of the engineered safeguards actuation signal ("S" signal). This automatic action would align the two residual heat removal pumps to take suction from the containment sump and to deliver directly to the RCS. It should be noted that the residual heat removal pumps would continue to operate during this changeover from injection mode to recirculation mode.
| |
| | |
| The two charging pumps and the two safety injection pumps would continue to take suction from the refueling water storage tank, following the above automatic action, until manual operator action is taken to align these pumps in series with the residual heat removal pumps.
| |
| The refueling water storage tank level protection logic consists of four level channels with each level channel assigned to a separate process control protection set. Four refueling water storage tank level transmitters provide level signals to corresponding normally deenergized level channel bistables.
| |
| Each level channel bistable would be energized upon reaching the RWST Level LO-2 setpoint.
| |
| A two -out-of-four coincident logic is utilized in both protection cabinets A and B to ensure a trip signal in the event that
| |
| | |
| 6.3-28 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| two of the four level channel RWST Level LO-2 bistables are energized. This trip signal, in conjunction with the "S" signal, provide the actuation signal to automatically open the corresponding containment sump isolation valves.
| |
| The LO-2 refueling water storage tank level signal is also alarmed to inform the operator to initiate the manual action required to realign the charging and safety injection pumps for the recirculation mode. The manual switchover sequence that must be performed by the operator is outlined in Table 6.3-7. Following the automatic and manual switchover sequence, the two residual heat removal pumps take suction from the containment sump and deliver borated water directly to the RCS cold legs. A portion of the Train A residual heat removal pump discharge flow would be used to provide suction to the two charging pumps which would also deliver directly to the RCS cold legs. A portion of the discharge flow from the Train B residual heat removal pump would be used to provide suction to the two safety injection pumps which would also deliver directly to the RCS cold legs. As part of the manual switchover procedure (Table 6.3-7, Step 5), the suctions of the safety injection and charging pumps are cross-connected so that one residual heat removal pump can deliver flow to the reactor coolant system and both safety injection and charging pumps, in the event of the failure of either residual heat removal pump.
| |
| Manual resetting of the system level safety injection signal by the operator prior to receipt of the RWST LO-2 level signal, will not disable the automatic switchover from the injection mode to the recirculation mode. However, an individual reset circuit exists to reset the automatic opening of the containment recirculation sump valves. An indicating light is provided with this reset circuit to make the operator aware that he has reset the automatic switchover function. The indicating light has a push-to-test feature to allow the operator to verify that it has not burned out.
| |
| | |
| See Section 7.5 for process information available to the operator in the control room following an accident.
| |
| | |
| The RWST level LO-3 alarm alerts operators to initiate containment spray pump switchover from the RWST to the containment recirculation sumps. Containment Spray (CS) pump switchover requires manually opening the CS pump sump suction valves (CS009A&B) and manually closing the CS pump RWST suction valves (CS001A&B). These actions provide the CS pumps with a long-term suction source from the containment recirculation sumps.
| |
| | |
| In order to eliminate the potential for air entrainment from the RWST suction lines into the ECCS and CS pumps, any pump that has not been aligned to the recirculation sumps or RHR pump discharge, upon reaching the RWST empty level following a LOCA, is secured.
| |
| Upon establishing a suction path from the recirculation sumps or RHR pump discharge, the associated ECCS and/or CS pumps are restarted to assure cooling flow is maintained. The RWST empty level should not be reached following a LOCA unless multiple
| |
| | |
| 6.3-29 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| equipment failures and/or operator errors occur during switchover to cold leg recirculation. No alarm exists for the RWST empty level; therefore, the empty level is determined via the RWST level indicators in the main control room. The specific RWST empty level value is given in the Emergency Operating Procedures.
| |
| Adequacy of the Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) Volume
| |
| | |
| The RWST has been sized to provide adequate water source for the RCS during the ECCS injection phase and during switchover to the recirculation phase.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-29a REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The shortest times available for ECCS injection and switchover are as follows.
| |
| | |
| Time Allowance for Safety Injection Mode of ECCS Operation:
| |
| The cold leg injection mode of ECCS operation consists of the ECCS pumps (residual heat removal pumps, safety injection pumps, and charging pumps) and the containment spray pumps (if Containment pressure reaches the HI-3 setpoint) taking suction from the RWST and delivering to the RCS and containment, respectively. During cold leg injection mode, operators diagnose the accident and verify safety system actuation. To provide time for these activities a minimum allowance of 10 minutes of cold leg injection mode is provided prior to the first manual operator action required for switchover to cold leg recirculation mode. Cold leg injection mode time is shortest following a large break LOCA since all ECCS and CS pumps inject, resulting in the fastest depletion of the RWST.
| |
| | |
| The minimum time allowance for cold leg injection mode following a large break LOCA is verified acceptable based upon the following assumptions, which establish the bases for the associated Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) Level Setpoints (Reference 4):
| |
| a) The RWST water volume available for injection mode operation is based upon the volume between the RWST Low Level and the RWST LO-2 Level, including allowance for instrumentation uncertainty.
| |
| b) Containment and RCS pressure are conservatively assumed to be 0 psig to maximize ECCS and CS pump flow rate, resulting in maximum RWST depletion rate.
| |
| c) Flow out of the RWST during the injection mode includes conservative allowances for two pumps of each type (RH, SI, CV, CS) operating at maximum flow rates.
| |
| | |
| Following a small break LOCA, the RHR pumps and CS pumps do not contribute to RWST depletion since RCS pressure remains above RHR pump shutoff head and containment pressure is not expected to reach the CS pump autostart setpoint. Therefore, significantly more than 10 minutes of injection mode time is available under most LOCA conditions.
| |
| The length of time for injection mode could be increased by lowering the RWST Level LO-2 setpoint. However, this would result in decreased time available for completing the manual actions required for switchover to recirculation mode prior to reaching the RWST empty level. Therefore, the RWST LO-2 Level is optimized to benefit both available time for injection mode and available time to complete switchover to recirculation mode.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-30 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Time Allowance for Switchover to Recirculation Mode of ECCS Operation:
| |
| | |
| Following a LOCA, ECCS switchover from cold leg injection mode to cold leg recirculation mode is initiated upon receipt of the RWST level LO-2 alarm. The RWST level LO-2 alarm initiates the automatic and manual operator actions necessary to align the RHR pump suction to the containment recirculation sumps and to align RHR pump discharge to the suction of the SI and CV pumps to assure a long term ECCS pump suction source. The RWST level LO-2 alarm in conjunction with an SI signal initiates automatic opening of the containment recirculation sump isolation valves (SI8811A&B),
| |
| which aligns the suction of the RHR pumps to the containment recirculation sumps. The RWST level LO-2 alarm also alerts the operator to initiate the manual actions required to align RHR pumps discharge to the suction of the SI and CV pumps. The volume between the RWST level LO-2 alarm and the RWST empty level provides sufficient time for operators to complete manual actions to align the discharge of the RHR pumps to the suction of the SI and CV pumps. The major steps of the ECCS switchover emergency procedure are outlined on Table 6.3-7.
| |
| The following is an outline of the bases for demonstrating operator capability of completing time critical manual actions for switchover to cold leg recirculation. These bases are detailed in Reference 4.
| |
| | |
| The time available to complete manual actions for switchover to cold leg recirculation is dependent upon factors such as LOCA size, RCS pressure, ECCS pump flow rates, gravity backflow from the RWST to the recirculation sumps, ECCS valve stroke time, operator communication techniques, and operator training on the switchover emergency procedure. Available switchover time following both a large break LOCA and a small break LOCA is evaluated.
| |
| | |
| A large break LOCA results in the shortest available switchover time due to rapid RWST depletion caused by containment spray pump actuation and maximum RHR pump injection flow to the RCS due to low RCS pressure. However, following a large break LOCA, injection from the RHR pumps alone provides the required core cooling flow. Plant design features provide automatic alignment of the RHR pumps suction to the recirculation sumps via automatic opening of the recirculation sump isolation valves (SI8811A&B),
| |
| therefore, required core cooling flow is established automatically following a large break LOCA. In the event the manual actions to align RHR pump discharge to the suction of the SI and CV pumps are not completed prior to reaching the RWST empty level, required core cooling capability will be maintained by the RHR pumps.
| |
| Following a small break LOCA, the RWST will deplete much slo wer than a large break LOCA since high RCS pressure prevents RHR pump injection and containment spray pump actuation on HI-3 containment pressure is not expected. Under these conditions, switchover to recirculation is not time critical since a relatively large amount
| |
| | |
| 6.3-31 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| of time is available. However, if the containment spray pumps actuate during the injection mode, the RWST level LO-2 alarm could be reached in a relatively short period of time, necessitating switchover to the recirculation mode. If RCS pressure remains above RHR pump shutoff head pressure under these conditions, only the SI and CV pumps are capable of providing core cooling flow.
| |
| Therefore, completing the manual actions to align RHR pump discharge to the suction of the SI and CV pumps becomes time critical since the SI and CV pumps will lose their suction source unless manual switchover actions are completed prior to reaching the RWST empty level. Since the possibility of CS pump actuation exists following a small break LOCA, the containment spray pump flow rate is conservatively included when calculating available switchover time following a small break LOCA.
| |
| | |
| Time available to complete switchover to recirculation is dependent upon three parameters: (1) RWST volume between the RWST level LO-2 alarm and the RWST empty level, (2) Flow rate out of the RWST during the switchover process, and (3) Time required to complete two milestone manual actions within the switchover procedure. These two actions are closing the SI8812A&B valves and opening either the CV8804A or the SI8804B valve. Closing the SI8812A&B valves reduces RWST outflow by eliminating backflow from the RWST to the containment recirculation sumps (if backflow is occurring due to low containment pressure) and realigning RHR pump suction from the RWST to the recirculation sumps. Backflow from the RWST to recirculation sumps will not occur if containment pressure is relatively high since the check valves in line with the RWST will be closed. Opening the CV8804A or SI8804B valve provides a flow path from RHR pump discharge to both SI and both CV pump suctions, therefore, this is the final action required to complete switchover to cold leg recirculation. In order to maximize available switchover time following a LOCA, it is desirable to close the SI8812A&B valves after the SI8811A&B valves open to reduce RWST water gravity backflow to the recirculation sumps. Reference 4 assumes 0 psig containment pressure, therefore, backflow from the RWST to the recirculation sumps is assumed maximum. Reference 4 also conservatively bases RWST outflow rate on a worst case single failure of one SI8812 valve failing to close, which results in backflow for the entire duration of the switchover evolution.
| |
| Capability to complete time critical manual actions for switchover to cold leg recirculation is demonstrated by performance of procedure B(w)EP ES-1.3 on the plant simulator with LOCA conditions. During the simulated LOCA, the time between receipt of the RWST level LO-2 alarm and the time of closing a single SI8812 valve is recorded. The volume of RWST water consumed up to and including closing the SI8812 valve is calculated based on RWST outflow rate and this time interval. Since flow rate is reduced in magnitude after closing the SI8812 valves, the time remaining to complete switchover is calculated based on the reduced RWST outflow rate and the remaining RWST water volume to the RWST empty level. Capability of completing switchover to cold leg recirculation following the worst case single failure is time validated by comparing actual operator action time against the calculated available time.
| |
| 6.3-32 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| A heating system controlled by thermostat is designed to maintain the RWST water temperature greater than 40F during the winter.
| |
| The RWST heating system consists of an electric-to-water heat exchanger with a water circulating pump, piping, and valves as shown in Drawing M-61. The entire heating system is Category II (non-safety-related). None of the electrical power, control, or instrumentation circuits are designed to meet single failure criteria or Seismic Category I requirements.
| |
| The heating system is connected to the RWST with 2 -inch Category II piping. Protection against inadvertent draining of the tank in the event of a pipe break is provided by a Category I standpipe on the return side of the system, and a Category I manual shutoff valve at the Category I/II interface on the supply side. If a break occurs in the Category II portion of the system, alarms will result from drainage into the auxiliary building sumps and also from the RWST level when the tank is drained to the low level alarm point. Drainage from the low level alarm point to the minimum Technical Specification tank level through a fully severed 2-inch line, on the discharge side of the RWST heating pumps, would require in excess of 45 minutes.
| |
| This would afford sufficient time to take action to close the isolation valve.
| |
| | |
| In the event a line break occurs on the suction side of the heating pump downstream of the manual isolation valve, the maximum flow from the line would be 260 gpm. This line break has negligible impact on the time available to complete switchover to cold leg recirculation mode since it depletes the RWST relatively slowly when compared to the combined flow from the ECCS pumps, CS pumps, and gravity backflow from the RWST to the recirculation sumps as a result of a different, more limiting assumed single failure (Reference 4).
| |
| Electric power for this system is derived from the following non-safety-related (non-Class 1E) buses:
| |
| Pump Motor (power and control) - 480 BMCC #134V5 (1AP48E)
| |
| Heater (power) - 480-V Switchgear 1346 (1AP17EN).
| |
| Heater ACB Control - 125-Vdc Distribution Panel 114 (1DC06EB).
| |
| | |
| 6.3-33 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Instrumentation - Miscellaneous Control System Panel
| |
| #1PA2JC and 480-V MCC 134V5 (1AP48E).
| |
| T he RWST vent is routed to the indoor auxiliary building filtered ventilation system. To prevent the RWST vent from freezing during cold weather, heat tracing has been provided for the portion of the vent pipe which is external to the tank or located outdoors.
| |
| 6.3.3 Performance Evaluation Accidents which require ECCS operation
| |
| : a. the accidental depressurization of the main steam system,
| |
| : b. a loss of reactor coolant from small breaks in pipes or from cracks in large pipes,
| |
| : c. a major reactor coolant system pipe break (LOCA),
| |
| : d. a major secondary system pipe break, and
| |
| : e. a steam generator tube rupture.
| |
| | |
| Accidental Depressurization of the Main Steam System The most severe core conditions resulting from an accidental depressurization of the main steam system are associated with an inadvertent opening of a single steam dump, relief, or safety valve.
| |
| | |
| The inadvertent opening with failure to close of a single steam dump, relief, or safety valve is considered representative of the various events that could cause an accidental depressurization of the main steam system. Should more than one valve open and fail to close, the resulting depressurization transient would be enveloped by the major secondary system pipe break analysis.
| |
| Safety injection system actuation is initiated by any of the following:
| |
| : a. low pressurizer pressure signal,
| |
| : b. low steamline pressure,
| |
| : c. high containment pressure, or
| |
| : d. manual actuation.
| |
| | |
| A safety injection signal will rapidly trip the main turbine, close all feedwater control valves, trip the main feedwater pumps, and actuate isolation valves.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-34 REVISION 4 - DECEMBER 1992 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Following the actuation signal, the suction of the centrifugal charging pumps is diverted from the volume control tank to the refueling water storage tank. The charging pumps then pump RWST water through the header and injection line into the cold legs of each loop. The safety injection pumps also start automatically but provide no flow when the RCS is at normal pressure. The passive injection system accumulators and the low head system also provide no flow at normal RCS pressure.
| |
| Results and Conclusions of Accidental Depressurization of Main Steam System
| |
| | |
| The assumed steam release is typical of the capacity of any single steam dump, relief, or safety valve. The boron solution provides sufficient negative reactivity to maintain the reactor well below criticality. The assumed cooldown for this case is more rapid than the actual case of steam release from all steam generators through one steam dump, relief, or safety valve. The transient is quite conservative with respect to cooldown since no credit is taken for the energy stored in the system metal, other than that of the fuel elements, or the energy stored in the steam generators. Since the transient occurs over a period of about 5 minutes, the neglected stored energy is likely to have a significant effect in slowing the cooldown. The analysis shows that there will be no return to criticality after reactor trip assuming a stuck rod cluster control assembly, with offsite power available, and assuming a single failure in the ESF.
| |
| Since the reactor does not return criticality a DNBR less than 1.30 does not exist.
| |
| Loss of Reactor Coolant from Breaks in Small Pipes or from Cracks in Large Pipes which Actuate Emergency Core Cooling System A LOCA is defined as a break of the reactor coolant system piping or of any line connected to the system. Breaks of small cross sections will cause expulsion of the coolant at a rate which can be accommodated by the charging pumps, which would maintain an operational water level in the pressurizer permitting the operator to execute an orderly shutdown.
| |
| | |
| The maximum break size for which the normal makeup system can maintain the pressurizer level is obtained by comparing the calculated flow from the RCS through the postulated break against the charging pump makeup flow at normal reactor coolant system pressure, i.e., 2250 psia. A makeup flow rate from one centrifugal charging pump is adequate to sustain pressurizer level at 2250 psia for a break through a 0.375-inch diameter hole.
| |
| | |
| The safety injection signal stops normal feedwater flow by closing the main feedwater line isolation valves and initiates emergency feedwater flow by starting auxiliary feedwater pumps.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-35 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The small break analysis deals with breaks of up to 1.0 ft2 in area, where the safety injection pumps play an important role in the initial core recovery because of the slower depressurization of the RCS.
| |
| For intermediate breaks, the rate of blowdown is such that the increase in fuel clad temperature is terminated solely by the accumulators, with pumped flow then providing continued cooling.
| |
| As break size decreases into small break LOCA, the accumulators and centrifugal charging and safety injection pumps both play a part in terminating the rise in clad temperature. As break size continues to decrease, the role of the accumulators continues to decrease until they are not required and the centrifugal charging and safety injection pumps become solely responsible for terminating the temperature increase.
| |
| | |
| Results and Conclusions from Analysis of Small Break LOCA The analysis of this break has shown that the high head and intermediate head portions of the emergency core cooling system, together with accumulators, provide sufficient core flooding to ensure that the 10 CFR 50.46 acceptance criteria are met. Hence, adequate protection is afforded by the ECCS in the event of a small break LOCA.
| |
| Major Reactor Coolant System Pipe Breaks (LOCA)
| |
| | |
| A major LOCA is defined as a break 1.0 ft2 or larger of the reactor coolant system piping including the double-ended break of the largest pipe in the reactor coolant system or of any line connected to that system. The boundary considered for loss-of-coolant accidents as related to connecting piping is defined in Section 3.6.
| |
| Should a major break occur, depressurization of the reactor coolant system results in a pressure decrease in the pressurizer. Reactor trip occurs when the pressurizer low-pressure trip setpoint is reached. The safety injection system is actuated when the appropriate pressurizer low-pressure setpoint is reached. Reactor trip and safety injection system actuation are also provided by a high containment pressure signal. These countermeasures will limit the consequences of the accident in two ways:
| |
| : a. Reactor trip and borated water injection provide additional negative reactivity insertion to supplement void formation in causing rapid reduction of power to a residual level corresponding to fission product decay heat.
| |
| : b. Injection of borated water ensures sufficient flooding of the core to prevent excessive cladding temperatures.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-36 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| When the pressure falls below the accumulator cover pressure, the accumulators begin to inject borated water. However, significant accumulator inventory is lost out of the break due to the phenomenon of emergency core cooling bypass. After the initial surge of accumulator inventory is lost out of the break, core bypass breaks down and the remaining accumulator liquid refills the lower portion of the reactor vessel. Reflood of the core and eventual quench of the fuel rods is accomplished by the injection of water from the RWST.
| |
| For breaks up to and including the double ended severance of a reactor coolant pipe, the ECCS will limit the cladding temperature to well below the melting point and ensure that the core will remain in place and substantially intact with its essential heat transfer geometry preserved. See Tables 15.6-4a to 15.6-4d for ECCS sequence of events.
| |
| Conclu sions - Thermal Analysis
| |
| | |
| For breaks up to and including the double ended severance of a reactor coolant pipe, the emergency core cooling system will meet the acceptance criteria as presented in 10 CFR 50.46, as follows:
| |
| : a. The calculated maximum fuel element cladding
| |
| | |
| temperature shall not exceed 2200F.
| |
| : b. The calculated total oxidation of the cladding shall nowhere exceed 0.17 times the total cladding thickness before oxidation.
| |
| : c. the chemical reaction of the cladding The calculated total amount of hydrogen generated from with water or steam shall not exceed 0.01 times the hypothetical amount that would be generated if all of the metal in the cladding cylinders surrounding the fuel, excluding the cladding surrounding the plenum volume, were to react.
| |
| : d. the cCalculated changes in core remains capable of being cooled.ore geometry shall be such that
| |
| : e. the ECCS, the calculated core temperature shall be After any calculated successful initial operation of maintained at an acceptable low value and decay heat shall be removed for the extended period of time required by the long-lived radioactivity remaining in the core.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-37 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| ECCS Line Breaks In the ECCS analysis, the large break and small break single failure is the loss of one ECCS train. This means that for a large break and for a small break credit could be taken for one high head, one intermediate head, and one low head pump. The following is a discussion of the modeling procedure for the ECCS minimum safeguards and the flow splitting from a break of an ECCS injection line.
| |
| The current design for both small and large breaks assumes that at least one train is available for delivery of water to the RCS. This means that one pump in each subsystem delivers to the primary loop.
| |
| | |
| For a large break analysis, a high head centrifugal charging pump starts and delivers flow through the injection lines (one for each loop) with one branch injection line spilling to the containment backpressure. Although the charging pumps are connected directly to the cold legs, they are conservatively modeled to inject into the accumulator lines yielding lower flow rates. To minimize delivery to the reactor, the branch line chosen to spill is selected as the one with the minimum resistance.
| |
| When the intermediate head safety injection pump and the low head residual heat removal pump start, flow is delivered to the reactor coolant system through the 10-inch accumulator lines. One line, with minimum resistance, is spilling to the containment backpressure.
| |
| | |
| The following discussion of ECCS minimum safeguards is for breaks with an equivalent diameter less than a 10-inch accumulator line. For the high head centrifugal charging pump, the branch lines are 1-1/2 inches in diameter. Therefore, all small breaks with equivalent diameters less than the 1-1/2 inches will have a spilling line to RCS pressure and this flow will be considered lost to the break. In the case of a small break, less than the 10-inch accumulator line but greater than the 1-1/2-inch branch injection line, the charging pump will spill to the containment backpressure. For simplicity, the high head centrifugal charging pump is assumed to spill to containment pressure for all break sizes in the small break analysis. Since the intermediate head safety injection pump connects to the 10-inch accumulator lines, this pump is assumed to spill to RCS pressure for all small breaks. Note that low head residual heat removal flow is not credited in the small break analysis.
| |
| | |
| Therefore in the ECCS analyses done by Westinghouse, single failure is taken into account, i.e., loss of one SI train for large break and small break, and the spilling of the minimum resistance injection line. A break in an injection line is of the small break category.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-38 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Major Secondary System Pipe Break The steam release arising from a break of a main steam pipe would result in energy removal from the RCS causing a reduction of coolant temperature and pressure. In the presence of a negative moderator temperature coefficient, the cooldown results in
| |
| | |
| 6.3-38a REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| a reduction of core shutdown margin. There is an increased possibility that the core will become critical and return to power. A return to power following a steam pipe break is a potential problem. The core is ultimately shut down by the boric acid injection delivered by the safety injection system.
| |
| The actual modeling of the safety injection system in MARVEL is described in WCAP-7909. The calculated transient delivery times for the borated water are listed in Table 15.1-1.
| |
| For the cases where offsite power is assumed, the sequence of events in the safety injection system is the following: after the generation of the safety injection signal (appropriate delays for instrumentation, logic, and signal transport included), the appropriate valves begin to operate and the high head safety injection pump starts. In 17 seconds, the valves are assumed to be in their final position and the pump is assumed to be at full speed. This does not include sequential transfer of high head safety injection pump suction from the VCT to the RWST. The additional 10 seconds for valves CV112B and C to close after CV112D and E are open has been evaluated and is consistent with the accident analysis results. Transfer of the pump suction would be completed in 27 seconds.
| |
| | |
| In cases where offsite power is not available, an additional 13-second delay is assumed to start the diesels and to load the necessary safety injection equipment onto them.
| |
| | |
| Results and Conclusions of Major Secondary System Pipe Break The analysis has shown that even assuming a stuck rod cluster control assembly (RCCA) with or without offsite power, and assuming a single failure in the engineered safeguards the core remains in place and intact. Radiation doses will not exceed 10 CFR 50.67 guidelines.
| |
| | |
| Although DNB (with possible cladding perforation) following a steam pipe break are not necessarily unacceptable and not precluded in the criterion, the above analysis, in fact, shows that no DNB occurs for any rupture assuming the most reactive RCCA stuck in its fully withdrawn position.
| |
| Steam Generator Tube Rupture
| |
| | |
| The accident examined is the complete severance of a single steam generator tube assuming it takes place at power.
| |
| | |
| Assuming normal operation of the various plant control systems, the following sequence of events is initiated by a tube rupture:
| |
| : a. Pressurizer low-pressure and low-level alarms are actuated and charging pump flow increases in an attempt to maintain pressurizer level. On the secondary side, there is a steam flow/feedwater
| |
| | |
| 6.3-39 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| flow mismatch before the trip as feedwater flow to the affected steam generator is reduced due to the additional break flow which is now being supplied to that unit.
| |
| : b. Continued loss of reactor coolant inventory leads to a reactor trip signal and safety injection generated by low-pressurizer pressure. The safety injection signal automatically terminates normal feedwater supply and initiates auxiliary feedwater addition. After reactor trip, the break flow reaches equilibrium at the point where incoming safety injection flow is balanced by outgoing break flow. The resultant break flow persists from plant trip for 30 to 60 minutes after the accident.
| |
| : c. The steam generator blowdown liquid monitor and the condenser off-gas radiation monitor will alarm, indicating a sharp increase in radioactivity in the secondary system and will automatically terminate steam generator blowdown.
| |
| : d. The reactor trip automatically trips the turbine; and if offsite power is available, the steam dump valves open permitting steam dump to the condenser. In the event of a coincident loss of offsite power, the steam dump valves would automatically close to protect the condenser. The steam generator pressure would rapidly increase resulting in steam discharge to the atmosphere through the steam generator safety and/or power-operated relief valves.
| |
| : e. Following reactor trip, the continued action of auxiliary feedwater supply and borated safety injection flow (supplied from the refueling water storage tank) provide a heat sink which absorbs some of the decay heat. Thus, steam bypass to the condenser or, in the case of loss of offsite power, steam relief to the atmosphere is attenuated during the period in which the recovery procedure leading to isolation is being carried out.
| |
| : f. Safety injection flow results in increasing pressurizer water level. The time after trip at which the operator can clearly see returning level in the pressurizer is dependent upon the amount of operating auxiliary equipment.
| |
| | |
| Results and Conclusions of a Steam Generator Tube Rupture A steam generator tube rupture will cause no subsequent damage to the reactor coolant system or the reactor core. An orderly
| |
| | |
| 6.3-40 REVISION 5 - DECEMBER 1994 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| recovery from the accident can be completed even assuming simultaneous loss of offsite power.
| |
| | |
| Existing Criteria Used to Judge the Adequacy of the ECCS Criteria from 10 CFR 50.46:
| |
| : a. Peak cladding temperature calculated shall not
| |
| | |
| exceed 2200F.
| |
| : b. The calculated total oxidation of the cladding shall nowhere exceed 0.17 times the total cladding thickness before oxidation.
| |
| : c. The calculated total amount of hydrogen generated from the chemical reaction of the cladding with water or steam shall not exceed 0.01 times the hypothetical amount that would be generated if all of the metal in the cladding cylinders surrounding the fuel, excluding the cladding around the plenum volume, were to react.
| |
| : d. Calculated changes in core geometry shall be such that the core remains amenable to cooling.
| |
| : e. After any calculated successful initial operation of the ECCS, the calculated core temperature shall be maintained at an acceptable low value, and decay heat shall be removed for the extended period of time required by long-lived radioactivity remaining in the core.
| |
| | |
| In addition to, and as an extension of, the final acceptance criteria, two accidents have more specific criteria as described in the following.
| |
| | |
| In the case of the accidental depressurization of the main steam system additional criteria for adequacy of the ECCS are in assuming a stuck RCCA with offsite power available and assuming a single failure in the ESF, there will be no return to criticality after reactor trip for a steam release equivalent to the spurious opening with failure to close of the larger of a single steam dump, relief, or safety valve.
| |
| | |
| For a major secondary system pipe break, the added criteria are:
| |
| assuming a stuck RCCA with or without offsite power and assuming a single failure in the engineered safeguards, the core remains in place and intact.
| |
| | |
| Inadvertent Operation of the ECCS During Pump Operation A safety injection system signal (SIS) normally results in a reactor trip followed by a turbine trip. However, it cannot be assumed that any single spurious condition or fault that
| |
| | |
| 6.3-41 REVISION 3 - DECEMBER 1991 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| actuates the SIS will also produce a reactor trip. Therefore, two different courses of events are considered:
| |
| | |
| Case A Trip occurs at the same time spurious SIS starts, and Case B The reactor protection system produces a trip later in the transient.
| |
| In regards to Case B, the clearance of a spurious actuation of an SIS component, which does not also initially generate a system level SIS signal, would occur either as soon as appropriate operator action is taken to correct this spurious actuation or following a subsequent system level SIS occurrence which is discussed below.
| |
| | |
| Following a Case A spurious SIS, a permissive circuit prevents the operator from resetting the system level SIS until a timer, started by the SIS, times out (30 to 120 seconds) and until the reactor has tripped. When the operator is allowed by this permissive circuit to reset SIS, he would do so prior to the time at which procedures would require him to take over manual control of the components which were inadvertently stimulated by the spurious SIS signal. It is noted that resetting SIS does not by itself change the state of the components that may have been falsely stimulated. Reset simply makes the SIS signal go away.
| |
| | |
| Under an assumption that loss of offsite power occurred after such a reset, essential functions to bring the plant to safe shutdown would be automatic.
| |
| | |
| For example, after a system level SIS is reset, the emergency diesel generators, which had previously started by SIS, may be manually stopped. A subsequent loss of offsite power would cause the emergency diesel generators to start and the proper equipment for taking plant to safe shutdown (hot standby) would be loaded onto the diesel generators. For the maintenance of safe shutdown, the automatic operations would be supplemented by operator action.
| |
| Use of Dual Function Components
| |
| | |
| The ECCS contains components which have no other operating function as well as components which are shared with other systems. Components in each category are as follows:
| |
| : a. Components of the ECCS which perform no other function are:
| |
| : 1. One accumulator for each loop which discharges borated water into its respective cold leg of the reactor coolant loop piping.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-42 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 2. Two safety injection pumps, which supply borated water for core cooling to the RCS. (May be used during check valve testing also.)
| |
| : 3. Associated piping, valves, and instrumentation.
| |
| : b. Components which also have a normal operating function are as follows:
| |
| : 1. The residual heat removal pumps and the residual heat exchangers: these components are normally used during the latter stages of normal reactor cooldown and when the reactor is held at cold shutdown for core decay heat removal. However, during all other plant operating periods, they are aligned to perform the low head injection function.
| |
| : 2. The centrifugal charging pumps: these pumps are normally aligned for charging service. As a part of the chemical and volume control System, the normal operation of these pumps is discussed in Chapter 9.0.
| |
| : 3. The refueling water storage tank: this tank is used to fill the refueling canal for refueling operations. However, during all other plant operating periods it is aligned to the suction of the safety injection pumps, and the residual heat removal pumps. The charging pumps are automatically aligned to the suction of the refueling water storage tank upon receipt of the safety injection signals since during normal operation they take suction from the volume control tank. (The containment spray pumps are also aligned to the suction of the refueling water storage tanks and upon receipt of a hi-3 containment pressure signal will pump water from the RWST to the spray rings.)
| |
| A n evaluation of all components required for operation of the ECCS demonstrates that either:
| |
| : a. the component is not shared with other systems; or
| |
| : b. if the component is shared with other systems, it is either aligned during normal plant operation to perform its accident function or if not aligned to its accident function, two valves in parallel are provided to align the system for injection and two valves in series are provided to isolate portions of the system not utilized for injection. These valves are automatically actuated by the safety injection signal.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-43 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Table 6.3-8 indicates the alignment of components during normal operation and the realignment required to perform the accident function.
| |
| | |
| In all cases of component operation, safety injection has the priority usage such that an "S" signal will override all other signals and start or align systems for injection.
| |
| | |
| During a normal startup or shutdown, automatic SI actuation signals from low pressurizer pressure and low steamline pressure may be manually blocked.
| |
| | |
| If a steamline break occurs while both of these SI actuation signals are blocked, steamline isolation will occur on high negative steam pressure rate. An alarm for steamline isolation will alert the operator of the accident.
| |
| For large LOCAs, sufficient mass and energy would be released to the containment to automatically actuate SI when the containment high pressure setpoint is reached. At this time, the operator would be alerted to the occurrence of a LOCA by the following safety-related indications:
| |
| : 1. loss of pressurizer level,
| |
| : 2. rapid decrease of RCS pressure, and
| |
| : 3. increase in containment pressure.
| |
| | |
| In addition to the above, the following indications are normally available to the operator at the control board:
| |
| : 1. radiation alarms inside containment,
| |
| : 2. increase in floor drain sump water level,
| |
| : 3. decrease off scale of accumulator water levels and decrease in pressure,
| |
| : 4. ECCS valve and pump position and status light in ECCS energized indication, and annunciators light as safeguards equipment becomes energized, and
| |
| : 5. flow from ECCS pumps.
| |
| | |
| For very small LOCAs (approximately less than 2-inch diameter) in which the containment high pressure setpoint may not be reached, the operator would observe the safety-related indications plus the first two normally available indications.
