ML20127H645: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20127H645 | | number = ML20127H645 | ||
| issue date = 05/23/1985 | | issue date = 05/23/1985 | ||
| title = Responds to NRC | | title = Responds to NRC Re Deficiencies Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/85-09.Corrective Actions:Appropriate Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Revised to Indicate Nondelegatable Authorities & Responsibilities | ||
| author name = Pilant J | | author name = Pilant J | ||
| author affiliation = NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT | | author affiliation = NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = CNSS854100, NUDOCS 8506260405 | | document report number = CNSS854100, NUDOCS 8506260405 | ||
| title reference date = 05-10-1985 | |||
| package number = ML20127H634 | | package number = ML20127H634 | ||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
==Dear Mr. Johnson:== | ==Dear Mr. Johnson:== | ||
This letter is written in response to your letter dated May 10, 1985 trans-mitting Inspection Report 50-298/85-09. Therein you identified certain deficiencies in our amergency preparedness program and requested a schedule for correcting thest Jeficiencies. The following is our response: | This letter is written in response to your {{letter dated|date=May 10, 1985|text=letter dated May 10, 1985}} trans-mitting Inspection Report 50-298/85-09. Therein you identified certain deficiencies in our amergency preparedness program and requested a schedule for correcting thest Jeficiencies. The following is our response: | ||
Item 50-298/8509-01: | Item 50-298/8509-01: | ||
The EPIPs did not address nondelegatable authorities and responsibilities. | The EPIPs did not address nondelegatable authorities and responsibilities. | ||
Revision as of 03:32, 22 August 2022
| ML20127H645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 05/23/1985 |
| From: | Pilant J NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Johnson E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127H634 | List: |
| References | |
| CNSS854100, NUDOCS 8506260405 | |
| Download: ML20127H645 (2) | |
Text
>
\.
COOPER NUCLEAR 5TATioN P.O. BOX 98. BROWNVILLE. NEBR ASKA 68321 Nebraska Pubh.c Power Distr.ict TE'EeNONE i4o2> =2s-38 n CNSS854100 May 23, 1985 -L - =Lr u lij 4
JUN - 41985 P
- Y Mr. E. H. Johnson, Chief Reactor Project Branch 1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Subject; NPPD Response to IE Inspection Report 50-298/85-09
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This letter is written in response to your letter dated May 10, 1985 trans-mitting Inspection Report 50-298/85-09. Therein you identified certain deficiencies in our amergency preparedness program and requested a schedule for correcting thest Jeficiencies. The following is our response:
Item 50-298/8509-01:
The EPIPs did not address nondelegatable authorities and responsibilities.
Response
The appropriate EPIPs have been revised to indicate nondelegatable authorities and responsibilities. These procedures are currently in distribution and will
'~
be in place by May 31, 1985.
Item 50-298/8509-02:
Licensed shift personnel lacked familiarity with their EPIPs in the areas of energency detection, classification, and protective action recommendations.
Response
Emergency Plan refresher training was provided for licensed shift personnel following this inspection. This training included the use of mini-scenarios designed to examine decision making actions that would cover the areas of emergency detection, classification, and protective action recommendations.
This refresher training for licensed shift personnel was completed by April 23, 1985.
O 5 G50614 O$hK0500029g PDR
[C-olS W
E
.. *1 Mr. E. H. Johnson, Chief
~
Msy 23, 1985 Page 2 Item 50-298/8509-03:
.The EPIPS did not address notifying the state and local governments within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency.
Response
The appropriate EPIP has been revised to provide a greater visibility of time requirements as expressed in 10CFR50.72 and 10CFR50, Appendix E, D.3. This procedure is currently in distribution and will be in place by May 31, 1985.
In addition to the actions taken with respect to the above listed deficiencies, Nebraska Public Power District will strive to promptly resolve the open items also listed in this report as a part of our commitment to improving our Emergency Preparedness Program.
Should you have any questions concerning this respense, please contact me.
Sincerely, M
J. M. Pilant Technical Staff Manager Nuclear Power Group
.JMP: DAW:PRW:lb
~ '
t
__