IR 05000324/1997013: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | {{Adams | ||
| number = | | number = ML20202D316 | ||
| issue date = | | issue date = 02/05/1998 | ||
| title = | | title = Omitted Page 42 to Insp Repts 50-324/97-13 & 50-325/97-13 Transmitted on 980123 | ||
| author name = | | author name = | ||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) | | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| addressee affiliation = | | addressee affiliation = | ||
| docket = 05000324, 05000325 | | docket = 05000324, 05000325 | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = 50-324-97-13, 50-325-97-13, NUDOCS | | document report number = 50-324-97-13, 50-325-97-13, NUDOCS 9802170044 | ||
| | | package number = ML20202D284 | ||
| document type = | | document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS | ||
| page count = | | page count = 1 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:___ - _ - _ | ||
. . | |||
. | |||
After discussions with the licensee. CR 97-04103 was issued to track the failure to provide the results of fire door evaluations in the FH This t/SAR discrepancy was identified by the inspector and is discussed in Sec ion F A review of the surveillance ins)ection and testing procedures for fire doors was perfcrmed to confirm tlat the licensee specified fire door clearance acce)tance criteria was in accordance with the guidance of National Fire 3rotection Association (NFPA) 80. Standard for Fire Door <, | |||
and Fire Windows. On December 10. 1997, the inspector observed ongoing door replacement and repair activities for fire doors in the DG buildirg. No discrepancies were identifie Conclusions The inspector concluded that fire door surveillance procedures and acceptance criteria for verification of fire door clearances were in accordance with NFPA guidanc However, a UFSAR discrepancy associated l documentation of fire door and frame evaluations was identifie F2.4 UFSAR Review A recent discovery of.a licensee o>erating tLa facility in a manner contrary to the UFSAR description -ighlighted the need for a special focused review that compares plant practices procedures, and/or parameters to the UFSAR des.' > iptions. While performing the inspections discussed in this reoort .e inspector reviewed the applicable portions of the UFSAR that relatec *. the areas inspected. The inspector verified that the UFSAR wording was consistent with the observed plant practices, procedures, and/or parameter The inspector reviewed UFSAR Section 9.5.1.4.3.4.b. Fire Doors as part of the fire protection program review activities. An int insistency was noted in ; hat the licensee failed to document the results of evaluations of fire doors and frames in the FHA. which is section 9.5.1.5 of the UFSA This issue is discussed in Section F2.3. This item will be identified as part of URI 50-325(324)/97-13-05. UFSAR Discrepancy Fire Door F3 Fire Protection Procedures and Documentation F3.1 Fire Protection Procedures InSDeCtion SCoDe (64704) | |||
The inspector evaluated the adequacy and implementation of the licensee's Fire Protection Program described in the UFSAR and in Plant Operating Manual Fire Protection Procedure OPLP-01. Revision 6. Fire Protection Program Document. In addition. a comparison was made of the program to selected NRC Safety Evaluation Reports which ap3 roved the station fire protection program. The inspector reviewed t1e following procedures for compliance with the NRC requirements and guidelines: | |||
9802170044 900205 PDR ADOCK 05000324 G PDR | |||
' | |||
3 J | |||
' | |||
- -. | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 19:07, 7 December 2021
| ML20202D316 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1998 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202D284 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-324-97-13, 50-325-97-13, NUDOCS 9802170044 | |
| Download: ML20202D316 (1) | |
Text
___ - _ - _
. .
After discussions with the licensee. CR 97-04103 was issued to track the failure to provide the results of fire door evaluations in the FH This t/SAR discrepancy was identified by the inspector and is discussed in Sec ion F A review of the surveillance ins)ection and testing procedures for fire doors was perfcrmed to confirm tlat the licensee specified fire door clearance acce)tance criteria was in accordance with the guidance of National Fire 3rotection Association (NFPA) 80. Standard for Fire Door <,
and Fire Windows. On December 10. 1997, the inspector observed ongoing door replacement and repair activities for fire doors in the DG buildirg. No discrepancies were identifie Conclusions The inspector concluded that fire door surveillance procedures and acceptance criteria for verification of fire door clearances were in accordance with NFPA guidanc However, a UFSAR discrepancy associated l documentation of fire door and frame evaluations was identifie F2.4 UFSAR Review A recent discovery of.a licensee o>erating tLa facility in a manner contrary to the UFSAR description -ighlighted the need for a special focused review that compares plant practices procedures, and/or parameters to the UFSAR des.' > iptions. While performing the inspections discussed in this reoort .e inspector reviewed the applicable portions of the UFSAR that relatec *. the areas inspected. The inspector verified that the UFSAR wording was consistent with the observed plant practices, procedures, and/or parameter The inspector reviewed UFSAR Section 9.5.1.4.3.4.b. Fire Doors as part of the fire protection program review activities. An int insistency was noted in ; hat the licensee failed to document the results of evaluations of fire doors and frames in the FHA. which is section 9.5.1.5 of the UFSA This issue is discussed in Section F2.3. This item will be identified as part of URI 50-325(324)/97-13-05. UFSAR Discrepancy Fire Door F3 Fire Protection Procedures and Documentation F3.1 Fire Protection Procedures InSDeCtion SCoDe (64704)
The inspector evaluated the adequacy and implementation of the licensee's Fire Protection Program described in the UFSAR and in Plant Operating Manual Fire Protection Procedure OPLP-01. Revision 6. Fire Protection Program Document. In addition. a comparison was made of the program to selected NRC Safety Evaluation Reports which ap3 roved the station fire protection program. The inspector reviewed t1e following procedures for compliance with the NRC requirements and guidelines:
9802170044 900205 PDR ADOCK 05000324 G PDR
'
3 J