| |
| In addition, a charging flow/letdown mismatch would provide the operator with another indication of leakage from the RCS.
| |
| Since the operator would observe the pressurizer level and
| |
| | |
| 6.3-44 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| receive additional indications that a LOCA occurred, a manual SI would be initiated immediately. As presented in Section 15.6 the time to uncover the core following a small break is relatively long (e.g., greater than 10 minutes for the limiting small break LOCA transients). The operator would, therefore, have sufficient time to manually initiate SI.
| |
| | |
| Limits on System Parameters The (ECCS) analysis shows that the design -basis performance characteristic of the ECCS is adequate to meet the requirements for core cooling following a LOCA with the minimum engineered safety feature equipment operating. In order to ensure this capability in the event of the simultaneous failure to operate any single active component, Technical Specifications are established for reactor operation.
| |
| | |
| Normal operating status of ECCS components is given in Table 6.3-9.
| |
| The ECCS components are available whenever the coolant energy is high and the reactor is critical. During low temperature physics tests there is a negligible amount of stored energy in the coolant and low decay heat; therefore, an accident comparable in severity to accidents occurring at operating conditions is not possible and ECCS components are not required.
| |
| | |
| The principal system parameters and the number of components which may be out of operation in test, quantities and concentrations of coolant available, and allowable time in a degraded status are illustrated in the Technical Specifications.
| |
| If efforts to repair the faulty component are not successful, the plant is placed into a lower operational status, i.e., hot standby to hot shutdown, hot shutdown to cold shutdown, etc.
| |
| 6.3.4 Tests and Inspections 6.3.4.1 ECCS Performance Tests
| |
| | |
| Preoperational Test Program at Ambient Conditions
| |
| | |
| The preoperational test program for the ECCS conforms to the recommendations of Regulatory Guides 1.68 and 1.79 and establishes proper flow requirements during cold conditions.
| |
| The capability of the pumps to deliver required flows under accident conditions is then verified by analysis to preclude any unnecessary thermal shock damage at hot operating conditions.
| |
| During the testing program, any unplanned or planned safety injection actuation is documented for further verification of flow capabilities. Check valve operability is conducted using guidelines and criteria established in Table 14.2-34.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-45 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Preliminary operational testing of the ECCS system is conducted during the hot functional testing of the reactor coolant system following flushing and hydrostatic testing with the system cold and the reactor vessel head removed. Provisions are made for excess water to drain into the refueling canal. The ECCS is aligned for normal power operation. Simultaneously, the safety injection block switch is reset, and the breakers on the lines supplying offsite power are tripped manually so that operation of the emergency diesels is tested in conjunction with the safety injection system. This test provides information including the following:
| |
| : a. satisfactory safety injection signal generation and transmission;
| |
| : b. proper operation of the emergency diesel-generators, including sequential load pickup;
| |
| : c. valve operating times;
| |
| : d. pump starting times; and
| |
| : e. pump delivery rates at runout conditions (one point on the operating curve).
| |
| Compo nents
| |
| : a. Pumps Separate flow tests of the pumps in the ECCS systems are conducted during the operational startup testing (with the reactor vessel head off) to check proper runout flow rates, proper flow balancing in branch injection headers (high head pumps only), and capability for sustained operation.
| |
| The centrifugal charging, safety injection, and residual heat removal pumps discharge into the reactor vessel through the injection lines; the overflow from the reactor vessel passes into the refueling canal. Each pump is tested separately with water drawn from the RWST. Data is taken to determine pump head and flow at this time. Pumps are then run on miniflow circuits and data taken to determine a second point on the head flow characteristic curve.
| |
| : b. Accumulators Each accumulator is filled with water from the RWST and pressurized with the MOV on the discharge line closed. Then the valve is opened and the accumulator allowed to discharge into the reactor vessel as part of the operational startup testing with the reactor cold and the vessel head off.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-46 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.3.4.2 Reliability Tests and Inspections
| |
| | |
| Description of Tests Planned Routine periodic testing is performed for ECCS components and all necessary support systems. Valves which must operate after a loss-of-coolant accident are operated through a complete cycle, and pumps are operated individually on their miniflow lines. If such testing indicates a need for corrective maintenance, the redundancy of equipment in these systems permits such maintenance to be performed without shutting down or reducing load under certain conditions. These conditions include considerations such as the period within which the component should be restored to service and the capability of the remaining equipment to provide the minimum required level of performance during such a period.
| |
| The operation of the remote stop valve and the check valve in each accumulator tank discharge line may be tested by opening the remote test line valves just downstream of the stop valve and check valve, respectively. Flow through the test line can be observed on instruments, and the opening and closing of the discharge line stop valve can be sensed on this instrumentation.
| |
| Where series check valves form the sole high -pressure to low-pressure isolation barrier between the reactor coolant system (RCS) and safety injection system (SIS) piping outside the reactor containment, periodic testing of these check valves is performed to provide assurance that certain postulated failure modes will not result in a loss of coolant from the low-pressure system outside containment with a simultaneous loss of safety injection pumping capacity.
| |
| The series check valves in the cold leg injection lines from the safety injection pumps and the residual heat removal pumps are in this category and require periodic testing. The remaining ECCS injection and recirculation lines employ a normally closed isolation valve for high-pressure to low-pressure isolation to ensure that a loss of coolant cannot occur in the low-pressure system outside containment. The capability is provided for periodic testing of the series check valves in these lines even though they are not susceptible to the same postulated failure modes that lead to a loss of coolant outside containment.
| |
| The SIS test line subsystem provides the capability for determination of the integrity of the pressure boundary formed by series check valves. The test performed verify that each of the series check valves can independently sustain differential pressure across its disc, and also verify that the valve is in its closed position. The required periodic tests are to be performed after each refueling just prior to plant startup, after the RCS has been pressurized.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-47 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The following check valves in the ECCS are provided with leak testing capability:
| |
| | |
| Group A Group B SI8949 A through D SI8818 A through D SI8905 A through D SI8819 A through D SI8900 A through D SI8948 A through D SI8841 A/B SI8956 A through D SI8815
| |
| | |
| Periodic component testing requirements are contained in the Technical Specifications and the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM). During periodic system testing, a visual inspection of pump seals, valve packings, flanged connections, and relief valves is made to detect leakage. Inservice inspection provides further confirmation that no significant deterioration is occurring in the ECCS fluid boundary.
| |
| | |
| Design measures have been taken to ensure that the following testing can be performed:
| |
| : a. Active components may be tested periodically for operability (e.g., pumps on miniflow, certain valves, etc.).
| |
| : b. An integrated system actuation test (details of the testing of the sensors and logic circuits associated with the generation of a safety injection signal together with the application of this signal to the operation of each active component are given in Section 7.2) can be performed when the plant is cooled down and the residual heat removal system (RHRS) is in operation. The ECCS will be arranged so that no flow will be introduced into the RCS for this test.
| |
| : c. An initial flow test of the full operational sequence can be performed.
| |
| The design features which ensure this test capability are specifically:
| |
| : a. Power sources are provided to permit individual actuation of each active component of the ECCS.
| |
| : b. The safety injection pumps can be tested periodically during plant operation using the minimum flow recirculation lines provided.
| |
| : c. The residual heat removal pumps are used every time the RHRS is put into operation. They can also be
| |
| | |
| 6.3-48 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| tested periodically when the plant is at power using the miniflow recirculation lines.
| |
| : d. The centrifugal charging pumps are either normally in use for charging service or can be tested periodically on miniflow.
| |
| : e. Remote-operated valves can be exercised during routine plant maintenance.
| |
| : f. Level and pressure instrumentation is provided for each accumulator tank for continuous monitoring of these parameters during plant operation.
| |
| : g. Flow from each accumulator tank can be directed through a test line to determine check valve leakage and to demonstrate operation of the accumulator motor-operated valves.
| |
| : h. A flow indicator is provided in the safety injection pump header and in the residual heat removal pump headers. Pressure instrumentation is also provided in these lines.
| |
| : i. An integrated system test can be performed when the plant is cooled down and the RHRS is in operation.
| |
| This test does not introduce flow into the RCS but does demonstrate the operation of the valves, pump circuit breakers, and automatic circuitry including diesel starting and the automatic loading of ECCS components of the diesels (by simultaneously simulating a loss of offsite power to the vital electrical buses).
| |
| | |
| See the Technical Specifications and the TRM for the selection of test frequency, acceptability of testing, and measured parameters. ECCS components and systems are designed to meet the intent of ASME Code Section XI for inservice inspection.
| |
| 6.3.5 Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| | |
| Instrumentation and associated analog and logic channels employed for initiation of emergency core cooling system (ECCS) operation is discussed in Section 7.3. The instrumentation readouts provided to the operator to enable him to perform required manual safety actions and to determine the effect of manual actions taken following reactor trip due to a Condition II, III, or IV event are listed in Table 7.5-1.
| |
| This section describes the instrumentation employed for monitoring ECCS components during normal plant operation and
| |
| | |
| 6.3-49 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| also ECCS postaccident operation. All alarms are annunciated in the control room.
| |
| | |
| Measurement uncertainty for installed ECCS flow and pressure instrumentation is accounted for in the applicable 10CFR50.46 LOCA Safety Analysis in accordance with NUREG-1482 and ASME Section XI, OM-6 recommendations.
| |
| 6.3.5.1 Temperature Indication
| |
| | |
| Cold Leg Injection/Normal RHR Return Line Two temperature elements monitor the temperature of the coolant being returned to the RCS during SI and normal RHR loop operation via the RHR heat exchanger. Readout is on the control board.
| |
| | |
| Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Inlet The fluid temperature at the inlet of each RHR heat exchanger is recorded in the control room.
| |
| Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Outlet
| |
| | |
| The temperature of the fluid leaving each RHR heat exchanger is indicated and recorded in the control room and monitored by a locally mounted temperature indicator.
| |
| 6.3.5.2 Pressure Indication
| |
| | |
| Charging Pump Inlet and Discharge Pressure
| |
| | |
| There is a locally mounted pressure indicator located at the suction and discharge of each centrifugal charging pump.
| |
| | |
| Safety Injection Header Pressure Safety injection pump discharge header pressure is indicated in the control room.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-50 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Suction of Safety Injection Pumps There is a locally mounted pressure indicator at the suction of each safety injection pump.
| |
| Accumulator Pressure
| |
| | |
| Duplicate pressure channels are installed on each accumulator.
| |
| Pressure indication in the control room and high- and low-pressure alarms are provided by each channel.
| |
| | |
| Test Line Pressure A local pressure indicator used to check for proper seating of the accumulator check valves between the injection lines and the reactor coolant system (RCS) is installed on the leakage test line.
| |
| Residual Heat Removal Pump Inlet
| |
| | |
| A local pressure indicator is mounted at the inlet to each RHR pump.
| |
| | |
| Residual Heat Removal Pump Discharge Pressure Residual heat removal discharge pressure for each pump is indicated in the control room. A high-pressure alarm is actuated by each channel.
| |
| 6 .3.5.3 Flow Indication
| |
| | |
| Charging Pump Injection Flow Charging pump injection flow through the reactor cold leg is indicated in the control room.
| |
| Safety Injection Pump Header Flow
| |
| | |
| Flow through the safety injection pump header is indicated in the control room.
| |
| Test Line Flow
| |
| | |
| Local indication of the leakage test line flow is provided to check for proper seating of the accumulator check valves between the injection lines and the RCS.
| |
| | |
| Residual Heat Removal Return Line Flow The return fl ow of reactor coolant from the residual heat removal loop during normal plant cooldown is recorded in the control room. This meter also controls the RHR bypass flow controller and alarms on low flow.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-51 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Safety Injection Pump Minimum Flow A flow indicator is installed in the safety injection pump minimum flow line.
| |
| Residual Heat Removal Pump Minimum Flow
| |
| | |
| A flowmeter installed in each residual heat removal pump discharge header provides control for the valve located in the pump minimum flow line.
| |
| 6.3.5. 4 Level Indication
| |
| | |
| Containment Recirculation Sump Levels
| |
| | |
| The containment floor water level instrumentation (LT-PC006 and LT-PC007) provide indication for verification that sufficient recirculation water level exists prior to switchover to recirculation. Per a design basis calculation (Reference 5b),
| |
| minimum reciculation water level is assured solely upon reaching the RWST level LO-2 alarm following a LOCA. The containment floor water level instrumentation provides reliable analog indication of containment floor water level in the control room and is environmentally qualified, safety-related, seismically mounted, and Regulatory Guide 1.97 Type 1 equipment. The containment floor water level instrumentation is available to diagnose a loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| | |
| Drawings of the containment recirculation sump are provided in Figures 6.3-8a and 6.3-8b.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-52 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Refueling Water Storage Tank Level Four water level instrumentation channels are provided for the refueling water storage tank. Each channel provides a high alarm, low alarm, LO-2 alarm, LO-3 alarm, and tank level indication in the main control room. Each alarm has a basis to ensure the ECCS and containment spray systems perform as designed. See Reference 4 for detailed calculations.
| |
| The RWST level high alarm protects against inadvertent overflowing of the RWST during normal operation.
| |
| | |
| The RWST level low alarm is provided to ensure that a sufficient volume of water is available in the RWST prior to a loss of coolant accident. The volume between the RWST high and low alarms provides for normal operating volume changes while providing margin to the minimum RWST level required by Technical Specifications for ECCS operations.
| |
| | |
| The RWST level LO-2 alarm setpoint is established to ensure the volume of RWST water injected from the low to the LO-2 alarms is sufficient to satisfy the following bases following a LOCA: (1) provide sufficient time prior to the first manual action required for switchover to recirculation following a LOCA, (2) adeqate containment floor water level exists to provide water flow into the recirculation sumps to replace the water being pumped out by the RHR pumps following a LOCA. This will also ensure NPSH for the RHR pumps prior to switchover to recirculation, (3) sufficient RWST volume remains to complete ECCS switchover to recirculation mode prior to reaching the RWST empty level, (4) 10 CFR 50.46 acceptance criteria are met, and (5) sufficient borated water is provided to maintain reactor shutdown margin. The LO-2 alarm also alerts operators to enter the emergency procedure to realign the ECCS pumps from the cold leg injection mode to the cold leg recirculation mode following a LOCA and automatically opens the recirculation sump isolation valves (SI8811A/B) if an SI signal is present.
| |
| The RWST level LO-3 alarm alerts operators to initiate manual actions to transfer containment spray pump suction from the RWST to the recirculation sumps.
| |
| The RWST empty level is determined by reading the level indicators in the main control room. The specific RWST empty level value is given in the Emergency Operating Procedures. Upon reaching the RWST empty level, the RWST is no longer considered a reliable suction source for the ECCS and CS pumps following a LOCA. In the event the RWST empty level is reached due to multiple equipment failures and/or operator error, action should be taken to secure any ECCS and/or CS pumps not aligned to the recirculation sumps or RHR pump discharge, establish a recirculation flow path, and restart the pumps.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-52a REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Accumulator Water Level Duplicate water level channels are provided for each accumulator.
| |
| Both channels provide indication in the control room and actuate high- and low-water level alarms.
| |
| 6.3.5.5 Valve Position Indication Valve positions which are indicated on the control board are done by a "normal off" system; i.e., should the valve not be in its proper position, a bright white light lights and gives a highly visible indication to the operator. Important valves will also have audible alarm in the control room.
| |
| For a list of manually operated valves with position indication in the control room, see Appendix 6.3A.
| |
| Accumulator Isolation Valve Position Indication The accumulator motor-operated valves are provided with red (open) and green (closed) position indicating lights located at the control switch for each valve. These lights are powered by valve control power and actuated by valve motor-operated limit switches.
| |
| A monitor light that is on when the valve is not fully open is provided in an array of monitor lights that are all off when their respective valves are in proper position enabling safety operation.
| |
| This light is energized from a separate monitor light supply and actuated by a valve motor-operated limit switch.
| |
| An alarm annunciator point is activated by both a valve motor operator limit switch and by a valve position limit switch activated by stem travel whenever an accumulator valve is not fully open for any reason with the system at pressure (the pressure at which the safety injection block is unblocked is approximately 1900 psig). A separate annunciator point is used for each accumulator valve. This alarm will be recycled at approximately 10 minute intervals to remind the operator of the improper valve lineup.
| |
| 6.3.6 References
| |
| : 1. R. A. Hill, et. al., "Evaluation of Mispositioned ECCS Valves,"
| |
| WCAP-8966, September 1977.
| |
| : 2. Letter from C. Caso of Westinghouse to T. Novak of the NRC dated April 1, 1975.
| |
| : 3. (Deleted)
| |
| : 4. Bryon/Braidwood Calculation SITH-1, Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) Level Setpoints.
| |
| 5a. Calculation BRW-06-0015-M/BYR06-025, "Design Loads and Sizing Limitations for the ECCS Containment Sump Trash Rack".
| |
| 5b. Byron/Braidwood Calculation SI-90-01 Minimum Water Volume Available for Containment Recirculation Sump Flooding.
| |
| 5c. Calculation CAE-07-49/CCE-07-48, Phase 2 Evaluation of Reduced SI Flow During Recirculation Phase of ECCS.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-53 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 6. Letter from K.R. Jury (Exelon) to U.S. NRC document Control Desk, April 12, 2002.
| |
| : 7. NRC Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems, dated January 11, 2008.
| |
| : 8. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Information Report by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation on the Single Failure Criterion, Commission Paper SECY 77-439, August 17, 1977 (ADAMS Accession No. ML060260236.
| |
| : 9. TSTF-523 Revision 2, Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation.
| |
| : 10. Letter from U.S. NRC to O.D. Kingsley (Commonwealth Edison Company), Response to Generic Letter 95 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, dated December 2, 1999.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-53a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-1 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMCOMPONENT PARAMETERS
| |
| | |
| ACCUMULATORS Number 4 Design pressure, psig 700 Design temperature,
| |
| | |
| +%&/.(*).%#+%&/."&%,
| |
| 0&#/10+%&/.(*)+&%''"&%,+'()
| |
| (*(#"#0+%&/.(*)+&% ''"&%,+'()
| |
| 0./1201"#%,3. 3 1350 each
| |
| | |
| Minimum water volume, ft 3 935
| |
| | |
| Volume N 2 gas, ft 3 500
| |
| | |
| Boric acid concentration, nominal, ppm 2300
| |
| | |
| Boric acid concentration, minimum, ppm 2200
| |
| | |
| Relief valve setpoint, psig 700
| |
| | |
| CENTRIFUGA L CHARGING PUMP S
| |
| | |
| Number 2
| |
| | |
| Design pressure, psig 2800
| |
| | |
| Design temperature,
| |
| ; %'()*3106&/.%,)+#
| |
| %'()*5%/8,3. :
| |
| /<
3106&/.%,)+#
| |
| 9%/8/.#/<
3106&/.%,3. -
| |
| ('45/&)%5%/8/.'5".033,3.
| |
| ;; 0.0&&/.(*),$5+
| |
| /<(#"# %="(&%8 ! 9/. )+#> ?,3. >@&0*?
| |
| >&/(86008 ?
| |
| ;;; (*(#"#
| |
| 2/(1/$1% ! 9,3.
| |
| | |
| ; *41"8%'#(*(3106
| |
| ;;
'%&2(4%3/4.0&*0.(*41"8%8
| |
| ;;; (*(#"# ! 9
| |
| $/'%80*#/<(#"#+"#+3106/*8+&%''"&%(*.5% A
| |
| $%106/.#0'+5%&(4+&%''"&%
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 54 REVISION 16- DECEMBER 2016 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| SAFETY INJECTION PUMPS Number 2
| |
| | |
| Design pressure, psig 1750**
| |
| | |
| Design temperature,
| |
| | |
| %'()*3106&/.%,)+#
| |
| | |
| %'()*5%/8,3.
| |
| | |
| /<
3106&/.%,)+#
| |
| | |
| 9%/8/.#/<
3106&/.%,3. :7
| |
| | |
| /<
8%'()*8('45/&)%+&%''"&%,+'() -
| |
| | |
| ; 0.0&&/.(*),$5+
| |
| | |
| /<(#"# %="(&%8 ! 9/. )+#> ?,3. :
:
| |
| | |
| ;;; (*(#"#
| |
| 2/(1/$1% ! 9,3. 7
| |
| | |
|
| |
| 9
| |
|
| |
| ! !
| |
| | |
| > %% "$'%4.(0*
-30&8%'()*+/&/#%.%&'?
| |
| | |
|
| |
| 9 D 9
| |
| | |
| > %% "$'%4.(0*
-30&8%'()*+/&/#%.%&'?
| |
| | |
| EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
| |
| ;
%&2(4%3/4.0&*0.(*41"8%8
| |
| ;; 0&.5%1(*%'3&0#.5% A .0.5%45/&)(*)+"#+/*8'/3%.@(*F%4.(0*+"#+'"4.(0*('01/.(0*2/12%'> G :: ?,
| |
| .5%'@'.%#8%'()*+&%''"&%(' +'()
0&.5%1(*%'3&0#.5%
| |
| '"4.(0*('01/.(0*2/12%> :: ?.0.5%'/3%.@(*F%4.(0*+"#+
| |
| '"4.(0*31/*) %',.5%'@'.%#8%'()*+&%''"&%(' +'()
0&
| |
| .5%1(*%'3&0#.5%'"4.(0*('01/.(0*2/12%'> ?.0.5%
| |
| 45/&)(*)+"#+'"4.(0*31/*)%',.5%'@'.%#8%'()*+&%''"&%('-
| |
| +'()
| |
| ;;; (*(#"# ! 9
| |
| $/'%80*#/<(#"#+"#+3106/*8+&%''"&%(*.5% A $%106/.#0'+5%&(4+&%''"&%
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 55 REVISION 16- DECEMBER 201 6 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| VALVES
| |
| | |
| Motor-operated valves Maximum expected stroke time*,
| |
| sec
| |
| : a. Up to and including 15 (open or close) 10 inches
| |
| : b. 12 inches 20 (open or close)
| |
| : c. SI8811A&B 100 (open only)
| |
| : d. SI8801A&B 10 (open only)
| |
| : e. CV112B&C 10 (close only)
| |
| : f. CV8105 and CV8106 10 (close only)
| |
| * Actual valve stroke times may differ from those shown above provided that an evaluation is performed to determine the impact on applicable plant analyses (i.e., longer valve stroke time evaluated for impact on overall time required to complete switchover to cold leg recirculation mode). ECCS motor- operated valve stroke time acceptance criteria are controlled under the station Inservice Testing ( IST)program.
| |
| Any changes to valve stroke time acceptance criteria are evaluated per the station IST program requirements. Stroke times do not include signal response times of the engineered safeguards signal, which is assumed to add 2 seconds to the valve actuation time.
| |
| 6.3- 56 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-2
| |
| | |
| ECCS RELIEF VALVES DATA
| |
| | |
| FLUID INLET SET BACK FLUID TEMPERATURE PRESSURE PRESSURE BUILDING DESCRIPTION DISCHARGE NORMAL (psig) CONSTANT (psig) CAPACITY
| |
| | |
| N2 supply to accumulators N2 AMB 700 0 0 1500 scfm
| |
| | |
| Safety injection pump discharge Water 100 1750 H )+#
| |
| %'(8"/1 5%/. &%
| |
| #02/1 +"#+ '/3%.@
| |
| (*F%4.(0* 1(*% A/.%& )+#
| |
| /3%.@ (*F%4.(0*
| |
| +"#+' '"4.(0*
| |
| 5%/8%& A/.%& )+#
| |
| | |
| 44"#"1/.0& .0 40*./(*#%*. A/.%& 0&
| |
| 2 Gas 120 700 0 0 1500 scfm
| |
| | |
| Residual heat removal pump suction header Water 350 450 3 50 900 g pm
| |
| | |
| Containment recirculation sump isolation valve Water 100 125 50 -- N/A*
| |
| * No specific relief capacity is required for this thermal relief valve.
| |
| H For Braidwood, the set pressure is 1810 psig.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 57 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-3
| |
| | |
| MOTOR- OPERATED ISOLATION VALVES IN ECCS
| |
| | |
| AUTOMATIC POSITION LOCATION VALVE I.D. INTERLOCKS FEATURES INDICATION ALARMS Accumulator SI8808 A,B,C,D S, RCS pres- Opens on S, on MCB Yes-out of position isolation sure > unblock RCS pressure valves > unblock
| |
| | |
| SI pump suc- SI8806 None None MCB Yes-out of position tion from SI8923 A&B None None MCB None RWST RHR suction SI8812 A&B Cannot be None MCB None from RWST opened unless sump valve closed RHR discharge CV8804A Cannot be None MCB None to SI/CHRG SI8804B opened unless pump suction SI pump mini-flow isolated SI HL injec- SI8802 A&B None None MCB None tion RHR HL injec- SI8840 None None MCB None tion
| |
| | |
| Containment SI8811 A&B Opens on RWST Opens on RWST MCB None sump isola-tion valve LO- 2 with S LO- 2 level signal alarm with S signal CVCS suction LCV-112 D&E Open on S Open on S MCB None from RWST
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 58 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-3 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| AUTOMATIC POSITION LOCATION VALVE I.D. INTERLOCKS FEATURES INDICATION ALARMS
| |
| | |
| CVCS normal LCV-112 B&C Close on S Close on S MCB None suction
| |
| | |
| SI pump to CL SI8835 None None MCB None
| |
| | |
| CVCS normal CV8105 Closes on S Closes on S MCB None discharge CV8106
| |
| | |
| Charging SI8807 A&B MCB None and SI pump SI8924 None None MCB None header from RHR
| |
| | |
| RHR to RCS SI8809 A&B None None MCB None cold legs
| |
| | |
| SI pump SI8813 None None MCB None miniflow SI8814 MCB None SI8920 MCB None
| |
| | |
| RHR cross- RH8716 A&B None None MCB None connect
| |
| | |
| SI pump SI8821 A&B None None MCB None cross-connect
| |
| | |
| CCP to RCS SI8801 A&B Open on S Open on S MCB None cold legs
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 59 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-4
| |
| | |
| MATERIALS EMPLOYED FOR
| |
| | |
| EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM COMPONENTS
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT MATERIAL Accumulators Carbon steel, clad with austenitic stainless steel Pumps Centrifugal charging Austenitic stainless steel Safety injection Austenitic stainless steel Residual heat removal Austenitic stainless steel
| |
| | |
| Residual heat exchangers Shell Carbon steel Shell end cap Carbon steel Tubes Austenitic stainless steel Channel Austenitic stainless steel Channel cover Austenitic stainless steel Tube sheet Austenitic stainless steel Valves Motor-operated valves containing radioactive fluids Pressure Austenitic stainless steel containing parts or equivalent Body-to-bonnet Low alloy steel bolting and nuts Seating surfaces Stellite No. 6 or equivalent
| |
| | |
| Stems Austenitic stainless steel or 17-4 PH stainless
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 60 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-4 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT MATERIAL
| |
| | |
| Motor-operated valves containing nonradioactive boron-free fluids
| |
| | |
| Body, bonnet and flange Carbon steel
| |
| | |
| Stems Corrosion resistance steel
| |
| | |
| Diaphragm Valves Austenitic stainless steel
| |
| | |
| Accumulator check valves
| |
| | |
| Parts contacting Austenitic stainless steel borated water
| |
| | |
| Clapper arm shaft Inconel 718
| |
| | |
| Relief valves
| |
| | |
| Stainless steel bodies Stainless steel
| |
| | |
| Carbon steel bodies Carbon steel
| |
| | |
| All nozzles, discs, spindles and guides Austenitic stainless steel
| |
| | |
| Bonnets for stainless Stainless steel or steel valves without a plated carbon steel balancing bellows
| |
| | |
| All other bonnets Carbon steel
| |
| | |
| Piping
| |
| | |
| All piping in contact Austenitic stainless with borated water Steel
| |
| | |
| Containment Recirculation Sump Stainless Steel, type 304 Screen
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 61 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-5
| |
| | |
| SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS FOR EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM COMPONENTS SHORT- TERM PHASE
| |
| | |
| COMPONENTS MALFUNCTION COMMENTS
| |
| : 1. Pumps
| |
| : a. Centrifugal charging Fails to start Two provided; evaluation based on operation of one.
| |
| : b. Safety injection Fails to start Two provided; evaluation based on operation of one.
| |
| : c. Residual heat removal Fails to start Two provided; evaluation based on operation of one.
| |
| : 2. Automatically operated valves
| |
| : a. Residual heat removal pumps Fails to open Two parallel lines; only one suction line to containment valve in either line required sump to open.
| |
| : b. Centrifugal Charging Pumps (1) Suction line to refueling Fails to open Two parallel lines; only one water storage tank valve in either line required to open.
| |
| (2) Discharge line to the Fails to close Two parallel in series; only normal charging path one valve required to close.
| |
| (3) Miniflow bypass line Fails to close Two valves in series; only one valve required to close.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 62 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-5 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT MALFUNCTION COMMENTS
| |
| | |
| (4) Suction from volume Fails to close Two valves in series; only one control tank valve required to close.
| |
| | |
| (5) Discharge line to Fails to open Two parallel lines; only one RCS cold legs valve required to open.
| |
| | |
| LONG- TERM PHASE
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT MALFUNCTION COMMENTS
| |
| : 1. Valves operated manually from the control room
| |
| : a. Residual heat removal pumps Fails to close Check valve in series with one suction line from refueling gate valve; operation of only water storage tank one valve required.
| |
| : b. Safety injection pump Fails to close Check valve in series with gate suction line from refueling valve; operation of only one water storage tank valve required.
| |
| : c. Centrifugal charging pump Fails to close Check valve in series with two suction line from refueling parallel gate valves; operation water storage tank of the gate valves required.
| |
| : d. High head pump suction line Fails to open Separate and independent high at discharge of residual head injection paths to safety heat exchanger injection pumps and charging pumps taking suction from discharge of residual heat exchangers; operation of only one valve required.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 63 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-5 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT MALFUNCTION COMMENTS
| |
| : e. Residual heat removal Fails to close Two valves in series; operation cross-connect line of one required.
| |
| : f. Safety injection pump Fails to close Two parallel valves provided miniflow lines inseries with a third; operation of either both parallel valves or series valve required.
| |
| : g. Safety injection/charging Fails to open Two parallel valves provided; cross- connect line in operation of either one suction header required.
| |
| : h. Safety injection/residual Fails to open Three flow paths available.
| |
| heat removal cold leg Adequate flow to core is isolation valves assured by any two.
| |
| I. Safety injection/residual Fails to close Redundant valves provided with heat removal cold leg suitable arrangements to preclude isolation valves pump runout.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 64 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-6
| |
| | |
| EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM RECIRCULATION PIPING PASSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS
| |
| | |
| LONG- TERM PHASE
| |
| | |
| FLOW PATH INDICATION OF LOSS OF FLOW PATH ALTERNATE FLOW PATH
| |
| | |
| From containment sump to low Accumulation of water in a residual Via the independent, head injection header via the heat removal pump compartment identical low head residual heat removal pumps orauxiliary building sump. flowpath utilizing and the residual heat thesecond residual exchangers. heatexchanger and residual heat removal pump
| |
| | |
| HIGH HEAD RECIRCULATION
| |
| | |
| From containment sump to the Accumulation of water in a residual From containment high head injection header heat removal pump compartment sump tothe high via residual heat removal or theauxiliary building sump or headinjection pump residual heat exchanger safety injection or charging pump headersvia alternate and the high head injection compartments. residual heat removal pumps. pump, residualheat exchanger, safety injection, or charging pump.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 65 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-7
| |
| | |
| SEQUENCE OF SWITCHOVER OPERATIONS
| |
| | |
| (BASED ON NO SINGLE FAILURES)
| |
| | |
| SWITCHOVER FROM INJECTION TO COLD LEG RECIRCULATION
| |
| | |
| The following subsections outline the major automatic and manual operator actions required to complete switchover from ECCS cold leg injection mode to cold leg recirculation mode following a LOCA. During the cold leg injection mode and prior to receipt of the RWST level LO-2 alarm, the operator is diagnosing the accident and verifying safety system actuation. Uponreceipt of the RWST level LO-2 alarm, the following actions are performed without delay. Manual actions one through six function to align the suction of the residual heat removal pumps to the containment recirculation sumps and to align the suction of the charging and safety injection pumps to the discharge of the residual heat removal pumps, thereby assuring a long term suction source for all ECCS pumps.
| |
| | |
| MAJOR STEPS FOR SWITCHOVER TO COLD LEG RECIRCULATION(1)
| |
| | |
| The RWST level LO-2 alarm signal in conjunction with a SI signal automatically initiates opening of the containment recirculation sump isolation valves (SI8811A&B). Upon receipt of the RWST level LO-2 alarm, the operator enters the switchover to cold leg recirculation emergency operating procedure, establishes/verifies component cooling water flow to the RHR heat exchangers, verifies adequate containment recirculation sump level and performs the following actions (Refer to emergency operating procedure B(w)EP ES- 1.3 Transfer to Cold Leg Recircula tion for a description of all steps, notes, and cautions):
| |
| | |
| Steps 1: When each containment recirculation sump isolation valve (SI8811A&B) has reached the fully open position, close the RWST to RHR pump suction isolation valves (SI8812A&B). Closing the SI8812A&B valves after the SI8811A&B valves open increases available switchover time by preventing gravity backflow from the RWST to the recirculation sumps and stopping RHR pump outflow from the RWST.
| |
| | |
| Step 2: Verify/close CV pump miniflow valves (CV8110, CV8111, CV8114, and CV8116).
| |
| | |
| Step 3: Close the three SI pump miniflow valves (SI8813, SI8814, and SI8920). If power has not been restored to the SI8813 valve, continue to the next step and close the SI8813 valve when power is restored.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 66 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-7 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| Step 4: Close the RHR heat exchanger discharge crosstie valves (RH8716A&B)
| |
| | |
| Step 5: Open the SI and CV pump suction header crosstie valves (SI8807A, SI8807B) and verify openvalve SI8924.
| |
| | |
| Step 6: If the associated train RHR pump is running, open the valve from the RH pump discharge line to the CV pump suction isolation valve and to the SI pump suction isolation valve (CV8804A and SI8804B) respectively.
| |
| | |
| Upon completion of Step 6, the ECCS is aligned for cold leg recirculation mode of operation with both RHR pumps delivering flow from the containment recirculation sump directly to the RCS cold legs (if RCS pressure is less than RHR pump shutoff head) and also delivering flow to the suction of the CV and SI pumps.
| |
| Both CV and SI pumps are also delivering flow to the RCS cold legs.
| |
| | |
| MAJOR STEPS TO ESTALISH REDUN DANT ISOLATION OF THE RECIRCULATING SUMP WATER FROM THE RWST:
| |
| | |
| Completion of the following manual actions are required to establish redundant isolation of the recirculating sump water from the RWST. These steps ensure a single valve failure (either check valve or motor- operated valve) will not result in pumping contaminated recirculation sump water to the RWST and decrease ECCS flow to the reactor vessel:
| |
| | |
| Step 1: Restore power to and close the RWST to SI pumps suction isolation valve (SI8806). If power has not been restored to the SI8806 valve, continue to the next step and close the SI8806 valve when power is restored.
| |
| | |
| Step 2: Close the RWST to CV pump suction valves (CV112D&E)
| |
| | |
| MAJOR STEPS FOR CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP SWITCHOVER FROM THE RWST TO THE CONTAINMENT RECIRCULATION SUMPS:
| |
| | |
| Containment spray pump switchover to the recirculation sumps is initiated upon receipt to the RWST level LO -3 alarm. Upon completion of the following manual actions, the containment spray pumps will have a long term suction source from the containment recirculation sumps:
| |
| | |
| Step 1: Open CS pump sump suction valves (CS009A&B)
| |
| | |
| Step 2: Close CSpump RWST suction valves (CS001A&B)
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 67 REVISION 13 -DECEMBER 2010 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-7 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| The actions stated above only outline major procedural steps required for switchover of ECCS and CS pumps to the recirculation mode of operation and providing redundant isolation of the RWST from the recirculating sump water. Refer to B(w)EP ES -1.3 for the exact description and sequence of all procedural steps, notes, and cautious required for proper ECCS system operation during switchover to cold leg recirculation.
| |
| | |
| SWITCHOVER FROM COLD LEG RECIRCULATION TO HOT LEG RECIRCULATION
| |
| | |
| At approximately 6.0hours after the accident, hot leg recirculation shall be initiated. The following manual operator actions are normally performed to complete the switchover operation from the cold leg recirculation mode to the hot leg recirculation mode.
| |
| | |
| SWITCHOVER STEPS
| |
| | |
| STEP 1: Close residual heat removal pump discharge cold leg header isolation valves SI8809 A&B.
| |
| STEP 2: Open residual heat removal pump discharge crossover isolation valve RH8716 A.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 67a REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-7 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| STEP 3: Open the residual heat removal pump discharge hot leg header isolation valve (SI8840).
| |
| | |
| STEP 4: Stop safety injection pump A.
| |
| STEP 5: Close the corresponding safety injection pump discharge crossover header isolation valve (SI8821A).
| |
| STEP 6: Open the corresponding safety injection pump discharge hot leg header isolation valve (SI8802A).
| |
| STEP 7: Restart safety injection pump A.
| |
| STEP 8: Stop safety injection pump B.
| |
| STEP 9: Close the corresponding safety injection pump discharge crossover isolation valve (SI8821B).
| |
| | |
| STEP 10: Open the corresponding safety injection pump discharge hot leg header isolation valve (SI8802B).
| |
| | |
| STEP 11: Restart safety injection pump B.
| |
| STEP 12: Close the safety injection pump discharge cold leg header isolation valve (SI8835).
| |
| | |
| The ECCS is now aligned for hot leg recirculation as follows:
| |
| : a. Both residual heat removal pumps are delivering from the containment sump directly to the RCS hot legs and are also delivering to the suction of the safety injectionand charging pumps.
| |
| : b. Both safety injection pumps are delivering to the RCS hot legs.
| |
| : c. Both charging pumps are delivering to the RCS cold legs.
| |
| NOTES:
| |
| | |
| (1) The operator actions for switchover from injection to cold leg recirculation are not to be interrupted until all of the steps in the switchover are completed; however, if the RWST empty level is reached anytime during the switchover, immediately stop any pumps that are not either aligned to the recirculation sump or RH pump discharge, then complete the switchover and restart any pump which was stopped, starting with the residual heat removal pump.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 68 REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-8
| |
| | |
| EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM SHARED FUNCTIONS EVALUATION
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT NORMAL OPERATING ARRANGEMENT ACCIDENT ARRANGEMENT
| |
| | |
| Refueling water Lined up to suction of safety Lined up to suction of storage tank injection and residual heat centrifugal charging, safety removal pumps injection and residual heat removal pumps.
| |
| | |
| Centrifugal Lined up for charging service. Lined for injection. Valves charging pumps for realignment meet single failure criteria.
| |
| | |
| Residual heat Lined up to cold legs of reactor Lined up to cold legs of removalpumps coolant piping. reactor coolant piping.
| |
| | |
| Residual heat Lined up to cold legs of Lined up to cold legs of exchangers reactor coolant piping. reactor coolant piping.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 69 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-9
| |
| | |
| NORMAL OPERATING STATUS OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING
| |
| | |
| SYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR CORE COOLING1
| |
| | |
| Number of safety injection pumps operable 2
| |
| | |
| Number of charging pumps operable 2
| |
| | |
| Number of residual heat removal pumps operable 2
| |
| | |
| Number of residual heat exchangers operable 2
| |
| | |
| Minimum Refueling water storage tank volume, gal 407,000
| |
| | |
| Boron concentration in refueling water storage tanks, nominal, ppm 2,400
| |
| | |
| Boron concentration in accumulator, minimum, ppm 2,200
| |
| | |
| Number of accumulators 4
| |
| | |
| Minimum accumulator pressure, psig 602 Minimum accumulator water volume, ft3 935
| |
| | |
| System valves, interlocks, and piping re quired for the above components which are operable All
| |
| | |
| 1 See Technical Specifications for all exceptions.
| |
| 6.3- 70 REVISION 9 -DECEMBER 2002 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10
| |
| | |
| FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS -EMERGENCY CORECOOLING SYSTEM -ACTIVE COMPONENTS
| |
| | |
| ECCS *EFFECT ON SYSTEM **FAILURE DETECTION COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASE OPERATION METHOD REMARKS
| |
| : 1. Motor-operated Fails to close Injection -cold Failure reduces Valve position Valve is electrically gate valve on demand. legs of RC loops. redundancy providing indication (open to closed interlocked with 1/2CV112B VCT discharge isolation. position change) at MCB. isolation valve (1/2CV112C No effect on safety Valve closedposition 1/2CV112D.
| |
| analogous). for system operation; monitor light for group Valve closes on isolation valves monitoring of components actuation by a SI 1/2CV112C and 1/2CV8440 at MCB. "S" signal providing provides backup tank isolation valve discharge isolation. 1/2CV112D is at a full open position.
| |
| : 2. Motor-operated Fails to open Injection -cold Failure reduces Valve position Valve is electrically gate valve on demand. legs of RC loops. redundancy of providing indication (closed to interlocked with 1/2CV112D fluid flow from RWST open position change) at the instrumentation (1/2CV112E to suction of CV MCB. Valve open position that monitors fluid analogous). pumps. No effect on monitor light for level of the VCT.
| |
| safety for system group monitoring of Valve opens upon operation. Alternate components at MCB. actuation by a SI isolation valve "S" signal or upon (1/2CV112E) opens to actuation by a provide backup flow LO-2 level path to suction of VCT signal.
| |
| CV pumps.
| |
| | |
| *See list at end of table for definition of acronyms and abbreviations used.
| |
| **As part of plant operation, periodic tests, surveillance inspections and instrument calibrations are made to monitor equipment andperformance. Failure may be detected during such monitoring of equipment in addition to detection methodsnoted.
| |
| 6.3- 71 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| : 3. Centrifugal Fails to deliver Injection and Failure reduces CV pump discharge One CV pump charging pump A, working fluid. Recirculation- redundancy of providing header flow (FT-3A) at used for normal (pump B cold legs of emergency coolant to MCB. Open pump switchgear charging of RCS analogous). RC loops. the RCS at prevailing circuit breaker during plant incident RCS pressure. indication at MCB. operation. Pump Fluid flow from CV Pump running circuit breaker pump A will be lost. monitor light aligned to close Minimum flow requirements for group monitoring of on actuation by a at prevailing high RCS components at MCB. SI "S" signal.
| |
| pressures will be met by Common breaker trip CV pump Bdelivery. alarm at MCB.
| |
| : 4. Motor-operated Fails to close Injection -cold Failure reduces Same methods of detection Valve aligned to globe valve on demand. legs of RC loops. redundancy of providing as those stated for close upon actuation Pump A: 1/2CV8111 isolation of CV item #1. In addition, by a SI "S" signal in (1/2CV8114 pump miniflow line. valve close position conjunction with RWST analogous), No effect on safety alarm for 1/2CV8114 and LO-2 level.
| |
| Pump B: 1/2CV8110 for system operation. 1/2CV8116 at MCB.
| |
| (1/2CV8116 Alternate isolation analogous). valve 1/2CV8114 (Pump A)/
| |
| 1/2CV8116 (Pump B) in miniflow line provides backup isolation.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 72 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| : 5. Motor-operated Fails to close Injection -cold Failure reduces Same methods of detection Valve aligned to gate valve 1/2CV8105 on demand. legs of RC loops. redundancy of providing as those stated close upon actuation (1/2CV8106 isolation of CV for item #1. by a SI "S" analogous). pump discharge to signal.
| |
| normal charging line of CVCS. No effect on safety for system operation. Alternate valve 1/2CV8106 provides backup normal CVCS charging line isolation.
| |
| : 6. Motor-operated Fails to open Injection -cold Failure reduces Same methods of detection Valve aligned to gate valve 1/2SI8801A on demand. legs of RC loops. redundancy of fluid flow as those stated open upon actuation (1/2SI8801B paths from CV for item #2. by a SI "S" analogous). pumps to the RCS. No signal.
| |
| effect on safety for system operation.
| |
| Alternate isolation valve 1/2SI8801Bopens to provide backup flow path from CVpumps.
| |
| : 7. Motor-operated a. Fails to Injection -cold a. Failure reduces a. Valve position Valve is regulated gate valve 1/2RH610 close on legs of RC loops. work fluid indication by signal from (1/2RH611 demand. delivered to RCS (open to closed flow transmitter analogous). from RHR pump A. position change) located in pump Minimum flow at MCB. RHR pump discharge header.
| |
| requirements for discharge The control valve
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 73 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| ECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEM FAILURE DETECTION COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASE OPERATION METHOD REMARKS
| |
| | |
| injectionwill be flow (FI-618) at MCB. opens when the met by RHR pump B pump discharge delivering working flow is less than fluid to RCS. 750 gpm and closes when the flow exceeds 1400 gpm whenthe valve MCB control switch
| |
| : b. Fails closed Injection -cold b. Failure results is in the Auto legs of RC loops. in an insufficient position.
| |
| fluid flow through RHR pump Afor a small LOCA or steam line break resulting in possible pump damage. If pump becomes inoperative minimum flow requirements for injectionwill be met by RHR pump B delivering working fluid to RCS.
| |
| : 8. Residual heat Fails to deliver Injection -cold Failure reducesredundancy RHR pump discharge The RHR pump is removal pump A, working fluid. legs of RC loops. of providing flow (FI-618) and low sized to deliver (Pump B emergency coolant to flow alarm at MCB. RHR reactor coolant analogous). the RCS from the pump discharge pressure through the RHR RWST at low RCS pressure. (PI-614) at MCB. heat exchanger Fluid flow from pump Open pump switchgear to meet plant cooldown require-
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 74 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| | |
| A will be lost. Minimum circuit breaker indication ments and is used flow requirements for at MCB. Pump running during plant cooldown injection will be met by monitor light for group and startup operations.
| |
| RHR pump B delivering monitoring of components The pump circuit working fluid. at MCB. Common breaker breaker is aligned trip alarm at MCB. to close on actuation by SI S signal.
| |
| : 9. Safety injection Fails to deliver Injection -cold Failure reduces SI pumps discharge Pump circuit pump A, working fluid. legs of RC loops. redundancy of providing pressure (PI-919) at breaker aligned (Pump B analogous). emergency coolant to MCB. SI pump discharge to close on actuation the RCS from the RWST flow (PI-918) at MCB. by a SI "S" at high RCS pressure. Open pump switchgear signal.
| |
| Fluid flow from SI pump A circuit breaker indication will be lost. Minimum at MCB. Pump running flow requirements for monitor light for group injection will be met by monitoring of components SI pump B delivering at MCB. Common breaker working fluid. trip alarm at MCB.
| |
| | |
| 10.Motor-operated Fails to open Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of detection Valve is actuated gate valve on demand. cold legs of RC of providing fluid as those stated for to open by SI "S" 1/2SI8811A loops. from the containment item #2. In addition, signal in coincidence (1/2SI8811B sump to the RCS failure may be detected with two-out-of-four analogous). during recirculation. through monitoring of RHR LO-2 level RWST RHR pump A will pump flow (FI-618) and signals. Valve not provide recirculation RHR pump discharge is electrically flow. Minimum injection interlocked from flow requirements
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 75 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| ECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEM FAILURE DETECTION COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASE OPERATION METHOD REMARKS
| |
| | |
| willbe met through pressure (PI-614) manually being opening of isolation at MCB. opened from MCB valve 1/2SI8811B and by recirculation of fluid 1/2SI8812A, by RHR pump B. 1/2RH8701A and 1/2RH8701B.
| |
| (For B train:
| |
| 1/2SI8812B, 1/2RH8702A, 1/2RH8702B)
| |
| | |
| 11.Motor- operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces Same methods of Valve is gate valve 1/2SI8812A on demand. cold legs of RC redundancy of providing detection as those electronically (1/2SI8812B analogous). loops. flow isolation from RWST stated for item #1. interlocked with to containment sump. valve 1/2SI8811A.
| |
| No effect on safety It may not be for system operation. manually opened Alternate check isolation from MCB unless valve 1/2SI8958A valve 1/2SI8811A provides backup isolation. is closed.
| |
| | |
| 12.Motor- operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of detection gate valve 1/2RH8716A on demand. cold legs of RC of providing RHR as those stated for (1/2RH8716B loops. pump train separation item #1.
| |
| analogous). for recirculation of fluids to cold legs of RCS. No effect on safety for system operation.
| |
| Alternate isolation valve 1/2RH8716B provides backup isolation for RHR pump train separation.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 76 REVISION 16- DECEMBER 2016 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| | |
| 13.Motor-operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces Same methods of globe valve on demand. cold legs of RC redundancy providing detection as those 1/2SI8813. loops. isolation of SI stated for item #1.
| |
| pump's miniflow line from RWST. No effect on safety for system operation.
| |
| Alternate isolation valve 1/2SI8814 (Pump A) and 1/2SI8920 (Pump B) in each pump's miniflow line provide backup isolation.
| |
| 14.Motor-operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces Same methods of globe valve 1/2SI8814 on demand. cold legs of RC redundancy of providing detection as those (1/2SI8920 analogous). loops. isolation of SI stated for item #1.
| |
| pump A miniflow isolation from RWST. No effect on safety for system operation.
| |
| Alternate isolation valve 1/2SI8813 in main miniflow line provides backup isolation.
| |
| 15.Motor-operated Fails to open Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of gate valve on demand. cold legs of RC of providing fluid flow detection as 1/2SI8807A loops. through cross-tie between those stated (1/2SI8807B suction of CV pumps for item #2.
| |
| analogous). and SI pumps. No effect on safety for system
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 77 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| | |
| operation. Alternate isolation valve 1/2SI8807B opens to provide backup flow path through cross-tie line.
| |
| 16.Motor-operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of gate valve on demand. cold legs of RC of providing flow detection as those 1/2SI8806. loops. isolation of SI pump stated for item #1.
| |
| suction from RWST. No effect on safety for system operation.
| |
| Alternate check isolation valve 1/2SI8926 provides backup isolation.
| |
| 17.Motor-operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of gate valve 1/2CV112D on demand. cold legs of RC of providing flow detection as those (1/2CV112E analogous). loops. isolation of suction stated foritem #1.
| |
| of CV pumps from RWST. No effect on safety for system operation.
| |
| Alternate check isolation valve 1/2CV8546 provides backup isolation.
| |
| 18.Residual heat Fails to deliver Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of detection removal pump A, working fluid. cold legs of RC of providing as those stated (pump B loops. recirculation of for item #8.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 78 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| | |
| analogous). coolant to the RCS from the Containment Sump. Fluid flow from RHR pump A will be lost. Minimum recirculation flow requirements for injection flow will be met by RHR pump B delivering working fluid.
| |
| | |
| 19.Safety injection Fails to deliver Recirculation - Failure reduces Same methods of pump A, (pump B working fluid. cold or hot legs redundancy of providing detection as those analogous). of RC loops. recirculation of stated coolant to the RCS for item#9.
| |
| from the Containment Sump via RHR and SI pumps. Fluid flow from SI pump A will be lost. Minimum recirculation flow requirements for injection flow will be met by SI pump B delivering working fluid.
| |
| | |
| 20.Motor-operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of gate valve on demand. hot legs of RC of providing detection as those 1/2SI8809A. loops. recirculation of stated for item #1.
| |
| coolant to the RCS from the Containment Sump to hot legs of RC loops. Fluid flow from RHR pump A
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 79 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHOD REMARKS
| |
| | |
| will continue to flow to cold legs of RC loops.
| |
| Minimum recirculation flow requirements to hot legs of RC loops will be met by RHR pump B recirculation fluid to RC hot legs via SI pumps.
| |
| 21.Motor-operated Fails to open Recirculation - Failure reduces Same methods of detection gate valve on demand. hot legs of RC redundancy of providing as those stated for item #2.
| |
| 1/2RH8716A. loops. recirculation of In addition, RHR pump coolant to the RCS discharge pressure from the Containment (PI-614) at MCB.
| |
| Sump to the hot legs of RC loops. Fluid flow from RHR pump A will be lost.
| |
| Minimum recirculation flow requirements to hot legs of RC loops will be met by RHR pump B recirculation fluid to RC hot legs via SI pump(s).
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 80 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| | |
| 22.Motor-operated Fails to open Recirculation - Failure reduces Same methods of detection gate valve on demand. hot legs of RC redundancy of as those stated for item 1/2SI8840. loops. providing recirculation #2. In addition, RHR pump of coolant to the hot discharge pressure legs of RCS from the (PI-614) at MCB.
| |
| containment sump via RHR pumps.
| |
| Minimum recirculating flow requirements to the hot legs of RC loops will be met by RHR pump(s) recirculating fluid via the SI pump(s) to hot legs of RC loops.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 80a REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| | |
| 23.Motor-operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces Same methods of gate valve on demand. hot legs of RC redundancy of providing detection as those 1/2SI8809B. loops. recirculation of stated for item #1.
| |
| coolant to the RCS from the Containment Sump to hot legs of RC loops. Fluid flow from RHR pump B will continue to flow to cold legs of RC loops.
| |
| Minimum recirculation flow requirements to hot legs of RC loops will be met by RHR pump A recirculating fluid to RC hot legs via the SI pump(s).
| |
| | |
| 24.Motor-operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces Same method of detection gate valve on demand. hot legs of RC redundancy of providing flow as that stated 1/2SI8821A loops. isolation of SI for item #1.
| |
| (1/2SI8821B pump flow to cold legs analogous). of RC loops. No effect on safety for system operation. Alternate isolation valve 1/2SI8835provides backup isolation against flow to cold legs of RC loops.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 81 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHOD REMARKS
| |
| | |
| 25.Motor-operated Fails to open Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of detection gate valve on demand. hot legs of RC of providing as those stated 1/2SI8802A loops. recirculation of for item #2. In addition, (1/2SI8802B coolant to the hot SI pump discharge analogous). legs of RCS from the pressure (PI-919) and Containment Sump via flow (FI-918) indications SI pumps. Minimum at MCB.
| |
| recirculating flow requirements to hot legs of RC loops will be met by SI pump B.
| |
| 26.Motor-operated Fails to close Recirculation - Failure reduces redundancy Same methods of detection gate valve on demand. hot legs of RC of providing as that stated 1/2SI8835. loops. flow isolation of for item #1.
| |
| SI pump flow to cold legs of RC loops. No effect on safety for system operation.
| |
| Alternate isolation valves 1/2SI8821Aand 1/2SI8821Bin cross-tie line between SI pumps provides backup isolation against flow to cold legs of RC loops.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 82 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- USFAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| COMPONENT FAILURE MODE OPERATION PHASEECCS EFFECT ON SYSTEMOPERATION FAILURE DETECTIONMETHODREMARKS
| |
| | |
| 27.Residual heat Fails to deliver Recirculation - Failure reduced redundancy Same method of detection removal pump A, working fluid. hot legs of RC of providing as thosestated (pump B loops. recirculation of cool- for item #8.
| |
| analogous). ant to the RCS from the Containment Sump to the hot legs of RC loops. Fluid flow from RHR pump A will be lost. Minimum flow requirements to hot legs of RC loop will be met by RHR pump B recirculation fluid to RC hot legs via SI pumps.
| |
| 28.Thermal relief Fails to open Recirculation - Failure could render Valve set to valve 1/2SI121A cold legs of RC 1/2SI8811A inoperable open at 75 psid (1/2SI121B loops (fails to open) due to analogous) pressure locking. Effect on system operation is the same as Item 10 above.
| |
| | |
| Fails to close Recirculation - Eliminates 1/2SI8811A cold legs of RC pressure locking loops concern.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 83 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-10 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| LIST OFABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CV -Chemical and Volume Control LOCA -Loss-of-Coolant Accident MCB -Main Control Board RC -Reactor Coolant RCS -Reactor Coolant System RHR -Residual Heat Removal RWST -Refueling Water Storage Tank SI -Safety Injection VCT -Volume Control Tank
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 84 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-11
| |
| | |
| ECCS ACTIVE COMPONENTS
| |
| | |
| VALVE LOCATION TYPE/ANS SEISMIC DESIGN ACTUATED NUMBER SYSTEM SAFETY CLASS CLASSIFICATION (1) BY SERVICES (2) 121 A/B SIS Relief/2 I ! --
| |
| 8900 A/B/C/D SIS Check/1 I(1) ! --
| |
| | |
| 8815 SIS Check/1 I ! --
| |
| | |
| 8801 A/B SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B 8843 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train N/A 8807 A/B SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B 8924 SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train B 8964 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train B 8871 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train A 8948 A/B/C/D SIS Check/1 I ! --
| |
| 8956 A/B/C/D SIS Check/1 I ! --
| |
| | |
| 8808 A/B/C/D SIS Gate/1 I Motor Electrical Train A/B/B/A 8968 SIS Check/2 I ! --
| |
| | |
| 8880 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train A 8949 A/B/C/D SIS Check/1 I ! --
| |
| 8841 A/B SIS Check/1 I ! --
| |
| 8905 A/B/C/D SIS Check/1 I ! --
| |
| | |
| 8823 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train N/A 8824 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train N/A 8825 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train N/A
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 85 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-11 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| VALVE LOCATION TYPE/ANS SEISMIC DESIGN ACTUATED NUMBER SYSTEM SAFETY CLASS CLASSIFICATION BY SERVICES (2) 8819 A/B/C/D SIS Check/1 I(1) ! --
| |
| 8818 A/B/C/D SIS Check/1 I P --
| |
| 8890 A/B SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train N/A 8809 A/B SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B 8840 SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train B 8804 B SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train --B 8958 A/B SIS Check/2 I P 8812 A/B SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B 8835 SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train B 8821 A/B SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B 8802 A/B SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B 8881 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train N/A 8888 SIS Globe/2 I Air Electrical Train B--
| |
| 8922 A/B SIS Check/2 I P 8814 SIS Globe/2 I Motor Electrical Train A 8920 SIS Globe/2 I Motor Electrical Train A 8813 SIS Globe/2 I Motor Electrical Train B 8923 A/B(Byron) SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B--
| |
| 8926 SIS Check/2 I P 8806 SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A 8811 A/B SIS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B 8105 CVCS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train B 8106 CVCS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A 8114 CVCS Globe/2 I Solenoid Electrical Train A 8116 CVCS Globe/2 I Solenoid Electrical Train B 8804A CVCS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 86 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-11 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| VALVE LOCATION TYPE/ANS SEISMIC DESIGN ACTUATED NUMBER SYSTEM SAFETY CLASS CLASSIFICATION (1) BY SERVICES (2) (3) 8110 CVCS Globe/2 I(1) Motor Electrical Train A
| |
| | |
| 8111 CVCS Globe/2 I Motor Electrical Train B 8440 CVCS Check/2 I ! --
| |
| 8481 A/B CVCS Check/2 I P --
| |
| 8546 CVCS Check/2 I P --
| |
| LCV-112 B/C CVCS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B LCV-112 D/E CVCS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B 8716 A/B RHRS Gate/2 I Motor Electrical Train A/B FCV-610 RHRS Globe/2 I Motor Electrical Train A FCV-611 RHRS Globe/2 I Motor Electrical Train B--
| |
| 8730 A/B RHRS Check/2 I P
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 87 REVISION 5 - DECEMBER 1994 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-11 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| ANS SEISMIC DESIGN PUMP SYSTEM SAFETY CLASS CLASSIFICATION SERVICES (3)
| |
| | |
| Centrifugal Charging CVCS 2 I Service Water, Bearing oil, No. 1 and 2 Gear oil, electrical train A/B
| |
| | |
| Safety Injection SIS 2 I Service Water, Bearing oil, No. 1 and 2 electrical train A/B
| |
| | |
| Residual Heat Removal RHRS 2 I C.C.W., electrical train A/B No. 1 and 2
| |
| | |
| Notes:
| |
| | |
| (1) I, denotes Seismic Category I per paragraph (B) of Regulatory Guide 1.29.
| |
| | |
| (2) Services other than "Air"; components requiring "Air" are designated as such in column Actuated By.
| |
| | |
| (3) Does not include environment control services, i.e., HVAC.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 88 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Table 6.3-12 has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 89 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| This page has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 90 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Table 6.3-13 has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 91 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| This page has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 92 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-14
| |
| | |
| ECCS AIR OPERATED VALVES
| |
| | |
| CORRECT POSITION VALVE FOLLOWING AUTOMATIC POSITION INDICATION LOCATION SAFEGUARDS FAILURE POSITIONING NUMBER ACTUATION POSITION SIGNAL RED/GREEN MONITOR LIGHTS SI8843 C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8882 C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8964 C F.C. T Yes Yes SI8871 C F.C. T Yes Yes SI8888 C F.C. T Yes Yes SI8879 A/B/C/D C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8877 A/B/C/D C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8875 A/B/C/D C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8878 A/B/C/D C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8880 C F.C. T Yes Yes SI8889 A/B/C/D C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8823 C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8824 C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8825 C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| SI8881 C F.C. -- Yes Yes SI8890 A/B C F.C. -- Yes --
| |
| FCV-618 C F.C. -- No* --
| |
| FCV-619 C F.C. -- No* --
| |
| HCV-606 O F.O. -- No* Yes**
| |
| HCV-607 O F.O. -- No* Yes**
| |
| HCV-943 C F.C. -- No* --
| |
| F.C. - Fails Closed F.O. - Fails Open C -Closed O -Open
| |
| | |
| *Position indication by percent valve opening.
| |
| **Provided with incorrect -closed position alarm on the Main Control Board.
| |
| 6.3- 93 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Table 6.3-15 have been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 94 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| This page have been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 95 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-16
| |
| | |
| ECCS VENT VALVES LOCATED INSIDE CONTAINMENT
| |
| | |
| BRAIDWOOD BRAIDWOOD BYRON BYRON LOCATION UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 1 UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| RHR Cold Leg 1SI092 2SI092 1SI092 2SI139 1SI093 2SI093 1SI093 1SI094 2SI094 1SI094 1SI096 2SI096 1SI140A 1SI097 2SI097 1SI140B
| |
| | |
| SI Cold Leg 1SI083 2SI098A 1SI083 2SI128 1SI098A 2SI098B 1SI128 2SI129 1SI098B 2SI098C 1SI130 2SI130 1SI098C 2SI098D 1SI131 2SI131 1SI098D 1SI133 2SI132 2SI133 2SI134 2SI135 2SI136
| |
| | |
| RHR Hot Leg 1SI089 1SI089
| |
| | |
| SI Hot Leg 1SI085 1SI085
| |
| | |
| SI Pumps Cold Leg 1SI082 1SI082 Injection Header High Point Vent
| |
| | |
| 6.3- 96 REVISION 1 7-DECEMBER 2018 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| This page has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-97 REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.3-17
| |
| | |
| PERMANENT DESIGN ECCS AND CS SYSTEM VOID LOCATIONS
| |
| | |
| LOCATION DESCRIPTION
| |
| | |
| Downstream of Valves Pump suction piping void 1/2SI8811A/B within the bellows, valve canister,and valve body due to sloped piping.
| |
| | |
| Downstream of Valves Pump suction piping void in 1/2CS009A the top of the pipe, elbow, and valve body due to the reduced port size of the gate valve.
| |
| | |
| 6.3-98 REVISION 13 - DECEMBER 2010 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| APPENDIX 6.3A PROPER POSITIONING OF VALVES B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Spurious Actuation or Mispositioning of Motor-Operated Valves In compliance with Branch Technical Position ICSB 18 (PSB),
| |
| "Application of the Single Failure Criterion to Manually-Controlled Electrically-Operated Valves," Subsection 6.3.1 identifies valves that have a control board power removal and restoration provision and Subsection 8.1.10 states that provisions are provided to disconnected power to the valves electrical systems.
| |
| | |
| Additionally, these valves have monitor panel position indication and alarms should they be mispositioned during normal operation.
| |
| The monitor panel position indication is in addition to the normal red- green position indication, and is provided via stem- mounted limit switches, which are independent of the normal limitorque position switches.
| |
| During normal plant operation as well as SI initiation following safeguards actuation, the above provisions ensure that motor- operated hot leg recirculation isolation valves SI8802A andSI8802B are or will remain in the correct position, which isclosed, and are not subject to inadvertent operator mispositioning.
| |
| | |
| Spurious actuation or mispositioning of valve SI8835 would not terminate all cold leg injection flow. Valve SI8835 is in the cold leg injection path from the discharge of the safety injection pumps to the RCS. Any spurious actuation or mispositioning of this valve would affect only the safety injection pump subsystem of the safety injection system. The centrifugal charging pumps, residual heat removal pumps, and the accumulators also provide cold leg injection flow to the RCS, depending upon the prevailing RCS pressure, as their ECCS safety injection system function.
| |
| | |
| The motor-operated valve SI8813, located in the minimum flow bypass line for SI pumps, is protected against spurious operationas discussed above.
| |
| | |
| Administrative procedures require control room power lockout during normal operation with valve SI8813 in the open position.
| |
| With these design provisions, any concern of damage to both safety injection pumps due to inadvertent valve movement is eliminated. Further, following an accident, power can easily berestored to the valve operator and the valve repositioned as required duringswitchover from the injection to the recirculation mode (also see Subsection 8.1.10).
| |
| | |
| Proper Positioning of Manually Operated Valves There is no single ECCS manual valve which, through mispositioning, could result in the defeat of redundant ECCS trains. Manual valves are utilized in the ECCS as (1) maintenance isolation valves and (2) throttling valves. In addition, manual valves are utilized as redundant ECCS isolation valves. When utilized forthese functions manual isolation
| |
| | |
| 6.3A-1 REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014 B/B- UFSAR valves are under administrative control which require them to be locked in the correct position (i.e., locked open, locked closed, or locked in place) to support ECCS operation.
| |
| The following manual valves are utilized as maintenance isolation valves and are located so that no single valve can isolate both trains of ECCS equipment:
| |
| SI8921 A/B Safety injection pump discharge CV8471 A/B Charging pump suction CV8485 A/B Charging pump discharge RH8724 A/B Residual heat removal pump discharge The following manual valves are utilized as throttling valves in the injection branch paths of high and intermediate head ECCS pumps. These valves are located inside containment and are common to redundant pump subsystems. If incorrectly positioned, these valves could affect ECCS flow rates to the reactor coolant system. Pump runout protection is provided by the throttle valves via a specialized trim package.
| |
| SI8810 A/B/C/D Charging pump to cold legs SI8816 A/B/C/D Safety injection pump to hot legs SI8822 A/B/C/D Safety injection pump to cold legs The following manual valves are utilized as isolation valves in the ECCS cold leg injection path. These valves are located in the auxiliary building and are closed, if needed, when ECCS cold leg injection isolation valves SI8801A/B fail to close. These valves are installed in a parallel path in series with SI8801A/B valves so that no single valve can isolate both trains of ECCS equipment:
| |
| SI101A SI8801A Upstream isolation valve SI101B SI8801B Upstream isolation valve In addition to the above itemized valves, there are other ECCS manual valves which, through mispositioning, can degrade the performance of the ECCS in mitigating an accident. These valves, listed below, are under administrative control commensurate with their function in the ECCS. Additionally, all of these valves, with the exception of SX254 (Braidwood only) and CV8479A and B, have computer point inputs providing position indication that could be used to monitor availability of ECCS.
| |
| | |
| 6.3A-2 REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| CV8479A & B Centrifugal charging pump recirculation
| |
| | |
| SI8963 Return to RWST from accumulator fill line
| |
| | |
| CS002A & B Containment spray pump suction CS004A & B Containment spray pump discharge
| |
| | |
| CS035A & B Containment spray eductor motive flow supply CS021A & B Containment spray eductor NaOH supply
| |
| | |
| CS018A & B Containment spray eductor NaOH supply CS040A & B Containment spray eductor NaOH supply
| |
| | |
| CS017A & B Containment spray eductor NaOH supply
| |
| | |
| 6.3A- 2a REVISION 14 - DECEMBER 2012 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| SI001A & B Containment spray pump recirculation (Test) to RWST AF002A & B Auxiliary feedwater pump suction
| |
| | |
| AF009A & B Auxiliary feedwater pump recirculation CD091 Condensate storage tank isolation (AF suction)
| |
| | |
| CD022 Condensate storage tank isolation (makeup and overflow)
| |
| | |
| CD149 Auxiliary feedwater suction isolation SX012A & B Essential service water pump discharge to various heat exchangers
| |
| | |
| SX013A & B Essential service water pump discharge to various heat exchangers
| |
| | |
| SX015A & B Essential service water return from various heat exchangers SX2102 Essential service water discharge from (Braidwood auxiliary feedwater pump lube oil Units 1 and2) cooler
| |
| | |
| SX052A & B Essential service water supply to DG heat exchangers SX057A & B Essential service water discharge from heat exchangers
| |
| | |
| SX104A & B Cross-tie valves toessential service water cooling of DG heat exchangers
| |
| | |
| SX105A & B Cross-tie valves in essential service water cooling of DG heat exchangers
| |
| : SX018A, B, C, & D Essential service water supply to primary containment coolers
| |
| : SX021A, B, C, & D Essential service water discharge from primary containment coolers SX022A, B C, & D Essential service water supply to primary containment coolers
| |
| | |
| 6.3A-3 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| SX025A, B, C, & D Essential service water discharge from primary containment coolers
| |
| | |
| SX254 Essential service water discharge from (Braidwood primary containment coolers - A train only) only Multiple valves in the component cooling system which provide cooling water to ESF equipment are also provided with position indication in the main control room.
| |
| | |
| RCS and ECCS piping has been reviewed to identify any lengths of piping which are isolated by normally closed valves and which do not have pressure relief protection in the piping section between the valves. The following categories of piping lengths were identified.
| |
| : a. Piping vents, drains, test connections, etc.,
| |
| typically have two closed valves or one closed valve and a blind flange.
| |
| : b. RCS loop fill and loop drain connections have two closed valves.
| |
| : c. ECCS check valve test lines have sections that are isolated by two closed valves.
| |
| | |
| In all cases, the identified piping sections have design pressure/temperature conditions compatible with the process piping to which they connect. Thus, valve leakage will not function to overpressurize the identified piping sections and pressure relief provisions to accommodate valve leakage are not required. Further, the identified piping segments are intended for normal operation functions and are not required to be operational either to cool down the plant or to mitigate any accidents requiring ECCS operation as discussed in Subsection 6.3.3.
| |
| | |
| Each of the two RHR loop suction valves which connect to the RCS hot legs and which are used for normal plant cooldown contain a section of piping inside containment which is isolated by two normally closed suction isolation valves (RH8701A/B and RH8702A/B). Although this section of piping is not considered to be either RCS or ECCS piping, it is required for plant cooldown.
| |
| The possibility that heating could cause overpressurizations of this isolated section and the need for relief protection between the two series valves in each suction line has been evaluated (see Subsection 5.4.7.2.3).
| |
| | |
| 6.3A-4 REVISION 6 - DECEMBER 1996 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.4 HABITABILITY SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| The Control Room Habitability Systems (CRHS) are plant systems that help ensure control room envelope (CRE) habitability. CRE habitability must be maintained during normal operations as well as during radiological, hazardous chemical, or smoke event emergencies. The CRHS includes the control room emergency ventilation/filtration system and the control room heating, ventilating and air- conditioning (HVAC)systems. The CRE boundary is considered an integral part of the CRHS, since it is critical to maintaining CRE habitability. The CRE is the area within the confines of the CRE boundary that contains the spaces that control room occupants inhabit to control the unit during normal and accident conditions. This area encompasses the control room and othernon-critical areas to which frequent personnel access, or continuous occupancy is not necessary in the event of an accident. The CRE is protected during normal operation, natural events, and accident conditions. The CRE boundary is the combination of walls, floor, roof, ducting, doors, penetrations and equipment that physically form the CRE.
| |
| The CRE boundary must be maintained to ensure that the inleakage of unfiltered air into the CRE will not exceed the inleakage assumed in the licensing basis analysis of design basis accident consequences to CRE occupants.
| |
| Adequate food, water storage, sanitary facilities, and medical supplies are provided to meet the requirements of operating personnel during and after an incident. In addition, the environments in all spaces served by the control room HVAC system (control room envelope) are controlled within specified limits which are conducive to prolonged service life of Safety Class 1 components during all station conditions.
| |
| 6.4.1 Design Basis
| |
| | |
| The design basesof the habitability systems upon which the functional design is established are summarized as follows:
| |
| : a. Redundant strings of HVAC equipment are provided to maintain habitable environmental conditions in the control room envelope.
| |
| : b. The habitability systems are designed to support a maximum of seven people during normal and 30 days of abnormal station operating conditions. During an emergency, action will be taken as needed to deliver food to the control room operating personnel. An unlimited water supply and onsite first aid is available.
| |
| c.Sanitary facilities are provided for control room operating personnel.
| |
| | |
| 6.4-1 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER2008 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| : d. The radiological effects on the control room envelope resulting from any incident described in Chapter 15.0 are considered in the design of the habitability system.
| |
| : e. The design includes provisions to preclude the effects of toxic gases (carbon dioxide and smoke) from inside or outside the plant.
| |
| : f. Seven SCBA units are available inside the control room envelope with dedicated air bottles. Two additional units are provided to comply with the single failure criteria described in Regulatory Guide 1.95.
| |
| Additional reserve air supplies are maintained onsite to provide a total of six hours of breathing air for each of the seven emergency staff personnel.
| |
| : g. The habitability systems are designed to operate effectively during and after a DBA such as a LOCA with the simultaneous loss of offsite power, safe shutdown earthquake, or failure of any one of the control room HVAC system equipment string components.
| |
| : h. Radiation monitors and ionization detectors continuously monitor the control room HVAC system outside makeup air intakes. Also, ionization, humidity, and HELB pressure detectors continuously monitor the control room HVAC system turbinebuilding makeup air intakes. Detection of high humidity is alarmed in the control room. Detection of HELB pressure affects the damper alignment for the air supply to the emergency makeup filter units during emergency operation as described in Subsection6.4.3.
| |
| Area radiation monitors are provided in the control room. Detection of high radiation or products of combustion is alarmed in the control room and related protection functions are simultaneously initiated.
| |
| Pressure differential indicators are provided in the control room which monitor the pressure differential between strategic areas within the control room envelope and surrounding areas. Low pressure differential is alarmed in the control room.
| |
| | |
| Outdoor air and individual room temperature indicators in the control room are provided for the control room envelope.
| |
| : i. The CRE Boundary is maintained to ensure that unfiltered inleakage into the CRE will not exceed the inleakage assumed in the licensing basis analysis of Design Basis Accident consequences to CRE occupants.
| |
| The assumed amount of unfiltered inleakage is provided in Table 6.4- 1a.
| |
| | |
| 6.4-1a REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.4.2 System Design
| |
| | |
| 6.4.2.1.1 Definition of Control Room The control room consists of the main control room (Units 1 and 2), Shift Managers office/records room, main control room toilet, and storage room.
| |
| 6.4.2.1.2 Definition of Control Room Envelope
| |
| | |
| The control room envelope consists of control room, auxiliary electric equipment rooms, upper cable spreading rooms, control room HVAC equipment rooms, security control center, locker rooms, toilet, janitors closet, electronic shop, and corridors.
| |
| 6.4.2.2 Ventilation System Design
| |
| | |
| Detailed control room HVAC system description is presented in Subsection 9.4.1. The control room emergency makeup unitis described in Subsection 6.5.1.
| |
| | |
| All the system equipment components are designed to perform their function during and after the safe shutdown earthquake except for the electric space heating, humidification equipment, the security computer A/C unit, and toilet and locker room recirculation filter units, which are supported to remain intact, but may not function.
| |
| All system components are protected from internally and externally generated missiles. A layout of the control room envelope, showing doors, corridors, stairways, and boundary walls/floors/ceilingsgiven in Drawing M-1033-13. Shield walls are shown on Figure 6.4-2.
| |
| | |
| The description of controls, instruments, and ionization and radiation monitors for the control room HVAC system is included
| |
| | |
| 6.4-2 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| in Subsections 7.1.2.1 and 7.3.1.1. The locations of makeup airintakes and potential sources of radioactive and toxic gas releases are indicated in Drawings M-1323-1 and M -1323-8and Figures 6.4-3 and 6.4- 4.
| |
| 6.4.2.3 Leaktightness
| |
| | |
| The entire control room envelope is designed as a low-leakage construction. All cable pans and duct penetrations are sealed.
| |
| Approximately 6,000 cfm of outside air is introduced in the control room envelope except during the 100% outdoor air purge mode and (Braidwood only) chlorine isolation mode. This quantity of air is sufficient to maintain the control room envelope at a positive pressure with respect to areas adjacent to the CRE to minimize unfiltered inleakage. The positive pressure inside the control room envelope minimizes infiltration of potentially contaminated air from adjacent areas.
| |
| | |
| During emergency operation (radiation accident) of the control room ventilation system, the normally open minimum outside air makeup dampers are closed. Infiltration through damper and personnel ingress/egress is the only expectedsource of unfiltered air into the system. Analyzed unfiltered inleakage values are provided in Table 6.4-1a.
| |
| Technical Specification 5.5.18, Control Room Envelope Habitability, requires determining the amount of unfiltered air inleakage in accordance with the testing methods and frequencies specified in Sections C.1 and C.2 of Regulatory Guide 1.197, Demonstrating Control Room Envelope Integrity at Nuclear Power Reactors, Revision 0, May 2003.
| |
| 6.4.2.4 Interaction With Other Zones and Pressure-ContainingEquipment
| |
| | |
| The control room HVAC system serves only rooms in the control room envelope. Areas surrounding the control room envelope are served by various systems.
| |
| The control room offices HVAC system (a separate system, not a part of the control room envelope) is shut down by a high radiation signal detected in the control room HVAC system outsideair intakes. The auxiliary building areas adjacent to the control room envelope are at negative pressure with respect to ambient and control room pressures at all times. The naturally vented turbine building pressure is a function of elevation and will vary seasonally depending on outside air temperatures. The building pressure at the main floor is approximately atmospheric at all times.
| |
| | |
| 6.4-3 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| All penetrations between the cable spreading rooms and the control room are sealed airtight. Any release of carbon dioxide within the cable spreading room would not enter the control room. Actuation of any of the carbon dioxide zone systems isolates that zone from airflow by simultaneously closing the airflow dampers surrounding the affected zone.
| |
| | |
| Normal access paths between plant areas and the control room envelope are double- door (two doors in series) vestibules to minimize system interaction. Single doors are not normally usedand are under administrative control of the operator.
| |
| | |
| There are no high-energy lines in the proximity or within the control room envelope. Small fire extinguishers are provided in areaswithin the control room envelope.
| |
| | |
| 6.4-4 REVISION 12 DECEMBER 2008 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.4 HABITABILITY SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| The Control Room Habitability Systems (CRHS) are plant systems that help ensure control room envelope (CRE) habitability. CRE habitability must be maintained during normal operations as well as during radiological, hazardous chemical, or smoke event emergencies. The CRHS includes the control room emergency ventilation/filtration system and the control room heating, ventilating and air- conditioning (HVAC) systems. The CRE boundary is considered an integral part of the CRHS, since it is critical to maintaining CRE habitability. The CRE is the area within the confines of the CRE boundary that contains the spaces that control room occupants inhabit to control the unit during normal and accident conditions. This area encompasses the control room and other non-critical areas to which frequent personnel access, or continuous occupancy is not necessary in the event of an accident. The CRE is protected during normal operation,natural events, and accident conditions. The CRE boundary is the combination of walls, floor, roof, ducting, doors, penetrations and equipment that physically form the CRE.
| |
| The CRE boundary must be maintained to ensure that the inleakage of unfiltered air into the CRE will not exceed the inleakage assumed in the licensing basis analysis of design basis accident consequences to CRE occupants.
| |
| Adequate food, water storage, sanitary facilities, and medical supplies are provided to meet the requirements of operating personnel during and after an incident. In addition, the environments in all spaces served by the control room HVAC system (control room envelope) are controlled within specified limits which are conducive to prolonged service life of Safety Class 1 components during all station conditions.
| |
| 6.4.1 Design Basis
| |
| | |
| The design bases of the habitability systems upon which the functional design is established are summarized as follows:
| |
| : a. Redundant strings of HVAC equipment are provided to maintain habitable environmental conditions in the control room envelope.
| |
| : b. The habitability systems are designed to support a maximum of seven people during normal and 30 days of abnormal station operating conditions. During an emergency, action will be taken as needed to deliver food to the control room operating personnel. An unlimited water supply and onsite first aid is available.
| |
| : c. Kitchen and sanitary facilities are provided for control room operating personnel.
| |
| | |
| 6.4-5 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| : d. The radiological effects on the control room envelope resulting from any incident described in Chapter 15.0 are considered in the design of the habitability system.
| |
| : e. The design includes provisions to preclude the effects of toxic gases (carbon dioxide and smoke) from inside or outside the plant.
| |
| : f. Seven SCBA units are available inside the control room envelope with dedicated air bottles. Two additional units are provided to comply with single failure criteria from Regulatory Guide 1.95. Additional bottled air supplies are maintained onsite to provide a total of 6 hours of breathing air for each of the seven emergency staff personnel. Proceduralized methods are available to refill SCBAs if required for long term use.
| |
| : g. The habitability systems are designed to operate effectively during and after a DBA such as a LOCA
| |
| | |
| 6.4-5a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| with the simultaneous loss of offsite power, safe shutdown earthquake, or failure of any one of the control room HVAC system equipment string components.
| |
| : h. Radiation monitors and ionization detectors continuously monitor the control room HVAC System outside makeup air intakes . Also, ionization, humidity, and HELB pressure detectors continuously monitor the control room HVAC system turbine building makeup air intakes. Detection of high humidity is alarmed in the control room. Detection of HELB pressure affects the damper alignment for the air supply to the emergency makeup filter units during emergency operation as described in Subsection 6.4.3.
| |
| Arearadiation monitors are provided in the control room. Detection of high radiation or products of combustion is alarmed in the control room and relatedprotection functions are simultaneously initiated. Pressure differential indicators are provided in the control room which monitor the pressure differential between strategic areas within the control room envelope and surrounding areas. Low pressure differential isalarmed in the control room.
| |
| | |
| Outdoor air and individual room temperature indicators inthe control room are provided for the control room envelope.
| |
| : i. The CRE Boundary is maintained to ensure that unfiltered inleakage into the CRE will not exceed the inleakage assumed in the licensing basis analysis of Design Basis Accident consequences toCRE occupants.
| |
| The assumed amount of unfiltered inleakage is provided in Table 6.4-1a.
| |
| 6.4.2 System Design
| |
| | |
| 6.4.2.1.1 Definition of Control Room The control room consists of the main control room (Units 1 and 2), Shift Managers office/records room, main control room toilet, and storage room.
| |
| 6.4.2.1.2 Definition of Control Room Envelope
| |
| | |
| The control room envelope consists of control room, auxiliary electric equipment rooms, upper cable spreading rooms, control room HVAC equipment rooms, security controlcenter, locker room, toilet, kitchen, janitors closet, electronic shop, and corridors.
| |
| 6.4.2.2 Ventilation System Design
| |
| | |
| Detailed control room HVAC system description is presented in Subsection 9.4.1. The control room emergency makeup unit is described in Subsection 6.5.1.
| |
| 6.4-6 REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| All the system equipment components are designed to perform theirfunction during and after the safe shutdown earthquake except for the electric space heating, humidification equipment, the security computer A/C unit, and kitchen, toilet, locker room exhaust fans and filters, and storage room toilet recirculation filter unit which are supported to remain intact, but may not function.
| |
| | |
| All system components are protected from internally and externally generated missiles. A layout of the control room envelope, showing doors, corridors, stairways, and boundary walls/floors/ceilingsis given in Drawing M-1033-13. Shield walls are shown on Figure 6.4-2.
| |
| The description of controls, instruments, and ionization and radiation monitors for the control room HVAC system is included in Subsections 7.1.2.1 and 7.3.1.1. The locations of makeup airintakes and potential sources of radioactive and toxic gas releases are indicated in Drawings M-1323-1 and M -1323-8 and Figures 6.4- 3, and 6.4- 4.
| |
| 6.4.2.3 Leaktightness
| |
| | |
| The entire control room envelope is designed as a low-leakage construction. All cable pans and duct penetrations are sealed.
| |
| Approximately 6,000 cfm of outside air is introduced in the control room envelope except during the 100% outdoor air purge mode and (Braidwood only) chlorine isolation mode. This quantity of air is sufficient to maintain the control room envelope at a positive pressure with respect to areas adjacent to the CRE to minimize unfiltered inleakage. The positive pressure inside the control roomenvelope minimizesinfiltration of potentially contaminated air from adjacent areas.
| |
| | |
| During emergency operation (radiation accident) of the control room ventilation system, the normally open minimum outside air makeup dampers are closed. Infiltration through damper and personnel ingress/egress is the only expected source of unfiltered air into the system. Analyzed unfiltered inleaka ge valves are provided in Table 6.4-1.
| |
| Technical Specification 5.5.18, Control Room Envelope Habitability, requires determining the amount of unfiltered air inleakage in accordance with the testing methods and frequencies specified in Sections C.1 and C.2 of Regulatory Guide 1.197, Demonstrating Control Room Envelope Integrity at Nuclear Power Reactors, Revision 0, May 2003.
| |
| 6.4.2.4 Interaction With Other Zones and Pressure-ContainingEquipment
| |
| | |
| The control room HVAC system serves only rooms in the control room envelope. Areas surrounding the control room envelope are served by various systems.
| |
| | |
| 6.4-7 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The control room offices HVAC system (a separate system, not a part of the control room envelope) and the laboratory HVAC systemand the radwaste HVAC system are shut down by a high radiation signal detected in the control room HVAC system outsidemakeup air intakes. The auxiliary building areas adjacent to the control room envelope are at negative pressure with respect to ambient and control room pressures at all times. The naturally vented turbine building pressure is a function of elevation and will vary seasonally depending on outside air temperatures. The building pressure at the main floor is approximately atmospheric at all times.
| |
| | |
| All penetrations between the cable spreading rooms and the control room are sealed airtight. Any release of carbon dioxidewithin the cable spreading room would not enter the control room. Actuation of any of the carbon dioxide zone systems isolates that zone from airflow by simultaneously closingthe airflow dampers surrounding the affected zone.
| |
| | |
| Normal access paths between plant areas and the control room envelope are double- door (two doors in series) vestibules to minimize system interaction. Single doors are not normally used and are under administrative control of the operator.
| |
| | |
| There are no high-energy lines in the proximity or within the control room envelope. Small fire extinguishers are provided inareas within the control room envelope.
| |
| | |
| 6.4-8 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The carbon dioxide fire protection system design is discussed in Subsection 2.3.3 and Appendix A5.4 of the Fire Protection Report.
| |
| 6.4.2.5 Shielding Design
| |
| | |
| The design- basis accident for the control room area shielding is the loss-of- coolant accident (LOCA). The shielding is designed so that the doses to the control room personnel over the course of the accident are well below the limit specified in General Design Criteria 19 of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A.
| |
| | |
| The design of the control room envelope shielding is based on the sources given in Table 6.4-1. The distribution of the LOCA sources outside the control room are shown in Figures 6.4 -3 and 6.4- 4. All of the noble gases and iodines are presumed to remainairborne and eventually escape into the plume. Radioactive decay in the plume is ignored.
| |
| | |
| Shielding thicknesses for the control room areshown in Figure 6.4- 2 and enumerated in Table 6.4-1. The sources for the LOCA shielding model are shown in Figures 6.4- 3 and 6.4-4.
| |
| 6.4.3 System Operational Procedures
| |
| | |
| The control room is a common facility which serves both Units 1 and 2. The facilityis served by two completely redundant HVAC equipment trains. The systems are shown in simplified schematic in Figures 6.4-5, 6.4-6, 6.4-7; and 6.4-8 (Byron only). Note that only one of the redundant trains is detailed in the sketches; the other train contains equivalent equipment. The control room envelope is supplied with filtered, cooled and reheated (as necessary) air to maintain a suitable environment.
| |
| | |
| Under normal conditions the system operates as shown in Figure 6.4- 5. The supply air consists of air that is recirculated from the control room envelope and outside air that is induced into the system to provide for control room envelope pressurization and to makeup for air that is exhausted. This mixture of recirculated and outside air is mixed and then passed through high- efficiency filters and then bypasses the charcoal adsorbers prior to being discharged into the control room.
| |
| | |
| Upon detection of high radiation in the minimum outside air intake, or upon a safety injection signal, the normally open outside air dampers close. The normally closed dampers of the turbine building emergency air intake are opened and the emergency makeup air filter unit is started. In addition, air that is normally bypassing the recirculation charcoal adsorber is routed through this charcoal adsorber. All of these actuations
| |
| | |
| 6.4-9 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| are automatic and the new system line-up is shown diagrammatically in Figure 6.4-6.
| |
| | |
| In addition, a radiation monitor located on each of the emergencymakeup air filter trains monitors the radiological quality of the air delivered to the control room envelope.
| |
| | |
| For an event involving a HELB in the turbine building that results in a safety injection signal, the normally open outside air dampers close. The normally closed dampers of the turbine building emergency air intake remain closed, and the emergency makeup air filter unit is started. The outside air bypass line intake damper is opened, and air that is normally bypassing the recirculation charcoal adsorber is routed through this charcoal adsorber. This is shown diagrammatically in Figure 6.4-7.
| |
| | |
| The operator also has manual capability for placing the system in the desired mode for responding to a HELB in the turbine building.
| |
| Should high moisture due to a HELB in the turbine building occur, ahumidity sensor located in the turbine building emergency makeup air intake will annunciate this condition in the main control room. This will alert the operator of this condition. The operator may then draw the makeup air from the minimum outside air intake by opening the normally closed bypassdamper and closing the turbine building emergency makeup air intake damper. This is shown diagrammatically in Figure 6.4- 7. In this minimum outside air intake configuration, the control room HVAC system will not automatically realign to the turbine building makeup air intake on a high radiation or ESF-SI actuation.
| |
| To remove any toxic gases, odors, and smoke from the control room environs, a charcoal adsorber is provided with each control room HVAC equipment string. These adsorbers, located downstream of high- efficiency filters, are normally bypassed. At Braidwood, if the station is notified of a toxic gas release in the near vicinity, the control room HVAC system is manually isolated via a control switch on the local panel. Actuation of the control switch places the system in 100% recirculation mode and routes the air through the charcoal adsorbers.
| |
| | |
| On detection of ionization products in the return air duct or mixed air plenum, the mixed air (return air and makeup air) is automatically routed through the charcoal adsorber and annunciated on the main control board. The operator may continue to route the system supply air through the charcoal adsorber for smoke removal, or depending on the condition of the outside air, may manually bypass the charcoal adsorber and purge the entire system with outside air. On ionization detection in outdoor makeup air intake, annunciation in the control room alerts the operator to transfer operation to a redundant equipment string utilizing a remote intake.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 10 REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| With the exception of an event involving a HELB in the turbine building, in the event of high radiation detection in the makeup air intake of the control room HVAC system, the radiation monitoring system automatically shuts off normaloutside makeup air supply to the system. The minimum outside air requirement is obtained from the turbine building makeup air intake and is routed through the emergency makeup air filter unit and fan (for removal ofradioactive particulates and iodine) before being supplied to the system. The makeup air is then mixed with return air and is routed through the recirculation charcoal adsorber for the removal of radioactive iodine before being supplied to the vital areas of the control room envelope. For an event involving a HELB in the turbine building, the minimum outside air requirement is obtained from the outside air bypass line intake to the emergency makeup unit.
| |
| | |
| Two emergency makeup air filter units and fans are provided, each capable of handling minimum requirements of makeup air for the system. In the event of high radiation levels, each train is
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 10a REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| sized to process 6,000 cfm of makeup air. The emergency makeup air filter units are described in detail in Subsection 6.5.1.
| |
| | |
| At Byron, to preclude injecting a HEPA filter challenging agent into the control room envelope during emergency makeup air unit filter testing, the makeup air filter unit may be operated with the system in purge mode. This configuration is illustrated in Figure 6.4- 8. The filter challenging agent is injected into the makeup air filter housing, mixes with the air being purged from the control room envelope and is expelled to the outside air.
| |
| The makeup air filter unit air inlet is aligned to the outside air intake to protect the control room envelope from a high radiation condition in the intake air. A high radiation condition in the outside air would result in ahigh radiation signal being generated that would realign the purge dampers such that all air entering the control room envelope would be treated by the makeup air filter unit. In this makeup outside air intake configuration, the control room HVAC system will not automatically realign to the turbine building makeup air intake on a high radiation or ESF-SI actuation.
| |
| 6.4.4 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| The control room HVAC system is designed to maintain a habitable environment compatible with prolonged service life of safety- related components in the control room under all the station operating conditions. The system is only provided with redundant equipment strings to meet the single-failure criterion.
| |
| The equipment strings are powered from redundant Unit 1 ESF buses and are operable during loss of offsite power. All the control room HVAC system equipment except heating and humidification equipment is designed for Seismic Category I loads.
| |
| 6.4.4.1 Radiological Protection
| |
| | |
| Two radiation monitors are provided in each control room HVAC system makeup air intake to detect high radiation. These monitors cause annunciation in the control room upon detection of high radiation or monitor failure conditions. Area radiation monitors are provided in the control room. The respective emergency makeup air filter unit connected to the operating equipment string (designed to remove radioactive particulates and adsorb radioactive iodine from the minimum quantity of makeup air) is automatically started upon high radiation signals in makeup air. The radiation monitors are described in detail in Subsections 11.5.2 and 12.3.4.
| |
| The control room ventilation system along with the CRE and control room shielding are designed to limit the occupational dose below levels required by General Design Criterion 19 of 10 CFR 50 Appendix A.
| |
| The introduction of the minimum quantity of outside air to maintain the control room and other areas served by the control room HVAC system at a positive pressure with respect to
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 11 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| external areas adjacent to the CRE boundary, at all the station operating conditions (except at Braidwood, when the system is in recirculation mode) minimizes the possibility of infiltration of unfiltered air into the control room (see Subsection 6.4.2.3).
| |
| The physical location of makeup air intakes (see Drawings M-1323-1 and M-1323-8) provides the option of drawing makeup air for the control room HVAC system from the less contaminated intake during and after an event involving the release of airborne activity.
| |
| It is possible one of the makeup intakes may not have any contaminants, while the other intake may have contaminants. For an event involving a HELB in the turbine building, makeup air is drawn from outside to prevent excessive moisture and heat from entering the control room.
| |
| | |
| An assessment of the radiological dose to control room occupants has been made for the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) postulated in Subsection 15.6.5, as well as other design bases accidents.
| |
| | |
| Control room AST dose results are given in Tables 15.0-11 and 15.0- 12.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 11a REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| For the DBA LOCA case, core inventory radionuclide release fractions are per Regulatory Guide 1.183 Table 2, and are available for releaseto the environment during the phased release period. Leakage from ESF equipment handling post-LOCA fluids is taken from Table 15.6-13. Credit for reduction of the amount of iodine available for release by engineered safety features (ESF) containment sprays is taken. Similarly credit is taken for the ESF control room makeup air filters (Subsection 6.5.1), the recirculation charcoal adsorbers, and ESF auxiliary building filters (Subsection 6.5.1).
| |
| The total dose as depicted in Figure 6.4- 4 is comprised of four components, three of which are dependent on site meteorology.
| |
| The effective atmospheric dispersion values, /Q, used were calculated using the Atmospheric Relative CONcentrations in Building Wakes (ARCON96) methodology (Reference 1), as shown in Section 2.3.6. ARCON96 calculates the highest 5thpercentile /Q values for the entire accident period (i.e., 0-2 hours, 2- 8 hours, 8-24 hours, 1-4 days, and 4-30 days) using the on- site meteorological data. The values of /Q used inthis analysis are given in Table 6.4- la.
| |
| | |
| Control room occupancy factors were taken from Table 1 of Reference 2.
| |
| | |
| When in accident mode, the control room HVAC system design has all incoming air passing through HEPA and charcoal filters. In addition, themakeup air mixes with the recirculation air flow and the mixture passes through the recirculation charcoal filter and medium efficiency filter. The filtration of intake and recirculation air flows limit the buildup of airborne iodine in the control room.
| |
| The resulting parametric factors and associated doses are given in Table 6.4-1. The doses are below General Design Criterion 19 to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A guidelines as interpreted by NUREG-0800, Section 6.4.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 12 REVISION 16- DECEMBER 2016 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.4.5 Testing and Inspection
| |
| | |
| The control room HVAC system and its components are thoroughly tested in a program consisting of the following:
| |
| : a. factory and component qualification tests,
| |
| : b. onsite preoperational testing, and
| |
| : c. onsite subsequent periodic testing.
| |
| | |
| Periodic inleakage testing ofthe CRE is performed in general conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.197 Revision 0 Sections C.1 and C.2.
| |
| | |
| Written test procedures establish minimum acceptable values for all tests. Test results are recorded as a matter of performance record, thus enabling early detection of faulty performance.
| |
| | |
| All equipment is factory inspected and tested in accordance withthe applicable equipment specifications, codes, and qualityassurance requirements. System ductwork and erection ofequipment is inspected during various construction stages forquality assurance. Construction tests are performed on all mechanical components, and the system is balanced for the designairflows and system operating pressures. Controls, interlocks, and safety devices on each system are cold checked, adjusted, and tested to ensure the proper sequence of operation.
| |
| The equipment manufacturers' recommendations and station practices are considered in determining required maintenance.
| |
| 6.4.6 Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| | |
| All the instruments and controls for the control room HVAC systemare electric or electronic. Further details are providedin the following:
| |
| : a. Each redundant control room HVAC system has a local control panel, and each is independently controlled.
| |
| Important operating functions are controlled and monitored from the main control room. Local control panels containing the local control switches are located inside equipment rooms that are under the administrative control of operators.
| |
| : b. Instrumentation is provided to monitorimportant variables associated with normal operation and to alarm abnormal conditions on the main control board.
| |
| : c. A radiation detection system is provided to monitor the radiation levels at the system outside air intakes. A high radiation signal is alarmed on the main control board.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 13 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| : d. The ionization detection is provided both in rooms andin the return air path from main control boards.
| |
| Ionization detection is annunciated in the main control room.
| |
| : e. A pressure monitoring system has been providedto detect the presence of a HELB environment at the turbine building intake and initiate appropriate protective actions.
| |
| : f. The control room HVAC system is designed for automaticenvironmental control with manual starting of fans.
| |
| : g. A fire protectionsystem water connection is provided to each charcoal adsorber bed.
| |
| : h. The various instruments of the control system are described in detail in Chapter 7.0.
| |
| : i. The emergency makeup air filter unit upstream HEPA filter high differential pressure is annunciated.
| |
| Theemergency makeup air filter unit high and low airflow rates are annunciated in the main control room. This airflow rate is indicated on the local control panel.
| |
| : j. The control room supply fan high and low differential pressures are annunciated in the main control room.
| |
| Supply fan trip is also annunciated in the main control room. Supply fan differential pressure is indicated on the local control panel.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 14 REVISION 15- DECEMBER 20 14 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.4.4.2 Chlorine Gas Protection
| |
| | |
| The control room HVAC system is provided with control switches onthe local control panels which can manually isolate the systemupon notification of an accidental release of chlorine gasfrom sources external to the station. Upon isolation of thesystem from outdoor makeup air, the control room HVAC systemoperates in 100% recirculation mode, thus routing the recirculated air through recirculation filters.
| |
| 6.4.5 Testing and Inspection
| |
| | |
| The control room HVAC system and its components are thoroughly tested in a program consisting of the following:
| |
| : a. factory and component qualification tests,
| |
| : b. onsite preoperational testing, and
| |
| : c. onsite subsequent periodic testing.
| |
| | |
| Periodic inleakage testing of the CRE is performed in general conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.197 Revision 0 Sections C.1 and C.2.
| |
| | |
| Written test procedures establish minimum acceptable values for all tests. Test results are recorded as a matter of performance record, thus enabling early detection of faulty performance.
| |
| | |
| All equipment is factory inspected and tested in accordance withthe applicable equipment specifications, codes, and qualityassurance requirements. System ductwork and erection ofequipment is inspected during various construction stages forquality assurance. Construction tests are performed on all mechanical components, and the system is balanced for the designairflows and system operating pressures. Controls, interlocks, and safety devices on each system are cold checked, adjusted, and tested to ensure the proper sequence of operation.
| |
| The equipment manufacturers' recommendations and station practices are considered in determining required maintenance.
| |
| 6.4.6 Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| | |
| All the instruments and controls for the control room HVAC system are electric or electronic. Further details are providedin the following:
| |
| : a. Each redundant control room HVAC system has a local control panel, and each is independently controlled.
| |
| Important operating functions are controlled and monitored from the main control room. Local control panels containingthe local control switches are located inside equipment rooms that are under the administrative control of operators.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 15 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| : b. Instrumentation is provided to monitor important variables associated with normal operation and to alarm abnormal conditions on the main control board.
| |
| : c. A radiation detection system is provided to monitor the radiation levels at the system outside air intakes. A high radiation signal is alarmed on the main control board.
| |
| : d. The ionization detection is provided both in rooms andin the return air path from main control boards.
| |
| Ionization detection is annunciated in the main control room.
| |
| : e. A pressure monitoring system has been provided to detect the presence of a HELB environment at the turbine building intake and initiate appropriate protective actions.
| |
| : f. The control room HVAC system is designed for automaticenvironmental control with manual starting of fans.
| |
| : g. A fire protection system water connection is provided to each charcoal adsorber bed.
| |
| : h. The various instruments of the control system are described in detail in Chapter 7.0.
| |
| : i. The emergency makeup air filter unit upstream HEPA filter high differential pressure is annunciated.
| |
| Theemergency makeup air filter unit high and low airflow rates are annunciated in the main control room. This airflow rate is also indicated and the lowairflow is annunciated on the local control panel.
| |
| : j. The control room supply fan high and low differential pressures are annunciated in the main control room.
| |
| Supply fan trip is also annunciated in the main control room. Supply fan differential pressure is indicated on the local control panel.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 16 REVISION 15- DECEMBER 2014 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.4.7 References
| |
| : 1. Ramsdell, J. V. Jr. and C. A. Simonen, Atmospheric Relative Concentrations in Building Wakes. Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, PNL- 10521, NUREG/CR-6331, Rev. 1, May 1997.
| |
| : 2. Murphy, K.G., and Campe, K.H., "Nuclear Power Plant Control Room Ventilation System Design for Meeting General Design Criterion 19, " Proceedings of the Thirteenth AEC Air Cleaning Conference, August 1974.
| |
| : 3. NEI 99- 03, Control Room Habitability Assessment Guidance, June 2001.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 16a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.4-1
| |
| | |
| EXPECTED DOSE TO CONTROL ROOM PERSONNEL AT BYRON STATION
| |
| | |
| FOLLOWING A LOSS-OF- COOLANT ACCIDENT (LOCA)
| |
| | |
| CONCRETE SHIELD ACCUMULATED 30 DAY DOSE, REM THICKNESS BETWEEN SOURCE AND CONTROL ROOM, INCHES TEDE
| |
| | |
| Direct Dose From Airborne Radio-activity in the Containment Sidewall - 102 0.023 Ceiling - 68
| |
| | |
| Dose From Post-LOCA Plume Surrounding Control Room 24 0.015
| |
| | |
| Dose From Radioactivity Accumulated on Control Room Makeup Air Filters 8 0.013
| |
| | |
| Dose From Air Drawn into the Control Room
| |
| | |
| From Containment Leakage N/A 3.35 From ESF Equipment Leakage N/A 1.54
| |
| | |
| 10 CFR 50.67 limits 5
| |
| | |
| Note: Principal assumptions are listed in Table 6.4-1a.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 17 REVISION 17- DECEMBER 2018 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.4-1a
| |
| | |
| PRINCIPAL ASSUMPTIONS USED IN CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY CALCULATIONS
| |
| | |
| Loss-of-Coolant Accident Modeling Subsection 15.6.5
| |
| | |
| Control room atmospheric dispersion factor (/Q) for Containment leakage 0-0.5 hour 1.73E-3 sec/m3 0.5- 2 hour 1.01E- 3 sec/m3 2-8 hour 7.25E-4 sec/m 3 8-24 hour 3.07E-4 sec/m 3 24-96 hour 2.07E-4 sec/m 3 96-720 hour 1.46E-4 sec/ m3
| |
| | |
| Control room atmospheric dispersion factor ( /Q) for ESF leakage
| |
| | |
| 0-0.5 hour 2.22E- 3 sec/m 3 0.5-2 hour 2.46E- 3 sec/m3 2-8 hour 1.92E- 3 sec/m3 8-24 hour 8.14E-4 sec/m3 24- 96 hour 5.52E- 4 sec/m3 96- 720 hour 4.40E- 4 sec/m3
| |
| | |
| Control room HVAC envelope volume 200,000 ft3 (Note 1)
| |
| | |
| Control room volume used for finite 70,275 ft3 cloud correction
| |
| | |
| Control room air intake flow 6000 cfm +10% (NOTE 2)
| |
| | |
| Control room air filtered recirculation 39,150 cfm flow
| |
| | |
| Control room air intake filter 0.99 (particulate) efficiency (all forms of iodine) 0.95 (elemental/organic)
| |
| | |
| Control room recirculation flow filter efficiency Elemental iodine 0.9 Organic iodine 0.9
| |
| | |
| ESF Equipment leak rate UFSAR Table 15.6-13
| |
| | |
| Unfiltered inleakage into the control 436 cfm room
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 18 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 BYRON- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.4-1a (continued)
| |
| | |
| PRINCIPALASSUMPTIONS USED IN CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY CALCULATIONS
| |
| | |
| Occupancy factor 0-24 hour 1.0 24-96 hour 0.6 96-720 hour 0.4 Breathing rate 3.50E-4 m3/sec
| |
| | |
| NOTE 1: Based on a calculated volume of 230,830 ft 3
| |
| | |
| NOTE 2: Based on var ious failure modes and assumptions, the value used in the RADTRAD model may differ from 6000 cfm
| |
| +/- 10%. See analysis BYR04 -051 for exact details.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 18a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.4-1
| |
| | |
| EXPECTED DOSE TO CONTROL ROOM PERSONNEL AT BRAIDWOOD STATION FOLLOWING A LOSS-OF- COOLANT ACCIDENT (LOCA)
| |
| | |
| CONCRETE SHIELD ACCUMULATED 30 DAY DOSE, REM THICKNESS BETWEEN SOURCE AND CONTROL ROOM, INCHES TEDE
| |
| | |
| Direct Dose From Airborne Radio-activity in the Containment Sidewall - 102 0.023 Ceiling - 68
| |
| | |
| Dose From Post-LOCA Plume Sur-rounding Control Room 24 0.015
| |
| | |
| Dose From Radioactivity Accumu-lated on Control Room Makeup Air Filters 8 0.013
| |
| | |
| Dose From Air Drawn into the Control Room From Containment Leakage N/A 3.35
| |
| | |
| From ESF Equipment Leakage N/A 1.54
| |
| | |
| 10 CFR 50.67 Limits 5
| |
| | |
| Note: Principal assumptions are listed in Table 6.4-1a.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 19 REVISION 17- DECEMBER 2018 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.4-1a
| |
| | |
| PRINCIPAL ASSUMPTIONS USED IN CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY CALCULATIONS
| |
| | |
| Loss-of-Coolant Accident Modeling Subsection 15.6.5
| |
| | |
| Control room atmospheric dispersion factor (/Q) for Containment Leakage 3 0-0.5 hour 1.73E-3 sec/m3 0.5-2 hour 1.01E-3 sec/m3 2-8 hour 7.25E-4 sec/m3 8-24 hour 3.07E-4 sec/m3 24-96 hour 2.07E-4 sec/m3 96-720 hour 1.46E-4 sec/m
| |
| | |
| Control room atmospheric dispersion factor (/Q) for ESF leakage 2.22E- 3 sec/m3 0-0.5 hour 2.46E- 3 sec/m3 0.5-2 hour 1.92E- 3 sec/m3 2-8 hour 8.14E- 4 sec/m3 8-24 hour 5.52E- 4 sec/m3 24- 96 hour 4.40E- 4 sec/m3 96- 720 hour Control room HVAC envelope volume 200,000 ft3 (Note 1)
| |
| | |
| Control room volume used for finite 70,275 ft3 cloud correction
| |
| | |
| Control room air intake flow 6000 cfm +10% (Note 2)
| |
| | |
| Control room air filtered recirculation 39,150 cfm flow
| |
| | |
| Control room air intake filter 0.99 (particulate) efficiency (all forms of iodine) 0.95 (elemental/organic)
| |
| | |
| Control room recirculation flow filter efficiency Elemental iodine 0.9 Organic iodine 0.9
| |
| | |
| ESF Equipment leak rate UFSAR Table 15.6-13
| |
| | |
| Unfiltered inleakage into the control 436 cfm room
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 20 REVISION 1 7 - DECEMBER 2018 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.4-1a (continued)
| |
| | |
| PRINCIPAL ASSUMPTIONS USED IN CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY CALCULATIONS
| |
| | |
| Occupancy factor 0-24 hour 1.0 24-96 hour 0.6 96-720 hour 0.4 Breathing rate 3.50E-4 m3/sec
| |
| | |
| NOTE 1: Based on a calculated volume of 232,872 ft 3
| |
| | |
| NOTE 2: Based on various failure modes and assumptions, the values used in the RADTRAD model may differ from 6000 cfm +/-10%.
| |
| See analysis BRW 0038-M Revision 6 for details.
| |
| | |
| 6.4- 20a REVISION 17- DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.5 FISSION PRODUCT REMOVAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 6.5.1 Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) Filter Systems
| |
| | |
| The following filtration systems, which are required to perform the safety-related functions subsequent to a design-basis accident (DBA), are provided:
| |
| : a. control room HVAC makeup air filter units: this system is utilized to clean the incoming air of gaseous iodine and particulates which are potentially present in incoming air following an accident.
| |
| : b. auxiliary building exhaust system: this system can be utilized to reduce gaseous iodine and particulate concentrations in gases leaking from primary containment and which are potentially present in nonaccessible cubicles (see Subsection 9.4.5) following the accident.
| |
| : c. fuel handling building exhaust system: this system is utilized to reduce gaseous iodine and particulate concentrations in the exhaust air from the fuel handling building which are potentially present following a fuel drop accident, involving recently irradiated fuel (i.e., fuel that has occupied part of a critical core within the previous 48 hours).
| |
| 6.5.1.1 Design Bases 6.5.1.1.1 Control Room Makeup Air Filter Units
| |
| : a. The makeup air filter units are designed to start automatically and provide outside air to the control room HVAC system in response to any one of the following signals:
| |
| : 1. high radiation signal from the radiation monitors provided to monitor the radiation levels at the control room HVAC outside air intakes;
| |
| : 2. manual activation from the main control room; and
| |
| : 3. ESF signal.
| |
| : b. The alternative source term model described in NUREG-1465 and Regulatory Guide 1.183 is used in conjunction with approved methods to calculate the quantity of activity released as a result of an accident and to determine inlet concentrations to the makeup air filter train.
| |
| : c. The capacity of the makeup air filter units is based on the air quantity required to maintain the control room served by the control room HVAC system at
| |
| | |
| 6.5-1 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 0.125 in. of H2O positive pressure with respect to adjacent areas.
| |
| : d. Two full-capacity emergency makeup air filter units and associated dampers, ducts, and controls are provided.
| |
| : e. Each makeup air filter unit utilizes air heaters, demister, and prefilters needed to assure the optimum air conditions entering the high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and charcoal adsorbers.
| |
| : f. The emergency makeup air filter unit exhibits a removal efficiency of no less than 95% on gaseous forms of radioiodine and no less than 99% on all particulate matter 0.3 micron and larger in size.
| |
| : g. The makeup air filter unit is designed to meet the single-failure criterion.
| |
| : h. The power supplies meet IEEE 308-1974 criteria and ensure uninterrupted operation in the event of loss of normal ac power. The controls meet IEEE 279-1971.
| |
| : i. The makeup air filter units are designed to Safety Category 1 requirements.
| |
| : j. The makeup air filter units are designed to permit periodic testing and inspection of principal system components as described in Subsection 6.5.1.4.
| |
| : k. The electrical components are qualified in accordance with IEEE 344-1971 and IEEE 323-1974.
| |
| 6.5.1.1.2 Auxiliary Building Exhaust Systems
| |
| : a. The auxiliary building exhaust system is designed to run continuously during all normal plant operations and exhaust auxiliary building air after filtering through prefilter and HEPA filter banks. Provisions are also made to route the effluents from nonaccessible cubicles in the auxiliary building (see Subsection 9.4.5) through charcoal adsorbers and HEPA filters on the following signals:
| |
| : 1. Automatically on a safety injection signal from Unit 1 or 2.
| |
| : 2. Manually through a control switch in the main control room.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-2 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 BYRON-UFSAR
| |
| : b. On loss-of-coolant accident concurrent with loss of offsite power, the auxiliary building supply and exhaust fans powered by the unit having a LOCA coincident with a LOOP are tripped. Two out of six charcoal booster fans are started, performing the following functions:
| |
| : 1. Maintain negative pressure in the auxiliary building.
| |
| : 2. Route the exhaust air from nonaccessible cubicles through the charcoal adsorber and downstream HEPA filter before exhausting to the outdoor atmosphere.
| |
| The auxiliary building supply and exhaust fans associated with the unit experiencing the LOCA/LOOP can be restarted manually by the control switch located on the main control panel after approximately 2 hours (based on expected ESF bus loading).
| |
| : c. The radioactive gases leaking from the primary containment after a LOCA or during normal operation are treated in order to remove particulates and radioactive and nonradioactive forms of iodine to limit the offsite dose.
| |
| : d. The auxiliary building exhaust system exhibits a removal efficiency of no less than 90% on radioactive and nonradioactive forms of iodine and no less than 99% on all particulate matter 0.3 micron and larger in size. The particulate removal efficiency is predicated on the use of HEPA filters having a 99% particulate removal efficiency. The charcoal is tested in accordance with Technical Specification Section 5.5.11 "Ventilation Filter Testing Program," and TRM Appendix K. The charcoal is contained in leak-tight, all-welded construction adsorbers to preclude bypass of the charcoal and to ensure the highest removal efficiencies on methyl iodine.
| |
| : e. The exhaust air from the auxiliary building exhaust system is released at an elevation of 599 feet 2 inches. The discharge air velocity from each auxiliary building exhaust system vent stack is approximately 60 fps maximum.
| |
| : f. The auxiliary building exhaust system is designed with redundancy to meet the single-failure criteria.
| |
| : g. The power supplies meet IEEE 308-1974 criteria and ensure uninterrupted operation in the event of loss
| |
| | |
| 6.5-3 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 BRAIDWOOD-UFSAR
| |
| : b. On loss-of-coolant accident the auxiliary building supply and exhaust fans powered by the unit having a LOCA are tripped. Two out of six charcoal booster fans are started, performing the following functions:
| |
| : 1. Maintain negative pressure in the auxiliary building.
| |
| : 2. Route the exhaust air from nonaccessible cubicles through the charcoal adsorber and downstream HEPA filter before exhausting to the outdoor atmosphere.
| |
| : c. The radioactive gases leaking from the primary containment after a LOCA or during normal operation are treated in order to remove particulates and radioactive and nonradioactive forms of iodine to limit the offsite dose.
| |
| : d. The auxiliary building exhaust system exhibits a removal efficiency of no less than 90% on radioactive and nonradioactive forms of iodine and no less than 99% on all particulate matter 0.3 micron and larger in size. The particulate removal efficiency is predicated on the use of HEPA filters having a 99% particulate removal efficiency. The charcoal is tested in accordance with Technical Specification Section 5.5.11 "Ventilation Filter Testing Program," and TRM Appendix K. The charcoal is contained in leak-tight, all-welded construction adsorbers to preclude bypass of the charcoal and to ensure the highest removal efficiencies on methyl iodine.
| |
| : e. The exhaust air from the auxiliary building exhaust system is released at an elevation of 599 feet 2 inches. The discharge air velocity from each auxiliary building exhaust system vent stack is approximately 60 fps maximum.
| |
| : f. The auxiliary building exhaust system is designed with redundancy to meet the single-failure criteria.
| |
| : g. The power supplies meet IEEE 308-1974 criteria and ensure uninterrupted operation in the event of loss
| |
| | |
| 6.5-3a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| of normal ac power. The controls meet IEEE 279-1971.
| |
| : h. The auxiliary building exhaust system is designed to Safety Category I requirements.
| |
| : i. The auxiliary building exhaust system is designed to permit periodic testing and inspection of the principal system components as described in Subsection 6.5.1.4.
| |
| 6.5.1.1.3 Fuel Handling Building Exhaust System
| |
| : a. The fuel handling building exhaust system, which is part of the auxiliary building HVAC system (see Subsection 9.4.5.1), is designed to run continuously during all normal plant operating conditions and while filtering the exhaust air through prefilter HEPA filter banks. Provisions are also made to route the effluent from the fuel handling building through charcoal adsorbers and downstream HEPA filters on the following signals:
| |
| : 1. Automatically on high radiation signal from redundant safety-related area monitors from fuel handling building,
| |
| : 2. Automatically on a safety injection (SI) signal from Units 1 or 2, and
| |
| : 3. Manually through a control switch in the main control room.
| |
| : b. The radioactive gases rising from the fuel pool following a fuel drop accident are treated in order to remove particulates and radioactive and nonradioactive forms of iodine to limit the offsite dose to the guidelines of 10 CFR 50.67.
| |
| : c. The fuel handling building exhaust system exhibits a removal efficiency of no less than 90% on elemental iodine, 30% on organic iodide, and no less than a 99% on all particulate matter 0.3 micron and larger in size. The particulate removal efficiency is predicated on the use of HEPA filters having 99%
| |
| particulate removal efficiency. The charcoal is tested to less than 10% methyl iodide penetration when tested at a temperature of 30 C and 95%
| |
| relative humidity. The charcoal is contained in leak-tight, all-welded construction adsorbers to preclude bypass of the charcoal and to ensure the highest removal efficiencies on methyl iodine.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-4 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : d. The fuel handling building exhaust system is designed with redundancy to meet the single-failure criterion.
| |
| : e. The power supplies meet IEEE 308-1974 criteria and ensure uninterrupted operation in the event of loss of normal ac power. The controls meet IEEE 279-1971.
| |
| : f. The fuel handling building exhaust system is designed to Safety Category I and Seismic Category I requirements.
| |
| : g. The fuel handling building exhaust system is designed to permit periodic testing and inspection of the principal system components as described in Subsection 6.5.1.4.
| |
| : h. The fuel handling building exhaust system is designed to maintain the fuel handling building at a negative pressure of 1/4 inch water gauge with respect to atmosphere.
| |
| 6.5.1.2 System Design 6.5.1.2.1 Emergency Makeup Air Filter Units
| |
| : a. The makeup air filter units work in conjunction with the control room HVAC system. Refer to Subsection 9.4.1 for further discussion.
| |
| : b. With the exception of an event involving a HELB in the turbine building, in the event of high radiation detection in the makeup air intake of the control room HVAC system, the radiation monitoring system automatically shuts off normal outside makeup air supply to the system. The minimum outside air requirement is obtained from the turbine building makeup air intake and is routed through the emergency makeup air filter unit and fan (for removal of radioactive particulates and iodine) before being supplied to the system. The makeup air is then mixed with return air and is routed through the recirculation charcoal adsorber for the removal of radioactive iodine before being supplied to the vital areas of the control room envelope. For an event involving a HELB in the turbine building, the minimum outside air requirement is obtained from the outside air bypass line intake and is routed through the emergency makeup air filter unit and charcoal adsorber.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-5 REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : c. Two redundant makeup air filter trains and fans are provided, each capable of handling 6000 cfm.
| |
| : d. Each makeup air filter unit is comprised of the following components in sequence:
| |
| : 1. A demister which removes any entrained water droplets and moisture to minimize water droplets and water loading of the prefilter.
| |
| The demister meets qualification requirements similar to those in Mine Safety Appliance Research (MSAR) Report 71-45 and will be UL Class I.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-5a REVISION 15 - DECEMBER 2014 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 2. A single-stage electric heater, sized to reduce the humidity of the airstream to at least 70%
| |
| relative humidity for the worst inlet conditions. A heater capacity of 23.8 kW was calculated using 110% of the filter design flow rate and entering air conditions of 95F and 100% relative humidity. A 27.2-kW heater is provided.
| |
| : 3. A prefilter, UL listed, all glass media, exhibiting no less than 80% efficiency based on ASHRAE 52.
| |
| : 4. A high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter, water resistant, capable of removing 99% minimum of particulate matter which is 0.3 micron or larger in size. The filter is designed to be fire resistant. Six 1000 cfm elements are provided. All elements are fabricated in accordance with NRC Health and Safety Bulletin 306, dated March 31, 1971, covering Military Specification MIL-F-51068 latest revision in effect at time of purchase, MIL-F-51079 latest revision in effect at time of purchase, UL-586, and after January 1995, AG-1 latest revision in effect at time of purchase.
| |
| : 5. A charcoal adsorber capable of removing not less than 99% of radioactive forms of iodine is provided. The charcoal adsorber is an all-welded airtight type, filled with impregnated coconut shell charcoal. The charcoal adsorber beds hold charcoal with 30 lb/ft3 density, having an ignition temperature of 340C. Total bed depth is 4 inches.
| |
| The bed dimensions are so designed that the air has at least 0.25 seconds of residence time through the charcoal. The charcoal shall be of the best grade available at the time of installation and meets the requirements of ANSI N509-1976. Charcoal received after September 23, 1988 shall meet the requirements of ANSI N509-1980.
| |
| Ten test canisters are provided for each charcoal adsorber. These canisters contain the same depth of the same charcoal as in the charcoal adsorber. The canisters are so mounted that a parallel flow path is created between
| |
| | |
| 6.5-6 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| each canister and the charcoal adsorber. Thus, the charcoal in the canisters is subjected to the same contaminants as the charcoal in the bed. Periodically, one of the canisters is removed and laboratory tested to reverify the adsorbent efficiency.
| |
| One deluge valve connected to the station fire protection system is mounted adjacent to each
| |
| | |
| 6.5-6a REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| charcoal adsorber bank. For each charcoal adsorber, a two-stage temperature switch is provided. When the first-stage setpoint (200F) is exceeded, it is alarmed on the main control panel and indicated on the local control panel. When the second-stage setpoint (310F) is exceeded, it is annunciated on the local control panel. After the second-stage setpoint is reached, the deluge valve can be actuated manually. Actuation of the deluge valves is indicated in the main control room.
| |
| : 6. A high-efficiency particulate filter identical to the upstream HEPA filter is provided to trap charcoal fines which are entrained by the airstream.
| |
| : 7. A fan induces the air from the intake louvers and the makeup air filter train and discharges it to the suction side of the control room air-handling equipment train. The fan performance is based on the maximum density and worst pressure condition, when it is inducing
| |
| -10oF air from the outdoors and the makeup air filter train, containing filters which operate at no less than twice their clean pressure drop.
| |
| : 8. Full-size access doors adjacent to each filter are provided in the equipment train housing.
| |
| Access doors are provided with transparent portholes to allow inspection and maintenance of components without violating the train integrity. Spacing between filter sections is based on ease of maintenance considerations.
| |
| : 9. The housing is an all-welded construction, heavily reinforced, and built to low leakage requirements.
| |
| : 10. Interior lights with external light switches are provided between all train components to facilitate inspection, testing, and replacement of components.
| |
| 6.5.1.2.2 Auxiliary Building Exhaust System
| |
| : a. The auxiliary building exhaust system works in conjunction with the auxiliary building ventilation system as described in Subsection 9.4.5.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-7 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : b. In the event of high radiation detection in the auxiliary building exhaust air duct, the auxiliary building charcoal booster fans are started manually. The charcoal filter bypass dampers are closed automatically and the effluents are routed through the charcoal adsorbers (for removal of radioactive particulates and iodine) before being exhausted to the outdoors.
| |
| : c. The auxiliary building exhaust system, common to both Units 1 and 2, consists of the following in sequence:
| |
| : 1. The following filter plenums operate in parallel:
| |
| a) Nonaccessible area exhaust filter plenums A, B, and C treating exhaust air from nonaccessible areas of the auxiliary building and discharging into auxiliary building exhaust plenum.
| |
| | |
| b) Fuel handling building exhaust plenum, treating exhaust air from fuel handling building and discharging into auxiliary building exhaust plenum.
| |
| c) Accessible area exhausts filter plenums, A, B, C, and D, treating exhaust air from accessible areas of the Auxiliary Building and discharging into auxiliary building exhaust plenum.
| |
| : 2. Auxiliary building exhaust plenum.
| |
| : 3. Four 50% capacity exhaust air fans drawing suction from the auxiliary building exhaust plenum. Two of the fans discharge into ductwork which directs air to the Unit 1 vent stack, and the other two fans discharge into ductwork which directs air to the Unit 2 vent stack.
| |
| : 4. Unit 1 and Unit 2 vent stacks.
| |
| : d. Nonaccessible area exhaust filter plenums Each of the three nonaccessible area exhaust filter plenums, A, B, and C, are identical, and each has 50% of the capacity required to treat exhaust air from nonaccessible areas, i.e., each plenum has an installed filter capacity of 62,000 cfm (for Byron) and 63,000 cfm (for Braidwood).
| |
| | |
| 6.5-8 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The exhaust air is routed from the potentially nonaccessible areas listed in Table 6.5-5.
| |
| Each nonaccessible area exhaust filter plenum consists of the following components in sequence:
| |
| : 1. An isolation damper.
| |
| : 2. Three 20,910 cfm capacity each, HEPA filter subplenums connected to operate in parallel, each consisting of the following components:
| |
| a) A high-efficiency prefilter.
| |
| b) A HEPA filter.
| |
| : 3. A bypass damper is provided downstream of the HEPA filters which provides direct connection to the auxiliary building exhaust filter plenum, bypassing the charcoal adsorber.
| |
| : 4. Three, 20,910 cfm capacity each, charcoal adsorber plenums connected to operate in parallel, and each consisting of the following components:
| |
| a) A charcoal adsorber with fire protection provisions.
| |
| b) A downstream HEPA filter.
| |
| : 5. Two charcoal adsorber booster fans with a design flow rate of 62,730 cfm each. (Each booster fan has a flow measuring element and a flow control damper downstream.)
| |
| : e. Fuel handling building exhaust plenum
| |
| | |
| This is described in detail in Subsection 6.5.1.2.3.
| |
| : f. Accessible area exhaust filter plenums (Non-ESF)
| |
| | |
| 6.5-9 REVISION 2 - DECEMBER 1990 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Each of the four accessible area exhaust filter plenums A, B, C, and D, are identical, and each has 33% of the capacity required to treat exhaust air from nonaccessible area, i.e., each plenum is designed to handle a nominal 41,830 cfm. Each accessible area exhaust filter plenum consists of the following components in sequence:
| |
| : 1. An upstream isolation damper.
| |
| : 2. Three, 13,943-cfm capacity each, HEPA filter subplenums each consisting of the following components:
| |
| a) A high-efficiency prefilter.
| |
| b) A HEPA filter.
| |
| : 3. A downstream isolation damper and a backdraft damper before discharging into the auxiliary building exhaust plenum.
| |
| : g. The high-efficiency prefilters provided in the auxiliary building exhaust system are UL listed, all-glass media, exhibiting no less than 80-85%
| |
| efficiency based on ASHRAE 52.
| |
| : h. The high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter provided in the auxiliary building exhaust system is water resistant and capable of removing 99% minimum of particulate matter which is 0.3 micron or larger in size. The filter is designed to be fire resistant. Each element provided is rated for 1000 cfm capacity. All elements are fabricated in accordance with NRC Health and Safety Bulletin 306, dated March 31, 1971, covering Military Specification MIL-F-51068 latest revision in effect at time of purchase, MIL-F-51079 latest revision in effect at time of purchase, UL-586, and after January 1995, AG-1 latest revision in effect at time of purchase.
| |
| : i. The charcoal adsorbers provided in the auxiliary building exhaust system are capable of removing not less than 90% of radioactive forms of iodine. The charcoal adsorbers are the tray type and are filled with impregnated coconut shell charcoal. The 3 charcoal adsorber beds hold charcoal of 30 lb/ft density with an ignition temperature of 340C.
| |
| Total bed depth is 2 inches.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-10 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The bed dimensions are so designed that the air has at least 0.25 seconds of residence time through the charcoal. The charcoal shall be of the best grade available at the time of purchase and shall meet the requirements of ANSI N509-1976. Charcoal received after September 23, 1988 shall meet the requirements of ANSI N509-1980.
| |
| Ten test canisters are provided for each charcoal bank in each adsorber bank in each subplenum.
| |
| These canisters contain the same depth of the same charcoal as in the charcoal adsorber. The canisters are so mounted that a parallel flow path
| |
| | |
| 6.5-10a REVISION 1 - DECEMBER 1989 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| is created between each canister and the charcoal adsorber. The charcoal in the canister is thus subjected to the same contaminants as the charcoal in the bed. Periodically, one of the canisters is removed and laboratory tested to reverify the absorbent efficiency.
| |
| One deluge valve connected to the station fire protection system is mounted adjacent to each charcoal adsorber bank. For each charcoal adsorber, a two-stage temperature switch is provided. When the first-stage setpoint (200F) is exceeded, it is alarmed on the main control panel and indicated on the local control panel. When the second-stage setpoint (310F) is exceeded, it is annunciated on the local control panel. After the second-stage setpoint is reached, the deluge valve can be actuated manually. Actuation of the deluge valve is indicated in the main control room.
| |
| : j. Full-size access doors adjacent to each filter bank are provided in the equipment plenums. Access doors are provided with transparent portholes to allow inspection and maintenance of components without violating the train integrity. Spacing between filter sections is based on ease of maintenance considerations. The plenums are all-welded steel plate construction with intermediate concrete floors, heavily reinforced, and built to low leakage requirements.
| |
| | |
| 6.5.1.2.3 Fuel Handling Building Exhaust System
| |
| : a. The fuel handling building exhaust system works in conjunction with the auxiliary building ventilation system as described in Subsection 9.4.5.
| |
| : b. In the event of high radiation detection in the fuel handling building, the radiation monitoring system automatically routes the effluents through the charcoal adsorbers and booster fans (for removal of radioactive particulates and iodine) before they are exhausted outdoors.
| |
| : c. The fuel handling exhaust system as indicated in Drawing M-95 is common to both Units 1 and 2 and consists of the following in sequence:
| |
| | |
| 6.5-11 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 1. Area radiation monitors located at the fuel pool in the fuel handling building.
| |
| : 2. Two fuel handling building exhaust filter plenums connected in parallel.
| |
| : 3. Auxiliary building exhaust plenum, four 50%
| |
| capacity exhaust fans, and Unit 1 and 2 vent stacks are common with the auxiliary building exhaust plenum, as described in Subsection 6.5.1.2.2.
| |
| : d. Fuel handling building exhaust filter plenum Each of the two fuel handling building exhaust filter plenums (FHBEFP) is identical and each has 100% of the capacity required to treat exhaust air from the fuel handling building, i.e., each plenum is designed to handle a nominal 21,000 cfm. Each FHBEFP consists of the following components:
| |
| : 1. An isolation damper.
| |
| : 2. A high-efficiency prefilter.
| |
| : 3. A HEPA filter.
| |
| : 4. A bypass damper downstream of the HEPA filters which provides direct connection to the auxiliary building exhaust filter plenum, bypassing the charcoal adsorbers.
| |
| : 5. Two 100% capacity charcoal adsorber plenums connected in parallel, each consisting of the following components:
| |
| a) A charcoal adsorber with fire protection provisions.
| |
| b) A HEPA filter.
| |
| c) An isolation damper.
| |
| : 6. A nominal 21,000 cfm capacity charcoal booster fan. Each fan has a flow measuring element and a flow control damper downstream.
| |
| : e. The high-efficiency prefilters provided in the auxiliary building exhaust system are UL listed, all glass media, exhibiting no less than 85%
| |
| efficiency based on ASHRAE 52.
| |
| : f. The high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter provided in the auxiliary building exhaust system
| |
| | |
| 6.5-12 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| is water resistant, capable of removing 99% minimum of particulate matter which is 0.3 micron or larger in size. The filter is designed to be fire resistant. Each element provided is rated for 1000 cfm. All elements are fabricated in accordance with NRC Health and Safety Bulletin 306, dated March 31, 1971, covering Military Specification MIL-F-51068 latest revision in effect at time of purchase, MIL-F-51079 latest revision in effect at time of purchase, UL-586, and after January 1995, AG-1 latest revision in effect at time of purchase.
| |
| : g. The charcoal adsorbers provided in the fuel handling building exhaust system are capable of removing not less than 90% of elemental iodine and 30% of organic iodide. The charcoal adsorbers are tray type and are filled with impregnated coconut shell charcoal.
| |
| The charcoal adso3rber beds hold charcoal of 30 lb/ft density with an ignition temperature of 340C. Total bed depth is 2 inches.
| |
| The bed dimensions are so designed that the air has at least 0.25 second of residence time through the charcoal. The charcoal shall be of the best grade available at the time of installation and shall meet the requirements of ANSI N509-1976. Charcoal received after September 23, 1988 shall meet the requirements of ANSI N509-1980.
| |
| Ten test canisters are provided for each charcoal adsorber bank. These canisters contain the same depth of the same charcoal as in the charcoal adsorber. The canisters are so mounted that a parallel flow path is created between each canister and the charcoal adsorber. The charcoal in the canisters is thus subjected to the same contaminants as the charcoal in the bed. Periodically, one of the canisters is removed and laboratory tested to reverify the adsorbent efficiency.
| |
| : h. The fuel handling building charcoal filter bypass line is closed automatically on a high radiation signal from safety-related area monitors located in the fuel handling building. The bypass isolation dampers are also interlocked as follows: damper OVA051Y is interlocked with fan OVA04CA such that the damper will close when the fan is started, and similarly for damper OVA435Y and fan OVA04CB. The control and instrumentation for the interlock is shown on the same drawing as the charcoal booster fans.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-13 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : i. The fuel handling building exhaust system does not include a means for humidity control of the exhaust air prior to entering the charcoal filters. Exhaust air relative humidity will vary with the outside air conditions (temperature and relative humidity), the evaporation rate of the spent fuel pool water (water temperature), and the area heat generation. The relative humidity of the inlet air to the fuel handling building exhaust filter system may be greater than 70%. Therefore, laboratory testing is conducted at 30C and 95% relative humidity and the removal efficiencies for the elemental and organic forms of radioiodine are 90% and 30% relatively.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-13a REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| THIS PAGE DELETED INTENTIONALLY.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-14 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : j. One deluge valve connected to the station fire protection system is mounted adjacent to each charcoal adsorber bank. For each charcoal adsorber, a two-stage temperature switch is provided. When the first-stage setpoint (200) is exceeded, it is alarmed on the main control panel and indicated on the local control panel. When the second stage setpoint (310) is exceeded, it is annunciated on the local control panel. After the second stage setpoint is reached, the deluge valve can be actuated manually. Actuation of the deluge valves is indicated in the main control room.
| |
| : k. Full-size access doors adjacent to each filter bank are provided in the equipment plenums. Access doors are provided with transparent portholes to allow inspection and maintenance of components without violating the train integrity. Spacing between filter sections is based on ease of maintenance considerations.
| |
| The plenums are all-welded steel plate construction with intermediate concrete floors, heavily reinforced, and built to low leakage requirements.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-15 REVISION 11 - DECEMBER 2006 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.5.1.3 Design Evaluation 6.5.1.3.1 Emergency Makeup Air Filter Units
| |
| | |
| The emergency makeup air filter system works in conjunction with the control room HVAC system to maintain habitability in the control room. The design evaluation is given in Subsection 6.4.4.
| |
| 6.5.1.3.2 Auxiliary Building Exhaust System The auxiliary building exhaust system is designed to preclude direct exfiltration of contaminated air from the auxiliary building following an accident or abnormal occurrence which could result in abnormally high airborne radiation in the auxiliary building. Equipment is powered from essential buses, and all power circuits meet the requirements of IEEE 279-1971 and IEEE 308-1974. Redundant components are provided where necessary to ensure that a single failure will not impair or preclude system operation. A system failure analysis is given in Table 9.4-10.
| |
| 6.5.1.3.3 Fuel Handling Building Exhaust System
| |
| | |
| The fuel handling building exhaust system is designed to preclude direct exfiltration of contaminated air from the fuel handling building, when required following an accident or abnormal occurrence which could result in abnormally high airborne radiation in the fuel handling building.
| |
| The fuel handling building will be maintained at a pressure of 0.25 inches (water) below atmospheric pressure. The basis for this requirement is the negative pressure differential indicated in SRP 6.2.3 Section II. The fuel handling building exhaust system will be under negative pressure at all times.
| |
| The necessary airflow rates are as follows:
| |
| exhaust air - 21,000 cfm at 0.066 lb/ft3 density; infiltration air - 4,070 cfm at 0.067 lb/ft3 density; and supply air - 16,135 cfm at 0.067 lb/ft3 density.
| |
| | |
| The control system has been modified to provide for a pressure differential controller sensing fuel handling building/outdoor differential pressure and controlling a modulating control damper in the air supply duct serving the fuel handling building.
| |
| Equipment is powered from essential buses, and all power circuits meet requirements of IEEE 279-1971 and IEEE 308-1974.
| |
| Redundant components are provided where necessary to ensure
| |
| | |
| 6.5-16 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| that a single failure does not impair or preclude the system operation. A system failure analysis is given in Table 9.4-10.
| |
| 6.5.1.3.3.1 Fuel Handling Accident Inside Spent Fuel Storage Building
| |
| | |
| The accident is defined as the dropping of a spent fuel assembly in the spent fuel pool resulting in the rupture of the cladding of 264 fuel rods. The cause of the event can be identified as any mechanical failure or operating error which results in the dropping of a fuel assembly into the refueling pool during its transfer from one position in the pool to another. The frequency classification, as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.70, can be categorized as one of limiting faults. This means that it is an occurrence that is not expected to occur but is postulated because its consequences would include the potential for the release of significant amounts of radioactive material. The step-by-step sequence of events from initiation to the final stabilized condition is described in Table 6.5-2. For the purpose of this accident, the time sequence will be referenced from the moment radioactivity is released from the surface of the pool water.
| |
| As originally designed, least 12 seconds would be required for radioactivity to travel from the exhaust inlet to the first isolation damper. Thus, all activity released from the accident could be filtered through HEPA and charcoal filters prior to release to the stack. However, design basis analyses performed utilizing alternative source term methodology do not credit filtration.
| |
| | |
| During handling of recently irradiated fuel (i.e. fuel that has occupied part of a critical core within the previous 48 hours), the fuel handling building ventilation system is required to be operable.
| |
| The normal supply system is designed to provide 19,050 cfm of outside air to the fuel handling building general area. The exhaust inlets are located at the pool edge. The shortest distance between the exhaust inlets and the inboard isolation valve is 222 feet.
| |
| Redundant GM -type gamma detectors are mounted on the walls near the edge of the pool to provide reliable and rapid detection of radioactivity released from the pool surface. If predetermined levels are exceeded, the monitors alarm locally and in the main control room and initiate control action to route the released activity through the emergency exhaust system. However, design basis analyses performed utilizing alternative source term methodology do not credit filtration.
| |
| The monitors have an operating range which extends from 0.1 to 104 mR/hr. The lower range level is chosen to assure that normal operating levels are on scale (provides indication that the instrument is operational). Operating levels below 0.1 or greater than 50 mR/hr are unlikely. Initial setpoints are listed in Table 12.3-3.
| |
| | |
| The worst case fuel handling accident (as originally analyzed) has the potential of exceeding the 10 R/hr maximum range of the fuel handling accident monitors, but this environment will not prevent the monitor from completing its design function. General Atomics (GA) has tested this monitor to 500 R/hr, and based on this
| |
| | |
| 6.5-17 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| test, they have determined that this monitor will perform its function up to 1000 R/hr.
| |
| | |
| The monitor was originally selected to assure initiation of control action within 6 seconds or less. Commercially available area monitors are suitable for this application.
| |
| | |
| Two separate and independent (nuclear safety-related) monitors are provided for the spent fuel pool. Two nuclear safety-related recorders are provided in the control room for the spent fuel pool.
| |
| 6.5.1.4 Tests and Inspections
| |
| | |
| The engineered safety feature filter systems and their components are thoroughly tested in a program consisting of the following:
| |
| : a. factory and component qualification tests,
| |
| : b. onsite preoperational and filter acceptance testing, and
| |
| : c. onsite periodic testing.
| |
| | |
| Written test procedures establish minimum acceptable values for all tests. Test results are recorded as a matter of performance record, thus enabling early detection of reduced performance.
| |
| The factory and component qualification tests consist of the following:
| |
| : a. equipment train housing - a leak test and magnetic particle or liquid penetrant testing per Section III of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code of all welds which could cause bypass leakage around HEPA filters or adsorber beds;
| |
| : b. demister - qualification test or objective evidence to demonstrate compliance with specified design criteria;
| |
| : c. HEPA filters - elements tested individually by the manufacturer in accordance with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.52.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-18 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : d. HEPA filter and charcoal adsorber mounting frames-leak test across filterless, covered bank;
| |
| : e. adsorbent beds - model test of bed or objective evidence to demonstrate flow pressure characteristics and channeling effects;
| |
| : f. adsorbent - qualification tests per ANSI N509-1976, after September 23, 1988 qualification tests per ANSI N509-1980;
| |
| : g. fans - tested in accordance with the latest revision of AMCA 210, "Air Moving and Conditioning Association Test Code for Air Moving Devices," to establish characteristic curves, etc.;
| |
| : h. heater - uniform temperature test, high-temperature cutout test, and entering and leaving air temperature test;
| |
| : i. prefilter - objective evidence or certification that American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) efficiency specified is attained; and
| |
| : j. dampers - shop tests demonstrating leak-tightness and closure times.
| |
| The onsite preoperational and filter acceptance tests are discussed in Section 14.2.
| |
| | |
| Operating personnel are trained and required to make surveillance checks. These checks shall include visual inspection and periodically running the equipment trains for performance testing as outlined in the Technical Specifications.
| |
| 6.5.1.5 Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| | |
| High differential pressure across the upstream and downstream HEPA filter is alarmed on the local control panel. One high filter differential pressure alarm for each plenum is provided on the main control panel.
| |
| | |
| For each charcoal adsorber, a two stage temperature switch is provided. When the first stage setpoint (200) is exceeded, it is alarmed on the main control panel and indicated on the local control panel. When the second-stage setpoint (310F) is exceeded, it is annunciated on the local control panel. One deluge valve for each charcoal adsorber bed is provided which can be opened manually when the second-stage setpoint is reached.
| |
| Flow signals are transmitted to the local control panel for indication and for modulation of the control damper.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-19 REVISION 8 - DECEMBER 2000 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Remote manual operation is provided on the main control board for each fan.
| |
| | |
| Design details and logic of the instrumentation are discussed in Subsections 7.3.1.1.8 and 7.3.1.1.9.
| |
| 6.5.1.6 Materials All component material is capab le of a service life of 40 years normal operation plus 6 months post-LOCA at the maximum cumulative radiation exposure without any adverse effects on service, performance, or operation. All materials of construction are compatible with the radiation exposure set forth. This includes but is not limited to all metal components, seals, gaskets, lubricants, and finishes, such as paints, etc.
| |
| Care is taken to avoid the use of any compounds or other chemicals during fabrication or production that contain chlorides or other constituents capable of inducing stress corrosion in stainless steels which are used in the adsorber bed.
| |
| | |
| All components, including the housings, shall be designed in accordance with the applicable pressure and temperature conditions.
| |
| | |
| All gaskets and seal pads are closed-cell, ozone-resistant, oil-resistant neoprene or silicone-rubber sponge, Grade SCE-43 or current designation at time of purchase in accordance with ASTM D1056.
| |
| Only adhesives as listed and approved under AEC Health and Safety Bulletin 306, dated March 31, 1971, covering Military Specification MIL-F-51068C, dated June 8, 1970, and all the latest amendments and modifications are used.
| |
| The organic compounds included in the filter train are as follows:
| |
| : a. charcoal;
| |
| : b. the binder in the HEPA filter media;
| |
| : c. adhesive used in HEPA filters - approximately 1 liquid quart of fire-retardant neoprene or polyurethane foam adhesive is used to manufacture each HEPA filter;
| |
| : d. neoprene gaskets used on HEPA filters and charcoal filter tray flanges;
| |
| : e. the binder in the glass pads used in the demister section (this is a phenolic compound); and
| |
| | |
| 6.5-20 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : f. phenolic compounds and elastomers associated with electrical components.
| |
| 6.5.2 Containment Spray Systems
| |
| | |
| The containment spray systems are designed to remove fission products, primarily iodine, from the containment atmosphere for the purpose of minimizing the offsite radiological consequences following the design-basis loss-of-coolant accident. At the same time, the spray water serves to nominally reduce containment temperature and pressure during the injection phase.
| |
| The containment spray systems may be used to mix the contents of the RWST prior to chemistry sampling. This is accomplished by lining up the containment spray system for recirculation to the RWST. This lineup is identical to the one used to test the containment spray pumps and may be performed in any mode.
| |
| | |
| The containment spray systems may also be used to transfer borated water from the refueling cavity and transfer canal to the RWST. This is accomplished by taking suction from an RCS hot leg via RHR piping and discharging to the RWST via the containment spray system recirculation piping. This evolution can only be performed when the reactor core is defueled.
| |
| 6.5 .2.1 Design Bases
| |
| | |
| The containment spray system is designed to reduce the pressure in the containment atmosphere at a rate which will ensure that the design leakage is not exceeded and to remove sufficient iodine from the containment atmosphere to limit, in the unlikely event of a LOCA, the offsite and site boundary doses to values below those set by 10 CFR 50.67.
| |
| The spray system is designed to provide a sufficient quantity of 30% to 36% NaOH solution to the containment to form an 8.0-10.5 pH solution when combined with the spilled reactor coolant water, the safety injection accumulator inventory, and the refueling water storage tank inventory . The containment spray system consists of two entirely independent subsystems such that the aforementioned requirements can be met in the event of a single active failure in either of the subsystems.
| |
| All components of the containment spray system except the test/recirculating line are Safety Category I and Quality Group B and are protected from missiles which could result from a loss-of-coolant accident. All risers and ring headers are supported to withstand loads resulting from the safe shutdown earthquake as well as operating loads. A seismic dynamic analysis has been performed on the system.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-21 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The following criteria apply to the spray nozzles:
| |
| : a. The Sauter (surface to volume ratio) mean diameter of the spray drops produced by the nozzle at the design pressure drop across the nozzle must be approximately 1000 microns or less.
| |
| : b. The pressure nozzle used is of a swirl chamber design, without any internal parts, such as swirl vanes, etc., which would be subject to clogging.
| |
| : c. Flow through the nozzle at the design operating point is at least 15 gpm. Lower nozzle flow due to degraded pump performance combined with limiting vacuum conditions in the RWST has been evaluated and is acceptable.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-21a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.5.2.2 System Design (for Fission Product Removal)
| |
| | |
| The containment spray system has been divided into two independent 100% capacity pumping systems with no common headers. A single active failure in either of the two pumping systems will therefore not affect the operation of the other subsystem. A single-failure analysis is presented in Table 6.5-1. The system diagram (Drawing M-46) illustrates equipment redundancy, flowpaths, and system operation.
| |
| | |
| The containment spray system includes six ring-type spray headers each having the following radii, pipe diameter, number of nozzles, and served by the pump indicated:
| |
| | |
| Nominal Destination of Pipe Number Pump Delivering NumberRing RadMeanius Diameter in. Nozzlesof Fluid to the Ring
| |
| | |
| 1 13 feet 0 inch 4 39 "A" Pump
| |
| | |
| 2 23 feet 6 inches 6 51 "B" Pump 3 34 feet 1/2 inch 6 60 "A" Pump
| |
| | |
| 4 45 feet 9 inches 6 90 "B" Pump 5 56 feet 7-1/2 inches 8 120 "A" Pump
| |
| | |
| 6 64 feet 9 inches 8 112 "B" Pump There are no cross connections between the "A" and "B" spray headers. Rings 1, 3, and 5 are supplied via a single 10-inch riser pipe with restricting orifices in laterals supplying rings 3 and 5 to assure that the flow to each ring is proportionate to the number of nozzles supplied. Similarly, rings 2, 4, and 6 are supplied via a single 10-inch riser pipe with restricting flow orifices in laterals supplying rings 4 and 6. The plan view of the spray headers showing nozzle location and orientation is given in Drawing M-535, Sheets 3-5.
| |
| | |
| The "A" pump is nominally designed to deliver 15 gpm to each of 219 spray nozzles, plus approximately 130 gpm of motive fluid to the eductor considering post-accident containment pressure versus RWST level time profiles and pump degradation. The "B" pump under like conditions is nominally designed to deliver 15 gpm to each of 253 spray nozzles plus approximately 130 gpm of motive fluid to the eductor. The nominal pump ratings are therefore 3415 and 3925 gpm for the "A" and "B" pumps respectively, at 450 feet total developed head.
| |
| In the event of a high -high-high (Hi-3) containment pressure signal (corresponding to approximately 20 psig), the CS007, the
| |
| : CS019,
| |
| | |
| 6.5-22 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| and the CS010 valves will open immediately if they are not previously in the open position; the CS pumps will start immediately once the CS019 valve is open, provided that offsite power to the ESF buses has not been lost. Otherwise, upon receipt of a safety injection signal and restoration of bus voltage, the containment spray pumps will be sequenced to start by the diesel engine generator load sequencer, providing the Hi-3 signal is present and the CS019 valve is open. The valve motor operators will start immediately upon receipt of an Hi-3 signal if power is available.
| |
| | |
| The refueling water storage tank (RWST) (containing 2300 to 2500 ppm of boron) for each unit has a capacity of approximately 458,000 gallons. Low-level switches are provided to automatically open the containment sump isolation valves, SI8811 A and B, on two out-of-four logic sensing a Lo-2 level with the presence of a safety injection signal. It should be noted that manual reset of safety injection does not defeat the automatic opening of the SI8811 A and B valves. The RHR pumps are thereby transferred to the recirculation mode automatically without stopping them. The charging pumps and safety injection pumps are then manually changed to the recirculating mode (see Subsection 6.3.2.8). The containment spray pump continues to take suction from the RWST until the Lo-3 level is reached. The CS pump suction is then manually transferred to the recirculation sump. NaOH addition continues, regardless of pump suction source, until the spray additive tank Lo-2 level is reached. The spray additive tank is then manually isolated from the CS eductor.
| |
| Heat tracing the spray additive tanks and piping is not necessary to prevent crystallization of the 30% to 36% sodium hydroxide solution. The spray additive tank also has a nominal 1 psig nitrogen cover blanket applied to eliminate ambient air contact with the solution.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-23 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The worst-case condition for maximum spray pH postulates the failure of one CS019 valve to open concurrently with two trains of ECCS and CS pump in operation. Since the spray additive tank is supplying only one eductor, the time to deplete the spray additive tank is greater than the time to deplete the RWST.
| |
| This will result in transferring the suction of the CS pump to the containment recirculation sump and continuing eduction of NaOH from the spray additive tank until the spray additive tank Lo-2 level is reached. This will result in NaOH being added to sump water that already contains NaOH. At this time, the resulting pH may exceed 10.5. However, this is acceptable with regard to the equipment qualification limit of 10.5 (see Subsection 3.11.5) and for hydrogen generation purposes.
| |
| Attachment A6.5 describes the Iodine removal effectiveness of the Containment Spray System.
| |
| Sufficient NaOH is delivered to the containment to form a minimum 8.0 pH sump solution when ECCS injection fluid (from the refueling water storage tanks and accumulators) is combined with spilled reactor coolant. This final sump pH will provide for long-term iodine retention. This will result in a decontamination factor of 200 in the containment atmosphere for sump temperatures between 150 F and 212 F.
| |
| Regulatory Guide 1.1 addresses the recirculation mode in which temperatures of the pumped fluid are at a maximum. The recirculation mode dictates the design for residual heat removal and containment spray pump suction piping because during the injection phase there is 50 to 90 feet of positive head available from the refueling water storage tank acting on the suction of these pumps.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-24 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The residual heat removal pumps require approximately 12 feet of NPSH at 3000 gal/min design capacity and approximately 19 feet of NPSH at runout capacity of 5000 gal/min. The containment spray "B" pump requires approximately 19 feet of NPSH at 3925 gal/min design capacity and approximately 22 feet of NPSH at 4600 gal/min runout capacity. Since the "B" train containment spray pump is of higher capacity than the "A" train pump, and the line size and equivalent feet of pipe are about the same for both the trains, for containment spray, the NPSH required versus available is most critical for the "B" train pump. Values of NPSH required are indicated as approximate because there are slight variations between pumps of duplicate design.
| |
| Allowing no credit for the water standing in the basement of the containment but assuming that the recirculation sump is full, the static head available is in excess of 30 feet for the containment spray pumps (containment basement elevation minus elevation of the centerline of the containment spray pumps) and in excess of 29 feet for the RHR pumps (containment basement elevation minus elevation of the centerline of RHR pumps).
| |
| Based upon both the RHR and containment spray "B" Pump operating under runout conditions, friction losses between the sump and pump inlet are conservatively calculated to be less than 3.5 feet for containment spray and for RHR. The minimum resultant NPSH available is approximately 29 feet for the containment spray B pump and approximately 28 feet for the RHR pumps.
| |
| | |
| For high temperature conditions, this analysis assumes that the liquid in the recirculation sump is at its vapor pressure at all times, thus there is no need to deliberately continue a high containment pressure condition to satisfy pump NPSH requirements.
| |
| As part of the chemical effects evaluations related to head loss through the containment recirculation sump strainers (in support of Generic Letter 2004-02), the NPSH analysis for the RHR pumps has been performed at low temperatures.
| |
| In accordance with the requirements specified in Regulatory Guide 1.1, the NPSH analysis at low temperatures assumes the containment atmospheric pressure is equal to the minimum containment atmospheric pressure that would be present inside containment before the Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) event.
| |
| This analysis does not credit calculated increases in containment pressure as a result of the LOCA.
| |
| Adequate net positive suction head is available to the RHR pumps.
| |
| | |
| The sump solution satisfies NPSH requirements of the pumps with adequate margin to assure satisfactory pump operation concurrent with RHR pump runout at the rate of 5000 gpm and CS pump maximum flow of 4800 gpm.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-25 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Containment sump water temperature is not monitored for postaccident analysis. Although identified in Regulatory Guide 1.97 as an important parameter, containment sump water temperature indication would only be useful to determine if adequate NPSH is available to the CS or RHR pumps during the recirculation mode. By design, cavitation of these pumps will not occur even at containment saturation peak water temperature.
| |
| The B/B design complies with Regulatory Guide 1.1 which states that, "Emergency core cooling and containment heat removal systems should be designed so that adequate net positive suction head (NPSH) is provided to system pumps assuming maximum expected temperatures of pumped fluids and no increase in containment pressure from that present prior to postulated loss of coolant accidents." Containment sump water temperature is therefore not a parameter required to indicate proper operation of the CS or RHR systems when in the recirculation mode.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-25a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Containment spray operation will continue for a minimum of 8 hours following a LOCA. After 8 hours of operation, containment spray may be terminated if containment pressure is less than 15 psig and the spray additive tank has reached the Lo-2 level.
| |
| Following a MSLB, containment spray operation may be terminated after containment pressure is less than 15 psig. NaOH addition may be secured prior to 15 psig.
| |
| Suction lines to each pump are provided with guard pipes and suction valve protection chambers up to and including the first valve outside the containment for passive failure protection.
| |
| Both pumps and all motor-operated valves are supplied with power from the emergency diesel generators in the event of a loss of offsite power. Failure of a single diesel generator or emergency bus will affect one subsystem only.
| |
| | |
| Spray Engineering Company of Burlington, Massachusetts, 1713A nozzles meet the requirements stated in the design basis. The following listed figures illustrate the characteristics of this nozzle when spraying into a chamber at atmospheric pressure and normal ambient temperature and h umidity:
| |
| : a. Figure 6.5-5, Diameter of spray envelope versus height when spraying vertically downward.
| |
| : b. Figure 6.5-6, Diameter of spray envelope versus height when spraying horizontally.
| |
| : c. Figure 6.5-7, Diameter of spray envelope versus height when spraying downward at a 45 angle.
| |
| The above figures are predicated upon a 40 psi drop across each nozzle with a resulting flow of 15.2 gpm per nozzle. Pressure versus flow characteristics of this nozzle are illustrated in Figure 6.5-8.
| |
| In determining the number of spray nozzles required and their configuration, the effects of density of the containment atmosphere must be considered. The reduction factors to be applied to spray envelope diameter as a function of containment saturation temperature are shown in Figure 6.5-9.
| |
| | |
| To prevent degradation of the sodium hydroxide, an inert atmosphere is maintained within the spray additive tank by means of a nominal 1 psig nitrogen blanket. A relief valve is provided to prevent overpressurization of the tank.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-26 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The components for this system are as follows:
| |
| : a. Containment Spray Pumps Number - two per unit Type - Vertical centrifugal Material - Stainless steel Capacity "A" pump - 3415 gpm Capacity "B" pump - 3925 gpm Net developed head - 450 feet
| |
| | |
| 6.5-26a REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : b. Spray Additive Tank Number - one per unit Material - Stainless steel Volume - 5000 gallons
| |
| | |
| Fluid - 30% to 36% NaOH in water Cover gas - Nitrogen Design pressure - 1.3 psig
| |
| | |
| Design temperature - 100F
| |
| : c. Eductors Number - two per unit
| |
| | |
| Design Pressure - approximately 300 psig
| |
| | |
| Design Temperature - 300F Design flow - 130 gpm at pressure connection (actual flow rate was determined during preoperational testing)
| |
| Design educted flow 60 gpm 30% NaOH at suction connection (for pH control)
| |
| Material - Stainless steel
| |
| : d. Spray Nozzles Material - Stainless steel
| |
| | |
| Type - Sprayco 6.5.2.3 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| An extensive research and development program has been conducted as part of the NRC's Reactor Safety Program to determine the iodine removal effectiveness of the chemical spray systems.
| |
| Containment spray experiments were performed in the 1350 ft3 vessel of the Nuclear Safety Pilot Plant (NSPP) at ORNL and were supported by additional containment spray experiments in the 3 large 25-foot-diameter by 66.7-foot-high (26,500 ft) vessel (approximately one-fifth the scale of a typical 1000 MWe nuclear reactor) of the Containment Systems Experiment (CSE) at BNWL.
| |
| Since the containment spray tests
| |
| | |
| 6.5-27 REVISION 10 - DECEMBER 2004 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| were begun, the iodine-removal capability of spray systems has been well established by over 80 spray tests in the NSPP and 28 spray tests in the eight CSE experiments.
| |
| | |
| The verification of the containment spray system spray coverage within the containment and system design parameters has been completed at the Zion Station. The experimental verification of the acceptability of the containment spray system as a viable means of rapidly removing iodine from the containment has been completed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation and reported in WCAP-7742 and other publications. The adequacy of sodium hydroxide spray additive has been documented in various ORNL and BNWL reports.
| |
| The extensive research on the behavior of iodine in accident environments and the dose reduction factors provided by containment spray systems has been completed, and the conclusion is that the containment spray system is an effective safety system which has been proven by experimental studies and large scale model tests.
| |
| One of the advantages of the sodium hydroxide spray system is that it responds rapidly by starting to clean all the gas in the containment after an accident by absorbing and reacting with the airborne iodine. Other types of iodine-removal systems respond much more slowly and thus permit the iodine to remain airborne for a longer time. In comparison to other systems, the spray system is much simpler in design. It utilizes system components which are reliable and well understood through extensive use. The fission product removal capability is discussed in detail in Attachment A6.5.
| |
| | |
| The following sections of the containment will not be directly covered during postaccident spray operation:
| |
| : a. containment fan cooler discharge structures,
| |
| : b. missile barrier passageways,
| |
| : c. chamber beneath upper internals storage area,
| |
| : d. chamber beneath lower internals storage area,
| |
| : e. chamber beneath exchange fixture storage area,
| |
| : f. chamber beneath transfer tube,
| |
| : g. passageways above transfer tube,
| |
| : h. entrance to seal table,
| |
| : i. volume beneath main steamline penetrations,
| |
| | |
| 6.5-28 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : j. volumes beneath floor slabs at elevation 426 outside the missile barriers.
| |
| : k. volume operating floor,
| |
| : l. chamber beneath pressurizer,
| |
| : m. chambers beneath steam generators
| |
| : n. sheltered volumes beneath seal table and heat exchanger compartments,
| |
| : o. net free volume within seal table and heat exchanger compartments, and
| |
| : p. net free volume within the reactor vessel cavity and in-core instrument shaft.
| |
| | |
| The maximum net containment volume is 2,848,387 ft3; the minimum net containment volume is 2,758,850 ft3. The minimum net volume of the containment which is sprayed directly is 2,349,944 ft3, or 82.50% of the maximum net volume and 85.18% of the minimum net volume. The regions not directly sprayed but having good communication with sprayed regions have a maximum vol33ume of 438,914 ft and a minimum of 349,377 ft , or 15.41% of maximum and 12.66% of minimum net containment volume.
| |
| | |
| The minimum net volume that is sprayed directly includes the volume above the operating floor minus: the polar crane; steam generator; pressurizer; and reactor coolant pump compartments; and plus: the refueling cavity; main steam vertical pipe chase; regenerative and excess letdown heat exchanger compartments.
| |
| There are no regions within the containment that are unsprayed and not in communication with sprayed volumes within the containment. The seal table compartment, with a net volume of 3 3146 ft, and the reactor coolant drain tank compartment, with a net volume of 341 ft3, have poor communication with the sprayed regions of the containment, for a total of 3487 ft3. This is 0.122% of the maximum net containment volume and 0.126% minimum net containment volume.
| |
| | |
| Under post-LOCA conditions, there is 56,042 ft3 of water in the containment basement. This plus the directly sprayed regions plus the seal table and reactor coolant drain tank compartment totals are equal to 2,409,473 ft3. The regions not directly sprayed but having good communication with sprayed volumes are by difference a maximum 438,914 ft3 and a minimum of 349,377 ft3, or 15.41% and 12.66% of maximum and minimum net containment volume. The 56,042 ft3 of water in the containment basement corresponds to a water level of 5 feet 2 inches. The maximum evaluated flood level of 6 feet 3 inches has minimal effect on
| |
| | |
| 6.5-29 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| these containment region volumes. The change to the maximum/minimum volumes is less than 0.1% for the regions not directly sprayed but having good communication with sprayed volumes.
| |
| The containment spray pumps will be run for at least 8 hours following a LOCA. During this time, switchover of pump suction
| |
| | |
| 6.5-29a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| from the injection to the recirculation mode of operation will be manually initiated and completed.
| |
| | |
| The containment spray pumps do not have to be stopped when transferring from the injection mode to the recirculation mode of operation, provided that the RWST has not reached the empty level. A summary of the sequence of events leading up to and during switchover follows.
| |
| The RWST level is initially one volume inac curacy below the low alarm setpoint. ECCS switchover is initiated when the RWST Lo-2 alarm annunciates. This is discussed in Section 6.3.
| |
| Spray switchover is initiated when the RWST Lo -3 alarm annunciates. Upon recognition of the RWST Lo-3 alarm, the operator opens the CS009 valve and closes the CS001 valve. At this time all ECCS and containment spray pumps have a long-term suction supply of water.
| |
| | |
| Upon initiation of containment spray, the operator monitors the spray additive tank level; on a LO-2 level, the containment spray eductor spray additive valve for each operating train is closed. In the event of a single failure of the containment spray eductor spray additive valve to open, the pump in the train with the failed valve will not autostart. While the ECCS pumps are operating from the recirculation sump, the one operating spray pump continues to take suction from the RWST until the RWST reaches the Lo-3 level. At this time the spray pump suction is switched to the recirculation sump.
| |
| Addition of required volume between Lo to Lo-2 level setpoints of 30-36% NaOH from the spray additive tank to the containment results in a minimum sump pH of 8.0 which is above the minimum required sump pH of 7.0 to ensure Iodine retention. This is accomplished by continuing caustic addition while the spray pump is taking suction from the sump.
| |
| At the initiation of containment spray, the CS pumps take suction from the RWST. The resulting pH of the RWST and NaOH mixture may exceed the upper EQ limit of 10.5 depending on the CSAT NaOH concentration. When the CS pumps are aligned to take suction from the containment sump, the eductors may still be in operation, adding NaOH to the pump flow. This will result in a maximum spray pH. When NaOH addition is secured and the CS pump suction is from the recirculation sump, the spray pH will be the same as the sump pH (8.0-10.5). The effects of these pH values on equipment qualification and hydrogen generation have been evaluated and found acceptable. Below is a detailed description of the effects on pH caused by the CS system operation.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-30 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| At the initiation of containment spray, water from the RWST is mixed with NaOH from the spray additive tank. The pH of the mixture is determined primarily by the concentration of NaOH in the spray additive tank. If the CSAT is at the upper concentration limit and the NaOH flow is at the upper limit, the resulting pH may be greater than the EQ limit of 10.5. When the source of containment spray water is switched from the RWST to the recirculation sump (LOCA only), the eductor may be adding NaOH to sump water that has already been treated with NaOH.
| |
| This will cause the pH to increase. The increase is determined by the actual flow rates before and present at the time of switchover. However, this value is bounded by the pH that occurs in the final minute of NaOH addition, when it is assumed that all the NaOH previously added had mixed uniformly and flowed to the recirculation sump. The duration of increased pH is determined by the number of trains of ECCS and CS pumps in operation.
| |
| Equipment qualification of components in containment was performed assuming a maximum spray pH of 10.5 at 77F. The pH described above has been reviewed concerning hydrogen generation and equipment qualification and has been found acceptable. Refer to Section 3.11.5.
| |
| | |
| Operator Actions The parameter used by the operator to determine when to initiate containment spray suction transfer to the recirculation sump is the RWST level.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-30a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Eductor flows are stopped when the spray additive tank level indicates that the required amount of NaOH has been added to achieve the required final pH in the containment sump. This ensures the required volume of 30% to 36% NaOH is added. There is a status lamp indicator to show when the low-low level has been reached. There is also an annunciator alarm. This quantity ensures that the required pH is achieved under worst case conditions of maximum reactor coolant and RWST boration.
| |
| In the case where the spray additive Lo-2 level alarm does not initiate before the RWST Lo-3 alarm initiates, spray switchover is initiated when the RWST Lo-3 alarm initiates, and NaOH addition continues until the spray additive tank Lo-2 level is reached.
| |
| Two series of operations are required to be accomplished by the operator to complete spray switchover: opening of the containment spray pump suction valve to the recirculation sump; and, closing of the containment spray pump suction valve to the RWST.
| |
| 6.5.2.4 Tests and Inspections 6.5.2.4.1 Preoperational Test Program
| |
| | |
| The preoperational test program has been conducted. The pump discharge was routed through the test recirculating line back to the refueling water storage tank (RWST) or routed directly into the refueling cavity inside containment. The valve operating and pump starting times, the pump and eductor delivery rates, and valves adjusted to ensure proper flows through the eductors, were recorded. The eductors were tested with demineralized water instead of sodium hydroxide, and the test values were adjusted for the appropriate sodium hydroxide flow rates. The actual eductor motive fluid flow rates were determined at this time.
| |
| 6.5.2.4.2 Reliability Tests and Inspections
| |
| | |
| Routine periodic testing of the containment spray components and support systems are performed per ASME Section XI requirements.
| |
| Remote operated valves are cycled to verify operability and inspected for leakage. The pumps are tested using the recirculation line to the RWST.
| |
| To implement the periodic component testing requirements, Technical Specifications have been established.
| |
| These tests verify valve position and actuation, pump performance and actuation, spray additive tank level and concentration, spray nozzle flow path, and NaOH addition rate.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-31 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| The NaOH addition rate is verified by using the primary water system to simulate the spray additive tank level at the eductor suction. The tank level is simulated at the high level alarm setpoint. In addition, the eductor motive fluid flow rate, as determined in the full-flow preoperational tests, is established. Under these conditions, the equivalent containment spray additive flow rate is verified to be adequate to ensure transfer of the CSAT inventory to the containment recirculation sump while limiting spray pH to values consistent with existing equipment environmental qualification constraints.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-31a REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| During periodic system testing, a visual inspection of pump seals, valve packings, flanged connections and relief valves is made to detect leakage and confirm that no significant deterioration is occurring in the containment spray system.
| |
| All testing of the containment spray system components may be done while the unit is in operation except for air testing of the nozzles, which should be accomplished when the reactor is shut down.
| |
| In addition, in response to NRC Generic Letter 95-07, Pressure Locking and Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, the following administrative procedural control was implemented to ensure continued reliability of the following containment spray valves:
| |
| | |
| The containment spray pump discharge isolation valves, 1(2)CS007A/B, are cycled following evolutions that could potentially create a pressure-locking condition.
| |
| 6.5.2.5 Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| | |
| The containment spray system is provided with the instrumentation and controls to permit the monitoring and actuation of the system from outside the containment.
| |
| | |
| The containment spray pumps and motor-operated valves can be actuated either automatically or manually. Automatic actuation signals are generated in the solid-state protection system cabinets. Both spray subsystems will be actuated by a Hi-3 containment spray signal. Actuation includes starting both pumps, and opening all valves required for system operation.
| |
| Manual actuation is from control switches on the main control board.
| |
| | |
| Indicating lights are provided on the main control board and on the ESF status panels to show the status of the pumps and the position of the valves. Main control board monitor lights are provided to show the status of the pumps and valves as an operator aid in evaluating system response subsequent to automatic safeguard actuation. Alarms on the main control board are provided for pump automatic trip, pump automatic start, pump fail to start and valves fail to open.
| |
| Refueling water storage tank level is indicated on the main control board, and alarms are provided for high, low, low-low, and low-low-low tank levels.
| |
| | |
| Spray additive tank level is indicated locally and on the main control board. Alarms are provided for high, low, and low-low tank levels. There is also a status lamp indicator and annunciator for low-low tank level located on the main control board.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-32 REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| During testing, either adjustable manual valves CS018A or CS021A and CS018B or CS021B in the caustic line are set (utilizing water and correcting for specific gravity) and locked in position at the desired 30% NaOH rate of flow to the eductor. In addition, the actual motive fluid flow rate to the eductor for each spray system was determined during preoperational testing. These flow rates are used during periodic system testing. Main control board flow indicators are provided for pump discharge, pump to eductor recirculation, and eductor NaOH suction, and an alarm is provided for NaOH injection flow failure. The temperature of the pump motor bearings is monitored. Ammeters are provided on the main control board to monitor motor current.
| |
| Design details of the containment spray controls and instrumentation are presented in Section 7.3.
| |
| 6.5.2.6 Materials
| |
| | |
| All components in the containment spray system which come into contact with spray solution during either the injection or recirculation phase are fabricated of stainless steel. All containment materials are compatible with the NaOH solution with the exception of galvanized steel and aluminum. These materials are discussed in Subsection 6.2.5.
| |
| 6.5.3 Fission Product Control Systems
| |
| | |
| The primary containment fission product control systems during normal plant operating conditions consist of the containment charcoal filter units and the containment miniflow purge system.
| |
| For further discussion of these systems, refer to Subsections 9.4.8 and 9.4.9.
| |
| The system which operates following a design-basis accident to remove fission products is the containment spray system. For further discussion of this system, refer to Subsection 6.5.2.
| |
| Note that the charcoal has been removed from the containment charcoal filter units at Byron.
| |
| Note that the containment charcoal filter units at Braidwood Station have been abandoned in place.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-33 REVISION 18 - DECEMBER 2020
| |
| | |
| B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.5-2 FUEL HANDLING ACCIDENT INSIDE SPENT FUEL STORAGE BUILDING
| |
| | |
| EVENT TIME
| |
| : 1. A fuel assembly is being handled by refueling 0 second equipment. The assembly drops onto the top of the spent fuel storage racks or pool floor during fuel transfer. Some of the fuel rods in both the dropped assembly and/or the spent storage racks are damaged, resulting in the release of radioactive noble gas and gaseous iodine to the spent fuel pool water.
| |
| | |
| The gaseous activity rises as a bubble(s) and reaches the pool surface partially depleted in iodine.
| |
| : 2. The nuclear safety-related monitors near the 0 second pool begin to detect the gamma radiation as the gas reaches and emerges from the pool surface.
| |
| : 3. The radioactive bubble(s) disperses and mixes with the air above the pool surface and begins to move towards the exhaust inlets located at the pool edge. There are 31 exhaust inlets around the pool located 5 inches above the pool surface.
| |
| : 4. The monitor sends a signal to close the normal 6 seconds HVAC system isolation dampers and open the dampers on the emergency exhaust filter train.
| |
| : 5. The isolation dampers are closed and the dampers 11 seconds on the emergency exhaust filter train are opened routing air through HEPA and charcoal filters (5 seconds or less total).
| |
| | |
| 6.5-35 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Tables 6.5-3 and 6.5-4 have been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| 6.5-36 and 6.5-37 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.5-5
| |
| | |
| NONACCESSIBLE AREAS OF THE AUXILIARY BUILDING
| |
| | |
| PLANT AREA FLOOR ELEVATION
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 Floor Drain Sump Rooms Units 1 and 2 Equipment Drain Pump Rooms Units 1 and 2 Residual Heat Removal Security -
| |
| Pumps A and B Rooms Related
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 Containment Spray Pumps information A and B Rooms Withheld Under Recycle Evaporators OA, OB Rooms 10 CFR 2.390
| |
| | |
| Recycle Evaporator Feed Pumps OA, OB Rooms, and Recycle Evaporator Feed Pumps Valve Aisles Units 1 and 2 Collection Drain Sump Ro om (Byron)
| |
| Unit 1 Collection Drain Sump Room (Braidwood)
| |
| Unit 2 Collection Drain Sump Room/ Hot Machine Shop (Braidwood)
| |
| | |
| Gas Decay Tank Rooms Gas Decay Tank Valve Aisle
| |
| | |
| Recycle Holdup Tank Pipe Tunnel and Tank OA Room
| |
| | |
| Gas Decay Tank and Recycle Evaporator Pipe Tunnel Units 1 and 2 Residual Heat Exchanger Rooms A and B
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 CASP Areas Units 1 and 2 Safety Injection Pumps A and B Rooms Units 1 and 2 Positive Displacement Charging Pump Room
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 Centrifugal Charging Pumps A and B Rooms
| |
| | |
| 6.5-38 REVISION 6 - DECEMBER 1996 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.5-5 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| PLANT AREA FLOOR ELEVATION
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 Spray Additive Tank Room and Pipe Penetration Area
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 Pipe Tunnels
| |
| | |
| HRSS Lab Area, HRSS Tank and Pump Room
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 Heat Exchanger Valve AislesSecurity -
| |
| Related Radwaste and Blowdown Mixed Bed Information Demineralizer Valve Aisle Withheld Under Radwaste Mixed Bed Demineralizer OA, OB and 10 CFR 2.390 OC Cubicles Units 1 and 2 Filter Valve Aisle, Operating Area, Pipe Tunnel and Associated Filter Cubicles
| |
| | |
| Blowdown Mixed Bed Demineralizer OA, OB, and OC and OD Cubicles Radwaste and Blowdown Mixed Bed Demineralizer Valve Aisle and Operating Area Units 1 and 2 Heat Exchanger Valve OperatingArea Aux. Steam Pipe Tunnels
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 Pipe Tunnels Spent Resin and Concentrate Pump Rooms
| |
| | |
| Radwaste Distillate Condensers Rooms A, B, C
| |
| | |
| Units 1 and 2 Demin. Valve Aisle, Pipe Tunnel and Associated Filter Cubicles
| |
| | |
| Surface Condenser Rooms A, B and C
| |
| | |
| Radwaste Evaporator Rooms A, B and C
| |
| | |
| Radwaste Gas Compressors OA, OB Rooms
| |
| | |
| 6.5-39 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE 6.5-5 (Cont'd)
| |
| | |
| PLANT AREA FLOOR ELEVATION
| |
| | |
| Clothes Change and Shower Room (Byron only)
| |
| Mask Cleaning Room (Braidwood only) Security -
| |
| Related Gas Analyzer Cabinet Aisle Information Withheld Under Units 1 and 2 Volume Control Tank Rooms 10 CFR 2.390 and Valve Aisle
| |
| | |
| Waste Gas Analyzer Rack Area
| |
| | |
| 6.5-40 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| ATTACHMENT A6.5 IODINE REMOVAL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM
| |
| | |
| Following a postulated Loss -of-Coolant Accident, the containment spray system functions to remove airborne iodine (in both the elemental and particulate forms) thus reducing the amount of activity available to leak from the containment.
| |
| The iodine removal constants of ( and ) are dependent on spray e p flow rate, droplet size, droplet fall time, and sprayed volume.
| |
| The models from NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.2 (Reference 1) are used to calculate the removal constants.
| |
| Retention of iodine in solution depends on maintaining a sump solution pH of >7.0 in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.183.
| |
| | |
| A6.5-1 REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| ATTACHMENT A6.5 IODINE REMOVAL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM A6.5.1 CONTAINMENT SPRAY DROPLET MODEL A6.5.1.1 Method of Calculation
| |
| | |
| In order to eliminate the need to scale-up factors from experimental results to full-sized reactor containments, the size dependent calculations in this model were programmed for discrete size parameters, i.e., the calculations are repeated for incremental height steps, and for 30 different drop-size groups to represent the effects of the drop-size distribution.
| |
| No significant effect on results was observed by increasing the number of groups. The resulting model with discrete size dependent parameters has been programmed for a digital computer.
| |
| The CIRCUS computer code is used to analyze the containment spray to determine average droplet size and fall time. A detailed description of the mathematical models used in the code has been presented in many WCAP reports such as WCAP-8376, "Iodine Removal by Spray in the Joseph M. Farley Station Containment."
| |
| In the computer code, the sprayed volume of the containment is divided into layers of incremental height and area equal to the total sprayed area at any height z. The height-dependent calculations such as drop trajectories and the change in the drop size distribution due to coalescence, are performed for each height step, using the parameters calculated in the previous step as input for the next step.
| |
| A6.5.1.2 Drop-Size Distribution The drop-size distribution used in the model is based on data obtained from measurements of the actual size distribution from the Sprayco 1713A nozzle for the design pressure drop of 40 psi.
| |
| Discussion of this distribution and how it was obtained is presented in References 5 and 6.
| |
| A6.5.1.3 Condensation As the spray solution enters the high temperature containment atmosphere, steam will condense on the spray drops. The amount of condensation is easily calculated by a mass balance of the drop:
| |
| mh + mh = m'h (A6.5-1) cg f where:
| |
| m and m' = the mass of the drop before and after condensation, lb,
| |
| | |
| A6.5-1a REVISION 12 - DECEMBER 2008 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| mc = the mass of condensate, lb, h = the initial enthalpy of the drop, Btu/lb, and h and h = saturation enthalpy of wa ter vapor and g f liquid, Btu/lb.
| |
| The increase in each drop diameter in the distribution, therefore, is given by:
| |
| | |
| (A6.5-2)
| |
| | |
| where:
| |
| v = the specific volume of liquid at saturation, f 3 ft/lb, v = the specific volume of the drop b3efore condensation, ft/lb,
| |
| | |
| hfg = the latent heat of evaporation, Btu/lb, d = the drop diameter, cm before condensation, and d' = the drop diameter, cm after condensation.
| |
| The drop-size distribution used in evaluating spray iodine removal effectiveness is a temporal distribution based on an average spatial distribution which is in turn determined by integrating the spatial distribution over the entire fall height, for discrete height steps including the effects of coalescence. In determining the spatial distribution for each height step, the spatial distribution from the previous step is used as input and no account is taken for the fact that the higher velocities of larger drops will result in these larger drops being further through their fall height at the end of the given height step. The only place where drop velocity enters into the calculation of spatial distribution is in evaluating the number of collisions due to differences in drop velocities within a given height step. The only changes in the spatial drop-size distribution throughout the spray fall height accounted for are those due to coalescence. Since the larger drops are available to coalesce for the same length of time as the smaller drops, the number of collisions between drops will be overpredicted. This will result in a relatively greater number of large drops, hence a lower available mass transfer surface area and larger terminal velocities. This last effect results in shorter drop residence times once the average spatial distribution is converted to a temporal distribution.
| |
| These effects result in a conservative evaluation of spray iodine removal effectiveness.
| |
| | |
| A6.5-2 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| An average temporal distribution can also be determined by converting the spatial distribution at each height step to a temporal distribution and then taking the average of these. When compared to this, the temporal distribution used in CIRCUS is more conservative in terms of both available mass transfer surface area and drop residence times. The distribution shown in Figure 4 of Reference 5, and Figure 2-3 of Reference 6, is based on over 30,000 data points.
| |
| Analysis of these drop-size measurements shows that the drop-size distribution from this nozzle may he represented by a continuous distribution function, which is used as the input to the computer code.
| |
| This increase in drop size due to condensation is expected to be complete in a few feet of fall for the majority of drop sizes in the distribution. More detailed calculations by Parsley (see Reference 2) show that even for the largest drops in the distribution, thermal equilibrium is reached in less than half of the available drop fall height. The change in the drop-size distribution due to condensation was conservatively modeled by a step increase to the equilibrium size immediately after the drops emerge from the nozzle.
| |
| A6.5.1.4 Drop Trajectories A description of the actual drop trajectories is required to obtain accurate drop residence times and to obtain the trajectory angle required for the coalescence calculations described below. These trajectories are obtained by integrating the equations of motion for each drop size.
| |
| The equations of motion were integrated numerically with the drag coefficient being determined iteratively from Reynolds number and terminal velocity.
| |
| These calculations yield the following results.
| |
| A6.5.1.4.1 Spread and Nozzle Interference Trajectory results for a range of drop sizes show that the horizontal velocities of the drops are quickly attenuated. For the smaller drop sizes (400), the trajectory essentially is a straight fall. Even for 1000 drops, the horizontal velocity component diminishes to less than 10% of the total velocity in less than 10 feet. The effect of temperature and pressure on drop trajectories has also been calculated. The resulting spray envelope is of smaller diameter at higher temperatures and pressure.
| |
| | |
| A6.5-3 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| For downward -directed spray nozzles, the initial vertical velocity is higher than the terminal velocity, resulting in a slightly shorter residence time.
| |
| Correction factors are calculated for each drop size in the spectrum, so that the drop fall-times used for the iodine removal calculations are the actual drop residence times.
| |
| A measure of conservatism is added to the drop residence calculations by the use of the drop diameters after condensation.
| |
| Actually, the drop velocities would have been attenuated to a fraction of the initial nozzle velocity by the time condensation is complete.
| |
| A6.5.1.5 Drop Coalescence This effect will tend to decrease the overall surface -to-volume ratio of the spray, thereby affecting the fission product removal capability of the system. Concern has been centered particularly on the effect of coalescence on scale-up factors applied to data obtained from small-scale experiments. The effects of this phenomenon are accounted for by a mathematical model which is independent of the containment size.
| |
| The mathematical model used to account for drop co alescence due to the effects of overlapping spray patterns and due to larger drops overtaking smaller ones shows the number of coalescences to be functions of the collision and coalescence efficiencies, as well as the trajectory angle, drop velocities, drop size, and drop density.
| |
| The coalescence efficiency is the probability that a collision will result in the formation of a single larger drop.
| |
| The collision efficiency describes the probability that two drops on a geometric collision course, i.e., their centers of motion are separated by a distance less than the sum of the radii of the two drops, will actually collide.
| |
| The results calculated with this model show that the smaller drops with diameters near the mode of the distribution are affected most. This is expected, since these sizes have the highest density of drop population. Due to the considerably larger volumes of the larger diameter drops, however, the increase in the larger drop population is not very pronounced.
| |
| | |
| A6.5.1.6 Results Using the plant parameters from Table A6.5-1 and taking into account the effects of condensation, drop trajectories, and drop coalescence, the average droplet size calculated to be 1240 microns and the average fall time is 12.44 seconds.
| |
| | |
| A6.5-4 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| A6.5.2 Elemental Iodine Spray Removal Coefficient The NRCs Standard Review Plan (Reference 1) identifies a methodology for the determination of spray removal of elemental iodine independent of the use of spray additive. The removal rate constant is determined by:
| |
| e = 6KgTF / VD Where e = Removal rate constant due to spray removal, hr-1 Kg = Gas phase mass transfer coefficent, 9.84 ft/min T = Time of fall of the spray drops, min F = Volume flow rate of sprays, ft3/hr V = Containment sprayed volume, ft3 D = Mass-mean diameter of the spray drops, ft The upper limit specified for this model is 20 hr-1.
| |
| | |
| Using the drop size and fall time from Subsection A6.5.1.6 and the plant parameters from Table A6.5-1, the elemental iodine -1 removal coefficient is calculated to be greater than 20 hr .
| |
| Since Reference 1 specifies an upper limit of 20 hr-1, this value is to be used in the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) dose analysis.
| |
| Removal of elemental iodine from the containment atmosphere is assumed to be terminated when the spray injection phase is terminated or, per Reference 1, when the airborne inventory drops to 0.5 percent of the total elemental iodine released to the containment (this is a DF of 200).
| |
| A6.5.3 Particulate Iodine Removal Coefficient The pa rticulate spray removal is determined using the model described in Reference 1:
| |
| = 3hFE / 2VD p
| |
| Where = Removal rate constant due to spray removal, p -1 hr h = Drop Fall Height, ft F = Spray Flow Rate, ft3/hr V = Volume Sprayed, ft3 E = Single Drop Collection Efficiency D = Average Spray Drop Diameter The E/D term depends upon the particle size distribution and spray drop size. From Reference 1, it is conservative to use 10 m-1 for E/D until the point is reached when the inventory in the atmosphere is reduced to 2% of its original (DF of 50) at which time the value for E/D is reduced by a factor of ten. The other parameters are taken from Table A6.5-1. Using these inputs, the value for p is 6 hr-1. When a DG of 50 is reached, the removal coefficient is reduced to 0.6 hr-1.
| |
| | |
| A6.5-5 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| A6.5.4 Spray Performance Evaluation A6.5. 4.1 Injection Phase Operation The spray iodine removal an alysis is based on the assumption that:
| |
| : a. Only one-out-of-two spray pumps are operating.
| |
| | |
| A6.5-6 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : b. The emergency core cooling system (ECCS) is operating at its maximum capacity.
| |
| | |
| The performance of the spray system was conservatively evaluated at the peak containment temperature and pressure following a postulated LOCA.
| |
| The spray flowrate of 2950 gpm per pump was used in the calculation of the spray removal coefficients.
| |
| Since this peak pressure condition is expected to exist, at most, for a few minutes, and since both mass transfer parameters and spray flowrate improve with decreasing pressure, an appreciable margin is added to this evaluation by this assumption.
| |
| A6.5.4.2 Recirculation Phase Although elemental iodine removal by the sprays would be expe cted to continue during the spray recirculation phase, no credit is taken for removal of elemental iodine after the spray injection phase is terminated. Spray removal of particulate iodine would continue during the spray recirculation phase. Although the spray recirculation could continue indefinitely, it is assumed that sprays are terminated eight hours into the accident.
| |
| | |
| A.6.5.4.3 Re-evolution of Iodine Due to the addition of sodium hydroxide from the spray additive, the water in the containment sump is adjusted to a pH of greater than 7.0 and re-evolution of iodine need not be considered (Reference 1).
| |
| | |
| A6.5-7 REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| A6.5.5 References
| |
| : 1. NUREG-0800, NRC Standard Review Plan, Section 6.5.2 Containment Spray as a Fission Product Cleanup System, Revision 2, December 1988.
| |
| | |
| A6.5-8a REVISION 6 - DECEMBER 1996 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| : 2. L. F. Parsley, Jr., "Design Considerations of Reactor Containment Spray Systems - Part VI," ORNL-TM-2412, Part 6, 1969.
| |
| : 3. Deleted.
| |
| : 4. Deleted.
| |
| : 5. M. O. Sanford, "Sprayco Model 1713A Nozzle Spray Drop-Size Distribution," WCAP 8258, Revision 1, May 1975.
| |
| : 6. E. V. Somers and M. O. Sanford, "Iodine Removal by Spray in the Joseph M. Farley Station Containment," WCAP 8376, July 1974.
| |
| | |
| A6.5-9 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| TABLE A6.5-1 INPUT PARAMETERS FOR SPRAY IODINE REMOVAL ANALYSIS
| |
| | |
| Containment temperature 260 °F*
| |
| | |
| Total containment free volume 2.85 x 106 ft3
| |
| | |
| Fraction of containment volume sprayed 0.825
| |
| | |
| Spray fall height 141 ft
| |
| | |
| Net spray flowrate per pump 2950 gpm
| |
| | |
| Number of spray pumps operation 1 of 2
| |
| | |
| *The effect of higher peak LOCA containment temperatures has been evaluated up to 300° F and has been determined to be negligible (Reference Westinghouse letter MSE-TPM-059, dated September 1, 1995).
| |
| A6.5-10 REVISION 9 - DECEMBER 2002 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.6 INSERVICE INSPECTION OF CLASS 2 AND 3 COMPONENTS
| |
| | |
| This section describes the inservice inspection program for Class 2 and 3 components.
| |
| 6.6.1 Components Subject to Examination
| |
| | |
| Class 2 and 3 components are examined and tested in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section XI, Subsections IWC and IWD, respectively. The applicable Edition and Addenda of Section XI are specified in 10 CFR 50.55a and the Station ISI Program Plan. In cases where the Section XI requirements are determined to be impractical, a relief request is developed to detail why the examination(s) are impractical and also include proposed alternative examination(s). Relief requests are included in the station ISI program plan and submitted to the NRC for approval.
| |
| | |
| Byron and Braidwood have been approved to implement 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-informed categorization and treatment of structures, systems, and components for nuclear power plants."
| |
| This regulation provides an alternative approach for establishing requirements for treatment of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) using a risk-informed method of categorizing SSCs according to their safety significance.
| |
| Specifically, for SSCs categorized as low safety significant, alternate treatment requirements may be implemented rather than treatments chosen by the ISI program. Refer to Section 3.2.3 for further information.
| |
| 6.6.2 Accessibility
| |
| | |
| The design arrangements of Class 2 and 3 system components provides, to the extent possible, adequate clearances to conduct code required examinations. When specific exceptions to the above are identified, alternate examinations are described and justified in the inservice inspection program.
| |
| 6.6.3 Examination Techniques and Procedures
| |
| | |
| The examination techniques and procedures described in Section XI of the code are used to the extent possible. When specific exceptions to the above are identified, alternate techniques and procedures will be described and justified in the inservice inspection program.
| |
| 6.6.4 Inspection Intervals and Scheduling
| |
| | |
| An inspection interval, as defined in ASME Section XI Subarticle IWA- 2400, is a 10-year interval of service. The schedule for inspection of Class 2 components is in accordance with Subarticles IWA- 2400 and IWC-2400. The schedule for inspection of Class 3 components is in accordance with Subarticles IWA -2400 and IWD-2400.
| |
| | |
| 6.6-1 REVISION 17-DECEMBER 2018 B/B- UFSAR
| |
| | |
| 6.6.5 Examination and Testing Requirements
| |
| | |
| Inservice inspection of Class 2 and 3 components is in agreement with the specific examination and testing requirements detailed in ASME Section XI, Tables IWC -2500-1 and IWD-2500-1, respectively. When these requirements cannot be met, a relief request is developed to detail why the examination(s) or test(s) are impractical and also include proposed alternative examination(s). Relief requests are included in the Station ISI Program Plan and submitted to the NRC for approval.
| |
| 6.6.6 Evaluation of Examination Results/Repair Procedures
| |
| | |
| Evaluation of the examination results for Class 2 and 3 components complies with the requirements of Articles IWC-3000 and IWD-3000, respectively. Repair procedures for Class 2 and 3 components comply with the requirements of Articles IWC-4000 and IWD- 4000, respectively.
| |
| 6.6.7 System Pressure Testing
| |
| | |
| System pressure testing of Class 2 and 3 components is performed in accordance with ASME Section XI, Articles IWC- 5000 and IWD-5000, respectively.
| |
| | |
| 6.6-2 REVISION 6 - DECEMBER 1996
| |
| | |
| REVISION 17 DECEMBER 2018
| |
| | |
| ------ Containment Pr111ur1
| |
| | |
| so------------------~----------~~-------------.
| |
| | |
| 45
| |
| | |
| 40
| |
| | |
| ,......, 35
| |
| | |
| c:::7' rn JO Q.
| |
| cu 25
| |
| :::t en en 20
| |
| ._ cu a..
| |
| t5
| |
| | |
| 10
| |
| | |
| 5
| |
| | |
| 0 -l-..W..Wllll-l..J..l.l.llllf-...l..IU.Wlll-'-lol.l.Ll.Uf .... ""'""'".&.L.1.111111--'-"'.U.WIJ-li-w. .......... 4 ..-..w.wolllf- ....... Yo&&Ut 1 o3 -z 10 10 18 Id 10 ,,
| |
| Ti me
| |
| | |
| UPDATED BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-3 LOCA CONTAINMENT PRESSURE RESPONSE FOR DOUBLE ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SI UNIT 1 REVISION 17 DECEMBER 2018 Contarnmenl Steam Temperature
| |
| ---- Contarnment sump Water Temperature
| |
| | |
| JOO ---------------------------------------------.
| |
| | |
| 250
| |
| ' ' \\ I ,, \\ \\
| |
| \\
| |
| L&.J \\
| |
| :::> a:::
| |
| t- 200 ' \\
| |
| 0::: '
| |
| L&.J '
| |
| a_ '
| |
| ::E w
| |
| t--
| |
| | |
| 150
| |
| | |
| *J 10 *2 10 _, 10 Id t I .~
| |
| '.( s)
| |
| | |
| UPDATED BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-4 LOCA FOR DOUBLE CONTAINMENT ENDED TEMPERATURE RESPONSE PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SI UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| REVISION 17 DECEMBER 2018 Containment Pr111ure
| |
| | |
| 50 ----------------------------------------------.
| |
| | |
| 45
| |
| | |
| 40
| |
| | |
| ......... 35
| |
| | |
| CJ"
| |
| | |
| Cl) 30
| |
| _.. Q.
| |
| | |
| Q) 25
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| =
| |
| en Cl) 20 C1' a..
| |
| 15
| |
| | |
| 10
| |
| | |
| 5
| |
| | |
| 1 a* 1 o~ 1 01 1 o' 18 1 d 1 J Ti me
| |
| | |
| UPDATED BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-9 LOCA CONTAINMENT PRESSURE RESPONSE FOR DOUBLE ENDED PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SI UNIT 2 DECEMBER REVISION 2018 17
| |
| | |
| Containment Sleom Temperature
| |
| ----Containment Sump Woter T1mpuotur1
| |
| | |
| 300 --~~--------------------------------------------
| |
| | |
| 250
| |
| | |
| I I I
| |
| L&J I 0::: I
| |
| ::> , I I- 200 I a:: I '
| |
| LI.I I a.. I ,_ ... __ .... __ _
| |
| :IE I w I t- I I
| |
| I I 150 I I I
| |
| , I I I
| |
| | |
| 100 ~U.Wq...l..E.Ull~U&llll-l..l~f.-1-L.&.111111 ......... Ullllfo..1.1.& ..... ~yyt-.LMl.11111-"l.l.lll.,_;l..LWllt-'.uJllll 10 -I 10 10 101 -z 1 d 10 10 I 2 ul 10 1~ *
| |
| -* Ti me ( s)
| |
| | |
| UPDATED BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-10 LOCA FOR DOUBLE CONTAINMENT ENDED TEMPERATURE RESPONSE PUMP SUCTION BREAK MAXIMUM SI UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| REVISION 7 DECEMBER 1998
| |
| | |
| *I 1 t I 10
| |
| * 10 10 10 10 ' 10 TIME (SECONDS)
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-13
| |
| | |
| MSLB CONTAINMENT PRESSURE RESPONSE COMPOSITE CURVE UNIT 1
| |
| | |
| 678
| |
| | |
| DECEMBER 2014 REVISION 15
| |
| | |
| 30----------------------. . . .
| |
| 25 ********:*****t**:********:********:******** . . . . . . . .
| |
| --~ 20 en
| |
| : 0. . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "
| |
| ._.. t5 . . . . . .
| |
| ~ : : : : . . . .
| |
| | |
| ~ 10 * * * * * * * * : * * * * * * * * * ' * * * * * * : * * * * * * * * : * * * * * *
| |
| * en . . .
| |
| ~ . : :
| |
| 0.. 5 ********:********:********:********:******** . . . .
| |
| o-i=----T'-:'*-=--: . . . . ........ : ........ : ........ : ....... .
| |
| -5...,__ __ ..._.. ....... ~---- ................ . . . . - .................. .......,..-....__. ................. ....-_,__.a...&..,&.,WJU,f
| |
| -t 0 3 10 10 1 2 10 10 10 4 10 Time (s)
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-13b MSLB 2ONTAINMENT PRESSURE RESPONSE FOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE - UNIT 1 1.0 FT DER AT 102% POWER WITH LOOP AND REVISION 8 DECEMBER 2000
| |
| | |
| 40 7------:---------------------------
| |
| | |
| I.
| |
| I
| |
| | |
| 30 1*! ** **************:*****************: ***** .. **********:************* ***: *****************: .... ********
| |
| | |
| -:::1 . ;* . I :
| |
| 0.. . . . . .
| |
| ~ I .
| |
| i 20 ~ - - -- - - - --------- - *-- - ----- - - - -- --- *- - -- -********-*- *--*- -***-*- *-*- - - - ----- --* - - - *- - - - - --- -***- - -- -
| |
| | |
| Cl'I
| |
| * Ill !
| |
| C) '
| |
| c.. ....
| |
| | |
| :o _ .... ........ ..... . . .. .. . **********:*r****I *****:*********************:****
| |
| | |
| .0 --:-----~-----:------;----__: ____ _:__ __ __J
| |
| | |
| *t ~
| |
| 10 ., ,o ,o 10 10 10 10 TIME (s}
| |
| | |
| t:POA BYI.ON/BRAIDWOOO ST A. TlONS TED f'INAL SAFETY ANAL YSJS Rf PORT
| |
| | |
| f'IGURf 6.2- 13c
| |
| ~LB CONT AINMerf PRfSSURE RESPONSE COMPOSITE CURVE. IJNTT l
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-13e has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 DECEMBER 2018 REVISION 17
| |
| | |
| MSLB Containment Temperature Response Unit 1
| |
| | |
| 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Time (sec)
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-14
| |
| | |
| MSLB CONTAINMENT TEMPERATURE RESPONSE COMPOSITE CURVE UNIT 1 REVISION 17 DECEMBER 2018 Containrnent Ternpe r ature for SLB SLB Case Unit 1 Most Lirnjting 350----------------------------
| |
| | |
| 300
| |
| | |
| 150 V
| |
| | |
| -1 0 ~ 2 3 4 10 10 10 *10 ,o 10 Time (seconds)
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-14a MSLB CONTAINMENT TEMPERATURE RESPONSE FOR 0.81 FT2 SPLIT BREAK AT 100% POWER WITH LOOP
| |
| & MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE FAILURE UNIT 1 Figure 6.2-14b has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 REVISION 17 DECEMBER 2018
| |
| | |
| MSLB Containment Temperature Response Unit 2
| |
| | |
| 'ii:' 0
| |
| ! 250 ,---------,.--___:..------~..;;;;;;.iiii~--
| |
| :::1 l! cu f 200 +---------~----------------
| |
| ~
| |
| | |
| 100 -t------.....--------r------..-------,------.------,
| |
| 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Tlme(sec)
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-14c MSLB CONTAINMENT TEMPERATURE RESPONSE COMPOSITE CURVE UNIT 2 Figure 6.2-14d has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018 Figure 6.2-14e has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018
| |
| | |
| Figures 6.2-16 through 6.2-16c have been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 17 - DECEMBER 2018
| |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSFT BUISPVHI CIBWFCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDA1ED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 8.2-18
| |
| | |
| CONTAINMENT NOOALIZATION SUBCOMPARlMENT DIAGRAM
| |
| | |
| REVISION 9 DECEMBER 2002
| |
| | |
| 30
| |
| | |
| 20 BREAK COMPARTMENT (3)
| |
| -<::II
| |
| :e
| |
| -w CIC:
| |
| ~
| |
| CIC:
| |
| A.
| |
| ~
| |
| C UPPER COMPARTMENT (9)
| |
| I-10
| |
| | |
| 0 0 I 2 Tit,£ AFTER BREAK (SECONDS)
| |
| | |
| See sub:;ection 6.2.1.2.1. These are loop compartment controlling loads. They need not be considered due to primary coolant loop leak-before-break analysis.
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-19 LOOP COMPARTMENT AND UPPER COMPARTMENT COMPARTMENT (ELEMENT 3) HAVING A DEHL BREAK PRESSURE TRANSIENT FOR WORST CASE BREAK REVISION 1 DECEMBER 1989 30 ,--------------------------
| |
| | |
| BREAK COMPARTMENT (3)
| |
| | |
| 20
| |
| -c.!:I
| |
| ~
| |
| -w a:
| |
| ::)
| |
| Cl)
| |
| ~
| |
| a:
| |
| A.
| |
| ..J
| |
| ~ UPPER COMPARTMENT (7) 0 I--
| |
| 10
| |
| | |
| 0 0 I 2 TIME AFTER BREAK (SECONDS)
| |
| | |
| See subsection 6.2.1.2.1. These are loop compartment controlling toads. They need not be considered due to primary coolant loop leak-before-break analysis.
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-20 LOOP COMPARTMENT ANO UPPER COMPARTMENT PRESSURE TRANSIENT FOR WORST CASE BREAK COMPARTMENT (ELEMENT 3) HAVING A DECL BREAK 20
| |
| | |
| -C, BREAK COMPARTMENT (28)
| |
| ~
| |
| -LI.I a:
| |
| = Cl) 10 Cl)
| |
| LU cir:
| |
| A.
| |
| ..J S t-
| |
| | |
| UPPER COMPARTMENT (7) ob=---d=========i 0 I 2 TIME AFTER BREAK (SECONDS)
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAL BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS VSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-21
| |
| | |
| UPPER PRESSURIZER CUBICLE ANO UPPER COMPARTMENT PRESSURE TRANSIENT FOR SPRAY LINE BREAK (ELEMENT 28) 20
| |
| | |
| BREAK COMPARTMENT (25)
| |
| | |
| -~
| |
| ~
| |
| | |
| LU CII::
| |
| ::::, 10 Cl)
| |
| Cl)
| |
| LU CII::
| |
| ~
| |
| ..J 0
| |
| I-
| |
| | |
| UPPER COMPARTMENT (7)
| |
| | |
| 0 0 2 3 TIME AFTER BREAK (SECONDS)
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-22
| |
| | |
| STEAMLINE COMPARTMENT ANO UPPER COMPARTMENT PRESSURE TRANSIENT FOR STEAMLINE BREAK (ELEMENT 25) 20
| |
| | |
| BREAK COMPARTMENT (26)
| |
| -(!)
| |
| | |
| Cl)
| |
| A.
| |
| -w a:
| |
| Cl) 10 Cl) w a:
| |
| A.
| |
| ~
| |
| C>
| |
| | |
| UPPER COMPARTMENT (7)
| |
| | |
| 0 0 2 3 TIME AFTER BREAK (SECONDS)
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-23
| |
| | |
| STEAMLINE COMPARTMENT AND UPPER COMPARTMENT PRESSURE TRANSIENT FOR STEAMLINE BREAK (ELEMENT 26)
| |
| B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-24 has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 14 - DECEMBER 2012 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-24a has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-24b has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 REVISION 16 DECEMBER 2016
| |
| | |
| 350
| |
| | |
| 300
| |
| ~
| |
| w a:
| |
| ~
| |
| ~
| |
| a: 250 w
| |
| D.
| |
| :E w
| |
| t-t-
| |
| z w
| |
| :E 200 z
| |
| Ci t-z 0
| |
| (.J 150
| |
| | |
| 100 50000 60000 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 HEAT REMOVAL RATE (BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| ACCIDENT MODE ENTERING SERVICE WATER TEMP = 100 F
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BYRON STATION
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-25 CAPACilY FOR ONE FAN COOLER CONTAINMENT ESTIMATED HEAT RESPONSE ANALYSIS REMOVAL REVISION 16 DECEMBER 2016
| |
| | |
| -u..
| |
| ~
| |
| LU a::
| |
| ::> 300 *c-------- ---*- **-*-*--* ---
| |
| ~
| |
| a::
| |
| LU a.
| |
| :?
| |
| !=! 250 "+------- - --*--------------*--------*-*---------- - --- - -*---**--~---.. **-*--*--*---.. *--*-------.. ---------*---*--*-*--*--------*------------
| |
| 1-z LU
| |
| :?
| |
| !: 200 +--**------******-.. ** -*--*-***--*------*-*-------~-----"-*--*-*-**----*-- - ------* .. *------*---**---**--***-*------------*--*-----*----****-----------------.. --
| |
| ~
| |
| z 8
| |
| | |
| 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 HEAT REMOVAL RATE (BTU/SEC)
| |
| | |
| Note -The estimated heat removal capacity is based on a Service Water inlet temperature of 104 °F.
| |
| The maximum initial Service Water Temperature is 102 °F. The cooler performance curve reflects the post-LOCA Ultimate Heat Sink temperature.
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL BRAIDWOOD STATION SAFElY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-25 CAPACilY FOR ONE FAN COOLER CONTAINMENT RESPONSE ANALYSIS ESTIMATED HEAT REMOVAL B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-26 has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 B/B-UFSAR
| |
| | |
| Figure 6.2-27 has been deleted intentionally.
| |
| | |
| REVISION 19 - DECEMBER 2022 INSIDE CONTAINMENT . OUTSIDE CX>NTAINMENT VENT
| |
| | |
| ISOLATION ISOLATION VALVE VALVE
| |
| .,._ _ _.__PROCESS LINE
| |
| | |
| ,-, I X
| |
| 'i' TO FLOWMETER OR PRESSURE DECAY TEST RIG
| |
| | |
| ISOLATION VALVES
| |
| | |
| THREADED .. T ... .. T ... PROCESS
| |
| .;.E:.:;No~===---------t----l)l<J--[)l<J-- LINE
| |
| | |
| VENT VENT
| |
| | |
| ISOLATION ISOLATION VALVE VALVE
| |
| | |
| ,'-, UPDA11D FINAL IAFETY ANAL IYRONIIRAl>WOOD STA1IONS YIISltEPOII .. _.IIT_
| |
| )(
| |
| 1.\\
| |
| I FIBUAEl.2-28 TO FLOWMETER OR PRESSURE DECAY TEST RIG
| |
| | |
| REVISION3 DECEMBER 1991
| |
| | |
| i...1--- Tranamltter - Cloeed to outside environment
| |
| | |
| Bellows aensor -
| |
| Closed to containment environment
| |
| | |
| Penetration aleeve
| |
| | |
| INSIDE CONTAINMENT OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT
| |
| | |
| CONTAINMENT PRESSURE AND REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE INSTRUMENT PENETRATIONS
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-30
| |
| | |
| INSTRUMENTATION PENETRATION SCHEME (SHEET 1 OF 3)
| |
| | |
| M4532.020 10-91 REVISION3 DECEMBER 1991
| |
| | |
| r-.f------- Containment wall To deadwelght teatatand
| |
| | |
| *r--- Locked cloaecl valve LC.
| |
| | |
| Transmitter -
| |
| c1oaecl to containment .... ._..__ lnatrument IIM environment
| |
| | |
| Penetration sleeve
| |
| | |
| INSIDE CONTAINMENT OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT
| |
| | |
| PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRANSMITTER DEADWEIGHT TEST STAND CALIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION PENETRATION
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-30
| |
| | |
| INSTRUMENTATION PENETRATION SCHEME (SHEET 2 OF 3)
| |
| | |
| M4532.021 10-91 REVISION3 DECEMBER 1991
| |
| | |
| .... I--,,_ ____ Containment wall
| |
| | |
| *r ..... 1--- Locked dosed valve LC. (TYPICAL)
| |
| | |
| 111 ..... ~- Instrument llne
| |
| | |
| Penetration aleeve
| |
| | |
| INSIDE CONTAINMENT OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT
| |
| | |
| INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST INSTRUMENT PENETRATIONS
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-30
| |
| | |
| INSTRUMENTATION PENETRATION SCHEME (SHEET 3 OF 3)
| |
| | |
| M.4532.022 10-91
| |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSFT UISPVHI IB WFCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| - /
| |
| ... (
| |
| J \\
| |
| | |
| I
| |
| | |
| I
| |
| | |
| /
| |
| 7
| |
| , j
| |
| - /* IO Ill
| |
| | |
| I
| |
| | |
| 'J J ' ...
| |
| Ill
| |
| ~
| |
| J I
| |
| .I I
| |
| ., I I I
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| | |
| I T
| |
| I -
| |
| I
| |
| | |
| j
| |
| * - N Ill
| |
| * I N I I Ill Ill
| |
| | |
| CllNJcl SNUtADclOJ/COM<<f Alf:JlOJ UPDATED FINAL 8AFEn ANALYSIS IIEPORT BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS
| |
| | |
| F°"'RE 8.2-33
| |
| | |
| TOTAL RESIDUAL DECAY POWER AS A FRACTION OF OPERATING POWER VS. lWE REVISION 12 DECEMBER 2008
| |
| | |
| I I I . ' I I
| |
| | |
| \\ -
| |
| | |
| l 7
| |
| /,
| |
| 77 n If j J I . ..
| |
| | |
| I ..
| |
| I -,, I
| |
| , I ,
| |
| / 7 7 I/ I I
| |
| .I I I
| |
| / I 7
| |
| / I l V /
| |
| | |
| , I , / / I
| |
| | |
| I T I
| |
| - , I , / / T
| |
| | |
| / / I _,
| |
| M/ ,..,
| |
| / I 7 V / 7
| |
| /
| |
| V I ..
| |
| /. I I a/ I I I I I I I j I I I I I
| |
| * CV * ., -*
| |
| - - *
| |
| * CV
| |
| * UPDATED flW. wm MALnmllEPOfl-IYRONIIIWDWOOD STATIONS --RT-
| |
| | |
| FtBUAEl.2~
| |
| BETA. GAMMA. ANO BETA PLUS GAMMA ENERGY AB EASE RATES VS. 1WE
| |
| | |
| (TID-14844 BASED)
| |
| Ill l'""'P""'I', .......,,l"""f'T ""I"", .,...,..,.* ""I"". ,.., * ...,..,...,-,.-rT'"T""l.-r, -rr,,-r, 'T"', rT"T"TT-r~. r-rr, .,..,, =
| |
| ~ \\ .
| |
| | |
| IO
| |
| | |
| Ill IO -
| |
| : \\[\\ \\ : I
| |
| | |
| l----1----4--+---+---llt---+----i--+--t-----1! ~
| |
| I\\~ . i
| |
| ~
| |
| \\. \\ \\ . . ~
| |
| | |
| I I I lo "~~1:
| |
| ~N- ~*...i...a...L..u.J..L..l*u....&..~~*L..~*....._*~*~~*~*...a.-~*~-.,&
| |
| & e m
| |
| * N & e e
| |
| * N &
| |
| N * * * * *
| |
| ( a,un . tCJIOQ>M ABDO CDltRISl.LNI IYIIONIIIIAIWIOOD ANALYSIS REPORT ITA110NI UPDATED FINAL IAFETY.
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 8.2-348 NTEGRATEO ENERGY RB EASE OF BETA, GAMMA, ANO BETA PLUS GAMMA VS. TIME
| |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSFT UISPVHI IB WFCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| PLATE
| |
| | |
| LINER
| |
| | |
| FIBERGLASS FILL
| |
| | |
| 1-:. .~: ,: ~:}
| |
| | |
| 0 <I () 6 0 0 0 0 t, 0 t7 0 I) 0 0 0 0
| |
| \\ ~ 0 b 0 0 0 0 ~ .
| |
| ,. ~
| |
| | |
| CONCRETE\\
| |
| | |
| CONTAINMENT LINER
| |
| | |
| RING
| |
| | |
| SEAL
| |
| | |
| 0 0
| |
| !. I SU~- O-< 2:11 l!=i g& ~~ ij I OONTAINMENT j m *
| |
| ,. C m r- I a ~ :z, .,, I t i: ~
| |
| | |
| REVISION 7 DECEMBER 1998
| |
| | |
| 16" SCH. 120 (TYP)
| |
| | |
| LENGTH VOL. (FT 3) 1A *(A1-A 2 ) 227' 227.8
| |
| | |
| (Az*A3) 115' 128.5 1a -<a 1-a 2 > 475' 476.7 (Bz-83) 113' 126.3 c,f:,I .,
| |
| | |
| lC -(c1-c 2 ) 480' 481.7 F£EDWAT£R CONTROL VALYE.
| |
| (~-C3) 155' 173.Z 1D -(D 1-D 2) 205' 205.7
| |
| | |
| (Dz*D3) 142' 158.7
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-39
| |
| | |
| PIPING VOLUMES IN THE MAIN FEEDWATER AND STEAM GENERATORS) - UNIT 1 SYSTEM (BETWEEN CONTROL VALVES
| |
| | |
| 692 REVISION 7 DECEMBER 1 998
| |
| | |
| 16" SCH. 120 (TYP)
| |
| | |
| L~GTH VOL. (FT 3 )
| |
| 1A -(A 1-A 2 ) 227' 227.8 (Az-A3) 138' 154.2 1a -cs1-a 2) 475' 476.7 (Bz-83) 138' 154.2 c,n ., o, lC -<c,-Cz) 480' 481. 7 FE£DWATER CCltTROL VALVES
| |
| | |
| (~*C3) 155' 173.2 10 -(o 1-o 2 ) 205' 205.7
| |
| | |
| (~*D3) 157' 175.4
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STAiIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.2-40 PIPING VOLUMES IN THE MP.IN FEEDWATER SYSTEM (BETWEEN CONTROL VALV~S
| |
| | |
| AND STEAM GENERATORS) - UNIT 2
| |
| | |
| 693
| |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSFT UISPVHI IBWFCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| 11 2006 m*Ol<'.(2.8) REPORT
| |
| | |
| SUMP 8 8735 ll) CONTAJNMENT RECIRC. SYSTEM
| |
| | |
| STATIONS Q!OSSOIIIB ANALYSIS REVISION DECEMBER 6.3-2a COOLING
| |
| | |
| 1120 ~l: 112[
| |
| LwJ SAFETY CORE FIGURE
| |
| | |
| IIZC u FINAL BYRON/BRAIDWOOD
| |
| /) t"'\\2,) EMERGENCY
| |
| | |
| UPDATED
| |
| | |
| e, ..
| |
| | |
| RE<:IRC, 7 (1,>f !1ECIRC.
| |
| | |
| attO ,OROEI'_. A
| |
| ~AD'EATOn9: POINT H I W[T PAOCel&R..OW~ SIDE HUMIEAED PUMP ELIMINATE O,nt!!Sffl'EM.lffllt0fDT0 THE RH TO a10, EACN CONCERNS.
| |
| AEFERTO ,'1 ON IS (37) t [NSTALLED "A" 8109 DIAQfWI. HOLE THE TH[S COHDfflOH O[SK LOCKING fflE TO EX ;;~1-t~ VENT FOIi REGEN~ HT MQO[FJED 3/16" CLOSEST OlSCHARGE.
| |
| neaOl4BAAiM*A~110N ,,tCll.lfATElHIEUNDS'IIT".MDINGOf'TMEPflOc.Esl. ~ntEPIPNCl.VAl.VB,IJiBTIIUIENTATIOM.ETCIENCJlttEERJQROW TAal.8 PRESSURE
| |
| | |
| NOTE: 1. 2.
| |
| | |
| ~)
| |
| | |
| H~IA HOii
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| ~ i L:J~ : :rm---i LJ ' j
| |
| | |
| ACCUMULATORS ------
| |
| j lJ I I I~ ,_,_
| |
| | |
| 1~
| |
| C 0 1 1 : ~l::::l7-I L E G s B/B - UFSAR
| |
| /05&450'*(63& B
| |
| | |
| .0%&40'01&3"5*0/
| |
| | |
| .0%&" */+&$5*0/
| |
| 5IJTNPEFQSFTFOUTUIFQSPDFTTDPOEJUJPOTGPSUIFDBTFPGNBYJNVN
| |
| TBGFHVBSET
J F
BMMQVNQTPQFSBUJOH
GPMMPXJOHBDDVNVMBUPS
| |
| EFMJWFSZ 5XPSFTJEVBMIFBUSFNPWBM 3)3
| |
| QVNQT
UXPTBGFUZ
| |
| JOKFDUJPO 4*
| |
| QVNQT
BOEUXPDFOUSJGVHBMDIBSHJOH $7
| |
| QVNQT
| |
| PQFSBUF
UBLJOHTVDUJPOGSPNUIFSFGVFMJOHXBUFSTUPSBHFUBOLBOE
| |
| EFMJWFSJOHUPUIFSFBDUPSUISPVHIUIFDPMEMFHDPOOFDUJPOT /PUF
| |
| UIBUUIFGMPXGSPNFBDIQVNQJTMFTTUIBOJUTNBYJNVNSVOPVU
| |
| TJODFUIFQVNQEJTDIBSHFQJQJOHJTTIBSFECZUIFUXPQVNQTPG
| |
| FBDITVCTZTUFN /PUFBMTPUIBUUIF4*QVNQCSBODIDPOOFDUJPOTUP
| |
| UIFSFTJEVBMMJOFTBSFBTTVNFEWFSZDMPTFUPUIFJSEJTDIBSHFJOUP
| |
| UIFBDDVNVMBUPSMJOFT
UIFSFCZFMJNJOBUJOHBOZJODSFBTFJOUIF
| |
| 3)3CSBODIMJOFIFBEMPTTEVFUPUIFDPNCJOFEGMPXTPGUIF3)3
| |
| BOE4*QVNQT
| |
| | |
| .0%&# $0-% -&(3&$*3$6-"5*0/
| |
| 5IJTNPEFQSFTFOUTUIFQSPDFTTDPOEJUJPOTGPSUIFDBTFPG DPME MFHSFDJSDVMBUJPOBTTVNJOHSFTJEVBMIFBUSFNPWBM 3)3
| |
| QVNQ
| |
| /P PQFSBUJOH
TBGFUZJOKFDUJPOQVNQT BOE PQFSBUJOH
BOE
| |
| DFOUSJGVHBMDIBSHJOH $7
| |
| QVNQT BOE PQFSBUJOH *UJTBTTVNFE
| |
| UIBUUIFTQSBZQVNQTIBWFFNQUJFEUIF3845BUUIJTUJNF
| |
| | |
| *OUIJTNPEFUIFTBGFHVBSETQVNQTPQFSBUFJOTFSJFT
XJUIPOMZ
| |
| UIF3)3QVNQDBQBCMFPGUBLJOHTVDUJPOGSPNUIFDPOUBJONFOUTVNQ
| |
| 5IFSFDJSDVMBUFEDPPMBOUJTUIFOEFMJWFSFECZUIF3)3QVNQUP
| |
| CPUIPGUIF4*QVNQTXIJDIEFMJWFSUPUIFSFBDUPSUISPVHIUIFJS
| |
| DPME MFHDPOOFDUJPOTBOEUPCPUIPGUIF$7QVNQTXIJDIEFMJWFSUP
| |
| UIFSFBDUPSUISPVHIUIFJSDPME MFHDPOOFDUJPOT 5IF3)3QVNQ BMTPEFMJWFSTGMPXEJSFDUMZUPUIFSFBDUPSUISPVHIUXPDPMEMFHT
| |
| TJODFUIF3)3EJTDIBSHFDSPTTDPOOFDUWBMWFTBSFDMPTFEXIFO
| |
| NBLJOHUIFUSBOTGFSGSPNJOKFDUJPOUPSFDJSDVMBUJPO
| |
| | |
| .0%&$ )05 -&(3&$*3$6-"5*0/
| |
| 5IJTNPEFQSFTFOUTUIFQSPDFTTDPOEJUJPOTGPSUIFDBTFPGIPU MFH
| |
| SFDJSDVMBUJPO
BTTVNJOHSFTJEVBMIFBUSFNPWBM 3)3
| |
| QVNQ/P
| |
| PQFSBUJOH
DFOUSJGVHBMDIBSHJOH $7
| |
| QVNQT BOE PQFSBUJOH
BOE
| |
| TBGFUZJOKFDUJPO 4*
| |
| QVNQT BOE PQFSBUJOH
| |
| | |
| *OUIJTNPEF
UIFTBGFHVBSETQVNQTBHBJOPQFSBUFJOTFSJFTXJUI
| |
| POMZUIF3)3QVNQUBLJOHTVDUJPOGSPNUIFDPOUBJONFOUTVNQ 5IF
| |
| SFDJSDVMBUFEDPPMBOUJTUIFOEFMJWFSFECZUIF3)3QVNQUPCPUIPG
| |
| UIF$7QVNQTXIJDIDPOUJOVFUPEFMJWFSUPUIFSFBDUPSUISPVHI
| |
| UIFJSDPME MFHDPOOFDUJPOTBOEUPCPUIPGUIF4*QVNQTXIJDI
| |
| EFMJWFSUPUIFSFBDUPSUISPVHIUIFJSIPU MFHDPOOFDUJPOT 5IF 3)3QVNQBMTPEFMJWFSTEJSFDUMZUPUIFSFBDUPSUISPVHIUXP IPU MFHDPOOFDUJPOT
| |
| | |
| 1 REVISION 7 - DECEMBER 1998
| |
| /g37/g18/g37/g3/g16/g3/g56/g41/g54/g36/g53/g3
| |
| | |
| 7"-7&"-*(/.&/5$)"35
| |
| | |
| 01&3"5*0/"-.0%&4
| |
| | |
| $0-%-&( )05-&(
| |
| 7"-7&/6.#&3 */+&$5*0/ "
| |
| 3&$*3$6-"5*0/ #
| |
| 3&$*3$6-"5*0/ $
| |
| 4*
| |
| 0 $ $
| |
| 4* #
| |
| 0 $ $
| |
| 4* "
| |
| 0 $ $
| |
| 4*
| |
| 0 $ $
| |
| 4*
| |
| 0 $ $
| |
| 4* "
| |
| 0 0 $
| |
| 4* #
| |
| 0 0 $
| |
| 4* "
| |
| $ $ 0
| |
| 4* #
| |
| $ $ 0
| |
| 3) " $$ $
| |
| BOE #
| |
|
| |
| 3) " $$ $
| |
| BOE #
| |
|
| |
| 4* #
| |
| $ 0 0
| |
| 4* "
| |
| $ 0 0
| |
| 3)
| |
| $ $ $
| |
| 3)
| |
| $ $ $
| |
| 3)
| |
| $ $ $
| |
| 3)
| |
| $ $ $
| |
| 3)
| |
| 0 0 0
| |
| 3)
| |
| 0 0 0
| |
| 4* #
| |
| $0 0
| |
| 0 01&/
| |
| $ $-04&%
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| /g37/g18/g37/g3/g16/g3/g56/g41/g54/g36/g53/g3 7"-7&"-*(/.&/5$)"35 $POUhE
| |
|
| |
| | |
| 01&3"5*0/"-.0%&4
| |
| | |
| 7"-7&/6.#&3 " # $
| |
| $7 "
| |
| $ 0 0
| |
| 3) #
| |
| 0 $ $
| |
| 3) "
| |
| 0 $ 0
| |
| 4* #
| |
| 0 0 $
| |
| 4* "
| |
| 0 0 $
| |
| $7 # $$ $
| |
| BOE$7 $
| |
|
| |
| 4*
| |
| $ $ 0
| |
| 4*
| |
| $0 0
| |
| $7
| |
| 0$ $
| |
| BOE$7
| |
| 4* " 00 0
| |
| BOE4* #
| |
|
| |
| $7 % 0$ $
| |
| BOE$7 &
| |
|
| |
| 4*
| |
| 0 0 $
| |
| 4* " $0 0
| |
| BOE4* #
| |
|
| |
| $7 7$ $
| |
| BOE$7
| |
|
| |
| 4*
| |
| 0$ $
| |
| 4* "
0$ $
| |
| 4* #
| |
| 4* $BOE
| |
| 4* %
| |
| $7 BOE $$ $
| |
| $7 0 01&/
| |
| $ $-04&%
| |
| 7 7BSJBCMF
DBOCFPQFOPSDMPTFEEFQFOEFOUPOSFBDUPSDPPMBOU
| |
| TZTUFNQSFTTVSF
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| REVISION 17 DECEMBER 2018
| |
| | |
| -Maximum Curve
| |
| - - - Minimum curve 600 r--- ---- ------r----. -
| |
| 500
| |
| ~-- - -- .. - --- .. -- .. .... ---...... ..........__
| |
| 400
| |
| . - - -- --- ..... -- -- ' ~ ~
| |
| | |
| 300 ---- ... -- ,.. ... .... ... ..
| |
| | |
| 200
| |
| | |
| 100
| |
| | |
| 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Flow(spm)
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.3-3
| |
| | |
| RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL PUMP (WITHOUT UNCERTAINTY) PERFORMANCE CURVE REVISION 17 DECEMBER 2018
| |
| | |
| - Maximum Curve
| |
| - - - Minimum Curve 7000
| |
| | |
| 6000 -
| |
| ------- i- - - - --- ~-
| |
| | |
| 5000 -- ... ... ... ... ...
| |
| | |
| ~ ... ...
| |
| "C
| |
| :c m 4000 --~ ...
| |
| | |
| 3000 . ~
| |
| ', ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
| |
| | |
| 2000
| |
| | |
| 1000
| |
| | |
| 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Flow(gpm)
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.3-4
| |
| | |
| CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP (WITHOUT UNCERTAINTY) PERFORMANCE CURVE REVISION 17 DECEMBER 2018
| |
| | |
| - Maximum Curve
| |
| | |
| - - - Minimum Curve 4000
| |
| | |
| 3500 -- ------~ i,...,._
| |
| ... - - - - - - ~
| |
| 3000 - I- ... -- ... ~
| |
| :!:, 2500 ~ ""
| |
| | |
| "O RI QI
| |
| :I: .... .... .... .... .... . .... .... .... .
| |
| 2000 ~
| |
| | |
| 1500
| |
| | |
| 1000
| |
| | |
| 500
| |
| | |
| 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Flow (gpm)
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFE1Y ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.3-5
| |
| | |
| SAFETY INJECTION PUMP (WITHOUT UNCERTAINTY) PERFORMANCE CURVE
| |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSF IBTCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSF IBTCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSF IBTCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| REVISION 12 DECEMBER 2008
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.3-BA
| |
| | |
| RECIRCULATION SUMP DETAILS REVISION 12 Sumo B DECEMBER 2008
| |
| | |
| -'-------------Containment BLDG. 9Cf' *. 9'-J"
| |
| * Reactor
| |
| | |
| 9'-J"
| |
| | |
| ~- CHl<O ft. (TY?.}
| |
| | |
| TYPICAL RECIRCULATION SUMP SCREENS FRAMING PLAN r
| |
| lo Of I t lo ,_ ___ ___,,_ ol
| |
| !: ~I:!
| |
| L DEBRIS INTERCEPTOR
| |
| | |
| SECTION 1-1
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.3-88 SUMP OUTLINE/TRASH RACK DETAILS
| |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSF IBTCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| | |
| 15 4
| |
| | |
| 201
| |
| | |
| REVISION REPORT DECEMBER STATIONS ROOM ANALYSIS DIAGRAM 6.4-5 CONTROL OPERATION SAFETY FIGURE SYSTEM NO FC HVAC NORMAL Redundant Equipment string FINAL SIMPLIFIED BYRON/BRAIDWOOD
| |
| | |
| UPDATED
| |
| | |
| CFM
| |
| | |
| 6000
| |
| *1
| |
| | |
| I
| |
| | |
| NO FC
| |
| | |
| NC )( ro
| |
| | |
| CFM
| |
| | |
| ,500 49 NO FO probe) detector)
| |
| | |
| sensor SENSOR (lsokinetic (Ionization
| |
| | |
| monitor Fl CFM CFM monitor PRESSURE
| |
| | |
| 6000 >>~;.-;;;:::::;::
| |
| 49,500 Temperature/humidity Radiation Smoke HELB
| |
| | |
| air @ @ @ @
| |
| | |
| makeup CFM 6000 NO FC
| |
| | |
| unit open closed damper NO FC Emergency lilter open closed path
| |
| | |
| Bypass NC FC Normally Normally Fail Fail Isolation Flow
| |
| | |
| NO NC FO
| |
| | |
| NC FC NC FC filters
| |
| | |
| adsorber coil coil efficiency bldg air air air Recirculation Charcoal Cooling Heating High Fan Relief Outlet Turbine emergency makeup Intake Minimum outside Intake Maximum outside Intake LEGEND AB CC HC HF F
| |
| | |
| # # 6'4"3
| |
| | |
| 'JHVSFT UISPVHI IBWFCFFOEFMFUFEJOUFOUJPOBMMZ
| |
| | |
| 3&7*4*0/ o%&$&.#&3
| |
| REVISION 10 DECEMBER 2004
| |
| ~~ 11 r::: 0
| |
| .-42 0
| |
| 0 ~ -'°
| |
| _, b -g d 0
| |
| () --
| |
| | |
| I
| |
| *an
| |
| - 6 C\\I
| |
| * II}
| |
| l -
| |
| 0.
| |
| *o " ... -
| |
| | |
| I 1/J
| |
| *o 0..
| |
| 0 ~
| |
| ~
| |
| :> II)
| |
| II)
| |
| Ill IIJ Q.
| |
| ri 0
| |
| J 0 lL l -~10,.0-,61 .1
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.5-5
| |
| | |
| NOZZLE SPRAYING DOWNWARD REVISION 10 DECEMBER 2004
| |
| | |
| *w
| |
| ___.,_r-t,___"0---, L-~ ~
| |
| z
| |
| | |
| (\\') <
| |
| ------- ______ ... ~ -
| |
| .,6-.~
| |
| | |
| tJ .
| |
| Ill a I -
| |
| 0 I 0 '
| |
| - "0-,81 0 1-j
| |
| | |
| .,,,o .o, t::>'2.
| |
| | |
| BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.5-6
| |
| | |
| NOZZLE SPRAYING HORIZONTALLY REVISION 10 DECEMBER 2004
| |
| | |
| 1111-,£1
| |
| | |
| a Ul w 0 I ;;j.
| |
| :g H-...... ---.f ~ z
| |
| = 0 <
| |
| * I ,..,
| |
| ~ -+-f::::=!~;::::..-U~-..l ~ -
| |
| -L . m
| |
| - tJ In -
| |
| | |
| *.o-,t:7
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.5*7
| |
| | |
| NOZZLE SPRAYING DOWNWARD AT 45° 0 8* C1J Il
| |
| ~& "°
| |
| : 0. I ii; R :t-
| |
| "0 i :s ~ 'I' -
| |
| ~ I
| |
| | |
| ~ ,,,,,....
| |
| ~ 0.
| |
| g .._, \\!J s 0 J
| |
| a) lJ.
| |
| | |
| \\ \\
| |
| | |
| \\ 3/4
| |
| \\
| |
| \\
| |
| \\ (\\J
| |
| \\
| |
| '-- __ ..._ __ ..._ __ ..._ __ ..._ ______ o
| |
| | |
| LI\\ 2. () 0
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATIONS
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.5-8
| |
| | |
| PRESSURE DROP VS. FLOW 1713A NOZZLE
| |
| ""' IL
| |
| {.,
| |
| ~ ::,
| |
| 8 ~
| |
| N t
| |
| ~
| |
| 6
| |
| ~
| |
| i ~
| |
| t-m l
| |
| ~ t-8 ~ 8
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| '° LO ~ g 0 0 d
| |
| | |
| UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BYRON/BRAIDWOOD STATION
| |
| | |
| FIGURE 6.5-9
| |
| | |
| SPRAY ENVELOPE REDUCTION FACTOR}}
| |
